Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Circular and Circulating DNA in IBD: from Pathogenesis to Potential Molecular Therapies

Altmetrics

Downloads

265

Views

84

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

20 June 2023

Posted:

21 June 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) are chronic multifactorial disorders which affect the gastrointestinal tract with variable extent. Despite extensive research, their etiology and exact pathogenesis are still unknown. Cell-free DNAs (cfDNAs) are defined as any DNA fragments which are free from origin cell and able to circulate into bloodstream with or without microvescicles. CfDNAs are now being increasingly studied in different human diseases, like cancer or inflammatory diseases. However, to date it is unclear how IBD etiology is linked to cfDNAs in plasma. Extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) are non-plasmidic, nuclear, circular and closed DNA molecules found in all eukaryotes tested. CfDNAs appear to play an important role in autoimmune diseases, inflammatory processes, and cancer; recently, interest has also grown in IBD, and their role in the pathogenesis of IBD has been suggested. We now suggest that eccDNAs also plays a role in IBD. In this review we have comprehensively collected available knowledge in literature regarding cfDNA, eccDNA, and structures involving them such as neutrophil extracellular traps and exosomes, and their role in IBD. Finally, we focused on old and novel potential molecular therapies and drug delivery systems, such as nanoparticles, for IBD treatment.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Pathology and Pathobiology

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) are chronic multifactorial disorders which affect the gastrointestinal tract with a variable extent, typically leading to the development of symptoms, such as rectal bleeding, abdominal pain, diarrhea and weight loss [1]. Although the pathogenesis of IBD remains still unknow, their development is considered as the result of genetic, environmental, gut microbiota and immunological factors [2]. The diagnostic procedures of IBD are time consuming, requiring endoscopy, blood and stool exams, ultrasonography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Sometimes these procedures need to be repeated multiple times before a definitive diagnosis is reached, prolonging the discomfort of the patient [3]. Therapeutic possibilities are limited, with rates of primary or secondary non-response to therapies reaching 50-60% of treated patients [4,5]. Moreover, despite ongoing research efforts, to date there are no biomarkers that can predict clinical response to available drugs, hence the need for continuous disease monitoring of IBD patients with invasive examinations, such as endoscopy.
In this respect, cell-free Nucleic Acids (cfNA) represent a promising field of research. In complement to the direct analysis of genomic material obtained from cells, the possibility of identifying and analysing cfNAs present in the circulation or other body fluids would allow the identification of asymptomatic individuals at high risk for IBD [6], or could represent a promising new non-invasive biomarker to distinguish patients with active disease from those in remission or from healthy individuals, allowing the tracking of disease onset, progression and remission following therapy, and hopefully also to predict drug-response.
First findings of cfNA date back to 1948, when Mandel and Métais described it in human plasma [7]. However, studies number grew only twenty years later, probably due to biotechnological and computational biology advances. Since then, their presence was detected in many easily obtainable bodily fluids, such as blood, saliva, stool and urine, assessing their ever-increasing role in new biochemical analysis. Among these, liquid biopsy reached wide interest, becoming part of the standard of care in many fields [8], such as prenatal care with the so-called “non-invasive prenatal testing” (NIPT) [9,10], and oncology [11,12,13,14,15].
All cfNA are, according to definition, free from origin cell and able to circulate into blood. Among them, human derived cfNAs can also travel with or without carriers, such as microparticles (MPs) [16,17,18]. Within MPs, exososmes, appear to have regulatory and influential activity in many dysfunctional conditions, like cancer, chronic inflammation (e.g.IBD, arthritis), thrombosis, pregnancy diseases and sickle cell anemia [19,20,21,22], findings that point towards an ever-growing role in immune system regulation. Thanks to increasing basic science-based studies on this topic and to the development of sophisticated biotechnologies, today the clinical management of the above mentioned (and many more) pathologies is drastically changing. The aim of this review is to contribute with our results to provide basis for a new target of care for chronic inflammatory conditions like IBDs, that exploits the potential of circulating nucleic acid from understanding the pathogenesis of the disease, to the development of novel molecular therapeutics.

2. Cell-free DNAs (cfDNAs)

Nucleic acids are known to be packed into nucleus or floating into cytosol, but recently another location has been conferred to them: blood circulation and extracellular space. CfNAs can be released into circulation by various biological processes, so to explicate a regulatory role not only into cells they are normally contained by, but also at distance, in either a coding or a non-coding manner [23,24,25]. Endogenous-derived nucleic acids must be distinguished from exogenous, which mostly derive from microbial (specifically bacterial) DNA. Endogenous nucleic acids result from many processes, among which apoptosis/necrosis, NETosis and active release (by microvesicles (MVs)/exosomes) are the most endorsed ones [26,27,28]. These processes generate RNAs, that longly distracted our attention from cfDNA, nuclear (cf-ncDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (cf-mtDNA) in a linear shape. Nucleic acids can appear totally naked, bound to vesicles or in macromolecular structures (virtosomes, nucleosomes, Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)) [27]. Another kind of cell free DNA, the extrachromosomal-circulating-circular DNA (eccDNA, see below), derives from other biogenesis mechanisms, mostly related to genomic instability, DNA damages and hostile cellular environments [11], but also apoptosis [29] and probably necrosis and pyroptosis. Similar to circulating DNA, which is findable either in a particulate (vesicles enclosed) and non-particulate form (naked DNA, nucleosomes), cfDNAs have been described as circulating free or MVs enclosed molecules, able to sustain propagation or even shut down inflammatory stimulus [30,31,32].
Cells undergo cycles of birth and death, on a frequency based on tissue homeostasis. Cell death can occur unexpectedly (necrosis) or can be programmed (apoptosis); both processes, in the end, contribute to vesicle bound or naked cf-DNA release [33]; thus, high-turnover tissues might contribute consistently to cfDNA circulation [34]. Several studies demonstrated that the circulating fraction of total cell-free DNA varies from 0.1 to 89% [35] suggesting that DNA circulation may occur on specific conditions. An unnatural high-turnover status is surely that of cancer; indeed, many studies associated cancer to abnormal cfDNA levels in serum [11,36]. Evaluations of length, patterns of methylation, nucleosomes alterations and fragmentomics revealed a ‘tissue-of-origin signature’ on cfDNA, proposing that most of it comes from mitotic cells, like those of cancer [37]. Moreover, stability and half-life of cfDNA depend on protein association: long naked molecules (>10kb), like free DNA fragments shedded during apoptosis, are rapidly cleaved by DNase and lost, instead, shorter molecules (<100 bp) are bounded by nucleosomes, protecting them from nucleases and increasing half-life [38], meaning that also clearance process contributes to DNA plasma levels; indeed, since DNAse activity in Crohn Disease is lower, here’s another reason of increased cfDNA plasma levels in IBD [39].

2.1. NETs

NETosis is the process by which neutrophils exert their ‘license to kill’: the cell ‘sacrifices’ itself, releasing complex structures of genetic material that entraps mainly bacteria contributing to the cfDNA pool. It consists in nuclear or mitochondrial oxidised DNA, histones and protases release, which have pro-inflammatory capacities [40,41]. NETs also contain cathepsin-G and calprotectin, a well-known biomarker in IBD [42,43]. Immunogenicity of NETs consists primarily in stimulating many cell activities: activation of TLR of dendritic cells (resulting in INF-alpha synthesis), Immunoglobulin (Ig) class switching in B cells and T cell response boosting [44]. It should be reminded that neutrophils can randomly circulate and be recruited from circulation to specific sites. This means that NETs can be released directly into circulation or in another tissue whose venous drainage can give back to systemic circulation NETs components or degrade them directly in site, without passing to blood. Thus, technically, not all of NETs released into the organism contribute to the circulating DNA pool [45]. An IBD gut is known to undergo a sustained and chronic inflammation process, where both unbalanced T-cell priming and microbial dysbiosis are features. Although it is not clear who as first started the inflammatory processes, if NETs are the “primum movens” or the answer to a preexistent noxa, it is increasingly clear that both microbiota alterations and microenvironment participate to NETosis [26] and so to mucosal damage. Specifically, in IBD, NETs seem to have pro-thrombotic abilities, through direct platelet activation [46] but probably also by contributing to endothelial damage at blood-cell interface. However, NETs can regulate many cytokines secretion during inflammation, and menage the clearance of damage-associated-molecular-patterns (DAMPs) in mice [47]. Recently, this mode has been extended also to eosinophils, cells able to release eosinophil extracellular traps (EETs), which apparently correlate with disease severity [48]. Ultimately, NETs, along with calprotectin, do correlate with inflammation severity [28,49], but due to their multiple functions, they are not an optimal target as a therapy or as markers in IBD.

2.2. Vesicle-bound DNA

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) or microparticles are cell-released membrane covered globules that include microvescicles (microparticles in literature), exosomes and others [50], and can differ in size, composition, role and genesis processes [51]. EVs are released from almost all cell types, including bacteria (Bacterial Extracellular vesicles, BEVs) [50,52], under specific circumstances. Their presence has been reported in saliva [53], sperm [54], milk [55], urine, blood (serum and/or plasma) [56] among others. Often, isolated vesicles were attributed to exosomes, since their exosome-like protein cargo; however, circulating vesicles are probably either MVs and exosomes. Indeed, studies revealed that luminal EV in IBD patients are of less than 500 nm in diameter [27,31], confirming presence of both exosomes and micro vesicles. In the last decade increasing interest has arisen, since it have been demonstrated that vesicles are shed from plasma membranes of cells in complete physiological conditions, and carry a significant amount of interesting biological material [57]. Many pathological conditions started to benefit from MPs role, not just as possible biomarkers: EVs are elevated in pneumological and rheumatic diseases, while urinary EV seem to reflect acute kidney injury [58]. Notably, their peculiar structure inspired new drug delivery systems [59].
Exosomes are considered as single layer lipid membrane vesicles of 30-150 nm diameter [27,31]. Cellular trafficking generates exosomes, born from the so called multi vesicular body (MVB), that can become a late endosome, from which exosomes derive, or fuse to lysosomes and be degraded [60], while macrovesicles derive from direct outward blebbing from plasma membrane [57]; both are known to mediate intercellular communication. Exosomes can be considered a frozen image of cell conditions, since they reflect its content [61].
In EVs originating from dendritic cells (DCs), besides MHC-I and MHC-II, CD86 costimulatory factor is present [15]; specific integrins on EVs surface are a cell-specific signature. IECs derived exosomes contain β-defensines, antimicrobial molecules immunoglobulins and heat shock proteins (HSPs) [15]. HSPs, a common finding also in DCs exosomes, are known to bind TLR2 and 4, as both Gram positive and negative do, leading to proinflammatory signaling [62]. In contrast, exosomes deriving from granulocytes myeloid-derived suppressor cells are able to inhibit Th1 and induce Treg proliferation, modulating inflammation [63]. Released exosomes are able to bind surface proteins of other cells or be internalised, in order to exert intercellular communication [22].
Although our interest is directed to DNA, proteins found in exosomes play a fundamental modulatory effect on immune cells, thus inseparable from inflammation pathogenesis. So far, in IBDs exosomes proteins are known to be involved in (I) immunity regulation: T-regs induction as previously explained [32] (II) regulation of intestinal barrier: annexin1 (ANXA1) exosomal levels in IBD patients serum correlates with systemic inflammation, conversely to the luminal exosomes ANXA1 enriched, that showed wound healing properties [64]. (III) Regulation of intestinal microbiota: in paediatric IBD patients, vesicles from mucosa-luminal interface show altered proteome (ROS, MPO loaded vesicles), that apparently correlates with microbiota modifications (increased L-cysteine degradation, fungi proliferation, H2S production) and increase in microbiota defensive systems (Uracil-DNA glycosylase, a DNA damage repair system), features of aberrant host-microbiota interactions that finally lead to worsen disease activity [65].
Haisheng Liu and coworkers [27] analysed EV-DNA trough nano-flow-cytometry at a single vesicle level from human colorectal cancer cell line (HCT-15) and normal human colon fibroblast cell line (CCD-18Co), adding precious information to the currently limited knowledge on the topic. By the results achieved, it become clearer that cfDNA can be contained either on surface and inside a vesicle, in a double-strand shape (ds-cfDNA) or single stranded (ss-cfDNA). Length oscillates from 200 bp to 5000 and no histones are present; thus, surface EV-cfDNA is labile to DNase activity. Conversely, inner EV-cfDNA is protected by EV envelope and so very stable. Moreover, EVs exist in two size peaks: large EVs, that might be called microvescicles, of 80-200 nm diameter, containing less and smaller DNA fragments (0.2-2 Kbp), and small EVs (<100 nm), called exosomes, that carry longer and more DNA fragments.

3. EccDNA

eccDNA is a non-plasmidic, circular and closed nucleic acid macromolecule of different dimensions. It resides mainly in nuclei of cells, but has also been found in plasma as circulating eccDNA [11] and it has so far been detected in all the species and tissues tested from mammals, birds, insects, plants and yeast [12,66,67,68]. The dimensions vary from hundred bp to mega bp in cellular eccDNA and the elements are thereby large enough to carry entire gene that are at least occationally expresse [14]. Extracellular eccDNA in plasma appears to be smaller and follow a periodic pattern of around 200 bp, 400 bp and 600 bp. This has lead to the suggestion that eccDNA in plasma derives form DNA that has been wrapping around one or more nucleosomes, and that apoptosis is the likely cause of these eccDNA [69].

3.1. Biogenesis of eccDNA in tissue

It is still largely unknown how eccDNA forms in human cells. Studies of cancer and cancer cell lines suggest that eccDNA formation is associated with DNA damage and repair [70]. A number of repair pathways have been suggested to be involved in the formation of eccDNA including non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) [70,71,72]. If homology occurs between termini, homology-dependent repair pathways will be involved (micro homology mediated end joining, homology recombination, mismatch repair) [70,73]. The formation will probably also depend on the repair pathways expressed in the given tissue and wether the eccDNA arises from single stranded or double DNA breaks, as suggested in [74].
Processes related to DNA instability can also lead to large eccDNA. This is the case for cells that have undergone chromothripsis, which consists in a single catastrophic event of chromosomes which break at multiple points [73]. Chromotripsis is found to occure in 2-3% of human cancers, but wether this and other types of DNA instabilities play a role in IBD is unknown.
For a better description of eccDNA classification, biogenesis, evolution and functions, the reader is directed towards the recent reviews on the subject [75,76].

4. CfDNA and eccDNA in inflammation

As described above, cfDNA are found either associated to MPs or free. Both display influential activity on the two immune system branches, with particular reference to the innate immune cells, as it follows.
Innate immunity is a branch of immune system able to detect pathogen derived ‘non self’ molecules, known as pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), trough pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), as Toll Like Receptors (TLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs)(Janeway, 1989) [77], explaining pathogen mediated inflammation. PAMPs free-inflammation, on the other hand, was better understood when Polly Matzinger [78] proposed the ‘danger’ theory, claiming that molecules that reflect cellular health, released during cellular distress or tissue damage, called damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), can induce activation of the same immune cells, leading to ‘sterile-inflammation’. Since then, many molecules, including cfNAs have been identified as DAMPs. Specifically, both DAMPs and PAMPs are ligands of TLR, that are known to be located either on the plasmatic and endosomal membrane [79]. Among these latter, that are known to be nucleic acids specific [79], TLR9 is able to sense foreign (pathogens, mainly bacteria) and host DNA motifs, such as CpG islets [80] and cause downstream NF-kB signaling.
cfDNA-binding molecules, such as histones, are the ligands of TLR2 and 4, whose activation results in the production of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10 and MPO [80,81,82]. Moreover, histones are able to elicit NETosis, hesitating in more histones release [83] and so propagating inflammation in a loop; notably, core histones act as auto-antigens in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [84]. Nucleosomes, on the other hand, exert stimulation of different inflammatory pathways that still lead to cytokine secretion [85,86]. High-mobility group box1(HMGB1)-DNA complexes bind RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products) and are carried by early endosomes for TLR9 recognition, causing activation of DCs and B cells [87].
Almost all nuclear components are massively exposed to extracellular environment or to blood stream during cell death and NETosis, displaying their immunogenicity especially in rheumatic disease, where ANAs abundantly circulate and eventually bind naked cfDNA, EV-cfDNA, forming immune complexes [20], thus propagating autoimmunity-related complications.
Both nc and mtDNA are able to initiate cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP)– adenosine monophosphate (AMP) synthase (cGAS)- stimulator of interferon protein (STING), STING-NF-kB or protein absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) cascade, either from direct binding to cell surface via MVs or leaking into cytosol, being sensed by genes stimulators [88,89]. Mitochondrial DNA, found in MVs or naked, is not protected by histones and so is smaller than ncDNA (30-80 bp) [90]. Still, it is able to initiate innate immunity cells activation via TLR9 [37,91,92], because of its particular similarity to bacterial DNA, or it can mediate communication between adaptive immunity cells, like T-lymphocytes and dendritic cells [101]. Coherently with their role as DAMPs, cfDNAs (both exo and endogenous) are able to induce either primary and secondary hemostasis, thus being potentially involved in threatening conditions such as DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation) [46,93].
As previously explained, many types of circulating nucleic acids are described across literature [94,95], but specifically circulating circular DNA is a less explored domain. Nonetheless, the few existing works already helped to gain a better insight. Wang et al. with their latest work highlighted concepts of great importance. They demonstrated that eccDNA is circular genetic fragment deriving from randomly chosen genome sequences, partly generated by cells undergoing apoptosis, that acts as a full-fledged DAMP, able to induce activation of innate immunity (in vitro DCs), throughout a cGAS-STING and TLR9 fashion, that results in INF type I, cytokines and chemokines production [29].
Obermeier et al. showed that bacterial cfDNA rich in CpG motif activate TLR9, worsening the course of DSS-induced colitis [96]. CpG motifs are typical of bacterial free DNA, but just recently attributed either to human cfDNA [80]: in particular, the above mentioned micro eccDNA is an example. This demonstrates how endogenous and exogenous cfDNA share similarities, and that can both activate immune response in a sequence-dependent manner; however, Li et al. in 2012 [82] added novelty to this model, demonstrating what Wang’s team later confirmed: eccDNA potency is to be attributed to its circular shape, but not sequence, since synthetic circular DNA triggered almost the same response and, above all else, that its linear counterpart was not nearly as potent as eccDNA [29]. Specifically, it was proposed that DNA curvature, induced by high-mobility group box 1 proteins (HMGB1) and histones H2A, H2B, significantly enhanced TLR9 binding, in a stereo-specific less than sequence-dependent mechanism. Finally, these studies suggest that self-derived circulating DNA (both non-circular cfDNA in nucleosomes or naked, and eccDNA) are able to induce and sustain the inflammation machinery, especially the ‘sterile inflammation’, which is typical of autoimmune disease, where they actually seem to be involved [84,97].
Conversely, other studies propose that preconditioning with methylated and unmethylated genomic DNA isolated from a probiotic mixture (VSL#3), followed by DSS colitis induction in mice, have anti-inflammatory effect, in a TLR9-dependent way, compared to control (TLR9 ko mice), that didn’t show any effect [98]. Likewise, Műzes et al. revealed that pretreatment with a single intravenous injection of colitic cfDNA in DSS-induced colitis mice showed increased TLR9-macroautophagy response and up-regulation of Baclin1 expression in the colon, with a decreased disease activity as compared to normal cfDNA injection [99]. These findings confirm the suspect that cfDNA exerts different behaviors depending on its origin (distressed cells or normal) and on the features of the local immunobiological milieu (inflamed or normal).
As previously mentioned, autophagy can occur following the activation of TLR9 [100]. Since DAMPs can activate TLR9, especially via CpG oligonucleotides [100], it can be stated that cfDNA sensing and autophagy are related: injection of cfDNA triggered increase of TLR9 mediated autophagy, that apparently supported cellular fitness within an inflamed environment, reasonably explaining its protective effect [101]. However, origin of such cfDNA and mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory response are still being elucidated.
In 2021, Zhao et al. demonstrated that levels of EVs containing ncDNA, mtDNA and proteins were increased in both plasma and colon lavage from DSS induced active colitis in mice, and in IBD patients, and that these EV were secreted by IECs [102]. Macrophages cultures enriched in EV from IBD patients showed inflammatory phenotype and activation of STING pathway, leading to cytokines synthesis. Further analysis declared that dsDNA is necessary to STING activation [31,102]. EV-cfDNA levels adequately correlated whit DAI and CDAI (disease activity index, Crohn disease activity index), suggesting that inflammation and cell damage trigger EV release and vice versa, and allowing to definitely confirm that EV-cfDNA could be an activity marker. These results propose that either EVs-cfDNA and cf-circulating DNA [28] are probably involved in immune stimulation to develop colitis in both mice and human, throughout different mechanisms but reaching the same result.
Much evidence suggests that EVs carrying nuclear or cytosolic auto-antigens, generated during apoptotic processes [103], undergo biochemical modification that lead to formation of modified self-molecules that break self-tolerance [104] and trigger autoimmune response. Posttranslational biochemical modification, such as citrullination, can occur in several cellular processes including apoptosis, autophagy and NETosis, contributing to auto-antigen formation in autoimmune disease [103,105]. This model has been approved for Sjögren syndrome, SLE, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) [105,106]. Specifically, citrullinated proteins are found in synovial fluid EVs from RA patients, neutrophils deriving from RA patients show citrullinated vimentin, that is a known autoantibody target in RA, and citrullinated histones [107]. These evidences suggest that EVs derived or DNA bound citrullinated proteins, the so-called “citrullinome” correlate to inflammation severity in the above-mentioned chronic inflammatory disease. Coming to IBD: higher expression of citrullination peptides have been found in colonic biopsies of IBD patients, confirming correlation between citrullination and inflammation [108]; however, these results are not significant and further analysis are needed. Moreover, M.-L. Liu et al. preliminary analysis revealed that tobacco smoke extract-treated neutrophils release MVs with an inhibitory effect of macrophage phagocytosis [109,110]. Hence, high apoptotic rate and NETosis, characteristic of autoimmune disease (AID) and chronic inflammatory diseases, correlate with increased MVs release and clearance slowdown, resulting in accumulation of apoptotic cells derived auto-antigens and immune complexes, worsening SLE and cutaneous LE [109]. In conclusion, it is clear how MVs and an unbalanced, non self-resolving immune system can truly mediate modification of local and distant microenvironment, concurring to pathogenesis and progression of AID.
Overall, the above-mentioned studies reveal that in IBD microenvironment, damage is mainly directed to colonocytes and enterocytes, which have been demonstrated to maximally contribute to cfDNA levels in situ and in plasma of induced colitis. Disruption of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), lining the surface of intestinal mucosa, results in a leaky gut, a way that may increase translocation of exogenous and microbial cfDNAs to circulation. In vivo studies of induced colitis in mice suggest that probably all those mechanisms of cell stress could act in concert to increase cfDNA plasma levels over time with disease progression [28]. What seems clear is that IECs, immune system and microbiota fit together into this loop, in which cfDNAs play a dominant role across all the disease progression over time, as Maronek et al. reviewed [28], which would imply that eccDNA in circulation has a similar role in disease progression. Consequently, the amount of cfDNA could correlate with DAI and be used as a diagnostic and monitoring tool instead of invasive examinations to assess disease severity. Finally, studies highly stressed how damaged or even normal genetic material can truly affect immune activity; however, although propagation mechanisms are ever clearer, initiation ones aren’t so. That’s the reason why IDB are still a tricky and obscure condition to heal.

5. The role of computational biology in profiling of eccDNA for personalized medicine

Cell-free eccDNA has a potential clinical application as a biomarker. Multiple approaches have been used to profile eccDNA. These studies are typically based on purified short-read sequenced eccDNA data, and have focused on discovering markers based on global features of the eccDNA, such as difference in their length for different length range distributions or number of detected eccDNA between control and treatment conditions. To gain more insight into the sequence content of cf eccDNA, computational biology methods for differential analysis of eccDNA have been developed such as DifCir [111]. This method is based on quantifying the number of eccDNA produced per gene (PpGCs) and finding the statistically significant different PpGCs (DPpGCs).
The most useful eccDNA biomarkers for personalized medicine are the ones predicted from easily extracted human samples such as plasma. However, plasma collects multiple types of DNA species from all the tissues of the human body. Thus, it is potentially difficult to discriminate disease specific biomarkers from the blood torrent of DNA fragments coming from tissues that have not necessarily been affected by the disease of the patient. These problems make the prediction of eccDNA markers from plasma samples a daunting task. However, the use of DifCir on the circulomics analysis of eccDNAs from Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients with DNASE1L3·deficiency have disclosed a distinctive and specific genic eccDNA profile of these patients [112].
Another challenge of eccDNA profiles is that the data do not necessarily follow a Gaussian distribution, which is also seen in human samples that have the intrinsic high variability. Therefore, the standard t-test for prediction of statistically significant molecules between two conditions is not applicable. Alternatively, the Wilcoxon test can be applied to determine if medians are different between groups [113], or a “democratic” method has been developed to search for commonly abundant molecules in different samples under less restrictive statistical conditions. The method has been initially reported for transcriptomics data analysis [114], then for DNA methylomics [115] and finally for circulomics data analysis [111] where it detects the common PpGCs (CPpGCs) shared by replicates.

6. Towards molecular therapies for IBD

6.1. TLR9 therapeutics

Toll-like receptor-9 (TLR9), belonging to the class of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), represent the first line of defense against bacterial pathogens, through the recognition of pathogen-associated-molecular patterns (PAMPs) [116]. The activation of TLRs is typically associated with an inflammatory response that clears the invading pathogens. However, TLRs are also involved in the recognition of the same conserved molecular patterns found in the resident microflora; the commensal recognition of the gut bacteria via TLRs is necessary to tolerate the resident microflora and to maintain the intestinal homeostasis [117,118,119].
Previous studies demonstrated that bacterial DNA or its synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) analogues (immunostimulatory sequence (ISS) ODNs or CpG-ODNs), recognized mainly by TLR9, ameliorated the severity of colitis in murine models [120,121,122]. Particularly, Bleich et al. showed that CpG-ODNs administration in germ-free mice reduced intestinal inflammation, as indicated by histology, decreased proinflammatory cytokines, and increased IL-10 secretion, even without pre-existence of bacterial microflora, thus suggesting that CpG-ODN-induced regulatory T-cells are not bacterial antigen specific [120]. Accordingly, Lee et al. showed that the protective effects of probiotics are mainly mediated by their own DNA, rather than by other metabolites or antigens, through the activation of the TLR9 pathway and the production of type 1 Interferon [123].
Rachmilewitz et al., in 2006, revealed that certain classes of CpG-ODNs inhibited, by triggering TLR9, the enhanced production of TNF-α and IL-1beta, ex vivo, by inflamed colonic mucosa of patients with active UC [124].
Furthermore, mouse models deficient in TLR9 are more susceptible to the development of colitis [118], and genetic polymorphisms of TLR9 are associated with and increased risk of IBD in humans [125,126], enhancing the critical role of bacterial DNA sensing in the development of IBD. CpG-ODNs can also elicit an antiapoptotic effect through theTLR9-induced upregulation of heat shock proteins, which usually can protect the gut epithelium against intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction [127,128,129].
O’Hara et al., in 2012, revealed that infection by Campylobacter jejuni reduces the expression of apical TLR9 in intestinal epithelial cells, thereby disrupting TLR9-induced reinforcement of the intestinal epithelial barrier, and that mice previously exposed to Campylobacter jejuni develop a more severe colitis after low doses of DSS administration, with a significant reduction in levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-25 and an increase of IL-17, which has an ambiguous role in the pathogenesis of IBD [130].
Based on these evidences, the first synthetic single-strand DNA-based immunomodulatory sequence 0150 (DIMS0150) (Kappaproct®, cobitolimod) was developed for the treatment of severe, chronic active, treatment-refractory UC. It contains unmethylated CpG motif and functions as an immunomodulator, inducing the activation of TLR9 pathway in effector T and B lymphocytes, dendritic cells and macrophages [131].
Activation of TLR9 by DIMS0150 results in the induction of regulatory T-cells, and in the production of cytokines, such as IL-10 and type I interferons from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and seems to increase steroid sensitivity in steroid-resistant UC patients [132]. Kuznetsov et al. identified 3 potential biomarkers CD168, TSP-1 and IL-1RII, whose response to steroid is enhanced after administration of DIMS0150 [133].
In a pilot study of 2013 DIMS0150 had been administered topically through colonoscopy in 8 patients with chronic active UC, elected for colectomy. Respectively 82% and 72% of all patients demonstrated a clinical response and remission at week 12, and all patients except one avoided colectomy at 2 years-follow-up [134].
Subsequently, Atreya et al., in a randomized controlled clinical trial involving 131 patients, demonstrated that dual topical administration of DIMS0150 with colonoscopy is a promising and well-tolerated therapeutic option for UC patients, showing statistical significant improvements in clinical remission with mucosal healing and symptomatic remission at week 4, although the study did not achieve the defined primary endpoint of induction of clinical remission at week 12 in active moderate-to-severe UC patients [135]. However, a clinical trial involving 104 patients with moderate-to-severe UC showed a significant higher achievement of symptomatic remission at week 12 in patients treated with dual topical administration of cobitolimod [136].
In a dose ranging, double-blinded phase IIb study (CONDUCT) involving 213 patients with moderate to severe UC, clinical remission at weeks 6 was achieved in the cobitolimod 250 mg group at 21% vs 7% in the placebo group [137].
Interestingly, even the oral administration of a TLR9 modulator (BL-7040) appeared efficacious, safe and well tolerated in a small cohort of patients with moderately active UC [138]. Results suggest that the TLR9 agonist ameliorates UC by inducing IL-10 and FoxP3 production, IL-17A, IL-17F decrease, recruiting wound healing macrophages and regulatory T cells [117]. Coherently with damage-associated cfDNA biogenesis, mucosal healing may be followed by cfDNA decrease in blood and in situ. Hence, it cannot be excluded that specific cfDNA subtypes could be used as predictive biomarkers of clinical response to this innovative treatment.

6.2. cGAS-STING therapeutics

Autophagy is a highly conserved intracellular process of degradation used to eliminate damaged protein aggregates, organelles, as well as invading pathogens [139]. Previous studies demonstrated that cGAS-STING signaling pathway is not only needed for the activation of autophagy and consequent innate immunity, but conversely it is also subject to negative regulation by autophagy components [140,141].
Indeed, the cGAS-STING signaling pathway is involved in a non-canonical autophagy response requiring only selective autophagy machinery components, including the complex ATG5-12-16L1 and the PIP3P effector WIPI2 [142,143,144,145,146]. Autophagy mediated by STING restricts viral propagation, working as a major host defense program. Autophagy components exert feedback on the regulation of STING activity [142,143,144,145,146]. Indeed, cells deficient in autophagy proteins or treated with drugs that inhibit lysosomal acidification, present increased type I interferon production [147]. The autophagy program also prevents the activation of cGAS-STING signaling pathway by delivering cytosolic DNA molecules toward lysosomes where they are degraded by DNase II [142].
Previous studies revealed an increased expression of STING proteins in murine models of DSS-induced colitis. Further investigations showed that the administration of STING agonists in DSS-induced colitis wild-type mice greatly exacerbated colitis, whereas the severity of colitis was markedly reduced in STING knockout (KO) mice [148].
Accordingly, TMEM173, the gene coding STING, was hypomethylated in the intestinal epithelium of 66 pediatric IBD patients, compared to age- and sex-matched non-inflammatory controls [149]. While hypermethylation of TMEM173 is associated with decreased expression of STING, hypomethylation could cause STING overexpression [150]. Zhao et al. demonstrated that both in murine models of colonic inflammation and patients affected by CD, active colitis was associated with an increased release of EVs containing cf-dsDNA, which, in turn, raised intestinal inflammation in macrophages via activating STING-pathway. The effect disappeared after the removal of exosomal dsDNA, and these findings were further confirmed by authors in STING-deficient mice and macrophages [102].
However, a study by Canesso et al. suggested a protective effect of cGAS-STING-IFN I axis in intestinal inflammation. Indeed, they showed that STING-deficient mice were more susceptible to DSS-induced colitis, enteric infection, especially by Salmonella typhimurium and to T-cell-induced colitis. These conflicting results could come from the different experimental design: STING-deficient mice and wild-type were cohoused for 4 weeks before the induction of colitis, therefore cohabitation could result in microbiota transfer, affecting the phenotype of mutant mice [151].
Notably, several other studies support the concept that cGAS–STING signaling pathway contributes to the intestinal inflammation in IBD.
Martin et al. showed that STING-deficient mice suffered from less severe DSS-induced colitis, while the use of STING agonist exacerbated DSS-induced colonic damage and inflammation in wild-type mice [148].
Aden et al. revealed that in intestinal organoids deficient of the gene ATG16L1, a gene involved in autophagy and regulation of endoplasmic reticulum function, there is an augmented activation of cGAS-STING signaling pathway via IL-22. Besides, IL-22-mediated activation of type I interferon signaling was associated with the severity of intestinal inflammation in mice [152].
Recently, Chen et al. demonstrated, in two different works, that the cGAS-STING signaling pathway was statistically activated in the intestine of patients with UC and mouse models of DSS-induced colitis, while levels of Atrial Natriuretin Peptide (ANP) and its receptor were decreased. Moreover, they showed that treatment with ANP attenuated DSS-induced colitis in murine models and repaired gut barrier through the inhibition of STING pathway phosphorylation in colonic tissue and epithelial cells [153,154].
Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated that the exacerbation of experimental colitis following the deficiency of pyroptosis executioner Gasdermin D (GSDMD) depends on the hyperactivation of cGAS-STING pathway. Indeed, GSDMD functions in macrophages are a negative regulator of cGAS-STING-dependent inflammation, thereby protecting against colitis. Accordingly, the administration of cGAS inhibitor RU.521 reduced weight loss, colon shortening, DAI score and histopathological findings in wild type murine models of DSS-induced colitis, totally rescuing the colitogenic phenotype in GSDMD-deficient mice. Treatment with RU.521 can also reduce cGAMP level and decrease STING, TBK1, and IRF3 phosphorylation during colitis, confirming the potential pathogenic role of cGAS–STING signaling pathway in colitis [155].
Notably, a study by Ahn et al. demonstrated that enterocolitis, exhibited through the loss of IL-10, was completely abrogated in the absence of STING. Indeed, cGAS-STING signaling pathway, stimulated by commensal bacteria, is involved in the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis, through the production in mononuclear phagocytes of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10. Accordingly, it has been reported that in homeostatic conditions, the gut microbiota release DNA-containing membrane vesicles, thereby mediating systemic priming of cGAS-STING-INF I-axis and protecting distant organs against infections in a state of constant preparedness [156]. However, cGAS-deficient mice exhibited less severe intestinal inflammation than STING-deficient mice, possibly suggesting a role for cyclic dinucleotides indirectly regulating STING signaling. The authors also revealed that IL-22 mRNA levels were remarkably increased in the colon of IL-10-deficient mice, suggesting possible negative feedback of IL-10 on IL-22, involving STING [157].
Given the role played by the hyperactivation of the cGAS-STING signaling pathway in the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis and controlling intestinal inflammation, its inhibition could represent a valid therapeutic intervention in IBD. The first selective cGAS inhibitor, named RU.521, had been discovered through high-throughput screening and structural improvement [158]. Immunoblot analysis confirmed that the intraperitoneal injection of RU.521 in mice models targeted the cGAS-STING signaling pathway and reduced signs of colitis in mice. Notably, Ru.521 totally rescued the colitogenic phenotype in mice lacking GSDMD [155]. These data suggest that RU.521 might potentially be useful for protecting against the development of colitis, or even for the treatment of IBD.
Interestingly, as previously explained, also ANP, a peptide hormone, can be used as an inhibitor of cGAS-STING signaling pathway. Indeed, intraperitoneal injection of ANP recombinant protein in DMXAA-treated colitis mice distinctly reversed the increased expression of cGAS and phosphorylation of STING, IRF3 and TBK1, while reducing body loss, colon shortening, DAI score and improving structural injury in a murine model of DSS-induced colitis. Intriguingly, activation of cGAS-STING pathway reduced the expression of ANP and its receptor in the intestine of IBD patients and colitis mice [153,154].
Recently, several novel molecules have been developed for the inhibition of the cGAS-STING-TBK1 signaling pathway as treatment of other autoimmune diseases, such as SLE, RA, Sjogren syndrome or neurodegenerative diseases, in which this pathway appears to play a key role. Such inhibitors reported to decrease the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the inflammatory signaling at the cellular and the animal levels. Indeed, the covalent STING inhibitor compound 36, as well as the compound 33, demonstrated to significantly decrease systemic cytokine responses respectively in mice models treated with the STING agonist and TREX1-/- mice, thereby attenuating symptoms of autoinflammatory diseases in vivo [159].
Particularly, three types of STING inhibitors have been developed: the first including covalent inhibitors that form specific covalent bonds with Cys91, Cys88/91 or His16, of which compound 36 is the representative; [160] the second, such as compound 28, can disrupt STING/TBK1 interactions [161]; and the third, including compound 33, compete with 2'3'-cGAMP at the CDN binding site of STING [162]. Currently, both the first and third types have demonstrated much more potent activity than the second type inhibitor, since the IC50 in at the nanomolar level instead of micromolar level, as second type [159].
Finally, the transcription factor Nrf2 has been recently discovered as a novel inhibitor of STING expression in human but not murine cells, through the destabilization of TMEM173 mRNA. Moreover, the demonstration that treatment with the Nrf2 inducer sulforaphane, or a cell permeable derivative of itaconate reduced STING-dependent release of type I IFNs, promoted the idea that Nrf2 represent a valid therapeutic target for the treatment of STING-dependent diseases [163].
These results, derived from in vitro studies and in animal models, reveal the importance and potential of cGAS-STING signaling inhibitors as a new therapeutic treatment for autoinflammatory diseases, and IBD in particular. However, human studies are required to confirm these promising findings.

6.3. Extracellular vesicles therapeutics

Macrovesicles and nanoparticles (NPs), administrated either orally or intravenously, can be used as drug carrier in IBD. Notably, in 2001, the targeted accumulation of small nanoparticles, sizes around 100 nm, in the inflamed intestinal mucosa of murine models, compared to healthy colonic mucosa, has been revealed [164,165]. Indeed, NPs can target and accumulating selectivity in intestinal inflammatory sites, due to: (1) the defective mucus layer and the loss of barrier integrity, which promotes NPs infiltration and transcellular transport; (2) the increased mucus secretion, which facilities NPs’ adhesion through hydrophilic functional groups on their surfaces, and diffusion through the mucus layer; (3) the infiltration of immune cells, such as macrophages and neutrophils, which promotes cellular uptake of NPs to the inflammation sites [166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173]. Particularly, several studies revealed that the best tissue-penetrating NPs for the treatment of IBD patients are less than 200 nm in size and have a negative surface charge, such as anionic liposomes, in order to benefit from the enhanced permeability effect of inflammation and from the accumulation of positively charged proteins at the damaged epithelium of IBD patients [174].
With regard, on the other hand, to the ligand/receptor-dominated IEC targeting, some membrane upregulated proteins in IBD patients, such as the glycoprotein CD98, the peptide transporter 1, or other transports, could be used as anchors for the attachment of NPs [175,176,177,178,179]. Moreover, ligands and adhesion molecules involved in leukocyte trafficking has recently become a popular approach for drug delivery. Indeed, NPs mimicking the structures of these ligand are being designed to attach to endothelial cells and release their content to the adjacent immune cells. Among them, synthesized NPs with recombinant P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) conjugated to PEGylated PLA particles showed a significantly stronger ability to adhere to the inflamed endothelium in an in vivo model, compared to unconjugated PEG-PLA particles [180,181]. Another emerging approach is targeting activated macrophages via recognition of their overexpressed receptors, by NPs -based cell-specific therapy in IBD. Indeed, different studies used mannosylated poly-(amidoamine)-based NPs to target mannose and galactosylated chitosan NPs to target the macrophage galactose/N-acetyl galactosamine-specific lectins. Thus, nanoparticle-based drug delivery can, not only deliver natural compounds and conventional agents, such as corticosteroids, immunosuppressive and biological drugs, to the inflammatory sites of the intestinal mucosa, but also increase local bioavailability and concentrations of the drug, while reducing exposure in healthy tissue [182,183,184]. Hence, these delivery systems would be able to facilitate remission in IBD patients by enhancing treatment efficacy and reducing side effects and systemic toxicity [185].
NPs can pass through different physiological barrier through their low immunogenicity and precise targeting, loading several therapeutic agents, such as proteins, cfDNA, RNA or anti-sense oligonucleotides, which could achieve high stability by NPs’ protection away from DNase’ degradation [186].

6.4. Oligonucleotide therapeutics

Therapeutic oligonucleotides are synthesized nucleic acids which interferes with the pathogenesis of IBD. Interestingly, multiple forms of oligonucleotides are being applied in medicine, entailing different molecular mechanisms, among which the inhibition of the translational process of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) transcripts is the most studied for IBD treatment.
Indeed, antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) or synthetic oligonucleotide-based therapy represent a promising approach for the management of IBD, including small-interfering RNA (siRNA), microRNA, aptamers and ASOs.
In details, siRNAs are double-stranded RNA which can suppress the expression of a gene through a process called RNA interference (RNAi) [187]. Aptamers are single-stranded RNA or DNA synthetic oligonucleotides (size 20-80pb), selected by a process referred to as SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment) [188,189].
ASOs are short single-stranded polymers of nucleic acids (DNA or RNA), designed to interact specifically with target mRNA [190]. Accordingly, data from preclinical work and clinical trials are accumulating for several oligonucleotide compounds, including alicaforsen, DIMS0150 and BL- 7040, Mongersen, STNM01, hgd40, ASA targeting NF-κBp65. As previously showed, DIMS0150 and BL-7040 are two oligonucleotides that enhance the activity of TLR9.
Alicaforsen (ISIS 2302) is a human RNase H-dependent, 20 base-long, phosphorothioate ASO that blocks, by hybridization to the mRNA, the production of the intercellular adhesion molecule [ICAM]-1, a trans- membrane glycoprotein that regulates rolling and adhesion of leukocytes to the inflamed intestinal mucosa [191,192]. While data in patients with Crohn’s Disease, on intravenous administration are inconsistent [193,194,195,196] alicaforsen administration by enema showed promising results in patients with left-side and distal ulcerative colitis or chronic pouchitis [197,198].
Mongersen (GED0301) is a synthetic phosphorothioate single-stranded DNA oligonucleotide that matches the region 107-128 of the human SMAD7 complementary DNA sequence [199]. By inhibiting SMAD7, it restores the transforming growth factor- β1 (TGF- β1)/SMAD2/3 associated anti-inflammatory signaling [200]. A multicenter phase II clinical trial revealed that orally administered Morgensen was superior to placebo in the treatment of patients with active steroid-dependent/resistant CD [201]. However, a phase III clinical trial was discontinued in advance, due to lack of efficacy.
STNM01 is a double-stranded RNA oligonucleotide silencing carbohydrate sulfotransferase 15 (CHST15), an enzyme involved in fibrogenic processes [202]. The submucosal injection of STNM01 during colonoscopy showed higher rates of mucosal healing, clinical remission and lower histological scores compared to placebo in CD and UC patients [202,203].
Hgd40 is a specific DNAzyme that efficiently cleaves and inhibits GATA3 RNA expression, a transcription factor which regulates the commitment of naïve T cells towards the type 2 T helper (Th2) phenotype [204,205]. Mice given hdg40 intra-rectally were protected from development of colitis and expressed lower level of proinflammatory cytokines than control DNAzyme [205].
Furthermore, given the role of p65 subunit of NF-κB in the development of colitis, an ASO targeting p65 has been produced. The intravenous, oral or intracolonic administration of ASO targeting p65 reduced the mucosal inflammation in murine models of TNBS- and DSS-induced colitis [206,207] and the proinflammatory cytokine expression by macrophages of the intestinal mucosa of IBD patients [207]. Nonetheless, clinical studies assessing the safety profile and efficacy of NF-κBp65 ASO are still lacking.
These and other promising novel oligonucleotides for the treatment of IBD are presented in Table 1.

6.5. eccDNA therapeutics

As previously explained, eccDNA appears to correlate with the severity of intestinal inflammation in patients with IBD. Moreover, several studies have now confirmed that eccDNA, and especially, the larger circular DNA fragments actively contribute to the promotion of carcinogenesis, greater tumor heterogeneity, malignant phenotype of cancer cells and development of drug resistance genes, thus promoting the evolution of neoplasia and worsening the prognosis of patients [76]. Given these premises, therefore, it is possible to hypothesize an active role for eccDNA in the promotion of intestinal inflammation and possibly in the evolution to low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia and finally cancer-associated with colitis (CAC), that IBD patients may develop. Indeed, eccDNA could be the site of formation and amplification of oncogenes, thus contributing to the development of a malignant phenotype by intestinal epithelial cells. In addition, similar to what occurs in cancer, circular DNA could harbor resistance genes to drugs commonly used in IBD, such as immunosuppressants, biologic drugs, or small molecules, thereby causing a primary nonresponse or secondary loss of response to therapy and contributing to changes in the immunologic environment over the course of disease evolution. Given all these findings, it is reasonable that targeting the eccDNA would be a good therapeutic strategy in IBD patients, and especially in patients who have developed low- or high-grade dysplasia or even CAC. Different studies have demonstrated that the total amount of eccDNA harboring oncogenes can be reduced by drug treatment in cells [214,215,216,217]. Particularly, a study involving 16 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, treated with a non-cytotoxic dose of hydroxyurea showed a decrease of the number of metaphase spreads containing eccDNA in cancer cells [218]. Next to drug treatment, also radiotherapy, using ionizing radiation proved to significantly reduce the number of eccDNA carrying MYC and MDR1 genes in human epidermoid and colon carcinoma cell lines [219,220]. Finally, CRISPR/Cas9 may represent a novel and promising methods to guide cleavage of targeted eccDNA [221].
On the other side, given the higher stability, the longer half-life than their linear counterpart, the resistivity to exonuclease digestion due to their circular structure, eccDNAs might constitute the most needed molecules to deliver required coding genes or regulatory RNAs for the treatment of IBD.
All the molecular therapies mentioned above are depicted in Figure 1.

7. Concluding remarks and future perspectives

In this review we performed a comprehensive overview of the role of cell-free DNA and circular DNA in inflammatory bowel disease, ranging from potential diagnostic to therapeutic applications. As we reviewed above, different types of cfDNAs can be detected in different body fluids, such as blood or feces, potentially representing a novel noninvasive and easily accessible biomarker. Rising from “passive” processes of cell death (necrosis, mechanical damage, etc), “active” processes of cell death (apoptosis, NETosis), defects in DNA repair mechanisms, oxidative stress and inflammatory environment, especially for eccDNA, and processes of cell-to-cell communications (microvescicles, exosomes, nanovesicles), the concentration of cfDNA seems to be associated with the severity of disease in IBD patients and murine models of colitis.
In each process, cfDNAs represent detectable signals of the processes which are ongoing in the organism, and of its own reaction, thereby, giving researchers the possibility of both passively monitoring or actively controlling these processes. Growing evidences show that cfDNAs play important roles in several inflammatory diseases, including IBD, most of whom are still unknown, requiring further research. The creation of in vitro models would allow us a better understanding of the exact meaning of these processes. Notably, Moller et al. created a dual-fluorescence biosensor cassette, which upon the delivery of pairs of CRISPR/Cas9 guide RNAs is able to generate in human cells eccDNA from intergenic and genic loci, of different sizes, thus, allowing researchers to study the cellular impact, persistence and function of eccDNAs in different tissues, such as human intestinal epithelium [72].
Furthermore, one goal for the future will be represented by focus on the rapid progression of single cell-based studies on immune system disorders, autoinflammatory or autoimmune diseases. In the past decade, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has driven a true revolution in the field of immunological research, since it allows a better understanding of the heterogeneity associated with individual immune cells and immunological responses at the molecular level both under physiological and pathological conditions [222]. The development of similar technologies for the purification and sequencing of cfDNA, and especially eccDNAs will open new roads to translational research in the field of immunology and cancer. Besides, it is urgently needed to innovate more bioinformatics tools for data analysis and integration from different technologies and data types, in order to standardize the immune cells annotation and to utilize the whole spectrum of available data.
Therefore, cfDNA may represent the much-needed noninvasive biomarker, from liquid biopsy, for early diagnosis, diseases monitoring, prediction of drug response, and early detection of progression to dysplasia in IBD.
Herein, we reviewed the current state of art regarding the development of molecular therapies in IBD, paying attention to the role played by cGAS-STING signaling, TLR9 signaling, and discussing several other potential oligonucleotide-based therapies in IBD. We also discussed the rationale of employing NPs for drug delivery and provided novel interesting insights into the use of different molecules, such as eccDNA for the treatment of IBD.
However, further research is needed to better characterize the origins, functions, and biological features of cfDNA and eccDNA, which could contribute to the elucidation of IBD pathogenesis and to the development of novel molecular therapeutic strategies.

Author Contributions

F.D.V., Y.Y. and D.G.: writing–original draft; V.P., V.E. and L.M.: resources; M.J.A.B., B.R. and F.S.: writing—review and editing; F.D.V. and Y.Y.: visualization; M.J.A.B., A:G., B.R. and F.S.: supervision, B.R. and F.S.: Conceptualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

“This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 899417”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Fondazione Roma for continuous support to our scientific research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gordon, H.; Biancone, L.; Fiorino, G.; Katsanos, K.H.; Kopylov, U.; Sulais, E.A.; Axelrad, J.E.; Balendran, K.; Burisch, J.; de Ridder, L.; et al. ECCO Guidelines on Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Malignancies. J Crohns Colitis 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, D.H.; Cheon, J.H. Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Recent Advances in Biologic Therapies. Immune Netw 2017, 17, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maaser, C.; Sturm, A.; Vavricka, S.R.; Kucharzik, T.; Fiorino, G.; Annese, V.; Calabrese, E.; Baumgart, D.C.; Bettenworth, D.; Borralho Nunes, P.; et al. ECCO-ESGAR Guideline for Diagnostic Assessment in IBD Part 1: Initial diagnosis, monitoring of known IBD, detection of complications. J Crohns Colitis 2019, 13, 144–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, S.; Fumery, M.; Sandborn, W.J.; Murad, M.H. Systematic review and network meta-analysis: first- and second-line biologic therapies for moderate-severe Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018, 48, 394–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, S.; Murad, M.H.; Fumery, M.; Dulai, P.S.; Sandborn, W.J. First- and Second-Line Pharmacotherapies for Patients With Moderate to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020, 18, 2179–2191.e2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moustafa, A.; Li, W.; Anderson, E.L.; Wong, E.H.M.; Dulai, P.S.; Sandborn, W.J.; Biggs, W.; Yooseph, S.; Jones, M.B.; Venter, J.C.; et al. Genetic risk, dysbiosis, and treatment stratification using host genome and gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2018, 9, e132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mandel, P.; Metais, P. [Nuclear Acids In Human Blood Plasma]. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 1948, 142, 241–243. [Google Scholar]
  8. Annala, M.; Vandekerkhove, G.; Khalaf, D.; Taavitsainen, S.; Beja, K.; Warner, E.W.; Sunderland, K.; Kollmannsberger, C.; Eigl, B.J.; Finch, D.; et al. Circulating Tumor DNA Genomics Correlate with Resistance to Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Discov 2018, 8, 444–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lo, Y.M.; Corbetta, N.; Chamberlain, P.F.; Rai, V.; Sargent, I.L.; Redman, C.W.; Wainscoat, J.S. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet 1997, 350, 485–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sin, S.T.K.; Jiang, P.; Deng, J.; Ji, L.; Cheng, S.H.; Dutta, A.; Leung, T.Y.; Chan, K.C.A.; Chiu, R.W.K.; Lo, Y.M.D. Identification and characterization of extrachromosomal circular DNA in maternal plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020, 117, 1658–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumar, P.; Dillon, L.W.; Shibata, Y.; Jazaeri, A.A.; Jones, D.R.; Dutta, A. Normal and Cancerous Tissues Release Extrachromosomal Circular DNA (eccDNA) into the Circulation. Mol Cancer Res 2017, 15, 1197–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Møller, H.D.; Parsons, L.; Jørgensen, T.S.; Botstein, D.; Regenberg, B. Extrachromosomal circular DNA is common in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112, E3114–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tie, J.; Cohen, J.D.; Lahouel, K.; Lo, S.N.; Wang, Y.; Kosmider, S.; Wong, R.; Shapiro, J.; Lee, M.; Harris, S.; et al. Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis Guiding Adjuvant Therapy in Stage II Colon Cancer. N Engl J Med 2022, 386, 2261–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Turner, K.M.; Deshpande, V.; Beyter, D.; Koga, T.; Rusert, J.; Lee, C.; Li, B.; Arden, K.; Ren, B.; Nathanson, D.A.; et al. Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives tumour evolution and genetic heterogeneity. Nature 2017, 543, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Van Niel, G.; Mallegol, J.; Bevilacqua, C.; Candalh, C.; Brugière, S.; Tomaskovic-Crook, E.; Heath, J.K.; Cerf-Bensussan, N.; Heyman, M. Intestinal epithelial exosomes carry MHC class II/peptides able to inform the immune system in mice. Gut 2003, 52, 1690–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Burger, D.; Schock, S.; Thompson, C.S.; Montezano, A.C.; Hakim, A.M.; Touyz, R.M. Microparticles: biomarkers and beyond. Clin Sci (Lond) 2013, 124, 423–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dignat-George, F.; Boulanger, C.M. The many faces of endothelial microparticles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2011, 31, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Morel, O.; Jesel, L.; Freyssinet, J.M.; Toti, F. Cellular mechanisms underlying the formation of circulating microparticles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2011, 31, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lamarre, Y.; Nader, E.; Connes, P.; Romana, M.; Garnier, Y. Extracellular Vesicles in Sickle Cell Disease: A Promising Tool. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pisetsky, D.S.; Ullal, A.J.; Gauley, J.; Ning, T.C. Microparticles as mediators and biomarkers of rheumatic disease. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012, 51, 1737–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tesse, A.; Meziani, F.; David, E.; Carusio, N.; Kremer, H.; Schneider, F.; Andriantsitohaina, R. Microparticles from preeclamptic women induce vascular hyporeactivity in vessels from pregnant mice through an overproduction of NO. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007, 293, H520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Li, C.; Yu, Y.; Yi, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, D. Exosome-Induced Regulation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front Immunol 2019, 10, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ermakov, A.V.; Konkova, M.S.; Kostyuk, S.V.; Izevskaya, V.L.; Baranova, A.; Veiko, N.N. Oxidized extracellular DNA as a stress signal in human cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2013, 2013, 649747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Glebova, K.; Veiko, N.; Kostyuk, S.; Izhevskaya, V.; Baranova, A. Oxidized extracellular DNA as a stress signal that may modify response to anticancer therapy. Cancer Lett 2015, 356, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kostyuk, S.V.; Tabakov, V.J.; Chestkov, V.V.; Konkova, M.S.; Glebova, K.V.; Baydakova, G.V.; Ershova, E.S.; Izhevskaya, V.L.; Baranova, A.; Veiko, N.N. Oxidized DNA induces an adaptive response in human fibroblasts. Mutat Res 2013, 747-748, 6–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Drury, B.; Hardisty, G.; Gray, R.D.; Ho, G.T. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Clinical Translation. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021, 12, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, H.; Tian, Y.; Xue, C.; Niu, Q.; Chen, C.; Yan, X. Analysis of extracellular vesicle DNA at the single-vesicle level by nano-flow cytometry. J Extracell Vesicles 2022, 11, e12206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maronek, M.; Gromova, B.; Liptak, R.; Konecna, B.; Pastorek, M.; Cechova, B.; Harsanyova, M.; Budis, J.; Smolak, D.; Radvanszky, J.; et al. Extracellular DNA Correlates with Intestinal Inflammation in Chemically Induced Colitis in Mice. Cells 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.; Wang, M.; Djekidel, M.N.; Chen, H.; Liu, D.; Alt, F.W.; Zhang, Y. eccDNAs are apoptotic products with high innate immunostimulatory activity. Nature 2021, 599, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Beccard, I.J.; Hofmann, L.; Schroeder, J.C.; Ludwig, S.; Laban, S.; Brunner, C.; Lotfi, R.; Hoffmann, T.K.; Jackson, E.K.; Schuler, P.J.; et al. Immune Suppressive Effects of Plasma-Derived Exosome Populations in Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mitsuhashi, S.; Feldbrügge, L.; Csizmadia, E.; Mitsuhashi, M.; Robson, S.C.; Moss, A.C. Luminal Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Exhibit Proinflammatory Effects on Epithelial Cells and Macrophages. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016, 22, 1587–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, M.; Johnson-Stephenson, T.K.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Li, L.; Zen, K.; Chen, X.; Zhu, D. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome-educated macrophages alleviate systemic lupus erythematosus by promoting efferocytosis and recruitment of IL-17(+) regulatory T cell. Stem Cell Res Ther 2022, 13, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jahr, S.; Hentze, H.; Englisch, S.; Hardt, D.; Fackelmayer, F.O.; Hesch, R.D.; Knippers, R. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cancer Res 2001, 61, 1659–1665. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lui, Y.Y.; Chik, K.W.; Chiu, R.W.; Ho, C.Y.; Lam, C.W.; Lo, Y.M. Predominant hematopoietic origin of cell-free DNA in plasma and serum after sex-mismatched bone marrow transplantation. Clin Chem 2002, 48, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bettegowda, C.; Sausen, M.; Leary, R.J.; Kinde, I.; Wang, Y.; Agrawal, N.; Bartlett, B.R.; Wang, H.; Luber, B.; Alani, R.M.; et al. Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci Transl Med 2014, 6, 224ra224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Leon, S.A.; Shapiro, B.; Sklaroff, D.M.; Yaros, M.J. Free DNA in the serum of cancer patients and the effect of therapy. Cancer Res 1977, 37, 646–650. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kustanovich, A.; Schwartz, R.; Peretz, T.; Grinshpun, A. Life and death of circulating cell-free DNA. Cancer Biol Ther 2019, 20, 1057–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jiang, P.; Chan, C.W.; Chan, K.C.; Cheng, S.H.; Wong, J.; Wong, V.W.; Wong, G.L.; Chan, S.L.; Mok, T.S.; Chan, H.L.; et al. Lengthening and shortening of plasma DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112, E1317–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Malíčková, K.; Duricová, D.; Bortlík, M.; Hrušková, Z.; Svobodová, B.; Machková, N.; Komárek, V.; Fučíková, T.; Janatková, I.; Zima, T.; et al. Impaired deoxyribonuclease I activity in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Autoimmune Dis 2011, 2011, 945861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bonaventura, A.; Liberale, L.; Carbone, F.; Vecchié, A.; Diaz-Cañestro, C.; Camici, G.G.; Montecucco, F.; Dallegri, F. The Pathophysiological Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Inflammatory Diseases. Thromb Haemost 2018, 118, 6–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Takei, H.; Araki, A.; Watanabe, H.; Ichinose, A.; Sendo, F. Rapid killing of human neutrophils by the potent activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) accompanied by changes different from typical apoptosis or necrosis. J Leukoc Biol 1996, 59, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. D'Haens, G.; Ferrante, M.; Vermeire, S.; Baert, F.; Noman, M.; Moortgat, L.; Geens, P.; Iwens, D.; Aerden, I.; Van Assche, G.; et al. Fecal calprotectin is a surrogate marker for endoscopic lesions in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012, 18, 2218–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hirschfeld, J.; Chicca, I.J.; Moonen, C.G.J.; White, P.C.; Ling, M.R.; Wright, H.J.; Cooper, P.R.; Milward, M.R.; Chapple, I.L.C. Characterization, Quantification, and Visualization of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Methods Mol Biol 2023, 2588, 451–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lood, C.; Blanco, L.P.; Purmalek, M.M.; Carmona-Rivera, C.; De Ravin, S.S.; Smith, C.K.; Malech, H.L.; Ledbetter, J.A.; Elkon, K.B.; Kaplan, M.J. Neutrophil extracellular traps enriched in oxidized mitochondrial DNA are interferogenic and contribute to lupus-like disease. Nat Med 2016, 22, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fuchs, T.A.; Kremer Hovinga, J.A.; Schatzberg, D.; Wagner, D.D.; Lämmle, B. Circulating DNA and myeloperoxidase indicate disease activity in patients with thrombotic microangiopathies. Blood 2012, 120, 1157–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, T.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, B.; Zhang, W.; Wang, L.; Yu, M.; Zhao, X.; Du, J.; Zhang, J.; et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Induce Intestinal Damage and Thrombotic Tendency in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2020, 14, 240–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Clancy, D.M.; Sullivan, G.P.; Moran, H.B.T.; Henry, C.M.; Reeves, E.P.; McElvaney, N.G.; Lavelle, E.C.; Martin, S.J. Extracellular Neutrophil Proteases Are Efficient Regulators of IL-1, IL-33, and IL-36 Cytokine Activity but Poor Effectors of Microbial Killing. Cell Rep 2018, 22, 2937–2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, J.; Huang, J.; Zhang, L.; Feng, J.; Li, J.; Xia, Q.; Zhao, Q.; Huang, L.; et al. Eosinophil extracellular traps drive asthma progression through neuro-immune signals. Nat Cell Biol 2021, 23, 1060–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, G.; Lin, J.; Zhang, C.; Gao, H.; Lu, H.; Gao, X.; Zhu, R.; Li, Z.; Li, M.; Liu, Z. Microbiota metabolite butyrate constrains neutrophil functions and ameliorates mucosal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1968257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yamamoto, S.; Azuma, E.; Muramatsu, M.; Hamashima, T.; Ishii, Y.; Sasahara, M. Significance of Extracellular Vesicles: Pathobiological Roles in Disease. Cell Struct Funct 2016, 41, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gelderman, M.P.; Simak, J. Flow cytometric analysis of cell membrane microparticles. Methods Mol Biol 2008, 484, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Díaz-Garrido, N.; Badia, J.; Baldomà, L. Microbiota-derived extracellular vesicles in interkingdom communication in the gut. J Extracell Vesicles 2021, 10, e12161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zheng, X.; Chen, F.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; You, P.; Sun, S.; Lin, J.; Chen, N. Salivary exosomal PSMA7: a promising biomarker of inflammatory bowel disease. Protein Cell 2017, 8, 686–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Barrachina, F.; Battistone, M.A.; Castillo, J.; Mallofré, C.; Jodar, M.; Breton, S.; Oliva, R. Sperm acquire epididymis-derived proteins through epididymosomes. Hum Reprod 2022, 37, 651–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tong, L.; Hao, H.; Zhang, Z.; Lv, Y.; Liang, X.; Liu, Q.; Liu, T.; Gong, P.; Zhang, L.; Cao, F.; et al. Milk-derived extracellular vesicles alleviate ulcerative colitis by regulating the gut immunity and reshaping the gut microbiota. Theranostics 2021, 11, 8570–8586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Théry, C.; Amigorena, S.; Raposo, G.; Clayton, A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 2006, Chapter 3, Unit 3.22. [CrossRef]
  57. Raposo, G.; Stoorvogel, W. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol 2013, 200, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhou, H.; Pisitkun, T.; Aponte, A.; Yuen, P.S.; Hoffert, J.D.; Yasuda, H.; Hu, X.; Chawla, L.; Shen, R.F.; Knepper, M.A.; et al. Exosomal Fetuin-A identified by proteomics: a novel urinary biomarker for detecting acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2006, 70, 1847–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Borges, F.T.; Reis, L.A.; Schor, N. Extracellular vesicles: structure, function, and potential clinical uses in renal diseases. Braz J Med Biol Res 2013, 46, 824–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vrablicova, Z.; Tomova, K.; Tothova, L.; Babickova, J.; Gromova, B.; Konecna, B.; Liptak, R.; Hlavaty, T.; Gardlik, R. Nuclear and Mitochondrial Circulating Cell-Free DNA Is Increased in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Clinical Remission. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020, 7, 593316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Valter, M.; Verstockt, S.; Finalet Ferreiro, J.A.; Cleynen, I. Extracellular Vesicles in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Small Particles, Big Players. J Crohns Colitis 2021, 15, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Asea, A.; Rehli, M.; Kabingu, E.; Boch, J.A.; Bare, O.; Auron, P.E.; Stevenson, M.A.; Calderwood, S.K. Novel signal transduction pathway utilized by extracellular HSP70: role of toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4. J Biol Chem 2002, 277, 15028–15034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, Y.; Tian, J.; Tang, X.; Rui, K.; Tian, X.; Ma, J.; Ma, B.; Xu, H.; Lu, L.; Wang, S. Exosomes released by granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells attenuate DSS-induced colitis in mice. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 15356–15368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Leoni, G.; Neumann, P.A.; Kamaly, N.; Quiros, M.; Nishio, H.; Jones, H.R.; Sumagin, R.; Hilgarth, R.S.; Alam, A.; Fredman, G.; et al. Annexin A1-containing extracellular vesicles and polymeric nanoparticles promote epithelial wound repair. J Clin Invest 2015, 125, 1215–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, X.; Deeke, S.A.; Ning, Z.; Starr, A.E.; Butcher, J.; Li, J.; Mayne, J.; Cheng, K.; Liao, B.; Li, L.; et al. Metaproteomics reveals associations between microbiome and intestinal extracellular vesicle proteins in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Commun 2018, 9, 2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cohen, S.; Houben, A.; Segal, D. Extrachromosomal circular DNA derived from tandemly repeated genomic sequences in plants. Plant J 2008, 53, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cohen, S.; Yacobi, K.; Segal, D. Extrachromosomal circular DNA of tandemly repeated genomic sequences in Drosophila. Genome Res 2003, 13, 1133–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Møller, H.D.; Ramos-Madrigal, J.; Prada-Luengo, I.; Gilbert, M.T.P.; Regenberg, B. Near-Random Distribution of Chromosome-Derived Circular DNA in the Condensed Genome of Pigeons and the Larger, More Repeat-Rich Human Genome. Genome Biol Evol 2020, 12, 3762–3777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kumar, P.; Dillon, L.W.; Shibata, Y.; Jazaeri, A.A.; Jones, D.R.; Dutta, A. Normal and Cancerous Tissues Release Extrachromosomal Circular DNA (eccDNA) into the CirculationHuman and Mouse microDNA in Circulation. Molecular Cancer Research 2017, 15, 1197–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dillon, L.W.; Kumar, P.; Shibata, Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Willcox, S.; Griffith, J.D.; Pommier, Y.; Takeda, S.; Dutta, A. Production of Extrachromosomal MicroDNAs Is Linked to Mismatch Repair Pathways and Transcriptional Activity. Cell Rep 2015, 11, 1749–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Meng, X.; Qi, X.; Guo, H.; Cai, M.; Li, C.; Zhu, J.; Chen, F.; Guo, H.; Li, J.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Novel role for non-homologous end joining in the formation of double minutes in methotrexate-resistant colon cancer cells. J Med Genet 2015, 52, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Møller, H.D.; Lin, L.; Xiang, X.; Petersen, T.S.; Huang, J.; Yang, L.; Kjeldsen, E.; Jensen, U.B.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; et al. CRISPR-C: circularization of genes and chromosome by CRISPR in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2018, 46, e131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shoshani, O.; Brunner, S.F.; Yaeger, R.; Ly, P.; Nechemia-Arbely, Y.; Kim, D.H.; Fang, R.; Castillon, G.A.; Yu, M.; Li, J.S.Z.; et al. Chromothripsis drives the evolution of gene amplification in cancer. Nature 2021, 591, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Noer, J.B.; Hørsdal, O.K.; Xiang, X.; Luo, Y.; Regenberg, B. Extrachromosomal circular DNA in cancer: history, current knowledge, and methods. Trends in Genetics 2022, 38, 766–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Arrey, G.; Keating, S.T.; Regenberg, B. A unifying model for extrachromosomal circular DNA load in eukaryotic cells. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2022, 128, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Noer, J.B.; Hørsdal, O.K.; Xiang, X.; Luo, Y.; Regenberg, B. Extrachromosomal circular DNA in cancer: history, current knowledge, and methods. Trends Genet 2022, 38, 766–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Janeway, C.A., Jr. Pillars article: approaching the asymptote? Evolution and revolution in immunology. Cold spring harb symp quant biol. 1989. 54: 1-13. J Immunol 2013, 191, 4475–4487. [Google Scholar]
  78. Matzinger, P. Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. Annu Rev Immunol 1994, 12, 991–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cao, X. Self-regulation and cross-regulation of pattern-recognition receptor signalling in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 2016, 16, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kindrachuk, J.; Potter, J.E.; Brownlie, R.; Ficzycz, A.D.; Griebel, P.J.; Mookherjee, N.; Mutwiri, G.K.; Babiuk, L.A.; Napper, S. Nucleic acids exert a sequence-independent cooperative effect on sequence-dependent activation of Toll-like receptor 9. J Biol Chem 2007, 282, 13944–13953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Abrams, S.T.; Zhang, N.; Manson, J.; Liu, T.; Dart, C.; Baluwa, F.; Wang, S.S.; Brohi, K.; Kipar, A.; Yu, W.; et al. Circulating histones are mediators of trauma-associated lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013, 187, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, Y.; Berke, I.C.; Modis, Y. DNA binding to proteolytically activated TLR9 is sequence-independent and enhanced by DNA curvature. Embo j 2012, 31, 919–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ligi, D.; Lo Sasso, B.; Giglio, R.V.; Maniscalco, R.; DellaFranca, C.; Agnello, L.; Ciaccio, M.; Mannello, F. Circulating histones contribute to monocyte and MDW alterations as common mediators in classical and COVID-19 sepsis. Crit Care 2022, 26, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Rekvig, O.P.; Hannestad, K. Human autoantibodies that react with both cell nuclei and plasma membranes display specificity for the octamer of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 in high salt. J Exp Med 1980, 152, 1720–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Cavalier, E.; Guiot, J.; Lechner, K.; Dutsch, A.; Eccleston, M.; Herzog, M.; Bygott, T.; Schomburg, A.; Kelly, T.; Holdenrieder, S. Circulating Nucleosomes as Potential Markers to Monitor COVID-19 Disease Progression. Front Mol Biosci 2021, 8, 600881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Marsman, G.; Zeerleder, S.; Luken, B.M. Extracellular histones, cell-free DNA, or nucleosomes: differences in immunostimulation. Cell Death Dis 2016, 7, e2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tsung, A.; Sahai, R.; Tanaka, H.; Nakao, A.; Fink, M.P.; Lotze, M.T.; Yang, H.; Li, J.; Tracey, K.J.; Geller, D.A.; et al. The nuclear factor HMGB1 mediates hepatic injury after murine liver ischemia-reperfusion. J Exp Med 2005, 201, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Deng, J.; Pan, W.; Ji, N.; Liu, N.; Chen, Q.; Chen, J.; Sun, Y.; Xie, L.; Chen, Q. Cell-Free DNA Promotes Inflammation in Patients With Oral Lichen Planus via the STING Pathway. Front Immunol 2022, 13, 838109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Zhang, W.; Li, G.; Luo, R.; Lei, J.; Song, Y.; Wang, B.; Ma, L.; Liao, Z.; Ke, W.; Liu, H.; et al. Cytosolic escape of mitochondrial DNA triggers cGAS-STING-NLRP3 axis-dependent nucleus pulposus cell pyroptosis. Exp Mol Med 2022, 54, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Thierry, A.R.; El Messaoudi, S.; Gahan, P.B.; Anker, P.; Stroun, M. Origins, structures, and functions of circulating DNA in oncology. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2016, 35, 347–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, J.; Huynh, L.; Cornwell, W.D.; Tang, M.S.; Simborio, H.; Huang, J.; Kosmider, B.; Rogers, T.J.; Zhao, H.; Steinberg, M.B.; et al. Electronic Cigarettes Induce Mitochondrial DNA Damage and Trigger TLR9 (Toll-Like Receptor 9)-Mediated Atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2021, 41, 839–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tumburu, L.; Ghosh-Choudhary, S.; Seifuddin, F.T.; Barbu, E.A.; Yang, S.; Ahmad, M.M.; Wilkins, L.H.W.; Tunc, I.; Sivakumar, I.; Nichols, J.S.; et al. Circulating mitochondrial DNA is a proinflammatory DAMP in sickle cell disease. Blood 2021, 137, 3116–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Hashimoto, T.; Ueki, S.; Kamide, Y.; Miyabe, Y.; Fukuchi, M.; Yokoyama, Y.; Furukawa, T.; Azuma, N.; Oka, N.; Takeuchi, H.; et al. Increased Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: Implications for Eosinophil Extracellular Traps and Immunothrombosis. Front Immunol 2021, 12, 801897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Johnson, P.; Zhou, Q.; Dao, D.Y.; Lo, Y.M.D. Circulating biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022, 19, 670–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Tao, L.; Huang, X.; Xu, M.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, F.; Hua, F.; Jiang, X.; Wang, Y. Value of circulating miRNA-21 in the diagnosis of subclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2020, 518, 110944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Obermeier, F.; Dunger, N.; Deml, L.; Herfarth, H.; Schölmerich, J.; Falk, W. CpG motifs of bacterial DNA exacerbate colitis of dextran sulfate sodium-treated mice. Eur J Immunol 2002, 32, 2084–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hajizadeh, S.; DeGroot, J.; TeKoppele, J.M.; Tarkowski, A.; Collins, L.V. Extracellular mitochondrial DNA and oxidatively damaged DNA in synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2003, 5, R234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rachmilewitz, D.; Katakura, K.; Karmeli, F.; Hayashi, T.; Reinus, C.; Rudensky, B.; Akira, S.; Takeda, K.; Lee, J.; Takabayashi, K.; et al. Toll-like receptor 9 signaling mediates the anti-inflammatory effects of probiotics in murine experimental colitis. Gastroenterology 2004, 126, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Műzes, G.; Sipos, F.; Fűri, I.; Constantinovits, M.; Spisák, S.; Wichmann, B.; Valcz, G.; Tulassay, Z.; Molnár, B. Preconditioning with intravenous colitic cell-free DNA prevents DSS-colitis by altering TLR9-associated gene expression profile. Dig Dis Sci 2014, 59, 2935–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Delgado, M.A.; Elmaoued, R.A.; Davis, A.S.; Kyei, G.; Deretic, V. Toll-like receptors control autophagy. Embo j 2008, 27, 1110–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Műzes, G.; Kiss, A.L.; Tulassay, Z.; Sipos, F. Cell-free DNA-induced alteration of autophagy response and TLR9-signaling: Their relation to amelioration of DSS-colitis. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2017, 52, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhao, F.; Zheng, T.; Gong, W.; Wu, J.; Xie, H.; Li, W.; Zhang, R.; Liu, P.; Liu, J.; Wu, X.; et al. Extracellular vesicles package dsDNA to aggravate Crohn's disease by activating the STING pathway. Cell Death Dis 2021, 12, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Schiller, M.; Bekeredjian-Ding, I.; Heyder, P.; Blank, N.; Ho, A.D.; Lorenz, H.M. Autoantigens are translocated into small apoptotic bodies during early stages of apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 2008, 15, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Navratil, J.S.; Sabatine, J.M.; Ahearn, J.M. Apoptosis and immune responses to self. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2004, 30, 193–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhou, Z.; Ménard, H.A. Autoantigenic posttranslational modifications of proteins: does it apply to rheumatoid arthritis? Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002, 14, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Rondas, D.; Crèvecoeur, I.; D'Hertog, W.; Ferreira, G.B.; Staes, A.; Garg, A.D.; Eizirik, D.L.; Agostinis, P.; Gevaert, K.; Overbergh, L.; et al. Citrullinated glucose-regulated protein 78 is an autoantigen in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2015, 64, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Khandpur, R.; Carmona-Rivera, C.; Vivekanandan-Giri, A.; Gizinski, A.; Yalavarthi, S.; Knight, J.S.; Friday, S.; Li, S.; Patel, R.M.; Subramanian, V.; et al. NETs are a source of citrullinated autoantigens and stimulate inflammatory responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci Transl Med 2013, 5, 178ra140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Makrygiannakis, D.; af Klint, E.; Lundberg, I.E.; Löfberg, R.; Ulfgren, A.K.; Klareskog, L.; Catrina, A.I. Citrullination is an inflammation-dependent process. Ann Rheum Dis 2006, 65, 1219–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Liu, M.; Xu, H.; Bashir, M.; Sharma, M.; Williams, K.; Anyanwu, C.; Okawa, J.; Werth, V. Proinflammatory microvesicles in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. In Proceedings of the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 2014; pp. S13-S13.
  110. Piette, E.W.; Foering, K.P.; Chang, A.Y.; Okawa, J.; Ten Have, T.R.; Feng, R.; Werth, V.P. Impact of smoking in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol 2012, 148, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gerovska, D.; Araúzo-Bravo, M.J. Skeletal Muscles of Sedentary and Physically Active Aged People Have Distinctive Genic Extrachromosomal Circular DNA Profiles. Int J Mol Sci 2023, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gerovska, D.; Araúzo-Bravo, M.J. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients with DNASE1L3·Deficiency Have a Distinctive and Specific Genic Circular DNA Profile in Plasma. Cells 2023, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Prada-Luengo, I.; Møller, H.D.; Henriksen, R.A.; Gao, Q.; Larsen, Camilla E.; Alizadeh, S.; Maretty, L.; Houseley, J.; Regenberg, B. Replicative aging is associated with loss of genetic heterogeneity from extrachromosomal circular DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Research 2020, 48, 7883-7898. [CrossRef]
  114. Infante, A.; Gener, B.; Vázquez, M.; Olivares, N.; Arrieta, A.; Grau, G.; Llano, I.; Madero, L.; Bueno, A.M.; Sagastizabal, B.; et al. Reiterative infusions of MSCs improve pediatric osteogenesis imperfecta eliciting a pro-osteogenic paracrine response: TERCELOI clinical trial. Clin Transl Med 2021, 11, e265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Araúzo-Bravo, M.J.; Erichsen, L.; Ott, P.; Beermann, A.; Sheikh, J.; Gerovska, D.; Thimm, C.; Bendhack, M.L.; Santourlidis, S. Consistent DNA Hypomethylations in Prostate Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Lavelle, E.C.; Murphy, C.; O'Neill, L.A.; Creagh, E.M. The role of TLRs, NLRs, and RLRs in mucosal innate immunity and homeostasis. Mucosal Immunol 2010, 3, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Cario, E.; Gerken, G.; Podolsky, D. Toll-like receptor 2 controls mucosal inflammation by regulating epithelial barrier function. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 1359–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lee, J.; Mo, J.H.; Katakura, K.; Alkalay, I.; Rucker, A.N.; Liu, Y.T.; Lee, H.K.; Shen, C.; Cojocaru, G.; Shenouda, S.; et al. Maintenance of colonic homeostasis by distinctive apical TLR9 signalling in intestinal epithelial cells. Nat Cell Biol 2006, 8, 1327–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Rakoff-Nahoum, S.; Paglino, J.; Eslami-Varzaneh, F.; Edberg, S.; Medzhitov, R. Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell 2004, 118, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bleich, A.; Janus, L.M.; Smoczek, A.; Westendorf, A.M.; Strauch, U.; Mähler, M.; Hedrich, H.J.; Fichtner-Feigl, S.; Schölmerich, J.; Falk, W.; et al. CpG motifs of bacterial DNA exert protective effects in mouse models of IBD by antigen-independent tolerance induction. Gastroenterology 2009, 136, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Obermeier, F.; Strauch, U.G.; Dunger, N.; Grunwald, N.; Rath, H.C.; Herfarth, H.; Schölmerich, J.; Falk, W. In vivo CpG DNA/toll-like receptor 9 interaction induces regulatory properties in CD4+CD62L+ T cells which prevent intestinal inflammation in the SCID transfer model of colitis. Gut 2005, 54, 1428–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Rachmilewitz, D.; Karmeli, F.; Takabayashi, K.; Hayashi, T.; Leider-Trejo, L.; Lee, J.; Leoni, L.M.; Raz, E. Immunostimulatory DNA ameliorates experimental and spontaneous murine colitis. Gastroenterology 2002, 122, 1428–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lee, J.; Rachmilewitz, D.; Raz, E. Homeostatic effects of TLR9 signaling in experimental colitis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006, 1072, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Rachmilewitz, D.; Karmeli, F.; Shteingart, S.; Lee, J.; Takabayashi, K.; Raz, E. Immunostimulatory oligonucleotides inhibit colonic proinflammatory cytokine production in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2006, 12, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Fuse, K.; Katakura, K.; Sakamoto, N.; Ohira, H. Toll-like receptor 9 gene mutations and polymorphisms in Japanese ulcerative colitis patients. World J Gastroenterol 2010, 16, 5815–5821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Török, H.P.; Glas, J.; Tonenchi, L.; Bruennler, G.; Folwaczny, M.; Folwaczny, C. Crohn's disease is associated with a toll-like receptor-9 polymorphism. Gastroenterology 2004, 127, 365–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Kuo, C.C.; Liang, C.M.; Lai, C.Y.; Liang, S.M. Involvement of heat shock protein (Hsp)90 beta but not Hsp90 alpha in antiapoptotic effect of CpG-B oligodeoxynucleotide. J Immunol 2007, 178, 6100–6108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kuo, C.C.; Liang, S.M.; Liang, C.M. CpG-B oligodeoxynucleotide promotes cell survival via up-regulation of Hsp70 to increase Bcl-xL and to decrease apoptosis-inducing factor translocation. J Biol Chem 2006, 281, 38200–38207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Malago, J.J.; Koninkx, J.F.; van Dijk, J.E. The heat shock response and cytoprotection of the intestinal epithelium. Cell Stress Chaperones 2002, 7, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. O'Hara, J.R.; Feener, T.D.; Fischer, C.D.; Buret, A.G. Campylobacter jejuni disrupts protective Toll-like receptor 9 signaling in colonic epithelial cells and increases the severity of dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice. Infect Immun 2012, 80, 1563–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Abreu, M.T. Toll-like receptor signalling in the intestinal epithelium: how bacterial recognition shapes intestinal function. Nat Rev Immunol 2010, 10, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Creed, T.J.; Lee, R.W.; Newcomb, P.V.; di Mambro, A.J.; Raju, M.; Dayan, C.M. The effects of cytokines on suppression of lymphocyte proliferation by dexamethasone. J Immunol 2009, 183, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Kuznetsov, N.V.; Zargari, A.; Gielen, A.W.; von Stein, O.D.; Musch, E.; Befrits, R.; Lofberg, R.; von Stein, P. Biomarkers can predict potential clinical responders to DIMS0150 a toll-like receptor 9 agonist in ulcerative colitis patients. BMC Gastroenterol 2014, 14, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Musch, E.; Lutfi, T.; von Stein, P.; Zargari, A.; Admyre, C.; Malek, M.; Löfberg, R.; von Stein, O.D. Topical treatment with the Toll-like receptor agonist DIMS0150 has potential for lasting relief of symptoms in patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis by restoring glucocorticoid sensitivity. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013, 19, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Atreya, R.; Bloom, S.; Scaldaferri, F.; Gerardi, V.; Admyre, C.; Karlsson, Å.; Knittel, T.; Kowalski, J.; Lukas, M.; Löfberg, R.; et al. Clinical Effects of a Topically Applied Toll-like Receptor 9 Agonist in Active Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2016, 10, 1294–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Atreya, R.; Reinisch, W.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Scaldaferri, F.; Admyre, C.; Knittel, T.; Kowalski, J.; Neurath, M.F.; Hawkey, C. Clinical efficacy of the Toll-like receptor 9 agonist cobitolimod using patient-reported-outcomes defined clinical endpoints in patients with ulcerative colitis. Dig Liver Dis 2018, 50, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Atreya, R.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Klymenko, A.; Augustyn, M.; Bakulin, I.; Slankamenac, D.; Miheller, P.; Gasbarrini, A.; Hébuterne, X.; Arnesson, K.; et al. Cobitolimod for moderate-to-severe, left-sided ulcerative colitis (CONDUCT): a phase 2b randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging induction trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020, 5, 1063–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Dotan, I.; Levy-Nissenbaum, E.; Chowers, Y.; Fich, A.; Israeli, E.; Adar, T.; Shteingart, S.; Soreq, H.; Goldin, E. Ameliorating Active Ulcerative Colitis via an Orally Available Toll-Like Receptor-9 Modifier: A Prospective Open-Label, Multicenter Phase II Trial. Dig Dis Sci 2016, 61, 3246–3254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Burman, C.; Ktistakis, N.T. Autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. Semin Immunopathol 2010, 32, 397–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wu, J.; Yan, N. No Longer A One-Trick Pony: STING Signaling Activity Beyond Interferon. J Mol Biol 2022, 434, 167257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhang, R.; Kang, R.; Tang, D. The STING1 network regulates autophagy and cell death. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2021, 6, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Gui, X.; Yang, H.; Li, T.; Tan, X.; Shi, P.; Li, M.; Du, F.; Chen, Z.J. Autophagy induction via STING trafficking is a primordial function of the cGAS pathway. Nature 2019, 567, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Konno, H.; Konno, K.; Barber, G.N. Cyclic dinucleotides trigger ULK1 (ATG1) phosphorylation of STING to prevent sustained innate immune signaling. Cell 2013, 155, 688–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Liu, D.; Wu, H.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Tian, H.; Siraj, S.; Sehgal, S.A.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Shang, Y.; et al. STING directly activates autophagy to tune the innate immune response. Cell Death Differ 2019, 26, 1735–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Prabakaran, T.; Bodda, C.; Krapp, C.; Zhang, B.C.; Christensen, M.H.; Sun, C.; Reinert, L.; Cai, Y.; Jensen, S.B.; Skouboe, M.K.; et al. Attenuation of cGAS-STING signaling is mediated by a p62/SQSTM1-dependent autophagy pathway activated by TBK1. Embo j 2018, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Saitoh, T.; Fujita, N.; Hayashi, T.; Takahara, K.; Satoh, T.; Lee, H.; Matsunaga, K.; Kageyama, S.; Omori, H.; Noda, T.; et al. Atg9a controls dsDNA-driven dynamic translocation of STING and the innate immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106, 20842–20846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Gonugunta, V.K.; Sakai, T.; Pokatayev, V.; Yang, K.; Wu, J.; Dobbs, N.; Yan, N. Trafficking-Mediated STING Degradation Requires Sorting to Acidified Endolysosomes and Can Be Targeted to Enhance Anti-tumor Response. Cell Rep 2017, 21, 3234–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Martin, G.R.; Blomquist, C.M.; Henare, K.L.; Jirik, F.R. Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) activation exacerbates experimental colitis in mice. Sci Rep 2019, 9, 14281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Howell, K.J.; Kraiczy, J.; Nayak, K.M.; Gasparetto, M.; Ross, A.; Lee, C.; Mak, T.N.; Koo, B.K.; Kumar, N.; Lawley, T.; et al. DNA Methylation and Transcription Patterns in Intestinal Epithelial Cells From Pediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Differentiate Disease Subtypes and Associate With Outcome. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 585–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. An, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zheng, T.; Wang, G.; Zhang, M.; Li, J.; Ji, H.; Li, S.; Yang, S.; Xu, D.; et al. An Analysis of the Expression and Association with Immune Cell Infiltration of the cGAS/STING Pathway in Pan-Cancer. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2019, 14, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Canesso, M.C.C.; Lemos, L.; Neves, T.C.; Marim, F.M.; Castro, T.B.R.; Veloso É, S.; Queiroz, C.P.; Ahn, J.; Santiago, H.C.; Martins, F.S.; et al. The cytosolic sensor STING is required for intestinal homeostasis and control of inflammation. Mucosal Immunol 2018, 11, 820–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Aden, K.; Tran, F.; Ito, G.; Sheibani-Tezerji, R.; Lipinski, S.; Kuiper, J.W.; Tschurtschenthaler, M.; Saveljeva, S.; Bhattacharyya, J.; Häsler, R.; et al. ATG16L1 orchestrates interleukin-22 signaling in the intestinal epithelium via cGAS-STING. J Exp Med 2018, 215, 2868–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Chen, C.; Yan, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Tao, M.; Feng, Q.; Fu, Y. ANP attenuates intestinal inflammation by regulating STING pathway. Available at SSRN 3756807 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Tao, M.; Zhao, X.; Feng, Q.; Fei, X.; Fu, Y. Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Attenuates Colitis via Inhibition of the cGAS-STING Pathway in Colonic Epithelial Cells. Int J Biol Sci 2022, 18, 1737–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Ma, C.; Yang, D.; Wang, B.; Wu, C.; Wu, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, X.; Lassen, K.; Dai, L.; Yang, S. Gasdermin D in macrophages restrains colitis by controlling cGAS-mediated inflammation. Sci Adv 2020, 6, eaaz6717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Erttmann, S.F.; Swacha, P.; Aung, K.M.; Brindefalk, B.; Jiang, H.; Härtlova, A.; Uhlin, B.E.; Wai, S.N.; Gekara, N.O. The gut microbiota prime systemic antiviral immunity via the cGAS-STING-IFN-I axis. Immunity 2022, 55, 847–861.e810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Ahn, J.; Son, S.; Oliveira, S.C.; Barber, G.N. STING-Dependent Signaling Underlies IL-10 Controlled Inflammatory Colitis. Cell Rep 2017, 21, 3873–3884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Vincent, J.; Adura, C.; Gao, P.; Luz, A.; Lama, L.; Asano, Y.; Okamoto, R.; Imaeda, T.; Aida, J.; Rothamel, K.; et al. Small molecule inhibition of cGAS reduces interferon expression in primary macrophages from autoimmune mice. Nat Commun 2017, 8, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Zhang, M.; Zou, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, J. Inhibitory targeting cGAS-STING-TBK1 axis: Emerging strategies for autoimmune diseases therapy. Front Immunol 2022, 13, 954129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Haag, S.M.; Gulen, M.F.; Reymond, L.; Gibelin, A.; Abrami, L.; Decout, A.; Heymann, M.; van der Goot, F.G.; Turcatti, G.; Behrendt, R.; et al. Targeting STING with covalent small-molecule inhibitors. Nature 2018, 559, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Gantier, M.; Ullah, T.; Johansen, M.; Balka, K.; Ambrose, R.; Gearing, L.; Wenholz, D.; Zeng, J.; Miemczyk, S.; Nguyen, D. Pharmacological inhibition of TBK1/IKKε blunts COVID-19 immunopathology. 2022.
  162. Hong, Z.; Mei, J.; Li, C.; Bai, G.; Maimaiti, M.; Hu, H.; Yu, W.; Sun, L.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, D.; et al. STING inhibitors target the cyclic dinucleotide binding pocket. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Olagnier, D.; Brandtoft, A.M.; Gunderstofte, C.; Villadsen, N.L.; Krapp, C.; Thielke, A.L.; Laustsen, A.; Peri, S.; Hansen, A.L.; Bonefeld, L.; et al. Nrf2 negatively regulates STING indicating a link between antiviral sensing and metabolic reprogramming. Nat Commun 2018, 9, 3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Lamprecht, A.; Schäfer, U.; Lehr, C.M. Size-dependent bioadhesion of micro- and nanoparticulate carriers to the inflamed colonic mucosa. Pharm Res 2001, 18, 788–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Wang, L.; Yu, M.; Yang, H. Recent Progress in the Diagnosis and Precise Nanocarrier-Mediated Therapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Inflamm Res 2021, 14, 1701–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Coco, R.; Plapied, L.; Pourcelle, V.; Jérôme, C.; Brayden, D.J.; Schneider, Y.J.; Préat, V. Drug delivery to inflamed colon by nanoparticles: comparison of different strategies. Int J Pharm 2013, 440, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Colombel, J.F.; Narula, N.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L. Management Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 351–361.e355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Cuvelier, C.A.; Quatacker, J.; Mielants, H.; De Vos, M.; Veys, E.; Roels, H.J. M-cells are damaged and increased in number in inflamed human ileal mucosa. Histopathology 1994, 24, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Mohan, L.J.; Daly, J.S.; Ryan, B.M.; Ramtoola, Z. The future of nanomedicine in optimising the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019, 54, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Pichai, M.V.; Ferguson, L.R. Potential prospects of nanomedicine for targeted therapeutics in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol 2012, 18, 2895–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Song, W.; Shen, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Goodwin, T.J.; Li, J.; Dorosheva, O.; Liu, T.; Liu, R.; Huang, L. Synergistic and low adverse effect cancer immunotherapy by immunogenic chemotherapy and locally expressed PD-L1 trap. Nat Commun 2018, 9, 2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Yin, Y.; Yang, J.; Pan, Y.; Gao, Y.; Huang, L.; Luan, X.; Lin, Z.; Zhu, W.; Li, Y.; Song, Y. Mesopore to Macropore Transformation of Metal-Organic Framework for Drug Delivery in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Adv Healthc Mater 2021, 10, e2000973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Youshia, J.; Lamprecht, A. Size-dependent nanoparticulate drug delivery in inflammatory bowel diseases. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2016, 13, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Xiao, B.; Xu, Z.; Viennois, E.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Han, M.K.; Kang, Y.; Merlin, D. Orally Targeted Delivery of Tripeptide KPV via Hyaluronic Acid-Functionalized Nanoparticles Efficiently Alleviates Ulcerative Colitis. Mol Ther 2017, 25, 1628–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Charania, M.A.; Laroui, H.; Liu, H.; Viennois, E.; Ayyadurai, S.; Xiao, B.; Ingersoll, S.A.; Kalman, D.; Merlin, D. Intestinal epithelial CD98 directly modulates the innate host response to enteric bacterial pathogens. Infect Immun 2013, 81, 923–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Wang, C.Y.; Liu, S.; Xie, X.N.; Tan, Z.R. Regulation profile of the intestinal peptide transporter 1 (PepT1). Drug Des Devel Ther 2017, 11, 3511–3517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Wang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Li, P.; Weng, Y.; Kamada, N.; Jiang, H.; Smith, D.E. Expression and regulation of proton-coupled oligopeptide transporters in colonic tissue and immune cells of mice. Biochem Pharmacol 2018, 148, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Xiao, B.; Laroui, H.; Viennois, E.; Ayyadurai, S.; Charania, M.A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Baker, M.T.; Zhang, B.; Gewirtz, A.T.; et al. Nanoparticles with surface antibody against CD98 and carrying CD98 small interfering RNA reduce colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 1289–1300.e1281-1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Zucchelli, M.; Torkvist, L.; Bresso, F.; Halfvarson, J.; Hellquist, A.; Anedda, F.; Assadi, G.; Lindgren, G.B.; Svanfeldt, M.; Janson, M.; et al. PepT1 oligopeptide transporter (SLC15A1) gene polymorphism in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009, 15, 1562–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Farzi, B.; Young, D.; Scrimgeour, J.; Cetinkaya, C. Mechanical properties of P-selectin PSGL-1 bonds. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2019, 173, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Sakhalkar, H.S.; Dalal, M.K.; Salem, A.K.; Ansari, R.; Fu, J.; Kiani, M.F.; Kurjiaka, D.T.; Hanes, J.; Shakesheff, K.M.; Goetz, D.J. Leukocyte-inspired biodegradable particles that selectively and avidly adhere to inflamed endothelium in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100, 15895–15900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Chung, C.H.; Jung, W.; Keum, H.; Kim, T.W.; Jon, S. Nanoparticles Derived from the Natural Antioxidant Rosmarinic Acid Ameliorate Acute Inflammatory Bowel Disease. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 6887–6896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Sun, T.; Kwong, C.H.T.; Gao, C.; Wei, J.; Yue, L.; Zhang, J.; Ye, R.D.; Wang, R. Amelioration of ulcerative colitis via inflammatory regulation by macrophage-biomimetic nanomedicine. Theranostics 2020, 10, 10106–10119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Xiao, B.; Merlin, D. Oral colon-specific therapeutic approaches toward treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2012, 9, 1393–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Rezaie, J.; Nejati, V.; Mahmoodi, M.; Ahmadi, M. Mesenchymal stem cells derived extracellular vesicles: A promising nanomedicine for drug delivery system. Biochem Pharmacol 2022, 203, 115167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Keener, A.B. How extracellular vesicles can enhance drug delivery. Nature 2020, 582, S14–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Reynolds, A.; Leake, D.; Boese, Q.; Scaringe, S.; Marshall, W.S.; Khvorova, A. Rational siRNA design for RNA interference. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. González, V.M.; Martín, M.E.; Fernández, G.; García-Sacristán, A. Use of Aptamers as Diagnostics Tools and Antiviral Agents for Human Viruses. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2016, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Hori, S.I.; Herrera, A.; Rossi, J.J.; Zhou, J. Current Advances in Aptamers for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Khvorova, A.; Watts, J.K. The chemical evolution of oligonucleotide therapies of clinical utility. Nat Biotechnol 2017, 35, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Gewirtz, A.T.; Sitaraman, S. Alicaforsen. Isis Pharmaceuticals. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2001, 2, 1401–1406. [Google Scholar]
  192. Vainer, B.; Nielsen, O.H. Changed colonic profile of P-selectin, platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), ICAM-2, and ICAM-3 in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Exp Immunol 2000, 121, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Schreiber, S.; Nikolaus, S.; Malchow, H.; Kruis, W.; Lochs, H.; Raedler, A.; Hahn, E.G.; Krummenerl, T.; Steinmann, G. Absence of efficacy of subcutaneous antisense ICAM-1 treatment of chronic active Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2001, 120, 1339–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Yacyshyn, B.; Chey, W.Y.; Wedel, M.K.; Yu, R.Z.; Paul, D.; Chuang, E. A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study of alicaforsen, an antisense inhibitor of intercellular adhesion molecule 1, for the treatment of subjects with active Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007, 5, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Yacyshyn, B.R.; Bowen-Yacyshyn, M.B.; Jewell, L.; Tami, J.A.; Bennett, C.F.; Kisner, D.L.; Shanahan, W.R., Jr. A placebo-controlled trial of ICAM-1 antisense oligonucleotide in the treatment of Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 1998, 114, 1133–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Yacyshyn, B.R.; Chey, W.Y.; Goff, J.; Salzberg, B.; Baerg, R.; Buchman, A.L.; Tami, J.; Yu, R.; Gibiansky, E.; Shanahan, W.R. Double blind, placebo controlled trial of the remission inducing and steroid sparing properties of an ICAM-1 antisense oligodeoxynucleotide, alicaforsen (ISIS 2302), in active steroid dependent Crohn's disease. Gut 2002, 51, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Greuter, T.; Biedermann, L.; Rogler, G.; Sauter, B.; Seibold, F. Alicaforsen, an antisense inhibitor of ICAM-1, as treatment for chronic refractory pouchitis after proctocolectomy: A case series. United European Gastroenterol J 2016, 4, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Greuter, T.; Vavricka, S.R.; Biedermann, L.; Pilz, J.; Borovicka, J.; Seibold, F.; Sauter, B.; Rogler, G. Alicaforsen, an Antisense Inhibitor of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1, in the Treatment for Left-Sided Ulcerative Colitis and Ulcerative Proctitis. Dig Dis 2018, 36, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Monteleone, G.; Fantini, M.C.; Onali, S.; Zorzi, F.; Sancesario, G.; Bernardini, S.; Calabrese, E.; Viti, F.; Monteleone, I.; Biancone, L.; et al. Phase I clinical trial of Smad7 knockdown using antisense oligonucleotide in patients with active Crohn's disease. Mol Ther 2012, 20, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Monteleone, G.; Kumberova, A.; Croft, N.M.; McKenzie, C.; Steer, H.W.; MacDonald, T.T. Blocking Smad7 restores TGF-beta1 signaling in chronic inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Invest 2001, 108, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Monteleone, G.; Neurath, M.F.; Ardizzone, S.; Di Sabatino, A.; Fantini, M.C.; Castiglione, F.; Scribano, M.L.; Armuzzi, A.; Caprioli, F.; Sturniolo, G.C.; et al. Mongersen, an oral SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotide, and Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 2015, 372, 1104–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Suzuki, K.; Arumugam, S.; Yokoyama, J.; Kawauchi, Y.; Honda, Y.; Sato, H.; Aoyagi, Y.; Terai, S.; Okazaki, K.; Suzuki, Y.; et al. Pivotal Role of Carbohydrate Sulfotransferase 15 in Fibrosis and Mucosal Healing in Mouse Colitis. PLoS One 2016, 11, e0158967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Suzuki, K.; Yokoyama, J.; Kawauchi, Y.; Honda, Y.; Sato, H.; Aoyagi, Y.; Terai, S.; Okazaki, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Sameshima, Y.; et al. Phase 1 Clinical Study of siRNA Targeting Carbohydrate Sulphotransferase 15 in Crohn's Disease Patients with Active Mucosal Lesions. J Crohns Colitis 2017, 11, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Liu, H.; Yu, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wu, B.; Zheng, L.; Haruehanroengra, P.; Wang, R.; Li, S.; Lin, J.; et al. Crystal structure of an RNA-cleaving DNAzyme. Nat Commun 2017, 8, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Popp, V.; Gerlach, K.; Mott, S.; Turowska, A.; Garn, H.; Atreya, R.; Lehr, H.A.; Ho, I.C.; Renz, H.; Weigmann, B.; et al. Rectal Delivery of a DNAzyme That Specifically Blocks the Transcription Factor GATA3 and Reduces Colitis in Mice. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 176–192.e175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Murano, M.; Maemura, K.; Hirata, I.; Toshina, K.; Nishikawa, T.; Hamamoto, N.; Sasaki, S.; Saitoh, O.; Katsu, K. Therapeutic effect of intracolonically administered nuclear factor kappa B (p65) antisense oligonucleotide on mouse dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis. Clin Exp Immunol 2000, 120, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Neurath, M.F.; Fuss, I.; Schürmann, G.; Pettersson, S.; Arnold, K.; Müller-Lobeck, H.; Strober, W.; Herfarth, C.; Büschenfelde, K.H. Cytokine gene transcription by NF-kappa B family members in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998, 859, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Sands, B.E.; Feagan, B.G.; Sandborn, W.J.; Schreiber, S.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Frédéric Colombel, J.; Rossiter, G.; Usiskin, K.; Ather, S.; Zhan, X.; et al. Mongersen (GED-0301) for Active Crohn's Disease: Results of a Phase 3 Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2020, 115, 738–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. van Deventer, S.J.; Wedel, M.K.; Baker, B.F.; Xia, S.; Chuang, E.; Miner, P.B., Jr. A phase II dose ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of alicaforsen enema in subjects with acute exacerbation of mild to moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006, 23, 1415–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Song, L.; Chang, R.; Sun, X.; Lu, L.; Gao, H.; Lu, H.; Lin, R.; Xu, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhan, L. Macrophage-derived EDA-A2 inhibits intestinal stem cells by targeting miR-494/EDA2R/β-catenin signaling in mice. Commun Biol 2021, 4, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Zhang, S.; Dong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, W.; Wei, M.; Yuan, L.; Yang, G. Selective Encapsulation of Therapeutic mRNA in Engineered Extracellular Vesicles by DNA Aptamer. Nano Lett 2021, 21, 8563–8570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Fay, N.C.; Muthusamy, B.P.; Nyugen, L.P.; Desai, R.C.; Taverner, A.; MacKay, J.; Seung, M.; Hunter, T.; Liu, K.; Chandalia, A.; et al. A Novel Fusion of IL-10 Engineered to Traffic across Intestinal Epithelium to Treat Colitis. J Immunol 2020, 205, 3191–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Stephens, M.; Keane, K.; Roizes, S.; Liao, S.; Weid, P.V. Mincle-binding DNA aptamer demonstrates therapeutic potential in a model of inflammatory bowel disease. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2022, 28, 935–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Prochazka, P.; Hrabeta, J.; Vícha, A.; Eckschlager, T. Expulsion of amplified MYCN from homogenously staining chromosomal regions in neuroblastoma cell lines after cultivation with cisplatin, doxorubicin, hydroxyurea, and vincristine. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2010, 196, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Valent, A.; Bénard, J.; Clausse, B.; Barrois, M.; Valteau-Couanet, D.; Terrier-Lacombe, M.J.; Spengler, B.; Bernheim, A. In vivo elimination of acentric double minutes containing amplified MYCN from neuroblastoma tumor cells through the formation of micronuclei. Am J Pathol 2001, 158, 1579–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Von Hoff, D.D.; Waddelow, T.; Forseth, B.; Davidson, K.; Scott, J.; Wahl, G. Hydroxyurea accelerates loss of extrachromosomally amplified genes from tumor cells. Cancer Res 1991, 51, 6273–6279. [Google Scholar]
  217. Yu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Quan, C.; Ji, W.; Zhu, J.; Huang, Y.; Guan, R.; Sun, D.; Jin, Y.; Meng, X.; et al. Gemcitabine eliminates double minute chromosomes from human ovarian cancer cells. PLoS One 2013, 8, e71988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Raymond, E.; Faivre, S.; Weiss, G.; McGill, J.; Davidson, K.; Izbicka, E.; Kuhn, J.G.; Allred, C.; Clark, G.M.; Von Hoff, D.D. Effects of hydroxyurea on extrachromosomal DNA in patients with advanced ovarian carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2001, 7, 1171–1180. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  219. Sanchez, A.M.; Barrett, J.T.; Schoenlein, P.V. Fractionated ionizing radiation accelerates loss of amplified MDR1 genes harbored by extrachromosomal DNA in tumor cells. Cancer Res 1998, 58, 3845–3854. [Google Scholar]
  220. Schoenlein, P.V.; Barrett, J.T.; Kulharya, A.; Dohn, M.R.; Sanchez, A.; Hou, D.Y.; McCoy, J. Radiation therapy depletes extrachromosomally amplified drug resistance genes and oncogenes from tumor cells via micronuclear capture of episomes and double minute chromosomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003, 55, 1051–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Feng, W.; Arrey, G.; Zole, E.; Lv, W.; Liang, X.; Han, P.; Mohiyuddin, M.; Pilegaard, H.; Regenberg, B. Targeted removal of mitochondrial DNA from mouse and human extrachromosomal circular DNA with CRISPR-Cas9. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2022, 20, 3059–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Chen, D.; Luo, Y.; Cheng, G. Single cell and immunity: Better understanding immune cell heterogeneities with single cell sequencing. Clin Transl Med 2023, 13, e1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 77202 g001
Figure 1. From pathogenesis to molecular therapies for IBD. The normal intestinal epithelium is characterized by the production and release of low amounts of cfDNA, present both locally and at a distance. In IBD, the increased rates of cellular turnover and the inflammation lead to increased production and release of cfDNA, both in free-form and within microvesicles. dsDNA is usually disrupted by Trex1, but Trex1 loss or malfunction can lead to the activation of the cGAS surveillance present in the cytoplasm. Moreover, chromosome damage, due to the involvement of centromeres, can cause chromatids mis-segregation in the two daughter cells, leading to the formation of micronuclei. When the micronuclear envelope ruptures, the DNA is exposed to cGAS surveillance. When cGAS binds to free cytoplasmatic DNA, it synthesizes cGAMP, which activates STING on the endoplasmic reticulum surface. STING, in turn, through the transcription factors IRF3 and NF-kB induces the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. RU.521, ANP and Nrf2 inhibits the cGAS-STING pathway, thus reducing inflammation. P65 ASO and miR-494-3p inhibit NF-kB and the consequent production of inflammatory cytokines. Conversely, cfDNA can also active TLR9 resulting in an immunomodulatory effect, depending on the specific DNA sequence. The TLR9 agonists DIMS0150 and BL-7040 ameliorates intestinal inflammation by inducing regulatory T-cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines, and reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as il-17A and IL-17F. ISIS-2303 blocks leukocytes trafficking, by inhibiting the production of ICAM-1. Persistent inflammation and continued DNA damage may lead to the accumulation of DNA mutations and amplification of oncogenes on eccDNA, thereby causing the development of dysplasia, and eventually colorectal cancer. In this scenario the use of low doses of hydroxyurea or ionizing radiation could destroy those fragments of eccDNA. Finally, both orally and intravenously administrated nanovescicles can represent the optimal delivery system of several molecules towards sites of intestinal inflammation. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. From pathogenesis to molecular therapies for IBD. The normal intestinal epithelium is characterized by the production and release of low amounts of cfDNA, present both locally and at a distance. In IBD, the increased rates of cellular turnover and the inflammation lead to increased production and release of cfDNA, both in free-form and within microvesicles. dsDNA is usually disrupted by Trex1, but Trex1 loss or malfunction can lead to the activation of the cGAS surveillance present in the cytoplasm. Moreover, chromosome damage, due to the involvement of centromeres, can cause chromatids mis-segregation in the two daughter cells, leading to the formation of micronuclei. When the micronuclear envelope ruptures, the DNA is exposed to cGAS surveillance. When cGAS binds to free cytoplasmatic DNA, it synthesizes cGAMP, which activates STING on the endoplasmic reticulum surface. STING, in turn, through the transcription factors IRF3 and NF-kB induces the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. RU.521, ANP and Nrf2 inhibits the cGAS-STING pathway, thus reducing inflammation. P65 ASO and miR-494-3p inhibit NF-kB and the consequent production of inflammatory cytokines. Conversely, cfDNA can also active TLR9 resulting in an immunomodulatory effect, depending on the specific DNA sequence. The TLR9 agonists DIMS0150 and BL-7040 ameliorates intestinal inflammation by inducing regulatory T-cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines, and reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as il-17A and IL-17F. ISIS-2303 blocks leukocytes trafficking, by inhibiting the production of ICAM-1. Persistent inflammation and continued DNA damage may lead to the accumulation of DNA mutations and amplification of oncogenes on eccDNA, thereby causing the development of dysplasia, and eventually colorectal cancer. In this scenario the use of low doses of hydroxyurea or ionizing radiation could destroy those fragments of eccDNA. Finally, both orally and intravenously administrated nanovescicles can represent the optimal delivery system of several molecules towards sites of intestinal inflammation. Created with BioRender.com.
Preprints 77202 g001
Table 1. Oligonucleotide-based therapy in IBD.
Table 1. Oligonucleotide-based therapy in IBD.
Molecule name Compound Target Mechanism of action Disease Study design - References Outcomes Route of administration Developmental stage
Mongersen ASO SMAD7 Restoring TGF-β1 activity CD Randomized quadruple blind, clinical trial [208] Not superior to placebo Oral Phase III
Alicaforsen ASO ICAM-1 Leukocyte trafficking CD Randomized double blind clinical trial [NCT00048113] Ongoing Intravenous phase III
UC Double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial [209] Statistical benefit over placebo for prolonged reduction of DAI Enema Phase II
Pouchitis Double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial [NCT02525523] Ongoing Enema Phase III
STNM01 ds-RNA CHST15 Inhibition of collagen fibril formation CD Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial [203] Amelioration of SES-CD and fibrosis Intracolonic phase I
UC Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial Higher rates of mucosal healing and clinical remission in left-sided refractory colits Intracolonic Phase IIa
Hdg40/SB012 DNAzyme GATA3 Inhibition of Th2-driven response UC Double blind randomized clinical trial [NCT02129439] Clinical and endoscopic improvement of disease activity Intrarectal phase IIa
DIMS0150, Cobitolimod ss-DNA TLR9 Induction of anti-inflammatory cytokines UC Randomized quadruple blind placebo controlled clinical trial [NCT01493960] Higher clinical remission in moderate-to-severe UC Intracolonic phase III
BL-7040, Monarsen Synthetic oligonucleotide TLR9 Induction of anti-inflammatory cytokines UC Single group assignment, open label clinical trial [138] Higher clinical response and remission in moderate UC Oral phase II
P65 ASO ASO nF-kB Reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines UC murine models [206] Downregulation of NF-kB and proinflammatory cytokines Intrarectal Pre-clinical studies
miR-494-3p microRNA IKKβ/NF-κB, EDA2R/EDA-A2 inhibits M1 macrophage recruitment, suppresses colonic stemness and epithelial repair DSS induced colitis in mice murine models [210] Ameliorated severity of colonic colitis intraperitoneal injection Pre-clinical studies
interleukin-10 (IL-10) mRNA mRNA anti-inflammatory cytokine DSS induced colitis in mice murine models [211] Anti-inflammatory effect on intestinal mucosa Pre-clinical studies
AMT-101 Chx386–hIL-10 fusion protein IL-10 receptor exerting IL-10 anti-inflammatory activity DSS induced colitis in mice murine models [212] Efficient transcytosis towards intestinal lamina propria and activation of IL-10R Oral Pre-clinical studies
AptMincleDRBL Aptamer Mincle blocking Mincle (PRR) pathway DSS induced colitis in mice murine models [213] Reduction of disease activity intraperitoneal injection Pre-clinical studies
ASO antisense oligonucleotide, CD Crohn’s disease, UC ulcerative colitis, DSS dextran sodium sulfate, IL Inteleukin, CHST15 carbohydrate sulfotransferase 15, ds double-stranded, ICAM intercellular adhesion molecule, NF-kB nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, ss single-stranded, TGF transforming growth factor, mRNA Messenger ribonucleic acid, Th2 type 2 T helper, TLR Toll-like receptor, PRR pattern recognition receptors.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated