1. Introduction
Worldwide, breast cancer remains the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women [
1,
2]. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different histopathological and biological features [
3]. According to immunohistochemical markers that include the presence or absence of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), breast cancer can be classified into molecular subtypes. These subtypes are Luminal A (ER and PR positive, HER2 negative, low Ki67), Luminal B (ER and/or PR positive, HER2 positive or high Ki67), HER2 enriched (ER and PR negative, HER2 positive) and triple-negative (TNBC) (ER, PR, HER2 negative) [
4]. Each molecular subtype shows different responses to clinical therapy and requires different treatment strategies [
5]. In addition to molecular and histological subtypes, breast cancer is evaluated according to tumor grade and size, lymph node status, and metastasis [
6].
Recently, potential biomarkers related to breast cancer development and progression, such as tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), have been proposed [
7]. TIMPs regulate tissue extracellular matrix turnover, inhibit MMPs, induce apoptosis, inhibit tumor cell migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and mainly inhibit MMPs [
8]. TIMPs are 21 to 28 kDa proteins that bind to MMPs and reversibly block their activity. Four TIMPs (TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, TIMP-4) have been described, and they are present in the extracellular matrix (ECM) in soluble form, except TIMP-3, which is bound to the ECM [
9,
10]. The inhibitory function of TIMPs is related to the presence of a C-terminal and an N-terminal domain, each with three conserved disulfide bonds, where the N-terminal domain folds into itself and binds to the active site of MMPs to inhibit their activity [
10,
11,
12].
Structurally, TIMPs are similar and can selectively inhibit different MMPs; however, they do not do so with the same efficacy [
10]. TIMP-1 preferentially inhibits MMP-7, MMP-9, MMP-1 and MMP-3, whereas TIMP-2 more effectively inhibits MMP-2. TIMP-3 can inhibit MMP-2 and MMP-9, and also most ADAMs (disintegrin and metalloproteinase), whereas TIMP-4 inhibits the catalytic activity of MMP-14 and MMP-2 [
13]. Therefore, an imbalance between TIMPs and MMPs is an important factor for cancer development by affecting the integrity of the extracellular matrix [
14].
Bioinformatic analyses report that TIMP-2 is a potential prognostic factor in several cancer types because it participates in pathways associated with ECM regulators, ECM degradation, and ECM disassembly [
15]. Likewise, in another bioinformatics analysis, it was shown that TIMP-2 down-regulates several breast cancer subtypes; moreover, TIMP-2 expression was associated with overall survival with different clinical features; thus, TIMP-2 could serve as a potential target and prognostic biomarker in breast cancer [
16]. However, there is little information on the biological role of all TIMPs in breast cancer; here, we elucidate the relationship of TIMPs with breast cancer progression stages, probability of disease-free survival, interaction with target proteins, correlation of TIMPs with MMPs, correlation of immune cell infiltrates with TIMPs, and epigenetic factors regulating TIMPs expression. Here, we report that overexpression of TIMP-1 is associated with longer survival of patients, whereas low levels of TIMP-2, TIMP-3 and TIMP-4 are associated with shorter survival of breast cancer patients. Interestingly, TIMP-3 showed the highest interactions and regulation of cancer-related functions. The correlation between immune cell infiltrates and TIMP expression is of great importance as they provide information on breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis, progression, and response to treatment.
3. Results
3.1. Expression levels of TIMPs and correlation with progression stages of breast cancer patients
TIMPs possess several biological functions, such as regulating MMP activation, angiogenesis, cell growth, apoptosis, and metastasis [
8,
23]. For this reason, it is important to determine the expression levels of TIMPs in tumors and normal breast tissue and their relationship with cancer staging.
In the GEPIA database (
http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html), we compared the expression levels of TIMPs in tumors and normal breast tissue; 1085 breast cancer samples and 291 normal tissue samples were included. We observed that TIMP-1 expression is 8.9 of log2(TPM+1) in tumors compared to 7.9 of log2(TPM+1) in normal tissues. TIMP-2 expression levels were lower by one log2(TPM+1) compared to normal tissue, TIMP-3 expression levels are 1.3 log2(TPM+1) higher in normal tissue than in tumor tissue, and TIMP-4 is 4.8 of log2(TPM+1) higher in normal tissue compared tumor tissue (Fig 1a b). We observed that expression levels in breast cancer were significantly increased (p < 0.05) compared to normal tissue for TIMP-1. In contrast, the expression levels of TIMP-3 and TIMP-4 significantly increased in normal tissue compared to tumor tissue. TIMP-2 levels increased in normal tissue compared to tumor tissue, although the data were not statistically significant (
Figure 1a).
Breast cancer can progress rapidly from an early stage to an advanced stage; the earliest stage is stage 0 (carcinoma in situ) and ranges from stage I to stage IV; at the latter stage, the breast cancer has metastasized to other organs [
24]. The rapid progression of breast cancer makes early diagnosis and monitoring of cancer progression difficult [
25]. Therefore, we performed a correlation analysis in GEPIA of the expression levels of TIMPs and pathological stages of breast cancer. We observed that TIMP-4 expression differences were statistically significant p=0.0306 at stages I, II, III, IV, and V, indicating that TIMP-4 may be related to essential roles in the occurrence and development of breast cancer (
Figure 1c). In contrast, the differences in expression of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, and TIMP-3 were greater p=0.05, i.e., there is no variability in cancer stages. This indicates that further studies are required to determine whether there is a relationship between their expression and breast cancer development (
Figure 1c). These results suggest that TIMP-4 levels in patient biopsies could be considered a potential biomarker of breast cancer progression.
Figure 1.
TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 mRNA expression levels in breast cancer, normal breast tissue, and breast cancer stages according to TNM system. a) Comparison of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 expression levels in breast cancer and normal tissue data were significant in TIMP-1, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 (p-value <0.05). b) comparison of TIMPs expression in breast cancer with normal tissue. c) Correlations between TIMP1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3 and TIMP-4 expression and tumor stage in breast cancer patients. Data were generated in the GEPIA database; we used log2 (TPM+1) for the logarithmic scale. BRCA= Breast cancer.
Figure 1.
TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 mRNA expression levels in breast cancer, normal breast tissue, and breast cancer stages according to TNM system. a) Comparison of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 expression levels in breast cancer and normal tissue data were significant in TIMP-1, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 (p-value <0.05). b) comparison of TIMPs expression in breast cancer with normal tissue. c) Correlations between TIMP1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3 and TIMP-4 expression and tumor stage in breast cancer patients. Data were generated in the GEPIA database; we used log2 (TPM+1) for the logarithmic scale. BRCA= Breast cancer.
3.2. Survival analysis of TIMPs expression in breast cancer patients
The role of TIMPs in breast cancer is very controversial; there are reports describing that TIMPs may have both a protumor and antitumor effect. It has been suggested that elevated levels of TIMPs are associated with early relapse in breast cancer patients [
26]. Considering that we observed that TIMP-1 increases its expression in breast cancer, unlike TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4, whose expression decreases, we decided to perform an analysis in the Kaplan-Meier Plotter database (
https://kmplot.com/analysis/) (
Figure 2). We observed that high TIMP-1 mRNA levels negatively correlate with recurrence-free survival (RFS) of breast cancer patients. In contrast, patients with low TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 mRNA expression showed a positive correlation of RFS in breast cancer patients. TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 mRNA levels were not statistically significant (p<0.05).
Figure 2.
Expression levels of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, TIMP-4 and their correlation with survival in cancer patients. Lines in red represent high levels, and lines in black represent low levels of expression. The Y-axis represents the probability of survival, and the X-axis represents the follow-up time of the patients. A representative p-value is represented in each graph. The data were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier Plotter (
https://kmplot.com/analysis/).
Figure 2.
Expression levels of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, TIMP-4 and their correlation with survival in cancer patients. Lines in red represent high levels, and lines in black represent low levels of expression. The Y-axis represents the probability of survival, and the X-axis represents the follow-up time of the patients. A representative p-value is represented in each graph. The data were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier Plotter (
https://kmplot.com/analysis/).
3.3. Interaction of TIMPs with their target proteins and functions
Breast cancer is associated with molecular alterations in protein networks that interact to regulate mechanisms related to proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance [
27]. To understand the protein-protein interaction (PPI) mechanisms, we decided to perform an interaction and function analysis in the STRING (
https://string-db.org/) and the Metascape (
https://metascape.org/gp/index.html#/main/step1) database to explain the cooperative interaction in TIMPs: TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3 and TIMP-4 and for physical interactions with other proteins, as well as to explain the functions of TIMPs in breast cancer development (
Figure 3). The species set for the analysis was "Homo sapiens"; the other values were kept as default settings for the PPI analysis. The results in the PPI network showed 9 nodes, the number of edges was 27, the expected number of nodes was 5, and the average node degree was 6. The average local clustering coefficient was 0.659. The p-value of the PPI enrichment was 1.4e-11. Mutual interaction analysis between TIMPs showed that TIMP-1 interacts with TIMP-2 and TIMP-3. However, there is no interaction of TIMP-4 with the rest of the TIMPs (
Figure 3a). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis obtained from the STRING database (
Figure 3b) showed enrichment in 4 cancer-related functions, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, proteolysis in cancer, and global cancer processes, including tumor progression and maintenance. We also used the GeneMANIA database to analyze the functions and interaction of TIMPs with other target proteins essential in the maintenance and incision of the extracellular matrix. The results show that TIMPs interact together with MMP-16, MMP-9, MMP-8, MMP-3, MMP-14, MMP-2, MMP-1, RECK (reversion inducing cysteine-rich protein with kazal motifs), AGTR2 (angiotensin II receptor type 2), PCSK5 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 5), ADAM17 (Disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17), EFEMP1 (EGF-containing fibulin-like extracellular matrix protein 1), MXRA8 (Matrix remodeling-associated protein 8), CD63 (CD63 antigen), ESR1 (estrogen receptor 1), JUND (Transcription factor JunD), AP-1 transcription factor, C17orf58 (Chromosome 17 Open Reading Frame 58), STAT3 (Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), ETV4 ETS variant transcription factor 4 (
Figure 3c). Our results show that the interaction of TIMPs and their target proteins MMP-16, -14, -9, -8, -3, -2, and -1 are related to metabolic processes, collagen degradation, and metalloproteinase activity. Interestingly, MMP-1, -2, -3, -8, -9, and PCK5, through TIMPs, regulate the functions of extracellular matrix organization, regulation of metallopeptidase activity, membrane proteolysis proteins, peptidase inhibition activity and serine-type peptidase activity (
Figure 3c).
Figure 3.
Mutual protein-protein interaction and cooperation analysis of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4. a) Protein-protein interaction and cooperativity analysis of TIMPs (STRIG analysis). b) Enrichment of the KEGG pathway of TIMPs (STRING). The colors indicate the cellular functions in which each TIMP in panel a participates. c) Diagram of protein-protein interaction analysis of TIMPs and their related molecules (GeneMANIA) in maintaining the extracellular matrix. On the left side, colors represent the functions of TIMPs and their target proteins represented in each node, respectively. The brown nodes represent other unrelated functions in cancer.
Figure 3.
Mutual protein-protein interaction and cooperation analysis of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4. a) Protein-protein interaction and cooperativity analysis of TIMPs (STRIG analysis). b) Enrichment of the KEGG pathway of TIMPs (STRING). The colors indicate the cellular functions in which each TIMP in panel a participates. c) Diagram of protein-protein interaction analysis of TIMPs and their related molecules (GeneMANIA) in maintaining the extracellular matrix. On the left side, colors represent the functions of TIMPs and their target proteins represented in each node, respectively. The brown nodes represent other unrelated functions in cancer.
We observed that TIMP-1 interacts physically through prediction and co-expression data with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-9, and MMP-14. Interestingly, in prediction and co-expression data, we observed that TIMP-2 shows physical interaction with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-14, and MMP-16. We also observed that there is co-expression of TIMP-2 with TIMP-1. We observed that TIMP-3 interacts physically and in co-expression with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, and MMP-14. Finally, we observed that TIMP-4 interacts directly with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-14 and MMP-16. In addition, we observed that there is co-expression of TIMP-4 and TIMP-3. We observed the interaction of TIMPs and target proteins such as MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-14, and MMP-16. The low expression of TIMPs in breast cancer could be related to the progression of cancer to more aggressive stages as a consequence of the non-inhibition of the function of MMPs, including MMP-1, -2, -3, -8, -9, -14, and -16. Furthermore, we propose that there may be a cooperative effect between TIMP-1, TIMP-2, and TIMP-3 as an opportunity to treat breast cancer.
3.4. Global interactome of TIMPs in breast cancer
To determine the cooperation of TIMPs with their target proteins, the four interactomes were analyzed in Cytoscape to generate the global interactome (
Figure 4). We observed that SLURP1 (secreted LY6/PLAUR domain containing 1) interacts with TIMP-2 and TIMP-3. MMP-3 and IGFBP1 (insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1) interact with TIMP-1 and TIMP-3. LY86 (lymphocyte antigen 86) interacts with TIMP-1 and TIMP-2. In contrast, MMP-2 interacts with TIMP-1, TIMP-2 and TIMP-4 and MMP-14 interacts with TIMP-1, TIMP-2 and TIMP3. While the four TIMPs, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4, interact with Pcsk5 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 5).
Figure 4.
Global interactome of TIMPs. TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 are shown in the center of each interactome. The proteins that have interaction with each of the TIMPs are observed. The lines represent the interaction of the protein with each TIMPs. The interactome was created in Cytoscape software.
Figure 4.
Global interactome of TIMPs. TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 are shown in the center of each interactome. The proteins that have interaction with each of the TIMPs are observed. The lines represent the interaction of the protein with each TIMPs. The interactome was created in Cytoscape software.
Interaction analyses revealed that TIMP-1 interacts with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-9 and MMP-14. TIMP-2 interacts with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-14 and MMP-16. TIMP-3 interacts with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9 and MMP-14. Finally, we observed that TIMP-4 interacts with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-14 and MMP-16.
To identify the cellular functions where TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 participate, a Metascape pathway function enrichment analysis (
https://metascape.org/gp/index.html#/main/step1) from proteins that physically interact with TIMP-1, 2, 3, and 4. The functions regulating the different TIMPs are shown in
Figure 5. For each TIMP, the -log10(p) function enrichment data greater than 4 were as follows. TIMP-1 shows higher function enrichment in the GO:0022617: extracellular matrix disassembly and GO:0001501: skeletal system development pathways. TIMP-2 shows higher enrichment of functions in the pathway of WP129: Matrix metalloproteinases, hsa05205: Proteoglycans in cancer, GO:0001704: formation of the primary germ layer, GO:0097094: craniofacial suture morphogenesis. TIMP-3 has further enrichment in GO:0048598: embryonic morphogenesis, M5885: NABA matrisome associated pathways, WP3869: Cannabinoid receptor signaling, R-HSA-5358351: Signaling by Hedgehog, GO:0090287: regulation of cellular response to growth factor stimulus, R-HSA-166786: Creation of C4 and C2 activators, R-HSA-166786: Creation of C4 and C2 activators, GO:0051702: the biological process involved in interaction with symbiont, GO:1901699: cellular response to nitrogen compound, R-HSA-1280215: Cytokine Signaling in Immune system, GO:0048568: embryonic organ development, GO:0070374: positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade, GO:0070613: regulation of protein processing, M153: PID P75 NTR PATHWAY, GO:0006897: endocytosis, GO:0006897: endocytosis and GO:0071396: cellular response to lipid. In contrast, TIMP-4 shows greater enrichment with functions in the pathways of M5885: Naba matrisome associated, GO:0061564: axon development, and GO:0030155: regulation of cell adhesion.
Figure 5.
Function enrichment analysis of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4. GO and function terms are plotted. The colors indicate the functions that show the highest enrichment for the values of –log10(p).
Figure 5.
Function enrichment analysis of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4. GO and function terms are plotted. The colors indicate the functions that show the highest enrichment for the values of –log10(p).
3.5. Correlation analysis of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3 and TIMP-4 with MMPs
TIMPs have been associated with breast cancer invasion and metastasis due to their ability to bind to MMPs and prevent their activation process [
10]. We performed a correlation analysis to evaluate the effect of TIMPs on the expression levels of MMPs in breast cancer (
Table 1). In breast cancer patients, TIMP-1 has a weak positive correlation with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-9, and MMP-14; the results were not statistically significant for MMP-1. In breast cancer samples, TMP-2 shows a weak positive correlation with MMP-1, MMP-8, and MMP-9, a moderate positive correlation with MMP-3 and MMP-16, and a strong positive correlation with MMP-2 and MMP-14, all data were statistically significant except for MMP-2. On the other hand, in breast cancer samples, TIMP-3 showed a weak positive correlation with MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-9 and a moderate positive correlation with MMP-2 and MMP-14; all data were statistically significant. TIMP-4 showed a weak positive correlation with MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-14, and MMP-16 and a weak negative correlation with MMP-1; all values were statistically significant. Correlation analyses of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 with MMPs in breast cancer patient samples show that as TIMP levels increase, MMP levels also increase, but not in the case of TIMP-4 and MMP-1.
In normal tissue, we observed that TIMP-1 has a weak positive correlation with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-8, MMP-9, and MMP-14, while a moderate positive correlation was observed with MMP-3; all data were significant except for MMP-8. TIMP-2 shows strong positive correlation with MMP2, weak positive correlation with MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-14 and MMP-16. We observed a weak negative correlation between TIMP-2 and MMP-1, but they were not significant as with MMP-3. TIMP-3 shows a weak negative correlation with MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-9, and MMP-14; only a weak positive correlation was observed with MMP-2. The data were statistically significant, except for MMP-9 and MMP-14. Finally, we observed that TIMP-4 has a weak negative correlation with MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-14, and MMP-16; only a weak positive correlation was observed with MMP-2. All data were significant except for MMP-14. In normal breast tissue, we observed a weak negative correlation of TIMPs with MMPs; the data indicate that when TIMP levels are low, MMP levels increase.
Table 1.
Correlation analysis of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 with MMPs in the GEPIA database.
Table 1.
Correlation analysis of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 with MMPs in the GEPIA database.
TIMPs |
MMPs |
Tissue |
Tumor |
Normal |
R |
P |
R |
P |
TIMP-1 |
MMP-1 |
0.023 |
0.46 |
0.39 |
*** |
MMP-2 |
0.21 |
*** |
0.38 |
*** |
MMP-3 |
0.14 |
*** |
0.6 |
*** |
MMP-8 |
0.062 |
* |
0.16 |
0.085 |
MMP-9 |
0.17 |
*** |
0.45 |
*** |
MMP-14 |
0.14 |
*** |
0.47 |
*** |
TIMP-2 |
MMP-1 |
0.32 |
*** |
-0.0038 |
0.97 |
MMP-2 |
0.87 |
0 |
0.76 |
*** |
MMP-3 |
0.54 |
*** |
0.016 |
0.87 |
MMP-8 |
0.4 |
*** |
0.3 |
*** |
MMP-9 |
0.25 |
*** |
0.19 |
* |
MMP-14 |
0.85 |
*** |
0.24 |
** |
MMP-16 |
0.63 |
*** |
0.19 |
* |
TIMP-3 |
MMP-1 |
0.15 |
*** |
-0.24 |
* |
MMP-2 |
0.58 |
*** |
0.43 |
*** |
MMP-3 |
0.29 |
*** |
-0.29 |
** |
MMP-9 |
0.11 |
*** |
-0.044 |
0.64 |
MMP-14 |
0.55 |
*** |
-0.14 |
0.14 |
TIMP-4 |
MMP-1 |
-0.22 |
*** |
-0.26 |
** |
MMP-2 |
0.22 |
*** |
0.3 |
** |
MMP-3 |
0.19 |
*** |
-0.31 |
*** |
MMP-14 |
0.072 |
* |
-0.17 |
0.072 |
MMP-16 |
0.25 |
*** |
-0.38 |
*** |
3.6. Immune cell infiltrates by expression of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3 and TIMP-4 in breast cancer patients and subtypes
Immune cells are essential components of normal breast tissue and act in innate and adaptive immunity. During breast cancer progression, there is an increase in immune cell infiltrates in the tumor parenchyma and stroma, such as granzyme B+ CD4+ and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells [
28]. These infiltrating lymphocytes could function as prognostic indicators for response to chemotherapy and survival of breast cancer patients [
29].
Given the importance of immune cell infiltrates in breast cancer development, we decided to perform an analysis in the TIMER2.0 database to analyze the correlation between infiltrating B cells, CD8+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells (DC) in breast cancer and the expression of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 (
Table 2). We analyzed 1100 breast cancer samples, type Basal 191, HER-2 82, BRCA-LumA 568, and BRCA-LumB 219. Correlation data were adjusted with Rho value and purity adjustment using Spearman correlation. TIMP1 has a positive correlation with dendritic cell infiltrates and a negative correlation with B-cell infiltrates. The data were not significant in TIMP-1 expression with CD8+ T cell infiltrates, CD4+ T cell infiltrates, macrophages, and neutrophils. TIMP-2 expression correlated positively with CD8+ T cell infiltrates, Neutrophils, and DCs. We observed a negative correlation between TIMP-2 expression and B-cell infiltrates; no statistically significant data were observed for CD4+ T-cell and macrophage infiltrates. TIMP-3 expression levels show a positive correlation with CD8+ T-cell infiltrates and a negative correlation with B-cell infiltrates. We did not observe a significant correlation with CD4+ T-cell, macrophage, neutrophil, and DC infiltrates. Finally, TIMP-4 expression levels show a positive correlation with CD4+ T cell infiltrates and a negative correlation with B cell infiltrates, macrophages, and neutrophils but no significant correlation with CD8+ T cell infiltrates and DCs.
Table 2.
Correlation between TIMPs and immune cell infiltration in breast cancer patients.
Table 2.
Correlation between TIMPs and immune cell infiltration in breast cancer patients.
TIMP |
B cells |
CD8+ T cells |
CD4+ T cells |
Macrophages |
Neutrophils |
DC |
TIMP-1 |
-0.136 |
0.043 |
-0.045 |
0.063 |
-0.029 |
0.149 |
TIMP-2 |
-0.237 |
0.406 |
-0.004 |
0.087 |
0.317 |
0.279 |
TIMP-3 |
-0.135 |
0.311 |
0.087 |
-0.048 |
0.054 |
0.05 |
TIMP-4 |
-0.11 |
0.072 |
0.143 |
-0.108 |
-0.139 |
0.03 |
4. Discussion
Worldwide, breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women [
1]. Despite advances in breast cancer therapy, it is crucial to identify new biomarkers related to the subtype, grade, and size of breast tumors. TIMPs could be considered therapeutic targets involved with breast cancer progression and development. An imbalance between the expression of TIMPs and MMPs has been described as an important factor in cancer development by affecting the integrity of the extracellular matrix [
14], inducing apoptosis, and promoting breast cancer migration, invasion, and angiogenesis [
8].
TIMP-1 is a multifunctional protein that regulates the activation of different metalloproteinases, including MMPs and ADAMs. It also plays a central role in carcinogenesis, controlling the development and progression of breast cancer [
30,
31]. Our results showed an increase in TIMP-1 mRNA expression in breast cancer relative to normal tissue and an increase in the overall survival of patients. Interestingly, TIMP-1 presented the highest physical interaction and positively correlated with proteins involved in extracellular matrix disassembly, such as MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-9, and MMP-14, regulating their activity. In addition, TIMP-1 is found to positively regulate the expression of skeletal system proteins and proteins that regulate signaling pathways that promote breast cancer progression. In this context, previous studies have reported that TIMP-1 regulates EMT [
32], in MCF10A mammary epithelial cells through Twist regulation, which suggests TIMP-1 is upregulated in breast cancer, increasing survival in breast cancer patients [
33]. However, it has been reported that high serum and tissue TIMP-1 levels in breast cancer patients are positively associated with lymph node metastasis, lower overall, and relapse-free survival [
34]. In addition, high levels of TIMP-1 are associated with an increased risk of relapse in patients with primary breast carcinoma [
35]. After a 3-year follow-up of breast cancer patients, high levels of TIMP-1 and MMP-9 are significantly associated with bone metastasis [
36]. High levels of TIMP-1 in breast cancer have been reported to promote growth and inhibit apoptosis through activation of FAK, PI3K, Akt, and Bcl-2 signaling [
37,
38]. In addition, high levels of TIMP-1 in tumor tissue and serum of breast cancer patients are associated with a low response to chemotherapy and endocrine therapy [
39,
40]. TIMP-1 also induces the expression of transcription factors that promote EMT, such as SLUG, TWIST, ZEB1, and ZEB2, thereby inhibiting the expression of epithelial markers and promoting the expression of mesenchymal markers [
32]. A previous report showed no association between TIMP-1 polymorphism and breast cancer; however, patients with C/C genotypes report elevated TIMP-1 levels, suggesting that the C allele may influence the level of TIMP-1 expression in serum [
41]. All these data demonstrate that TIMP-1 expression is directly related to markers of tumor progression in breast cancer.
Regarding TIMP-2 participates in the remodeling of the extracellular matrix and can regulate the proliferation, invasion, and chemoresistance of tumor cells [
42,
43]. Our study found that the mRNA expression level of TIMP-2 was higher in normal tissue to breast cancer, whereas low TIMP-2 levels are directly related to lower overall survival. The primary function of TIMP-2 is to regulate the activation of MMPs, and we found that it interacts directly with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-14, and MMP-16. Previous reports show that nude mice transfected with TIMP-2 decreased tumor growth and invasion of mammary cancer cells [
44]. Peney et al. report that TIMP-2 inhibits TNBC growth and metastasis in a murine model through modulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by decreased expression of SNAIL, SLUG, ZEB1, and vimentin, as well as inhibition of PI3K and p27 [
45]. However, Ree et al. report that TIMP-2 overexpression correlates with breast cancer progression; they found that high TIMP-2 mRNA levels promote lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients [
46].
Furthermore, high protein levels TIMP-2 in breast cancer tissues correlate with lower overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients [
47]. Interestingly, this dual effect of TIMP-2 is regulated at different stages of carcinogenesis, and the effect varies according to the tumor microenvironment; therefore, it is suggested that TIMP-2, TIMP-4, MMP-14 and MMP-2 levels should be determined together for prognostic evaluation [
48]. In addition, TIMP-2 is a determinant in regulating MMP-2 activation, where TIMP-2 binds to proMMP-2 and forms a complex with MMP-14, which cleaves MMP-2, thus initiating its activation process [
49]. These findings suggest that TIMP-2 may have a dual role in mammary carcinogenesis, promoting or inhibiting tumor progression in breast cancer.
TIMP-3 has been described to have anticancer effects, induce apoptosis, and inhibit angiogenesis and metastasis [
50,
51]. Interestingly, it has been described that it may be a biomarker and is the only TIMP that has been proposed as a therapeutic target in cancer [
51,
52,
53]. On the other hand, plasma from patients with oral head and neck squamous cell carcinoma has been found to have decreased TIMP3 mRNA levels compared to healthy patients [
53]. It has also been reported that overexpression of TIMP-3 inhibits in vitro invasion and promotes apoptosis of HeLa cervical cancer cells and HT1080 fibrosarcoma [
54]. We found that TIMP-3 interacts physically and in co-expression with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, and MMP-14. Our analysis also showed that TIMP-3 regulates more functions and the highest number of protein interactions concerning the other TIMPs. Previous reports describe that the decrease in TIMP-3 levels is due to hypermethylation of the
TIMP3 gene promoter and transcriptional repression, preventing TIMP-3 inhibits the activity of MMPs and consequently avoiding a malignant and invasive phenotype of cancer cells [
55,
56]. Bian, J., et al. in 1996 reported that overexpression of TIMP-3 in colon carcinoma DLD-1 cells inhibited cell growth and in nude mice inhibited tumor-forming capacity [
57]. In another study, they report that decreased TIMP-3 expression increases interleukin-6 (IL-6) production, which promotes cell growth and invasion, decreased overall survival, and relapse-free survival periods in HPV-infected non-small cell lung cancer patients [
58].
On the other hand, in an in vivo study using mice, they reported that silencing of TIMP-3 resulted in the suppression of mammary tumors and suggested that it was under the regulation of the
Tnf or
Tnfr1 genes [
59]. It has also been reported that breast cancer patients with high TIMP-3 mRNA levels are associated with a better response to endocrine therapy with tamoxifen [
60]. Interestingly, in biopsies of patients with head and neck carcinoma, overexpression of TIMP-3 mRNA is associated with poorer survival compared to those with low mRNA levels [
61]. Interestingly, results found in other types of cancer show that TIMP-3 overexpression is associated with shorter survival. In contrast, in our study, we report that lower TIMP-3 expression is associated with decreased survival in breast cancer patients.
TIMP-4 is the least studied member of the TIMPs; however, elevated levels of TIMP-4 have been found in breast, ovarian, cervical, prostate, brain, colon, endometrial, and renal papillary tumors. In contrast, down-regulation was observed in pancreatic and renal clear cell tumors [
62]. However, our results showed that TIMP-4 is downregulated in breast cancer patients relative to healthy patients, and this was associated with shorter overall survival. TIMP-4 showed indirect interaction with MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-14, and MMP-16 and had the lowest number of protein interactions for the other TIMPs. Background reports that in nude mice with cervical cancer cell xenografts, overexpression of TIMP-4 induces tumor formation. In vitro, assays promote the enrichment of the cancer stem cell population through NFκB signaling [
63]. On the other hand, they report that in patients with estrogen receptor-negative infiltrating ductal breast cancer, overexpression of TIMP-4 is associated with malignant progression and correlates with a low probability of long-term disease-free survival (more than 3 years) [
64]. TIMP-4 also inhibits apoptosis of MDA-MB-435 breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo employing a nude mouse model by regulating the expression of TIMP-4, which upregulates the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL [
65].
Recently, research on the immune microenvironment of breast cancer has increased because immune infiltration is highly correlated with the diagnosis, progression, prognosis, and response to the treatment of breast cancer patients [
66].
It has been shown that there is an increase in tumor-infiltrating DCs in both primary and metastatic lesions. It is associated with increased overall survival and decreased recurrence rate in breast cancer patients and was positively correlated with CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte infiltration [
67].
For this reason, we determined the relationship between TIMPs expression and immune infiltration of breast cancer. We found that TIMP-1 expression correlated positively with dendritic cell infiltrates and negatively correlated with B-cell infiltrates. In other cancer types, a positive relationship between TIMP-1 and dendritic cells has been reported in glioblastoma, adenocarcinoma of the stomach, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck [
68,
69]. On the other hand, our results show that TIMP-2 expression correlates positively with the infiltration of CD8+ T cells, Neutrophils, and DCs. Interestingly, in stomach adenocarcinoma and colon adenocarcinoma, we also report that TIMP-2 was positively correlated with CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells [
70]. We also found that TIMP-3 expression levels positively correlate with CD8+ T-cell infiltrates. While in glioblastoma patients, TIMP-3 expression was associated with B cells, CD4+ T cells, macrophages, and neutrophils [
68]. Finally, TIMP-4 expression levels positively correlate with cellular infiltrates of CD4+ T cells. However, in patients with glioblastoma, TIMP-4 expression was positively associated with B-cell, CD8+ T-cell, and macrophage infiltration [
68]. These findings and previous reports describe the importance of immune system infiltration in prognosis and response to treatment in breast cancer.