Preprint
Review

Energy Grid Optimization Using Deep Machine Learning: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities

Altmetrics

Downloads

568

Views

115

Comments

0

Submitted:

26 June 2023

Posted:

27 June 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The optimization of the energy grid is a critical task for ensuring a sustainable and efficient energy future. Deep machine learning techniques have the potential to improve energy grid optimization by predicting energy demands and supplies, optimizing energy production and distribution, and detecting and preventing fraud. However, there are also several challenges associated with the use of deep machine learning in energy grid optimization. These include the lack of standardized datasets and data quality issues, interpretability and explain-ability of machine learning models, ethical and social implications of using machine learning, and integration with existing energy infrastructure and regulatory frameworks. Having a clear understanding that continued research and developments in deep learning applications to energy field are crucial for achieving a sustainable and efficient energy future. This paper therefore reviewed existing literature for challenges and opportunities associated with deep machine learning in energy grid optimization; and highlights the importance of continued research and development in the field. The paper found out that opportunities for future research in deep machine learning for energy grid optimization include advancements in machine learning algorithms and techniques, development of new datasets and data collection methods, integration of machine learning with other emerging technologies. It also established needs for collaborative research and public-private partnerships.
Keywords: 
Subject: Engineering  -   Other

1. Introduction

The energy grid is a complex and interconnected system that plays a vital role in the provision of reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy to communities and industries worldwide [1]. With the increasing demand for energy, the need for optimizing the energy grid has become more important than ever. Energy grid optimization involves the use of advanced technologies and techniques to ensure the efficient and effective generation, transmission, and distribution of energy while minimizing the cost and environmental impact of energy production and consumption [2].
Deep machine learning is one of the most promising technologies for energy grid optimization. Machine learning algorithms can analyze large amounts of data from various sources, including smart meters, weather sensors, and energy markets, to predict energy demand, optimize energy generation and distribution, and control energy consumption in real-time. By leveraging machine learning, energy grid operators can optimize the energy supply and demand while reducing the cost and environmental impact of energy production and consumption [3].
One of the most significant advantages of using machine learning for energy grid optimization is the ability to analyze data from various sources, including smart meters, weather sensors, and energy markets [4]. This enables energy grid operators to get a better understanding of energy usage patterns and predict future energy demand with greater accuracy [5]. By predicting energy demand, energy grid operators can optimize the energy supply to meet the demand while reducing the cost and environmental impact of energy production and consumption [6].
Moreover, machine learning algorithms can be used to optimize energy generation and distribution by predicting the optimal output of renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, and managing energy storage systems more effectively [7]. This not only increases the efficiency of energy production and distribution but also helps in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, which is critical for mitigating the effects of climate change [8].
Machine learning can also be used for demand response, where energy consumption is adjusted to match the available supply [9]. This can be achieved by using machine learning algorithms to predict the behavior of energy consumers and adjust the energy supply to match their requirements [10]. Demand response can help to reduce energy costs and improve the stability of the energy grid.
The purpose of this review paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the challenges and opportunities of using deep machine learning for energy grid optimization. The paper aims to identify the challenges and opportunities in this field and to provide insights into the future direction of research in this area.
The main focus of the paper will be on the challenges and opportunities of using deep machine learning for energy grid optimization. This will involve a detailed discussion of the various techniques, algorithms, and models used in deep machine learning for energy grid optimization. The paper will also provide an overview of the various data sources used in deep machine learning for energy grid optimization, such as smart meters, weather sensors, and energy markets.
In addition, the paper will discuss the challenges faced in implementing deep machine learning techniques for energy grid optimization, including issues related to data quality, data privacy, and interpretability. These challenges will also cut across energy grid systems like the dynamic and complex nature of the energy grid, limited availability of real-time data, uncertainty in renewable energy generation, variability in energy demand patterns, operational constraints and regulations, and the integration of distributed energy resources. The paper will also examine the ethical and social implications of using deep machine learning for energy grid optimization.
Finally, the paper will conclude with a discussion of the future direction of research in this field. This will include identifying areas of research that require further investigation, such as the development of more efficient and accurate deep learning algorithms, and the need for more extensive and diverse data sets. The paper will also identify the potential impact of deep machine learning on energy grid optimization and the broader implications for the energy industry and society as a whole.

1.1. Importance of Energy Grid Optimization

The energy grid is a critical infrastructure that underpins the functioning of modern society. It ensures the reliable and continuous supply of electricity to homes, businesses, and industries, enabling economic growth, technological advancements, and improved quality of life. However, the traditional energy grid faces numerous challenges and inefficiencies that call for optimization. One of the primary reasons for energy grid optimization is the increasing demand for energy [11]. With the global population growing and industrialization expanding, the demand for electricity continues to rise. To meet this increasing demand, the energy grid must be optimized to ensure sufficient energy generation, transmission, and distribution capacity. By optimizing the energy grid, we can mitigate the risk of blackouts or brownouts, which can disrupt essential services, manufacturing processes, and daily activities [12].
Energy grid optimization also plays a crucial role in cost reduction. Inefficient energy production, transmission, and distribution processes lead to wastage and unnecessary expenses. By implementing optimization strategies, such as improving load balancing and minimizing transmission losses, energy grid operators can reduce costs associated with energy production and delivery [13]. This, in turn, can lead to more affordable energy prices for consumers and businesses. Furthermore, energy grid optimization is closely linked to environmental sustainability. The traditional energy grid heavily relies on fossil fuels, which contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. By optimizing the energy grid, we can integrate more renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and hydropower, into the system. Deep machine learning techniques can help optimize the integration and management of renewable energy sources, enabling a smoother transition to a cleaner and more sustainable energy mix [14]. This not only reduces carbon emissions but also promotes energy independence and resilience against the volatility of fossil fuel prices.
Another important aspect of energy grid optimization is improving grid stability. The energy grid is susceptible to disturbances, such as power outages caused by equipment failures, natural disasters, or cyber-attacks. By employing advanced optimization techniques, such as real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and control systems, the energy grid can enhance its stability and response to such disturbances [15]. This ensures a more reliable energy supply and minimizes disruptions, benefiting both consumers and businesses.

1.2. Background Overview

Energy grid optimization is the process of optimizing the generation, transmission, and distribution of energy to meet the growing demand for energy while minimizing the cost, environmental impact, and potential risks associated with energy production and consumption [16]. Energy grid optimization has become increasingly important due to the need for more sustainable and efficient energy systems.
Machine learning has a critical role to play in energy grid optimization. Machine learning algorithms can be used to analyze large-scale data from various sources, including smart meters, weather sensors, and energy markets, to predict energy demand, optimize energy generation and distribution, and control energy consumption in real-time. By leveraging machine learning, energy grid operators can optimize the energy supply and demand while reducing the cost and environmental impact of energy production and consumption [17].
Figure 1. Graphical representation of an Optimised Energy Market Operation and Design. Source: Ahmad, T., Zhang, D., Huang, C., Zhang, H., Dai, N., Song, Y., & Chen, H. (2021). Artificial intelligence in sustainable energy industry: Status Quo, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125834.
Figure 1. Graphical representation of an Optimised Energy Market Operation and Design. Source: Ahmad, T., Zhang, D., Huang, C., Zhang, H., Dai, N., Song, Y., & Chen, H. (2021). Artificial intelligence in sustainable energy industry: Status Quo, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125834.
Preprints 77678 g001
The history of machine learning applications in energy grid optimization dates back several decades. In the early days, machine learning techniques such as linear regression, decision trees, and artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used to predict energy demand and forecast energy prices [18]. However, these early applications had limited success due to the lack of data and computational resources. ANNs are capable of learning complex patterns and relationships in energy data and are well-suited for time-series analysis [19]. They were used to predict energy demand at different time scales, from hourly to annual, and their accuracy was found to be superior to that of traditional statistical methods.
In recent years, there has been a surge in the use of more advanced machine learning techniques for energy grid optimization. For example, deep learning algorithms such as convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks have been used to predict energy demand with greater accuracy and granularity [20]. These techniques can also be used to optimize energy generation and distribution in real-time, taking into account various factors such as weather conditions, energy demand, and energy market prices [21]. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have also been used for energy grid optimization. These networks can capture temporal dependencies in time series data, making them well-suited for applications such as demand response, where energy consumption needs to be adjusted in real-time to balance the grid [22]. RNNs have been used to develop predictive models for energy consumption, energy prices, and renewable energy generation.
Other machine learning techniques, such as reinforcement learning (RL) and evolutionary algorithms, have been used to optimize energy consumption in buildings and homes [23]. These techniques can learn from the energy consumption patterns of occupants and adjust the energy consumption of appliances and HVAC systems to minimize energy costs and improve comfort. Reinforcement learning (RL) is a type of machine learning technique that involves an agent interacting with an environment and learning from feedback in the form of rewards or punishments. In the context of energy consumption optimization, RL has been used to learn optimal control policies for various energy-consuming systems, such as HVAC systems and lighting [24]. RL agents can learn to adjust the energy consumption of these systems in response to various environmental factors, such as occupancy patterns and outdoor temperature, to minimize energy costs while maintaining comfort levels. Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are another class of machine learning techniques that have been used for energy consumption optimization [25]. EAs are inspired by the process of natural selection and involve the use of genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, and other techniques to evolve optimal solutions to energy optimization problems. EAs have been used to optimize the scheduling of appliances and other energy-consuming devices in homes and buildings, with the goal of minimizing energy costs and improving energy efficiency [26].

2. Deep Machine Learning Techniques for Energy Grid Optimization

Deep machine learning techniques, such as neural networks, decision trees, clustering, and reinforcement learning, have been widely used for energy grid optimization in recent years [27]. These techniques can analyze large volumes of data from various sources, including smart meters, weather sensors, and energy markets, to optimize energy generation and distribution, predict energy demand, and control energy consumption in real-time [28]. In this section, we will discuss some of the most commonly used techniques and their respective applications. Neural networks are a fundamental deep learning technique that has been extensively applied in energy grid optimization. They are designed to simulate the behavior of the human brain by using interconnected layers of artificial neurons. Neural networks excel at learning complex patterns and relationships within the data, making them well suited for tasks such as energy demand prediction, load forecasting, and energy price modeling [29]. By training neural networks on historical data, they can capture the underlying patterns and make accurate predictions for future energy demand and pricing, enabling efficient energy resource allocation and pricing strategies [30].

2.1. Supervised Learning Techniques

Supervised learning is a type of machine learning in which the algorithm learns to map input data to a corresponding output label based on a labeled dataset. Supervised learning techniques have been used for various applications in energy grid optimization such as demand response, load forecasting, and fault detection [31]. For instance, supervised learning techniques such as linear regression, support vector regression, and neural networks have been used for short-term load forecasting [32]. Demand response refers to the adjustment of energy consumption in response to changes in the availability of price of electricity. By utilizing supervised learning algorithms such as linear regression, support vector regression, and neural networks, energy grid operators can predict the behavior of energy consumers and adjust the energy supply accordingly [33]. These models can analyze historical data related to energy consumption, weather conditions, time of day, and other factors to forecast the expected energy demand. By optimizing the energy supply to match the predicted demand, grid operators can effectively manage and balance the grid, reduce peak demand, and mitigate the need for additional generation capacity [34].
Load forecasting is another significant application of supervised learning in energy grid optimization. Accurate load forecasting plays a crucial role in efficient energy generation, transmission, and distribution. Supervised learning techniques such as linear regression, support vector regression, and neural networks have been utilized to forecast short-term load patterns based on historical data [35]. These models consider various factors, including historical load data, weather conditions, seasonal trends, and special events, to predict future load demand with high accuracy. By leveraging load forecasting, energy grid operators can optimize energy generation and distribution, plan maintenance activities, and improve overall system reliability and stability [36]. Supervised learning techniques also contribute to fault detection and diagnosis in energy grid systems. By training models on labeled data that represent normal and abnormal operating conditions, supervised learning algorithms can identify deviations from expected behavior and detect potential faults or anomalies in the energy grid. These models can analyze real-time sensor data, historical patterns, and system parameters to detect abnormal system behavior, locate faults, and trigger appropriate actions for grid maintenance and restoration. Early fault detection allows for timely intervention, reducing downtime, improving grid resilience, and enhancing overall system performance. The application of supervised learning techniques in energy grid optimization is not limited to the examples mentioned above. These techniques have been utilized for a wide range of tasks, including energy price modeling, renewable energy forecasting, power quality monitoring, and optimal control of grid-connected devices. The ability of supervised learning algorithms to learn from labeled data and make accurate predictions or classifications has paved the way for significant advancements in energy grid optimization [37]. In the subsequent sections of this review paper, we will explore additional deep machine learning techniques beyond supervised learning, as well as discuss the challenges and opportunities associated with the application of deep machine learning in energy grid optimization.

2.2. Unsupervised Learning Techniques

Unsupervised learning is a type of machine learning in which the algorithm learns to find patterns and structure in unlabeled data. Unsupervised learning techniques such as clustering and anomaly detection have been used for energy grid optimization [38]. Clustering techniques have been used for identifying groups of similar consumers based on their energy consumption patterns [39]. Anomaly detection techniques have been used for fault detection and identification. Clustering techniques have been widely used to identify groups or clusters of similar energy consumers based on their energy consumption patterns. By applying clustering algorithms to unlabeled data, energy grid operators can gain insights into different consumer segments with similar energy usage behaviors [40]. This information can be leveraged to develop tailored strategies for energy management, demand response programs, and targeted marketing campaigns. Clustering techniques enable grid operators to understand the diverse energy consumption patterns across different consumer groups, allowing for more accurate predictions, load balancing, and the identification of potential energy-saving opportunities.
Anomaly detection techniques, another key application of unsupervised learning in energy grid optimization, aim to identify abnormal behavior or outliers in the energy grid system [41]. By analyzing the unlabeled data and detecting deviations from normal patterns, anomaly detection algorithms can provide early warnings for potential faults or abnormalities in the grid. This enables proactive maintenance, reducing the risk of system failures and enhancing grid reliability. Anomaly detection techniques can analyze data from various sources, including sensor readings, network performance data, and historical system behavior, to identify unusual patterns or outliers that may indicate equipment malfunctions, cybersecurity breaches, or other anomalies that require further investigation. The combination of clustering and anomaly detection techniques can provide a comprehensive understanding of the energy grid system. By identifying similar consumer groups through clustering and detecting anomalies through anomaly detection, energy grid operators can gain valuable insights into the system's behavior, optimize energy generation and distribution strategies, and ensure grid stability and efficiency.
In addition to clustering and anomaly detection, other unsupervised learning techniques, such as dimensionality reduction, association rule mining, and generative modeling, have also been explored for energy grid optimization [42]. Dimensionality reduction techniques, like principal component analysis (PCA) or t-SNE, can help to reduce the complexity of data and extract essential features, facilitating visualization and understanding of the energy grid system [43]. Association rule mining techniques can identify correlations and dependencies among different variables, enabling the discovery of valuable insights for energy optimization strategies [44]. Generative modeling techniques, such as variational autoencoders (VAEs) or generative adversarial networks (GANs), can generate synthetic data that closely resemble the characteristics of the real energy grid system, facilitating data augmentation and addressing the challenges associated with limited datasets [45]. The utilization of unsupervised learning techniques in energy grid optimization holds great potential for uncovering hidden patterns, identifying anomalies, and improving system efficiency. However, there are challenges and considerations, such as the choice of appropriate algorithms, feature selection, and interpretation of results, that need to be addressed when applying unsupervised learning in real-world energy grid scenarios [46]. These challenges will be further discussed in the subsequent sections of this review paper.

2.3. Reinforcement Learning

Reinforcement learning is a type of machine learning in which the algorithm learns to take actions to maximize a cumulative reward signal. Reinforcement learning techniques have been used for energy consumption optimization in buildings and homes [47]. For example, reinforcement learning algorithms have been used to learn the optimal control strategies for HVAC systems and appliances to minimize energy costs and improve comfort [48]. Reinforcement learning algorithms offer a dynamic and adaptive approach to learning optimal control strategies for building systems, such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, as well as individual appliances [49]. By using reinforcement learning, agents can learn how to control these systems based on real-time data, environmental conditions, and energy pricing signals [50]. The objective is to minimize energy consumption while maintaining comfort levels or other specified performance criteria. The agent learns from trial and error, exploring different actions and observing the resulting rewards or penalties. Over time, the agent learns to take actions that lead to higher rewards, optimizing the energy consumption patterns and improving the overall energy efficiency of the building.
Reinforcement learning has the advantage of adaptability and flexibility in dynamic environments. It can handle uncertainties and changing conditions by continuously learning and updating its decision-making policies. This is particularly valuable in the energy grid context, where factors such as weather conditions, energy demand, and pricing can fluctuate. Moreover, reinforcement learning algorithms can capture complex relationships between system parameters, actions, and energy consumption [51]. They can learn non-linear control policies that may be difficult to model analytically. By leveraging deep reinforcement learning techniques, such as deep Q-networks (DQN) or policy gradients, agents can learn high-dimensional representations of the environment and make more informed decisions based on the available data [52]. However, applying reinforcement learning in the energy grid optimization domain comes with its own set of challenges. One major challenge is the need for extensive computational resources and time to train reinforcement learning agents. The energy grid systems are large-scale and complex, and the training process can be computationally intensive [53]. Additionally, real-world energy grid optimization often involves multiple agents and interacting subsystems, which can further complicate the learning process [54]. Another challenge is the limited availability of real-time data for training reinforcement learning agents. Real-time data, such as energy prices, weather conditions, and building occupancy, are crucial for accurate decision-making. However, obtaining real-time data and integrating it into the learning process can be challenging due to data acquisition, privacy concerns, and synchronization issues.
Furthermore, the interpretability of reinforcement learning models can be a concern in the energy grid domain. As reinforcement learning agents learn complex policies based on reward signals, it can be challenging to understand and explain the underlying decision-making process. Explainability and transparency are essential for gaining trust and acceptance in critical infrastructure systems like the energy grid. Despite these challenges, reinforcement learning techniques hold significant potential for optimizing energy consumption in buildings and homes [55]. They provide a flexible and adaptive approach to energy management, allowing for personalized and context-aware control strategies. As research in reinforcement learning continues to advance, addressing these challenges and exploring new techniques will pave the way for more effective and widespread application of reinforcement learning in energy grid optimization.

2.4. Deep Neural Networks (DNNs)

Deep neural networks are a type of machine learning algorithm that can learn complex and hierarchical representations of data. Convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks have been used for various applications in energy grid optimization, such as demand response, load forecasting, and fault detection [56]. For instance, recurrent neural networks have been used for long-term load forecasting, which involves predicting energy demand for several days or weeks in advance [57]. These applications leverage the ability of DNNs to capture intricate patterns and dependencies within the data, enabling more accurate predictions and better decision-making. Demand response is a crucial aspect of energy grid optimization, aiming to balance energy supply and demand by adjusting consumers' energy consumption in response to changes in availability or pricing [58]. DNNs have been utilized to predict the behavior of energy consumers and optimize the energy supply accordingly [59]. By analyzing historical energy consumption data, weather conditions, and other relevant factors, DNNs can learn the complex relationships between inputs and energy demand patterns. This enables energy grid operators to make informed decisions and implement demand response strategies effectively. Load forecasting is another important application where DNNs have shown promising results [60]. Accurate load forecasting is essential for efficient energy grid management and planning. DNNs, particularly recurrent neural networks (RNNs), have been employed for long-term load forecasting, which involves predicting energy demand over extended time horizons, ranging from several days to weeks [61]. RNNs excel in capturing temporal dependencies and can effectively model sequential data, making them suitable for this task. By considering historical load patterns, weather data, seasonal trends, and other relevant factors, DNNs can provide accurate load forecasts, enabling better resource allocation and optimization of energy generation and distribution [62].
Furthermore, DNNs have been applied to fault detection in the energy grid. Faults and anomalies in the grid can lead to disruptions, inefficiencies, and potential risks. By training DNNs on historical data that includes information about past faults and normal operation, these models can learn to identify abnormal patterns or deviations from expected behavior [63]. This allows for early detection of faults and timely interventions to prevent system failures, minimize downtime, and enhance overall grid reliability. However, employing DNNs for energy grid optimization does come with certain challenges. One primary challenge is the need for large amounts of labeled training data, which may be limited in the energy domain. Acquiring labeled data can be costly and time-consuming, especially for fault detection where labeled fault data is often scarce [64]. Techniques such as transfer learning and data augmentation can be employed to overcome data limitations and improve model performance. Another challenge is the interpretability of DNNs. As deep neural networks are composed of multiple layers and thousands or millions of parameters, understanding the decision-making process and providing explanations for their outputs can be challenging. Interpretable AI methods and model visualization techniques are areas of ongoing research to address this concern and ensure transparency and trust in the decision-making process of DNN-based energy grid optimization models.

2.5. Decision Trees

Decision trees are a type of machine learning algorithm that can learn decision rules from labeled data. Decision trees have been used for various applications in energy grid optimization, such as fault detection and identification [65]. For example, decision trees have been used for identifying fault locations in power systems based on sensor data [66]. Fault detection and identification are critical tasks in maintaining the reliability and stability of the energy grid. The timely detection of faults and accurate identification of their locations can help operators take necessary actions to minimize disruptions and prevent further damage [67]. Decision trees offer an intuitive and interpretable approach to address these challenges. By training decision tree models on labeled sensor data from the energy grid, the algorithm can learn to make decisions based on various features and conditions [68]. Each node in the decision tree represents a decision or a test based on a specific feature, while each branch represents an outcome or a subsequent decision based on the test result. The leaves of the tree represent the final predictions or classifications.
In the case of fault detection and identification, decision trees can be trained using historical data that includes information about normal operation as well as different types of faults in energy grid systems [69]. The decision tree algorithm learns to discern patterns and relationships between sensor readings and fault conditions. Once trained, the decision tree can process real-time sensor data and follow the decision rules to detect and identify potential faults. For example, decision trees have been used to identify fault locations in power systems based on sensor data. By considering features such as voltage levels, current flows, and other relevant parameters, decision trees can analyze the data and determine the most likely location of a fault in the grid [70]. This information can then be used by grid operators to take appropriate actions, such as isolating the faulty section and restoring power to the rest of the system.
One advantage of decision trees is their interpretability. Decision trees provide transparent decision rules that can be easily understood and interpreted by humans. This interpretability is particularly valuable in the energy grid domain, where operators need to comprehend the reasoning behind the system's decisions [71]. The transparency of decision trees allows operators to gain insights into the factors contributing to faults and aids in diagnosing and addressing grid issues effectively. However, decision trees also have limitations. They can be prone to overfitting, especially when dealing with complex datasets. Overfitting occurs when a decision tree model becomes too specific to the training data and fails to generalize well to unseen data. Techniques such as pruning and ensemble methods like random forests can help mitigate this issue by enhancing the model's generalization capabilities.

2.6. Other Machine Learning Algorithms

Other machine learning algorithms such as random forests, support vector machines, and Bayesian networks have also been used for energy grid optimization. Random forests have been used for fault detection and classification [72]. Support vector machines have been used for load forecasting [73]. Bayesian networks have been used for probabilistic load forecasting [74].

2.6.1. Random Forests

Random forests are an ensemble learning method that constructs multiple decision trees and aggregates their predictions to make a final prediction. This method has been used for fault detection and classification in energy systems. Faults can cause significant damage to energy systems and can result in power outages and downtime. Random forests can help to detect and classify faults by analyzing data from sensors and other sources [75]. The algorithm can learn patterns in the data and identify anomalous behavior that may indicate a fault. Fault detection is crucial for maintaining the reliability and stability of the energy grid. Random forests can be employed to analyze sensor data and identify abnormal patterns that may indicate the presence of faults [76]. By training on labeled data that includes both normal and faulty conditions, the random forest algorithm can learn to recognize fault signatures and make accurate predictions. Moreover, random forests can provide insights into the importance of different features in fault detection. By examining the feature importance measures derived from the ensemble of decision trees, operators can identify the most influential factors contributing to faults [77]. This information can guide maintenance and optimization efforts to prevent future faults and enhance the overall resilience of the energy grid.

2.6.2. Support Vector Machines (SVMs)

Support vector machines is a supervised learning method that can be used for classification and regression tasks. SVMs have been applied for load forecasting in energy systems. Load forecasting is the process of predicting the amount of energy that will be consumed in a given period. Accurate load forecasting is crucial for energy grid operators to plan and optimize energy supply. SVMs can learn from historical data and predict future load patterns with high accuracy.By utilizing historical load data along with relevant features such as weather conditions, day of the week, and holidays, SVMs can learn patterns and relationships to predict future load demand [78]. The trained SVM model can then be used to forecast load demand, enabling grid operators to optimize energy generation and ensure adequate supply to meet the demand [79]. SVMs offer the advantage of handling high-dimensional feature spaces and can capture nonlinear relationships between the input features and load demand. They have been successfully applied to short-term load forecasting tasks, where accurate predictions for the upcoming hours or days are crucial for grid operation and energy scheduling.

2.6.3. Bayesian Networks

Bayesian networks are probabilistic graphical models that can be used for probabilistic load forecasting in energy systems [80]. Probabilistic load forecasting involves predicting not only the expected load but also the probability distribution of the load [81]. Bayesian networks can learn from historical data and estimate the probability distribution of future load patterns. This information can be used by energy grid operators to make more informed decisions and reduce the risk of energy shortages or surpluses. Probabilistic load forecasting considers the uncertainty associated with load demand predictions [82]. Bayesian networks can capture the probabilistic dependencies between different variables and estimate the probability distribution of load demand [83]. By incorporating historical load data, weather information, and other relevant factors, Bayesian networks can provide probabilistic load forecasts with associated confidence intervals [84]. The advantage of using Bayesian networks is their ability to handle uncertainty and provide probabilistic forecasts [85]. This allows grid operators to make more informed decisions by considering the range of possible load demand scenarios and their associated probabilities. It facilitates better resource planning, risk management, and decision-making under uncertain conditions.
The specific algorithm used will depend on the specific use case and the characteristics of the data available.

3. Challenges and Limitations of Deep Machine Learning for Energy Grid Optimization

Despite the many benefits of machine learning for energy grid optimization, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed. One major challenge is the lack of standardized datasets for energy grid optimization [86]. Data quality and availability are critical factors for the success of machine learning algorithms, and the lack of standardized datasets can limit the development and evaluation of machine learning models. Machine learning algorithms rely on large and diverse datasets to learn patterns and make accurate predictions. However, in the energy sector, data quality and availability are often limited, and there is a lack of standardized datasets that can be used for developing and evaluating machine learning models [87]. One reason for the lack of standardized datasets is the diversity of energy systems and infrastructures across different regions and countries [88]. Each system has its own unique characteristics, making it difficult to develop a universal dataset that can be used for energy grid optimization [89]. Additionally, the data collected from energy systems is often fragmented and heterogeneous, which makes it challenging to integrate data from different sources into a single dataset [90]. Another challenge related to data is the issue of data privacy and security. Energy data contains sensitive information about individuals, businesses, and critical infrastructure [91]. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the data used for machine learning is anonymized and secure to protect the privacy of individuals and prevent cyberattacks [92]. To address these challenges, researchers and energy companies need to work together to develop standardized datasets that can be used for machine learning applications. This requires collaboration and coordination across different stakeholders in the energy sector, including regulators, utilities, and technology providers. Additionally, data privacy and security measures need to be implemented to ensure that the data used for machine learning is protected.
Another challenge is the need for explainable and interpretable machine learning models. Energy grid operators need to understand the underlying mechanisms and reasoning of machine learning models to trust and adopt them [93]. The lack of transparency in machine learning models can limit their adoption in energy grid optimization. Machine learning models, especially deep learning models, can be highly complex and difficult to interpret, making it challenging for energy grid operators to understand the underlying mechanisms and reasoning behind the models' decisions [94]. This lack of transparency can make it difficult for operators to trust and adopt machine learning models. To address this challenge, researchers have developed various techniques for explaining and interpreting machine learning models. One approach is to use feature importance techniques to identify the most important features that contribute to the model's predictions [95]. Another approach is to use visualization techniques to help operators understand the model's internal workings and decision-making process. However, these approaches have their limitations. For example, feature importance techniques can be sensitive to the specific dataset and may not always provide a comprehensive understanding of the model's reasoning [96]. Visualization techniques may also be limited by the complexity of the model and the amount of data being analyzed. Therefore, the development of more interpretable and explainable machine learning models remains an active area of research in energy grid optimization. Such models can help energy grid operators better understand the underlying mechanisms and reasoning of the models and thus improve their trust and adoption in energy grid optimization.
Figure 2. Graphical representation of a 2 conventional, current, and future electricity grid. Source: Thirunavukkarasu, G. S., Seyedmahmoudian, M., Jamei, E., Horan, B., Mekhilef, S., & Stojcevski, A. (2022). Role of optimization techniques in microgrid energy management systems—A review. Energy Strategy Reviews, 43, 100899.
Figure 2. Graphical representation of a 2 conventional, current, and future electricity grid. Source: Thirunavukkarasu, G. S., Seyedmahmoudian, M., Jamei, E., Horan, B., Mekhilef, S., & Stojcevski, A. (2022). Role of optimization techniques in microgrid energy management systems—A review. Energy Strategy Reviews, 43, 100899.
Preprints 77678 g002
It is also of great importance to note that energy grid systems optimization face numerous challenges that go beyond data-related issues. This section will also be exploring some key challenges specific to energy grid systems and their implications for optimizing strategies. Some of the challenges that will be explored are: the dynamic and complex nature of the energy grid, limited availability of real-time data, uncertainty in renewable energy resources, variability in energy demand patterns, operational constraints and regulations, and the integration of distributed energy resources [97].

3.1. Lack of Standardized Datasets and Data Quality Issues

In energy grid optimization, standardized datasets that accurately represent the energy consumption patterns, weather conditions, and energy market prices are essential for effective machine learning modeling [98]. However, creating such datasets can be challenging due to the complexity and diversity of the energy grid system. Data quality issues can also pose a challenge for deep machine learning in energy grid optimization. For example, data collected from sensors may contain noise or missing values, which can affect the accuracy and reliability of machine learning models [99]. Additionally, data privacy concerns can limit the availability of data for training machine learning models. The lack of data can also lead to overfitting, where machine learning models become too specialized in the available data and fail to generalize well to new data. Addressing these challenges requires collaboration between energy grid operators, data providers, and machine learning experts to develop standardized datasets and improve data quality. Data cleaning and preprocessing techniques can also be used to handle missing or noisy data. Moreover, novel data acquisition techniques such as crowdsourcing or simulation models can be used to supplement existing datasets.

3.2. Interpretability and Explainability of Machine Learning Models

Interpretability and explainability of machine learning models have been a topic of great interest and concern in recent years. While deep machine learning techniques have shown remarkable success in various domains, they often work as black boxes that make it difficult for users to understand how decisions are made. This is particularly problematic in energy grid optimization, where operators need to understand the underlying mechanisms and reasoning of machine learning models to trust and adopt them. There are several approaches to improving the interpretability and explainability of machine learning models. One approach is to use simpler, more interpretable models such as decision trees or linear regression models [100]. These models can provide more insight into the decision-making process and allow for easier interpretation of results. However, the trade-off is that these models may sacrifice some predictive accuracy compared to more complex models such as deep neural networks. Another approach is to use model-agnostic methods such as LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations) or SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations), which can be applied to any type of model to provide local or global explanations for individual predictions [101]. These methods can help to identify important features that contribute to the model's decision-making process and provide insights into how the model works.

3.3. Ethical and Social Implications of Using Machine Learning in Energy Grid Optimization

The use of machine learning in energy grid optimization can have implications on social justice and equity. For example, if machine learning algorithms are used to set prices for electricity, there is a risk that low-income households may be disproportionately affected. Similarly, if machine learning algorithms are used to determine which areas receive investment for energy infrastructure, there is a risk that some areas may be left behind [102]. It is important to consider the potential ethical and social implications of machine learning in energy grid optimization and take steps to address them. This may include ensuring that the design and implementation of machine learning models are transparent, accountable, and fair. It may also include engaging with stakeholders and affected communities to ensure that their perspectives and concerns are taken into account.

3.4. Integration with Existing Energy Infrastructure and Regulatory Frameworks

The integration of deep machine learning techniques for energy grid optimization with existing energy infrastructure and regulatory frameworks can be challenging due to several reasons. Firstly, the energy grid is a complex system that involves a large number of interconnected components such as power plants, transmission lines, and distribution networks. These components operate under various conditions, and their behavior is affected by a range of factors, including weather, demand, and supply. Therefore, developing machine learning models that can effectively capture and analyze such complex and dynamic systems requires significant expertise and resources. Secondly, energy grid optimization involves multiple stakeholders, each with their own goals and priorities. For instance, energy providers may prioritize cost reduction, while regulators may prioritize environmental sustainability, and consumers may prioritize comfort and convenience. Therefore, machine learning models need to be designed to align with the goals and priorities of all stakeholders. Thirdly, energy grid optimization is subject to various regulations and standards. These regulations and standards are designed to ensure safety, reliability, and efficiency in energy production and distribution. Machine learning models need to comply with these regulations and standards to be adopted by the energy industry. Finally, the integration of machine learning models with existing energy infrastructure requires careful planning and implementation [103]. Machine learning models need to be integrated with existing systems and processes to ensure that they can be effectively deployed and managed. Moreover, the integration process needs to be carefully designed to avoid any disruptions or unintended consequences.

3.5. Dynamic and Complex Nature of the Energy Grid

The energy grid is a highly intricate and interconnected system with multiple variables, including various energy sources, transmission networks, distribution networks, consumer behavior, and external factors such as weather conditions and market dynamics. This complexity introduces several challenges when applying deep machine learning techniques for optimization purposes.
Here are some ways in which the dynamic and complex nature of the energy grid poses challenges: (i) High dimensionality: The energy grid involves a vast number of variables and interconnected components, leading to high-dimensional data. Deep machine learning models typically require large amounts of training data to effectively learn and capture complex patterns. However, the high dimensionality of the energy grid data increases the computational complexity and the need for extensive and representative training datasets. (ii) Non-linear relationships: The relationships between different elements of the energy grid are often non-linear and can exhibit complex dependencies. Deep machine learning models, such as neural networks, are well-suited for capturing non-linear relationships [104]. However, effectively modeling and understanding the intricate non-linear interactions between energy generation, transmission, distribution, and consumption requires careful design and training of deep learning architectures. (iii) Real-time updates: The energy grid operates in real-time, where changes in energy demand, supply, and grid conditions occur continuously. Deep machine learning models need to adapt and update their predictions and optimization strategies in real-time to reflect the evolving dynamics of the grid. Handling real-time updates in deep learning models requires efficient algorithms, data streaming techniques, and fast computational infrastructure to ensure timely decision-making and optimization. (iv) Uncertainty and variability: The energy grid is subject to uncertainties and variabilities, such as fluctuating renewable energy generation, varying consumer behavior, and unpredictable events like equipment failures or extreme weather conditions. Deep machine learning models need to account for these uncertainties and variabilities to provide robust and reliable optimization solutions. Incorporating uncertainty quantification techniques, probabilistic modeling, and ensemble methods can help address the challenges posed by uncertainties in the energy grid. (v) Scalability and computational requirements: Deep machine learning models can be computationally intensive, requiring significant computational resources and time for training and inference. Scaling up deep learning algorithms to handle the size and complexity of the energy grid can be challenging. Efficient algorithms, distributed computing frameworks, and hardware acceleration techniques need to be employed to ensure scalability and enable real-time optimization in large-scale energy grid systems.
In addressing the challenges associated with the dynamic and complex nature of the energy grid requires a combination of advanced deep learning techniques, domain-specific expertise, and collaboration between researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers. It involves developing specialized deep learning architectures, incorporating domain knowledge into model design, and integrating real-time data streams and advanced optimization algorithms to enhance the performance and effectiveness of energy grid optimization using deep machine learning.

3.6. Limited Availability of Real-time Data

Real-time data is crucial for accurate modeling, forecasting, and decision-making in energy grid operations. However, obtaining and accessing real-time data can be challenging due to several factors, including communication delays, technical limitations, and data collection and transmission issues.
The challenges posed by limited availability of real-time data include: (i) Inaccurate demand forecasting: Real-time data is essential for predicting energy demand accurately. Without timely and up-to-date information, deep machine learning models may struggle to capture sudden changes in energy consumption patterns, leading to suboptimal demand forecasting. Inaccurate demand forecasts can result in imbalances between energy supply and demand, leading to increased costs, inefficiencies, and potential disruptions in the grid. (ii) Reduced situational awareness: Real-time data provides operators with valuable insights into the current state of the energy grid. It enables them to monitor grid conditions, detect anomalies, and respond swiftly to potential disruptions or failures. However, limited availability of real-time data reduces situational awareness, making it challenging to identify and address issues in a timely manner. This can result in delays in detecting and resolving grid-related problems, leading to potential inefficiencies and grid instability. (iii) Impaired load management: Real-time data is crucial for effective load management and demand response initiatives. Deep machine learning models can leverage real-time data to optimize energy supply and demand, balance loads, and adjust energy consumption patterns based on grid conditions. However, the limited availability of real-time data hampers the ability to make accurate and timely decisions for load management. This can lead to challenges in balancing energy supply and demand, particularly during peak periods, which may result in increased costs and grid stress. (iv) Suboptimal decision-making: Deep machine learning models rely on current and accurate data to make informed decisions and optimize energy grid operations. The lack of real-time data restricts the ability to capture the dynamic nature of the energy grid and may result in suboptimal decision-making. This can lead to inefficiencies in energy generation, transmission, and distribution, impacting the overall performance and cost-effectiveness of the grid.
To overcome these challenges, efforts should be made to improve the availability and accessibility of real-time data in energy grid operations. This may involve the deployment of advanced data collection systems, enhanced communication infrastructure, and collaboration between stakeholders to facilitate data sharing. Additionally, alternative strategies and methodologies should be explored to mitigate the impact of limited real-time data on deep machine learning models, such as integrating historical data, implementing predictive modeling techniques, and incorporating advanced algorithms for handling missing or delayed data.

3.7. Uncertainty in Renewable Energy Generation

Renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, are highly dependent on weather conditions and can exhibit variable and intermittent generation patterns. This uncertainty introduces complexities and difficulties when applying deep machine learning techniques for energy grid optimization.
Here are some ways in which uncertainty in renewable energy generation poses challenges: (i) Prediction accuracy: Deep machine learning models rely on accurate and reliable data for training and prediction. However, predicting the generation output of renewable energy sources can be challenging due to the variability and uncertainty associated with weather conditions. Inaccurate predictions can lead to suboptimal decisions and inefficient grid operations. Developing robust deep learning models that can effectively handle and account for the uncertainties in renewable energy generation is crucial for accurate optimization. (ii) Integration challenges: Integrating renewable energy sources into the energy grid requires careful management to ensure grid stability and reliable power supply. The variability and uncertainty in renewable energy generation can create challenges in balancing supply and demand, as well as maintaining grid frequency and voltage stability. Deep machine learning models need to incorporate this uncertainty into optimization strategies to effectively balance the intermittency of renewable energy sources with other energy generation and demand elements. (iii) Planning and investment decisions: Energy grid optimization involves long-term planning and investment decisions to meet future energy demand and ensure the cost-effective integration of renewable energy sources. However, uncertainty in renewable energy generation introduces challenges in accurately estimating the potential capacity and output of renewable energy installations. Deep machine learning models can assist in optimizing investment decisions by considering uncertainty and variability in renewable energy generation scenarios, helping to determine the optimal capacity and configuration of renewable energy installations. (iv) Flexibility and adaptability: The dynamic nature of renewable energy generation requires flexibility and adaptability in energy grid operations. Deep machine learning models need to adapt quickly to changing conditions and make real-time adjustments to optimize energy flow and utilization. Uncertainties in renewable energy generation can disrupt the optimization process, necessitating the development of adaptive deep learning algorithms that can adjust optimization strategies based on real-time data and changing generation patterns. (v) Ancillary services and grid stability: Renewable energy sources may not provide the same level of ancillary services, such as frequency regulation and voltage support, as conventional power plants. Uncertainties in renewable energy generation can impact the availability and reliability of these ancillary services, leading to challenges in maintaining grid stability. Deep machine learning models need to consider the impact of renewable energy uncertainty on grid stability and incorporate mechanisms to ensure the provision of necessary ancillary services.
Addressing the challenges associated with uncertainty in renewable energy generation requires advancements in deep learning techniques, integration of weather forecasting data, and the incorporation of uncertainty quantification methods into optimization models. Additionally, close collaboration between energy grid operators, renewable energy providers, and researchers is essential to develop robust and adaptive deep machine learning approaches that can effectively handle the uncertainty in renewable energy generation and support optimized energy grid operations.

3.8. Variability in Energy Demand Patterns

Energy demand is influenced by various factors such as time of day, weather conditions, seasonality, economic activities, and consumer behavior. This variability introduces complexities and uncertainties that need to be addressed when applying deep machine learning techniques for energy grid optimization.
Variability in energy demand patterns poses challenges in several ways: (i) Prediction accuracy: Deep machine learning models rely on accurate demand forecasting for effective energy grid optimization. However, the variability in energy demand patterns makes it challenging to predict future demand accurately. Sudden changes in demand, peak demand periods, and unexpected variations can lead to inaccuracies in predictions. Developing robust deep learning models that can capture and adapt to the variability in energy demand patterns is crucial for accurate optimization. (ii) Load balancing and grid stability: Energy grid optimization aims to balance the supply and demand of electricity to ensure grid stability and reliable power delivery. Variability in energy demand patterns can pose challenges in balancing supply and demand in real-time. Rapid changes in demand, especially during peak periods, can strain the grid and lead to voltage fluctuations, frequency deviations, and potential instability. Deep machine learning models need to account for these variations and adapt optimization strategies to ensure load balancing and grid stability. (iii) Demand response management: Demand response is an important strategy for optimizing energy grids, where energy consumption is adjusted to match the available supply. However, the variability in energy demand patterns can make it challenging to predict and influence consumer behavior effectively. Deep machine learning models can help in understanding and predicting consumer demand patterns, but the variability in demand adds complexity to demand response management. The models need to consider and accommodate the dynamic nature of demand patterns to optimize demand response strategies. (iv) Resource allocation and grid planning: Energy grid optimization involves efficient resource allocation and grid planning to meet energy demand while minimizing costs and environmental impact. The variability in energy demand patterns can influence the optimal allocation of energy resources, such as power generation and storage capacities. Deep machine learning models need to incorporate the variability in demand patterns to optimize resource allocation and grid planning strategies effectively. (v) Real-time decision-making: Energy grid optimization often requires real-time decision-making to respond to changing demand conditions and ensure efficient grid operations. The variability in energy demand patterns necessitates timely and accurate adjustments to optimize energy flow and utilization. Deep machine learning models need to be capable of processing and analyzing real-time data to make informed decisions and adapt optimization strategies based on changing demand patterns.
To address the challenges associated with variability in energy demand patterns requires the development of advanced deep learning techniques, integration of diverse data sources, and incorporation of demand forecasting models with high accuracy. Additionally, collaboration between energy grid operators, demand response providers, and researchers is crucial to developing adaptive deep machine learning approaches that can effectively handle the variability in energy demand patterns and support optimized energy grid operations.

3.9. Operational Constraints and Regulations

The energy grid operates within a complex regulatory framework that includes technical, economic, and environmental constraints. These constraints and regulations can impact the implementation and effectiveness of deep machine learning techniques in optimizing the energy grid.
Operational constraints and regulations present challenges in various ways: (i) Technical limitations: Deep machine learning models require access to relevant and high-quality data for training and optimization. However, operational constraints such as limited availability of data or data incompatibility across different grid components can hinder the development and deployment of effective models. Additionally, technical constraints related to grid infrastructure, communication systems, and computational resources can impact the scalability and performance of deep learning algorithms in real-world energy grid operations. (ii) Compliance and regulatory requirements: Energy grid operations are subject to various regulations and compliance standards aimed at ensuring safety, reliability, and environmental sustainability. These regulations govern aspects such as grid stability, power quality, renewable energy integration, emissions control, and cybersecurity. Deep machine learning models need to comply with these regulatory requirements, which can pose challenges in terms of model interpretability, transparency, and adherence to specific guidelines or standards. (iii) Grid constraints and limitations: The energy grid has physical limitations and constraints that must be considered in optimization processes. These constraints may include transmission and distribution capacity, voltage and frequency limits, equipment limitations, and network topology. Deep machine learning models need to account for these operational constraints to avoid violating system limits and ensure the feasibility and reliability of optimization solutions. (iv) Operational complexities: Energy grid operations involve numerous stakeholders, including power generators, transmission system operators, distribution system operators, and energy consumers. Coordinating and optimizing the activities of these diverse entities can be challenging due to varying objectives, contractual agreements, and operational procedures. Deep machine learning models need to consider these operational complexities and incorporate coordination mechanisms to enable effective collaboration among stakeholders for grid optimization. (v) Interconnection of distributed energy resources: The integration of distributed energy resources (DERs) such as solar panels, wind turbines, and energy storage systems presents both opportunities and challenges for energy grid optimization. Deep machine learning models need to account for the dynamic behavior and intermittent nature of DERs while ensuring their optimal utilization and integration into the grid. Compliance with regulations related to DER interconnection, grid codes, and net metering can further complicate the optimization process.
Addressing the challenges associated with operational constraints and regulations requires a multidisciplinary approach that combines deep machine learning expertise with domain knowledge in energy grid operations, policy-making, and regulatory frameworks. Collaborations between researchers, grid operators, regulatory bodies, and technology providers are essential for developing solutions that not only optimize the energy grid but also comply with operational constraints and regulatory requirements. Moreover, advancements in explainable AI and interpretable deep learning methods can enhance transparency and facilitate the alignment of deep machine learning models with regulatory guidelines and constraints.

3.10. Integration of Distributed Energy Resources

Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) include decentralized power generation sources such as solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, wind turbines, and energy storage devices, which are typically connected to the distribution grid. While DERs can contribute to renewable energy generation, grid stability, and localized energy management, their integration introduces several challenges for energy grid optimization.
integration of DERs poses challenges to deep machine learning-based grid optimization in various ways. This includes: (i) Intermittency and uncertainty: DERs, particularly renewable energy sources like solar and wind, exhibit inherent intermittency and variability in their generation. The availability of solar and wind resources depends on weather conditions, making their output uncertain and difficult to predict accurately. This uncertainty poses challenges for deep machine learning models, as accurate forecasting of DER generation becomes crucial for optimizing grid operations, load balancing, and energy scheduling. (ii) Complexity of DER configurations: DERs can be highly diverse in terms of technology, capacity, and control capabilities. They may vary in their energy generation profiles, energy storage capacity, and response to grid signals. Integrating and optimizing these diverse DER configurations within the energy grid requires advanced deep learning models that can adapt to different DER characteristics and provide customized optimization strategies for each resource. (iii) Grid stability and power quality: The integration of DERs can impact grid stability and power quality due to the fluctuating nature of renewable energy generation. Sudden changes in DER output can result in voltage and frequency variations, potentially affecting grid operations and the quality of power supplied to consumers. Deep machine learning models need to consider grid stability constraints and incorporate measures to maintain grid reliability and power quality, such as appropriate power factor control and voltage regulation techniques. (iv) Grid congestion and distribution system limitations: The increased penetration of DERs at the distribution level can lead to grid congestion and voltage regulation challenges. The bidirectional power flow from DERs can strain the distribution system, especially during periods of high DER generation. Deep machine learning models need to account for these grid constraints and optimize DER operation to avoid overloading distribution transformers, voltage violations, and other distribution system limitations. (v) Coordination and control of DERs: Integrating DERs into the grid requires effective coordination and control mechanisms to ensure seamless interaction between the central grid and distributed resources. Deep machine learning models need to incorporate advanced control strategies that can efficiently manage the dynamic behavior of DERs, enable effective demand response, and facilitate grid-wide optimization while considering the decentralized nature of the DERs.
Addressing these challenges requires the development of advanced deep machine learning algorithms that can handle uncertainty, adapt to diverse DER configurations, and account for grid constraints and stability considerations. Additionally, robust data acquisition and management systems are needed to collect real-time DER data and provide accurate input for deep learning models. Collaborations between grid operators, DER aggregators, technology providers, and researchers are crucial to developing innovative solutions that optimize the integration of DERs and leverage the capabilities of deep machine learning for grid optimization.

4. Use Cases of Deep Machine Learning for Energy Grid Optimization

Demand response is a critical use case of deep machine learning in energy grid optimization. By incentivizing consumers to reduce their energy consumption during peak hours, demand response programs can reduce the strain on the grid and prevent blackouts [105]. Deep machine learning techniques can be used to predict peak demand and identify consumers who are most likely to participate in demand response programs [106]. This information can then be used to design effective demand response programs and incentivize consumers to participate.
Load forecasting is another important use case of deep machine learning in energy grid optimization. Accurate load forecasting can help energy grid operators optimize energy generation and distribution, reduce costs, and minimize the environmental impact of energy production. Deep machine learning techniques such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks have been used for load forecasting with high accuracy.
Figure 3. Graphical representation of electric load forecasting. Source: Habbak, H., Mahmoud, M., Metwally, K., Fouda, M. M., & Ibrahem, M. I. (2023). Load Forecasting Techniques and Their Applications in Smart Grids. Energies, 16(3), 1480.
Figure 3. Graphical representation of electric load forecasting. Source: Habbak, H., Mahmoud, M., Metwally, K., Fouda, M. M., & Ibrahem, M. I. (2023). Load Forecasting Techniques and Their Applications in Smart Grids. Energies, 16(3), 1480.
Preprints 77678 g003
Fault detection and identification is another use case of deep machine learning in energy grid optimization. Faults in power systems can lead to downtime, increased maintenance costs, and safety hazards. Deep machine learning techniques such as support vector machines (SVMs) and random forests can be used for fault detection and classification in power systems [107]. These techniques can analyze data from sensors and other sources to identify potential faults and notify energy grid operators to take corrective action.
Figure 4. Graphical representations of 5 SVMs deployed in the protective relays in substations. Source: Venkata, P., Pandya, V., Vala, K., & Sant, A. V. (2022). Support vector machine for fast fault detection and classification in modern power systems using quarter cycle data. Energy Reports, 8, 92-98.
Figure 4. Graphical representations of 5 SVMs deployed in the protective relays in substations. Source: Venkata, P., Pandya, V., Vala, K., & Sant, A. V. (2022). Support vector machine for fast fault detection and classification in modern power systems using quarter cycle data. Energy Reports, 8, 92-98.
Preprints 77678 g004
Energy consumption optimization in buildings and homes is also a critical use case of deep machine learning in energy grid optimization. Machine learning algorithms can learn from the energy consumption patterns of occupants and adjust the energy consumption of appliances and HVAC systems to minimize energy costs and improve comfort. Reinforcement learning algorithms have been used for energy consumption optimization in buildings and homes, learning from the energy consumption patterns of occupants and adjusting energy consumption in real-time [108].
Figure 5. Graphical representation of a reinforcement learning based home energy. management system. Source: Lee, S., & Choi, D. H. (2019). Reinforcement learning-based energy management of smart home with rooftop solar photovoltaic system, energy storage system, and home appliances. Sensors, 19(18), 3937.
Figure 5. Graphical representation of a reinforcement learning based home energy. management system. Source: Lee, S., & Choi, D. H. (2019). Reinforcement learning-based energy management of smart home with rooftop solar photovoltaic system, energy storage system, and home appliances. Sensors, 19(18), 3937.
Preprints 77678 g005

5. Opportunities for Future Research in Energy Grid Optimization using Deep Machine Learning

Here are some of the possible ways to expand on the opportunities surrounding the future research in the area of machine learning for energy grid optimization.

5.1. Advancements in Machine Learning Algorithms and Techniques

An area of advancement in machine learning algorithms and techniques is the development of more interpretable and explainable models. This can increase the transparency and trustworthiness of machine learning models, which is crucial for their adoption in the energy sector. Furthermore, there is a need for algorithms that can handle streaming data in real-time, as this can enable more accurate and timely predictions, especially in demand response and fault detection applications in the energy grid. Another area of research in machine learning algorithms and techniques is the development of hybrid models that combine the strengths of different algorithms. For example, hybrid models can combine the strengths of neural networks and decision trees to improve accuracy and interpretability. Hybrid models can also combine the strengths of supervised and unsupervised learning to enable more efficient and effective data analysis. In addition, advancements in machine learning techniques for anomaly detection, clustering, and classification can improve the accuracy and reliability of fault detection and identification in energy grid systems [109]. These techniques can help identify patterns and anomalies in data that may be indicative of faults or anomalies in the system.

5.2. Development of New Datasets and Data Collection Methods

In the context of energy grid optimization, the development of new datasets and data collection methods can enable more accurate predictions and recommendations. Currently, the lack of standardized datasets and data quality issues pose a challenge for machine learning models. The development of new datasets that are diverse, representative, and standardized can help improve the performance and generalizability of machine learning models. One potential source of new data is the deployment of smart meters and sensors. Smart meters and sensors can collect data on energy consumption, weather conditions, and other relevant factors at a high granularity and frequency [110]. This data can be used to develop more accurate load forecasting models, which can help utilities optimize their energy production and distribution. In addition, smart meters and sensors can be used to identify anomalies and detect faults in the energy grid, which can help prevent power outages and reduce downtime [111]. Another potential source of new data is the integration of data from multiple sources. For instance, data from social media platforms, traffic sensors, and other sources can be used to predict energy demand patterns. This can help utilities plan for peak demand and adjust their energy production accordingly.

5.3. Integration of Machine Learning with other Emerging Technologies

The integration of machine learning with other emerging technologies has the potential to transform the energy grid and enable more efficient and sustainable energy systems. One such emerging technology is the Internet of Things (IoT), which refers to the interconnected network of smart devices and sensors that can collect and share data in real-time [112]. Machine learning algorithms can be trained on this data to make more accurate predictions and recommendations. For example, by integrating machine learning with IoT devices, energy grid operators can monitor energy consumption patterns in real-time, detect anomalies, and adjust energy supply accordingly [113]. This can help prevent grid overload and improve energy efficiency. Similarly, machine learning can be used to optimize energy consumption in buildings by analyzing data from IoT devices, such as smart thermostats and lighting systems. Another emerging technology that can be integrated with machine learning for energy grid optimization is blockchain. Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that allows for secure and transparent transactions without the need for intermediaries. In the energy sector, blockchain can be used to create a decentralized energy grid where energy transactions can be securely recorded and verified. Machine learning algorithms can be used to analyze the data on the blockchain to predict energy demand and supply, optimize energy production and distribution, and detect and prevent fraud. The integration of machine learning with emerging technologies like IoT and blockchain presents new research opportunities for developing more advanced and efficient algorithms and models. It also presents opportunities for collaboration between different sectors, such as energy and technology, to create more sustainable and efficient energy systems.

5.4. Collaborative Research and Public-Private Partnerships

Collaborative research and public-private partnerships can provide a platform for researchers, energy providers, regulators, and consumers to work together and address some of the challenges and limitations of deep machine learning for energy grid optimization. For instance, collaborative research can help identify the most pressing research questions and develop solutions that align with the goals and priorities of all stakeholders. Public-private partnerships can provide access to funding and resources that can accelerate the development and deployment of machine learning models in the energy sector. Furthermore, collaborative research and public-private partnerships can also facilitate knowledge sharing and technology transfer between academia and industry. Academia can bring cutting-edge research and expertise in machine learning, while industry can provide practical insights and data to test and validate machine learning models in real-world settings. Such collaborations can help bridge the gap between theory and practice and promote the adoption of machine learning models in the energy sector. These are just a few examples of the opportunities for future research in machine learning for energy grid optimization. As this field continues to evolve, there will likely be many new opportunities for research and innovation.

6. Conclusion

In this review paper, we have explored the challenges and opportunities associated with using deep machine learning for energy grid optimization. The challenges identified include data-related issues such as the lack of standardized datasets, data quality concerns, and limited availability of real-time data. Additionally, the interpretability and explainability of machine learning models pose challenges in gaining trust and understanding from stakeholders. The ethical and social implications of using machine learning in energy grid optimization, as well as the integration of machine learning with existing infrastructure and regulatory frameworks, are also important considerations.
Despite these challenges, there are numerous opportunities for future research and development in this field. Advancements in machine learning algorithms and techniques can enhance the accuracy and efficiency of energy grid optimization. Developing new datasets and improving data collection methods can provide richer and more comprehensive information for training and validating machine learning models. Integration of machine learning with other emerging technologies, such as blockchain and Internet of Things (IoT), can further enhance the capabilities and effectiveness of energy grid optimization.
Collaborative research and public-private partnerships play a vital role in driving innovation and facilitating the adoption of machine learning models in the energy industry. These partnerships can provide the necessary funding, expertise, and resources to address the challenges and implement the findings of research in real-world energy grid systems. By fostering collaboration among researchers, industry experts, policymakers, and other stakeholders, we can accelerate the development and deployment of advanced machine learning techniques for energy grid optimization.
The potential benefits of using deep machine learning for energy grid optimization are significant. With more accurate predictions, energy grid operators can optimize energy generation, transmission, and distribution to meet the demand while minimizing costs and environmental impact. By leveraging machine learning models, renewable energy sources can be integrated more effectively into the grid, reducing dependence on fossil fuels and mitigating climate change. Moreover, the adoption of machine learning techniques can enable more efficient demand response strategies, reducing energy costs for consumers and improving the stability and reliability of the energy grid.
In conclusion, deep machine learning holds immense potential for optimizing energy grids. However, addressing the challenges and seizing the opportunities requires ongoing research, collaboration, and the commitment of various stakeholders. By continuing to advance machine learning techniques, developing high-quality datasets, and fostering collaborations, we can pave the way for a sustainable and efficient energy future. The integration of machine learning in energy grid optimization has the potential to transform the energy industry and contribute to a cleaner and more sustainable environment.

Acknowledgments

In this section, you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gui, E.M.; MacGill, I. Typology of future clean energy communities: An exploratory structure, opportunities, and challenges. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2018, 35, 94–107. [CrossRef]
  2. Zafar, R.; Mahmood, A.; Razzaq, S.; Ali, W.; Naeem, U.; Shehzad, K. Prosumer based energy management and sharing in smart grid. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1675–1684. [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmad, T.; Madonski, R.; Zhang, D.; Huang, C.; Mujeeb, A. Data-driven probabilistic machine learning in sustainable smart energy/smart energy systems: Key developments, challenges, and future research opportunities in the context of smart grid paradigm. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 160, 112128. [CrossRef]
  4. Alahakoon, D.; Yu, X. Smart Electricity Meter Data Intelligence for Future Energy Systems: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2016, 12, 425–436. [CrossRef]
  5. Menezes, A.C.; Cripps, A.; Bouchlaghem, D.; Buswell, R. Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap. Appl. Energy 2012, 97, 355–364. [CrossRef]
  6. Chan, S.; Tsui, K.; Wu, H.; Hou, Y.; Wu, Y.-C.; Wu, F.F. Load/Price Forecasting and Managing Demand Response for Smart Grids: Methodologies and Challenges. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2012, 29, 68–85. [CrossRef]
  7. Rangel-Martinez, D.; Nigam, K.; Ricardez-Sandoval, L.A. Machine learning on sustainable energy: A review and outlook on renewable energy systems, catalysis, smart grid and energy storage. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2021, 174, 414–441. [CrossRef]
  8. González, A.D.; Frostell, B.; Carlsson-Kanyama, A. Protein efficiency per unit energy and per unit greenhouse gas emissions: Potential contribution of diet choices to climate change mitigation. Food Policy 2011, 36, 562–570. [CrossRef]
  9. Azuatalam, D.; Lee, W.-L.; de Nijs, F.; Liebman, A. Reinforcement learning for whole-building HVAC control and demand response. Energy AI 2020, 2, 100020. [CrossRef]
  10. Edwards, R.E.; New, J.; Parker, L.E. Predicting future hourly residential electrical consumption: A machine learning case study. Energy Build. 2012, 49, 591–603. [CrossRef]
  11. Kubatko, O.; Ignatchenko, V.; Shaparenko, S.; Starodub, I.; Yaryomenko, D. Economic Optimization of Resource Use Based on Smart Grid. Mech. Econ. Regul. 2020, 37–47. [CrossRef]
  12. Cavoukian, A.; Polonetsky, J.; Wolf, C. SmartPrivacy for the Smart Grid: embedding privacy into the design of electricity conservation. Identit- Inf. Soc. 2010, 3, 275–294. [CrossRef]
  13. Kalambe, S.; Agnihotri, G. Loss minimization techniques used in distribution network: bibliographical survey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 29, 184–200. [CrossRef]
  14. Ahmad, T.; Madonski, R.; Zhang, D.; Huang, C.; Mujeeb, A. Data-driven probabilistic machine learning in sustainable smart energy/smart energy systems: Key developments, challenges, and future research opportunities in the context of smart grid paradigm. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 160, 112128. [CrossRef]
  15. Diamantoulakis, P.D.; Kapinas, V.M.; Karagiannidis, G.K. Big Data Analytics for Dynamic Energy Management in Smart Grids. Big Data Res. 2015, 2, 94–101. [CrossRef]
  16. Baños, R.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F.; Montoya, F.; Gil, C.; Alcayde, A.; Gómez, J. Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1753–1766. [CrossRef]
  17. Brandi, S.; Piscitelli, M.S.; Martellacci, M.; Capozzoli, A. Deep reinforcement learning to optimise indoor temperature control and heating energy consumption in buildings. Energy Build. 2020, 224, 110225. [CrossRef]
  18. Olu-Ajayi, R.; Alaka, H.; Sulaimon, I.; Sunmola, F.; Ajayi, S. Building energy consumption prediction for residential buildings using deep learning and other machine learning techniques. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 45, 103406. [CrossRef]
  19. Fekri, M.N.; Patel, H.; Grolinger, K.; Sharma, V. Deep learning for load forecasting with smart meter data: Online Adaptive Recurrent Neural Network. Appl. Energy 2020, 282, 116177. [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, J.; Moon, J.; Hwang, E.; Kang, P. Recurrent inception convolution neural network for multi short-term load forecasting. Energy Build. 2019, 194, 328–341. [CrossRef]
  21. Gelazanskas, L.; Gamage, K.A. Demand side management in smart grid: A review and proposals for future direction. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2013, 11, 22–30. [CrossRef]
  22. Shateri, M.; Messina, F.; Piantanida, P.; Labeau, F. Real-Time Privacy-Preserving Data Release for Smart Meters. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2020, 11, 5174–5183. [CrossRef]
  23. Mason, K.; Grijalva, S. A review of reinforcement learning for autonomous building energy management. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2019, 78, 300–312. [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, X.; Lu, R.; Jiang, J.; Hong, S.H.; Song, W.S. Testbed implementation of reinforcement learning-based demand response energy management system. Appl. Energy 2021, 297, 117131. [CrossRef]
  25. Zitzler, E.; Thiele, L. An evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: the strength Pareto approach. TIK-Report, 43. [CrossRef]
  26. Morán, A. J., Profaizer, P., Zapater, M. H., Valdavida, M. A., & Bribián, I. Z. (2016). Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) for energy efficiency in buildings: Review and analysis of results from EU pilot projects. Energy and buildings, 127, 128-137.
  27. Zhang, D.; Han, X.; Deng, C. Review on the research and practice of deep learning and reinforcement learning in smart grids. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 2018, 4, 362–370. [CrossRef]
  28. Diamantoulakis, P.D.; Kapinas, V.M.; Karagiannidis, G.K. Big Data Analytics for Dynamic Energy Management in Smart Grids. Big Data Res. 2015, 2, 94–101. [CrossRef]
  29. Kuster, C.; Rezgui, Y.; Mourshed, M. Electrical load forecasting models: A critical systematic review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 35, 257–270. [CrossRef]
  30. Sharifzadeh, M.; Sikinioti-Lock, A.; Shah, N. Machine-learning methods for integrated renewable power generation: A comparative study of artificial neural networks, support vector regression, and Gaussian Process Regression. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 108, 513–538. [CrossRef]
  31. Fan, C.; Xiao, F.; Zhao, Y. A short-term building cooling load prediction method using deep learning algorithms. Appl. Energy 2017, 195, 222–233. [CrossRef]
  32. Niu, D.-X.; Wanq, Q.; Li, J.-C. Short term load forecasting model using support vector machine based on artificial neural network. In 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (Vol. 7, pp. 4260-4265). IEEE. [CrossRef]
  33. Shirzadi, N.; Nizami, A.; Khazen, M.; Nik-Bakht, M. Medium-Term Regional Electricity Load Forecasting through Machine Learning and Deep Learning. Designs 2021, 5, 27. [CrossRef]
  34. Aghaei, J.; Alizadeh, M.-I. Demand response in smart electricity grids equipped with renewable energy sources: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 18, 64–72. [CrossRef]
  35. Niu, D.-X.; Wanq, Q.; Li, J.-C. Short term load forecasting model using support vector machine based on artificial neural network. In 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (Vol. 7, pp. 4260-4265). IEEE. [CrossRef]
  36. Ghiassi, M.; Zimbra, D.K.; Saidane, H. Medium term system load forecasting with a dynamic artificial neural network model. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2006, 76, 302–316. [CrossRef]
  37. Ibrahim, M.S.; Dong, W.; Yang, Q. Machine learning driven smart electric power systems: Current trends and new perspectives. Appl. Energy 2020, 272, 115237. [CrossRef]
  38. Ibrahim, M.; Alsheikh, A.; Awaysheh, F.M.; Alshehri, M.D. Machine Learning Schemes for Anomaly Detection in Solar Power Plants. Energies 2022, 15, 1082. [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, T.; Ren, M.; Zhou, K. Identifying household electricity consumption patterns: A case study of Kunshan, China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 91, 861–868. [CrossRef]
  40. Himeur, Y.; Ghanem, K.; Alsalemi, A.; Bensaali, F.; Amira, A. Artificial intelligence based anomaly detection of energy consumption in buildings: A review, current trends and new perspectives. Appl. Energy 2021, 287, 116601. [CrossRef]
  41. Li, M.; Zhang, K.; Liu, J.; Gong, H.; Zhang, Z. Blockchain-based anomaly detection of electricity consumption in smart grids. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2020, 138, 476–482. [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, X.; Ding, Y.; Tang, H.; Xiao, F. A data mining-based framework for the identification of daily electricity usage patterns and anomaly detection in building electricity consumption data. Energy Build. 2020, 231, 110601. [CrossRef]
  43. Anowar, F.; Sadaoui, S.; Selim, B. Conceptual and empirical comparison of dimensionality reduction algorithms (PCA, KPCA, LDA, MDS, SVD, LLE, ISOMAP, LE, ICA, t-SNE). Comput. Sci. Rev. 2021, 40, 100378. [CrossRef]
  44. Fan, C.; Xiao, F.; Madsen, H.; Wang, D. Temporal knowledge discovery in big BAS data for building energy management. Energy Build. 2015, 109, 75–89. [CrossRef]
  45. Fan, C.; Chen, M.; Tang, R.; Wang, J. A novel deep generative modeling-based data augmentation strategy for improving short-term building energy predictions. In Building Simulation (Vol. 15, pp. 197-211). Tsinghua University Press. [CrossRef]
  46. Peters, M.; Ketter, W.; Saar-Tsechansky, M.; Collins, J. A reinforcement learning approach to autonomous decision-making in smart electricity markets. Mach. Learn. 2013, 92, 5–39. [CrossRef]
  47. Lissa, P.; Deane, C.; Schukat, M.; Seri, F.; Keane, M.; Barrett, E. Deep reinforcement learning for home energy management system control. Energy AI 2020, 3, 100043. [CrossRef]
  48. Fang, X.; Gong, G.; Li, G.; Chun, L.; Peng, P.; Li, W.; Shi, X.; Chen, X. Deep reinforcement learning optimal control strategy for temperature setpoint real-time reset in multi-zone building HVAC system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2022, 212. [CrossRef]
  49. Fang, X.; Gong, G.; Li, G.; Chun, L.; Peng, P.; Li, W.; Shi, X.; Chen, X. Deep reinforcement learning optimal control strategy for temperature setpoint real-time reset in multi-zone building HVAC system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2022, 212. [CrossRef]
  50. Nagy, A., Kazmi, H., Cheaib, F., & Driesen, J. (2018). Deep reinforcement learning for optimal control of space heating. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.03777.
  51. Perera, A.; Kamalaruban, P. Applications of reinforcement learning in energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 137, 110618. [CrossRef]
  52. Lipton, Z.; Li, X.; Gao, J.; Li, L.; Ahmed, F.; Deng, L. BBQ-Networks: Efficient Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems. 2018, 32. [CrossRef]
  53. Mills, K.; Ryczko, K.; Luchak, I.; Domurad, A.; Beeler, C.; Tamblyn, I. Extensive deep neural networks for transferring small scale learning to large scale systems. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 4129–4140. [CrossRef]
  54. Schreiber, T.; Netsch, C.; Baranski, M.; Müller, D. Monitoring data-driven Reinforcement Learning controller training: A comparative study of different training strategies for a real-world energy system. Energy Build. 2021, 239, 110856. [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, Z.; Hong, T. Reinforcement learning for building controls: The opportunities and challenges. Appl. Energy 2020, 269, 115036. [CrossRef]
  56. Vanting, N.B.; Ma, Z.; Jørgensen, B.N. A scoping review of deep neural networks for electric load forecasting. Energy Informatics 2021, 4, 1–13. [CrossRef]
  57. Din, G.M.U.; Marnerides, A.K. Short term power load forecasting using Deep Neural Networks. In 2017 International conference on computing, networking and communications (ICNC) (pp. 594-598). IEEE. [CrossRef]
  58. Kilkki, O.; Alahaivala, A.; Seilonen, I. Optimized Control of Price-Based Demand Response With Electric Storage Space Heating. IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics 2014, 11, 281–288. [CrossRef]
  59. Shaqour, A.; Ono, T.; Hagishima, A.; Farzaneh, H. Electrical demand aggregation effects on the performance of deep learning-based short-term load forecasting of a residential building. Energy AI 2022, 8, 100141. [CrossRef]
  60. Hosein, S., & Hosein, P. (2017, April). Load forecasting using deep neural networks. In 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
  61. Kong, Z.; Zhang, C.; Lv, H.; Xiong, F.; Fu, Z. Multimodal Feature Extraction and Fusion Deep Neural Networks for Short-Term Load Forecasting. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 185373–185383. [CrossRef]
  62. Jang, J.; Jeong, W.; Kim, S.; Lee, B.; Lee, M.; Moon, J. RAID: Robust and Interpretable Daily Peak Load Forecasting via Multiple Deep Neural Networks and Shapley Values. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6951. [CrossRef]
  63. Lu, W.; Li, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Meng, D.; Liang, B.; Zhou, P. Early Fault Detection Approach With Deep Architectures. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2018, 67, 1679–1689. [CrossRef]
  64. Wu, Z.; Jiang, H.; Zhao, K.; Li, X. An adaptive deep transfer learning method for bearing fault diagnosis. Measurement 2020, 151, 107227. [CrossRef]
  65. Benkercha, R.; Moulahoum, S. Fault detection and diagnosis based on C4.5 decision tree algorithm for grid connected PV system. Sol. Energy 2018, 173, 610–634. [CrossRef]
  66. Jindal, A.; Dua, A.; Kaur, K.; Singh, M.; Kumar, N.; Mishra, S. Decision Tree and SVM-Based Data Analytics for Theft Detection in Smart Grid. IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics 2016, 12, 1005–1016. [CrossRef]
  67. Andresen, C. A., Torsæter, B. N., Haugdal, H., & Uhlen, K. (2018, September). Fault detection and prediction in smart grids. In 2018 IEEE 9th International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  68. Wang, D.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, L. Detection of power grid disturbances and cyber-attacks based on machine learning. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 2019, 46, 42–52. [CrossRef]
  69. Diao, R.; Sun, K.; Vittal, V.; O'Keefe, R.J.; Richardson, M.R.; Bhatt, N.; Stradford, D.; Sarawgi, S.K. Decision Tree-Based Online Voltage Security Assessment Using PMU Measurements. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2009, 24, 832–839. [CrossRef]
  70. Casagrande, E.; Woon, W.L.; Zeineldin, H.H.; Svetinovic, D. A Differential Sequence Component Protection Scheme for Microgrids With Inverter-Based Distributed Generators. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2013, 5, 29–37. [CrossRef]
  71. Chen, M.; Liu, Q.; Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.-H.; Liu, R. XGBoost-Based Algorithm Interpretation and Application on Post-Fault Transient Stability Status Prediction of Power System. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 13149–13158. [CrossRef]
  72. Dhibi, K.; Fezai, R.; Mansouri, M.; Trabelsi, M.; Kouadri, A.; Bouzara, K.; Nounou, H.; Nounou, M. Reduced Kernel Random Forest Technique for Fault Detection and Classification in Grid-Tied PV Systems. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 2020, 10, 1864–1871. [CrossRef]
  73. Chen, B.-J.; Chang, M.-W.; Lin, C.-J. Load Forecasting Using Support Vector Machines: A Study on EUNITE Competition 2001. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2004, 19, 1821–1830. [CrossRef]
  74. Bessani, M., Massignan, J. A., Santos, T. M., London Jr, J. B., & Maciel, C. D. (2020). Multiple households very short-term load forecasting using bayesian networks. Electric Power Systems Research, 189, 106733.
  75. Xu, G.; Liu, M.; Jiang, Z.; Söffker, D.; Shen, W. Bearing Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network and Random Forest Ensemble Learning. Sensors 2019, 19, 1088. [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, R.; Srinivasan, R.S.; Ahrentzen, S. Random Forest based hourly building energy prediction. Energy Build. 2018, 171, 11–25. [CrossRef]
  77. González, C.; Mira-McWilliams, J.; Juárez, I. Important variable assessment and electricity price forecasting based on regression tree models: classification and regression trees, Bagging and Random Forests. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2015, 9, 1120–1128. [CrossRef]
  78. Chen, B.-J.; Chang, M.-W.; Lin, C.-J. Load Forecasting Using Support Vector Machines: A Study on EUNITE Competition 2001. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2004, 19, 1821–1830. [CrossRef]
  79. Pallonetto, F.; Jin, C.; Mangina, E. Forecast electricity demand in commercial building with machine learning models to enable demand response programs. Energy AI 2021, 7, 100121. [CrossRef]
  80. O’neill, Z.; O’neill, C. Development of a probabilistic graphical model for predicting building energy performance. Appl. Energy 2016, 164, 650–658. [CrossRef]
  81. Hong, T.; Fan, S. Probabilistic electric load forecasting: A tutorial review. Int. J. Forecast. 2016, 32, 914–938. [CrossRef]
  82. Segarra, E.L.; Ruiz, G.R.; Bandera, C.F. Probabilistic Load Forecasting for Building Energy Models. Sensors 2020, 20, 6525. [CrossRef]
  83. Bassamzadeh, N.; Ghanem, R. Multiscale stochastic prediction of electricity demand in smart grids using Bayesian networks. Appl. Energy 2017, 193, 369–380. [CrossRef]
  84. Borunda, M., Jaramillo, O. A., Reyes, A., & Ibargüengoytia, P. H. (2016). Bayesian networks in renewable energy systems: A bibliographical survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 32-45.
  85. Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, X. Review on probabilistic forecasting of wind power generation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 255–270. [CrossRef]
  86. Resch, B.; Sagl, G.; Törnros, T.; Bachmaier, A.; Eggers, J.-B.; Herkel, S.; Narmsara, S.; Gündra, H. GIS-Based Planning and Modeling for Renewable Energy: Challenges and Future Research Avenues. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information 2014, 3, 662–692. [CrossRef]
  87. Venkatraj, V.; Dixit, M. Challenges in implementing data-driven approaches for building life cycle energy assessment: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 160. [CrossRef]
  88. Rehbein, J.A.; Watson, J.E.M.; Lane, J.L.; Sonter, L.J.; Venter, O.; Atkinson, S.C.; Allan, J.R. Renewable energy development threatens many globally important biodiversity areas. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 3040–3051. [CrossRef]
  89. Perpiñá, C.; Alfonso, D.; Pérez-Navarro, A.; Peñalvo, E.; Vargas, C.; Cárdenas, R. Methodology based on Geographic Information Systems for biomass logistics and transport optimisation. Renew. Energy 2009, 34, 555–565. [CrossRef]
  90. Pfenninger, S.; Staffell, I. Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data. Energy 2016, 114, 1251–1265. [CrossRef]
  91. Kimani, K., Oduol, V., & Langat, K. (2019). Cyber security challenges for IoT-based smart grid networks. International journal of critical infrastructure protection, 25, 36-49.
  92. Gupta, C.; Johri, I.; Srinivasan, K.; Hu, Y.-C.; Qaisar, S.M.; Huang, K.-Y. A Systematic Review on Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Electronic Information Security in Mobile Networks. Sensors 2022, 22, 2017. [CrossRef]
  93. Bouktif, S.; Fiaz, A.; Ouni, A.; Serhani, M.A. Optimal Deep Learning LSTM Model for Electric Load Forecasting using Feature Selection and Genetic Algorithm: Comparison with Machine Learning Approaches . Energies 2018, 11, 1636. [CrossRef]
  94. Chen, M.; Liu, Q.; Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.-H.; Liu, R. XGBoost-Based Algorithm Interpretation and Application on Post-Fault Transient Stability Status Prediction of Power System. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 13149–13158. [CrossRef]
  95. Ahmad, T.; Zhang, D.; Huang, C.; Zhang, H.; Dai, N.; Song, Y.; Chen, H. Artificial intelligence in sustainable energy industry: Status Quo, challenges and opportunities. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 289, 125834. [CrossRef]
  96. Jurado, S., Nebot, À., Mugica, F., & Avellana, N. (2015). Hybrid methodologies for electricity load forecasting: Entropy-based feature selection with machine learning and soft computing techniques. Energy, 86, 276-291.
  97. Rathor, S.K.; Saxena, D. Energy management system for smart grid: An overview and key issues. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 4067–4109. [CrossRef]
  98. Ahmed, R.; Sreeram, V.; Mishra, Y.; Arif A review and evaluation of the state-of-the-art in PV solar power forecasting: Techniques and optimization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 124, 109792. [CrossRef]
  99. Ahmad, T.; Madonski, R.; Zhang, D.; Huang, C.; Mujeeb, A. Data-driven probabilistic machine learning in sustainable smart energy/smart energy systems: Key developments, challenges, and future research opportunities in the context of smart grid paradigm. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 160, 112128. [CrossRef]
  100. Tso, G.K.F.; Yau, K.W.K. Predicting electricity energy consumption: A comparison of regression analysis, decision tree and neural networks. Energy 2007, 32, 1761–1768. [CrossRef]
  101. Zafar, M. R., & Khan, N. M. (2019). DLIME: A deterministic local interpretable model-agnostic explanations approach for computer-aided diagnosis systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.10263.
  102. Ahmad, T.; Madonski, R.; Zhang, D.; Huang, C.; Mujeeb, A. Data-driven probabilistic machine learning in sustainable smart energy/smart energy systems: Key developments, challenges, and future research opportunities in the context of smart grid paradigm. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 160, 112128. [CrossRef]
  103. Alabi, T.M.; Aghimien, E.I.; Agbajor, F.D.; Yang, Z.; Lu, L.; Adeoye, A.R.; Gopaluni, B. A review on the integrated optimization techniques and machine learning approaches for modeling, prediction, and decision making on integrated energy systems. Renew. Energy 2022, 194, 822–849. [CrossRef]
  104. Dixon, M. Sequence classification of the limit order book using recurrent neural networks. J. Comput. Sci. 2018, 24, 277–286. [CrossRef]
  105. Rastegar, M.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Outage Management in Residential Demand Response Programs. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2014, 6, 1453–1462. [CrossRef]
  106. Vázquez-Canteli, J.R.; Nagy, Z. Reinforcement learning for demand response: A review of algorithms and modeling techniques. Appl. Energy 2018, 235, 1072–1089. [CrossRef]
  107. Ankitdeshpandey; Karthi, R. Development of Intrusion Detection System Using Deep Learning for Classifying Attacks in Power Systems. In Soft Computing: Theories and Applications: Proceedings of SoCTA 2019 (pp. 755-766). Springer Singapore. [CrossRef]
  108. Chou, J.-S.; Ngo, N.-T. Time series analytics using sliding window metaheuristic optimization-based machine learning system for identifying building energy consumption patterns. Appl. Energy 2016, 177, 751–770. [CrossRef]
  109. Ibrahim, M.S.; Dong, W.; Yang, Q. Machine learning driven smart electric power systems: Current trends and new perspectives. Appl. Energy 2020, 272, 115237. [CrossRef]
  110. Alahakoon, D.; Yu, X. Smart Electricity Meter Data Intelligence for Future Energy Systems: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2016, 12, 425–436. [CrossRef]
  111. Yen, S.W.; Morris, S.; Ezra, M.A.; Huat, T.J. Effect of smart meter data collection frequency in an early detection of shorter-duration voltage anomalies in smart grids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 109, 1–8. [CrossRef]
  112. Motlagh, N.H.; Mohammadrezaei, M.; Hunt, J.; Zakeri, B. Internet of Things (IoT) and the Energy Sector. Energies 2020, 13, 494. [CrossRef]
  113. Azad, S., Sabrina, F., & Wasimi, S. (2019, November). Transformation of smart grid using machine learning. In 2019 29th Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated