1. Introduction

Figure 1. Main components of an aircraft engine [4].

Figure 1. Main components of an aircraft engine [4].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material

Inconel 718 is a chromium-nickel superalloys. According to European standards, it has the designation NC₁₉FeNb [3]. Despite its poor machinability, the alloy is relatively well processed by pressure and has good weldability. The primary analogs are (other brands) such as Alloy 718, Nicrofer 5219, Alvac 718, Haynes 718, and Altemp 718. Inconel 718 is available in bar, wire, sheet, plate, strip, etc.

Table 1. Chemical composition of Inconel 718 (%) [19].

Table 1. Chemical composition of Inconel 718 (%) [19].

Ni	Cr	Cu	Nb	Mo	Ti	Al	Co	Mn	C	Si	P	B	S	Fe
50-55	17-21	<0.30	4.75-5.50	2.80-3.30	0.65-1.15	0.20-0.80	<1	<0.35	0.08	<0.35	<0.015	0.006	<0.015	Other

Since the composition of the alloy includes nickel, this increases its heat resistance during operation. Still, at the same time, it affects the cutting temperature, significantly reducing the temperature resistance of the cutting tool. Chromium increases hardness and strength, slightly reduces plasticity, and increases corrosion resistance. Niobium improves acid resistance and reduce corrosion in welded structures. Molybdenum increases elasticity, ultimate strength, anti-corrosion properties, and resistance to oxidation at high temperatures. Titanium increases the strength and density of steel, is a good deoxidizer, and improves machinability and corrosion resistance. The mechanical properties of the alloy are listed in Table 2.

The classification of the main fields of application of the Inconel 718 alloy in products is given in Table 3.

3. Machinability of the Inconel 718 alloy

3.1. The influence of the cutting tool material on the parameters of the machining process

The main requirements for any cutting tool material used for processing nickel-based alloys are [22]:

• good wear resistance,
• high hot hardness,
• high strength and durability,
• good thermal shock properties,
• adequate chemical stability at elevated temperature

For turning Inconel 718, the following cutting insert materials are most often used - PCBN (polycrystalline cubic boron nitride), mineral ceramics, and carbides [1,6].

The graph shows the use of one or another type of material for the cutting insert according to the frequency of cases:

Figure 2. Diagram of the distribution of the frequency of use of instrumental material.

Figure 2. Diagram of the distribution of the frequency of use of instrumental material.

It can be seen from the graph that carbide is the most common material for machining the Inconel 718 alloy; its share in the number of cases is 75%. PCBN is in second place with a share of 12%. Let’s consider each material and cases of its use in more detail.

3.1.1. Carbide

Carbide (WC-Co) is the industry’s most common cutting tool material. More than 65% of all produced carbide is used for machining metal [1]. The advantages of this type of cutting material are relatively low cost, high strength, and thermal conductivity. Due to their low thermochemical stability, they are quite suitable for machining Inconel 718 but are limited to a cutting range of 30 m/min to 70 m/min. However, they can be used at high feed rates due to their viscosity. The use of carbides above the recommended feed rates and cutting speeds decreases tool life [23], making its use irrelevant for high-speed turning. Before the polycrystalline cubic boron nitride tool appeared, tungsten carbide was actively used for finishing the Inconel 718 alloy. However, even now, it occupies an extensive niche in turning since carbides have longer tool life than PCBN tools [14,23], while PCBN tools provide 4-6 times faster cutting speed.

Figure 3. Total life of Carbide and PCBN tools [15].

Figure 3. Total life of Carbide and PCBN tools [15].

At low cutting speeds of 15 m/min and 25 m/min, the primary type of tool wear was an adhesive fracture of the nose of the tool caused by the formation and shedding of growths. In contrast, at a 40 m/min speed, microcracks were detected on the rake face and a small amount of adhesive material of elements Ni and Fe. As the cutting speed increases, diffusion and oxidation between the tool and the workpiece weaken the carbide strength [24].

In a study on carbide tool wear the following wear stages were identified: initial wear, normal wear, and sharp wear. At the initial stage of tool wear, bonds of elements Ni, Cr, and Fe, which are contained in Inconel 718, are formed on the surface of the cutting insert. Normal wear takes up most of the total wear and then turns into sharp wear. In the normal stage, the sticking process continues, leading to adhesion. At the stage of sharp wear, a growth is formed, which leads to further chipping of the material of the cutting plate. At the same time, increasing the cutting speed accelerates the onset of the stage of sharp wear, which negatively affects the tool life [25]. Various methods and types of coating are actively used to increase the productivity of carbides. In addition to coating, it can apply the pre-treatment method of carbide plates in a household microwave oven since they are microwave absorbers. Additional microwave treatment improves tool properties such as microhardness and wears resistance of the carbide tool [26].

For carbide inserts, preliminary preparation can be used by creating special microgrooves on the front surface of the carbide cutting insert. It was reported that microgroove modified inserts has higher efficiency comparing to non-modified ones. Cutting force and temperature were reduced for recommended cutting parameters (v = 35-80 m/min, f = 0.1 mm/rev, a_p = 1.5 mm). The tool life of the micro-grooved cutting tool was 23.08% longer than that of a similar untreated tool. It also improves the process of chip destruction, which has a positive effect on the stability of the tool [27].

Carbide is a reasonably versatile solution for machining Inconel 718. It has good resistance and a low price. In general, Inconel 718 alloy is well suited for rough and semi-finishing. However, its use for finishing is no longer relevant since, in this niche, it is inferior to polycrystalline boron nitride tools.

3.1.2. Cubic Boron Nitride

Cubic Boron Nitride (CBN) is one of the hardest materials. Its hardness is less than synthetic diamonds but it has better temperature and chemical properties. Usually, this material is used for the rough machining of hardened alloys and cast iron. Cubic Boron Nitride (CBN) can machine nickel-based superalloys with a hardness greater than 35 HRC at 200 to 350 m/min cutting speeds [23]. СBN has high thermal conductivity, hot hardness, and thermal stability. However, the performance of CBN tools still needs to be improved due to the extremely high manufacturing cost, which is about ten times the cost of conventional carbide or ceramic tools [28]. This factor makes this type of tool unsuitable for industrial use, which is confirmed by the results of the study of the Pareto diagram (Figure 2).

To increase the machining productivity, it is possible to apply microgrooves on the rake face of the insert. Since the most common type of wear for this type of material is adhesion [29,30], the application of microgrooves allows to stabilize the adhesive layer formed during the machining and prevent its further chipping using the effect of fixing the textured surface. Surface texturing on the flank face is a promising method for increasing the durability of the CBN tool during high-speed machining of hard to machine materials [29].

Another way to increase the economic feasibility of using this type of material is to apply coatings. The AlCrN-coated CBN tool can be used to machine Inconel 718 in the cutting speed range of 120 m/min, with lower feed rates and depths of cut. Usage of AlCrN coating increases the cost of the insert by only 2-3%, but reduce cutting force for 10% - 12%, flank wear up to 15% and improve surface roughness up to 10 % [17].

Figure 4. Flank wear: (a) uncoated CBN insert; (b) coated CBN insert [17].

Figure 4. Flank wear: (a) uncoated CBN insert; (b) coated CBN insert [17].

CBN cutting inserts is not the best choice for machining the Inconel 718 alloy. Despite its advantages, the too-high price of CBN cutting inserts limits their utilization in machining Inconel 718 applications. In these conditions the perspective alternative can be polycrystalline boron nitride.

3.1.3. Polycrystalline Cubic Boron Nitride

A new type of tool material was created based on CBN - PCBN (polycrystalline cubic boron nitride). In a PCBN insert, the CBN grains are bonded by a ceramic such as TiN or TiCN, which acts as a binder for the CBN grains [31]. PCBN inserts are divided into two types - low content of cubic boron nitride CBN (40-70%) and high content of CBN (85-90%). Thanks to the low content of CBN, it was possible to create a new generation of tools that demonstrated increased hardness and viscosity [23]. PCBN inserts can withstand cutting temperatures above 1000 °C [14]. The cutting edge can be sharper due to the improved strength of PCBN tools, making them suitable for finishing operations at higher cutting speeds than carbide and ceramic tools. The finished surface machined with the PCBN tool achieves a more consistent quality and better surface roughness during machining [15,23]. A significant disadvantage of this type of tool is its high cost, but it is lower than that of a CBN tool [32].

Overall, PCBN tools are the appropriate choice when hard material (>50 HRC) is to be machined, offering high performance in terms of quality surface finishing. PCBN tools are increasingly used for the hard machining of various materials due to their excellent properties [23].

The main type of PCBN tool wear is chipping, notch wear, flank wear, and built-up edge. PCBN tool life is very sensitive to the cutting speed [33]. Tool life decreased by 250% with increasing speed from 250 m/min to 350 m/min. In comparison, the effect of feed on tool life is not significant. Depth of cut also has a significant effect on PCBN tool life [14]. Percentage CBN content in the range of 45% to 60% and cutting speed from 250 m/min to 300 m/m ensure the best surface quality and tool life. The low CBN content in the tool has a positive effect on increasing the tool’s life. Throughout the machining process, the roughness of the machined surface is negligible, but towards the end of the tool life, due to the wear of the insert radius nose, the roughness increases [23]. Tool life can be increased by applying coatings. For example, using a TiN-coated PCBN tool resulted in ~20% higher tool life compared to equivalent uncoated PCBN inserts when machining Inconel 718 at 250 m/min. In addition, the machining efficiency is affected by the shape of the insert. For example, round inserts have significantly longer tool life than diamond/C-type tools at low cutting speeds (150 m/min), but at the higher parameters of 300 and 450 m/min no significant difference was observed [34].

It can be concluded that PCBN is a good choice for high-speed and finish machining of Inconel 718 alloy because it has high hardness and can withstand significant temperatures, which is important when machining Inconel 718. Despite the relatively high price, this type of tool can be used for finishing critical parts, as it allows to get a good and constant quality of the treated surface.

3.1.4. Ceramic

Ceramic cutting tools are mainly used for machining hard materials in the industry due to their unique mechanical properties. The high-temperature resistance of ceramic tools makes them suitable for high speed machining of materials with abrasion and corrosion resistance, high hardness, and low chemical affinity. Compared to carbide tools, they have a longer tool life [22,35].

Ceramic tools based on aluminum oxide (aluminum oxide, Al₂O₃ and silicon nitride (Si₃N₄) are suitable for machining nickel alloys. The fracture toughness of Al₂O₃ ceramics can be increased by adding ZrO₂, and its thermal shock resistance by adding TiC and TiN. Alumina combined with TiC improves the thermal properties of the insert. Such combination of tool material chemical composition result in five times higher cutting speeds comparing to carbide tools (120-240 m/min), although resistance to thermal and mechanical shock is not significantly improved compared to tungsten carbides. Silicon carbide (SiC) fibers or fibers are added to increase the strength of Al₂O₃ ceramic tools and increase thermal conductivity because SiC has a very high tensile strength. Alumina ceramics (Al₂O₃ + SiC_whisker), reinforced with filaments can achieve cutting speeds ranging from 200 to 750 m/min and feed rates from 0.18 to 0.375 mm/rev and have increased strength [23,32].

R. P. Zeilmann et al. [35] compared ceramic inserts with SiAlON and Al₂O₃ + SiC_whisker and investigated the effect of cooling. A water-miscible vegetable oil emulsion, Vasco 1000, with a concentration of 10%, was used as a cutting fluid. The cutting parameters were the same throughout the experiment: cutting speed 250 m/min, feed = 0.2 mm/rev, and depth of cut = 1.5 mm. It was found that the best conditions for wet turning were achieved with the SiAlON insert. The tool life was 2.06 min. For the Al₂O₃ + SiC_whisker tool, the wear was higher, and the tool life was about 1 min. The predominant wear types for ceramics (SiAlON) were notch wear and flank wear. These are the main causes of insert destruction, which limits the tool life. Oxidation and diffusion also occur due to high cutting temperatures. At the same time, for the Al₂O₃ + SiC_whisker tool, the main type of wear was more intensive notches. When turning without the use of liquid, the result was the opposite; the stability time of SiAlON insert was 0.75 min, while the tool life of the Al₂O₃ + SiC_whisker, insert was 1.25 min. It can be said that SiAlON is the more appropriate material for machining with the use of cutting fluid. This is due to its excellent strength, abrasion resistance, and good chemical stability.

A study by M. A. Shalaby et al. [32] compared different types of ceramic tools. It was found that at a cutting speed of 150 m/min, the Al₂O₃ pure ceramic tool had 1.13 times longer tool life than the Al₂O₃+SiC_whisker tool. A similar result was obtained at a cutting speed of 250 m/min, at which the tool life of the Al₂O₃ tool was 1.26 times greater than that of the Al₂O₃+SiC_whisker tool.

The ceramic tool has not been widely used in the machining of Inconel 718. Despite its properties, it is inferior in versatility to the carbide tool, and the niche of high-speed machining is more actively occupied by the polycrystalline cubic boron nitride tool. The characteristics of all analyzed materials can be seen in comparative Table 4.

It can be concluded that, as of now, carbide is still the most common and universal solution for turning Inconel 718. In general, the niche of existing tool materials used for machining Inconel 718, their chemical and physical properties during machining, and the mechanism of wear are sufficiently researched.

3.2. Effect of coating of cutting inserts on cutting parameters and stability

Coatings on cutting tools are extremely important because they directly affect the interaction between the cutting tool and the chip formation on machining operations. Various types of coatings are applied to cutting tools to increase wear resistance and prevent sticking at elevated cutting temperatures. Coatings also act as thermal barriers, which leads to a decrease the amount of heat transferred in the cutting tool [36].

Coated tools have a complex material structure consisting of a base coated with a hard, anti-friction, chemically inert, and thermally insulating layer approximately one to several micrometers thickness. Thus, compared to uncoated tools, coated tools offer better protection against mechanical and thermal stresses, reduce friction? tool-chip interaction, and improve wear resistance over a wide range of cutting temperatures [37].

For the cutting tool used to process the Inconel 718 alloy, the most common coating methods are the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method and the physical vapor deposition (PVD) method. This is confirmed by the research results (Figure 5). The moderate temperature method (MT-CVD) is also used.

According to the results, the share of the PVD method in the number of cases is 75%, the CVD method - is 24%, while the MT-CVD method has only 1%.

Vapor deposition is characterized by a process in which coating elements are evaporated into atoms, molecules, or ions in a vacuum and then condensed on the substrate surface to form the desired coating. According to the principle, vapor deposition methods can be classified into chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD) [38].

Table 5. Comparison of PVD and CVD methods [38].

Table 5. Comparison of PVD and CVD methods [38].

Characteristic	PVD	CVD
Coating material	Solid	Gaseous
Deposition temperature	250~600 °C	450~1100 °C
Gas pressure	10-2 ~10 Pa	10-2 ~10 Pa
Coating thickness	Usually a thin coating	Usually a thick coating
Residual stress	Compressive stress	Tensile stress
Application	High speed steel tools, carbide tools, PCBN tools, etc.	Carbide tool

Let’s consider the most common types of coverage in the analyzed studies (Figure 6)

Based on the obtained data, we have the following distribution:

• 30% of the inserts had no coating
• 25% of the inserts had a TiAlN coating
• 10% had AlTiN coating
• 8% had (Ti,Al)N+TiN coating
• 7% had TIAlN + AlCr₂O₃ coating
• 5% had TiN coating

Figure 7. Wear on the inserts at the feed rate (f_r) of 0.20 mm/rev; (a) medium temperature chemical vapor deposition (MT-CVD)/radius: 0.4 mm; (b) physical vapor deposition (PVD)/radius: 0.4 mm; (c) MT-CVD/radius: 0.8 mm; (d) PVD/radius: 0.8 mm [36].

Figure 7. Wear on the inserts at the feed rate (f_r) of 0.20 mm/rev; (a) medium temperature chemical vapor deposition (MT-CVD)/radius: 0.4 mm; (b) physical vapor deposition (PVD)/radius: 0.4 mm; (c) MT-CVD/radius: 0.8 mm; (d) PVD/radius: 0.8 mm [36].

Gürgen et al. [36] compared a single-layer PVD TiAlN coating and a multilayer MT-CVD TiCN/Al₂O₃/TiN deposited on a carbide tool. Both coating methods have advantages such as reduced friction and cutting force comparing to uncoated inserts, but PVD coating provides a smoother surface for the Inconel 718 workpiece than MT-CVD coating. In addition, PVD TiAlN coating provides improved wear resistance of cutting tools than MT-CVD TiCN/Al2O3/TiN multilayer coating.

J. Zhao et al. [39] studied how the coating thickness of carbide inserts by the PVD method and TiAlN coating affects the dry turning of Inconel 718. It was established that an insert with a coating thickness of 1 μm (TiAlN-1) has a 15.23% higher microhardness. In addition, TiAlN-1 had a 4.17% better surface roughness. The measured yield forces of TiAlN-1 and TiAlN-2 decreased by approximately 27.46% and 23.51%, or 34.85% and 21.52%, compared to the uncoated tool at the cutting speed of 90 or 120 m/min in the initial stage tool wear. The cutting temperatures of TiAlN-1 and TiAlN-2 were reduced by approximately 9.57% and 5.80%, or 6.60% and 2.39%, compared to the uncoated tool at cutting speeds of 90 or 120 m/min. The cutting temperature of TiAlN-1 was reduced by approximately 19−30 °C compared to TiAlN-2 within the cutting speed range of 30−120 m/min.

AlCrN-coated CBN inserts exhibit excellent resistance to the heat generated in the tool-workpiece interface. The AlCrN coating is only 2-3% more expensive than a conventional uncoated CBN insert, but the coating reduces cutting forces by 10-12%, flank wear by 15%, and surface roughness by 10%. The AlCrN-coated CBN tool can be used to process difficult-to-cut materials at a cutting speed of 120 m/min, with a lower feed rate and depth of cut [17].

The application of coatings is a very effective method of increasing the stability of any cutting tool used for machining Inconel 718 and increasing its productivity with a slight increase in the cost of the cutting insert. As can be seen from the study, when machining Inconel 718, single-layer coatings applied by the method of physical vapor deposition (PVD) are the most common, which is due to their relatively low cost and the effectiveness of the resulting coatings.

3.3. Influence of technological environments on cutting conditions

High cutting temperatures during machining always lead to aggressive adhesive wear on the tool surface. Traditionally, cutting fluid is used to cool and lubricate the cutting process, thereby reducing tool wear and increasing tool life. The cost of cutting fluids is approximately 7-17% of the total cost of the machining process. In recent years, several technologies have been developed to control the temperature in the cutting zone to improve the overall efficiency of the process, such as cryogenic cooling, solid coolants/lubricants, flood cooling, and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). High-pressure coolant (HPC), is a internal tool cooling using of compressed air/gases [40]. Cooling has a significant effect on reducing the temperature in the cutting zone with a percentage share of 83.53% (second place is taken by the cutting speed with a contribution of 13.68%) [41].

When comparing dry, wet, and cryogenic turning, the highest tool life was obtained with cryogenic (nitrogen) turning, while the lowest tool life was obtained with dry turning. Tool life was almost 133% longer for wet and cryogenic turning compared to dry. Abrasion is the main cause of high flank wear in dry turning. In the case of wet and cryogenic turning, chipping and adhesion were the main causes of wear. Also, cryogenic turning has less energy consumption compared to wet turning since the installation consumes less energy [8], and is safe for the environment [40]. In another study comparing LN₂, LCO₂ and traditional lubrication, traditional lubrication had the best results for carbide tool life, while LN₂ shows lower tool life. LN₂ and LCO₂ showed higher cutting force when machining compared to traditional lubrication. This phenomenon can be explained be lower gas density in comparation to a liquid fluid lubrication. Regarding the roughness of the machined surface, traditional lubrication and LCO₂ allowed to obtain a lower roughness when turning with LN₂. Of the listed methods (traditional, liquid nitrogen LN₂ and carbon dioxide LCO₂) LN₂ was noted by researchers as the most acceptable [42].

Figure 8. Tool for cryogenic cooling [40].

Figure 8. Tool for cryogenic cooling [40].

Another study examined the effects of LN₂ on vibration, machined surface roughness, and ceramic insert wear. Compared to dry machining, the use of LN₂ significantly reduces vibration acceleration, improves the quality of the machined surface, reduces the temperature on the tool-chip surface and friction between the tool-chip surface, reduces the shear strength of the workpiece material and, as a result, reduces tool wear [43].

Dry high-speed machining of Inconel 718 is not industrially rational, although it has certain advantages because the use of cutting coolants can cause certain problems related to environmental problems, worker health, costs, and other important issues regarding its application. In addition, dry machining has such advantages as reduced skin and respiratory diseases and other health problems, safer for the environment due to the absence of coolant residues on machined components, which reduces or eliminates cleaning costs and reduced disposal costs and a result, the associated energy consumption [35].

High-pressure coolant (HPC) is a machining technology in which a high-pressure fluid is fed to the tool and the workpiece. High liquid pressure promotes better liquid penetration into the tool-workpiece and tool-chip interface zones (Figure 9) [40].

It was found that increasing the contact area by 12% allows to reduce in the flank wear by 45% for a carbide tool [44]. H. Khochtali et al. [10] compared the conventional cooling method and the HPC method for a coated carbide tool. It was established that the use of HPC allows for improved chip fragmentation, reduce cutting force, and double the tool life. Compared to conventional lubrication, HPC lubrication increase tool life by 110% and 76%, respectively.

Other lubrication technique which was considered in the review was MQL. The oil mixes with the air, forming an aerosol, and is fed close to the cutting edge. In an MQL application, heat transfer occurs predominantly in the vapor mode, which is more efficient than the convection heat transfer common in conventional wet turning [40].

Figure 10. Progression of average principal flank wear [40].

Figure 10. Progression of average principal flank wear [40].

When machining using MQL for all tool types and cutting parameters, better results were shown than with other types of lubricants, which in turn indicates that a small amount of lubricants is sufficient when machining Inconel 718. The ceramic tool showed less tool wear at both cutting speeds with MQL and without lubrication, but with constant lubrication feed, notches formed. The carbide insert showed the greatest wear under non-cooling conditions. An insert made of cubic boron nitride at 150 m/min and in conditions without lubrication underwent adhesive wear [6]. For a carbide tool, the use of the MQL method is rational and allows obtaining a higher quality surface and tool life than in conditions with air cooling using a vortex tube and conditions without cooling [41].

A positive effect on the roughness of the treated surface can be achieved using a lubricant based on soybean oil with the addition of CuO particles during cooling by the MQL method. During the study, it was found that the percentage contribution of the flow rate to the surface roughness is 24.97%, the cutting speed is 21.83%, the feed is 0.78%, and the mass % of nanoparticles has the greatest influence and is 52.43% [45]. From this, it can be concluded that using lubricant with the addition of nanoparticles can improve the quality of the treated surface. But it is worth considering that the viscosity of the oil decreases as the temperature increases. As the cutting speed increases, the temperature increases, and therefore the viscosity decreases. This reduced viscosity is not able to remove heat from the cutting zone at high cutting speed, and therefore at high cutting speed, due to the reduced viscosity of the nanofluid, the surface roughness begins to increase. An increase in the concentration of nanoparticles in the base fluid causes an increase in the number of nanoparticles at the interface between the tool and the workpiece. This results in less contact between the workpiece and the tool, acting as a spacer between the tool and the workpiece, thus reducing the surface roughness [45].

Turning Inconel 718 alloy without cooling is inefficient due to inefficient cutting modes and low tool life. The use of cryogenic cooling methods has not yet proven its effectiveness and is difficult to implement from a technical point of view on existing serial equipment in production conditions. The conventional cooling method is effective, but it is inferior to the MQL method in its efficiency. Minimum quantity lubrication is a fairly promising and effective method of cooling when turning Inconel 718. The use of this technique allows for good cooling, low energy consumption, and the use of coolant, and makes it possible to use various ecological types of coolant, which allows for reducing the harmful impact on the environment and per worker, as well as reduce the cost of disposal or recycling.

3.5. Geometry of the cutting tool

Geometry of the cutting insert has significant effect on chip formation, cutting force and surface roughness. In feature statistical study the distributions of tool cutting angle, clearance angle, rake angle, and corner radius were analyzed.

Tool cutting angle is the angle between the projection of the main cutting edge on the main plane and the feed direction. This angle affects the chip formation, shape, direction of its rise, and the thickness.

Figure 14. The most common values of the tool cutting angle when machining Inconel 718.

Figure 14. The most common values of the tool cutting angle when machining Inconel 718.

According to the analysis, the most common tool-cutting angles are 95° in 50% of cases, 45° in 32% of cases, and 91° in 11% of cases.

The clearance angle is the angle between the upper surface of the cutting insert and the surface of the workpiece. This angle affects chip formation, temperature, and tool life. Depending on the type of material being processed, the clearance angle can be positive, neutral, or negative. The results of the analysis of the most common clearance angles when machining the Inconel 718 alloy are shown in Figure 15.

The most common clearance angles of 0° in 66% of cases and a positive angle of 7° in 18% of cases.

Using a neutral clearance angle can reduce the cutting force. The positive clearance angle helps to reduce friction between the insert and the workpiece, which reduces the cutting temperature and increases tool life.

The rake angle plays a significant role in determining the cutting force by affecting the rake angles during the cutting process. Bigger rake angles tends to decrease cutting force when machining Inconel 718 [49]. The results of the analysis are shown in Figure 16.

We have the following distribution of rake angles:

• 46% of cases – angle 0°;
• 23% of cases – angle -6°;
• 7% of cases – angles of -5° and 5°;

The corner radius of the insert is the rounding of the corner of the top of the cutting insert. The corner radius has a significant effect on the roughness of the machined surface [3,36], as well as on the stability of the cutting tool during machining. A larger radius is used for high feed rates and greater depths of cut because it has a stronger cutting edge. A smaller radius is used for shallower depths of cut and helps reduce vibration, but it has less cutting-edge strength. In the percentage contribution of the radius, feed rate, and coverage of the tool, the influence on the quality of the machined surface of the part is 77%, 19%, and 4%, respectively. Lower corner radius results in lower surface roughness [3,36]. This finding were verified in other research in which it was defined that 0.4 mm corner radius insure lower cutting temperature when turning Inconel 718 with SiN and CBN tools [18].

Figure 17. The most common values of corner radius of the cutting insert when machining Inconel 718.

Figure 17. The most common values of corner radius of the cutting insert when machining Inconel 718.

It can be seen that the most common insert corner radius values are 0.8 mm in 54% of cases and 0.4 mm in 19% of cases. This is due to the fact that these values of the radius are the most universal in machining. It can be summarized that the most common geometry when machining Inconel 718 is: tool cutting angle - 95°, clearance angle - 0°, rake angle - 0°, corner radius 0.8 mm.

3.6. Cutting edge microgeometry

In this research of authors Arunachalam et al. [50] surface integrity of Inconel 718 machined by cemented carbide tools was investigated. As shown in Figure 18, a honed (rounded) cutting edge results in a better surface roughness parameter than a sharp or chamfered cutting edge. Higher surface roughness values for sharp cutting edges may be related to excessive chipping of sharp cutting edges during feed and cut. On the contrary, the slight rounding of the honed cutting edge prevents it from chipping excessively. A similar effect is achieved with chamfered cutting edges. However, due to higher cutting forces and discontinuities in the cutting process, higher values are produced compared to honed cutting edges, but lower than sharp cutting edges. The trends for wet and dry cutting are similar.

Moreover, the effect of cutting edge preparation, i.e., honed (rounded) cutting edge, chamfered cutting edge and sharp cutting edge, on the residual stresses was determined. In both wet and dry cutting, a sharp cutting edge produces a higher level of residual tensile stress than a honed cutting edge, while a chamfered cutting edge produces a residual compressive stress [50].

Figure 19, 20 and 21 shows the effect of varying cutting edge geometry on the average roughness Ra (μm) for all different tool materials and insert shapes. Values in the graph represent the mean of multiple measurements, and vertical bars represent the 95% confidence interval for the mean [51].

Surface roughness parameter values Ra below 1.5 µm were typically reached by the round inserts, which are the lowest values when compared to the square and triangular shapes. These results were expected because of the point radius effect. The round inserts are 12 mm diameter (6 mm point radius) while the square and triangular ones have 0.8 mm nose radius. The interesting results are that the lower values of Ra when the honed edges were used, compared to the sharp one, except under conditions where tool wear was relatively high, which adversely affected surface roughness. The differences in roughness between the square and triangular inserts are not significant for the sharp edges [51].

Figure 19. The effect of cutting edge preparation of Ceramic tool (C50) on the surface roughness parameter Ra of machined surface (a_p = 0.35 mm, f = 0.1 mm and v_c = 500 m.min-1) [51].

Figure 19. The effect of cutting edge preparation of Ceramic tool (C50) on the surface roughness parameter Ra of machined surface (a_p = 0.35 mm, f = 0.1 mm and v_c = 500 m.min-1) [51].

Figure 20. The effect of cutting edge preparation of Ceramic tool (C70) on the surface roughness parameter Ra of machined surface (a_p = 0.35 mm, f = 0.1 mm and v_c = 500 m.min-1) [51].

Figure 20. The effect of cutting edge preparation of Ceramic tool (C70) on the surface roughness parameter Ra of machined surface (a_p = 0.35 mm, f = 0.1 mm and v_c = 500 m.min-1) [51].

Figure 21. The effect of cutting edge preparation of PCBN tool (C70) on the surface roughness parameter Ra of machined surface (a_p = 0.35 mm, f = 0.1 mm and v_c = 500 m.min-1) [51].

Figure 21. The effect of cutting edge preparation of PCBN tool (C70) on the surface roughness parameter Ra of machined surface (a_p = 0.35 mm, f = 0.1 mm and v_c = 500 m.min-1) [51].

The results of Kejia Zhuang at al. [52] indicate that Inconel 718 suffers severe work hardening behavior in turning with chamfered inserts. The work hardening layer thickness is about 60-80 μm under the surface with the given cutting conditions. The machined surface micro hardness is found to be 1.2 times workpiece micro hardness. The chamfer length has a more significant influence on the mechanical loads than chamfer angle. If chamfer length is larger then depth of work hardening in the cutting of Inconel 718 will be larger as can be seen from the graph (Figure 22). The change of chamfer angle has little effect on the work hardening phenomenon.

The research of Vopat at al. [53] deals with the edge preparation of cemented carbide cutting inserts. The influence of cutting edge radius sizes on the tool life was investigated when machining the difficult-to-cut material, in particular a nickel alloy Inconel 718. This article presents the new finding on the impact of cutting edge preparation on selected aspects of the Inconel 718 machining of nickel alloy Inconel 718. The longest tool life was achieved with a cutting edge radius of 35 μm as seen from the graph (Figure 23). The average tool life for this cutting edge radius was 15.13 minutes. The tool life of the cutting insert with cutting edge radius of 35 μm was increased by 25.83% compared to the cutting edge radius of 10 μm. The tool life of the cutting insert with cutting edge radius of 50 μm was increased by 13.33% compared to the cutting edge radius of 10 μm [53].

4. Finite element modeling of Inconel 718 alloy machining

5. Conclusions

References

1. De Bartolomeis, A.; Newman, S.T.; Jawahir, I.S.; Biermann, D.; Shokrani, A. Future research directions in the machining of Inconel 718. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2021, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Fu, S.H.; Dong, J.X.; Zhang, M.C.; Xie, X.S. Alloy design and development of INCONEL718 type alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A 2009, 499, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Frifita, W.; Ben Salem, S.; Haddad, A.; Yallese, M.A. Optimization of machining parameters in turning of Inconel 718 Nickel-base super alloy. Mechanics and Industry 2020, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Yin, Q.; Liu, Z.; Wang, B.; Song, Q.; Cai, Y. Recent progress of machinability and surface integrity for mechanical machining Inconel 718: a review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2020, 109, 215–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. D’Addona, D.M.; Raykar, S.J.; Narke, M.M. High Speed Machining of Inconel 718: Tool Wear and Surface Roughness Analysis. In Proceedings of the Procedia CIRP; 2017; pp. 269–274. [Google Scholar]
6. Jeyapandiarajan, P.; Xavior, M.A.; Sasidharan, N.C.; Duchosal, A. Surface hardening and wear correlations studies when turning inconel 718. MM Science Journal 2019, 2019, 3041–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
7. Marques, A.; Paipa Suarez, M.; Falco Sales, W.; Rocha Machado, Á. Turning of Inconel 718 with whisker-reinforced ceramic tools applying vegetable-based cutting fluid mixed with solid lubricants by MQL. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2019, 266, 530–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Khanna, N.; Agrawal, C.; Dogra, M.; Pruncu, C.I. Evaluation of tool wear, energy consumption, and surface roughness during turning of inconel 718 using sustainable machining technique. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 2020, 9, 5794–5804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Tamil Alagan, N.; Hoier, P.; Zeman, P.; Klement, U.; Beno, T.; Wretland, A. Effects of high-pressure cooling in the flank and rake faces of WC tool on the tool wear mechanism and process conditions in turning of alloy 718. Wear 2019, 434-435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
10. Khochtali, H.; Ayed, Y.; Zemzemi, F.; Bensalem, W. Tool wear characteristics in rough turning of Inconel 718 with coated carbide tool under conventional and high-pressure coolant supplies. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2021, 114, 2371–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
11. Ali, M.A.M.; Khalil, A.N.M.; Azmi, A.I.; Salleh, H.M. Optimization of Cutting Parameters for Surface Roughness under MQL, using Al2O3 Nanolubricant, during Turning of Inconel 718. In Proceedings of the International Research and Innovation Summit (IRIS), Melaka, MALAYSIA, May 06-07, 2017. [Google Scholar]
12. Xavior, M.A.; Manohar, M.; Jeyapandiarajan, P.; Madhukar, P.M. Tool Wear Assessment during Machining of Inconel 718. In Proceedings of the Procedia Engineering; 2017; pp. 1000–1008. [Google Scholar]
13. Shalaby, M.A.; Veldhuis, S.C. Tool wear and chip formation during dry high speed turning of direct aged Inconel 718 aerospace superalloy using different ceramic tools. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part J-Journal of Engineering Tribology 2019, 233, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Cantero, J.L.; Díaz-Álvarez, J.; Infante-García, D.; Rodríguez, M.; Criado, V. High speed finish turning of inconel 718 using PCBN tools under dry conditions. Metals 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Criado, V.; Díaz-Álvarez, J.; Cantero, J.L.; Miguélez, M.H. Study of the performance of PCBN and carbide tools in finishing machining of Inconel 718 with cutting fluid at conventional pressures. In Proceedings of the Procedia CIRP; 2018; pp. 634–637. [Google Scholar]
16. Zhao, J.; Liu, Z.; Shen, Q.; Wang, B.; Wang, Q. Investigation of cutting temperature during turning Inconel 718 with (Ti, Al)N PVD coated cemented carbide tools. Materials 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
17. Jeyapandiarajan, P.; Xavior, M.A.; Anbalagan, A. Performance evaluation of (Alcrn) pvd coated cbn inserts on machining of inconel 718. MM Science Journal 2021, 2021-November, 5219-5227. [CrossRef]
18. Veeranaath, V.; Anshuman, A.; Sethia, S. Experimental Study and Finite Element Analysis of the Impact of Tool Edge Geometry in Orthogonal Machining of Super Alloy Inconel 718. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020/9//, 2020.
19. Ghiban, B.; Elefterie, C.F.; Guragata, C.; Bran, D. Requirements of Inconel 718 Alloy or Aeronautical Applications. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Advanced Materials (ICSAAM), Bucharest, ROMANIA, Sep 19-22, 2017. [Google Scholar]
20. Jeyadurga, P.; Balamurali, S.; Aslam, M. Design of an attribute np control chart for process monitoring based on repetitive group sampling under truncated life tests. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 2018, 47, 5934–5955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
21. Chu, J.; Dickin, O.; Nadarajah, S. A review of goodness of fit tests for Pareto distributions. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2019, 361, 13–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
22. Dudzinski, D.; Devillez, A.; Moufki, A.; Larrouquere, D.; Zerrouki, V.; Vigneau, J. A review of developments towards dry and high speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 2004, 44, 439–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
23. Díaz-álvarez, J.; Criado, V.; Miguélez, H.; Luis Cantero, J. PCBN performance in high speed finishing turning of inconel 718. Metals 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
24. Hongjun, Z.; Jianguang, L.; Zhaopeng, H. Wear Mechanism of Cemented Carbide Tool and Modeling Tool Wear in Machining Inconel 718. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020/4//, 2020.
25. Dong, D.; Li, T.; Wang, X.; Qiao, Y.; Guo, P. Tool wear mechanism of turning Inconel 718 and EEMD-based feature analysis. In Proceedings of the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021/10//, 2021.
26. Jadam, T.; Datta, S.; Masanta, M. Wear morphology of microwave post-treated WC-Co tool during machining of Inconel 718 superalloy. In Proceedings of the Materials Today: Proceedings; 2020; pp. 2133–2139. [Google Scholar]
27. Zou, Z.; He, L.; Jiang, H.; Yuan, S.; Ren, Z. Influence of microgroove structure on cutting performance and chip morphology during the turning of superalloy Inconel 718. Materials 2021, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
28. Sugihara, T.; Tanaka, H.; Enomoto, T. Development of Novel CBN Cutting Tool for High Speed Machining of Inconel 718 Focusing on Coolant Behaviors. 45th Sme North American Manufacturing Research Conference (Namrc 45) 2017, 10, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
29. Sugihara, T.; Nishimoto, Y.; Enomoto, T. Development of a novel cubic boron nitride cutting tool with a textured flank face for high-speed machining of Inconel 718. Precision Engineering-Journal of the International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology 2017, 48, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
30. Costes, J.P.; Guillet, Y.; Poulachon, G.; Dessoly, M. Tool-life and wear mechanisms of CBN tools in machining of Inconel 718. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 2007, 47, 1081–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
31. Jadam, T.; Datta, S.; Masanta, M. Influence of cutting tool material on machinability of Inconel 718 superalloy. Machining Science and Technology 2021, 25, 349–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
32. Shalaby, M.A.; Veldhuis, S.C. Tool wear and chip formation during dry high speed turning of direct aged Inconel 718 aerospace superalloy using different ceramic tools. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology 2019, 233, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
33. Bushlya, V.; Zhou, J.; Stahl, J.E. Effect of Cutting Conditions on Machinability of Superalloy Inconel 718 During High Speed Turning with Coated and Uncoated PCBN Tools. 45th Cirp Conference on Manufacturing Systems 2012 2012, 3, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
34. Khan, S.A.; Soo, S.L.; Aspinwall, D.K.; Sage, C.; Harden, P.; Fleming, M.; White, A.; M’Saoubi, R. Tool wear/life evaluation when finish turning Inconel 718 using PCBN tooling. In Proceedings of the Procedia CIRP; 2012; pp. 283–288. [Google Scholar]
35. Zeilmann, R.P.; Fontanive, F.; Soares, R.M. Wear mechanisms during dry and wet turning of Inconel 718 with ceramic tools. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2017, 92, 2705–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
36. Gürgen, S.; Tali, D.; Kushan, M.C. An investigation on surface roughness and tool wear in turning operation of inconel 718. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
37. Bouzakis, K.D.; Michailidis, N.; Skordaris, G.; Bouzakis, E.; Biermann, D.; M’Saoubi, R. Cutting with coated tools: Coating technologies, characterization methods and performance optimization. Cirp Annals-Manufacturing Technology 2012, 61, 703–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
38. Deng, Y.; Chen, W.L.; Li, B.X.; Wang, C.Y.; Kuang, T.C.; Li, Y.Q. Physical vapor deposition technology for coated cutting tools: A review. Ceramics International 2020, 46, 18373–18390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
39. Zhao, J.; Liu, Z. Influences of coating thickness on cutting temperature for dry hard turning Inconel 718 with PVD TiAlN coated carbide tools in initial tool wear stage. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 2020, 56, 1155–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
40. Sharma, V.S.; Dogra, M.; Suri, N.M. Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 2009, 49, 435–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
41. Çakıroğlu, R. Machinability Analysis of Inconel 718 Superalloy with AlTiN-Coated Carbide Tool Under Different Cutting Environments. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 2021, 46, 8055–8073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
42. Chaabani, S.; Arrazola, P.J.; Ayed, Y.; Madariaga, A.; Tidu, A.; Germain, G. Comparison between cryogenic coolants effect on tool wear and surface integrity in finishing turning of Inconel 718. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2020, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
43. Mou, W.; Zhu, S. Vibration, tool wear and surface roughness characteristics in turning of Inconel 718 alloy with ceramic insert under LN2 machining. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2020, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
44. Hoier, P.; Klement, U.; Tamil Alagan, N.; Beno, T.; Wretland, A. Characterization of tool wear when machining alloy 718 with high-pressure cooling using conventional and surface-modified WC–Co tools. Journal of Superhard Materials 2017, 39, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
45. Mane, P.A.; Kallol, A.N.; Doiphode, R.L.; Manjunath, G.A.; Saleh, B.; Abbas, M.; Saleel, C.A.; Alarifi, I.M. Inconel 718 Turning Process Parameters Optimization with MQL Nanofluid Based on CuO Nanoparticles. Journal of Nanomaterials 2022, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
46. Pinheiro, C.; Kondo, M.Y.; Amaral, S.S.; Callisaya, E.S.; De Souza, J.V.C.; Alves, M.C.D.; Ribeiro, M.V. Effect of machining parameters on turning process of Inconel 718. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2021, 36, 1421–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
47. Rakesh, M.; Datta, S. Machining of Inconel 718 Using Coated WC Tool: Effects of Cutting Speed on Chip Morphology and Mechanisms of Tool Wear. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 2020, 45, 797–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
48. Paturi, U.M.R.; Methuku, S.; Siripragada, S.S.; Sangishetty, Y.; Gunda, R.K. Finite element simulations of machinability parameters in turning of Inconel 718. In Proceedings of the Materials Today: Proceedings; 2020; pp. 2658–2663. [Google Scholar]
49. Xu, D.; Ding, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Liao, Z. Investigation of the influence of tool rake angles on machining of inconel 718. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 2021, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
50. Arunachalam, R.M.; Mannan, M.A.; Spowage, A.C. Surface integrity when machining age hardened Inconel 718 with coated carbide cutting tools. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 2004, 44, 1481–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
51. Coelho, R.T.; Silva, L.R.; Braghini, A.; Bezerra, A.A. Some effects of cutting edge preparation and geometric modifications when turning INCONEL 718 (TM) at high cutting speeds. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2004, 148, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
52. Zhuang, K.; Hu, C.; Zhou, J.; Lin Peng, R. Investigation on work hardening phenomenon in turning Inconel 718 with chamfered inserts considering thermal-mechanical loads. Procedia CIRP 2020, 87, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
53. Vopat, T.; Straka, R.; Kuruc, M.; Peterka, J. The Effect of Cutting Edge Radius Sizes on Tool Life in Machining Nickel Alloy Inconel 718. Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings of the International DAAAM Symposium 2022, 33(1) 180-187. [CrossRef]
54. Korkmaz, M.E.; Gupta, M.K. A State of the Art on Simulation and Modelling Methods in Machining: Future Prospects and Challenges. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2023, 30, 161–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
55. Mouli, G.C.; Marimuthu, K.P.; Jagadeesha, T.; Iop. 2d finite element analysis of inconel 718 under turning processes. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering (ICAME) / 1st International Conference on Recent Advances in Composite Materials (ICRACM), SRM Inst Sci & Technol, Chennai, INDIA, Feb 24-29, 2020.
56. Vijayaraghavan, V.; Garg, A.; Gao, L.; Vijayaraghavan, R.; Lu, G.X. A finite element based data analytics approach for modeling turning process of Inconel 718 alloys. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016, 137, 1619–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
57. Parida, A.K.; Maity, K. Effect of nose radius on forces, and process parameters in hot machining of Inconel 718 using finite element analysis. Engineering Science and Technology-an International Journal-Jestech 2017, 20, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
58. Shen, Q.; Liu, Z.Q.; Hua, Y.; Zhao, J.F.; Lv, W.Y.; Mohsan, A.U.H. Effects of Cutting Edge Microgeometry on Residual Stress in Orthogonal Cutting of Inconel 718 by FEM. Materials 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
59. Veeranaath, V.; Anshuman, A.; Sethia, S.; Iop. Experimental Study and Finite Element Analysis of the Impact of Tool Edge Geometry in Orthogonal Machining of Super Alloy Inconel 718. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering (ICAME) / 1st International Conference on Recent Advances in Composite Materials (ICRACM), SRM Inst Sci & Technol, Chennai, INDIA, Feb 24-29, 2020.
60. Lotfi, M.; Amini, S. FE simulation of linear and elliptical ultrasonic vibrations in turning of Inconel 718. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E-Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 2018, 232, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
61. Mitrofanov, A.V.; Babitsky, V.I.; Silberschmidt, V.V. Finite element analysis of ultrasonically assisted turning of Inconel 718. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2004, 153, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
62. Uhlmann, E.; von der Schulenburg, M.G.; Zettier, R. Finite element modeling and cutting simulation of Inconel 718. Cirp Annals-Manufacturing Technology 2007, 56, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
63. Diaz-Alvarez, J.; Cantero, J.L.; Miguelez, H.; Soldani, X. Numerical analysis of thermomechanical phenomena influencing tool wear in finishing turning of Inconel 718. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 2014, 82, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
64. Nouzil, I.; Pervaiz, S.; Kannan, S. Role of jet radius and jet location in cryogenic machining of Inconel 718: a finite element method based approach. International Journal of Interactive Design and Manufacturing - Ijidem 2021, 15, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
65. Reddy, S.R.; Kumar, M.S.; Vasu, V. Temperature study in Turning Inconel-718: 3D Simulation and Experimentation. Materials Today-Proceedings 2017, 4, 9946–9950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
66. Jangali, S.G.; Gaitonde, V.N.; Kulkarni, V.N.; Madhusudhana, H.K. Analyzing the effect of cutting parameters on forces and tool-tip temperature in turning of nickel-based superalloy using FE simulation. Materials Today-Proceedings 2022, 49, 1833–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
67. Ren, X.P.; Liu, Z.Q. A simulation model for predicting surface integrity coupled thermal-mechanical effect in turning of Inconel 718 super alloy. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2019, 100, 1825–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
68. D’Addona, D.M.; Raykar, S.J. Thermal Modeling of Tool Temperature Distribution during High Pressure Coolant Assisted Turning of Inconel 718. Materials 2019, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
69. Liu, L.; Wu, M.Y.; Li, L.B.; Cheng, Y.N. FEM Simulation and Experiment of High-Pressure Cooling Effect on Cutting Force and Machined Surface Quality During Turning Inconel 718. Integrated Ferroelectrics 2020, 206, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]