1. Introduction
Dye pollution in the aquatic water system is a serious environmental problem because of the decrease in photosynthetic activity of water streams and causing disruption of equilibrium of the aquatic environment. Most synthetic dyes found in many industrial wastewater effluents are also toxic and carcinogenic to both human and animal health at a very low percentage of concentration. Various physical, physicochemical, chemical, and biological treatment processes have been used to remove dyes from wastewater, including adsorption [
1], membrane separation [
2], coagulation–flocculation [
3], ion exchange [
4], ozonation [
5]. Among these techniques, the adsorption has superior advantages such as low investment and operational cost, simple design, easy operation, high effectiveness, and so on for removing dyes.
Congo red (CR) [1-naphthalenesulfonic acid, 3,3′-(4,4′-biphenylenebis (azo)) bis(4-amino-) disodium salt] is an anionic diazo dye [
6], used in several industries such as paper, plastic, leather, textiles etc., for colouring their final products. Wastewater containing CR dye is a kind of threatening wastewater because of the difficulty of its degradation. In addition, a carcinogen product such as benzidine is formed as a result of its decomposition under anaerobic conditions [
7]. In this present study, CR is chosen as an anionic dye for the adsorption process due to its chemical structure, environmental concern, and potential toxicity to humans. Many adsorbents such as carbonized leonardite [
8], nickel-based materials [
7], MIL-88A [
9], MXene/carbon foam hybrid aerogel [
10], polycrystalline α-Fe
2O
3 nanoparticles [
11] have been reported in literature for the adsorption of CR dye. However, most of the commercial adsorbents used in the treatment of dye effluent are not economically viable, some are not technically efficient.
Agricultural waste materials have attracted more attention to be used as adsorbent for the removal of contaminants in aqueous solutions due to their viable properties such as eco-friendly, renewable, and biodegradable nature, inexpensive, availability in abundance, and easy to obtain composites with them. Furthermore, agricultural wastes have various functional groups, which enhance their chemical reactivity and are responsible for removal of various water pollutants. A number of researchers have studied the feasibility of using agricultural solid waste like coir pith [
12], potato plant [
13], durian peel [
14], grape fruit peel [
15], mandarin orange peels [
16], citrus limetta peel [
17], orange peel [
18], kiwi peel [
19] etc., as adsorbents for the removal of dyes and/or heavy metals from wastewater.
Mandarin (
Citrus reticulata) peel waste, an agricultural waste from peels that accounts for approximately 30% of the mass of mandarin fruit, is obtained as by-products from the food industry and juice companies, besides household waste [
20]. It is estimated that around 110-120 million tons of citrus waste are produced annually worldwide. Dumping of this waste on landfills or marine environments results in nitrogen deficiency during microorganic activities and a significant increase in the levels of biological oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand [
21]. Hence, the reusability of this waste in different areas is significant due to increased environmental damage. The
Citrus reticulata peel waste (CRPW), abundantly available in Mediterranean countries, Brazil, Japan, Argentina, United States, and Australia, can be used as an effective adsorbent for the removal and recovery of dyes and heavy metals from wastewater because of the various functional groups such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, phenolic, and amino [
22]. In this study, CRPW was utilized as an alternative material which offers a high affinity for dye molecules to synthesize polymeric composites as bio-adsorbents.
Chitosan, which has been obtained from alkaline hydrolysis of chitin, is one of the most popular adsorbents for various adsorption processes due to its high absorptivity and affinity for environmental contaminants, biodegradability, biocompatibility, nontoxicity, hydrophilicity, physicochemical characteristics, high chemical reactivity, hydrophilicity [
23]. Because of its significant advantages, chitosan has positive feedback from many researchers employing chitosan as an adsorbent. However, chitosan has disadvantages such as poor mechanical strength, thermal instability, and low surface area. In recent studies, it has been observed that this problem has been largely overcome with the use of chitosan-based composites obtained using agricultural waste [
24]. However, the literature studies reveal that so far no considerable effort has been made to study the removal of CR dye by chitosan-based composites containing fruit peel of mandarin. In this research, the efficiency of the cross-linked chitosan/
Citrus reticulata peel waste (C/CRPW) composites in adsorption of CR dye from aqueous solution has been investigated.
Batch experiments were carried out to study the effect of several experimental parameters such as contact time, pH, adsorbent dosage, initial CR concentration, and temperature. Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm models were used to analyse mechanisms of adsorption. The adsorption kinetics was analysed by Lagergren’s pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order and Weber-Morris intra-particle diffusion kinetic models. Furthermore, the thermodynamic parameters, such as enthalpy, entropy, and free energy, were also investigated. This study explores the possibility of utilizing CRPW to synthesize cross-linked chitosan-based composites as cost-effective and efficient adsorbents for the adsorptive removal of CR dye from polluted wastewater.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Chitosan (Medium Molecular Weight, viscosity 200-800 cP, 1 wt. % in 1% acetic acid, Deacetylation 75-85%) and CR (3,3ʹ-[(1,1ʹ-Biphenyl)-4,4ʹ-diylbis(azo)] bis(4-amino-1-naphthalenesulfonic Acid) 2Na, dye content 97%, CAS 573-58-0) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Glutaraldehyde (50 wt. % solution in ethanol) was supplied from Acros Organics. Hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, reagent grade) were purchased from JT Baker (USA). All materials reached analytical grade and were used directly.
The CRPW used in this study was obtained from the Seferihisar region of Izmir, Turkey. The CRPW was washed with distilled water and cut into 1 cm2 pieces before dried in an air oven (Natural Convection Oven, JSON-100, JSR Korea) at 100 °C. After drying, it was ground into fine powder and then passed through a sieve to be of size range from 500 μm to 250 μm.
2.2. Preparation of the cross-linked C/CRPW composites
The synthesis processes of cross-linked C/CRPW composites were accomplished based on three main steps. First, the determined amounts of chitosan (1.75 g, 1.50 g, and 1.25 g) were dissolved in 75 mL of acetic acid solutions (5%, w/w) forming gels and then mixed with the different amount of CRPW (0.25 g, 0.50 g, and 0.75 g) under stirring by a magnetic stirrer (Isolab Laborgerate GmbH, Germany) for 24 h. This is followed by treating of C/CRPW powder mixtures by ultrasonic irradiation at 20 kHz, 50% amplitude and no pulsation ultrasound regime at 20 minutes in an ultrasonicator device (Bandelin, HD4100, Germany) to accelerate the intercalation of chitosan between CRPW. The mixtures were then added into the NaOH solutions (1.0 M) dropwise to allow the formation of gel beads and the mixtures were stirred at 150 rpm for another 24 hours. After this process, the obtained C/CRPW composites containing different amounts of chitosan and CRWP were filtered and washed multiple times with deionised water until the pH reached 7. In the third stage, the obtained composites were crosslinked with glutaraldehyde solution (2.5 %, v/v) in a water bath at 60 °C for 24 h to enhance their mechanical properties and stability in acidic solutions. Lastly, dried C/CRPW composites were obtained by washing these composites exhaustively with deionised water three times followed by drying in an oven (Natural Convection Oven, JSON-100, JSR Korea) at 60 °C for 48 h.
The cross-linked C/CRPW composites containing different amounts of chitosan and CRPW were referred to as xC/yCRPW, where x and y denote the amount of chitosan and CRPW used in the synthesis process, respectively. Three different composites obtained in this study were named 1.75C/0.25CRPW, 1.50C/0.50CRPW and 1.25C/0.75CRPW.
2.3. Characterization of the cross-linked C/CRPW composites
The field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Gemini Supra 40 VP, Zeiss, Germany) was used to determine the surface morphology of the cross-lined C/CRPW composites at 10.00 kV. The composites were coated with a thin layer of gold using a sputter coater. The chemical structure of the cross-linked C/CRPW composites was determined by using a Fourier transfer infrared (FTIR) spectroscope (Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS50FT-IR). The spectral data of all composites were acquired in the wavenumber range of 400–4000 cm−1 with 50 scans at a resolution of 4 cm-1. N2 adsorption-desorption was measured at liquid nitrogen temperature 77 K using a Quantachrome Autosorb-1C-MS instrument. The specific surface area was determined by the multipoint Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) technique. The pore volume and pore size were derived from the desorption branches of the isotherms using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method.
2.4. Batch adsorption studies
The adsorption of CR dye onto the C/CRPW composites (1.75C/0.25CRPW, 1.50C/0.50CRPW, and 1.25C/0.75CRPW) was carried out in batch mode. A stock solution of CR dye (1000 mg/L) was prepared, which was diluted to desired concentrations for further usage. All the adsorption experiments were performed by adding the determined amount of adsorbent to 100 mL CR dye solutions in a thermostatic shaker bath (Nuve ST 30) at a fixed agitation speed of 150 rpm for the pre-determined time. The pH of CR dye solutions was adjusted using HCl (0.1 N) and NaOH (0.1 N) solutions. After adsorption, the concentration of CR dye was measured spectrophotometrically by monitoring the absorbance at 497 nm using a Hitachi U-2900 spectrophotometer (Hitachi High Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
The equilibrium adsorption capacities of the C/CRPW composites (
qe (mg/g)) were estimated using Equation (1):
where
Ci is the initial dye concentration (mg/L),
Ce is the dye concentration at equilibrium (mg/L),
V is the volume of dye solution (L), and m is the mass of the adsorbents (g).
Effects of contact time (0-24 hours), initial solution pH (4-9), adsorbent dosage (2-6 g/L), initial CR concentration (20-100 mg/L), and temperature (298.15-328.15 K) on the adsorption of CR dye were investigated. To verify that the results are repeatable, all adsorption experiments were conducted in triplicates and the mean value reported.
4. Conclusions
In the present research work, three cross-linked chitosan-based composites containing mandarin (Citrus reticulata Seferihisar cv.) peel waste, namely 1.75C/0.25CRPW, 1.50C/0.50CRPW, and 1.25C/0.75CRPW, as new low cost and green adsorbents have been successfully synthesized for removal of the toxic anionic dye, CR, from aqueous solution. 1.25C/0.75CRPW composites performed the best adsorption capacity (43.57 mg/g) for CR removal from aqueous solutions, followed by 1.50C/0.50CRPW composites (39.66 mg/g) and 1.75C/0.25CRPW composites (38.92 mg/g). The results showed that the increase in CRPW content of the cross-linked C/CRPW composites resulted in an increase of adsorption capacity because of the enhancement of the porosity of the composite surface. The influence of various operating parameters such as contact time, pH, adsorbent dosage, initial dye concentration, and temperature on the adsorption capacities of all the composites was investigated. Compared with the effect of factors on the adsorption capacities of the composites, all parameters influenced the adsorption capacities, but also the effect of pH change on the adsorption capacities was more obvious. The highest adsorption capacity values were obtained in adsorption conditions where pH of 4, adsorbent dosage of 2 g/L, the initial CR dye concentration of 100 mg/L, and adsorption temperature of 328 K. The adsorption kinetics for all the composites investigated in this work followed the pseudo-second-order equation. The adsorption equilibrium data also could be well described by the Freundlich isotherm model. The high adsorption ability of the cross-linked C/CRPW composites and the abundant availability of CRPW as waste material revealed that these composites can be used as low cost and green bio-adsorbents for removal of CR dye in industrial wastewater.
Figure 1.
FESEM images of the cross-linked 1.75C/0.25CRPW (a,b), 1.50C/0.50CRPW (c,d), and 1.25C/0.75CRPW composites (e,f).
Figure 1.
FESEM images of the cross-linked 1.75C/0.25CRPW (a,b), 1.50C/0.50CRPW (c,d), and 1.25C/0.75CRPW composites (e,f).
Figure 2.
FTIR spectra of chitosan, CRPW, and the cross-linked C/CRPW composites.
Figure 2.
FTIR spectra of chitosan, CRPW, and the cross-linked C/CRPW composites.
Figure 3.
Adsorption amount of CR onto the cross-linked C/CRPW composites varying with time (a) and linear fitting of Lagergren’s pseudo-first-order (b), pseudo-second-order (c), intra-particle diffusion (d) (experimental conditions: adsorbent dosage = 2 g/L; initial dye concentration = 60 mg/L; pH = 7; temperature = 298 K).
Figure 3.
Adsorption amount of CR onto the cross-linked C/CRPW composites varying with time (a) and linear fitting of Lagergren’s pseudo-first-order (b), pseudo-second-order (c), intra-particle diffusion (d) (experimental conditions: adsorbent dosage = 2 g/L; initial dye concentration = 60 mg/L; pH = 7; temperature = 298 K).
Figure 4.
Effect of initial solution pH (a), adsorbent dosage (b), and initial dye concentration (c) on the adsorption of CR onto the cross-linked 1.75C/0.25CRPW, 1.50C/0.50CRPW, and 1.25C/0.75CRPW composites (experimental conditions: adsorbent dosage = 2 g/L; contact time = 24 hours; initial dye concentration = 60 mg/L; temperature = 298 K).
Figure 4.
Effect of initial solution pH (a), adsorbent dosage (b), and initial dye concentration (c) on the adsorption of CR onto the cross-linked 1.75C/0.25CRPW, 1.50C/0.50CRPW, and 1.25C/0.75CRPW composites (experimental conditions: adsorbent dosage = 2 g/L; contact time = 24 hours; initial dye concentration = 60 mg/L; temperature = 298 K).
Figure 5.
Langmuir (a), Freundlich (b), Temkin (c), and Dubinin–Radushkevich (d) adsorption isotherm models of CR onto the cross-linked 1.75C/0.25CRPW, 1.50C/0.50CRPW, and 1.25C/0.75CRPW composites (experimental conditions: adsorbent dosage = 2 g/L; contact time = 24 hours; pH =4; temperature = 298 K).
Figure 5.
Langmuir (a), Freundlich (b), Temkin (c), and Dubinin–Radushkevich (d) adsorption isotherm models of CR onto the cross-linked 1.75C/0.25CRPW, 1.50C/0.50CRPW, and 1.25C/0.75CRPW composites (experimental conditions: adsorbent dosage = 2 g/L; contact time = 24 hours; pH =4; temperature = 298 K).
Figure 6.
Van't Hoff plot for the adsorption of CR dye onto the cross-linked 1.75C/0.25CRPW, 1.50C/0.50CRPW, and 1.25C/0.75CRPW composites (experimental conditions: adsorbent dosage = 2 g/L; contact time = 24 hours; initial dye concentration = 100 mg/L; pH =4).
Figure 6.
Van't Hoff plot for the adsorption of CR dye onto the cross-linked 1.75C/0.25CRPW, 1.50C/0.50CRPW, and 1.25C/0.75CRPW composites (experimental conditions: adsorbent dosage = 2 g/L; contact time = 24 hours; initial dye concentration = 100 mg/L; pH =4).
Figure 7.
Recycling of the cross-linked 1.75C/0.25CRPW, 1.50C/0.50CRPW, and 1.25C/0.75CRPW composites for the removal of CR.
Figure 7.
Recycling of the cross-linked 1.75C/0.25CRPW, 1.50C/0.50CRPW, and 1.25C/0.75CRPW composites for the removal of CR.
Table 1.
Surface parameters of the CRPW and cross-linked C/CRPW composites.
Table 1.
Surface parameters of the CRPW and cross-linked C/CRPW composites.
Samples |
BET surface area (m2/g) |
BJH pore volume (cm3/g) |
BJH pore size (A°) |
1.75C/0.25CRPW |
10.04 |
0.06225 |
29.83 |
1.50C/0.50CRPW |
13.86 |
0.1014 |
16.17 |
1.25C/0.75CRPW |
20.42 |
0.1500 |
16.39 |
CRPW |
17.61 |
0.02269 |
18.85 |
Table 2.
Kinetic parameters of the Lagergren’s pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intra-particle diffusion kinetic models for CR onto the cross-linked C/CRPW composites.
Table 2.
Kinetic parameters of the Lagergren’s pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intra-particle diffusion kinetic models for CR onto the cross-linked C/CRPW composites.
Models |
Parameters |
Values |
1.75C/0.25CRPW |
1.50C/0.50CRPW |
1.25C/0.75CRPW |
Experimental result |
qe,exp (mg/g) |
5.69 |
6.94 |
12.35 |
Lagergren’s pseudo-first-order |
qe,cal (mg/g) |
5.09 |
6.34 |
12.81 |
k1 (1/hour) |
0.2021 |
0.2775 |
0.2763 |
R2
|
0.9950 |
0.9652 |
0.9893 |
Pseudo-second-order |
qe,cal (mg/g) |
6.39 |
7.78 |
13.91 |
k2 (g/mg hour) |
0.0545 |
0.0548 |
0.0275 |
R2
|
0.9971 |
0.9963 |
0.9968 |
Intra-particle diffusion |
kid,1 (mg/g hour0.5) |
1.7985 |
2.4436 |
4.0972 |
C1 |
-0.1430 |
-0.2177 |
-0.3548 |
R2
|
0.9901 |
0.9876 |
0.9968 |
kid,2 (mg/g hour0.5) |
1.0920 |
1.0936 |
2.4286 |
C2
|
1.5399 |
3.0752 |
3.5203 |
R2
|
0.9954 |
0.9997 |
0.9984 |
kid,3 (mg/g hour0.5) |
0.2411 |
0.1211 |
0.1380 |
C3
|
4.5149 |
6.3582 |
11.682 |
R2
|
0.9972 |
0.9551 |
0.9870 |
Table 3.
Adsorption isotherm parameters for adsorption of CR onto the cross-linked C/CRPW composites.
Table 3.
Adsorption isotherm parameters for adsorption of CR onto the cross-linked C/CRPW composites.
Isotherm |
Constants |
1.75C/0.25CRPW |
1.50C/0.50CRPW |
1.25C/0.75CRPW |
Langmuir |
qmax,L (mg/g) |
55.56 |
58.48 |
97.09 |
KL (L/mg) |
0.0251 |
0.0260 |
0.0243 |
RL |
0.6659-0.2851 |
0.6581-0.2779 |
0.6729-0.2915 |
R2
|
0.9895 |
0.9764 |
0.9714 |
Freundlich |
n |
1.4102 |
1.4098 |
1.2472 |
KF ((mg/g)(mg/L)−1/n) |
2.115 |
2.284 |
2.886 |
R2
|
0.9904 |
0.9907 |
0.9908 |
Temkin |
BT (J/mol) |
10.88 |
11.28 |
18.56 |
KT (L/mg) |
0.3003 |
0.3193 |
0.1706 |
R2
|
0.9844 |
0.9771 |
0.9520 |
Dubinin-Radushkevich |
qmax,D-R (mg/g) |
23.50 |
24.23 |
30.66 |
KD-R (mol2/J2) |
8 x 10-6 |
7 x 10-6 |
4 x 10-6 |
E (kJ/mol) |
0.250 |
0.267 |
0.353 |
R2
|
0.8736 |
0.8631 |
0.9049 |
Table 4.
Thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of CR onto the cross-linked C/CRPW composites.
Table 4.
Thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of CR onto the cross-linked C/CRPW composites.
Thermodynamic parameters |
T (K) |
1.75C/0.25CRPW |
1.50C/0.50CRPW |
1.25C/0.75CRPW |
ΔG° (J/mol) |
298.15 |
1052.27 |
668.89 |
-878.22 |
308.15 |
199.92 |
-164.92 |
-1691.12 |
318.15 |
-652.43 |
-998.73 |
-2504.01 |
328.15 |
-1504.78 |
-1832.54 |
-3316.90 |
ΔH° (kJ/mol) |
|
26.465 |
25.528 |
23.358 |
ΔS° (J/mol.K) |
|
85.235 |
83.38 |
81.29 |
Table 5.
Comparison of maximum adsorption capacities of different adsorbents obtained by different agricultural waste for CR dye.
Table 5.
Comparison of maximum adsorption capacities of different adsorbents obtained by different agricultural waste for CR dye.
Adsorbent |
Adsorption capacity (mg/g) |
References |
Cabbage waste powder |
2.313 |
[46] |
Activated carbon prepared from coir pith |
6.72 |
[47] |
Bengal gram fruit shell |
22.22 |
[48] |
Coconut-based activated carbon fibers |
22.1 |
[49] |
Chinese yam peel–polypyrrole composites |
86.66 |
[50] |
Tunics of the corm of the saffron |
6.2 |
[51] |
1.75C/0.25CRPW composites |
38.92 |
Present work |
1.50C/0.50CRPW composites |
39.66 |
Present work |
1.25C/0.75CRPW composites |
43.57 |
Present work |