1. Introduction
Obesity predisposes to several comorbidities but its interaction effects in bone metabolism are complex and not yet fully elucidated. Although increased body weight had been traditionally considered as protective against osteoporosis due to mechanical loading [
1,
2,
3], more recent studies have reported an inverse association of fat mass with bone mineral density (BMD) in both women and men [
4,
5,
6] and with bone formation by histomorphometric analysis [
7]. However, the underlying mechanisms behind this controversy remain unknown.
A recent meta-analysis evidenced that both obesity and overweight are characterized by sympathetic overactivation to different target organs, contributing to the development of comorbidities, such as hypertension and increased risk of cardiovascular disease [
8]. Interestingly, some epidemiological studies have disclosed that the use of beta-adrenergic blocking therapy for hypertension was associated with increased BMD and decreased hip fracture risk, suggesting that the central control of bone mass is mediated by a neuronal pathway involving the sympathetic nervous system [
9,
10]. Moreover, the treatment with propranolol, a nonselective beta-adrenergic blocker, significantly increases bone formation and bone mass in mice [
11]. Adipokines and hormones released by adipose tissue such as leptin and others have complex effects on bone metabolism as demonstrated by several experimental studies [
12]. Although it has been suggested that leptin may exert direct stimulatory effects on bone cells as opposed to indirect inhibitory brain effects [
13,
14], it is still a matter of controversy [
12]. Leptin receptor ObRb is expressed in serotonergic neurons within the brainstem that project to the ventromedial hypothalamus, where they control bone mass through hypothalamic-generated sympathetic tone. Increased sympathetic drive mediates signaling in osteoblasts through β2-adrenergic receptors inhibiting bone formation and increasing release of the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL) thus increasing bone resorption [
11,
15]. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is another neuromodulator of bone metabolism, widely distributed in the central nervous system (CNS), but mainly expressed in the hypothalamus and released from the sympathetic nerve terminal [
16,
17,
18]. It acts predominantly through its receptors Y1 expressed in peripheral tissues including osteoblasts [
19], and Y2, expressed predominantly in the hypothalamus [
20]. The underlying mechanism of NPY action in bone mass may involve the inhibition of cAMP pathway followed by ERK phosphorylation, resulting in osteoblast differentiation inhibition [
21] which in turn is seen in mouse models expressing higher levels of NPY [
22]. A negative effect on bone mass has been described under conditions of NPY excess [
23].
Given that retroperitoneal white adipose tissue (rWAT) is an important fat visceral depot which receives intense sympathetic and sensory innervation, and that its denervation is able to induce systemic responses in other organs and tissues as previously reported [
24], the present study aimed to determine the effects evoked by bilateral rWAT denervation (Dnx) on the adipose tissue-CNS-bone axis. We evaluated biochemical and hormonal parameters of bone mineral metabolism, including leptin and NPY, as well as bone histomorphometry in an experimental model of high-fat diet (HFD) induced obesity in rats before and after rWAT Dnx.
4. Discussion
The relationship between obesity and bone mass is complex and still debatable. The increase in adipose afferent reflex observed in obesity is known to induce sympathetic overactivity to different target organs such as heart, vessels, kidney and bone [
24,
30]. The current experimental model of rWAT denervation has been designed in order to address how the adipose tissue-CNS-bone signaling modulates changes in bone remodeling induced by obesity.
The present study disclosed that rWAT denervation blunted the decrease in bone formation observed in HFD-induced obesity rat model possibly through a preferential reduction in the neurohormonal actions of serum and hypothalamic NPY.
The reduced bone formation in HFD animals observed in this study evidenced by both decreased serum P1NP and histomorphometric bone formation parameters (lower Tb.N, higher Tb.Sp and consequent lower BV/TV, accompanied by lower BFR/BS in tibia) is in agreement with previous observations from Tencerova et al. [
31] in a model of HFD-induced obesity in mice. Accordingly, current findings might have been ascribed to a shift favoring differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSC) into adipocytes, at the expense of compromised osteoblast differentiation and bone formation [
32]. The lack of alterations in histomorphometric indices of bone resorption as well as in serum markers such as CTX in HFD groups in the current HFD-induced obesity animal model is in line with other investigators [
31] although differing from other obesity models in which metabolic syndrome had been induced by high-carbohydrate resulting in higher eroded surfaces and CTX levels[
33]. The effects of leptin on bone cells are known to be site-specific [
12]. Although the increased sympathetic tone through hypothalamic relay is expected to inhibit bone formation and increase bone resorption, opposite effects have been described at peripheral levels acting directly on osteoblasts, leading to reduced bone resorption and increased bone formation [
12,
13,
14].
The increased levels of serum leptin in HFD rats found herein are in line with a recent study using a similar HFD-induced obesity design [
24] and importantly, the current observation of higher levels of leptin in bone tissue further emphasizes the impact of adiposity in bone remodeling. Both positive and negative associations of circulating leptin with bone mass have already been reported in clinical and experimental studies [
12,
34,
35,
36,
37] supporting the persistent controversy. Herein we also observed increased serum and bone protein levels of FGF23 in HFD rats, coupled with decreased serum levels of 1,25(OH)
2D
3 and phosphate and higher fractional excretion of phosphate, the latter effect as an expected coordinated modulation of renal phosphate handling by FGF23 [
38]. Such findings agree well with Tsuji et al. [
39] who suggested that leptin directly stimulates FGF-23 bone production inhibiting 1,25(OH)
2D
3 synthesis. The present high FGF23 levels in the setting of reduced bone formation found in histomorphometry in addition to lower P1NP, are coherent with in vitro observations showing suppression of osteoblast differentiation and matrix mineralization induced by FGF23 overexpression [
40]. The decreased levels of PTH observed in HFD rats might have been ascribed to the direct actions of FGF23 on the parathyroid through the MAPK pathway [
41]. Unexpectedly, despite reduced bone formation in HFD rats, reduction of serum and bone protein levels of sclerostin and DKK1 were not evidenced in the present study, for reasons that remain unclear.
Finally, we observed higher levels of serum and hypothalamic NPY in HFD rats, corroborating clinical and experimental data in obesity conditions [
42,
43]. Moreover, NPY knockout mice present increased bone mass resulting from enhanced osteoblast activation and conversely, hypothalamic NPY overexpression reduces osteoblastic activity [
22], suggesting a critical role of such mediators controlling bone formation. In a clinical study of patients with chronic kidney disease, Panuccio et al. [
23] also demonstrated inverse associations of NPY levels with alkaline phosphatase reflecting osteoblast activity. In agreement with our present findings related to bone resorption, Matic et al. [
44] did not observe increased osteoclast activity in mice overexpressing NPY.
Experimental evidence in mice demonstrate that at the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus, the leptin receptor is co-expressed with NPY-positive neurons and its activation inhibits NPY secretion promoting anorexigenic effects [
45]. However, prolonged exposure to increased leptin levels as observed in obese subjects may promote leptin resistance leading to a disruption in the regulation of NPY secretion by leptin and consequently imbalance in energy homeostasis [
46].
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show that bilateral removal of rWAT innervation blunted the decrease of bone formation parameters in obese animals, namely Ob.S/BS, OV/BV, OS/BS, bone formation marker P1NP and mineralization surface (MS/BS), without changing bone resorption, as shown by histomorphometry and lack of alterations in CTX. It can be hypothesized that additional effects upon bone resorption after Dnx were not herein found because of the counteracting peripheral effects of leptin possibly reducing bone resorption that in its turn, was not even increased by obesity alone.
The higher serum leptin levels observed in HFD rats were not blunted after denervation surgery contrasting with findings of Garcia et al. [
24]. However, in an elegant experimental study, Yamada et al. [
47] showed that epididymal WAT denervation promoted a decrease in NPY expression in the hypothalamus without changes in serum glycaemia, insulin and leptin levels, suggesting that neuronal signals from intra-abdominal adipose tissue possibly participate in the NPY hypothalamic expression control but that leptin regulation is independent of this signaling pathway. Moreover, we did not observe significant alterations in serum and bone FGF23 levels, as well as 1,25(OH)
2D
3 and PTH after Dnx surgery suggesting that the latter did not change the peripheral signaling of these hormone secretions.
In summary, the interruption of the communication between rWAT and hypothalamus by the denervation procedure might have decreased hypothalamic NPY expression through an unknown mechanism resulting in decreased sympathetic activation to rWAT and possibly to bone tissue (hypothetical mechanism is shown in
Figure 7).
Limitations of the present study included the lack of bone marrow gene expression evaluation and measurement of bone marrow adiposity. Since only male rats were used to minimize the confounding effects of female sex hormones on bone, present findings cannot be extrapolated to female rats. Additional functional studies employing inhibitors of NPY receptors are still warranted to validate present findings and to further elucidate cause-effect underlying mechanisms between NPY and bone formation in the current model. Whether NPY actions in response to adipose tissue denervation are central, peripheral, or both, also remain to be investigated.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: MSO, LMO, EEN, CTB, ABC and IPH; Data curation: MSO and IPH; Formal analysis: MSO and RM; Funding acquisition: IPH; Investigation: MSO, MVLM, RM, MLG, ACA, JJAMM and EEN; Methodology: MSO, MLG, LMO, EEN, CTB, ABC and IPH; Resources: IPH; Writing – original draft: MSO and IPH; Writing – review & editing: CTB, ABC and IPH.
Figure 1.
Body weight, waist circumference and white adipose tissue (WAT) pads (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars): (a) body weight, (b) waist circumference, (c) total WAT weight, (d) retroperitoneal WAT weight, (e) mesenteric WAT weight, (f) epididymal WAT weight. (c) and (e) values were log-transformed to stabilize variance. A significant effect of diet was observed in (b) through (f).
Figure 1.
Body weight, waist circumference and white adipose tissue (WAT) pads (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars): (a) body weight, (b) waist circumference, (c) total WAT weight, (d) retroperitoneal WAT weight, (e) mesenteric WAT weight, (f) epididymal WAT weight. (c) and (e) values were log-transformed to stabilize variance. A significant effect of diet was observed in (b) through (f).
Figure 2.
Static histomorphometric parameters (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars): (a) bone volume – BV/TV, (b) trabecular number – Tb.N, (c) trabecular separation – Tb.Sp, (d) osteoid volume – OV/BV, (e) osteoblastic surface – Ob.S/BS, (f) osteoid surface – OS/BS, (g) eroded surface – ES/BS and (h) osteoclastic surface – Oc.S/BS. A significant effect of diet was observed in (b) and (c). Interaction was significant in (a) p=0.044, (d) p=0.001, (e) p<0.001 and (f) p<0.001.
Figure 2.
Static histomorphometric parameters (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars): (a) bone volume – BV/TV, (b) trabecular number – Tb.N, (c) trabecular separation – Tb.Sp, (d) osteoid volume – OV/BV, (e) osteoblastic surface – Ob.S/BS, (f) osteoid surface – OS/BS, (g) eroded surface – ES/BS and (h) osteoclastic surface – Oc.S/BS. A significant effect of diet was observed in (b) and (c). Interaction was significant in (a) p=0.044, (d) p=0.001, (e) p<0.001 and (f) p<0.001.
Figure 3.
Dynamic histomorphometric parameters and serum bone formation and resorption markers (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars): (a) mineralizing surface – MS/BS, (b) bone formation rate – BFR/BS, (c) mineral apposition rate – MAR and (d) mineralization lag time – Mlt. Serum (e) P1NP and serum (f) CTX. (f) values were log-transformed to stabilize variance. A significant effect of diet was observed in (b). Interaction was significant in (a) p=0.002 and (e) p=0.003.
Figure 3.
Dynamic histomorphometric parameters and serum bone formation and resorption markers (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars): (a) mineralizing surface – MS/BS, (b) bone formation rate – BFR/BS, (c) mineral apposition rate – MAR and (d) mineralization lag time – Mlt. Serum (e) P1NP and serum (f) CTX. (f) values were log-transformed to stabilize variance. A significant effect of diet was observed in (b). Interaction was significant in (a) p=0.002 and (e) p=0.003.
Figure 4.
Serum calciotropic hormones/ levels of serum and urinary phosphate/ bone levels of leptin and FGF23 (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars) : (a) serum leptin, (b) bone leptin protein expression, (c) serum FGF23, (d) bone FGF23 protein expression, (e) serum 1,25(OH)2D3, (f) serum PTH, (g) serum phosphate and (h) fractional excretion of phosphate – FeP. (b) and (d) values were log-transformed to stabilize variance. A significant effect of diet was observed in (a) through (h).
Figure 4.
Serum calciotropic hormones/ levels of serum and urinary phosphate/ bone levels of leptin and FGF23 (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars) : (a) serum leptin, (b) bone leptin protein expression, (c) serum FGF23, (d) bone FGF23 protein expression, (e) serum 1,25(OH)2D3, (f) serum PTH, (g) serum phosphate and (h) fractional excretion of phosphate – FeP. (b) and (d) values were log-transformed to stabilize variance. A significant effect of diet was observed in (a) through (h).
Figure 5.
Serum and bone levels of sclerostin/DKK1 (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars): (a) serum sclerostin, (b) bone sclerostin, (c) serum DKK1 and (d) bone DKK1. (b) and (d) values were log-transformed to stabilize variance.
Figure 5.
Serum and bone levels of sclerostin/DKK1 (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars): (a) serum sclerostin, (b) bone sclerostin, (c) serum DKK1 and (d) bone DKK1. (b) and (d) values were log-transformed to stabilize variance.
Figure 6.
Serum levels and hypothalamic protein and gene expression of NPY (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars): (a) serum NPY, (b) hypothalamic NPY protein levels and (c) hypothalamic NPY gene expression. Interaction was significant in (a) p<0.001, (b) p<0.001 and (c) p=0.014.
Figure 6.
Serum levels and hypothalamic protein and gene expression of NPY (median and interquartile range) under standard diet (SD) or high fat diet (HFD) in Sham groups (open bars) and Dnx (closed bars): (a) serum NPY, (b) hypothalamic NPY protein levels and (c) hypothalamic NPY gene expression. Interaction was significant in (a) p<0.001, (b) p<0.001 and (c) p=0.014.
Figure 7.
Hypothetical mechanism of the interaction between neuropeptide Y (NPY) and bone remodeling. (A) Obesity: increases in circulating and hypothalamic NPY levels may promote sympathetic overactivity to bone tissue through activation of hypothalamic Y2 receptor. NPY acts on Y1 receptor expressed in osteoblasts inhibiting cAMP signaling pathway, followed by phosphorylation of ERK, which leads to reduced osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. (B) Retroperitoneal white adipose tissue (rWAT) denervation (Dnx): the interruption of the communication between rWAT and hypothalamus by Dnx might have restored central NPY levels resulting in normalization of sympathetic activation to rWAT and possibly to bone tissue as well, rescuing bone formation. Decreased peripheral levels of NPY induced by Dnx might have also contributed to restore bone formation. SNS - sympathetic nervous system.
Figure 7.
Hypothetical mechanism of the interaction between neuropeptide Y (NPY) and bone remodeling. (A) Obesity: increases in circulating and hypothalamic NPY levels may promote sympathetic overactivity to bone tissue through activation of hypothalamic Y2 receptor. NPY acts on Y1 receptor expressed in osteoblasts inhibiting cAMP signaling pathway, followed by phosphorylation of ERK, which leads to reduced osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. (B) Retroperitoneal white adipose tissue (rWAT) denervation (Dnx): the interruption of the communication between rWAT and hypothalamus by Dnx might have restored central NPY levels resulting in normalization of sympathetic activation to rWAT and possibly to bone tissue as well, rescuing bone formation. Decreased peripheral levels of NPY induced by Dnx might have also contributed to restore bone formation. SNS - sympathetic nervous system.