Altmetrics
Downloads
212
Views
104
Comments
0
A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.
This version is not peer-reviewed
Submitted:
14 July 2023
Posted:
17 July 2023
You are already at the latest version
Author (year) | Type of study | Sample | Instrument | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aasvik et al. (2015) [1] | Quantitative | 167 patients | Clinical assessment: clinical questionnaires to measure memory complaints (EMQ-R), chronic pain (SF-8), depression and anxiety (HADS), fatigue (CFQ) and insomnia (ISI) | Significant levels of fatigue and anxiety while those of depression, insomnia and intensity of pain are not. Subjective memory complaints may reflect concerns about one's own memory performance, so it is an expression of anxiety, becoming anxious when asked to remember something. Anxiety consumes attention. |
Balderston et al. (2017) [15] | Quantitative | 69 participants from the Washington DC metropolitan area |
Participants completed measures of anxiety: Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), State/Trait Anxiety Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) |
There is a deterioration in performance in patients with anxiety, slower reaction time, difficulty recruiting some regions in cognitive tasks, there are intrusive thoughts and low control over them, low regulation of emotions, they have to make efforts to face fearful stimuli, continuous thoughts related to threats during tasks. |
Fitzgerald et al. (2017) [16] |
Qualitative | 69 individuals |
A block-design Emotion Regulation Task (ERT) |
Individuals with trait anxiety exhibit deficits in cognitive control mediated by the dIPFC; in this study, they experimentally manipulate threat, and it is found that patients with anxiety demonstrated performance deficits. These results suggest that poor cognitive control is a stable trait in patients with anxiety. Furthermore, these results generate a testable hypothesis that WM deficits may predict the future severity of symptoms or the outcome of treatment. |
Fonzo et al. (2014) [17] | Quantitative | 32 individuals (21 adults with a principal diagnosis of a generalized anxiety disorder and 11 non-anxious healthy controls) | PSWQ, 10 sessions of weekly cognitive-behavioral therapy, the Emotion Face Assessment Task | It provides evidence for a dual-process psychotherapeutic model of changes in neural systems in generalized anxiety disorder in which cingulo-amygdala reactivity to threat signals is attenuated while insular responses to positive facial emotions are potentiated. |
Gordeev et al. (2013) [18] | Quantitative | 95 patients (34 patients with panic disorder, 32 patients with generalized anxiety disorder and 29 healthy) | Clinical-neurological, psychometric, neuropsychological, and neurophysiological methods | Patients with generalized anxiety disorder differed from patients with panic disorder by a higher level of anxiety, a greater degree of depression, and more reported disorders of short-term memory and directed attention. They also had lower P300 amplitudes but in panic patients they were higher. |
Hallion et al. (2017) [19] | Quantitative | 56 participants (35 of them had generalized anxiety disorder, the other 21 had no history of mental health, treatment, or mental disorders) | Has been used: MINI, CSR, CGI, SIGH-A, PSWQ, SIGH-D | Generalized anxiety states predicted impaired 'cool' inhibition and impaired cognitive inhibition, although not for the worry trait. Anxiety affects cognitive efficiency by requiring more effort (reflected in part by slower response times) to maintain adequate overall performance (reflected in task accuracy), and that this increased effort is partly attributable to the presence of worry, which competes for attentional resources. |
Khdour et al. (2016) [20] | Quantitative | 73 participants from clinics associated with the universities of Cairo and Ain Shams. | The North American Adult Reading Test (NAART), the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R), Digit Span test and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). | Patients with generalized anxiety learned better from negative feedback. There is a cognitive dissociation between the subtypes of anxiety spectrum disorders, which could underlie a difference in the neural circuitry involved in these disorders. Enhanced learning from negative feedback in people with generalized anxiety is not attributed to group differences in speed of learning or the ability to explore available outcomes. |
Plana et al. (2014) [21] | Quantitative | 1417 anxious patients and 1321 non-clinical controls. | 40 studies evaluating mentalization, emotion recognition, social perception/knowledge, or attributional style in anxiety disorders | The results indicate different patterns of deterioration of social cognition: people with post-traumatic stress disorder show deficits in mentalization and emotion recognition while other anxiety disorders showed attributional biases. |
Moon et al. (2015) [22] | Quantitative | 36 right-hand subjects (18 patients with generalized anxiety disorder and 18 healthy controls) | The subjects underwent structured clinical interviews for DSM-IV diagnosis 18 and various psychiatric rating scale: HAMD 17, GAD-7, STAI-I, STAIII, ASI-R | Patients with generalized anxiety disorder showed significant differences on all questionnaires compared to healthy controls.Therefore, this finding suggests that patients with generalized anxiety tend to respond to anxiety-related situations with fear, lower accuracy, and a combination of cognitive deficits. with low attention. |
Renna et al. (2018) [23] | Qualitative | 17 participants from two different clinics in the northeastern of United States | Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV and the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV | Patients with generalized anxiety disorder present a deficit in attention regulation. They found that a greater ability to sustain attention may be an indicator of clinical improvement. Worry is the hallmark of generalized anxiety, and it inhibits the ability to divert attention because of this, they pay more attention to the threat. There is a decrease in social skills (due to lack of maintenance of attention). |
Stefanopoulou et al. (2014) [24] | Quantitative | 17 participants after their first session of cognitive-behavioral treatment or on a waitlist from National Health Service clinical psychology clinics in the UK. | Penn State Worry Questionnaire, BDI-II, N-Back Task, Random Generation Key-Pressing Task, Mood ratings, thought valence ratings, filler task and WTAR. | People with generalized anxiety disorder have fewer residual attentional control resources available during the worry process. Fewer resources were available to perform concurrent thinking tasks when individuals with anxiety were thinking about personally relevant topics. Verbal preoccupation takes less attentional control, suggesting that negative biases use resources. |
Tempesta et al. (2013) [25] | Quantitative | Forty subjects between 20 and 35 years of age with a first episode of generalized anxiety from the Psychiatry Service for Diagnosis and Treatment, Hospital G. | STAI, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), PSQI, TAS-20 | Executive functions, as measured by the WCST, were affected in young subjects, immediate recall is also affected. Worry can interfere with the execution of some cognitive functions since it dedicates attentional resources to ruminant linguistic processing of threatening stimuli. Antidepressant treatment affects performance on sustained attention tasks, reducing the ability to remain alert for a long period of time. |
White et al. (2017) [26] |
Quantitative | 78 participants 18-50 years of age (46 had generalized anxiety disorder and 32 were healthy subjects). | A passive avoidance task | Individuals with generalized anxiety disorder showed impaired reinforcement-based decision making. Lower correlation on the test between punishment and responses. They showed impaired reinforcement-based and worry about possible future consequences, such as illness or losing a job. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated