Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Nanoencapsulation of Anthocyanins from Red Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. Capitata f. rubra) through Coacervation of Whey Protein Isolate and Apple High Methoxyl Pectin

Altmetrics

Downloads

110

Views

63

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

24 July 2023

Posted:

25 July 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Encapsulation is a valuable strategy to protect and deliver anthocyanins (ACNs), phenolic com-pounds with outstanding antioxidant capacity but limited stability. In this study, coacervation was used to encapsulate an ACNs-rich red cabbage extract (RCE). Two agri-food by-products polymers, whey protein isolate (WPI) and apple high-methoxyl pectin (HMP), were blended at pH 4.0 in a specific ratio to induce the formation of nanoparticles (NPs). The process optimisation yielded a monodispersed population (PDI < 0.200) of negatively charged (-17 mV) NPs with an average diameter of 380 nm. RCE concentration influenced size, charge, and antioxidant capacity in a dose-dependent manner. NPs were also sensitive to pH increase from 4 to 7, showing a progressive breakdown. The encapsulation efficiency was 30%, with a retention of ACNs within the polymeric matrix being influenced by their chemical structure: diacylated and/or C3-triglucoside forms were more efficiently encapsulated than monoacylated C3-diglucosides. In conclusion, we report a promising, simple, and sustainable method to produce monodispersed NPs for ACNs encapsu-lation and delivery. Evidence of differential binding of ACNs to NPs, dependent on specific ac-ylation/glycosylation patterns, indicate that care must be taken in the choice of the appropriate NPs formulation for the encapsulation of phenolic compounds.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Food Science and Technology

1. Introduction

Anthocyanins (ACNs) are plant secondary metabolites belonging to the flavonoids family, that represents the most numerous group of phenolic compounds [1,2]. Their structure, which is based on the flavylium cation (2-phenyl-1-benzopyrilium), presents several hydroxyl (-OH) and/or methoxyl (-OCH3) groups linked to one or more sugars. The number and position of the different substituents give rise to the six basic anthocyanidins: cyanidin, malvidin, pelargonidin, petunidin, delphinidin and peonidin, which, in turn, may additionally present acylations on the hydroxyl group of their sugar units. The most interesting feature of ACNs is that they are natural water-soluble red pigments responsible for the colour of several fruits and vegetables like berries, red cabbage, black carrot, purple corn and potato [2]. Thus, from a technological point of view, ACNs play a crucial role in guiding the acceptance of plant-derived foods by consumers and represent natural alternative solutions to synthetic food colourants [3]. The importance of ACNs goes well beyond their technological implications since, in the last years, several health-promoting properties have been ascribed to these molecules. ACNs possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potency and have been proven effective in preventing age-related chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancers, neurodegenerative, and eye-related diseases [4,5].
Nevertheless, the chemical stability of ACNs is scarce and influenced by several physiochemical parameters like temperature, oxygen, light, presence of metals, and degrading enzymes [6]. For this reason, processes typically applied to transform and conserve foods may strongly affect the colour and the biological activity of ACNs. To tackle this problem, encapsulation strategies based on different wall materials to protect ACNs have been implemented [7,8,9]. Besides being efficacious, an ideal encapsulation process should also be cost-effective and based on sustainable materials, possibly achieved from food by-products in a circular economy perspective [10]. Whey proteins and pectins, deriving from cheese-making and fruit-juice production chains, respectively, represent good candidates to encapsulate phenolic compounds. Previously published studies showed that these two polymers can electrostatically interact in a specific pH range to form a network that can entrap polyphenols, among which ACNs [11,12,13]. The interactions of these colloids with phenolic compounds are mainly driven by hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions. Depending on the different conditions, this process, also called coacervation, allows for the production of nanoparticles that can be used to protect and deliver ACNs [11]. The results reported so far are limited to applications on simple anthocyanins, like cyanidin-3-glucoside, or are referred to ACNs-rich extracts deriving from undisclosed plant sources. However, ACNs are known to present many structures that can strongly affect their functional properties. To verify whether the structure of the ACNs may influence the performance of the process in terms of efficiency, different ACNs should be tested in the same conditions. For this reason, red cabbage (RC) represents a suitable model since it contains several ACNs characterised by different acylations and glycosylations, which are also acknowledged for their positive biological activities [14]. The aim of the present study was to investigate the optimal conditions for the encapsulation of RC ACNs within a whey protein isolate (WPI) and high methoxyl pectin (HMP) coacervate. The effects of ACNs concentration on the physiochemical characteristics of the beads and whether differently acylated and glycosylated ACNs might specifically interact with the polymeric network were evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Fresh red cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. Capitata f. rubra) was purchased from a local market. Whey protein isolate (WPI) was purchased from Carbery (Cork, Ireland). High methoxyl pectin (70-75% DE) from apple skin (HMP), Folin-Ciocalteau reagent, sodium carbonate, 2,2′-azinobis-3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS), 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ), ferric chloride, formic acid, acetonitrile, methanol, hydrochloric acid, cyanidin 3-glucoside (Cy3G), gallic acid (GA), Trolox and ethanol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, US).

2.2. Preparations and characterisation of anthocyanin water extract

2.2.1. ACNs extraction

The extraction of ACNs from RC was conducted following the protocol suggested by Zanoni et al. (2020) [15] with some adaptions. Briefly, 500 g of leaves were collected from daily-fresh samples harvested at maturity and without signs of pest or disease injury, minced with a knife and homogenised using a mixer. The extraction was conducted using deionised water acidified with formic acid (final pH 3.4 ± 0.1) for 60 minutes at room temperature under steady agitation (ratio sample:water 1:1). RC extract (RCE) was finally centrifuged at 6000 g, at 8 °C for 15 mins using a Beckman Coulter Avanti JXN-26 supercentrifuge (CA, US) and the supernatant freeze-dried using a 5Pascal Lio5P (Milan, Italy) freeze-drying apparatus. The process was conducted at -50 °C for at least three days and with a final chamber pressure of 0.020 mbar. The resulting samples were stored at -20 °C until further use.

2.2.2. Differential pH method

Free anthocyanins concentration was measured through the differential pH method as described by the AOAC Official Method 2005.02 [16]. In brief, RCE samples were diluted in potassium chloride buffer (pH 1.0) and sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5) in a 1:20 ratio (v:v). The absorbance of each solution was then measured using a Jasco V-730 Spectrophotometer (Jasco Europe, Italy) at 520 nm and 700 nm. The free anthocyanin content was calculated using the following equation:
Free   anthocyanins   ( mg / L ) =   A × M W × D F × 10 3 ε × l  
where A = (A520 nm – A700 nm) at pH 1.0 – (A520 nm – A700 nm) at pH 4.5; MW (molecular mass) = 449.2 g/mol for cyanidin-3-glucoside (Cy3G); DF = dilution factor established; Ɛ (molar extinction coefficient) = 26,900 L mol–1 cm–1 for Cy3G. The analysis was performed in 1 cm path length cuvettes.

2.2.3. HPLC-DAD-MS analysis

Chromatographic analyses were carried out by an HPLC Extrema LC-4000 system (Jasco Europe Srl, Italy) equipped with a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (i.d. 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 μm particle size, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The mobile phases were as follows: (A) 5% formic acid and (B) acetonitrile, and the analyses were carried out by applying the following multistep gradient at 0.5 mL/min: 5-21% B (0-76 min), 21-100% B (76-78 min), 0-100% B (78-80 min), 100-4% B (82-84 min). A six-points Cy3G calibration curve (10–200 ng) was prepared. Peak areas were linearly correlated with corresponding concentrations (R2= 0.999, p<< 0.001). Data acquisition was performed using Jasco ChromNAV v.2.03.06 software.
ACNs identification was performed using an HP 1260L liquid chromatography equipped with a DAD detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and an API (Atmospheric Pressure Ionisation) interface/ ESI (ElectroSpray Ionization) using the same column and conditions described for HPLC-DAD analysis. MS operating conditions were as follows: N2 flow of 10.5 L/min; gas temperature of 350 °C; capillary voltage of 3500 V; nebuliser pressure of 1811 Torr. The acquisition of the spectra was performed in positive ionisation, with a fragmentation energy of 150 eV.

2.3. Nanoparticles formation

2.3.1. Solutions preparation

WPI and pectin solutions were prepared by adapting the protocol proposed by Thongkaew and co-workers [12]. Briefly, powdered WPI was solubilised at 5% (w/v) concentration, while HMP was solubilised at 2% (w/v) with deionised water and stirred at ambient temperature to ensure complete hydration. WPI solution was filtered using filter paper 5-8 μm size (Lab Logistic Group, Meckenheim, Germany) to remove undissolved particles. All solutions were stored at 4 °C until use and for no more than 2 days.

2.3.2. WPI/HMP Complex coacervation

Nanoparticles were obtained by combining WPI and HMP as described previously with some modifications [11]. Four blending methods were tested and compared (see Table 1). For methods nos. 2 and 3, the WPI solution was heated at 65 °C for 40 min as previously described [12], while for method no. 4 the heating process involved the whole mix. No heat treatments were performed for method no. 1. Attempts to heat the WPI solution at 90° C for 5 minutes, as described by Arroyo-Maya et al. (2015) [11], led to its coagulation as a result of protein denaturation and aggregation (data not shown). In all cases, after the preparation, the pH was brought to 4.0 with a 1 N HCl solution to allow the coacervation. All formulations were centrifuged using an Eppendorf 5424 R centrifuge (Hamburg, Germany) at 21.000 g for 90 seconds at room temperature to remove macro-aggregates. Control samples were prepared following the same procedures and substituting RCE with an equal volume of deionised water.

2.4. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) analysis

DLS analyses were performed using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) at 25° C. Small aliquots of WPI, HMP and fresh NPs formulations were opportunely diluted with 10 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.0 to avoid multiple scattering effects. Each DLS analysis was performed in triplicate using automatic settings and disposable cuvettes. DLS outputs considered in this study were the Z-average, which represents an intensity-weighted mean of all the particles populations, the hydrodynamic diameter of the main peak, the polydispersity index (PDI), which indicates the variance in size of the particle distribution, and the ζ-potential, which defines the particles charge. The latter parameter was measured using the Smoluchowsky approximation.

2.5. Encapsulation Efficiency (EE)

The encapsulation efficiency was measured through HPLC-DAD analysis of the loaded ACNs after the removal of unbound ACNs and precipitation of the polymeric material. Briefly, 1.5 mL of fresh formulation (at 1042.0 mg/L) was dialysed for 24h using an MD10 Membra-Cel® Membrane Dialysis to separate unbound ACNs from the biopolymer particles. Dialysis was performed at 4 °C against 1 L of 5 mM sodium acetate buffer adjusted to pH 4.0, under gentle stirring. An aliquot of dialysed sample was treated with EtOH at a ratio of 1:1 v/v, gently agitated on an orbital shaker (Heidolph, Germany) for 10 minutes to cause the denaturation of the protein nanoparticles, and ultimately centrifuged to remove the insolubilised polymers. The supernatant was dried in a Heto Vacuum Centrifuge (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA), resuspended in 5% formic acid and quantified by HPLC. This ACNs fraction represents “bound ACNs”, while “total ACNs” is represented by the undialysed sample treated the same way. Hence, the EE% can be calculated through the following equation:
EE   ( % ) =   b o u n d A C N s t o t a l A C N s     x   100
Each analysis was performed in triplicate.

2.6. Effect of pH

The stability of the NPs was tested by DLS after diluting each sample in 40 mM acetate buffer at pH 5.0 or 40 mM phosphate buffer at pH 6.0 and 7.0 and gently shaking for 10 minutes. Samples were further centrifuged and analysed as described in paragraph 2.4.

2.7. Antioxidant capacity

2.7.1. ABTS

The ABTS radical-scavenging assay was performed following the method proposed by Bellumori et al. (2021) [17] with some adaptation. The ABTS working solution was produced by mixing a 7 mM ABTS solution with a 2.6 mM potassium persulfate solution in equal quantities and allowing the mixture to react for 12 h protected from light. The radical solution was then diluted with 10 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.0, to an absorbance of 0.75 ± 0.02 at 734 nm immediately before the analysis. The assay was performed on 96-well microplates (Starstedt, Germany), mixing 20 μL of standard extract or NPs with 200 μL of ABTS·, and subsequently incubating in the dark for 10 mins. The absorbance decrease at 734 nm was measured through a microplate reader. The results were expressed as Trolox-equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC, in mM) using a Trolox calibration curve from 0.5 mM to 0.015 mM.

2.7.2. Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The FRAP assay was conducted on 96-well microtiter plate, adapting a previously proposed protocol [18]. Shortly, 20 μL of standard, extract or NPs were mixed with 280 μL of freshly prepared FRAP reagent. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, and the absorbance read at 593 nm. The FRAP reagent was prepared by mixing 10 volumes of 300 mM acetate buffer at pH 4.0, 1 volume of 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ) 10mM, and 1 volume of 20 mM ferric chloride solution in 40 mM HCl. The results were expressed as Trolox equivalents (mM) using a Trolox calibration curve from 1 mM to 0.015 mM.

2.8. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)

The IR spectra of WPI, HMP, RCE, and NPs were obtained using Jasco FT/IR-4700 type A (S/N F058261788 version 2.23.06) FTIR spectrometer equipped with horizontal attenuated total reflectance (ATR) crystal (Diamond). The spectra were collected in transmittance mode on lyophilised or dried samples placed directly onto the ATR crystal. Each spectrum is the result of the average of 64 scans at 4 cm−1 resolution. Measurements were recorded between 4000 and 400 cm−1. Images were recorded and analysed using the dedicated software Jasco FTIR-4700.

2.9. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

The AFM analysis was performed on a NT-MDT Solver Pro AFM (Moscow, Russia) in semi-contact mode, using a rectangular cantilever equipped with a NT-MDT NSG01 crystal silicon golden coated tip. NPs solutions were diluted 1:30 in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.0 immediately before analysis. A 50 μl drop of suspension was deposited onto freshly cleaved inert mica supports and incubated for 10 mins at ambient temperature, then dried under argon gas flow. Images were processed with the open-source software Gwyddion ver. 2.62.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), and the data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SE). Differences between the experimental groups were assessed using Student’s t-test, unequal variances t-test (Welch test), and, where appropriate, by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the post-hoc Tukey test.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterisation of RCE

The concentration of free ACNs was 577.9 ± 70.5 mg/L. This value is consistent with previously published results [14]. RCE was analysed by HPLC-DAD, which allowed to detect 22 peaks compatible with ACNs. The analysis by HPLC-MS led to the identification of 16 peaks as glycosylated and differently acylated ACNs whose tentative identification is displayed in Table 1. The identification was carried out by comparing the data with the analytical standards when available, their retention times and their mass spectral characteristics with the literature [19,20,21,22].
Preprints 80382 g001
Figure 1. HPLC-DAD chromatogram of RCE (520 nm). Inset: typical structure of RC ACNs.
Figure 1. HPLC-DAD chromatogram of RCE (520 nm). Inset: typical structure of RC ACNs.
Preprints 80382 g001
The chromatogram is similar to previously published results [20], even if the relative abundance of the different ACNs showed some differences. This was not surprising, given the variability of the plant material in terms of genotypes, season, cultural practices etc. [23].

3.2. Coacervation

3.2.1. Electrical characterisation of the biopolymers

The ζ-potential of the WPI solution was recorded in a pH interval ranging from 3.5 to 7.0. The isoelectric point of the protein mixture was around 4.4, in agreement with previously published data [24]. Heating WPI solutions above denaturation temperature has been demonstrated to improve the stability of electrostatically-stabilised complexes with pectin [25,26]. In our hands, heating at 90 °C, as previously described [11,25], led to a strong protein denaturation, which culminated in the coagulation of the WPI solution (data not shown). The different behaviour observed by the Authors has probably been caused by the 10-fold lower protein concentration they employed. On the contrary, the thermal treatment performed at a lower temperature (65 °C), as proposed by Thongkaew et al. (2014) [12], induced a steep decrease of the ζ-potential around pH 4.0 compared to the non-heated sample (Figure 2), but no coagulation was observed.
The ζ-potential of HMP was also investigated. As expected, the polysaccharide displayed a negative charge independently of the pH, showing an increase below pH 4.0 due to the partial protonation of carboxyl groups of galacturonic acid, the main constituent of the pectin backbone. For this reason, the coacervation was performed at pH 4.0 since this specific value guaranteed the largest potential difference between the two colloids.

3.2.2. Coacervation

Coacervation is an encapsulation method in which one or more polyelectrolytes bind an active ingredient, spontaneously separating within the formulation [27]. In this work, the coacervation process involved a protein solution, mainly composed of β-lactoglobulin (~56%) and, to a lesser extent, α-lactalbumin, and an anionic polysaccharide, i.e. apple pectin, which is characterised by nearly 70% of methyl esterification. As suggested by Thongkaew et al. (2014) [12], the WPI:HMP ratio was 5:2, with a concentration of the biopolymer being 5-10 times higher than what can be found in the literature [11,28,29]. The increase in the polymer content was justified by the need for a more sustainable formulation. Indeed, too much-diluted preparations need longer and more expensive concentration steps that might limit the future scale-up. Higher polymer concentrations were impractical due to the excessive viscosity of the colloidal dispersion. Different heating and blending orders of the components were tested, and the stability of each formulation was assessed through the analysis of particle size, polydispersity index and ζ-potential. The results are presented in Table 2.
No significant differences in terms of ζ-potential between the methods were observed (p< 0.05). Although these values are somewhat similar to previously published data [11], the PDI of method no. 2 (0.170) is worthy of note since values below 0.200 are typical of a monodisperse particle population. Indeed, PDI is a measure of the heterogeneity of a sample based on size and varies from 0 to 1. The homogeneity of a NPs formulation is considered an important quality trait as functional properties and stability depend on the dimension of the particles, so the lower the dispersion, the better the functionality of the formulation. In this regard, method no. 3, which differs from the previous ones only for the blending order, i.e., the addition of HMP before RCE, showed the highest PDI. This is also evident by the presence of a second peak in the micrometer range displayed in Figure 3 (green line), in which examples of size distributions of the different methods are presented. The same figure shows that NPs produced by method no. 4 were characterised by the biggest mean diameter (445 nm vs 370-380 nm). This is in agreement with the results of Arroyo-Maya et al. (2015) [11], who observed an increase in the NP mean diameter when heating was carried out after the addition of the anthocyanin-rich extract. The absence of any thermal treatment (method no. 1) returned a relatively homogeneous NP population around 380 nm in size with a PDI slightly higher than 0.200, but with several precipitates or sediments. The diameter of the NPs is generally higher than those previously reported [11], but this might depend on the concentration of the polymers, which was higher than that used in previous works. Method no. 2 was thus selected for the following experiments.

3.2.3. Effect of RCE concentration on the morphology of NPs

Lyophilised RCE was reconstituted in deionised water immediately before the preparation of each formulation. Different concentrations, namely 38.6, 115.9, 347.4, and 1042.0 mg/L, were used to formulate NPs following method no. 2. The empty coacervate was prepared using an equal amount of water. The results are shown in Figure 4 and Table 3.
The results show that the addition of RCE to the biopolymers caused an increase in the NPs size. In particular, samples prepared at 347.4 mg/L and 1042.0 mg/L ACNs concentration display a significantly larger hydrodynamic diameter than the less concentrated formulations (p<0.05), whose size is close to the empty counterpart. Also, the ζ -potential was influenced by the presence of RCE in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4), with NPs negative charge decreasing significantly following the increase of RCE concentration. These results might be explained by considering that, at pH 4.0, the charge of ACNs can still present a faint cationic nature [30]. Under this hypothesis, the ACNs charge could be neutralised by the negative charge of HMP, thus reducing the interaction of this colloid with WPI. This would decrease the overall coacervate final charge and lead to a looser polymeric network, thus increasing the dimension of the NPs.
The results obtained by AFM are in agreement with the DLS analysis (Figure 5). Although NPs showed a monodispersed distribution in liquid form, as described in Table 3, they tend to aggregate once the solvent is removed. Although the dried samples showed a slight increase in size on the x and y axes, they appear flattened on the z axis. The different dimensions recorded in this instance may result from the loss of spherical shape suffered by the samples once dried, likely due to the NPs soft structure.

3.2.4. Effect of pH

Coacervation heavily relies on the electrostatic forces between oppositely charged biopolymers. Thus, pH changes can trigger the disruption of the polymeric network and the release of the trapped target molecules [31]. To evaluate this possibility, the NPs at 1042.0 mg/L ACNs were incubated at increasing pH values and the effects were assessed by DLS analysis. At pH 4.0, which represents the pH value of the coacervation at its optimal conditions, results show a monodisperse NPs population (PDI: 0.170, from Table 2). At pH 5.0, the PDI starts rising (PDI > 0.700), showing signs of coacervates disruption and an increase in the variance of particle distributions. This can also be deduced from the decrease in the % signal intensity and the main peak diameter. The same trend can be observed at pH 6.0 (PDI > 0.300), where a substantial decrement in the signal intensity can be appreciated, which becomes even more evident at pH 7.0 (PDI > 0.500).
These results demonstrate that by increasing pH the coacervates disaggregate. This phenomenon is of great importance since, together with the action of digestive enzymes, it might contribute to the release of the RCE active molecules within the gut lumen, where the pH is around 7.0 [32], improving their bioaccessibility.

3.2.5. Antioxidant capacity

Thanks to their peculiar structure, ACNs can exploit their antioxidant capacity to scavenge radicals following both hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) and single-electron transfer (SET) mechanisms [33]. Due to the complexity of these phenomena, their dependence on the environment and their simultaneous occurrence, several bioassays are used to determine the total antioxidant capacity of polyphenols. In this study, two well-known assays based on different scavenging mechanisms have been employed, i.e. ABTS and FRAP, representative of HAT and SET mechanisms, respectively. The ABTS assay is based on the decolourisation (inhibition) of a blue/green radical chromophore mediated by the antioxidant. The inhibiting capacity of RCE was compared with that of the empty and loaded NPs. As expected, the loaded coacervates showed a lower TEAC (16.07 ± 0.1 mM for the sample at 1042.0 mg/L and 3.82 ± 0.1 mM for that at 38.6 mg/L) than the extract tested at the same concentrations (TEAC: 22.05 ± 0.01 mM and 4.09 ± 0.2 mM, respectively), probably due to the interaction between the biopolymers and the ACNs that limited the scavenging capacity of the latter. Also empty NPs displayed a noticeable AOC (2.91 ± 0.1 mM) which is similar to the AOC exerted by the sample containing 38.6 mg/L of ACNs. This is not surprising since it is acknowledged that proteins possess antioxidant capacity and may react with ABTS•+ as already observed [34]. A similar scenario could be observed for FRAP assay. This is based on the reduction of the ferric ion mediated by electron-donating groups of the antioxidant. Even in this case, the AOC of the extract (1042.0 mg/L: 59.13 ± 0.3 mM and 38.6 mg/L: 4.69 ± 0.1 mM TEAC) was greater than that of the NPs (1042.0 mg/L NPs: 32.2 ± 0.4 mM, and 38.6 mg/L NPs: 2.31 ± 0.01 mM TEAC), but empty NPs showed negligible reducing power (0.06 ± 0.01 mM TEAC). pH is a critical point of such colourimetric assays. In both cases, the pH of the working solution was adjusted to pH 4.0, to avoid any modification of the NPs structure, especially in light of the results shown in Figure 6. This pH value ensures both the solubility equilibrium of the Fe3+/Fe2+ species, which precipitate at neutral conditions, and the stability of the ABTS•+ radical, which is less prone to its spontaneous auto-degradation [35].

3.3. Fourier-Transform IR (FT-IR) analysis of coacervates

Infrared spectroscopy is an analytical technique that provides indications on the presence of specific functional groups. In this study, there is evidence of particular structural moieties, including peptide bonds in WPI, polysaccharides composed of galacturonic acid partially converted into methyl ester in HMP, and glycosylated ACNs present in RCE, highly acylated by hydroxycinnamoyl residues like feruloyl, p-coumaroyl and sinapoyl, as determined by HPLC-DAD and MS analysis (Figure 1 and Table 1). The IR spectra registered within 400-4000 cm-1 range of WPI, HMP, RCE, empty NPs and RCE-loaded NPs are presented in Figure 8.
WPI displayed the typical protein spectrum, showing a large band between 3600 and 3000 cm-1 assigned to O-H bonds stretching with a minimum at 3276 cm-1 due to N-H stretching (Amide A band) and the two main bands at 1631 cm-1 arising mainly from the C=O stretching vibration (Amide I band), and at 1515 cm-1 due to in-plane N-H bending and C-N stretching vibration (Amide II band) [36]. Minor peaks below 3000 cm-1 (2960 and 2930 cm-1) are relative to C-H stretching. HMP spectrum was characterised by a broad absorption band at around 3358 cm-1 due to OH-stretching, with a remarkable intensity, which is typical of polyhydroxyl compounds, a band of low intensity at around 2900 cm-1 due to C-H stretching, and two characteristic peaks at 1730 cm-1 and 1612 assigned to the C=O stretchings of methoxyl groups and carboxyl groups respectively [37,38]. The peak at 1010 cm-1 is probably attributable to the glycosidic linkage between sugar units.
The RCE spectrum showed typical absorption for anthocyanins, characterised by the broad O-H stretching of the phenyl units at 3276 cm-1, the very weak C-H stretching at 2930 cm-1, the weak band at 1587 probably due to C=C stretching vibration of the aromatic rings, typically absorbing around 1600 cm-1 [39], and the intense absorption at around 530 cm-1 in the fingerprint region. Additionally, the intense peak at 1013 cm-1, attributable to C-O stretching of the glycosidic units, besides the broad band at 3276 cm-1, are indicative of glycosyl-substituted anthocyanins.
Empty NPs showed an IR spectrum markedly more similar to that of WPI than to methylated pectin. Indeed, while the two Amide bands are well visible, the C=O vibration of the methyl ester group produced a faint signal. The ratio of WPI:HMP is 5:2, not high enough to justify such a difference in the band intensities. In addition, the frequencies of the O-H and Amide I bands remained almost unaltered, and only the Amide II band showed a shift of 9 cm-1 (1525 cm-1). Similar results were observed by Guerrero et al. (2014) [40], who studied the effects of blending different carboxylated polysaccharides with model proteins. When polysaccharides were added, the vibrational frequencies assigned to the amide I and II bands remained constant, while the band assigned to carboxylate in the polysaccharides was not detectable in the blends with proteins. This indicates the occurrence of interactions between the protein and the polysaccharides, highlighting the lower capacity of the carbohydrates to form intermolecular hydrogen bonds between themselves in the presence of the protein [41]. The spectrum of RCE-loaded NPs qualitatively resembled that of the empty ones: the O-H stretching band is characterised by the same frequency but with a higher intensity. Also, the band assigned to C-OH at 1013 cm-1 showed a markedly higher intensity with respect to empty NPs. The rest of the profile, in particular the Amide I and Amide II bands absorption, is less intense, and the contribution of C=C-C vibration is not appreciable. The absorption at 2960 cm-1 is less intense: this peak is specific of the polymers, and the addition of RCE reduced its contribution to the spectrum. The results indicate that beetween WPI, HMP and the phenolic compounds contained in the extract occur some interactions.
Preprints 80382 g006
Figure 6. Overlayed DLS % intensity signals of particle distributions of the sample formulated at 1042.0 mg/L ACNs at pH 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 and 7.0.
Figure 6. Overlayed DLS % intensity signals of particle distributions of the sample formulated at 1042.0 mg/L ACNs at pH 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 and 7.0.
Preprints 80382 g006
Preprints 80382 g007
Figure 7. Comparison of the antioxidant capacity measured by ABTS (a) and FRAP (b) of NPs (at 38.6 mg/L and 1042.0 mg/L ACNs), RCE (at the same ACNs concentration), and empty NPs.
Figure 7. Comparison of the antioxidant capacity measured by ABTS (a) and FRAP (b) of NPs (at 38.6 mg/L and 1042.0 mg/L ACNs), RCE (at the same ACNs concentration), and empty NPs.
Preprints 80382 g007

3.4. Encapsulation Efficiency

The encapsulation efficiency (EE%) was assessed through HPLC-DAD after the removal of unbound molecules and the denaturation of the coacervates with the release of encapsulated ACNs. Due to the presence of several different ACNs in RCE, the EE% was calculated as the sum of all quantified peaks normalised on their relative abundance. The EE% was found to be 29.3% ± 0.1, in accordance with the results presented by Arroyo-Maya and McClements [11], which attested their loading efficiency between 17% ± 5 and 35% ± 7 for the NPs prepared by adding the ACNs extract after the thermal treatment. The comparison of the HPLC profiles of the NPs content before and after dialysis revealed peculiar binding profiles of the ACNs to the polymeric network in agreement with the FTIR results.
Preprints 80382 g009
Figure 9. Relative abundance of individual ACNs loaded in the NPs before and after dialysis. ACNs are indicated with the same numbering as in Figure 1. The significance attribution was given based on the results of an unequal variances t-test (Welch t-test) performed on each dialysed and non-dialysed peak, normalised over the respective total ACNs content, with s* and s** indicating significant differences with p values ≤ 10-3 and ≤ 10-6, respectively. NS indicates non-significant differences.
Figure 9. Relative abundance of individual ACNs loaded in the NPs before and after dialysis. ACNs are indicated with the same numbering as in Figure 1. The significance attribution was given based on the results of an unequal variances t-test (Welch t-test) performed on each dialysed and non-dialysed peak, normalised over the respective total ACNs content, with s* and s** indicating significant differences with p values ≤ 10-3 and ≤ 10-6, respectively. NS indicates non-significant differences.
Preprints 80382 g009
A comparison of the ratio between each single ACN and the total amount of all ACNs contained in the extract showed that during dialysis, the molecules harbouring a triglycosylation on the C3 position and/or a double acylation are retained more efficiently within the biopolymer than the ACNs presenting a disaccharide or a monoacylation (Figure 8). In almost all cases, the relative concentration of all peaks differed significantly from their respective non-dialysed homologues, except for peaks nos. 2 and 5, whose concentrations did not show any enrichment or depletion. For peak no. 5 this could be due to the coelution of two ACNs, cyanidin-3-(sinapoyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside and cyanidin-3-(sinapoyl)-triglucoside-5-glucoside. Notably, the non-acylated form, cyanidin-3-diglucoside-5-glucoside, was reduced by nearly 40% after dialysis, highlighting weak interaction established with the polymeric structure. A complex interplay of different factors, that include the degree of glycosylation and/or acylation appears to affect the affinity of each ACN to the polymers of the coacervates and, in turn, the overall encapsulation efficiency of the extracts. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the loading of a coacervate with a complex phenolic mixture is characterised at the single-molecule level. Further investigations are required to elucidate the differential retention of each ACN within the coacervate polymeric structure.

4. Conclusions

The present study described a simple and sustainable coacervation process to nanoencapsulate RC ACNs starting from two by-products of food industries, i.e. WPI and pectin, thus contributing to their valorisation. The pH adjustment to 4.0 led to the assembly of a monodispersed population of NPs whose dimension and ζ-potential are influenced by the concentration of the extract. Using an HPLC approach, we could provide insight into the binding affinity between the biopolymeric network and the different ACNs, showing a major binding capacity of the more glycosylated and acylated ACNs over the others. The influence of structure on the interaction with the network might be based on the affinity between the acyl groups/sugar moieties and the polymers or might be stereochemically driven by their more extended configuration. Further studies on the binding of single ACNs from different plant sources with the polymeric network could help verify whether their structure affects the encapsulation efficiency and predict which anthocyanins are better suited to be vehiculated by this approach.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.F., L.D., and G.Z.; methodology, I.F. and L.D.; investigation, I.F., L.D., G.R., M.B, A.P, I.M. A.R., A.S., and F.M.; data curation, I.F. and R.C.; writing—original draft preparation, I.F. and G.Z.; writing—review and editing, I.F. and G.Z.; project administration, G.Z..; funding acquisition, G.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received funding from Veneto Region from POR FSE 2014-2020 ASSE I (ID: FSE 1695-0023-1463-2019).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

This work received funding from the European Union under NextGenerationEU (Project iNEST). Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or The European Research Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Mattioli, R.; Francioso, A.; Mosca, L.; Silva, P. Anthocyanins: A Comprehensive Review of Their Chemical Properties and Health Effects on Cardiovascular and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Molecules 2020, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alappat, B.; Alappat, J. Anthocyanin Pigments: Beyond Aesthetics. Molecules 2020, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jackman, R.L.; Yada, R.Y.; Tung, M.A.; Speers, R.A. Anthocyanins as Food Colorants - a Review. J Food Biochem 1987, 11, 201–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Salehi, B.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Cappellini, F.; Reiner, A.; Zorzan, D.; Imran, M.; Sener, B.; Kilic, M.; El-Shazly, M.; Fahmy, N.M.; et al. The Therapeutic Potential of Anthocyanins: Current Approaches Based on Their Molecular Mechanism of Action. Front Pharmacol 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ockermann, P.; Headley, L.; Lizio, R.; Hansmann, J. A Review of the Properties of Anthocyanins and Their Influence on Factors Affecting Cardiometabolic and Cognitive Health. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Enaru, B.; Dretcanu, G.; Pop, T.D.; Stanila, A.; Diaconeasa, Z. Anthocyanins: Factors Affecting Their Stability and Degradation. Antioxidants-Basel 2021, 10, 1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Song, J.H.; Yu, Y.; Chen, M.H.; Ren, Z.Y.; Chen, L.; Fu, C.L.; Ma, Z.F.; Li, Z.M. Advancement of Protein- and Polysaccharide-Based Biopolymers for Anthocyanin Encapsulation. Front Nutr 2022, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rosales, T.K.O.; Fabi, J.P. Nanoencapsulated anthocyanin as a functional ingredient: Technological application and future perspectives. Colloid Surface B 2022, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, H.; Saroglu, O.; Karadag, A.; Diaconeasa, Z.; Zoccatelli, G.; Conte, C.A.; Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A.; Ou, J.Y.; Bai, W.B.; Zamarioli, C.M.; et al. Available technologies on improving the stability of polyphenols in food processing. Food Frontiers 2021, 2, 109–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Comunian, T.A.; Silva, M.P.; Souza, C.J.F. The use of food by-products as a novel for functional foods: Their use as ingredients and for the encapsulation process. Trends Food Sci Tech 2021, 108, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arroyo-Maya, I.J.; McClements, D.J. Biopolymer nanoparticles as potential delivery systems for anthocyanins: Fabrication and properties. Food Res Int 2015, 69, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thongkaew, C.; Gibis, M.; Hinrichs, J.; Weiss, J. Polyphenol interactions with whey protein isolate and whey protein isolate-pectin coacervates. Food Hydrocolloid 2014, 41, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oliveira, A.; Ruiz-Henestrosa, V.M.P.; von Staszewski, M.; Pilosof, A.M.R.; Pintado, M. Behaviour of cyanidin-3-glucoside, beta-lactoglobulin and polysaccharides nanoparticles in bulk and oil-in-water interfaces. Carbohyd Polym 2015, 132, 460–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ghareaghajlou, N.; Hallaj-Nezhadi, S.; Ghasempour, Z. Red cabbage anthocyanins: Stability, extraction, biological activities and applications in food systems. Food Chem 2021, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zanoni, F.; Primiterra, M.; Angeli, N.; Zoccatelli, G. Microencapsulation by spray-drying of polyphenols extracted from red chicory and red cabbage: Effects on stability and color properties. Food Chem 2020, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, J.; Durst, R.W.; Wrolstad, R.E. Determination of total monomeric anthocyanin pigment content of fruit juices, beverages, natural colorants, and wines by the pH differential method: Collaborative study. J Aoac Int 2005, 88, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bellumori, M.; De Marchi, L.; Mainente, F.; Zanoni, F.; Cecchi, L.; Innocenti, M.; Mulinacci, N.; Zoccatelli, G. A by-product from virgin olive oil production (pate) encapsulated by fluid bed coating: evaluation of the phenolic profile after shelf-life test and in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Int J Food Sci Tech 2021, 56, 3773–3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. de la Torre, A.A.S.B.; Henderson, T.; Nigam, P.S.; Owusu-Apenten, R.K. A universally calibrated microplate ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay for foods and applications to Manuka honey. Food Chem 2015, 174, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wiczkowski, W.; Szawara-Nowak, D.; Topolska, J. Red cabbage anthocyanins: Profile, isolation, identification, and antioxidant activity. Food Res Int 2013, 51, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fang, S.; Lin, F.B.; Qu, D.F.; Liang, X.R.; Wang, L.P. Characterization of Purified Red Cabbage Anthocyanins: Improvement in HPLC Separation and Protective Effect against H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress in HepG2 Cells. Molecules 2019, 24, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Steingass, C.B.; Burkhardt, J.; Baumer, V.; Kumar, K.; Mibus-Schoppe, H.; Zinkernagel, J.; Esquivel, P.; Jimenez, V.M.; Schweiggert, R. Characterisation of acylated anthocyanins from red cabbage, purple sweet potato, and Tradescantia pallida leaves as natural food colourants by HPLC-DAD-ESI(+)-QTOF-MS/MS and ESI(+)-MS(n) analysis. Food Chem 2023, 416, 135601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Izzo, L.; Rodriguez-Carrasco, Y.; Pacifico, S.; Castaldo, L.; Narvaez, A.; Ritieni, A. Colon Bioaccessibility under In Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion of a Red Cabbage Extract Chemically Profiled through UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS. Antioxidants-Basel 2020, 9, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Strauch, R.C.; Mengist, M.F.; Pan, K.; Yousef, G.G.; Iorizzo, M.; Brown, A.F.; Lila, M.A. Variation in anthocyanin profiles of 27 genotypes of red cabbage over two growing seasons. Food Chem 2019, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pelegrine, D.H.G.; Gasparetto, C.A. Whey proteins solubility as function of temperature and pH. Lwt-Food Sci Technol 2005, 38, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jones, O.; Decker, E.A.; McClements, D.J. Thermal analysis of beta-lactoglobulin complexes with pectins or carrageenan for production of stable biopolymer particles. Food Hydrocolloid 2010, 24, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gentes, M.C.; St-Gelais, D.; Turgeon, S.L. Stabilization of Whey Protein Isolate-Pectin Complexes by Heat. J Agr Food Chem 2010, 58, 7051–7058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Grgic, J.; Selo, G.; Planinic, M.; Tisma, M.; Bucic-Kojic, A. Role of the Encapsulation in Bioavailability of Phenolic Compounds. Antioxidants-Basel 2020, 9, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Krzeminski, A.; Prell, K.A.; Weiss, J.; Hinrichs, J. Environmental response of pectin-stabilized whey protein aggregates. Food Hydrocolloid 2014, 35, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Girard, M.; Sanchez, C.; Laneuville, S.I.; Turgeon, S.L.; Gauthier, S.E. Associative phase separation of beta-lactoglobulin/pectin solutions: a kinetic study by small angle static light scattering. Colloid Surface B 2004, 35, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Di Meo, F.; Garcia, J.C.S.; Dangles, O.; Trouillas, P. Highlights on Anthocyanin Pigmentation and Copigmentation: A Matter of Flavonoid pi-Stacking Complexation To Be Described by DFT-D. J Chem Theory Comput 2012, 8, 2034–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Devi, N.; Sarmah, M.; Khatun, B.; Maji, T.K. Encapsulation of active ingredients in polysaccharide-protein complex coacervates. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2017, 239, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lindahl, A.; Ungell, A.L.; Knutson, L.; Lennernas, H. Characterization of fluids from the stomach and proximal jejunum in men and women. Pharm Res-Dordr 1997, 14, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tena, N.; Martin, J.; Asuero, A.G. State of the Art of Anthocyanins: Antioxidant Activity, Sources, Bioavailability, and Therapeutic Effect in Human Health. Antioxidants-Basel 2020, 9, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zanoni, F.; Vakarelova, M.; Zoccatelli, G. Development and Characterization of Astaxanthin-Containing Whey Protein-Based Nanoparticles. Mar Drugs 2019, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ozgen, M.; Reese, R.N.; Tulio, A.Z.; Scheerens, J.C.; Miller, A.R. Modified 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) method to measure antioxidant capacity of selected small fruits and comparison to ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2 '-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) methods. J Agr Food Chem 2006, 54, 1151–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barth, A. Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007, 1767, 1073–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Koziol, A.; Sroda-Pomianek, K.; Gorniak, A.; Wikiera, A.; Cyprych, K.; Malik, M. Structural Determination of Pectins by Spectroscopy Methods. Coatings 2022, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fellah, A.; Anjukandi, P.; Waterland, M.R.; Williams, M.A.K. Determining the degree of methylesterification of pectin by ATR/FT-IR: Methodology optimisation and comparison with theoretical calculations. Carbohyd Polym 2009, 78, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pismenskaya, N.; Sarapulova, V.; Klevtsova, A.; Mikhaylin, S.; Bazinet, L. Adsorption of Anthocyanins by Cation and Anion Exchange Resins with Aromatic and Aliphatic Polymer Matrices. Int J Mol Sci 2020, 21, 7874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guerrero, P.; Kerry, J.P.; de la Caba, K. FTIR characterization of protein-polysaccharide interactions in extruded blends. Carbohyd Polym 2014, 111, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Carpenter, J.F.; Crowe, J.H. An Infrared Spectroscopic Study of the Interactions of Carbohydrates with Dried Proteins. Biochemistry-Us 1989, 28, 3916–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Preprints 80382 g002
Figure 2. Influence of pH on the ζ-potential of WPI, pre-heated WPI (H-WPI), and HMP solutions.
Figure 2. Influence of pH on the ζ-potential of WPI, pre-heated WPI (H-WPI), and HMP solutions.
Preprints 80382 g002
Preprints 80382 g003
Figure 3. Representation of DLS intensity % distribution of the formulations obtained with the four methods. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p≤0.05).
Figure 3. Representation of DLS intensity % distribution of the formulations obtained with the four methods. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p≤0.05).
Preprints 80382 g003
Preprints 80382 g004
Figure 4. Effect of RCE concentration on the hydrodynamic diameter of the main peak and ζ-potential of the preparation obtained with method no. 2. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p≤0.05).
Figure 4. Effect of RCE concentration on the hydrodynamic diameter of the main peak and ζ-potential of the preparation obtained with method no. 2. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p≤0.05).
Preprints 80382 g004
Preprints 80382 g005
Figure 5. Semi-contact AFM analysis of empty NPs (A and D), NPs containing 38.6 mg/L ACNs (B and E) and NPs containing 1042.0 mg/L ACNs (C and F). Dimensions of the scanning areas were 30 x 30 for panels A-C and 5 x 5 μm for panels D-F. Samples were diluted 1:30 using 10 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.0, and allowed to be set on muscovite micas for at least 10 mins before drying through argon flow immediately before scanning.
Figure 5. Semi-contact AFM analysis of empty NPs (A and D), NPs containing 38.6 mg/L ACNs (B and E) and NPs containing 1042.0 mg/L ACNs (C and F). Dimensions of the scanning areas were 30 x 30 for panels A-C and 5 x 5 μm for panels D-F. Samples were diluted 1:30 using 10 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.0, and allowed to be set on muscovite micas for at least 10 mins before drying through argon flow immediately before scanning.
Preprints 80382 g005
Preprints 80382 g008
Figure 8. IR spectra of WPI, HMP, RCE, empty NPs and RCE-loaded NPs.
Figure 8. IR spectra of WPI, HMP, RCE, empty NPs and RCE-loaded NPs.
Preprints 80382 g008
Table 1. Identification of RC ACNs.
Table 1. Identification of RC ACNs.
Peak No. Peak Identity M+(m/z)
1 Cyanidin-3-diglucoside-5-glucoside 773
2 Cyanidin-3-glucoside-5-glucoside 611
5 Cyanidin-3-(sinapoyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside 979
5 Cyanidin-3-(sinapoyl)-triglucoside-5-glucoside 1141
7 Cyanidin-3-(p-coumaroyl)-triglucoside-5-glucoside 1081
8 Cyanidin-3-(feruloyl)-triglucoside-5-glucoside 1111
9 Cyanidin-3-(sinapoyl)-triglucoside-5-glucoside 1141
11 Cyanidin-3-(feruloyl)(feruloyl)-triglucoside-5-glucoside 1287
13 Cyanidin-3-(feruloyl)(sinapoyl)-triglucoside-5-glucoside 1317
14 Cyanidin-3-(sinapoyl)(sinapoyl)-triglucoside-5-glucoside 1347
15 Cyanidin-3-(p-coumaroyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside 919
16 Cyanidin-3-(sinapoyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside 979
16 Cyanidin-3-(feruloyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside 949
18 Cyanidin-3-(sinapoyl)-glucoside-5-glucoside 817
19 Cyanidin-3-(feruloyl)(feruloyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside 1125
20 Cyanidin 3-(5-OHferuloyl)(sinapoyl)-triglucoside-5-glucoside 1171
21 Cyanidin-3-(feruloyl)(sinapoyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside 1155
22 Cyanidin-3-(sinapoyl)(sinapoyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside 1185
Table 2. Z-Average, PDI (polydispersity index), diameter, and ζ-potential of the nanoparticles developed with the different methods.
Table 2. Z-Average, PDI (polydispersity index), diameter, and ζ-potential of the nanoparticles developed with the different methods.
Method Blending Order Heat Treatment Z-Average (nm) + SE PDI + SE Diameter (nm) + SE ζ-potential (mV) + SE
1 WPI + RCE + HMP (1:0.2:1) None 396.80 ± 21.78 0.225 ± 0.03 385.85 ± 7.26 a -16.83 ± 0.33 ab
2 WPI + RCE + HMP (1:0.2:1) WPI, 65 °C, before blending 323.71 ± 12.97 0.170 ± 0.09 337.28 ± 5.33 b -17.76 ± 0.40 a
3 WPI + HMP + RCE (1:1:0.2) WPI, 65 °C before blending 428.61 ± 35.35 0.308 ± 0.04 384.31 ± 11.69 a -17.99 ± 0.15 a
4 WPI + HMP + RCE (1:1:0.2) Whole mix, 65 °C, after blending 507.62 ± 13.8 0.283 ± 0.03 445.20 ± 2.23 c -15.86 ± 0.38 b
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE) from triplicates. Different lowercase letters within the same column indicate significant differences (p≤0.05). The relative volume ratio of WPI, RCE, and HMP used for every formulation is reported in round brackets. The ACN concentration was 38.6 mg/L. Data for methods 5 and 6, which required the application of a 90 °C thermal treatment, are not shown due to the coagulation of the WPI solution during the coacervation process.
Table 3. Z-Average, PDI (polydispersity index), diameter of the main peak, and ζ-potential of the nanoparticles developed with different concentrations of RCE using method no. 2.
Table 3. Z-Average, PDI (polydispersity index), diameter of the main peak, and ζ-potential of the nanoparticles developed with different concentrations of RCE using method no. 2.
ACN concentration
(mg/L)		 Z-Average (nm) + SE PDI + SE Diameter (nm) + SE ζ-potential (mV) + SE
Empty 320.4 ± 5.2 0.09 ± 0.1 337.2 ± 6.7 a -17.20 ± 1.0 a
38.6 323.7 ± 13.0 0.170 ± 0.1 337.3 ± 5.3 a -15.64 ± 0.0 b
115.9 322.7 ± 9.7 0.160 ± 0.1 335.9 ± 6.4 a -15.52 ± 0.1 b
347.4 343.0 ± 2.1 0.050 ± 0.0 356.8 ± 0.4 b -15.34 ± 0.1 b
1042.0 365.0 ± 8.5 0.250 ± 0.1 368.2 ± 3.0 b -14.24 ± 0.3 c
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE) from triplicates. Different lowercase letters within the same column indicate significant differences (p≤0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated