Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Realism and Contextuality: Maximal Bell Violations with Non-Invasive Measurements
Version 1
: Received: 8 August 2023 / Approved: 9 August 2023 / Online: 9 August 2023 (10:54:11 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 11 October 2023 / Approved: 11 October 2023 / Online: 13 October 2023 (12:42:51 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 10 January 2024 / Approved: 10 January 2024 / Online: 10 January 2024 (14:42:26 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 11 October 2023 / Approved: 11 October 2023 / Online: 13 October 2023 (12:42:51 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 10 January 2024 / Approved: 10 January 2024 / Online: 10 January 2024 (14:42:26 CET)
How to cite: Mardari, G. Realism and Contextuality: Maximal Bell Violations with Non-Invasive Measurements. Preprints 2023, 2023080773. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.0773.v1 Mardari, G. Realism and Contextuality: Maximal Bell Violations with Non-Invasive Measurements. Preprints 2023, 2023080773. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.0773.v1
Abstract
Predetermined physical properties cannot manifest at the same time if they are mutually exclusive. As part of a single system, they become observable at different times, in sequence. In this case, pairwise detections in a narrow window of coincidence allow for maximal Bell violations (S=4 for the CHSH protocol), without room for doubt about the local nature of the process. This shows that a deeper description of physical reality is possible, as suggested by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen. Though, a more inclusive definition of Realism is required, in order to account for Bohr’s Contextuality.
Keywords
quantum entanglement; EPR paradox; Bell’s theorem; realism; contextuality.
Subject
Physical Sciences, Quantum Science and Technology
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment