1. Introduction
At the heart of ring theory lies the concept of derivations, over the years, several researchers have extended the notion of derivations in various directions such as generalized derivations,
-derivations, bi-derivations, higher derivations, symmetric
n-derivations, etc. and have studied the structure of rings as well as the structure of additive mappings (refer to [
3,
4,
5,
6,
12,
13,
22,
23]). In this research article, we present a comprehensive investigation of symmetric generalized
n-derivations, seeking to establish a theoretical connection between symmetric generalized
n-derivations and other fundamental algebraic concepts. “Throughout the discussion, we will consider
to be an associative ring with
being its center. A ring
is said to be prime if,
implies that either
or
, and semiprime if,
implies that
, where
. The symbols
and
denote the commutator,
and the anti-commutator,
, respectively, for all
. A ring
is said to be
n-torsion free if
implies that
for all
. If
is
-torsion free, then it is
d-torsion free for every divisor
d of
. Recall that an ideal
of
is said to be prime if,
and for
,
implies that
or
. An additive mapping
is called a derivation if
holds for all
. Following [
14], an additive mapping
is said to be a generalized derivation on
if there exists a derivation
such that
holds for all
. A bi-additive map
is said to be symmetric if
for all
. A symmetric bi-additive map is said to be symmetric bi-derivation if
for all
. The concept of symmetric bi-derivation in rings was introduced by G. Maksa [
16]. Suppose
n is a fixed positive integer and
. A map
is said to be symmetric(permuting) if the relation
holds for all
and for every permutation
. The concept of derivation and symmetric bi-derivation was generalized by Park [
18] as follows: a permuting map
is said to be a permuting
n-derivation if
is
n-additive (i.e.; additive in each coordinate) and
holds for all
. A 1-derivation is a derivation and a 2-derivation is a symmetric bi-derivation while a 3-derivation is known as permuting tri-derivation (viz., [
2,
7,
12,
17,
23,
24,
25]). Let
be a fixed integer and a map
defined by
for all
, where
is a permuting map, be the trace of
. If
is symmetric and
n-additive, then the trace
d of
satisfies the relation
for all
."
Motivated by the concept of generalized derivation in ring, Ashraf et al. [
12] introduced the notion of permuting generalized
n-derivation in ring. Let
be a fixed positive integer. A permuting
n-additive map
is known to be permuting generalized
n-derivation if there exists a permuting
n-derivation
such that
holds for all
. In fact, in [
12], the authors proved that “for a fixed positive integer
, let
be a
-torsion free semiprime ring admitting a permuting generalized n-derivation
with associated
n-derivation
such that the trace
of
is centralizing on
. Then
is commuting on
". Also, in [
8], Ashraf et al. have characterized the traces of permuting generalized
n-derivations. In fact, their result was motivated by the result due to Hvala [
15]. Basically, they proved that “for a fixed positive integer
, let
be a
-torsion free prime ring. Suppose that
and
are the traces of permuting generalized
n-derivations
,
respectively and
;
are the traces of associated derivations
and
respectively. If
holds for all
, then there exists
, the extended centroid of
such that
."
Many researchers have extensively examined a wide range of identities involving traces of
n-derivations, leading to the discovery of various interesting results (see, for example [
1,
2,
8,
10,
12,
19] and the associated references). Very recently, Ali et al. [
2], explored some algebraic identities associated with the trace of symmetric
n-derivations acting on prime ideal
of
, but without imposing the assumption of primeness on the ring under consideration. In fact, apart from proving some other interesting results, they extended the famous result [
20] for the trace of symmetric
n-derivations which involves prime ideals. Precisely, they proved that for any fixed integer
, let
be any ring and
be a prime ideal of
such that
is
-torsion free. If there exists a non-zero symmetric
n-derivation
with trace
on
such that
, for all
, then either
is a commutative integral domain or
.
The main purpose of our current research is to delve into the structure of the quotient ring where is any ring and is a prime ideal of which admits symmetric generalized n-derivations satisfying certain algebraic identities acting on prime ideals . In particular, we prove that if a ring admits a symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying any one of the following functional identities:
- (i)
- (ii)
- (iii)
- (iv)
- (v)
- (vi)
,
for all , then one of the following holds:
- (1)
- (2)
is a commutative integral domain.
2. The Results
The following auxiliary results are essential for proving the above mentioned results:
Lemma 1. “ ([
19]) For a fixed positive integer
n, let
be a ring and
be a prime ideal of
, such that
is
-torsion free. Suppose that
satisfy
for
. Then
for
Lemma 2. [
21] Let
be a ring and
be a prime ideal of
. If one of the following conditions is satisfied, then
is a commutative integral domain.
Lemma 3. ([
2]) For a fixed integer
, let
be a ring and
be a prime ideal of
such that
is
-torsion free and
be a nonzero symmetric
n-derivation on
with trace
. If
for all
, then
or
is a commutative integral domain.”
Our first main result establishes a link between the derivation and symmetric generalized n-derivation. In simpler terms, we demonstrate the following result:
Theorem 4. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. Let be a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with associated symmetric n-derivation with traces of and of . Next, let be a derivation on . If ∀, then we have one of the following assertions:
-
1.
-
2.
is a commutative integral domain.
Proof. By the assumption, we have
Replacing
by
for
,
, we get
Continuing to solve, we obtain
Application of relation (
1) yields that
This can be written as
where
represents the term in which
appears
t-times.
On taking account of Lemma 1, we get
Substitute
for
, we see that
which on solving, we get
By (
4), we have
Replace
by
in (
5) and use (
5) to get
or
Considering the primeness of the ideal
, we get for all
Consequently,
is a union of two of its proper subgroups
and
, where
Since a group cannot be a union of two of its proper subgroups, we are forced to conclude that either
or
. Consider the first case,
, i.e.,
. Using Lemma 2, we conclude that
is commutative integral domain. By the second case, we have
. □
Theorem 5. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying the condition ∀, then one of the following holds:
-
1.
-
2.
is a commutative integral domain.
Proof. We have
Replace
by
for
and
leads to
As a consequence obtaining
∀
. Using the relation (
6), we obviously find that
and thus,
where
represents the term in which
appears
t-times.
The application of Lemma 1 yields
Replacing
by
, we can see that
After additional computation
By using (
7) and using the hypothesis, we get
Since
is
-torsion free, we get
Again replacing
by
and using (
8), we obtain
Next, replace
by
for
,
, to get
After simplification, we find that
∀
. Application of (
9) and Lemma 1 gives
Putting
instead of
z in (
10) and using (
10), we can see that
or
On taking account of primeness of
, we get for all
Consequently,
is a union of two of its proper subgroups
and
, where
Since a group cannot be a union of two of its proper subgroups, we can only deduce that either
or
. Consider the second case,
, i.e.,
. Replace
w by
to obtain
. This implies that
for all
, i.e.,
. Since
, then
for all
, i.e.,
. If
, then using Lemma 2, we conclude that
is a commutative integral domain. □
Theorem 6. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying any one of the following conditions:
-
1.
∀
-
2.
∀
Then we have one of the following assertions:
-
1.
-
2.
is commutative integral domain.
Proof. It is given that
Replacing
by
for
and
in above, we get
After simplifying the expression, we get
∀
. On using the given condition, we obtain
which implies that
∀
where
represents the term in which
z appears
t-times.
In view of Lemma 1 and torsion restriction, we have
Replacing
z by
and using the given condition, we find that
for all
. In particular,
for all
. Thus by Lemma 3,
is commutative integral domain or
.
- (ii)
Proceeding in the same way as in , we conclude. □
Theorem 7. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying any one of the following conditions:
-
1.
∀
-
2.
∀
Then we have one of the following assertions:
-
1.
-
2.
is commutative integral domain.
Proof. Assume that
On replacing
by
, for
, we get
By simplifying, we find
∀
. By applying the provided condition, we obtain the following:
which implies that
∀
where
represents the term in which
z appears
t-times.
Taking into account of Lemma 1 and torsion restriction, we find that
Replacing
z by
, we get
, then our hypothesis reduces to
. Replace
by
to get
and hence we get
for all
, i.e.,
. Since
, then
. In particular,
for all
. Thus by, [
2],
is commutative integral domain or
.
- (ii)
Proceeding in the same way as in , we conclude. □
Theorem 8. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying the condition for all , then either or is commutative integral domain.
Proof. It is provided that
Substitute
in place of
for
to get
∀
. Through the utilization of the given condition, we get
which implies that
∀
where
represents the term in which
z appears
t-times.
In the context of Lemma 1 and torsion restriction, we get
Replacing
z by
and using the given condition, we find that
for all
. In particular,
for all
. Thus by, Theorem 5,
is commutative integral domain or
. □
Corollary 9. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying the condition ∀, then either or is commutative integral domain.
Theorem 10. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying the condition for all , then one of the following assertions hold:
-
1.
-
2.
is commutative integral domain.
Proof. Assume that
Replace
by
, for
to get
After simplifying, it becomes
∀
. By employing the provided condition, we obtain
which implies that
∀
where
represents the term in which
z appears
t-times.
In light of Lemma 1 and torsion restriction, we get
Replacing
z by
and using the given condition, we find that
for all
. In particular,
for all
. Thus by, [
2],
is commutative integral domain or
. □
Theorem 11. For any fixed integer , let be a ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying ∀, then is commutative integral domain.
Proof. On replacing
by
,
for
in the given condition, we get
Further solving, we have
In accordance of the given condition and Lemma 1, we get
Replacing
by
, we find that
or
The application of the torsion restriction gives that
. This implies that
for all
. Replacing
by
, we get
. Again replacing
z by
, we get
for all
. Using the primeness of
, we get
for all
. Hence
is commutative integral domain by Lemma 2. □
Theorem 12. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying one of the following conditions:
-
1.
-
2.
Then is commutative integral domain.
Proof.
Given that
Consider a positive integer
m;
. Replacing
by
, where
in (
11), we get
On further solving, we get
On taking account of hypothesis, we see that
which results in
where
represents the term in which
z appears
t-times.
Using Lemma 1 and torsion restriction, we have
In particular, for
, we get
Now using the given condition, we find that
From Lemma 2,
is commutative integral domain.
- (ii)
Follows from the first implication with a slight modification. □
Following are the very interesting observations derived from Theorem 12.
Corollary 13. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying one of the following conditions:
Then is commutative integral domain.
Corollary 14. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying one of the following conditions:
Then is commutative integral domain.
Proof.
Let us assume that
According to semiprimeness, there exists a family
of prime ideals
such that
thereby obtaining
for all
. Invoking the previous theorem, we conclude that
is commutative integral domain. Therefore, for all
, we have
and since
. This implies that
. Hence,
is commutative.
- (ii)
Similarly, if for all , then the same reasoning proves the required result. □
Corollary 15. For any fixed integer , let be a -torsion free semiprime ring and be a n-derivation of with trace satisfying any one of the following conditions:
Then is commutative.
Theorem 16. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and P be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying ∀ then is commutative integral domain.
Proof. The given condition is that
Put
in place of
, where
to get
Upon simplifying, we arrive at
∀
. In light of the given condition, we obtain
which implies that
∀
where
represents the term in which
z appears
t-times.
Because of Lemma 1 and torsion restriction, we get
Replacing
z by
and using the given condition, we find that
∀
i.e.,
. Using the Lemma 2, we get
is commutative integral domain. □
Corollary 17. For any fixed integer , let be a - torsion free semiprime ring. If admits a nonzero permuting n-derivation with trace satisfying , ∀, then is commutative.
Theorem 18. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying any one of the following conditions:
-
1.
-
2.
,
Then is commutative integral domain.
Proof.
Replacing
by
for
,
in the given condition, we get
After simplification, it becomes
Using the specified condition, we get
which implies that
∀
where
represents the term in which
z appears
t-times. Using Lemma 1 and using the fact that
is
-torsion free, we get
For
, we get
then our hypothesis reduces to
. Using the Lemma 2, we get
is commutative integral domain.
- (ii)
Proceeding in the same way as in , we conclude. □
Corollary 19. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric n-derivation with trace . If satisfying any one of the following conditions:
Then is commutative integral domain.
Corollary 20. [
9] For any fixed integer
, let
be a
- torsion free semiprime ring. If
admits a nonzero permuting
n-derivation
with trace
satisfying
, ∀
, then
is commutative.
Theorem 21. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying one of the following conditions:
-
1.
-
2.
Then is commutative integral domain.
Proof.
Given that
Replacing
by
, where
and
in the given condition, we get
which on solving
∀
. By using hypothesis, we get
which implies that
∀
where
represents the term in which
z appears
t-times.
Making use of Lemma 1 and torsion restriction, we see that
Replace
z by
to get
Hence, by using the given condition, we find that
. On taking account of Lemma 2, we get
is commutative integral domain.
- (ii)
Follows from the first implication with a slight modification. □
Corollary 22. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying one of the following conditions:
Then is commutative integral domain.
Corollary 23. For any fixed integer , let be a -torsion free semiprime ring. If admits a nonzero symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying one of the following conditions:
Then is commutative.
Theorem 24. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric generalized n-derivation with trace associated with symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying one of the following conditions:
-
1.
-
2.
-
3.
Then is commutative integral domain.
Proof.
We assume that
Replacing
by
, where
and
in the given condition, we get
which on solving
By using hypothesis, we get
which implies that
∀
where
represents the term in which
z appears
t-times.
Making use of Lemma 1, we see that
Since
is
-torsion free, we get
In particular,
, we get
Hence, by using the given condition, we find that
. On taking account of Lemma 2, we get
is commutative integral domain.
Replace
by
, where
and
, we get
After simplification, we obtain
By using hypothesis, we get
which implies that
∀
where
represents the term in which
z appears
t-times. Application of Lemma 1 gives that
Since
is
-torsion free, we get
In particular,
, we get
Hence, by using the given condition, we find that
and using Lemma 2, we get
is commutative integral domain.
- (iii)
Proceeding in the same way as in , we conclude. □
Corollary 25. For any fixed integer , let be a -torsion free semiprime ring and be n-derivation of with trace . If satisfy any one of the following:
Then is commutative.
Theorem 26. For any fixed integer , let be any ring and be a prime ideal of such that is -torsion free. If admits a nonzero symmetric n-derivation with trace satisfying ∀ then either or is commutative integral domain.
Proof. Replacing
by
for
,
in the hypothesis, we get
After simplification, it becomes
which implies that
∀
where
represents the term in which
z appears
t-times.
Using Lemma 1 and the fact that
is
-torsion free , we have
Replace
z by
in above relation and using the above relation, we have
Also,
Using (
14) and (
15), we get
Writing
instead of
r, we get
In particular for
,
Since
is prime, it follows that either
or
for all
. Using the Lemma 3, we get
or
is commutative integral domain. □
Corollary 27. [
9] For any fixed integer
, let
be a
- torsion free semiprime ring. If
admits a nonzero permuting
n-derivation
with trace
satisfying
, ∀
, then
is commuting on
.