Introduction
The Hubble tension is the fact that early universe measurement and calculations to determine the value of Hubble’s constant and late time measurements have given results with a difference which is larger than the uncertainties of the determined values. A recent review of late time measurements have been given by Adam Riess and co-workers [
1] with the result
H0 = 73.04 ± 1.04 km s
−1 Mpc
−1. The most recent result using supernovae and quasars was announced 30. August 2023 by T. Liu et al. [
2]. They found
H0 = 73.51 ± 0.67 km s
−1 Mpc
−1. A review of the early universe measurements have been given by the Planck team [
3] with the result
H0 = (67.4 ± 0.5) km s
−1 Mpc
−1. Further references are found in these articles.
A large number of articles have been published with proposed solutions to the Hubble tension, but so far no solution has been generally accepted. A review [
4] with 709 references have recently been published by Maria Dainotti and co-workers.
In the present paper I focus on the proposal that the cosmic anisotropy can solve the problem [
5]. Akarsu et al. [
6] have given constraints on the anisotropy of a Bianchi type I spacetime extension of the standard ΛCDM universe model. We shall now deduce the main kinematical properties of two such universe models.
Simple Bianchi type I extension of the standard ΛCDM universe model
The Bianchi type I universe model is the simplest extension of the flat, isotropic ΛCDM-universe admitting anisotropic cosmic expansion. In this section we shall consider the most simple universe model of this type where only one direction expands anisotropically from the others, following M. Le Delliou et al. [
7].
The line element has the form (using units so that the velocity of light
)
where the scale factor
is normalized so that its present value is
. The departure from isotropy is measured by the anisotropic perturbation parameter
. In accordance with observational constraints Delliou et al. applied the initial condition
at the point of time of the cosmic recombination,
, when the scale factor had the value
.
In this universe model the field equations for
a have the same form as in the isotropic ΛCDM universe model [
8]. Hence the co-moving volume
has the same time evolution as that of the isotropic model,
where
are a characteristic time, the Hubble constant, and the mass-energy parameters of the mass and dark energy.
By integrating the field equation for
Delliou et al. [
7] showed that
, where
is the present rate of change of
. Inserting the expression (2) for
V we have
Integrating this equation gives
Following [
7] the average Hubble parameter for this universe model is given by
In the isotropic ΛCDM-universe
, and the formula for the Hubble parameter reduces to
Hence at the present time
Using this together with
the formula (6) gives for the Hubble parameter in the anisotropic universe at the present time
The difference between the Hubble constants in the isotropic- and anisotropic universe is
. This is the change of the Hubble constant necessary to solve the Hubble tension. Hence the present rate of change of the anisotropy parameter necessary to solve the Hubble tension is
The difference between the values of the Hubble constant obtained from late time and early time measurements were reviewed in the introduction and gives
. Hence the present rate of change of the anisotropy parameter necessary to solve the Hubble tension is
.
The present value of
coming from observations can be estimated for the formulae in the appendix of [
7]. According to their eq.(A8)
with
Since
we can approximate the expression (12) with
Hence, since we are only interested in an order of magnitude estimate, we can calculate the value of the present rate of change of the anisotropy parameter from
Inserting
gives
. This is a factor
smaller than that needed to solve the Hubble tension.
General Bianchi type I extension of the standard ΛCDM universe model
We now consider a general Bianchi type I universe model allowing for different expansion factors in three orthogonal directions with scale factors
. Using units with the velocity of light
the line-element has the form
The average scale factor,
, and co-moving volume,
, are
The scale factors are normalized so that the co-moving volume at the present time is
. The directional Hubble parameters and the average Hubble parameter are
The shear scalar,
is a kinematic quantity representing the anisotropy of the cosmic expansion.
We consider a Bianchi type I universe filled by cold matter in the form of dust with density
and vanishing pressure, and dark energy of the LIVE-type [
8] having a constant density,
, which can be represented by the cosmological constant
, and a pressure
. A model of this type has earlier been studied by P. T. Saunders [
9], and the corresponding model without dust was used by Ø. Grøn to describe the expansion isotropization during the inflationary era [
10].
For the line element (1) Einstein’s field equations
where
is Einstein’s gravitational constant, take the form [
5],
Integration of Eq.(21), using that
, gives
where
are integration constants equal to the values of
at the present time. Hence the shear scalar is
where
is the value of the shear scalar at the present time.
A consequence of Einstein’s field equations is the laws of energy and momentum conservation in the form
Assuming that there is no transition between matter and dark energy, this gives the equations of continuity for the matter and energy
Hence
where
is the present value of the average density of the cosmic matter.
It has become usual to express equation (20) in terms of the mass density parameter,
, the dark energy parameter,
and the expansion anisotropy parameter,
. Inserting these parameters into Eq.(20) gives
Furthermore inserting also Eqs.(23) and (26) into Eq.(20) and using that
gives
Integrating this equation with the initial condition
gives
which may also be written as
This is the time-dependence of the co-moving volume in the Bianchi-type I anisotropic generalization of the
CDM universe model. In the isotropic case with
this model reduces to the standard universe model with co-moving volume given in eq.(2).
The anisotropic universe model will now be used to investigate whether the expansion isotropy of the universe may solve the Hubble tension. Differentiating Eq.(30) gives the average Hubble parameter
The corresponding formula for the Hubble parameter in the
universe is given in eq.(7). From equations (23) and (30) the time-evolution of the shear scalar is
This shows that the shear scalar decreases exponentially with time.
Application to the Hubble tension
The value of the Hubble constant as determined from measurements of the temperature fluctuations in the microwave background radiation by the Planck team is
H0 = (67.4 ± 0.5) km s
−1 Mpc
−1=1/1.45
·10
10 years. For the present values of the mass parameters of matter and dark energy we will use the values
and
. V. Yadav [
5] has found that
. With these values we get
years and
.
We shall now find the value of needed to solve the Hubble tension. We define the difference between the Hubble constant in an isotropic- and anisotropic universe as or . In order to solve the Hubble tension the present value of must be at least as large as the difference between the late time and early time measurements of the Hubble constant, (km/s)Mpc-1.
We need to express the shear parameter
in terms of
. From eq.(31) we have
Solving this equation with respect to
gives
Let
,
and
Using eq.(8) we then have
Inserting the values of the constants in eq.(35) gives
. Hence eq.(36) gives
Inserting this and
into eq.(34) gives
. Thus the value of the expansion anisotropy parameter necessary to solve the Hubble tension is
This is ten billion times larger than the value of this parameter as determined from observations [
6] in accordance with the result obtained from the simple anisotropic extension of the ΛCDM universe model.
Conclusion
The calculations in the present paper show that the expansion anisotropy of the universe is much too small to solve the Hubble tension.
References
- Riess, A. G. et al., A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team. Astrophys. J. Let. 2022, 934:L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b. [CrossRef]
- Liu, T; Yang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Biesiada, M. Measurements of the Hubble constant from combinations of supernovae and radio quasars. 2023. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.15731.pdf.
- Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2020, 642, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910. 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910.
- Dainotti, M. et al. The Hubble constant tension: current status and future perspectives through new cosmological probes. Proceedings of Science, 2023, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.10572.pdf.
- Yadav, V. Measuring Hubble constant in an anisotropic extension of ΛCDM model. 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16135.
- Akarsu, Ö. Et al. Constraints on a Bianchi type I spacetime extension of the standard ΛCDM model. Phys. Rev. 2019, D100, 023532, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023532. [CrossRef]
- Le Delliou et al. An Anisotropic Model for the Universe. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1741; 10.3390/sym12101741. [CrossRef]
- Grøn, Ø. A new standard model of the universe. Eur. J, Phys., 2002, 23, 135, 10.1088/0143-0807/23/2/307. [CrossRef]
- Saunders, P. T., Observations in some simple cosmological models with shear. Mon. Not. R.A.S. 1969, 142, 212, 10.1093/mnras/142.2.213. [CrossRef]
- Grøn, Ø. Expansion isotropization during the inflationary era. Phys. Rev., 1985, D32, 2522. 10.1103/PhysRevD.32.2522. [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).