Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Alternative Splicing Variation: Accessing and Exploiting in Crop Improvement Programs

Altmetrics

Downloads

152

Views

77

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

05 September 2023

Posted:

07 September 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Alternative splicing (AS) is a gene regulatory mechanism modulating gene expression in multiple ways. AS is prevalent in all eukaryotes including plants. AS generates two or more mRNAs from the precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) to regulate transcriptome complexity and proteome diversity. Advances in next-generation sequencing, omics technology and bioinformatics tools, and computational methods provide new opportunities to quantify and visualize AS-based quantitative trait variation associated with plant growth, development, reproduction, and stress tolerance. Domestication, polyploidization and environmental perturbation may evolve novel splicing variants associated with agronomically beneficial traits. To date, pre-mRNAs from many genes are spliced into multiple transcripts that cause phenotypic variation for complex traits, both in model plant Arabidopsis and field crops. Cataloguing and exploiting such variation may provide new paths to enhance climate resilience, resource-use efficiency, productivity, and nutritional quality of staple food crops. This review provides insights into AS variation alongside gene expression analysis to select for novel phenotypic diversity for use in breeding programs. AS contributes to heterosis, enhances plant symbiosis (mycorrhiza and rhizobium), and provides a mechanistic link between the core clock genes and diverse environmental clues.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Agricultural Science and Agronomy

1. Alternative splicing isoforms as source of transcriptome and proteome diversity and contributes to phenotypic variation

Transcript expression and alternative splicing (AS) are two key pre-translational processes, which can generate phenotypic variation for all organisms [1,2]. While transcript expression levels are largely dependent on the interplay between promoter and enhancer activity regulating transcription rates and the rate of RNA degradation (or decay), AS can alter the transcript structure leading to modifications of the encoded protein structure to generate different protein isoforms or protein variants[3]. Alternative splicing can also alter the 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional structure of RNA transcripts, with possibilities for altered functionality at the non-coding transcript level.
Regardless of the close spatiotemporality shared between transcript expression and AS, it has been considered that these two processes are independent of each other [4,5]. However, the regulatory relationship connecting these processes remains unclear [6-9]. Because AS can produce new protein variants, it has been suggested that AS is a major source of transcriptome and proteome diversity in eucaryotes, with ultimate impacts on phenotypic variation [10]. Supporting this, a positive correlation has been indicated between the percentage of genes subject to AS and organismal complexity, measured in terms of unique number of cell types [11]. Nonetheless, the role of AS in evolutionary processes such as speciation and adaptation remains largely unexplored [8-10].
Most transcriptome research has tended to focus on the relative expression levels of mRNA transcripts, both spatially and temporally. This emphasis has arisen due to the relative ease of investigating transcript expression levels with sequencing technologies and bioinformatic tools [12-15]. Within the canon of transcriptome research, only a subset has a focus on AS variation. However, from a functional viewpoint, there is a paucity of investigations that ascribe clear functional effects between the genome-wide extent of AS over time and space and major phenotypic effects. Hence, it is unclear whether AS is a major source of standing genetic variation that in turn generates phenotypic variation. This lack of clarity likely arises from the experimental challenges associated with functionally characterizing the effects of alternative splice isoforms on phenotype [16,17]. Understanding the functional effects of AS isoforms remains a complex task, [10,11]. An increasing number of investigations are revealing growing significance of AS in evolutionary processes, employing advanced techniques such as whole-transcriptome mRNA sequencing [18].
In plants, the domestication process has generated multiple examples of rapid adaptation via AS [19-22]. One example of this is the EARLY MATURITY 8 (EAM8) gene in barley [19], which is an orthologue of the circadian core component EARLY FLOWERING 3 (ELF3) in Arabidopsis thaliana. It has been demonstrated that a mutated version of EAM8 (eam8.I), carrying an A to G transition in position 3257 at intron 3 which leads to an AS event with intron retention and a putative truncated protein, is responsible for the early flowering of a barley landrace from the Tibetan plateau, which is a short-season adaptation to high latitudes [19]. Another example of AS is in the domestication of sunflowers, where the domestication process (approximately 5,000 years ago) was associated with a large frequency of alternative transcript isoforms generated by AS. In the AS analysis of sunflower domestication, both new combinations of ancestral spliced genes were found and also novel isoforms [20,21]. These examples suggest that AS can be an important component in evolution and domestication contributing to phenotypic variation within and between natural and domesticated populations.
In addition to phenotypic variation, phenotypic plasticity is also a key force in evolution and adaptation [23,24]. While the role of transcript expression is well understood, little is known regarding the potential of AS to generate phenotypic plasticity [10,25]. In plants, the association of environment-triggered AS with environmental stress responses suggests that AS could act as a "molecular thermometer" [26]. However, the role and underlying mechanisms by which AS can produce plastic phenotypes in novel ecological or environmental contexts are largely unexplored.

2. Bioinformatic tools, software, and computational methods to quantify and visualize splicing variants

Transcriptome-wide analyses of AS in tissues and plants subjected to various biotic and abiotic stresses as well as in different cultivars have been performed using high-throughput next-generation sequencing technologies such as Illumina RNA-seq (RNA-seq) [27-29], Pacific Biosciences single-molecule real-time (SMRT) long-read Isoform sequencing (PacBio Iso-seq) [30,31], and Oxford Nanopore direct RNA sequencing (dRNA-seq), also called native RNA sequencing [29,32-35]. All these technologies involve sequencing of fragments of total cellular RNA [ribodepleted/poly(A)] or chromatin-associated RNA converted into cDNAs (Illumina short reads), full-length cDNAs (PacBio Iso-seq and Oxford dRNA-seq) or full-length RNAs (Oxford dRNA-seq). Among these, RNA-seq using the Illumina platform has been widely used as it is cheaper and yields more reads. Large-scale Illumina RNA-seq research allowed the prediction of AS events [36-39]. However, there are limitations with Illumina short reads. The transcript assemblies from short reads are often inaccurate and produce large numbers of misassembled transcripts and missing real transcripts [40,41]. Also, research has shown that it is difficult to reconstruct splice isoforms and quantify differential expression of isoforms using short reads [42,43], which is necessary to determine the nature of the encoded protein and in assessing a splice variants’ role [32,43]. To overcome these limitations with short reads, PacBio Iso-seq, which provides long reads, has been used for accurate identification of full-length splice variants and other post-transcriptional regulatory events such as alternative transcription start sites and alternative polyadenylation sites [30]. As compared to Illumina RNA-seq, PacBio Iso-seq provides more comprehensive insights into different splicing events and isoform diversity and tissue/condition-specific splicing regulation. Since 2016, Iso-seq has been used to analyze the splice isoforms in several plants and this has provided a more detailed and in-depth view of numerous novel splice isoforms [30,31,44-47]. The most recent annotated splice isoforms in AtRTD3 (Arabidopsis thaliana Reference Transcript Database3) were assembled with PacBio Iso-seq and Illumina using RNA from many organs/tissues that were subjected to different stresses [31]. The Oxford Nanopore sequencing, which also provides long reads of cDNA or RNAs (dRNA-seq), is increasingly used in recent years to predict splice isoforms and other post-transcriptional processes including base modifications. Other specialized high-throughput technologies such as Ribo-seq are used to assess the translation of splice isoforms [48,49]. Although Iso-seq and dRNA-seq approaches can generate full-length transcript sequences, the major issues are the limited depth in coverage, and high error rates, which generate many mis-annotated transcripts [30,31,50,51]. Self- or hybrid-correction methods have been used to overcome the effects of sequencing errors in long reads [30,31,51]. Self-correction uses the raw signal and consensus-based calls to reduce errors while hybrid correction uses Illumina short reads to correct errors in the long reads. Despite the shortcomings of each of these methods, global research of AS in plants revealed enormous complexity of plant transcriptomes and their regulation at the co-/post-transcriptional level [29,31,32,52-54]. In plants, pre-mRNAs of about 80% of intron-containing genes undergo AS, an essential regulatory mechanism in many developmental and physiological processes that affects thousands of genes [28,31,55-57]. For example, research has shown that about 25% of genes that respond to cold stress are regulated by AS [58] and 20 splicing regulators of the SR family produce close to 100 distinct transcripts [59-61]. Intron retention is the predominant form of AS in plants, whereas exon skipping is the most prevalent AS event in animals [55,62,63]. However, Braunschweig et al. [64] have shown that IR is highly prevalent in mammals. Research has shown that IR is a regulated process that plays a role in development, stress responses, and disease [64-67].
Accurate reconstruction of transcript isoforms and quantification of the relative abundance of individual splice isoforms are necessary for a comprehensive analysis of transcriptomes, and to decipher the biological functions of individual transcripts. Many computational pipelines have been developed to analyse RNA-seq data to identify AS events, estimate isoform abundance, and differential expression of splice variants across tissues/conditions. Some of the tools/pipelines used for AS analysis are shown in Table 1. These methods use different statistical models, and each has advantages and disadvantages [30,68-70]. Depending on the type of reads (short or long reads) and sequencing platform, different computational methods are used. These methods involve alignment of sequence reads to the reference genome (or reference transcriptome in some cases) and allow detection of specific splicing events (exon skipping, intron retention, alternative 3’ and 5’ splice sites, etc.) and full-length splice isoforms in some cases thereby providing insights into their functional implications. There are also de novo assembly tools but these methods are highly prone to the assembly of erroneous transcripts [71,72]. More recently, machine learning tools especially deep learning methods are being increasingly used to develop models that can accurately predict splicing/AS patterns of pre-mRNAs and gene expression from genome sequences in humans [73-79]. These methods are yet to be applied to splicing analysis in plants. The deep learning models determine splicing determinants directly from the nucleotide sequence [73], splice site strength in tissues [74], and the impact of genetic variation on RNA splicing [74,75]. These emerging methods offer new ways to predict tissue/condition-specific AS and the effects of genetic variation in plants on the splicing of protein-coding and -non-coding RNAs and the biological significance of splicing changes.
Different genome browsers including Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV - https://software.broadinstitute.org/software/igv/), Integrated Genome Browser (IGB - https://www.bioviz.org/), or UCSC Genome Browser (https://genome.ucsc.edu/) allow loading of aligned files (BAM files) to visualize sequence depth corresponding to each exon and intron, and AS events. Sashimi plot tool that is part of MISO (mixture of isoforms - https://miso.readthedocs.io/en/fastmiso/) software, which is also available on IGV (https://software.broadinstitute.org/software/igv/Sashimi) takes RNA-seq alignment files (BAM files) and gene annotations as input and provides a comprehensive view of AS patterns. The output plot shows gene structure including exons and introns, splice junctions, AS events, read coverage, and relative abundance of splice isoforms across tissues/conditions. Isoform expression level and individual splice events such as the percent “Splice In” of an AS event across samples can also be visualized using heatmaps [80]. Absolute quantification of splice isoforms in tissues or in response to signals can also be performed using “Quant AS” using a combination of quantitative PCR and digital PCR.
Table 1. Some commonly used tools to analyse RNA-seq data for alternative splicing.
Table 1. Some commonly used tools to analyse RNA-seq data for alternative splicing.
Tool/pipeline Sequencing platform Splicing analysis URL address Reference
ASpli Illumina short reads Annotated and novel AS events https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/ASpli.html [69]
rMATS Illumina short reads; Requires replicates Differential AS events https://rnaseq-mats.sourceforge.net/ [81]
DEXSeq Illumina short reads Differential exon usage https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DEXSeq.html [82]
MAJIQ Illumina short reads Known and novel local splice variations https://majiq.biociphers.org/ [83]
3D RNA-seq Illumina short reads GUI-based pipeline to analyse differential AS and transcript isoforms https://3drnaseq.hutton.ac.uk/app_direct/3DRNAseq/ [31,70]
TAPIS PacBio Iso-seq Analysis of AS events and transcript isoforms https://bitbucket.org/comp_bio/tapis/src/master/ [30]
SUPPA2 Illumina short reads Differential splicing across multiple conditions https://github.com/comprna/SUPPA [84]
TAMA PacBio Iso-seq Transcript isoforms https://github.com/GenomeRIK/tama [31,51,85]
MISO Illumina short reads Differentially spliced exons https://miso.readthedocs.io/en/fastmiso/ [86]
SpliceGrapher Illumina short reads Detects patterns of AS https://splicegrapher.sourceforge.net/ [87]
iDiffIR Illumina short reads Differential intron retention https://bitbucket.org/comp_bio/idiffir/src/master/ [88]
DARTS Illumina short reads;
Uses a deep learning model and incorporates the expression of RBP.		 Differential AS https://github.com/Xinglab/DARTS [79]
SpliceAI Illumina short reads;
Uses a deep learning model		 AS events and splice isoforms https://github.com/Illumina/SpliceAI [73]
Pangolin A deep learning model that predicts RNA splicing from DNA sequence Predicts effects of genetic variants on splicing; tissue-specific splicing https://github.com/tkzeng/Pangolin [74]
SpliceVault
Web portal 		Uses RNA-seq data Genetic variant’s effect on splicing https://kidsneuro.shinyapps.io/splicevault/ [76]
This list is not comprehensive. Older versions of some of the tools are not listed. Also, some tools for which weblinks are inactive are not included. DARTS, deep-learning augmented RNA-seq analysis of transcript splicing; MAJIQ: Modeling Alternative Junction Inclusion Quantification; MISO, Mixture of Isoforms; RBP, RNA-binding protein; rMATS, Replicate Multivariate Analysis of Transcript Splicing; SUPPA2, Sequencing Unified Pipeline for Proximal Alternative splicing analysis2; TAMA, Transcriptome Annotation by Modular Algorithms.

3. Mining gene pools for splicing isoforms and diversifying gene functions to obtain novel phenotypic diversity

Alternative splicing allows a gene to encode for various proteins because its exons are put together differently, thus resulting in related but distinct mRNA transcripts. It has been demonstrated that thale cress (Arabidopsis thaliana) uses AS disproportionally as a stress response [89] cite ref 28 also. There are other plants showing a splicing memory that remembers an environmental stress such as heat [90], which leads to a response to an increase in temperature. Moreover, a synthesized Brassica hexaploid had significant AS events [91], thus diversifying its gene expression patterns that could improve its adaptability. Furthermore, Zhang et al. [92] indicated that many genes contributing to quantitative traits are likely to be spliced into multiple transcripts causing their variation.
The availability of both genome and transcript sequences in plants enables a thorough analysis of AS in various species, including crops [93]. Multivariate analysis of transcript splicing (MATS) and replicate MATS (rMATS) are robust and flexible statistical software that detect differential AS between two RNA-Seq samples [94], or replicate RNA-Seq data [81], respectively. The synthetic programming of AS patterns, however, remains underused for improving crops [95]. Hence, Pramanik et al. [96] suggested CRISPR/Cas9-mediated engineering for modifying AS with the aim of (de)regulating plant development.
Genome-wide mapping led to identification of thousands of AS mRNAs isoforms in thale cress [36]. Most of the AS transcripts related to isoforms with premature termination codons, which could shift under abiotic stress. Li et al. [97] did a search of AS affecting reproductive development of young panicles as well as both unfertilized and fertilized florets in rice with the aid of direct RNA sequencing, small RNA sequencing and degradome sequencing. They found 35,317 AS events, of which in excess of 2/3 were novel, and concluded that AS was significantly related to development stages and to complex gene regulation in rice. An RNA-seq survey was able to define AS patterns, and to determine that 59.3 % of expressed multi-exon genes underwent AS in seedlings, flowers and young developing fruits of tomato [98]. The use of a single molecule long-read sequencing (Iso-Seq) led to an integrated transcriptome data analysis that facilitated investigating AS in polyploid cotton [99]. This Iso-Seq data analysis was able to identify 15,102 fibre-specific AS events, as well as to notice that about 51.4% homeologous genes produce divergent isoforms in each cotton sub-genome.

4. Molecular mechanisms regulating stress-dependent gene-splice variants

Numerous RNA-seq investigations with plants subjected to various biotic and abiotic stresses have revealed that AS of pre-mRNA is widespread. Furthermore, stresses and developmental cues have a profound impact on the splicing patterns of many genes [28,29,31,44-47,59,100-107]. Despite the prevalence of AS and its role in stress responses, the regulatory mechanisms of splicing and functions of most splice isoforms are not well understood in plants. Decoding the splicing code in plants would require a comprehensive understanding of the rules that dictate splice site choice and identification of specific mRNA targets of splicing regulators. A variety of factors including splice site strength, and the presence of exonic and intronic splicing enhancers and suppressors affect splice site choice, and RNA structural features [108-110] also contribute to AS. Limited research with plants has shown that sequence elements are one of the important determinants of splice site choice [111-114]. Interestingly, the alternatively spliced genes are over-represented in functional categories related to splicing regulators and stress responses [36,103,115,116]. RNA binding proteins such as serine/arginine-rich (SR) and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) are some of the key regulators of splicing. Alternative splicing of plant pre-mRNAs encoding SR proteins is dramatically altered in response to various stresses [56,59,117-122]. The changes in the levels of these splicing regulators in response to stresses may change the splicing of other pre-mRNAs due to auto- and cross-regulation of splicing [111,123-127]. These investigations suggest that altered ratios of splice variants of splicing regulators in response to stresses may have a role in fine-tuning gene expression at the mRNA and protein level and the adaptation of plants to stresses [28,128]. Also, many stress-responsive genes are associated with significant splicing quantitative trait loci (sQTL) in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes, suggesting a role of AS in plant stress responses [129].
There are several hundred RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) in any given plant species and the precise roles of most of these proteins in co-/post-transcriptional processes are unknown [130]. Many approaches to identifying the roles of RBPs in splice site choice are available and a comprehensive review of these methods was recently published [29,131], hence is not covered in any detail here. In animals, in vitro splicing assays have greatly contributed to our understanding of the roles of spliceosomal and other splicing regulatory proteins in splicing and elucidating steps in spliceosome assembly and spliceosome composition. However, the lack of a robust plant-derived in vitro splicing system in plants has been a major limitation [132]. Hence, other biochemical, cell biological, genetic, and genomic approaches are used to understand splicing regulation in plants [28,29,103,109,133]. Application of new methodologies such as identification of targets of RNA binding proteins using TRIBE (targets of RNA binding proteins identified by editing) [133,134] and targeted isoform degradation with CRISPR/Cas13 variants [135] may provide insights into targets of hundreds of uncharacterized RNA binding proteins and elucidating isoforms faction. With TRIBE, the targets of an RNA binding protein are edited irreversibly by deaminating adenosine to inosine, which is then recognized as guanosine in cDNAs [136] or modified inosines can be identified directly with nanopore native RNA sequencing [137]. RNA from the RBP-ADAR-expressing plants is sequenced to identify the RNA targets of the RBP by edited events. Expression of specific isoforms in the mutant background or degrading specific isoforms using CRISPR/Cas13 variants (e.g. Cas13d and Cas13x) that specifically bind RNA [135] open a novel and efficient way to study the functions of splice isoforms.
Emerging evidence suggests that stresses/external cues converge on splicing regulators via different signalling pathways. For example, two proteins [Highly ABA-Induced 1 (HAI1), a protein phosphatase 2C and its interacting RNA binding protein, HIN1(HAI interactor 1, HIN1), an RNA binding protein] involved in drought acclimation interact with SR family of splicing factors and regulate splicing [107]. Phytochromes, key light receptors and regulators of many aspects of plant growth and development, interact directly with several splicing regulatory proteins and modulate AS of many pre-mRNAs [103,138-140]. The light- and drought-regulated alternatively spliced transcripts contain GAA repeats [107,138] that are known to bind splicing regulators (e.g. SCL33, SCL30, SR45), suggesting that stress signaling pathways could converge on these splicing regulators [111,113,141]. A mutant of SR45, which encodes a splicing factor, showed altered responses to abiotic and biotic stresses [142,143]. Like abiotic stresses, biotic stresses also change the splicing patterns of many genes. Recent research shows that pathogens effectors modulate host pre-mRNA splicing by binding to splicing regulators such as serine/lysine/arginine-rich proteins, U1-70K, SR30, SR45, and GRP7, and suppress plant immunity [80,144-146], suggesting that pathogens have evolved effectors that target host splicing components and subvert plant immunity. It has been shown that many splicing regulators and spliceosomal proteins form speckles (also called biological condensates or membraneless organelles) and stresses alter the dynamics of proteins in these structures, and also the size/shape of these structures [133,147-155], suggesting that external signals through reorganization of speckles and their constituent proteins affect pre-mRNA splicing. However, the mechanisms of stress-induced reorganization of speckles in plants are yet to be understood. Also, the phosphorylation status of many spliceosomal proteins and regulatory splicing factors is known to play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing [156] and stresses may alter phosphorylation status and function of splicing regulators.
Until recently, the splicing code has been thought to consist primarily of exonic and intronic sequence motifs that recruit RBPs that either enhance or suppress the selection of nearby splice sites [55,157]. However, in recent years, most pre-mRNA splicing was found to occur co-transcriptionally in both plants and animals [53,54,158], suggesting that chromatin state may affect splice site choice and AS. Emerging research provides evidence in support of multiple regulatory mechanisms at the chromatin level (open vs closed chromatin, epigenetic modifications including histone modifications and DNA methylation), and the speed of transcription as key regulators that determine the outcome of AS in plants [28,159,160]. A rice mutant (OsMet1-2) with impaired DNA methylation altered all types of AS events [159]. Also, a mutant with reduced histone H3 lysine 36-specific methyltransferase in rice showed altered intron retention events [160]. In Arabidopsis and rice, open chromatin was found to be associated with intron retention [161]. Higher speeds of transcription in open chromatin regions provide less time for the spliceosomal machinery to recognize and excise introns co-transcriptionally [162,163]. Alternatively, accessible chromatin regions could be the sites of binding for TFs or other regulatory proteins that recruit splicing factors directly or indirectly through chromatin modifications to affect the outcome of splicing [64,164]. The rate of pol II elongation during transcription was shown to be involved in light-regulated AS of splicing factors [165,166]. A point mutation in Pol II with increased elongation speed increased splicing, indicating a role for Pol II speed in splicing regulation [166]. Furthermore, an increase in two epigenetic changes (H3K4me3 or H3K9ac) increased the rate of transcription elongation and lowered co-transcriptional splicing efficiency [53]. A double mutant, rz-1b rz-1c, of hnRNP-like proteins showed impaired splicing of nascent RNAs, suggesting that these proteins promote splicing at the chromatin level [53]. The direct association of RZ-1C with nascent RNAs further supports its role in co-transcriptional splicing [53]. It has been shown that a shift in temperature alters H3K36me3 methylation and AS [167] and low temperature changes RNA Pol II elongation kinetics and reduces co-transcriptional splicing [168]. The involvement of chromatin modifiers and a mediator complex in splicing regulation was also reported and some of these proteins interact with spliceosomal proteins [169,170]. A phosphoprotein phosphatase required for Pol II occupancy was found to promote intron excision [171]. Collectively, these investigations indicate that the epigenetic state of chromatin and the dynamics of transcription modulate AS in plants.
One of the key adaptive changes in response to stresses in plants is the post-transcriptional reprogramming of gene expression [172,173]. The resulting transcript isoforms fine-tune gene expression in profound ways to cope with stresses [90,128,174-176]. Research discussed above indicate that stresses/external cues through some yet-to-be-elucidated signalling pathways converge on splicing regulatory proteins and chromatin architecture to modulate AS. An in-depth understanding of splicing code in plans and the roles of splice variants will have applications in fine-tuning gene regulation and developing stress-resilient crops as stresses and developmental cues dramatically alter the levels of splice variants that encode proteins involved in stress responses and plant growth and development [28,29,103].

5. Global expression of AS isoforms in model plant Arabidopsis and among diverse crops

5.1. Arabidopsis

Arabidopsis thaliana, as the main model in plants, has been the subject of intensive investigations to better understand the landscape and functional effects of alternative splice isoforms. Several investigations have demonstrated the widespread extent of AS in Arabidopsis, with initial estimations placed the occurrence of AS events at 11.6% across its genome [116]. However, in recent years due to the advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies, the estimated rate of intron-containing genes subject to AS has risen to 61% - 70% in A. thaliana [39,89]. Around 40% of the AS events detected represent intron retention, as the predominant type of AS in Arabidopsis [39,89]. Comparisons between AS events involving intron-retention vs non-retention , as well as with constitutive introns, has revealed that the size of the retained introns was significatively smaller than the non-retained ones, with no differences with constitutive introns [39]. An additional layer of complexity in the Arabidopsis genome has emerged as cryptic introns, characterized by the presence of splice sites within annotated coding exons. Approximately 1300 cryptic introns (around 14.1% of all retained introns) have been detected, with nearly half of them undergoing in-frame splicing, hence possessing the ability to excise amino acid stretches from the full-length protein, generating novel protein isoforms [39]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that in Arabidopsis, AS may modulate upstream ORF production in response to environmental stresses by extending 5′ UTR sequences [89]. Interestingly, not only has it been proposed that transcript expression and AS are independent mechanisms in Arabidopsis, but also that transcript expression and AS act in an exclusive manner, in which the genetic structure of transcript expression-regulated and AS-regulated genes exhibit differential genomic architecture [89]. This may suggest that transcript expression and AS are non-redundant, non-overlapping, yet complementary mechanisms to generate phenotypic effects.
In a comparison of the global landscape of AS between A. thaliana and animals, striking divergences in their regulatory roles have been identified. While animals have harnessed AS as a powerful source of transcriptomic and proteomic diversity, primarily facilitating cellular and tissue specialization, plants have shaped AS into a regulatory mechanism to respond to the ever-changing demands of their sessile lifestyle [89]. For plants, fast and efficient adaptation to shifting environmental conditions and stressors necessitates an AS machinery that can orchestrate in situ responses [89,90]. The divergent evolutionary trajectories of these lineages have led to unique molecular regulatory mechanisms, allowing them to exploit the diverse capabilities of AS to meet their specific developmental and physiological requirements [90].

5.2. Grain and fibre crops

AS is involved in plant response to abiotic stresses and on various aspects of plant growth, development, and reproduction. Genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) is a powerful approach to identify genomic regions and genes associated with complex traits. GWAS has also been found useful in providing genome-wide summary statistics of AS variants and in genome-wide association analysis of AS variants associated with complex traits. Genomic regions associated with gene expression are commonly referred to as quantitative trait loci (QTL), whereas those regulated by AS variants are referred to as splicing quantitative trait loci (sQTL). Analysis of population-level transcriptome data and GWAS of splicing QTL in developing maize kernels from 368 maize inbred lines unfolded 19,554 unique sQTL for 6570 genes, with distinct protein functions. Natural variation in AS and overall mRNA levels were independently regulated with different cis-sequences used preferentially. Two hundred and fourteen putative trans-acting splicing regulators including ZmGRP1 controlled the largest trans-cluster, and knockout of ZmGRP1 modified splicing of several downstream genes. There were 739 sQTL that colocalized with known trait QTL, indicating the significance of AS in diversifying gene function to regulate phenotypic variation [22].
GWAS unfolded 35,317 AS events at early reproductive stage in rice, of which ~67% were of novel AS isoforms, and intron retention (IR) subtype the most abundant [97]. Over 11,000 novel splice isoforms, alternative polyadenylation (APA) of ∼11,000 expressed genes and more than 2,100 novel genes were reported in sorghum [30] [177], whereas 15,102 fibre-specific AS were reported in cotton [99]. To date, a large numbers of AS events associated with various development stages and molecular functions have been reported in soybean—294,164 AS events across multiple experiments [178]; 1,278 AS events associated with nitrate stress in root hairs [179]; or 154,469 AS events in 23,764 genes across development stages [180]. Intron retention form of AS events was predominant in most research reported here followed by alternative acceptor sites, alternative donor sites, and exon skipping.
Polyploidization, an evolutionary force, promotes diversity and evolution of new species. A GWAS analysis of synthesized hexaploidy Brassica (2n = 54) and its parents unfolded 7,913, 14,447, and 13,205 AS genes that produced 27,540, 70,179, and 60,804 AS isoforms in Brassica rapa (turnip, 2n = 20), B. carinata (Ethiopian mustard, amphidiploid, 2n = 34), and Brassica hexaploidy, respectively. Hexaploid Brassica has 920 new genes. The differentially spliced genes between hexaploidy Brassica and its parents were 56. Hexaploid Brassica and its parents had diverse AS patterns of genes, including the gain and loss of AS isoforms [91].
Maize is domesticated in tropics but is widely grown in temperate environments. How variation in gene expression, as measured by changes in transcriptomes, enabled maize to adapt in temperate environments? A genome-wide association study involving eGWAS and sGWAS based on 572 unique RNA-seq datasets from the roots of 340 maize lines identified, respectively, 19,602 eQTLs associated with the expression of 11,444 genes and 49,897 sQTLs for 7,614 genes. Genes containing both cis-eQTLs and cis-sQTLs in LD disproportionately encoded TFs associated with one or more stresses. Further, gene expression data listed transcriptional regulatory networks associated with gene expression, cell propagation, and phase transition powered tropical maize adapt in temperate environments [182].

6. Genomic regions regulating splicing of quantitative trait loci (sQTL)

6.1. Novel splicing variants impacting flowering and plant architecture

Evolutionary transition from wild species to crops or polyploidization may evolve novel splicing variants and may contribute to adaptation and population divergence. Hexaploid wheat is an ideal model for studying variation in the AS landscape in response to domestication and polyploidization. Transcriptome sequencing of roots and leaves of wheat species differing in ploidy levels unfolded ~22% of the genes exhibiting AS events. However, AS events decreased after domestication and polyploidization. The decrease in AS events is consistent with the functional sharing model that proposes complementarity between the two (AS duplicated genes) in regulating transcriptome plasticity in polyploid crops. Subgenomes exhibited biased AS response to polyploidization, with ~87% of homeologs showing AS partitioning in hexaploid wheat, and substitution of the D-subgenome modified ~43% of AS patterns of the A- and B-subgenomes. Thus, AS variation occurs extensively after polyploidization and domestication in wheat [183].
The substantial splicing divergence and predominance of divergent splicing transcripts for seed traits between wild and cultivated sunflowers suggests that domestication and selection for seed development affected the evolution of splicing variants in sunflowers. While Helianthus annuus (wild species) contributed to most of the differential splicing patterns, other Helianthus species also contributed domestication associated splicing patterns in sunflower [21]. Significantly more AS isoforms were reported among wild accessions than domesticated sorghum accessions [184].
A multi-silique trait (zws-ms) was discovered in the rapeseed. Such a line forms three independent siliques instead of a commonly observed single silique, and temperature being the most critical factor likely to switch on/off the formation of multi-silique [185]. Assessing the pattern of transcriptome variation between zws-ms and its NIL (zws-217; which produces normal siliques (i.e., single silique) grown under optimal and in colder environment unfolded 11 differentially expressed alternative splicing (DAS) genes, of which four were upregulated and seven were downregulated in multi-silique line. Five such genes were associated with the multi-silique trait [186], and two thermos-morphogenesis genes, which switched off genes controlling multi-silique trait in cold environment [187].
Whether AS events affect flowering and plant architecture in wheat? The two splicing variants of TaNAK1 (TaNAK1.1 and TaNAK1.2) show distinct expression patterns during wheat growth and development, while such effect has not been observed for TaNAK1.3. TaNAK1 is mainly expressed in developing grains, while TaNAK1.2 in leaf and flag leaf. Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing TaNAK1.1 and TaNAK1.2 showed opposite effects (i.e., TaNAK1.2 positively regulates transition from vegetative to reproductive growth, plant height, branching, seed size and seed yield, while TaNAK1 negatively regulate these traits) on flowering and plant architecture, resulting in varying seed yields [188].

6.2. Seed yield and quality

Spikelet architecture, seed size and weight are the major determinants of yield in cereal crops. Five splicing variants in TaGS3, TaGS3.1 to TaGS3.5, showed expression divergence during polyploidization and differential functions to regulate seed size and weight in wheat. TaGS3.1 overexpression significantly reduces seed weight and length by 5.89% and 5.04%, respectively. TaGS3.2-3.4 overexpression relative to wild type (WT) had no significant effect on grain size. TaGS3.5 overexpression significantly increases seed weight and length by 5.7% and 4.3%, respectively [189]. The mechanism of transcriptional regulation of spike architecture in wheat revealed 4,143 expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) and 12,933 splice QTLs (sQTL) that unfolded 774 cis-eQTL and 321 cis-sQTL for 86 eGenes and 73 sGenes, respectively, and were widely involved in the co-expression modules regulating wheat spike architecture. eQTL locus AX-108754757 regulated the expression of 5 eGenes that negatively regulated seeds spike-1, whereas AX-111592099 regulated both the splicing and expression of TraesCS7B02G442100 controlling spike length [190].
Multiple signalling pathways at transcriptional and post-translational levels control GS3, seed size QTL in rice. The dominant AS isoforms of GS3, GS3.1 and GS3.2, account for about 50% and 40% of total transcripts, respectively. GS3.1 overexpression decreases seed size, whereas GS3.2 had no significant effect on seed size. GS3.2 interacts with RGB1 to disrupt GS3.1 activity, thereby implying AS of GS3 decreases the amount of GS3.1 and GS3.2 disrupts the GS3.1 signalling to inhibit the negative effects of GS3.1 to fine-tune grain size in rice [191].
Poor seed filling of inferior spikelets is one of the major limitations in raising rice production. Post-anthesis moderate soil drying promotes starch synthesis and seed filling in inferior spikelets. Assessment of AS events at the grain-filling stage in inferior spikelets under control (irrigated, C) and moderate drought (MD) stress unfolded 16,089 AS events, of which 1840 involving 1392 genes occurred differentially between C and MD treatments, many of which function on spliceosome, starch and sucrose metabolism, providing new insights into the role of AS to promote seed filling in inferior spikelets under MD in rice [192].
Maintaining yield and quality under low nitrogen conditions is a significant production constraint in cereal. OsGS1;1 enhances nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). SNP polymorphisms in OsGS1;1 region led to discovery of AS that generated two functional transcripts, OsGS1;1a and OsGS1;1b. Germplasm containing OsGS1;1b haplotype had improved NUE, positively affected seed development, and reduced amylose content, providing a new avenue to raise yield and nutritional quality of rice under low N conditions [193]. OsLG3b regulates grain length in tropical Japonica rice. OsLG3b expression is higher during the panicle and seed development stages. SNP polymorphism in the OsLG3b region discovered AS that were found associated with grain length and was extensively used in breeding to enhance productivity of tropical japonica’s [194].
Yellow seed coat colour in rapeseed is associated with higher oil content and higher quality of meal. A comparison of yellow- and black-seeded rapeseed lines at five developmental stages revealed highly similar AS events in the different samples, with intron retention type being the predominant form of AS patterns. The early and middle stages of seed development were most affected by AS variants. Twenty-three co-expression modules composed of differentially spliced genes were detected, of which the function of two modules were highly associated with seed coat color. Both the modules in-housed differentially alternative splicing (DAS) candidate genes related to the flavonoid pathway (TT8, TT5, TT12, AHA10, CHI, BAN, DFR), which could be exploited to develop stable, yellow-seeded rapeseed [195]. A splicing error in phytic acid synthase gene inositol-1,3,4 triphosphate 5/6-kinase 3 (GmITPK3) caused low seed phytate phenotype in soybean [196]. Low seed-phytate crops improve the bioavailability of micronutrients. Food rich in flavonoids promotes human health and minimizes the risk of age-old diseases [197]. BnaPAP2.A7 regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis, with AS (three splicing isoforms) as the main mechanism for modulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in a rapeseed leaf [198].

6.3. Mineral nutrient homeostasis

Very limited knowledge exists about the role of AS in maintaining mineral nutrient homeostasis in plants. Using root transcriptome sequencing of rice grown in the presence or absence of minerals (Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, P), Dong et al. [106] noted 13,291 alternatively spliced genes, with a small overlap between differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and DAS genes. Nutrient-specific AS genes represented ~53.3% of multiexon genes in the rice genome. A group of splicing factors known as Serine/Arginine-rich (SR) proteins regulates AS mechanisms. Characterization of mutants in gene encoding Ser/Arg (SR) proteins in rice unfolded several SR proteins as critical regulators of Zn, Mn, and P nutrition, with highly specific AS targets to each nutrient. For example, three SR protein-encoding genes regulate P uptake and remobilization between leaves and shoots of rice [106]. Clearly, this is an underexplored area of research and must be further investigated to unfold the molecular basis of mineral nutrient homeostasis (DEGs, DAS genes, and interaction between DEG and DAS) in plants.

6.4. Abiotic stress adaptation

Alternative splicing variants increase proteome diversity. Heat shock transcription factor (Hsf) under stress may form different transcripts by AS. A novel splice variant TaHsfA2-7-AS, induced by high temperature, regulates thermotolerance in wheat, and its overexpression in Arabidopsis enhances tolerance to heat stress [199]. Plant serine/arginine-rich (SR) proteins contribute to abiotic stress adaptation by regulating AS of key genes. Overexpression of BrSR45a in Arabidopsis regulates the drought stress response via the AS of target genes in a concentration-dependent manner [200]. Overexpression of AS-related protein from cassava, MeSCL30 in Arabidopsis enhances tolerance to drought via maintaining ROS homeostasis and increasing the expression of drought-responsive genes [201].
SR-rich splicing factors play a key role in pre-mRNA splicing to regulate plant growth and development under stress conditions. Butt et al. [202] investigated the role of the plant-specific SR protein RS33 in regulating pre-mRNA splicing and abiotic stress responses in rice. Loss-of-function mutant rs33 showed increased sensitivity to salt and low temperature stresses. They identified multiple splice isoforms of stress-responsive genes whose AS are regulated by RS33, and expression of RS33-regulated genes were more under cold than salt stress, indicating plant-specific splicing factor RS33 is crucial in response to abiotic stresses [202]. Multiple abiotic stresses also triggered extensive but different expressional regulations on sweet potato SR genes. Heat stress caused substantial disturbances in both gene transcription and pre-mRNA AS. Tissue and species-specific AS regulations in response to stresses were noted in sweet potato, unlike Arabidopsis and rice [203].
Multiple abiotic stress induces several DAS genes. Three hundred and fifty-seven DAS genes and their splicing isoforms of candidate genes (RBP45C, LHY, MYB59, SCL30A, RS40, MAJ23.10, and DWF4) were induced in rapeseed [204]. In soybean roots, between 385 and 1429 AS events were differentially spliced under varying water-deficit and recovery after severe drought stress [205]. In rice, 764 genotype-specific splicing (GSS) events were identified in salt stress conditions, of which six events in five genes were significantly associated with the shoot Na+ content. OsNUC1 and OsRAD23 emerged as candidate genes with splice variants exhibiting significant divergence between the variants for shoot growth under salt stress conditions [206]. In response to drought, heat, and combined (drought and heat) stress in wheat, 200, 3576 and 4056 genes exhibited significant AS pattern changes. The combined stress induced specific AS compared to individual stress, while the B subgenome exhibited more AS events than on A and D genomes [207]. The splicing isoforms of candidate genes could be a valuable resource for enhancing abiotic stress adaptation in plants.

7. Alternatively spliced variants contribute to hybrid vigour

Heterosis, or the superior performance of F1 hybrids vis-á-vis their parental lines, has been widely applied breeding output to raise the productivity of crops, especially in cross-pollinated grain crops (e.g. maize, pearl millet, pigeonpea) and in a few self-pollinated crops (e.g. rice, tomato and other vegetables). Differential gene and protein expression between hybrids and their parents regulate hybrid vigour. Genome-wide assessment of AS variants between hybrids and their parents may provide additional means to exploit heterosis in plants. Profiling of AS landscape data from immature ears of the maize hybrid ZD808 and its parents (NG5 and CL11) unfolded substantial differential AS events in the hybrid vis-á-vis its parents, which were classified into parental-dominant and novel DAS patterns. NG5-dominant events prevalent in the hybrid accounted for 42% of DAS events and were mainly involved in regulating gene expression associated with carbon/nitrogen metabolism and cell division processes. Cis regulation was the predominant contributor to AS variation and involved in biological processes associated with immature ear development in maize [208]
In sorghum, the developing embryo and endosperm show significant and multifaceted differences in gene expression and AS that may potentially correlate with hybrid vigour. Analysis of genome-wide gene expression between developing embryo and endosperm as well between F1 hybrids and their parental lines in sorghum uncovered substantial differences in both gene expression and AS events between embryo and endosperm, which were consistent with their biological roles in the two tissues. The hybrids relative to their parents showed substantial and multifaceted differences in gene expression and AS events, which were distinct and tissue specifics, and may provide transcriptome resources to further elucidate seed yield heterosis in sorghum [209].
A recent study on sunflower hybrid under control (irrigated) and drought stress conditions revealed ‘absence’ alleles at presence/absence variants (PAVs) were disproportionately associated with reduced values of heterosis-related traits, but not those of non-heterotic traits. The expression of gene PAVs differentiating the parental lines was complemented in hybrids, thereby supporting dominance model of hybrid vigour and yield stability across environments. The consistent expression of many of the PAVs in control and drought stress conditions possibly contributed to heterosis under drought stress. A further comparison of DEGs between hybrid and parental lines revealed that parents responded similarly to drought stress by up-regulating stress response and down-regulating metabolic process genes, while these responses were further strengthened in the hybrid. An inverse relationship between AS changes and expression changes in DEGs implies that AS acts to reinforce expression responses [210].

8. Establishing a platform for cataloguing, curating, and retrieving alternative splicing isoforms and gene expression quantification database across tissues, development, and stress conditions

One of the major challenges in researching AS and transcript expression is the fragmented nature of data, in which AS isoforms and transcript expression data are scattered across many investigations and datasets, often lacking standardized annotations and metadata [211,212]. Such fragmentation hinders efficient data retrieval, comparison, and interpretation. Furthermore, inconsistencies in data formats and quality pose additional obstacles for researchers [211,212]. To address these challenges, the development of unified platforms for cataloguing, curating, and retrieving AS isoforms and GE quantification data is important. In this context, multiple attempts to generate a unified platform for GE and AS has been published to the date [211-216]. The aim of such platforms provides to researchers with a centralized resource for accessing comprehensive and high-quality data across different biological contexts and investigations.
Accessibility of such platforms requires a focus on user-friendly interfaces, powerful search functionalities, and intuitive data visualization tools. This can allow researchers to better explore and analyse complex AS patterns and transcript expression dynamics. Advanced algorithms and computational tools are being implemented to enable more comprehensive data analysis, allowing researchers to uncover novel insights into AS and transcript expression [211-216]. For instance, the PlantExp platform integrates plant transcript expression and AS profiles from 131,423 uniformly processed publicly available RNA-seq samples that belong to 85 plant species across 24 plant orders [213]. This platform not only allows researchers to investigate and navigate across AS and transcript expression profiles, but also allows differential and specific expression analysis, analysis of co-expression networks, cross-species expression conservation analysis and easy visualisation of data [213].
Such platforms not only facilitate data-driven research, but also promote collaboration between scientists working on AS and transcript expression. By integrating fragmented data, ensuring data quality and accessibility, and providing powerful analysis tools, such platforms empower researchers to explore the intricate relationship between AS and transcript expression. In addition, scientists can flexibly customize sample groups to reanalyse publicly available RNA-seq datasets and obtain new insights [211-216].

9. Alternative spliced circadian clock genes in response to abiotic stress

Circadian clock genes are a key point of regulation for adaptation to new environments and abiotic stress conditions. Alternative splicing plays a crucial role in the regulation of many core clock genes in plants, and represents an important mechanistic link between the core of the circadian clock and diverse environmental inputs [217-222]. One example is partially redundant MYB-related transcription factors CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) [223]. Under cold conditions a non-functional spliced variant of LHY, which has a premature stop codon, is accumulated [217]. In contrast, the spliced variant of CCA1β, which lacks the MYB-like DNA binding domain by retaining the fourth intron, is inhibited at low temperatures. The result is that CCA1β interferes with the formation of CCA1α (functional full-length CCA1) and LHY hetero- and homo-dimers [224]. The overexpression of CCA1β reduces freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis, while the overexpression of CCA1α increased tolerance to cold conditions [224]. Thus, the opposite regulation of LHY and CCA1 under low temperatures has revealed the role of AS in ensuring the balance of LHY and CCA1 under acclimation to low temperatures [217,224].
In addition to CCA1 and LHY, other genes of the clock have been shown to display AS related to cold stress. For example, the spliced version of TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1 (TOC1β) is transcriptionally increased at low temperatures, while the ELF3β is suppressed under the same conditions [220]. During dial time course at 20°C the non-fully spliced transcript of REVEILLE (RVE2) is accumulated, while plants acclimated to 4°C primarily produce the functional fully-spliced transcript [218]. Other abiotic stresses are also involved in differential alternative slicing in plants. For instance, heat stress triggers AS increasing the levels of CCA1β, PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR7β (PRR7β), TOC1β and ELF3β, while saline conditions do not seem to affect AS of CCA1, PRR7, TOC1 and ZEITLUPE (ZTL) genes, but reduce the ELF3β variant over the ELE3α, revealing a role of AS in the regulation of ELF3 under salt stress [220]. It has been shown that the splice variants of TOC1 and ELF3 undergo degradation via the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathway, while the splice variants of other clock genes exhibited insensitivity to NMD [220].
Multiple spliceosome components are involved in AS of core plant clock genes. For example, the conserved methyltransferase PROTEIN ARGININE METHYLTRANSFEREASE 5 (PRMT5), involved in histone methylation, regulates AS of PRR9 [225,226]. Another key spliceosome component involved in AS of circadian genes is SNW/SKI-INTERACTING PROTEIN (SKIP). It is proposed that SKIP regulates AS of CCA1, LHY, PRR7, PRR9 and TOC1 by modulating the recognition of 5′ and 3′ splice donor and acceptor sites. Conversely, loss of SKIP causes a long-period phenotype [219]. Likewise, mutants of SPLICEOSOMAL TIMEKEEPER LOCUS 1 (STIPL1), a homolog of a human spliceosome protein, also cause a long-period phenotype. Additionally, in stipl1 mutants, transcript levels of the spliced variants of CCA1, LHY, PRR9 and TOC1 are altered [227].
Core components of the spliceosomal U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex, SM-like (LSM) genes, also regulate circadian rhythms in plants. Mutations in LSM5 or LSM4 in Arabidopsis, extend the circadian period by affecting AS more than constitutive splicing [228]. Another spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein assembly factor, GEMIN2, has been suggested to attenuate the effects of temperature on the circadian period by regulation of AS of clock genes such as CCA1, TOC1 and PRR9 [229]. Despite these discoveries, complete details of the molecular mechanisms involved in AS effects on circadian components remain unknown.

10. Alternative splicing shapes plant symbiosis with mycorrhiza and rhizobia

Legumes establish a symbiotic relationship with N-fixing soil bacteria, whereas mycorrhiza establishes a symbiotic relationship with both monocots and dicots. Rhizobium captures atmospheric N to support plant growth and development, while the bacteria use nutrients from the plants to support their own growth [230]. Mycorrhiza in optimal and stressed environments provides nutrients to host plants to improve biomass yield and quality of edible products under optimal and stressed environments [231]. Recent research as discussed herewith state that AS variants contribute to the functioning of symbiosis in plants.

10.1. Mycorrhiza symbiosis: Numerous genes regulate the formation of symbiotic structures and bidirectional nutrient exchange between host plant and mycorrhiza fungi. Tomato has emerged as a model plant for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (AMS). AMS in tomatoes upregulated 3,174 protein coding genes, 42% of which were AS isoforms. Symbiosis consistently induced 24 genes from ortho groups in eight phylogenetically distant angiosperms. Seven additional ortho groups were specifically induced by AMS in all surveyed dicot AMS-host plants, whereas these orthos were absent or not induced in monocots and/or non-AMS hosts, indicating a continuously evolving AMS-responsive network in addition to a conserved core regulatory module. A tomato symbiotic transcriptome database (https://efg.nju.edu.cn/TSTD) may serve as a resource for deep deciphering of the AMS regulatory network [232].

AS regulates transcriptome and proteome diversity and therefore may influence symbiosis. Transcriptome profiling of pea roots in symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhiza and control (nonsymbiotic) showed highly similar AS profiles. Intron retention type accounted for 67% of the AS types, as noted among plant species in general. Eight genes with AS events specific for mycorrhizal roots were identified. Four of which were annotated as encoding an apoptosis inhibitor protein, a serine/threonine-protein kinase, a dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase, and a pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DEAH1. The isoforms of these genes were upregulated in mycorrhizal roots. Two such genes with mycorrhiza-specific AS were related to splicing and were parts of the feedback loops involved in fine-tuning gene expression during mycorrhization [233].

10.2. Rhizobium symbiosis:

Iso-Seq of soybean root tissues inoculated and uninoculated with Rhizobium unfolded 200,681 transcripts and covered 26,183 gene loci. Most of the multi-exon loci produced more than one splicing variant. Seven thousand and seventy-four DAS events had highly diverse splicing patterns (i.e., defense and transport-related processes) during nodule development. Profiling of genes with differential isoform uses unlocked 2008 multi-isoform loci that underwent stage-specific or simultaneous major isoform switches after inoculation. In addition, 157 of 1,563 high-confidence long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) were also differentially expressed during nodule development [234]. A study involving soybean transcriptome data unfolded key transcription patterns of nodule development which included 9,669 core genes and 7,302 stage-specific genes and uncovered 2,323 genes that undergo AS events during nodule developmental stage in nodules compared to roots. Stage-specific changes during nodulation were also noted in DNA methylation that impacted the expression of 1,864 genes. Thus, there exists an association between gene expression, AS, and DNA methylation in shaping transcriptome complexity and proteome specificity in developing nodules [5]. Assessment of AS events in the pea nodules and root tips unravelled AS isoforms of four genes, PsSIP1, PsIGN, PsWRKY40, and PsPR-10, with pathogens stress response isoforms highly enriched in nodules than root tips [235].

11. Applied aspects of splice isoforms in controlling agricultural traits

Alternative splicing produces more than one mRNA from a single pre-RNA molecule in plants, thus increasing transcriptome plasticity and proteome complexity [236], and affecting plant metabolism at different development stages [237]. AS provides therefore means for plants to adapt to changing surrounding environments by regulating their fitness, particularly when they grow under stress [238], e.g. in the response of barley’s clock genes to low temperature [221] or during infection of blast fungus in rice [239]. The recent advances in next-generation sequencing coupled with extensive transcriptomic resources have facilitated the understanding of AS role in regulating developmental processes in plants for adapting to stress-prone environments [240].
Splice variants affect agronomic characteristics in crops, e.g. floral development in cereals [241], seed shattering and weight in rice [242], grain size and weight in wheat [189,243], plant architecture in soybean [244], as well as nutritional quality in rice [207,245], soybean [246,247], tomato [248] and wheat [249]. Genome-wide association genetic analysis (GWAS) can further reveal how AS variants diversify gene function and regulate variation in crops, as done by Chen et al. [22] in maize. They found ca. 20,000 unique splicing quantitative trait loci for 6570 genes affecting protein functions in 366 inbred lines.

12. Conclusion

AS of pre-mRNA is widespread and the major source of transcriptome and proteome diversity, which in turn generates phenotypic variation. A variety of computational pipelines including deep learning machine tools methods are now available to analyze RNA-seq data to identify AS events, estimate isoform abundance, and differential expression of splice variants across tissues/conditions, and development stages.
Domestication and polyploidization (Brassica species, wheat) besides environmental perturbation cause varying expression of AS isoforms in plants. Arabidopsis uses AS isoforms as stress response mechanism to enhance its adaptation to a range of geographically diverse agro-ecologies. To date, many AS quantitative trait loci (sQTLs) for large number of genes with distinct protein functions impacting phenology, plant architecture, biomass yield or quality including nutrient homeostasis, and stress responses have been reported in grain (maize, rice, sorghum, wheat), oil (Brassica species., soybean), and fiber (cotton) crops. Many of these sQTLs colocalize with known pQTLs impacting phenotypic variation. Evidence also suggests that AS variants contribute to functioning of symbiosis (mycorrhiza, rhizobium) in plants, heterosis in grain and oil crops, and provide a mechanistic link between the core of the circadian clock genes and diverse environmental stimuli.
Though significant advances in genome wide expression of AS variants have been made in various crops, applying such advances poses a significant challenge in crop improvement programs, which include but not limited to, i) a significant bottleneck to establishing cost-effective high throughput assay to identify AS variants in early breeding generations, ii) differentiating and quantifying the impact of sQTLs from pQTLs for genes impacting phenotypic variation, iii) accurate reconstruction of transcript isoforms and quantification of relative abundance of individual isoforms in deciphering the biological functions of individual transcripts iv) identifying common genetic tags (e.g. SNPs, InDels and structural variation) linked with AS variants and gene expression, and v) possible adverse effect of combining AS variants with trait-gene(s) on phenotypic variation. Until such logistical issues are resolved, the exploitation of AS variants in crop improvement programs will be limited to discovery and functional characterization of AS variants across tissues or conditions, and development stages in plants.

Author Contributions

SLD: Conceptualization, investigation, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. LFQ: Investigation, writing—original draft, and editing. ASNR: Investigation, writing—original draft, and editing. CS: Investigation, writing—original draft, and editing. RO: Conceptualization, project administration, investigation, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gueroussov, S.; Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, T.; Irimia, M.; Raj, B.; Lin, Z.-Y.; Gingras, A.-C.; Blencowe, B.J. An alternative Splicing Event Amplifies Evolutionary Differences between Vertebrates. Science 2015, 349, 868–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Josephs, E.B. Gene Expression Links Genotype and Phenotype during Rapid Adaptation. Molecular Ecology 2021, 30, 30–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tellier, M.; Maudlin, I.; Murphy, S. Transcription and Splicing: A Two-way Street. WIREs RNA 2020, 11, e1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Soergel, D.A.; Lareau, L.F.; Brenner, S.E. Regulation of Gene Expression by Coupling of Alternative Splicing and NMD. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay 2006, 175–196. [Google Scholar]
  5. Niyikiza, D.; Piya, S.; Routray, P.; Miao, L.; Kim, W.-S.; Burch-Smith, T.; Gill, T.; Sams, C.; Arelli, P.R.; Pantalone, V.; et al. Interactions of Gene Expression, Alternative Splicing, and DNA Methylation in Determining Nodule Identity. The Plant Journal 2020, 103, 1744–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grantham, M.E.; Brisson, J.A. Extensive Differential Splicing Underlies Phenotypically Plastic Aphid Morphs. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2018, 35, 1934–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Healy, T.M.; Schulte, P.M. Patterns of Alternative Splicing in Response to Cold Acclimation in Fish. Journal of Experimental Biology 2019, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jacobs, A.; Elmer, K.R. Alternative Splicing and Gene Expression Play Contrasting Roles in the Parallel Phenotypic Evolution of a Salmonid Fish. Molecular Ecology 2021, 30, 4955–4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Singh, P.; Börger, C.; More, H.; Sturmbauer, C. The Role of Alternative Splicing and Differential Gene Expression in Cichlid Adaptive Radiation. Genome Biology and Evolution 2017, 9, 2764–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Singh, P.; Ahi, E.P. The Importance of Alternative Splicing in Adaptive Evolution. Molecular Ecology 2022, 31, 1928–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, L.; Bush, S.J.; Tovar-Corona, J.M.; Castillo-Morales, A.; Urrutia, A.O. Correcting for Differential Transcript Coverage Reveals a Strong Relationship between Alternative Splicing and Organism Complexity. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2014, 31, 1402–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Brawand, D.; Soumillon, M.; Necsulea, A.; Julien, P.; Csárdi, G.; Harrigan, P.; Weier, M.; Liechti, A.; Aximu-Petri, A.; Kircher, M.; et al. The Evolution of Gene Expression Levels in Mammalian Organs. Nature 2011, 478, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. El Taher, A.; Böhne, A.; Boileau, N.; Ronco, F.; Indermaur, A.; Widmer, L.; Salzburger, W. Gene Expression Dynamics during Rapid Organismal Diversification in African Cichlid Fishes. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2021, 5, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hill, M.S.; Vande Zande, P.; Wittkopp, P.J. Molecular and Evolutionary Processes Generating Variation in Gene Expression. Nature Reviews Genetics 2021, 22, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wray, G.A. The Evolutionary Significance of Cis-regulatory Mutations. Nature Reviews Genetics 2007, 8, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Blencowe, B.J. The Relationship between Alternative Splicing and Proteomic Complexity. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2017, 42, 407–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tress, M.L.; Abascal, F.; Valencia, A. Alternative Splicing May Not Be the Key to Proteome Complexity. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2017, 42, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bedre, R.; Irigoyen, S.; Petrillo, E.; Mandadi, K.K. New Era in Plant Alternative Splicing Analysis Enabled by Advances in High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS) Technologies. Frontier In Plant Science 2019, 10, 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xia, T.; Zhang, L.; Xu, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, B.; Hao, M.; Chang, X.; Zhang, T.; Li, S.; Zhang, H.; et al. The Alternative Splicing of EAM8 Contributes to Early Flowering and Short-season Adaptation in a Lndrace Barley from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2017, 130, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Smith, C.C.R.; Rieseberg, L.H.; Hulke, B.S.; Kane, N.C. Aberrant RNA Splicing due to Genetic Incompatibilities in Sunflower Hybrids. Evolution 2021, 75, 2747–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Smith, C.C.R.; Tittes, S.; Mendieta, J.P.; Collier-zans, E.; Rowe, H.C.; Rieseberg, L.H.; Kane, N.C. Genetics of Alternative Splicing Evolution during Sunflower Domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2018, 115, 6768–6773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Q.; Han, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Sun, J.; Zhao, B.; Li, W.; Tian, J.; Liang, Y.; Yan, J.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Analyses Reveal the Importance of Alternative Splicing in Diversifying Gene Function and Regulating Phenotypic Variation in Maize. The Plant Cell 2018, 30, 1404–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. West-Eberhard, M.J. Phenotypic Plasticity and the Origins of Diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1989, 20, 249–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ehrenreich, I.M.; Pfennig, D.W. Genetic Assimilation: A Review of its Potential Proximate Causes and Evolutionary Consequences. Annals of Botany 2015, 117, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Somero, G.N. RNA Thermosensors: How Might Animals Exploit Their Regulatory Potential? Journal of Experimental Biology 2018, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mastrangelo, A.M.; Marone, D.; Laidò, G.; De Leonardis, A.M.; De Vita, P. Alternative Splicing: Enhancing Ability to Cope with Stress via Transcriptome Plasticity. Plant Science 2012, 185-186, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sedlazeck, F.J.; Lee, H.; Darby, C.A.; Schatz, M.C. Piercing the Dark Matter: Bioinformatics of Long-range Sequencing and Mapping. Nature Reviews Genetics 2018, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jabre, I.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Kalyna, M.; Chaudhary, S.; Khokhar, W.; Byrne, L.J.; Wilson, C.M.; Syed, N.H. Does Co-transcriptional Regulation of Alternative Splicing Mediate Plant Stress Responses? Nucleic Acids Research 2019, 47, 2716–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reddy, A.S.N.; Huang, J.; Syed, N.H.; Ben-Hur, A.; Dong, S.; Gu, L. Decoding Co-/post-transcriptional Complexities of Plant Transcriptomes and Epitranscriptome using Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies. Biochemecal Society Transactions 2020, 48, 2399–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Hamilton, M.; Jacobi, J.L.; Ngam, P.; Devitt, N.; Schilkey, F.; Ben-Hur, A.; Reddy, A.S. A Survey of the Sorghum Transcriptome using Single-molecule Long Reads. Nature communications 2016, 7, 11706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, R.; Kuo, R.; Coulter, M.; Calixto, C.P.G.; Entizne, J.C.; Guo, W.; Marquez, Y.; Milne, L.; Riegler, S.; Matsui, A.; et al. A High-resolution Single-molecule Sequencing-based Arabidopsis Transcriptome using Novel Methods of Iso-seq Analysis. Genome Biology 2022, 23, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhao, L.Z.; Zhang, H.X.; Kohnen, M.V.; Prasad, K.V.S.K.; Gu, L.F.; Reddy, A.S.N. Analysis of Transcriptome and Epitranscriptome in Plants Using PacBio Iso-Seq and Nanopore-Based Direct RNA Sequencing. Frontier In Genetics 2019, 10, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Parker, M.T.; Knop, K.; Sherwood, A.V.; Schurch, N.J.; Mackinnon, K.; Gould, P.D.; Hall, A.J.; Barton, G.J.; Simpson, G.G. Nanopore Direct RNA Sequencing Maps the Complexity of Arabidopsis mRNA Processing and m(6)A Modification. Elife 2020, 9, e49658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, S.; Li, R.; Zhang, L.; Chen, S.; Xie, M.; Yang, L.; Xia, Y.; Foyer, C.H.; Zhao, Z.; Lam, H.M. New Insights into Arabidopsis Transcriptome Complexity Revealed by Direct Sequencing of Native RNAs. Nucleic Acids Research 2020, 7700–7711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Xi, F.; Wang, H.; Han, X.; Wei, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Zhu, Q.; et al. Profiling of Circular RNA N(6) -methyladenosine in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) using Nanopore-based Direct RNA Sequencing. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Filichkin, S.A.; Priest, H.D.; Givan, S.A.; Shen, R.; Bryant, D.W.; Fox, S.E.; Wong, W.K.; Mockler, T.C. Genome-Wide Mapping of Alternative Splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Research 2010, 20, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mandadi, K.K.; Scholthof, K.B. Genome-wide Analysis of Alternative Splicing Landscapes Modulated during Plant-Virus Interactions in Brachypodium distachyon. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Thatcher, S.R.; Zhou, W.; Leonard, A.; Wang, B.B.; Beatty, M.; Zastrow-Hayes, G.; Zhao, X.; Baumgarten, A.; Li, B. Genome-Wide Analysis of Alternative Splicing in Zea mays: Landscape and Genetic Regulation. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 3472–3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marquez, Y.; Brown, J.W.; Simpson, C.; Barta, A.; Kalyna, M. Transcriptome Survey Reveals Increased Complexity of the Alternative Splicing Landscape in Arabidopsis. Genome Research 2012, 22, 1184–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mourão, K.; Schurch, N.J.; Lucoszek, R.; Froussios, K.; MacKinnon, K.; Duc, C.; Simpsoon, G.; Barton, G.J. Detection and Mitigation of Spurious Antisense Expression with RoSA. F1000 Research 2019, 8, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, W.; Coulter, M.; Waugh, R.; Zhang, R. The Value of Genotype-specific Reference for Transcriptome Analyses in Barley. Life Sci Alliance 2022, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kratz, A.; Carninci, P. The Devil in the Details of RNA-seq. Nature Biotechnology 2014, 32, 882–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Steijger, T.; Abril, J.F.; Engstrom, P.G.; Kokocinski, F.; Hubbard, T.J.; Guigo, R.; Harrow, J.; Bertone, P.; Consortium, R. Assessment of Transcript Reconstruction Methods for RNA-seq. Nature Methods 2013, 10, 1177–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Schaarschmidt, S.; Fischer, A.; Lawas, L.M.F.; Alam, R.; Septiningsih, E.M.; Bailey-Serres, J.; Jagadish, S.V.K.; Huettel, B.; Hincha, D.K.; Zuther, E. Utilizing PacBio Iso-Seq for Novel Transcript and Gene Discovery of Abiotic Stress Responses in Oryza sativa L. International Journal of Mol Sciences 2020, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Feng, S.; Xu, M.; Liu, F.; Cui, C.; Zhou, B. Reconstruction of the Full-length Transcriptome Atlas using PacBio Iso-Seq Provides Insight into the Alternative Splicing in Gossypium australe. BMC Plant Biology 2019, 19, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Minio, A.; Massonnet, M.; Figueroa-Balderas, R.; Vondras, A.M.; Blanco-Ulate, B.; Cantu, D. Iso-Seq Allows Genome-Independent Transcriptome Profiling of Grape Berry Development. G3 (Bethesda) 2019, 9, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wei, J.; Cao, H.; Liu, J.D.; Zuo, J.H.; Fang, Y.; Lin, C.T.; Sun, R.Z.; Li, W.L.; Liu, Y.X. Insights into Transcriptional Characteristics and Homoeolog Expression bias of Embryo and De-embryonated Kernels in Developing Grain through RNA-Seq and Iso-Seq. Functional Integrative Genomics 2019, 19, 919–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Juntawong, P.; Girke, T.; Bazin, J.; Bailey-Serres, J. Translational Dynamics Revealed by Genome-WideProfiling of Ribosome Footprints in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2014, 111, E203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Reixachs-Sole, M.; Ruiz-Orera, J.; Alba, M.M.; Eyras, E. Ribosome Profiling at Isoform Level Reveals Evolutionary Conserved Impacts of Differential Splicing on the Proteome. Nature communications 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Holmes, I.; Durbin, R. Dynamic Programming Alignment Accuracy. Journal of Computational Biology 1998, 5, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kuo, R.I.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, R.; Brown, J.W.S.; Smith, J.; Archibald, A.L.; Burt, D.W. Illuminating the Dark Side of the Human Transcriptome with Long Read Transcript Sequencing. BMC Genomics 2020, 21, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Marquardt, S.; Petrillo, E.; Manavella, P.A. Cotranscriptional RNA Processing and Modification in Plants. Plant Cell 2023, 35, 1654–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhu, D.; Mao, F.; Tian, Y.; Lin, X.; Gu, L.; Gu, H.; Qu, L.J.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Z. The Features and Regulation of Co-transcriptional Splicing in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant 2020, 13, 278–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Chen, X.; Gong, Z. Global Co-transcriptional Splicing in Arabidopsis and the Correlation with Splicing Regulation in Mature RNAs. Molecular Plant 2020, 13, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Reddy, A.S.; Marquez, Y.; Kalyna, M.; Barta, A. Complexity of the Alternative Splicing Landscape in Plants. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3657–3683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Staiger, D.; Brown, J.W. Alternative Splicing at the Intersection of Biological Timing, Development, and Stress Responses. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3640–3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Laloum, T.; Martin, G.; Duque, P. Alternative Splicing Control of Abiotic Stress Responses. Trends In Plant Science 2018, 23, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Calixto, C.P.G.; Guo, W.; James, A.B.; Tzioutziou, N.A.; Entizne, J.C.; Panter, P.E.; Knight, H.; Nimmo, H.G.; Zhang, R.; Brown, J.W.S. Rapid and Dynamic Alternative Splicing Impacts the Arabidopsis Cold Response Transcriptome. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 1424–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Palusa, S.G.; Ali, G.S.; Reddy, A.S. Alternative Splicing of Pre-mRNAs of Arabidopsis serine/arginine-rich Proteins: Regulation by Hormones and Stresses. Plant Journal 2007, 49, 1091–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Palusa, S.G.; Reddy, A.S. Extensive Coupling of Alternative Splicing of pre-mRNAs of Serine/Arginine (SR) Genes with Nonsense-mediated Decay. New Phytology 2010, 185, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Palusa, S.G.; Reddy, A.S. Differential Recruitment of Splice Variants from SR pre-mRNAs to Polysomes during Development and in Response to Stresses. Plant Cell Physiology 2015, 56, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Petrillo, E. Do not panic: An Intron-centric Guide to Alternative Splicing. Plant Cell 2023, 35, 1752–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jia, J.; Long, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, D.; Jin, X.; Deng, X.; Xia, R.; et al. Post-transcriptional Splicing of Nascent RNA Contributes to Widespread Intron Retention in Plants. Nature Plants 2020, 6, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Braunschweig, U.; Barbosa-Morais, N.L.; Pan, Q.; Nachman, E.N.; Alipanahi, B.; Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, T.; Frey, B.; Irimia, M.; Blencowe, B.J. Widespread Intron Retention in Mammals Functionally Tunes Transcriptomes. Genome Research 2014, 24, 1774–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Boothby, T.C.; Zipper, R.S.; van der Weele, C.M.; Wolniak, S.M. Removal of Retained Introns Regulates Translation in the Rapidly Developing Gametophyte of Marsilea vestita. Developmental Cell 2013, 24, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yap, K.; Lim, Z.Q.; Khandelia, P.; Friedman, B.; Makeyev, E.V. Coordinated Regulation of Neuronal mRNA Steady-state Levels Through Developmentally Controlled Intron Retention. Genes and Development 2012, 26, 1209–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jung, H.; Lee, D.; Lee, J.; Park, D.; Kim, Y.J.; Park, W.Y.; Hong, D.; Park, P.J.; Lee, E. Intron Retention is a Widespread Mechanism of Tumor-Iuppressor inactivation. Nature Genetics 2015, 47, 1242–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mehmood, A.; Laiho, A.; Venalainen, M.S.; McGlinchey, A.J.; Wang, N.; Elo, L.L. Systematic Evaluation of Differential Splicing Tools for RNA-seq Studies. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2020, 21, 2052–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Estefania, M.; Andres, R.; Javier, I.; Marcelo, Y.; Ariel, C. ASpli: Integrative Analysis of Splicing Landscapes Through RNA-Seq Assays. Bioinformatics 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Guo, W.; Tzioutziou, N.A.; Stephen, G.; Milne, I.; Calixto, C.P.; Waugh, R.; Brown, J.W.S.; Zhang, R. 3D RNA-seq: A Powerful and Flexible Tool for Rapid and Accurate Differential Expression and Alternative Splicing Analysis of RNA-seq Data for Biologists. RNA Biology 2021, 18, 1574–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hsieh, P.H.; Oyang, Y.J.; Chen, C.Y. Effect of DeNovo Transcriptome Assembly on Transcript Quantification. Science Report 2019, 9, 8304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Freedman, A.H.; Clamp, M.; Sackton, T.B. ; Error, Noise and Bias in De Novo Transcriptome Assemblies. Molecular Ecology Resources 2021, 21, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Jagannathan, S.; Ramachandran, S.; Rissland, O.S. Slow Down to Catch Up. Cell 2019, 178, 774–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zeng, T.; Li, Y.I. Predicting RNA Splicing from DNA Sequence using Pangolin. Genome Biology 2022, 23, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Avsec, Z.; Agarwal, V.; Visentin, D.; Ledsam, J.R.; Grabska-Barwinska, A.; Taylor, K.R.; Assael, Y.; Jumper, J.; Kohli, P.; Kelley, D.R. Effective Gene Expression Prediction from Sequence by Integrating Long-range Interactions. Nature methods 2021, 18, 1196–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dawes, R.; Bournazos, A.M.; Bryen, S.J.; Bommireddipalli, S.; Marchant, R.G.; Joshi, H.; Cooper, S.T. SpliceVault Predicts the Precise Nature of Variant-Associated Mis-splicing. Nature Genetics 2023, 55, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cheng, J.; Nguyen, T.Y.D.; Cygan, K.J.; Celik, M.H.; Fairbrother, W.G.; Avsec, Z.; Gagneur, J. MMSplice: Modular Modeling Improves the Predictions of Genetic Variant Effects on Splicing. Genome Biology 2019, 20, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dawes, R.; Joshi, H.; Cooper, S.T. Empirical Prediction of Variant-Activated Cryptic Splice Donors using Population-based RNA-Seq Data. Nature communications 2022, 13, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, Z.; Pan, Z.; Ying, Y.; Xie, Z.; Adhikari, S.; Phillips, J.; Carstens, R.P.; Black, D.L.; Wu, Y.; Xing, Y. Deep-Learning Augmented RNA-seq Analysis of Transcript Splicing. Nature methods 2019, 16, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Huang, J.; Lu, X.; Wu, H.; Xie, Y.; Peng, Q.; Gu, L.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Dong, S. Phytophthora Effectors Modulate Genome-wide Alternative Splicing of Host mRNAs to Reprogram Plant Immunity. Molecular Plant 2020, 13, 1470–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shen, S.; Park, J.W.; Lu, Z.-x.; Lin, L.; Henry, M.D.; Wu, Y.N.; Zhou, Q.; Xing, Y. rMATS: Robust and Flexible Detection of Differential Alternative Splicing from Replicate RNA-Seq Data. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of USA 2014, 111, E5593–E5601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Reyes, A.; Anders, S.; Weatheritt, R.J.; Gibson, T.J.; Steinmetz, L.M.; Huber, W. Drift and Conservation of Differential Exon Usage Across Tissues in Primate Species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2013, 110, 15377–15382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Vaquero-Garcia, J.; Barrera, A.; Gazzara, M.R.; Gonzalez-Vallinas, J.; Lahens, N.F.; Hogenesch, J.B.; Lynch, K.W.; Barash, Y. A New View of Transcriptome Complexity and Regulation Through the Lens of Local Splicing Variations. Elife 2016, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Trincado, J.L.; Entizne, J.C.; Hysenaj, G.; Singh, B.; Skalic, M.; Elliott, D.J.; Eyras, E. SUPPA2: Fast, Accurate, and Uncertainty-aware Differential Splicing Analysis Across Multiple Conditions. Genome Biology 2018, 19, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Coulter, M.; Entizne, J.C.; Guo, W.; Bayer, M.; Wonneberger, R.; Milne, L.; Schreiber, M.; Haaning, A.; Muehlbauer, G.J.; McCallum, N.; et al. BaRTv2: A Highly Resolved Barley Reference Transcriptome for Accurate Transcript-Specific RNA-seq Quantification. Plant Journal 2022, 111, 1183–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Katz, Y.; Wang, E.T.; Airoldi, E.M.; Burge, C.B. Analysis and Design of RNA Sequencing Experiments for Identifying Isoform Regulation. Nature methods 2010, 7, 1009–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rogers, M.F.; Thomas, J.; Reddy, A.S.; Ben-Hur, A. SpliceGrapher: Detecting Patterns of Alternative Splicing from RNA-Seq Data in the Context of Gene Models and EST Data. Genome Biology 2012, 13, R4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Filichkin, S.A.; Hamilton, M.; Dharmawardhana, P.D.; Singh, S.K.; Sullivan, C.; Ben-Hur, A.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Jaiswal, P. Abiotic Stresses Modulate Landscape of Poplar Transcriptome via Alternative Splicing, Differential Intron Retention, and Isoform Ratio Switching. Frontier In Plant Science 2018, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Martín, G.; Márquez, Y.; Mantica, F.; Duque, P.; Irimia, M. Alternative Splicing Landscapes in Arabidopsis thaliana Across Tissues and Stress Conditions Highlight Major Functional Differences with Animals. Genome Biology 2021, 22, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chaudhary, S.; Khokhar, W.; Jabre, I.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Byrne, L.J.; Wilson, C.M.; Syed, N.H. Alternative Splicing and Protein Diversity: Plants Versus Animals. Frontiers In Plant Science 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, R.; Liu, H.; Liu, Z.; Zou, J.; Meng, J.; Wang, J. Genome-Wide Analysis of Alternative Splicing Divergences Between Brassica Hexaploid and its Parents. Planta 2019, 250, 603–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.-H.; Xu, W.; Smith, C.W.; Murray, S.C.; Zhang, H.-B. Analysis of the Genes Controlling Three Quantitative Traits in Three Diverse Plant Species Reveals the Molecular Basis of Quantitative Traits. Scientific Reports 2020, 10, 10074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Barbazuk, W.B.; Fu, Y.; McGinnis, K.M. Genome-Wide Analyses of Alternative Splicing in Plants: Opportunities and Challenges. Genome Research 2008, 18, 1381–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Shen, S.; Park, J.W.; Huang, J.; Dittmar, K.A.; Lu, Z.-x.; Zhou, Q.; Carstens, R.P.; Xing, Y. MATS: A Bayesian Framework for Flexible Detection of Differential Alternative Splicing from RNA-Seq Data. Nucleic Acids Research 2012, 40, e61–e61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Mathur, M.; Kim, C.M.; Munro, S.A.; Rudina, S.S.; Sawyer, E.M.; Smolke, C.D. Programmable Mutually Exclusive Alternative Splicing for Generating RNA and Protein Diversity. Nature communications 2019, 10, 2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Pramanik, D.; Shelake, R.M.; Kim, M.J.; Kim, J.Y. CRISPR-Mediated Engineering Across the Central Dogma in Plant Biology for Basic Research and Crop Improvement. Molecular Plant 2021, 14, 127–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, H.; Li, A.; Shen, W.; Ye, N.; Wang, G.; Zhang, J. Global Survey of Alternative Splicing in Rice by Direct RNA Sequencing During Reproductive Development: Landscape and Genetic Regulation. Rice 2021, 14, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sun, Y.; Xiao, H. Identification of Alternative Splicing Events by RNA Sequencing in Early Growth Tomato Fruits. BMC Genomics 2015, 16, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, M.; Wang, P.; Liang, F.; Ye, Z.; Li, J.; Shen, C.; Pei, L.; Wang, F.; Hu, J.; Tu, L.; et al. A Global Survey of Alternative Splicing in Allopolyploid Cotton: Landscape, Complexity and Regulation. New Phytologist 2018, 217, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Ullah, F.; Ben-Hur, A.; Reddy, A.S.N. Transcriptome Analysis of Drought-Resistant and Drought-Sensitive Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Genotypes in Response to PEG-Induced Drought Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Xie, S.Q.; Han, Y.; Chen, X.Z.; Cao, T.Y.; Ji, K.K.; Zhu, J.; Ling, P.; Xiao, C.L. ISOdb: A Comprehensive Database of Full-Length Isoforms Generated by Iso-Seq. International Journal of Genomics 2018, 2018, 9207637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ganie, S.A.; Reddy, A.S.N. Stress-Induced Changes in Alternative Splicing Landscape in Rice: Functional Significance of Splice Isoforms in Stress Tolerance. Biology (Basel) 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kathare, P.K.; Xin, R.; Ganesan, A.S.; June, V.M.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Huq, E. SWAP1-SFPS-RRC1 splicing Factor Complex Modulates pre-mRNA Splicing to Promote Photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2022, 119, e2214565119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zhu, G.; Li, W.; Zhang, F.; Guo, W. RNA-seq Analysis Reveals Alternative Splicing Under Salt Stress in Cotton, Gossypium davidsonii. BMC Genomics 2018, 19, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Li, S.; Yu, X.; Cheng, Z.; Zeng, C.; Li, W.; Zhang, L.; Peng, M. Large-scale Snalysis of the Cassava Transcriptome Reveals the Impact of Cold Stress on Alternative Splicing. Journal of Experimental Botany 2020, 71, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Dong, C.; He, F.; Berkowitz, O.; Liu, J.; Cao, P.; Tang, M.; Shi, H.; Wang, W.; Li, Q.; Shen, Z.; et al. Alternative Splicing Plays a Critical Role in Maintaining Mineral Nutrient Homeostasis in Rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Cell 2018, 30, 2267–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chong, G.L.; Foo, M.H.; Lin, W.D.; Wong, M.M.; Verslues, P.E. Highly ABA-Induced 1 (HAI1)-Interacting Protein HIN1 and Drought Acclimation-enhanced Splicing Efficiency at Intron Retention Sites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2019, 116, 22376–22385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chen, M.; Manley, J.L. Mechanisms of Alternative Splicing Regulation: Insights from Molecular and Genomics Approaches. Nature Review Molecular Cell Biology 2009, 10, 741–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Assmann, S.M.; Chou, H.L.; Bevilacqua, P.C. Rock, scissors, paper: How RNA Structure Informs Function. Plant Cell 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ding, Y.; Tang, Y.; Kwok, C.K.; Zhang, Y.; Bevilacqua, P.C.; Assmann, S.M. In Vivo Genome-Wide Profiling of RNA Secondary Structure Reveals Novel Regulatory Features. Nature 2014, 505, 696–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Thomas, J.; Palusa, S.G.; Prasad, K.V.; Ali, G.S.; Surabhi, G.K.; Ben-Hur, A.; Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Reddy, A.S. Identification of an Intronic Splicing Regulatory Element Involved in Auto-Regulation of Alternative Splicing of SCL33 pre-mRNA. Plant Journal 2012, 22, 12004. [Google Scholar]
  112. Day, I.S.; Golovkin, M.; Palusa, S.G.; Link, A.; Ali, G.S.; Thomas, J.; Richardson, D.N.; Reddy, A.S. Interactions of SR45, an SR-like Protein, with Spliceosomal Proteins and an Intronic Sequence: Insights into Regulated Splicing. Plant Journal 2012, 71, 936–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Xing, D.; Wang, Y.; Hamilton, A.; Ben-Hur, A.; Reddy, A.S.N. Transcriptome-Wide Identification of RNA Targets of Arabidopsis Serine/Arginine Protein 45 (SR45) Uncovers the Unexpected Roles of This RNA Binding Protein in RNA Processing. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 3294–3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Liu, Z.; Yuan, G.; Liu, S.; Jia, J.; Cheng, L.; Qi, D.; Shen, S.; Peng, X.; Liu, G. Identified of a Novel Cis-element Regulating the Alternative Splicing of LcDREB2. Science Report 2017, 7, 46106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wang, B.B.; Brendel, V. Genomewide Comparative Analysis of Alternative Splicing in Plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103, 7175–7180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Iida, K.; Seki, M.; Sakurai, T.; Satou, M.; Akiyama, K.; Toyoda, T.; Konagaya, A.; Shinozaki, K. Genome-Wide Analysis of Alternative Pre-mRNA Splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana Based on Full-Length cDNA Sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 2004, 32, 5096–5103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Long, J.C.; Caceres, J.F. The SR Protein Family of Splicing Factors: Master Regulators of Gene Expression. Biochemical Journal 2009, 417, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lareau, L.F.; Inada, M.; Green, R.E.; Wengrod, J.C.; Brenner, S.E. Unproductive Splicing of SR Genes Associated with Highly Conserved and Ultraconserved DNA Elements. Nature 2007, 446, 926–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lazar, G.; Goodman, H.M. The Arabidopsis Splicing Factor SR1 is Regulated by Alternative Splicing. Plant Molecular Biology 2000, 42, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Rauch, H.B.; Patrick, T.L.; Klusman, K.M.; Battistuzzi, F.U.; Mei, W.; Brendel, V.P.; Lal, S.K. Discovery and Expression Analysis of Alternative Splicing Events Conserved Among Plant SR Proteins. Molecular Biology Evolution 2014, 31, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Reddy, A.S.N.; Ali, G.S. Plant SR Proteins: Roles in Pre-mRNA Splicing, Plant Development and Stress Responses. WIREs RNA 2011, 2, 875–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Duque, P. A Role for SR Proteins in Plant Stress Responses. Plant Signal Behavior 2011, 6, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Reddy, A.S.N. Alternative Splicing of Pre-Messenger RNAs in Plants in the Genomic Era. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2007, 58, 267–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Ali, G.S.; Reddy, A.S. Regulation of Alternative Splicing of Pre-mRNAs by Stresses. Current Topic Microbiology Immunology 2008, 326, 257–275. [Google Scholar]
  125. Kalyna, M.; Lopato, S.; Barta, A. Ectopic Expression of atRSZ33 Reveals its Function in Splicing and Causes Pleiotropic Changes in Development. Molecular Biology of Cell 2003, 14, 3565–3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kalyna, M.; Lopato, S.; Voronin, V.; Barta, A. Evolutionary Conservation and Regulation of Particular Alternative Splicing Events in Plant SR Proteins. Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34, 4395–4405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lopato, S.; Kalyna, M.; Dorner, S.; Kobayashi, R.; Krainer, A.R.; Barta, A. atSRp30, One of Two SF2/ASF-like Proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana, Regulates Splicing of Specific Plant Genes. Genes and Development 1999, 13, 987–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Chaudhary, S.; Jabre, I.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Staiger, D.; Syed, N.H. Perspective on Alternative Splicing and Proteome Complexity in Plants. Trends In Plant Science 2019, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Khokhar, W.; Hassan, M.A.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Chaudhary, S.; Jabre, I.; Byrne, L.J.; Syed, N.H. Genome-Wide Identification of Splicing Quantitative Trait Loci (sQTLs) in Diverse Ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontier In Plant Science 2019, 10, 1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Koster, T.; Marondedze, C.; Meyer, K.; Staiger, D. RNA-Binding Proteins Revisited - The Emerging Arabidopsis mRNA Interactome. Trends In Plant Science 2017, 22, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Burjoski, V.; Reddy, A.S.N. The Landscape of RNA-Protein Interactions in Plants: Approaches and Current Status. International Journal of Molecular Science 2021, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Albaqami, M.; Reddy, A.S.N. Development of an In Vitro Pre-mRNA Splicing Assay using Plant Nuclear Extract. Plant Methods 2018, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Zhou, G.; Niu, R.; Zhou, Y.; Luo, M.; Peng, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Xu, G. Proximity Editing to Identify RNAs in Phase-Separated RNA Binding Protein Condensates. Cell Discovery 2021, 7, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. McMahon, A.C.; Rahman, R.; Jin, H.; Shen, J.L.; Fieldsend, A.; Luo, W.; Rosbash, M. TRIBE: Hijacking an RNA-Editing Enzyme to Identify Cell-Specific Targets of RNA-Binding Proteins. Cell 2016, 165, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Tong, H.; Huang, J.; Xiao, Q.; He, B.; Dong, X.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Han, D.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; et al. High-Fidelity Cas13 Variants for Targeted RNA Degradation with Minimal Collateral Effects. Nature Biotechnology 2023, 41, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Rahman, R.; Xu, W.; Jin, H.; Rosbash, M. Identification of RNA-Binding Protein Targets with HyperTRIBE. Nature Protoccol 2018, 13, 1829–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Nguyen, T.A.; Heng, J.W.J.; Kaewsapsak, P.; Kok, E.P.L.; Stanojevic, D.; Liu, H.; Cardilla, A.; Praditya, A.; Yi, Z.; Lin, M.; et al. Direct Identification of A-to-I Editing Sites with Nanopore Native RNA Sequencing. Nature methods 2022, 19, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Lin, B.Y.; Shih, C.J.; Hsieh, H.Y.; Chen, H.C.; Tu, S.L. Phytochrome Coordinates with a hnRNP to Regulate Alternative Splicing via an Exonic Splicing Silencer. Plant Physiology 2020, 182, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Xin, R.; Zhu, L.; Salome, P.A.; Mancini, E.; Marshall, C.M.; Harmon, F.G.; Yanovsky, M.J.; Weigel, D.; Huq, E. SPF45-related Splicing Factor for Phytochrome Signaling Promotes Photomorphogenesis by Regulating Pre-mRNA Splicing in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2017, 114, E7018–E7027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Xin, R.; Kathare, P.K.; Huq, E. Coordinated Regulation of Pre-mRNA Splicing by the SFPS-RRC1 Complex to Promote Photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 2052–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Yan, Q.; Xia, X.; Sun, Z.; Fang, Y. Depletion of Arabidopsis SC35 and SC35-like Serine/Arginine-Rich Proteins Affects the Transcription and Splicing of a Subset of Genes. PLoS Genetics 2017, 13, e1006663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Albaqami, M.; Laluk, K.; Reddy, A.S.N. The Arabidopsis Splicing Regulator SR45 Confers Salt Tolerance in a Splice Isoform-dependent Manner. Plant Molecular Biology 2019, 100, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Zhang, X.N.; Shi, Y.; Powers, J.J.; Gowda, N.B.; Zhang, C.; Ibrahim, H.M.M.; Ball, H.B.; Chen, S.L.; Lu, H.; Mount, S.M. Transcriptome Analyses Reveal SR45 to be a Neutral Splicing Regulator and a Suppressor of Innate Immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genomics 2017, 18, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Huang, J.; Gu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, T.; Kong, G.; Kong, L.; Guo, B.; Qiu, M.; Wang, Y.; Jing, M.; et al. An Oomycete Plant Pathogen Reprograms Host Pre-mRNA Splicing to Subvert Immunity. Nature communications 2017, 8, 2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Ochola, S.O.; Dong, S. Functional Analysis of PsAvr3c Effector Family From Phytophthora Provides Probes to Dissect SKRP Mediated Plant Susceptibility. Frontier In Plant Science 2018, 9, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Rigo, R.; Bazin, J.R.M.; Crespi, M.; Charon, C.L. Alternative Splicing in the Regulation of Plant-Microbe Interactions. Plant Cell Physiology 2019, 60, 1906–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Fang, Y.; Hearn, S.; Spector, D.L. Tissue-Specific Expression and Dynamic Organization of SR Splicing Factors in Arabidopsis. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2004, 15, 2664–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ali, G.S.; Golovkin, M.; Reddy, A.S. Nuclear localization and In Vivo Dynamics of a Plant-Specific Serine/Arginine-rich Protein. Plant Journal 2003, 36, 883–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ali, G.S.; Prasad, K.V.; Hanumappa, M.; Reddy, A.S. Analyses of In Vivo Interaction and Mobility of Two Spliceosomal Proteins using FRAP and BiFC. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Ali, G.S.; Reddy, A.S. ATP, Phosphorylation and Transcription Regulate the Mobility of Plant Splicing Factors. Journal of Cell Science 2006, 119, 3527–3538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ali, G.S.; Reddy, A.S. Spatiotemporal Organization of Pre-mRNA Splicing Proteins in Plants. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 2008, 326, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Bazin, J.; Romero, N.; Rigo, R.; Charon, C.; Blein, T.; Ariel, F.; Crespi, M. Nuclear Speckle RNA Binding Proteins Remodel Alternative Splicing and the Non-coding Arabidopsis Transcriptome to Regulate a Cross-Talk Between Auxin and Immune Responses. Frontier In Plant Science 2018, 9, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Reddy, A.S.; Day, I.S.; Gohring, J.; Barta, A. Localization and Dynamics of Nuclear Speckles in Plants. Plant Physiology 2012, 158, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Lorkovic, Z.J.; Hilscher, J.; Barta, A. Co-localisation Studies of Arabidopsis SR Splicing Factors Reveal Different Types of Speckles in Plant Cll Nuclei. Experimental Cell Research 2008, 314, 3175–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Tillemans, V.; Leponce, I.; Rausin, G.; Dispa, L.; Motte, P. Insights into Nuclear Organization in Plants as Revealed by the Dynamic Distribution of Arabidopsis SR Splicing Factors. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3218–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Morton, M.; Tamimi, N.A.; Butt, H.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Mahfouz, M. Serine/Arginine-rich Protein Family of Splicing Regulators: New Approaches to Study Splice Isoform Functions. Plant Science 2019, 283, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Jha, A.; Gazzara, M.R.; Barash, Y. Integrative Deep Models for Alternative Splicing. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, i274–i282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Tilgner, H.; Knowles, D.G.; Johnson, R.; Davis, C.A.; Chakrabortty, S.; Djebali, S.; Curado, J.; Snyder, M.; Gingeras, T.R.; Guigo, R. Deep Sequencing of Subcellular RNA Fractions Shows Splicing to be Predominantly Co-transcriptional in the Human Genome but Inefficient for lncRNAs. Genome Research 2012, 22, 1616–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Wang, X.; Hu, L.; Wang, X.; Li, N.; Xu, C.; Gong, L.; Liu, B. DNA Methylation Affects Gene Alternative Splicing in Plants: An Example from Rice. Molecular Plant 2016, 9, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wei, G.; Liu, K.; Shen, T.; Shi, J.; Liu, B.; Han, M.; Peng, M.; Fu, H.; Song, Y.; Zhu, J.; et al. Position-Specific Intron Retention is Mediated by the Histone Methyltransferase SDG725. BMC Biology 2018, 16, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ullah, F.; Hamilton, M.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Ben-Hur, A. Exploring the Relationship between Intron Retention and Chromatin Accessibility in Plants. BMC Genomics 2018, 19, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Naftelberg, S.; Schor, I.E.; Ast, G.; Kornblihtt, A.R. Regulation of Alternative Splicing through Coupling with Transcription and Chromatin Structure. Annual review of Biochemistry 2015, 84, 165–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Saldi, T.; Cortazar, M.A.; Sheridan, R.M.; Bentley, D.L. Coupling of RNA Polymerase II Transcription Elongation with Pre-mRNA Splicing. Journal of Molecular Biology 2016, 428, 2623–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Ullah, F.; Jabeen, S.; Salton, M.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Ben-Hur, A. Evidence for the Role of Transcription Factors in the Co-transcriptional Regulation of Intron Retention. Genome Biology 2023, 24, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Godoy Herz, M.A.; Kubaczka, M.G.; Brzyzek, G.; Servi, L.; Krzyszton, M.; Simpson, C.; Brown, J.; Swiezewski, S.; Petrillo, E.; Kornblihtt, A.R. Light Regulates Plant Alternative Splicing through the Control of Transcriptional Elongation. Molecular Cell 2019, 1065–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Leng, X.; Ivanov, M.; Kindgren, P.; Malik, I.; Thieffry, A.; Brodersen, P.; Sandelin, A.; Kaplan, C.D.; Marquardt, S. Organismal Benefits of Transcription Speed Control at Gene Boundaries. EMBO Report 2020, 21, e49315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Pajoro, A.; Severing, E.; Angenent, G.C.; Immink, R.G.H. Histone H3 Lysine 36 Methylation Affects Temperature-Induced Alternative Splicing and Flowering in Plants. Genome Biology 2017, 18, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Kindgren, P.; Ivanov, M.; Marquardt, S. Native Elongation Transcript Sequencing Reveals Temperature Dependent Dynamics of Nascent RNAPII Transcription in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Research 2020, 48, 2332–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yu, X.; Meng, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, T.J.; Zhang, A.; Li, N.; Qi, X.; Liu, B.; Xu, Z.Y. The Chromatin Remodeler ZmCHB101 Impacts Alternative Splicing Contexts in Response to Osmotic Stress. Plant Cell Report 2019, 38, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wu, F.; Deng, L.; Zhai, Q.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Q.; Li, C. Mediator Subunit MED25 Couples Alternative Splicing of JAZ Genes with Fine-Tuning of Jasmonate Signaling. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 429–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wang, S.; Quan, L.; Li, S.; You, C.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, L.; Zeng, L.; Liu, L.; Qi, Y.; Mo, B.; et al. The PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE4 Complex Promotes Transcription and Processing of Primary microRNAs in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 486–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Reddy, A.S.N.; Ali, G.S.; Celesnik, H.; Day, I.S. Coping with Stresses: Roles of Calcium- and Calcium/Calmodulin-Regulated Gene Expression. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2010–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Peck, S.; Mittler, R. Plant Signaling in Biotic and Abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 2020, 71, 1649–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Dong, J.; Chen, H.D.; Deng, X.W.; Irish, V.F.; Wei, N. Phytochrome B Induces Intron Retention and Translational Inhibition of PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR3. Plant Physiology 2020, 182, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Wang, S.X.; Tian, L.; Liu, H.J.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.H.; Chen, X.Y.; Jia, X.M.; Zheng, X.; Wu, S.B.; Chen, Y.H.; et al. Large-Scale Discovery of Non-conventional Peptides in Maize and Arabidopsis through an Integrated Peptidogenomic Pipeline. Molecular Plant 2020, 13, 1078–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Raxwal, V.K.; Simpson, C.G.; Gloggnitzer, J.; Entinze, J.C.; Guo, W.; Zhang, R.; Brown, J.W.S.; Riha, K. Nonsense-mediated RNA Decay Factor UPF1 is Critical for Post-transcriptional and Post-translational Gene Regulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2020, In press. [CrossRef]
  177. Panahi, B.; Abbaszadeh, B.; Taghizadeghan, M.; Ebrahimie, E. Genome-Wide Survey of Alternative Splicing in Sorghum Bicolor. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 2014, 20, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Min, X.; Kasamias, T.; Wagner, M.; Ogunbayi, A.; Yu, F. Identification and Analysis of Alternative Splicing in Soybean Plants. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of 14th International Conference, 2022; pp. 1–9.
  179. Guo, B.; Dai, Y.; Chen, L.; Pan, Z.; Song, L. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Soybean Root Transcriptome Reveals the Impact of Nitrate on Alternative Splicing. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 2021, 11, jkab162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Shen, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, W.; Fang, C.; Wu, M.; Ma, Y.; Liu, T.; Kong, L.-A.; Peng, D.-L.; et al. Global Dissection of Alternative Splicing in Paleopolyploid Soybean. The Plant Cell 2014, 26, 996–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Ner-Gaon, H.; Leviatan, N.; Rubin, E.; Fluhr, R. Comparative Cross-Species Alternative Splicing in Plants. Plant Physiology 2007, 144, 1632–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Sun, G.; Yu, H.; Wang, P.; Lopez-Guerrero, M.; Mural, R.V.; Mizero, O.N.; Grzybowski, M.; Song, B.; van Dijk, K.; Schachtman, D.P.; et al. A Role for Heritable Transcriptomic Variation in Maize Adaptation to Temperate Environments. Genome Biology 2023, 24, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Yu, K.; Feng, M.; Yang, G.; Sun, L.; Qin, Z.; Cao, J.; Wen, J.; Li, H.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, X.; et al. Changes in Alternative Splicing in Response to Domestication and Polyploidization in Wheat. Plant Physiology 2020, 184, 1955–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Ranwez, V.; Serra, A.; Pot, D.; Chantret, N. Domestication Reduces Alternative Splicing Expression Variations in Sorghum. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Chai, L.; Zhang, J.; Lu, K.; Li, H.; Wu, L.; Wan, H.; Zheng, B.; Cui, C.; Jiang, J.; Jiang, L. Identification of Genomic Regions Associated with Multi-silique Trait in Brassica napus. BMC Genomics 2019, 20, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Chai, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Zheng, B.; Jiang, J.; Cui, C.; Jiang, L. Investigation for a Multi-siliqueTrait in Brassica napus by Alternative Splicing Analysis. PeerJ 2020, 8, e10135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Chai, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Cui, C.; Jiang, J.; Zheng, B.; Wu, L.; Jiang, L. Investigation of Thermomorphogenesis-Related Genes for a Multi-Silique Trait in Brassica napus by Comparative Transcriptome Analysis. Frontier In Genetics 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Wu, B.; Zhang, X.; Hu, K.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, S.; Liu, X.; Ma, M.; Zhao, H. Two Alternative Splicing Variants of a Wheat Gene TaNAK1, TaNAK1.1 and TaNAK1.2, Differentially Regulate Flowering Time and Plant Architecture Leading to Differences in Seed Yield of Transgenic Arabidopsis. Frontiers In Plant Science 2022, 13, 1014176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Ren, X.; Zhi, L.; Liu, L.; Meng, D.; Su, Q.; Batool, A.; Ji, J.; Song, L.; Zhang, N.; Guo, L.; et al. Alternative Splicing of TaGS3 Differentially Regulates Grain Weight and Size in Bread Wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Yang, G.; Pan, Y.; Cui, L.; Chen, M.; Zeng, Q.; Pan, W.; Liang, Z.; Edwards, D.; Batley, J.; Han, D.; et al. Genetic Basis of Expression and Splicing Underlying Spike Architecture in Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.). bioRxiv 2023, 2023.2005.2004.539218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Liu, L.; Zhou, Y.; Mao, F.; Gu, Y.; Tang, Z.; Xin, Y.; Liu, F.; Tang, T.; Gao, H.; Zhao, X. Fine-Tuning of the Grain Size by Alternative Splicing of GS3 in Rice. Rice 2022, 15, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Teng, Z.; Zheng, Q.; Liu, B.; Meng, S.; Zhang, J.; Ye, N. Moderate Soil Drying-Induced Alternative Splicing Provides a Potential Novel Approach for the Regulation of Grain Filling in Rice Inferior Spikelets. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Liu, X.; Tian, Y.; Chi, W.; Zhang, H.; Yu, J.; Chen, G.; Wu, W.; Jiang, X.; Wang, S.; Lin, Z.; et al. Alternative Splicing of OsGS1;1 Affects Nitrogen-Use Efficiency, Grain Development, and Amylose Content in Rice. The Plant Journal 2022, 110, 1751–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Yu, J.; Miao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xiong, H.; Zhu, X.; Sun, X.; Pan, Y.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Abdul Rehman, R.M.; et al. Alternative Splicing of OsLG3b Controls Grain Length and Yield in Japonica Rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal 2018, 16, 1667–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Lin, A.; Ma, J.; Xu, F.; Xu, W.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, H.; Qu, C.; Wei, L.; Li, J. Differences in Alternative Splicing between Yellow and Black-Seeded Rapeseed. Plants 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Qin, D.; Nishida, S.; Tominaga, R.; Ueda, A.; Raboy, V.; Saneoka, H. Aberrant RNA Splicing of the Phytic Acid Synthesis Gene Inositol-1,3,4 trisphosphate 5/6-kinase in a Low Phytic Acid Soybean Line. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2022, 68, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Dwivedi, S.L.; Mattoo, A.K.; Garg, M.; Dutt, S.; Singh, B.; Ortiz, R. Developing Germplasm and Promoting Consumption of Anthocyanin-Rich Grains for Health Benefits. Frontiers In Sustainable Food Systems 2022, 6, 867897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Chen, D.; Liu, Y.; Yin, S.; Qiu, J.; Jin, Q.; King, G.J.; Wang, J.; Ge, X.; Li, Z. Alternatively Spliced BnaPAP2.A7 Isoforms Play Opposing Roles in Anthocyanin Biosynthesis of Brassica napus L. Frontiers In Plant Science 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Ma, Z.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, B.; Liu, Z.; Duan, S.; Meng, X.; Li, G.; Guo, X. Alternative Splicing of TaHsfA2-7 Is Involved in the Improvement of Thermotolerance in Wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Muthusamy, M.; Yoon, E.K.; Kim, J.A.; Jeong, M.-J.; Lee, S.I. Brassica Rapa SR45a Regulates Drought Tolerance via the Alternative Splicing of Target Genes. Genes 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Weng, X.; Zhou, X.; Xie, S.; Gu, J.; Wang, Z.Y. Identification of Cassava Alternative Splicing-Related Genes and Functional Characterization of MeSCL30 Involvement in Drought Stress. Plant Physiology Biochemistry 2021, 160, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Butt, H.; Bazin, J.; Prasad, K.V.S.K.; Awad, N.; Crespi, M.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Mahfouz, M.M. The Rice Serine/Arginine Splicing Factor RS33 Regulates Pre-mRNA Splicing during Abiotic Stress Responses. Cells 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Chen, S.; Mo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Ling, Y. Insights into Sweet Potato SR Proteins: From Evolution to Species-Specific Expression and Alternative Splicing. Planta 2022, 256, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Yang, L.; Yang, L.; Zhao, C.; Liu, J.; Tong, C.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Jiang, H.; Shen, J.; Xie, M.; et al. Differential Alternative Splicing Genes and Isoform Co-Expression Networks of Brassica napus Under Multiple Abiotic Stresses. Frontiers In Plant Science 2022, 13, 1009998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Song, L.; Pan, Z.; Chen, L.; Dai, Y.; Wan, J.; Ye, H.; Nguyen, H.T.; Zhang, G.; Chen, H. Analysis of Whole Transcriptome RNA-seq Data Reveals Many Alternative Splicing Events in Soybean Roots under Drought Stress Conditions. Genes 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Yu, H.; Du, Q.; Campbell, M.; Yu, B.; Walia, H.; Zhang, C. Genome-Wide Discovery of Natural Variation in Pre-mRNA Splicing and Prioritising Causal Alternative Splicing to Salt Stress Response in Rice. New Phytology 2021, 230, 1273–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Liu, Z.; Qin, J.; Tian, X.; Xu, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Peng, H.; Yao, Y.; Hu, Z.; et al. Global Profiling of Alternative Splicing Landscape Responsive to Drought, Heat and their Combination in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal 2018, 16, 714–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Hu, X.; Wang, H.; Li, K.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Li, S.; Huang, C. Genome-Wide Alternative Splicing Variation and its Potential Contribution to Maize Immature-Ear Heterosis. The Crop Journal 2021, 9, 476–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Zhang, M.; Li, N.; Yang, W.; Liu, B. Genome-Wide Differences in Gene Expression and Alternative Splicing in Developing Embryo and Endosperm, and Between F1 Hybrids and their Parental Pure Lines in Sorghum. Plant Molecular Biology 2022, 108, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Lee, J.S.; Jahani, M.; Huang, K.; Mandel, J.R.; Marek, L.F.; Burke, J.M.; Langlade, N.B.; Owens, G.L.; Rieseberg, L.H. Expression Complementation of Gene Presence/Absence Polymorphisms in Hybrids Contributes Importantly to Heterosis in Sunflower. Journal of Advanced Research 2022, 42, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Chen, M.-X.; Mei, L.-C.; Wang, F.; Boyagane Dewayalage, I.K.W.; Yang, J.-F.; Dai, L.; Yang, G.-F.; Gao, B.; Cheng, C.-L.; Liu, Y.-G.; et al. PlantSPEAD: A Web Resource Towards Comparatively Analysing Stress-Responsive Expression of Splicing-related Proteins in Plant. Plant Biotechnology Journal 2021, 19, 227–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Liu, J.; Lang, K.; Tan, S.; Jie, W.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, S.; Huang, W. A Web-based Database Server using 43,710 Public RNA-seq Samples for the Analysis of Gne Expression and Alternative Splicing in Livestock Animals. BMC Genomics 2022, 23, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Shi, Y.; Guan, Z.; Lang, K.; Shen, D.; Huang, W.; Dou, D. PlantExp: A Platform for Exploration of Gene Expression and Alternative Splicing Based on Public Plant RNA-seq Samples. Nucleic Acids Research 2022, 51, D1483–D1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Guan, Z.; Shen, D.; Dou, D. FungiExp: A User-Friendly Database and Analysis Platform for Exploring Fungal Gene Expression and Alternative Splicing. Bioinformatics 2023, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Tan, S.; Wang, W.; Jie, W.; Liu, J. FishExp: A Comprehensive Database and Analysis Platform for Gene Expression and Alternative Splicing of Fish Species. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 2022, 20, 3676–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Liu, J.; Yin, F.; Lang, K.; Jie, W.; Tan, S.; Duan, R.; Huang, S.; Huang, W. MetazExp: A Database for Gene Expression and Alternative Splicing Profiles and Their Analyses Based on 53 615 Public RNA-seq Samples in 72 Metazoan Species. Nucleic Acids Research 2021, 50, D1046–D1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. James, A.B.; Syed, N.H.; Bordage, S.; Marshall, J.; Nimmo, G.A.; Jenkins, G.I.; Herzyk, P.; Brown, J.W.S.; Nimmo, H.G. Alternative Splicing Mediates Responses of the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock to Temperature Changes. The Plant Cell 2012, 24, 961–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. James, A.B.; Sharples, C.; Laird, J.; Armstrong, E.M.; Guo, W.; Tzioutziou, N.; Zhang, R.; Brown, J.W.S.; Nimmo, H.G.; Jones, M.A. REVEILLE2 Thermosensitive Splicing: A Molecular Basis for the Integration of Nocturnal Temperature Information by the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock. bioRxiv 2023, 2023.2004.2024.538045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Wang, X.; Wu, F.; Xie, Q.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Yue, Y.; Gahura, O.; Ma, S.; Liu, L.; Cao, Y.; et al. SKIP Is a Component of the Spliceosome Linking Alternative Splicing and the Circadian Clock in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 2012, 24, 3278–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Kwon, Y.-J.; Park, M.-J.; Kim, S.-G.; Baldwin, I.T.; Park, C.-M. Alternative Splicing and Nonsense-Mediated Decay of Circadian Clock Genes under Environmental Stress Conditions in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biology 2014, 14, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Calixto, C.P.G.; Simpson, C.G.; Waugh, R.; Brown, J.W.S. Alternative Splicing of Barley Clock Genes in Response to Low Temperature. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Dantas, L.L.B.; Calixto, C.P.G.; Dourado, M.M.; Carneiro, M.S.; Brown, J.W.S.; Hotta, C.T. Alternative Splicing of Circadian Clock Genes Correlates With Temperature in Field-Grown Sugarcane. Frontiers In Plant Science 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Lu, S.X.; Knowles, S.M.; Andronis, C.; Ong, M.S.; Tobin, E.M. CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL Function Synergistically in the Circadian Clock of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 2009, 150, 834–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Seo, P.J.; Park, M.-J.; Lim, M.-H.; Kim, S.-G.; Lee, M.; Baldwin, I.T.; Park, C.-M. A Self-Regulatory Circuit of CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED1 Underlies the Circadian Clock Regulation of Temperature Responses in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2427–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Sanchez, S.E.; Petrillo, E.; Beckwith, E.J.; Zhang, X.; Rugnone, M.L.; Hernando, C.E.; Cuevas, J.C.; Godoy Herz, M.A.; Depetris-Chauvin, A.; Simpson, C.G.; et al. A Methyl Transferase Links the Circadian Clock to the Regulation of Alternative Splicing. Nature 2010, 468, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Hong, S.; Song, H.-R.; Lutz, K.; Kerstetter, R.A.; Michael, T.P.; McClung, C.R. Type II Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is Required for Circadian Period Determination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107, 21211–21216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Jones, M.A.; Williams, B.A.; McNicol, J.; Simpson, C.G.; Brown, J.W.S.; Harmer, S.L. Mutation of Arabidopsis SPLICEOSOMAL TIMEKEEPER LOCUS1 Causes Circadian Clock Defects. The Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4066–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Perez-Santángelo, S.; Mancini, E.; Francey, L.J.; Schlaen, R.G.; Chernomoretz, A.; Hogenesch, J.B.; Yanovsky, M.J. Role for LSM Genes in the Regulation of Circadian Rhythms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2014, 111, 15166–15171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Schlaen, R.G.; Mancini, E.; Sanchez, S.E.; Perez-Santángelo, S.; Rugnone, M.L.; Simpson, C.G.; Brown, J.W.S.; Zhang, X.; Chernomoretz, A.; Yanovsky, M.J. The Spliceosome Assembly Factor GEMIN2 Attenuates the Effects of Temperature on Alternative Splicing and Circadian Rhythms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2015, 112, 9382–9387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Backer, R.; Rokem, J.S.; Ilangumaran, G.; Lamont, J.; Praslickova, D.; Ricci, E.; Subramanian, S.; Smith, D.L. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria: Context, Mechanisms of Action, and Roadmap to Commercialization of Biostimulants for Sustainable Agriculture. Frontiers In Plant Science 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Begum, N.; Qin, C.; Ahanger, M.A.; Raza, S.; Khan, M.I.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmed, N.; Zhang, L. Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Plant Growth Regulation: Implications in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Frontiers In Plant Science 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Zeng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Feng, X.Y.; Li, S.X.; Jiang, X.M.; Chen, J.Q.; Shao, Z.Q. The RNAome Landscape of Tomato During Arbuscular mycorrhizal Symbiosis Reveals an Evolving RNA Layer Symbiotic Regulatory Network. Plant Communication 2023, 4, 100429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Zorin, E.A.; Afonin, A.M.; Kulaeva, O.A.; Gribchenko, E.S.; Shtark, O.Y.; Zhukov, V.A. Transcriptome Analysis of Alternative Splicing Events Induced by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (Rhizophagus irregularis) in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Roots. Plants 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Liu, J.; Chen, S.; Liu, M.; Chen, Y.; Fan, W.; Lee, S.; Xiao, H.; Kudrna, D.; Li, Z.; Chen, X.; et al. Full-Length Transcriptome Sequencing Reveals Alternative Splicing and lncRNA Regulation during Nodule Development in Glycine max. International Journal Molecular Sciences 2022, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Zorin, E.A.; Kulaeva, O.A.; Afonin, A.M.; Zhukov, V.A.; Tikhonovich, I.A. Analysis of Alternative Splicing Events in the Root Tips and Nodules of Pisum sativum L. Ecological Genetics 2019, 17, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Muhammad, S.; Xu, X.; Zhou, W.; Wu, L. Alternative Splicing: An Efficient Regulatory Approach Towards Plant Developmental Plasticity. WIREs RNA 2023, 14, e1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Lam, P.Y.; Wang, L.; Lo, C.; Zhu, F.-Y. Alternative Splicing and Its Roles in Plant Metabolism. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Shang, X.; Cao, Y.; Ma, L. Alternative Splicing in Plant Genes: A Means of Regulating the Environmental Fitness of Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Jeon, J.; Kim, K.-T.; Choi, J.; Cheong, K.; Ko, J.; Choi, G.; Lee, H.; Lee, G.-W.; Park, S.-Y.; Kim, S.; et al. Alternative Splicing Diversifies the Transcriptome and Proteome of the Rice Blast Fungus during Host Infection. RNA Biology 2022, 19, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Kim, S.; Kim, T.-H. Alternative Splicing for Improving Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Agronomic Traits in Crop Plants. Journal of Plant Biology 2020, 63, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Hirsz, D.; Dixon, L.E. The Roles of Temperature-Related Post-Transcriptional Regulation in Cereal Floral Development. Plants 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Jiang, L.; Ma, X.; Zhao, S.; Tang, Y.; Liu, F.; Gu, P.; Fu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Cai, H.; Sun, C.; et al. The APETALA2-Like Transcription Factor SUPERNUMERARY BRACT Controls Rice Seed Shattering and Seed Size. The Plant Cell 2019, 31, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Su, Z.; Hao, C.; Wang, L.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, X. Identification and Development of a Functional Marker of TaGW2 Associated with Grain Weight in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2011, 122, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Roy, N.S.; Basnet, P.; Ramekar, R.V.; Um, T.; Yu, J.-K.; Park, K.-C.; Choi, I.-Y. Alternative Splicing (AS) Dynamics in Dwarf Soybean Derived from Cross of Glycine max and Glycine soja. Agronomy 2022, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Liu, J.; Wu, X.; Yao, X.; Yu, R.; Larkin, P.J.; Liu, C.-M. Mutations in the DNA Demethylase OsROS1 Result in a Thickened Aleurone and Improved Nutritional Value in Rice Grains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2018, 115, 11327–11332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Román, Á.; Andreu, V.; Hernández, M.L.; Lagunas, B.; Picorel, R.; Martínez-Rivas, J.M.; Alfonso, M. Contribution of the Different Omega-3 Fatty Acid Desaturase Genes to the Cold Response in Soybean. Journal of Experimental Botany 2012, 63, 4973–4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Yuan, F.J.; Zhu, D.H.; Tan, Y.Y.; Dong, D.K.; Fu, X.J.; Zhu, S.L.; Li, B.Q.; Shu, Q.Y. Identification and Characterization of the Soybean IPK1 Ortholog of a Low Phytic Acid Mutant Reveals an Exon-Excluding Splice-site Mutation. Theoretical and Applied Genetetics 2012, 125, 1413–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Chen, L.; Li, W.; Li, Y.; Feng, X.; Du, K.; Wang, G.; Zhao, L. Identified Trans-Splicing of YELLOW-FRUITED TOMATO 2 Encoding the PHYTOENE SYNTHASE 1 Protein Alters Fruit Color by Map-based Cloning, Functional Complementation and RACE. Plant Molecular Biology 2019, 100, 647–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Luo, M.; Ding, J.; Li, Y.; Tang, H.; Qi, P.; Ma, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, G.; Pu, Z.; Li, W.; et al. A Single-Base Change at a Splice Site in Wx-A1 Caused Incorrect RNA Splicing and Gene Inactivation in a Wheat EMS Mutant Line. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2019, 132, 2097–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated