Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Epicardial and Pericoronary Adipose Tissue, Coronary Inflammation, and Acute Coronary Syndromes

Altmetrics

Downloads

110

Views

39

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

05 September 2023

Posted:

07 September 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Vascular inflammation is recognized as the primary trigger of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, current noninvasive methods are not capable of accurately detecting coronary inflammation. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT), in addition to their role as an energy reserve system, have been found to contribute to the development and progression of coronary artery calcifica-tion, inflammation, and plaque vulnerability. They also participate in the vascular re-sponse during ischemia, sympathetic stimuli, and arrhythmia. As a result, the evalua-tion of EAT and PCAT using imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and nuclear imaging has gained significant atten-tion. PCAT-CT attenuation, which measures the average CT attenuation in Hounsfield units (HU) of the adipose tissue, reflects adipocyte differentiation/size and leukocyte infiltration. It is emerging as a marker of tissue inflammation and has shown prognos-tic value in coronary artery disease (CAD), being associated with plaque development, vulnerability, and rupture. In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), an in-flammatory pericoronary microenvironment promoted by dysfunctional EAT/PCAT has been demonstrated, and more recently, it has been associated with plaque rupture in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Endothelial dysfunc-tion, known for its detrimental effects on coronary vessels and its association with plaque progression, is bidirectionally linked to PCAT. PCAT modulates the secretory profile of endothelial cells in response to inflammation and also plays a crucial role in regulating vascular tone in the coronary district. Consequently, dysregulated PCAT has been hypothesized to contribute to type 2 myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) and coronary vasculitis. Recently, quan-titative measures of EAT derived from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) have been included in artificial intelligence (AI) models for cardiovascular risk stratification. These models have shown incremental utility in predicting major adverse cardiovas-cular events (MACE) compared to plaque characteristics alone. Therefore, the analysis of PCAT and EAT, particularly through PCAT-CT attenuation, appears to be a safe, valuable, and sufficiently specific noninvasive method for accurately identifying cor-onary inflammation and subsequent high-risk plaque. These findings have been sup-ported by biopsy and in vivo evidence. Although speculative, these pieces of evidence open the door to a fascinating new strategy in cardiovascular risk stratification. The incorporation of PCAT and EAT analysis, mainly through PCAT-CT attenuation, could potentially lead to improved risk stratification and guide early targeted primary pre-vention and intensive secondary prevention in patients at higher risk of cardiac events.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

1. Introduction

The burden of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and its associated mortality have consistently increased over time [1,2]. Recent advancements in diagnostics and treatment have partially mitigated this upward trend. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) provides various tools to assess coronary artery disease, ranging from calcium scoring to coronary plaque analysis. These tools are utilized as comprehensive prognostic indicators (based on scores) [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and peri-coronary adipose tissue (PCAT) contribute to cardiovascular risk in different ways. They have been shown to have a prognostic role in coronary artery disease (CAD) [18,19], contribute to the development and progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC) and coronary plaque vulnerability [20,21,22], and impact the inflammatory damage observed in coronary arteritis and myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) [23,24].
Emerging evidence suggests that the paracrine activity of EAT and PCAT is associated with coronary plaque instability [25,26]. It is clear that EAT and PCAT exhibit distinct biological properties, which manifest differently under various circumstances. This review focuses on the emerging role of EAT in coronary inflammation, CAD development, plaque vulnerability, and ACS, with particular emphasis on its endocrine properties and the imaging modalities currently employed for its evaluation.

2. Pathophysiologic Role of EAT and PCAT

It is widely recognized that approximately 20% of the total ventricular mass is comprised of adipocytes [27,28,29,30]. EAT is situated in the atrioventricular and interventricular sulcus, surrounding the two appendages and the free walls of the atria. It maintains a consistent fat/muscle ratio even during hypertrophic changes [31,32,33]. EAT and PCAT, which originate from brown adipose tissue, share a close spatial and metabolic relationship with myocardial cells. Their role in immunological, inflammatory, metabolic, and vascular modulation of the heart has gained significant attention.
Under normal conditions, EAT exhibits various cardioprotective and metabolic properties. These include the release of free fatty acids (FFAs) as an energy source for the myocardium during periods of increased metabolic demand, the expression of the thermogenic protein UCP-1 in response to cold exposure, and the production of cardioprotective factors such as adrenomedullin. Adrenomedullin is a potent vasodilator and antioxidative peptide with anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic properties [34,35]. EAT also acts in a paracrine manner as a key regulator of vascular response during ischemia, sympathetic stimuli, and arrhythmia [36,37,38].
Firstly, EAT plays a role in initiating inflammatory signals in response to regional ischemia, leading to the release of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-6 soluble receptor, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), and a decrease in the secretion of adiponectin—an adipokine with anti-inflammatory and antiatherogenic properties [39,40]. Potential mechanisms involve the release of adipokines from PCAT, which may traverse the coronary wall through paracrine diffusion or direct release into the vasa vasorum, subsequently passing into the arterial wall in a vasocrine manner [34].
Secondly, increased EAT volume in obesity can disrupt ion channel properties, creating an arrhythmogenic substrate for atrial fibrillation (AF) [37]. Additionally, EAT has demonstrated heightened adrenergic activity in heart failure, as evidenced by higher concentrations of norepinephrine compared to plasma and the expression of catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes. This establishes a negative feedback loop, ultimately leading to functional and anatomical denervation of the heart [38].

3. Imaging Evaluation of EAT and PCAT

EAT and PCAT, as well as thoracic fat, are commonly assessed using non-contrast computed tomography (CT) or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Echocardiographic evaluation of EAT has also been described. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a readily available and user-friendly imaging modality for measuring EAT thickness. Typically, EAT is visualized in the parasternal long-axis views as the hypoechoic space between the free wall of the right ventricle and the visceral layer of the pericardium during end-systole. Previous reports have indicated a median thickness of 7 mm [41,42]. However, the use of TTE for EAT evaluation is limited due to operator dependence, frequent poor acoustic windows, and poor correlation with CT-derived volume.
CMR can quantify EAT volume using black blood T1-weighted diastolic single-shot spin echo sequences [30]. CMR provides excellent visualization of the visceral and parietal pericardium, making EAT visualization straightforward, without the need for radiation exposure or contrast agents. However, high cost, incompatibility with implanted devices, and claustrophobia in some patients are important limitations of this method.
Currently, epidemiological evidence on the role of EAT as a biomarker and predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is mainly derived from CT imaging. In CT scan protocols, adipose tissue is identified by voxels with attenuation values between -30 and -190 Hounsfield Units (HU), depending on its normal or inflamed condition. The CT attenuation of PCAT represents the average attenuation in HU of the adipose tissue within the defined volume of interest. It reflects the balance between lipid and aqueous phases, with a well-established association between signal attenuation and adipocyte differentiation and size, primarily driven by intracellular lipid accumulation. Generally, a gradient from higher to lower attenuation has been observed from PCAT to EAT [18,43]. (Figure 1 and Figure 2)

4. Correlation between EAT, Coronary Inflammation, Coronary Flow Reserve and Cardiovascular Risk

EAT consists of adipocytes, pre-adipocytes, ganglia, interconnecting nerves, immune cells, and inflammatory infiltrate, primarily macrophages [36,44]. The imbalance between pro-inflammatory M1 and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages is observed in patients with CAD [45]. EAT, which is in close proximity to myocardiocytes, can release pro-inflammatory and pro-atherogenic substances directly into the coronary lumen under pathological conditions. The transcriptome of EAT encodes inflammatory cytokines, affecting its pro-atherogenic characteristics, especially in unfavorable metabolic conditions like diabetes [46,47,48,49,50,51]. Radiographic fat density correlates with adipocyte enlargement, while CT attenuation is inversely related to adipocyte size. Higher CT attenuation in EAT indicates the presence of enlarged adipocytes and infiltration of pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, indicating inflammation [46,52]. CT attenuation of the surrounding PCAT has prognostic significance in CAD, as elevated attenuation is associated with reduced coronary flow reserve [18,19,53], while a pericoronary fat attenuation index (pFAI) exceeding a specific threshold has been predictive of both all-cause and cardiac mortality [54]. Utilizing the pFAI could potentially improve risk assessment and guide targeted prevention strategies for individuals at higher risk [52].
PCAT has shown a positive association with the presence, amount, and progression of CAC, independent of total body fat [20,21,22]. Even after considering conventional cardiovascular risk factors and inflammatory markers, the volume of EAT remains a significant predictor of CAC burden [21]. This may be attributed to the development of an inflammatory micro-environment, lower levels of anti-atherogenic cytokines, and the secretion of inflammatory substances such as interleukins (ILs) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). Consequently, dysfunctional EAT/PCAT promotes inflammatory infiltration, leading to tissue changes that are reflected in the attenuation observed through CT imaging (Figure 3).
Moreover, EAT volume has been previously associated with an increased CVD risk profile in a directly proportional manner [55,56,57,58]. However, in advanced heart failure (HF), a reduction in EAT mass has been observed due to the lipolytic activity induced by natriuretic peptides. In end-stage HF, lower EAT volume predicts a poorer prognosis [59]. This suggests a U-shaped association between EAT volume and CVD risk across the entire spectrum of ejection fraction. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis has confirmed the prognostic role of EAT/PCAT volume, demonstrating positive associations with obstructive CAD and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [58].
EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; FFA, free fatty acid; HRP, high risk plaque; IL, interleukin; LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein; PAI, plasminogen activator inhibitor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. EAT, located around the coronary arteries, secretes various bioactive molecules such as adipokines, citokines and FFAs. In the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, EAT undergoes inflammation, characterized by increased infiltration of immune cells. Dysfunction of PCAT and its effects on the coronary arteries can contribute to the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis, leading to the development of HRP.

5. EAT/PCAT Activity Overcomes Systemic Inflammatory Markers in ACS

Various biomarkers, including microRNA (miRNA), IL-6, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), cardiac troponin I (c-TnI), adiponectin, adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (A-FABP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and lipocalin-2, have been associated with coronary inflammation and ACS. However, their lack of specificity limits their clinical utility [60]. Standard non-invasive approaches fail to accurately identify coronary inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and high-risk coronary plaques (HRP) [61,62].
C-TnI is released from myocardiocytes following cardiac injury, not only in the case of myocardial infarction but also in other pathological conditions such as HF, myocarditis, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, and renal failure [63,64]. BNP, primarily a marker of ventricular stretch, increases in response to ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial infarction, playing a role in volume homeostasis and ventricular remodeling in HF [65,66,67,68]. Adiponectin, an anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic adipokine, has been inversely associated with endothelial dysfunction and obstructive CAD, but its plasma level is influenced differently by factors such as body mass, insulin resistance, and triglycerides [66]. A-FABP, expressed in adipocytes and macrophages, is involved in glucose and lipid metabolism and has been linked to the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, although its expression is similarly influenced by insulin resistance, hypertension, and HF [69,70]. Lipocalin-2, an inflammatory marker found in various tissues, including adipose tissue, has been associated with atherosclerosis development and CAD severity, and its levels increase in response to factors such as body mass, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and insulin resistance [66,71,72]. Elevated levels of circulating hs-CRP and IL-6 in patients with stable angina have been correlated with HRP, MACE, and hospitalization for HF [73,74,75], with higher CRP levels observed in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared to those with stable CAD [76,77]. However, while these biomarkers can detect both systemic and coronary inflammation, they lack specificity and do not provide information about the localization of coronary plaques.
On the other hand, CT imaging of PCAT inflammation can specifically identify HRP, with progressively higher attenuation observed from stable CAD to ACS [78,79]. PCAT CT attenuation does not correlate with standard circulating inflammatory biomarkers, as shown in a post hoc analysis of the SCOT-HEART study. This suggests that CT attenuation can identify coronary inflammatory status and active plaques that cannot be traced by systemic markers [80]. Furthermore, studies indicate that mean PCAT attenuation is higher in patients with myocardial infarction compared to those with stable CAD, suggesting phenotypic changes in the entire coronary tree during ACS, consistent with findings from intracoronary imaging [78,79,81].

6. Correlation between PCAT, Plaque Vulnerability and ACS

EAT plays a role in plaque instability and ACS through its paracrine regulation of coronary vessels. HRP are prone to rupture and exhibit positive remodeling without significant lumen narrowing. Standard imaging methods may not accurately assess non-obstructive but high-risk plaques [82]. However, innovative approaches using 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) positron emission tomography (PET) uptake and PCAT attenuation on CT show promise [83,84,85].
Studies have demonstrated that increased PCAT CT attenuation is associated with atherosclerotic coronary segments and plaque rupture in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). PCAT CT attenuation is higher in culprit lesions compared to non-culprit lesions and stable CAD controls. Indeed, it has emerged as an independent predictor of culprit lesions in patients with multivessel CAD.
PCAT may contribute to atherogenesis, plaque instability, and ACS (Figure 3) [25,26,86]. The exact mechanisms underlying the relationship between PCAT and HRP development are not fully understood. It remains unclear whether inflammatory signals from coronary vessels with HRP influence PCAT or if PCAT exerts vasocrine regulation through inflammatory pathways. Proposed mechanisms include the release of growth factors by adipocytes, secretion of angiotensin II and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 by EAT, and the release of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) promoting smooth muscle cell proliferation (Figure 3) [87,88]. Further research is needed to fully comprehend the complex interactions between PCAT, coronary inflammation, and plaque vulnerability. These findings highlight the potential of PCAT attenuation on CT and 18F-NaF PET uptake as non-invasive markers for coronary inflammation and plaque instability [85].
Increased myocardial oxidative stress leads to the release of oxidation messenger products, which can affect the secretory profile of EAT and its role in heart disease [89]. EAT, in response to oxidative stress, releases adiponectin, an adipokine with antioxidant properties, to protect myocardiocytes and endothelium from oxidative stress. Thus, the phenotype of PCAT could be the result, rather than the cause, of underlying heart disease [89].
Regardless of the underlying mechanism, PCAT attenuation on CT is emerging as a highly sensitive method to evaluate coronary inflammation, with biopsy-proven results supporting its validity [89]. These findings suggest that PCAT can be used as a non-invasive tool to detect HRP, enhancing the identification of high-risk patients who could benefit from aggressive primary prevention strategies.

7. Correlation between PCAT and Coronary Arteritis

Perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) is located at the outermost boundary of the arterial wall and has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of vasculitis. Studies have hypothesized that PVAT may have a triggering role in the development of vasculitis, and isolated peri-adventitial inflammation has been associated with an increased likelihood of developing giant cell arteritis. This suggests a primary role of PVAT in the pathogenesis of systemic vasculitis [23].
In Takayasu arteritis (TAK), an inflammatory arteritis affecting the aorta and its branches, the density of periaortic adipose tissue (PAAT) and PCAT has been quantified. Patients with TAK showed higher PAAT and PCAT density compared to patients with CAD or controls, independently of other factors. PAAT and PCAT density were closely related to markers of disease activity in TAK, indicating a potential role of PAAT and PCAT in the pathogenesis of TAK. PCAT density was also identified as an independent predictor of coronary inflammation, as visualized by 68Ga-DOT PET imaging [24].
Kawasaki disease (KD), an acute inflammatory vasculitis primarily affecting medium-sized elastic arteries, particularly the coronary arteries, is a major cause of acquired heart disease in children. Coronary artery aneurysms and inflammatory cell infiltration have been observed in KD, and adipokines have been suggested to play a central role in its pathogenesis. A meta-analysis showed that resistin and adiponectin levels were significantly elevated in KD patients with coronary artery lesions compared to those without coronary involvement [90,91,92].
While further research is needed to fully understand the relationship between PCAT and arteritis, it is reasonable to assume that the inflammatory microenvironment surrounding coronary vessels, including the contribution of PCAT through paracrine secretion, plays a causative role in the development and progression of coronary damage. Future studies are needed to investigate the role of PCAT in regulating vessel inflammation and to explore potential therapeutic approaches in this field.

8. Correlation between PCAT and MINOCA

MINOCA is diagnosed when invasive coronary angiography reveals a patent coronary tree in a patient with AMI [93]. The prevalence of MINOCA is 1-13% of all patients with a clinical diagnosis of AMI, and several potential etiologies exist. After initial negative angiography, MINOCA may be reclassified as type 1 or type 2 AMI due to mechanisms of myocardial ischemia; the first represents a plaque-induced event where plaque rupture or erosion with superimposed thrombus develops spontaneous recanalization. On the contrary, type 2 AMI arises from non-plaque-induced conditions due to reduced blood supply and oxygen imbalance, such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), embolism, vasospasm, and microvascular disease [94]. Mechanisms causally connecting plaque rupture/erosion with PCAT as well as endothelial dysfunction and EAT have been previously described in this document. Furthermore, emerging evidence currently exists about the contributory role of EAT in other type-2 MINOCA [95].

8.1. Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

SCAD is defined as a non-traumatic, non-atherosclerotic separation of the layers of the arterial wall, resulting in the creation of a false lumen. The role of inflammatory infiltrate in the pathogenesis of SCAD is still debated, and its causative or healing role has not been conclusively determined. Some reports suggest a causative role of eosinophilic infiltrates in coronary wall injury, leading to the expansion of intramural hemorrhage through the release of cytotoxic products and stimulation of aberrant neovascularization [96,97]. On the other hand, a large pathology case series suggests that periadventitial inflammation in SCAD is time-dependent and proportional to the time elapsed between symptom onset and death, indicating a healing response of the inflammatory infiltrate in SCAD [98].
Regardless of its contribution, an inflammatory environment is consistently present in SCAD, involving both the vessel wall and the PCAT bidirectionally [99]. In vivo detection of vascular inflammation would be useful, and several studies have evaluated the role of PCAT CT attenuation in this context. One study failed to show a significant difference in median PCAT attenuation between SCAD patients and controls, potentially due to the healing process and resolution of ACS with invasive or medical treatment [100]. However, another study demonstrated that elevated PCAT density on CT, performed within 48 hours of coronary angiography, had a higher prevalence than the imaging of dissection identified by angiography [101]. Additionally, a cohort study showed a significant association between PCAT CT attenuation, wall motion abnormality, and initial elevated troponin levels in patients with high-degree stenosis due to SCAD or atherosclerosis [99].
While invasive coronary angiography is the first-line examination for patients presenting with ACS and suspected SCAD, CT may play a role, especially in those with early presentation and normal initial troponin levels. PCAT CT attenuation can provide valuable information, particularly when small dissections may not be detectable due to spatial resolution limitations of CT [102].

8.2. Vasospastic Angina

The endothelium modulates vascular tone through the release of relaxing factors (mainly prostaglandins and nitric oxide) and hyperpolarizing factors. The former mediates relaxation of large arteries (i.e., epicardial coronary arteries), while the latter has a key role in regulating resistances of small arteries by opening calcium-activated potassium channels and subsequently hyperpolarizing vascular smooth muscle cells’ (VSMCs) membrane [103]. Multiple studies have tried to identify the mechanism behind coronary vasospasm, and different pathological reports have described extensive adventitial inflammation near spastic coronary artery [104,105]. Such inflammatory environment seems to mediate VSMCs’ hypercontraction by the influx of Ca2+ through L-type Ca-channel as an initial trigger, which is functionally up-regulated via PKC and GTPase-Rho-dependent mechanism [103]. Moreover, Ohyama et al. recently demonstrated increased PCAT volume at the site of higher lumen reduction in spastic coronary segments, which suggests involvement of PCAT in the inflammatory context leading to the spasm [106].
As previously described, 18F-FDG PET/CT is able to detect perivascular inflammation, with signal intensity directly proportional to macrophage density and microcalcifications [107]. As expected, ECG-gated 18F-FDG PET/CT recently showed significantly increased FDG uptake in patients with vasospastic angina, which significantly decreased during the follow-up period [108]. Numerous studies suggest that PVAT regulates the vascular bed in a paracrine way with opposite effects among peripheral and coronary districts, due to different proteomic responses secondary to local and systemic factors. Owen et al. previously demonstrated that biological factors released from PCAT potentiate coronary vasoconstriction, with a directly proportional expression of RhoA (2.9-fold) and calpastatin (1.6-fold) to total fat volume leading to increased function of VSMCs’ Ca2+ channels, H2O2-sensitive K+ channels, or mediators regulating these channels [109]. Notably, inhibition of Ca2+ channels with nifedipine or diltiazem is able to neutralize this effect.
These data suggest a key role of PCAT in regulating vascular tone in the coronary district beyond endothelial function and systemic mediators, highlighting the potential detrimental effects of dysregulated PCAT in type 2 MINOCA.

9. Future Perspectives: Application of Artificial Intelligence

The term artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the application of computing methods to tasks that ordinarily call for human intellect. AI subfields, such as machine learning (ML), are increasingly used in cardiovascular imaging: ML models can now be employed to merge clinical data with AI-derived information for personalized risk stratification [110]. CCTA-derived quantitative measures have been previously included in ML models, which outperformed qualitative or quantitative high-risk plaque characteristics alone in outcome prediction [111,112]. Deep learning (DL), a subset of ML, generates assumptions directly from input data through multilayered artificial neural networks. Recently, Driessen et al. applied DL to CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) software to aid in identifying coronary lumen border and generating hybrid computational fluid dynamics analysis, demonstrating higher diagnostic performance of CT-FFR than CCTA for stenosis evaluation and PET for ischemia detection [113].
Interestingly, radiomics, a new frontier of imaging evaluation through data-characterization algorithms, has been recently applied in PCAT analysis with interesting results [114]. Oikonomou et al. used PCAT radiomic features to train a random forest ML model to create a patient-level “fat radiomic profile.” This indicator demonstrated incremental utility for MACE prediction beyond traditional CCTA-based risk categorization when assessed in 1575 SCOT-HEART study participants [115]. Therefore, texture and geometry-based parameters of PCAT may outperform PCAT CT attenuation in discriminating high-risk plaque, even though the lack of standardized methodology in the radiomic workflow, complex manual delineation, and the need for highly experienced staff, are important limitations against its wide adoption [116]. However, the combination of radiomics and PCAT CT attenuation could further enhance the identification of patients at risk of acute coronary events.

10. Conclusion

Vascular inflammation is the main driver of ACS, but standard noninvasive approaches such as exercise treadmill testing (ETT) and perfusion imaging have failed to precisely identify coronary inflammation and subsequent endothelial dysfunction. Existing noninvasive methods, like 18F-NaF-PET, which is well standardized in identifying coronary inflammation, require complex imaging protocols and processing. Additionally, circulating biomarkers that are widely used lack adequate specificity. As a result, the noninvasive detection of HRP and dysfunctional endothelium remains challenging.
PCAT undeniably plays a key role in coronary inflammation and the development of HRP due to the bidirectional interconnection between epicardial fat and the coronary vessels. PCAT evaluation through CT attenuation has emerged as a promising method for predicting MACE, with demonstrated relationships between PCAT volume/density and coronary flow reserve (CFR), CAC, and cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, PCAT attenuation has recently shown the ability to predict plaque rupture in AMI and accurately identify culprit lesions in patients with multivessel CAD. Given its proximity to the vascular wall, PCAT has also been hypothesized to have a triggering role in coronary vasculitis and MINOCA.
AI has been progressively applied in cardiovascular risk stratification, and ML models incorporating CCTA-derived quantitative measures have demonstrated incremental utility in predicting MACE compared to plaque characteristics alone. Therefore, the evaluation of PCAT appears to be a safe, valuable, and sufficiently specific noninvasive method for accurately identifying coronary inflammation and subsequent HRP, with biopsy- and in vivo-proven results.
While speculative, these pieces of evidence pave the way for a fascinating future strategy in cardiovascular risk stratification. It is conceivable that the assessment of EAT status may be incorporated into risk stratification tools, enabling early targeted primary prevention and intensive secondary prevention in patients at higher risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.N. and V.P.; methodology, A.I.G.; software, P.B. and M.R.; validation, G.P., A.I.G. and M.M.C.; formal analysis, G.N.; investigation, D.D.F. and L.F.; resources, F.B. and F.F.; data curation, A.B., N.C. and R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, G.N.; writing—review and editing, V.P.; visualization, S.M.; supervision, A.I.G.; project administration, G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bueno, H. Epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes. In The ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, James, S., Camm, A.J., Lüscher, T.F., Maurer, G., Serruys, P.W., Eds.; Oxford University Press: 2018; p. 0.
  2. Yao, H.; Ekou, A.; Brou, I.; Niamkey, T.; Koffi, F.; Tano, S.; Kouamé, I.; N’Guetta, R. [Evolution of epidemiology and management of acute coronary syndromes in Abidjan: A cross-sectional study of 1011 patients.]. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) 2022, 71, 130-135. [CrossRef]
  3. Maffei, E.; Seitun, S.; Martini, C.; Palumbo, A.; Tarantini, G.; Berti, E.; Grilli, R.; Tedeschi, C.; Messalli, G.; Guaricci, A.; et al. CT coronary angiography and exercise ECG in a population with chest pain and low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease. Heart 2010, 96, 1973-1979. [CrossRef]
  4. Maffei, E.; Seitun, S.; Martini, C.; Aldrovandi, A.; Cervellin, G.; Tedeschi, C.; Guaricci, A.; Messalli, G.; Catalano, O.; Cademartiri, F. Prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin. Radiol Med 2011, 116, 690-705. [CrossRef]
  5. Guaricci, A.I.; Arcadi, T.; Brunetti, N.D.; Maffei, E.; Montrone, D.; Martini, C.; De Luca, M.; De Rosa, F.; Cocco, D.; Midiri, M.; et al. Carotid intima media thickness and coronary atherosclerosis linkage in symptomatic intermediate risk patients evaluated by coronary computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiol 2014, 176, 988-993. [CrossRef]
  6. Guaricci, A.I.; Maffei, E.; Brunetti, N.D.; Montrone, D.; Di Biase, L.; Tedeschi, C.; Gentile, G.; Macarini, L.; Midiri, M.; Cademartiri, F.; et al. Heart rate control with oral ivabradine in computed tomography coronary angiography: a randomized comparison of 7.5 mg vs. 5 mg regimen. Int J Cardiol 2013, 168, 362-368. [CrossRef]
  7. Narula, J.; Achenbach, S. Napkin-ring necrotic cores: defining circumferential extent of necrotic cores in unstable plaques. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2, 1436-1438. [CrossRef]
  8. Dodd, J.D.; Rieber, J.; Pomerantsev, E.; Chaithiraphan, V.; Achenbach, S.; Moreiras, J.M.; Abbara, S.; Hoffmann, U.; Brady, T.J.; Cury, R.C. Quantification of nonculprit coronary lesions: comparison of cardiac 64-MDCT and invasive coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008, 191, 432-438. [CrossRef]
  9. Si, N.; Shi, K.; Li, N.; Dong, X.; Zhu, C.; Guo, Y.; Hu, J.; Cui, J.; Yang, F.; Zhang, T. Identification of patients with acute myocardial infarction based on coronary CT angiography: the value of pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics. Eur Radiol 2022. [CrossRef]
  10. Pergola, V.; Cabrelle, G.; Mattesi, G.; Cattarin, S.; Furlan, A.; Dellino, C.M.; Continisio, S.; Montonati, C.; Giorgino, A.; Giraudo, C.; et al. Added Value of CCTA-Derived Features to Predict MACEs in Stable Patients Undergoing Coronary Computed Tomography. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022, 12. [CrossRef]
  11. Paul, J.F.; Rohnean, A.; Giroussens, H.; Pressat-Laffouilhere, T.; Wong, T. Evaluation of a deep learning model on coronary CT angiography for automatic stenosis detection. Diagn Interv Imaging 2022. [CrossRef]
  12. Pontone, G.; Andreini, D.; Bertella, E.; Baggiano, A.; Mushtaq, S.; Loguercio, M.; Segurini, C.; Conte, E.; Beltrama, V.; Annoni, A.; et al. Impact of an intra-cycle motion correction algorithm on overall evaluability and diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 2016, 26, 147-156. [CrossRef]
  13. Baggiano, A.; Fusini, L.; Del Torto, A.; Vivona, P.; Guglielmo, M.; Muscogiuri, G.; Soldi, M.; Martini, C.; Fraschini, E.; Rabbat, M.G.; et al. Sequential Strategy Including FFR(CT) Plus Stress-CTP Impacts on Management of Patients with Stable Chest Pain: The Stress-CTP RIPCORD Study. J Clin Med 2020, 9. [CrossRef]
  14. Esposito, A.; Francone, M.; Andreini, D.; Buffa, V.; Cademartiri, F.; Carbone, I.; Clemente, A.; Guaricci, A.I.; Guglielmo, M.; Indolfi, C.; et al. SIRM-SIC appropriateness criteria for the use of Cardiac Computed Tomography. Part 1: Congenital heart diseases, primary prevention, risk assessment before surgery, suspected CAD in symptomatic patients, plaque and epicardial adipose tissue characterization, and functional assessment of stenosis. Radiol Med 2021, 126, 1236-1248. [CrossRef]
  15. Neglia, D.; Liga, R.; Gimelli, A.; Podlesnikar, T.; Cvijić, M.; Pontone, G.; Miglioranza, M.H.; Guaricci, A.I.; Seitun, S.; Clemente, A.; et al. Use of cardiac imaging in chronic coronary syndromes: the EURECA Imaging registry. European Heart Journal 2022, 44, 142-158. [CrossRef]
  16. Pontone, G.; Baggiano, A.; Andreini, D.; Guaricci, A.I.; Guglielmo, M.; Muscogiuri, G.; Fusini, L.; Soldi, M.; Del Torto, A.; Mushtaq, S.; et al. Diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous evaluation of coronary arteries and myocardial perfusion with single stress cardiac computed tomography acquisition compared to invasive coronary angiography plus invasive fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol 2018, 273, 263-268. [CrossRef]
  17. Pontone, G.; Andreini, D.; Guaricci, A.I.; Guglielmo, M.; Baggiano, A.; Muscogiuri, G.; Fusini, L.; Soldi, M.; Fazzari, F.; Berzovini, C.; et al. Quantitative vs. qualitative evaluation of static stress computed tomography perfusion to detect haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018, 19, 1244-1252. [CrossRef]
  18. Antonopoulos, A.S.; Sanna, F.; Sabharwal, N.; Thomas, S.; Oikonomou, E.K.; Herdman, L.; Margaritis, M.; Shirodaria, C.; Kampoli, A.M.; Akoumianakis, I.; et al. Detecting human coronary inflammation by imaging perivascular fat. Sci Transl Med 2017, 9. [CrossRef]
  19. Goeller, M.; Rahman Ihdayhid, A.; Cadet, S.; Lin, A.; Adams, D.; Thakur, U.; Yap, G.; Marwan, M.; Achenbach, S.; Dey, D.; et al. Pericoronary adipose tissue and quantitative global non-calcified plaque characteristics from CT angiography do not differ in matched South Asian, East Asian and European-origin Caucasian patients with stable chest pain. Eur J Radiol 2020, 125, 108874. [CrossRef]
  20. Cosson, E.; Nguyen, M.T.; Rezgani, I.; Tatulashvili, S.; Sal, M.; Berkane, N.; Allard, L.; Brillet, P.-Y.; Bihan, H. Epicardial adipose tissue volume and coronary calcification among people living with diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Cardiovascular Diabetology 2021, 20, 35. [CrossRef]
  21. Yerramasu, A.; Dey, D.; Venuraju, S.; Anand, D.V.; Atwal, S.; Corder, R.; Berman, D.S.; Lahiri, A. Increased volume of epicardial fat is an independent risk factor for accelerated progression of sub-clinical coronary atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2012, 220, 223-230. [CrossRef]
  22. Vancheri, F.; Longo, G.; Vancheri, S.; Danial, J.S.H.; Henein, M.Y. Coronary Artery Microcalcification: Imaging and Clinical Implications. Diagnostics (Basel) 2019, 9. [CrossRef]
  23. Galli, E.; Muratore, F.; Boiardi, L.; Restuccia, G.; Cavazza, A.; Catanoso, M.; Macchioni, P.; Spaggiari, L.; Casali, M.; Pipitone, N.; et al. Significance of inflammation restricted to adventitial/periadventitial tissue on temporal artery biopsy. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 2020, 50, 1064-1072. [CrossRef]
  24. Wall C, H.Y., Le EPV, Ćorović A, Uy CP, Gopalan D, Ma C, Manavaki R, Fryer TD, Aloj L, Graves MJ, Tombetti E, Ariff B, Bambrough P, Hoole SP, Rusk RA, Jayne DR, Dweck MR, Newby D, Fayad ZA, Bennett MR, Peters JE, Slomka P, Dey D, Mason JC, Rudd JHF, Tarkin JM. Pericoronary and periaortic adipose tissue density are associated with inflammatory disease activity in Takayasu arteritis and atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J Open. 2021 2021, 1:oeab019.
  25. Marwan, M.; Hell, M.; Schuhbäck, A.; Gauss, S.; Bittner, D.; Pflederer, T.; Achenbach, S. CT Attenuation of Pericoronary Adipose Tissue in Normal Versus Atherosclerotic Coronary Segments as Defined by Intravascular Ultrasound. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2017, 41, 762-767. [CrossRef]
  26. Nakajima, A.; Sugiyama, T.; Araki, M.; Seegers, L.M.; Dey, D.; McNulty, I.; Lee, H.; Yonetsu, T.; Yasui, Y.; Teng, Y.; et al. Plaque Rupture, Compared With Plaque Erosion, Is Associated With a Higher Level of Pancoronary Inflammation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022, 15, 828-839. [CrossRef]
  27. Toemen, L.; Santos, S.; Roest, A.A.; Jelic, G.; van der Lugt, A.; Felix, J.F.; Helbing, W.A.; Gaillard, R.; Jaddoe, V.W.V. Body Fat Distribution, Overweight, and Cardiac Structures in School-Age Children: A Population-Based Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2020, 9, e014933. [CrossRef]
  28. Marciniak, M.; van Deutekom, A.W.; Toemen, L.; Lewandowski, A.J.; Gaillard, R.; Young, A.A.; Jaddoe, V.W.V.; Lamata, P. A three-dimensional atlas of child’s cardiac anatomy and the unique morphological alterations associated with obesity. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022, 23, 1645-1653. [CrossRef]
  29. Wong, C.; Marwick, T.H. Obesity cardiomyopathy: pathogenesis and pathophysiology. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2007, 4, 436-443. [CrossRef]
  30. Guglielmo, M.; Lin, A.; Dey, D.; Baggiano, A.; Fusini, L.; Muscogiuri, G.; Pontone, G. Epicardial fat and coronary artery disease: Role of cardiac imaging. Atherosclerosis 2021, 321, 30-38. [CrossRef]
  31. Corradi, D.; Maestri, R.; Callegari, S.; Pastori, P.; Goldoni, M.; Luong, T.V.; Bordi, C. The ventricular epicardial fat is related to the myocardial mass in normal, ischemic and hypertrophic hearts. Cardiovasc Pathol 2004, 13, 313-316. [CrossRef]
  32. Iacobellis, G.; Ribaudo, M.C.; Zappaterreno, A.; Iannucci, C.V.; Leonetti, F. Relation between epicardial adipose tissue and left ventricular mass. Am J Cardiol 2004, 94, 1084-1087. [CrossRef]
  33. Marchington, J.M.; Mattacks, C.A.; Pond, C.M. Adipose tissue in the mammalian heart and pericardium: structure, foetal development and biochemical properties. Comp Biochem Physiol B 1989, 94, 225-232. [CrossRef]
  34. Iacobellis, G.; Bianco, A.C. Epicardial adipose tissue: emerging physiological, pathophysiological and clinical features. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2011, 22, 450-457. [CrossRef]
  35. Silaghi, A.; Achard, V.; Paulmyer-Lacroix, O.; Scridon, T.; Tassistro, V.; Duncea, I.; Clément, K.; Dutour, A.; Grino, M. Expression of adrenomedullin in human epicardial adipose tissue: role of coronary status. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007, 293, E1443-1450. [CrossRef]
  36. Iacobellis, G.; Corradi, D.; Sharma, A.M. Epicardial adipose tissue: anatomic, biomolecular and clinical relationships with the heart. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005, 2, 536-543. [CrossRef]
  37. Lin, Y.-K.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chen, J.-H.; Chen, S.-A.; Chen, Y.-J. Adipocytes modulate the electrophysiology of atrial myocytes: implications in obesity-induced atrial fibrillation. Basic Research in Cardiology 2012, 107, 293. [CrossRef]
  38. Parisi, V.; Rengo, G.; Perrone-Filardi, P.; Pagano, G.; Femminella, G.D.; Paolillo, S.; Petraglia, L.; Gambino, G.; Caruso, A.; Grimaldi, M.G.; et al. Increased Epicardial Adipose Tissue Volume Correlates With Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Heart Failure. Circulation Research 2016, 118, 1244-1253, doi:doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307765.
  39. Mazurek, T.; Zhang, L.; Zalewski, A.; Mannion, J.D.; Diehl, J.T.; Arafat, H.; Sarov-Blat, L.; O’Brien, S.; Keiper, E.A.; Johnson, A.G.; et al. Human epicardial adipose tissue is a source of inflammatory mediators. Circulation 2003, 108, 2460-2466. [CrossRef]
  40. Iacobellis, G.; Pistilli, D.; Gucciardo, M.; Leonetti, F.; Miraldi, F.; Brancaccio, G.; Gallo, P.; di Gioia, C.R. Adiponectin expression in human epicardial adipose tissue in vivo is lower in patients with coronary artery disease. Cytokine 2005, 29, 251-255. [CrossRef]
  41. Iacobellis, G.; Willens, H.J. Echocardiographic Epicardial Fat: A Review of Research and Clinical Applications. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2009, 22, 1311-1319. [CrossRef]
  42. Natale, F.; Tedesco, M.A.; Mocerino, R.; de Simone, V.; Di Marco, G.M.; Aronne, L.; Credendino, M.; Siniscalchi, C.; Calabrò, P.; Cotrufo, M.; et al. Visceral adiposity and arterial stiffness: echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness reflects, better than waist circumference, carotid arterial stiffness in a large population of hypertensives. European Journal of Echocardiography 2009, 10, 549-555. [CrossRef]
  43. Hell, M.M.; Achenbach, S.; Schuhbaeck, A.; Klinghammer, L.; May, M.S.; Marwan, M. CT-based analysis of pericoronary adipose tissue density: Relation to cardiovascular risk factors and epicardial adipose tissue volume. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2016, 10, 52-60. [CrossRef]
  44. McAninch, E.A.; Fonseca, T.L.; Poggioli, R.; Panos, A.L.; Salerno, T.A.; Deng, Y.; Li, Y.; Bianco, A.C.; Iacobellis, G. Epicardial adipose tissue has a unique transcriptome modified in severe coronary artery disease. Obesity 2015, 23, 1267-1278. [CrossRef]
  45. Hirata, Y.; Tabata, M.; Kurobe, H.; Motoki, T.; Akaike, M.; Nishio, C.; Higashida, M.; Mikasa, H.; Nakaya, Y.; Takanashi, S.; et al. Coronary Atherosclerosis Is Associated With Macrophage Polarization in Epicardial Adipose Tissue. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2011, 58, 248-255. [CrossRef]
  46. Iacobellis, G.; Mahabadi, A.A. Is epicardial fat attenuation a novel marker of coronary inflammation? Atherosclerosis 2019, 284, 212-213. [CrossRef]
  47. Christensen, R.H.; von Scholten, B.J.; Hansen, C.S.; Jensen, M.T.; Vilsbøll, T.; Rossing, P.; Jørgensen, P.G. Epicardial adipose tissue predicts incident cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2019, 18, 114. [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, X.; Feng, C.; Feng, J. Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2023, 28, 10742484231151820. [CrossRef]
  49. Maffei, E.; Seitun, S.; Nieman, K.; Martini, C.; Guaricci, A.I.; Tedeschi, C.; Weustink, A.C.; Mollet, N.R.; Berti, E.; Grilli, R.; et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease and calcified coronary plaque burden by computed tomography in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Eur Radiol 2011, 21, 944-953. [CrossRef]
  50. Guaricci, A.I.; Lorenzoni, V.; Guglielmo, M.; Mushtaq, S.; Muscogiuri, G.; Cademartiri, F.; Rabbat, M.; Andreini, D.; Serviddio, G.; Gaibazzi, N.; et al. Prognostic relevance of subclinical coronary and carotid atherosclerosis in a diabetic and nondiabetic asymptomatic population. Clin Cardiol 2018, 41, 769-777. [CrossRef]
  51. Basile, P.; Guaricci, A.I.; Piazzolla, G.; Volpe, S.; Vozza, A.; Benedetto, M.; Carella, M.C.; Santoro, D.; Monitillo, F.; Baggiano, A.; et al. Improvement of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain after 6-Month Therapy with GLP-1RAs Semaglutide and Dulaglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot Study. J Clin Med 2023, 12. [CrossRef]
  52. Oikonomou, E.K.; Marwan, M.; Desai, M.Y.; Mancio, J.; Alashi, A.; Hutt Centeno, E.; Thomas, S.; Herdman, L.; Kotanidis, C.P.; Thomas, K.E.; et al. Non-invasive detection of coronary inflammation using computed tomography and prediction of residual cardiovascular risk (the CRISP CT study): a post-hoc analysis of prospective outcome data. Lancet 2018, 392, 929-939. [CrossRef]
  53. Guaricci, A.I.; Neglia, D.; Acampa, W.; Andreini, D.; Baggiano, A.; Bianco, F.; Carrabba, N.; Conte, E.; Gaudieri, V.; Mushtaq, S.; et al. Computed tomography and nuclear medicine for the assessment of coronary inflammation: clinical applications and perspectives. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 2023, 24, e67-e76. [CrossRef]
  54. Nomura, C.H.; Assuncao-Jr, A.N.; Guimarães, P.O.; Liberato, G.; Morais, T.C.; Fahel, M.G.; Giorgi, M.C.P.; Meneghetti, J.C.; Parga, J.R.; Dantas-Jr, R.N.; et al. Association between perivascular inflammation and downstream myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020, 21, 599-605. [CrossRef]
  55. Mancio, J.; Azevedo, D.; Saraiva, F.; Azevedo, A.I.; Pires-Morais, G.; Leite-Moreira, A.; Falcao-Pires, I.; Lunet, N.; Bettencourt, N. Epicardial adipose tissue volume assessed by computed tomography and coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart Journal—Cardiovascular Imaging 2017, 19, 490-497. [CrossRef]
  56. Rajani, R.; Shmilovich, H.; Nakazato, R.; Nakanishi, R.; Otaki, Y.; Cheng, V.Y.; Hayes, S.W.; Thomson, L.E.; Friedman, J.D.; Slomka, P.J.; et al. Relationship of epicardial fat volume to coronary plaque, severe coronary stenosis, and high-risk coronary plaque features assessed by coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2013, 7, 125-132. [CrossRef]
  57. Bo, X.; Ma, L.; Fan, J.; Jiang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, W. Epicardial fat volume is correlated with coronary lesion and its severity. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015, 8, 4328-4334.
  58. Mancio, J.; Azevedo, D.; Saraiva, F.; Azevedo, A.I.; Pires-Morais, G.; Leite-Moreira, A.; Falcao-Pires, I.; Lunet, N.; Bettencourt, N. Epicardial adipose tissue volume assessed by computed tomography and coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018, 19, 490-497. [CrossRef]
  59. Antonopoulos, A.S.; Tousoulis, D. The molecular mechanisms of obesity paradox. Cardiovascular Research 2017, 113, 1074-1086. [CrossRef]
  60. Guaricci, A.I.; Pontone, G.; Fusini, L.; De Luca, M.; Cafarelli, F.P.; Guglielmo, M.; Baggiano, A.; Beltrama, V.; Muscogiuri, G.; Mushtaq, S.; et al. Additional value of inflammatory biomarkers and carotid artery disease in prediction of significant coronary artery disease as assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017, 18, 1049-1056. [CrossRef]
  61. Hansson, G.K.; Libby, P.; Tabas, I. Inflammation and plaque vulnerability. J Intern Med 2015, 278, 483-493. [CrossRef]
  62. Sarwar, N.; Butterworth, A.S.; Freitag, D.F.; Gregson, J.; Willeit, P.; Gorman, D.N.; Gao, P.; Saleheen, D.; Rendon, A.; Nelson, C.P.; et al. Interleukin-6 receptor pathways in coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 82 studies. Lancet 2012, 379, 1205-1213. [CrossRef]
  63. Roongsritong, C.; Warraich, I.; Bradley, C. Common causes of troponin elevations in the absence of acute myocardial infarction: incidence and clinical significance. Chest 2004, 125, 1877-1884. [CrossRef]
  64. Guaricci, A.I.; Masci, P.G.; Muscogiuri, G.; Guglielmo, M.; Baggiano, A.; Fusini, L.; Lorenzoni, V.; Martini, C.; Andreini, D.; Pavon, A.G.; et al. CarDiac magnEtic Resonance for prophylactic Implantable-cardioVerter defibrillAtor ThErapy in Non-Ischaemic dilated CardioMyopathy: an international Registry. Europace 2021, 23, 1072-1083. [CrossRef]
  65. Morita, E.; Yasue, H.; Yoshimura, M.; Ogawa, H.; Jougasaki, M.; Matsumura, T.; Mukoyama, M.; Nakao, K. Increased plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1993, 88, 82-91. [CrossRef]
  66. Wong, Y.-K.; Tse, H.-F. Circulating Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2021, 8. [CrossRef]
  67. Guaricci, A.I.; Santoro, F.; Paoletti Perini, A.; Ioffredo, L.; Trivedi, C.; Pontone, G.; Di Biase, M.; Brunetti, N.D. Correlations between NT-proBNP, outcome and haemodynamics in patients with septic shock. Acta Cardiol 2015, 70, 545-552. [CrossRef]
  68. Guaricci, A.I.; Bulzis, G.; Pontone, G.; Scicchitano, P.; Carbonara, R.; Rabbat, M.; De Santis, D.; Ciccone, M.M. Current interpretation of myocardial stunning. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2018, 28, 263-271. [CrossRef]
  69. Hsu, B.G.; Chen, Y.C.; Lee, R.P.; Lee, C.C.; Lee, C.J.; Wang, J.H. Fasting serum level of fatty-acid-binding protein 4 positively correlates with metabolic syndrome in patients with coronary artery disease. Circ J 2010, 74, 327-331. [CrossRef]
  70. Bao, Y.; Lu, Z.; Zhou, M.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Gao, M.; Wei, M.; Jia, W. Serum levels of adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein are associated with the severity of coronary artery disease in Chinese women. PLoS One 2011, 6, e19115. [CrossRef]
  71. Zografos, T.; Haliassos, A.; Korovesis, S.; Giazitzoglou, E.; Voridis, E.; Katritsis, D. Association of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin with the severity of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2009, 104, 917-920. [CrossRef]
  72. Elkhidir, A.E.; Eltaher, H.B.; Mohamed, A.O. Association of lipocalin-2 level, glycemic status and obesity in type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Res Notes 2017, 10, 285. [CrossRef]
  73. Caselli, C.; Rovai, D.; Lorenzoni, V.; Carpeggiani, C.; Teresinska, A.; Aguade, S.; Todiere, G.; Gimelli, A.; Schroeder, S.; Casolo, G.; et al. A New Integrated Clinical-Biohumoral Model to Predict Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Chronic Chest Pain. Can J Cardiol 2015, 31, 709-716. [CrossRef]
  74. Caselli, C.; De Graaf, M.A.; Lorenzoni, V.; Rovai, D.; Marinelli, M.; Del Ry, S.; Giannessi, D.; Bax, J.J.; Neglia, D.; Scholte, A.J. HDL cholesterol, leptin and interleukin-6 predict high risk coronary anatomy assessed by CT angiography in patients with stable chest pain. Atherosclerosis 2015, 241, 55-61. [CrossRef]
  75. Pepe, M.; Napoli, G.; Biondi-Zoccai, G.; Giordano, A. Anti-Inflammatory Therapy for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Is It Time for a Shift in the Treatment Paradigm? J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2022, 80, 633-635. [CrossRef]
  76. Held, C.; White, H.D.; Stewart, R.A.H.; Budaj, A.; Cannon, C.P.; Hochman, J.S.; Koenig, W.; Siegbahn, A.; Steg, P.G.; Soffer, J.; et al. Inflammatory Biomarkers Interleukin-6 and C-Reactive Protein and Outcomes in Stable Coronary Heart Disease: Experiences From the STABILITY (Stabilization of Atherosclerotic Plaque by Initiation of Darapladib Therapy) Trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2017, 6. [CrossRef]
  77. Zebrack, J.S.; Anderson, J.L.; Maycock, C.A.; Horne, B.D.; Bair, T.L.; Muhlestein, J.B. Usefulness of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in predicting long-term risk of death or acute myocardial infarction in patients with unstable or stable angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2002, 89, 145-149. [CrossRef]
  78. Lin, A.; Nerlekar, N.; Yuvaraj, J.; Fernandes, K.; Jiang, C.; Nicholls, S.J.; Dey, D.; Wong, D.T.L. Pericoronary adipose tissue computed tomography attenuation distinguishes different stages of coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021, 22, 298-306. [CrossRef]
  79. Araki, M.; Sugiyama, T.; Nakajima, A.; Yonetsu, T.; Seegers, L.M.; Dey, D.; Lee, H.; McNulty, I.; Yasui, Y.; Teng, Y.; et al. Level of Vascular Inflammation Is Higher in Acute Coronary Syndromes Compared with Chronic Coronary Disease. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2022, 15, e014191, doi:doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014191.
  80. Tzolos, E.; Williams, M.C.; McElhinney, P.; Lin, A.; Grodecki, K.; Flores Tomasino, G.; Cadet, S.; Kwiecinski, J.; Doris, M.; Adamson, P.D.; et al. Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Attenuation, Low-Attenuation Plaque Burden, and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022, 15, 1078-1088. [CrossRef]
  81. Kubo, T.; Imanishi, T.; Kashiwagi, M.; Ikejima, H.; Tsujioka, H.; Kuroi, A.; Ishibashi, K.; Komukai, K.; Tanimoto, T.; Ino, Y.; et al. Multiple coronary lesion instability in patients with acute myocardial infarction as determined by optical coherence tomography. Am J Cardiol 2010, 105, 318-322. [CrossRef]
  82. Dawson, L.P.; Layland, J. High-Risk Coronary Plaque Features: A Narrative Review. Cardiol Ther 2022, 11, 319-335. [CrossRef]
  83. Nerlekar, N.; Ha, F.J.; Cheshire, C.; Rashid, H.; Cameron, J.D.; Wong, D.T.; Seneviratne, S.; Brown, A.J. Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography-Derived Plaque Characteristics Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2018, 11, e006973. [CrossRef]
  84. Narula, J.; Nakano, M.; Virmani, R.; Kolodgie, F.D.; Petersen, R.; Newcomb, R.; Malik, S.; Fuster, V.; Finn, A.V. Histopathologic characteristics of atherosclerotic coronary disease and implications of the findings for the invasive and noninvasive detection of vulnerable plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013, 61, 1041-1051. [CrossRef]
  85. Joshi, N.V.; Vesey, A.T.; Williams, M.C.; Shah, A.S.; Calvert, P.A.; Craighead, F.H.; Yeoh, S.E.; Wallace, W.; Salter, D.; Fletcher, A.M.; et al. 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial. Lancet 2014, 383, 705-713. [CrossRef]
  86. Goeller, M.; Achenbach, S.; Cadet, S.; Kwan, A.C.; Commandeur, F.; Slomka, P.J.; Gransar, H.; Albrecht, M.H.; Tamarappoo, B.K.; Berman, D.S.; et al. Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Computed Tomography Attenuation and High-Risk Plaque Characteristics in Acute Coronary Syndrome Compared With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. JAMA Cardiol 2018, 3, 858-863. [CrossRef]
  87. Barandier, C.; Montani, J.-P.; Yang, Z. Mature adipocytes and perivascular adipose tissue stimulate vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation: effects of aging and obesity. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 2005, 289, H1807-H1813. [CrossRef]
  88. Gennero, I.; Xuereb, J.M.; Simon, M.F.; Girolami, J.P.; Bascands, J.L.; Chap, H.; Boneu, B.; Sié, P. Effects of lysophosphatidic acid on proliferation and cytosolic Ca++ of human adult vascular smooth muscle cells in culture. Thromb Res 1999, 94, 317-326. [CrossRef]
  89. Antonopoulos, A.S.; Margaritis, M.; Verheule, S.; Recalde, A.; Sanna, F.; Herdman, L.; Psarros, C.; Nasrallah, H.; Coutinho, P.; Akoumianakis, I.; et al. Mutual Regulation of Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Myocardial Redox State by PPAR-γ/Adiponectin Signalling. Circulation Research 2016, 118, 842-855, doi:doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307856.
  90. Harnden, A.; Takahashi, M.; Burgner, D. Kawasaki disease. Bmj 2009, 338, b1514. [CrossRef]
  91. Shi, H.; Wu, H.; Winkler, M.A.; Belin de Chantemèle, E.J.; Lee, R.; Kim, H.W.; Weintraub, N.L. Perivascular adipose tissue in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Pharmacological Research 2022, 182, 106354. [CrossRef]
  92. Cai, X.; Zhu, Q.; Wu, T.; Zhu, B.; Liu, S.; Liu, S.; Aierken, X.; Ahmat, A.; Li, N. Association of circulating resistin and adiponectin levels with Kawasaki disease: A meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 2020, 19, 1033-1041. [CrossRef]
  93. Agewall, S.; Beltrame, J.F.; Reynolds, H.R.; Niessner, A.; Rosano, G.; Caforio, A.L.P.; De Caterina, R.; Zimarino, M.; Roffi, M.; Kjeldsen, K.; et al. ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. European Heart Journal 2016, 38, 143-153. [CrossRef]
  94. Occhipinti, G.; Bucciarelli-Ducci, C.; Capodanno, D. Diagnostic pathways in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA). European Heart Journal. Acute Cardiovascular Care 2021, 10, 813-822. [CrossRef]
  95. Pergola, V.; Previtero, M.; Cecere, A.; Storer, V.; Castiello, T.; Baritussio, A.; Cabrelle, G.; Mele, D.; Motta, R.; Caforio, A.P.; et al. Clinical Value and Time Course of Pericoronary Fat Inflammation in Patients with Angiographically Nonobstructive Coronaries: A Preliminary Report. J Clin Med 2021, 10. [CrossRef]
  96. Robinowitz, M.; Virmani, R.; McAllister, H.A.J. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection and eosinophilic inflammation: a cause and effect relationship? Am J Med 1982, 72, 923-928. [CrossRef]
  97. Pitliya, A.; Datta, S.; Kalayci, A.; Kahe, F.; Sharfaei, S.; Jafarizade, M.; Goudarzi, S.; Chi, G. Eosinophilic inflammation in spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A potential therapeutic target? Med Hypotheses 2018, 121, 91-94. [CrossRef]
  98. Margaritis, M.; Sheppard, M.; Parsons, S.; Robertus, J.L.; Vink, A.; Samani, N.; Adlam, D. Abstract 15829: Periadvential Inflammation in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Causal Role or Response to Injury? Circulation 2018, 138, A15829-A15829, doi:doi:10.1161/circ.138.suppl_1.15829.
  99. Hedgire, S.; Baliyan, V.; Zucker, E.J.; Bittner, D.O.; Staziaki, P.V.; Takx, R.A.P.; Scholtz, J.E.; Meyersohn, N.; Hoffmann, U.; Ghoshhajra, B. Perivascular Epicardial Fat Stranding at Coronary CT Angiography: A Marker of Acute Plaque Rupture and Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection. Radiology 2018, 287, 808-815. [CrossRef]
  100. Yuvaraj, J.; Lin, A.; Nerlekar, N.; Rashid, H.; Cameron, J.D.; Seneviratne, S.; Nicholls, S.; Psaltis, P.J.; Wong, D.T.L. Is spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) related to vascular inflammation and epicardial fat? -insights from computed tomography coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2020, 10, 239-241. [CrossRef]
  101. Tweet, M.S.; Akhtar, N.J.; Hayes, S.N.; Best, P.J.; Gulati, R.; Araoz, P.A. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Acute findings on coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2019, 8, 467-475. [CrossRef]
  102. Pergola, V.; Continisio, S.; Mantovani, F.; Motta, R.; Mattesi, G.; Marrazzo, G.; Dellino, C.M.; Montonati, C.; De Conti, G.; Galzerano, D.; et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: the emerging role of coronary computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023, 24, 839-850. [CrossRef]
  103. Shimokawa, H. 2014 Williams Harvey Lecture: importance of coronary vasomotion abnormalities—from bench to bedside†. European Heart Journal 2014, 35, 3180-3193. [CrossRef]
  104. Forman, M.B.; Oates, J.A.; Robertson, D.; Robertson, R.M.; Roberts, L.J., 2nd; Virmani, R. Increased adventitial mast cells in a patient with coronary spasm. N Engl J Med 1985, 313, 1138-1141. [CrossRef]
  105. Lange, R.A.; Cigarroa, R.G.; Yancy, C.W., Jr.; Willard, J.E.; Popma, J.J.; Sills, M.N.; McBride, W.; Kim, A.S.; Hillis, L.D. Cocaine-induced coronary-artery vasoconstriction. N Engl J Med 1989, 321, 1557-1562. [CrossRef]
  106. Ohyama, K.; Matsumoto, Y.; Nishimiya, K.; Hao, K.; Tsuburaya, R.; Ota, H.; Amamizu, H.; Uzuka, H.; Takahashi, J.; Ito, K.; et al. Increased Coronary Perivascular Adipose Tissue Volume in Patients With Vasospastic Angina. Circulation Journal 2016, advpub. [CrossRef]
  107. Ohyama, K.; Matsumoto, Y.; Amamizu, H.; Uzuka, H.; Nishimiya, K.; Morosawa, S.; Hirano, M.; Watabe, H.; Funaki, Y.; Miyata, S.; et al. Association of Coronary Perivascular Adipose Tissue Inflammation and Drug-Eluting Stent-Induced Coronary Hyperconstricting Responses in Pigs: (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2017, 37, 1757-1764. [CrossRef]
  108. Ohyama, K.; Matsumoto, Y.; Takanami, K.; Ota, H.; Nishimiya, K.; Sugisawa, J.; Tsuchiya, S.; Amamizu, H.; Uzuka, H.; Suda, A.; et al. Coronary Adventitial and Perivascular Adipose Tissue Inflammation in Patients With Vasospastic Angina. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018, 71, 414-425. [CrossRef]
  109. Owen, M.K.; Witzmann, F.A.; McKenney, M.L.; Lai, X.; Berwick, Z.C.; Moberly, S.P.; Alloosh, M.; Sturek, M.; Tune, J.D. Perivascular adipose tissue potentiates contraction of coronary vascular smooth muscle: influence of obesity. Circulation 2013, 128, 9-18. [CrossRef]
  110. Lin, A.; Kolossváry, M.; Motwani, M.; Išgum, I.; Maurovich-Horvat, P.; Slomka, P.J.; Dey, D. Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging for Risk Stratification in Coronary Artery Disease. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2021, 3, e200512. [CrossRef]
  111. Al’Aref, S.J.; Singh, G.; Choi, J.W.; Xu, Z.; Maliakal, G.; van Rosendael, A.R.; Lee, B.C.; Fatima, Z.; Andreini, D.; Bax, J.J.; et al. A Boosted Ensemble Algorithm for Determination of Plaque Stability in High-Risk Patients on Coronary CTA. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020, 13, 2162-2173. [CrossRef]
  112. Dey, D.; Gaur, S.; Ovrehus, K.A.; Slomka, P.J.; Betancur, J.; Goeller, M.; Hell, M.M.; Gransar, H.; Berman, D.S.; Achenbach, S.; et al. Integrated prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia from quantitative coronary CT angiography using machine learning: a multicentre study. Eur Radiol 2018, 28, 2655-2664. [CrossRef]
  113. Driessen, R.S.; Danad, I.; Stuijfzand, W.J.; Raijmakers, P.G.; Schumacher, S.P.; van Diemen, P.A.; Leipsic, J.A.; Knuuti, J.; Underwood, S.R.; van de Ven, P.M.; et al. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019, 73, 161-173. [CrossRef]
  114. Muscogiuri, G.; Chiesa, M.; Baggiano, A.; Spadafora, P.; De Santis, R.; Guglielmo, M.; Scafuri, S.; Fusini, L.; Mushtaq, S.; Conte, E.; et al. Diagnostic performance of deep learning algorithm for analysis of computed tomography myocardial perfusion. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [CrossRef]
  115. Oikonomou, E.K.; Williams, M.C.; Kotanidis, C.P.; Desai, M.Y.; Marwan, M.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Thomas, K.E.; Thomas, S.; Akoumianakis, I.; Fan, L.M.; et al. A novel machine learning-derived radiotranscriptomic signature of perivascular fat improves cardiac risk prediction using coronary CT angiography. Eur Heart J 2019, 40, 3529-3543. [CrossRef]
  116. Lin, A.; Kolossváry, M.; Yuvaraj, J.; Cadet, S.; McElhinney, P.A.; Jiang, C.; Nerlekar, N.; Nicholls, S.J.; Slomka, P.J.; Maurovich-Horvat, P.; et al. Myocardial Infarction Associates With a Distinct Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Radiomic Phenotype: A Prospective Case-Control Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020, 13, 2371-2383. [CrossRef]
Preprints 84338 g001
Figure 1. CT scan of a 49-year-old male patient depicting the epicardial adipose tissue (red) immediately internal to the pericardium.
Figure 1. CT scan of a 49-year-old male patient depicting the epicardial adipose tissue (red) immediately internal to the pericardium.
Preprints 84338 g001
Preprints 84338 g002
Figure 2. CT scan of a 39-year-old female patient. Panel (a) shows a 3D reconstruction of the heart focusing on the middle segment of RCA. Panel (b) and (c) illustrate PCAT distribution around RCA in longitudinal and ortogonal view respectively. CT, computed tomography; PCAT, pericoronary adipose tissue; RCA, right coronary artery.
Figure 2. CT scan of a 39-year-old female patient. Panel (a) shows a 3D reconstruction of the heart focusing on the middle segment of RCA. Panel (b) and (c) illustrate PCAT distribution around RCA in longitudinal and ortogonal view respectively. CT, computed tomography; PCAT, pericoronary adipose tissue; RCA, right coronary artery.
Preprints 84338 g002
Preprints 84338 g003
Figure 3. Interaction between EAT, PCAT and atherogenesis.
Figure 3. Interaction between EAT, PCAT and atherogenesis.
Preprints 84338 g003
Table 1. Imaging modalities to assess adipose tissue.
Table 1. Imaging modalities to assess adipose tissue.
Preprints 84338 i001
AT, adipose tissue; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated