1. Introduction
Gerhard Herden inaugurated a very general approach to Mathematical Utility Theory and in particular to Real Representation of Preferences (see, e.g., Herden [
1,
2,
3] and Herden and Pallack [
4]). In particular, Herden was able to provide characterizations of the existence of continuous order-preserving functions for a not necessarily total preorder on a generic topological space, by using the fundamental notion of a
linear decreasing separable system, which generalizes the concept of a
decreasing scale introduced by Burgess and Fitzpatrick [
5].
The popular theorems by Eilenberg [
6] and Debreu [
7,
8], according to which there exists a continuous order-preserving function (utility function) for every continuous total preorder on a connected and separable, and respectively on a second countable, topological space are particular cases of Herden’s axiomatization. We recall that a total preorder on a topological space is said to be continuous if all the weak lower and upper sections are closed (or, equivalently, if all the strict lower and upper sections are open).
The very important concept of a
useful topology (i.e., a topology on a given set such that every continuous total preorder is representable by a continuous utility function) was inaugurated by Herden [
3], who based his analysis on
linear separable systems on a topological space. Indeed, to each linear separable system it is possible to associate a continuous total preorder in a very natural way. Useful topologies were recently studied and fully characterized in three subsequent papers by Bosi and Zuanon [
9,
10,
11], after the seminal paper by Bosi and Herden [
12], who introduced and applied the concept of a
complete separable system on a topological space. This is the case of a particular linear separable system. According to Bosi and Zuanon [
11, Theorem 2], a completely regular topology is useful if and only if it is separable and every chain of clopen sets is countable. It is very important to notice that the assumption of complete regularity is not restrictive, since a (total) preorder is continuous if and only if it is continuous with respect to the weak topology of continuous functions, which is completely regular (see Bosi and Zuanon [
9, Lemma 3.1]). Other deep contributions to the study of useful topologies were presented by Herden and Pallack [
13], Campión et al. [
14,
15,
16] and Candeal et al. [
17].
A very natural and general extension of the concept of a
continuous total preorder to the nontotal case is the notion of a
weakly continuous preorder introduced by Herden and Pallack [
4]. This is the case of a preorder ≾ on a topological space
such that, for every
, there exists a continuous increasing real-valued function
such that
. In other words, points
are separated by continuous increasing functions. In the case of a total preorder, the notion of weak continuity is equivalent to that of continuity.
In order to generalize the concept of a useful topology, Bosi and Zuanon [
18] introduced the notion of a
strongly useful topology on a set. This is the case of a topology such that every weakly continuous and not necessarily total preorder admits a continuous order-preserving function. It is easy to see that a strongly useful topology is useful. The concept of a strongly useful topology was further examined by Bosi [
19], who studied the bijective correspondence between weakly continuous preorders on one hand, and (equivalence classes of) families of complete separable systems on the other hand. Therefore, some characterizations of strongly useful topology are already available. Actually, the situation is, needless to say, much more complicated when the preorder may fail to be total. However, there is some analogy with useful topologies, in the sense that, while in the case of useful topologies it is not restrictive to deal with completely regular topologies, in the case of strongly useful topologies it is not restrictive to deal with normal and Hausdorff spaces.
This paper is aimed to take advantage of this latter very important consideration, in order to prove interesting properties of strongly useful topologies which are also normal and Hausdorff. Indeed, we show that strongly usefulness is an hereditary property on open sets when the topology is normal Hausdorff. This is proven by using the fact that strongly usefulness depends, loosely speaking, on the properties of families of complete separable systems, and on the weakly continuous preorders which are naturally associated to them. We further prove that strongly useful normal Hausdorff topologies are hereditarily separable on closed sets, and we identify a simple condition concerning well-ordered families of open sets, which implies the Lindelöf property.
Incidentally, under fairly general conditions, we establish that a topology is strongly useful provided that the topology generated by every family of open sets is second countable, and we show that such condition is not necessary for strongly usefulness. We further furnish a very general characterization of the existence of continuous order-preserving functions, which is strictly related to the consideration of linear separable systems which are actually complete.
2. Notation and Preliminaries
The reader is assumed to be familiar with the definition of a
preorder ≾ on a set
X, and the related classical notation, according to which the associated
strict part and
symmetric part are denoted by ≺ and ∼, respectively. An
order≲ is an
antisymmetric preorder, and a
chain is a total order. However, all the detailed definitions can be found for example, in Herden [
1].
Definition 1. A real-valued function u on a preordered set is said to be
- 1.
increasing, if, for all
,
- 2.
order-preserving, if
u is increasing and, for all
,
- 3.
a utility function, if is equivalent to , for all .
In the sequel, will stand for the natural topology (i.e., interval topology) on . Without loss of generality, we shall consider continuous increasing functions or continuous order-preserving functions u taking values in , i.e. we shall be authorized to use the notation instead of .
Definition 2
(Herden and Pallack [
4]). A preorder ≾ on a topological space
is said to be
weakly continuous if, for every pair
, there exists a continuous and increasing real-valued function
such that
.
It is immediate to check that weak continuity is a necessary condition for the existence of a continuous order-preserving function. Let us introduce the basic definition of a strongly useful topology.
Definition 3
(Bosi and Zuanon [
18]). A topology
t on a nonempty set
X is said to be
strongly useful if every weakly continuous preorder on the topological space
admits a continuous order-preserving function
.
Characterizations of a strongly useful topology are presented in Bosi and Zuanon [
18, Theorem 3.4] and Bosi [
19, Theorem 4.2].
A subset D of a preordered set is said to be decreasing if and imply , for all .
We now recall the definition of a
complete separable system on a topological space
, which is a particularly relevant case of a
linear separable system, as introduced by Bosi and Herden [
12].
Definition 4
(Bosi and Herden [
12]). Let a topology
t on
X be given. A family
of open subsets of the topological space
, such that
, is said to be a
complete separable system on
if it satisfies the following conditions:
-
S1:
There exist sets and such that .
-
S2:
For all sets and such that , there exists some set such that .
-
S3:
For all sets and , at least one of the following conditions , or , or holds.
In the case when ≾ is a preorder on X, a complete separable system on is said to be a complete decreasing separable system on as soon as every set is required to be decreasing.
Denote by and the set of all complete separable systems and the set of all families of complete separable systems on , respectively.
Let us now present the definition of the weakly continuous preorder associated to a family of complete separable systems.
Definition 5.
If we consider any family
, then the weakly continuous preorder
naturally associated to
is defined as follows, for all points
:
We now present a characterization of weak continuity of a preorder on a topological space.
Proposition 1.
Let ≾ be a preorder on a topological space . Then the following conditions are equivalent:
-
1.
≾ is weakly continuous;
-
2.
For every , there exists a complete decreasing separable system on such that there exists with , .
Proof. 1 ⇒ 2. Let ≾ be a weakly continuous preorder on a topological space
. Consider any pair
, and a continuous and increasing real-valued function
such that
. Then just define
in order to immediately verify that condition 2 holds.
2 ⇒ 1. Assume that, given any pair
, there exists a complete decreasing separable system
on
with the indicated property. Then, from Bosi and Zuanon [
10, Lemma 3.7]), there exists a complete decreasing separable subsystem
such that
for every
. Therefore, we have that
is a complete decreasing separable system on
such that
,
for every
. Then the thesis follows from Bosi and Zuanon [
20, Remark 2.21, 2], since to every complete decreasing separable system we can associate a continuous increasing function in a very natural way. □
Remark 1.
The weak continuity of the preorder presented in Definition 5 is an immediate consequence of the previous proposition.
Based on the above Proposition 1, it is easy to prove the following theorem, which presents a general characterization of the existence of a continuous order-preserving function. This theorem provides a slight generalization of the analogous characterizations presented by Herden [
1, Theorem 4.1] and Herden [
2, Theorem 3.1]. We omit the proof that is based on the proof of the aforementioned theorems and on the above Proposition 1.
Theorem 1.
Let ≾ be a preorder on a topological space . Then the following condition are equivalent:
-
1.
There exists a continuous order-preserving function ;
-
2.
There exists a countable complete decreasing separable system such that, for every , there exists with , ;
-
3.
There exists a countable family of complete decreasing separable systems on such that, for every , there exist and with , ;
-
4.
There exists a countable family of continuous increasing functions such that, for every , there exists with .
Denote by the family of all continuous increasing functions for a preorder ≾ on a topological space . Let us now define the family of complete separable systems associated to a (weakly continuous) preorder.
Definition 6.
Let ≾ be a weakly continuous preorder on a topological space
. Then the family
which is naturally associated to ≾ is defined as follows:
Definition 7.
Let ≾ and be two preorders on a set X. Then is said to extend ≾ if and .
Remark 2.
Let ≾ be a weakly continuous preorder on a topological space . Then the preorder is a weakly continuous preorder which extends ≾.
Definition 8.
Given a topological space , the weak topology on X, , is the coarsest topology on X satisfying the property that every continuous real-valued function on remains continuous. Two points are considered equivalent if for all continuous real-valued functions f. In this case, we write .
The reader is assumed to be familiar with the fundamental concepts of general topology, like those of basis, subbasis, complete regularity and Hausdorff. However, for reader’s convenience we recall the definition of normal topological space since it is central in the present study.
Definition 9.
A topology t on a nonempty set X is said to be normal, if, for every pair of disjoint closed subsets of X, there exist two open disjoint sets such that , .
The famous Urysohn’s Lemma states that a topology t on a set X is normal if and only if for every pair of disjoint nonempty closed sets there exists a continuous function such that for all and for all .
Bosi and Zuanon [
18, Lemma 3.6 and Proposition 3.8] proved the following result.
Proposition 2.
Let be a topological space. Then the following conditions hold:
-
1.
The coarsest topology on X satisfying the property that all weakly continuous preorders on remain being continuous is ;
-
2.
In order that t is strongly useful, it is necessary that is a normal Hausdorff-space.
Notice that, according to the previous proposition, it is not restrictive to limit ourselves to take into account normal Hausdorff spaces when dealing with strongly useful topology. This consideration is of vital importance, and motivates the analysis performed in the next section.
A final proposition concludes this section, which is a direct consequence of normality. Its easy proof is therefore omitted.
Proposition 3.
Let be a normal Hausdorff topological space. Then, for every open set such that , there exists a countable complete separable system such that O is the minimum element of the chain .
3. Properties of Strongly Useful Topologies
We now present a sufficient condition for the strong usefulness of a topology. This condition holds in the general case, without the aforementioned normality assumption. We recall that the topology generated by any family of complete separable systems on a topological space is the topology on X which has as a subbasis of open sets.
Proposition 4.
A topology t on a set X is strongly useful provided that the topology generated by every family is second countable.
Proof .
Let ≾ be a weakly continuous preorder on a topological space
, and consider the family
of complete separable systems associated to ≾ as in Definition 6. Since the topology
is second countable, we have that there exists a countable family
of continuous increasing functions such that the topology generated by
coincides with
. Therefore, based on this family
, we have that, for every
, there exists
with
. Hence, the function
is a continuous order-preserving function for ≾. This consideration completes the proof. □
The previous proposition is analogous to the sufficient part of the characterization of useful topologies presented by Bosi and Herden [
12, Theorem 3.1], according to which a topology is useful if and only if the topology generated by every complete separable system is second countable. However, the converse of Proposition 4 does not hold in the case of a normal Hausdorff space, as the following example shows.
Example 1.
Consider any normal Hausdorff topology that is defined on a countable set
X, but fails to be second countable. The reader may think, for instance, of
Appert’s topology that is defined on the positive integers
. For a detailed description of
the reader may consult Steen and Seebach [
21]. The countability of
X, of course, guarantees that
is strongly useful. But since
is not second countable, the countability of
X implies the existence of at least one point
having a basis
of (open) neighborhoods of
x, the cardinality of which is not countable. Let now, for every
, some (countable) complete separable system (chain)
be chosen in such a way that
is the minimum element of
. Since
is a normal topological space, the arbitrary construction of these chains does not make any difficulties (see Proposition 3). But now we are already done. Indeed, the topology
that is generated by the family
cannot be second countable.
Another general property of strongly useful topologies is in order now. We shall denote by the set of all continuous function on the topological space taking values in the real interval .
Proposition 5.
Let be a strongly useful normal Hausdorff topological space. Then for every open subset O of X the subspace of is strongly useful.
Proof. Let some (non-empty) open subset
O of
X be arbitrarily chosen. First of all, we notice that our assumption
to be a normal Hausdorff-space allows us to choose a complete separable system
on
in such a way that there exists some countable strictly increasing chain
of closed subsets of
O having the properties that
coincides with
O and
belongs to
for every
. Let now
be a complete separable system on
, i.e. the open and closed sets with respect to
are open and closed with respect to the relativized topology
on
O. At this point, we consider for every
the complete separable system
that is induced by
. Since
O is open and every set
, where
n runs through the set
of natural numbers, is closed we may apply our assumption
to being strongly useful in order to conclude that for every
there exists a function
that represents the total preorder
(see Bosi and Zuanon [
20]). Since
the function
is a function such that its restriction to
O represents the total preorder
. Summarizing our considerations, it follows that
is the restriction of some complete separable system that is defined on
, and, needless to say, such consideration naturally extends to the case of any family of complete separable systems on
. This means, however, that the case of an arbitrary open subset
O of
X to be given reduces to the situation that
O coincides with
X. Hence, we have completed the proof. □
Let us now present other properties relative to the assumption of normality of the topological space. The appropriateness of such hypothesis has been previously discussed.
The reader may recall that a topology t on a set X is said to be hereditarily separable on closed sets if every subspace of is separable whenever A is a closed subset of X.
Proposition 6.
Let be a strongly useful normal Hausdorff topological space. Then t is hereditarily separable on closed sets.
Proof. Consider a strongly useful normal Hausdorff topological space
. Assume, by contraposition, that
t is not hereditarily separable on closed sets. Then, there exists some (non-empty) closed subset
C of
X such that the induced topology
is not separable. Consider, however, that
is a normal Hausdorff topology, since normality is an hereditary property on closed sets. Then, from Bosi and Zuanon [
9, Theorem 3.1, statement 3], since
is in particular a completely regular topology, there exists a continuous total preorder
which does not admit any continuous order-preserving function (i.e., utility function)
. Define the preorder ≾ on
X as follows, for all
:
Notice that, since
is a normal Hausdorff topological space, every increasing function
can be extended, by the Tietze-Urysohn Extension Theorem, to a continuous increasing function
(see e.g. Engelking [
22, Theorem 2.1.8]). Therefore ≾ is a weakly continuous preorder on
, and clearly it cannot admit any continuous order-preserving function
(otherwise, its restriction to
C would be a continuous order-preserving function for
). Hence, the topology
t on
X is not strongly useful, and the proof is complete. □
Since from Bosi [
19, Theorem 4.2], a topology
t is strongly useful if and only if for every family
of complete separable systems there exists a complete separable system
for which
is second countable and
, we have that the following proposition holds.
Proposition 7.
Let be a strongly useful topological space. Then for every family of clopen subsets of X, there exists a complete separable system on such that and is second countable.
In order to proceed, we consider for every subset S of X the set of all well-ordered chains of open subsets of X such that . Then the length of is the cardinality of , or equivalently the least ordinal which can be order-embeddable in .
The reader may recall that a topology t on X is said to be a Lindelöf-topology if for every open covering of X there exists a countable covering of X.
In order to prove the following theorem, which in some sense illustrates how close are strongly useful normal Hausdorff topological spaces to Lindelöf topological spaces, the following lemma is needed, which provides a sufficient condition for the non-strong usefulness of a topology.
Lemma 1.
Let t be a topology on X. If there exists a complete separable system on which contains an uncountable well-ordered sub-chain , then t is not strongly useful.
Proof. Consider the weakly continuous total preorder associated to the complete separable system (see Definition 5). Since there exists an uncountable well-ordered sub-chain of , then does not admit a continuous order-preserving function (utility function) by the above Theorem 1. This consideration completes the proof. □
As usual, stands for the first uncountable ordinal number.
Theorem 2.
In order for a strongly useful normal Hausdorff topological space to be Lindelöf, it is sufficient that every chain , such that the length exceeds , contains some open set having the property that for some .
Proof. First consider that, if
is not Lindelöf, then there exists an open cover of
X which does not admit a countable subcover of
X, and therefore a standard transfinite induction argument guarantees the existence of a well-ordered chain
such that
. Therefore, it suffices to exclude this possibility given our hypotheses.
Let us consider any well-ordered chain which covers X. We have to show that the length is not greater than . Therefore, we distinguish between the case and the case . In the first case we are done. In the second case there exists some set having the property that for some . Hence, we may consider the disjoint closed sets and . Since is a normal Hausdorff-space there exists some function such that and . We, thus, may proceed by transfinite induction.
Let be not a limit ordinal and let some function with corresponding sets and such that already have been defined. Then we consider the chain and distinguish between the case and the case . In the first case nothing remains to be proved. In the second case there exists some set having the property that for some . Using the above normality argument it follows that in this case there exists some function satisfying the equations and .
Let be a limit ordinal. Now we may assume that for every ordinal number already functions have been defined with respect to corresponding sets . Let be the minimum of all ordinal numbers that are not smaller than any of the ordinal numbers that already have been considered. Then we consider the chain and distinguish, in analogy to the above considerations, between the case and the case . In the first case the limit step is done. In the second case there again exist sets and a corresponding function such that and .
Having finished the transfinite induction procedure we must distinguish between the case that there exists an ordinal number
such that the transfinite induction process stops at
and the case that there exists no such ordinal number. In the first case it follows that
and everything is shown. In the second case, however, the complete separable system
on
that is induced by the functions
contains some well-ordered sub-chain, the length of which is at least
. This conclusion contradicts our assumption
to be strongly useful since the above Lemma 1 applies. So, the proof is complete. □