1. Introduction
The persistent rise in environmental contamination due to noxious agents like pesticides, dyes, pharmaceutical products, and potentially harmful metal species is an alarming trend. This phenomenon can be ascribed to the heightened industrial and agricultural activities aimed at fulfilling the growing demands of the population, the indiscriminate utilization of fossil fuels, and the exploitation of mineral resources. Consequently, the adverse repercussions of these detrimental anthropogenic practices are increasingly evident in the environmental impact caused by effluents containing toxic substances. The non-sustainability of production and exploitation methods is primarily responsible for the contamination (CARNEIRO et al., 2010; MINELLO et al., 2009; GARCÍA- SÁNCHEZ et al., 2022). Among the various types of environmental pollutants, potentially toxic metal species (formerly known as heavy metals) are responsible for several deleterious effects on organisms (GUPTA and KHAN, 2020; ZHANG; WANG and YAO, 2021; ALMEIDA; SOARES; FIGUEIRA, 2018). After entering the environment, heavy metals like copper, cadmium, zinc, lead, chromium, and arsenic have the potential to spread through the lithosphere, hydrosphere, and atmosphere, causing contamination across a significant portion of the planet. One of the most common ways of dispersion is through water, as they become solubilized in liquid media and then discharged into bodies of water that carry them over long distances from their sources, or by infiltration into the ground, reaching the groundwater. They can also be dispersed in the atmosphere, becoming adsorbed onto solid particles resulting from the burning of materials containing such elements. In this case, they can deposit on soils, lakes, and rivers, reaching distant regions, or undergo precipitation along with rain, causing the contamination of large areas (REEVE, 2002; BAIRD and CANN, 2011). As environmental pollutants, potentially toxic metal species do not undergo degradation and can be converted into organometallic species by bacterial activity in the medium. These compounds interact with organisms and are introduced into the food chain, causing the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of heavy metals in the environment (MANAHAN, 2000; ALMEIDA; SOARES; FIGUEIRA, 2018; REEVE, 2002). Organometallic compounds tend to pose a higher level of harm compared to free metal cations. This elevated hazard stems from their heightened attraction to the fatty tissues of aquatic organisms, leading to significantly higher bioconcentration factors. As a consequence, we can observe intoxication in communities that depend on aquatic animals for food (MANAHAN, 2000; ALMEIDA; SOARES; FIGUEIRA, 2018; REEVE, 2002). Given the inherent risks associated with the contamination of drinking water by heavy metals, which has a direct impact on human health, it is of great importance to develop and apply techniques for remediating wastewater. These techniques aim to prevent the emission of toxic metal species and the contamination of rivers, lakes, and seas. Among the methods for removing metal species from aqueous samples, solid-phase extraction using adsorbent materials is widely used due to its low cost, simplicity, and the possibility of anchoring different molecular ligands on the surfaces of the materials (ALCÂNTARA et al., 2004; MADRAKIAN; ZOLFIGOL; SOLGI, 2008; MAHMOUD et al., 2010; FERREIRA et al., 2011; PRADO et al., 2011; FILHO et al., 2013; HAJIAGHABABAEI et al., 2013; JORGETTO et al., 2013). This technique takes advantage of the presence of chelating or complexing groups (such as amines, amides, carboxylic acids, and hydroxyls) on the surface of the adsorbent, which are capable of sequestering metal ions and allowing the removal of such species from aqueous solutions. The chemical process entails the creation of covalent coordinate bonds between metal cations, which act as Lewis acids, and chemical molecules or groups anchored to the adsorbent’s surface, acting as Lewis bases. Lewis bases, including organic groups containing elements like N, O, S, and P, possess unshared electrons that can form covalent bonds with electron-deficient species (in this scenario, the metal cations). This ensures the secure immobilization of the metal species on the adsorbent, facilitating their effective removal (JORGETTO et al., 2015). Over time, several adsorbents have been proposed for remediating metal-contaminated wastewater, such as modified silicas, activated carbon, zeolites, sand, clays, cellulose polymers, industrial and agricultural residues, among others (AHMAD and AHMAD, 2022; GUPTA et al., 2012; MELLAH; CHEGROUCHE; BARKAT, 2006; PENG et al., 2012; LIU; WANG; LI, 2005; LI et al., 2021; WALCARIUS; MERCIER, 2010; NAIYA; BHATTACHARYA; DAS, 2008; SINGHA and DAS, 2013). Nevertheless, certain materials necessitate an organic functionalization process to enhance their adsorption capacity prior to their use as adsorbents. During this stage, a complexing or chelating molecule is bonded to the material’s surface, enabling it to effectively extract metal ions from the solution (FILHO et al., 2013; JORGETTO et al., 2013; WALCARIUS and MERCIER, 2010; SOUZA et al., 2011). Organofunctionalized materials present a serious disadvantage in terms of their application, namely the use of expensive reagents and solvents, as well as the generation of toxic waste during their synthesis and functionalization, which makes large-scale production for environmental purposes impractical (FERREIRA et al., 2011; FILHO et al., 2013; JORGETTO et al., 2013; SOUZA et al., 2011). As an eco-friendly substitute for synthetic materials, a range of adsorbents can be created from abundant naturally occurring organic materials, making them suitable for use in solid-phase extraction methods. Biomaterials, in particular, possess inherent complexing groups within their chemical composition, obviating the necessity for additional functionalization processes. The adsorption capabilities of these natural materials are linked to the inclusion of N, O, P, and S atoms (which act as Lewis bases) in their complexing groups, enabling the formation of covalent bonds through electron pair sharing with the metal species present in the solution (CASTRO et al., 2011; MARTINS et al., 2013). These biomaterials can be readily gathered and undergo uncomplicated preparation using basic techniques like drying, milling, and sieving, enabling their transformation into a finely powdered form suitable for conducting solid-phase extraction of metal species from aqueous solutions (SAAD et al., 2021; SEPEHRI et al., 2023). Biomaterials emerge as a compelling and cost-effective option for producing adsorbents to remediate wastewater (JORGETTO et al 2014; JORGETTO et al., 2015). Several biomaterials, such as banana peels (CASTRO et al., 2011), castor leaves (MARTINS et al., 2013), cassava root husks (JORGETTO et al., 2014), sugarcane bagasse (GURGEL and GIL, 2009), orange peels (GÖNEN and SERIN, 2012), peanut shells (ZHANG; LI; ZHOU, 2021), coconut fibers (GONZALES et al., 2008), pine bark (GUNDOĞDU et al., 2009), grass biomass (HOSSAIN et al., 2012), rice husk ash (NAIYA; BHATTACHARYA; DAS, 2009), green coconut shells (SOUZA et al., 2010), and corn leaves (SILVA et al., 2015), have already been studied regarding their adsorption capacities, demonstrating their effective removal of metal species from aqueous solutions. In addition to their low cost and ease of preparation, some of these materials can be reused for several adsorption/desorption cycles (CASTRO et al., 2011; MARTINS et al., 2013; KOBYA, 2004). In order to gauge a material’s potential suitability as an adsorbent, it becomes crucial to delve into the fundamental facets of its physicochemical properties. This inquiry aids in ascertaining the attraction between the adsorbent and specific metal species, alongside understanding the impact of environmental conditions such as pH and contact time on the material’s adsorption capacity. In this current study, we assessed the viability of a powder derived from Diospyros kaki L.f. (persimmon) leaves as a promising biosorbent for the removal of Cu(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous samples. The choice of this material is based on sustainability, as the leaves of this tree naturally fall during a certain period of the year (when the tree enters a stage of senescence), generating a large amount of available biomass (MATSUMOTO and SATO, 1997). Biosorbents, in addition to originating from renewable sources, have become a promising material as they do not require chemical modifications, making them even more economically viable (VAGHETTI, 2009; DEMIRBAS, 2008; AHALYA; RAMACHANDRA; KANAMADI, 2003). Thus, several relevant parameters that influence the adsorption process of metal species were investigated to elucidate the biosorbent properties of persimmon leaves.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Solvents, solutions and reagents
The solutions of Cu(II) and Cd(II) were prepared by dissolving their respective high-purity chlorides (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) in ultra-pure deionized water (18.2 MΩ·cm-1, Direct-Q system, Millipore, France) to obtain stock solutions of approximately 500 mg L-1 for both metals. Treatments involving Cu(II) and Cd(II) solutions of distinct concentrations were prepared through the process of dilution, starting from the stock solutions, to achieve the intended concentrations. The standard metal solutions used for calibration of the spectrometer were prepared by diluting their respective 1000 mg L-1 stock solutions (Specsol, Brazil). For pH adjustment, dilute solutions of HNO3 (Carlo Erba) and NaOH (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used. All containers were washed with 10 % v.v. HNO3 for at least 24 hours, rinsed with deionized water, and dried at room temperature or in an oven heated to 50 °C prior to use.
2.2. Preparation of the biosorbent
The persimmon leaves were collected in the city of Botucatu, Brazil, and thoroughly washed with ultrapure water. They were placed in paper bags and stored in a ventilated chamber heated to 100 °C for one week to ensure complete drying. The dried material was manually ground and processed in a knife mill, resulting in a crude powder with particles of varying sizes. Subsequently, the material was sieved using sieves with different pore diameters. The fraction with a diameter between 63 and 106 μm was selected for the adsorption tests. Prior to conducting the experiments, the material underwent a washing process in a Soxhlet system, employing 500 mL of distilled water, until the washing effluent achieved clarity. This procedure was performed with the objective of eliminating water-soluble organic compounds liberated from the powder, which might otherwise interact with the metal ions and potentially hinder their adsorption onto the persimmon leaf particles. Following this, the washed material was subsequently transferred to a heated oven set at 55 °C to facilitate the evaporation of any residual solvent.
2.3. Equipments
The material was characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) using a Nicolet Nexus 670 spectrometer. The sample was scanned 200 times with a resolution of 4 cm-1 in transmittance mode. A 200 mg KBr pellet containing 1 % by weight of the sample was prepared to collect the spectrum of the persimmon leaves. Nitrogen, hydrogen, and carbon contents were determined through elemental analysis of 2.0 mg of the persimmon leaf powder using a Thermo Finnigan Flash 1112 Series EA CHNS elemental analyzer (CE Instruments). The concentrations of Cu(II) and Cd(II) were obtained at their most sensitive resonance spectral lines (324.7 and 228.8 nm, respectively) using a Shimadzu AA 7000 atomic absorption spectrometer in flame atomization mode (air-acetylene mixture). The morphology of the particles was observed using a Quanta 200 scanning electron microscope (FEI Company), and elemental mapping of N, P, S, and O was performed using an X-Max accessory (Oxford equipment) coupled to the electron microscope. The sample particles were dispersed in isopropanol, and the suspension was poured onto a glass slide. After drying, the sample was coated with gold. High-resolution 13C-NMR experiments were conducted at a magnetic field of 5.9 T using a DD2 NMR Agilent spectrometer. Samples were spun at up to 5.0 KHz in 4 mm zirconium rotors under magic angle conditions. The 13C spectra were obtained from {1H}-13C cross-polarization experiments by applying a π/2 pulse of 6.0 µs on 1H, a contact time of 1.0 ms, and a recycle delay of 5.0 s. 20,000 signals were collected. High-power proton decoupling was applied during the acquisition period in the cross-polarization experiments. A solid adamantine sample was used as a secondary standard for 13C isotropic chemical shift (high-frequency resonance at 38.6 ppm relative to tetramethylsilane, TMS), as well as for calibration of the {1H}-13C cross-polarization conditions.
2.4. Point of zero charge (pHPZC)
To provide a more comprehensive characterization of the adsorbent’s surface, we determined the point of zero charge (pHPZC) through the immersion method. In these experiments, 25.0 mg of the powdered material was transferred to several Falcon tubes and stirred with 50.0 mL aliquots of a 0.01 mol L-1 NaCl solution using a simple batch method on an axial axial homogenizer. The initial pH of these aliquots ranged from 2.0 to 12.0. Their pH was adjusted by the addition of dilute solutions of HCl and NaOH. The mixtures containing the material were stirred for 24 hours. At the end of the agitation period, the final pH of the solutions was measured (TAN et al., 2008). A calibrated pH meter, PHS-3B (PHTEK, Brazil), was used to record the initial and final pH of the solutions.
2.5. Batch adsorption experiments
To gain insight into the adsorption capabilities of the persimmon leaves powder and assess its suitability as a biosorbent, we explored critical parameters including kinetic equilibrium, pH impact, and maximum adsorption capacity. Batch experiments were conducted by stirring 10 mg of the adsorbent powder with 1.80 mL of the metal solution within 2.0 mL Eppendorf tubes, using an axial homogenizer. The material was subsequently filtered under pressure (to minimize contact between the metal species and the paper filter), and the supernatant was collected for metal content analysis. The analysis of the metal concentration in the collected solutions was performed by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS), after appropriate dilutions of the supernatants (using diluted HNO3 solution). In each experiment, parameters such as contact time, pH, and analyte concentration were individually adjusted. Kinetic tests were carried out to ascertain the minimum duration necessary for the material to attain equilibrium in adsorption kinetics. These experiments entailed the mechanical agitation of the material with the analyte solution, spanning a time range of 1 to 240 minutes, conducted at room temperature. The concentrations of Cu(II) and Cd(II) in the solutions were set at 50 mg L-1 and 25 mg L-1, respectively, while maintaining a pH of around 5.5. The specific influence of solution pH on the adsorption of copper and cadmium was evaluated. Adsorption experiments were conducted under different pH values to determine the optimal pH at which the material exhibits the highest adsorption capacity. These experiments involved mechanical agitation of Cu(II) and Cd(II) solutions with concentrations of 50 mg L-1 and 20 mg L-1, respectively. The pH values of the Cu(II) and Cd(II) solutions were adjusted within a range from 1 to 6, and the material was allowed to interact with the solutions for 120 minutes.
To determine the influence of the analyte concentration on the maximum adsorption capacity of the material, it was mechanically agitated with Cu(II) and Cd(II) solutions of different concentrations (1 to 400 mg L
-1). For these experiments, the pH of the Cu(II) and Cd(II) solutions was adjusted to around 5.5, and the stirring time of the material with these solutions was 120 minutes. All batch experiments were performed at a room temperature of approximately 25 °C. After determining the residual concentration of the metals in the diluted supernatants, the adsorption capacity for all experiments was calculated using equation (1):
where
ni is the initial number of millimoles of the metal ion in the solution,
ns is the number of millimoles of the metal ion in the supernatant after extraction, and
m is the mass of the adsorbent used (in grams).