Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections (PANDAS): Myth or Reality? The State of the Art on a Controversial Disease

Altmetrics

Downloads

135

Views

74

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

18 September 2023

Posted:

19 September 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections (PANDAS) is one of the most controversial diseases in pediatric rheumatology. Despite its first description being published more than 25 years ago as the sudden and rapid onset of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and/or tic disorder symptoms as complications of a Group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus (GAS) infection, precise epidemiological data are still lacking, and there are no strong recommendations for its treatment. Recent advances in the comprehension of PANDAS pathophysiology are largely attributable to animal model studies and the understanding of the roles of Ca++/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaM kinase) II, disrupted dopamine re-lease in the basal ganglia, and striatal cholinergic interneurons. The diagnosis of PANDAS should be made after an exclusion process and should include prepubescent children with a sudden onset of OCD and/or a tic disorder, with a relapsing/remitting disease course, a clear temporal association between GAS infection and onset or exacerbation of symptoms, and the association with other neurological abnormalities such as motoric hyperactivity and choreiform movements. Antibiotic medications are the primary therapeutic modality. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of randomized studies and validated data, resulting in a scarcity of solid recommendations.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

1. Introduction

Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections (PANDAS) is a subject that generates significant controversy within the fields of pediatric rheumatology and neurology. In 1998, Swedo et al. published the first description of a cohort of children with PANDAS, defining the disease as the sudden and rapid onset of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and/or tic disorder symptoms as complications of a Group A beta-haemolytic Streptococcus (GAS) infection [1]. The existence of the disease, its pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and classification criteria are a frequent point of debate, and physicians and academics often have divergent opinions. The discussed pathogenesis of PANDAS is primarily supported by evidence of neurological involvement in patients with Sydenham’s Chorea (SC). Unlike PANDAS, SC is universally acknowledged as a severe complication of GAS infections. In fact, the American Heart Association's 2015 revision to the Jones criteria for Acute Rheumatic Fever still includes SC among the major classification criteria for both high-risk and lower to moderate-risk populations. [2]. SC typically develops not simultaneously with GAS infection, but after a variable period of time, up to several months, spreading with involuntary movements of the limbs and trunk, frequently accompanied by muscle weakness and emotional instability [3]. Interestingly, a consistent subset of children with SC experiences OCD and tics; pointing a major point of connection with PANDAS, as well as the aforementioned issues [4,5,6]. However, there are some major points that must be specified regarding this topic. The absence of consensus in the medical literature is widely attributable to the lack of large randomized studies, the high incidence of both neuropsychiatric disorders (primarily tics, OCD, and emotional lability) and GAS infections in children, the frequent inability to establish clear temporal and causal correlations between GAS infection and the onset of symptoms, the consistent proportion of asymptomatic GAS carriers among children, and the insufficient data regarding the real efficacy of antibiotics in children with PANDAS, particularly in comparison to placebo or other types of drugs. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the most recent knowledge on PANDAS pathophysiology, clinical features, and therapeutic approaches. In addition, this paper aims to critically analyze both the evidence and lack of support for this discussed disease.

2. Epidemiology

There is a lack of precise data regarding the epidemiology of PANDAS. The challenges associated with understanding and diagnosing this condition primarily stem from intricate clinical presentations and the difficulty in establishing causal relationships. Undoubtedly, the prevalence of both GAS infections and OCD/tic disorders in children is noteworthy. While it is widely acknowledged that PANDAS is a condition of low occurrence, the precise prevalence and incidence rates remain uncertain [7,8,9,10]. According to the first description, the prevalence of the disease appears to be higher in males, with a male to female ratio estimated to be between 2.6 and 4.7 to 1. The mean age of symptom onset for children diagnosed with PANDAS and exhibiting tics is approximately 6.3 years, whereas those presenting with OCD tend to experience symptom onset at around 7.4 years of age [1]. Additionally, more recent research confirmed a male predominance [11].

3. Pathophysiology

Currently, the pathophysiology of PANDAS is still matter of debate. According to the latest accredited evidence, after a GAS infection, antibodies produced against GAS epitopes presumably cross-react against self-tissue such as proteins expressed in neurons of basal ganglia, through a molecular mimicry mechanism, suggesting an autoimmune pathogenesis, similar to SC [12]. Several functional studies and experiments tried to explain the immune pathophysiology of the disease, focusing on distinct neuronal targets, potentially involved in the complex interaction between Streptococcus and brain, building a model of autoantibody effect in the central nervous system. They include lysoganglioside, tubulin, dopamine 1 and 2 receptors (D1R, D2R) [13,14,15,16].

3.1. Animal model studies

Over the years, animal model studies have described how GAS infections (such as pharyngitis, skin, and/or soft tissue infections) could stimulate an immune response in mice, with the production of antibodies directed to brain tissue and the consequent development of neurological disorders. Specifically, the serum of mice previously immunized with GAS contained autoantibodies that reacted against cerebellar tissue. Contextually, mice presented movement and/or behavior disorders [13,17]. Furthermore, mice exposed to GAS antigens showed impaired food handling. Clinical features in mouse models were related to brain blood barrier (BBB) disruption with consequent autoantibody diffusion. Interestingly, lipopolysaccharide broke the BBB in vitro, suggesting that the bacterial infection could lead to its disruption in vivo [18,19]. Moreover, functional studies revealed a new promising target of GAS infection, showing that intrathecal passive transfer of antibodies extracted from sera of children with PANDAS interfered with the Ca++/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaM kinase) II activity, leading to an increased protein level. CaMKII is a multifactorial protein mainly involved in behavior control, learning and memory mechanisms, neuronal development, cortical excitability, neurotransmitter synthesis, and release. Its activity is strictly related to calcium intracellular and extracellular levels, and an increased CAMKII has been associated with tic and/or OCD in mouse models. Specifically, mice treated with PANDAS serum showed increased CAMKII levels with a consequent increase in tyrosine hydroxylase activity and dopamine release. This disrupted signaling led to the onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms in animal models, while mice treated with control sera didn’t manifest any abnormal behavior or CAMKII/dopamine release impairment. Of note, antineuronal antibodies appeared cross-reactive with antibodies directed to a GAS carbohydrate antigen, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosamine, presumably a crucial factor in GAS-mediated cellular signaling, with structure sequences similar to neuronal antigens [13,16]. CAMKII is considerably increased in SC while appearing slightly raised in PANDAS, suggesting that the different concentrations probably lead to neuropsychiatric and movement disorders in SC and isolated neuropsychiatric disorders in PANDAS. Indeed, CAMKII presents a high specificity of function, related to qualitative and/or quantitative changes. Interestingly, several studies suggested that the D2R represented the target of autoantibodies produced in PANDAS and SC, with subsequent development of choreiform movements and behavior disorders [14,17,18,19,20]. An experiment showed how the autoantibodies reacted with both intracellular and extracellular epitopes of D2R, and mice presented gait impairment with neuropsychiatric manifestations during in vivo tests. Specifically, the autoantibodies affected D2R neurons in the cortex and basal ganglia but didn’t manifest reactivity against D1R neurons [14]. This study differed from previous literature by excluding D1R from targets implicated in PANDAS physiopathology. Even though several neuronal targets have been identified to be involved in GAS-related disorders, these findings have never been consistently addressed.
The latest evidence arising from the literature is allowing for a growing comprehension of PANDAS pathogenesis. Nonetheless, as stated above, the first publication of a PANDAS cohort was made more than 25 years ago, and the authors already provided a good point of view in the discussion: "studies of SC revealed that obsessive-compulsive symptoms were common during the illness (present in nearly three-quarters of children) and had their onset shortly before the chorea began [...]. Based on these observations, we postulated that children might exhibit only tics or OCD if the "dose" of a presumed etiologic agent was not sufficient to cause frank chorea."[1].

3.2. Striatal cholinergic interneurons: latest evidence of a new key player in PANDAS pathophysiology

Presumably, the impairment of dopaminergic circuits in the basal ganglia, related to autoantibodies, could provoke the onset of extrapyramidal movement and/or neuropsychiatric symptoms, as occurs in other neurological diseases with a known pathogenesis. The last evidence attributed to a misidentified neuronal population plays a key role in PANDAS pathophysiology [21]. Specifically, the IgG of children with PANDAS, compared to age- and sex-matched controls, have been complexed with mouse cerebral slices, evaluating both in vivo and ex vivo bonding to substrates. Ribosomal S6 (RS6) protein has been used as a validated marker of neuronal activity [22]. Unlike previous studies, results have been replied in human brains, proving how 11 PANDAS sera showed high avidity binding to a newly identified neuronal population, striatal cholinergic interneurons (CINs). Over the years, functional studies have suggested that the bond between autoantibodies in children with PANDAS and CINs caused CINs activity inhibition. Notably, CINs loss of function has been previously involved in Tourette Syndrome pathogenesis and in repetitive behavioral disorders [23,24]. Experimental depletion of CINs in mice with normal neurodevelopment led to elevated grooming and repetitive behaviors. Furthermore, striatum postmortem analysis revealed a decreased expression of CINs-related genes in patients with Tourette syndrome. Interestingly, the IgG of children with PANDAS didn’t bind either GABAergic interneurons or medium spiny neurons expressing D1R-D2R, unlike what was previously reported. Thus, the only expression of D2R by CINs could explain the high avidity bond between IgG and CINs, sustaining the relevant role of DR2 in PANDAS pathophysiology compared with DR1. Interestingly, the same striatal mouse slices have been complexed with PANDAS and control sera after treatment with immunoglobulins (IVIg) ex vivo, using RS6 activity as a marker. A relevant decrease in the CINs-PANDAS IgG bond occurred, with a contextual clinical improvement. This suggests an immune pathogenesis with a pivotal role for neuroinflammation in the onset of GAS-related disorders.

3.3. Imaging studies

Imaging studies have been performed in children with PANDAS and revealed striatal involvement [25]. Specifically, a PET scan has been carried out to evaluate neuroinflammatory changes in the basal ganglia and thalamus in children with PANDAS clinically diagnosed. Using a target expressed in activated microglia, it was observed that the PANDAS group had more neuroinflammation in both the caudate and lentiform nuclei on both sides of the brain. Of note, after IVIg treatment, a relevant decrease in striatal neuroinflammation occurred. Furthermore, a neuroradiological study compared the brain magnetic resonance imaging of 34 children with PANDAS to that of 82 age- and sex-matched controls [26]. The sizes of the caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus, but not the thalamus or total cerebrum, were considerably greater in the group of children with PANDAS than in the healthy controls. These findings were consistent with what was previously found in subjects with SC compared with normal subjects, suggesting an inflammatory involvement antibody-related of the basal ganglia after GAS infection, with subsequent development of typical symptoms. Therefore, imaging studies confirmed the immune pathogenesis and the crucial role of basal ganglia neuroinflammation in children with PANDAS, as described in the latest clinical and functional studies.

3.4. The complex network of basal ganglia: from physiology to pathophysiology

Several theories tried to explain how neuroinflammation of the basal ganglia could lead to the onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms in children with PANDAS. Basal ganglia are subcortical nuclei deeply located in cerebral hemispheres and include the putamen, caudate, globus pallidus, and related structures such as the subthalamic nucleus (SN) in the diencephalon, the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), and the pedunculopontine nucleus in the mesencephalon [27]. Basal ganglia modulate motor learning and control, executive functions, behavior, and emotions. They include output, input, and intermediate nuclei. The input nuclei (striatum, nucleus accumbens, and olfactory tubercle) receive inputs from the cortex, thalamus, and SNc, while the output nuclei present as outputs in thalamocortical circuits and include the internal parts of the globus pallidus and substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr). Intermediate nuclei comprise SN and SNc. The integrity of basal ganglia circuits requires a physiological release of dopamine. Specifically, the striatum plays a key role in basal ganglia circuits, representing the great subcortical structure in the mammalian brain. It includes two types of neurons: projection neurons, also called medium-sized spiny neurons (MSNs, 90%), and interneurons (10%).
MSNs are GABAergic inhibitory neurons and include two distinct groups. One MSN group projects to the globus pallidus externus (GPe) through D2R, leading to the tonic inhibition of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and SNr (indirect pathway), while the second MSN group projects to GPi and SNr through D1R, suspending the tonic inhibition of GPi and SNr on their targets. This circuit constitutes the direct pathway that promotes elected motor programs (Figure 1) [28,29]. The most abundant interneurons are cholinergic. They use acetylcholine as their main neurotransmitter and are tonically active, modulating both MSNs and other GABAergic interneurons activity.
The striatum can be functionally subdivided into two compartments: the matrix and the striosomes. Cortical sensorimotor areas, dopaminergic, and thalamus-striatal inputs mainly project to the matrix, while cortical limbic areas and the basolateral amygdala project to striosomes. Cholinergic interneurons present an associative function, integrating synaptic inputs [28]. Indeed, their dendrites project both to the matrix and striosomes, while axon projections are limited to the matrix and mainly target MSNs [22,30,31].
Over the years, the traditional model of basal ganglia physiology has been a matter of debate. Originally, it was understood as a two-pathway (direct and indirect) system where the basal ganglia modulated cortical projections with facilitation or inhibition of movement programs through dopamine and acetylcholine release. There is now a better appreciation for other basal ganglia functions such as attention and time estimation, implicit learning and habit formation, reward-related behavior, and emotions. Indeed, they relate to cortical and subcortical areas through several loops that constitute a complex network. This structure can simultaneously facilitate and inhibit different inputs belonging to the motor, associative, limbic, and emotional domains [27]. An activity gradient could potentially modulate dopamine release during signaling. Specifically, the fast dopamine release leads to the interruption of the tonic activity of cholinergic interneurons that facilitate cortico-striatal transmission. They act by modulating the cortical output through the stimulation of one MSNs pool and the inhibition of concurrent inputs at the same time. Cholinergic interneurons are well located to modulate information processing in the basal ganglia. They regulate the activity of MSNs and their D1 and D2 expression, both directly and through interactions with glutamate and dopamine release, and modulate the activity of GABAergic interneurons [28]. They work through muscarinic (M) and nicotinic (nAChR) receptors and get excitatory glutamatergic inputs from the cerebral cortex and intralaminar nuclei of the thalamus. M2/M4 autoreceptors and presynaptic D2 dopaminergic receptors both inhibit their activity. The acetylcholine release leads to MSNs activation through M1 receptors, increasing the excitability of MSNs and the indirect pathway. By contrast, activation of postsynaptic M4 receptors inhibits these neurons, stimulating the direct pathway. Furthermore, nAChRs lead to dopamine release, whereas M2/M4 inhibit it at the presynaptic level [28,32]. Interestingly, cholinergic disruption in the dorsal striatum may thus produce an imbalance between the direct and indirect pathways through the basal ganglia, leading to disinhibition of off-target behaviors. Specifically, tics, obsessions, and compulsions have been associated with hyperactivity of the direct pathway concerning motor and limbic domains. In mouse models, cholinergic transmission interrupted stereotypies, and the administration of the D2 antagonist raclopride led to an increase in acetylcholine, with the same result. By contrast, local blockade of muscarinic receptors or neurotoxin-induced degeneration of cholinergic interneurons worsened the motor stereotypes [33]. These results suggest a critical role for cholinergic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of movement and behavioral disorders that affect the basal ganglia network. The identification of a novel neuronal population (CINs) involved in GAS-related disorders sheds light on a greater clarification of PANDAS pathophysiology with prognostic and therapeutic implications (Figure 2). Moreover, validated molecular targets could help highlight new diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers. However, the specificity of the CINs-IgG bond and the neuroinflammation pattern should be elucidated.

4. Clinical features and classification criteria

The working PANDAS classification criteria require all of the following [1]:
(1)
Presence of OCD and/or a tic disorder;
(2)
Prepubertal symptom onset;
(3)
Acute onset of symptoms with a relapsing/remitting disease course;
(4)
A clear temporal association between GAS infection and symptoms’ onset or exacerbation;
(5)
Association with other neurological abnormalities (particularly motoric hyperactivity and choreiform movements).
The diagnosis of PANDAS is based only on clinical criteria, requiring a critical exclusionary diagnostic process to other psychiatric and neurological disorders. Several studies attempted to establish the differences between PANDAS and other psychiatric disorders. However, the similarities between OCD and tics in PANDAS and non-PANDAS disorders are notable. The lack of identifiable biological markers or distinct clinical characteristics continues to raise doubts and provoke controversy over the accuracy of diagnoses [8,12,34,35,36]. Working criteria for PANDAS were improved in 2017: OCD and/or tics should be complex or not observable in other disorders, a specific age should be considered (symptoms of PANDAS are more common between the age of 3 years and puberty), acute onset and episodic changes in behaviour should be both present, the association with GAS infection should be clearly proved, and neurological impairment should coexist [37,38].

4.1. The causal and temporal relationship associated with GAS infection

The relationship between GAS infections and PANDAS or other neuropsychiatric manifestations is still debatable. A large case-control study was conducted in 2005 on about 75,000 children aged 4 to 13 years old. Individuals diagnosed with OCD, Tourette syndrome, or tic disorder exhibited a higher probability of having experienced a previous GAS infection within the three months preceding the onset of symptoms in comparison to the control group, while children who experienced multiple streptococcal infections within a 12-month period had a significantly higher risk. The observed associations remained largely consistent even when the analysis was restricted to cases with a clearly defined date of symptom onset or when the matching criteria for health care behaviour were more stringent. The authors conclude that their findings lend epidemiologic evidence that PANDAS may arise as a result of a postinfectious autoimmune phenomenon induced by childhood streptococcal infection [39].
In a large prospective study of 814 patients with sore throat aiming to determine the characteristics of PANDAS patients, children who were diagnosed with a GAS infection and subsequently received treatment for their infection did not exhibit a higher likelihood of developing PANDAS, in comparison to children who were presumed to have a viral illness or were in good health [7].
Another longitudinal study, which was published in 2007, involved a sample of 693 children. The study's findings indicated that there were observable motor and behavioural changes that occurred in association with a positive GAS culture. Moreover, the study provided support for the notion that repeated GAS exposure increases the risk of these changes [40].
In 2017, a population-based cohort study focusing on the risk of mental disorders was performed through data from the nationwide Danish registers, including more than 1 million children [41]. Individuals who were diagnosed with streptococcal infection demonstrated an increased vulnerability to a range of mental disorders, particularly OCD to a greater extent, and tic disorders to a lower extent, in comparison to individuals who did not undergo testing for streptococcal infection. Moreover, the likelihood of developing any neuropsychiatric disorder was found to be higher following a streptococcal throat infection compared to a nonstreptococcal infection. However, it is worth noting that individuals who have a nonstreptococcal throat infection also exhibit a heightened susceptibility to developing any form of mental disorder [41].
However, additional studies have reached divergent results, making the relationship between GAS infection and neuropsychiatric disorders, including PANDAS, still debatable [7,42,43,44].
There exist three primary approaches for ascertaining the presence of a GAS infection. In general, the identification of a concurrent throat infection, such as pharyngitis or pharyngotonsillitis, is accomplished through the utilization of a throat swab. Both a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) and a culture test can be utilized in this context. The RADT offers advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness and efficiency, whereas the culture test is considered to be more sensible but also entails higher expenses and longer processing times. An inaccurate acquisition of the sample may lead to false negative results, especially in young children, such as infants and toddlers, who may not willingly comply with the invasive nature of the testing procedure [45,46,47]. However, GAS may cause only paucisymptomatic throat infections (without the execution of a throat swab) or, in addition to the pharynx and tonsils, may affect the skin, nasal cavity, perineum, and genitals [48]. GAS may cause infections in these regions, causing scarlatiniform rash, impetigo, deep tissue infiltration, and perianal or genital dermatitis [49]. Recent GAS infections may be detected with a blood test investigating increased anti-streptolysin-O (ASO) or anti-DNase B (ADB) titres [45,46]. It may be challenging to correctly interpret ASO and ADB titres. Indeed, the onset and duration of these biomarkers are distinct. After a GAS infection, ASO typically begins to rise after 1 week and peaks 3 to 5 weeks later, decreasing after 6 to 8 weeks, staying elevated for about 6 months or more [50].
ADB usually rises slightly later than ASO, about 2 weeks after GAS infection, peaks 6 to 8 weeks later and begins to decline about 3 months after the infection (Figure 3).
Thus, a concomitant or recent GAS infection must be documented before making a diagnosis of PANDAS.
There are some additional considerations that should be made:
(1)
GAS infection are common issues among children attending communities and schools;
(2)
In a similar way, vocal and/or motor tics and OCD are not uncommon in children;
(3)
ASO and ADB may be found elevated also in older GAS infections, resulting in false-positive tests.
(4)
ASO may rise due to chronic liver disease, hypergammaglobulinemia, hypercholesterolemia [50].
In patients with a suspicion of PANDAS, performing repeated tests (throat swabs, ASO, and ADB) appears to be the best way to evaluate the relationship between clinical manifestations and GAS infections. Indeed, flares ought to be correlated with a positive throat swab or an increase in ASO/ADB titres relative to previous wellness analysis [51].Nevertheless, discerning the correlation between a disease flare and a GAS infection can prove challenging, primarily due to the lack of swab or blood sample procedures in routine clinical practice. This limitation may arise from the suboptimal adherence by patients and families.

4.2. Clinical characteristics

PANDAS predominantly manifests during a specific developmental stage in childhood, typically observed between the ages of 3 years and the onset of puberty. Moreover, the incidence of PANDAS is notably higher among males [37,52]. The occurrence of PANDAS at an early age is linked to the period when the rate of exposure to GAS is at its peak [37]. Children impacted by PANDAS exhibit notable and expeditious alterations in their behaviour, showing psychotic symptoms within a timeframe ranging from 24 to 72 hours [53]. Following this, the clinical trajectory can be described as exhibiting a "sawtooth" pattern, wherein periods of symptom inactivity are interspersed with episodes of exacerbation that manifest suddenly and resolve gradually over a span of weeks to months [1,12,54].
The symptoms commonly associated with PANDAS encompass a sudden and pronounced emergence of OCD, accompanied by tics, hyperactivity, urinary urgency, impulsivity, anxiety, impulsiveness, eating disorders, and a notable deterioration in academic performance, as well as a decline in handwriting proficiency [55,56]. The extended duration of the streptococcal infection may exacerbate the clinical outcome [37]. On average, the severity of anxiety and other mood symptoms tends to be higher in comparison to somatic and functional symptoms, such as gastric pain and arthromyalgia [11]. Psychiatric comorbidities observed within PANDAS cohorts encompass attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) at a prevalence rate of 40%, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) also at a prevalence rate of 40%, and depression at a prevalence rate of 36%. According to the literature, additional symptoms may include emotional labiality at a rate of 66%, personality changes at 54%, bedtime fears at 50%, fidgetiness at 50%, sensory defensiveness at 40%, irritability at 40%, and impulsivity and distraction at 38%. The prevalence of anorexia and dietary limitations was comparatively lower, affecting approximately 10-20% of individuals. However, these conditions frequently resulted in substantial weight reduction and posed significant health hazards [1,57]. Enuresis, occurring in 20% of cases, and dysthymia, observed in 12% of cases, are less frequently encountered while also urinary urgency and dysuria have been reported [1,57,58]. It is not uncommon for individuals to exhibit behavioural changes resembling those associated with ADHD as a result of concurrent or previous infections caused by GAS [7]. Up to 95% of patients diagnosed with PANDAS exhibit choreiform movements bearing resemblance to those observed in SC, but are not present at rest and are always elicited by stressed postures [1,57]. However, SC is characterized by more severe obsessive-compulsive syndromes and the presence of hypotonia. Additionally, SC typically exhibits complete remissions and a duration of less than one year. On the other hand, the course of PANDAS is more likely to be chronic, with an average remission period of 3.3 years [3,59,60]. Furthermore, it was noted that a majority of children, approximately 72%, exhibited at least one instance of worsened PANDAS symptoms during the course of gradual remission in a period of 6–57 months of follow-up [61].
Numerous studies have tried to ascertain the existence of distinct clinical characteristics in PANDAS in contrast to OCD or tics without a PANDAS association. Nevertheless, there have been no significant clinical differentiations identified between these two cohorts, with the exception of the observation that children diagnosed with PANDAS commonly manifest psychiatric conditions beyond tic disorder or OCD [62,63,64]. The research conducted by Bernstein et al. in 2010 confirmed that children diagnosed with PANDAS demonstrated an increased probability of manifesting symptoms including separation anxiety, urinary urgency, hyperactivity, impulsivity, deterioration in handwriting, and decline in school achievement during the initial phases of the illness. This was in comparison to children diagnosed with non-PANDAS OCD. Moreover, in a study conducted by Murphy et al., it was shown that children diagnosed with Pediatric Autoimmune PANDAS demonstrated a higher frequency and intensity of tic symptoms in comparison to other individuals [55,62].
Furthermore, the caregivers of patients with PANDAS encounter heightened levels of anxiety, stress, and depression [65].
The aforementioned studies did not yield conclusive evidence supporting the presence of distinct phenomenological features specific to PANDAS. Due to the challenges associated with diagnosis, it is evident that a more refined definition of PANDAS syndrome is necessary in order to establish more accurate diagnostic guidelines and indications.

5. Treatment options and disease course

Antibiotic medications serve as the primary therapeutic modality for pediatric patients diagnosed with PANDAS. Nevertheless, it is important to emphasize that there is a dearth of randomized studies and validated data in comparison to placebo, resulting in a lack of robust recommendations. Furthermore, there are not currently established guidelines regarding the right choice of antibiotics for administration. In clinical practice, the selection of an antibiotic is primarily based on individual experience, patient and family preferences, and limited non-randomized studies.
According to the literature, beta-lactam antibiotics (mainly cephalosporins), azithromycin, and clindamycin may be all useful for affected patients [58]. However, some experts discourage the use of amoxicillin in PANDAS because it does not exhibit enhanced intracellular permeation and only demonstrates its activity during bacterial cell division.
As stated above, there are only a few of randomized trials evaluating the different treatment strategies in children with PANDAS [66].
The first study, conducted in 1999, employed a double-blind, balanced cross-over design and involved a sample of 37 patients diagnosed with PANDAS. Although there was a modest effectiveness observed in antibiotic medications, this study did not provide statistical evidence of improvements in children receiving penicillin V prophylaxis compared to those receiving a placebo, following an 8-month follow-up period. It is worth noting that there was an equivalent incidence of infections observed in both the treatment and placebo groups, and no significant alterations were observed in the severity of OCD or tic symptoms [67].
A subsequent study conducted in 2005 demonstrated notable advancements in the reduction of both GAS infections and neuropsychiatric symptoms among patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis using penicillin or azithromycin, as observed during a one-year follow-up period. However, a comparison between the treated group and a placebo group was not conducted, and the baseline period was retrospectively evaluated [68].
Patients suffering from PANDAS usually show a dramatic resolution of their symptoms after antibiotic administration despite the frequent relapsing of a consistent group of them. Indeed, according to a small observational study on 12 PANDAS patients, about 50% of them may have one or more recurrence, triggered by a GAS infection, in a follow-up period of 3 years [58]. The same authors, in a following study, observed that children with PANDAS exhibited a statistically significant higher likelihood of experiencing a remission of neuropsychiatric symptoms when undergoing antibiotic therapy, as compared to individuals without PANDAS [62].
Although there is a lack of high-quality data, it is plausible the risk of recurrence could be associated with the frequency of GAS infections prior to the onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms [58].
According to a larger number of authors, the presence of untreated GAS infection has been observed to potentially induce OCD and tic disorders within a specific subset of the pediatric population [7,66,69]. Moreover, additional research has documented the favorable effectiveness of antibiotics in individuals diagnosed with PANDAS or those exhibiting symptoms suggestive of the condition. These findings have also indicated a high level of patient satisfaction with the antibiotic treatment [70].
In another prospective study including a cohort of 120 children diagnosed with PANDAS, a comparison was made between 56 individuals who underwent tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy and 64 un-operated controls. Over a period of more than two years, the group that underwent surgery did not exhibit any significant differences compared to the control group in terms of the progression of symptoms, levels of streptococcal and neuronal antibodies, or the severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms. According to the authors, the criteria for performing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy should be restricted to those that are endorsed for the broader community, including conditions like sleep-disordered breathing or recurrent GAS infections [71].
Psychological, behavioral, and psychopharmacological therapies that are customized to suit the specific characteristics of each child can lead to a reduction in symptoms and an enhancement in overall functioning, both in the short-term and long-term phases of the illness. Typically, evidence-based therapies are suitable for addressing the many symptoms associated with PANDAS. The presence of individual variations in anticipated reaction to psychiatric medicine may necessitate a significant decrease in the initial dosage of treatment [38].
According to a considerable number of placebo-controlled studies, immunomodulatory therapy (IVIg and plasmapheresis) may be helpful in PANDAS and in children with infection-triggered OCD and tic disorders [72,73,74,75,76]. However, results are still controversial, and other studies failed to demonstrate considerable improvement compared to placebo [77]. Broader studies should be performed to clarify this aspect.
Corticosteroids, rituximab, and mycophenolate mofetil have also been evaluated for a possible role in the treatment of PANDAS [73].
However, given the significant implications of immunologic factors in the pathogenesis of PANDAS, there has been a growing interest among allergists and immunologists in exploring this disease [78].
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment options for PANDAS patients has recently been published in 2022 [79]. In contrast to previous observations, the authors' analysis suggests that surgical intervention in specific patient populations has the potential to yield favorable outcomes [71,79,80]. However, the efficacy of medical therapy is still a subject of debate in academic circles, primarily due to the absence of universally accepted treatment guidelines and the variability in patient response based on the specific medication employed and the timing of its administration [79].
Furthermore, the implementation of a short-term trial of prophylactic antibiotics can contribute to the diagnostic process by assessing the presence of reduced symptomatology following their administration.

6. Conclusions

Despite significant advancements in the understanding of the pathogenesis and therapeutic management of affected children, PANDAS remains a subject of dispute among experts. The controversial issues discussed in this paper can primarily be attributed to the challenges associated with establishing a definitive and timely correlation between the occurrence or recurrence of OCD and tic disorder in children who experience multiple GAS infections. Furthermore, it is important to note that the existing research examining the effectiveness of treatment techniques suffers from limitations in terms of sample size and rigorous inclusion criteria, which consequently hinders the ability to provide robust recommendations. Additional research is required to enhance our comprehension of the real prevalence of the disease, the precise pathogenic pathways involved, and the appropriate evidence-based methodology for its treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation and editing, creation of the figures: SLB, GS, MR, ADL, FM. Supervision, revision, and approval of the final version of the paper: MA, FC, AS, LB. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Swedo, S.E.; Leonard, H.L.; Garvey, M.; Mittleman, B.; Allen, A.J.; Perlmutter, S.; Dow, S.; Zamkoff, J.; Dubbert, B.K.; Lougee, L. Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated With Streptococcal Infections: Clinical Description of the First 50 Cases. Am. J. Psychiatry 1998, 155, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gewitz, M.H.; Baltimore, R.S.; Tani, L.Y.; Sable, C.A.; Shulman, S.T.; Carapetis, J.; Remenyi, B.; Taubert, K.A.; Bolger, A.F.; Beerman, L.; et al. Revision of the Jones Criteria for the Diagnosis of Acute Rheumatic Fever in the Era of Doppler Echocardiography: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015, 131, 1806–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Oosterveer, D.M.; Overweg-Plandsoen, W.C.T.; Roos, R.A.C. Sydenham’s Chorea: A Practical Overview of the Current Literature. Pediatr. Neurol. 2010, 43, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, S.W.; Grant, J.E.; Kim, S.I.; Swanson, T.A.; Bernstein, G.A.; Jaszcz, W.B.; Williams, K.A.; Schlievert, P.M. A Possible Association of Recurrent Streptococcal Infections and Acute Onset of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2004, 16, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cardoso, F. Sydenham’s Chorea. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2011, 100, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mercadante, M.T.; Campos, M.C.; Marques-Dias, M.J.; Miguel, E.C.; Leckman, J. Vocal Tics in Sydenham’s Chorea. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 1997, 36, 305–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Perrin, E.M.; Murphy, M.L.; Casey, J.R.; Pichichero, M.E.; Runyan, D.K.; Miller, W.C.; Snider, L.A.; Swedo, S.E. Does Group A β-Hemolytic Streptococcal Infection Increase Risk for Behavioral and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Children? Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2004, 158, 848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chiarello, F.; Spitoni, S.; Hollander, E.; Matucci Cerinic, M.; Pallanti, S. An Expert Opinion on PANDAS/PANS: Highlights and Controversies. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pract. 2017, 21, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wilbur, C.; Bitnun, A.; Kronenberg, S.; Laxer, R.M.; Levy, D.M.; Logan, W.J.; Shouldice, M.; Yeh, E.A. PANDAS/PANS in Childhood: Controversies and Evidence. Paediatr. Child Health 2019, 24, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Prato, A.; Gulisano, M.; Scerbo, M.; Barone, R.; Vicario, C.M.; Rizzo, R. Diagnostic Approach to Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated With Streptococcal Infections (PANDAS): A Narrative Review of Literature Data. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Calaprice, D.; Tona, J.; Parker-Athill, E.C.; Murphy, T.K. A Survey of Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome Characteristics and Course. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2017, 27, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Swedo, S.E.; Leonard, H.L.; Rapoport, J.L. The Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated With Streptococcal Infection (PANDAS) Subgroup: Separating Fact From Fiction. Pediatrics 2004, 113, 907–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cunningham, M.W.; Cox, C.J. Autoimmunity against Dopamine Receptors in Neuropsychiatric and Movement Disorders: A Review of Sydenham Chorea and Beyond. Acta Physiol. 2016, 216, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cox, C.J.; Sharma, M.; Leckman, J.F.; Zuccolo, J.; Zuccolo, A.; Kovoor, A.; Swedo, S.E.; Cunningham, M.W. Brain Human Monoclonal Autoantibody from Sydenham Chorea Targets Dopaminergic Neurons in Transgenic Mice and Signals Dopamine D2 Receptor: Implications in Human Disease. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950 2013, 191, 5524–5541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ben-Pazi, H.; Stoner, J.A.; Cunningham, M.W. Dopamine Receptor Autoantibodies Correlate with Symptoms in Sydenham’s Chorea. PloS One 2013, 8, e73516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kirvan, C.A.; Swedo, S.E.; Heuser, J.S.; Cunningham, M.W. Mimicry and Autoantibody-Mediated Neuronal Cell Signaling in Sydenham Chorea. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hoffman, K.L.; Hornig, M.; Yaddanapudi, K.; Jabado, O.; Lipkin, W.I. A Murine Model for Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Group A Beta-Hemolytic Streptococcal Infection. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 1780–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yaddanapudi, K.; Hornig, M.; Serge, R.; De Miranda, J.; Baghban, A.; Villar, G.; Lipkin, W.I. Passive Transfer of Streptococcus-Induced Antibodies Reproduces Behavioral Disturbances in a Mouse Model of Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infection. Mol. Psychiatry 2010, 15, 712–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Brimberg, L.; Benhar, I.; Mascaro-Blanco, A.; Alvarez, K.; Lotan, D.; Winter, C.; Klein, J.; Moses, A.E.; Somnier, F.E.; Leckman, J.F.; et al. Behavioral, Pharmacological, and Immunological Abnormalities after Streptococcal Exposure: A Novel Rat Model of Sydenham Chorea and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Neuropsychopharmacol. Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 37, 2076–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Dale, R.C.; Merheb, V.; Pillai, S.; Wang, D.; Cantrill, L.; Murphy, T.K.; Ben-Pazi, H.; Varadkar, S.; Aumann, T.D.; Horne, M.K.; et al. Antibodies to Surface Dopamine-2 Receptor in Autoimmune Movement and Psychiatric Disorders. Brain 2012, 135, 3453–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Xu, J.; Liu, R.-J.; Fahey, S.; Frick, L.; Leckman, J.; Vaccarino, F.; Duman, R.S.; Williams, K.; Swedo, S.; Pittenger, C. Antibodies From Children With PANDAS Bind Specifically to Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons and Alter Their Activity. Am. J. Psychiatry 2021, 178, 48–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bertran-Gonzalez, J.; Chieng, B.C.; Laurent, V.; Valjent, E.; Balleine, B.W. Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons Display Activity-Related Phosphorylation of Ribosomal Protein S6. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e53195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lennington, J.B.; Coppola, G.; Kataoka-Sasaki, Y.; Fernandez, T.V.; Palejev, D.; Li, Y.; Huttner, A.; Pletikos, M.; Sestan, N.; Leckman, J.F.; et al. Transcriptome Analysis of the Human Striatum in Tourette Syndrome. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 79, 372–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kataoka, Y.; Kalanithi, P.S.A.; Grantz, H.; Schwartz, M.L.; Saper, C.; Leckman, J.F.; Vaccarino, F.M. Decreased Number of Parvalbumin and Cholinergic Interneurons in the Striatum of Individuals with Tourette Syndrome. J. Comp. Neurol. 2010, 518, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kumar, A.; Williams, M.T.; Chugani, H.T. Evaluation of Basal Ganglia and Thalamic Inflammation in Children With Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated With Streptococcal Infection and Tourette Syndrome: A Positron Emission Tomographic (PET) Study Using 11 C-[R]-PK11195. J. Child Neurol. 2015, 30, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Giedd, J.N.; Rapoport, J.L.; Garvey, M.A.; Perlmutter, S.; Swedo, S.E. MRI Assessment of Children with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder or Tics Associated with Streptococcal Infection. Am. J. Psychiatry 2000, 157, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fazl, A.; Fleisher, J. Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Syndromes of the Basal Ganglia: A Brief Review. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol. 2018, 25, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Benarroch, E.E. Effects of Acetylcholine in the Striatum: Recent Insights and Therapeutic Implications. Neurology 2012, 79, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. DeLong, M.; Wichmann, T. Update on Models of Basal Ganglia Function and Dysfunction. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2009, 15, S237–S240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Graybiel, A.M. Neurochemically Specified Subsystems in the Basal Ganglia. In Novartis Foundation Symposia; Evered, D., O’Connor, M., Eds.; Wiley, 1984; pp. 114–149. ISBN 978-0-470-66425-4.
  31. Van Vulpen, E.H.S.; Van Der Kooy, D. Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons: Birthdates Predict Compartmental Localization. Dev. Brain Res. 1998, 109, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Oldenburg, I.A.; Ding, J.B. Cholinergic Modulation of Synaptic Integration and Dendritic Excitability in the Striatum. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2011, 21, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Aliane, V.; Pérez, S.; Bohren, Y.; Deniau, J.-M.; Kemel, M.-L. Key Role of Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons in Processes Leading to Arrest of Motor Stereotypies. Brain 2011, 134, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kilbertus, S.; Brannan, R.; Sell, E.; Doja, A. No Cases of PANDAS on Follow-Up of Patients Referred to a Pediatric Movement Disorders Clinic. Front. Pediatr. 2014, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jaspers-Fayer, F.; Han, S.H.J.; Chan, E.; McKenney, K.; Simpson, A.; Boyle, A.; Ellwyn, R.; Stewart, S.E. Prevalence of Acute-Onset Subtypes in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2017, 27, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gamucci, A.; Uccella, S.; Sciarretta, L.; D’Apruzzo, M.; Calevo, M.G.; Mancardi, M.M.; Veneselli, E.; De Grandis, E. PANDAS and PANS: Clinical, Neuropsychological, and Biological Characterization of a Monocentric Series of Patients and Proposal for a Diagnostic Protocol. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2019, 29, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Baj, J.; Sitarz, E.; Forma, A.; Wróblewska, K.; Karakuła-Juchnowicz, H. Alterations in the Nervous System and Gut Microbiota after β-Hemolytic Streptococcus Group A Infection—Characteristics and Diagnostic Criteria of PANDAS Recognition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Thienemann, M.; Murphy, T.; Leckman, J.; Shaw, R.; Williams, K.; Kapphahn, C.; Frankovich, J.; Geller, D.; Bernstein, G.; Chang, K.; et al. Clinical Management of Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome: Part I—Psychiatric and Behavioral Interventions. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2017, 27, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mell, L.K.; Davis, R.L.; Owens, D. Association between Streptococcal Infection and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Tourette’s Syndrome, and Tic Disorder. Pediatrics 2005, 116, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Murphy, T.K.; Snider, L.A.; Mutch, P.J.; Harden, E.; Zaytoun, A.; Edge, P.J.; Storch, E.A.; Yang, M.C.K.; Mann, G.; Goodman, W.K.; et al. Relationship of Movements and Behaviors to Group A Streptococcus Infections in Elementary School Children. Biol. Psychiatry 2007, 61, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Orlovska, S.; Vestergaard, C.H.; Bech, B.H.; Nordentoft, M.; Vestergaard, M.; Benros, M.E. Association of Streptococcal Throat Infection With Mental Disorders: Testing Key Aspects of the PANDAS Hypothesis in a Nationwide Study. JAMA Psychiatry 2017, 74, 740–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Leckman, J.F.; King, R.A.; Gilbert, D.L.; Coffey, B.J.; Singer, H.S.; Dure, L.S.; Grantz, H.; Katsovich, L.; Lin, H.; Lombroso, P.J.; et al. Streptococcal Upper Respiratory Tract Infections and Exacerbations of Tic and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms: A Prospective Longitudinal Study. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2011, 50, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kurlan, R.; Johnson, D.; Kaplan, E.L. ; and the Tourette Syndrome Study Group Streptococcal Infection and Exacerbations of Childhood Tics and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms: A Prospective Blinded Cohort Study. Pediatrics 2008, 121, 1188–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nielsen, M.Ø.; Köhler-Forsberg, O.; Hjorthøj, C.; Benros, M.E.; Nordentoft, M.; Orlovska-Waast, S. Streptococcal Infections and Exacerbations in PANDAS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2019, 38, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Delice, S. Detection of Anti- DNase B Antibody Upper Normal Values in Children’s Age Groups Who Were Admitted to Hospital with Noninfectious Reasons. North. Clin. Istanb. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sen, E.S.; Ramanan, A.V. How to Use Antistreptolysin O Titre. Arch. Dis. Child. - Educ. Pract. Ed. 2014, 99, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cohen, J.F.; Bertille, N.; Cohen, R.; Chalumeau, M. Rapid Antigen Detection Test for Group A Streptococcus in Children with Pharyngitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chang, K.; Frankovich, J.; Cooperstock, M.; Cunningham, M.W.; Latimer, M.E.; Murphy, T.K.; Pasternack, M.; Thienemann, M.; Williams, K.; Walter, J.; et al. Clinical Evaluation of Youth with Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome (PANS): Recommendations from the 2013 PANS Consensus Conference. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2015, 25, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Feigin & Cherry’s Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases; Feigin, R.D., Ed.; 6th ed.; Saunders/Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, 2009. ISBN 978-1-4160-4044-6.
  50. Shet, A.; Kaplan, E.L. Clinical Use and Interpretation of Group A Streptococcal Antibody Tests: A Practical Approach for the Pediatrician or Primary Care Physician. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2002, 21, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Johnson, D.R.; Kurlan, R.; Leckman, J.; Kaplan, E.L. The Human Immune Response to Streptococcal Extracellular Antigens: Clinical, Diagnostic, and Potential Pathogenetic Implications. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jadah, R.H.S.; Mujeeb, A.A. Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Following Sore Throat in a Young Boy. BMJ Case Rep. 2019, 12, e227540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Murphy, T.K.; Kurlan, R.; Leckman, J. The Immunobiology of Tourette’s Disorder, Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcus, and Related Disorders: A Way Forward. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2010, 20, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Allen, A.J.; Leonard, H.L.; Swedo, S.E. Case Study: A New Infection-Triggered, Autoimmune Subtype of Pediatric OCD and Tourette’s Syndrome. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 1995, 34, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bernstein, G.A.; Victor, A.M.; Pipal, A.J.; Williams, K.A. Comparison of Clinical Characteristics of Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections and Childhood Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2010, 20, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Calkin, C.V.; Carandang, C.G. Certain Eating Disorders May Be a Neuropsychiatric Manifestation of PANDAS: Case Report. J. Can. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2007, 16, 132–135. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Williams, K.A.; Swedo, S.E. Post-Infectious Autoimmune Disorders: Sydenham’s Chorea, PANDAS and Beyond. Brain Res. 2015, 1617, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Murphy, M.L.; Pichichero, M.E. Prospective Identification and Treatment of Children With Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorder Associated With Group A Streptococcal Infection (PANDAS). Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2002, 156, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Crealey, M.; Allen, N.M.; Webb, D.; Bouldin, A.; Mc Sweeney, N.; Peake, D.; Tirupathi, S.; Butler, K.; King, M.D. Sydenham’s Chorea: Not Gone but Perhaps Forgotten. Arch. Dis. Child. 2015, 100, 1160–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Murphy, T.K.; Goodman, W.K.; Ayoub, E.M.; Voeller, K.K. On Defining Sydenham’s Chorea: Where Do We Draw the Line? Biol. Psychiatry 2000, 47, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Leon, J.; Hommer, R.; Grant, P.; Farmer, C.; D’Souza, P.; Kessler, R.; Williams, K.; Leckman, J.F.; Swedo, S. Longitudinal Outcomes of Children with Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorder Associated with Streptococcal Infections (PANDAS). Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2018, 27, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Murphy, T.K.; Storch, E.A.; Lewin, A.B.; Edge, P.J.; Goodman, W.K. Clinical Factors Associated with Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections. J. Pediatr. 2012, 160, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Leckman, J.F.; King, R.A.; Gilbert, D.L.; Coffey, B.J.; Singer, H.S.; Dure Iv, L.S.; Grantz, H.; Katsovich, L.; Lin, H.; Lombroso, P.J. Streptococcal Upper Respiratory Tract Infections and Exacerbations of Tic and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms: A Prospective Longitudinal Study. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2011, 50, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Orefici, G.; Cardona, F.; Cox, C.J.; Cunningham, M.W. Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections (PANDAS). In Streptococcus pyogenes : Basic Biology to Clinical Manifestations [Internet]; University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 2016.
  65. O’Dor, S.L.; Homayoun, S.; Downer, O.M.; Hamel, M.A.; Zagaroli, J.S.; Williams, K.A. A Survey of Demographics, Symptom Course, Family History, and Barriers to Treatment in Children with Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorder Associated with Streptococcal Infections. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2022, 32, 476–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Burchi, E.; Pallanti, S. Antibiotics for PANDAS? Limited Evidence: Review and Putative Mechanisms of Action. Prim. Care Companion CNS Disord. 2018, 20, 17r02232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Garvey, M.A.; Perlmutter, S.J.; Allen, A.J.; Hamburger, S.; Lougee, L.; Leonard, H.L.; Witowski, M.E.; Dubbert, B.; Swedo, S.E. A Pilot Study of Penicillin Prophylaxis for Neuropsychiatric Exacerbations Triggered by Streptococcal Infections. Biol. Psychiatry 1999, 45, 1564–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Snider, L.A.; Lougee, L.; Slattery, M.; Grant, P.; Swedo, S.E. Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Azithromycin or Penicillin for Childhood-Onset Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 2005, 57, 788–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wang, H.-C.; Lau, C.-I.; Lin, C.-C.; Chang, A.; Kao, C.-H. Group A Streptococcal Infections Are Associated With Increased Risk of Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Taiwanese Population-Based Cohort Study. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2016, 77, e848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hesselmark, E.; Bejerot, S. Patient Satisfaction and Treatments Offered to Swedish Patients with Suspected Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome and Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2019, 29, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pavone, P.; Rapisarda, V.; Serra, A.; Nicita, F.; Spalice, A.; Parano, E.; Rizzo, R.; Maiolino, L.; Di Mauro, P.; Vitaliti, G.; et al. Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorder Associated with Group a Streptococcal Infection: The Role of Surgical Treatment. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2014, 27, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Perlmutter, S.J.; Leitman, S.F.; Garvey, M.A.; Hamburger, S.; Feldman, E.; Leonard, H.L.; Swedo, S.E. Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Tic Disorders in Childhood. Lancet Lond. Engl. 1999, 354, 1153–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Frankovich, J.; Swedo, S.; Murphy, T.; Dale, R.C.; Agalliu, D.; Williams, K.; Daines, M.; Hornig, M.; Chugani, H.; Sanger, T.; et al. Clinical Management of Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome: Part II-Use of Immunomodulatory Therapies. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2017, 27, 574–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tucker, D.M.; Leckman, J.F.; Scahill, L.; Wilf, G.E.; LaCamera, R.; Cardona, L.; Cohen, P.; Heidmann, S.; Goldstein, J.; Judge, J.; et al. A Putative Poststreptococcal Case of OCD with Chronic Tic Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 1996, 35, 1684–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Beşiroğlu, L.; Ağargün, M.Y.; Ozbebit, O.; Sözen, M.; Dilek, I.; Güleç, M. [Therapeutic response to plasmapheresis in four cases with obsessive-compulsive disorder and tic disorder triggered by streptococcal infections]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. Turk. J. Psychiatry 2007, 18, 270–276. [Google Scholar]
  76. Hachiya, Y.; Miyata, R.; Tanuma, N.; Hongou, K.; Tanaka, K.; Shimoda, K.; Kanda, S.; Hoshino, A.; Hanafusa, Y.; Kumada, S.; et al. Autoimmune Neurological Disorders Associated with Group-A Beta-Hemolytic Streptococcal Infection. Brain Dev. 2013, 35, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Williams, K.A.; Swedo, S.E.; Farmer, C.A.; Grantz, H.; Grant, P.J.; D’Souza, P.; Hommer, R.; Katsovich, L.; King, R.A.; Leckman, J.F. Randomized, Controlled Trial of Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated With Streptococcal Infections. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2016, 55, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bellanti, J.A. The PANDAS/PANS Disorders. Is It Time for More Allergist-Immunologists to Get Involved? Allergy Asthma Proc. 2023, 44, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cocuzza, S.; Maniaci, A.; La Mantia, I.; Nocera, F.; Caruso, D.; Caruso, S.; Iannella, G.; Vicini, C.; Privitera, E.; Lechien, J.R.; et al. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in PANS/PANDAS in Children: In Search of a Qualified Treatment-A Systematic Review and Metanalysis. Child. Basel Switz. 2022, 9, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Cooperstock, M.S.; Swedo, S.E.; Pasternack, M.S.; Murphy, T.K. Clinical Management of Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome: Part III-Treatment and Prevention of Infections. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2017, 27, 594–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Preprints 85414 g001
Figure 1. The pathophysiology of Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections (PANDAS) involves an autoimmune response triggered by a streptococcus. The presence of neuroinflammation in the dorsal striatum can result in the disruption of cholinergic activity. This disruption can lead to an imbalance between the direct and indirect pathways within the basal ganglia. Consequently, off-target behaviors such as tics, obsessions, and compulsions may be disinhibited. Notably, the hyperactivity of the direct pathway in relation to motor and limbic domains has been linked to these behaviors (created with BioRender.com).
Figure 1. The pathophysiology of Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections (PANDAS) involves an autoimmune response triggered by a streptococcus. The presence of neuroinflammation in the dorsal striatum can result in the disruption of cholinergic activity. This disruption can lead to an imbalance between the direct and indirect pathways within the basal ganglia. Consequently, off-target behaviors such as tics, obsessions, and compulsions may be disinhibited. Notably, the hyperactivity of the direct pathway in relation to motor and limbic domains has been linked to these behaviors (created with BioRender.com).
Preprints 85414 g001
Preprints 85414 g002
Figure 2. The IgG antibodies derived from pediatric patients diagnosed with Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections (PANDAS) exhibit affinity towards cholinergic interneurons (CINs) located within the striatum. The deficiency of CINs has been found to be independently linked to the presence of tics in people and the manifestation of repeated behavioral disease in mice. This suggests that CINs deficiency could potentially serve as a viable pathological factor (created with BioRender.com).
Figure 2. The IgG antibodies derived from pediatric patients diagnosed with Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections (PANDAS) exhibit affinity towards cholinergic interneurons (CINs) located within the striatum. The deficiency of CINs has been found to be independently linked to the presence of tics in people and the manifestation of repeated behavioral disease in mice. This suggests that CINs deficiency could potentially serve as a viable pathological factor (created with BioRender.com).
Preprints 85414 g002
Preprints 85414 g003
Figure 3. Dynamics of anti-streptolysin-O (ASO) and anti-DNase B (ADB) titres.
Figure 3. Dynamics of anti-streptolysin-O (ASO) and anti-DNase B (ADB) titres.
Preprints 85414 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Clinical Characteristics, Activity Levels and Mental Health Problems in Children with Long COVID: A Survey of 510 Children

Danilo Buonsenso

et al.

,

2021

Autoimmune Encephalitis – a variable pathology

Monica Neațu

et al.

,

2023

Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS) Did Occur in Poland during Months with Low COVID-19 Prevalence. Preliminary Results of a Nationwide Register.

Magdalena Okarska-Napierała

et al.

,

2020

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated