To determine the effects of pretreatment through surface peening on the surface corrosion of 316L stainless steel, we applied the same immersion corrosion conditions.
Figure 3a shows an SEM image of a sample that underwent peening at a force of 0.5 kg/cm
2 for 20 s followed by immersion corrosion. Under these peening conditions, the expected surface pores were not observed, presumably because of the insufficient peening force leading to a thin stress layer on the stainless-steel surface. Additionally, the subsequent prolonged immersion corrosion may have depleted the stress layer, thus preventing the formation of surface pores.
Figure 3b depicts the SEM image of a sample that underwent peening with a force of 0.5 kg/cm
2 for 40 s followed by immersion corrosion. In this scenario, surface pores were evident, presumably because of the extended peening time, which resulted in a thicker stress layer. Immersion corrosion yielded recessed bowl-shaped pores with a diameter of approximately 10 μm on the surface, with three-dimensionally undulating topography. Comparing the surface morphologies depicted in
Figure 3a,b reveals that longer peening times resulted in the accumulation or uneven distribution of internal stresses, thus affecting the corrosion of the metal material. Simultaneously, these internal stresses presumably caused minor surface defects, such as small cracks or depressions, which served as the initiation sites for localized corrosion, potentially accelerating the corrosion process, especially because localized corrosion often proceeds more rapidly and severely than general corrosion. Peening time also presumably affected the microstructure of the stainless-steel, with longer times rendering the surfaces rougher or less even. These structural alterations presumably increased the surface area, thus exposing additional metal to the corrosive environment and consequently accelerating the corrosion process. Similarly, stronger peening forces presumably yielded outcomes similar to those achieved with longer peening times.
Figure 3c depicts the results obtained when the same short peening time (20 s) was used but with a greater force of 1 kg/cm
2. This configuration revealed numerous small pores within large recesses, unlike the peening results shown in
Figure 3b, presumably contributing to a surface morphology conducive to cell adhesion. We also increased the peening force while shortening the peening time to obtain different samples and observe their surface morphologies (
Figure 3d). However, despite fairly uniform corrosion, no surface pores were observed. As shown in
Table 3, increasing the peening force (1 kg/cm
2) and shortening the peening time (10 s) resulted in excessive surface roughness. According to the literature, the optimal range for surface roughness is 1–10 μm, with a diameter of 1–4 μm and a depth of 1.5 μm for hemispherical pores. In this study, when a peening force of 0.5 kg/cm
2 was used for 40 s or when a peening force of 1.0 kg/cm
2 was used for 20 s, the pore characteristics approximated these optimal values.