1. Introduction
“Infectogenomics” was introduced to define the effect of host genetic variants in influencing microbial colonization in a given echological niche[
1]. Applying this concept to human diseases characterized by dysbiotic biofilms, “genetic dysbiosis” implies a host genome-driven imbalance between the integrity of barrier organs and their colonizing microorganisms[
2,
3].
In periodontitis, inflammation is thought to drive a progressive increase in the microbial diversity, leading in turn to perturbations in the microenvironment, such as increased availability of substrates favouring growth of Gram-negative bacteria[
4]. The resulting dysbiosis predisposes to the activation of a host response cascade, causing periodontal tissue damage and, eventually, tooth loss. Data collected over the last 20 years provided evidence about the associations between host genetic variants and the presence and counts of specific bacteria in the subgingival niche. In this reggard, evidence was mainly based on analysis of a few specific candidate host genetic variants and a few specific candidate periodontopathogenic bacteria, analysed by checkerboard, culture or polymerase chain reaction PCR[5-8]. Only a handful of studies have employed a wider genome-wide approach[
9] or a metagenomic analysis approach[
10], so leaving us with a rather “restricted” view of potential associations between host genetic variants and subgingival dysbiosis.
The importance of integrating host genetic data for a better understanding of subgingival dysbiosis has been recently suggested[
11]. In previous studies from our group[
12,
13] biomarkers of gingival crevicular fluid were shown to be associated with Mets, as well as left ventricular geometry with periodontitis. This latter finding further underscored the concept linking the burden of microinflammation on cardiovascular system[
14]. Given the association between periodontitis and metabolic syndrome[
15] and the potential effects of oral bacteria on gut microbiota[
16,
17] studying the effect of host genetic variants on the subgingival microbiota may also be particularly relevant to our understanding of connections between periodontitis and systemic health. Therefore, this study aimed to perform detailed analyses of associations between host genetic variants and subgingival microbiota in patients with Mets with or without periodontitis.
3. Discussion
This is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, reporting host genome-wide analysis and 16s subgingival microbiota in patients with MetS. This study broadly confirms that host genetic variants play a role in shaping the subgingival biofilm in periodontitis. Among target-studied SNPs, some showed associations with microbial diversity and with microbial species subgingivally. Measures of microbial diversity were associated with 7 of the 20 target genes. In particular,
RUNX2 (rs1321081, rs3749863) and
CAMTA1 (rs1193247, rs12407666) were associated with alpha-diversity, while SNPs in
TRPS1 (rs1012478)
, GLT6D1 (rs57670611)
, KCNK1 (rs701223)
, VAMP3 (rs111692854) and
VDR (rs631236) genes were associated with Evenness and Simpson indices, although only at the nominal p<0.05 significance. A different
VDR SNP (rs12717991) showed a strong association with
S. mutans and a slightly weaker association with
Veillonella parvula. For incidence,
S.mutans is notoriously a caries-associated bacterium, which appears to compete with periodontopathogenic bacteria, such as
P.gingivalis[
19]. Intriguingly, it has been shown that co-culture with
V.parvula alters the physiology of S. mutans, giving it an advantage in surviving antimicrobial treatment[20,21]. These data suggest that a host genetic variant (such as this
VDR SNP) may alter the physiology of the subgingival biofilm, potentially favoring the growth of bacteria, which in turn influences the biofilm differentiation and growth, along the lines of the keystone pathogen and IMPEDE theories[
22]. Findings relative to the potential effect of the VDR gene variants in the subgingival microbiota are also in agreement with an association with alpha diversity in a recent study on twins[
23] and, previously, with subgingival detection of
P. gingivalis[
24].
The associations between
IL6 SNP (rs1800795) and genera Campylobacter and
Actinomyces sp. HMT 897 confirm its possible involvement in shaping the subgingival microbiota. This has been previously described and suspected to be mediated by an increased production of IL-6, leading to an increased inflammatory cascade, favoring in turn the growth of specific microbes[
6,
25].
IL10 SNP (rs6667202) was associated with genera Prevotella and with species
Ruminococcaceae [G1] HMT 075. This is interesting, as variants in this gene have recently emerged as potentially affecting the composition of the subgingival biofilm[
3,
23]. Other interesting associations emerging from this study are those between
UHRF2 and both the genera Tannerella and species
Prevotella melaninogenica,
Leptotrichia hofstadii and
F. nucleatum, between TRPS1 and
Desulfobulbus, between RUNX2 and
P.gingivalis and between CAMTA1 and several genera and species. Some of these bacteria are well-known periodontal pathogens, while others are oral health-associated. It is hard to speculate on specific mechanisms of associations at this stage, especially for genes whose involvement in periodontal pathogenesis is still somewhat unclear. A
conserved noncoding element within CAMTA1 upstream of VAMP3 (rs10864294) seems to emerge as a potentially important locus in the association with the subgingival microbiome, given associations with alpha diversity, as well as with specific genera and species. Interestingly, gene variants in CAMTA1/VAMP3 have been suspected to be responsible for shared predisposition to both periodontitis and cardiovascular disease[
26,
27] which is relevant considering the nature of the present sample (MetS).
A second part of the analysis consisted of a discovery genome-wide analysis where no statistically significant signals emerged at p<10
-7, consistent with other periodontal GWAS with no reported associations at this statistical level. This may in part be due to the small sample size of the present study. The closest associations with Shannon diversity data were found for CTD-3037G24.3 (rs62029200) and a SNP downstream of the lincRNA
RP11-570K4.1 (rs4714409). Although other genes showed nominal associations with subgingival genera and species, such as genera
Filifactor (gene
NUBPL), Gracilibacteria (FAT3), Fretibacterium (CAMTA1, AKAP3), Leptotrichia (FCRL5), Megasphaera (MPST, GPR176), Peptoniphilaceae (SEC16B), Treponema (TMEM51), it is difficult to speculate as to what these putative associations mean.
NUBPL is involved in assembly of mitochondrial Complex I and its expression in salivary glands is reported to be associated gamma delta T cell infiltration in primary Sjogren Syndrome[
28]. A number of these genes, such as
FCLR5, FAT3, AKAP3, RUNX2, CAMTA1, are also involved in immune response pathways, so it is plausible that these variants or identified genes could be involved in a dysfunctional host-microbial response in periodontitis, as the genera identified in this study to be associated with these genes previously recognized as being associated with periodontitis. Further, associations for the
CSMD1 gene were found in the species-level GWAS and waist circumference (
Figure 5, Supplemental
Figure 2). For incidence, this gene is a regulator of the complement cascade highlighting potential interactions between Mets and periodontitis.
The robustness of the 16s microbial analysis is confirmed by the associations detected between periodontal status and subgingival genera and species. Genera such as
Filifactor, Peptostreptococcus, Bacterioidetes, Fretibacterium, Treponema, Mogibacterium and
Dialister were increased in severe periodontitis. Furthermore, taxa including classical ‘red complex’ species such as
Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia and others with well-known associations with periodontitis, such as
Filifactor alocis, Fretibacterium fastidiosum, Fusobacterium nucleatum ssp
nucleatum, Peptoniphilaceae [G-1] HMT 113,
Lachnospiraceae [G-8] HMT 500, Peptostreptococcus stomatis and
Dialister pneumosintes, were associated with severe periodontitis (Fig. 4), while taxa such as
Granulicatella elegans, Gemella haemolysans, Neisseria flavescens, Rothia aeria, Streptococcus parasangunis clade 411 were associated with no-mild or moderate periodontitis. This is in line with previous literature, as streptococci are well-known commensal bacteria, competing against periodontopathogenic bacteria, and usually highly abundant in healthy sites[
29,
30]. The role of
Granulicatella in the periodontal biofilm is less clear, while
G. adiacens has shown ability to co-aggregate with
F. nucleatum[
31]. Along with the classical periodontal pathogens described by Socransky and co-workers[32-34], the list of taxa associated with periodontitis in the present study includes some bacteria recently associated with periodontitis such as
Fretibacterium[
35],
Dialister pneumosintes[
36] and
Filifactor alocis[37-39]. These associations are confirmatory, although novel in relation to this specific population of patients with minimal dental care, and all affected by Mets. The effect of the number of MetS components on subgingival microbiota was investigated, but only a tendency for association with microbial diversity was detected. A limitation of this analysis was the absence of diagnosis based on the 2018 classification of periodontal disease, which was not possible retrospectively in this population. The per-protocol AAP classification was instead used[
18].
Some gene variants found in our periodontitis patients to link with components of Mets have recently been described as determinants in different metabolic disorders. In particular,
PARD3 has been associated with signaling pathway related to diabetes[
40];
CSMD1 affected BMI and blood lipid levels[
41];
ADAMTSL3 was linked to metabolic impairment, especially for incipient diabetes, defined on the basis of both fasting and non-fasting blood glucose, and the distribution of lean body mass[42-44];
TEX2 was associated with diabetes and impaired lipid metabolism[
45].
Periodontitis and MetS are clearly associated, possibly mediated by genetic, environmental and behavioural factors, as well as by bi-directional effects of dyslipidemia, reduced glucose tolerance, oxidative stress, molecular mimicry and dysbiosis[
15]. This study shows that, even in MetS patients, host genetic variants are likely to influence the composition of the subgingival biofilm. Among tested SNPs (hypothesis-testing analysis), those in
RUNX2,
CAMTA1,
VDR, IL6 and
TRPS1 genes emerged as possibly the most likely to influence the subgingival microbiota in this patient sample, while no new SNPs clearly emerged as associated with the microbial outcomes at genome-wide analysis (hypothesis-generating). This adds to our understanding of infectogenomics but calls for further studies to elucidate pathogenic pathways leading to periodontal breakdown.
Strengths of this study are the ethnic homogeneity of the included subjects, the consistency of full mouth periodontal examinations carried out by a single calibrated examiner and the novelty of combining genome-wide host data with 16s microbial analysis, which should be considered the next step for the field of infectogenomics. The main limitation of the study is the absence of controls without the metabolic syndrome (with presence only of internal controls with MetS and no periodontitis).
Overall, some strenghts should be highlighted: 1) this is the first study to report analysis of GWAS and 16s subgingival plaque in patients with different degrees of periodontal disease, providing further evidence for infectogenomics effects on the subgingival biofilm; 2) this study suggests that systemic health-associated host traits may further interact with oral health and microbiome.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, L.N., A.S., R.A., F.P., N.D., L.M.; methodology, L.N., A.S., L.M.; software, A.S., R.A., N.D.; validation, L.N., A.S., F.P., N.D., L.M..; formal analysis, L.N., A.S., R.A.; investigation, L.N., A.S., R.A., A.D.P., F.P., N.D., M.R., L.M.; resources, L.N., F.P., N.D., L.M.; data curation, L.N., A.S., R.A., A.D.P., V.T., M.P., S.D.M., V.F., R.S., F.P., N.D., M.R., L.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.N., A.S., R.A., N.D., M.R., L.M.; writing—review and editing, L.N., A.S., R.A., N.D., M.R., L.M.; visualization, M.R., L.M.; supervision, L.N., F.P., N.D., L.M.; project administration, L.N., F.P., N.D., L.M.; funding acquisition, L.N., F.P., N.D., L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.