Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Investigation of the Combined Influence of Temperature and Humidity on Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Al6082 Alloy in a Coastal Environment

Altmetrics

Downloads

161

Views

38

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

02 October 2023

Posted:

04 October 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) of aluminium alloys under the combined influence of temperature and humidity remains a relatively unexplored area, receiving limited attention due to its intricate nature and challenges in predicting the combined impact of these factors. The challenge was to investigate and address the specific mechanisms and interactions between temperature and humidity, as in coastal environment conditions, on the FCGR of aluminium alloy. The present study conducts a comprehensive investigation on the combined influence of temperature and humidity on the FCGR of Al6082 alloy. The fatigue pre-cracked compact tension specimens were corroded for 7 days and then subjected to various temperature and humidity conditions in a thermal chamber for 3 days to simulate coastal environments. The obtained data were analysed to determine the influence of temperature and humidity on the FCGR of Al6082 alloy. An empirical model was also established to predict fatigue life cycle values under these environmental conditions precisely. The correlation between FCGR and fracture toughness models was also examined. The Al6082 alloy exhibits a 34% increase in the Paris constant C, indicating reduced FCGR resistance due to elevated temperature and humidity levels. At the same time, fatigue, corrosion, moisture-assisted crack propagation, and hydrogen embrittlement lead to a 27% decrease in threshold fracture toughness. The developed model exhibited accurate predictions for fatigue life cycles, and the correlation between fracture toughness and FCGR showed less than 10% error, indicating a strong relationship between these parameters.
Keywords: 
Subject: Engineering  -   Mechanical Engineering

1. Introduction

Aluminium alloys in the 6xxx series have gained significant popularity and are widely utilised in diverse structural applications such as marine applications [1], rotor blades, and aircraft wings [2]. Aluminum has found extensive applications in marine environments [3,4] due to its unique properties, lightweight, corrosion resistance, and mechanical strength. However, in coastal conditions with temperature and humidity variations [5], factors such as corrosion [6], fatigue loading [7], fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) and fracture toughness [8,9,10,11] can affect aluminium performance.
The connection between FCGR and fracture toughness is essential in understanding the fatigue behaviour of aluminium alloys [12]. Various deterministic FCGR functions, including the Paris–Erdogan [13], Walker, Trantina–Johnson, Forman, and generalised Forman models, have been proposed and widely utilised in the literature [14]. A material with high fracture toughness typically exhibits a slower FCGR, indicating better resistance to crack growth under cyclic loading. Understanding crack growth behaviour and the factors influencing it is paramount for confirming the structural integrity and reliability of components subjected to repeated loading. Materials are often exposed to complex environmental conditions [15] that significantly affect fatigue performance in real-world applications [5,16]. Among these conditions, temperature and humidity variations, particularly in coastal environments, play a critical role in finding the extent of crack growth and the overall durability of materials [5]. However, the fatigue behaviour of the aluminium alloy under combined exposure to temperature and humidity in coastal environments is poorly understood.
The coastal environment, characterised by high humidity levels and fluctuating temperatures, poses unique challenges to materials due to the corrosive nature of the atmosphere [14]. Middle Eastern locations can experience summertime temperatures close to 60 °C [17], high humidity levels ranging from 40% to 90%, and a chloride ion concentration of approximately 3.6% [17,18]. The heat generated by components during their operating condition can exceed 70 °C, impacting their performance. In these circumstances, structures can reach temperatures of up to 80 °C, with humidity levels of 90% [5]. The presence of chloride ions, moisture, and temperature variations can accelerate corrosion processes, leading to increased crack growth rates and reduced fatigue life.
Several factors, including corrosion, temperature, and humidity, influence the aluminium's FCGR. Corrosion can lead to localized weakening of the material, accelerating crack growth. Temperature variations can affect the diffusion of atoms along the crack front, influencing crack growth rates. Additionally, higher humidity levels can promote crack propagation due to moisture and environmental factors.
The correlation between FCGR and fracture toughness is critical in understanding the fatigue behaviour of Al6082 alloy. Fracture toughness represents the material's capability to resist crack propagation and absorb energy before failure. Higher fracture toughness values indicate better crack resistance. On the other hand, FCGR measures the rate at which cracks extend under cyclic loading. The FCGR is influenced by factors such as stress levels and crack size.
I Alqathani et al. [5] established the empirical model to predict the fracture toughness of Al6082 alloy under combined temperature and humidity conditions as mentioned below:
K I c = 46.22 − ( 4.687 ∗ 10 − 5 ∗ H 3 ) + ( 3.099 ∗ 10 − 6 ∗ T H 2 ) − ( 1.729 ∗ 10 − 5 ∗ T 2 H ) + ( 7.486 ∗ 10 − 7 ∗ T 3 ) + ( 0.011 ∗ H 2 ) + ( 0.0005344 ∗ T H ) + ( 0.001533 ∗ T 2 ) − ( 0.8736 ∗ H ) − ( 0.04909 ∗ T )
Where H is humidity in %, T is temperature in °C. As per the results, the accuracy of the developed model is 98%.
One of the crack growth functions, such as Paris–Erdogan model, is given in Equation (2) [19]. The Paris model is limited to describing linear or stable crack growth rates at a specific stress ratio, and modifications have been made to account for different stress ratios. However, Equation (2) still has been used to characterise corrosion fatigue crack growth (FCG) behaviour [14].
d a d N = C ( ∆ K ) m
Where ,   d a d N is the crack growth per stress cycle, a is the crack length or size, ∆ K is the stress intensity factor (SIF) range, C is the material-specific Paris constant, and m is the material constant.
Three distinct regions are observed in a da/dN vs ΔK plot. The threshold region, characterized by low ΔK values, shows minimal crack growth due to closure effects. The Paris region, with intermediate ΔK values, displays a linear connection between da/dN and ΔK, representing stable crack growth. At high ΔK values beyond the Paris region, the accelerated growth region significantly increases da/dN, leading to potential crack propagation and failure [20].
In coastal conditions, environmental factors like temperature and humidity impact the corrosion FCGR of aluminium alloys. Hassaan Bin Younis et al. [21] utilized a genetic algorithm, hill climbing, and simulated annealing techniques to foresee FCGR in aerospace aluminium alloys. Danyil Kovalov et al. [22] explored corrosion fatigue in aluminium alloy 2024-T351, finding influence from electrochemical potential, NaCl concentration, loading frequency, and temperature. Tianyu Zhang et al. [23] developed a model accounting for corrosion and fatigue alternation effects on 2024-T4 aluminium alloy.
However, despite utilising various models [22,23,24] to analyse the obtained data and predict the life cycle under both non-corroded and corroded conditions, the specific effect of temperature and humidity remains unaddressed in the current understanding. Investigating the combined impact of temperature and humidity on FCG behaviour is still critical for ensuring the reliable and safe performance of components made from Al6082 alloy in coastal environments. Previous studies have separately examined the influence of temperature [25,26,27,28] and humidity [29,30,31] on the fatigue properties of materials [32,33,34,35]. However, a comprehensive understanding of the combined impact of these factors is critical for accurately predicting fatigue life [36] and developing empirical equations for predicting and correlating FCGR with fracture toughness.
This research aims to address the knowledge gap by studying Al6082 alloy’s FCGR under controlled temperature and humidity conditions that simulate a coastal environment. This study focuses solely on investigating the stable crack growth regime in the da/dN vs ΔK plot. The research is limited to examining crack growth behaviour within this region, where crack growth is predictable and stable. The influence of temperature and humidity variations on the crack propagation characteristics will be evaluated by subjecting the alloy to cyclic loading and monitoring crack growth. The novelty of this work lies in the thorough investigation of FCGR under combined temperature and humidity conditions in a coastal environment, the development of an empirical model for accurate fatigue life prediction, and the correlation between FCGR and fracture toughness models. These contributions significantly advance the understanding of the fatigue behaviour of Al6082 alloy in coastal environments, leading to a comprehensive understanding of aluminium alloy for potential applications in coastal environments.

2. Methods

2.1 Material

The Al6082 alloy is well-known for being strong and lightweight, making it popular in the aerospace, automotive, and marine industries [37]. Table 1 presents the main elements present in the Al6082 alloy. Al6082 alloy has a density of 2.71 g/cc, elastic modulus of 70 GPa, yield strength of 320 MPa, tensile strength of 348 MPa, and elongation of 17.5%. Its fracture toughness is 28.63 MPa√m in non-corroded conditions and 23 MPa√m in high humidity conditions at room temperature [5].

2.2 Specimen Preparation

The preparation of the compact tension (C(T)) specimen from a 7 mm thick sheet of Al6082 alloy was conducted following the specified geometry, as depicted in Figure 1 [38]. Wire-cut EDM cut the notch in the specimen's centre [39]. The C(T) specimens underwent pre-cracking using a servo-hydraulic testing apparatus. Additionally, a fatigue crack of 3mm was introduced at the notch's end for all C(T) specimens, ensuring the maintenance of a consistent a/W (crack length-to-width) ratio [40]. Incorporating a fatigue crack before conducting the FCGR test, the focus shifts from evaluating the material's strength or ductility to emphasizing its ability to endure crack propagation and fracture. This distinction is significant since each material inherently possesses very tiny, sharp cracks [41]. However, it's essential to note that the notch created using wire-cut EDM may not accurately replicate the characteristics of cracks within the material.

2.3 Simulation of Coastal Environment

The fatigue pre-cracked C(T) specimens were placed in a 3.5% NaCl solution for 3 days at room temperature in order to conduct localised corrosion testing. Subsequently, the specimens were removed, air-dried, and subjected to harsh coastal environmental conditions using a thermal chamber. This chamber simulated temperatures of 20, 40, 60, and 80°C along with humidity ranging from 40% to 90%, as shown in Figure 2a.

2.4 FCGR Experimentation

FCGR investigation on Al6082 alloy is performed using a servo-hydraulic testing apparatus on a 7mm thick specimen with a 3mm initial fatigue pre-crack size. The servo-hydraulic testing machine can apply controlled cyclic loads to the specimen shown in Figure 2b. In the present work (PW), the load ratio (R ratio) considered is 0.1. During the experiment, the specimen is subjected to cyclic loading at 3Hz. The crack length is continuously monitored and measured regularly using a high-speed camera.
In this experiment, the fatigue life cycles and related crack lengths of Al6082 alloy were recorded under cyclic loading conditions. The change in crack size over the number of fatigue cycles provided valuable data to analyze the FCG behaviour. The FCGR values were also determined under different temperature and humidity conditions.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fatigue Crack Growth Rate (FCGR)

Further understanding the connection between FCGR (da/dN) and SIF range (ΔK) involved using the obtained data to plot da/dN against ΔK. The plot, often presented on a log-log scale, allows for a linear representation of the FCGR within a specific SIF range. By fitting the experimental data on the da/dN vs ΔK plot, the FCG coefficients (C and m) can be determined. Figure 3a, Figure 3b, Figure 3c and Figure 3d shows the da/dN vs ΔK plot for different temperature and humidity levels.
The da/dN vs ΔK plot for the power law regime [42] has been drawn, focusing on studying the stable crack growth regime. The exponential growth in the crack size (da/dN) resulting from power-law behaviour is transformed into a linear connection with the SIF range by plotting the data on log scale. The values of C and m can be determined using the power-law representation and applying regression on the log-log plot of da/dN vs ΔK. The obtained C and m values are shown in Figure 4a and Figure 4b.
It is evident from Figure 4a that the value of C increases as the percentage of humidity rises from 40% to 90%. An increase in the C value with rising humidity from 40% to 90% leads to a higher FCGR, indicating faster crack growth rates in the material. This trend suggests that as the humidity level rises, the resistance to FCG of the Al6082 alloy tends to decrease. In other words, higher humidity conditions can accelerate crack growth rates in the material, indicating reduced resistance to fatigue crack propagation. From Figure 4a, it can also be observed that an increment in temperature, from 20°C to 80°C, leads to a decrement in the values of C. The formation of phase particles at higher temperatures can hinder dislocation movement and slow crack propagation rates. This enhanced resistance to crack growth leads to smaller C values, indicating lower crack growth rates in the material under elevated temperature conditions.
From Figure 4b, a noticeable trend emerges as humidity levels rise, indicating that the m values do not change significantly and remain within the range of 1.41 to 1.64. This indicates that the Al6082 alloy's crack growth behaviour is relatively consistent under different humidity conditions, and the exponent m in the Paris law equation remains relatively constant within the specified range of humidity values.
The constant m values as humidity increases indicate that the material's crack growth behaviour remains consistent, and the da/dN vs ΔK curves (Figure 3a, Figure 3b, Figure 3c and Figure 3d) remain almost the same for different humidity conditions.
The information presented in Figure 4c shows that the fatigue life cycles decrease as the humidity increases from 40% to 90%. As humidity increases from 40% to 90%, the fatigue life cycles decrease, indicating a detrimental effect on the material's fatigue life. High humidity increases moisture content, accelerating corrosion and promoting crack initiation and propagation. Moisture is corrosive, weakening the material and reducing fatigue life. Additionally, moisture can facilitate hydrogen embrittlement, contributing to crack growth and reduced fatigue life. Increased corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement under higher humidity levels makes the material susceptible to crack propagation and failure under cyclic loading conditions.

3.2 Threshold Stress Intensity Factor Range

Subjecting fatigue pre-cracked Al6082 alloy samples to a 3.5% NaCl solution for 168 hrs, followed by 72 hrs of temperature and humidity exposure, FCG has been investigated. The presence of moisture can accelerate corrosion processes, further contributing to crack growth. Thus, the fatigue pre-crack becomes smaller as it gets deeper into the material. Small-crack fatigue thresholds, represented by the threshold SIF range (ΔKth), were calculated from the Paris constants C and m, as per the equation mentioned by Robertson and Ritchie [43] and Nestor Perez [44].
∆ K t h = 10 − 6 C 1 m
Using Equation (3), it is possible to predict the threshold SIF range for small cracks by extending the linear stable growth-rate curve downward to a level as low as 10-6 mm/cycle. The threshold SIF values have been calculated and listed in Table 2.
Table 2 presents the threshold SIF values (in units of MPa√m) for Al6082 alloy under different temperature and humidity levels. The data shows that the threshold SIF ranges from 0.37 to 0.61, depending on the specific temperature and humidity combination. These values represent the SIF range below which small cracks do not propagate, signifying the material's resistance to crack initiation and growth.
From the data, it can be observed that an increment in the temperature leads to an increment in the threshold SIF. This means the material exhibits greater resistance to crack initiation and propagation at higher temperatures. The higher threshold SIF values indicate that the material can withstand higher SIF ranges before cracks propagate. On the other hand, as humidity increases, the threshold SIF decreases. Higher humidity levels make the material more susceptible to crack initiation and growth at lower SIF ranges. This suggests that moisture and increased corrosion potential under humid conditions can reduce the Al6082 alloy’s resistance to crack growth.
The observed range of threshold SIF values, with a low ΔKth value of 0.61 MPa√m, indicates that Al6082 alloy is susceptible to crack initiation under varying temperature and humidity conditions. The combination of fatigue, corrosion, moisture-assisted crack propagation, and hydrogen embrittlement due to high humidity contributes to the reduced threshold SIF. These factors act together, promoting crack initiation and propagation at relatively low-stress levels.

3.3 Effect of Temperature and Humidity

The effect of temperature and humidity is discussed in two sections, focusing on the effects of temperature and humidity, which is considered an effective approach to present the findings clearly and organised.

3.3.1 Effect of Temperature:

In Figure 4a, Figure 4b and Figure 4c, it can be observed that with an increase in temperature, the value of C decreases, and at the same time, the fatigue life of Al6082 alloy increases. This trend indicates that the alloy's resistance to FCGR improves at higher temperatures. This improved resistance to FCGR at higher temperatures can be attributed to various factors, including reduced corrosion [45], crack closure [46], and the presence of phase particles [47].
(a) Reduced Corrosion:
As temperatures increase, Al6082 alloy experiences a reduction in the corrosion rate, which can impact crack initiation and growth behaviour. As temperature increases, the rate of oxide formation accelerates, resulting in a thicker and more protective oxide layer on the surface of Al6082 alloy, as shown in Figure 5a.
This enhanced oxide layer acts as a barrier [48], effectively slowing down the reaction of the metal with aggressive agents present in the environment. The oxide formation process involves the reaction between aluminium and oxygen in the air, creating a thin layer of aluminium oxide (Al2O3) on the surface [5]. This oxide layer acts as a physical and chemical barrier, impeding the penetration of corrosive agents in the environment, such as moisture, chlorides, or other chemicals. It hinders their access to the underlying aluminium metal, reducing corrosion initiation and propagation chances. The oxide layer effectively shields the metal from direct contact with the aggressive agents, minimizing the electrochemical reactions that drive the corrosion process.
Moreover, the more stable oxide layer formed at higher temperatures adheres more firmly to the metal surface, enhancing its resistance to degradation. This increased stability and adhesion make it more difficult for aggressive agents to dislodge or degrade the oxide layer, further reducing the overall corrosion rate.
The data also reveals that the activity of aggressive agents, represented by their respective values (0.46 to 0.26), decreases at higher temperatures, as shown in Figure 5b. The reduced activity of aggressive agents such as chlorine at increased temperatures contributes to the overall decrease in corrosion rate. This increases the corrosion resistance and helps Al6082 alloy minimise crack initiation and growth.
(b) Crack Closure:
As temperatures increase, the Al6082 alloy undergoes the formation of an oxide layer, the presence of phase particles in dimples, and plastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, among other mechanisms [49]. These factors contribute to the phenomenon of crack closure. In Figure 6, SEM images reveal many similar observations which collectively suggest the occurrence of crack closure during certain stages of the loading cycle.
The roughness around the crack tip leads to interlocking and meshing of the crack surfaces, causing crack closure and slowing down FCGR [50]. Additionally, particles in dimples near the crack obstruct the crack path and contribute to crack closure effects. The plastic deformation ahead of the crack tip creates a resistant zone, leading to crack closure and influencing FCGR. Moreover, the oxide layer acts as a protective barrier, hindering aggressive agents' penetration and further promoting crack closure effects, thus enhancing resistance to FCGR. Additionally, the proximity of two nearby cracks can lead to their interaction and change the direction of the crack, resulting in crack closure behaviour and reducing FCGR.
(c) Presence of Phase Particles:
As the temperature rises from 20°C to 80°C, the Al6082 alloy's percentage elongation also increases, resulting in improved ductility and enhanced resistance to FCGR. The samples subjected to testing at 60°C and 80°C exhibited noticeable phase particles, whereas their presence was considerably diminished at 20°C and 40°C (Figure 7a,b). This suggests that phase particle formation primarily occurs at temperatures exceeding 60°C. Thus, forming phase particles in the Al6082 alloy's cracked surface decreases crack growth, reducing FCGR [51].
Upon reaching a temperature of 70°C and above and cooling, elements like Mg within the Al6082 alloy tend to aggregate, creating stable particles referred to as precipitates, specifically the Mg2Si intermetallic compound [5]. These formed precipitates effectively impede the motion of dislocations, thereby augmenting the material's mechanical strength. Furthermore, they function as barriers, impeding the ingress of chlorides into the Al6082 alloy.
At room temperature, dislocation motion is low. It increases rapidly from 30°C to 60°C but slows down after 60°C. An increment in temperature from 60°C to 80°C minimally impacts resistance to FCG in the Al6082 alloy due to reduced dislocation motion. This reduction allows phase particles to act as effective barriers, regulating void formation, reducing crack nucleation at the crack tip, and slowing down the crack propagation, increasing resistance to fatigue crack growth.

3.3.2 Effect of Humidity:

In Figure 4a,Figure 4c, it becomes evident that as humidity levels rise, the value of C increases, and at the same time, the fatigue life of Al6082 alloy decreases. This trend indicates that the resistance to FCGR of the Al6082 alloy decreases at higher humidity conditions. This decrement in resistance to FCGR at higher humidity conditions can be attributed to various factors, including corrosion [48], moisture-assisted crack propagation [51,52], and hydrogen embrittlement [29].
(a) Corrosion/Corrosion Fatigue:
Varying humidity levels can significantly influence the corrosion process in Al6082 alloy and subsequently impact crack initiation and growth. The presence of chloride ions, which increase with higher humidity levels, is critical in initiating aggressive localized corrosion on the metal surface, such as pitting corrosion.
At 60°C and 40% humidity, the chloride content is relatively low (0.11%), which may result in minimal localized corrosion. As humidity increases to 60%, 70%, and 90%, the chloride content rises to 0.27%, 0.35%, and 0.53%, respectively, as shown in Figure 8. The presence of chloride ions in these pits facilitates crack initiation and accelerates crack growth rates. As the crack propagates, it encounters varying microstructures, including the phase particles present in the Al6082 alloy. The reduced O value from 4% to 3% with increasing humidity indicates a more reduced oxide layer caused by an increment in the chloride ions. Furthermore, the observed decrease in Mg and Si levels below their actual values suggests that these alloying elements may participate in corrosion processes, leading to material degradation and a reduction in corrosion resistance. This promotes corrosion processes and further leads to accelerated corrosion and crack initiation.
This increase in chloride content significantly enhances the potential for localized corrosion, particularly in pitting [48]. The synergistic effects between humidity and corrosion can lead to corrosion fatigue in the Al6082 alloy. The formation of corrosion pits and cyclic loading during FCGR testing can serve as initiation sites for fatigue cracks. The cyclic stresses applied to the material can open and close the cracks, accelerating the transport of corrosive agents to the crack tip and enhancing crack growth.
(b) Moisture-Assisted Crack Propagation:
When the material is exposed to higher humidity levels, the absorption and diffusion of moisture into the material promote the formation of a thin electrolyte layer (TEL) [53] refers to a thin water layer or a moisture film on its surface. This micro-environment can create localized areas conducive to corrosion, especially in the presence of chloride ions [54]. This enhances the localized corrosion process, leading to the degradation of the material in the vicinity of the crack tip. As a result, the presence of moisture in combination with corrosion products (oxides, hydroxides, or chloride compounds) [55] further promotes localized corrosion and accelerates crack growth, as shown in Figure 9. The moisture-driven corrosion process weakens the material, making it more susceptible to crack propagation. The synergy between moisture and corrosion products significantly influences crack growth. It might reduce fatigue life and compromise the structural integrity of Al6082 alloy exposed to such environments.
At low humidity conditions (40%), the reduced moisture on the material's surface slows down the corrosion process, resulting in a less aggressive corrosion rate than in higher humidity conditions. Typical corrosion products that can form under such conditions include oxides and hydroxides [55]. At high humidity conditions (70% and above), the abundance of moisture on the material's surface creates a more conducive environment for corrosion, further enhancing localized corrosion, such as pitting corrosion, due to the higher potential for chloride-induced corrosion. Additionally, chloride compounds, such as aluminium chloride, may form in the presence of chloride ions, contributing to the corrosive attack on the aluminium surface. These factors can lead to the formation of corrosion-induced cracks and corrosion fatigue cracks. The combination of high humidity, the presence of chloride ions, and corrosive agents can further compromise the material's structural integrity and decrease the material's resistance to FCG.
(c) Hydrogen Embrittlement:
As humidity increases, aluminium becomes more susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement, reducing its ductility and toughness and promoting a transition from ductile to brittle fracture behaviour [29]. The observed voids in the material microstructure, shown in Figure 10, indicate hydrogen-induced cracking, where hydrogen accumulates on the surface of the exposed portion of Al6082 alloy and within the lattice, causing localized weakening and void formation [5]. Void formation indicates hydrogen-induced cracking, while deeper dimples and crack blunting are characteristic of reduced flexibility due to hydrogen diffusion.
These hydrogen embrittlement effects extend beyond the crack tip region, influencing the material's mechanical behaviour. As humidity increases, the material's crack growth behaviour becomes more influenced by hydrogen-induced embrittlement, leading to an accelerated crack growth rate. The presence of hydrogen in the material can lower the threshold for crack initiation and promote faster crack propagation, reducing the material's fatigue life and overall resistance to crack growth. The combined impact of hydrogen embrittlement (HE) contributes to the observed reduction in aluminium's resistance to fatigue crack growth at higher humidity levels.
Hydrogen embrittlement HE is common in various aluminium alloy series when exposed to humid environments [29]. However, the HE sensitivity is generally low in the Al6xxx series. Despite this, certain Al6xxx series alloys, such as Al6082, remain susceptible to HE even under high humidity conditions [5]. At high temperatures, particularly at 80°C and high humidity, secondary phase particle formation, such as Mg2Si, is likely in the alloy microstructure. These particles accumulate within the micro-void regions, impeding hydrogen diffusion activity [56]. As a result, hydrogen absorption at the Al6082 alloy's surface is reduced, as illustrated in Figure11.
Figure 7d displays the microstructure of the Al6082 alloy at 80°C and 80% humidity, revealing the presence of phase particles. The energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis of these particles indicates that their composition includes Mg and Si, with values of 2.01 and 2.16, respectively. These EDS results suggest that the detected elements (Mg and Si) are not inherent to the Al6082 alloy itself but rather represent precipitated elements formed under the specific conditions of 80°C and 80% humidity. The presence of precipitated phase particles in the Al6082 alloy significantly influences its resistance to hydrogen embrittlement, corrosion, and FCGR.

3.4 Striation Spaces

During stage II of FCG, the distance separating fatigue striations is equal to the rate at which the fatigue crack expands within a single cycle [57,58,59]. As the crack propagates steadily during each fatigue cycle, it leaves behind a characteristic pattern of striations on the fracture surface. The striation spacing is, therefore, a direct representation of the FCGR under stable crack growth conditions [60].
As humidity increases from 40% to 90%, the environmental conditions become more conducive to corrosion and crack propagation. This can lead to an acceleration in the FCGR of the material. The faster crack growth rate means that the crack propagates over a larger distance during each fatigue cycle, resulting in wider spacing between individual striations on the fractured surface, as shown in Figure 12. The Paris constant (C) is a material-specific parameter in the Paris law equation, which relates the crack growth rate to the SIF range (ΔK). As the FCGR increases with higher humidity, the C also increases to account for the faster crack growth under these environmental conditions. This implies the Al6082 alloy's resistance to FCG decreases as humidity increases.
Therefore, the experimental observation of increased striation spacing with increasing humidity is consistent with the higher FCGR and larger C values. The combination of these factors indicates that as humidity increases, the material's FCGR becomes more rapid, leading to wider spacing between the striations on the fractured surface.

3.5 Crack Propagation Path

The study of crack propagation paths at different temperatures (ranging from 20 to 80°C) under 80% humidity has revealed a consistent trend, i.e., the fatigue cracks propagate along relatively straight paths [61], as shown in Figure 13.
This observation indicates that the fatigue cracks growth behaviour in the Al6082 alloy remains relatively stable across the tested temperature range and under specific humidity conditions. The material exhibits a consistent crack propagation pattern, indicating that the environmental conditions, including humidity and temperature, have a relatively uniform influence on the crack propagation mechanism. The consistent and relatively straight crack propagation paths imply that the material’s fatigue behaviour remains predictable and reliable under temperature and humidity conditions.

3.6 FCGR Models for Fatigue Life Cycles and C value

The significance of this study lies in its comprehensive examination of FCGR in an Al6082 alloy under combined temperature and humidity conditions within a coastal environment. By subjecting the material to varying temperature and humidity levels, we have gained valuable insights into the material's fatigue crack growth behaviour, crack initiation, and propagation mechanisms. This work aims to develop an empirical model to predict fatigue life cycles and the Paris constant C [62]. Since the experimental m value remains nearly constant with an increase in humidity and temperature, the establishment of the empirical model is not within the scope of this paper.
This study employs a novel curve fitting technique to develop an empirical model that predicts fatigue life cycles and the Paris constant C for the Al6082 alloy under various temperature and humidity variations within a coastal environment. The curve fitting process is applied to the experimental data points to identify the mathematical relationship that best represents the correlation between fatigue life cycles and crack growth rates with temperature and humidity.
A 3D scatter plot, as shown in Figure 14a, has been constructed to visualize the connection between temperature, humidity, and fatigue life cycles in the Al6082 alloy. The scatter plot displays data points in a three-dimensional space, where each point represents a specific combination of temperature, humidity, and the corresponding fatigue life cycles obtained from the experimental tests. The empirical equation derived through regression analysis is expressed in Equation (4):
Fatigue life cycle = 29597 + 89.1T - 126.8H
The equation indicates that the fatigue life cycles of the material are influenced by both temperature and humidity. A positive coefficient for T suggests that an increase in temperature is associated with an increase in the predicted fatigue life cycles. On the other hand, a negative coefficient for H implies that an increase in humidity leads to a decrease in the predicted fatigue life cycles.
Similarly, A 3D scatter plot, as shown in Figure 14(b), has been constructed to visualize the relationship between temperature, humidity, and Paris constant C in the Al6082 alloy. The Paris constant C quantifies how quickly a crack grows under cyclic loading conditions for Al6082 alloy. The empirical equation derived through regression analysis is expressed in Equation (5):
Paris constant C = 1.0046 – 0.0076T + 0.0374H
The equation represents how temperature and humidity levels influence the Paris constant C. A negative coefficient for T suggests that an increment in temperature reduces the predicted Paris constant C. In contrast, a positive coefficient for H signifies that an increase in humidity is associated with an increase in the predicted Paris constant C. Therefore, as humidity increases, the C value increases, and the material's resistance to FCGR decreases, and as temperature increases, the C value decreases and the resistance to FCGR increases.

4. Correlation and Validation

4.1 Correlation of Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Life Cycles

The novelty of this work lies in conducting a comprehensive investigation of the FCGR under combined temperature and humidity conditions in a coastal environment, developing an empirical model for accurate fatigue life prediction, and establishing a correlation between FCGR and fracture toughness models.
The established empirical model of fracture toughness [5] is represented by Equation (1), which enables accurate prediction of fracture toughness for different temperature and humidity conditions.
In Figure 15, the fatigue life cycles found from the FCGR test [PW] and the corresponding fracture toughness values (previous work, [5]) measured for the same material under the same experimental conditions were plotted to examine their correlation using the curve fitting approach. The data points representing the fracture toughness values and the corresponding fatigue life cycles were fitted to a polynomial cubic curve. The selection of a polynomial cubic curve was based on its ability to capture the complexity of the relationship between fracture toughness and fatigue life cycles. An R-squared value of 0.94 indicates that the variation in fatigue life cycles can explain approximately 94% of the variance in fracture toughness.
The empirical model for fracture toughness (KIc) has been developed as Equation (6):
K I c = 80.87 − 0.0068 X + 2.5 ∗ 10 − 7 X 2 − 2.83 ∗ 10 − 12 X 3
where X represents the number of fatigue life cycles. This polynomial cubic curve, with coefficients derived from the curve fitting approach, allows for accurately predicting fracture toughness values at varying fatigue life cycles.
Table 3 presents a comparison of Fracture toughness values obtained from experimental testing [5] and the values predicted using the regression equation (Equation (6)) developed in this study [PW]. It is observed that the maximum error between these two sets of values is within 10%. This error level indicates a relatively good agreement between the empirical model and the experimental data, signifying the effectiveness and accuracy of the developed regression equation in predicting fracture toughness values based on fatigue life cycles.

4.2 Validation

The empirical equation for determining fracture toughness (Equation (1)) was derived through fracture toughness testing [5]. Empirical equations for determining fatigue life cycles, the Paris constant C, and the correlation between fracture toughness and fatigue life cycles were derived through FCGR experimentation [PW]. These experiments were conducted within the 20 - 80°C temperature range and humidity conditions of 40 - 90%. A new series of experiments using arbitrarily selected temperature and humidity conditions such as 30°C & 85%, 50°C & 65%, and 70°C & 55% and using Al6082 alloy material was carried out to validate the established empirical equations. The comprehensive analysis of these experimental outcomes has been thoroughly discussed, enhancing the understanding of the empirical models' validity and their suitability across a wider spectrum of environmental factors.
Figure 16 illustrates the da/dN vs ΔK plot within the power law regime, considering distinct temperature and humidity conditions as mentioned. The transformation of the exponential growth in crack length (da/dN), arising from power-law behaviour, is accomplished by logarithmically scaling the data. This conversion establishes a linear relationship with the SIF range (ΔK). The Paris constant C and exponent m values can be ascertained by employing the power-law representation and regression analysis on the logarithmic representation of da/dN vs ΔK. The resultant C and m values are documented in Table 4(a). The empirical Equation (5) significantly correlates with the experimental results, demonstrating a maximum error of 8% for the Paris constant C. The m value exhibits minimal variation, remaining within the range of 1.41 to 1.65, as observed in the primary experimental findings.
Likewise, the comparison between experimental and empirical model results of fatigue life cycle values is documented in Table 4(b). The empirical Equation (4) demonstrates a notable correlation with the experimental results, showcasing a maximum error of 4% for the fatigue life cycle values.
Similarly, the comparison between experimental and empirical model results of fracture toughness values is presented in Table 4(c). Additionally, empirical Equation (1) displays a substantial correlation with the outcomes derived from empirical Equation (6), indicating a maximum error of 7% for the fracture toughness values.
The strong correlation observed between the experimental and developed models, with a maximum error of 10%, can be attributed to the alignment of the validation conditions (30°C & 85%, 50°C & 65%, and 70°C & 55%) within the broader investigated range of temperature (20–80°C) and humidity (40–90%). This strategic selection facilitated verifying the equations' consistency across diverse environmental scenarios.

5. Conclusions

This research investigated the combined influence of temperature and humidity on fatigue crack growth rate in Al6082 alloy within a coastal environment. The outcomes of this study hold considerable significance for the scientific community, shedding light on the complex relationship between temperature, humidity, and fatigue crack growth rate in Al6082 alloy within coastal conditions. Through the comprehensive experimental study, the following significant conclusions were drawn:
  • The combined influence of an increase in temperature and humidity levels, in line with coastal environmental conditions, decreases the FCGR resistance of Al6082 alloy. The corrosion under higher humidity levels reduces the threshold fracture toughness, facilitating crack initiation and propagation at relatively low-stress levels. This is evident from the notable decrease in threshold fracture toughness by 27% and the increase in the fatigue crack growth constant C by 34% as temperature and humidity increase.
  • Higher temperature conditions enhance the alloy's resistance to FCGR by introducing precipitated phase particles, facilitating the formation of an oxide layer, and inducing crack closure. In contrast, heightened humidity conditions diminish the resistance of the Al6082 alloy to FCGR due to escalated corrosion, moisture-assisted crack propagation, and hydrogen embrittlement.
  • The precision of the developed empirical models is remarkable, showcasing an error of less than 10% in predicting Paris constant C, fatigue life cycles, and the relationship between fracture toughness and FCGR. This robust correspondence underscores the models' reliability for both researchers and engineers. The alignment between experimental and developed models confirmed through validation experiments, establishes a solid foundation for predicting FCGR in diverse environmental conditions.
This research offers vital insights to the scientific community regarding the intricate interplay between temperature, humidity, fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR), and fracture toughness in Al6082 alloy. The derived empirical model is a practical tool for optimizing material selection and design strategies specifically tailored for applications in coastal environments. By understanding how temperature and humidity influence the FCGR and fracture toughness, engineers and researchers can make informed decisions to enhance the durability and reliability of components in such challenging conditions.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, information collection, modifications, validation, resources, I.A; Review, modifications, supervision, A.S; Conceptualization, methodology, review, supervision, M.K.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing does not apply to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mengxia Liang, Robert Melchers, I.C. Corrosion and Pitting of 6060 Series Aluminium after 2 Years Exposure in Seawater Splash, Tidal and Immersion Zones. Corros. Sci. 2018, 140, 286–296. [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Zhang, X.; Gao, L. Environmental Failure Behavior Analysis of 7085 High Strength Aluminum Alloy under High Temperature and High Humidity. Metals (Basel). 2022, 12, 1–8. [CrossRef]
  3. Can Peng, Gongwang Cao, Tianzhen Gu, Chuan Wang, Zhenyao Wang, C.S. The Corrosion Behavior of the 6061 Al Alloy in Simulated Nansha Marine Atmosphere. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 19, 709–721. [CrossRef]
  4. Yang XK, Zhang LW, Zhang SY, Liu M, Zhou K, M.X. Properties Degradation and Atmospheric Corrosion Mechanism of 6061 Aluminum Alloy in Industrial and Marine Atmosphere Environments. Mater Corros 2017, 68, 529-535.
  5. Alqahtani, I.; Starr, A.; Khan, M. Coupled Effects of Temperature and Humidity on Fracture Toughness of Al–Mg–Si–Mn Alloy. Materials (Basel). 2023, 16. [CrossRef]
  6. Igwemezie, V.; Mehmanparast, A. Waveform and Frequency Effects on Corrosion-Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour in Modern Marine Steels. Int. J. Fatigue 2020, 134, 105484. [CrossRef]
  7. Mohammed Y. Abdellah Ductile Fracture and S–N Curve Simulation of a 7075-T6 Aluminum Alloy under Static and Constant Low-Cycle Fatigue,. J Fail. Anal. Preven. 2021, 21, 1476–1488. [CrossRef]
  8. Menan, F.; Henaff, G. Influence of Frequency and Exposure to a Saline Solution on the Corrosion Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of the Aluminum Alloy 2024. Int. J. Fatigue 2009, 31, 1684–1695. [CrossRef]
  9. Abdellah, M.Y.; Alharthi, H. Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Crack Growth Analyses on a Biomedical Ti-27Nb Alloy under Constant Amplitude Loading Using Extended Finite Element Modelling. 4467. 2023, 16, 4467. [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Shimaa H. Kamal, Nouby M. Ghazaly, Mohammed Y. Abdellah, A.-E.H.A.S. and G.T.A.-J. Influence Parameters on the Essential Work of Fracture of 5754-H111 Aluminum Alloy Plate: Comparative Study. SVU-International J. Eng. Sci. Appl. 2023, 4, 243–259. [CrossRef]
  11. Mohammed Y. Abdellah, Nouby M. Ghazaly, Al-Shimaa H. Kamal, A.-E.H.A.; Abdel-Jabe, S. and G.T. Ductile Fracture Toughness of Al 5754-H111 Alloy Using Essential Work of Fracture Method. AIMS Mater. Sci. 2023, 10, 370–389. [CrossRef]
  12. Abdellah, M.Y. Essential Work of Fracture Assessment for Thin Aluminium Strips Using Finite Element Analysis. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2017, 179, 190–202. [CrossRef]
  13. Correia, J.A.F.O.; De Jesus, A.M.P.; Alves, A.S.F.; Lesiuk, G.; Tavares, P.J.S.; Moreira, P.M.G.P. Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour of the 6082-T6 Aluminium Using CT Specimens with Distinct Notches. Procedia Struct. Integr. 2016, 2, 3272–3279. [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, C.Q.; Xiong, J.J.; Shenoi, R.A.; Liu, M.D.; Liu, J.Z. A Modified Model to Depict Corrosion Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior for Evaluating Residual Lives of Aluminum Alloys. Int. J. Fatigue 2016, 83, 280–287. [CrossRef]
  15. Bonakdar, A.; Wang, F.; Williams, J.J.; Chawla, N. Environmental Effects on Fatigue Crack Growth in 7075 Aluminum Alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 2012, 43, 2799–2809. [CrossRef]
  16. Free, B.; Marino, G.; Schindelholz, E.; Galyon Dorman, S.; (Warner) Locke, J.S. Measurement of Atmospheric Corrosion Fatigue Crack Growth Rates on AA7085-T7451. Int. J. Fatigue 2023, 167. [CrossRef]
  17. M. Otieno, M.T. Marine Exposure Environments and Marine Exposure Sites. In Marine Concrete Structures; Alexander, M.G., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing, 2016; pp. 171–196.
  18. Ya-Ya Zheng, Bing-Hui Luo , Chuan He, Yang Gao, Z.-H.B. Corrosion Evolution and Behaviour of Al–2.1Mg–1.6Si Alloy in Chloride Media. Rare Met. 2021, 40, 908–919. [CrossRef]
  19. Yibing Xiang, Y.L. EIFS-Based Crack Growth Fatigue Life Prediction of Pitting-Corroded Test Specimens. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2010, 77, 1314–1324. [CrossRef]
  20. Carpinteri, A.; Paggi, M. Are the Paris’ Law Parameters Dependent on Each Other? Frat. ed Integrità Strutt. 2008, 1, 10–16. [CrossRef]
  21. Younis, H. Bin; Kamal, K.; Sheikh, M.F.; Hamza, A. Prediction of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Aircraft Aluminum Alloys Using Optimized Neural Networks. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2022, 117, 103196. [CrossRef]
  22. Kovalov, D.; Fekete, B.; Engelhardt, G.R.; Macdonald, D.D. Prediction of Corrosion Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Alloys. Part II: Effect of Electrochemical Potential, NaCl Concentration, and Temperature on Crack Propagation in AA2024-T351. Corros. Sci. 2019, 152, 130–139. [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, T.; He, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, S. Effect of Alternate Corrosion and Fatigue on Fatigue Crack Growth Characterization of 2024-T4 Aluminum Alloy. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 2020. [CrossRef]
  24. Zai BA, Khan MA, Khan SZ, Asif M, Khan KA, Saquib AN, Mansoor A, S.M.& and M.A. Prediction of Crack Depth and Fatigue Life of an Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Cantilever Beam Using Dynamic Response. J. Test. Eval. 2020, 48, 1520-1536.
  25. Bayoumi, M.. Fatigue Behaviour of a Commercial Aluminium Ahoy in Sea Water at Different Temperatures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 1993, 45, 297–307.
  26. Alqahtani, I.M.; Starr, A.; Khan, M. Experimental and Theoretical Aspects of Crack Assisted Failures of Metallic Alloys in Corrosive Environments – A Review. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 66, 2530–2535. [CrossRef]
  27. Khan MA, Khan SZ, Sohail W, Khan H, S.M.& N.S. Mechanical Fatigue in Aluminum at Elevated Temperature and Remaining Life Prediction Based on Natural Frequency Evolution. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2015, 38, 897–903.
  28. Omar I, K.M.& S.A. Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Crack Propagation under Coupled Load and Temperature. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7212.
  29. Safyari, M.; Hojo, T.; Moshtaghi, M. Effect of Environmental Relative Humidity on Hydrogen-Induced Mechanical Degradation in an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu Alloy. Vacuum 2021, 192, 110489. [CrossRef]
  30. M. Guo, D. Li, S.X. Rao, B.L.G. Effect of Environmental Factors on the Corrosion of 2024T3 Aluminium Alloy. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Aluminium Alloys; J.F. Nie, A.J.M. and B.C.M., Ed.; Institute of Materials Engineering Australasia Ltd., 2004; pp. 433–438.
  31. Ichitani, K. Effect of Experimental Humidity on Fatigue Fracture of 6XXX-Series Aluminum Alloys. 2012, 15–21.
  32. He, F.; Khan, M. Effects of Printing Parameters on the Fatigue Behaviour of 3d-Printed Abs under Dynamic Thermo-Mechanical Loads. Polymers (Basel). 2021, 13, 1–23. [CrossRef]
  33. MA, K.K.& K. Current Challenges in Modelling Vibrational Fatigue and Fracture of Structures: A Review. J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2020, 43, 77.
  34. Agala A, Khan M, S.A. Degradation Mechanisms Associated with Metal Pipes and the Effective Impact of LDMs and LLMs in Water Transport and Distribution. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2023, 237, 1855–1876. [CrossRef]
  35. Sohaib Z. Khan, Tariq M. Khan, Yasir F. Joya, Muhammad A. Khan, S.A.& A.S. Assessment of Material Properties of AISI 316L Stainless Steel Using Non-Destructive Testing. Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 2016, 31, 360–370. [CrossRef]
  36. Zai BA, Khan M, Khan KA, Mansoor A, Shah A, S.M. The Role of Dynamic Response Parameters in Damage Prediction. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2019, 233, 4620–4636. [CrossRef]
  37. Abdellah, M.Y.; Fadhl, B.M.; Abu El-Ainin, H.M.; Hassan, M.K.; Backar, A.H.; Mohamed, A.F. Experimental Evaluation of Mechanical and Tribological Properties of Segregated Al-Mg-Si Alloy Filled with Alumina and Silicon Carbide through Different Types of Casting Molds. Metals (Basel). 2023, 13, 1–21. [CrossRef]
  38. ASTM E647−13 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. 2014, 03, 1–50.
  39. Andrea Gilioli, Andrea Manes, M.G. Numerical Simulation of a Fracture Toughness Test of an Al6061-T6 Aluminium Alloy Using a Ductile Criterion. Mech. Res. Commun. 2014, 58, 2–9. [CrossRef]
  40. ASTME399-22 Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane Strain Fracture Toughness KIc of Metallic Materials. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. 2022.
  41. W. Dietzel, P. Bala Srinivasan, A.A. 3 - Testing and Evaluation Methods for Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) in Metals. In Metals and Surface Engineering, Stress Corrosion Cracking; V.S. Raja, T.S., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing, 2011; pp. 133–166.
  42. Tudose, L.M.; Popa, C.O. Stress Intensity Factors Analysis Cracks in the Hertzian Stresses Field of Teeth Gears. 10th Int. Conf. Tribol. 2016, 1–8.
  43. Robertson, S.W.; Ritchie, R.O. A Fracture-Mechanics-Based Approach to Fracture Control in Biomedical Devices Manufactured from Superelastic Nitinol Tube. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. - Part B Appl. Biomater. 2008, 84, 26–33. [CrossRef]
  44. Perez, N. Fracture Mechanics; 2nd ed.; Springer, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-24997-1.
  45. Sadananda, K.; Nani Babu, M.; Vasudevan, A.K. A Review of Fatigue Crack Growth Resistance in the Short Crack Growth Regime. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 754, 674–701. [CrossRef]
  46. Ye, H.; Le, F.; Wei, C.; Ye, K.; Liu, S.; Wang, G. Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Fabricated via Laser Metal Deposition: Effects of Building Orientation and Heat Treatment. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 868, 159023. [CrossRef]
  47. Pribe, J.D.; Addison, D.A.; Siegmund, T.; Kruzic, J.J. High-Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth under Transient Overloading: Application to Alloy 617. Int. J. Fract. 2021, 232, 23–42. [CrossRef]
  48. Ramesh, R S, M V Santhosh Kumar, Y.B.; Doddamani, S.; K, M.K. Fracture Toughness Investigations of AA6061-SiC Composites : Effect of Corrosion Parameters. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 308, 1–8. [CrossRef]
  49. Pokorný, P.; Vojtek, T.; Jambor, M.; Náhlík, L.; Hutař, P. Effect of Underload Cycles on Oxide-Induced Crack Closure Development in Cr-Mo Low-Alloy Steel. Materials (Basel). 2021, 14, 1–22. [CrossRef]
  50. Yamada, Y.; Newman, J.C. Crack-Closure Behavior of 2324-T39 Aluminum Alloy near-Threshold Conditions for High Load Ratio and Constant Kmax Tests. Int. J. Fatigue 2009, 31, 1780–1787. [CrossRef]
  51. T.R.F. Cavalcante, G.S. Pereira, G.Y. Koga, C. Bolfarini, W.W. Bose Filho, J.A.A. Fatigue Crack Propagation of Aeronautic AA7050-T7451 and AA2050-T84 Aluminum Alloys in Air and Saline Environments. Int. J. Fatigue 2022, 154. [CrossRef]
  52. Burns, J.T.; Jones, J.J.; Thompson, A.D.; Locke, J.S. (Warner. Fatigue Crack Propagation of Aerospace Aluminum Alloy 7075-T651 in High Altitude Environments. Int. J. Fatigue 2018, 106, 196–207. [CrossRef]
  53. 2021 Corrosion Evolution of High-Strength Aluminum Alloys MOISTURE.Pdf.
  54. Liwei Wang, Jianming Liang, Han Li, Lianjun Cheng, Z.C. Quantitative Study of the Corrosion Evolution and Stress Corrosion Cracking of High Strength Aluminum Alloys in Solution and Thin Electrolyte Layer Containing Cl-. Corros. Sci. 2021, 178. [CrossRef]
  55. Mahmood, S.; Gallagher, C.; Engelberg, D.L. Atmospheric Corrosion of Aluminum Alloy 6063 Beneath Ferric Chloride Corrosion Product Droplets. Corrosion 2020, 76, 985–994. [CrossRef]
  56. Yamabe, J.; Awane, T.; Murakami, Y. Hydrogen Trapped at Intermetallic Particles in Aluminum Alloy 6061-T6 Exposed to High-Pressure Hydrogen Gas and the Reason for High Resistance against Hydrogen Embrittlement. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 24560–24568. [CrossRef]
  57. Shyam, A.; Lara-Curzio, E. A Model for the Formation of Fatigue Striations and Its Relationship with Small Fatigue Crack Growth in an Aluminum Alloy. Int. J. Fatigue 2010, 32, 1843–1852. [CrossRef]
  58. Anis, S.F.; Koyama, M.; Hamada, S.; Noguchi, H. Mode I Fatigue Crack Growth Induced by Strain-Aging in Precipitation-Hardened Aluminum Alloys. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2019, 104, 102340. [CrossRef]
  59. Williams, J.J.; Yazzie, K.E.; Connor Phillips, N.; Chawla, N.; Xiao, X.; De Carlo, F.; Iyyer, N.; Kittur, M. On the Correlation between Fatigue Striation Spacing and Crack Growth Rate: A Three-Dimensional (3-D) X-Ray Synchrotron Tomography Study. Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 2011, 42, 3845–3848. [CrossRef]
  60. Zhu, M.; Yang, S.; Bai, Y.; Fan, C. Microstructure and Fatigue Damage Mechanism of 6082-T6 Aluminium Alloy Welded Joint. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8, 56505. [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, Y.; Pan, Q.; Liu, B.; Yu, Q.; Li, G.; Pan, D. Effect of Aging Treatments on Fatigue Properties of 6005A Aluminum Alloy Containing Sc. Int. J. Fatigue 2022, 163. [CrossRef]
  62. Bergner, F.; Zouhar, G. New Approach to the Correlation between the Coefficient and the Exponent in the Power Law Equation of Fatigue Crack Growth. Int. J. Fatigue 2000, 22, 229–239. [CrossRef]
Preprints 86769 g001
Figure 1. Specimen: (a) Geometry and (b) Prepared sample.
Figure 1. Specimen: (a) Geometry and (b) Prepared sample.
Preprints 86769 g001
Preprints 86769 g002
Figure 2. (a) Thermal chamber, (b) Experimental setup.
Figure 2. (a) Thermal chamber, (b) Experimental setup.
Preprints 86769 g002
Preprints 86769 g003a
Figure 3(a). FCG curves of the Al6082 alloy at Temperature 20°C and different humidity levels.
Figure 3(a). FCG curves of the Al6082 alloy at Temperature 20°C and different humidity levels.
Preprints 86769 g003a
Preprints 86769 g003b
Figure 3(b). FCG curves of the Al6082 alloy at Temperature 40°C and different humidity levels.
Figure 3(b). FCG curves of the Al6082 alloy at Temperature 40°C and different humidity levels.
Preprints 86769 g003b
Preprints 86769 g003c
Figure 3(c). FCG curves of the Al6082 alloy at Temperature 60°C and different humidity levels.
Figure 3(c). FCG curves of the Al6082 alloy at Temperature 60°C and different humidity levels.
Preprints 86769 g003c
Preprints 86769 g003d
Figure 3(d). FCG curves of the Al6082 alloy at Temperature 80°C and different humidity levels.
Figure 3(d). FCG curves of the Al6082 alloy at Temperature 80°C and different humidity levels.
Preprints 86769 g003d
Preprints 86769 g004a
Figure 4(a). Influence of increasing humidity on C values for different temperatures.
Figure 4(a). Influence of increasing humidity on C values for different temperatures.
Preprints 86769 g004a
Preprints 86769 g004b
Figure 4(b). Influence of increasing humidity on m values for different temperatures.
Figure 4(b). Influence of increasing humidity on m values for different temperatures.
Preprints 86769 g004b
Preprints 86769 g004c
Figure 4(c). Influence of increasing humidity on fatigue life cycles for different temperatures.
Figure 4(c). Influence of increasing humidity on fatigue life cycles for different temperatures.
Preprints 86769 g004c
Preprints 86769 g005a
Figure 5(a). Oxide layer on surface of the Al6082 alloy at low humidity and different temperatures.
Figure 5(a). Oxide layer on surface of the Al6082 alloy at low humidity and different temperatures.
Preprints 86769 g005a
Preprints 86769 g005b
Figure 5(b). Chlorine on the corroded surface of the Al6082 alloy at high humidity and different temperatures.
Figure 5(b). Chlorine on the corroded surface of the Al6082 alloy at high humidity and different temperatures.
Preprints 86769 g005b
Preprints 86769 g006
Figure 6. Crack closure mechanisms observed in different conditions.
Figure 6. Crack closure mechanisms observed in different conditions.
Preprints 86769 g006
Preprints 86769 g007
Figure 7. Phase particles observed in different temperature conditions.
Figure 7. Phase particles observed in different temperature conditions.
Preprints 86769 g007
Preprints 86769 g008
Figure 8. Chloride on the corroded surface of the Al6082 alloy at different humidity conditions.
Figure 8. Chloride on the corroded surface of the Al6082 alloy at different humidity conditions.
Preprints 86769 g008
Preprints 86769 g009
Figure 9. Formation of corrosion products on the surface of Al6082 alloy at different humidity conditions.
Figure 9. Formation of corrosion products on the surface of Al6082 alloy at different humidity conditions.
Preprints 86769 g009
Preprints 86769 g010
Figure 10. Hydrogen embrittlement mechanism observed at humidity 90%, temperature 20°C.
Figure 10. Hydrogen embrittlement mechanism observed at humidity 90%, temperature 20°C.
Preprints 86769 g010
Preprints 86769 g011
Figure 11. Obstacle hydrogen embrittlement in Al6082 alloy.
Figure 11. Obstacle hydrogen embrittlement in Al6082 alloy.
Preprints 86769 g011
Preprints 86769 g012
Figure 12. Striations spaces for Al6082 alloy with varying temperature and humidity.
Figure 12. Striations spaces for Al6082 alloy with varying temperature and humidity.
Preprints 86769 g012
Preprints 86769 g013
Figure 13. Crack propagation path of Al6082 alloy at different temperatures.
Figure 13. Crack propagation path of Al6082 alloy at different temperatures.
Preprints 86769 g013
Preprints 86769 g014a
Figure 14(a). Curve fitting shows linear variation for Fatigue life cycles with varying temperature and humidity.
Figure 14(a). Curve fitting shows linear variation for Fatigue life cycles with varying temperature and humidity.
Preprints 86769 g014a
Preprints 86769 g014b
Figure 14(b). Curve fitting shows linear variation for Paris constant C with varying temperature and humidity.
Figure 14(b). Curve fitting shows linear variation for Paris constant C with varying temperature and humidity.
Preprints 86769 g014b
Preprints 86769 g015
Figure 15. Correlation between fatigue life cycles and fracture toughness.
Figure 15. Correlation between fatigue life cycles and fracture toughness.
Preprints 86769 g015
Preprints 86769 g016
Figure 16. Fatigue crack growth curves for different temperature and humidity conditions.
Figure 16. Fatigue crack growth curves for different temperature and humidity conditions.
Preprints 86769 g016
Table 1. Main elements present in Al6082 alloy (wt. %) [5].
Table 1. Main elements present in Al6082 alloy (wt. %) [5].
Element Mg Si Mn Fe Zn Ti Cu Cr Al
Wt.% 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.08 Balance
Table 2. Threshold SIF (MPa.√m) values of Al6082 alloy.
Table 2. Threshold SIF (MPa.√m) values of Al6082 alloy.
Temperature (°C) / Humidity (%) 20 40 60 80
Threshold SIF (MPa.√m)
40 0.58 0.60 0.61 0.61
50 0.54 0.56 0.60 0.60
60 0.50 0.52 0.53 0.58
70 0.45 0.44 0.45 0.46
80 0.44 0.42 0.44 0.44
90 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.42
Table 3. Comparison of Fracture toughness values.
Table 3. Comparison of Fracture toughness values.
Temperature (°C) Humidity (%) Fatigue life cycles Fracture Toughness (MPa.√m) Percentage Error
Experimental [5] Regression eq. 6
20 40 27122 25.97 23.88 8.0
20 50 25857 23.79 23.26 2.2
20 60 24283 23.43 22.64 3.4
20 70 23251 23.30 22.34 4.1
20 80 21483 23.13 22.11 4.4
20 90 18628 23.01 22.66 1.5
40 40 27923 26.82 24.30 9.4
40 50 26111 25.00 23.38 6.5
40 60 24863 23.76 22.85 3.8
40 70 23921 23.57 22.52 4.4
40 80 22737 23.42 22.24 5.1
40 90 21182 23.40 22.11 5.5
60 40 29857 27.55 25.38 7.9
60 50 27958 25.71 24.32 5.4
60 60 27628 25.00 24.15 3.4
60 70 25698 24.60 23.19 5.7
60 80 25133 24.38 22.95 5.8
60 90 24088 24.01 22.58 6.0
80 40 31488 28.03 26.27 6.3
80 50 30364 27.80 25.66 7.7
80 60 29089 26.58 24.95 6.1
80 70 27325 25.29 23.99 5.2
80 80 27037 25.11 23.84 5.1
80 90 26451 25.04 23.54 6.0
Table 4(a). Comparison of Paris constant C and m values.
Table 4(a). Comparison of Paris constant C and m values.
Sl. No. Temperature
(°C)		 Humidity
(%)		 Paris constant C x 10-5 Paris
constant
m
Experimental Empirical eq.5 % Error
1 30 85 4.07 3.95 2.95 1.45
2 50 65 3.23 3.05 5.57 1.51
3 70 55 2.33 2.52 7.54 1.63
Table 4(b). Comparison of fatigue life cycle values.
Table 4(b). Comparison of fatigue life cycle values.
Sl. No. Temperature
(°C)		 Humidity
(%)		 Fatigue life cycles
Experimental Empirical eq.4 % Error
1 30 85 21122 21492 1.72
2 50 65 25369 25810 1.71
3 70 55 27863 28860 3.45
Table 4(c). Comparison of Fracture toughness values.
Table 4(c). Comparison of Fracture toughness values.
Sl. No. Temperature
(°C) 		Humidity
(%) 		Fracture Toughness (MPa.√m)
Empirical eq.1 Empirical eq.6 % Error
1 30 85 23.29 22.11 5.1
2 50 65 24.09 23.05 4.3
3 70 55 26.04 24.27 6.8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated