1. Introduction
The continuous growth of industrial processes in combination with the increasing demand for clean energy sources, have led to a substantial rise in the emission of hazardous gases into the atmosphere. Among these harmful emissions, hydrogen sulfide (H
2S) poses significant environmental and health risks due to its corrosive nature and toxic properties [
1,
2]. Anthropogenic activities such as waste landfilling, home heating, and biogas production contribute substantially to H
2S emissions. Industrial processes, such as petroleum refining, pulp and paper manufacturing, and wastewater treatment, are some sources which release H
2S to the atmosphere [
3]. Consequently, there is a growing urgency to develop efficient and sustainable processes for H
2S removal from industrial flue gases, biogas, and natural gas streams.
There are several procedures for H
2S removal such as biological processes, oxidation, physical separation, solid-phase reactions, dry scrubbing, chemical absorption and adsorption [
3,
4,
5]. Each method has its own benefits and challenges, and the selection of the appropriate method depends on the specific requirements of the application, efficiency considerations, and cost-effectiveness [
5].
However, among the various techniques, adsorption has emerged as the most widely applied approach for H
2S removal, due to its favorable balance between cost and effectiveness for large and small scale applications even at low concentrations and temperatures [
1,
5,
6]. Different adsorbent materials have been used for this purpose such as zeolites, activated carbons, and metal oxides [
5]. Among these materials, activated carbons are very promising materials as effective adsorbents for H
2S because exhibit interesting surface chemistry, high surface area and tunable porosity, which enhances their sorption capacity [
3,
7,
8]. Such materials, act both as catalysts for oxidation of H
2S by air and as adsorbents effectively eliminating sulphur and its oxides from the fuel gas stream[
8]. Moreover, biomass-derived activated carbons which are products from carbonized biomass waste are very attractive and environmentally friendly materials for H
2S adsorption applications because of their natural waste origin [
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14].
In the recent years, porous carbon/metal oxide composites have emerged as promising materials for H
2S sorption due to their unique combination of properties [
15,
16,
17,
18,
19]. The incorporation of metal oxides into the carbon matrix enhances the chemical reactivity, improving the overall sorption performance. Metal oxides, such as iron oxide (Fe
2O
3), zinc oxide (ZnO), and manganese oxide (MnO
2), can chemically react with H
2S to form stable metal sulfides, increasing the overall sorption capacity and efficiency [
3]. Among various metal oxides, ZnO seems to exhibit the highest equilibrium constant for sulfidation, reducing H
2S levels to fractions of 1 ppm [
20] and several studies have been reported about desulfurization using ZnO [
3,
21,
22]. The combination of activated carbon and zinc oxide in composites could exhibits synergistic effects in H
2S capture [
23,
24]. High surface area and micropore hierarchical pore structure of activated carbons, support and enhance the physical and/or chemical adsorption of H
2S molecules. Zinc oxide reacts chemically according to the exothermic reaction presented below and leading to the chemisorption of H
2S.
This combined mechanism, results in higher H2S sorption capacities and faster kinetics compared to individual components. Continued research and innovation in this field will lead to advance technologies and will address the challenges posed by H2S pollution.
In this study, high porous activated carbons derived from three different kinds of biomass waste materials (spent coffee, Aloe-Vera waste leaves and corncob) have been investigated as effective matrices for zinc oxide incorporation and for hydrogen sulfide removal application. Inspired from Geng et al. [
25] who adopted the novel melt infiltration technique to fabricate ZnO-based adsorbents, we produced novel composite ZnO@AC materials for H
2S sorption, meeting the demands of modern times, fulfilling the criteria for simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and environmental friendliness. Overall, this study presents a promising possibility for the development of efficient H
2S sorbents, emphasizing the significance of activated carbon/zinc oxide composites as potential candidates for mitigating H
2S emissions in various industrial processes and environmental applications.
5. Conclusions
In this study, we successfully synthesized and characterized biomass derived pure AC and ZnO@AC composites from three different biomass sources for efficient H2S removal. Using spent coffee, Aloe-Vera waste leaves, and corncob as biomass sources, three different activated carbon matrices were obtained by pyrolysis and chemical activation process. Their ZnO@AC composites were also synthesized, and all the prepared materials exhibited mainly microporous structure with high specific surface area values. XRD results revealed the formation of crystalline zinc oxide particles inside the pore structure with average crystallite size 11, 8.3 and 13.4 nm for ZnO@AC derived from spent coffee, aloe leaves and corncob respectively. The H2S sorption measurements were confirmed the results of the SEM-EDS analysis that the presence of ZnO significantly enhanced the material activity during this process. Moreover, from the overall study we can conclude that surface chemistry of materials plays a key role in this process.
Overall, the proposed biomass derived ZnO@AC composites, seems to be a very promising cost-effective and eco-friendly solution for H2S removal process and the aloe leaves derived material, with 106 mgH2S/gads. adsorption capacity, was the most functional for this process. Future research should focus on scaling up the production of these composites and exploring their performance under real-world conditions to accelerate their practical implementation.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, C.E.S. and M.A.K.; methodology, M.B., C.E.S. and M.A.K.; validation, C.E.S.; formal analysis, M.B. and C.E.S.; investigation, A.G., C.G., D.M., A.E.G., A.A. and M.B.; data curation, M.B. and C.E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B., C.E.S. and M.A.K.; supervision, C.E.S. and M.A.K.;. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”
Figure 1.
Handmade apparatus for H2S adsorption measurements using an artificial H2S+Ar gas mixture of 6000 ppm. Inset figure is a graphical representation of adsorption capacity results after mathematical treatment.
Figure 1.
Handmade apparatus for H2S adsorption measurements using an artificial H2S+Ar gas mixture of 6000 ppm. Inset figure is a graphical representation of adsorption capacity results after mathematical treatment.
Figure 2.
XRD patterns of ZnO@AC composites in comparison with the corresponding patterns of raw activated carbon matrices (inset figure).
Figure 2.
XRD patterns of ZnO@AC composites in comparison with the corresponding patterns of raw activated carbon matrices (inset figure).
Figure 3.
Comparison of FT-IR spectra curves of pure AC and ZnO@AC composites.
Figure 3.
Comparison of FT-IR spectra curves of pure AC and ZnO@AC composites.
Figure 4.
Comparison of TG% curves of pure AC and ZnO@AC composites.
Figure 4.
Comparison of TG% curves of pure AC and ZnO@AC composites.
Figure 5.
Nitrogen porosimetry experimental loops (points) of AC originated from different biomass sources i.e., spent coffee, aloe leaves, and corncob, and the relevant CPSM simulation (continuous line) (a) before melt impregnation with Zn salt (b) after melt impregnation with Zn salt.
Figure 5.
Nitrogen porosimetry experimental loops (points) of AC originated from different biomass sources i.e., spent coffee, aloe leaves, and corncob, and the relevant CPSM simulation (continuous line) (a) before melt impregnation with Zn salt (b) after melt impregnation with Zn salt.
Figure 6.
Pore volume distributions, according to CPSM and DFT models, for AC (left hand) and ZnO@AC composites (right hand), derived from different biomass sources. activated carbon composite materials (a), (b) micro- pore region (c), (d) meso pore region (e) DFT pore volume distribution for pure AC (d) DFT pore volume distribution for ZnO@AC composites.
Figure 6.
Pore volume distributions, according to CPSM and DFT models, for AC (left hand) and ZnO@AC composites (right hand), derived from different biomass sources. activated carbon composite materials (a), (b) micro- pore region (c), (d) meso pore region (e) DFT pore volume distribution for pure AC (d) DFT pore volume distribution for ZnO@AC composites.
Figure 7.
SEM-EDS mapping images for pure AC and ZnO@AC composites before and after H2S removal process. (a) spent coffee, (b) aloe leaves, (c) corncob. (1) pure AC before H2S removal process, (2) ZnO@AC composites before H2S removal process, (3) pure AC after H2S removal process, (4) ZnO@AC composites after H2S removal process.
Figure 7.
SEM-EDS mapping images for pure AC and ZnO@AC composites before and after H2S removal process. (a) spent coffee, (b) aloe leaves, (c) corncob. (1) pure AC before H2S removal process, (2) ZnO@AC composites before H2S removal process, (3) pure AC after H2S removal process, (4) ZnO@AC composites after H2S removal process.
Figure 8.
EDS quantitative analysis for pure AC and ZnO@AC composites before and after H2S removal process. (a) spent coffee, (b) aloe leaves, (c) corncob. (1) pure AC before H2S removal process, (2) pure AC after H2S removal process, (3) ZnO@AC composites before H2S removal process, (4) ZnO@AC composites after H2S removal process.
Figure 8.
EDS quantitative analysis for pure AC and ZnO@AC composites before and after H2S removal process. (a) spent coffee, (b) aloe leaves, (c) corncob. (1) pure AC before H2S removal process, (2) pure AC after H2S removal process, (3) ZnO@AC composites before H2S removal process, (4) ZnO@AC composites after H2S removal process.
Table 1.
Specific surface areas of activated carbon matrices and ZnO@AC composite materials according to BET, Langmuir, and CPSM model.
Table 1.
Specific surface areas of activated carbon matrices and ZnO@AC composite materials according to BET, Langmuir, and CPSM model.
Material code |
Sg(m2/g) (BET) |
CBET
|
Sg(m2/g) (Lang.) |
CLang.
|
Sg(m2/g) (CPSM) |
decreasing ratio |
ACsc |
1195 |
-65 |
1643 |
288 |
1653 |
1.5 |
ZnO@ACsc |
818 |
-64 |
1121 |
241 |
1132 |
ACav |
1148 |
-67 |
1577 |
256 |
1594 |
1.3 |
ZnO@ACav |
846 |
-72 |
1156 |
210 |
1188 |
ACcc |
953 |
-59 |
1300 |
506 |
1341 |
1.6 |
ZnO@ACcc |
597 |
-65 |
816 |
250 |
832 |
Table 2.
Pore structure properties of pure AC matrices and ZnO@AC composite materials.
Table 2.
Pore structure properties of pure AC matrices and ZnO@AC composite materials.
Material code |
Total pore volume (cm3/g) |
Dmean (nm) CPSM low micro |
%microp. (CPSM) |
%microp. (Dubinin) |
ACsc |
0.615 |
1.37 |
91 |
93 |
ZnO@ACsc |
0.422 |
1.29 |
91 |
93 |
ACav |
0.613 |
1.29 |
80 |
90 |
ZnO@ACav |
0.474 |
1.24 |
72 |
84 |
ACcc |
0.484 |
1.20 |
82 |
95 |
ZnO@ACcc |
0.329 |
1.30 |
81 |
87 |
Table 3.
Sulfur % wt. presence on the surface of materials as it was calculated by the EDS instrument analysis.
Table 3.
Sulfur % wt. presence on the surface of materials as it was calculated by the EDS instrument analysis.
|
(SEM-EDS) S % wt. |
Material code |
fresh |
used |
increasing ratio |
ACsc |
0.32 |
2.39 |
4.84 |
ZnO@ACsc |
0.12 |
10.13 |
ACav |
0.38 |
2.31 |
5.65 |
ZnO@ACav |
0.23 |
11.13 |
ACcc |
0 |
2.46 |
4.05 |
ZnO@ACcc |
0 |
9.97 |
Table 4.
Pure AC and ZnO@AC composites capacity on H2S removal process.
Table 4.
Pure AC and ZnO@AC composites capacity on H2S removal process.
Material code |
% yield |
H2S flow (ml/min) |
GHSV (min-1) |
Ads. Cap. (mgH2S/gads.) |
Ads. Cap. (mmolH2S/gads.) |
times increase |
ACsc |
18.9 |
35.7 |
183 |
10.21 |
0.299 |
6.5 |
ZnO@ACsc |
37.4 |
204 |
66.34 |
1.945 |
ACav |
17.6 |
35.7 |
128 |
17.84 |
0.523 |
5.9 |
ZnO@ACav |
35.7 |
136 |
106.03 |
3.109 |
ACcc |
23.0 |
35.7 |
286 |
12.42 |
0.364 |
3.8 |
ZnO@ACcc |
35.7 |
217 |
46.90 |
1.375 |
Table 5.
H2S uptake capacities of ZnO-based adsorbents cited in the literature.
Table 5.
H2S uptake capacities of ZnO-based adsorbents cited in the literature.
Adsorbent |
Ads. Cap. (mgH2S/gads.) |
Reference |
AC |
2.7 |
[24] |
ZnO@AC |
30.5 |
[24] |
ZnO@N-AC |
62.5 |
[24] |
Commercial ZnO |
37.7 |
[17] |
AC |
6.2 |
[13] |
SBA-15@ZnO |
18.5 |
[47] |
SBA-15@ZnO |
41.0 |
[25] |
MCM-48@ZnO |
53.2 |
[25] |
MCM-41@ZnO |
54.9 |
[25] |