1. Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) represents a large global disease burden with an ominous prognosis [
1]. It is predicted that more than 550 million people worldwide will be diabetic by 2030, compared to 108 million in 1980 [
2]. Diabetes is among diseases with the most rapidly increasing global prevalence and improving therapies and prevention methods to reduce diabetes-related complications and premature mortality is of utmost importance.
DM is characterized by a relative or absolute lack of insulin, resulting in elevated blood glucose levels. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) accounts for more than 90% of DM cases and is primarily caused by an inappropriate cellular response to insulin. In response to insulin resistance (IR) or intolerance, pancreatic beta cells hypertrophy and release more insulin, consequently leading to pancreatic exhaustion and failure in later stages of the disease [
3]. The natural history of T2D is characterized by obesity in >80% of cases, which is further exacerbated by a Western diet and physical inactivity leading to IR, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and hyperinsulinemia [
4]. Chronic hyperglycemia can lead to microvascular (e.g., nephropathy, retinopathy, and polyneuropathy) and macrovascular (e.g., stroke, cardiovascular disease) complications [
5]. In T2D patients, cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, accounting for 68% of all diabetes-related deaths [
6].
Given the physiological complexity of the disease, in vitro models that could provide a path to discovery and testing of novel therapeutics have been limited. By modeling this complex disease
in vitro, we want to increase and accelerate the discovery of therapeutic targets, improve disease screening, and enable improved preclinical drug testing. In vitro cell models can provide an economically and ethically acceptable research tool and enable the targeting of specific processes linked to a single cell type of interest, without uncontrolled influences of the whole organism. In vitro cell models can be performed with high throughput and reproducibility and can be genetically modified by transfection to investigate specific genes of interest [
7]. Thus, cell-based models, if developed properly, could serve as tools to accelerate therapeutic discovery.
In general, in vitro models of diabetes are derived from the tissues that are mainly involved in the disease pathophysiology, such as muscle, pancreas, adipose tissue, and liver [
8]. Skeletal muscle is the primary recipient of postprandial glucose, and T2D patients often show significantly impaired blood glucose clearance [
9]. Also, the higher flux of FFAs in patients with T2D leads to an increased FA-uptake into myocytes [
10]. To assess the effect of T2D on skeletal muscle, we chose to use C2C12 cells, a mouse myoblast cell line, which is well-established and has been widely used in diabetes research [
11]. In the setting of IR, the myocardium’s ability to utilize glucose as an energy source is reduced [
12], whereas under physiological conditions energy utilization from FA and carbohydrates is based on metabolic demand and availability [
13]. Even though FFAs are the major energy source for heart muscle, an excess of plasma FFAs may predispose the heart to ischemic damage and high oxidative stress [
14]. These metabolic changes and the accumulation of lipids in the heart play a critical role in the development of diabetes-related cardiac complications, such as diabetic cardiomyopathy [
15,
16]. To further understand these mechanisms in heart muscle, we mimicked diabetic conditions in H9C2 cells, which are myocytes from embryonic rat ventricular tissue [
17]. H9C2 myocytes are widely applied in studies addressing cardiac hypertrophy, metabolism, ischemic stress, and IR/diabetes [
18,
19].
To cause IR as it is occurring in T2D, most cell models with adipocytes and myocytes use chronic insulin exposure or fatty acid treatments (mainly palmitate) [
20] (
Table 1). The most commonly used immortalized muscle cell lines for in vitro diabetes models are L6 and C2C12 myoblasts [
21].
To simulate the diabetic milieu
in vitro, not only the cells themselves play a critical role, but also the conditions in which they are cultured. The main reason for metabolic syndrome and T2D is chronic overnutrition consisting mainly of fatty acids and carbohydrates in the developed world [
32]. In vitro studies showed that once a cell becomes overwhelmed by the excess supply of FFAs, the accumulation of lipids such as diacylglyceride (DAG) and ceramide may contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), low-grade inflammation, and finally IR and apoptosis [
33]. Correspondingly, symptoms of T2D are caused by both hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia, whereas hyperglycemia alone would more likely reflect uncontrolled T1D [
34]. In cell culture research, it is a common practice to use culture media with supraphysiological glucose concentrations to promote and accelerate cellular growth. Previous studies addressing IR and diabetes in H9C2 and C2C12 muscle cells worked with 22-25 mM glucose as control and 33-40 mM glucose to mimic hyperglycemia, which is 8 times more than physiological levels [
28,
29]. In several studies investigating DM, glucose concentrations of cell culture media are not specified, leaving the reader uninformed (
Table 1) [
26,
27,
31]. The American Diabetes Association and WHO define normoglycemia as a fasting plasma glucose between 3.9 mmol/L and 5.6 mmol/L [
35,
36]. Diabetes is defined when the fasting plasma glucose reaches 7.0 mmol/L or higher [
37]. It is recommend to first growing and differentiating cells in physiological glucose levels of 5 mM [
25]. The simulation of hyperlipidemia requires the treatment with fatty acids (FA). Chavez and Summers showed that the saturated FA palmitate (the most dominant fat in the western fast food diet) causes IR, whereas unsaturated FAs such as oleate even reversed palmitate-induced IR in skeletal muscle [
20]. This suggests using the widely applied FA palmitate for T2D-related hyperlipidemia conditions. High concentrations of palmitate (200-750 µM), which have previously been used in studies investigating IR, can cause apoptosis and high myotube loss in skeletal and cardiac muscle cells [
26,
38,
39]. We therefore worked with a maximal concentration of 150 µM for C2C12 and 75 µM for H9C2, which still leads to IR but is less toxic and close to the physiological range (300-410 µM in humans [
40] and 100-400 µM in rats [
41]). In conclusion, exposure to high glucose, palmitate, and insulin together, may be closer to conditions observed in T2D patients compared to previously described cell-based approaches (
Table 1). To achieve more similarity to human muscle tissue we worked with differentiated myotubes, whilst many research groups work with the undifferentiated myoblasts [
25,
42,
43]. The insulin dependent glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) is similarly expressed in C2C12 myotubes compared to human skeletal muscle cells [
11]. Undifferentiated H9C2 myoblasts express little cardiac specific markers and can still differentiate into skeletal muscle instead of cardiac muscle. In 2017 Patten et al. stated that the combination of serum reduction with retinoic acid (RA) supplementation in the differentiation process did increase the expression of cardiac specific markers [
44]. Lopashuk et al. identified that only differentiated H9C2 cells switch from glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation, which is characteristic for heart tissue [
45]. Also, insulin-signaling molecules such as insulin receptor substrate-1 and GLUT4 are significantly more expressed by differentiated H9C2 myotubes [
46]. In conclusion, differentiation into myotubes to explore heart and skeletal muscle specific processes related to T2D is necessary. Various human studies suggested the existence of mitochondrial dysfunction in muscle cells of obese and insulin-resistant patients [
47,
48]. Comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms that relate mitochondrial function and insulin signaling is still lacking. Identifying the factors and mechanisms responsible for changes in mitochondrial energetics could make mitochondria to a potential target for treating diabetes. Therefore, we examined mitochondrial function in vitro in rodent skeletal and heart muscle utilizing the Agilent Seahorse XF Analyzer and utilized transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to examine mitochondrial morphometry.
Taken together, this study aimed to develop a novel model for simulating T2D in vitro in skeletal and cardiac muscle cells that reflects the cellular response typified by T2D patients.
4. Discussion
We observed that complex T2D in vitro modeling has significant effects on the functionality of rodent skeletal and heart muscle cells, leading to severe IR, changes in ATP-linked respiration, shifts in energetic phenotypes, and mitochondrial morphology changes, all consistent with what has been observed in the muscle of patients suffering from T2D [
55]. Pre-existing in vitro models of T2D often disregard many critical and complex aspects of the disease (
Table 1). The current study shows that by following some essential steps lacking in the literature, a representative in vitro model of human T2D-related changes in muscle cells can be created.
Basal glucose uptake rates were increased in both cell lines after HG treatment compared to LG, especially after long-term exposure. The gradient-driven glucose uptake might have facilitated this via GLUT1 instead of insulin-dependent GLUT4. McMillin et al. showed that mGLUT4 knockout mice still showed increased basal glucose uptake after chronic exposure to HG. They also found that in mouse skeletal muscle cells, GLUT1, 3, 6 or 10 almost exclusively mediate glucose uptake after chronic glucose overload [
56]. Gosmanov et al. observed that, compared to 5 mM glucose exposure, HG treatment (30mM, up to 48h) of aortic endothelial cells increased GLUT1 expression and GLUT4-dependent glucose uptake, but didn’t change baseline glucose uptake rates. Heilig et al. saw an 134% increase in GLUT1 mitochondrial RNA as well as a 50% increase in deoxy-glucose uptake in rat mesangial cells exposed to 20 mM glucose for 3 days, when compared to cells adapted to physiological glucose levels (8mM).
We examined mitochondrial function and metabolic phenotypes in rodent skeletal and heart muscle. Skeletal myotubes from insulin-sensitive subjects with T2D family history have decreased ATP content, consistent to previous studies showing decreased ATP and impaired mitochondrial activity in myotubes from lean offspring of T2D patients [
57,
58,
59]. Mailloux et al. also observed that C2C12 myotubes exposed to 24 mM glucose for 24h showed a glycolytic phenotype and more ROS production than a low glucose control with an oxidative phenotype; however, ATP-linked respiration was not altered, indicating that those myotubes still were metabolically flexible and achieved the ATP demand via glycolysis [
60]. Elkalaf et al. followed a similar approach and saw differences in maximal respiration in hyperglycemic C2C12 myotube cultures and a phenotype switch. In both studies, cells were differentiated for up to 7 days in media containing 5 mM or 25 mM glucose before any experiment [
61]. Differentiating cells in high glucose might have caused an adaptation of the cells, leading to restored cellular flexibility. In the current study, cells were differentiated in low glucose levels and only exposed to high glucose for 24-96h when already differentiated, which more accurately represents the changes of T2D
in vivo. Future experiments should include longer exposure to high glucose to investigate if, following differentiation, an adaptation to supraphysiological glucose and correspondingly non-altered ATP levels is possible.
Strongly increased respiration rates might be associated with elevated cellular stress since high glucose and palmitate levels lead to apoptosis in cardiomyocytes [
62,
63,
64]. On the other hand, it can also reflect a highly energetic phenotype with increased oxidation abilities [
51]. The increase in ATP-linked respiration might be associated with an increase of FA oxidation and decreased glucose utilization, which is assumed to be increased in the T2D heart in humans [
65,
66]. FA uptake into the heart is mainly driven by the availability in the blood stream [
67]. With an oversupply in fatty acids, not only is FA oxidation increased but also detrimental lipid metabolites (i.e., ceramides) [
63,
68]. Reliance of the heart on FA oxidation to produce ATP might lead to oxidative stress and ischemic damage [
14]. Therefore, losing the ability to switch to glycolysis combined to an increase in ROS due to the increased FA oxidation and increasing lipotoxicity contribute to both decreased ATP production and cardiac inefficiency.
In patients with T2D mitochondrial content is reduced, size and fusion are impaired, and endoplasmic reticulum stress occurs in different cell types [
69]. Increased fission and impaired fusion was observed in human renal glomerular endothelial cells treated with high glucose (30 mM for 72h) [
70]. A reduced number and fragmented mitochondria were found in skeletal muscle from T2D and obese subjects, as well as decreased electron transport chain activity [
47]. In our study, we did observe a significant decrease in mitochondrial density in diabetic C2C12 cells, consistent with decreased ATP-linked respiration. We did not observe any significant changes in mitochondrial number per 10 µm
2 area of cytoplasm after 24h exposure to T2D mimicking conditions. Thus, it is likely that the reduction of mitochondrial number that was reported in patients suffering from T2D, is a chronic condition that will only occur in vitro after longer treatments.
H9C2 myotubes treated with T2D mimicking conditions including palmitate (HGP, HGPI) showed a significant increase in mitochondrial density compared to control, which can be a sign of increased fusion, allowing an enhanced transport of metabolites and enzymes. This observation is consistent to our Mito Stress Tests, where these cells showed increased ATP-linked respiration, confirming a better adaptability to an in vitro T2D environment of heart muscle cells.
Both C2C12 and H9C2 myotubes treated with HM and T2D mimicking conditions showed a higher fraction of swollen/vacuolated mitochondria compared to LG controls. Mitochondrial swelling can be caused by osmotic changes in cell culture media and FA treatments but is also a known sign of apoptosis and necrosis [
71]. The question remains if whether the decreased ATP-linked respiration we observed in skeletal muscle cells in the T2D environment led to imminent apoptosis and then mitochondrial swelling, or if the T2D mimicking treatments directly caused mitochondrial swelling, subsequently leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and decreased ATP turnover.
There are several limitations to consider in our studies. We chose to use the saturated FA palmitate for our investigations, as it was previously used for studies addressing IR. Even when the Western diet is dominated by saturated FAs, using only one saturated FA is not physiologically accurate since in vivo circulating FFAs are a mixture of various saturated and unsaturated FAs. For future experiments, a mixture of the most common FAs in human plasma could be used (i.e. oleic, palmitic and stearic acids) [
72].
High mannitol treatments served as osmotic controls for high glucose treatments in our study, as it has been widely applied in the literature. Yet we observed some hitherto undescribed effects, especially after 96h high mannitol treatments, such as decreased ATP-linked respiration, a shift to glycolysis but decreased basal glucose uptake, and mitochondrial swelling. The mechanistic background of the effects that we observed must still be explored. Still, it can be stated that the impact of hyperosmolarity and hyperlipidemia in a hyperglycemic T2D environment appears more complex than expected.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, E.K. and H.P.; methodology, E.K. and S.M.; validation, E.K., D.D., R.L. and S.M.; formal analysis, R.C.; investigation, E.K. and D.D., resources, H.P., D.R., S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, E. K.; writing—review and editing, E.K., H.P., R.L., D.R., D.D.; visualization, E.K.; supervision, H.P.; project administration, E. K.; funding acquisition, H.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Basal and insulin dependent 3H-2-deoxy-glucose-uptake of C2C12 and H9C2 myotubes after 24h and 96h treatments. The effect upon an acute insulin stimulus (100 nM) was compared between different T2D-mimicking conditions and physiological (LG) and osmotic (HM) controls. IR occurred in all T2D-mimicking conditions. E, F, I, J, O, P: Half-violin plots for combined 24h and 96h baseline and insulin-dependent glucose uptake, with error bars for standard error and lines connecting mean glucose uptake between conditions, by group. A: C2C12 LG control groups after 24h treatment. B: H9C2 LG control groups after 24h treatment. C: C2C12 treated with high glucose, palmitate and insulin for 24h. D: H9C2 treated with HG, palmitate and insulin for 24h. E: All C2C12 cells plotted by treatment. F: All H9C2 cells by treatment. G: C2C12 osmotic control groups treated with HM for 24h. H: H9C2 osmotic control groups treated with HM for 24h. I: C2C12 cells receiving high glucose treatment plotted by palmitate status. J: H9C2 cells receiving high glucose treatment plotted by palmitate status. K: C2C12 96h LG treatment. L: H9C2 96h LG treatment. M: C2C12 96h HG treatments. N: H9C2 96h HG treatments. O: All C2C12 cells plotted by palmitate status. P: All H9C2 cells by palmitate status. Insulin (+): 100 nM acute insulin; LG: low glucose 5 mM; LGI: low glucose + 1 nM insulin; LGP: low glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; LGPI: low glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin; HG: high glucose 25 mM; HGI: high glucose + 1 nM insulin; HGP: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; HGPI: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin; HM: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose; HMI: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose + 1 nM insulin; HMP: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; HMPI: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin. Basal glucose uptake and insulin dependent glucose uptake are presented as cpm per mg protein or per million cells. Values represent the means (SD); n=6 per treatment group for LG and HG treatments, n=3 per group for HM treatments. One-way ANOVA for A-D, G, H, K-N p<0.0001. Brackets indicate Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests with *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 1.
Basal and insulin dependent 3H-2-deoxy-glucose-uptake of C2C12 and H9C2 myotubes after 24h and 96h treatments. The effect upon an acute insulin stimulus (100 nM) was compared between different T2D-mimicking conditions and physiological (LG) and osmotic (HM) controls. IR occurred in all T2D-mimicking conditions. E, F, I, J, O, P: Half-violin plots for combined 24h and 96h baseline and insulin-dependent glucose uptake, with error bars for standard error and lines connecting mean glucose uptake between conditions, by group. A: C2C12 LG control groups after 24h treatment. B: H9C2 LG control groups after 24h treatment. C: C2C12 treated with high glucose, palmitate and insulin for 24h. D: H9C2 treated with HG, palmitate and insulin for 24h. E: All C2C12 cells plotted by treatment. F: All H9C2 cells by treatment. G: C2C12 osmotic control groups treated with HM for 24h. H: H9C2 osmotic control groups treated with HM for 24h. I: C2C12 cells receiving high glucose treatment plotted by palmitate status. J: H9C2 cells receiving high glucose treatment plotted by palmitate status. K: C2C12 96h LG treatment. L: H9C2 96h LG treatment. M: C2C12 96h HG treatments. N: H9C2 96h HG treatments. O: All C2C12 cells plotted by palmitate status. P: All H9C2 cells by palmitate status. Insulin (+): 100 nM acute insulin; LG: low glucose 5 mM; LGI: low glucose + 1 nM insulin; LGP: low glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; LGPI: low glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin; HG: high glucose 25 mM; HGI: high glucose + 1 nM insulin; HGP: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; HGPI: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin; HM: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose; HMI: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose + 1 nM insulin; HMP: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; HMPI: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin. Basal glucose uptake and insulin dependent glucose uptake are presented as cpm per mg protein or per million cells. Values represent the means (SD); n=6 per treatment group for LG and HG treatments, n=3 per group for HM treatments. One-way ANOVA for A-D, G, H, K-N p<0.0001. Brackets indicate Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests with *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 2.
Plate-based oxygen consumption measurements of C2C12 (A-H, Q-R) and H9C2 (I-P, S-T) myotubes. The cells were plated at 1.2 x104 cells per well in XF96 microplates and differentiated for 5 days. Treatments were carried out for 24h or 96h prior to the assay. A: ATP-linked respiration of C2C12 myotubes after 24h treatments (row/treatment factor (Rf) F (7, 292) = 70.16, P<0.0001; column factor (Cf) F (2, 292) = 9.807, P<0.0001). B: Maximal respiration of C2C12 Myotubes after 24h treatments (Rf F (7, 288) = 2.206, P=0.0338; Cf F (2, 288) = 9.502, P=0.0001). C: Spare respiratory capacity of C2C12 Myotubes after 24h treatments (Rf F (7, 292) = 3.153, P=0.0031; Cf F (2, 292) = 15.72, P<0.0001). D, H, L, P: Relative oxygen consumption rate percentage (D: Rf F (7, 282) = 1.516; Cf F (2, 282) = 5.305, H: Rf F (5, 168) = 0.7035, Cf F (2, 168) = 2.439, L: Rf F (5, 146) = 0.6060, Cf F (2, 146) = 1.126, P: Rf F (5, 131) = 0.8578, Cf F (2, 131) = 0.7791). E: ATP-linked respiration 96h (Rf F (5, 123) = 21.21, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 123) = 28.60, P<0.0001). F: Maximal respiration 96h (Rf F (5, 155) = 19.18, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 155) = 38.29, P<0.0001). G: Spare respiratory capacity 96h (Rf F (5, 154) = 12.12, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 154) = 33.39, P<0.0001). I: ATP-linked respiration of H9C2 myotubes after 24h treatments (Rf F (5, 139) = 23.58, P<0.0001; incubation factor F (2, 139) = 7.225, P=0.0010). J: Maximal respiration 24h (Rf F (5, 144) = 20.55, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 144) = 69.85, P<0.0001). K: Spare respiratory capacity 24h (Rf F (5, 135) = 15.03, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 135) = 47.87, P<0.0001). M: ATP-linked respiration 96h (Rf F (5, 178) = 8.173, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 178) = 0.2515, P=0.7779). N: Maximal respiration 96h (Rf F (5, 185) = 5.086, P=0.0002; Cf F (2, 185) = 47.23, P<0.0001). O: Spare respiratory capacity 96h (Rf F (5, 186) = 0.6408, P=0.6688; Cf F (2, 186) = 26.49, P<0.0001). Q, R: OCR plotted versus ECAR of C2C12 after 24h (Q) and 96h (R) treatment. S, T: OCR plotted versus ECAR of H9C2 after 24h (S) and 96h (T) treatment. LG: low glucose 5 mM; LGI: low glucose + 1 nM insulin; HG: high glucose 25 mM; HGI: high glucose + 1 nM insulin; HGP: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; HGPI: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin; HM: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose; HMI: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose + 1 nM insulin. Each graph represents data of minimum three independent biological replicates and presented as means ± standard deviation, n per treatment group = 8-15 (C2C12) or 6-15 (H9C2) wells per assay. Two-way-ANOVA for row factor treatment (Rf) and column factor Seahorse assays (Cf). Significance of secondary pairwise comparisons among treatments by Tukey´s test is indicated by brackets and asterisks *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01; ***: p<0.001 in the panels.
Figure 2.
Plate-based oxygen consumption measurements of C2C12 (A-H, Q-R) and H9C2 (I-P, S-T) myotubes. The cells were plated at 1.2 x104 cells per well in XF96 microplates and differentiated for 5 days. Treatments were carried out for 24h or 96h prior to the assay. A: ATP-linked respiration of C2C12 myotubes after 24h treatments (row/treatment factor (Rf) F (7, 292) = 70.16, P<0.0001; column factor (Cf) F (2, 292) = 9.807, P<0.0001). B: Maximal respiration of C2C12 Myotubes after 24h treatments (Rf F (7, 288) = 2.206, P=0.0338; Cf F (2, 288) = 9.502, P=0.0001). C: Spare respiratory capacity of C2C12 Myotubes after 24h treatments (Rf F (7, 292) = 3.153, P=0.0031; Cf F (2, 292) = 15.72, P<0.0001). D, H, L, P: Relative oxygen consumption rate percentage (D: Rf F (7, 282) = 1.516; Cf F (2, 282) = 5.305, H: Rf F (5, 168) = 0.7035, Cf F (2, 168) = 2.439, L: Rf F (5, 146) = 0.6060, Cf F (2, 146) = 1.126, P: Rf F (5, 131) = 0.8578, Cf F (2, 131) = 0.7791). E: ATP-linked respiration 96h (Rf F (5, 123) = 21.21, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 123) = 28.60, P<0.0001). F: Maximal respiration 96h (Rf F (5, 155) = 19.18, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 155) = 38.29, P<0.0001). G: Spare respiratory capacity 96h (Rf F (5, 154) = 12.12, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 154) = 33.39, P<0.0001). I: ATP-linked respiration of H9C2 myotubes after 24h treatments (Rf F (5, 139) = 23.58, P<0.0001; incubation factor F (2, 139) = 7.225, P=0.0010). J: Maximal respiration 24h (Rf F (5, 144) = 20.55, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 144) = 69.85, P<0.0001). K: Spare respiratory capacity 24h (Rf F (5, 135) = 15.03, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 135) = 47.87, P<0.0001). M: ATP-linked respiration 96h (Rf F (5, 178) = 8.173, P<0.0001; Cf F (2, 178) = 0.2515, P=0.7779). N: Maximal respiration 96h (Rf F (5, 185) = 5.086, P=0.0002; Cf F (2, 185) = 47.23, P<0.0001). O: Spare respiratory capacity 96h (Rf F (5, 186) = 0.6408, P=0.6688; Cf F (2, 186) = 26.49, P<0.0001). Q, R: OCR plotted versus ECAR of C2C12 after 24h (Q) and 96h (R) treatment. S, T: OCR plotted versus ECAR of H9C2 after 24h (S) and 96h (T) treatment. LG: low glucose 5 mM; LGI: low glucose + 1 nM insulin; HG: high glucose 25 mM; HGI: high glucose + 1 nM insulin; HGP: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; HGPI: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin; HM: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose; HMI: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose + 1 nM insulin. Each graph represents data of minimum three independent biological replicates and presented as means ± standard deviation, n per treatment group = 8-15 (C2C12) or 6-15 (H9C2) wells per assay. Two-way-ANOVA for row factor treatment (Rf) and column factor Seahorse assays (Cf). Significance of secondary pairwise comparisons among treatments by Tukey´s test is indicated by brackets and asterisks *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01; ***: p<0.001 in the panels.
Figure 3.
Mitochondrial morphology and number of C2C12 and H9C2 myotubes after 24h treatment with T2D mimicking conditions. A: Normal muscular mitochondria. B-C: Swollen mitochondria. D-H: Mitochondria of C2C12 myotubes after different treatments in 15kX magnification. L-N, P, Q: Mitochondria of H9C2 myotubes, n. = nucleus, m = normal mitochondria, sm = swollen/vacuolated mitochondria. I, O: Mitochondrial number per 10 µm2 area of cytoplasm of C2C12 (I) and H9C2 (O). J, R: Mitochondrial density (area occupied by mitochondria in total area of cytoplasm) in C2C12 (J) and H9C2 (R). K, S: Percentage of swollen mitochondria in C2C12 (K) and H9C2 (S) myotubes. LG: low glucose 5mM; HM: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose; HG: high glucose 24mM; HGP: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; HGPI: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin. One-way ANOVA of I p= 0.1241; J p=0.0007, K + S p<0.0001; O p=0.0681; R p=0.0009. Tukey’s tests for multiple comparisons *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 3.
Mitochondrial morphology and number of C2C12 and H9C2 myotubes after 24h treatment with T2D mimicking conditions. A: Normal muscular mitochondria. B-C: Swollen mitochondria. D-H: Mitochondria of C2C12 myotubes after different treatments in 15kX magnification. L-N, P, Q: Mitochondria of H9C2 myotubes, n. = nucleus, m = normal mitochondria, sm = swollen/vacuolated mitochondria. I, O: Mitochondrial number per 10 µm2 area of cytoplasm of C2C12 (I) and H9C2 (O). J, R: Mitochondrial density (area occupied by mitochondria in total area of cytoplasm) in C2C12 (J) and H9C2 (R). K, S: Percentage of swollen mitochondria in C2C12 (K) and H9C2 (S) myotubes. LG: low glucose 5mM; HM: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose; HG: high glucose 24mM; HGP: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; HGPI: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin. One-way ANOVA of I p= 0.1241; J p=0.0007, K + S p<0.0001; O p=0.0681; R p=0.0009. Tukey’s tests for multiple comparisons *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 4.
Relative frequency of mitochondria with respect to area and length after 24h treatment with T2D mimicking conditions. A-I C2C12 myotubes, J-R H9C2 myotubes. Kolmogorov-Smirnov-Test of mitochondrial area (µm2) and length (µm) of LG vs HG (A, J), LG vs HGP (B, K), HM vs HG (C, L); LG vs HGPI (D, M), HG vs HGP (E, N), Hm vs HGP (F, O); HG vs HGPI (G, P), HGP vs HGPI (H, Q); HM vs HGPI (I, R). LG: low glucose 5 mM; HM: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose; HG: high glucose 25 mM; HGP: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; HGPI: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin.
Figure 4.
Relative frequency of mitochondria with respect to area and length after 24h treatment with T2D mimicking conditions. A-I C2C12 myotubes, J-R H9C2 myotubes. Kolmogorov-Smirnov-Test of mitochondrial area (µm2) and length (µm) of LG vs HG (A, J), LG vs HGP (B, K), HM vs HG (C, L); LG vs HGPI (D, M), HG vs HGP (E, N), Hm vs HGP (F, O); HG vs HGPI (G, P), HGP vs HGPI (H, Q); HM vs HGPI (I, R). LG: low glucose 5 mM; HM: 20 mM mannitol + 5 mM glucose; HG: high glucose 25 mM; HGP: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2; HGPI: high glucose + 150 µM palmitate for C2C12 and 75 µM palmitate for H9C2 + 1 nM insulin.
Table 1.
Selection of current in vitro models of type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance.
Table 1.
Selection of current in vitro models of type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance.
Cell type and differentiation |
Preincubation |
Type of treatment, concentration, duration |
Read outs |
Reference |
3T3-L1 adipocytes
|
DMEM 5 mM glucose |
Palmitate 0.75 mM 17h Hypoxia 16h Dexamethasone 1 µmol/l 24h High glucose 25 mM 18h |
Inhibition of phosphorylation of insulin receptor and protein kinase B; decrease in insulin dependent glucose uptake Impaired GLUT4 membrane intercalation |
[20] [22] [23]
[24] |
C2C12 myoblasts
|
DMEM 25 mM glucose |
Insulin 60 nM 24h Palmitate 0.4 mM 24h |
Inhibition of insulin stimulated activation of Akt/protein kinase B; Swollen mitochondria |
[21] |
DMEM 5 mM glucose |
Glucose 15 mM 24h Palmitate 0.25 mM 24h |
Increased apoptosis, increased ROS production |
[25] |
C2C12 myotubes
|
DMEM 5 mM glucose
DMEM not specified |
Palmitate 0.75 mM 17h
Palmitate 0.6 mM 24h |
Inhibition of insulin stimulated glycogen synthesis and activation of protein kinase B, diacylglyceride accumulation Reduced Akt phosphorylation, glucose uptake and GLUT4 expression |
[20]
[26] |
Huh7 differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma |
DMEM 25 mM glucose |
Insulin 60 nM 24h Palmitate 0.4 mM 24h |
Inhibition of insulin stimulated activation of Akt/protein kinase B |
[21] |
Primary human myotubes |
DMEM not specified |
Palmitate 0.5 mM 48h |
Decrease in insulin stimulated glucose uptake |
[27] |
H9C2 myoblasts
|
DMEM 25 mM glucose
DMEM 5 mM glucose |
Glucose 33 mM 36h
Glucose 40 mM 24h Glucose 25 mM + insulin 100 nM 24h |
Enhanced apoptosis, activation of cardiac hypertrophy proteins Increased ROS production + apoptosis Decrease in insulin stimulated glucose uptake, Inhibition of insulin stimulated activation of Akt |
[28]
[29] [30] |
H9C2 myotubes
|
DMEM not specified |
Palmitate 100 µM 24h |
Decrease in insulin stimulated glucose uptake |
[31] |
Table 2.
Escalation of palmitate concentrations for long term (96h) treatments of C2C12 and H9C2 myotubes. Palmitate concentrations were increased every 24 hours.
Table 2.
Escalation of palmitate concentrations for long term (96h) treatments of C2C12 and H9C2 myotubes. Palmitate concentrations were increased every 24 hours.
Treatment duration |
Conc. For C2C12 |
Conc. For H9C2 |
24h |
35 µM |
5 µM |
48h |
70 µM |
25 µM |
72h |
105 µM |
50 µM |
96h |
150 µM |
75 µM |