Introduction
The global burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), now termed metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease (MASLD) is increasing worldwide in parallel with that of obesity; the prevalence of NAFLD in the overweight population is 79%[
1]. NAFLD is characterized by pathologic liver features ranging from steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH, now called metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, or MASH), characterized by steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis. Between 20% and 30% of NAFLD cases progress to NASH, and 10%–20% of NASH cases progress to cirrhosis (fibrosis stage 4) [
2,
3]. NAFLD, NASH, and cirrhosis are associated with increased risks of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver transplantation [
4]. Many lines of evidence have revealed that hepatocyte cell death, inflammation, oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and lipotoxicity, which promote MASLD to progress into hepatocarcinogenesis.
Compared with livers of healthy subjects,
de novo lipogenesis is increased by 26% in livers of patients with NAFLD or NASH [
5,
6,
7,
8,
9]. The alterations in lipid metabolism leads to the lipotoxicity and hepatocyte cell death that contribute to HCC development.
Sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs) are transcription factors that regulate lipid lipogenesis; alterations in this process have been associated with pathogenesis of NAFLD, NASH, and eventually HCC. SREBPs regulate transcription of genes that control biogenesis of triglycerides (TG), fatty acids (FAs), and cholesterol in mammals [
10].
Mammalian SREBPs are encoded by the genes
SREBF1 and
SREBF2.
SREBP1 expresses 2 isoforms: SREBP-1a and SREBP-1c, which differ in their first exons due to different transcriptional start sites. SREBP1 isoforms are abundant in liver, white adipose tissue, adrenal glands, skeletal muscle, and brains of mice and humans, while SREBP2 is expressed ubiquitously [
11]. SREBP-1c regulates transcription of genes involved in FA and triacylglycerol synthesis, whereas SREBP-1a stimulates FA and cholesterol synthesis. SREBP-2 regulates transcription of genes that control cholesterol synthesis; all these pathways interact and overlap in a complicated fashion [
12,
13].
The transcription activation domain of SREBPs is located at the N-terminus. SREBPs are expressed as precursors that are cleaved to release the N-terminal domain, which can then enter the nucleus to stimulate the transcription of target genes. An escort protein, SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP), transports SREBP precursors to the Golgi apparatus, where the active forms are generated by 2 proteases (site 1 protease and site 2 protease) and an anchoring protein. Insulin induced genes (INSIGS), ER membrane proteins with 6 transmembrane helices, bind the sterol-sensing domains of SCAP, causing the retention of the SCAP–SREBP complex based on sterol levels [
14].
During development of liver diseases, SREBP activation or repression alters lipid profiles, contributing to metabolic disorders and cancer. Signaling pathways, such as the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)–protein kinase B (PKB, Akt)–mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, regulate SREBP activation and are altered under different physiologic conditions [
15,
16]. Strategies to target the SREBP pathways have therefore been studied and developed. We review the roles and mechanism of SREBPs in healthy vs diseased liver and potential therapies to target these pathways.
Multifunctional role of SREBPs in NAFLD and NASH
Because SREBPs have multifunctional roles in lipid metabolism, many metabolic disorders are related to SREBP deregulation, such as type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, and hepatic steatosis [
17,
18]. Variants of
SREBP1 have been associated with increased risk for NAFLD [
19]. Transgenic overexpression of SREBP-1c in in mouse liver led to increased lipogenesis and hepatic steatosis [
20]. On the other hand, deletion of the gene encoding SREBP-1c in livers of
ob/ob mice, which are insulin resistant, results in an approximate 50% reduction of hepatic triglycerides (TGs), indicating the role of SREBP-1c in the hepatic steatosis in
ob/ob mice [
21]. In
ob/ob mice, diet-induced NAFLD and steatosis were reversed by SREBP-1c antisense oligonucleotides, without improving insulin hepatic resistance [
22].
HIV-patients with insulin-resistant lipodystrophia have altered hepatic expression of SREBP1 and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), compared with NAFLD or control subjects, which contributes to pathogenesis of steatosis and fibrosis [
23]. Alterations in patatin-like phospholipase3 (PNPLA3) activity have also been associated with development of NASH [
24,
25]; polymorphisms in
PNPLA3 have been associated with severity of NAFLD [
26]. Expression of PNPL3 is regulated by SREBP-1c, which binds to the
PNPLA3 promoter. Accumulation of PNPL3 on lipid droplets stimulates lipid accumulation in mouse hepatocytes [
26,
27].
Insulin mediates expression of the
SREBP1, proteolytic processing of its products, and thereby hepatic lipogenesis. Insulin stimulates of SREBP-1c to active the PI3K–Akt and Akt–mTORC1 signaling pathways. Furthermore, AMPK, an energy sensor for cellular energy of homeostasis, inhibits cleavage and transcriptional activation of SREBP via phosphorylation. If AMPK activity is stimulated with metformin, SREBP-1c cleavage and nuclear translocation (via ser 372 phosphorylation) are suppressed, leading to attenuation of liver steatosis in mice deficient in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) with diet-induced insulin resistance [
28].
In patients with NAFLD, treatment with antrodan, which is used to treat alcohol-associated steatohepatitis, alleviate fatty liver symptoms and the liver injuriesal, by altering AMPK–Sirt1–PPARγ–SREBP-1c signaling, although the mechanism not clear [
29]. Similarly, xanthohumol inhibits the development of fatty liver in mice by impairing EF–Golgi translocation of the SCAP–SREBP complex and blocking incorporation into common coated protein II vesicles [
30]. In patients with hepatic steatosis and lipodystrophy, leptin treatment improves insulin-stimulated hepatic and peripheral glucose metabolism, suggesting potential therapeutic approaches [
31].
Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) have been identified that regulate lipid metabolism at the post-transcriptional level. The miRNAs can affect intracellular lipid levels, cholesterol transportation, and HDL formation by affecting SREBP expression [
32,
33]. Long non-coding
RNAs (lncRNAs) also regulate hepatic lipogenesis, and alterations in lncRNAs have been associated with NASH. For example, ln
cARSR is upregulated in serum and liver of NAFLD patients and mouse models by methionine-choline deficient (MCD) diet feeding. lncARSR mediates lipogenesis via the Akt–SREBP-1c pathway [
34]
. miRNAs and lncRNAs also regulate lipid metabolism synthetically. In cell lines and mouse models of NAFLD, abundant transcript 1 (NEAT1) binds miR-140 to exacerbate the progression, through inactivating the AMPK–SREBP-1 pathway, which presenting a new therapeutic strategy[
35]
.
Studies support the roles of lncRNAs in hepatic lipid accumulation. For example, the lncRNA Gm15622 is highly expressed in livers of mice with high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity. Gm15622 acts as a sponge for the miRNA miR-742-3p, thereby increasing expression of SREBP-1c to promote lipid accumulation. These findings have increased our understanding of how lipid metabolism and accumulation are altered during development of NAFLD [
36].
SREBPs may mediate Liver Fibrosis via TGF-β Signaling during Chronic liver disease progressing to HCC
Liver fibrosis develops with chronic liver disease or injury, such as in NAFLD, hepatitis virus infections, or alcohol-induced steatohepatitis, leading to HCC and liver failure [
47]. Liver fibrosis is characterized by an excess deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) in the perisinusoidal space (between hepatocytes and the sinusoids), distorting liver architecture and causing liver stiffness [
47,
48]. The ECM, a network of extracellular macromolecules and minerals, contains enzymes, glycoproteins, and proteins such as collagen that provide structural and biochemical support to surrounding cells. Collagen, the main structural protein in connective tissues, is produced by myofibroblasts (hepatic stellate cells in liver).
Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) activates signaling pathways that lead to liver fibrosis. TGF-β signaling, via TβRII and SMADs, causes quiescent HSCs (5%–8% of liver cells) to transdifferentiate into activated HSCs, which are highly proliferative, contractile, and fibrogenic. Activated HSCs produce ECM proteins and promote not only fibrogenesis but hepatic inflammation. TGF-β signaling pathways interact with MAPK, mTOR, PI3K/AKT, and Rho/GTPase pathways [
49], and are regulated by SREBP-1c, which inhibits HSC.
In rat and mouse HSCs, leptin-induced β-catenin signaling reduces levels of SREBP-1c protein and activity, independent of conventional key regulators of SREBP-1c activity, such as SCAP, INSIG, and other proteins [
50]. This observation provides a potential mechanisms of the liver fibrogenesis associated with increased levels of leptin in obese individuals, and indicates the important function of SREBP signaling in HSCs.
Further investigation into the mechanisms by which SREBP1c regulates HSCs and liver fibrosis[
51] demonstrated that overexpression of SREBP1c inhibited liver fibrosis in mice, by reducing levels of TGFβ1 and signaling via SMAD3 and Akt1/2/3[
51]. In activated HSCs, SREBP1c was reported to regulate epigenetic factors such as bromodomain-containing chromatin-modifying factor bromodomain protein 4 (BrD4) and methionine adenosyltransferase 2B (MAT2B) to prevent liver fibrogenesis. Interestingly, PPARγ, a transcription factor that regulates activation of HSCs, increases with levels of SREBP1c and together these proteins inhibits HSC activation.
SREBP2 has been implicated in liver fibrosis via regulation of cholesterol levels in HSCs. In mouse models of NASH and primary mouse HSCs, the nuclear form of SREBP2 increases with HSC activation. Addition of 25-hydroxycholesterol or LDL, which promotes the formation of the SCAP–INSIG complex, decreased the nuclear form of SREBP2 in quiescent HSCs, but not in activated HSCs; this difference is attributed to differences in levels of INSIG-1 and INSIG-2 in cells. Activated HSCs have nearly undetectable levels of INSIG-1 and INSIG-2, resulting in the constitutive processing of SREBP when excess free cholesterol accumulates. The feedback regulation of cholesterol homeostasis mediated by SREBP2 is disrupted in HSCs. This disruption affects the sensitivity of HSCs to activation by TGF-ß, resulting in accumulation of free cholesterol and contributing to the vicious cycle of liver fibrosis [
52]. Therefore, the SREBP pathway has a crucial role in the process of liver fibrosis and requires careful characterization.
SREBPs are defined as pro-fibrotic mediators because they activate TGF-β in lipotoxicity-induced fibrosis development. There are also investigations into SREBP mediation of kidney fibrosis, via a lipid-independent pathways [
53]. SREBPs also regulate cell functions such as autophagy, metabolic circadian rhythm, and other process that affect expression of non-lipogenic genes in different organs or cell lines during fibrosis development. In light of the similarities among cell and tissue types in fibrosis signaling, it is worthwhile to address the versatility and complexity of SREBPs in mediating liver fibrosis, and hopefully identify inhibitors that can be used to treat liver and other diseases.
Role of SREBPs in HCC
HCC is the second-leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Studies have shown that alterations in lipid metabolism and accumulation of lipid metabolic products contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis. HCCs of high histologic grade, advanced, and metastatic tumors overexpress SREBP-1. On the other hand, downregulation of SREBP1 inhibits proliferation and apoptosis in HCC cell lines, such as HepG2 [
54]. Tissue microarray analysis showed that high expression of spindlin 1 (SPIN1), associated with HCC malignancy, is co-activated with SREBP-1c and that the proteins cooperate to increase intracellular TGs, cholesterols, and lipid droplets, which promote progression of HCC [
55].
SREBP-1 affects HCC development via different signaling pathways. Hepatoma-derived growth factor (HDGF) is co-expressed with SREBP-1 in HCCs, and is closely associated with HCC prognosis [
56]. Similarly, apoptosis-antagonizing transcription factors (AATFs) are highly expressed in HCC tissues and cell lines; AATFs bind SREBP-1c to regulate proliferation, migration, colony formation, and tumor growth [
57].
An HCC-associated tumor suppressor, zinc fingers and homeoboxes2 (ZHX2), inhibits SREBP-1c-regulated lipogenesis in cell lines and human specimens. This regulation pathway induces SREBP-1c degradation, by increasing transcription of miRNA-24-3P, to suppress HCC development [
58]. Acyl CoA synthetase 4 (ACSL4), and oncogene and marker of the alpha-fetoprotein-high subtype of HCC, upregulates expression of SREBP-1 and downstream lipogenic enzymes to reprogram fatty acid metabolism through c-myc, which facilitates HCC progression [
59]. In mice with diet-induces obesity that develop steatohepatitis and liver tumors, histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) and SREBP-1 are co-expressed in tumor tissues, and HDAC8 is directly upregulated by SREBP-1. Additionally, HDAC8 promotes cell proliferation by coordinating with the chromatin modifier EZH2 to epigenetically repress Wnt antagonists. This repression of Wnt antagonists inhibits cell death through the p53–p21 pathway, leading to G2/M cell cycle arrest. Notably, this regulatory pathway is also perturbed in human NAFLD-associated HCC tissues, in which HDAC8 is aberrantly upregulated by SREBP-1. [
60].
When signal transducers and activators of transcription 5 (STAT5) are deficient, SREBP-1 and peroxisome PPARγ signaling is upregulated, activating tumor necrosis factor, reactive oxygen species, and STAT3, which contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis [
61]. Expression analysis of human HCC specimens showed that SREBP-1 expression correlated with expression of UBC12, which contributes to HCC aggressiveness. If the NEDD8-activating enzyme E1, MLN4924, is incorporated in tumor xenograft mice, HCC progression is blocked [
62].
mTOR signaling can activate SREBPs. One of the genes regulated by SREBP encodes enzyme fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2), which is upregulated in HCC cells [
63]. The transcription factor Krüppel-like factor 10 (KLF10) is phosphorylated by AMPK, which then represses SREBP-1c and thereby the lipogenesis pathways in liver tumor cells [
64].
Collectively, multiple pathways regulate SREBP-1 expression, activation, and stability to promote the proliferation, invasion, and migration of HCC cells, leading to tumor growth and metastasis. Moreover, genetic disruption or pharmaceutical blocking of regulators of SREBP pathways, such as with SCAP or gp78, inhibits lipid synthesis-related gene expression and reduces HCC progression in chow diet mouse models [
65]. In addition to SCAP-dependent SREBP activation during the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), SCAP-independent regulation also plays a role. Our research has demonstrated that chronic alcohol consumption-induced HCC upregulates IL-17A signaling, which further increases cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis via TNFR1-caspase-2-dependent activation of SREBP1/2 in both mouse and human steatotic hepatocytes [
66]. Deletion of the IL-17A receptor results in significant downregulation of SREBP1/2 proteins and less lipid accumulation in ethanol and HFD fed mice. Therefore, targeting the IL-17A-SREBP signaling pathway may be a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with alcohol-induced HCC.
SREBP-2 regulates cholesterol synthesis, and SREBP-2 activation promotes cholesterol accumulation that contributes to liver tumor progression. P53 induces the mevalonate pathway through SREBP-2 maturation and induces expression of the cholesterol transporter gene ABCA1. A p53 activator, haploinsufficient tumor suppressor ASPP2, interacts with SREBP-2 and negatively regulates the mevalonate pathway to inhibit growth of HCC cells, . [
67]Interaction of the oncogene staphylococcal nuclease with tudor domain containing-1 (SND-1) leads to altered activation of the sterol regulatory element-binding protein SREBP2 in hepatocellular carcinoma, promoting accumulation of cellular cholesteryl esters[
68]. In FASN-knockout mice, which develop liver tumors, levels of HMGCR cholesterol synthesis and nuclear SREBP-2 are increased [
69]. If FASN ubiquitination is blocked, the SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 degradation complexes are disrupted, preventing development of liver tumors [
70].
Targeting SREBPs for treating HCC and chronic liver disease
Targeting SREBPs, by modulating the level of expression or activation process, small molecules or natural products as potential therapeutics for preventing or treating liver disease have been thoroughly investigated
(Table 1). Song et al. [
63] reported that
a small molecule, betulin, specifically inhibits the maturation of SREBP by inducing interaction of SCAP with INSIGS, which could improve hyperlipidemia. The function of betulin in treating liver diseases has been studied in HCC cells. In mice with diethylnitrosamine-induced liver tumors, betulin suppressed tumor progression by reducing inflammation [
64]
.
Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor of RAS–MEK–ERK signaling, VEGFR, and PDGFR, is a first-line treatment for HCC. Sorafenib reduces expression of SCD-1 to decrease synthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids, and activates AMPK to reduce levels of SREBP-1 and phosphorylate mTOR, which suppresses liver cancer [
71]. Sorafenib is not an effective treatment for HCC, and high levels of SREBP-1 in tumors correlate with shorter survival. Administration of betulin increases the ability of sorafenib to kill HCC cells and slow growth of xenograft tumors by suppressing cellular glucose metabolism and reducing glycolytic activity [
72].
Radiofrequency ablation is an important strategy for treatment of advanced HCC. After undergoing RFA, tumors in some patients have high protein levels of SREBP-1, which correlates with reduced survival. A small-molecule inhibitor of SREBP-1, SI-1, 1-(4-bromophenyl)-3-(pyridin-3-yl) urea, inhibits aerobic glycolysis and increases killing HCC cells by radiofrequency ablation and slows growth of xenograft tumors. SI-1, 1-(4-bromophenyl)-3-(pyridin-3-yl) urea therefore could be a promising approach for treatment of HCC [
73].
Other compounds, such as cinobufotalin and emodin, inhibit HCC cells via SREBP-1 and its downstream targets. Cinobufotalin, extracted from the skin secretion of the giant toad, promotes HCC cells apoptosis, induces cell cycle G2/M arrest, and inhibits cell proliferation. Cinobufotalin downregulates SREBP-1 expression and inhibits
de novo lipid synthesis in HCC cells [
74]. In addition, emodin, a component of a Chinese medicinal herb Moldenke, induces apoptosis and activates expression of intrinsic apoptosis signaling pathway-related proteins, such as caspase 9, Bax, and BCL-2, in HCC cells. This apoptotic process may or may not depend on the SREBP-1 pathway, [
75]. Emodin inhibits SREBP-2 transcriptional activity to suppress cholesterol metabolism and Akt signaling, which sensitizes HCC cells to the anti-cancer effect of sorafenib
in vitro and in xenograft tumors [
76]. Moreover, ursolic acid, a natural pentacyclic terpenoid, activates SREBP-2 and increases the expression of cholesterol biosynthesis-related enzymes to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HCC cells [
77].
Conclusions
We have reviewed our understanding of the role of SREBP-mediated lipid metabolism in development of liver diseases and potential therapeutic targets. Inhibition of SREBP-mediated pathways with small molecules might prevent or slow progression of HCC
(Figure 1). Multiple signaling pathways and molecules regulate expression, stability, and activation of of SREBP-1 and SREBP-2, which control gene transcription to regulate liver cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and metastasis
(Figure 2). Small molecules, compounds, or herbal extracts
(Table 1) that target the SREBP-1- or SREBP-2-regulated mevalonate pathway to repress lipid metabolism might be developed to inhibit liver tumor progression.
SREBP inhibition is not always beneficial for liver diseases. For example, liver-specific PTEN deficiency results in excess lipids and steatosis in mice, whereas when combined with SCAP deletion it reduces steatosis, exacerbates the later stage development of inflammation and liver injury, and accelerates the development of NASH and HCC [
78]. Targeting lipogenesis via the SREBP pathway is not straightforward, and therefore, alternative approaches that consider lipid levels, based on the physiologic situation, should be explored. To effectively address liver pathology, it is crucial to target different stages of disease progression precisely. This approach ensures the maintenance of lipid homeostasis while intervening in lipid metabolism.