Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Effects of Waterlogging at Flowering Stage on the Grain Yield and Starch Quality of Waxy Maize

Altmetrics

Downloads

67

Views

33

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

06 November 2023

Posted:

06 November 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Waterlogging is a common abiotic stress in global maize production. Maize flowering stage (from tasseling to silking) is more fragile to environmental stresses among different growth stages. The effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on the grain yield and starch quality of waxy maize were studied using Suyunuo5 (SYN5) and Yunuo7 (YN7). The grain yield and starch concentration of both hybrids were reduced by waterlogging. The size of starch granules and proportion of small-molecule amylopectin increased in SYN5 and decreased in YN7 when plants suffered waterlogging at flowering, in contrast to the change trend of relative crystallinity. The pasting viscosities and gelatinization temperatures were reduced, whereas the gelatinization enthalpy was unaffected by waterlogging in both hybrids. Our study indicated that waterlogging at flowering reduced the grain yield, restricted starch deposition, and deteriorated the pasting property of waxy maize. Between the two hybrids, YN7 and high pasting viscosities and low retrogradation percentage than SYN5, indicated its advantages on produce starch for viscous and less retrograde food. Results provide information for utilization of waxy maize grain in food production.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Agricultural Science and Agronomy

1. Introduction

In the current climate change scenario, agriculture faces increasing instability with extreme weather events, leading to considerable yield losses. Waterlogging is a prevalent environmental adversity that suppresses maize productivity and degrades grain quality; it is predicted to increase in magnitude and frequency along with global warming [1]. In South and Southeast Asia alone, 18% of total maize growing area is frequently affected by waterlogging conditions, which constitute 25%–30% of annual production losses [2]. Maize is a rainfed crop and considered vulnerable to waterlogging when the field soil moisture content is higher than 80%, thereby affecting plant growth and development [3]. Among different growth stages, the flowering stage (from tasseling to silking) is sensitive to environmental stresses. Waterlogging around the flowering stage induces the increase in lodging risk by decreasing the stem diameter, rind penetration strength, and transverse bending strength of the third base internode [3]. Waterlogging also decreases the chlorophyll and carbohydrate contents [4] and the nitrogen content in different organs at silking and maturity stages [5]. Waterlogging also disturbs carbon-nitrogen metabolism, breaks plant endogenous hormone balance, accelerates leaf senescence, eventually resulting in a significant reduction in photosynthetic capacity and maize grain yield [6,7,8].
Waterlogging also affects grain starch formation, deposition, and structural and functional properties. Waterlogging starting at the anthesis stage decreases the amyloplast number in the wheat endosperm, and advances the programmed cell death in endosperm cells [9]. Post-anthesis waterlogging suppresses the activities of ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase and soluble starch synthase in wheat grains, increases the starch granule size, and reduces the viscosity parameters [10,11]. Meanwhile, waterlogging during grain filling all decrease the grain weight and affect the milling quality, although changes in protein composition may increase or maintain the gluten strength.[12] However, short duration of waterlogging and shading decreases the size of starch granules and increases the peak viscosity [13]. In rice, the structural and pasting properties of starch are affected by flooding irrigation, but the influence varies among cultivars [14]. In comparison with alternate wetting and drying, constant-flooding irrigation decreases the peak and breakdown viscosities, gelatinization temperature, setback viscosity, and gelatinization enthalpy; however, the effect on starch granule size and amylopectin chain length distribution has different trends [15]. In peanut, the oil, unsaturated fatty acids, and starch contents in grain increased, while crude protein, soluble sugar, saturated fatty acids, essential amino acids, non-essential amino acids, and total amino acids contents decreased under waterlogging. [16] Waxy maize is a special maize type with starch is composed of nearly pure amylopectin, which endows high viscosity, low retrograde, and high stability than normal maize starch [17]. Our previous study reported that waterlogging during grain filling stage has significantly affect the starch physicochemical properties [18,19]. However, limited information is available regarding the starch deposition and functional properties of waxy maize that suffered waterlogging at flowering stage. We hypothesize that waterlogging at the flowering stage affects starch accumulation and changes the starch structure, thereby affecting the starch physicochemical properties, such as the pasting and thermal properties of waxy maize. Results could provide a fundamental basis for using stressed starch based on the utilization of waxy maize.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Experimental design

A pot trial was conducted on the Experimental Farm in Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, China in 2014–2015. Seeds were sown on March 15 in both years. The two seedlings at one-leaf stage were transplanted to pots (38 cm height and 43 cm diameter), and one seedling at the four-leaf stage was left. The plants were supplied with 10 g of compound fertilizer (N:P2O5:K2O=15%:15%:15%) at transplanting time and 6 g of urea (N=46%) at jointing stage[18]. The weeds in the pot were manually removed. The mean temperature, rainfall, and sunlight durations during plant growth in 2014 and 2015 were 21.73 and 21.00 ℃, 426 and 730 mm, and 599 and 500 h, respectively.
Soil moisture content was controlled by a negative-pressure water supply and controlling pot device (Chinese Patent 200510123976) by setting the water supply tension of the device at different values [20]. Before the tasseling, the soil relative moisture content was set at 75%. At the flowering stage (from tasseling to silking), the soil relative moisture content for control (CK) and waterlogging (WS) was set at 80% and over 100% (10 mm water level aboveground). Stress was terminated after the ears were manually pollinated. During treatment, the plants were covered with a transparent canopy that was 5 m high aboveground to avoid the influence of rainfall. After treatment, the soil relative moisture content was reset to approximately 75% until maturity.

2.2. Grain yield

The grains were harvested at the maturity (about 40 days after pollination), and grain number per ear was counted. The grains were manually stripped from the cobs, and grain weight (mg) and grain yield (g/plant) were determined after sun drying.

2.3. Starch content

Starch content in grains was determined with anthrone–sulfuric acid method [21].

2.4. Starch isolation

The grains were steeped in 1 g/L NaHSO3 solution at room temperature for 2 days. The starches were isolated using the method described by Lu et al. [20]. The samples were rinsed with distilled water, and then ground using a blender for 2.5 min. The suspensions were passed through a 100-mesh sieve. The residues on the screen were again homogenized for 1.5 min and then passed through the same sieve. The starch–protein slurry was collected in a 1000mL wide-neck flask and allowed to stand for 4 h. The supernatant was suctioned, and the settled starch layer was collected in 50 mL centrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 10 min. The upper non-white layer was scooped. The white layer was resuspended in distilled water and stirred for 30 min before centrifugation. The isolation procedures were repeated thrice. The starch was then collected and dried in an oven at 40°C for 48 h. The protein and ash contents in the isolated starch were determined by using the International Methods 46-10.01 and 08-17.01 of AACC. These contents were lower than 0.3% and 0.2%, indicating that the purity of starch was up to the Chinese National Standard (GB/T 8885-2017).

2.5. Starch granule size

The average starch granule size (µm) was expressed in terms of the volume of equivalent spheres. The size distributions of starch granules were estimated with a laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Mastersizer2000, Malvern, Worcestershire, England) following a procedure described in the study of Lu et al. [20]. The disperse phase was absolute ethyl alcohol. Instrument accuracy was verified by using Malvern standard glass particles. The instrument, which follows the principle of laser diffraction, can measure sizes of 0.1 and 2000 μm.

2.6. Starch molecular weight

For isoamylase debranched starch granules, starch (5 mg) was dissolved in 5 mL of distilled deionized water in a boiling water bath for 60 min. Sodium azide solution (10 µL 2%w/v), acetate buffer (50 µL, 0.6 M, pH 4.4), and isoamylase (10 µL, 1400 U, EC 3.2.1.68, Sigma) were added to the starch dispersion. The mixture was incubated in a water bath at 37 ℃ for 24 h. The hydroxyl groups of the debranched glucans were reduced by treatment with 0.5% (w/v) of sodium borohydride under alkaline conditions for 20 h. The preparation about 600 µL was dried in vacuo at room temperature and allowed to dissolve in 20 µL of 1 M NaOH for 60 min. The solution was diluted with 580 µL of distilled water.
Molecular weight distribution was analyzed using a PL–GPC 220 high-temperature chromatograph (Agilent Technologies UK Limited; Shropshire, UK) with three columns (PL110–6100, 6300, and 6525) and a differential refractive index detector [22,23]. The eluent system used dimethyl sulfoxide containing 0.5 mM NaNO3 at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The temperature of the column oven was controlled at 80 °C.

2.7. X-ray diffraction

X-ray diffraction patterns of starch were obtained with an X-ray diffractometer (D8 Advance, Bruker–AXS, Germany) operated at 200 mA and 40 kV. The scanning region of diffraction angle (2θ) ranged from 3° to 40° at a step size of 0.04° with a count time of 0.6 s. Relative crystallinity (RC, %) was calculated as the percentage of the sum of total crystalline peak areas to total diffractograms.

2.8. Pasting property

The pasting properties of starch (1.96 g of starch added in 26.04 g of water, total weight of 28 g; 7% db, w/w) were estimated using a rapid viscosity analyzer (RVA, Model 3D; Newport Scientific, Warriewood NSW, Australia) following the method of Lu and Lu[24]. A sample suspension was equilibrated at 50 °C for 1 min, heated to 95 °C at 12 °C/min, maintained at 95 °C for 2.5 min, cooled to 50 °C at 12 °C/min, and maintained at 50°C for 1 min. The paddle speed was set at 960 rpm for the first 10 s and then decreased to 160 rpm for the rest of the analysis.

2.9. Thermal property

The gelatinization properties of starch were estimated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, Model 200 F3 Maia, NETZSCH, Germany) following the method of Lu and Lu [24]. Each sample (5 mg, dry weight) was loaded into an aluminum pan (25/40 microliters, D = 5 mm) and distilled water was added to achieve a starch-water suspension containing 66.7% water. Samples were hermetically sealed and allowed to stand for 24 h at 4 ℃ before heating in the DSC. The DSC analyzer was calibrated using an empty aluminum pan as a reference. Sample pans were heated at a rate of 10 ℃/min from 20 to 100 ℃. Thermal transitions of starch were defined as onset temperature (To), peak gelatinization temperature (Tp), conclusion temperature (Tc), and gelatinization enthalpy (ΔHgel). Samples were stored at 4 °C for 7 days after thermal analysis for retrogradation investigations. Retrogradation enthalpy (ΔHret) was automatically calculated and retrogradation percentage (%R) was computed as %R = 100 ×ΔHret /ΔHgel.

2.10. Statistical design

Data presented in tables and figures are the mean of three repetitions. Analysis was performed using ANOVA and Duncan’s test at a significance level of p < 0.05 with the data processing system (version 7.05).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Grain yield

The grain weight was significantly reduced by waterlogging in both hybrids in both years, with decrease was 8.4% and 23.5% for YN7 and SYN5, respectively (Figure 1). The grain number was also reduced by waterlogging in both hybrids in both years (6.7% for YN7 and 7.5% for SYN5), and the decrease was significant for SYN5 in 2015 and for YN7 in 2014.The reduced grain weight and number induced the yield loss in both years, and the decrease was 14.7% for YN7 and 29.1% for SYN5, indicated that YN7 was more tolerant to waterlogging than that of SYN5. Yield penalty due to waterlogging at the flowering stage has been widely reported in maize and is mainly related to the decreased grain number and weight. These yield penalties may related to the decreases in dry matter accumulation, redistribution of stored photosynthate to the grain, and the conversion capacity from carbohydrate to starch in grain [25]. This results were caused by decreased the activities of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, decreased the contents of zeatin riboside, indole-3-acetic acid and gibberellic acid but increased abscisic acid in leaf, and reduced photosynthetic rate by disordered the leaf gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters [6,7,8], which resulted in the decreased antioxidative enzyme activities, accelerating leaf senescence, and ultimately leading to decreased biomass accumulation [25]. The yield for YN7 under different treatments was higher than that for SYN5, this genotypic difference was also reported in various studies [6].

3.2. Starch content

The starch content in YN7 was decreased by waterlogging (6.3% and 12.5% in 2014 and 2015) in both years, and the value in SYN5 was unaffected in 2015 and decreased by 6.7% in 2014 (Figure 1). The unaffected starch content in SYN5 in 2015 may due to the severe yield decrease in this year, and the shrunken sink make the surviving grains received similar source. Our previous study on fresh waxy maize observed that the starch content was increased due to the accelerated grain filling and shortened grain filling duration [26]. Zhou et al. [11] observed that the post-anthesis waterlogging reduced the wheat grain amylose content but did not affect the amylopectin content. The reduced starch content maybe caused by the weakened activities of sucrose synthase and soluble starch synthase [25], and decreased the allocation of nitrogen and carbon assimilates at pre- and post-anthesis to the grains [27]. A study in peanut also reported that the decreased starch content under waterlogging at the flowering stage was mainly caused by the decreased activities of sucrose synthetase and sucrose phosphate synthetase [28].

3.3. Starch granule size

The size distributions of starch granules all presented dual peaks (Figure 2). The average starch granule size in response to waterlogging differed between the two hybrids; that is, it increased in SYN5 and decreased in YN7 in both years when the plants suffered from waterlogging. A study on rice also observed that the starch granule size in response to constant flooding irrigation management differed between the two cultivars [15]. Waterlogging during wheat heading and anthesis causes damage to endosperm cell structure, decreased the starch granules numbers in endosperms, resulting in the formation of irregular starch granules and increased the starch granule size [11]. Another study reported that short-time waterlogging and shading decreased the starch granules size [13]. Our previous study reported that the starch granule size of the two hybrids was decreased by post-silking waterlogging [18]. In the present study, the discrepancy of the results between the two hybrids may due to the different features of their development; the amyloplast in the endosperm in SYN5 was formed late and less but developed quickly, whereas the starch granules in YN7 formed more number in endosperm cells [29]. Therefore, amyloplast formation in endosperm cells needs further study to clarify the discrepancy on different hybrids.

3.4. Starch molecular weight distribution

The molecular weight distribution of isoamylase debranched starch for all the samples presented dual peaks, namely, peak1 and peak2 (Figure 3), consistent with those of different waxy starch resources, indicating the typical waxy starch character [30]. In the GPC profiles of amylopectin, the peak1 fraction contained short starch chains, such as A and B chains (A + B1 chains) and the peak2 fraction consisted of long B chains with high-molecular-weight molecules [31]. The peak1/peak2 value with waterlogging increased in SYN5 but decreased in YN7 in both hybrids, consistent with the change trends of starch granule size; this finding indicated that starch with large granule size has high proportion of small molecular size of amylopectin branch chains [30]. A study on rice observed that the amylopectin chain length in response to constant-flooding irrigation management differed between the two cultivars [15].

3.5. Starch X-ray diffraction

The X–ray diffraction (XRD) of starch provided information on the long–range molecular order and was associated with ordered arrays of double helices formed by the amylopectin side chains [32]. All the samples presented refection angles at 15°, 23°, 17°, and 18°, which present a typical A diffraction pattern (Figure 4). The relative crystallinity (RC) with waterlogging decreased in SYN5 but increased in YN7 in both years. The different responses of RC to flooding irrigation was also reported in rice [14]. In the present study, the change trend of RC was contrary to the trend of starch granule size and peak1/peak2 ratio, indicated the starch with large granule size and high molecular-weight has low RC. Our previous study also observed that waxy maize starch with high proportion of medium-sized starch granules has high RC [33]. Hsieh et al. [30] reported that waxy starch with small granule size and high proportion of peak1 has high RC.

3.6. Pasting property

The grain flour peak (PV), trough (TV), final (FV), and setback (SB) viscosities in SYN5 were reduced by waterlogging in both years, whereas the breakdown viscosity (BD) was reduced and unaffected by waterlogging in 2014 and 2015 (Table 1). The pasting viscosities of YN7 were decreased by waterlogging in 2014. The PV and BD were reduced, whereas the TV, FV, and SB were unaffected in 2015. The pasting temperature (Ptemp) in YN7 was unaffected by waterlogging in both years, whereas the value in SYN5 was unaffected in 2014 but decreased by waterlogging in 2015. In general, the pasting viscosities decreased, and Ptemp was unaffected by waterlogging. This finding is consistent with the observation on wheat [10,11] and our previous study on waxy maize starch [18,19]. The decreased viscosity is mainly due to the decreased starch content [34]. However, a study on wheat observed that short-time (7 d) waterlogging and shading increased the PV and Ptemp but decreased the TV and FV [13]. In rice, the pasting viscosity in response to waterlogging differed among the cultivars [14]. YN7 has higher PV, BD, FV, and SB than SYN5, but they have similar TV and Ptemp. This finding indicated that YN7 has an advantage for producing viscous foods.

3.7. Thermal property

The gelatinization and retrogradation characteristics of waxy maize flours under different water conditions are presented in Table 2. The ΔHgel was unaffected by waterlogging in both hybrids in both years, whereas the ΔHgel in response to post-silking waterlogging was dependent on hybrids [19]. A study on rice also observed that ΔHgel with constant flooding irrigation was higher than that after alternate wetting and drying irrigation, but it compared with conventional irrigation was fluctuated between cultivar and year [15]. The To and Tp in SYN5 were reduced by waterlogging in both years; the two parameters in YN7 were reduced and unaffected by waterlogging in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The Tc in SYN5 was unaffected and decreased by waterlogging in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The Tc in YN7 was unaffected and increased by waterlogging in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Constant-flooding irrigation reduced the transition temperature of starch in rice [15], indicating that waterlogging reduced the stability of the starch structure [17].
Retrogradation occurred after the gelatinized samples were stored at 4 ℃ for 7 days. The ΔHret and %R in both hybrids were decreased by waterlogging in 2014 and were unaffected in 2015. Our previous study observed that the %R was increased by waterlogging after pollination [19]. The discrepancy may be due to the plants grown in 2015, which has longer rainfall duration during grain filling (211 and 445 mm in 2014 and 2015, respectively); the adequate rainfall erased the influence of waterlogging during flowering. The two hybrids have similar ΔHgel and To, but SYN5 has higher Tp, Tc, ΔHret, and %R than YN7, which endows the advantage of YN7 to produce low retrograde food.
Table 2. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on the flour thermal property of waxy maize.
Table 2. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on the flour thermal property of waxy maize.
Year Hybrid water ΔHgel
(J/g)		 To
(℃)		 Tp
(℃)		 Tc
(℃)		 ΔHret
(J/g)		 %R
(%)
2014 SYN5 CK 8.84±0.24abc 69.6±0.1d 75.6±0.0de 82.4±0.1c 3.5±0.0a 39.7±0.9a
WS 8.74±0.22bcd 68.5±0.1e 74.8±0.0f 81.9±0.1c 2.9±0.1b 33.0±0.3b
YN7 CK 8.53±0.12cd 70.2±0.0cd 75.5±0.0e 82.3±0.0c 2.7±0.2b 31.9±1.5b
WS 8.23±0.07d 68.3±0.1e 74.6±0.0f 83.1±0.1b 2.1±0.2c 24.9±1.9c
2015 SYN5 CK 8.93±0.07abc 72.5±0.0a 77.8±0.2a 84.7±0.0a 3.6±0.1a 40.8±1.8a
WS 9.36±0.11a 70.4±0.1cd 76.2±0.1b 83.3±0.2b 4.1±0.2a 43.2±2.2a
YN7 CK 8.83±0.11abcd 71.4±0.6b 76.0±0.0c 82.9±0.1b 3.6±0.1a 40.6±1.1a
WS 9.16±0.30ab 70.9±0.2bc 75.8±0.2cd 83.0±0.2b 3.7±0.2a 40.0±0.7a
SYN5, Suyunuo5; YN7, Yunuo7; CK, control; WS, waterlogging; ΔHgel, gelatinization enthalpy; To, onset temperature; Tp, peak gelatinization temperature; Tc, conclusion temperature; ΔHret, retrogradation enthalpy; %R, retrogradation percentage. Mean value in the same column followed by different letters is significantly different (P < 0.05).

4. Conclusion

This study showed that waterlogging stress at the flowering stage decreased the grain number and weight, resulting in yield loss. The grain starch content was reduced by waterlogging. The size of starch granules was enlarged and reduced by waterlogging in SYN5 and YN7, respectively. The proportion of high-molecular weight in amylopectin and RC were decreased and increased by waterlogging in SYN5 and YN7. The grain flour pasting viscosities were reduced by waterlogging in general, whereas those parameters in response to waterlogging were inconsistent between the two hybrids across the two years. The ΔHgel was unaffected, and the transition temperatures were reduced by waterlogging in general. The ΔHret and %R in both hybrids were reduced and unaffected by waterlogging in 2014 and 2015, respectively. Between the two hybrids, YN7 had higher pasting viscosity and low %R and is superior in producing food with viscous taste and low retrograde. The plants growth in 2015 with adequate rainfall during grain filling achieved higher grain yield, PV, BD, and %R. The results offer the option to choose an optimal waxy maize hybrid under normal and waterlogged conditions based on different food utilizations.

Author Contributions

Huan Yang: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing–original draft, Writing–review & editing. Xuemei Cai: Investigation, Formal analysis. Dalei Lu: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing–review & editing.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Key Research & Development Program of Jiangsu Province (BE2021317), earmarked fund for Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System (JATS[2022]497), Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and High–end Talent Support Program of Yangzhou University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mustroph, A. Improving Flooding Tolerance of Crop Plants. Agronomy-Basel 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kaur, G.; Vikal, Y.; Kaur, L.; Kalia, A.; Mittal, A.; Kaur, D.; Yadav, I. Elucidating the morpho-physiological adaptations and molecular responses under long-term waterlogging stress in maize through gene expression analysis. Plant Sci 2021, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tian, L.X.; Bi, W.S.; Ren, X.S.; Li, W.L.; Sun, L.; Li, J. Flooding has more adverse effects on the stem structure and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) than waterlogging in Northeast China. Eur J Agron 2020, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dash, S.S.; Lenka, D.; Sahoo, J.P.; Tripathy, S.K.; Samal, K.C.; Lenka, D.; Panda, R.K. Biochemical characterization of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under excessive soil moisture stress. Cereal Res Commun 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Otie, V.; Ping, A.; Udo, I.; Eneji, E. Brassinolide effects on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and yield under waterlogged conditions. J Plant Nutr 2019, 42, 954–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ren, B.; Zhang, J.; Dong, S.; Liu, P.; Zhao, B. Responses of carbon metabolism and antioxidant system of summer maize to waterlogging at different stages. J Agron Crop Sci 2018, 204, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tian, L.X.; Li, J.; Bi, W.S.; Zuo, S.Y.; Li, L.J.; Li, W.L.; Sun, L. Effects of waterlogging stress at different growth stages on the photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) Under field conditions. Agr Water Manage 2019, 218, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ren, B.Z.; Dong, S.T.; Zhao, B.; Liu, P.; Zhang, J.W. Responses of Nitrogen Metabolism, Uptake and Translocation of Maize to Waterlogging at Different Growth Stages. Front Plant Sci 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fan, H.Y.; Zhou, Z.Q.; Yang, C.N.; Jiang, Z.; Li, J.T.; Cheng, X.X.; Guo, Y.J. Effects of waterlogging on amyloplasts and programmed cell death in endosperm cells of Triticum aestivum L. Protoplasma 2013, 250, 1091–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, Q.; Wu, X.J.; Xin, L.; Jiang, H.D.; Wang, X.; Cai, J.; Jiang, D. Waterlogging and simulated acid rain after anthesis deteriorate starch quality in wheat grain. Plant Growth Regul 2018, 85, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, Q.; Huang, M.; Huang, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Cai, J.; Dai, T.B.; Cao, W.X.; Jiang, D. Effect of post-anthesis waterlogging on biosynthesis and granule size distribution of starch in wheat grains. Plant Physiol Bioch 2018, 132, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Arata, A.F.; Dinolfo, M.I.; Martinez, M.; Lazaro, L. Effects of Waterlogging during Grain Filling on Yield Components, Nitrogen Uptake and Grain Quality in Bread Wheat. Cereal Res Commun 2019, 47, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, H.W.; Wang, Z.S.; Zhuo, Q.C.; Zhang, B.; Wang, F.H.; Jiang, D. Starch Granule Size Distribution and Pasting Characteristic Response to Post-Anthesis Combined Stress of Waterlogging and Shading. Agriculture-Basel 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, Z.K.; Du, Y.F.; Mao, Z.L.; Zhang, Z.J.; Li, P.; Cao, C.G. Grain starch, fatty acids, and amino acids determine the pasting properties in dry cultivation plus rice cultivars. Food Chem 2022, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xiong, R.Y.; Xie, J.X.; Chen, L.M.; Yang, T.T.; Tan, X.M.; Zhou, Y.J.; Pan, X.H.; Zeng, Y.J.; Shi, Q.H.; Zhang, J.; Zeng, Y.H. Water irrigation management affects starch structure and physicochemical properties of indica rice with different grain quality. Food Chem 2021, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zeng, R.; Chen, T.; Zhang, H.; Cao, J.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Yao, S.; Gao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L. Effect of waterlogging stress on grain nutritional quality and pod yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J Agron Crop Sci 2023, 209, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, X.R.; Yu, H.; Zhang, J.; Shao, S.S.; Xiong, F.; Wang, Z. Endosperm Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Starches from Normal, Waxy, and Super-Sweet Maize. Int J Food Prop 2015, 18, 2825–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, H.; Wen, Z.R.; Huang, T.Q.; Lu, W.P.; Lu, D.L. Effects of waterlogging at grain formation stage on starch structure and functionality of waxy maize. Food Chem 2019, 294, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, D.L.; Cai, X.M.; Shi, Y.X.; Zhao, J.R.; Lu, W.P. Effects of waterlogging after pollination on the physicochemical properties of starch from waxy maize. Food Chem 2015, 179, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, D.L.; Cai, X.M.; Lu, W.P. Effects of water deficit during grain filling on the physicochemical properties of waxy maize starch. Starch-Starke 2015, 67, 692–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hansen, J.; Møller, I. Percolation of starch and soluble carbohydrates from plant tissue for quantitative determination with anthrone. Anal. Biochem 1975, 68, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lin, L.S.; Guo, D.W.; Zhao, L.X.; Zhang, X.D.; Wang, J.; Zhang, F.M.; Wei, C.X. Comparative structure of starches from high-amylose maize inbred lines and their hybrids. Food Hydrocolloid 2016, 52, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cai, C.H.; Lin, L.S.; Man, J.M.; Zhao, L.X.; Wang, Z.F.; Wei, C.X. Different Structural Properties of High-Amylose Maize Starch Fractions Varying in Granule Size. J Agr Food Chem 2014, 62, 11711–11721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lu, D.L.; Lu, W.P. Effects of protein removal on the physicochemical properties of waxy maize flours. Starch-Starke 2012, 64, 874–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, D.; Fan, X.M.; Dai, T.B.; Cao, W.X. Nitrogen fertiliser rate and post-anthesis waterlogging effects on carbohydrate and nitrogen dynamics in wheat. Plant Soil 2008, 304, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, H.; Huang, T.Q.; Ding, M.Q.; Lu, D.L.; Lu, W.P. Effects of Waterlogging Around Flowering Stage on the Grain Yield and Eating Properties of Fresh Waxy Maize. Cereal Chemistry 2016, 93, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zheng, C.F.; Jiang, D.; Dai, T.B.; Jing, Q.; Cao, W.X. Effects of salt and waterlogging stress at post-anthesis stage on wheat grain yield and quality. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 2009, 20, 2391–2398. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Zeng, R.E.; Chen, T.T.; Wang, X.Y.; Cao, J.; Li, X.; Xu, X.Y.; Chen, L.; Xia, Q.; Dong, Y.L.; Huang, L.P. , et al. Physiological and Expressional Regulation on Photosynthesis, Starch and Sucrose Metabolism Response to Waterlogging Stress in Peanut. Front Plant Sci 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, H.; Shen, X.; Ding, M.Q.; Lu, D.L.; Lu, W.P. Effects of High Temperature after Pollination on Grain Development and Endogenous Hormone Contents of Waxy Maize. Journal of Maize Sciences 2017, 25, 55–60, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hsieh, C.F.; Liu, W.C.; Whaley, J.K.; Shi, Y.C. Structure and functional properties of waxy starches. Food Hydrocolloid 2019, 94, 238–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, A.C.; Gilbert, R.G. Molecular Weight Distributions of Starch Branches Reveal Genetic Constraints on Biosynthesis. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 3539–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, Y.; Yang, Q.; Xu, X.; Qi, L.; Dong, Z.; Luo, Z.; Lu, X.; Peng, X. Structural changes of waxy and normal maize starches modified by heat moisture treatment and their relationship with starch digestibility. Carbohyd Polym 2017, 177, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lu, D.L.; Guo, H.F.; Dong, C.; Lu, W.P. Starch Granule Size Distribution and Thermal Properties of Waxy Maize Cultivars in Growing Seasons. ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2010, 36, 1998–2003. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lu, D.L.; Sun, X.L.; Yan, F.B.; Wang, X.; Xu, R.C.; Lu, W.P. Effects of high temperature during grain filling under control conditions on the physicochemical properties of waxy maize flour. Carbohyd Polym 2013, 98, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Preprints 89744 g001
Figure 1. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on grain yield and starch content of waxy maize. Mean value in the same column within each hybrid followed by different letters is significantly different (P < 0.05). SYN5, Suyunuo5; YN7, Yunuo7; CK, control; WS, waterlogging.
Figure 1. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on grain yield and starch content of waxy maize. Mean value in the same column within each hybrid followed by different letters is significantly different (P < 0.05). SYN5, Suyunuo5; YN7, Yunuo7; CK, control; WS, waterlogging.
Preprints 89744 g001
Preprints 89744 g002
Figure 2. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on size distribution of waxy maize starch granules. SYN5, Suyunuo5; YN7, Yunuo7; CK, control; WS, waterlogging. Value in the bracket is the average granule size.
Figure 2. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on size distribution of waxy maize starch granules. SYN5, Suyunuo5; YN7, Yunuo7; CK, control; WS, waterlogging. Value in the bracket is the average granule size.
Preprints 89744 g002
Preprints 89744 g003
Figure 3. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on molecular weight distribution of isoamylase debranched starch in waxy maize. SYN5, Suyunuo5; YN7, Yunuo7; CK, control; WS, waterlogging. Value in the bracket is the ratio of peak1 to peak2.
Figure 3. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on molecular weight distribution of isoamylase debranched starch in waxy maize. SYN5, Suyunuo5; YN7, Yunuo7; CK, control; WS, waterlogging. Value in the bracket is the ratio of peak1 to peak2.
Preprints 89744 g003
Preprints 89744 g004
Figure 4. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on X-ray diffraction pattern of waxy maize starch. SYN5, Suyunuo5; YN7, Yunuo7; CK, control; WS, waterlogging. Value in the bracket is the relative crystallinity.
Figure 4. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on X-ray diffraction pattern of waxy maize starch. SYN5, Suyunuo5; YN7, Yunuo7; CK, control; WS, waterlogging. Value in the bracket is the relative crystallinity.
Preprints 89744 g004
Table 1. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on the flour pasting property of waxy maize.
Table 1. Effects of waterlogging at flowering stage on the flour pasting property of waxy maize.
Year Hybrid water PV
(mPa.s)		 TV
(mPa.s)		 BD
(mPa.s)		 FV
(mPa.s)		 SB
(mPa.s)		 Ptemp
(℃)
2014 SYN5 CK 1384±1d 1256±6a 128±7d 1660±20a 404±14a 76.1±0.4bc
WS 998±26e 927±24e 71±2e 1181±32e 254±8de 75.3±0.4c
YN7 CK 1378±42d 1275±34a 103±8d 1692±52a 417±18a 76.1±0.4bc
WS 1016±2e 983±3de 33±1f 1299±12cd 316±9b 75.3±0.4c
2015 SYN5 CK 1586±20b 1134±4b 452±16c 1427±6b 293±2bc 77.9±0.4a
WS 1477±29c 1022±22cd 455±7c 1246±22de 224±0e 76.3±0.4bc
YN7 CK 1791±4a 1075±5bc 717±9a 1344±1bc 270±6cd 76.3±0.5bc
WS 1659±13b 1061±5c 599±9b 1354±9bc 293±4bc 77.1±0.4ab
Mean value in the same column followed by different letters is significantly different (P < 0.05). SYN5, Suyunuo5; YN7, Yunuo7; CK, control; WS, waterlogging; PV, peak viscosity; TV, trough viscosity; BD, breakdown viscosity; FV, final viscosity; SB, setback viscosity; Ptemp, pasting temperature.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated