1. Introduction
Due to different conditions such as rainfall intensity and duration, rainwater may completely penetrate through the permeable asphalt pavement after satisfying the absorption and accumulation of water by the road surface, or some rainwater may not have time to penetrate into the pavement or the asphalt pavement structure may be saturated, resulting in surface runoff that adversely affects the functional performance of the road surface [
1]. Therefore, it is necessary to study and analyze the drainage characteristics of long-slope asphalt pavement to provide a theoretical basis for subsequent pavement structure design [
2,
3].
Permeable asphalt pavement structures typically use open-graded asphalt mixtures with large void spaces as surface layer materials, with void rates up to 25%. Cabrera proposed the use of dry packing methods for the design of open-graded asphalt mixtures. The basic principle is to gradually compact the coarse aggregates from the maximum particle size with the minimum void space until the target void space rate is achieved after compacting the coarse aggregates of the minimum particle size. Subsequently, Zoorob et al. improved the dry packing method and introduced the wet packing method as a design method for open-graded asphalt mixtures. This method involves mixing the aggregates with asphalt before compaction, and then determining the optimal blending form of the aggregates [
4]. Hardiman et al. used a dry packing method to design an open-graded mixture with a maximum particle size of 14mm. Studies have found that the minimum void space generated by several mixtures is always smaller than the minimum void space of a single component, and when designing open-graded mixtures, the packing essence of the aggregates was not considered. Therefore, the designed void space obtained using this method is essentially achieved by adjusting the proportion of fine aggregates, so this design method does not have general applicability [
5]. In response to the limitations of dry packing methods, Zhang and others proposed the use of “reserved void space” concepts and applied the Beiley method to the design of open-graded asphalt mixtures [
6]. On this basis, Zhang and others further studied the differences between the improved Beiley method and traditional empirical design methods for open-graded asphalt mixtures, concluding that the improved Beiley method can accurately calculate the blending ratio of aggregates of different sizes [
7]. William J.K. studied and analyzed the void space rate, permeation performance, and noise reduction function of open-graded asphalt mixtures through laboratory experiments. He used the Corelok Vacuum-seal Device and volume methods to measure the void space rate and compared them to obtain a regression relationship between them; he used a variable water head permeameter to study and analyze the permeation performance of open-graded asphalt mixtures, finding that their permeation performance is linearly correlated with their void space rate; he studied and analyzed the noise reduction effect of open-graded asphalt mixtures mixed with different materials at different frequencies [
8]. Mallick and others studied the void space rate and permeation performance of Open graded granulite friction course (OGFC), finding that when the void space rate of OGFC is greater than 17%, its permeation coefficient increases rapidly with increases in void space rate. When the void space rate of OGFC is between 17% and 20%, it simultaneously exhibits excellent permeation performance and excellent road performance [
9].
Alvarez et al. studied and analyzed the durability of permeable asphalt pavement, and identified the influencing factors affecting the durability of permeable asphalt pavement through analysis [
10]. Hamzah M O et al. used a rotary compactor to simulate the effect of heavy loads on single-layer and double-layer drainage asphalt pavements. The height changes of the specimens of single-layer and double-layer drainage asphalt pavement mixtures were observed before and after the experiment, and the permeation parameters of the specimens before and after the experiment were measured and recorded [
11]. The results showed that after being compacted by the rotary compactor, the height of all specimens decreased and the void space decreased. The specimens of single-layer drainage asphalt pavement mixed with small-size aggregates and ordinary asphalt showed poor resistance to heavy loads, while those mixed with SBS modified asphalt showed good resistance to heavy loads. After being compacted by the rotary compactor, the height of double-layer drainage asphalt pavement specimens decreased the most, indicating that double-layer drainage asphalt pavement specimens had poor resistance to heavy loads compared to single-layer ones. After compaction, both single-layer and double-layer drainage asphalt pavement specimens had a longer drainage time, and the specimens made with SBS modified asphalt had better water permeability performance than those made with ordinary asphalt [
12,
13]. Kimberly et al. studied the influence of different fibers on the performance of permeable asphalt pavement. The results showed that adding fibers can improve the wear resistance of permeable asphalt pavement mixture, but adding too much fiber will reduce its water permeability performance [
14]. Hokari et al. conducted a detailed study on the internal characteristics of voids in drainage asphalt pavement using sound absorption spectrum [
15]. Alber et al. introduced a modular hydromechanical approach for evaluating both short-term and long-term surface drainage behavior in deformable asphalt pavements. The paper demonstrated how road geometry, road surface conditions, and rainfall properties impact the drainage capacity of the pavement surface through selected numerical examples [
16]. Awwad examined the impact of water floods and rainfall on Jordan’s roads and highways, focusing on their effects on road sustainability and performance. The paper delves into the influence of factors such as road slopes, asphalt surface conditions, rainfall intensity, and water flow velocity on drainage length, drainage duration, and water depth [
17]. Kalore er al. presented an analytical model for estimating drainage time in pavement base material, considering unsaturated characteristics. The model was calibrated using a mechanistic approach and compared with FHWA and finite element analysis. It performed comparably to finite element analysis, offered different results from FHWA, and was sensitive to key design parameters. The model was recommended for drainage layer design and parametric studies [
18]. Ma et al. introduced an innovative method to assess clogging in porous asphalt pavement. It evaluated permeability anisotropy, considering the decrease in voids and increase in clogging grains. Finite element models based on porous media and Biot’s theory were proposed. Results suggested that assessing maximum drainage capacity (MDC) using drainage capacity coefficient (DCC) was essential to avoid surface ponding. Clogging increased pore water pressure, affected by pavement layer height. To enhance road safety, considered pavement thickness and drainage evaluations under clogging and load conditions [
19].
The evaluation of the water stability of asphalt concrete mainly uses methods such as Marshall test, splitting test, immersion compressive test, Texas bearings freeze-thaw test, Lottman test, improved Lottman test, Tunniclif and Root test, and immersion rutting test [
20,
21]. Currently, China commonly uses the immersion Marshall test, vacuum saturation Marshall test, and freeze-thaw splitting test [
22]. It is not difficult to see from the above that the current research on asphalt concrete water damage is quite insufficient [
23,
24]. In experimental research, most studies focus on the experimental methods and evaluation of water damage of pavement, and do not accurately express and demonstrate the mechanism and microscopic evolution process of water damage. In theoretical research, although there has been some progress, most studies have remained at the stage of qualitative description of the mechanism of water damage and local surface description [
25,
26]. In fact, there are many influencing factors for the occurrence of water damage in asphalt concrete pavement. A single factor cannot lead to the occurrence of water damage [
27,
28]. It is necessary to study and propose a theoretical analysis and calculation method that reflects the damage process of pavement structure and materials under vehicle load and water pressure [
29]. In numerical analysis, most studies start from the saturated state to analyze the distribution law of excess pore water pressure and study the fatigue damage process in saturated state, which is different from the actual situation of non-saturated state road surface [
30]. How to more closely approximate the actual situation and reflect the non-saturated seepage process is not yet well studied [
31]. As a typical section in road engineering, the long slope section shows different failure modes during long-term service. Currently, research on the asphalt mixture for long slope sections mainly focuses on high temperature resistance to rutting, shear resistance, water damage resistance, fatigue resistance, etc.
The gradation design of asphalt mixtures for long slope sections has been studied in the paper. Taking the high-performance asphalt mixture (High functional asphalt mixture) gradation as a starting point, an orthogonal experiment was used to design asphalt mixtures for long slope roads (referred to as FAM mixtures). The main control indexes are shear performance and void space ratio of the mixture. Then, the void space characteristics of the mixture were analyzed through CT scanning. Subsequently, the performance of permeable pavement structures in long slope sections was analyzed to provide references for the promotion of permeable pavements in long slope sections.
4. Conclusion
This article conducts a study on the design of new asphalt mixtures for long slopes, using CT scanning to analyze the void fraction of different rotated and compacted test specimens. Through image processing technology, the article analyzes their void characteristics. Meanwhile, the article also carries out experimental research and technical evaluations on the various performance characteristics of the FAM mixture. Parallel experiments are set up to compare and analyze the performance of the mixture. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1) Based on the research philosophy of functional integration, a new asphalt mixture gradation suitable for long slopes is proposed. The optimal key factor composition is: 0.075mm passing rate of 7%, 2.36mm passing rate of 20%, 9.5mm passing rate of 55%, and oil-stone ratio of 4.8%.
(2) The spatial distribution of void fractions in the upper image of the test specimen is similar to a bucket shape. By statistically analyzing the internal void fraction of the test specimen, it is found that the minimum value is located 9.7mm away from the bottom with a value of 3.2%, which is 49.2% smaller than the average void fraction.
(3) Analysis of the void fractions show that the upper part has a slightly higher void fraction overall than the lower part, while the middle part is closest to the overall void fraction. The largest voids are distributed mostly on the top part of the test specimen, followed by the bottom and side parts, while small voids are evenly distributed within the mixture test specimen.
(4) The three tested mixtures’ void distribution profiles all follow an inverted V-shape pattern, with high void fraction curves on both sides and a low curve in between.
(5) It is found that under high temperature conditions (50℃), FAM mixtures have a minimum dynamic modulus value of 323 MPa and a peak value of 22746 MPa at -10℃ and a frequency of 25 Hz. Under high temperature conditions, dynamic modulus values are lower than under low temperature conditions; high frequency conditions have higher dynamic modulus values than low frequency conditions.
(6) In the future, comprehensive research should be conducted on the mix design of asphalt lakes and rivers with long longitudinal slopes from the perspectives of resistance to weathering and temperature changes, vehicle loads, and long-term maintenance.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.L. and B.X.; methodology, H.W.; software, A.G.; validation, X.Y., S.P. and S.Z.; formal analysis, S.Z.; investigation, A.G.; resources, S.Z.; data curation, X.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.W.; writing—review and editing, S.P.; visualization, H.L.; supervision, S.P.; project administration, H.L.; funding acquisition, S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Comparison diagram before and after image segmentation.
Figure 1.
Comparison diagram before and after image segmentation.
Figure 2.
Single-axis penetration test instrument.
Figure 2.
Single-axis penetration test instrument.
Figure 3.
Dynamic modulus specimen drilling and sensor installation.
Figure 3.
Dynamic modulus specimen drilling and sensor installation.
Figure 8.
50mm height CT scan void separation diagram of different mixtures.
Figure 8.
50mm height CT scan void separation diagram of different mixtures.
Figure 9.
Extraction map of side section gap separation at different distances from the center of the circle.
Figure 9.
Extraction map of side section gap separation at different distances from the center of the circle.
Figure 10.
Distribution of FAM-13 porosity along height.
Figure 10.
Distribution of FAM-13 porosity along height.
Figure 11.
Porosity distribution of different mixtures along height.
Figure 11.
Porosity distribution of different mixtures along height.
Figure 12.
Porosity test pieces in different parts.
Figure 12.
Porosity test pieces in different parts.
Figure 13.
Void ratio measured by CT scan and test.
Figure 13.
Void ratio measured by CT scan and test.
Figure 14.
Effect of void separation for different volume types.
Figure 14.
Effect of void separation for different volume types.
Figure 15.
A three-dimensional model of voids in FAM mixture.
Figure 15.
A three-dimensional model of voids in FAM mixture.
Figure 16.
The variation of rutting factor with load frequency at different temperatures.
Figure 16.
The variation of rutting factor with load frequency at different temperatures.
Table 1.
FAM-13 asphalt mixture factors and levels.
Table 1.
FAM-13 asphalt mixture factors and levels.
Serial number |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Factor |
9.5 mm |
2.36 mm |
0.75 mm |
Asphalt content /%
|
Horizontal 1 |
55 |
16 |
5 |
4.8 |
Horizontal 2 |
59 |
18 |
7 |
5.1 |
Horizontal 3 |
63 |
20 |
9 |
5.4 |
Table 2.
Target grading passing rate data table.
Table 2.
Target grading passing rate data table.
Number |
16 |
13.2 |
9.5 |
4.75 |
2.36 |
1.18 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
0.15 |
0.075 |
Asphalt content |
1 |
100 |
95 |
55 |
22 |
16 |
15 |
14 |
12 |
10 |
5 |
4.8 |
2 |
100 |
95 |
55 |
22 |
18 |
15 |
14 |
12 |
10 |
7 |
5.1 |
3 |
100 |
95 |
55 |
22 |
20 |
15 |
14 |
12 |
10 |
9 |
5.4 |
4 |
100 |
95 |
59 |
22 |
16 |
15 |
14 |
12 |
10 |
7 |
5.4 |
5 |
100 |
95 |
59 |
22 |
18 |
15 |
14 |
12 |
10 |
9 |
4.8 |
6 |
100 |
95 |
59 |
22 |
20 |
15 |
14 |
12 |
10 |
5 |
5.1 |
7 |
100 |
95 |
63 |
22 |
16 |
15 |
14 |
12 |
10 |
9 |
5.1 |
8 |
100 |
95 |
63 |
22 |
18 |
15 |
14 |
12 |
10 |
5 |
5.4 |
9 |
100 |
95 |
63 |
22 |
20 |
15 |
14 |
12 |
10 |
7 |
4.8 |
Table 3.
Orthogonal experimental results.
Table 3.
Orthogonal experimental results.
Factor |
9.5 |
2.36 |
0.075 |
Asphalt binder |
Porosity |
Shearing strength |
Experiment 1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6.85 |
1.24 |
Experimen 2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
6.8 |
1.32 |
Experimen 3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4.6 |
1.90 |
Experimen 4 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
6.15 |
1.82 |
Experimen 5 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
7.85 |
1.58 |
Experimen 6 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
5.9 |
1.25 |
Experimen 7 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
7.75 |
1.53 |
Experimen 8 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
6.2 |
1.57 |
Experimen 9 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
7.55 |
1.60 |
Table 4.
FAM-13 mixture grading range.
Table 4.
FAM-13 mixture grading range.
Screen hole size (mm) |
16 |
13.2 |
9.5 |
4.75 |
2.36 |
1.18 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
0.15 |
0.075 |
Pass rate (%) |
upper limit |
100 |
100 |
62 |
30 |
26 |
18 |
15 |
13 |
11 |
10 |
lower limit |
100 |
90 |
54 |
20 |
18 |
12 |
11 |
10 |
9 |
7 |
Table 5.
Machine parameters of CT detection equipment.
Table 5.
Machine parameters of CT detection equipment.
Voltage |
Current |
FDD |
FOD |
Resolution |
Integration time |
The number of projection sheets |
Device model |
240 KV |
140 μA |
805 mm |
232 mm |
0.04 mm |
2000 ms |
1800 |
Diondo D2 |
Table 6.
Summary table of CT image parameters at different heights.
Table 6.
Summary table of CT image parameters at different heights.
Height(mm) |
Number of voids (pcs) |
Void area(mm2) |
Void equivalent diameter (mm) |
Porosity (%) |
25 |
54 |
440 |
0.292 |
5.62 |
50 |
57 |
445 |
0.309 |
5.66 |
75 |
61 |
479 |
0.312 |
5.83 |
Table 7.
The results of void parameters of different mixtures.
Table 7.
The results of void parameters of different mixtures.
Mix type |
Number of voids (pcs) |
Void area(mm2) |
Void equivalent diameter (mm) |
Porosity (%) |
FAM-13 |
57 |
445 |
0.309 |
5.66 |
SMA-13 |
31 |
260 |
0.152 |
3.32 |
PAC-13 |
95 |
1328 |
2.595 |
16.92 |
Table 8.
Statistics table of void parameters of different side sections.
Table 8.
Statistics table of void parameters of different side sections.
Distance from center of circle(mm) |
Number of voids (pcs) |
Void area(mm2) |
Void equivalent diameter (mm) |
Porosity (%) |
0 |
74 |
462 |
0.312 |
5.63 |
10 |
58 |
372 |
0.311 |
5.63 |
30 |
32 |
221 |
0.307 |
5.64 |
Table 9.
Porosity statistics table of upper, middle and lower specimens.
Table 9.
Porosity statistics table of upper, middle and lower specimens.
Position |
Porosity (%) |
Rate of change |
Surface |
7.38 |
0.17 |
Central |
5.98 |
-0.06 |
Bottom |
5.62 |
-0.11 |
Specimen void rate |
6.3 |
- |
Table 10.
Summary of porosity of different parts measured by dry method of FAM mixture.
Table 10.
Summary of porosity of different parts measured by dry method of FAM mixture.
Position |
Porosity (%) |
Rate of change |
surface |
5.68 |
0.014 |
Central |
5.61 |
0.002 |
bottom |
5.57 |
-0.005 |
Specimen void rate |
5.6 |
- |
Table 11.
Distribution of void volume and quantity.
Table 11.
Distribution of void volume and quantity.
Void volume (mm3) |
0-5 |
5-10 |
10-50 |
50-100 |
100 or more |
Total
|
quantity |
1062 |
43 |
67 |
18 |
60 |
1250 |
Divination ratio (%) |
84.96 |
3.4 |
5.36 |
1.44 |
4.8 |
- |
Table 12.
The shear strength results of three types of asphalt mixtures tested by uniaxial penetration method.
Table 12.
The shear strength results of three types of asphalt mixtures tested by uniaxial penetration method.
Mixture type |
Temperature |
1# |
2# |
3# |
Average value |
FAM |
20℃ |
2.12 |
2.01 |
2.02 |
2.05 |
60℃ |
1.73 |
1.59 |
1.54 |
1.62 |
SMA |
20℃ |
1.68 |
1.74 |
1.77 |
1.73 |
60℃ |
1.4 |
1.6 |
1.32 |
1.44 |
PAC |
20℃ |
1.25 |
1.16 |
1.1 |
1.17 |
60℃ |
0.83 |
0.71 |
0.68 |
0.74 |
Table 13.
Structural depth test results.
Table 13.
Structural depth test results.
Mixture type |
Paving area diameter(mm) |
Construction depth TD(mm) |
FAM |
7.15 |
1.44 |
SMA |
8.9 |
1.35 |
PAC |
6.55 |
1.56 |
Table 14.
Three types of asphalt mixture pendulum test results.
Table 14.
Three types of asphalt mixture pendulum test results.
Mix type |
Serial number |
Average value |
1# |
2# |
FAM |
71.7 |
72.9 |
72.3 |
SMA |
62.5 |
63.1 |
62.8 |
PAC |
75.4 |
74.8 |
75.1 |
Table 15.
Dynamic modulus experimental results under different temperature and frequency conditions.
Table 15.
Dynamic modulus experimental results under different temperature and frequency conditions.
Temperature(℃) |
Frequency(Hz) |
25 |
10 |
5 |
1 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
|E*|(MPa) |
φ(°) |
|E*|(MPa) |
φ(°) |
|E*|(MPa) |
φ(°) |
|E*|(MPa) |
φ(°) |
|E*|(MPa) |
φ(°) |
|E*|(MPa) |
φ(°) |
-10 |
22746 |
8.2 |
21607 |
8.49 |
18642 |
11.01 |
15432 |
13.51 |
13830 |
15.5 |
9942 |
20.6 |
5 |
15701 |
12.68 |
13860 |
13.85 |
12487 |
16.84 |
9216 |
19.46 |
7866 |
20.74 |
5221 |
23.72 |
20 |
8266 |
20.85 |
6742 |
21.96 |
5504 |
24.96 |
3499 |
27.95 |
2820 |
28.78 |
1755 |
29.1 |
35 |
4240 |
26.14 |
3212 |
25.9 |
2316 |
30.01 |
1349 |
30.18 |
1076 |
29.63 |
667 |
27.3 |
50 |
1689 |
25.57 |
1549 |
22.71 |
796 |
27.87 |
518 |
25.58 |
436 |
24.84 |
323 |
22.44 |
Table 16.
Rutting factor E*/sin Ф values at different test temperatures.
Table 16.
Rutting factor E*/sin Ф values at different test temperatures.
Temperature (°C). |
Rutting factor (E*/sin Ф) |
25 |
10 |
5 |
1 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
-10 |
159476.8 |
146352.4 |
97612.15 |
66057.38 |
51751.55 |
28257.03 |
5 |
71528.91 |
57899.37 |
43103.2 |
27663.32 |
22212.32 |
12978.93 |
20 |
23224.15 |
18028.7 |
13043.1 |
7465.316 |
5857.333 |
3608.621 |
35 |
9623.984 |
7353.45 |
4630.6 |
2683.412 |
2176.388 |
1454.269 |
50 |
3913.223 |
4012.256 |
1702.794 |
1199.71 |
1037.883 |
846.1794 |