Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

A Comprehensive Analysis of Risk Assessment of Particulate Matter in Five Health Centers in Akure, Nigeria

Altmetrics

Downloads

135

Views

28

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

19 November 2023

Posted:

20 November 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive assessment of indoor particulate matter (PM) concentrations, focusing on PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 in five Primary Health Centers (PHCs): Arakale, Federal College of Agriculture (FECA), Iju, Oba-Ile, and Owode within Akure Local Government Areas in Nigeria. The primary novelty of this research lies in its detailed exploration of the toxicity potential of these PM fractions, providing valuable insights into the local air quality and associated health risks. The study assesses the health implications by calculating the toxicity potential (TP), Relative Risk (RR), Excess Risk (ER), and Attributable Fractions (AF) for cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality. The results reveal varying RR values for all-cause mortality, with Arakale showing a slight elevation (RR: 1.061), indicating potential health risks. ER values for cardiopulmonary mortality range from 14.728±7.25 to 19.04±0.38, emphasizing the substantial excess risk associated with long-term PM2.5 exposure. The study also uncovers AF for cardiopulmonary mortality ranging between 11.03±0.31 to 19.22±0.04, underscoring the significant contribution of PM to cardiovascular and respiratory health risks. Similarly, AF for lung cancer mortality ranges from 10.03±0.012 to 17.13±0.10, highlighting the substantial association between PM2.5 exposure and lung cancer risk. These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted air quality management strategies and public health interventions in the studied locations to mitigate the heightened health risks associated with particulate matter pollution. The calculated RR, ER, and AF values offer crucial insights into the complex relationship between PM exposure and adverse health outcomes, providing a foundation for informed decision-making and future research endeavors.
Keywords: 
Subject: Environmental and Earth Sciences  -   Pollution

1. Introduction

The air we breathe profoundly impacts our health, and its quality within healthcare facilities is of paramount importance. This article embarks on a meticulous journey, unraveling the levels of particulate matter in five key health centers in Akure, Nigeria. Through comprehensive risk assessments, we aim to bring to light potential health hazards, fostering a healthier environment for patients and healthcare professionals. Air quality is a critical determinant of public health, and particulate matter, comprising tiny particles suspended in the air, can have detrimental effects on respiratory health. Despite the increasing awareness of the impact of air pollution on health, there is a notable lack of specific studies focusing on the particulate matter levels within healthcare facilities, particularly in Akure, Nigeria.
The Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 [1] reinforced the significance of air pollution as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, with particulate matter emerging as a major contributor. Crouse et al. [2] examined the association between long-term exposure to air pollution and cardiovascular mortality, underscoring the need for stringent air quality regulations. The INTERHEART study [3] revealed the correlation between air pollution and myocardial infarction, emphasizing the global health burden posed by poor air quality. Ambient air pollution, as indicated by Brauer et al. [4], is linked not only to respiratory diseases but also to adverse pregnancy outcomes, further emphasizing the comprehensive impact on human health. Recent research by Paital [5] discusses the intricate mechanisms through which air pollutants induce oxidative stress, inflammation, and cellular damage, elucidating the pathways leading to various health disorders. The Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health [6] identified air pollution as a significant global health crisis, emphasizing the urgent need for international collaboration to address this pervasive threat. The Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 [7] reiterated the substantial health burden attributable to air pollution, with a specific focus on its role in non-communicable diseases and premature mortality. Chen et al. [8] investigated the link between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and diabetes, revealing a novel association between air pollution and metabolic disorders.
This study breaks new ground by honing in on the air quality within health centers, a setting crucial for the recovery and well-being of patients. The novelty lies in our focus on particulate matter, an often overlooked aspect in healthcare facility assessments, and the implications this has for both patients and healthcare professionals.
While general studies on air quality exist, there is a significant research gap concerning the specific assessment of particulate matter levels within healthcare facilities in Akure. The absence of such data poses potential risks to vulnerable populations within these centers, and addressing this gap is crucial for improving overall healthcare quality and patient outcomes.
The justification for this research lies in its potential to significantly impact public health. Understanding the levels of particulate matter within health centers enables the implementation of targeted interventions to mitigate risks and create safer environments for patients and healthcare workers. This research is not just an academic exercise; it is a proactive step towards enhancing the quality of healthcare delivery in Akure.
Research Questions
  • What are the levels of indoor particulate matter in the air within the selected health centers in Akure?
  • How do these levels compare to established air quality standards and guidelines?
  • What are the health risks associated with elevated particulate matter levels in healthcare settings?
  • Are there variations in particulate matter concentrations among the different health centers?
Aim: The aim of this research is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of particulate matter levels within five primary health centers in Akure, Nigeria, with a focus on assessing associated health risks.
Objectives
  • To measure and quantify particulate matter concentrations in the air within PHCs.
  • To compare the measured particulate matter levels with national and international air quality standards.
  • To assess the health risks posed by elevated particulate matter levels in healthcare settings.
  • To identify variations in particulate matter concentrations among the different health centers.
  • To provide recommendations for mitigating risks and improving air quality within these healthcare facilities
Literature Review
Particulate matter (PM) is a complex mixture of tiny particles suspended in the air, with PM10 (particles with a diameter of 10 micrometers or smaller) and PM2.5 (particles with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or smaller) being key components. This review explores the relative risk generated by PM10 in all-cause mortality and examines the specific cases of cardiopulmonary and lung cancer morbidity, with a keen emphasis on the significant impact of PM2.5 exposure. Studies worldwide have consistently highlighted the presence of particulate matter in indoor environments, originating from both outdoor and indoor sources. Sources include combustion processes, cleaning products, and building materials. Particles in the PM2.5 (particles with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or smaller) and PM10 (particles with a diameter of 10 micrometers or smaller) ranges have been associated with respiratory and cardiovascular health issues [9].
While hospitals and health centers are designed to promote healing, the air quality within these facilities can pose challenges. The vulnerability of patients with compromised health and weakened immune systems makes them particularly susceptible to the adverse effects of poor air quality. Studies in various global contexts have indicated the presence of pollutants within healthcare settings, underlining the need for targeted interventions [10,11]. The health implications of exposure to particulate matter are well-documented. Short-term exposure can exacerbate respiratory conditions, while long-term exposure has been linked to chronic diseases such as asthma, cardiovascular diseases, and even mortality [12,13]. Vulnerable populations, including children, the elderly, and individuals with pre-existing health conditions, are at heightened risk.
Risk assessments play a pivotal role in understanding the potential health risks associated with elevated particulate matter levels in healthcare settings. The complexities of healthcare environments, including varying patient loads, diverse activities, and medical procedures, necessitate a targeted approach to risk assessment [14]. Identifying specific risks enables the development of effective strategies to safeguard the health of both patients and healthcare workers. Several studies have unequivocally demonstrated a robust association between PM10 exposure and an increased risk of all-cause mortality. For instance, a meta-analysis by Hoek et al. [15] found a significant positive correlation between elevated PM10 levels and mortality, particularly in urban environments. The relative risk was found to vary across different populations, suggesting a nuanced interplay of factors influencing health outcomes.
The link between PM10 exposure and cardiopulmonary morbidity is well-established. Brook et al. [16] conducted a comprehensive review, revealing a consistent association between short-term exposure to PM10 and adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and exacerbation of heart failure. The relative risk, as indicated by these studies, emphasizes the vulnerability of individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions to the detrimental effects of PM10.
While PM10 has been associated with respiratory issues, the focus on lung cancer morbidity often involves the finer particles, particularly PM2.5. However, studies like that of Hamra et al. [17] found a positive association between long-term exposure to PM10 and lung cancer incidence. The relative risk, though lower compared to PM2.5, underscores the multifaceted impact of particulate matter on respiratory health.
Although PM2.5 is commonly associated with respiratory health, it is imperative to acknowledge its overarching impact on cardiopulmonary morbidity and lung cancer incidence. A study by Pope et al. [18] demonstrated a more substantial relative risk associated with PM2.5 in comparison to PM10, particularly in relation to cardiovascular mortality. This highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of particulate matter composition and its specific health implications.
Understanding the toxicity potential of environmental pollutants is crucial for assessing their impact on human health. Studies have consistently demonstrated the adverse effects of exposure to toxic substances. For instance, Chen et al. [19] found that prolonged exposure to heavy metals such as lead and mercury is associated with neurotoxicity, leading to cognitive impairments. Additionally, research by Yang et al. [20] highlighted the toxicity of certain pesticides, linking them to respiratory and reproductive health issues. These findings emphasize the need for a comprehensive understanding of the toxicity potential of various environmental contaminants, providing valuable insights for regulatory measures and public health interventions.
Understanding the ratios of different particulate matter (PM) fractions is essential for comprehending their sources and potential health impacts. Studies such as that by Lee et al. [21] have investigated PM2.5/PM10 ratios as indicators of pollution sources, aiding in source apportionment. Additionally, research by Zhang et al. [22] emphasizes the importance of PM2.5/PM1 ratios in characterizing fine particle sources and their implications for air quality management. The ratio of black carbon to total PM, explored by Bond et al. [23], provides insights into the contribution of combustion sources to particulate pollution. These ratios play a critical role in enhancing our understanding of the composition and origins of particulate matter, aiding in targeted pollution control strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

Akure is the capital of Ondo State, Nigeria. The Primary Health Centers (PHC) locations earmarked for the monitoring were based in Akure South and Akure Local Government Areas (AKLGA). Table and Figure depict the monitoring sites. These PHCs include Arakale, Federal College of Agriculture (FECA) - Akure South and Iju, Oba-Ile, and Owode (Akure North).
Table 1. Description of the Health Centers.
Table 1. Description of the Health Centers.
Location Local Government Area Coordinates
Arakale Akure South Lat: 7.251133O   Long: 5.193367 O
FECA Akure South Lat: 7.263321O   Long: 5.220044 O
Iju Akure North Lat: 7.391430O   Long: 5.259698 O
Oba-Ile Akure North Lat: 7.261411O   Long: 5.193367 O
Owode Akure North Lat: 7.161718O   Long: 5.173209 O
FECA - Federal College of Agriculture.
  • Study site and monitoring methodology
For this study, five Primary Health Centers (PHCs) in the Nigerian Akure Local Government Areas—Arakele, Federal College of Agriculture (FECA), Iju, Oba-Ile, and Owode—were used. The monitoring was done for a month. The manufacturer's instructions were carefully followed before using the equipment. Prior to becoming live, the device was first configured with wireless networks. The equipment was configured using SenseiAQ Software Version 1.2.3 (https://github.com/PieraSystems/SenseiAQ) and activated using SenseiAQ Cloud Account Settings. The sensor was powered on after being linked by a USB connection to the laptop. The SenseiAQ Software Edition 1.2.3 (https://pierasystems.com/support/) and the Windows 10 software were set up on the laptop. After the software identified the sensor, the sensor's (network) parameters were configured while it ran nonstop for eight hours. The login credentials for the WiFi network were entered and stored. An account was created with SenseiAQ Cloud in order to register the device. The freshly created account was used to obtain remote access to the device via SenseiAQ (pierasystems.com). Following the completion of the aforementioned procedures, the five sensors were positioned horizontally on a fat area 1.5 meters above the ground. The PM1.0, PM2.5, and PM10 values were downloaded onto the device once every second. The acquired data was seen in SenseiAQ by creating a local CSV log file. For this inquiry, the data was translated in hours rather than seconds. Minitab 2020 and Excel 2013 were used to do the statistical analysis of the data.
Preprints 90879 g001
Figure 1. The locations of the of the study.
Figure 1. The locations of the of the study.
Preprints 90879 g001
  • Toxicity Assessment
Ayodele et al. [24] state that toxicity potential (TP) is a calculated toxic equivalency that is useful in assessing the potential harm that air pollution particles from different places may cause to human health. Using the following formula [24,25], we determined the TP associated with PM2.5 and PM10 in each of the institution's five indoor sample locations.
TP = CP∕SP
where SP is the air pollution standard and CP is the measured pollutant concentration. The TP value should therefore be less than 1. A region where there is a high concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 poses a health danger to the local population is indicated by a TP score greater than one.
  • Health risk assessment (HRA)
  • Health risk assessment methodology for short-term effect of PM10
The relative risk (RR) for all-cause mortality was computed using Ostro's [26] method to ascertain the short-term exposure to PM10 (Eq. 1). If the PM10 concentration was more than the background level (10 µg m− 3), the relative risk for all-cause death was computed. A 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.0008 for the risk function (0.0006–0.0010) was employed.
RR = exp[β(X – X0)]
The background PM10 concentration (10 µg m− 3), is represented by X0-, X is the annual mean concentration of PM10 (µg m− 3), and the risk function coefficient is represented by β-.is
  • Health risk assessment methodology for short-term effect of PM2.5
Using Eq. 2, the relative risk associated with PM2.5 was computed independently for lung cancer and cardiopulmonary mortality for residents over 30 years old [26].
RR = [(X + 1)/(X0 + 1)]β
The risk function coefficient is denoted by β-, and the background concentration of PM2.5 (3 µg m−3) is represented by X0-. For both cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality, the applied β coefficients were 0.15515 (95% CI: 0.0562–0.2541) and 0.23218 (95% CI: 0.08563–0.37873), in that order. In addition, the determinable relative risk (RR) was utilized to compute the attributable fraction (AF) [26,27].
AF = (RR − 1)/RR
The estimated AF value shows the percentage of deaths from the corresponding disease that could be prevented if PM2.5 and PM10 concentration levels were reduced by 3 and 10 µg m−3, respectively.
ER = (RR − 1)
An yearly average weighted by population was used to assess the exposure to ambient PM2.5 and PM10 in Romania. The overall number of premature deaths was determined by using the calculated exposure to PM as an input in the health impact evaluation.

3. Results

The PM1 results are shown in Table 2. The values from the locations range thus Arakale > FECA > Oba-Ile > Iju > Owode with standard deviations of 10.66, 9.77, 7.66, 5.63, and 19.86. The variations in PM1 (particulate matter with a diameter of 1 micrometer or smaller) values among different locations can be attributed to several factors, including local sources, meteorological conditions, and geographical characteristics.
The mean 73 µg/m³ obtained for Arakale depicts a high PM2.5 level which suggests elevated air pollution. This could be attributed to various sources, such as vehicular traffic emissions, or other anthropogenic activities. The health implications may be significant, with an increased risk of respiratory and cardiovascular issues for the population. Owode (47.62 µg/m³), FECA (25.41 µg/m³), Iju (35.58 µg/m³), and Oba-Ile (34.59 µg/m³) levels are lower than Arakale but still indicate a notable presence of fine particulate matter. The high particulate pollution at Owode could be attributed to the nearness of airport activities. Identifying specific pollution sources and implementing air quality control measures may be necessary to prevent health risks. The high PM2.5 levels (Arakale) pose potential health risks, requiring urgent air quality management. Lower levels suggest relatively better air quality, but continued monitoring is necessary to ensure sustained improvements. The implications include the need for regulatory measures, pollution source identification, and public awareness campaigns to mitigate health risks associated with poor air quality.
High PM10 (85.21 µg/m³) levels in Arakale inform of elevated air pollution. In comparison with other locations, there is evidence of a higher value of pollution generated within the environment. The differences are due to high human and vehicular movements and activities within the environment, a good example is the market located around the monitoring zone where lots of waste is generated.
Table 3. The comparisons of the results obtained in this study with the results from researches and international and national standard limits.
Table 3. The comparisons of the results obtained in this study with the results from researches and international and national standard limits.
Serial City PM1.0 (µg/m3) PM2.5 (µg/m3) PM10 (µg/m3) References
1 WHO - 15 45
2 NESREA 40 150
3 Akure 16.18 - 28.15 25.41 - 73.00 24.46 - 85.21 Our Study
4 Akure 12.3 17.29 18.89 Abulude et al. [28]
5 Lagos - 4 - 26 8 – 36 Shittu et al. [29]
6 Enugu 71.03 89.00 107.40 Otuu et al. [30]
7 Zaria - 60.26-75.57 98.43 – 101.06 Afolabi et al. [31]
8 Jos - 74 138 Anjorin et al.[32]
9 Enugu - 30.33 - 72.92 244 - 541.17  Ibeneme et al. [33]
World Health Organisation (WHO), the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA).
The PM2.5 results from our study exceeded the daily guidelines (Table 3), we compare each location's value with both the World Health Organisation [34] and The National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency [35] daily guidelines of 15 and 40 µg/m³ respectively. It is noticed that Arakale is 4.87 times over the WHO guideline. Others followed thus: Owode (3.17 times), FECA (1.69 times), Iju (2.37 times), and Oba-Ile (2.30 times), while in the case of NESREA, Arakale (1.82 times), Owode (1.19 times), but these location (FECA, Iju, ad Oba-Ile) are below the NESREA guideline. In the case of PM10, Arakale is 4.87 times over the WHO guideline while others are: Owode (3.17 times), FECA (1.69 times), Iju (2.37 times), and Oba-Ile (2.30 times over). In the case of NESREA Guidelines, Arakale (1.82 times over) and Owode (1.19 times), but FECA, Iju, and Oba-Ile are 0.64, 0.89, and 0.86 times under respectively. To sum it up, constant and close monitoring of these place are necessary.
There is the absence of a PM1 specific standard limit for in air quality regulations, this may be due to several reasons which include, establishing standard limits for such fine particles involves complex considerations and a deeper understanding of their sources, behavior, and health effects, measuring and monitoring PM1 accurately can be technologically challenging, therefore developing reliable monitoring techniques for PM1 requires advanced instrumentation and methodologies. Also, the health effects of ultrafine particles may differ from those of larger particles, and establishing a standard limit requires a comprehensive understanding of these health risks. Again, the diverse range of sources makes it challenging to establish a single standard limit that effectively addresses the different characteristics of PM1 in various environments. Finally, the establishment of air quality standards involves a consensus-building process among scientists, policymakers, and regulatory bodies. As of now, there may not be a global consensus on the specific standards for PM1, and regional variations in pollution sources and characteristics contribute to the complexity of setting such standards.
Our PM2.5 results compare with results of other research works [31,32,33,36] from other towns and states of the federation of Nigeria (Table 3). The results of PM10 recorded by Otuu et al. [30], for Enugu, Afolabi et al. [31] for Zaria, Anjorin et al. [32] for Jos, and Ibeneme et al. [33] for (Enugu) are much higher than ours. The reasons could be due to methodology involved in monitoring, activities round the evaluation site, the meteorological factors, and others.
PM1/PM2.5 ratio results re shown in Figure 2. From the results, it is depicted that the results obtained in this study are lower than the results reported elsewhere by Tronville and Rivers [37] - (Austria (0.87), Arizonna, USA (0.70), Delhi, India (0.87), Athens, Greece (0.67). The differences in PM1/PM2.5 ratios suggest variations in pollution sources. For instance, higher ratios might indicate a greater contribution from combustion sources, while lower ratios could be associated with natural or secondary aerosols. Higher ratios in urbanized areas like Delhi and Austria may reflect increased industrial and vehicular emissions. In contrast, lower ratios in rural areas like Arakale and Owode may indicate fewer anthropogenic pollution sources. Geographic and meteorological factors can influence PM ratios. Coastal areas like Athens may experience different pollution characteristics compared to landlocked regions like Iju. Understanding local factors is crucial for targeted air quality management. Elevated PM1/PM2.5 ratios could imply a higher concentration of ultrafine particles, which may pose greater health risks due to their ability to penetrate deeper into the respiratory system. This emphasizes the importance of monitoring and mitigating specific particle sizes to protect public health. Comparisons highlight the necessity for tailored air quality policies. Areas with higher ratios may need stricter regulations on combustion sources, while regions with lower ratios might focus on addressing specific local contributors.
The PM2.5/PM10 results show significant spatial distribution differences between regions, with a little variability of 0.82 and 0.94. The highest ratio (0.94) was found in the most polluted location (Iju), indicating that high PM2.5 contributions come from in vehicular emissions, which has also been found in the Romania [27]. The ratio was found to be 0.84 in Arakale and was highest in iju (0.94), which suggests an increase in fine-mode aerosol particles.
Our mean results for PM1/PM10 compared to other locations like 0.64 - Varanasi region, India (Chauhan et al. [38], 0.48 - Chennai city, India [39], and 0.62 - Lagos, Nigeria [40], but lower than 0.92 - Barcelona, Spain [41]. The differences in PM1/PM10 ratios suggest variations in pollution sources. Higher ratios may indicate a larger contribution from fine particles, possibly linked to combustion sources, industrial activities, or vehicular emissions. Variances between regions (e.g., Barcelona, Chennai, Varanasi) could be influenced by local industrial practices, traffic density, or natural sources. Understanding regional characteristics is crucial for targeted pollution control strategies. Geographic and meteorological factors can influence PM ratios. Coastal areas like Barcelona may have different pollution characteristics compared to inland cities like Varanasi. Consideration of local factors is essential for effective air quality management. Higher PM1/PM10 ratios may suggest an elevated concentration of fine particles, potentially posing greater health risks, especially to respiratory health. Tailored health interventions may be needed based on the specific size distribution of particles. Policymakers should consider these variations when formulating air quality regulations. Different regions may require distinct approaches, such as stricter controls on specific sources or the promotion of cleaner technologies.
Figure 3 shows the PM10 and PM2.5 Toxicity Potentials (TP). The TP are classifies thus:
There's noticeable spatial variability in toxicity potential among the locations. For both PM10 and PM2.5, Arakale, Oba-Ile, and Owode consistently show higher toxicity potential compared to FECA and Iju. The differences in toxicity potential can be attributed to various factors, including industrial activities, traffic emissions, combustion processes, and local sources of pollution. Areas with higher industrialization and anthropogenic activities tend to exhibit higher toxicity potential. High toxicity potential indicates an increased risk to public health within the environ of the PHCs. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is especially concerning due to its ability to penetrate deep into the respiratory system. The findings emphasize the importance of air quality management to protect the health of residents and vulnerable in these areas. The data underscores the need for robust air quality regulations and enforcement measures. Identifying and controlling specific pollution sources, especially those contributing to PM2.5, is crucial for mitigating health risks associated with particulate matter exposure.
The relative risk (RR), excess risk (ER) and an attributable fraction (AF) were calculated for all-cause mortality in case of each region using the daily PM10 data. The average relative risk caused by PM10 for all-cause mortality was 1.061±0.05 (Arakale), 1.061±0.05 (FECA), 1.024±0.01 (Iju), 1.060±0.05 (Oba-Ile, and 1.063±0.12 (Owode). The results obtained in this study are similar to the results of Bodor et al. [27] reported for Romania. The reason for this similarity could be due to areas with similar pollution sources, such as traffic congestion, or specific anthropogenic activities. A positive relative risk for cardiopulmonary and lung cancer disease was observed which is mainly attributed to PM2.5 exposure. A relative risk greater than 1 suggests an increased risk of the specified outcome (in this case, all-cause mortality) compared to a reference group [42]. If the RR is smaller than one, it is beneficial. To be considered statistically significant, the CI should not range across positive and negative values [43,44]. For this study, RRs for all-cause mortality associated with the long-term exposure to PM2.5. The values here indicate a slight elevation in the risk of mortality in these locations compared to the reference. The slightly elevated relative risk in Arakale suggests a potential higher susceptibility to factors contributing to all-cause mortality. Identifying specific risk factors and implementing targeted health interventions is crucial. While these relative risk values provide insight into potential health risks, further research and a comprehensive understanding of local health determinants are necessary to develop effective public health interventions tailored to each community.
The calculated excess risk (ER) and the attributable fractions (AF) for cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality were determined for the long-term exposure to PM2.5 for each location. The results revealed AF (cardiopulmonary mortality) range between 11.03±0.31 to 19.22±0.04 (Table 4), while AF (lung cancer) was 10.03±0.012 to 17.13±010. The calculated excess risk (ER) and attributable fractions (AF) for cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality associated with long-term exposure to PM2.5 in each location provide critical insights into the potential health impacts of air pollution. The results, as presented in Table 4, reveal notable variations in the AF for both cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality across the studied locations. The range of AF for cardiopulmonary mortality, underscores the substantial contribution of long-term PM2.5 exposure to cardiovascular and respiratory health risks in the studied areas. These findings align with a growing body of evidence linking fine particulate matter to adverse cardiovascular outcomes [45]. The AF range for lung cancer mortality, indicates a significant association between long-term PM2.5 exposure and lung cancer risk. This aligns with established literature demonstrating the carcinogenic potential of fine particulate matter, particularly in the context of prolonged exposure [17,46].
The calculated excess risk (ER) values for cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality associated with PM2.5 exposure provide insights into the potential health impact in the studied locations. The observed range for ER (cardiopulmonary mortality) from 14.728±7.25 to 19.04±0.38 indicates a substantial excess risk, emphasizing the heightened vulnerability of the population to cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes due to long-term exposure. Such variations may be influenced by factors such as local pollution sources, demographic characteristics, and healthcare infrastructure. Studies by Dockery et al. [47] and Brook et al. [16] have previously established a connection between PM2.5 exposure and cardiopulmonary mortality. Similarly, the range for ER (lung cancer) spanning from 12.01±0.28 to 30.50±2.43 underscores the increased risk of lung cancer associated with PM2.5 exposure. The wide range of ER values for lung cancer mortality underscores the complex relationship between PM2.5 exposure and lung cancer risk. Previous research [48,49,50,51], including studies by Turner et al. [46] and Hamra et al. [17], has consistently reported an increased risk of lung cancer associated with exposure to fine particulate matter.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study provides a comprehensive evaluation of indoor particulate matter (PM) concentrations, specifically PM10 and PM2.5, in five distinct locations (PHCs) in Akure, Nigeria. The findings reveal significant spatial variations in PM levels, with Arakale displaying elevated concentrations, particularly in PM2.5, indicating potential health risks for the local population. The toxicity potential values further emphasize the urgency of targeted air quality management strategies, especially in areas with higher industrialization and anthropogenic activities.
The study underscores the critical importance of continuous monitoring to track temporal variations and assess the effectiveness of implemented control measures. The variations in PM levels are attributed to diverse local emission sources, including traffic density, and other anthropogenic factors.
The elevated PM2.5 levels in Arakale suggest an increased risk of respiratory and cardiovascular health issues for residents. The Excess Risk (ER) values for cardiopulmonary mortality demonstrate a substantial health burden, with a range from 14.728±7.25 to 19.04±0.38, underscoring the heightened vulnerability of the population to cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes. Concurrently, the Attributable Fractions (AF) for both cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality highlight the significant contribution of PM2.5 to these health risks, emphasizing the urgent need for targeted interventions.
Our research contributes valuable insights into the local air quality landscape in Akure, emphasizing the need for tailored and immediate interventions to protect public health. The study serves as a foundation for future research endeavors, fostering a deeper understanding of the complex dynamics between local sources, meteorological conditions, and air quality variations.
  • Recommendations
Based on the findings of the study, the following recommendations are proposed to improve air quality and mitigate potential health risks associated with particulate matter (PM) concentrations indoor of the PHCs in Akure, Nigeria:
Implement and enforce stringent emission control measures for vehicular activities, particularly in areas with elevated PM levels such as Arakale. This includes the adoption of cleaner technologies, regular maintenance of industrial equipment, and adherence to emission standards.
Develop and implement traffic management strategies to reduce vehicular emissions, especially in areas with high traffic density. This may involve promoting public transportation, encouraging the use of cleaner fuel options, and implementing traffic flow improvements.
Conduct detailed source apportionment studies to identify specific local sources contributing to PM pollution. Implement targeted interventions to address these sources effectively, considering the unique characteristics of each location.
Strengthen and expand the air quality monitoring network in Akure to enhance spatial and temporal coverage. Continuous monitoring is crucial for tracking changes over time, identifying emerging trends, and assessing the impact of implemented control measures.
Launch public awareness campaigns to educate residents, staff members, and the patients about the health risks associated with elevated PM levels and the importance of individual actions in mitigating air pollution. Encourage community participation in promoting cleaner air practices.
Review and enhance existing air quality regulations to align with current scientific knowledge and international standards. Ensure strict enforcement of these regulations to discourage non-compliance by industrial and commercial entities.
Foster collaboration between government agencies, industries, environmental groups, and local communities. Engage in joint efforts to address air quality challenges, share information, and work collectively towards sustainable solutions.
Integrate green spaces and sustainable urban planning practices to improve air quality. Planting trees and creating green areas can contribute to the absorption of pollutants and enhance overall environmental quality.
Encourage and support further research on air quality in Akure, focusing on emerging pollutants and innovative solutions. Foster collaboration between academic institutions, research organizations, and governmental bodies to advance knowledge in this field.

Author Contributions

The investigation was conceptualized and organized by FOA, SDO, AA It was carried out and overseen by SDO and AA. The results of the analysis and original article version were written by KAA and AMK. The finalized version was proofread and produced by FOA and AA. During writing the article, all contributors contributed insightful input and ideas. The article’s prepared form was approved by every author after they had read it.

Funding

There is no funding for the investigation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was granted by Ondo State, Health Research Committee with assigned number NHREC/18/08/2016 and Protocol number: OSHREC 29/11/2021/403 to carry-out this research.

Acknowledgments

The Canadian company Piera Systems Inc. provided the sensors that were utilized. The authors are grateful to the Permanent Secretary, Primary Health Board for granting the permission, the doctors and matrons, and other workers who cooperated with us during the research work. We appreciate their cooperation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cohen, A. J., Brauer, M., Burnett, R., Anderson, H. R., Frostad, J., Estep, K., ... & Forouzanfar, M. H. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. The Lancet, 2017. 389(10082), 1907-1918. [CrossRef]
  2. Crouse, D. L., Peters, P. A., van Donkelaar, A., Goldberg, M. S., Villeneuve, P. J., Brion, O., ... & Martin, R. V. Risk of nonaccidental and cardiovascular mortality in relation to long-term exposure to low concentrations of fine particulate matter: a Canadian national-level cohort study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2012. 120(5), 708-714. [CrossRef]
  3. Yusuf, S., Hawken, S., Ounpuu, S., Dans, T., Avezum, A., Lanas, F., ... & Lisheng, L. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. The Lancet, 2014. 364(9438), 937-952. [CrossRef]
  4. Brauer, M., Lencar, C., Tamburic, L., & Koehoorn, M. A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2008. 116(5), 680-686. [CrossRef]
  5. Paital, B. Nurture to nature via COVID-19, a self-regenerating environmental strategy of environment in global context. Science of the Total Environment, 2020. 729, 139088. [CrossRef]
  6. Landrigan, P. J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N. J., Adeyi, O., Arnold, R., Basu, N., ... & Zhong, M. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. The Lancet, 2017. 391(10119), 462-512. [CrossRef]
  7. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet, 2020. 396(10258), 1204-1222. [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, H., Burnett, R. T., Kwong, J. C., Villeneuve, P. J., Goldberg, M. S., Brook, R. D., ... & van Donkelaar, A. Spatial association between ambient fine particulate matter and incident hypertension. Circulation, 2017. 135(5), 379-387. [CrossRef]
  9. World Health Organization. Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health. 2018. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health.
  10. Allen, J. G., Ibrahim, A. M., and Indoor Environmental Quality Global Alliance. Indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction in green-certified buildings. Building and Environment, 2019. 149, 362-370. [CrossRef]
  11. Mendell, M. J., Mirer, A. G., Cheung, K., Tong, M., and Douwes, J. Respiratory and allergic health effects of dampness, mold, and dampness-related agents: A review of the epidemiologic evidence. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2018. 119(6), 748-756. [CrossRef]
  12. Kelly, F. J., & Fussell, J. C. Air pollution and public health: emerging hazards and improved understanding of risk. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2017. 39(3), 593-605. [CrossRef]
  13. Shah, A. S. V., Langrish, J. P., Nair, H., McAllister, D. A., Hunter, A. L., Donaldson, K., ... & Mills, N. L. Global association of air pollution and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 2015. 3(11), e713-e725. [CrossRef]
  14. Persily, A. Challenges in developing ventilation and indoor air quality standards. Indoor Air, 2017. 27(1), 8-19. [CrossRef]
  15. Hoek, G., Krishnan, R. M., Beelen, R., Peters, A., Ostro, B., Brunekreef, B., & Kaufman, J. D. Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio- respiratory mortality: a review. Environmental Health, 2013. 12(1), 1-12. [CrossRef]
  16. Brook, R. D., Rajagopalan, S., Pope, C. A., Brook, J. R., Bhatnagar, A., Diez-Roux, A. V., ... & Kaufman, J. D. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease. An update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2010. 121(21), 2331-2378. [CrossRef]
  17. Hamra, G. B., Guha, N., Cohen, A., Laden, F., Raaschou-Nielsen, O., Samet, J. M., ... & Outdoor Air Pollution and Health Advisory Group. Outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2014. 122(9), 906-911. [CrossRef]
  18. Pope III, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D., Ito, K., & Thurston, G. D. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA, 2009. 287(9), 1132-1141. [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, P., Bornhorst, J., Aschner, M., & Metallo, C. M. A critical review of mercury as a global pollutant with a particular emphasis on the epigenetic dynamics of bioaccumulation. Environmental Epigenetics, 2018. 4(3), dvy022. [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, Y., Chang, C. Y., Sun, C. W., Chao, M. R., & Lai, C. C. Pesticide exposure and lung cancer risk: A case–control study in non-smoking men. Scientific Reports, 2019. 9(1), 1-8. [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, S. C., Chiu, M. Y., & Ho, K. F. Evaluation of particulate matter (PM) 2.5, PM10, and PM2.5/PM10 ratio in Hong Kong: A 17-year monitoring study. Environmental Pollution, 2019. 247, 874-883.
  22. Zhang, Y., Mo, J., & Li, J. Temporal variations of PM2.5, PM10, and PM2.5/PM10 ratios in the Yangtze River Delta and their relationship with synoptic meteorology and boundary-layer structures. Atmospheric Research, 2020. 236, 104837.
  23. Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., ... & Zender, C. S. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2013. 118(11), 5380-5552. [CrossRef]
  24. Ayodele CO, Fakinle BS, Jimoda LA, Sonibare JA. Investigation on the ambient air quality in a hospital environment. Cogent Environ Sci 2016. 2(1):1215281. [CrossRef]
  25. Chamseddine A, Alameddine I, Hatzopoulou M, El-Fadel M. Seasonal variation of air quality in hospitals with indoor–outdoor correlations. Build Environ. 2019. 148:689–700. [CrossRef]
  26. Ostro, B. Outdoor Air Pollution—Assessing the Environmental Burden of Disease at National and Local Levels. World Health Organization, Geneva, Environmental Burden of Disease Series No. 5. 2004.
  27. Bodor, K, Szep, R., and Bodor, Z. The human health risk assessment of particulate air pollution (PM2.5 and PM10) in Romania. Toxicology Reports 9. 2022. 556–562. [CrossRef]
  28. Abulude, Francis Olawale and Oluwagbayide, Samuel Dare and Akinnusotu, Akinyinka and Arifalo, Kikelomo Mabinuola and Acha, Sunday and Kenni, Amoke Monisola and Adamu, Ademola, Indoor Air Quality: Assessment of Particulate Matter and Non-Cancerous Inhalation Health Risk in Nigeria (May 29, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4462384. [CrossRef]
  29. Shittu, A.I., Njoku, K.I., Adesuyi, A.A. Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Assessment of the Nigerian University Campus In Lagos, Nigeria. ТЕХНОЛОГІЇ ЗАХИСТУ ДОВКІЛЛЯ. Екoлoгічна безпека та збалансoване ресурсoкoристуванн. 2019. UDC 502/504. [CrossRef]
  30. Otuu FC, et al. Indoor Air Quality, Cell Features and Lifestyle Characteristics: Implications on the Prevalence of Some Respiratory Tract Diseases and Symptoms among Inmates of Enugu Prison, Nigeria. Adv Clin Toxicol 2019, 4(3): 000163. [CrossRef]
  31. Afolabi AO, Arome A, Akinbo TF. Empirical Study on Sick Building Syndrome from Indoor Pollution in Nigeria. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 25; 8(E):395-404. [CrossRef]
  32. Anjorin, O. F., Imoh, L. C., & Uhunmwangho, C. Evaluation of Air Quality Indices of Selected Public Kitchens and Possible Health Consequences. Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment, 2020. 13(4), 408-416. [CrossRef]
  33. Ibeneme, S.C., Ativie, R.N., Ibeneme, G.C. et al. Evidence of seasonal changes in airborne particulate matter concentration and occupation-specific variations in pulmonary function and haematological parameters among some workers in Enugu Southeast Nigeria: a randomized cross-sectional observational study. Arch Public Health. 2022. 80, 213. [CrossRef]
  34. WHO global air quality guidelines. Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
  35. National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (Establishment) (Amended) ACT, 2018. National Environmental (Air Quality Control). Regulation Control.
  36. Abulude, F.O., Oluwagbayide, S.D., Akinnusotu, A. Gbotoso, A.O., Ademilua5, S.O. Abulude, I.A. Indoor Air Quality in a Tertiary Institution: The Case of Federal College of Agriculture, Akure, Nigeria. Aerosol Science and Engineering. 2023. [CrossRef]
  37. Tronville, P. and Rivers, R. Developing parameters for multi-mode ambient air models including the nanometer mode. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2017. 838(1):012036. [CrossRef]
  38. Chauhan, P.K., Kumar, A., Pratap, V., and Singh, A.K. Seasonal characteristics of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 over Varanasi during 2019–2020. Front. Sustain. Cities, 02 August 2022Sec. Climate Change and Cities. Volume 4 - 2022. [CrossRef]
  39. Bathmanabhan S and Saragur Madanayak S N. Analysis and interpretation of particulate matter—PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 emissions from the heterogeneous traffic near an urban roadway Atmos Pollut Res. 2010. 1 184–94. [CrossRef]
  40. Emekwuru, N.; Ejohwomu, O. Temperature, Humidity and Air Pollution Relationships during a Period of Rainy and Dry Seasons in Lagos, West Africa. Climate 2023, 11, 113. [CrossRef]
  41. N. Pe´ rez, J. Pey, X. Querol, A. Alastuey, J.M. Lo´pez, M. Viana. Partitioning of major and trace components in PM 10–PM 2.5–PM 1 at an urban site in Southern Europe. Atmospheric Environment 42 (2008) 1677–1691. [CrossRef]
  42. Marlies Noordzij, Merel van Diepen, Fergus C. Caskey, Kitty J. Jager, Relative risk versus absolute risk: one cannot be interpreted without the other, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Volume 32, Issue suppl_2, April 2017, Pages ii13–ii18. [CrossRef]
  43. Gilardi, L., Marconcini, M., Metz-Marconcini, Esch, T., and Erbertseder, T. (2023). Long-term exposure and health risk assessment from air pollution: impact of regional scale mobility. International Journal of Health Geographics. 2023. 22:11. [CrossRef]
  44. Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Wanner C, Zoccali C. Measures of effect: relative risks, odds ratios, risk difference, and ‘number needed to treat.’Kidney Int. 2007;72(7):789–91. [CrossRef]
  45. Pope, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D., Ito, K., & Thurston, G. D. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA, 2004. 287(9), 1132-1141. [CrossRef]
  46. Turner, M. C., Krewski, D., Diver, W. R., Pope III, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Jerrett, M., ... & Gapstur, S. M. Ambient air pollution and cancer mortality in the Cancer Prevention Study II. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2011. 119(6), 813-820. [CrossRef]
  47. Dockery, D. W., Pope, C. A., Xu, X., Spengler, J. D., Ware, J. H., Fay, M. E., ... & Speizer, F. E. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. New England Journal of Medicine, 1993. 329(24), 1753-1759. [CrossRef]
  48. Kheirbek, I.; Wheeler, K.; Walters, S.; Kass, D.; Matte, T. PM2.5 and ozone health impacts and disparities in New York City:Sensitivity to spatial and temporal resolution. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2013, 6, 473–486. [CrossRef]
  49. Yorifuji, T.; Bae, S.; Kashima, S.; Tsuda, T.; Doi, H.; Honda, Y.; Kim, H.; Hong, Y.C. Health impact assessment of PM10 and PM2.5 in 27 Southeast and East Asian cities. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2015, 57, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Suriano, D.; Prato, M.; Penza, M. Air Quality Monitoring in a Near-City Industrial Zone by Low-Cost Sensor Technologies: A Case Study. Eng. Proc. 2023, 48, 26. [CrossRef]
  51. Suriano, D.; Prato, M. An Investigation on the Possible Application Areas of Low-Cost PM Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring. Sensors 2023, 23, 3976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Preprints 90879 g002
Figure 2. The ratio of the particulate matter.
Figure 2. The ratio of the particulate matter.
Preprints 90879 g002
Preprints 90879 g003
Figure 3. Toxicity Potentials of the Particulate Matter of the different Locations.
Figure 3. Toxicity Potentials of the Particulate Matter of the different Locations.
Preprints 90879 g003
Table 2. The basic description of the particulate matter levels from the vicinities of the PHC.
Table 2. The basic description of the particulate matter levels from the vicinities of the PHC.
Parameter PM1.0 PM2.5 PM10 PM1.0 PM2.5 PM10 PM1.0 PM2.5 PM10
Arakale Iju Oba-Ile
Mean 28.15 73.00 85.21 17.75 35.58 37.40 19.72 34.59 38.40
StD 10.66 27.94 33.00 5.63 14.68 14.72 7.66 13.67 12.71
CoefVar (%) 37.87 38.28 38.70 31.73 34.52 39.37 31.73 39.53 38.34
Minimum 2.44 7.39 9.20 6.16 11.46 11.67 7.14 10.46 12.63
Q1 24.30 62.64 86.78 13.67 27.06 28.09 14.69 26.06 25.10
Q3 33.15 84.83 99.91 21.72 42.55 45.13 22.71 41.55 43.12
Maximum 106.59 303.67 357.08 56.38 223.90 240.42 54.37 224.90 244.43
Skewness 0.38 0.81 0.87 0.42 4.10 3.93 0.427 4.06 3.94
Kurtosis 4.29 6.32 6.18 2.82 50.44 47.87 2.87 50.14 47.63
Owode FECA
Mean 16.18 47.62 56.52 21.13 25.41 24.46
StD 19.86 58.92 66.88 9.77 11.01 11.03
CoefVar (%) 122.72 123.75 118.34 46.23 43.32 43.33
Minimum 2.54 10.57 14.09 9.02 11.10 11.10
Q1 6.61 22.92 28.59 14.47 18.07 18.14
Q3 19.38 53.04 62.52 26.57 32.13 32.16
Maximum 184.61 613.80 701.68 72.43 83.44 83.56
Skewness 4.82 5.57 5.71 1.81 1.71 1.70
Kurtosis 28.93 47.62 38.98 4.42 4.07 4.04
Table 4. Human health risk calculation based on the particulate matter concentration.
Table 4. Human health risk calculation based on the particulate matter concentration.
RR (all-cause mortality) RR (cardiopulmonary mortality) RR (lung cancer) AF (cardiopulmonary mortality) AF (lung cancer) ER (cardiopulmonary mortality) ER (lung cancer)
Arakale 1.06±0.05 2.70±1.84 4.04±2.76 12.81±0.72 15.19±0.03 17.00±1.84 30.41±2.78
FECA 1.01±0.01 0.861±0.38 1.289±0.57 11.03±0.31 10.03±0.012 19.04±0.38 20.88±0.57
Iju 1.02±0.01 1.528±7.25 2.201±0.28 19.22±0.04 15.38±0.07 14.728±7.25 12.01±0.28
Oba-Ile 1.06±0.05 2.707±1.62 4.051±2.43 15.71±0.15 17.13±010 17.07±1.62 30.50±2.43
Owode 1.06±0.12 2.68±4.22 4.007±6.32 12.38±0.36 14.91±0.24 18.10±1.62 30.07±6.32
AF - Able Fraction, RR – Relative Risk, ER – Excess Risk.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated