Preprint
Review

A Review of Distribution and Profiles of HBCD in Different Environmental Media of China

Altmetrics

Downloads

96

Views

38

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

21 November 2023

Posted:

22 November 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) was most important flame retardant in Expanded Polystyrene foam and Extruded Polystyrene foam in the past forty years in the world. China was the major producer and user of HBCD, and the total HBCD production was about 0.3 million tons. Although HBCD has been completely banned in China in 2021 because of its long-range transport, bioaccumulation and toxicity, there's still a lot of residues in environment. Therefore, we reviewed multiple studies concerning the distribution of HBCD in diverse environmental matrices, such as air, dust, soil, water, sediment and biota. Results revealed that HBCD levels in different environments in China present a geographical variation and were at high level compared with other countries. In all environmental media, relatively high HBCD concentrations have been found in industrial and urban areas. Industrialization and urbanization are two important factors that influence the concentration and distribution of HBCD in the environment. In terms of isomer, γ-HBCD was the dominant isomer in soil, water, and sediment, while in the biota, α-HBCD was the predominant isomer.
Keywords: 
Subject: Environmental and Earth Sciences  -   Pollution

1. Introduction

Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD, C12H18Br6) was a class of persistent organic pollutants with obvious toxicity (carcinogenicity and mutagenicity), which was commonly found in a wide range of environmental media, including the atmosphere, water, and organisms. HBCD in the environment were characterized by difficult degradation, long-range transport, bioaccumulation, and low water solubility (Covaci et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2016; Choo et al., 2019; Drage et al., 2019; Jaksic et al., 2020; Tao et al., 2020). The possible adverse effects of exposure to HBCD were of public concern due to its highly toxic properties. And HBCD was listed in the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants in 2013.
HBCD has been mainly applied as a flame retardant in Expanded Polystyrene foam (EPS) and Extruded Polystyrene foam (XPS) for insulation and construction (UNEP, 2015). Among the brominated flame retardants (BFRs) used worldwide, HBCD has the third highest production volume. China was the major producer and user of HBCD(Yi et al., 2016). According to our joint investigation with the relevant associations, the total production of HBCD was about 300,000 tons, in addition to 26 million tons of EPS and 2.3 million tons of XPS containing HBCD in China. The production and use of HBCD has been on an increasing trend due to improvements of fire awareness and safety standards in China. Between 2001 and 2009, the annual production of HBCD doubled approximately 20 times to 10,000 tons (POPRC, 2011). After 2010, annual production of HBCD jumped to 20,000 tons and then remained constant at approximately 18,000 tons until 2021. Although the production and use of HBCD has been completely banned in China in 2021, the products and wastes containing HBCD can still enter and affect the environment due to its release and may be biomagnified through food chains and transmitted to humans. The residual HBCD in the environment will be another potential source of pollution.
As a signatory to the Stockholm convention, China has made a lot of efforts in HBCD pollution prevention and control, and many scientists in China have investigated the occurrence, emission, and environmental pollution of HBCD from various sources. More studies were conducted around 2015, with a downward trend in studies after 2019. However, the latest overall contamination levels of HBCD in different environmental media at the national level since 2021 have not been summarized and reported. We reviewed over 100 studies on the distribution of HBCD in China during the last 20 years. The literatures reviewed were mainly from top journals, sourced from various databases, including ACS, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink and Web of Science, and keywords like HBCD, air, soil, water, sediment and biota were used. The objective of this study was to summarize the available information on HBCD and to discuss and compare the levels of HBCD in various environmental media in China after the ban of HBCD in 2021. We provide a comprehensive overview of the spatial distribution of HBCD in these environmental media and considered the causes of the pollution.

2. HBCD Distribution in Air

Long-range transport of HBCD would occur from contaminated sites to the atmosphere by volatilization or particle-bound under certain environmental conditions (Remberger et al., 2004; Yu et al., 2008). Only few studies were found on HBCD in air in China were, mainly in Beijing and Guangdong Province. The levels of HBCD in Beijing (Hu et al., 2011), Guangzhou(Yu et al., 2008), Foshan(Hong et al., 2013) ranged from 0.69–1800 pg/m3, which were comparable with or slightly higher than those at the remote or urban sites in the United States (Michigan: 0.2-8.0 pg/m3, Louisiana: 0.2-6.2 pg/m3, Arkansas: 0.2-11 pg/m3, Chicago: 0.9-9.6 pg/m3)(Hoh and Hites, 2005), but were comparable with or significantly lower than those in the European (Stockholm: 76–610 pg/m3, Sweden: 1.07×106 pg/m3, Norway: 0.2×106-1.5×108 pg/m3) (Sellström et al., 1998; Remberger et al., 2004; Thomsen et al., 2007). This may be due to the fact that Europe was the first country to use HBCD as a replacement for penta- and octa-BDE flame retardant products and its consumption of HBCD accounted for more than half of the world market demand, according to a technical report.
Gas-particle distribution could affect the deposition, transport and subsequent fate of HBCD (Yu et al., 2008; Hu et al., 2011). HBCD was primarily distributed in environmental solids such as dust and tended to deposit near point sources (Watanabe and Sakai, 2003; Birnbaum and Staskal, 2004; Ueno et al., 2006; Hong et al., 2013). Yu (Yu et al., 2008) observed that level of HBCD in particle phase was much higher than that in gas phase at all four sampling sites (urban, city background, and industrial site) in Guangzhou. At national level, HBCD concentrations in outdoor dust in China were highly variable (0.133 to 25,400 ng/g). Similarly, in some cities, such as Shanghai and Beijing, the concentration values in outdoor dust also varied considerably, from 0.3 to 249 ng/g and 5.3 to 2580 ng/g, respectively (Abafe and Martincigh, 2016). In addition, HBCD concentration in outdoor dust was positively correlated with the dust particle size. This result was observed in Chongqing and Beijing (Cao et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2018a).
Serious HBCD pollution was found in some areas affecting by the HBCD sources. Very high concentrations of HBCD have been found in Zhejiang (12,400 ng/g), Tianjin (20,300 ng/g) and Guangdong (25,400 ng/g), which were more than 10–100 times those in dust from areas away from pollution (Zhu et al., 2018). This may be because the sampling points were located near EPS production facilities and might be affected by the release from the production of HBCD-related products. Therefore, attention should be paid to the occupational exposure risk, contamination remediation and environmental management in these places where HBCD was produced and used.
Because HBCD was mainly used in building materials and upholstery textiles as flame retardant, urban areas were the main source of HBCD. It was reported in study in the atmosphere of some cities in Southern China and in the BSEF technical report about HBCD applications (Yu et al., 2008; Hong et al., 2013). Some indoor places like workplaces presented large quantities of HBCD-containing foams and electronic products, which could lead to high concentrations of HBCD in the air of the area due to volatilization or wear and tear of these products (de Wit et al., 2012; Hong et al., 2013; Cao et al., 2015). Total HBCD concentrations at workplaces (48.2 pg/m3) are higher than those in offices (8.21 pg/m3) and homes (5.43 pg/m3) in Guangzhou and Foshan (Hong et al., 2013). HBCD released from urban sources was substance in the air that was most likely to adversely affect humans and many people spend most of their time indoors, therefore, the contribution of HBCD in indoor dust to human exposure was generally much higher than that outdoors. Therefore, the concentrations of HBCD in indoor air deserve attention.

3. HBCD in Soil

3.1. Distribution and Levels of HBCD

Soil is a sink for HBCD, and there are many studies on HBCD in soil. Research from recent studies is collated in Fig. 1 to illustrate the distribution of HBCD in soil in China. Most studies on HBCD in soil in China have been concentrated in the northeast coastal areas, and after that, the Pearl River Delta region. This may be due to the fact that the HBCD-related products in China are mainly produced on the coastal areas. HBCD showed regional distribution in soil, with varying concentrations from 0.88 to 23,200 ng/g across different areas (Covaci et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2017b; Cao et al., 2018). Spatially distributed, HBCD concentrations in soil decreased from southeast to north China, except for Yingkou. For instance, HBCD concentration is higher in Jiangmen (7.6 ng/g) (Lu et al., 2019) compared to Weihai (0.449 ng/g) (Zhang et al., 2016).
Figure 1. Distribution of HBCD concentration in soil in China.
Figure 1. Distribution of HBCD concentration in soil in China.
Preprints 91052 g001
HBCD in soil mainly comes from the local discharge of industrial wastewater and waste and/or deposition of atmospheric pollution from HBCD-related industrial processes. Generally, high concentrations of HBCD were found in soils near HBCD manufacturing plants, followed by soils near plants producing HBCD-related products (Fig. 2) (Li et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2017b; Cao et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018). For example, the highest HBCD concentration measured in China (11,700 ng/g) was found in soil near one of the biggest HBCD manufacturing facilities in China (Zhang et al., 2018). Similarly, HBCD at concentrations up to 6901 ng/g was detected in soil near HBCD manufacturing facilities in the Laizhou Bay, East China(Li et al., 2012). However, the concentrations of HBCD detected in soil near the HBCD-related production and processing plants in Tianjin (1730 ng/g) and Weifang (560.4 ng/g) were lower compared to the above-mentioned areas (Yi et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2017b). Additionally, HBCD-related product wastes, including plastic waste, e-waste and textiles, are also sources of HBCD pollution in the environment. For example, high concentrations of HBCD in soil samples near plastic waste treatment site (11.0-624 ng/g) were detected in Dingzhou and Xinle (Huang et al., 2017a). Recycled plastic waste consisted mainly of EPX and XPS. E-waste and textile also contributed to increased HBCD concentrations in the environment, although the amount of HBCD used in textiles and electrical/electronic equipment was relatively small. For example, HBCD concentrations in soils near the e-waste recycling areas in Guangzhou were at moderate levels (0.38-284 ng/g), which was consistent with the level of HBCD detected in soil in Ningbo (below detection limits-102.6 ng/g), where the textile and electronic equipment industries are well developed. Above two areas had much higher HBCD concentrations in urban soils in Guangzhou (1.7-5.6 ng/g) and in soil in Chongming Island (the Yangtze River Delta) (not detected-93.8 pg/g) without industrial activities (Yu et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2011; Meng et al., 2011a; Tang et al., 2014).
Figure 2. Different sources of HBCD in the surface soil.
Figure 2. Different sources of HBCD in the surface soil.
Preprints 91052 g002
Notable variations in HBCD concentrations exist across various soil types. For example, a study conducted in Ningbo analyzed six types of soil and revealed that significantly higher concentrations of HBCD were observed in waste dumping sites (mean: 67.4 ng/g) and industrial areas (mean: 37.9 ng/g), followed by traffic areas (mean: 31.8 ng/g), residential areas (mean: 14.1 ng/g), vegetable soils (mean: 11.0 ng/g) and farmland soils (mean: 7.75 ng/g) (Tang et al., 2014). Similarly, in Dingzhou and Xinle, the highest HBCD concentrations were observed in disposal/recycling sites (11–624 ng/g), followed by roadside soil (2.96–5.4 ng/g), and farmland soil (8.69–55.5 ng/g) (Huang et al., 2017a). However, only slight difference of HBCD concentration was observed in the different soil types in Chongming Island, where there is no industrial activity. The average concentration of HBCD in tideland soils (38.9 pg/g) was comparable to that in road soils (34.1 pg/g) and woodland soils (27.8 pg/g) and was only 2 times higher than in farmland soils (15.3 pg/g) and grassland soils (15.1 pg/g), respectively (Meng et al., 2011b). In addition, HBCD concentrations in soil clearly showed a decreasing trend with increasing distance (Remberger et al., 2004; Gao et al., 2011; Li et al., 2012; Yi et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016). It was also found that the concentration of HBCD decreased dramatically with distance up to a certain distance, and decreased more slowly beyond that distance. For example, at the biggest HBCD manufacturing plant in China, HBCD concentrations decreased sharply by 11,600 ng/g over a distance of 2 km, while for the next 4.1 km, the decrease was only 75.2 ng/g(Zhang et al., 2018). At another HBCD production plant in China, an approximate 466-fold decrease in HBCD concentrations in soil was observed within 7 km in two directions(Li et al., 2012). At an e-waste recycling site in Guangzhou. a dramatic decreasing trend of HBCD in the soil from 5.82 ng/g to 0.01 ng/g was observed in a range of 30 km (Gao et al., 2011).

3.2. Diastereoisomer Profiles in Surface Soils

γ-HBCD usually shared the major proportion to the total HBCD in the soil, while certain cases revealed a relatively high proportion of α-HBCD (Fig. 3). The composition of HBCD diastereoisomer in soils was strongly influenced by industrial emissions. For example, the diastereoisomer composition of HBCD in soils from the HBCD production facility area in China was found to be consistent with commercial HBCD products. Commercial HBCD consist mainly of 70–89% γ-HBCD and 10-13% α-HBCD and 1-12% β-HBCD. The proportions to the total HBCD of γ-HBCD, α-HBCD and β-HBCD were 76±10%, 16 ± 8% and 8 ± 6% in the soil near the largest HBCD manufacturer in China (Zhang et al., 2018). γ-HBCD was predominant (averaged 73.9%) in the brominated flame retardants production area in Shouguang, followed by α-HBCD (averaged 16.2%) and β-HBCD (averaged 9.9%) (Zhang et al., 2016). Similar patterns were also observed in soil samples collected from Laizhou Bay and Weifang (Li et al., 2012; Yi et al., 2016). And in Guiyu, α-HBCD was the dominant isomer in soils from e-waste recycling areas, accounting for 56%–57% (Gao et al., 2011), which is similar to the profiles reported for soils near plastics industrial parks in Cangzhou (α-HBCD: 42.8%-81.1%) (Zhang et al., 2016). The isomer pattern in HBCD-containing products and environment media can be changed by industrial processes, particularly extrusion molding and thermal cutting, before emission because of differences in the physical properties of the three isomers (Gao et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018). Lower γ-HBCD proportion (55.5%) was found in polystyrene hard plastics consumer products (general purpose polystyrene, high impact polystyrene; etc.) with more industrial processing than EPS (Rani et al., 2014). And γ-HBCD was the predominant component of commercial technical HBCD products in EPS raw foam, but α-HBCD was found to be the main congener in particles emitted from thermal cutting of EPS. However, the diastereoisomer composition of HBCD in soils differed between point source and non-point source sites. For example, in Shouguang, the HBCD diastereoisomer composition in soils in point source sites (65.3% γ-HBCD, 23.2% β-HBCD and 11.5% α-HBCD) showed significant differences from that in non-point source sites (56.4% γ-HBCD, 23.8% α-HBCD and 19.7% β-HBCD) (p<0.028) (Zhu et al., 2014).
Figure 3. HBCD stereoisomer in soil in China (ASERS: Areas surrounding the e-waste recycling sites; EWRS: e-waste recycling sites).
Figure 3. HBCD stereoisomer in soil in China (ASERS: Areas surrounding the e-waste recycling sites; EWRS: e-waste recycling sites).
Preprints 91052 g003

4. HBCD in Water, Sludge, and Sediment

4.1. HBCD in Water

4.1.1. Distribution and Levels of HBCD

Only a few studies on HBCD in water have been published in the past. There were three main sources of HBCD in natural water: discharge of industrial wastewater, direct discharge of domestic sewage, and atmospheric wet deposition. The concentration of HBCD in water bodies is both related to human activities, such as direct discharge of domestic sewage and effluent from sewage treatment plants, and affected by its solubility (2.1–28.8 μg/L at room temperature) (Xu J, 2013; Li et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018). In natural rivers along the southern coast of the Bohai Sea, the concentrations of HBCD were relatively low, ranging from 4.98 to 41.3 ng/L (Zhang et al., 2018). Using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization, HBCD has been detected in Taihu Lake at concentrations ranging from not detected to 0.37 ng/L (Xu J, 2013). In water samples from the Yellow Sea, HBCD concentrations range from 0.12 to 2.23 ng/L. However, in many rivers receiving industrial wastewater, the concentration of HBCD has exceeded the range permitted by international standards (1.6–500 ng/L) (Hu et al., 2016). For example, the HBCD concentration in wastewater discharged from HBCD plant was 27.9–5080 ng/L, and the water samples with the highest concentration of HBCD (5080 ng/L) was collected near large HBCD producers on the southern coast of the Bohai Sea (Zhang et al., 2018). In urban environments, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), and especially those treating industrial wastewater, are a crucial sink for HBCD (Clarke B O 2010). The type of industrial wastewater influences the HBCD concentrations in WWTPs. For example, high HBCD concentrations (37.2 and 34.9 ng/g) have been found in WWTPs in Shanghai that mainly treat wastewater from motorcycle and automobile industries where HBCD is used (Fig. 4a) (Xiang et al., 2015).

4.1.2. Diastereoisomer Profiles in Water

α-HBCD and γ-HBCD typically dominated in the water. For example, at the southern coast of the Bohai Sea, the concentration of α-HBCD was the highest (1.23 - 1800 ng/L), followed by γ-HBCD (1.10 - 2150 ng/L) and β-HBCD (0.85 - 1120 ng/L) (Zhang et al., 2018). Similar findings were observed in the Pearl River, with concentrations of 0.0075–0.0276 ng/L for α-HBCD, 0.0041–0.0545 ng/L for γ-HBCD, and 0.0018–0.0071 ng/L for β-HBCD. In addition, at the northern coast of the Yellow Sea, γ-HBCD is dominant, accounting for 73%–100% (He et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2014).

4.2. HBCD in Sludge of Wastewater Treatment Plants

Due to its strong hydrophobicity (logKow of 5.4–5.8), HBCD has a propensity to adsorb onto suspended particulate matter and accumulate in sludge during wastewater treatment (Byrns, 2001; Marvin et al., 2011). To date, there have been few studies on HBCD in sludge of wastewater treatment plants in China. Two publications have reported on HBCD concentrations in sludge in Shanghai (0.1–37.2 ng/g) (Xiang et al., 2015) and the Pearl Delta River (112–136 ng/g) (Feng et al., 2012).
Figure 4. Concentration of HBCD (a) and corresponding isomers (b) in sludge from sewage treatment plants in Shanghai.
Figure 4. Concentration of HBCD (a) and corresponding isomers (b) in sludge from sewage treatment plants in Shanghai.
Preprints 91052 g004
A comparison with the 2001 national sewage sludge survey conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reveals that sludge from Shanghai exhibits lower concentrations of HBCD (mean: 4.7 ng/g) than the global average (mean: 19.8 ng/g) (Venkatesan and Halden, 2014). In terms of annual production in China, the proportion of HBCD that ends up in sewage sludge is extremely low (< 0.002%) (Xiang et al., 2015). α-HBCD (47.9%) and γ-HBCD (48.0%) are the two main components in sewage sludge in Shanghai (Fig. 4b), which is similar to the composition of sewage sludge in the United States (12.3 ng/g for γ-HBCD, 6.7 ng/g for α-HBCD) (Venkatesan and Halden, 2014), and Spain (375 ng/g for γ-HBCD, 175 ng/g for α-HBCD) (Guerra et al., 2010). Previous studies have demonstrated that γ-HBCD exhibits the highest hydrophobicity among the three HBCD isomers, leading to its accumulation in solid matrices such as soils and sediments (Wu et al., 2010; Gao et al., 2011; Meng et al., 2011b; Li et al., 2013). However, the isomer profiles of HBCD in Chinese sewage sludge have not been thoroughly investigated, necessitating further analysis.
In the Pearl River Delta region of China, HBCD concentrations (112–136 ng/g) in sewage treatment plant sludge are much higher than those in river sediment from the same region (not detected to 31.6 ng/g) (Feng et al., 2012). Similar results have been found in Spain (Gorga et al., 2013) and Turkey (Demirtepe and Imamoglu, 2019). This is mainly because the sludge from sewage treatment plants has a high organic matter content, and organic matter is a strong adsorbent of HBCD (Ganci et al., 2019). Consequently, HBCD remains in the sludge, resulting in a relatively high concentration. Therefore, the concentration of HBCD in sewage treatment plant sludge (13.1–616.2 ng/g) is generally 100–1000 times that in river sediment in the same area (Gorga et al., 2013; Fang et al., 2016; Demirtepe and Imamoglu, 2019).

4.3. HBCD in Sediment

Many studies have shown that because of its low water solubility, HBCD is readily adsorbed by particles in aquatic environments. It then enters sediments through sedimentation and other processes, and sediments are one of the main storage sites of HBCD in the natural environment.

4.3.1. Distribution and Levels of HBCD

Fig. 5 showed the geographical distributions and concentrations of total HBCD in sediments from the Yellow River, Yangtze River, Haihe River, Pearl River Delta, Liaohe River, Hunhe River, Ertix River, Tarim River and some tributaries (e.g., the Dongjiang River, Beijiang River, and Xijiang River).
Figure 5. Geographical distribution and level of HBCD in sediments from several river drainage basins in China.
Figure 5. Geographical distribution and level of HBCD in sediments from several river drainage basins in China.
Preprints 91052 g005
The HBCD concentrations measured in sediment from the seven major rivers listed above range from not detected to 206 ng/g (Li et al., 2013). Generally, HBCD concentrations in sediment increased from the north to the southeast of China (Fig. 5). Compared with most other regions in the world, except for Europe and the coast of Korea (Ramu et al., 2010), the Yangtze River had very high HBCD concentrations. The average HBCD concentration in sediments from the Yangtze River drainage basin was as high as 206 ng/g, which was much higher than that from the second-most polluted area the Pearl River drainage basin (0.03–31.6 ng/g) (Feng et al., 2012). HBCD concentrations in sediments from the remaining five rivers (Haihe River, Ertix River, Yellow River, Tarim River and Liaohe River), which were all located in north China, were all lower than 0.5 ng/g. The HBCD concentrations decreased from the lower reaches to the upper reaches of the rivers. For example, the HBCD concentration in sediments from the upper reaches of the Hunhe River in northeast China (0.05–1.42 ng/g) is relatively low compared with that from the lower reaches (0.10–25.8 ng/g) (Su et al., 2015). Similar spatial distributions of HBCD have been observed in sediments from the Yangtze River and Pearl River (Li et al., 2013).
For tributaries of these rivers, the total HBCD was at a low level. The highest HBCD concentrations were detected in the Dongjiang River (mean: 6.89 ng/g) (Feng et al., 2012), followed by the Hunhe River (3.74 ng/g) (Su et al., 2015), Zhujiang River (2.85 ng/g) (Feng et al., 2012), Shunde tributaries (1.43 ng/g) (Feng et al., 2012), Beijiang River (0.69 ng/g), Xijiang River (0.44 ng/g), and Dayanhe River (0.21 ng/g). The concentration of HBCD in sediments from Taihu Lake was basically at the same level, ranging from 0.168 to 2.66 ng/g dw in 2009 and 0.046 ng/g dw to 2.56 ng/g dw in 2010 (Xu J, 2013; Wang et al., 2016).
Numerous industrial, commercial, and urban activities can affect the distribution of HBCD. The HBCD concentrations in sediments from industrial or urban areas were significantly higher (p < 0.023) than those from rural or less industrialized areas. For instance, higher HBCD concentrations were found in sediments from the downriver section of the Hunhe River, which was exposed to industrial effluent from Shenyang and Fushun. Similar results have been found in the Pearl River and Yangtze River Delta, which are on the southeast coast of China in regions with high industrialization and high population densities (Li et al., 2013); the Kuzuryu River in Japan, which is severely polluted with effluent from the textile industries containing HBCD (Oh et al., 2014); and Onsan Bay in Korea, which is a heavily industrialized and urbanized region (Ramu et al., 2010). The mean HBCD concentrations in the Beijiang River, Pearl River Delta, Xijiang River, and Dayanhe River were 0.69, 0.50, 0.44, and 0.21 ng/g, respectively (Feng et al., 2012). The HBCD concentration in Laizhou Bay near manufacturing facilities ranged from 2.93 to 1029 ng/g (Li et al., 2012). Higher concentrations of HBCD have been observed in certain regions of China, likely due to intensive industrial activity, relatively high population density, and market demand for HBCD in these areas. These findings indicate that industrial activities and urbanization serve as potential sources of HBCD.

4.3.2. Diastereoisomer Profiles in Sediment

Generally, γ-HBCD is the dominant isomer in sediment. This has been observed in sediment from the Hunhe River and coast of the northern Yellow Sea in China (Harrad et al., 2009a; Su et al., 2015), lakes in England (Harrad et al., 2009b), the coast of Korea (Ramu et al., 2010), and Tokyo Bay in Japan (Minh et al., 2007). The contribution of γ-HBCD to the total HBCD concentration was consistent with the relative abundance (70%–95%) of γ-HBCD in commercial technical products available in China, and with the concentrations measured in soils near manufacturing plants in North China (Huang et al., 2017a). For example, in Taihu Lake, γ-HBCD was the dominant isomer, accounting for 64.5% - 87.7% of total HBCD (Wang et al., 2016).
Numerous studies have reported variations in the isomer profiles of sediment samples. Specifically, certain studies have identified elevated concentrations of α-HBCD in sediment samples(Marvin et al., 2006). The proportions of HBCD isomers in different environmental matrices are potentially affected by thermal isomerization of HBCD-containing products (Heeb et al., 2010), photolysis under natural light (Harrad et al., 2009a), and different degradation kinetics under aerobic and anaerobic conditions (α-HBCD slower than β- and γ-HBCD) (Davis et al., 2006; Gerecke et al., 2006).

5. HBCD in Biota

As a semi-volatile organic pollutant, the main way for HBCD to enter organisms are through migration of soil and water pollution (Huang et al., 2017a), respiratory intake (Li et al., 2019), and enrichment via the food chain (Zhu et al., 2017a; Choo et al., 2019). The concentrations of HBCD in organisms are affected by both its concentration in the environment (Feng et al., 2012; Gu et al., 2017) and the species (Reindl and Falkowska, 2015).

5.1. HBCD in Animals

The overall distribution of HBCD in various types of aquatic biota in China is shown in Fig. 6. In many studies, fish and shellfish are the common target aquatic species of HBCD, and the concentration of HBCD varies greatly among different aquatic species and regions. Because of the lipophilicity of HBCD, the content of HBCD in organisms is positively correlated with its fat content. This conclusion is proved by the distribution in fish tissues, and studies have found that the concentrations of HBCD in fish tissues decreased in the order of eggs > liver > muscles (Zhang et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2018). In animals, the concentration distribution of HBCD among different tissues varies. HBCD concentrations in liver and eggs were higher than those in muscles of freshwater fish from the Yangtze River (Xian et al., 2008).
Figure 6. Geographical distribution and concentration of HBCD in various types of aquatic biota in China.
Figure 6. Geographical distribution and concentration of HBCD in various types of aquatic biota in China.
Preprints 91052 g006
Overall, HBCD concentrations in aquatic biota in China are relatively low. HBCD concentrations in large yellow croaker and silver pomfrets, which are common consumer fish in coastal regions, from nine coastal cities (Shanghai, Zhoushan, Fuzhou, Dalian, Tianjin, Qingdao, Wenzhou, Quanzhou and Xiamen) ranged from 0.62 to 8.7 ng/g lw (lipid weight) and from 0.57 to 10.1 ng/g lw (lipid weight), respectively (Xia et al., 2011). The HBCD concentration of bluntsnout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) and snubnose pompano (Trachinotus blochii) in Guangdong was 0.471–0.665 ng/g lw (Meng et al., 2012). Interestingly, the HBCD concentration increases from the south (average: 1.2 ng/g lw) to the north (average: 6.5 ng/g lw) in silver pomfrets (Fig. 6b) and other aquatic species, which may be due to the fact that the consumption of EPS/XPS containing HBCD is less in the south than in the north. HBCD concentrations (not detected–0.194 ng/g lw) have been detected in 12 consumer fish species in 11 coastal cities in South China (Fig. 6a) (Meng et al., 2012). Those in apple snails (Ampullaria gigas spix) and grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) from East China are 3.5–6.55 ng/g lw and 14.9–67.8 ng/g lw, respectively (Zhu et al., 2017a).
The obtained results demonstrate similarity to the concentrations found in benthic shellfish, including oysters, scallops, and mussels, in the northern region of the Yellow Sea, which ranged from 0.87 ng/g to 67.08 ng/g (Harrad et al., 2009a).However, they appear slightly lower in comparison to the concentrations detected in mollusks from the Bohai Sea, which ranged from 25.1 ng/g to 148.87 ng/g lw(Zhu et al., 2012).
The HBCD related industrial activities likely affect the concentration and geographical distribution of HBCD in biota. High concentration of HBCD is detected in rivers and lakes related to HBCD pollution in China. For instance, the high concentrations of HBCD in aquatic species (goby, silver carp, loach, and freshwater shrimp) (7.09 - 815 ng/g lw) was found near manufacturing facilities in Laizhou Bay which was the important HBCD production base in China (Li et al., 2012). In the e-waste recycling area of China, HBCD concentrations of up to 186, 377 and 1791 ng/g lw have been found in crucian, loach, carp and winkle, respectively (Zhang et al., 2009). HBCD concentrations in freshwater fish from the low reach of the Yangtze River ranged from 11 to 330 ng/g lw, where large amount of polymer raw materials, textiles, electronic appliances and fine petrochemicals plants located (Xian et al., 2008). HBCD concentrations were detected in rats (mean: 40.3 ng/g lw, range: 22.1-51.1 ng/g lw) from an e-waste dismantling region in East China (Zhu et al., 2017a). HBCD has been detected in samples collected near an EPS material manufacturing plant in Tianjin. In marine species such as shrimp, crab, and fish, the total concentration of HBCD ranged from 0.878 ng/g to 44.8 ng/g (Zhu et al., 2017b). Geographically, among the nine Chinese coastal cities, the highest HBCD concentrations was found in Dalian (large yellow croaker:5.2 ng/g lw; silver pomfrets:10.1 ng/g lw) which is located near Laizhou Bay in the Bohai Sea and has been seriously polluted by domestic and industrial effluent (Xia et al., 2011). HBCD concentrations were observed to be higher in terrestrial passerine birds inhabiting urban and e-waste sites in the Pearl River Delta, while rural sites exhibited the lowest concentrations (Sun et al., 2012). These results indicated that industrial activities related to HBCD affected the concentration level and distribution of HBCD

5.2. HBCD in Plants and Mangrove Wetlands

The concentrations of HBCD decreased in the order of industrial areas > commercial areas > residential areas in tree bark (Hu et al., 2011; Han et al., 2017). These results are in the agreement with those from a study on tree bark from 12 locations around the world (Salamova and Hites, 2013). In Xinle and Dingzhou, which are major plastic waste recycling areas in North China, HBCD concentrations ranged from 3.47 ng/g in spinach to 23.4 ng/g in leeks (Huang et al., 2017a). High concentration of HBCD was detected in holly, cypress and pine (3.45 - 2494 ng/g dw) collected around an EPS manufacturing plant in Tianjin (Zhu et al., 2017b). Surprisingly, the highest HBCD have been detected at concentrations ranging from 8.88 to 160241 ng/g dw in plants (cypress, reed and seepweed) near HBCD manufacturing facilities in Laizhou Bay (Li et al., 2012). These results showed that point sources of HBCD can have a wide impact on the concentration of HBCD of the plants. In addition, enrichment of HBCD in different tissues from terrestrial plants showed some regularity. HBCD concentrations decreased in the order of leaf wax > inner leaf > branch > bark (Zhu et al., 2017b).
In coastal intertidal areas, mangrove wetlands are unique ecosystems that are natural sinks for many pollutants. In the northeastern coast of Shenzhen Bay, South China, the concentrations of total HBCD in mangrove plants ranged from 0.016 to 194 ng/g dw, in which the average concentrations of total HBCD in stems, roots and leaves were 766, 329 and 298 pg/g dw. The total concentrations in this region were relatively low compared to other regions worldwide. Mangrove plants exhibit tissue-specific accumulation of HBCD. γ-HBCD was the primary isomer found in the roots, while α-HBCD dominated in leaves and stems. Furthermore, α-HBCD was the dominant isomer in aboveground tissues, potentially due to metabolism, isomer-specific translocation, and/or isomerization in mangrove plants. Enantioselective enrichment of (−)-α-, (−)-β-, and (+)-γ-HBCD was observed in all mangrove plant tissues, suggesting the tissues exhibit enantioselectivity for HBCD. The logarithms of translocation factors for HBCD isomers and logKow exhibited a negative correlation (p = 0.03), indicating that passive translocation of HBCD is driven by moisture movement during transpiration (Li et al., 2019).

5.3. HBCD in Human Breast Milk

The analysis of HBCD in human breast milk suggested that global exposure of humans to HBCD was low. As China was the country with high production and use of HBCD, increasing HBCD concentrations in breast milk were detected in recent years in some studies. According to data from two national breast milk surveys on HBCD, the concentration of HBCD in Chinese people has increased approximately six times from 0.944 ng/g lw in 2007 (Shi ZX et al., 2009) to 6.83 ng/g lw in 2011 (Shi et al., 2017). In Beijing, the HBCD concentration in breast milk in 2014 (mean: 5.67 ng/g lw) (Huang et al., 2020) was two times higher than those measured in 2011 (mean: 2.4 ng/g lw) (Shi et al., 2013). HBCD is mainly used as a flame retardant for thermal insulation materials (such as polystyrene foams) and textiles which are used in residential and commercial upholstered furniture. Compared with the northern region, the HBCD concentration in breast milk was relatively low in South China. For example, the mean concentration of HBCD in breast milk was 1.42 ng/g lw in Shanghai (Ding W W 2011) and 1.82 ng/g lw in Shenzhen (Lu et al., 2018b), which was lower than that in Weifang, North China (mean: 2.86 ng/g lw) (Huang et al., 2017b). This may be due to the heating in winter in northern China and the fact that most HBCD manufacturers are located in northern China, which makes HBCD more widely used in north China. In addition, since controls of HBCD were implemented by the European Union in 2013, HBCD concentrations in breast milk in Britain (Harrad and Abdallah, 2015; Tao et al., 2017) and France (Antignac et al., 2016; Inthavong et al., 2017) have decreased. Therefore, in China, the content of HBCD in breast milk is expected to decrease since the production and use of HBCD was completely banned in December 2021.

5.4. Diastereoisomer Profiles in Biota

Generally, the dominant isomer is α-HBCD in most biota, including plants, river fish, aquatic invertebrates, marine mammals, birds, and rats (Xian et al., 2008; Nakagawa et al., 2010; Xia et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2017a; Zhu et al., 2017a; Wang et al., 2018). This is followed by γ- and β-HBCD. Compared with sediments, where γ-HBCD is dominant, the dominance of α-HBCD in biota indicated that the bioaccumulative potential of α-HBCD was higher than that of γ-HBCD. This is likely due to the faster metabolism of γ-HBCD compared to α-HBCD, leading to the enrichment of α-HBCD. This pattern of dominance agrees with research on juvenile rainbow trout and harbor seals (Zegers et al., 2005). In the Yangtze River, α-HBCD is dominant in different tissues from freshwater fish, including the liver (80%), muscles (60%), and eggs (40%) (Xian et al., 2008). These results agree with those from a study on fish from other areas like the North Sea estuaries, Europe (Morris et al., 2004). In East China, α-HBCD is the dominant isomer in grass carp (89.8%), frogs (55.8%), and apple snails (44.9%) (Zhu et al., 2017a). However, in grasshoppers (65.8%) and dragonflies (73.6%), γ-HBCD is dominant, which is consistent with the profiles in spotted doves (72%) and Chinese francolin (63%) from an e-waste recycling region in South China (He et al., 2010). Therefore, these species might be exposed to nearby sources of HBCD pollution.
HBCD isomers exhibited tissue-specific bioaccumulation patterns. For instance, in crabs, α-HBCD exhibited preferential accumulation in the spermary and ovary, whereas β-HBCD and γ-HBCD were found to accumulate in muscle tissues. A similar trend was observed in the roe and muscles of goby fish (Li et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2017a). HBCD in plants also exhibits high enantioselectivity (Huang et al., 2017a). For example, the percentage contributions of α-, β-, and γ-HBCD in spinach root and garlic root collected from Yihezhuang were 48.5%, 24.4%, 27.1% as well as 56.9%, 29.4% and 13.8%, respectively.
To study the cumulative effect of HBCD in biota, researchers have used the trophic amplification factor (TMF). The concentration level of HBCD may affect its cumulative effect in biota. For example, in aquatic food webs in areas with high HBCD concentrations, the TMF is greater than one (Zhu et al., 2017a; Zhu et al., 2017b), suggesting a trophic magnification. While in aquatic food webs in areas with low HBCD concentrations, such as the Tibet Plateau and Singapore, the TMF is one, which shows that some trophic dilution occurs (Zhu N, 2014; Zhang and Kelly, 2018). Similar results have been found in a terrestrial food web (Zhu et al., 2017a).

6. Conclusions

In all environmental media, relatively high HBCD concentrations have been found in HBCD polluted areas. Because of its relatively high volatility and hydrophobicity, HBCD is mainly distributed in atmospheric particles (dust) rather than in the gas phase. The HBCD concentration ranges in outdoor dust and outdoor air in some areas were 0.133–25 400 ng/g and 3.09 to 1800 pg/m3, respectively. Furthermore, there is a positive correlation between HBCD concentrations and total suspended particulate matter in the atmosphere (R2 = 0.531, p < 0.01). In soil, the total HBCD concentration ranges from 0.88 to 23200 ng/g and decreases from the southeast to the north. In rivers, the HBCD concentrations in water was between 4.98 and 41.3 ng/L, while the concentrations of HBCD in sediment from not detected to 206 ng/g and decreases from the southeast to the north of China. In aquatic biota, HBCD concentrations in the Bohai Sea and Yangtze River were the highest in China. For terrestrial species, HBCD concentrations were linked to the pollution of HBCD and the function of each district. Enrichment of HBCD in different tissues from terrestrial biota showed some regularity. In breast milk, the total HBCD concentration increased year by year, from 0.944 ng/g lw in 2007 to 6.83 ng/g lw in 2011. However, the concentration of HBCD was expected to decline in the future after China completely prohibited the production and use of HBCD in 2021. Studies have shown that γ-HBCD is the dominant isomer in soil, water, and sediment, while in biota, α-HBCD is dominant. Further studies are needed to investigate the mechanism behind HBCD isomer dominance and to identify factors influencing the isomer profile.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC3902302) (2022YFB4101505) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22076207). We thank Gabrielle David, PhD, from Liwen Bianji (Edanz) (www.liwenbianji.cn) for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

References

  1. Bromine Science and Environmental Forum (BSEF). http://www.bsef.com/env_health/hbcd/.
  2. Abafe, O.A., Martincigh, B.S., 2016. Determination and human exposure assessment of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and tetrabromobisphenol A in indoor dust in South Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23, 7038-7049. [CrossRef]
  3. Antignac, J.P., Main, K.M., Virtanen, H.E., Boquien, C.Y., Marchand, P., Venisseau, A., Guiffard, I., Bichon, E., Wohlfahrt-Veje, C., Legrand, A., Boscher, C., Skakkebaek, N.E., Toppari, J., Le Bizec, B., 2016. Country-specific chemical signatures of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in breast milk of French, Danish and Finnish women. Environ Pollut 218, 728-738. [CrossRef]
  4. Birnbaum, L.S., Staskal, D.F., 2004. Brominated flame retardants: cause for concern? Environ Health Perspect 112, 9-17. [CrossRef]
  5. Byrns, G., 2001. The fate of xenobiotic organic compounds in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 35, 2523-2533. [CrossRef]
  6. Cao, X., Lu, Y., Zhang, Y., Khan, K., Wang, C., Baninla, Y., 2018. An overview of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDs) in environmental media with focus on their potential risk and management in China. Environ Pollut 236, 283-295. [CrossRef]
  7. Cao, Z., Xu, F., Li, W., Sun, J., Shen, M., Su, X., Feng, J., Yu, G., Covaci, A., 2015. Seasonal and Particle Size-Dependent Variations of Hexabromocyclododecanes in Settled Dust: Implications for Sampling. Environ Sci Technol 49, 11151-11157. [CrossRef]
  8. Choo, G., Lee, I.S., Oh, J.E., 2019. Species and habitat-dependent accumulation and biomagnification of brominated flame retardants and PBDE metabolites. J Hazard Mater 371, 175-182. [CrossRef]
  9. Clarke B O, P.N.A., 2010. Persistent Organic Pollutants in Sewage Sludge: Levels, Sources, and Trends. Contaminants of Emerging Concern in the Environment: Ecological and Human Health Considerations. American Chemical Society, pp. 137-171.
  10. Covaci, A., Gerecke, A.C., Law, R.J., Voorspoels, S., Kohler, M., Heeb, N.V., Leslie, H., Allchin, C.R., De Boer, J., 2006. Hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs) in the environment and humans: a review. Environ Sci Technol 40, 3679-3688. [CrossRef]
  11. Davis, J.W., Gonsior, S.J., Markham, D.A., Friederich, U., Hunziker, R.W., Ariano, J.M., 2006. Biodegradation and product identification of [14C]hexabromocyclododecane in wastewater sludge and freshwater aquatic sediment. Environ Sci Technol 40, 5395-5401. [CrossRef]
  12. de Wit, C.A., Bjorklund, J.A., Thuresson, K., 2012. Tri-decabrominated diphenyl ethers and hexabromocyclododecane in indoor air and dust from Stockholm microenvironments 2: indoor sources and human exposure. Environ Int 39, 141-147. [CrossRef]
  13. Demirtepe, H., Imamoglu, I., 2019. Levels of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and hexabromocyclododecane in treatment plant sludge: Implications on sludge management. Chemosphere 221, 606-615. [CrossRef]
  14. Ding W W, T.Y., Jin J, 2011. Levels of hexabromocyclododecane in human breast-milk and the daily intake of newborns in a Shanghai hospital. Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi Chinese journal of preventive medicine 45, 498-501. [CrossRef]
  15. Drage, D.S., Heffernan, A.L., Cunningham, T.K., Aylward, L.L., Mueller, J.F., Sathyapalan, T., Atkin, S.L., 2019. Serum measures of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in reproductive-aged women in the United Kingdom. Environ Res 177, 108631. [CrossRef]
  16. Fang, M., Guo, J., Chen, D., Li, A., Hinton, D.E., Dong, W., 2016. Halogenated carbazoles induce cardiotoxicity in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 35, 2523-2529. [CrossRef]
  17. Feng, A.H., Chen, S.J., Chen, M.Y., He, M.J., Luo, X.J., Mai, B.X., 2012. Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) and tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in riverine and estuarine sediments of the Pearl River Delta in southern China, with emphasis on spatial variability in diastereoisomer- and enantiomer-specific distribution of HBCD. Mar Pollut Bull 64, 919-925. [CrossRef]
  18. Ganci, A.P., Vane, C.H., Abdallah, M.A., Moehring, T., Harrad, S., 2019. Legacy PBDEs and NBFRs in sediments of the tidal River Thames using liquid chromatography coupled to a high resolution accurate mass Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Sci Total Environ 658, 1355-1366. [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, S., Wang, J., Yu, Z., Guo, Q., Sheng, G., Fu, J., 2011. Hexabromocyclododecanes in surface soils from E-waste recycling areas and industrial areas in South China: concentrations, diastereoisomer- and enantiomer-specific profiles, and inventory. Environ Sci Technol 45, 2093-2099. [CrossRef]
  20. Gerecke, A.C., Giger, W., Hartmann, P.C., Heeb, N.V., Kohler, H.P., Schmid, P., Zennegg, M., Kohler, M., 2006. Anaerobic degradation of brominated flame retardants in sewage sludge. Chemosphere 64, 311-317. [CrossRef]
  21. Gorga, M., Martinez, E., Ginebreda, A., Eljarrat, E., Barcelo, D., 2013. Determination of PBDEs, HBB, PBEB, DBDPE, HBCD, TBBPA and related compounds in sewage sludge from Catalonia (Spain). Sci Total Environ 444, 51-59. [CrossRef]
  22. Gu, S.Y., Ekpeghere, K.I., Kim, H.Y., Lee, I.S., Kim, D.H., Choo, G., Oh, J.E., 2017. Brominated flame retardants in marine environment focused on aquaculture area: Occurrence, source and bioaccumulation. Sci Total Environ 601-602, 1182-1191. [CrossRef]
  23. Guerra, P., Eljarrat, E., Barcelo, D., 2010. Simultaneous determination of hexabromocyclododecane, tetrabromobisphenol A, and related compounds in sewage sludge and sediment samples from Ebro River basin (Spain). Anal Bioanal Chem 397, 2817-2824. [CrossRef]
  24. Han, T., Wu, M.H., Zang, C., Sun, R., Tang, L., Liu, N., Lei, J.Q., Shao, H.Y., Gu, J.Z., Xu, G., 2017. Hexabromocyclododecane and tetrabromobisphenol A in tree bark from different functional areas of Shanghai, China: levels and spatial distributions. Environ Sci Process Impacts 19, 1346-1354. [CrossRef]
  25. Harrad, S., Abdallah, M.A., 2015. Concentrations of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers, Hexabromocyclododecanes and Tetrabromobisphenol-A in Breast Milk from United Kingdom Women Do Not Decrease over Twelve Months of Lactation. Environ Sci Technol 49, 13899-13903. [CrossRef]
  26. Harrad, S., Abdallah, M.A., Covaci, A., 2009a. Causes of variability in concentrations and diastereomer patterns of hexabromocyclododecanes in indoor dust. Environ Int 35, 573-579. [CrossRef]
  27. Harrad, S., Abdallah, M.A., Rose, N.L., Turner, S.D., Davidson, T.A., 2009b. Current-use brominated flame retardants in water, sediment, and fish from English lakes. Environ Sci Technol 43, 9077-9083. [CrossRef]
  28. He, M.J., Luo, X.J., Yu, L.H., Liu, J., Zhang, X.L., Chen, S.J., Chen, D., Mai, B.X., 2010. Tetrabromobisphenol-A and hexabromocyclododecane in birds from an e-waste region in South China: influence of diet on diastereoisomer- and enantiomer-specific distribution and trophodynamics. Environ Sci Technol 44, 5748-5754. [CrossRef]
  29. He, M.J., Luo, X.J., Yu, L.H., Wu, J.P., Chen, S.J., Mai, B.X., 2013. Diasteroisomer and enantiomer-specific profiles of hexabromocyclododecane and tetrabromobisphenol A in an aquatic environment in a highly industrialized area, South China: vertical profile, phase partition, and bioaccumulation. Environ Pollut 179, 105-110. [CrossRef]
  30. Heeb, N.V., Graf, H., Schweizer, W.B., Lienemann, P., 2010. Thermally-induced transformation of hexabromocyclo dodecanes and isobutoxypenta bromocyclododecanes in flame-proofed polystyrene materials. Chemosphere 80, 701-708. [CrossRef]
  31. Hoh, E., Hites, R.A., 2005. Brominated Flame Retardants in the Atmosphere of the East-Central United States. Environmental Science & Technology 39, 7794-7802. [CrossRef]
  32. Hong, J., Gao, S., Chen, L., Han, Q., Yu, Z., Peng, P., Fu, J., 2013. Hexabromocyclododecanes in the indoor environment of two cities in South China: their occurrence and implications of human inhalation exposure. Indoor and Built Environment 25, 41-49. [CrossRef]
  33. Hu, J., Jin, J., Wang, Y., Ma, Z., Zheng, W., 2011. Levels of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and hexabromocyclododecane in the atmosphere and tree bark from Beijing, China. Chemosphere 84, 355-360. [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, X.C., Andrews, D.Q., Lindstrom, A.B., Bruton, T.A., Schaider, L.A., Grandjean, P., Lohmann, R., Carignan, C.C., Blum, A., Balan, S.A., Higgins, C.P., Sunderland, E.M., 2016. Detection of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in U.S. Drinking Water Linked to Industrial Sites, Military Fire Training Areas, and Wastewater Treatment Plants. Environ Sci Technol Lett 3, 344-350. [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, H., Wang, D., Wan, W., Wen, B., 2017a. Hexabromocyclododecanes in soils and plants from a plastic waste treatment area in North China: occurrence, diastereomer- and enantiomer-specific profiles, and metabolization. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24, 21625-21635. [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, M., Li, J., Xiao, Z., Shi, Z., 2020. Tetrabromobisphenol A and hexabromocyclododecane isomers in breast milk from the general population in Beijing, China: Contamination levels, temporal trends, nursing infant's daily intake, and risk assessment. Chemosphere 244, 125524. [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, X.M., Ma, S.T., Cui, J.T., Li, P., Zeng, X.Y., Yu, Z.Q., 2017b. Simultaneous Determination of Multiple Persistent Halogenated Compounds in Human Breast Milk. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry 45, 593-599. [CrossRef]
  38. Inthavong, C., Hommet, F., Bordet, F., Rigourd, V., Guerin, T., Dragacci, S., 2017. Simultaneous liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of brominated flame retardants (tetrabromobisphenol A and hexabromocyclododecane diastereoisomers) in French breast milk. Chemosphere 186, 762-769. [CrossRef]
  39. Jaksic, K., Matek Saric, M., Culin, J., 2020. Knowledge and attitudes regarding exposure to brominated flame retardants: a survey of Croatian health care providers. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27, 7683-7692. [CrossRef]
  40. Li, D., Zhu, X., Zhong, Y., Huang, W., Peng, P., 2017. Abiotic transformation of hexabromocyclododecane by sulfidated nanoscale zerovalent iron: Kinetics, mechanism and influencing factors. Water Res 121, 140-149. [CrossRef]
  41. Li, H., Hu, Y., Sun, Y., De Silva, A.O., Muir, D.C.G., Wang, W., Xie, J., Xu, X., Pei, N., Xiong, Y., Luo, X., Mai, B., 2019. Bioaccumulation and translocation of tetrabromobisphenol A and hexabromocyclododecanes in mangrove plants from a national nature reserve of Shenzhen City, South China. Environ Int 129, 239-246. [CrossRef]
  42. Li, H., Shang, H., Wang, P., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, Q., Jiang, G., 2013. Occurrence and distribution of hexabromocyclododecane in sediments from seven major river drainage basins in China. J Environ Sci (China) 25, 69-76. [CrossRef]
  43. Li, H., Zhang, Q., Wang, P., Li, Y., Lv, J., Chen, W., Geng, D., Wang, Y., Wang, T., Jiang, G., 2012. Levels and distribution of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) in environmental samples near manufacturing facilities in Laizhou Bay area, East China. J Environ Monit 14, 2591-2597. [CrossRef]
  44. Lu, H., Ma, X.J., Huang, X.J., Lu, S., Huang, Y.H., Mo, C.H., Cai, Q.Y., Wong, M.H., 2019. Distribution, diastereomer-specific accumulation and associated health risks of hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs) in soil-vegetable system of the Pearl River Delta region, South China. J Environ Manage 248, 109321. [CrossRef]
  45. Lu, J.F., He, M.J., Yang, Z.H., Wei, S.Q., 2018a. Occurrence of tetrabromobisphenol a (TBBPA) and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) in soil and road dust in Chongqing, western China, with emphasis on diastereoisomer profiles, particle size distribution, and human exposure. Environ Pollut 242, 219-228. [CrossRef]
  46. Lu, S., Tan, Z., Jiang, Y., Wu, D., Zhang, J., Zhou, J., Lin, X., 2018b. Hexabromocyclododecanes in breast milk from residents in Shenzhen, China: Implications for infant exposure. Sci Total Environ 622-623, 1090-1097. [CrossRef]
  47. Marvin, C.H., Tomy, G.T., Alaee, M., Macinnis, G., 2006. Distribution of hexabromocyclododecane in Detroit River suspended sediments. Chemosphere 64, 268-275. [CrossRef]
  48. Marvin, C.H., Tomy, G.T., Armitage, J.M., Arnot, J.A., McCarty, L., Covaci, A., Palace, V., 2011. Hexabromocyclododecane: current understanding of chemistry, environmental fate and toxicology and implications for global management. Environ Sci Technol 45, 8613-8623. [CrossRef]
  49. Meng, X.-Z., Duan, Y.-P., Yang, C., Pan, Z.-Y., Wen, Z.-H., Chen, L., 2011a. Occurrence, sources, and inventory of hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs) in soils from Chongming Island, the Yangtze River Delta (YRD). Chemosphere 82, 725-731. [CrossRef]
  50. Meng, X.Z., Duan, Y.P., Yang, C., Pan, Z.Y., Wen, Z.H., Chen, L., 2011b. Occurrence, sources, and inventory of hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs) in soils from Chongming Island, the Yangtze River Delta (YRD). Chemosphere 82, 725-731. [CrossRef]
  51. Meng, X.Z., Xiang, N., Duan, Y.P., Chen, L., Zeng, E.Y., 2012. Hexabromocyclododecane in consumer fish from South China: implications for human exposure via dietary intake. Environ Toxicol Chem 31, 1424-1430. [CrossRef]
  52. Minh, N.H., Isobe, T., Ueno, D., Matsumoto, K., Mine, M., Kajiwara, N., Takahashi, S., Tanabe, S., 2007. Spatial distribution and vertical profile of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and hexabromocyclododecanes in sediment core from Tokyo Bay, Japan. Environ Pollut 148, 409-417. [CrossRef]
  53. Morris, S., Allchin, C.R., Zegers, B.N., Haftka, J.J., Boon, J.P., Belpaire, C., Leonards, P.E., Van Leeuwen, S.P., De Boer, J., 2004. Distribution and fate of HBCD and TBBPA brominated flame retardants in North Sea estuaries and aquatic food webs. Environ Sci Technol 38, 5497-5504. [CrossRef]
  54. Nakagawa, R., Murata, S., Ashizuka, Y., Shintani, Y., Hori, T., Tsutsumi, T., 2010. Hexabromocyclododecane determination in seafood samples collected from Japanese coastal areas. Chemosphere 81, 445-452. [CrossRef]
  55. Oh, J.K., Kotani, K., Managaki, S., Masunaga, S., 2014. Levels and distribution of hexabromocyclododecane and its lower brominated derivative in Japanese riverine environment. Chemosphere 109, 157-163. [CrossRef]
  56. POPRC, 2011. Report of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee on the work of its seventh meeting.
  57. Ramu, K., Isobe, T., Takahashi, S., Kim, E.Y., Min, B.Y., We, S.U., Tanabe, S., 2010. Spatial distribution of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and hexabromocyclododecanes in sediments from coastal waters of Korea. Chemosphere 79, 713-719. [CrossRef]
  58. Rani, M., Shim, W.J., Han, G.M., Jang, M., Song, Y.K., Hong, S.H., 2014. Hexabromocyclododecane in polystyrene based consumer products: An evidence of unregulated use. Chemosphere 110, 111-119. [CrossRef]
  59. Reindl, A.R., Falkowska, L., 2015. Flame retardants at the top of a simulated baltic marine food web--a case study concerning African penguins from the Gdansk Zoo. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 68, 259-264. [CrossRef]
  60. Remberger, M., Sternbeck, J., Palm, A., Kaj, L., Stromberg, K., Brorstrom-Lunden, E., 2004. The environmental occurrence of hexabromocyclododecane in Sweden. Chemosphere 54, 9-21. [CrossRef]
  61. Salamova, A., Hites, R.A., 2013. Brominated and chlorinated flame retardants in tree bark from around the globe. Environ Sci Technol 47, 349-354. [CrossRef]
  62. Sellström, U., Kierkegaard, A., de Wit, C., Jansson, B., 1998. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers and hexabromocyclododecane in sediment and fish from a Swedish River. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 17, 1065-1072. [CrossRef]
  63. Shi, Z., Jiao, Y., Hu, Y., Sun, Z., Zhou, X., Feng, J., Li, J., Wu, Y., 2013. Levels of tetrabromobisphenol A, hexabromocyclododecanes and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in human milk from the general population in Beijing, China. Sci Total Environ 452-453, 10-18. [CrossRef]
  64. Shi, Z., Zhang, L., Zhao, Y., Sun, Z., Zhou, X., Li, J., Wu, Y., 2017. A national survey of tetrabromobisphenol-A, hexabromocyclododecane and decabrominated diphenyl ether in human milk from China: Occurrence and exposure assessment. Sci Total Environ 599-600, 237-245. [CrossRef]
  65. Shi ZX, Wu YN, Li JG, Zhao YF, JF, F., 2009. Dietary Exposure Assessment of Chinese Adults and Nursing Infants to Tetrahromohisphenol-A and Hexabromocyclododecanes: Occurrence Measurements in Foods and Human Milk. Environ Sci Technol 43, 4314-4319. [CrossRef]
  66. Su, J., Lu, Y., Liu, Z., Gao, S., Zeng, X., Yu, Z., Sheng, G., Fu, J.M., 2015. Distribution of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and HBCD in sediments of the Hunhe River in Northeast China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22, 16781-16790. [CrossRef]
  67. Sun, Y.X., Luo, X.J., Mo, L., He, M.J., Zhang, Q., Chen, S.J., Zou, F.S., Mai, B.X., 2012. Hexabromocyclododecane in terrestrial passerine birds from e-waste, urban and rural locations in the Pearl River Delta, South China: levels, biomagnification, diastereoisomer- and enantiomer-specific accumulation. Environ Pollut 171, 191-198. [CrossRef]
  68. Tang, J., Feng, J., Li, X., Li, G., 2014. Levels of flame retardants HBCD, TBBPA and TBC in surface soils from an industrialized region of East China. Environ Sci Process Impacts 16, 1015-1021. [CrossRef]
  69. Tao, F., Abou-Elwafa Abdallah, M., Ashworth, D.C., Douglas, P., Toledano, M.B., Harrad, S., 2017. Emerging and legacy flame retardants in UK human milk and food suggest slow response to restrictions on use of PBDEs and HBCDD. Environ Int 105, 95-104. [CrossRef]
  70. Tao, W., Zhou, Z., Shen, L., Zhu, C., Zhang, W., Xu, L., Guo, Z., Xu, T., Xie, H.Q., Zhao, B., 2020. Determination of polyhalogenated carbazoles in soil using gas chromatography-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. Sci Total Environ 710, 135524. [CrossRef]
  71. Thomsen, C., Molander, P., Daae, H.L., Janák, K., Froshaug, M., Liane, V.H., Thorud, S., Becher, G., Dybing, E., 2007. Occupational Exposure to Hexabromocyclododecane at an Industrial Plant. Environmental Science & Technology 41, 5210-5216. [CrossRef]
  72. Ueno, D., Alaee, M., Marvin, C., Muir, D.C., Macinnis, G., Reiner, E., Crozier, P., Furdui, V.I., Subramanian, A., Fillmann, G., Lam, P.K., Zheng, G.J., Muchtar, M., Razak, H., Prudente, M., Chung, K.H., Tanabe, S., 2006. Distribution and transportability of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) in the Asia-Pacific region using skipjack tuna as a bioindicator. Environ Pollut 144, 238-247. [CrossRef]
  73. UNEP, 2015. Guidance for the inventory, identification and substitution of Hexabromocyclododecane(HBCD).
  74. Venkatesan, A.K., Halden, R.U., 2014. Brominated flame retardants in U.S. biosolids from the EPA national sewage sludge survey and chemical persistence in outdoor soil mesocosms. Water Res 55, 133-142. [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, J., Jia, X., Gao, S., Zeng, X., Li, H., Zhou, Z., Sheng, G., Yu, Z., 2016. Levels and distributions of polybrominated diphenyl ethers, hexabromocyclododecane, and tetrabromobisphenol A in sediments from Taihu Lake, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23, 10361-10370. [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, W., Choo, G., Cho, H.S., Park, K., Shin, Y.J., Oh, J.E., 2018. The occurrence and distribution of hexabromocyclododecanes in freshwater systems, focusing on tissue-specific bioaccumulation in crucian carp. Sci Total Environ 635, 470-478. [CrossRef]
  77. Watanabe, I., Sakai, S., 2003. Environmental release and behavior of brominated flame retardants. Environ Int 29, 665-682. [CrossRef]
  78. Wu, J.P., Guan, Y.T., Zhang, Y., Luo, X.J., Zhi, H., Chen, S.J., Mai, B.X., 2010. Trophodynamics of hexabromocyclododecanes and several other non-PBDE brominated flame retardants in a freshwater food web. Environ Sci Technol 44, 5490-5495. [CrossRef]
  79. Wu, X., Zu, G.R., Gao, H., 2014. Distribution characteristic and bioaccumulation of hexabromocyclododecanes( HBCDs) in multimedia environment in the coast of northern Yellow Sea. Environ. Chem (in Chinese) 33, 142-147.
  80. Xia, C., Lam, J.C., Wu, X., Sun, L., Xie, Z., Lam, P.K., 2011. Hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs) in marine fishes along the Chinese coastline. Chemosphere 82, 1662-1668. [CrossRef]
  81. Xian, Q., Ramu, K., Isobe, T., Sudaryanto, A., Liu, X., Gao, Z., Takahashi, S., Yu, H., Tanabe, S., 2008. Levels and body distribution of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs) in freshwater fishes from the Yangtze River, China. Chemosphere 71, 268-276. [CrossRef]
  82. Xiang, N., Chen, L., Meng, X.Z., Dai, X., 2015. Occurrence of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) in sewage sludge from Shanghai: implications for source and environmental burden. Chemosphere 118, 207-212. [CrossRef]
  83. Xu J, Z.Y., Guo C, He Y, Li L, Meng W, 2013. Levels and distribution of tetrabromobisphenol A and hexabromocyclododecane in Taihu Lake, China. Environ Toxicol Chem 32, 2249-2255. [CrossRef]
  84. Yi, S., Liu, J.G., Jin, J., Zhu, J., 2016. Assessment of the occupational and environmental risks of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) in China. Chemosphere 150, 431-437. [CrossRef]
  85. Yu, Z., Chen, L., Mai, B., Wu, M., Sheng, G., Fu, J., Peng, P., 2008. Diastereoisomer- and enantiomer-specific profiles of hexabromocyclododecane in the atmosphere of an urban city in South China. Environ Sci Technol 42, 3996-4001. [CrossRef]
  86. Zegers, B.N., Mets, A., Van Bommel, R., Minkenberg, C., Hamers, T., Kamstra, J.H., Pierce, G.J., Boon, J.P., 2005. Levels of hexabromocyclododecane in harbor porpoises and common dolphins from western European seas, with evidence for stereoisomer-specific biotransformation by cytochrome p450. Environ Sci Technol 39, 2095-2100. [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, H., Kelly, B.C., 2018. Sorption and bioaccumulation behavior of multi-class hydrophobic organic contaminants in a tropical marine food web. Chemosphere 199, 44-53. [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, X., Yang, F., Luo, C., Wen, S., Zhang, X., Xu, Y., 2009. Bioaccumulative characteristics of hexabromocyclododecanes in freshwater species from an electronic waste recycling area in China. Chemosphere 76, 1572-1578. [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, Y., Li, Q., Lu, Y., Jones, K., Sweetman, A.J., 2016. Hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDDs) in surface soils from coastal cities in North China: Correlation between diastereoisomer profiles and industrial activities. Chemosphere 148, 504-510. [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, P., Li, Q., Zhang, M., Johnson, A.C., 2018. Transport of Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) into the soil, water and sediment from a large producer in China. Sci Total Environ 610-611, 94-100. [CrossRef]
  91. Zhu, C., Wang, P., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Li, H., Ssebugere, P., Zhang, Q., Jiang, G., 2017a. Trophic transfer of hexabromocyclododecane in the terrestrial and aquatic food webs from an e-waste dismantling region in East China. Environ Sci Process Impacts 19, 154-160. [CrossRef]
  92. Zhu, H., Sun, H., Yao, Y., Gan, Z., Wang, Y., Kannan, K., 2018. Legacy and alternative brominated flame retardants in outdoor dust and pine needles in mainland China: Spatial trends, dust-plant partitioning and human exposure. Environ Pollut 243, 758-765. [CrossRef]
  93. Zhu, H., Zhang, K., Sun, H., Wang, F., Yao, Y., 2017b. Spatial and temporal distributions of hexabromocyclododecanes in the vicinity of an expanded polystyrene material manufacturing plant in Tianjin, China. Environ Pollut 222, 338-347. [CrossRef]
  94. Zhu, N., Li, A., Wang, T., Wang, P., Qu, G., Ruan, T., Fu, J., Yuan, B., Zeng, L., Wang, Y., Jiang, G., 2012. Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) isocyanurate, hexabromocyclododecanes, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in mollusks from Chinese Bohai Sea. Environ Sci Technol 46, 7174-7181. [CrossRef]
  95. Zhu N, S.K., Wang T, Henkelmann B, Zheng X, Fu J, Gao Y, Wang Y, Jiang G, 2014. Environmental fate and behavior of persistent organic pollutants in Shergyla Mountain, southeast of the Tibetan Plateau of China. Environ Pollut. [CrossRef]
  96. Zhu, Z.-C., Chen, S.-J., Zheng, J., Tian, M., Feng, A.-H., Luo, X.-J., Mai, B.-X., 2014. Occurrence of brominated flame retardants (BFRs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in agricultural soils in a BFR-manufacturing region of North China. Science of The Total Environment 481, 47-54. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated