Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Effect of Fertilization with Increasing Doses of Ammonium Nitrate on Growth, Yield, and Concentration of N, P, and K in Leaves of Olive Trees (Olea Europea L.) c.v. “Kalinioti”

Altmetrics

Downloads

121

Views

49

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

24 November 2023

Posted:

28 November 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Nitrogen is the most commonly managed mineral nutrient in olive groves because it is essential for plant growth. The precise management of N fertilization in olive cultivation is still not fully clarified, but it is now essential for providing sustainable production. A nitrogen fertilizer ex-periment with olive trees (cv. Kalinioti) was carried out over a six-year period. Seven levels of nitrogen fertilizer given as ammonium nitrate (control, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 kg/tree) were annually applied in order to determine the effect of nitrogen on vegetative growth, fruit set, fruit weight, yield, maturation index and leaf N,P, and K concentrations. The results indicate that, under these conditions, application of up to 4 kg NH4NO3/tree significantly increased yield to 62.5 kg/tree compared to the control. The positive effect was attributed to the initial and final fruit set increases (7.63 and 3.73%, respectively). However, the weight of 100 olives (337 g) at the same fertilizer rate was considerably lower compared to the control. Higher nitrogen rates decreased yield while increasing overall shoot growth. Nitrogen fertilization did not significantly influence the oil content of olive fruit. Fruit weight, maturation index and concentration of oil reached maximum levels in the beginning of December, indicating a suitable start to olive harvesting with reduced yield losses due to unfavorable weather conditions. With increasing fertilizer levels from 0 to 6 kg NH4NO3,/tree concentration of N in olive leaves also increased from 1.23% to 2.38%. Maximum yield was achieved at a level of 6 kg NH4NO3/tree, which corresponded to 2.01% N in leaves. The results suggest that application of 3 kg NH4NO3/tree can be recommended for table olive pro-duction due to the fact that fruit weight was not decreased, while fertilization with 4 kg NH4NO3/tree was suitable for oil olives.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Agricultural Science and Agronomy

1. Introduction

Application of Nitrogen is the main aspect of olive orchard (Olea europaea L.) fertilization due to its significant influence on plant growth as a key nutritional component [1,2]. The importance of N fertilization in enhancing olive productivity has been reported by a number of researchers [3,4,5,6]. These studies have consistently reported a gradual increase in productivity, as a result of nitrogen applications.
There is some disagreement on the importance of applying nitrogen once a year, to increase olive production when it comes to fertilization management, since N is often given in too large of amounts [1,7,8]. According to Fernández-Escobar et al. [9], a major problem arises in olive orchards due to excessive nitrogen fertilization, leading to various adverse effects on both the trees and the soil. Furthermore, excessive use of fertilizer faces significant costs and results in the loss of nitrogen through leaching, which has detrimental effects on the ecosystem [10]. The optimal management of nitrogen fertilization in olive orchards, including fertilizer dose and timing of distribution, remains poorly understood [7,11,12]. However, it is of paramount significance to develop management strategies aimed at mitigating the environmental consequences of nitrogen losses and minimizing the adverse impacts of excessive nitrogen on tree health.
Many works on olive nutrition have pointed out that nitrogen fertilization a) promotes olive yield [4,5,6]; b) reduce the phenomenon of alternate bearing [6,13]; c) increases fruit set [14]; d) increases shoot length and the number of inflorescences and regulates the growth of female bodies of olive flowers [15,16,17,18]. Most of them have used between 0.5 and 1.3 kg N/ tree in their experiments, while the application of excessive amounts of nitrogen had adverse effects on yield, fruit weight, fruit set, oil content and oil quality [14,18,19,20]. Hartmann [15] pointed out that N fertilization consistently increases olive yield, but only when leaf N is below the sufficiency threshold. On the other hand, the limited supply of nitrogen resulted in a reduction in vegetative growth, flowering, fruit set, and ultimately fruit output. Furthermore, it has been observed that both excessive and insufficient amounts of nitrogen have a considerable negative impact on oil productivity, as demonstrated by previous studies [6,14]. It must be emphasized that early investigations have also shown that the application of nitrogen does not improve olive performance [9,21].
Nitrogen fertilization is usually applied to the soil at 0.5–1.5 kg per olive tree at the end of winter, using urea, ammonium sulfate, or ammonium nitrate, mainly depending on soil properties [22,23]. A lack of nitrogen is a common nutritional deficiency in olives. Symptoms of nitrogen deficiency in olive trees have been recorded by many workers [15,17]. Concentration of N can be correctly detected through a leaf analysis, which is the best diagnosis method to determine the nutrient status and plan fertilizer recommendations [24]. Despite the economic importance of olive tree cultivation in the Mediterranean region, there is not enough information regarding olive nutrient requirements, mainly nitrogen [17,25]. Ferreira et al. [26] argue that previous studies on nitrogen fertilization in olive groves, while important, lack conclusive guidance for fertilizer recommendation systems. Consequently, this topic holds scientific interest and carries substantial practical significance within the field of olive grove fertilization.
A good knowledge of olive nutrition is fundamental in order for fertilization to promote olive fruit and oil production and decrease the phenomenon of alternate bearing. This phenomenon may influence the nutrient content of the trees and their annual nutrient consumption [27]. The lack of data regarding nitrogen fertilization of the olive variety Kalinioti cultivated in South Albania, in conjunction with the fact that olive fertilization is usually based on visual practices, has resulted in the thoughtless and excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers that many times adversely affect productivity, fruit quality, olive oil production, and groundwater quality [28,29,30]. The aim of this work was to study the effect of nitrogen fertilization on the vegetative growth, yield, fruit set, fruit weight, and fruit oil concentration of the olive cultivar Kalinioti and to determine its nitrogen requirements.

2. Results

A significant and positive impact of N-fertilizer doses on shoot length was recorded (Table 1). Tree crown volume showed the same tendency with the amount of N applied (Table 2). At the highest level, N trees showed excessive vegetative growth with many water shoots.
Table 2 shows that N fertilization positively affected olive yield compared to control. The increase was significant with the application of 4 kg NH4NO3/tree, where yield reached 62.5 kg/tree compared to 37.1 kg/tree of the control. Further increases in N rates significantly reduced yield but increased the number of water shoots.
As regards fruit set, a significant increase in the initial fruit set was recorded due to the application of 3 and 4 kg NH4NO3/tree compared to the control (Table 3). Application of 4 kg fertilizer/tree gave the highest initial and final fruit sets (7.63 % and 3.03 % respectively) among treatments. A further increase of N fertilizer (5 kg NH4NO3/tree and 6 kg NH4NO3/tree, or approximately 1.74 and 2.1 kg N/tree, respectively) reduced fruit set.
Furthermore, a delay of 8–10 days on fruit coloration was evident (Table 4). Fresh weight of 100 olives, oil content, and maturation index increased with time, reaching maximum levels at 5–10 December. Even though maximum yield was achieved with the addition of 4 kg NH4NO3/tree, the weight of 100 olives was significantly lower compared to the other treatments. The application of nitrogenous fertilizer had no effect on oil content, but higher fertilizer applications (5 and 6 kg NH4NO3/tree) in December substantially reduced the maturation index.
With increasing N doses, leaf N concentration increased, reaching 2.38% at the level of 6 kg NO3NH4/tree (Table 5). Maximum yield (62.5 kg/tree at the dose of 4 kg/tree) corresponded to 2.01 % N in leaves. Control trees and trees receiving 1 kg NO3NH4 showed leaf N concentrations (1.23-1.34%, d.w.) below the optimum levels (1.5-2.3%) [31,32]. High fertilizer levels (5-6 kg NH4NO3/tree) reduced P and K concentrations in leaves compared to control; however, the decrease was significant only for K. Leaf P and K concentrations were within the optimal range (0.09-0.3% for P and 0.70-1.0% for K) [17,32], with the exception of the concentration of K in the leaves of trees receiving N dosages (5-6 kg NH4NO3/tree), where values were above deficient levels (0.4%, dry weight).

3. Discussion

The significant and positive impact of N-fertilizer doses on shoot length and tree crown volume indicated that nitrogenous fertilization promoted vegetative growth. In fact, the highest level of leaf N (2.38%) found in treatments with 6 kg NH4NO3/ tree showed excessive vegetative growth. Similar findings were reported by Hartman [33] and Gavalas [17], where shoot growth was increased by high N doses (1.5-2 kg/tree). Haberman et al also [6] also found that the highest N level was the most effective in promoting vegetative growth but did not induce an increase in yield, whereas low nitrogen fertilization has negative effects on both vegetative growth and the production of olive fruit and oil content. These effects were attributed to a decrease in the intensity of flowering and a reduction in the rate of perfect flowers and fruit set.
The high yields achieved at 3 and 4 kg fertilizer/ tree were necessary for a satisfactory production, which is probably attributed to different soil climate conditions, different varieties, e.t.c. Similar findings were reported by Esteban et al. [34] where maximum yields corresponded to 1.2 kg N/tree (about 3.4 kg NH4NO3/ tree). In addition, many workers found an increase in olive yield of up to 50% when nitrogen was given at a level of 1.2 kg/tree compared to untreated trees [13,16,17]. Olive trees in southern Spain’s arid regions were fertilized annually with varying quantities of nitrogen. Fernández-Escobar and Marín [22] and Fernández-Escobar et al. [35] concluded that after three and six years of experimentation, respectively, increasing the amount of N applied from 0 to 1 kg of N per olive tree (about 2.86 kg NH4NO3/ tree) did not result in an increase in yield, fruit size, oil content, or vegetative growth. Fernández-Escobar and Marín [22] suggested that there is no need for annual application of nitrogen fertilizer in olive orchards, in order to achieve satisfactory productivity and growth, as long as the leaf nitrogen levels remain over the sufficiency threshold. Further increases in N rates (>4 kg fertilizer/ tree) reduced yield and increased the number of water shoots, which have high requirements for nutrients and water [15,17]. Ângelo Rodrigues et al [36] recommend adjustments to the rates of N every year to prevent reductions in tree crop performance and improve nutrient-use efficiency.
High application rates of nitrogen (3-4 kg NH4NO3/tree) significantly reduced fruit set compared to control. Similar results were found by other workers [16,17,34]. In a container experiment, Erel et al. [18] investigated the effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium concentrations in the irrigation solution on olive tree flowering and fruit set (Olea europaea L. cv. Barnea). They observed that the highest N concentration in the irrigation solution (14.1mM) decreased fruit set, but to a lesser extent than flowering. According to the findings of Fernández-Escobar et al. [37], the maturation of the fruit was observed to be delayed in trees exhibiting elevated nitrogen levels. This delay was attributed to the increased concentration of anthocyanin. Similarly, N deficiency has an adverse impact on fruitset [38], probably due to inadequate total quantities of nutrients available to the flowers when they developed into fruit [18].
The results of olive yield and the observations taken during the experimental period show that the NH4NO3 doses of 3-4 kg/tree reduced alternate bearing. Moreover, under low N availability, trees appeared to be more susceptible to alternate bearing [6]. Nitrogen fertilization before and after fruit set (June) seems to correct this phenomenon [39]. Therefore, the ratio yield from 6:1 at control was reduced to 4.5:1 and 4:1 at 3 and 4 kg NH4NO3/ tree respectively. González et al [13] showed that sufficiency of nitrogen during and after fruit set in the year of olive production strengthens shoot growth, which, when there is a large amount of final fruit set, is usually exceptionally low and consequently the next year’s yield as well.
The significant increase with time in fresh weight of 100 olives, oil content, and maturation index (Table 4) reached maximum levels at 5–10 December, indicating a suitable period for harvest when considering the local soil climatic conditions. In this way, we can avoid yield losses derived from early or late harvests. Even though maximum yield was achieved with the addition of 4 kg NH4NO3/tree, the weight of 100 olives was significantly lower compared to the rest of the fertilization rates, which is not desirable for table olives. Many authors have also reported that high N fertilization reduces olive weight [15,17,40]. In particular, Silva et al. [40] reported that Nitrogen application decreased the fruit’s weight and size due to photosynthate partitioning. In addition, elevated nitrogen applications (4-6 kg NH4NO3/tree) had a negative impact on maturation index relative to the control by extending the coloration period and fruit maturation [14,18,41]. Silva et al. [40] reported that Nitrogen application reduced the fruit maturation index, particularly when applied at high rates (120 N kg ha-1)
Moreover, our results showed that nitrogen fertilization did not affect oil content. Similar findings were also reported by Fernández-Escobar et al. [35] where increasing the amount of nitrogen applied from 0 to 1 kg of N per olive tree did not result in an increase in oil content. Moreover, Fernández-Escobar and Marin [22] found that the oil content of trees with leaf nitrogen concentrations below the deficient threshold of 1.4% was lower, indicating that lipogenesis was also delayed. In contrast, other authors have shown that nitrogen fertilization has positive effects on oil content [41]. Erel et al. [42] highlighted the significance of balanced N nutrition in oil-olive cultivation for optimizing oil content production.
The nitrogen status of olive trees is often assessed by analyzing the concentration of nitrogen in the leaves during the month of July. A leaf nitrogen content below 1.2-1.4% is generally regarded as a deficiency level [21,35,43,44]. Control trees and trees receiving 1 kg NH4NO3 showed leaf N concentrations (1.23 % dw and 1.34 % dw, respectively) below the optimum levels. On the other hand, maximum yield corresponded to 2.01% N in leaves. Almeida et al [45] found that maximum olive yield corresponded to 2.1 % N concentration in leaves. Vasilaki Stamou and Prasoulidou Bovi [46] did not find a significant increase in yield when N leaf levels ranged between 1.54 and 1.66 % compared to untreated trees, but significant yield increases were evident at 2.05% N. On the other hand, Gonzalez et al. [13] reported reduced yields when the concentration of N in leaves exceeded the level of 2.3%. Similarly, in our study, leaf N concentrations of 2.29–2.38% in trees treated with 5–6 kg of NH4NO3 were associated with reduced yields. According to Ferreira et al. [26], the response of olive plants to nitrogen is dependent on agroecological growing conditions, specifically those determining yield potential and nutrient removal.
In addition, after six years of experiments, even control trees showed leaf P and K concentrations in leaves within the optimum range according to Gavalas [17] (0.09-0.11% for P and 0.70-0.90% for K), which is probably due to the fact that basic soil analysis showed an excessive concentration of P (120 mg kg-1) and an adequate level of available K (0.45 meq/100g).

4. Materials and Methods

For the experiment, 25-year-old irrigated olive trees cv. "Kalinioti" grafted on wild olive rootstock (O.e.v. Oleaster) were selected. The soil of the experimental field was clay loamy, with slightly alkaline pH 7.8, rich in total CaCO3 (10.3%), poor in organic matter (1,2 %), medium in total N (1.47 mg/g), relatively high in available K (0.45 meq/100g) and very rich in available phosphorus (120 mg kg-1), indicating that phosphorus is more likely to be lost by runoff, since levels of P-Olsen exceeded 60 mg kg-1 [47]. A complete randomized design was implemented with seven levels of nitrogenous fertilizer NH4NO3, 0 (control) to 6 kg/tree, which corresponded to approximately 0, 0.3, 0.7, 1.0, 1.3, 1.7, and 2 kg N /tree respectively. Each treatment consisted of three plots and each plot had five well-developed olive trees. The selection of trees was based on criteria of uniformity for vigor and fruit load. Fertilizer was applied on a per-tree basis. Half of the fertilizer was given at the beginning of the annual cycle, in the first 10 days of March, and the rest was given at the end of the fruit set [48], which approximately corresponded to the end of May and the beginning of June. Trees were drip-irrigated with hundred liters of water per week.

4.1. Measurements

  • Vegetative growth: From March to November, the length of 20 tagged shoots located at the four points of the horizon was measured monthly in two trees from each replicate.
  • Fruit set: Fruit set was expressed as the percentage of the initial number of flowers. Four branches were taken from the middle of the crown of one tree/ plot/treatment and from the four points of the horizon. In total, 2000 buds were approximately used in each plot. Measurements were taken each month from May to November.
  • Olive yield: Harvest took place in the second half of December.
  • Fruit weight: The fresh weight of 100 fruits was measured from each tree in the experimental plots. Samples were taken every 15 days during November and December.
  • Maturation index: Samples of 100 olives per tree were selected every 15 days during November and December and were categorized into 8 colour classes in order to determine the maturation index according to the following equation [49].
    M.I. = (αχ 0 + bχ1+cχ2+dχ3+eχ4+fχ5+gχ6+hχ7) /100
    where a-h, are the numbers of olives and 1-7 are the numbers of colour classes.
6.
Canopy volume: For the determination of the canopy volume the following equation was used according to Roose et al [50]:
V=4/6 Χ π Χ H Χ R2 where V= volume (m3), π=3.14, H= tree height (m) and R= radius of canopy
7.
Fruit chemical analysis: Oil content was determined on a sample of about 100 fruits per tree by extracting dry material with petroleum ether at 40–60 °C using a Soxhlet apparatus. Olives were dried at 70 °C in a ventilated oven until a constant weight was measured in two successive weighing measurements. Then olives were ground in a mortar and the paste was weighed and analyzed by the Soxhlet apparatus [51]
8.
Leaf analysis: Samples of 40 fully-expanded, mature leaves (5-8 months old) per tree were collected at the end of August from the middle portion of non-bearing, current-season shoots, according to the method described by Koukoulakis and Papadopoulos, [52]. Once in the laboratory, samples were washed using 1% Triton X-100, and rinsed three times with water and deionized water. Moisture was eliminated using filter paper and then the samples were dried in paper envelopes at 70 0C until they reached a constant weight. Dried samples were ground in a stainless “Fritch” pulverisette mill to pass through the 1-mm round whole sieve. Ground samples were stored at room temperature in acid-washed glass jars. Leaf samples were analyzed for total N, P, K. Total N was determined by the Kjeldahl method, using a semiautomatic analyzer Buchi, B324. Prior to the measurement of the other nutrients, leaf subsamples were subjected to dry ashing at 520◦C for 6 hours, then diluted with hydrochloric acid (HCl) in a 1:1 ratio v/v [53]. Phosphorus was determined calorimetrically in the same solution by the vanado-molybdo-phosphoric method [54] using an UV–vis spectrophotometer. Total K, through atomic absorption spectrophotometry (PerkinElmer AAnalyst 100 atomic absorption spectrometer).

4.2. Statistical analysis

The effect of nitrogenous fertilizer on plant attributes was evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS version 21. The experimental design used was Completely Randomized Design (CRD). Before performing analysis of variance (ANOVA), Shapiro-Wilk (p ≤ 0.05) and Bartlett (p ≤ 0.05) tests were applied to test normality and homogeneity of variances, respectively. Duncan’s multiple-range test was used to test differences among means (P < 0.05).
In conclusion, considering the current experimental conditions, the application of 4 kg NH4NO3/ tree gave the highest yield while significantly reducing the weight of 100 olives and therefore this dose is recommended for olive oil production. Similar yields were also achieved by the lower dose of fertilizer, 3 kg NH4NO3/tree, without reducing olive weight indicating the appropriate fertilizer dose for table olives. Further additions of fertilizer caused reduced growth and a delay in fruit maturation. The best period for harvesting olives c.v. Kalinioti seems to be the beginning of December (5-10) when olive weight, oil content and maturation index are at their maximum levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.P. and V.K.; methodology, C.P.; validation, V.K. and C.P..; data curation, V.K.; writing—original draft preparation, C.P.; writing—review and editing, V.K.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the authors upon request..

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fernández-Escobar, R. Use and abuse of nitrogen in olive fertilization. Acta Hortic. 2011, 888, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kirkby, E. Introduction, Definition and Classification of Nutrients. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2012; pp. 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hartmann, H.; Brown, J. The effect of certain mineral deficiencies on the growth, leaf appearance, and mineral content of young olive trees. Hilgardia 1953, 22, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ferreira, J.; Garcı́a-Ortiz, A.; Frias, L.; Fernández, A. Los Nutrientes N, P, K en la fertilización del olivar. Olea 1986, 17, 141–152. [Google Scholar]
  5. Morales-Sillero, A.; Fernández, J.; Ordovás, J.; Suárez, M.; Pérez, J.A.; Liñán, J.; López, E.P.; Girón, I; Troncoso, A. Plant-soil interactions in a fertigated ‘Manzanilla de sevilla’olive orchard. Plant Soil 2009, 319, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Haberman, A.; Dag, A.; Shtern, N.; Zipori, I.; Erel, R.; Ben-Gal, A.; Yermiyahu, U. Significance of proper nitrogen fertilization for olive productivity in intensive cultivation. Sci. Horti. 2019, 246, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Garcı́a-Novelo, J.M.; Molina-Soria, C.; Parra, M.A. An approach to nitrogen balance in olive orchards. Scientia Hortic. 2012, 135, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Centeno, A.; Garcı́a Martos, J.M.; Gómez-del-Campo, M. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and nitrification inhibitor product on vegetative growth, production and oil quality in ‘Arbequina’hedgerow and ‘Picual’vase-trained orchards. Grasas Aceites 2017, 68, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Marin, L.; Sánchez-Zamora, M.A.; García-Novelo, J.M.; Molina-Soria, C.; Parra, M.A. Long-term effects of N fertilization on cropping and growth of olive trees and on N accumulation in soil profile. European J. Agron. 2009, 31, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boussadia, O.; Steppe, K.; Zgallai, H.; Ben El Hadj, S.; Braham, M.; Lemeur, R.; Van Labeke, M.C. Effects of nitrogen deficiency on leaf photosynthesis, carbohydrate status and biomass production in two olive cultivars ‘Meski’ and ‘Koroneiki’. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 123, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fernández-Escobar, R. Olive Nutritional Status and Tolerance to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Reale, L.; Nasini, L.; Cerri, M.; Regni, L.; Ferranti, F.; Proietti, P. The influence of light on olive (Olea europaea L.) fruit development is cultivar dependent. Front. Plant Sci. 2019; 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. González García, F.; Garcia Gómez, A.M.; Chaves Sánchez, M.; Mazuelos Vela, C. Estado de nutrición, equilibrio nutritivo y rendimiento en el olivar de la provincia de Sevilla. I. Estudio sobre variedades de aceite. Anales Edafol. Agrobiol, 1967; XXVI, 733–762. [Google Scholar]
  14. Erel, R.; Kerem, Z.; Ben-Gal, A.; Dag, A.; Schwartz, A.; Zipori, I.; Basheer, L.; Yermiyahu, U. Olive (Olea eurpaea L.) Tree Nitrogen Status Is a Key Factor for Olive Oil Quality. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 11261–11272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hartman, H.T. Some responses of the olive to nitrogen fertilizers. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1958, 72, 257–266. [Google Scholar]
  16. Androulakis, Ι.; Skilourakis, P.; Psillakis, Ν. Results of fertilization experiments on olive cultivar Koroneiki. In Proceedings of 1st Symposium of Geotechnical Research, Β-Ι, September 1974, 364-376.
  17. Gavalas, A.Ν. Inorganic nutrition and fertilization of Olive; Benakio Phytopathological Institute: Athens, Greece, 1978; pp. 41–48. [Google Scholar]
  18. Erel, R.; Dag, A.; Ben-Gal, A.; Schwartz, A.; Yermiyahu, U. Flowering and fruit set of olive trees in response to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. J. Am.Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2008, 133, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. 19 Erel, R.; Yermiyahu, U.; Van Opstal, J.; Ben-Gal, A.; Schwartz, A.; Dag, A. The importance of olive (Olea europaea l.) tree nutritional status on its productivity. Scientia Hortic. 2013, 159, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dag, A.; Ben-David, E.; Kerem, Z.; Ben-Gal, A.; Erel, R.; Basheer, L.; Yermiyahu, U. Olive oil composition as a function of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium plant nutrition. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1871–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Parra, M.A.; Navarro, C.; Arquero, O. Foliar diagnosis as a guide to olive fertilization. Spanish. J. Agric. Res 2009, 7, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Marín, L. Nitrogen fertilization in olive orchards. Acta Hortic. 1999, 474, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. López-Granados, F.; Jurado-Expósito, M.; Álamob, S.; Garcıa-Torres, L. Leaf nutrient spatial variability and site-specific fertilization maps within olive (Olea europaea L.) orchards. Europ. J. Agronomy 2004, 21, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fernández-Escobar, R. Fertilización. In El Cultivo del olivo; Barranco, D., Fernández-Escobar, R., Rallo, L., Eds.; Editorial Mundi-Prensa: Madrid, Spain, 1997; pp. 239–257. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sfakiotakis, E. Courses in Olive Growing; Typo MAN: Thesaloniki, Greece, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ferreira, I.; Arrobas, M.; Moutinho Pereira, J.; Correia, C.; Rodrigues, M. The effect of nitrogen applications on the growth of young olive trees and nitrogen use efficiency. Turk J Agric For. 2020, 44, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brown, P.H.; Weinbaum, S.A.; Picchioni, G.A. Alternate bearing influences annual nutrient consumption and the total nutrient content of mature pistachio trees. Trees 1995, 9, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Weinbaum, S.A.; Picchioni, G.A.; Muraoka, T.T.; Ferguson, L.; Brown, P.H. Fertilizer nitrogen and boron uptake, storage, and allocation vary during the alternate-bearing cycle in pistachio trees. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1994, 119, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Marın, L.; Fernández-Escobar, R. Optimization of nitrogen fertilization in olive orchards. Acta Hortic. 1997, 448, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Benlloch, M.; Herrera, E.; Garcıa-Novelo, J.M. Effect of traditional and slow-release N fertilizers on growth of olive nursery plants and N losses by leaching. Sci Horti 2004, 101, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Connell, J.; Vossen, P.M. Fertility management for oil olives. In First Press, Newsletter of Olive Oil production and Evaluation; University of California Cooperative Extension: 2006; Volume 1, pp. 1–2.
  32. Sotiropoulos, S.; Chatzissavvidis, C.; Papadakis, I.; Kavvadias, V.; Paschalidis, C.; Antonopoulou, C.; Korik, A.i. Inorganic and organic foliar fertilization in olives. Hort. Sci. 2023, 50, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hartman, H.T. Olive production in California; Manual / California agricultural experiment station. Extension service. College of agriculture. University of California (no. 7), Manual 7. Publisher: Berkeley, 1953; p. 59.
  34. Esteban, E.; Oliveira, A.I.; Souza, M.L. Fertilization mineral en olivares de la provincia de Granada. Regultatos de 7 anos de ensayo. Agronomia. Lusit. 1965, 27, 103–122. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Sÿnchez-Zamora, M.A.; Uceda, M.; Beltran, G. The effect of nitrogen overfertilization on olive tree growth and oil quality. Acta Hortic. 2002, 586, 429–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ângelo Rodrigues, M.; Pavão, F.; Lopes, J.I.; Gomes, V.; Arrobas, M.; Moutinho-Pereira, J.; Ruivo, S.; Cabanas, J.E.; Correia, C.M. Olive Yields and Tree Nutritional Status during a Four-Year Period without Nitrogen and Boron Fertilization. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 2011, 42, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Braz Frade, R.; Lopez Campayo, M.; Beltrán Maza, G. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on fruit maturation of olive trees. Acta Hortic 2014, 1057, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Freeman, M.; Uriu, K.; Hartmann, H.T. Diagnosing and correcting nutrient problems. In Olive Production Manual, 2nd ed.; Sibbett, G.S., Ferguson, L., Eds.; University of California Agricultural and Natural Resources Publication: 2005; Volume 3353, pp. 83–92.
  39. Sommaini, L. La concimazione azotata ritardada all’ olivo osservata nel tempo enello spazio. Annali Sper. Agr. 1955, 8, 1887–1927. [Google Scholar]
  40. Silva, E.; Gonçalves, A.; Martins, S.; Pinto, L.; Rocha, L.; Ferreira, H.; Moutinho-Pereira, J.; Rodrigues, M.Â.; Correia, C.M. Moderate Nitrogen Rates Applied to a Rainfed Olive Grove Seem to Provide an Interesting Balance between Variables Associated with Olive and Oil Quality. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Elbadawy, N.; Hegazi, E.; Yehia, T.; Abourayya, M.; Mahmoud, T. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield, Fruit Quality and Oil Content in Manzanillo Olive Trees. J. Arid. Land Stud. 2016, 26, 175–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Erel, R.; Yermiyahu, U.; Yasuor, H.; Ben-Gal, A.; Zipori, I.; Dag, A. Elevated fruit nitrogen impairs oil biosynthesis in olive (Olea europaea L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1180391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. López-Villalta, L.C.; Muñoz-Cobo, M.P. Production techniques. In World Olive Encyclopedia; International Olive Council: Sabadell, Spain, 1996; pp. 145–190. [Google Scholar]
  44. Therios, I.. Olives: Crop production science in horticulture; Wallingford: CABI Publishing: 2009; p. 409.
  45. Almeida, F.J. Quelques carences alimentaires de l’olivier au Portugal. Infs Oleic. Int., N.S. 1964; 25, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vasilaki-Stamou, V.; Prasoulidou-Bovi, Μ. Olive leaf analysis and its application on fertilization experiments in the region of Evia. Journal of Agricultural Bank 1969, 166, 24–34. [Google Scholar]
  47. Heckrath, G.; Brookes, P.C.; Poulton, P.R.; Goulding, K.W.T. Phosphorus leaching from soils containing different phosphorus concentrations in the Broadbalk experiment. J. Environ. Qual. 1995, 24, 904–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Χiloyannis, C.; Celano, G.; Palese, A.M.; Dichio, B.; Nuzzo, V. Mineral nutrient uptake from the soil in irrigated olive trees, cultivar Coratina, over six years after planting. Acta Hort. 2002, 586, 453–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ferreira, J. Explotacionos ollittareras colaboradoras; no. 5. Ministerio de Agricultura: Madrid, Spain, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  50. Roose, M.L.; Atkin, D.; Kupper, R.S. Yield and tree size of four citrus cultivars on 21 rootstocks in California. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1989, 114, 678–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Donaire, J.P.; Sanchez-Raya, A.J.; Lopez-George, J.L.; Recalde, L. Etudes physiologiques et biochimiques de l’olive. I. Variation de la concentration de divers metabolites pendant son cycle evolutive. Agrochimica 1977, 21, 311–321. [Google Scholar]
  52. Koukoulakis, S.P.; Papadopoulos, A. The interpretation of Foliar Analysis. Stamoulis Ed., Athens. Greece, December 2003. pp. 516.
  53. Allen, S.E.; Grimshaw, H.M.; Parkinson, J.A.; Quarmby, C. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials; Allen, E., Ed.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK; London, UK, 1974; p. 565. [Google Scholar]
  54. Jackson, M.L. Phosphorus determinations for soils. Vanadomolybdo-phosphoric yellow color method in nitric acid system. In Soil chemical analysis; Jackson, M.L., Ed.; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1970; pp. 151–154. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. The effect of increasing doses of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on shoot length of olive (c.v. Kalinioti) trees.
Table 1. The effect of increasing doses of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on shoot length of olive (c.v. Kalinioti) trees.
Treatments Shoot length (cm)
Control 9.2a (1)
1 kg NH4NO3/tree 11.4b
2 kg NH4NO3/tree 12.8bc
4 kg NH4NO3/tree 19.3e
5 kg NH4NO3/tree 24.7f
6 kg NH4NO3/tree 30.2h
(1) Means in the same column followed by different letters denote significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P=0.05).
Table 2. The effect of increasing doses of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on fruit yield and canopy volume of olive (c.v. Kalinioti) trees. .
Table 2. The effect of increasing doses of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on fruit yield and canopy volume of olive (c.v. Kalinioti) trees. .
Treatments Yield
(kg/tree)		 Canopy volume (m3) Yield
(kg/m3)
Control 37.09a (1) 18.2a 2.03a
1 kg NH4NO3/tree 39.2a 19.4a 2.02a
2 kg NH4NO3/tree 45ab 19.8ab 2.27a
3 kg NH4NO3/tree 54c 21.5b 2.51ab
4 kg NH4NO3/tree 62.5d 21.0ab 2.97b
5 kg NH4NO3/tree 49.0b 24.7c 1.98a
6 kg NH4NO3/tree 46.4ab 25.8cd 1.79a
(1) Means in the same column followed by different letters denote significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P=0.05).
Table 3. The effect of increasing doses of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on initial (June) and final (November) fruit set of olive (c.v. Kalinioti) trees. .
Table 3. The effect of increasing doses of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on initial (June) and final (November) fruit set of olive (c.v. Kalinioti) trees. .
Treatments Initial fruit set (June) (%) Final fruit set (November) (%)
Control 3.07a (1) 0.7a
1 Kg NH4NO3/tree 3.55a 1.13a
2 Kg NH4NO3/tree 5.32ab 1.79ab
3 Kg NH4N03/tree 6.09b 2.53c
4 Kg NH4N03/tree 7.63bc 3.03cd
5 Kg NH4N03/tree 5.91ab 1.71ab
6 Kg NH4N03/tree 5.19ab 1.65ab
(1) Means in the same column followed by different letters denote significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P=0.05).
Table 4. The effect of time collection, on weight of 100 olives (W, g./tree), oil content (OC, %) and maturation index (M.I., %) of olive (c.v. Kalinioti) trees.
Table 4. The effect of time collection, on weight of 100 olives (W, g./tree), oil content (OC, %) and maturation index (M.I., %) of olive (c.v. Kalinioti) trees.
1-5 Νovember 20-25 November 5-10 December 20-25 December
W100 OC M.I. W100 OC M.I. W100 OC M.I. W100 OC M.I.
Treatments g % % g % % g % % g % %
Control 336a(1) 21.8a 2.13a 360a 24.2a 3.05a 389a 27.1 3.66a 384a 26.2 3.37a
1 kg NH4NO3/tree 325ab 21.3a 2.10a 353a 23.8a 3.15a 375a 26.8 3.75a 375a 26.5 3.44a
2 kg NH4NO3/tree 321ab 21.2a 2.18a 342ab 24.5a 3.21a 370ab 27.2 3.82a 369a 26.7 3.48a
3 kg NH4NO3/tree 318ab 21.0a 2.12a 329b 23.7a 3.28a 365ab 27.5 3.78a 361ab 26.0 3.51a
4 kg NH4NO3/tree 381c 20.9a 2.10a 309c 23.5a 3.15a 337c 26.3 3.66a 331c 25.8 3.55ab
5 kg NH4NO3/tree 315d 20.8a 1.95ab 345ab 24.1a 2.75ab 374ab 26.8 3.16a 370ab 25.9 3.00a
6 kg NH4NO3/tree 312d 21.1a 1.87b 340ab 23.7a 2.71ab 378a 27.0ns 3.11a 373a 26.1ns 3.01a
(1) Means (values of 6 years) in the same column followed by different letters denote significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P=0.05). ns: no significant differences.
Table 5. The effect of increasing doses of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on Ν, P, K concentration of leaves of olive (c.v. Kalinioti) trees.
Table 5. The effect of increasing doses of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on Ν, P, K concentration of leaves of olive (c.v. Kalinioti) trees.
Treatments Ν
(%, d.w.)		 Ρ
(%, d.w.)		 Κ
(%, d.w.)
Control 1.23a (1) 0.123ab 0.78b
1 kg NH4NO3/tree 1.34a 0.125ab 0.75b
2 kg NH4NO3/tree 1.55b 0.128b 0.77b
3 kg NH4NO3/tree 1.89c 0.131b 0.73b
4 kg NH4NO3/tree 2.01d 0.129b 0.69ab
5 kg NH4NO3/tree 2.29e 0.120a 0.61a
6 kg NH4NO3/tree 2.38ef 0.115a 0.57a
(1) Means in the same column followed by different letters denote. significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P=0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated