2,4‐D Herbicide‐Induced Hepatotoxicity: Unveiling Disrupted Liver Functions and Associated Biomarkers

Preprint

Review

2,4‐D Herbicide‐Induced Hepatotoxicity: Unveiling Disrupted Liver Functions and Associated Biomarkers

Altmetrics

Downloads

111

Views

Comments

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

28 November 2023

Posted:

29 November 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts

Abstract

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a globally used herbicide and is frequently found in water samples. This fact has prompted studies on its effects in non-target organisms, revealing significant alterations on liver structure and function. In this review, we evaluated the literature on the hepatotoxicity of 2,4-D, focusing on morphological damages, biomarkers of toxicity and affected liver functions. Searches were conducted on PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus and 83 articles were selected after curation. Among the studies, 72% used in vivo models and 30% used in vitro models. Additionally, 48% used the active ingredient, and 35% used commercial formu-lations in exposure experiments. The most affected biomarkers were related to a decrease in an-tioxidant capacity, including alterations in the activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase, and in the levels of malondialdehyde. Changes in energy metabolism, lipids, liver function, and xenobiotic metabolism were also identified. Furthermore, we found studies about the effects of 2,4-D in mixtures with other pesticides, as well as hepatoprotection trials. The reviewed data in-dicate that the reduction in antioxidant capacity and oxidative stress play an important role in 2,4-D-induced hepatotoxicity. However, the mechanism of action of the herbicide is still not ful-ly understood and further research in this area is needed.

Keywords:

Subject: Biology and Life Sciences - Toxicology

1. Introduction

2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is an herbicide belonging to the class of compounds derived from phenoxyacetic acid. It has been used in agriculture since 1946 for weed control [1]. This chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbon was one of the first synthetic herbicides to be commercially marketed and is currently the main ingredient in over 1,500 products available in the market, such as Weedestroy® AM40 and DMA® 4 IVM [2].

The 2,4-D herbicide mimics the effects of auxins, hormones that regulate plant growth [3]. Due to its high water solubility, the herbicide is able to penetrate plant leaves and roots, reach conducting vessels, and spread throughout the plant, causing abnormal tissue growth and other deleterious effects that ultimately lead to plant death [3,4]. Owing to its high efficiency and low-cost, 2,4-D is globally used as a pre- and post-emergence herbicide in crops such as rice, coffee, sugarcane, corn, and soybeans [4].

Countries with significant agricultural activity exhibit a prominent use of the herbicide. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, the USA, South America, Europe, and Russia are the primary markets and producers of 2,4-D, with their consumption experiencing a significant 40% increase over the past decade [5]. In the United States, approximately 600 agricultural and residential products contain 2,4-D as the active ingredient. Furthermore, in 2012, it was the fifth most widely applied herbicide in the agricultural sector of the country [6]. In Argentina, over 2000 tons of 2,4-D are employed in various crop types, particularly in glyphosate-tolerant corn and soybean cultivation [5]. In Brazil, a total of 62,165.70 tons of 2,4-D were sold in 2021, positioning it as the second best-selling agrochemical in the country, a prominent position maintained since 2013 [7]. 2,4-D is also highly consumed in Asian countries. In Thailand, 2,4-D emerged as the most imported herbicide in 2021, totaling 11,781 tons [8]. In China, the production of 2,4-D reached a significant milestone of 40,000 tons in 2010 [9].

Considering that products applied in crops undergo leaching and have access to aquatic bodies, the high level of commercialization of 2,4-D is evident in its frequent detection in surface, groundwater, and drinking water samples [3]. Furthermore, 2,4-D is environmentally persistent, with a half-life in water ranging from 15 to 300 days depending on environmental parameters [10,11]. Concentrations of 2,4-D detected in aquatic environments usually range from 4 to 24 µg/L [12]. In surface water, 2,4-D has been detected at varying concentrations worldwide. In Spain, the detection in drinking and surface water ranged from 62 to 207 ng/L while in the United States, it was found to range between 0.1-12 μg/L in urban surface water and sediments [13,14]. Likewise, in Australia, 2,4-D was identified in urban waterways at a concentration of 3.5 ng/L [15]. In northern Iran, 2,4-D was detected in river water at 16.6 μg/L [16]. In Greece, similarly in river water, the herbicide was detected at 1.16 μg/L [17]. Furthermore, values ranging from 359 to 656 µg/L have already been detected in surface waters shortly after herbicide spraying in plantations [12,18].

In Brazil, according to data obtained by the Ministry of Health through the Water Quality Surveillance Information System for Human Consumption (SISAGUA), 2,4-D was detected in 92% of water samples that supplied more than 2300 cities in Brazil between 2014 and 2017 [19]. Despite only two detections showing concentrations above the permissible limit in Brazil (30 µg/L), 4270 detections exhibited values exceeding the limit set by the European Union, which adopts a more conservative stance (0.1 µg/L) [19,20]. The concern of the presence of 2,4-D in water lies in its toxic effects on non-target organisms. Among them, there is a growing number of studies in the literature that highlight its hepatotoxicity in different biological models (e.g., rodents and fish). The effects include liver cellular and tissue damage, inhibition of hepatic antioxidant enzymes, lipid peroxidation (LPO), and increased serum levels of transaminases [21,22,23].

The liver plays vital functions in vertebrates, including nutrient metabolism and detoxification processes [24]. Hepatic damage can have negative impacts on these processes and lead to the development of several diseases such as fibrosis, cirrhosis, steatosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma [24]. Therefore, the current study aimed to summarize and critically analyze the available literature on the hepatotoxicity induced by pure 2,4-D or commercial formulations containing it as the active ingredient. To do so, we address markers of toxicity and affected liver functions, as well as biological models, chemical compounds, effects in mixtures, and hepatoprotection assays. Research gaps and recommendations for future studies were also addressed.

2. Materials and Methods

The articles used in the literature review were obtained from the PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases, and the search covered all papers published until July 2023. Two keyword combinations were used: (i) “2,4-D” and “liver”; (ii) “2,4-D” and “hepatotoxicity”. The decision to utilize the abbreviation 2,4-D rather than its full nomenclature in the database queries was motivated by the higher volume of located articles and the consistency in outcomes across various keyword combinations. The articles found were curated according to the following inclusion and exclusion criteria:

(i) Inclusion criteria: Articles written and published in English; original and experimental articles; articles that used pure 2,4-D or commercial formulations containing it as the active ingredient; articles that used vertebrates or derivatives (e.g., cells, organelles, enzymes) as biological models; articles that used biological samples derived from hepatic tissue.

(ii) Exclusion criteria: Articles that were not written and published in English; articles that studied other chemical compounds but not 2,4-D; articles that did not use vertebrates or derivatives as biological models; review articles; clinical cases, efficacy studies, protocols, technical reports, and studies that did not meet the research aims.

Subsequently, the selected articles were examined for relevant information on the theme of the review. The extracted information included: DOI, year of publication, geographic location of the study identified by the corresponding author's address, nature of the chemical compound (active ingredient or commercial formulation), biological model used, route of administration/exposure, exposure period, evaluated concentrations, morphological liver damages and toxicity biomarkers.

2.1. Overview

The searches in PubMed using the keyword combinations resulted in a total of 232 findings. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 64 articles remained. In Web of Science, a total of 193 findings were identified, and 46 articles remained after applying the eligibility criteria. In Scopus, a total of 869 articles were identified, from which 62 were selected. At the end of the curation process and removal of duplicates, a total of 83 articles remained, with 31 of them being present in all three databases (Figure 1a and 1b). These articles are summarized in Table 1 (in vivo studies) and Table 2 (in vitro studies).

The biomarkers of toxicity identified were grouped according to the hepatic function (HF) they are directly related to [104,105,106]. The HFs were: antioxidant metabolism (AM), energetic metabolism (EM), lipid metabolism (LM), liver function (LF), and xenobiotic metabolism (XM). Effects that were not directly related to any specific HF were allocated to “not determined” (ND). Markers related to more than one HF were placed in both groups (e.g., glutathione S-transferase and glutathione were allocated in both AM and XM). After this classification, it was possible to determine which HFs were evaluated by each article in the review and identify the toxicity markers that appeared most frequently in the studies. Additionally, eight studies were identified containing information on the hepatotoxic effects of 2,4-D in association with other agrochemicals, and eight studies focused on hepatoprotection against damage induced by the herbicide.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Historical review and geographical distribution

The article published by Olson et al. (1974) was the oldest study on the hepatotoxicity of 2,4-D [101]. Since then, a significant number of studies have been published (Figure 2a). It is noteworthy that approximately 55% (n=46) of the articles in this review were published up to the year 2000. In part, the high number of older studies can be explained by the fact that 2,4-D was the first synthetic herbicide to be developed (in the 1940s) and its worldwide use in agriculture, which sparked the interest of research groups in studying its effects on non-target organisms [1]. In addition to its use in agriculture, the fact that 2,4-D is one of the components of Agent Orange, a defoliant widely used during the Vietnam War, may have also contributed to the significant number of studies conducted during that period [12].

The studies identified in the review were conducted by research groups from 23 countries, mainly the USA (n=17; 20%), Brazil (n=11; 13%) and Turkey (n=9; 11%) (Figure 2b). In both countries, agriculture plays a significant economic role, and 2,4-D is widely commercialized [6,7].

3.2. Chemical compounds

In the toxicity assays of the selected studies, 2,4-D was used either in its pure form (n=40; 48%) or as a commercial formulation containing it as the active ingredient (n=29; 35%). Articles that did not specify the origin of the substance used in the exposure assays were classified as "not specified" (n=14; 17%) (Figure 3a).

Désormone Lourd (600 g/L), U46D-Fluid (868 g/L), Vesakontuho tasku (500 g/kg), and Tordon 75D® (300g/L 2,4-D + 75 g/L picloram) are examples of 2,4-D-based commercial formulations used in the studies of this review. Commercial formulations are cocktails containing one or more active ingredients and other substances known as inert or adjuvant ingredients (e.g., surfactants, solvents, and preservatives). These substances serve to improve the dissolution, stability, absorption, and pesticidal action of the active ingredient [107]. However, adjuvants can have biological activity and influence the toxicity of the active ingredient [108]. This makes it difficult to compare experimental data since different formulations vary in the composition and concentration of these compounds [107]. Furthermore, among the analyzed studies, only one conducted a comparative analysis of the hepatotoxic effects of the active ingredients of the herbicide (Tordon 75D®) and its inert ingredients [92]. Comparative studies are essential for evaluating differences in toxicity among different 2,4-D formulations, including the pure herbicide, and identifying variations in toxic effects due to adjuvants [108]. This highlights the lack of such studies in the literature, which could provide important information for establishing safe limits for these compounds in the environment.

3.3. Biological models

Approximately 72% (n=60) of studies used in vivo biological models, while around 30% (n=25) used in vitro models (Figure 3b). Only the study by Di Paolo et al. (2001) employed both approaches [45]. In vivo models have advantages in hepatotoxicity studies compared to in vitro models because they consider the interactions between different liver cell types, as well as the influence of systemic factors [109]. Revised results showed that further studies using Organs-on-chips (OoCs) and Body-on-a-chip (BoC) platforms are needed, since these methodologies create the environments that recapitulate one or more tissue-specific functions [110].

Regarding the in vivo models, 68% (n=41) were rodents, 27% (n=16) were fish, and 5% (n=3) were amphibians (Figure 3c). Among these, 18 different species were identified, with Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus being the predominant ones (Table 1). Rodents are widely used in hepatotoxicity studies due to their high morphophysiological, biochemical, and genetic homology with humans, including liver metabolism [111]. Fish, such as Poecilia vivipara, Cyprinus carpio and Rhandia quelen are organisms sensitive to changes in environmental parameters and directly affected by the presence of agrochemicals in aquatic bodies [112]. Figure 3d depicts in vitro biological models. Among them, the most commonly used were the inibithion assay of isolated hepatic glutathione S-transferase (GST) (n=7, 28%). Isolated liver mitochondria from R. norvegicus were also used as a model (n=6, 24%), along with hepatocyte cultures (n=4, 16%) and HepG2 cells (n=4, 16%). The remaining studies utilized liver and chicken embryo and were categorized as "other" (n=2, 8%). More information about the in vitro biological models can be found in Table 2.

3.4. Morphological markers

The liver is composed of different cell types, such as hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, stellate cells, and hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells [113]. The composition and organization of these cells in the organ vary according to the species, but in general, hepatocytes are more abundant and perform many of the hepatic functions [114].

Data collected in this review show that 2,4-D causes various impacts on liver tissue. Macroscopically, exposure to 2,4-D induces hepatomegaly in rodents. Male rats treated with 150 mg/kg of Désormone Lourd (600 g/L 2,4-D) for 4 weeks showed approximately a 43% increase in absolute organ weight compared to the negative control [52]. At the cellular and tissue level, histopathological analyses were predominant in identifying damages in the reviewed articles. Rats treated with 15 mg/kg of Désormone Lourd (600 g/L 2,4-D) for 4 weeks exhibited cellular death indicated by the formation of pyknotic nuclei and focal necrosis [52]. Additionally, 5 mg/kg of the same commercial formulation induced perivascular inflammatory infiltration in the liver of rats, indicating the presence of immune system cells and other components involved in the inflammatory response [21]. In addition to inflammatory effects, dietary exposure to 2,4-D has been previously associated with a high incidence of hepatic steatosis in rats [61].

Other histopathological changes frequently observed after exposure to 2,4-D include hepatocyte vacuolization and deterioration of liver tissue structure. Cattaneo et al. (2008) identified these effects in the liver of R. quelen after exposure to 700 mg/L of U46D-Fluid (868 g/L 2,4-D) for 96 hours [72]. Similar effects were found in the liver of zebrafish larvae at 120 hours post-fertilization (hpf) exposed to pure 2,4-D (> 97%) at 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/L(2).

3.5. Toxicity biomarkers

3.5.1. Antioxidant metabolism

Toxicity biomarkers associated with antioxidant metabolism and oxidative stress were the most frequent, reported in 49% (n=41) of the reviewed articles (Figure 4a). Free radicals, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), are natural byproducts of cellular aerobic metabolism [115]. However, when the production of free radicals exceeds the antioxidant capacity of the organism and reaches high concentrations, oxidative stress occurs, resulting in oxidative damage to cellular macromolecules, such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids [24,116].

The decrease in antioxidant capacity was mainly evidenced by the reduction in the activity of hepatic antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione S-transferase (GST), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and glutathione reductase (GR) [51,53,64]. Among them, CAT (n=19, 46%), GST (n=16, 39%), and SOD (n= 13, 31%) were the most frequently reported in the articles that investigated markers related to the antioxidant response. (Figure 4b). SOD is responsible for converting the superoxide radical (O₂-) into a less reactive form, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), while CAT decomposes H₂O₂ into water and oxygen [117]. GST, GPx, and GR are involved in the regulation and metabolism of glutathione (GSH), a crucial non-enzymatic antioxidant involved in neutralizing free radicals and eliminating endogenous and exogenous toxic compounds from the body [118].

Exposure to 2,4-D also leads to depletion of GSH levels in the liver, contributing to the decrease in antioxidant capacity [60,107]. This effect was observed in rats receiving doses of 5 mg/kg of Désormone Lourd (600 g/L 2,4-D) for 4 weeks, resulting in a decrease in hepatic GSH levels and the activity of SOD, CAT, GPx, and GST [22]. Toxicity studies conducted with the active ingredient in rats identified similar results, further supporting that this effect is attributed to the active ingredient [60,63].

The decrease in antioxidant response and induction of oxidative stress lead to cellular and tissue damage. This is evidenced by the increase in MDA levels, an effect frequently reported in the articles (n=14, 34%) [23,49]. This alteration indicates the oxidative degradation of lipids (LPO) induced by 2,4-D. MDA is a product of lipid peroxidation, especially of polyunsaturated fatty acids, and is considered a common marker of oxidative stress and oxidative damage to lipids and cell membranes [23]. Hepatic cells are particularly vulnerable to oxidative stress from various toxic agents as the liver serves as the primary site for drug metabolism [24]. Furthermore, oxidative stress plays a crucial role in the progression of liver diseases induced by toxic chemical compounds, such as Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) [115]. These data suggest that oxidative stress plays an important role in the progression of 2,4-D-induced hepatotoxicity.

3.5.2. Energetic metabolism

The analyzed articles demonstrate that markers associated with energetic metabolism are disrupted following exposure to 2,4-D and were reported in 36% (n=30) of the studies (Figure 4a). Among them, alterations associated with mitochondrial dysfunction were frequent (n=9, 30%) (Figure 4b). 2,4-D can inhibit the activity of mitochondrial enzymes and cause a depletion in cellular ATP levels, compromising the availability of energy required for proper functioning of the hepatic cells [90,91]. Isolated liver mitochondria treated with 600 µM of 2,4-D showed inhibition of complex III (cytochrome c reductase)(90). Additionally, complex I (NADH cytochrome c reductase) was also inhibited in liver mitochondria exposed to 13.2 nmol/mg of the herbicide Tordon 2,4-D 64/240 triethanolamine BR [91]. This compromises the proton gradient across the mitochondrial inner membrane and impairs electron transfer necessary for ATP production during oxidative phosphorylation [119]. Furthermore, various studies in the literature report that the uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation is a common mechanism of toxicity for chlorophenols [120,121,122]. The mitochondrial respiratory chain represents the major source of intracellular ROS formation, with complexes I and III being the major sites of O₂- production [123,124]. Inhibition of these complexes results in an accumulation of superoxide-generating electron transport intermediates, enhances electron transfer to oxygen, and triggers excessive O₂- production [123,124]. This contributed to oxidative stress, depletion of antioxidant systems, and damage at cellular and tissue levels [123,124].

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was a frequently disrupted biomarker (n=9, 30%) in articles related to energy metabolism (Figure 4b). LDH participates in energy production through anaerobic metabolism, and the increase in its activity may be associated with low oxygen availability and/or tissue injury [125,126]. Although LDH is not a specific marker of hepatotoxicity, the increase in its levels is related to liver disorders. Rats treated with 126 mg/kg of 2,4-D for approximately 21 days exhibited histopathological damage in the liver and a significant increase in LDH activity [23]. Two days of treatment with 2.5 mg/L of 2,4-D also caused this effect in zebrafish larvae at 120 hpf [2]. Furthermore, different analyzed articles reported that the increase in LDH activity is accompanied by a reduction in antioxidant enzyme activity and hepatic tissue damage [2,21,22,23]. This reinforces that oxidative stress plays a crucial role in the progression of 2,4-D-induced hepatotoxicity.

3.5.3. Lipid metabolism

2,4-D also has negative impacts on lipid metabolism, as reported in 18% (n=15) of the reviewed articles. The analyzed biomarkers indicate that 2,4-D induces an increase in fatty acid oxidation in the liver, as evidenced by the elevation in the activity of mitochondrial enzymes involved in β-oxidation process [26,28,32]. Rats fed a diet containing 0.25% (w/w) of 2,4-D for seven days showed an increase in the activity of carnitine acetyltransferase (CrAT) and an elevation in the oxidation of palmitoyl-CoA [28]. CrAT catalyzes the reversible transfer of acetyl groups between acyl-coenzyme A and L-carnitine, a fundamental process for transporting short and medium-chain fatty acids into the mitochondria, where they are oxidized to generate energy [104,127]. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase, fatty acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, and acyl-CoA hydrolase II are also crucial mitochondrial enzymes for fatty acid oxidation, and their activity is increased by the herbicide [30,38]. 2,4-D also enhances peroxisomal β-oxidation of fatty acids [31,38]. Peroxisomes are organelles that house vital enzymes for a range of metabolic process, including fatty acid oxidation, phospholipid synthesis, and the maintenance of cellular redox balance [128].Fatty acid β-oxidation represents a pivotal peroxisomal function, being crucial for shortening the chains of very long-chain fatty acids that cannot be oxidized in mitochondria [128].

Peroxisomes and mitochondria are significant sources of ROS generation and maintain a close relationship with redox balance [129]. Peroxisomes serve as a major source of H₂O₂, generated through the activities of various FAD-dependent oxidoreductases involved in peroxisomal metabolic processes, including β-oxidation [130]. Although peroxisomes contain antioxidant enzymes such as catalase, imbalances in H₂O₂ levels can compromise antioxidant systems and contribute to oxidative stress [129,130]. Furthermore, disruptions in antioxidant mechanisms and peroxisomal β-oxidation can lead to mitochondrial oxidative stress in different organs, including the liver [130]. This underscores that the increase in fatty acid oxidation may be a significant factor in the generation of oxidative stress induced by exposure to 2,4-D.

3.5.4. Liver Function

Liver markers are indicators used to evaluate liver function and are particularly useful in detecting and monitoring injuries caused by various factors, including toxic chemical compounds. 2,4-D increased the levels of different liver markers, with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) being the most recurrent among the analyzed articles (Figure 4b). The higher detection of AST and ALT is due to the fact that the AST/ALT ratio is a well-established markers of liver damage [131]. AST and ALT are enzymes involved in amino acid metabolism, catalyzing the conversion of aspartate and alanine to pyruvate, respectively [132]. Both enzymes are primarily found inside hepatocytes. When liver damage occurs, hepatocyte membranes are compromised, resulting in the release of these enzymes into the bloodstream [131,132]. This leads to an increase in AST and ALT activity and levels in the blood, making them sensitive markers of liver damage [131]. Shafeeq and Mahboob (2021) demonstrated that rats receiving 150 mg/kg/day of 2,4-D for 4 weeks showed increased levels of AST, ALT, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) [63]. The increase in enzymatic activity of these three markers was also observed in zebrafish larvae at 120 hpf treated with 2.5 mg/L of 2,4-D for two days [2].

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was the third most mentioned marker of liver function in the analyzed studies. This enzyme is located in the membranes of the biliary canaliculi, structures responsible for bile transport in the liver. An increase in ALP levels indicates dysfunction or obstruction of the biliary flow, a condition that can be caused by liver damage and hepatobiliary disorders [131,133]. Additionally, an increase in total bilirubin levels was also induced by 2,4-D [21,51]. Bilirubin is metabolized by the liver and excreted in the bile, implying that any abnormality in this process can result in its accumulation in the blood [131].

3.5.5. Xenobiotic metabolism

Exposure to 2,4-D alters the activity of enzymes related to xenobiotic metabolism (Figure 4a). Among them, the most frequent marker are GST and GSH. GST plays an important role in the conjugation of xenobiotics with GSH molecules, resulting in the formation of water-soluble conjugates, facilitating their excretion from the body [118]. Additionally, 2,4-D also affects enzymes related to cytochrome P450 (CYP450) [34,46]. CYP450 is a family of enzymes, primarily present in the liver, responsible for the metabolism of a wide range of substances, including xenobiotics [105]. Different isoforms of CYP450 are involved in the metabolism of 2,4-D. Badawi et al. (2000) demonstrated that rats treated with a single dose of 2,4-D (375 mg/L) showed an increase in the expression of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1 isoforms in the liver [44]. Furthermore, rats receiving doses of 1.6 and 2.9 mg/kg/bw of 2,4-D exhibited changes in the activity of CYP450 and the enzymes ethylmorphine N-demethylase and ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase, which are also part of the cytochrome P450 family [41]. Furthermore, the CYP-mediated metabolism can also produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), in addition to bioactivated intermediates, leading to oxidative stress, particularly in the liver, and contributing to liver pathologys [134].

Exposure to 2,4-D also induces the proliferation of peroxisomes, organelles that contain a variety of oxidative enzymes important in xenobiotic metabolism [34,46]. Epoxide hydrolases are enzymes present in peroxisomes that are increased in activity by exposure to 2,4-D [27,34]. These enzymes function to convert epoxides, intermediates formed during oxidative metabolism by CYP450, into more stable and less reactive metabolites, contributing to the detoxification and elimination of the compound in the body [135]. Figure 5 depicts a schematic representation of the mechanisms underlying the 2,4-D-induced hepatotoxicity reported in section 3.6 of this study.

3.6. Hepatoprotective assessments

Oxidative stress plays a significant role in the hepatotoxicity induced by 2,4-D [21,22,63]. Therefore, chemical compounds with antioxidant properties are being tested in hepatoprotection assays, aiming to reduce the damages caused by the herbicide (Table 3).

Studies in rats have demonstrated that supplementation with selenium (Se) attenuates the 2,4-D-induced hepatotoxicity. This protection is indicated by the reduction in markers of liver function (AST, ALT, ALP), levels of MDA, reduction in histopathological liver damage, and improvement in the activity of hepatic antioxidant enzymes (CAT, GR, SOD, and GPx) [21,63]. Similar results were also found in rats supplemented with magnesium (Mg) [60]. Se and Mg play essential roles as enzymatic cofactors in antioxidant systems (e.g., for GPx activation and activity), contributing to cell protection against oxidative damage [60,63].

Olive oil and its hydrophilic fraction have also shown promising results against oxidative damage in the livers of 2,4-D-induced rats. The promoted outcomes include the recovery of antioxidant enzyme activity, reduction in AST/ALT and MDA levels, and preservation of hepatic histoarchitecture [51,53]. These benefits are attributed to the presence of phenolic compounds (e.g., flavonoids, terpenoids) known for their antioxidant properties, as they have the ability to donate electrons to neutralize free radicals and stimulate antioxidant enzyme activity [22]. The aqueous extract of Thymus munbyanus, a plant also rich in phenolic compounds, was also effective against herbicide-induced oxidative damage [22].

3.7. Pesticide mixtures containing 2,4-D

This review identified studies that evaluated the toxic effects of 2,4-D when combined with other pesticide products. This approach is important as it reflects a more realistic scenario of exposure for non-target organisms. After all, these products are often applied in combination in target crops [136]. Additionally, the mixtures can influence the absorption, distribution, and metabolism of pesticides in non-target organisms, resulting in potential alterations in the toxicity of the individual active ingredients [136,137].

Exposure with commercial formulations of 2,4-D (27 ppm) and azinphosmethyl (0.3 ppm) individually and in combination for 96 hours produced different results in altering the levels of hepatic antioxidant enzymes in Oreochromis niloticus [68]. A synergistic effect between the pesticides was observed in SOD activity, while an antagonistic effect was seen in GPx and GR activity [68]. Chaturvedi et al. (1991) tested the effects of 2,4-D alone and in combination with the insecticides toxaphene (TOX) and parathion (PA) in mice and observed different effects on hepatic xenobiotic metabolism enzymes [40]. When administered alone at 50 mg/kg, 2,4-D altered the activities of Amidopyrine N-demethylase and Benzo [a]pyrene hydroxylase. However, when combined with TOX (50 mg/kg) or TOX (50 mg/kg) + PA (5 mg/kg), it induced the activity of other enzymes such as aniline hydroxylase, phenacetin O-dealkylase, and increased CYP450 activity [40].

2,4-D was also evaluated in combination with the herbicide picloram, both of which are components of the commercial herbicide formulation Tordon [66]. The mixture of 5.5 mg/L 2,4-D + 0.5 mg/L picloram increased the hepatic ethoxyresorufin 0-deethylase activity in Ictalurus punctatus, as well as decreased the liver-to-body weight ratio. These effects were not observed in treatments with the individual herbicides, indicating a synergistic effect [66]. These findings highlight the importance of conducting studies that investigate the toxicity of pesticide mixtures, given the scarcity of research in this field of literature.

3.8. Conclusions and perspectives

In conclusion, 2,4-D has a negative impact on various hepatic biochemical parameters, particularly components of the antioxidant system. This indicates that oxidative damage may play a significant role in the progression of 2,4-D-induced hepatotoxicity. However, despite the advancements made in this field, the mechanism of action, targets, and molecular pathways involved in the herbicide's hepatotoxicity are not yet fully understood. Comprehending the mechanism of action of herbicides is of paramount importance in the development of more efficient agricultural strategies that minimize risks to the environment and non-target organisms [138,139].

In this context, the use of in silico and in chemico tools has emerged as a viable and efficient alternative for predicting toxicity mechanisms of contaminants (Cotterill et al., 2019). Examples include network analyses (e.g., protein-protein interaction networks) that provide a comprehensive understanding of the interactions between molecular targets and the toxic substance of interest [140,141]. In chemico approaches, such as docking and molecular dynamics, can also be employed to assess the affinity between a chemical compound and different targets, thereby increasing the reliability of the obtained results [142]. Moreover, these approaches make use of toxicological data available in freely accessible databases, such as GeneCards (https://www.genecards.org/) and DisGeNET (https://www.disgenet.org/), and are aligned with the principles of the 3 R's of animal experimentation (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) [143]. Therefore, the use of predictive methodologies in investigating the mechanism of action of 2,4-D offers a promising perspective for advancing our knowledge of its toxicity and contributes to the development of more effective strategies for environmental safety and public health.

Author Contributions

Rafael Xavier Martins: Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. Matheus Carvalho, Maria Eduarda Maia and Bruno Flor: Data curation, Methodology, Formal analysis. Terezinha Souza, Thiago Lopes Rocha and Luís M. Félix: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Davi Farias: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. All authors approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was funded by Public Call n. 03 Produtividade em Pesquisa PROPESQ/PRPG/UFPB, grant number PVA13245-2020, Public Call Demanda Universal FAPESQ, grant number 3045/2021, and CNPq Productivity Scholarship for T.LR., grant number 306329/2020–4.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC, Brazil), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB, Brazil), Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado da Paraíba (FAPESQ, Brazil), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brazil), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científco e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) for supporting this research with grants and scholarships.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

Li K, Wu JQ, Jiang LL, Shen LZ, Li JY, He ZH, et al. Developmental toxicity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in zebrafish embryos. Chemosphere. 2017 Mar;171:40–8. [CrossRef]
Martins RX, Vieira L, Souza JACR, Silva MGF, Muniz MS, Souza T, et al. Exposure to 2,4-D herbicide induces hepatotoxicity in zebrafish larvae. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;248:109110. [CrossRef]
Da Silva AP, Morais ER, Oliveira EC, Ghisi N de C. Does exposure to environmental 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid concentrations increase mortality rate in animals? A meta-analytic review. Environ Pollut. 2022 Jun;303:119179. [CrossRef]
Freitas L, Valadares L de A, Camozzi M, de Oliveira P, Ferreira Machado M, Lima F. Animal models in the neurotoxicology of 2,4-D. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2019 Oct;38(10):1178–82. [CrossRef]
Magnoli K, Carranza CS, Aluffi ME, Magnoli CE, Barberis CL. Herbicides based on 2,4-D: its behavior in agricultural environments and microbial biodegradation aspects. A review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020 Nov;27(31):38501–12. [CrossRef]
Freisthler MS, Robbins CR, Benbrook CM, Young HA, Haas DM, Winchester PD, et al. Association between increasing agricultural use of 2,4-D and population biomarkers of exposure: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2014. Environ Health. 2022 Dec;21(1):23.
IBAMA. Pesticide Commercialization Reports. [Internet]. Ministry of the Environment.; 2022. Available from: https://www.gov.br/ibama/en-us/topics/chemicals-and-biology/pesticides/pesticide-commercialization-report.
Casimero M, Abit MJ, Ramirez AH, Dimaano NG, Mendoza J. Herbicide use history and weed management in Southeast Asia. Adv Weed Sci. 2022 Dec 22;40(spe1):e020220054. [CrossRef]
Liu W, Li H, Tao F, Li S, Tian Z, Xie H. Formation and contamination of PCDD/Fs, PCBs, PeCBz, HxCBz and polychlorophenols in the production of 2,4-D products. Chemosphere. 2013 Jul;92(3):304–8. [CrossRef]
Dehnert GK, Karasov WH, Wolman MA. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid containing herbicide impairs essential visually guided behaviors of larval fish. Aquat Toxicol. 2019 Apr;209:1–12.
Gaaied S, Oliveira M, Le Bihanic F, Cachot J, Banni M. Gene expression patterns and related enzymatic activities of detoxification and oxidative stress systems in zebrafish larvae exposed to the 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide. Chemosphere. 2019 Jun;224:289–97.
Islam F, Wang J, Farooq MA, Khan MSS, Xu L, Zhu J, et al. Potential impact of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on human and ecosystems. Environ Int. 2018 Feb;111:332–51.
Ensminger MP, Budd R, Kelley KC, Goh KS. Pesticide occurrence and aquatic benchmark exceedances in urban surface waters and sediments in three urban areas of California, USA, 2008–2011. Environ Monit Assess. 2013 May;185(5):3697–710.
Rodil R, Quintana JB, Concha-Graña E, López-Mahía P, Muniategui-Lorenzo S, Prada-Rodríguez D. Emerging pollutants in sewage, surface and drinking water in Galicia (NW Spain). Chemosphere. 2012 Mar;86(10):1040–9. [CrossRef]
Meftaul IM, Venkateswarlu K, Dharmarajan R, Annamalai P, Megharaj M. Movement and Fate of 2,4-D in Urban Soils: A Potential Environmental Health Concern. ACS Omega. 2020 Jun 9;5(22):13287–95. [CrossRef]
Yamini Y, Saleh A. Ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction combined with injection-port derivatization for the determination of some chlorophenoxyacetic acids in water samples: Sample Preparation. J Sep Sci. 2013 Jul;36(14):2330–8.
Tsaboula A, Papadakis EN, Vryzas Z, Kotopoulou A, Kintzikoglou K, Papadopoulou-Mourkidou E. Environmental and human risk hierarchy of pesticides: A prioritization method, based on monitoring, hazard assessment and environmental fate. Environ Int. 2016 May;91:78–93. [CrossRef]
Nault ME, Netherland MD, Mikulyuk A, Skogerboe JG, Asplund T, Hauxwell J, et al. Efficacy, selectivity, and herbicide concentrations following a whole-lake 2,4-D application targeting Eurasian watermilfoil in two adjacent northern Wisconsin lakes. Lake Reserv Manag. 2014 Jan 2;30(1):1–10.
SISAGUA. Detection and concentration of pesticides from 2014 to 2017 in human drinking water. [Internet]. Ministry of Health; 2018. Available from: http://www.vigilanciasanitaria.sc.gov.br/index.php/saude-ambiental/sisagu.
Zuanazzi NR, Ghisi NDC, Oliveira EC. Analysis of global trends and gaps for studies about 2,4-D herbicide toxicity: A scientometric review. Chemosphere. 2020 Feb;241:125016.
Tichati L, Trea F, Ouali K. Potential Role of Selenium Against Hepatotoxicity Induced by 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid in Albino Wistar Rats. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2020 Mar;194(1):228–36. [CrossRef]
Tichati L, Trea F, Ouali K. The antioxidant study proprieties of Thymus munbyanus aqueous extract and its beneficial effect on 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid -induced hepatic oxidative stress in albino Wistar rats. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2021 Mar 24;31(3):212–23.
Troudi A, Ben Amara I, Samet AM, Zeghal N. Oxidative stress induced by 2,4-phenoxyacetic acid in liver of female rats and their progeny: Biochemical and histopathological studies. Environ Toxicol. 2012 Mar;27(3):137–45.
Elufioye TO, Habtemariam S. Hepatoprotective effects of rosmarinic acid: Insight into its mechanisms of action. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Apr;112:108600. [CrossRef]
Vainio H, Nickels J, Linnainmaa K. Phenoxy acid herbicides cause peroxisome proliferation in Chinese hamsters. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1982 Mar;8(1):70–3. [CrossRef]
Vainio H, Linnainmaa K, Kähönen M, Nickels J, Hietanen E, Marniemi J, et al. Hypolipidemia and peroxisome proliferation induced by phenoxyacetic acid herbicides in rats. Biochem Pharmacol. 1983 Sep;32(18):2775–9. [CrossRef]
Hietanen E, Linnainmaa K, Vainio H. Effects of Phenoxyherbicides and Glyphosate on the Hepatic and Intestinal Biotransformation Activities in the Rat. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1983 Aug;53(2):103–12. [CrossRef]
Kawashima Y, Katoh H, Nakajima S, Kozuka H, Uchiyama M. Effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid on peroxisomal enzymes in rat liver. Biochem Pharmacol. 1984 Jan;33(2):241–5.
Y Kawashima, N Hanioka, H Kozuka. Induction of microsomal stearoyl-CoA desaturase by the administration of various phenoxyacetic acid derivatives. J Pharmacobiodyn. 1984;7((5)):286–93.
Katoh H, Nakajima S, Kawashima Y, Kozuka H, Uchiyama M. Induction of rat hepatic long-chain acyl-CoA hydrolases by various peroxisome proliferators. Biochem Pharmacol. 1984 Apr;33(7):1081–5.
Hietanen, E., Ahotupa, M., Heinonen, T., Hämäläinen, H., Kunnas, T., Linnainmaa, K., Mäntylä, E., & Vainio, H. (1985). Enhanced peroxisomal beta-oxidation of fatty acids and glutathione metabolism in rats exposed to phenoxyacetic acids. Toxicology, 34(2), 103–111. [CrossRef]
Lundgren B, Meijer J, DePIERRE JW. Examination of the structural requirements for proliferation of peroxisomes and mitochondria in mouse liver by hypolipidemic agents, with special emphasis on structural analogues of 2-ethylhexanoic acid. Eur J Biochem. 1987 Mar;163(2):423–31. [CrossRef]
Gorzinski S. Acute, pharmacokinetic, and subchronic toxicological studies of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid*1, *2. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1987 Oct;9(3):423–35.
Lundgren B, Meijer J, DePierre JW. Induction of cytosolic and microsomal epoxide hydrolases and proliferation of peroxisomes and mitochondria in mouse liver after dietary exposure to p-chlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Biochem Pharmacol. 1987 Mar;36(6):815–21.
Mustonen R, Elovaara E, Zitting A, Linnainmaa K, Vainio H. Effects of commercial chlorophenolate, 2,3,7,8-TCDD, and pure phenoxyacetic acids on hepatic peroxisome proliferation, xenobiotic metabolism and sister chromatid exchange in the rat. Arch Toxicol. 1989 May;63(3):203–8. [CrossRef]
A G Abdellatif, V Préat, J Vamecq, R Nilsson, M Roberfroid. Peroxisome proliferation and modulation of rat liver carcinogenesis by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, perfluorooctanoic acid and nafenopin. Carcinogenesis. 1990;1899–902. [CrossRef]
Kuntz DJ, Rao NGS, Berg IE, Khattree R, Chaturvedi AK. Toxicity of mixtures of parathion, toxaphene and/or 2,4-D in mice. J Appl Toxicol. 1990 Aug;10(4):257–66. [CrossRef]
Kozuka H, Yamada J, Horie S, Watanabe T. Characteristics of induction of peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation-related enzymes in rat liver by drugs: Relationships between structure and inducing activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1991, 41, 617-623. [CrossRef]
N Inomata, H Yoshida, Y Aoki, M Tsunoda, M Yamamoto. Effects of MCPA and other phenoxyacid compounds on hepatic xenobiotic metabolism in rats. 1991;171–82. [CrossRef]
Chaturvedi AK, Kuntz DJ, Rao NGS. Metabolic aspects of the toxicology of mixtures of parathion, toxaphene and/or 2,4-D in mice. J Appl Toxicol. 1991 Aug;11(4):245–51. [CrossRef]
Knopp D, Schiller F. Oral and dermal application of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid sodium and dimethylamine salts to male rats: Investigations on absorption and excretion as well as induction of hepatic mixed-function oxidase activities. Arch Toxicol. 1992 Feb;66(3):170–4.
C A Paulino, J L Guerra, G H Oliveira, J Palermo-Neto. Acute, subchronic and chronic 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) intoxication in rats. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1996;38:348–52.
Miranda S, Vollrath V, Wielandt AM, Loyola’ G, Bronfman’ M, Chianale J. Overexpression of mdr2 gene hy peroxisopmroleiferators inthe mouse liver.
Badawi AF, Cavalieri EL, Rogan EG. Effect of chlorinated hydrocarbons on expression of cytochrome P450 1A1, 1A2 and 1B1 and 2- and 4-hydroxylation of 17β-estradiol in female Sprague–Dawley rats.
Di Paolo O, de Duffard AME, Duffard R. In vivo and in vitro binding of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid to a rat liver mitochondrial protein. Chem Biol Interact. 2001 Sep;137(3):229–41. [CrossRef]
Ozaki K, Mahler JF, Haseman JK, Moomaw CR, Nicolette ML, Nyska A. Unique Renal Tubule Changes Induced in Rats and Mice by the Peroxisome Proliferators 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) and WY-14643. Toxicol Pathol. 2001 Jun;29(4):440–50. [CrossRef]
Ge R, Tao L, Kramer PM, Cunningham ML, Pereira MA. Effect of peroxisome proliferators on the methylation and protein level of the c- myc protooncogene in B6C3F1 mice liver. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2002 Jan;16(1):41–7. [CrossRef]
Yilmaz HR, Yuksel E. Effect of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on the activities of some metabolic enzymes for generating pyridine nucleotide pool of cells from mouse liver. Toxicol Ind Health. 2005 Aug;21(7–8):231–7. [CrossRef]
Celik I, Tuluce Y, Isik I. Influence of subacute treatment of some plant growth regulators on serum marker enzymes and erythrocyte and tissue antioxidant defense and lipid peroxidation in rats. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2006 Aug;20(4):174–82.
Aydýn H, Baran A, Demirel G, Yýldýrým M. Effects of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) treatment on the epididymal spermatozoa, blood serum transaminases and its accumulation in liver of rats. 2006.
Nakbi A, Tayeb W, Grissa A, Issaoui M, Dabbou S, Chargui I, et al. Effects of olive oil and its fractions on oxidative stress and the liver’s fatty acid composition in 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid-treated rats. Nutr Metab. 2010;7(1):80.
Tayeb W, Nakbi A, Trabelsi M, Attia N, Miled A, Hammami M. Hepatotoxicity induced by sub-acute exposure of rats to 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid based herbicide “Désormone lourd.” J Hazard Mater. 2010 Aug 15;180(1–3):225–33.
Nakbi A, Tayeb W, Dabbou S, Chargui I, Issaoui M, Zakhama A, et al. Hypolipidimic and antioxidant activities of virgin olive oil and its fractions in 2,4-diclorophenoxyacetic acid–treated rats. Nutrition. 2012 Jan;28(1):81–91. [CrossRef]
Tayeb W, Nakbi A, Cheraief I, Miled A, Hammami M. Alteration of lipid status and lipid metabolism, induction of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic herbicide in rat liver. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2013 Jul;23(6):449–58. [CrossRef]
Kalipci E, Ozdemir C, Oztas H. Assessing eco-toxicological effects of industrial 2,4-D acid iso-octylester herbicide on rat pancreas and liver. Biotech Histochem. 2013 May;88(3–4):202–7. [CrossRef]
Mazhar FM, Moawad KM, El-Dakdoky MH, Amer AS. Fetotoxicity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in rats and the protective role of vitamin E. Toxicol Ind Health. 2014 Jun;30(5):480–8.
Al-Baroudi DA, Arafat R, El-kholy T. Hepatoprotective effect of chamomile capitula extract against 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Life Science Journal. 2014;11(8):34–40.
Dakhakhni TH, Raouf GA, Qusti SY. Evaluation of the toxic effect of the herbicide 2, 4-D on rat hepatocytes: an FT-IR spectroscopic study. Eur Biophys J. 2016 May;45(4):311–20. [CrossRef]
Satapathy A., M. Rao. Protective effect of Curcumin on 2, 4- Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid exerted Hepatotoxicity in Mice. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018;11(2):637–42.
Shafeeq S, Mahboob T. Magnesium supplementation ameliorates toxic effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in rat model. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2020 Jan;39(1):47–58.
Bonfim DJP, Magalhães LR, Chagas PHN, Serra FDM, Benatti LAT, Nai GA. Hepatic, renal, and pancreatic damage associated with chronic exposure to oral and inhaled 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-d): an environmental exposure model in rats. Comp Clin Pathol. 2020 Oct;29(5):1001–10. [CrossRef]
Bueno Franco Salla G, Bracht L, Valderrama Parizotto A, Comar JF, Peralta RM, Bracht F, et al. Kinetics of the metabolic effects, distribution spaces and lipid-bilayer affinities of the organo-chlorinated herbicides 2,4-D and picloram in the liver. Toxicol Lett. 2019 Oct;313:137–49. [CrossRef]
Shafeeq S, Mahboob T. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid induced hepatic and renal toxicological perturbations in rat model: Attenuation by selenium supplementation. Toxicol Ind Health. 2021 Mar;37(3):152–63.
Ince S, Demirel HH, Zemheri-Navruz F, Arslan-Acaroz D, Kucukkurt I, Acaroz U, et al. Synergistic toxicity of ethanol and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid enhances oxidant status, DNA damage, inflammation, and apoptosis in rats. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022 Sep 9;30(4):10710–23. [CrossRef]
Nechalioti PM, Karampatzakis T, Mesnage R, Antoniou MN, Ibragim M, Tsatsakis A, et al. Evaluation of perinatal exposure of glyphosate and its mixture with 2,4-D and dicamba οn liver redox status in Wistar rats. Environ Res. 2023 Jul;228:115906. [CrossRef]
Gallagher E, Digiulio R. Effects of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and picloram on biotransformation, peroxisomal and serum enzyme activities in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Toxicol Lett. 1991 Jun;57(1):65–72.
Neskovid N, Karan V, Elezovic I, Poleksic V, Budimir M. Toxic effects of 2,4-D herbicide on fish. J Environ Sci Health Part B. 1994;29(2):265–79.
Oruç EÖ, Üner N. Combined effects of 2,4-D and azinphosmethyl on antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in liver of Oreochromis niloticus. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 2000 Dec;127(3):291–6. [CrossRef]
Ackers JT, Johnston MF, Haasch ML. Immunodetection of hepatic peroxisomal PMP70 as an indicator of peroxisomal proliferation in the mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus. Mar Environ Res. 2000 Jul;50(1–5):361–5. [CrossRef]
Özcan Oruç E, Üner N. Marker enzyme assesment in the liver of cyprinus carpio (L.) exposed to 2,4-D and azinphosmethyl: Marker Enzymes in Cyprinus Carpio. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2002 Aug;16(4):182–8.
da Fonseca MB, Glusczak L, Silveira Moraes B, de Menezes CC, Pretto A, Tierno MA, et al. The 2,4-D herbicide effects on acetylcholinesterase activity and metabolic parameters of piava freshwater fish (Leporinus obtusidens). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2008 Mar;69(3):416–20.
Cattaneo R, Loro VL, Spanevello R, Silveira FA, Luz L, Miron DS, et al. Metabolic and histological parameters of silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen) exposed to commercial formulation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxiacetic acid (2,4-D) herbicide. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2008 Nov;92(3):133–7.
Matviishyn TM, Kubrak OI, Husak VV, Storey KB, Lushchak VI. Tissue-specific induction of oxidative stress in goldfish by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid: Mild in brain and moderate in liver and kidney. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Mar;37(2):861–9.
Vigário AF, Sabóia-Morais SMT. Effects of the 2,4-D herbicide on gills epithelia and liver of the fish Poecilia vivipara. Pesqui Veterinária Bras. 2014 Jun;34(6):523–8.
Menezes C, Fonseca MB, Leitemperger J, Pretto A, Moraes BS, Murussi CR, et al. Commercial formulation containing 2,4-D affects biochemical parameters and morphological indices of silver catfish exposed for 90 days. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2015 Apr;41(2):323–30. [CrossRef]
Yakovenko BV, Tretyak OP, Mekhed OB, Iskevych OV. Effect of herbicides and surfactants on enzymes of energy metabolism in European carp. Ukr J Ecol. 2018 Mar 22;8(1):948–52. [CrossRef]
Kaya İ, Yılmaz M, Kaya MM, Kükürt bdulsamed, Karapehlivan M. The Effects of Carbaryl and 2,4- Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid on Oxidative Stress Index in Capoeta capoeta (Guldensteadt 1773). Pak J Zool [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jul 14];51(1). Available from: http://researcherslinks.com/current-issues/The-Effects-of-Carbaryl-and-Dichlorophenoxyacetic/20/1/1847/htm.
Zaffaroni NP, Zavanella T, Cattaneo A, Arias E. The toxicity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid to the adult crested newt. Environ Res. 1986 Oct;41(1):79–87. [CrossRef]
Van Meter RJ, Glinski DA, Purucker ST, Henderson WM. Influence of exposure to pesticide mixtures on the metabolomic profile in post-metamorphic green frogs (Lithobates clamitans). Sci Total Environ. 2018 May;624:1348–59.
Curi LM, Peltzer PM, Sandoval MT, Lajmanovich RC. Acute Toxicity and Sublethal Effects Caused by a Commercial Herbicide Formulated with 2,4-D on Physalaemus albonotatus Tadpoles. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2019 Jan;230(1):22. [CrossRef]
Dierickx PJ. Interaction of chlorophenoxyalkyl acid herbicides with rat-liver glutathione S-transferases. Food Chem Toxicol. 1983 Oct;21(5):575–9. [CrossRef]
Vessey DA, Boyer TD. Differential activation and inhibition of different forms of rat liver glutathione S-transferase by the herbicides 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate (2,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetate (2,4,5-T). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1984 May;73(3):492–9. [CrossRef]
Dierickx PJ. Hepatic glutathione S-transferases in rainbow trout and their interaction with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 1,4-benzoquinone. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Comp Pharmacol. 1985 Jan;82(2):495–500. [CrossRef]
Singh S. Inhibition of human glutathione S-transferases by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate (2,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetate (2,4,5-T). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1985 Nov;81(2):328–36.
Elia AC, Mantilacci L, Natali M, Principato G. Association of glutathione peroxidase activity with an acidic glutathione S-transferase in carp liver. Ital J Zool. 2000 Jan 1;67(1):39–43. [CrossRef]
Dierickx PJ. Interaction of 1,4-benzoquinone and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid with microsomal glutathione transferase from rat liver. Arch Int Physiol Biochim. 1988 Jan;96(1):1–5.
Özaslan MS, Demir Y, Aksoy M, Küfrevioğlu ÖI, Beydemir Ş. Inhibition effects of pesticides on glutathione- S -transferase enzyme activity of Van Lake fish liver. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2018 Sep;32(9):e22196.
Dixon A, Osterloh J, Becker C. Inhibition of Palmitoyl Co-enzyme A Hydrolase in Mitochondria and Microsomes by Pharmaceutical Organic Anions. J Pharm Sci. 1990 Feb;79(2):103–5.
Zychlinski L, Zolnierowicz S. Comparison of uncoupling activities of chlorophenoxy herbicides in rat liver mitochondria. Toxicol Lett. 1990 Jun;52(1):25–34.
Palmeira C. M., Moreno A. J., Madeira V. M. Interactions of herbicides 2,4-D and dinoseb with liver mitochondrial bioenergetics. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1994;127(1):50–7.
Pereira LF, Campello AP, Silveira O. Effect of tordon 2,4-D 64/240 triethanolamine BR on the energy metabolism of rat liver mitochondria. J Appl Toxicol. 1994 Jan;14(1):21–6.
Oakes DJ, Pollak JK. Effects of a herbicide formulation, Tordon 75D®, and its individual components on the oxidative functions of mitochondria. Toxicology. 1999 Aug;136(1):41–52.
Palmeira C. M., Moreno A. J., Madeira V. M. C. Metabolic alterations in hepatocytes promoted by the herbicides paraquat, dinoseb and 2,4-D. 68:24–31.
Palmeira CM, Moreno AJ, Madeira VMC. Thiols metabolism is altered by the herbicides paraquat, dinoseb and 2,4-D: A study in isolated hepatocytes. Toxicol Lett. 1995 Nov;81(2–3):115–23. [CrossRef]
Li C, Grillo MP, Benet LZ. In vitro studies on the chemical reactivity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetyl-S-acyl-CoA thioester. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2003 Mar;187(2):101–9.
Salvo LM, Malucelli MIC, da Silva JRMC, Alberton GC, Silva De Assis HC. Toxicity assessment of 2,4-D and MCPA herbicides in primary culture of fish hepatic cells. J Environ Sci Health Part B. 2015 Jul 3;50(7):449–55. [CrossRef]
Tuschl H, Schwab C. Cytotoxic effects of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in HepG2 cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2003 Mar;41(3):385–93. [CrossRef]
Tuschl H, Schwab CE. Flow cytometric methods used as screening tests for basal toxicity of chemicals. Toxicol In Vitro. 2004 Aug;18(4):483–91. [CrossRef]
Bharadwaj L, Dhami K, Schneberger D, Stevens M, Renaud C, Ali A. Altered gene expression in human hepatoma HepG2 cells exposed to low-level 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and potassium nitrate. Toxicol In Vitro. 2005 Aug;19(5):603–19.
Barrón Cuenca J, De Oliveira Galvão MF, Ünlü Endirlik B, Tirado N, Dreij K. In vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of single and combined pesticides used by Bolivian farmers. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2022 Jan;63(1):4–17.
Olson RJ, Trumble TE, Gamble W. Alterations in cholesterol and fatty acid biosynthesis in rat liver homogenates by aryloxy acids. Biochem J. 1974 Aug 15;142(2):445–8.
Santagostino A, Leone MP, Maci R, Casale A, Marabini L. Effects of Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides on Chicken Embryo Liver Drug Metabolizing Enzymes. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991 Feb;68(2):110–4. [CrossRef]
Evangelista de Duffard A, Fabra de Peretti A, Castro de Cantarini S, Duffard R. Effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid butyl ester on chick liver. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol [Internet]. 1993 Aug [cited 2023 Jul 14];25(2). Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF0021213.
Adeva-Andany MM, Pérez-Felpete N, Fernández-Fernández C, Donapetry-García C, Pazos-García C. Liver glucose metabolism in humans. Biosci Rep. 2016 Dec 1;36(6):e00416. [CrossRef]
Almazroo OA, Miah MK, Venkataramanan R. Drug Metabolism in the Liver. Clin Liver Dis. 2017 Feb;21(1):1–20.
Ore A, Akinloye O. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Biomarkers in Clinical and Experimental Models of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Medicina (Mex). 2019 Jan 24;55(2):26. [CrossRef]
Nagy K, Duca RC, Lovas S, Creta M, Scheepers PTJ, Godderis L, et al. Systematic review of comparative studies assessing the toxicity of pesticide active ingredients and their product formulations. Environ Res. 2020 Feb;181:108926. [CrossRef]
Mesnage R, Antoniou MN. Ignoring Adjuvant Toxicity Falsifies the Safety Profile of Commercial Pesticides. Front Public Health. 2018 Jan 22;5:361. [CrossRef]
Bambino K, Morrison J, Chu J. Hepatotoxicity in Zebrafish Larvae. In: Hansen JM, Winn LM, editors. Developmental Toxicology [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2019 [cited 2023 Nov 24]. p. 129–38. (Methods in Molecular Biology; vol. 1965). Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4939-9182-2_.
Ingber DE. Human organs-on-chips for disease modelling, drug development and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Genet. 2022 Aug;23(8):467–91.
Lieschke GJ, Currie PD. Animal models of human disease: zebrafish swim into view. Nat Rev Genet. 2007 May;8(5):353–67.
Ruiz de Arcaute C, Soloneski S, Larramendy ML. Toxic and genotoxic effects of the 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)-based herbicide on the Neotropical fish Cnesterodon decemmaculatus. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016 Jun;128:222–9.
Wilkins BJ, Pack M. Zebrafish Models of Human Liver Development and Disease. In: Terjung R, editor. Comprehensive Physiology [Internet]. 1st ed. Wiley; 2013 [cited 2022 Jun 17]. p. 1213–30. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cphy.c12002.
Trefts E, Gannon M, Wasserman DH. The liver. Curr Biol. 2017 Nov;27(21):R1147–51.
Chen Z, Tian R, She Z, Cai J, Li H. Role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020 May;152:116–41.
Cichoż-Lach H. Oxidative stress as a crucial factor in liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(25):8082. [CrossRef]
Han KH. Relationships among alcoholic liver disease, antioxidants, and antioxidant enzymes. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(1):37. [CrossRef]
Massarsky A, Kozal JS, Di Giulio RT. Glutathione and zebrafish: Old assays to address a current issue. Chemosphere. 2017 Feb;168:707–15. [CrossRef]
Ramanathan R, Ali AH, Ibdah JA. Mitochondrial Dysfunction Plays Central Role in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 30;23(13):7280. [CrossRef]
Datta S, Sahdeo S, Gray JA, Morriseau C, Hammock BD, Cortopassi G. A high-throughput screen for mitochondrial function reveals known and novel mitochondrial toxicants in a library of environmental agents. Mitochondrion. 2016 Nov;31:79–83.
Igbinosa EO, Odjadjare EE, Chigor VN, Igbinosa IH, Emoghene AO, Ekhaise FO, et al. Toxicological Profile of Chlorophenols and Their Derivatives in the Environment: The Public Health Perspective. Sci World J. 2013;2013:1–11.
Shannon RD, Boardman GD, Dietrich AM, Bevan DR. Mitochondrial response to chlorophenols as a short-term toxicity assay. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1991 Jan;10(1):57–66.
Mansouri A, Gattolliat CH, Asselah T. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Signaling in Chronic Liver Diseases. Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):629–47. [CrossRef]
Paradies G. Oxidative stress, cardiolipin and mitochondrial dysfunction in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(39):14205. [CrossRef]
Arya DS, Arora S, Malik S, Nepal S, Kumari S, Ojha S. Effect of Piper betle on cardiac function, marker enzymes, and oxidative stress in isoproterenol-induced cardiotoxicity in rats. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2010 Nov;20(9):564–71.
Maharajan K, Muthulakshmi S, Nataraj B, Ramesh M, Kadirvelu K. Toxicity assessment of pyriproxyfen in vertebrate model zebrafish embryos ( Danio rerio ): A multi biomarker study. Aquat Toxicol. 2018 Mar;196:132–45.
Song MJ, Park C, Kim H, Han S, Lee SH, Lee DH, et al. Carnitine acetyltransferase deficiency mediates mitochondrial dysfunction-induced cellular senescence in dermal fibroblasts. Aging Cell. 2023 Nov;22(11):e14000.
Okumoto K, Tamura S, Honsho M, Fujiki Y. Peroxisome: Metabolic Functions and Biogenesis. In: Lizard G, editor. Peroxisome Biology: Experimental Models, Peroxisomal Disorders and Neurological Diseases [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 3–17. [CrossRef]
Fransen M, Lismont C, Walton P. The Peroxisome-Mitochondria Connection: How and Why? Int J Mol Sci. 2017 May 24;18(6):1126.
Kleiboeker B, Lodhi IJ. Peroxisomal regulation of energy homeostasis: Effect on obesity and related metabolic disorders. Mol Metab. 2022;65:101577. [CrossRef]
Giannini EG. Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians. Can Med Assoc J. 2005 Feb 1;172(3):367–79. [CrossRef]
Sookoian S, Pirola CJ. Liver enzymes, metabolomics and genome-wide association studies: From systems biology to the personalized medicine. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(3):711. [CrossRef]
Fernandes M da S, Iano FG, Rocia V, Yanai MM, Leite A de L, Furlani TA, et al. Alkaline phosphatase activity in plasma and liver of rats submitted to chronic exposure to fluoride. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2011 Dec;54(6):1187–92.
Veith A, Moorthy B. Role of cytochrome P450s in the generation and metabolism of reactive oxygen species. Curr Opin Toxicol. 2018 Feb;7:44–51.
Warner J, Hardesty J, Zirnheld K, McClain C, Warner D, Kirpich I. Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Inhibition in Liver Diseases: A Review of Current Research and Knowledge Gaps. Biology. 2020 Jun 12;9(6):124.
Monticelli Barizon RR, Kummrow F, Fernandes De Albuquerque A, Assalin MR, Rosa MA, Cassoli De Souza Dutra DR, et al. Surface water contamination from pesticide mixtures and risks to aquatic life in a high-input agricultural region of Brazil. Chemosphere. 2022 Dec;308:136400.
Mansano AS, Moreira RA, Dornfeld HC, Freitas EC, Vieira EM, Daam MA, et al. Individual and mixture toxicity of carbofuran and diuron to the protozoan Paramecium caudatum and the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia silvestrii. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 Sep;201:110829. [CrossRef]
Aparecida M, Campos Ventura- Camargo BD, Miyuki M. Toxicity of Herbicides: Impact on Aquatic and Soil Biota and Human Health. In: Price A, editor. Herbicides - Current Research and Case Studies in Use [Internet]. InTech; 2013 [cited 2023 Jul 18]. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/herbicides-current-research-and-case-studies-in-use/toxicity-of-herbicides-impact-on-aquatic-and-soil-biota-and-human-healt.
Lushchak VI, Matviishyn TM, Husak VV, Storey JM, Storey KB. Pesticide toxicity: a mechanistic approach. EXCLI J 17Doc1101 ISSN 1611-2156 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jul 18]; Available from: https://www.excli.de/vol17/Lushchak_08112018_proof.pd.
Zhang C, Wang N, Xu Y, Tan HY, Li S, Feng Y. Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Oxidative Stress-Associated Liver Injury Induced by Chinese Herbal Medicine: An Experimental Evidence-Based Literature Review and Network Pharmacology Study. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Sep 13;19(9):2745. [CrossRef]
Zhao S, Iyengar R. Systems Pharmacology: Network Analysis to Identify Multiscale Mechanisms of Drug Action. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012 Feb 10;52(1):505–21. [CrossRef]
Cotterill JV, Palazzolo L, Ridgway C, Price N, Rorije E, Moretto A, et al. Predicting estrogen receptor binding of chemicals using a suite of in silico methods – Complementary approaches of (Q)SAR, molecular docking and molecular dynamics. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;378:114630.
Liebsch M, Grune B, Seiler A, Butzke D, Oelgeschläger M, Pirow R, et al. Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives. Arch Toxicol. 2011 Aug;85(8):841–58. [CrossRef]
Bastian M., Heymann S., Jacomy M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. [CrossRef]

Figure 1. (a) methodological approach to the systematic review of 2,4-D herbicide-induced hepatotoxicity and (b) degree of overlap across the databases queried in this study.

Figure 2. Bibliometric data of articles on the 2,4-D herbicide induced hepatotoxicity. a Absolute and cumulative number of articles over the years. b Number of articles per Country.

Figure 3. (a) Types of 2,4-D formulation used in hepatotoxicity studies (b)across in vivo and in vitro models. (c) types of in vivo models used and (d) types of in vitro models used.

Figure 4. (a)Selected articles in the review (small black dots) and the hepatic functions that were affected: antioxidant metabolism (AM), energetic metabolism (EM), liver function (LF), lipid metabolism (LM), xenobiotic metabolism (XM) and not determined (ND). (b) The top-seven disturbed biochemical markers for each hepatic function. Size circles correspond to the number of occurrences in the articles. Abbreviations: catalase (CAT), Superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione S-transferase (GST), malondialdeíde (MDA), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), reduced glutathione (GSH), glutathione reductase (GR). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD). alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), multidrug resistance protein 2 gene (MDR2). GST, cytochrome p450 enzymes (CYP450), epoxide hydrolases (EH), amidopyrine N-demethylase (APND). Carnitine acetyltransferase (CrAT).

Figure 5. Summary of 2,4-D herbicide induced-hepatotoxicity mechanisms.

Table 1. Studies of the hepatotoxicity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxiacetic acid (2,4-D) in in vivo biological models.

Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Chinese Hamsters	Commercial formulation (550 g/L)	AR: oral gavage T: 9 days C: 100 mg/kg of body weight	NA	ND: Peroxissomes plorifaration	Vainio et al. (1982) [25]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation (550 mg/kg)	AR: oral gavage T: 2 weeks C: 100-200 mg/kg of body weight	NA	LM: peroxissome proliferation, CrAT, protein lipases AM: CAT	Vainio et al. (1983) [26]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation ( 550 g/L)	AR.: intragastrically gavage T: 2 weeks C: 100, 150 and 200 mg/kg of body weight	NA	XM: EH, UDPglucuronosyltransferase , GST AM: GST	Hietanen et al. (1983) [27]
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: feeding T: 14 h C: 0.25% w/w	NA	LM: CrAT, palmitoyl-CoA, triglycerides AM: CAT	Kawashima et al. (1984) [28]
Rattus novergicus	not specified	AR.: feeding T: 14 days C: 0.5 % of diet	NA	LM: stearoyl-CoA	Kawashima et al. (1984) [29]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: feeding and subcutaneously T: 1 or 2 weeks C: 0.25% of diet or 0.93 mmole or 1.86 mmole per kg of body weight	NA	LM: acyl-CoA hydrolase II; β oxidation	Katoh et al. (1984) [30]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation ( 550 g/L )	AR: intragastrically ET: 14 days CT: 1 mmol/kg of body weight	NA	LM: peroxissome proliferation, β-oxidation AM: GR	Hietanen et al. (1985) [31]
Mus musculus	not specified	AR: diet T: 4 days C: ---	Increase liver somatic index	LM: palmitoil-CoA, CrAT EM: cytochrome oxidase	Lundgren et al. (1987) [32]
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: gavage and feeding T: single dose and 13 days C: 553 mg/kg and 1090 mg/kg (single dose); 0, 15, 60, 100, or 150 mg/kg/day (13 days)	Dose levels of 100 or 150 mg/kg/day produced minimal swelling and increased staining homogeneity in the liver cells and were associated with a slight elevation of liver weight	LF: ALT, ALP EM: glucose	Gorzinskj et al. (1987) [33]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Mus musculus	not specified	AR: feeding T: 4 days C: 100 mg/kg/bw	NA	XM: EH, CYP450, GST, peroxissome proliferation AM: GST	Lundgren et al. (1987) [34]
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient (>99%)	AR.: intragastrically gavage T: 2 weeks C: 100 mg/kg of body weight	NA	XM: peroxisome proliferation, CYP450, UDP-glucunorosyl transferase, NADPH diaphorase	Mustonen et al. (1989) [35]
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR.: feeding T: 7 months C: 0.05% of diet	NA	LM: peroxissome proliferation, acyl Coa oxidase, dicarboxylyl CoA oxidase	Abdellatif et al.. (1990) [36]
Mus musculus	Active ingredient (97- 99%)	AR.: oral intubathion T: 14 days exposure + 7 days recovery C: 50 mg/kg	Increase liver/ body weight ratio	LF: ALT	Kuntz et al. (1990) [37]
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: feeding T: 6 days C: 1.680 ppm	NA	LM: CrAT; carnitine palmitoyltransferase fatty acyl-CoA dehydrogenase cyanide-insensitive fatty acyl-CoA, peroxissome proliferation AM: CAT	Kozuka (1991) [38]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Rattus novergicus	not specified	AR.: oral T: 2 weeks C: 200 mg/kg/day	NA	XM: NADPH cytocrome C reductase, aniline hydroxylase, Cytocrome B, NADPH ferricicyanide reductase, aminopyrine N-demethylase	N Inomata et al. (1991) [39]
Mus musculus	Active ingredient (>97%)	AR: oral intubation T: 7 days C: 50 mg/kg of body weight	NA	XM: amidopyrine N-demethylas, Benzo [a]pyrene hydroxilase	Chaturvedi et al. (1991) [40]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation	AR: oral and middorsal skin applications T: single dose C: 1.9 and 2.6 mg/kg of body weight	NA	XM: CYP450, ethylmorphine N-demethylase, ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase	Knopp and Schiller (1992) [41]
Rattus novergicus	not specified	AR: oral T: single dose; 30 days and 180 days C: 600 mg/kg (single dose) and 200 ppm (30 and 180 days)	NA	LF: AST, ALT, ALP EM: LDH, amylase, glucose ND: Creatinine	Paulino et al. (1996) [42]
Mus musculus	Active ingredient	AR.: feeding T: 4 days C: 0.125% of diet	NA	LF: mdr2 gene	Miranda et al. (1997) [43]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: oral gavage T: single dose C: 375 mg/L	NA	XM: CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1	Badawi et al. (2000) [44]
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient (>98%)	AR: injections T: 30 days C: 70 mg/kg of body weight	NA	EM: mitochondrial dysfunction	Di Paolo et al. (2001) [45]
Rattus novergicus ; Mus musculus and Syrian hamsters	Active ingredient	AR: feeding T: 3 months C: 0, 12, 28, 83, 250, 700, and 1,680 ppm (M. musculus); 0, 17, 83, 250, 750, 1,250, and 2,500 ppm (R. novergicus); 0, 12, 100, 500, 1,000, and 5,000 ppm (Syrian hamsters)	Increase of mice liver weith	XM: CYP450; peroxissome proliferation AM: CAT	Ozaki et al. (2001) [46]
Mus musculus	Active ingredient	AR: feeding T: 6 days C: 1.680 ppm	NA	ND: c-myc gene	Ge et al. (2002) [47]
Mus musculus	Active ingredient	AR: Intraperitoneally T: 55 days C: 3.8 mg/kg bw	NA	EM: LDH, MDH	Yilmaz and Yuksel (2005) [48]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Rattus novergicus	not specified	AR: drink water T: 25 day C: 50 and 100 ppm	NA	AM: SOD, GSH, GR, MDA EM: LDH, creatine kinase LF: AST XM: GSH	Celik et al. (2006) [49]
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: Feed and drink water T: 30 days C: 25 ppm and 50 ppm (water) and 50 ppm and 100 ppm (food)	No hepatic damage was observed, but the level of 2,4-D in the liver was found to be significantly higher in both the feed and water groups compared to the control group.	NA	Aydin et al. (2006) [50]
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: drink water T: 21 days C: 600 ppm or 126 mg/kg	Vascular congestion, cytoplasmic vacuolization, and mononuclear cells’ infiltration	AM: SOD, CAT, GPx, MDA LF: AST, ALT, ALP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase EM: LDH	Troudi et al. (2012) [23]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation (600 g/L)	AR: oral gavage T: 4 weeks C: 5 mg/ kg/ bw	NA	AM: SOD, CAT, GPx, GR, MDA LF: AST, ALT, ALP, γ-GGT, total bilirubin. LM: change of fatty acid composition	Nakbi. et al (2010) [51]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation (600 g/L)	AR: oral gavage T: 4 weeks C: 15, 75 and 150 mg/kg of body weight	Body weight decreased and the liver weight increased significantly .2,4-D induced hepatic cord disruption, focal necrosis, vessel dilation and pycnotic nucleus.	LF: AST, ALT, ALP, γ-GGT AM: CAT, GR	Tayeb et al. (2010) [52]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation (600 g/L)	AR: oral gavage T: 4 weeks C: 5 mg/kg of body weight/ day	Vascular congestion and wide sinusoidal spaces and a necrotic	AM: SOD, CAT, GPx, MDA LF: AST, ALT LM: low density lipoprotein, cholesterol	Nakbi et al. (2012) [53]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation (600 g/L)	AR: oral gavage T: 28 days C: 15, 75 and 150 mg/kg/bw/day	NA	AM: SOD, CAT, GPx, GR, MDA LM: change of fatty acid composition	Tayeb et al. (2013) [54]
Rattus novergicus	not specified	AR: feeding T: 16 weeks C: 200 mg/kg/day	2,4-D acid iso-octylester caused the formation of atypical cell foci (ACF) in the pancreata and livers of rats.	NA	Kalipici et al. (2013) [55]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient (≥ 90%)	AR: oral gavage T: 19 days C: 100 mg/kg of body weight	NA	AM: CAT, MDA, total antioxidant capacity	Mazhar. et al. (2014) [56]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation	AR: oral T: 28 days C: 75 or 150 mg/kg of body weight	2,4-D. increased liver weight and induced nuclear changes in liver cells, including alterations in size and shape, irregularity, and slight distention of nuclear envelope, Hepatic nuclei exhibited varying degrees of pyknosis, disaggregation and apoptosis.	LF: AST, ALT, ALP, total bilirubin AM: GR, SOD EM: LDH	Al-Baroudi et al. (2014) [57]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation	AR: oral gavage T: 24 h (single dose) C: 639 mg/kg of body weight	NA	AM: hydroperoxyl and carbonyl lipids EM: glycogen	Dakhakhni et al. (2016) [58]
Mus musculus	Active ingredient	AR: oral T: 45 days C: 30, 60, 90 mg/kg/day	Vascular and hepatocellular lesions with necrotic changes and focal areas of necrosis in the liver	AM: GSH, SOD, CAT, GPx, GR, GST and total –SH EM: ATP and SDH XM: GSH and GST	Satapathy and Rao (2018) [59]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: oral gavage T: 4 weeks C: 150 mg/Kg/day	NA	AM: SOD, CAT, GSH, MDA LF: AST, ALT XM: GSH ND: Urea and creatinine	Shafeeq and Mahboob (2020) [60]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation (806 g/L)	AR: inhalation and feed T: 6 months C: 3.71/6.19 and 9.28×10⁻³ g a.i./ha	The groups exposed to oral 2,4-D had a higher incidence of steatosis, and exposed to high doses had increased liver inflammation.	LF: ALT	Bonfim et al (2020) [61]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation (600 g/L)	AR: oral gavage T: 4 weeks C: 5 mg/kg/b.w./day	Rat livers shown perivascular inflammatory infiltration around the vessel, sinusoidal dilatation and vacuolization of hepatocytes	AM: SOD, CAT, GSH, GPx, GST, MDA LF: AST, ALT, ALP, total bilirubin EM: LDH XM: GST, GSH	Tichati et al. (2020) [21]
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient (> 98%)	AR: cannulation of portal and cava veins liver T: 20 min. C: 10 – 400 µM	Membrane lipid bilayer deformity	EM: NADH, NAD⁺ , lactate, glycolisis, gluconeogenesis	Salla et al. (2019) [62]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: oral gavage T: 4 weeks C: 150 mg/Kg/day	NA	AM: SOD, CAT, GSH, MDA LF: AST, ALT, ALP XM: GSH ND: urea and creatinine	Shafeeq and Mahboob (2021) [63]
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation (600 g/L)	AR: oral gavage T: 30 days C: 5 mg/kg/b.w	2,4-D increases relative and absolute liver weights. Furthermore, 2,4-D induces severe infiltration of mononuclear inflammatory cells with vacuolar degeneration around a dilated central lobular vein, congestion of the hepatic sinusoids, and degenerative hepatocytes with largely vacuolated cytoplasm and a large number of lipid droplets.	AM: SOD, CAT, GPx, GST, MDA, carbonyl proteins LF: AST, ALT, ALP, γ-GGT EM: LDH XM: GST, GSH	Tichati et al. (2021) [22]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation (480 g/L)	AR: oral T: 60 days C: 5 mg/kg of body weight	In the liver tissue of rats, focal areas of mononuclear cell infiltration in the pericentral and periacinal region, sinusoidal dilatation, and hyperemia in the vessels and areas of pyknosis and parenchymal degeneration in the nuclei of hepatocytes were determined	LF: AST, ALT, ALP AM: SOD, GSH, CAT, MDA XM: GSH ND: NF-κB, COX-2, TNF-α, MCP-I, TGFβI, and CYP2E P53, Bax/Bcl-2, caspase-3, caspase-8, caspase-9, and PARP	Sinan Ince et al. (2022) [64]
Rattus novergicus	2,4-D, gliphosate and dicamba (not specified)	AR: drink water T: 90 days C: gliphosate (0.5 mg/kg bw/day) + 2,4-D (0.3 mg/kg bw/day) + dicamba (0.02 mg/kg bw/ day)	NA	AM: GSH and MDA	Nechalioti et al. (2023) [65]
Ictalurus punctatus	Active ingredient 2,4-D (>99%) Picloram (>99%)	AR: water expossure T: 10 days C: 22.5, 7.5, and 2.25 mg/L	NA	XM: ethoxyresorufin 0-deethylase	Gallagher and Digiulio (1991) [66]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Cyprinus carpio	Active ingredient (>98%)	AR: water exposure T: 96 h and 14 days C: 310, 295 and 270 mg/L (96 h ) 150, 200, and 250 mg/L (14 days)	Hepatocycites shown slight vacuolar degeneration and pycnotic nuclei (some of them displaced)	LF: AST, ALT	Neskovic et al. (1994) [67]
Oreochromis niloticus	Commercial formulation (500 g/L)	AR: water exposure T: 96 h C: 27 ppm	NA	AM: SOD, GPx, GR EM: glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase	Oruç. and Uner (2000) [68]
Fundulus heteroclitus	not specified	AR: water expossure T: 21 days C: 0.04, 0.41, and 4.1 µM	NA	ND: peroxissome proliferation	Ackers et al. (2000) [69]
Cyprinus carpio	Commercial formulation (500 g/L)	AR: water exposure T: 96 h C: 87 ppm	NA	AM: GST, SOD EM: G6PD XM: GST	Oruç and Uner (2002) [70]
Leporinus obtusidens	Commercial formulation (868 g/L)	AR: water exposure T: 96 h C: 1 and 10 mg/L	NA	EM: glycogen, lactate, glucose	Fonseca et al. (2008) [71]
Rhamdia quelen	Commercial formulation (720 g/L )	AR: water exposure T: 96 h C: 0, 400, 600 and 700 mg/L	Hepatocytes vacualization and changes in its arrangement cords	EM: glycogen,lactate, glucose	Cattaneo et al. (2008) [72]
Carassius auratus	Active ingredient	AR: water exposure T: 90 h C: 1, 10 and 100 mg/L	NA	AM: carbonyl proteins, lipid peroxidases LM: lipid peroxidases	Matviishyn et al. (2014) [73]
Poecilia vivipara	Commercial formulation (868g/L)	AR: water exposure T: 48 h C: 10,20 and 40μl	Swollen nuclei and cytoplasmic vacuolization. Finally, the 40 μl/L group presented blood vessel alterations indicating vasodilatation, hepatocytes with swollen nuclei, Ito cells, and micronuclei.	NA	Vigário and Sabóia-Morais (2014) [74]
Rhamdia quelen	Commercial formulation (720 g/L)	AR: water exposure T: 90 days C: 0.5 and 2 mg/L	NA	AM: CAT, MDA EM: glycogen; lactate, glucose	Menezes. et al. (2015) [75]
Cyprinus carpio L	not specified	A.R.: water exposure T: --- C: 0.2 mg/dm³	NA	EM: ICDH, LDH, G6PD	Yakovenko et al. (2018) [76]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Capoeta capoeta	not specified	AR: water expossure T: 7 days C: 10 and 20 mg/L	NA	AM: plasma oxidative status index LF: AST	Kaya et al. (2018) [77]
Danio rerio	Active ingredient (> 97%)	AR: water exposure T: 48 h C: 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/L	Hepatocytes had heterogeneous eosiniphilic, cytosol vacualization and cell nucleus were eccentric, Loss of cell boundaries and liver with necrotic appearence, Release of cytosolic content among adjacent cells	LF: AST, ALT, ALP AM: CAT, GST XM: GST EM: LDH	Martins et al. (2021) [2]
Triturus cristatus carnifex	Commercial formulation (37% of 2,4-D as iso-octylic ester)	AR: water exposure T: 3 months C: 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 ppm	Vacuolar degeneration of liver parenchyma and necrosis of kidney tubules	NA	Zaffaroni et al. (1986) [78]
Lithobates clamitans	Active ingredient (>98%)	AR: soil exposition T: 2 days C: 14.3 µg/cm²	NA	NA	Van Meter et al. (2018) [79]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Cellular and tissues damage	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Physalaemus albonotatus	Commercial formulation) (48.5% w/v of active ingredient)	AR: water exposure T: 96 h (acute) and 49 days (chronic) C: 350, 700, 1400, and 2400 mg/L(acute); 43.7, 87.5, 175 or 262.5 mg/L (chronic)	The liver of treated tadpoles showed enlargement of hepatic sinu- soids , hypervascularization, dilation of blood vessels, and vacuolization of hepatocytes	NA	Curi et al. (2019) [80]

Abbreviations. (AR) administration route; (T) time; (C) concentrations; (AM) antioxidant metabolism; (EM) energetic metabolism; (LF) liver function; (LM) lipid metabolism; (XM) xenobiotic metabolism; (ND) Not determined; (NA) no analysed; (NS) not specified; (---) information not informed by the authors. Abbreviations. (AR) administration route; (T) time; (C) concentrations; (AM) antioxidant metabolism; (EM) energetic metabolism; (LF) liver function; (LM) lipid metabolism; (XM) xenobiotic metabolism; (ND) Not determined; (NA) no analysed; (NS) not specified; (CAT) catalase; (GST) glutathione S-transferase; (GPx) glutathione peroxidase; (CrAT) carnitine acetyltransferase; (EH) epoxide hydrolases; (GR) glutathione reductase; (ALT) alanine aminotransferase; (AST) aspartate aminotransferase; (ALP) alcaline phosphatase; (CYP450) cytochrome P450; (LDH) lactate dehydrogenase; (MDH) malate dehydrogenase; (SOD) superoxide dismutase; (GSH) reduced glutathione; (MDA) malondialdehyde; (γ-GGT) gamma-glutamyltransferase; (SDH) succinate dehydrogenase; (G6PD) glicose-6-fosfato desidrogenase; (IDH) isocitrate dehydrogenase.

Table 2. Studies of the hepatotoxicity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxiacetic acid (2,4-D) in in vitro biological models.

Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Liver GST of Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR.: enzyme kinetics T: --- C:---	AM: GST XM: GST	Dierickx (1983) [81]
Liver GST of Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient (>99%)	AR: enzyme kinetics T: --- C: 2 -12 mM	XM: GST AM: GST	Vessey and Boyer (1984) [82]
Liver GST of Salmo gairdneri	Active ingredient	AR: enzyme kinetics T: --- C: 2 mM	AM: GST XM: GST	Dierick (1985) [83]
Liver GST of Homo sapiens (autopsy)	Active ingredient (>97%)	AR: --- T: --- C: ---	AM: GST XM: GST	Singh (1985) [84]
Liver GST of Cyprinus carpio	not specified	AR: cell culture T: --- C: ---	AM: GST XM: GST	Elia et al. (2000) [85]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Liver GST of Rattus novergicus	not specified	AR: --- T: --- C: ---	AM: GST XM: GST	Dierickx (1988) [86]
Liver GST of Chalcalburnus tarichii Pallas	Active ingredient	AR.: --- T: --- C: 0.6, 0.23 and 0.57 mM	AM: GST XM: GST	Özaslan et al. (2018) [87]
Liver mitochondria of Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR.: cell culture T: --- C: 0, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 2 mM.	LM: palmitoyl CoA hydrolase , fatty acyl CoA EM: mitochondrial dysfunction	Dixon et al. (1990) [88]
Liver mitochondria of Rattus novergicus	not specified	AR: cell culture T: --- C: 0.1 - 4.0 mM	EM: mitochondrial dysfunction	Zychlinski and Zolnierowicz (1990) [89]
Liver mitochondria of Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: cell culture T: --- C: 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 µM	EM: SDH, cytochrome c reductase, mitochondrial dysfunction	Palmeira et al. (1994) [90]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Liver mitochondria of Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation (2,4-D 1.08 M + Picloram 0.265 M)	AR: cell culture T: --- C: 66.2 nmol picloram + 270 nmol 2,4-D mg^-1 protein	EM: NADH oxidase, NADH cytochrome c reductase, ATP, mitochondrial dysfunction	Pereira et al. (1994) [91]
Liver mitochondria of Rattus novergicus	Commercial formulation. Tordon (2,4-D 300 g/L + picloram 75 g/L)	AR.: cell culture T: --- C: ---	EM: mitochondrial dysfunction	Oakes and Pollak (1999) [92]
Liver Rattus novergicus mitochondria	Active ingredient (>98%)	AR: injections T: 30 days C: 70 mg/kg of body weight	EM: mitochondrial dysfunction	Di Paolo et al. (2001) [45]
Hepatocytes of Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: cell culture T: --- C: 1-10 mM	EM: LDH, ATP, ADP, AMP, NADH, NAD⁺ AM: GSH, GSSG XM: GSH, GSSG	Palmeira et al. (1994) [93]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Hepatocytes of Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient (> 98%)	AR: cell culture T: 200 min C: 1, 5 and 10 mM	AM: MDA, proteins thiol, GSH XM: GSH	Palmeira et al. (1995) [94]
Hepatocytes of Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: cell culture ET: 3 months C.T: 1 mM	NA	Li et al. (2003) [95]
Hepatocytes of Metynnis roosevelti	Active ingredient	AR: cell culture T: --- C: 0.275, 2.75 and 27.5 mg/L	EM: mitochondrial dysfunction	Salvo et al. (2015) [96]
HepG2 cells	Active ingredient	AR: cell culture T: 48 h C: 4, 8 and 16 mM	EM: mitochondrial dysfunction ND: Cell cicle alterations, apoptose, DNA damage	Tuschl and Schwab (2003) [97]
HepG2 cells	Active ingredient	AR: cell culture T: 48 h C: 8, 14 and 16 mM	ND: Cell cycle alterations, apoptosis, DNA damage	Tuschl and Schwab (2004) [98]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Impaired biochemical markers	References
HepG2 cells	Commercial formulation	AR: cell culture T: --- C: 0.1 nM to 4 mM	ND: Genes involved to stress response, cell cycle control, immunological and DNA repair genes. (FTH1, FTL, PCNA, DCLRE1C, TCLK1, JM11, VEGF, USP19, DDB2, IL1RL1, PTGER3 and GTF2A.	Bharadwaj et al. (2005) [99]
HepG2 cell	Active ingredient (>90%)	AR.: cell culture T: --- C: 0.001 - 0.1 mM	NA	Barrón Cuenca et al. (2022) [100]
Liver homogenates of Rattus novergicus	Active ingredient	AR: cell culture T: --- C: ---	LM: cholesterol	Olson et al. (1974) [101]
Biological model	Exposure compounds	Exposure conditions	Impaired biochemical markers	References
Chicken embryo	Commercial formulation (37%)	AR.: injected into the air cell of the eggs T: 19 days C: 1, 2 and 4 mg/egg	XM: ethoxycoumarin O-deethylase, GST AM: GST	Santagostino et al. (1991) [102]
Chicken Liver	Commercial formulation (31.6% w/v)	AR: Fertilized eggs were externally treated T: 21 days C: 3.1 mg	EM: G6Pase LM: total lipids AM: CAT	Duffard et al. (1993) [103]

Table 3. Hepatoprotection studies against 2,4-D herbicide induced-hepatotoxicity.

Biological model	Hepatoprotective agent	Concentrations and time of exposure	Hepatoprotective effects	References
Rattus novergicus	Extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) and its hydrophilic fraction (OOHF)	C: 2,4-D (5 mg/kg body weight) + EVOO (300 μl/day) or OOHF (1 mL/day) T: 4 weeks	EVOO and OOHF suplementation induced a significant increase in the antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, GPx and GR), liver marker (AST, ALT and total bilirubin) and a decrease in the conjugated dienes (CD) and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARs) levels in the liver.	Nakbi, A. et al. (2010) [51]
Rattus novergicus	Extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) and its hydrophilic fraction (OOHF)	C: 2,4-D (5 mg/kg body weight) + EVOO (300 μl/day) or OOHF (1 mL/day) T: 4 weeks	EVOO and OOHF suplementation induced a significant increase in the antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, GPx), liver marker (AST, ALT and total bilirubin), and decreased MDA levels in the liver.	Nakbi, A. et al. (2012) [53]
Biological model	Hepatoprotective agent	Concentrations and time of exposure	Hepatoprotective effects	References
Rattus novergicus	Chamomile capitula extract	C: 2,4-D (75 or 150 mg/kg body weight) + Chamomile capitula extract- (500 mg/kg body weight) T: 28 days	Chamomile capitula extract presented antioxidant effects, improving the levels of SOD and GR. The levels of hepatic enzymes AST, ALT, ALP, and LDH decreased, as well as total bilirubin. Additionally, the degenerative damages in the hepatic tissue caused by 2,4-D were also alleviated.	Al-Baroudi et al. (2014) [57]
Mus musculus	Curcumin	C: 2,4-D (30, 60, 90 mg/kg/day) + Curcumin (10 mg/kg/day) T: 45 days	Curcumin supplementation exhibited antioxidant effects, mainly normalizing the levels of GSH, GR, and lipid peroxidation. Furthermore, curcumin supplementation reduced hepatic tissue damage.	Satapathy and Rao (2018) [59]
Biological model	Hepatoprotective agent	Concentrations and time of exposure	Hepatoprotective effects	References
Rattus novergicus	Magnesium (Mg)	C: 2,4-D (150 mg/kg body weight/day) + Mg supplement (50 mg/kg body weight/day) T: 4 weeks	Mg supplementation exhibited its antioxidant properties by significantly improving urea, creatinine SOD, MDA, CAT, GSH and MDA levels and antioxidant enzyme activities. Hepatic markers were also improved: AST, ALT and ALP and absolute liver weight.	Shafeeq and Mahboob (2020) [60]
Rattus novergicus	Selenium (Se)	C: 2,4-D (5 mg/kg body weight/day) + Se supplement (1 mg/kg body weight/day) T: 4 weeks	Se supplementation in 2,4- D-treated rats elicited a reduction in the toxic effects of the pesticide by improving the studied parameters (absolute liver weight, total bilirubin, AST, ALP, LDH, MDA and carbonyl proteins) which was confirmed by the histological study of the liver.	Tichati, L. et al. (2020) [21]
Rattus novergicus	Selenium (Se)	C: 2,4-D (150 mg/kg body weight/day) + Se supplement (1 mg/kg body weight/day) T: 4 weeks	Se supplementation exhibited its antioxidant properties by significantly improving urea, creatinine, ALP, AST, and ALT, and MDA levels and antioxidant enzyme activities. Hepatic and renal toxicities were attenuated by Se supplementation.	Shafeeq and Mahboob (2021) [63]
Biological model	Hepatoprotective agent	Concentrations and time of exposure	Hepatoprotective effects	References
Rattus novergicus	Thymus munbyanus extract (AETM)	C: 2,4-D (5 mg/kg body weight) + AETM (10 ml/kg body weight) T: 30 days	AETM supplementation showed a marked enhancement in the above altered hepatic functional and antioxidant parameters (CAT, GST, total bilirubin, AST, ALP, MDA, carbonyl proteins) and liver histopathology.	Tichati, L. et al. (2021) [22]

Abbreviations. (C): concentration, (T): time of exposure.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Choose an area of interest and we will send you notifications of new preprints at your preferred frequency.

Disclaimer

2,4‐D Herbicide‐Induced Hepatotoxicity: Unveiling Disrupted Liver Functions and Associated Biomarkers

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Overview

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Historical review and geographical distribution

3.2. Chemical compounds

3.3. Biological models

3.4. Morphological markers

3.5. Toxicity biomarkers

3.5.1. Antioxidant metabolism

3.5.2. Energetic metabolism

3.5.3. Lipid metabolism

3.5.4. Liver Function

3.5.5. Xenobiotic metabolism

3.6. Hepatoprotective assessments

3.7. Pesticide mixtures containing 2,4-D

3.8. Conclusions and perspectives

Author Contributions

Funding

Acknowledgments

Declaration of competing interest

References

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Subscribe