Submitted:
01 December 2023
Posted:
01 December 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Thermal analysis
4. Result and Discussion
4.1. Solar Irradiation

4.2. Solar coffee dryer performance
4.2.1. Temperature absorbent
4.2.2. Drying chamber temperature
4.3. Coffee drying quality
4.3.1. Drying rate
4.3.2. Quality of coffee content
5. Conclusions
- Variations in air velocity flow can affect the temperature that occurs on the absorber plate, drying chamber and solar dryer efficiency. So obtained DB1 with an air flow velocity of 1 m / s can produce the highest average absorber temperature, which is 55.35 C. DB2 with an air flow velocity of 1.5 m / s can produce the highest average drying room temperature, which is 43.68 C. DB5 with a speed of 3 m / s has the highest collector thermal efficiency of 44.88686%.
- The optimum quality category is that the coffee beans produced have the lowest water content and free fatty acid, as well as the highest protein content and carbohydrate. DB2 with a drying air speed of 1.5 m/s is a condition that can produce the most optimum coffee quality. DB2 has a water content of 13.6%, Protein content 12.2%, Carbohydrate 22.8%, Free Fatty Acid 0.05%.
Author Contributions
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- International Coffee Organization (I C O). Available online: https://icocoffee.org/. (accessed on 2 October 2023).
- Coffee Review. Available online: https://www.coffeereview.com/ (accessed on 2 October 2023).
- Badan Pusat Statistic Indonesia (B P S). Available online: https://www.bps.go.id/. (accessed on 3 October 2023).
- Menya, E.; Komakec, A.J. Investigating the effect of different loading densities on selected properties of dried coffee using a GHE dryer. 2013, 15, 231–237.
- Ssalhi, H.; Tadili, R.; Bargach, M.N. Conception of a Solar Air Collection for an Indirect Solar Dryer. Pera Drying TEST 2017, 141, 29–33. [Google Scholar]
- Ortiz Rodrigguez, N.M.; Garcia-Valladares, O.P. Solar–LP Gas Hybrid Plant for Dehydration of Food 177, 115496.
- Atalay, H. Assesment of energy and cost analysis of packed bed and phase change material thermal Energy storage system for the solar energy-sissted drying process. 198, 124–138.
- Ghaffari, A. Solar dryer performance simulation: Experimental and numerical study. J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, e13875. [Google Scholar]
- Siagian, P.; Setyawan, E.Y. A field survey on coffee beans drying methods of Indonesian small holder farmers 1st Nommensen International Conference on Technology and Engineering IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2017, 237, 012037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nukulwar, M.R.; Tungikar, V.B. Design and Development of Steam-Based Solar Dryer for Agricultural Products. Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 2020, 174, 365–375. [Google Scholar]
- Cormio, C.; Dicorato, M.; Minoia, A.; Trovato, M. A regional energy planning methodology including renewable energy sources and environmental constraints. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2003, 7, 99–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, P.; Pandey, B.K.; Gaur, M.K. Performance evaluation of evacuated solar collector assisted hybrid greenhouse solar dryer under active and passive mode. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 57, 2002–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.S.G.; Hans, V.S.; Mittal, T.C. Experimental performance and economic viability of evacuated tube solar collector assisted greenhouse dryer for sustainable development. Energy 2022, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lingayat, A.; Chandramohan, V.P. Numerical investigation on solar air collector and its practical application in the indirect solar dryer for banana chips drying with energy and exergy analysis. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2021, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.; Biswas, A.; Das, B.; Reddy, B.V. Development and testing of novel photovoltaic-thermal collector-based solar dryer for green tea drying application. Sol. Energy 2022, 231, 1072–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pruengam, P.; Pathaveerat, S.; Pukdeewong, P. Fabrication and testing of double-sided solar collector dryer for drying banana. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2021, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murali, S.; Delfiya, D.S.A.; Alfiya, P.V.; Samuel, M.P.; Ninan, G. Development of sensible heat storage based solar hybrid dryer with evacuated tube collector and biomass gasifier for shrimp drying. Sol. Energy 2023, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salhi, M.; Chaatouf, D.; Raillani, B.; Bria, A.; Amraqui, S.; Mezrhab, A. Numerical investigation of an indirect solar dryer equipped with two solar air collectors using computational fluid dynamics. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2023, 104, 102189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rani, P.; Tripathy, P.P. CFD coupled heat and mass transfer simulation of pineapple drying process using mixed-mode solar dryers integrated with flat plate and finned collector. Renew. Energy 2023, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekka, J.P.; Muthukumar, P.; Bala, K.; Kanaujiya, D.K.; Pakshirajan, K. Performance studies on mixed-mode forced convection solar cabinet dryer under different air mass flow rates for drying of cluster fig. Sol. Energy 2021, 229, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tagnamas, Z.; Lamsyehe, H.; Moussaoui, H.; Bahammou, Y.; Kouhila, M.; Idlimam, A.; Lamharrar, A. Energy and exergy analyses of carob pulp drying system based on a solar collector. Renew. Energy 2021, 163, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rani, P.; Tripathy, P.P. Drying characteristics, energetic and exergetic investigation during mixed-mode solar drying of pineapple slices at varied air mass flow rates. Renew. Energy 2021, 167, 508–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, A.; Nikbahkt, A.M.; Welsh, Z.; Yarlagadda, P.; Fawzia, S.; Karim, A. Experimental and thermodynamic analysis of solar air dryer equipped with V-groove double pass collector: Techno-economic and exergetic measures. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2022, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| No | Time | Energi (MJ/m2) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Day I | 6.50202 |
| 2 | Day II | 5.94993 |
| 3 | Day III | 4.21117 |
| No | Dryer | Efficiency collector |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dryer Box 1 | 32.32996 % |
| 2 | Dryer Box 2 | 38.02492 % |
| 3 | Dryer Box 3 | 33.77358 % |
| 4 | Dryer Box 4 | 35.50234 % |
| 5 | Dryer Box 5 | 44.88686 % |
| Composition | Sample and Proximate Test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DB 1 | DB 2 | DB 3 | DB 4 | DB 5 | |
| Water content (%) | 12.0 | 13.6 | 18.5 | 12.9 | 15.2 |
| Protein content (%) | 11.7 | 12.2 | 11.5 | 11.6 | 11.3 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 21.7 | 22.8 | 19.9 | 18.1 | 20.4 |
| Free Fatty Acid (%) | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
