2.1. Could NTQ of a given phosphor be well reproducible?
It is generally acknowledged that an essential
requirement for experimental results on material properties of scientific
significance that deserve discussion is the repeatability. If NTQ is an
intrinsic property of a specific phosphor, temperature dependence of the
emission intensity of given phosphor measured by different researchers or by
the same research group at different times should be reproducible within a
reasonable range of uncertainty.
Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:Eu
2+,
a sodium superionic conductor (NASICON)-type phosphor, is one of the most
heavily investigated Eu
2+-doped phosphors. TQ property of Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:Eu
2+
was reported by more than five independent research groups during 2016-2022 [
1,
2,
5,
6,
7,
8,
71]. In particular, the paper authored by
Im et al. entitled “A zero- thermal-quenching phosphor” published in “Natural
Materials” in 2017 has been widely cited in the reports on NTQ [
2]. Although these authors all claimed that the
phase-pure Na
3-2xSc
2(PO
4)
3:xEu
2+
phosphors had a NTQ phenomenon. Nevertheless, both the temperature at which a
maximum emission intensity was obtained and magnitude of the maximum emission
intensity with respect to the intensity at room temperature, i. e.
Imax(T),
for the Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3: Eu
2+
phosphor with the same Eu
2+ doping concentration reported by
different research groups or even by the same research group in different
publications were different considerably. Wang et al. reported that, while
heating the phosphor from 25 to 250 °C, the
emission intensity increased gradually at first and then reached the maximum at
150 °C, upon which the emission intensity started to decrease. The emission
intensity of the phosphor with an optimum concentration of Eu
2+ doping
Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+
(NSP:0.03Eu
2+) at 150 °C was 110% compared to that at room
temperature, as shown in
Figure 1a [
5]. Im and co-workers reported that the Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+
(NSPO:0.03Eu
2+) phosphor showed a ∼25%
increase in emission intensity in the β-phase (above 65 °C) compared to the RT
emission, and reached a maximum at ∼164
ºC (β-phase)[
2]. Im and co-workers reported
recently in another paper that emission intensity of the Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+
increased by about 70% when the temperature was increased from 25 to 150°C, and
reached a maximum at about 175 °C, as displayed in
Figure 1b [
1].
Xian et al. reported that emission intensity of Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+
under 340 nm excitation increased when increasing temperature from 300 up to
425 K. Further increasing temperature led to TQ phenomenon. The emission
intensity at 425 K was ~120% compared to the emission intensity at room
temperature, as depicted in
Figure 1c [
8]. Liu et al. reported that integrated
luminescence intensity of Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:
0.03Eu
2+ (NSPO:0.03Eu
2+) increased by ~30% when the
temperature was increased from 30 to 150 °C, as illustrated in
Figure 1d [
71].
Yan et al. reported that integrated emission intensity of Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+
(NSP: 0.03Eu
2+) increased with increasing temperature from 300 up to
425 K, and then decreased when further increasing temperature above 425 K. The
emission intensity at 425K was ca. 160% compared with the initial emission
intensity at room temperature, as shown in
Figure 1e [
7].
Mn
4+-doped fluorides are a kind of
red-emitting phosphors which have been extensively reported to have NTQ [
47,
48,
49,
50,
51,
52,
53,
54,
55,
56], although many researchers reported normal
TQ of Mn
4+ luminescence [
82,
83,
84,
85,
86,
87,
88].
Taking the most extensively studied phosphor K
2SiF
6:Mn
4+
as an example, some researchers reported that the K
2SiF
6:Mn
4+
showed a normal TQ behavior at high temperatures, analogous to that of most
inorganic phosphors [
82,
86,
87,
88]. On the
contrary, many researchers reported that the K
2SiF
6:Mn
4+
phosphor showed an NTQ behavior [
47,
48,
49,
50,
52,
53].
However, both the temperature at which a maximum emission intensity observed
and the magnitude of the maximum emission intensity with respect to the
intensity at room temperature of phase-pure K
2SiF
6:Mn
4+
phosphor reported by different researchers, or even the same commercial
TriGain® K
2SiF
6:Mn
4+ phosphor measured by the
same research group [
47,
89] were distinct, as
illustrated in
Figure 2. The author
discussed this issue in a previous paper [
80].
Based on the results in
Figure 1 and
Figure 2, it appears hard for one to
draw a conclusion that NTQ phenomenon of either Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+
or K
2SiF
6: Mn
4+ phosphor is reproducible
within a reasonable range of measurement errors.
2.2. Could the associated data of a specific NTQ phosphor be in line with the law of conservation of energy?
As is well known, phosphors are a kind of frequency
(or wavelength) conversion materials. The down-shift phosphors can convert one
short wavelength (high frequency) photon to one long wavelength (low frequency)
photon. Due to possible non-radiative decay process of the excited state, part
of the absorbed energy could be lost in the phosphor as heat. The law of
conservation of energy states that when light is absorbed by a phosphor, the
energy must go somewhere. Considering that no afterglow luminescence was
observed at any temperature in the phosphors reported with NTQ, it means that
the light absorption and emission processes do not involve energy storage and a
delayed release for these phosphors. Therefore, the sum of the instantaneously
emitted energy (
EEm) by the phosphor and the energy lost in
the phosphor should be equal to the absorbed energy (
EAbs) by
the phosphor. The energy lost in the phosphor includes the energy lost due to
non-radiative decays (
ENR) and Stokes shift (
ESS).
That is, the flow of energy past through a phosphor in a unit time period at
any temperature could be expressed by the following equation:
Let’s first discuss the left-hand side of energy
balance equation (1) for a phosphor. - the absorbed energy by a phosphor (
EAbs).
Considering that a monochromatic radiation is usually chosen as an excitation
light (
λexc) when
measuring an emission spectrum, the absorbed energy by the phosphor can be
approximated as the product of the energy of single-frequency excitation
radiation and the total number of photons absorbed. The number of photons
absorbed by the phosphor is proportional to the number of activator centers per
unit volume (
N) and the transition probability (
Pif).
According to the literature, electric dipole absorption probability of a
two-level center in crystal could be expressed as[
90]:
where
is the intensity of the incident radiation
(assuming an incident plane wave), ℏ
is the reduced Planck’s constant,
c0 is the speed of light in
a vacuum,
n is the refractive index of the phosphor, and ε
0
is the permittivity in a vacuum,
μif is the matrix element of
electric dipole moment,
Eloc and
E0 are the
actual local electric field acting on the valence electrons of the absorbing
center due to the electromagnetic incoming wave and the average electric field
in the medium, respectively.
δ(∆ω)
is the frequency of the incident monochromatic radiation [
90]. From Eq. (2) one can hardly expect that the
absorption probability increases with increasing temperature.
In fact, the temperature dependence of the
absorption intensity of specific phosphors that exhibited NTQ have been
investigated by some researchers. Shao et al. investigated temperature-variable
diffuse reflection spectra of the K
2SiF
6: Mn
4+
phosphor in a temperature range from 20 to 80 ºC [
49],
and found that no obvious changes in absorption rates with increasing the
temperature. Im et al. studied the temperature-dependent absorption fraction of
Na
3-2xSc
2(PO
4)
3: xEu
2+
(x=0.01, 0.03, 0.07) under 370 nm excitation in the temperature range of 25 –
175ºC with temperature interval of 25 ºC. The
results showed that the absorption fraction of the Na
3-2xSc
2(PO
4)
3:
xEu
2+ phosphors remained unchanged with rising temperature,
suggesting that the enhanced emission intensity does not arise from the
increase in absorption fraction [
2].
Next, we will discuss the first item on the
right-hand side of Eq. (1): the emitted energy by the phosphor (
EEm),
which is called radiant power measured in joules per second or watt in
radiometry. It is easily imagined that the
EEm is associated
with the emission spectral intensity. Given that in spectral measurement the
emission by the phosphor upon excitation is directional-hemispherical while the
spectrum recorded by a spectrofluorometer is the radiant power per unit solid
angle of a specific direction determined by the geometrical configurations of
the spectrofluorometer (radiant intensity), the total radiant power could be
obtained by 2π steradian times the
radiant intensity [
91]. If the emission
spectrum is plotted as emitted energy per constant wavelength interval, then
where
I(λ)
is the spectral intensity, which is defined as the radiant intensity per unit
wavelength interval.
The emitted energy by a phosphor is determined by
the number of activator center per unit volume in the excited state(
N*),
the probability of radiative transition of the excited electron (
Pfi),
and energy difference between the emitting level of excited and ground states [
92,
93].
The second term on the right-hand side of Eq. (1), the energy lost in the phosphor due to non-radiative decay (
ENR), can be quantified by internal quantum efficiency (IQE), defined as the ratio of the number of emitted quanta to the number of absorbed quanta by the phosphor. The IQE is determined by the probability of radiative and nonradiative decays of the excited center per unit time (i.e., decay rates) and can be expressed as:
where
ΓR and
ΓNR are the radiative and nonradiative decay rates of the excited center, respectively [
48,
51]. Eq. (4) indicates that
ENR increases when the IQE of a phosphor decreases, and vice versa.
The third term on the right-hand side of Eq. (1),
ESS, stems from the interaction between electron in the excited state and the crystal lattice vibrations. Upon excitation from the ground state, the excited electron quickly relaxes into the lowest vibrational level within the excited electronic state, losing some of the initial excitation energy as heat. Subsequently, electron in the lowest vibrational level of the excited state decays to the ground state accompanied with light emission. Vibrational relaxation of the excited electron results in the energy of emitted photons to be less than that of absorbed photons [
92,
93,
94].
The emission spectral intensity of a phosphor increases with increasing temperature, i.e., NTQ, suggesting that the emitted energy (
Eem) by the phosphor increases with increasing temperature. If the absorbed energy does not increase, in order to ensure that Eq. (1) holds, the second or/and third terms on the right-hand side of the formula should be decreased in an equal proportion. The third term, Stokes loss, is caused by the interaction between the excited state electron and lattice vibrations. As the temperature increases, lattice vibrations strengthen. It seems difficult for one to expect that the Stokes loss could be decreased with increasing temperature. It has shown that for Eu
2+ and Ce
3+-activated phosphors, the Stokes shift increased with increasing temperature due to an enlarged activator site induced by lattice thermal expansion along with enhanced vibrations at high temperatures [
95]. Therefore, it appears that only when the energy lost in the phosphor due to non-radiative decay (
ENR) decreases, that is, the IQE increases with increasing temperature, could the above Eq. (1) hold.
To make IQE of a given phosphor increasing with temperature, it requires either the radiative decay rate (
ΓR) increasing with temperature or the non-radiative decay rate (
ΓNR) decreasing with temperature, or concurrent of the two. Nevertheless, for allowed electric dipole transitions, like 4f
n−15d
1 → 4f
n5d
0 transitions of Eu
2+ and Ce
3+-doped phosphors, the radiative decay rate (
ΓR) is constant independent of temperature, it is hard to imagine that radiative decay rate (
ΓR) for these phosphors could increase with increasing temperature. At the same time, the nonradiative decay rate (
ΓNR) commonly increases above a critical temperature leading to luminescence TQ. Temperature dependence of nonradiative decay rate can be expressed as [
92,
93]:
in which
A is a constant (units s
-1), Δ
E is the energy barrier for thermal quenching,
kB is Boltzmann’s constant (8.617×10
-5 eV.K
-1). Irrespective of the mechanism (or pathway) for non-radiative decay being either multi-phonon emission, crossover of the ground and excited potential curves in the configuration coordinate diagram, or photoionization of 5d electron into the conduction band of the matrix, it is hard to expect that the non-radiative decay rate decreasing with increasing temperature could happen based on Eq. (5).
There were also reports in the literature on the temperature dependence of IQE of some phosphors that showed NTQ in the emission spectral measurements. Zhou et al. reported that the peak intensity and integrated area intensity of SB
0.3PE at 150 ºC reached 108% and 124% of the room temperature value, as illustrated in
Figure 3a [
12]. The IQE of the phosphor at 150 ºC decreased to 85% from the room temperature value 100%, and the absorption of the excitation light within the range of 25-150 ºC was almost constant, as shown in
Figure 3b [
12].
Figure 3 shows that although the emission spectral intensity increased with increasing temperature, neither the energy absorbed by the phosphor nor the IQE of the phosphor increased with increasing temperature, indicating that a decrease in the energy loss due to non-radiative decay was not observed in this phosphor that exhibited NTQ.
There were also reports in the literature on the temperature dependent QE of K
2SiF
6:Mn
4+, as illustrated in
Figure 4 [
82]. It can be seen from
Figure 4 that the IQE and EQE of the phosphor maintained almost unchanged with the increase of temperature from room temperature to 150 ºC, indicating that the energy lost in the phosphor due to nonradiative decay did not decrease with the increase of temperature, and the absorption of the excitation light by the phosphor did not increase with the increase of temperature either.
The results in
Figure 3 and
Figure 4 reveal that the variation of IQE with temperature showed a different trend from that of the emission spectral intensity, suggesting that these data could hardly be in line with Eq. (1).
2.3. Could NTQ of a given phosphor be demonstrated in prototype WLED device?
The aim of phosphor researches lies not only in exploring the theoretical issues underlying, but also in finding practical applications for specific phosphors. If a phosphor possesses a peculiar attribute, in addition to be proven by characterizations, it should also be demonstrated in practical applications. One of the motivations for designing TQ resistant phosphors is the application in high-power WLED and/or laser-driven lighting, because the temperature of the phosphors during the operation of WLED or laser-driven lighting is relatively high [
94]. If the QE of the phosphors decreases at working temperature, the efficiency and color of the device will change. Generally, four metrics – luminous efficacy, the color-rendering index (CRI), correlated color temperature (CCT), lifetime, are used to describe the performance of a WLED device [
94]. The luminous efficacy expressed in lumens per watt, is a parameter describing how bright the radiation is perceived by the average human eye. It scales with the eye sensitivity curve
V(λ) and can be calculated from the emission spectrum
I(λ). As the eye sensitivity peaks at 555 nm, the fraction of green-yellow light, along with its wavelength and IQE have the greatest impact on luminous efficacy of WLED. The CRI quantifies the color-rendering ability or color reproducibility of a white light source scored on a scale from 0 (no color reproducibility) to 100 (perfect reproducibility, achieved by black body radiators). The CCT describes the hue of the white light. The lower CCT value represents the warmer light (being yellower) while the higher CCT value denotes the cooler light (being bluer). Generally, the CCT of a WLED device is largely determined by the fractions of red and blue light in the white spectrum. An increase in CCT means that the either fraction of the blue light in the white spectrum increases, or the fraction of the red light decreases. On the contrary, a decrease in CCT means that the fraction of the red light in the white spectrum increases, or the fraction of the blue light decreases. [
94,
96]. Given that the main concern of this paper is whether the phosphor that exhibited NTQ in temperature-dependent spectral measurement could demonstrate a similar performance in a prototype WLED device along with that the emitting colors of the phosphors discussed in this paper which reportedly exhibited NTQ are dominantly blue and red, we focus our discussion on the variation of CCT of the prototype WLED device at different driven currents.
Table 1 compiles the results reported in the literature about chromaticity coordinate and CCT of four prototype WLED devices fabricated by coating an InGaN blue chip or an UV chip using the phosphor blend containing specific phosphors which showed NTQ in the spectral measurement under different drive currents. No.1 and No.2 devices are composed of a blue chip and the phosphor blend in which the red-emitting phosphor K
2TiF
6:Mn
4+ [
48,
51,
52,
53] and K
3AlF
6:Mn
4+ [
97,
98,
99] have been reported by multiple independent research groups to exhibit NTQ in the spectral measurements. No.3 and No. 4 devices are composed of an UV chip and the phosphor blend in which the blue-emitting phosphor Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+ (NSPO:Eu
2+) and Sr
1.38Ba
0.6P
2O
7:0.02Eu
2+ (SB
0.3PE) have been reported by multiple independent research groups to exhibit NTQ in spectral measurements [
1,
2,
5,
6,
7,
8,
12]. Could the red-emitting phosphors or blue emitting phosphors exhibit NTQ in the respective WLED device?
As has been discussed earlier, if emission intensity of the red-emitting phosphor increases with temperature while the emission intensity of the blue-emitting phosphor decreases with increasing temperature (normal TQ), the CCT of the WLED is expected to decrease at elevated temperatures. If emission intensity of the blue-emitting phosphor increases with temperature while emission intensity of the red-emitting phosphor decreases with temperature, the CCT of the WLED is expected to increase at high temperatures. If the quenching rate with temperature of the blue-emitting and red-emitting phosphors is the same, the CCT of the WLED changes little with temperature.
Table 1 shows that the CCT of No.1 WLED increased gradually when the drive current increased from 20 to 120 mA, while the CCT of No.2 WLED increased steadily with increasing drive current from 40 to 240 mA. With further increasing drive current from 240 to 300 mA, the CCT of No. 2 WLED decreased. The variation of CCT with drive current of these two WLED devices indicates that the fraction of the red light in the spectrum of these two WLED decreased with increasing drive current below 240 mA, implying that NTQ of the respective red-emitting phosphor, i.e., the emission intensity increasing with temperature could hardly be substantiated by its performance in these two WLED devices.
It is worth mentioning that, in addition to TQ, excitation saturation may also result in a decrease in luminescence efficiency (droop) of the specific phosphor at high drive current of WLED. The excitation saturation refers to that the luminescence intensity of a phosphor does not linearly increase with the increase of excitation power. The excitation saturation is generally caused by ground-state depletion and associated with luminescence lifetime of the phosphor [
94,
101,
102]. The luminescence lifetime of Mn
4+ -activated phosphors (ms at room temperature) is longer than that of Ce
3+-activated phosphors (ns) and Eu
2+-activated phosphor (μs) [
48,
81,
103]. Experimental results showed that Mn
4+-activated fluorides had considerably lower threshold for excitation saturation than that of Eu
2+ and Ce
3+ -activated phosphors in WLED [
88,
104,
105]. It is not clear which drive current is the onset of excitation saturation for these two red-emitting phosphors in No.1 and No.2 WLED devices and to what extent the excitation saturation also contributed the increase in the CCT of No.1 and No.2 WLED devices at high drive current given that the blue light in these two WLEDs was provided by a InGaN chip which also suffers from the external quantum efficiency drop when increasing drive current above a critical value [
106].
The data in
Table 1 show that the CCT of No. 3 WLED gradually increased from 7041 K to the maximum 7121 K when the drive current increased from 100 mA to 300 mA. The CCT monotonically decreased with further increasing the drive current above from 400 mA, indicating that the fraction of the blue light in the WLED spectrum decreased with increasing drive current above 400 mA, that is NTQ of the blue emitting phosphor Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+ could hardly be substantiated by its performance in WLED device above 400 mA. If the blue-emitting phosphor had NTQ, i.e., emission intensity increasing with increasing temperature, the CCT of the WLED should increase as well [
94]. Given that the blue-emitting phosphor Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+ and red-emitting phosphor (SrCa)AlSiN
3:Eu
2+ in No. 3 WLED contain the same activator (Eu
2+) with similar luminescence lifetime, excitation saturation could not be the issue resulting in decrease in CCT with increasing drive current of No. 3 WLED.
In addition to luminescence TQ and excitation saturation, another possible reason that could cause decrease in the fraction of the blue light under high drive current is an increased reabsorption process of the other additive phosphor components. In the supplementary information, Im et al. mentioned that the excitation spectrum of the yellow-emitting La
3Si
6N
11:Ce
3+ and red-emitting (SrCa) AlSiN
3: Eu
2+ overlapped with the emission spectrum of Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+ phosphor, and there was a significant absorption of the blue component of Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+ phosphor by the yellow-emitting La
3Si
6N
11:Ce
3+ phosphor and red-emitting (SrCa)AlSiN
3:Eu
2+ phosphor, resulted in the decrease of blue component during WLED fabrication [
2]. If the absorption of blue light by the red-emitting or/and yellow-emitting phosphor enhances at high temperatures, even if the blue-emitting phosphor Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+ had no TQ at high drive current, an enhanced reabsorption by the red and/or yellow-emitting phosphor could also result in a decrease in the fraction of the blue light in WLED device. Then, could the decrease in CCT of No.3 WLED device under high operating current be caused by the enhanced reabsorption of the red or/and yellow-emitting phosphor?
There were no reports in the literature on the temperature-dependent excitation spectra of (SrCa) AlSiN
3:Eu
2+ and La
3Si
6N
11:Ce
3+ phosphors. As mentioned earlier, the absorption intensity of Eu
2+ and Ce
3+-doped phosphors is determined by the number of activator centers per unit volume and the transition probability from the ground state to the excited state. On the one hand, multiple independent researchers confirmed that both the yellow-emitting phosphor La
3Si
6N
11:Ce
3+[
107,
108] and the red emitting phosphors CaAlSiN
3:Eu
2+ and (SrCa)AlSiN
3:Eu
2+ [
109,
110] exhibited TQ, and the mechanism of TQ was generally believed to be thermally-assisted photoionization of 5d electrons of the activator ion (Ce
3+, Eu
2+), suggesting that the number of the activator centers per unit volume could hardly increase with increasing temperature. On the other hand, the light absorption of (SrCa) AlSiN
3: Eu
2+ and La
3Si
6N
11:Ce
3+ phosphors originates from the parity-allowed 4f
n5d
0 → 4f
n−15d
1 electric dipole transition of respective Eu
2+ and Ce
3+ ions, whose transition probability could be expressed by Eq. (2) and independent of temperature. In terms of either the number of activator center in unit volume or transition probability, it seems difficult to predict theoretically that the absorption of the blue light by the yellow-emitting and/or red-emitting phosphors will increase with increasing temperature.
Multiple independent research groups reported on the absorption spectra of Y
3Al
5O
12: Ce
3+(YAG: Ce
3+) [
111,
112] and Y
3Ga
5O
12: Ce
3+ (YGG: Ce
3+) [
113] phosphors at different temperatures, as shown in
Figure 5a,b. YAG:Ce
3+ and YGG:Ce
3+ showed two intense bands within the measured range of the absorption spectra, which can be attributed to the transition from the ground state (4f
1) to the two lowest-lying 5d
1 states of the Ce
3+ ion. As the temperature increased, the intensity of absorption band in the blue region corresponding to the transition from the 4f
1 to the lowest-lying 5d
1 state of the Ce
3+ ion decreased gradually, suggesting unambiguously that absorption of blue light decreased with increasing temperature in the temperature range investigated [
111,
112,
113]. The excitation spectrum of La
3Si
6N
11:Ce
3+ shown in
Figure 5c [
114] resembles the excitation spectra of YAG: Ce
3+ and YGG: Ce
3+. There were also two absorption bands in the blue and nUV regions corresponding to the transition from the ground state of the Ce
3+ ion (4f
1) to the two lowest-lying 5d
1 states. It seems reasonable to infer that temperature-dependence of the excitation (absorption) spectrum of the La
3Si
6N
11:Ce
3+ phosphor should be similar to that of YAG:Ce
3+ and YGG:Ce
3+, that is, the absorption intensity of the blue light should not increase with increasing temperature.
The temperature-dependent excitation spectra of red-emitting phosphor CaAlSiN
3:Eu
2+ were reported by Chen et al., as shown in
Figure 6 [
115]. It is evident that the excitation intensity of CaAlSiN
3:Eu
2+ phosphor by the blue light did not increase with increasing temperature from 20 to 300 K. It seems reasonable to suggest that the variation of the excitation spectrum of (SrCa)AlSiN
3: Eu
2+ phosphor with temperature should have a similar to trend to that of CaAlSiN
3:Eu
2+. The results in
Figure 5 and
Figure 6 indicate that the decrease in CCT of No.3 WLED device at high drive current seems unlikely to be caused by an increased absorption of the blue light by the yellow-emitting phosphor La
3Si
6N
11:Ce
3+ or/and red-emitting phosphor (SrCa) AlSiN
3: Eu
2+ at high temperatures.
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [
115], Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Given the above discussion, it appears that attributing the decrease in CCT with increasing drive current for No.3 WLED device in
Table 1 to either excitation saturation or increased reabsorption process of the other additive phosphor components is unconvincing. The reason for the decrease in CCT of the WLED device at high drive current should be that the blue-emitting phosphor Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+ suffered from severer fluorescence TQ than that of the red-emitting phosphor. This indicates that NTQ of the blue-emitting phosphor Na
3Sc
2(PO
4)
3:0.03Eu
2+ could not be proven by its performance in the prototype WLED device under high drive current.
Sr
1.38Ba
0.6P
2O
7:0.02Eu
2+ (abbreviated as SB
0.3PE) was also a blue-emitting phosphor with emission maximum at wavelength 420 nm under nUV excitation which reportedly exhibited NTQ. The temperature- dependent emission spectral measurement showed that the peak intensity and integrated area intensity at 150 ºC reached 108% and 124% of the room temperature values, respectively, as shown in
Figure 3a [
12]. Could NTQ of Sr
1.38Ba
0.6P
2O
7:0.02Eu
2+ be demonstrated in the prototype WLED device?
No. 4 WLED device listed in
Table 1 was fabricated by coating a 365 nm nUV chip with the phosphor blend containing the blue-emitting (Sr
1.38Ba
0.6P
2O
7:0.02Eu
2+) (SB
0.3PE), yellow-emitting (SrBa)
2SiO
4:Eu
2+ and red-emitting (SrCa) AlSiN
3:Eu
2+. The drive current dependent CCT of WLED showed the CCT of No.4 WLED monotonically decreased from 3831 K to 3775 K when the drive current increased from 25 mA to 200 mA, suggesting that the fraction of the blue light component in the white spectrum gradually decreased with the increase of the drive current. The decrease in the fraction of the blue light component in the white spectrum could also be seen from the variation of intensity with drive current for the three phosphors in the blend shown in
Figure 7. Based on an analogous reasoning to that in No. 3 WLED of
Table 1, it seems reasonable to deduce that the decrease in the blue light fraction in No.4 WLED as the drive current increased could hardly be ascribed to either the excitation saturation or absorption by the yellow-emitting phosphor (SrBa)
2SiO
4:Eu
2+ and/or red-emitting phosphor (SrCa) AlSiN
3:Eu
2+. The most likely reason for the decrease in the fraction of the blue light component in the white spectrum is that the blue emitting phosphor Sr
1.38Ba
0.6P
2O
7:0.02Eu
2+ suffered from severer TQ than that of the red-emitting phosphor (SrCa)AlSiN
3:Eu
2+. The fact that the blue emitting phosphor Sr
1.38Ba
0.6P
2O
7:0.02Eu
2+ suffered from severer TQ than that of the red-emitting phosphor (SrCa)AlSiN
3:Eu
2+ suggest that NTQ of the blue-emitting phosphor Sr
1.38Ba
0.6P
2O
7:0.02Eu
2+(SB
0.3PE) could not be demonstrated in high-power WLED device.