BACKGROUND
A discussion of homeostasis, hormesis, toxicogenomics, epigenetics and possibly quantum biology is needed to build a model for this new approach.
Homeostasis is a fundamental survival strategy [
23,
24]. It is the ability to self heal, (G. Billman) -
The health and vitality of the organism can be said to be the end result of homeostatic regulation [
20]. Healthy cell differentiation and whole organism development are under the control of homeostasis [
25,
26]. (Henry Jakubowski):
Homeostasis shapes both form and function from the molecular to organismal levels [
27]. The ongoing ability to gradually adapt to the environment and or resist toxicity from the environment is a function of homeostasis. The innate self correcting mechanism for every cell structure and function has five components: stimulus, sensors, analysis functions (System Controllers) [
21], maintenance of an endpoint and feedback mechanism: (Henry Jakubowski):
Homeostasis is maintained by a series of control mechanisms functioning at the organ, tissue, or cellular level. These control mechanisms include substrate supply, activation or inhibition of individual enzymes and receptors, synthesis and degradation of enzymes, and compartmentalization. The primary components responsible for the maintenance of homeostasis can be categorized as stimulus, receptor, control center, effector, and feedback mechanism [
27]. Any one of these five mechanisms or a combination of them can be healthy and prevent illness or go wrong, leading to changes in gene expression, then chemical imbalances, then changes in anatomy, lesional diseases and finally recognizable fully developed disease processes that end in early death.
Understanding homeostasis at the analysis or control center level is still unrealized. Consider the number of calculations needed to be made every second in order to receive all the information, as well as compare this information to the totality of the set points and then formulate a reaction for each of the following:
- The development of each cell structure (how to arrange and maintain all the atoms, molecules, cell organelles etc).
- The function of every cell, its purpose and objectives, are all the functions at the right levels of performance?
- The map of how all the cells should be arranged into tissues and organ systems.
- How to fold each protein correctly in about four seconds [
28].
- How to form each organ system into whole body functions; vascular, nervous, skeletal etc.
- The overall anatomy of a mature whole organism.
- The personality and instincts for each organism.
- What genes to turn and off for each type of cell.
- When and how to divide each cell.
- How to repair a tissue or organelle after exposure to an injury or toxin.
- How to best adapt to the slight changes in the environment.
- How to differentiate stem cells when needed into new cells that are needed.
If we could visualize these mechanisms, presumably we could formulate a method to repair them. Unfortunately, there are no cellular structures to be found with the label: Control Center for Homeostasis, Language Used for Homeostasis, Mechanisms of Homeostasis, Set of Plans to Refer To (Set Points/Reference Image). For example the regulation of appetite requires about twenty different hormones and related receptors [
29]. We can locate the receptors and hormones, leading to an understanding of the effect of each one but we can’t find any CPU [
30]. For example we can’t see how a cell can “remember or store the value” for each hormone’s set point. No doubt the set points for every hormone are there, as homeostasis has an intrinsic idea of what are the healthy levels for each one, and how to keep them in a normal range [
21]. Homeostasis, one of the most important functions at the processing level, has no discernable physical structure.
This homeostasis map, totality of set points, quantum (most likely non local) reference image—was present in the first cell before it differentiated into, say, a pine tree or a cat. How is this accomplished? The DNA is used by homeostasis to open the correct genes, but the DNA in humans is only made up of about 23,000 genes, templates to make proteins and cellular structures. A human has only 20,000 protein coding genes but we can make 6.13 million different protein species [
31]. The DNA is more like a dictionary, a template to form words, as different genes are used to create parts of proteins and then the parts (words) are assembled to make sentences, whole peptides.
A polypeptide is kind of like a long word that is "spelled out" in amino acid letters. The chemical properties and order of the amino acids are key in determining the structure and function of the polypeptide, and the protein it's part of [
32].
The homeostasis “identity brain/ totality of set points” is one level of constraints above the DNA, it turns on all the genes it needs to make a perfect skin cell for example and turns off all the genes it has no use for in creating skin cells. But we have no idea how it connects to the DNA, whether it is actually a part of the DNA or some other construct? If certain genes are knocked out, the homeostasis identity brain will find a work-a-round and use other genes to accomplish its task to make a certain needed protein.
4 The homeostasis author just found other letters and words to complete the sentence it needed.
Homeostasis receives signals (hormonal, electrical and small molecules) then processes this information on this unidentified level. It is comparing what it can sense in the body with an ideal image of itself, the totality of all the reference points: - (Kotas et al)
Regardless of whether a reference point is real or imaginary, the term ‘set point’, if nothing else, is a convenient shortcut by which to refer to the defended level of a regulated variable… [
21]. Then continual adjustments are made as best it can to maintain the set points, thus optimizing health in every part of every cell.
The mechanics of homeostasis on this level. are extremely complex, but they are definitely present, as none of these processes or outcomes are random. (Davies):
Homeostasis does not occur by chance …biological systems are continuously making short-term adaptations [
23]. Pertinent to this discussion is to validate that when there is a dysfunction in one or more of the processing centers of the homeostasis cycle which determines the sensors, analysis and reactions, a disease will result either mildly or severely. Ultimately the goal is to diagnose and correct them at this level of origin, leading to healthy gene expression and resolution of the disease process.
Every disease is just another example of homeostasis gone wrong. There are so many ways that it can go wrong, giving us all the known diseases. This fact allows for the authors of this standard textbook, which most first year medical students read: The Pathological Basis of Disease, to make the following profound and far reaching statement:
Just as we live in a constantly changing world, so do the cells and tissues survive in a constantly changing microenvironment. The "normal" or "physiologic" state then is achieved by adaptive responses to the ebb and flow of various stimuli permitting the cells and tissues to adapt and to live in harmony within their microenvironment. Thus, homeostasis is preserved. It is only when the stimuli become more severe, or the response of the organism breaks down, that disease results—a generalization as true for the whole organism as it is for the individual cell [
33].
The next logical step in this textbook would be to investigate ways to diagnose the deficiencies of homeostasis and ways to correct them but this is never done. We have lacked the tools, but now a new tool is perhaps available; in our ability to define epimutations. The markers on the genes are in binary patterns which in theory can precisely define the dysfunctions of homeostasis pattern enough to give us an exact understanding of what is needed.
Epigenetics
Epigenetics [
34,
35,
36] is another function of homeostasis. The basic building blocks of the DNA are nucleic acids which code for different proteins; they are arranged in double stranded helical spirals, making up 23 chromosomes and about 23,000 individual genes. Although every cell in the human body has the same set of genes, why is it that different types of cells, such as those from heart or brain, look and behave differently? Homeostasis programs each cell's DNA with its own signature of molecular attachments such as methyl groups, giving it the instructions to individualize with certain anatomical and functional features. This is the individualized epigenetic modeling for every type of cell. These attachments are also called marks or markers, they change according to stages of development and react according to the conditions of the environment. Genes are continually being turned on or off by this homeostasis process depending on the needs of each cell.
Some epigenetic characteristics are positive and stable, lasting a lifetime, and may be passed on from one generation to the next, without changing. If homeostasis is strong, the epigenome stays healthy leading to healthy cellular functions. If not strong enough, a unique susceptibility is created that can be triggered by stress from environmental influences, such as toxins, heat, lack of nutrients, emotional trauma, and can then cause homeostasis to falter, leading to abnormal patterns called epimutations which can also be passed on to the next generation. Changes in the epigenome can lead to changes in gene expression that can be an advantage or the beginning of a disease process.
Epimutations
Epimutations are heritable changes in gene activity that are not associated with changes in the sequences of the base pairs, but rather with a gain or loss of DNA methylation or other heritable modifications of chromatin [
37]. During the last twenty years it is becoming clear that epimutations account for many diseases, acute and chronic. As stated earlier, epigenetic susceptibility is defined by the strengths and weaknesses of homeostasis. It is becoming clear that many chronic diseases are associated with epimutations: including inflammatory diseases such as heart disease, diabetes and Alzheimer's disease [
39]. Most likely all diseases start with an epimutation.
Hormesis [
17,
40] is also a subcategory of homeostasis - that is, large doses of any substance eventually become toxic (homeostasis breaks down), or as the dose of the same substance becomes small enough, but not repeated too often, it becomes a stimulant (homeostasis is made stronger). This principle has been discovered many times over [
41,
42,
43,
44], given different names but never fully utilized into mainstream medicine.
5 In the literature there have been two main areas of study into the hormesis phenomenon. The more recent studies demonstrate how any end-point can be stimulated from 30 to 60% [
40]. For example, muscle strength, heat tolerance, longevity and immunity. The second area of study is to diagnose an exact susceptibility and correct it with the mechanism of hormesis. Every substance, mineral, plant or animal in a small dose is a stimulant to one or more areas of homeostasis. As there are so many different substances, in theory every end-point in a healthy person can be made stronger by 30 to 60% [
45,
46]. If a substance can cause harm to immunity in a large dose, then in a small dose it can trigger feedback systems to increase immunity—the basic principle of vaccinations. In this way, hormesis can be used to treat almost any disease process.
The mechanism of action of hormesis is based on the principle that if homeostasis can maintain healthy set points with say, 100% effectiveness when healthy, then for evolutionary reasons it can act at 130-160% if stimulated. It is a generalized phenomenon and without this capacity life could not have evolved. (Calabrese et al.):
Hormesis represents a central evolutionary strategy…[
18]. Without this capacity living organisms could not make the necessary adjustments in order to cope with a changeable and sometimes toxic environment.
The second use of the hormesis principle is during an acute or chronic illness, where the functions of homeostasis are compromised mildly, moderately, or severely. In the past there were no laboratory technologies that could test for the exact deficiencies in homeostasis. In the last ten years we can now record the attachments on the DNA with greater accuracy. This has brought us to the possibility of measuring the deficiency patterns of homeostasis.
When there is a chronic disease and the maintenance level of homeostasis for a certain function is at say, 8% of normal and the external environmental stress at 15% then the correct substance (toxin in a small dose) is needed to elicit a strong enough reaction to get homeostasis for that exact set point back above 15% or if healing is to be rapid, stimulate it to as near 100% as possible. The higher above 15% the faster the recovery. The study designed (see below) should be able to prove or disprove this theory. The first step is to demonstrate this principle, the second step is to show that it can work for any illness.
Toxicogenomics
Toxins can be defined by the epimutation patterns they can cause. The resolution or definition of them is gradually becoming more exact. There are a number of toxicogenomic databases being developed [
47], including: ToxSign [
48], CTD [
49] and ToxicoDB [
50].
Quantum Biology
It is difficult to imagine that life evolved without utilizing the advantages that all atoms were made of fields with different mathematical descriptions. If the information in a field is enough to create an atom; then a more complicated field combination could be assembled to create viable and valuable biological systems? Another way to look at the problem: biological systems are not somehow unique, atoms and molecules forming into proteins and able to function like Newtonian billiard balls, as if there were no quantum fields creating each atom. We have to validate the reality that the correct relationship between each quantum field, and how they interact with each other is the basis of complex biological molecules. The maintenance and rules for quantum fields in biological systems are most likely the totality of rules and abilities for homeostasis.
The amount of technology to understand everything about quantum biology is most likely hundreds of years in the future. We don’t yet understand the rules and abilities for a field in how it can act alone or combine with another field to create new effects.
Biological systems resist change and react intelligently with the environment. Based on the rapidity of these calculations and conservation of space we have to consider the possibility of quantum homeostasis.
Quantum effects in biology such as coherence and non locality are difficult to measure. If we take apart a biological system to this level it loses its essential features, it therefore needs to be studied at the level of a living temporal system. How is this possible?
Which Patients Need Constitutional Hormesis Treatment?
Case One - No epimutations. The environment is the primary factor in the disease process: The patient is born with homeostasis acting in all areas from say 100 to 130% and there are no epimutations (no inherited disease susceptibilities). The functions of homeostasis in these individuals is resistant to any illness and resilient because of inheritance and many other positive environmental influences. The stress from a superbug, car accident or emotional shock if severe enough could lead to a temporary cluster of symptoms, but they are transient and soon resolve on their own. Recommended treatment: Give general supportive, first aid, rest, nutrition etc, they will recover in time. There will be no lingering effect, the individuals in this group after each infection or trauma gradually acquire some additional homeostasis adaptations over time and can pass on these onto the next generation. (Another example of hormesis). Within our populations there is almost no one in this category but many people with good health do have areas with these characteristics which means that stress in these areas makes them more resilient. For example individuals who can tolerate a certain ambient level of various toxins, those who can work up to fourteen hours a day with no ill effects, those who can drink coffee in the evening and still fall asleep easily. This again demonstrates the basic principle of hormesis, that healthy individuals can be made stronger by moderate stresses or even severe ones that are not repeated too often. These individuals, who have no tendency to illness, do not need constitutional hormesis treatment.
Case Two - Mild epimutations and therefore a mild susceptibility.
The environment in these types of cases plays less of a role in the disease process because there are some very minor dysfunctions in one or more of the cycles of homeostasis. The severity and onset of the disease is now dependent on the amount of stress from the environment. If the environmental influence is always positive, then the person may never develop any disease. If there is some toxicity in the environment or mental emotional stresses which persist for long enough, then some minor functional symptoms may gradually develop. In these cases removing the stress may be enough to relieve them of their symptoms. Also, determining a constitutional hormesis treatment for the minor susceptibility would also be useful. If the environmental influence is very toxic over a long period of time, the patient can develop a very severe illness. Using pharmacy drugs in their typical large doses is often enough to suppress the symptoms, such as minor pain medications, antibiotics, antacids, etc. If the illness is too severe and goes on for too long, then the pharmacy drugs are of less benefit especially in the later stages. These people can definitely benefit from constitutional hormesis therapy. They will respond very quickly and easily overcome the obstacles in the environment.
Case Three - Moderate to severe epimutations.
Even a positive environment can’t keep these people healthy. The susceptibility to disease is moderate to severe. The functions of homeostasis have moderate to severe deficits in the connections in one or more of the following three areas: The sensors/receptors are not collecting or transferring correct information to the processing centers, the processing analysis functions are incorrect in how they transfer information to the set points or the final actions needed, final information is not implemented or completed back to the DNA or other somatic end point. The chemistry of the body begins to go off balance, and eventually there are anatomical changes. In these cases removing the stresses can help but the illness usually remains and becomes worse over time. All the known disease categories with their sub definitions are a part of this category, including cancers of all types, metabolic diseases, skin diseases, psychiatric diseases etc. Drugs in large doses can lessen the symptoms but even in larger and often dangerous dose schedules many symptoms persist. The underlying pathology continues and eventually the disease will dominate and the drugs will become ineffective. Others living in the same family or same community do not have the same symptoms and so it is clear that it’s their own unique inherited and acquired deficiencies in homeostasis that are primarily to blame for the illness and not the environment. The only effective treatment for these individuals is constitutional homeostasis therapy. This is where the comprehensive and systematic use of this diagnosis and treatment method offers the greatest benefit to society.
Collaboration
I am looking for any lab currently doing toxicogenomic studies with an interest in a method to reverse epimutations. Here is the proof of concept study design. After this step there are many other details to be worked out.
STUDY DESIGN - A Method to Test This Theory
Determine the unique epigenetic signatures of a toxin (sulfur for example) on peripheral blood cells. Use a toxin that is already known, like sulfur, to cause certain epimutation on certain genes. Create a stable epimutation pattern on at least two genes that are persistent for at least one month and record that concentration of the toxin. Once this is established the same drug can be given in a hormesis dose of sulfur as a primer for a month before the cells are exposed to the toxic dose. The primer should prevent the epimutations from forming or only a few cells will show the epimutation. The groups can be compared and statistically analyzed for significance.
Part Two
In another group of cells that have been exposed to the toxin creating the epimutations on the same genes, the same drug, sulfur in a hormesis dose can be applied on a daily basis to determine if the epimutations can be reversed. Compared to the cells that were not given the hormesis antidote, there should be a significant reduction in epimutations found in the hormesis groups of cells. If these two studies can be shown to have significance then there is evidence that epimutations can be reversed by this method.
Variation of this study
The toxicity of two different concentrations - of sulfur- 100 percent and 50 percent concentration. Showing epimutations in at least 80 percent of the cells in the 100 percent group and the second dose schedule at 50 percent concentration, shows epimutations in about 40 percent of cells exposed. Perform the same tests as stated above.
Divide the cells into five groups. Group one: red line: no primer, sulfur at the high concentration - result: the maximum number of epimutations. Blue line - a mild hormesis dose used as a primer for one month. Result: some epimutations are prevented. The orange line - the sulfur is used in a dose half of that of the red line dose: no primer is used. Result expected: half the number of epimutations. The green line represents a stronger hormesis dose for a month. the expected result: a further reduction in epimutations formed. The yellow line represents the strongest hormesis dose and the result is that in this group of cells the fewest number of epimutations are found. The blue, green and yellow are all applied to the cell groups for a month before the toxic doses of sulfur are applied.
Here is the graph for the hormesis primer groups when the 50 percent concentrated toxin was added after one month: There are less epimutations than when a higher toxic dose of sulfur was used.
Here is the graph for the hormesis dilutions used after the epimutations were established:
Compared to the controls, when the hormesis doses were applied the epimutations significantly reversed in the 100 percent toxic cell group and 50 percent toxic cell group. All the graphs above are the expected results, none of these studies have been completed yet.
Equipment
Illumina’s Infinium Methylation Array technology. Infinium EPIC Array v2.
Discussion
The effects of specific toxins on peripheral blood cell methylation patterns is not a very developed area of study. To start with, use at least two different concentrations of the toxin and compare them to find a dose that creates at least epimutations in 80 to 90 percent of the cells. Peripheral blood cells are relatively accessible and can be standardized into cell lines to limit variables. These cells contain all the epimutations that can be passed from one generation to the next, they are shown to contain the profiles of any chronic disease [
51,
52].
Confounding Factors
1. There is no such a thing as a healthy peripheral blood cell line. How can they be created to be healthy enough to not confound this study? If they contain too many previously acquired epimutations which are stronger than the new epimutation pattern from the toxin being studied then they can combine into a hybrid mutation pattern and the small dose antidote will not work. Answer: Find a way to create healthy hematopoietic stem cells with a minimum number of epimutations. Or take them from people who are healthy and who have a healthy family history. Use blood cells from at least 20 donors, men, women, and different races.
The age of the cells studied produces a different epigenome. Answer: Expose the toxin to the PB cells of the same age. Or use the same toxin to study them at various ages. Study them at their most mature stage?
2. Each type of cell produces a different epigenome. Answer: Use the same type of cells from peripheral blood.
3. The pattern of the disease is spread (manifested) over many different cells. It is not easy or even possible to recognize the pattern in one specific cell. Answer: In the initial study the goal is to test the overall principle. This issue will have to be solved later.
4. Layers of chronic diseases in the same person present patterns that are too complex to understand or recognize. Each parent will contribute a different pattern of chronic tendencies to the patient. They could be dominant at different times in the patient's life. Answer: The limits put on the initial study design remove this confounding factor. Later it will need to be addressed in patients with complicated chronic disease inheritances.
5. Diseases present gradually, the pattern may not be recognizable in the beginning or even after a few years. Each pattern presents at a different rate. Answer: The limits put on the initial study design remove this confounding factor. Later it will need to be addressed in patients with complicated chronic diseases.
6. Acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, such as smoking, the ingesting of heavy metals and or the exposure to a virus or bacteria will temporarily affect the epigenome. Answer: The limits put on the initial study design remove this confounding factor. Later it will need to be addressed in patients with complicated chronic diseases.
7. Malnutrition at any stage of development and other physical influences such as injury, working conditions or ambient toxins produce confounding epimutation patterns that can muddle the disease that is most in need of treatment. Answer: The limits put on the initial study design remove this confounding factor. Later it will need to be addressed in patients with complicated chronic diseases.
8. Acute emotional or mental stress at any stage of development can start to create new epimutation patterns: Answer: The limits put on the initial study design remove this confounding factor. Later it will need to be addressed in patients with complicated chronic diseases.
9. As there is going to be more than one epimutation pattern affecting many genes, how to find the one that is primary? Or perhaps there will be only one expressed at one time? Answer: The limits put on the initial study design remove this confounding factor. Later it will need to be addressed in patients with complicated chronic diseases.
10. Is the equipment able to produce sufficient resolution of the toxicity signature? Answer: Yes, we can choose a toxin that produces a reliable known epimutation and find out if homeostasis is able to resist it when given a primer.
11. Genes that are off and should be on perhaps are not recognized as part of the toxicity image? Answer: As time goes on the image can be refined.
12. Small doses don’t retain quantum information. Answer: This experiment can determine if this is true or false.