2.2. FT-IR and NMR Spectroscopic Characterization of the Thiosemicarbazone Ligand
That H
2(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT exists as the thio-keto (thione) tautomer in the solid state is demonstrated by the prominent IR absorption band at 3157 cm
–1 indicative of the thio-amide ν(N–H) (
Figure 2). The associated thio-carbonyl bond is characterised by the vibrational band with a stretching frequency of 1032 cm
–1. Indeed, the absence of a vibrational band around 2600 cm
–1 due to ν(S–H) [
10] excluded the possibility of the occurrence of the thio-enol tautomer. At 3320 cm
–1 in the IR spectrum occurs an absorption band ascribable to the N–H stretch of the terminal secondary amino group of the thiosemicarbazone. A characteristic feature of Schiff bases is the imine bond whose presence in H
2(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT is evidenced by the absorption at 1609 cm
–1 typifying ν(C=N). The
tert-buyl C–H stretches are conspicuous by their characteristic pattern of absorption bands in the range 2867–2960 cm
–1 [
59]. Contributing to the intensity of these absorptions are the C–H vibrations of the
N-ethyl substituent group. The sharp absorption band with the wavenumber 3013 cm
–1 is attributable to the aromatic ν(C–H). Finally, the broad band around 3500 cm
–1 is typical of phenolic C–O vibrations.
The 1H-NMR spectrum of H2(3,5-t-Bu2)-sal4eT was recorded in DMSO-d6 at a radiofrequency of 700 MHz with TMS as an internal reference standard (δ = 0). The broad peak at δ 9.98 assignable to the hydrazinic proton reveals that the thione tautomer of this thiosemicarbazone remains intact in solution. The phenolic proton, which is represented by the singlet at δ 11.27, is the most deshielded on account of its intramolecular interaction with the imine nitrogen atom. The aldimine proton is associated with the sharp singlet at δ 8.28. A broad resonance shaped like an unresolved triplet occurs at δ 8.48 and is attributable to the proton of the amino group between the thio-carbonyl and ethyl groups. The aromatic protons in positions 4 and 6 resonate as doublets at δ 7.13 and 7.29, respectively, with identical coupling constants (J = 2.38 Hz). The N-ethyl group is characterised by partially overlapping quartet signals at δ 3.59 (J = 6.55 Hz) and a triplet resonance at δ 1.16 (J = 7.14 Hz) corresponding to the methylene protons in non-equivalent environments and the methyl protons, respectively. Finally, the protons of the 3-tert-butyl and 5-tert-butyl substituent groups have singlet signals with the chemical shifts δ 1.41 and 1.27, respectively.
2.3. Single-Crystal X-ray Structure Determination of the Thiosemicarbazone Ligand
Definitive evidence for the solid-state 3-D structure of the ligand was provided by single-crystal X-ray analysis. A colourless needle amenable to X-ray diffraction was grown from a solution of H
2(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT in EtOH at room temperature. X-ray data collection was performed at 100 K. Crystal data, details of data collection and parameters for structure solution and refinement are compiled in
Table 1. Evidently, this thiosemicarbazone ligand crystallized in the monoclinic space group
P2
1/
c with four molecules in the unit cell. The X-ray crystal structure is depicted in
Figure 3 while selected bond distances and angles are presented in
Table 2. The distance of the Schiff-base bond C=N [C(15)–N(1) = 1.2904(19) Å] lies within the range observed for normal imine bonds [1.26–1.30 Å] [
13,
14,
15,
19,
20,
60,
61,
62,
63,
64,
65,
66,
67,
68,
69] in non-coordinated ligands. Upon reduction of the Schiff base, the imine double bond becomes a single bond (C–N) with a distance of ~1.47 Å [
65]. The C(16)–S(1) distance of 1.7029(14) Å verifies the occurrence of the thione tautomer. Literature values for the distance of the thio-carbonyl bond in free thiosemicarbazone ligands range typically from 1.65 to 1.70 Å [
13,
14,
15,
19,
20,
60,
61,
62,
63,
64,
65,
66,
67,
68,
69] (even longer if involved in bifurcated H-bonding) [
67]. Both imine nitrogen and thio-carbonyl carbon are sp
2-hybridised and the angles around them reflect the angular (with a lone pair) and trigonal planar geometries about these two atoms. The hydrazinic N–N bond [N(1)–N(2) = 1.3854(16) Å] is somewhat longer than most of those reported for other non-coordinated thiosemicarbazones and is consistent with single-bond character.
One of the prominent structural features of interest is the intramolecular H-bonding interaction between the phenolic –O–H group and the imine nitrogen atom [O(1)–H(1)···N(1): O1–H1 = 0.84 Å, H1···N1 = 1.98 Å, O1···N1 = 2.7221(15) Å, O1–H1···N1 = 147.4º]. Indeed, the vast majority of Schiff bases derived from 2-hydroxybenzaldehydes, 2-hydroxyacetophenones, 2-hydroxybenzophenones, 2-hydroxypropiophenones, etc. exhibit this intramolecular electrostatic force. It is well-established that pyridyl-/phenol-based thiosemicarbazones can adopt an
E- or
Z-configuration with respect to the imine double bond. Moreover, they can also orient themselves in different conformations as a consequence of free rotation about the C(py/phenol)–C(imine) [i.e. C(6)–C(15) in this structure] single bond and the amide N(H)–C(=S) [i.e. N(2)–((16) in this structure] single bond. Thus the potential donor atoms can be positioned
anti or
syn relative to each other. Examples of crystallographically observed orientations of phenolic thiosemicarbazones,
viz. E(syn,anti) [
60,
62,
63],
E(syn,syn) [
61,
64] and
E(ant,anti) [
63], are shown in
Figure 3. The structure of H
2(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT is consistent with the
E-configuration; the phenolic –OH group and the imine nitrogen are positioned
syn to each other while the thione sulfur points to the opposite side in an
anti-orientation relative to the imine nitrogen.
2.4. Synthesis and Chemical Identification of the Copper(II) Thiosemicarbazone Complexes
Reaction of H
2(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT with a molar equivalent of Cu(OAc)
2·H
2O in refluxing MeOH, followed immediately by addition of a stoichiometric amount of 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (2,9-Me
2-phen) or 1,10-phenathroline (phen) with brief heating of the resultant dark olive green solution, afforded the mononuclear copper(II) complex [Cu{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}(2,9-Me
2-phen)] (
1) or the dinuclear copper(II) complex [Cu
2{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}
2(phen)] (
2), respectively. The chemical formulations of these two ternary complexes were established by elemental analyses. The positive-ion ESI mass spectrum of complex
1 presented in
Figure 4(a) shows a molecular peak at
m/z = 605.4 in agreement with the molecular mass of this complex (605.25 amu). As regards the dinuclear complex (
2), the parent ion was not detected; however, the ESR spectrum revealed important structural information from the fragmentation pattern. In the negative mode, the spectrum shows a minor peak at
m/z = 792.5 consistent with the loss of the phen co-ligand. At
m/z = 730.5 occurs a major peak ascribable to the fragment [Cu{(3,5-Bu
2)-sal4eT}
2]
2– indicative of a loss of [Cu(phen)]
2+ [
Figure 4(b)]. On the other hand, the positive-ion ESI spectrum exhibits a peak at
m/z = 732.6 attributable to the fragment [Cu{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}
2]
+. Further dissociation affords the fragment [Cu{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}]
+ observed at
m/z = 397.2, signifying the loss of one of the thiosemicarbazonate ligands. That complexes
1 and
2 are molecular has been demonstrated by the negligible value of the molar electrical conductivity (Λ
M ~3 Ω
–1 cm
2 mol
–1) of their nonelectrolyte solutions in MeOH, EtOH and DMF at room temperature [
70].
2.5. FT-IR Spectroscopy and Magnetic Susceptibility Measurements
A comparison of the IR spectra of the thiosemicarbazone ligand and its copper(II) complexes (
1 and
2) in
Figure 3 shows clearly the absence of the vibrational band of the hydrazinic N–H bond from the spectra of the complexes. The disappearance of the hydrazinic proton coupled with the shift in the stretching frequency of the absorption band of the carbon-sulfur bond from 1032 cm
–1 for the ligand to 842 and 858 cm
–1 for
1 and
2, respectively, is indicative of tautomerisation and deprotonation of the thiosemicarbazone upon coordination to the copper(II) ion, as is indeed necessary for charge-neutrality of the resultant complexes. The presence of the N–H group attached to the terminal ethyl group is proven by the occurrence of sharp absorption bands at 3398 and 3342 cm
–1 in the spectra of
1 and
2, respectively. The wavenumbers of the imine bond for
1 and
2 complexes are somewhat lower than that of the free ligand [ν(C=N): 1598 and 1599 cm
–1 vs. 1609 cm
–1)] consistent with coordination of the imine donor atom. Interestingly, the ν(N–N) absorptions for the ligand and complexes
1 and
2 virtually coincide (1172, 1170 and 1169 cm
–1, respectively), implying minimal delocalisation of π-electrons, if any, along the ligand backbone in the complexes. Finally, the other ligand IR absorption patterns, especially those of the
tert-butyl C–H bonds (2850–2960 cm
–1), are retained.
Complexes
1 and
2 are paramagnetic with a single unpaired electron at the metal centre in the ground state. The room-temperature effective magnetic moment [µ
eff = (8χ
M)
½] of the mononuclear complex (
1) is 1.83 µ
B. It is comparable with the spin-only value [µ
S = {4
S(
S + 1)}
½, where
S = ½] and lies within the range of literature values [
45,
50,
54,
56,
57,
58,
59]. In contrast, for the dinuclear complex (
2), µ
eff = 2.38 µ
B at room temperature, which is close to the spin-only value for two magnetically uncoupled d
9 paramagnetic centres [{4
S1(
S1 + 1) + 4
S2(
S2 + 1)}
½, where
S1 =
S2 = ½].
2.6. Single-Crystal X-ray Analyses of the Ternary Copper(II) Complexes
For each of the complexes [Cu{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}(2,9-Me
2-phen)] (
1) and [Cu
2{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}
2(phen)] (
2), X-ray diffraction data were collected on a single crystal at 100 K employing Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). Crystal data together with details of data collection and structure refinement are presented in
Table 1. Selected bond distances and angles are given in
Table 3. Whereas complex
1 crystallised in the monoclinic space group
P2
1/
n with
Z = 4, complex
2 did so in the triclinic space group
P with two complex molecules in the unit cell. Both complexes
1 and
2 do not possess solvent molecules of crystallisation.
The crystal structure of [Cu{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}(2,9-Me
2-phen)], depicted in
Figure 5, reveals that this complex exists as a centrosymmetric dimer of mononuclear molecular ternary complexes of copper(II). The dimerisation occurs by two intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions involving the –N
4–H group of one complex molecule and the thio-enolate sulfur of the other complex molecule [
Figure 5(b)] [N(3)–H(3)···S(1): N–H = 0.88 Å, H···S = 2.64 Å, N···S = 3.482(3) Å, N–H–S = 159.9º (symmetry code: 1–
x, 1–
y, –
z)]. The charge-neutrality of this ternary complex implies that the thiosemicarbazone been doubly deprotonated upon complexation. Indeed transformation of the ligand from the thio-keto tautomer to the thio-enolate anion is demonstrated by the changes to the lengths of the pertinent bonds of the thio-amide. The thio-amide N–C bond [N(2)–C(16): 1.3499(18) Å] in the free ligand has shortened considerably upon complexation [N(2)–C(8): 1.313(4) Å in complex
1] while the thio-carbonyl (C=S) bond [C(16)–S(1): 1.7029(14) Å] has converted to thio-enolate C–S
– bond in the complex [C(8)–S(1) = 1.739(3) Å]. Carbon-nitrogen bonds with double-bond character have been reported to have distances in the range 1.27–1.32 Å [
66,
71,
72,
73] when the N donor atom is coordinated to a central metal ion. On the other hand, typical lengths of carbon-sulfur bonds with single-bond character in thio-enolate complexes are in the range 1.72–1.77 Å [
66,
71,
72,
73]. The distances of the imine C=N [C(7)–N(1) = 1.296(4) Å] and the hydrazinic N–N [N(1)–N(2) = 1.400(4) Å] in
1 are normal with respect to their respective bond orders.
The five-coordinate geometry at the copper(II) centre arises from the tridentate coordination of the thiosemicarbazonate ligand with the donor atoms, namely phenolate oxygen, imine nitrogen and thio-enolate sulfur, arranged meridionally and the bidentate coordination of the 2,9-Me
2-phen co-ligand oriented nearly perpendicularly relative to the primary ligand. The axial-equatorial coordination mode of pyridyl nitrogen atoms of 2,9-Me
2-phen leads to the construction of a coordination sphere best described as distorted square pyramidal in accord with the trigonality index [τ = (β – α)/60º] [
74] of ~0.14, the largest two angles β and α being in the basal plane. The axial Cu–N bond is considerably longer than the one lying equatorially [Cu–N
ax (co-ligand) = 2.308(3) Å
vs. Cu–N
eq (co-ligand) = 2.057(3) Å]. This elongation of the axial coordinate bond is attributable to the tetragonal distortion at the metal centre. Invariably, square pyramidal [
31,
32,
33,
34,
35,
36,
37,
38,
39,
40,
41,
42,
43,
45,
46,
47,
48,
49,
50,
51,
52] and octahedral [
44,
53] ternary complexes with axial-equatorial coordination of bidentate co-ligand (bipy, phen or their derivatives) are subject to the Jahn-Teller effect evidenced by this structural feature. In some cases, even binary bis(chelate) copper(II) complexes [
75] with two potentially tridentate ligands experience this effect, causing one of the ligands to coordinate bidentately due to considerable weakening of one of the axial Cu–L bonds. The magnitude of the disparity in the Cu–N distances of the asymmetrically coordinated N,N-donor co-ligand is in the range ~0.22–0.32 Å. Moreover, the complex cation of tris(1,10-phenanthroline)copper(II) perchlorate [
76] exhibits Jahn-Teller distortion (Cu–N bond averages: Cu–N
ax ~2.33 Å
vs. Cu–N
eq ~2.04 Å) whereby the axial Cu–N
phen bonds are elongated to the same extent as those in the above-mentioned square pyramidal copper(II) ternary complexes. In contrast, it has been crystallographically proven that the two Cu–N bonds of N,N-donor co-ligands in square pyramidal and octahedral complexes where they lie on the equatorial plane are virtually equivalent as neither is subject to the Jahn-Teller effect [
54,
55,
56,
57,
58]. In addition, in the complex [Cu{N(CN)
2}(phen)
2]
+ [
77] with a distorted
trigonal bipyramidal geometry at the metal centre the phen Cu–N distances are virtually indistinguishable from each other as the Jahn-Teller effect does not apply. The copper(II) ion in [Cu{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}(2,9-Me
2-phen)] (
1) is displaced out of the mean basal plane [(N(1), S(1), O(1), N(4)] towards the apical phen N(5) donor atom by 0.1998(12) Å. Finally, the magnetostructural behaviour of this complex is consistent with half occupancy of the
dx2
–y2 orbital in the ground state.
As can be seen from
Figure 6, [Cu
2{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}
2(phen)] (
2) exists in the crystal lattice as a centrosymmetric dimer of dinuclear molecular ternary complexes of copper(II) stabilized mainly by two types of intermolecular forces. The linkage of two dinuclear complex molecules occurs through two H-bonds between the N
4–H group of one dinuclear molecule and the imine nitrogen of another dinuclear molecule [N(3)–H(3)···N(7): N–H = 0.88 Å, H···N = 2.17 Å, N···N = 2.964(11) Å, N–H···N = 150.5º (symmetry code: 2–
x, –
y, 1–
z)]. Moreover, this complex exhibits π-π stacking interactions involving the plane N(5), C(24)–C(28) of the phen co-ligand in two complex molecules (symmetry code: 1–
x, 1–
y, 1–
z) [angle of interaction of the two planes = 0.0(7)º, centroid-to-centroid distance = 6.603(8) Å, shift distance = 1.218(17) Å] (
Figure S1).
The two copper(II) centres are 4.8067(18) Å apart and display different coordination numbers, one four-coordinate and the other five-coordinate, the respective coordination geometries being distorted square planar [τ
4 = {360º – (α + β)}/141º = 0.082, α = 176.3º and β = 172.1º] [
78] and distorted square pyramidal [τ
5 = (β – α)/60º = 0.33, β = 172.4º and α = 152.4º] [
74]. The two associated thiosemicarbazonate ligands exhibit different denticities: one coordinates in a tridentate fashion to the metal centre, [Cu(2) in
Figure 6] with coordination number 4 whereas the other adopts the relatively unusual quadridentate coordination mode to bridge the two metal centres with the thio-enolate nitrogen atom, N(2), and coordinate meridionally to the other metal centre [Cu(1) in
Figure 6]. For the tridentate ligand, coordinated to Cu(2), the distance of the newly-formed thio-enolate N=C bond is virtually indistinguishable from that of the imine C=N bond (
cf. N(7)–C(38) = 1.316(12) Å
vs. C(37)–N(6) = 1.310(12) Å, respectively] and the distance of C(32)–S(2) [1.746(9) Å] lies within the range reported for such thio-enolate bonds. Similarly, for the quadridentate ligand, the distances of the thio-enolate N=C and imine C=N bonds compare favourably [
cf. N(2)–C(8) = 1.322(13) Å and C(7)–N(1) = 1.301(13) Å, respectively] [
66,
71,
72,
73]. The distance of the thio-enolate C–S
– bond [C(8)–S(1) = 1.737(9) Å is normal for complexed thiosemicarbazonate ligands [
66,
71,
72,
73]. It is noteworthy that the lengths of the hydrazinic N–N bonds in this dinuclear complex [N(1)–N(2) = 1.381(11) Å and N(6)–N(7) = 1.391(11) Å] are very similar to that observed in the free ligand as a thio-keto (thione) tautomer [1.3854(16) Å], suggesting that there is no delocalization of electrons involving this chemical bond in the thiosemicarbazonate backbone.
The five-coordinate geometry at Cu(1) is similar to that described for the mononuclear ternary complex (
1). The bidentate phen co-ligand adopts the axial-equatorial coordination mode. Consequently, the axial Cu–N
phen bond is tetragonally elongated, even longer than the Cu–S bond [Cu(1)–S(1) = 1.266(3) Å], causing asymmetric coordination of this co-ligand [Cu(1)–N(4)
eq = 2.039(8) Å
vs. Cu(1)–N(5) = 2.276(9) Å]. The copper(II) ion , Cu(1), resides 0.177(4) Å above the mean basal plane [N(1), S(1), O(1), N(4)] in the direction of the axial N(5)
phen atom. Both copper(II) centres [Cu(1) and Cu(2)], regardless of the differences in the coordination geometries, have a
dx2
–y2 ground state. The literature has witnessed a number of examples of crystallographically characterised dinuclear thiosemicarbazone complexes of copper(II), but these tend to have the same coordination geometry at the two metal centres [
8,
9,
10,
72]. To the best of our knowledge, the dinuclear complex [Cu
2{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}
2(phen)] (
2) is one of only two of its kind. The other structurally characterised dinuclear thiosemicarbazone complex of copper(II) featuring two different coordination spheres is [Cu
2(sal4eT)
2(bipy)] (
Scheme 1), reported as [Cu
2(L
2)
2(bipy)] [
4]. Beyond the superficial similarities, there is a sharp distinction between the structures of [Cu
2{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}
2(phen)] (
2) and [Cu
2(sal4eT)
2(bipy)] as regards the orientation of the ligands, intermolecular forces and the five-coordinate geometry at one of the two copper(II) centres. Unlike
2, [Cu
2(sal4eT)
2(bipy)] exists as two independent complex molecules which are similar but not identical and the thiosemicarbazonate ligands are oriented (differently from
2) such that
intramolecular hydrogen bonding occurs between the phenolate oxygen atom bonded to the copper(II) ion in the distorted square planar geometry and the N
4–H group of the bridging quadridentate ligand. Moreover, the geometries of the five-coordinate copper(II) centres in the two molecules of [Cu
2(sal4eT)
2(bipy)] were reported as
distorted trigonal bipyramidal. We have calculated their trigonality indices, τ
5 [
74], to compare them with that of our dinuclear complex (
2). For [Cu
2(sal4eT)
2(bipy)], the values of τ
5 are ~0.50 and ~0.51 (intermediate between square pyramidal and trigonal bipyramidal); in contrast, for
2, τ
5 = 0.33, clearly pointing to greater distortion towards
square pyramidal.
2.8. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of the Thiosemicarbazone Ligand and the Ternary Copper(II) Complexes
The antiproliferative activity of H
2(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT, [Cu{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}(2,9-Me
2-phen)] (
1) and [Cu
2{(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT}
2(phen)] (
2) was investigated in two cancer cell lines, namely human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) and human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) using the MTT cell viability assay [MTT = 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide]. The values of the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC
50) of these substances together with the positive controls (docetaxel and paclitaxel) were determined as exemplified for complexes
1 and
2 in the HeLa and MCF-7 cancer cells, respectively (
Figure 9). The
in vitro antiproliferative potential of each substance was tested within the 0.01–100-μ
M range of concentrations; the results of these cytotoxicity measurements are presented in
Table 4. IC
50 values for cisplatin were obtained from the literature [
82,
83].
In striking contrast to the marked potent and selective antiproliferative activity of naphthol- and pyridyl-based thiosemicarbazones [
11,
12], together with their corresponding metal complexes, against tumour cells, the phenolic thiosemicarbazone H
2(3,5-
t-Bu
2)-sal4eT is nontoxic towards both cancer cells in this investigation. However, as is often the case with hydrazones, complexation with metal ions induces phamarcological activity as can be seen from
Table 4. Intriguingly, complex
1 exhibits selective potency towards the Hela cancer cells over the MCF-7 cancer cells. Conversely, the antiproliferative activity of complex
2 is specific towards MCF-7. Although this behaviour has only been observed from tests carried out
in vitro, these results show that these copper(II) thiosemicarbazone complexes have potential applications as metallo-drugs in targeted cancer treatment.
Their selectivity over non-cancerous cells such as the human breast epithelial cell line (MCF-10A), have yet to be determined. It is noteworthy that in vitro complexes
1 and
2 are more efficacious as antiproliferative agents than cisplatin. Moreover, cisplatin lacks the cancer-specificity which these complexes possess. They also exhibit higher potent anticancer activity than the standards. Although the study of the mode of action of complexes
1 and
2 as anticancer agents is beyond the scope of this work, it has been amply demonstrated previously for a diverse range of copper(II) complexes, including those of thiosemicarbazones, that the potentials of the Cu
II/Cu
I redox couple [
8,
15,
18,
20,
30] lie within the biologically accessible redox potential window leading to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which cause apoptotic cell death.