Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

A Comprehensive Review on the Role of Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Post-stroke Motor and Sensory Outcome

Altmetrics

Downloads

98

Views

53

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

supplementary.docx (38.00KB )

Submitted:

20 December 2023

Posted:

20 December 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Stroke is a major leading cause of chronic disability, often affecting patients’ motor and sensory functions. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is the most commonly used method of functional neuroimaging and allows the non-invasive study of brain activity. The time-dependent coactivation of different brain regions at rest is described as resting-state activation. As a non-invasive task-independent functional neuroimaging approach, resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) may provide therapeutically useful information on both the focal vascular lesion and the connectivity-based reorganization and subsequent functional recovery in stroke patients. Considering the role of prompt and accurate prognosis in stroke survivors along with the potential of rs-fMRI in identifying patterns of neuroplasticity in different post-stroke phases, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest literature regarding the role of rs-fMRI in stroke prognosis in terms of motor and sensory outcome. Our comprehensive review suggests that with the advancement of MRI acquisition and data analysis methods, rs-fMRI emerges as a promising tool to study the motor and sensory outcome in stroke patients and evaluate the effect of different interventions.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Neuroscience and Neurology

1. Introduction

Stroke is one of the leading causes of chronic disability due to its impact on the motor, sensory and cognitive functions of patients. The presence of these deficits is one of the factors that hinder the full recovery of patients [1]. During the post-stroke period, the brain inherently tries to restore its functional status that has been affected [2]. There can be recovery, where the affected function is fully restored, or compensation, where mechanisms emerge through which other brain regions participate in achieving a previous level of functionality [3]. However, compensatory mechanisms may sometimes lead to incomplete recovery, exacerbating the existing deficit through maladaptive plasticity [4]. The range of these mechanisms partially explains the range of varying degrees of effectiveness of intervention programs [5] and highlights the need to study additional factors or markers that could both contribute to better design a rehabilitation program and to predict treatment motor and sensory outcome and better assess intervention effectiveness.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is the most commonly used method of functional neuroimaging and allows the non-invasive study of brain activity [6]. It is based on the investigation of the differences between the paramagnetic properties of oxygenated and non-oxygenated hemoglobin, examined through the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in different brain regions either during a task (task fMRI) or at rest (resting state fMRI; rs-fMRI) within the MRI scanner. During rs-fMRI the subject remains still and calm inside the MRI scanner with eyes -usually- closed, without receiving external stimuli or thinking about anything. The time-dependent coactivation of different brain regions at rest is described as resting-state (rs) activation. Distinct brain areas that are co-activated in response to stimuli (e.g. during task-fMRI) also show specific or functional organization at rest and constitute the so-called rs functional networks (Figure 1). Thus, rs-fMRI is a task-independent approach that is based on intrinsic low-frequency fluctuations (typically <0.1 Hz) in the BOLD signal. The latter can be used to compute the functional connectivity between spatially remote areas based on the temporal correlations of BOLD signal between these areas [7]. These functionally connected networks are named after the function they are related to when activated [8]. Each rs functional network is composed of individual brain regions (structures/nodes), whose functional connectivity (FC) is based on the quantitative correlation of the perfusion rate of individual structures. The magnitude of the correlations of BOLD signal time series between nodes constituting a functional structure and the magnitude of the correlations of BOLD signal time series between individual structures constituting a network is considered an indication of the adequacy of FC [9]. Two of the main ways of detecting FC between individual structures/nodes are: a) correlation of the BOLD signal time series of individual structures, b) independent component analysis. As a non-invasive task-independent functional neuroimaging approach, rs-fMRI may therefore provide therapeutically useful information on both the focal vascular lesion and the connectivity-based reorganization and subsequent functional recovery in stroke patients [10].
Considering the role of prompt and accurate prognosis in stroke survivors along with the potential of rs-fMRI in identifying patterns of neuroplasticity in different post-stroke phases, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest literature regarding the role of rs-fMRI in stroke prognosis in terms of motor and sensory outcome.

2. State-of-the-Art of Current Literature on rs-fMRI in Motor and Sensory Outcome after Stroke

To address the main aim of this comprehensive review, we reviewed most representative human studies (cross-sectional or longitudinal) during the last decade, which used rs-fMRI and focused on stroke motor and sensory outcome (Supplementary Material, Table 1).

2.1. Prediction of Motor Outcome Using rs-fMRI

2.1.1. Changes in FC Based on Traditional and Relatively New rs-fMRI Indices

The topological characteristics of the cortical motor-related network in patients with subcortical stroke were examined in a study by Yin et al (2013), in which all areas of interest were distal to the initial lesion [11]. The results indicated decreased FC between the ipsilesional M1 and the contralesional middle frontal gyrus, as well as between the ipsilesional postcentral gyrus and the contralesional postcentral gyrus. Accordingly, disruption of interhemispheric FC in the somatomotor network was found to be strongly associated with post-stroke upper limb dysfunction, whereas it was not associated with performance in the same network. Additionally, the study identified diverse patterns of functional remodeling in both cortical connectivity and localized homogeneity, suggesting varying results in hand functionality. Specifically, decreased betweenness centrality (that assesses the amount of influence a node has over the flow of information in a graph) of ipsilesional dorsolateral premotor cortex indicated poor outcomes in hand functionality.
According to Li et al (2014), patients with dysphagia showed greater rs functional architecture irregularities, than patients that experienced no difficulty swallowing [12]. These irregularities are largely related to alterations in the coherent intrinsic neuronal activity of BOLD fluctuations detected by rs-fMRI. The results imply that effective recovery is linked to brain activation relevant to cortical swallowing representation in the compensatory hemisphere or other recruited regions of the unaffected hemisphere.
Lam et al (2018), with respect to FC as a stroke biomarker, investigated left (L) and right (R) motor cortex rs-FC (L M1-R M1), which they considered as a sign of functional integrity [13]. Stroke patients with higher L M1-R M1 rs-connectivity were less disabled than those with lower connectivity, consistent with the fact that L M1-R M1 patterns at rest are comparable to those that arise during motor task performance and contribute to the variability of motor behavior. Contrary to previous studies on this topic, in which both a positive and a negative relationship between the two were found, possibly because of different stroke parameters, there was no significant interaction between corticospinal tract (CST) injury and L M1-R M1 rs-connectivity in the regression models obtained in this study. According to the authors, this underscores the need for larger-scale studies that assess stroke patients at all stages of chronicity and severity. The authors speculate that CST injury and L M1-R M1 rs connectivity may serve as different indices of motor outcome considering the above.
It is well documented that after rehabilitation, ipsilesional intrahemispheric FC decreases and interhemispheric FC increases. Furthermore, the decrease in FC between bilateral motor cortices correspond more strongly with neurological function than the decrease in FC inside ipsilesional motor cortices. Chi et al (2018) studied patients with mild acute ischemic stroke (AIS) stroke and found that although the interhemispheric FC of the motor network was less in patients than in healthy subjects, there were differences between patients with favorable and poor outcomes only in the M1 and in the contralesional dorsal premotor area [14]. The authors conclude that in functional recovery after AIS, interhemispheric FC may be more important than ipsilesional intrahemispheric FC. Additionally, FC may represent a potentially therapeutic target in stroke patients as well as a reliable and prompt imaging biomarker for AIS using neurostimulation techniques.
Zou et al (2018) revealed that the frontoparietal system is essential for higher order motor-cognitive processing, including motor imagery and regulation of goal-directed movements, whereas the sensorimotor system is primarily active during motor execution and somatosensory information processing. Both systems have been found to be involved in cerebral remodeling characterized by aberrant task-evoked brain activation as well as disturbed rs-FC [15]. The random reorganization hypothesis is supported by the fact that when a stroke affects the brain, connectivity reorganization occurs in two distinct phases: First, existing links are broken and rewired, and second, new links are created due to connections being established randomly, across all possible brain regions. The authors also concluded that there was a correlation between the degree of motor deficits and lower interhemispheric FC between cortical motor regions, even in individuals who had made an excellent clinical recovery.
In the study conducted by Hong et al (2019), only the completely paralyzed patients showed reduced FC in perceptual areas, although both patients with completely and partially paralyzed hands showed reduced within-network FC in the contralesional superior parietal cortex and ipsilesional supplementary motor area (SMA) [16]. Because continuous dominant stimulation of the contralesional sensorimotor cortex has been shown to interfere with normal function of the paretic hand, the authors suggested that this region may be involved in functional outcomes of the ipsilateral hand. They discovered that patients whose hands were completely paralyzed had increased network FC in the contralesional sensorimotor cortex compared with patients who were only partially paralyzed, suggesting that the severe hand impairments were followed by excessive mobilization of contralesional sensorimotor assets. In addition, there was a negative correlation between the Fulg-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scores and the mean FC in the contralesional sensorimotor cortex, indicating that contralesional hemisphere involvement is not a desirable indicator in stroke patients in the chronic stage.
More sophisticated approaches on rs-fMRI data have also been applied during the past few years. Liu et al (2015) revealed that the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), which reflects regional spontaneous neuronal activity, was increased in the bilateral M1 area during the initial phase of subcortical infarction [17]. The authors hypothesize that this is due to several factors, including altered vasomotor activity and neurovascular coupling, although the exact neurophysiological basis remains unknown. The findings indicate that increased spontaneous neuronal activity, determined via rs-fMRI, might possibly contribute to the functional reorganization of physically impaired brain regions during post-stroke motor recovery.
Moreover, in a study by Zhao et al (2018), patients with completely paralyzed hands showed decreased regional homogeneity (ReHo) in the bilateral cerebellar posterial lobes and increased ReHo in the contralesional SMA compared with patients with less severe paralysis in the typical frequency band [18]. Similar findings were noted in the slow and subfrequency bands, supporting the authors’ theory that the frequency of low-frequency oscillations and stroke severity influence spontaneous brain activity after stroke. In addition, there was a strong association between mean ReHo values in these regions and FMA-HW scores in all patients, suggesting that frequency-specific changes in ReHo may be related to hand function recovery in stroke patients.
Brain entropy (BEN), an fMRI-based approach, was utilized by Liang et al (2020) to map the temporal complexity of the entire brain and its capacity to handle incoming or outgoing data [19]. Lower BEN values often signify decreased neural activity and erratic information processing capabilities. It has been noted that lower BEN values in the contralesional precentral gyrus and ipsilesional M1 may be indicative of a reduced aptitude of information exploration in the contralesional sensorimotor system. Furthermore, lower BEN values were observed in the bilateral SMA, suggesting that the operational framework of motor execution and planning was disturbed. It is possible that decreased brain complexity in this area is connected to the impaired integrity of the cortical structure. Additionally, the BEN values in the ipsilesional SMA showed a positive correlation with the FMA scores, suggesting that the absence of brain complexity in this region could contribute to poor motor outcomes in stroke patients. This occurs because SMA is essential for the progression of motor rehabilitation.
On top of that, Bonkhoff et al (2020), in a study of patients with mild to severe stroke, demonstrated for the first time that moderately impaired patients spent significantly more time in state 2, a less connected state, while patients with severe motor symptoms significantly preferred State 1, a state with strong intradominal connectivity [20]. Unexpectedly, they discovered that moderately impaired patients had more pronounced changes in FC (between the ipsi- and contralesional sensorimotor cortices and the same sensorimotor network and bilateral paracentral cortex) in both static and dynamic analyses, despite a milder clinical deficit. However, the researchers found impaired interhemispheric connectivity between sensorimotor cortical components in severe strokes with motor symptoms only in dynamic analysis. On another basis, Bonkhoff et al (2021) showed that in the first three months after stroke, the observed recovery in stroke severity was strongly connected with, or showed strong trends in, dynamic connectivity between three pairs of networks [21]. The change in stroke severity and the dynamic connectivity of default-mode networks in the bilateral intraparietal lobule and left angular gyrus were significantly inversely correlated in State 1. Dynamic connectivity of the bilateral putamen and superior temporal gyrus and first and bilateral anterior insula also showed positive associations with recovery of stroke severity at stage 3. Recovery of motor symptoms, which make up a large proportion of NIHSS score, may be related to the subcortical putamen, revealing its importance in stroke outcome. It is known that the default mode and cognitive control networks control basic brain activities, which explains why individuals who have lesions in these regions tend to have worse stroke outcomes. In addition, the strong negative connectivity between networks suggests that there is less communication between different functional areas. However, the researchers found no significant association between the degree of segregation and changes in stroke severity in the first three months after stroke.

2.1.2. Changes in FC in Association with the Application of Specific Rehabilitation Methods

In a study by Fan et al (2015), who used robot-assisted bilateral arm therapy (RBAT) for stroke patients, changes in M1-M1 connectivity before and after treatment were associated with better motor and functional progress, and these differences are thought to serve as a significant mediator of the relationship between changes in some disability scores [22]. As a result, rs-FC can demonstrate this flexibility and bilateral arm training can alter functional connections between sensorimotor brain regions and restore hemispheric imbalances in stroke recovery.
Zhang et al (2016) examined the functional connectivity (FC) alterations between the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) and the entire brain of stroke patients compared to normal controls, as well as in stroke patients preceding and following traditional rehabilitation and motor imagery therapy [23]. Relative to the controls, the FC in the patient group was substantially increased between the ipsilesional M1 and other areas of the brain, this may be a form of compensation when interhemispheric FC balance is lost due to the stroke. Following the treatment, the FC between the ipsilesional and contralesional M1 rose, yet the FC between the ipsilesional M1 and other regions dropped. Specifically, the decreased FC between the ipsilesional M1 and left paracentral lobules, areas involved in the motion control and the sensation of the limbs, hinted ipsilateral hemispheric FC recovery. The study revealed positive correlations between the FC change and the motor function recovery of stroke patients with hemiplegia, indicating that the FC could be used as a biomarker of motor function recovery. Moreover, Li et al (2016) used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the ipsilesional M1 to increase CST activity, which aided recovery of motor function in stroke patient [24]. The authors attributed this to enhanced FC between the bilateral M1 and the contralesional supplementary motor area (SMA), which serves as an anatomical basis for motor recovery once M1 output is disrupted. Increased FC between the ipsilesional M1 and bilateral thalamus, which is a critical component of the extrapyramidal system and strongly related to motor coordination, was also noted, and this may be considered a possible compensatory mechanism for recovery of motor function after stroke.
On the same basis, Lefebvre et al (2017) showed that FC increased exclusively in the somatomotor network after combined dual transcranial direct-current stimulation (dual-tDCS)/motor skill learning relative to the period before intervention, which altered the spontaneous activity of the somatomotor network [25]. Consistent with previous studies, they supported the possibility that stroke could cause a net deleterious inhibition from the normal hemisphere to the damaged side. However, they also suggested another mechanism, namely, that stroke patients rely more heavily on their nondamaged upper limb in daily activities, which could strengthen the cortical FC of this limb.
Furthermore, Li et al (2017), in their study on FC in subcortical stroke patients using conventional Western medical treatment and a combination with acupuncture, found a statistically significant association between pretreatment FC values between bilateral M1 and percent changes in neurological deficit scores [26]. Given that ischemic stroke damage causes anatomic and functional changes in perilesional and distal brain regions, communication, and connectivity between the two hemispheres were also influenced. Intra-hemispheric FC in regions of interests in the right contralateral hemisphere showed a considerable rise in post-stroke patients. This finding can be interpreted based on the mechanism of compensation for decreased FC of brain regions in the contralateral hemisphere to maintain motor function.
On the other hand, Guo et al (2021) studied the motor networks of stroke patients with motor deficits after treatment with rTMS. Motor recovery could be due to the different functional recovery and reorganization that both high frequency-rTMS and low frequency-rTMS induced in the motor network [27]. Of note, after high-frequency rTMS and low-frequency rTMS, the alterations were observed in the ipsilesional and contralateral hemispheres, respectively. This could be explained by the different processes of the various rTMS modes. High-frequency rTMS could promote cortical excitability, whereas low-frequency rTMS might reduce the abnormally excessive inhibition of lesioned M1 and support regrowth of the damaged hemisphere. As a result, the compensation of unequal interhemispheric excitability and connection may be related to motor recovery after stroke. A similar outcome was found by Chen et al (2022) investigated how coupled inhibitory and facilitative rTMS treatment affects early reorganization of motor networks in cerebral infarction patients [28]. They discovered that rTMS can induce functional remodeling of cortical motor networks by altering the intensity of intra- and interhemispheric FC. In addition, they note that FC changes were associated with a regaining of motor function and may serve as a future focus of neurorehabilitation interventions for early cerebral stroke patients.

2.1.3. Changes in FC and Structural Connectivity

Chen et al (2013) demonstrated a correlation between the upper extremities FMA (UE-FMA) score and the left and right M1 rs-FC, as well as the white matter integrity in the transcallosal M1-M1 tract [29]. However, they did not find any discernible association between WM integrity of the transcallosal M1-M1 tract and the rs-interhemispheric M1 FC. According to their theories, which are consistent with previous findings, the ipsilesional M1 may no longer have the same inhibitory effect on the contralesional M1 as before, and/or the contralesional M1 has an excessively imbalanced inhibitory effect on the ipsilesional M1. It is therefore plausible that patients who recovered more quickly from their motor impairments had greater interhemispheric M1 connectivity and a more normal inhibitory effect from ipsilesional to contralesional M1.
The investigation by Kalinosky et al (2017) successfully combined structural and functional connectivity techniques. While rs-FC alone can identify abnormalities in stroke patients that are associated with function, structuro-functional connectivity (SFC) detects the maximum of FC to a voxel over various distances and may provide insight into network-specific processes underlying pathology and recovery [30]. The cerebellum, midbrain, and thalamus—integrative brain regions that are crucial for motor function—were found to have decreased SFC. Intrinsic SFC in the cerebellum was substantially linked with hand motor performance, serving as a marker of sensorimotor function. Additionally, stroke patients were found to have decreased intrinsic SFC between regions connected by longer fiber pathways, especially in areas associated with integrative cortical network nodes, including the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex, the center of the default-mode network. This supports the possibility that alterations in these structuro-functional networks reflect compensatory or maladaptive mechanisms of reorganization and that the stroke-affected sensorimotor and cerebellar networks shift towards creating shorter-distance connections to default-mode and prefrontal network nodes.
Lin et al (2018) discovered that structural and functional features may have good predictive value for initial motor impairment [31]. FC between motor areas improved in the long-term phase, but mainly in the first three months, which was substantially associated with motor function throughout the same period, but not at 12 months post-stroke. Therefore, the integrity of CST was found to influence interhemispheric FC and recovery developed mainly within the first three months after the stroke, never reaching the optimal levels.
On another basis, research by Lee et al (2019) shows changes in structural and functional connectivity after stroke measured with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and rs-fMRI [32]. Patients with mild stroke experienced restructuring of brain networks in motor-related areas, whereas the severe stroke group showed no significant alterations in FC, possibly indicating significant structural damage in the affected brain regions. The severity of motor impairment is influenced by alterations in myelination and axonal density, which may be due to differences in structural connectivity between the two groups. During poststroke reorganization, the severe group cannot successfully recover motor function through remyelination processes. Like other research, spared projections may be able to control paretic muscles again post-stroke through perilateral reconfiguration of the motor network, which would lead to an increase in FC between specific motor-related brain regions such as M1 and SMA.
With respect to rs-fMRI as a prognostic tool, Lu et al (2019) support that FC of neuronal networks in the brain fluctuates dynamically because of synchronization of intrinsic neuronal interactions [33]. Compared to the baseline, the interhemispheric FC between ROIs was decreased at day 7, then gradually increased from day 7 to 90 and returned to normal at day 90. Of note, From day 7 to day 90 post-stroke, FA in the bilateral (ipsilesional, contralesional) CST increased as well, NHISS scores decreased while FMA and BI progressively increased. The early decline in interhemispheric FC after stroke may point to the disruption of ischemic stroke-damaged networks. The elimination of transient hemispheric diaschisis and the formation of new axons forming new connections and projections might be associated with the restoration of interhemispheric FC. Therefore, the above results suggest that the response of the contralesional hemisphere to ipsilesional brain activity changes when the two hemispheres cannot communicate effectively at rest. Proliferative reorganization in the ipsilesional and contralesional CST and functional reorganization in the SMN may support and promote neurological functional recovery after internal capsule infarction.
Similarly, the study by Xia et al (2021) involving participants with mild to moderate stroke showed longitudinal improvement in their interhemispheric FC [34]. Notably, interhemispheric FC recovery largely took place within 4 weeks of stroke, making this the ideal time window for patients to experience interhemispheric FC reorganization. Considering these, it was found that increased interhemispheric FC and recovery of corticospinal pathways were positively correlated during the first 4 weeks after stroke but not between weeks 4 and 12.

2.2. Prediction of Sensory Outcome Using rs-fMRI

Bannister et al (2015) found increased interhemispheric FC of the S1 at 6 months in stroke patients with a lower degree of touch impairment that was not present at 1 month and lower interhemispheric connectivity in stroke patients with impaired touch compared with healthy controls [35]. The stroke group also showed FC at 6 months that was absent in the visual occipital regions and frontoparietal attention regions at month 1. These results suggest a pattern of disrupted FC between somatosensory and other cortical regions that eventually exhibited some signs of recovery. Moreover, the improvements in TDT score over time and the changes in FC between the 1- and 6-month periods were all located in the contralesional hemisphere. These emphasize the importance of an intact contralesional hemispheric FC, particularly in the somatosensory cortex. Moreover, Goodin et al (2018) examined the rs-FC in stroke patients with both right and left hemisphere lesions and discovered that the right lesion group displayed greater FC in comparison with the left hemisphere group, based on a connection between the contralesional left primary somatosensory cortex (S1) seed to the left superior parietal and mid-occipital regions [36]. This may indicate that connections between the somatosensory and visual networks are disrupted when only the left hemisphere, and not the right, is damaged. In addition, disruption of interhemispheric FC from both hemispheres was found regardless of the lesion location. Consequently, injury to the somatosensory system in one hemisphere not only affects interhemispheric inhibition, but also exerts a negative effect on recovery in general.

3. Discussion

The current comprehensive analysis of the latest literature within the field of the application of rs-fMRI in stroke patients suggests that rs-fMRI can be a promising biomarker for the prediction of motor and sensory outcome.
Lesion volume or lesion location, age, stroke severity and comorbid factors may influence stroke outcome [37,38,39,40,41,42,43] but even mild stroke severity is not enough to provide an accurate prediction of favorable outcome [44]. Thus, novel prognostic biomarkers are crucial for the development of personalized recovery treatment strategies [45] and the amelioration of patients’ and caregivers’ quality of life [46]. Brain plasticity remains a crucial issue in stroke rehabilitation and the advances in MRI techniques have the potential to improve the clinical and research opportunities and knowledge in that field. Clinical recovery, whether motor or sensory, is supported through reorganization of surviving brain tissue, alterations in interhemispheric lateralization, involvement of associative cortices linked to injured areas, and organization of cortical representation maps [47]. The variability of motor and sensory impairment after stroke has been associated not only to structural [48] but also functional alterations [47] in networks proximal and/or distal to the brain lesions. In contrast to task-related fMRI, rs-fMRI minimizes the subject’s involvement and the interindividual differences in task performance, thus enabling the integration of rs-fMRI into clinical MRI and the monitoring of functional alterations during different post-stroke phases (e.g. subacute vs chronic) and therapeutic approaches (e.g. physiotherapy, motor imagery, neuromodulation, etc).
Some critical comments regarding methodological aspects of the available literature are necessary before reaching a conclusion. We found that some studies focused on motor outcome using classic and more sophisticated approached for the rs-fMRI analysis (Table 1, section a), other studies used rs-fMRI and focused on motor outcome following specific rehabilitation interventions (Table 1, section b), other studies examined motor outcome in association with functional connectivity and structural connectivity (Table 1, section c), while few studies focused on sensory outcome. (Table 1, section d). Most studies included patients with either ischemic stroke or either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The total number of stroke patients included in all studies varied a lot, ranging from 10 to 67 patients. Of note, the stroke patients were contrasted to demographically matched healthy individuals in most but not all studies and none of the studies included a disease-control group other than stroke patients. We also identified a great variability on the time of MRI acquisition post-stroke, ranging from few days (i.e. 2-3 days) post-stroke to 60.0 +/- 69.6 months post-stroke. Most studies used 3T, while the rs-fMRI acquisition time (when available) ranged between 5min to 10.25min. Several approaches were applied to analyze the raw data, including independent component analysis (ICA), seed-to-whole brain FC analysis, region-of-interest (ROI) to ROI FC analysis, regional homogeneity (ReHO) analysis, amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (ALFF) analysis, intrinsic structural-functional connectivity (iSFC) analysis, as well as static and dynamic functional network connectivity analysis. Some studies also included other MRI modalities and reported lesion analysis (location and extent), white matter hyperintensities analysis, structural integrity of white matter using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) or cortical thickness of rs-fMRI ROIs. The most commonly used clinical measures were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and the Barthel Index (BI).
Despite the available research on the application of rs-fMRI in post-stroke motor and sensory outcome so far, several questions remain unanswered, leaving room for further investigations. The sample size of most studies was small and together with the sample heterogeneity (e.g. stroke severity, post-stroke phase) the generalization of the current findings may be limited. Of note, different post-stroke phases are associated with different static and dynamic functional and structural features and thus, the inclusion of patients under different post-stroke phases may limit the clinical significance of the findings. In addition, the interventional studies included interventions of different durations while the follow-up period differed among studies. As a result, a dose-effect of intervention on FC patterns could not be easily found whereas the durability of this effect needs further investigation in longitudinal studies with longer follow-up periods. Furthermore, even though the majority of studies used the FMA for the evaluation of motor functional disability, gold-standard clinical measures (e.g. NIHSS) were not uniformly used in all studies. From a methodological point of view, detailed descriptions of rs-fMRI protocols were not available for all studies (e.g. duration of rs-fMRI sequence) and thus replication of the findings may not be easily done for all studies. Finally, different and more sophisticated methodological approaches on rs-fMRI raw data may definitely yield informative details regarding the usefulness of rs-fMRI in research settings, yet the application in every-day clinical practice and prediction of single-subject prognosis has yet to be answered. Thus, longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes and well-characterized groups in terms of clinical features are warranted to enable the identification of possible rs-fMRI biomarkers for the prognosis of stroke motor and sensory outcome not only at group level but also and more importantly at single-case level.

4. Conclusions

With the advancement of MRI acquisition and data analysis methods, rs-fMRI emerges as a promising tool to study the motor and sensory outcome in stroke patients and evaluate the effect of different interventions, including recently used rTMS and tDCS. The implementation of rs-fMRI in stroke may further establish the predictive value of rs-fMRI in stroke clinical practice and provide valuable information for more accurate patients’ stratification into clinical trials and evidence-based clinical decision making.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org.

Author Contributions

F.C., C.K. (Christos Koutsokostas) and I.O. reviewed the literature, screened the abstracts of the reference list, deleted duplicates and citations not meeting the inclusion criteria, and assessed the articles; D.T., E.K. and E.P. solved any disagreement regarding screening or selection process; F.C. and I.O. wrote the first manuscript; F.C. analyzed the MRI data (Figure 1); A.T., C.K., E.M., N.A., and K.V. reviewed the tables. The corrected version was discussed collegially. F.C., A.S. and I.O. updated and wrote the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the project “Study of the interrelationships between neuroimaging, neurophysiological and biomechanical biomarkers in stroke rehabilitation (NEURO-BIO-MECH in stroke rehab)” (MIS 5047286), which was implemented under the action “Support for Regional Excellence” funded by the operational program “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRFm2014-2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (the European Regional Development Fund).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

The MRI (rs-fMRI and DTI) data (Figure 1) were acquired from a healthy control who provided written informed consent for acquisition, analysis, and presentation of data.

Acknowledgments

We thank the healthy control for participating in the acquisition of MRI data. We also thank Advantis Medical Imaging for providing access in Brainance MD platform to analyze rs-fMRI and DTI data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sachdev, P.S.; Brodaty, H.; Valenzuela, M.J.; Lorentz, L.; Looi, J.C.L.; Wen, W.; Zagami, A.S. The Neuropsychological Profile of Vascular Cognitive Impairment in Stroke and TIA Patients. Neurology 2004, 62, 912–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Loubinoux, I.; Brihmat, N.; Castel-Lacanal, E.; Marque, P. Cerebral Imaging of Post-Stroke Plasticity and Tissue Repair. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2017, 173, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hylin, M.J.; Kerr, A.L.; Holden, R. Understanding the Mechanisms of Recovery and/or Compensation Following Injury. Neural Plast 2017, 2017, 7125057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hommel, M.; Detante, O.; Favre, I.; Touzé, E.; Jaillard, A. How to Measure Recovery? Revisiting Concepts and Methods for Stroke Studies. Transl. Stroke Res. 2016, 7, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sarraj, A.; Grotta, J.C. Stroke: New Horizons in Treatment. Lancet Neurol 2014, 13, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, J.E.; Glover, G.H. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods. Neuropsychol Rev 2015, 25, 289–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Friston, K.J.; Frith, C.D.; Liddle, P.F.; Frackowiak, R.S.J. Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993, 13, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. The Oxford Handbook of Functional Brain Imaging in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neurosciences; Papanicolaou, A.C., Papanicolaou, A.C., Eds.; Oxford Library of Psychology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York, 2017.
  9. Stamatakis, E.A.; Orfanidou, E.; Papanicolaou, A.C. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in The Oxford Handbook of Functional Brain Imaging in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neurosciences; Oxford University Press, 2017.
  10. Ovadia-Caro, S.; Margulies, D.S.; Villringer, A. The Value of Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Stroke. Stroke 2014, 45, 2818–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yin, D.; Song, F.; Xu, D.; Sun, L.; Men, W.; Zang, L.; Yan, X.; Fan, M. Altered Topological Properties of the Cortical Motor-related Network in Patients with Subcortical Stroke Revealed by Graph Theoretical Analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 2013, 35, 3343–3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, S.; Zhou, M.; Yu, B.; Ma, Z.; Chen, S.; Gong, Q.; He, L.; Huang, X.; Lui, S.; Wang, X.; et al. Altered Default Mode and Affective Network Connectivity in Stroke Patients with and without Dysphagia. J Rehabil Med 2014, 46, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lam, T.K.; Binns, M.A.; Honjo, K.; Dawson, D.R.; Ross, B.; Stuss, D.T.; Black, S.E.; Chen, J.J.; Fujioka, T.; Chen, J.L. Variability in Stroke Motor Outcome Is Explained by Structural and Functional Integrity of the Motor System. Sci Rep 2018, 8, 9480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chi, N.-F.; Ku, H.-L.; Chen, D.Y.-T.; Tseng, Y.-C.; Chen, C.-J.; Lin, Y.-C.; Hsieh, Y.-C.; Chan, L.; Chiou, H.-Y.; Hsu, C.Y.; et al. Cerebral Motor Functional Connectivity at the Acute Stage: An Outcome Predictor of Ischemic Stroke. Sci Rep 2018, 8, 16803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zou, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Yin, D.; Fan, M.; Small, M.; Liu, Z.; Hilgetag, C.C.; Kurths, J. Brain Anomaly Networks Uncover Heterogeneous Functional Reorganization Patterns after Stroke. NeuroImage: Clinical 2018, 20, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hong, W.; Lin, Q.; Cui, Z.; Liu, F.; Xu, R.; Tang, C. Diverse Functional Connectivity Patterns of Resting-State Brain Networks Associated with Good and Poor Hand Outcomes Following Stroke. Neuroimage Clin 2019, 24, 102065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liu, G.; Dang, C.; Peng, K.; Xie, C.; Chen, H.; Xing, S.; Chen, X.; Zeng, J. Increased Spontaneous Neuronal Activity in Structurally Damaged Cortex Is Correlated with Early Motor Recovery in Patients with Subcortical Infarction. Eur J Neurol 2015, 22, 1540–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhao, Z.; Tang, C.; Yin, D.; Wu, J.; Gong, J.; Sun, L.; Jia, J.; Xu, D.; Fan, M. Frequency-specific Alterations of Regional Homogeneity in Subcortical Stroke Patients with Different Outcomes in Hand Function. Hum Brain Mapp 2018, 39, 4373–4384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liang, L.; Hu, R.; Luo, X.; Feng, B.; Long, W.; Song, R. Reduced Complexity in Stroke with Motor Deficits: A Resting-State fMRI Study. Neuroscience 2020, 434, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bonkhoff, A.K.; Espinoza, F.A.; Gazula, H.; Vergara, V.M.; Hensel, L.; Michely, J.; Paul, T.; Rehme, A.K.; Volz, L.J.; Fink, G.R.; et al. Acute Ischaemic Stroke Alters the Brain’s Preference for Distinct Dynamic Connectivity States. Brain 2020, 143, 1525–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bonkhoff, A.K.; Schirmer, M.D.; Bretzner, M.; Etherton, M.; Donahue, K.; Tuozzo, C.; Nardin, M.; Giese, A.-K.; Wu, O.; D Calhoun, V.; et al. Abnormal Dynamic Functional Connectivity Is Linked to Recovery after Acute Ischemic Stroke. Hum Brain Mapp 2021, 42, 2278–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fan, Y.; Wu, C.; Liu, H.; Lin, K.; Wai, Y.; Chen, Y. Neuroplastic Changes in Resting-State Functional Connectivity after Stroke Rehabilitation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2015, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, L.; Yang, J.; Yan, R.; Zhang, J.; Sang, L.; Li, P.; Wang, J.; Qiu, M. Relationship between Functional Connectivity and Motor Function Assessment in Stroke Patients with Hemiplegia: A Resting-State Functional MRI Study. Neuroradiology 2016, 58, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, J.; Zhang, X.-W.; Zuo, Z.-T.; Lu, J.; Meng, C.-L.; Fang, H.-Y.; Xue, R.; Fan, Y.; Guan, Y.-Z.; Zhang, W.-H. Cerebral Functional Reorganization in Ischemic Stroke after Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: An fMRI Study. CNS Neurosci Ther 2016, 22, 952–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lefebvre, S.; Dricot, L.; Laloux, P.; Desfontaines, P.; Evrard, F.; Peeters, A.; Jamart, J.; Vandermeeren, Y. Increased Functional Connectivity One Week after Motor Learning and tDCS in Stroke Patients. Neuroscience 2017, 340, 424–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liao, C.; Huang, W.; Wu, P. Longitudinal Brain Functional Connectivity Changes of the Cortical Motor-Related Network in Subcortical Stroke Patients with Acupuncture Treatment. Neural Plast 2017, 2017, 5816263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guo, Z.; Jin, Y.; Bai, X.; Jiang, B.; He, L.; McClure, M.A.; Mu, Q. Distinction of High- and Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Functional Reorganization of the Motor Network in Stroke Patients. Neural Plast 2021, 2021, 8873221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, X.; Liu, F.; Lin, S.; Yu, L.; Lin, R. Effects of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Training on Cognitive Function and Activities of Daily Living of Patients With Poststroke Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022, 103, 1422–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, J.L.; Schlaug, G. Resting State Interhemispheric Motor Connectivity and White Matter Integrity Correlate with Motor Impairment in Chronic Stroke. Front Neurol 2013, 4, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kalinosky, B.T.; Berrios Barillas, R.; Schmit, B.D. Structurofunctional Resting-State Networks Correlate with Motor Function in Chronic Stroke. Neuroimage Clin 2017, 16, 610–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, L.Y.; Ramsey, L.; Metcalf, N.V.; Rengachary, J.; Shulman, G.L.; Shimony, J.S.; Corbetta, M. Stronger Prediction of Motor Recovery and Outcome Post-Stroke by Cortico-Spinal Tract Integrity than Functional Connectivity. PLoS One 2018, 13, e0202504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, J.H.; Kyeong, S.; Kang, H.; Kim, D.H. Structural and Functional Connectivity Correlates with Motor Impairment in Chronic Supratentorial Stroke: A Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. NeuroReport 2019, 30, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lu, Q.; Huang, G.; Chen, L.; Li, W.; Liang, Z. Structural and Functional Reorganization Following Unilateral Internal Capsule Infarction Contribute to Neurological Function Recovery. Neuroradiology 2019, 61, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xia, Y.; Huang, G.; Quan, X.; Qin, Q.; Li, H.; Xu, C.; Liang, Z. Dynamic Structural and Functional Reorganizations Following Motor Stroke. Med Sci Monit 2021, 27, e929092-1–e929092-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bannister, L.C.; Crewther, S.G.; Gavrilescu, M.; Carey, L.M. Improvement in Touch Sensation after Stroke Is Associated with Resting Functional Connectivity Changes. Front Neurol 2015, 6, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Goodin, P.; Lamp, G.; Vidyasagar, R.; McArdle, D.; Seitz, R.J.; Carey, L.M. Altered Functional Connectivity Differs in Stroke Survivors with Impaired Touch Sensation Following Left and Right Hemisphere Lesions. NeuroImage: Clinical 2018, 18, 342–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. F, C.; D, T.; A, S.; S, K.; S, K.; S, K.; S, A.; K, T.; Ea, P.; E, K.; et al. The Clinical Utility of Leukoaraiosis as a Prognostic Indicator in Ischemic Stroke Patients. Neurology international, 2022, 14 (4). [CrossRef]
  38. Gkantzios, A.; Karapepera, V.; Tsiptsios, D.; Liaptsi, E.; Christidi, F.; Gkartzonika, E.; Karatzetzou, S.; Kokkotis, C.; Kyrtsopoulos, M.; Tsiakiri, A.; et al. Investigating the Predictive Value of Thyroid Hormone Levels for Stroke Prognosis. Neurol Int 2023, 15, 926–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Karatzetzou, S.; Tsiptsios, D.; Sousanidou, A.; Christidi, F.; Psatha, E.A.; Chatzaki, M.; Kitmeridou, S.; Giannakou, E.; Karavasilis, E.; Kokkotis, C.; et al. Elucidating the Role of Baseline Leukoaraiosis on Forecasting Clinical Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Reperfusion Therapy. Neurol Int 2022, 14, 923–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Karatzetzou, S.; Tsiptsios, D.; Sousanidou, A.; Fotiadou, S.; Christidi, F.; Kokkotis, C.; Gkantzios, A.; Stefas, E.; Vlotinou, P.; Kaltsatou, A.; et al. Copeptin Implementation on Stroke Prognosis. Neurol Int 2023, 15, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Liaptsi, E.; Merkouris, E.; Polatidou, E.; Tsiptsios, D.; Gkantzios, A.; Kokkotis, C.; Petridis, F.; Christidi, F.; Karatzetzou, S.; Karaoglanis, C.; et al. Targeting Neutrophil Extracellular Traps for Stroke Prognosis: A Promising Path. Neurol Int 2023, 15, 1212–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Orgianelis, I.; Merkouris, E.; Kitmeridou, S.; Tsiptsios, D.; Karatzetzou, S.; Sousanidou, A.; Gkantzios, A.; Christidi, F.; Polatidou, E.; Beliani, A.; et al. Exploring the Utility of Autonomic Nervous System Evaluation for Stroke Prognosis. Neurol Int 2023, 15, 661–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tziaka, E.; Christidi, F.; Tsiptsios, D.; Sousanidou, A.; Karatzetzou, S.; Tsiakiri, A.; Doskas, T.K.; Tsamakis, K.; Retzepis, N.; Konstantinidis, C.; et al. Leukoaraiosis as a Predictor of Depression and Cognitive Impairment among Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review. Neurol Int 2023, 15, 238–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. P, K.; Mr, C.; Kc, J. Ninety-Day Outcome Rates of a Prospective Cohort of Consecutive Patients with Mild Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2012, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Personalized Approaches to Stroke: One Step Forward for Functional Recovery of Stroke Patients - PMC https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148160/ (accessed Dec 18, 2023).
  46. BioMed | Free Full-Text | A Scoping Review on Coping Strategies and Quality of Life of Stroke Caregivers: Often Underestimated Variables in Stroke Recovery Process? https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8430/3/3/29 (accessed Dec 18, 2023).
  47. Cramer, S.C. Repairing the Human Brain after Stroke: I. Mechanisms of Spontaneous Recovery. Ann Neurol 2008, 63, 272–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Christidi, F.; Tsiptsios, D.; Fotiadou, A.; Kitmeridou, S.; Karatzetzou, S.; Tsamakis, K.; Sousanidou, A.; Psatha, E.A.; Karavasilis, E.; Seimenis, I.; et al. Diffusion Tensor Imaging as a Prognostic Tool for Recovery in Acute and Hyperacute Stroke. Neurol Int 2022, 14, 841–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Preprints 93928 g001
Figure 1. The characteristic pattern of functional connectivity at rest between the regions of the motor network of a healthy individual. The nodes of the motor network (left and right M1, SMA) are overlaid on a 3D-T1 sequence and presented in axial (a) and coronal (b) plane. The location of the left and right M1 nodes and their association with the distribution of the major motor white-matter pathway (CST) is presented in (c). Note that the CST had been reconstructed using tractography on available DTI data for the same subject and is colored based on the distribution of the fractional anisotropy values along the tract. The analysis of the DTI data, as well as the rs-fMRI data and the identification of motor network at rest has been performed on a healthy subject (who provided written informed consent for the data acquisition, analysis and presentation) using the Brainance MD platform (Advantis Medical Imaging). rs-fMRI = resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging; DTI = diffusion tensor imaging; L = left hemisphere; M1 = primary motor cortex; SMA = supplementary motor area; CST = corticospinal tract.
Figure 1. The characteristic pattern of functional connectivity at rest between the regions of the motor network of a healthy individual. The nodes of the motor network (left and right M1, SMA) are overlaid on a 3D-T1 sequence and presented in axial (a) and coronal (b) plane. The location of the left and right M1 nodes and their association with the distribution of the major motor white-matter pathway (CST) is presented in (c). Note that the CST had been reconstructed using tractography on available DTI data for the same subject and is colored based on the distribution of the fractional anisotropy values along the tract. The analysis of the DTI data, as well as the rs-fMRI data and the identification of motor network at rest has been performed on a healthy subject (who provided written informed consent for the data acquisition, analysis and presentation) using the Brainance MD platform (Advantis Medical Imaging). rs-fMRI = resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging; DTI = diffusion tensor imaging; L = left hemisphere; M1 = primary motor cortex; SMA = supplementary motor area; CST = corticospinal tract.
Preprints 93928 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated