2.1. Optical properties
The UV-Vis-NIR spectra of the luminescent samples and of a non-hydrophobized and non-functionalized silica powders (notes GR0) are show on
Figure 1. All silica samples display overtones and combinational vibrations attributed to SiO
2 in the range 2250-2400 nm. Even the hydrophobic samples have some residual water according to the spectra in the NIR region. Water molecules have two intense overtones in the near-infrared. The peaks are centered around 1940 and 1450 nm. The luminescent samples also display peaks at 1186 nm and a doublet at 1696 and 1745 nm. These bands are associated with combinational and overtone vibrations of C-H groups in aromatic compounds, however, the position of the maxima are slightly shifted compared to C-H energies in pure benzene. This means they most likely originate from the phen molecule and the shift of the maxima is due to the presence of a N-heteroatom in the aromatic ring of the molecule [
10].
Due to the low concentration of Ln
3+ (1%) complex in the matrix the f-f transition in the ions are not visible in the reflection spectra of the samples (
Figure 1). These transitions are forbidden by the Laporte selection rules and have a low oscillator strength, therefore, a low intensity. The UV region of the reflectance spectra is dominated by ligand (phen) and matrix (SiO
2) absorption bands. The phen molecule has strong and broad absorption band around 350 nm which is seen as a shoulder in the reflectance spectra. This is the most important excitation channel in these complexes and composite materials doped with them. The energy is transferred trough the following path: first the UV photon (350 nm) is absorbed by the phen molecule and it is excited to the first singlet state. Afterwards the phen molecules relax non-radiatively to it’s first triplet state from which though intersystem crossing it transfers the energy to the emitting level of the lanthanide ion. A simplified energy transfer scheme is S
0→S
1→T
1→
5D
J(Ln
3+) [
3], [
11]. Furthermore, very intense ligand to metal charge transfer transitions (CTT) are visible in the UV region around 220 nm and 260 nm. It is the well known O
2-→Ln
3+ transition observed in oxide matrices [
5], [
12], [
13]. These transitions partially overlap with some phen peaks in the UV (232 and 265 nm).
Figure 2. a and b show the excitation and emission spectra, respectively, of the composite samples. The excitation spectra do not follow the reflectance spectra. They clearly show three distinct energy transfer pathways in the luminescent [Ln(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 complexes depending on the dopant type and doping level. The first is the ligand to metal CTT at 260 nm. The second and the most intense is the ligand to metal resonant energy transfer described above. This transition occurs when the ligand is excited with UV light with wavelength around 350 nm. Similar to our previous findings, this energy transfer from 1,10 - phenanthroline molecules is more efficient for the Eu
3+ complex rather than for the Tb
3+ one [
3]. The resonant energy transfer in hybrid molecules is the most efficient when the triplet T
1 state of the ligand is 2000-3000 cm
-1 above the metal receiving level (
5D
J, J=0,1,2 for Eu
3+ and J=3,4 for Tb
3+) [
5]. This ensures there is little-to-non back energy transfer from the metal ion to the ligand molecule. The last energy transfer path is via direct excitation of the lanthanide ion (380-390 nm). This is the least efficient excitation path due to the forbidden nature of the f-f transition. The intensity of this transition is about 1/10
th of the intensity of the FRET transition,
Figure 2 a.
The emission spectra, shown in
Figure 2b, display the well known f-f transition peaks for the Eu
3+ and Tb
3+ emission. The mixed samples, containing Eu
3+ and Tb
3+, do not show any emission originating from Tb
3+ ions. This effect is discussed in the following paragraphs. Samples 1%Eu, EuTb_11 and EuTb_15 have only Eu
3+ emission peaks. There can be observed
5D
0-
7F
J (J=1,2,3) transition. The most intense is the f-f electric dipole transition
5D
0-
7F
2 at 615 nm which gives the distinct red emission color of the Eu
3+-doped composites. The only sample exhibiting green Tb
3+ emission is the one doped with pure [Tb(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 complex, namely sample 1%Tb, fig 2b. There, one can observe the
5D
4-
7F
J (J=6,5,4,3,2) transitions. The most intense Tb
3+ peak is the
5D
4-
7F
5 transition, centered at 542 nm and giving the green color of the emission.
The optical properties of the aerogel nanocomposites are summarized in
Table 1. The relative spectral intensities between the electro-dipole and magnetic-dipole transitions clearly indicates a low site symmetry, C
2V or lower, around the Ln
3+ ions [
12], [
14]. For the [Eu(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 complex the ratio between the electro-dipole transition
5D
0-
7F
2 and the magnetic-dipole transition
7D
0-
7F
1 is calculated. The calculated ratios for samples 1%Eu, EuTb_11 and EuTb_15 are 5.98, 5.92 and 6.06, respectively. They are lower than the calculated ratio for the pure [Eu(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 complex. This indicates some structural changes and inhomogeneities forming during the in situ formation of the nanocrystalites inside the silica gel pores. The intensity ratios for the composites are similar in value but they tend to increase when higher concentration of Tb
3+ is used. This indicates a lowering of the site symmetry around Eu
3+ ions or increased polarizability of the phen ligand in the different environment [
12].
The Tb
3+ ion’s f-f electron transitions are less site sensitive than the electro-dipole transition
5D
0-
7F
2 in the Eu
3+ ion. For this reason, Tb
3+ is rarely used as a spectroscopic probe, nevertheless, different relative intensities in the emission peaks of the Tb
3+ ion still indicate some structural and site changes around the ion. There is no definitive procedure to determine the site symmetry around the Tb
3+ ion from the emission spectra, although there is one developed for Eu
3+. The intensity ratio
5D
4-
7F
6 to
5D
4-
7F
5 is calculated for sample 1%Tb. It’s value is 0.39 and is close to the ratio for the pure complex [Tb(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 – 0.37 [
5], [
15].
In
Table 1., quantum yield, spectral ratio and CIE-1931 color coordinates are compared to that of the pure solid complexes. It is visible that the Tb – green f-f emission is suppressed by the Eu – doping, which indicates for a possible energy transfer 1,10-phenanthroline →Tb
3+→Eu
3+. Such an assumption correlates with the Diecke diagrams of the terbium and europium ions. The energy of the emitting Tb
3+ level
5D
4 (20660 cm
-1) is slightly above the two lowest energy levels of Eu
3+ ion (
5D
0 and
5D
1 with energy 17240 and 21550 cm
-1, respectively). The next energy level of the Tb
3+ 5D
3 (26315 cm
-1) has similar energy as the Eu
3+’s
5G
8 and is above the
5L
6 (25450 cm
-1) and
5D
3 (24100 cm
-1) [
16,
17,
18]. Binnenmans et al [
5], [
12] predict such behavior. The relative spectral intensities are expressed through the ratio I
ED/I
MD, which is a semi-quantitative indicator for the site symmetry of the lanthanide ions [
13]. The assumption of a Tb
3+→Eu
3+is supported by the relative peak intensities in the excitation spectra,
Figure 2a, at 350 nm.
According to the concept of Foerster resonant energy transfer (FRET), the intensity of the transfer is strongly proportional to the inverse of the distance between the species. The mean distance between the europium and terbium ions, incorporated in the pores of the aerogels is less than 10 nm. Such an assumption is well supported by texture investigations of the silica matrix, showing a mean pore diameter about 7 nm [
4]. The question about an in situ formation of a binary [Eu-Tb(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 nanostructure in the pore system during the two step activation, however, needs additional structure investigations, which will be a subject of next contribution.
The quantum yield (QY) of the samples containing Eu
3+ are similar to that of the pure powder complex [Eu(phen)
2](NO
3)
3. The QY of the samples with europium are 30-35% and that of the pure complex is 35%. Sample 1%Tb has QY 6.3%, which is half the QY of the pure Tb
3+ complex (13%). This could be due to concentration quenching or strong non-radiative relaxation. Glasses and ceramics doped with europium usually display significant concentration quenching above 5% dopant [
19].
2.3. X-ray diffraction results
The optically active nanocrystallites in this study display structural polymorphism. The [Eu(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 and [Tb(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 are isostructural with small differences in the cell parameters. However, [Eu(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 has two polymorphs [
21]. The pure powdered [Eu(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 complex crystalizes in a monoclinic phase described by Mirochnik et al. [
22]. The XRD pattern of this phase is shown in
Figure 3. as Euphen_th (black line), while the theoretical patterns of the [Tb(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 are given as Tbphen_th (green line). PowderCell program [
20] was applied to construct the XRD pattern using data collected from the crystal structure information. The crystals are monoclinic with space group C2/c. The cell parameters are a = 11.168(1), b = 17.976(2), c = 13.053(1) Å, β = 100.577(2)°. The XRD pattern for the Tb complex was constructed using structure data from [
23]. Hence, being isostructural the two complexes display very similar XRD patterns.
Lindenberg et. al. [
21] have found that depending on the reaction conditions two different polymorphs of [Eu(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 or a mixture of both can be obtained. They give the following cell parameters for the second [Eu(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 phase: a = 9.515, b = 15.454, c = 17.176 Å, β = 93.45° with a space group P2
1/c. In agreement with these results the X-ray diffraction patterns here show the presence of both structures as the peaks of the phase observed by Lindenberg et. al. [
20] are marked with *. Thus, we can conclude that a mixture of the two polymorphic forms of [Ln(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 is obtained in the pores of the silica gels during the in- situ preparation procedure.
No diffraction patterns from Eu(NO
3)
3, Tb(NO
3)
3 or 1,10-phenanthroline were found. For the full, the presence of both anhydrous and different possible crystalhydrates were also checked. It should also be stressed that the interpretation of the XRD pattern of the samples is hampered by the low concentration of the dopant (1%) and the presence of intense broad amorphous halo originating from the silica matrix [
4]. Therefore, the formation of a new nanostructure in the pores of the silica matrix with a composition [Eu,Tb(phen)
2](NO
3)
3 cannot be excluded.
The mean crystallite sizes of the crystallites in
Figure 3 are about 20 nm.