1. Introduction
People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) (PLWH) are at increased risk of developing cancer affecting epithelial cells, even with long-term successful antiretroviral therapy. One of the driving mechanisms was suggested to be the direct tumorigenic effect(s) of some HIV-1 proteins, specifically their ability to cause malignant transformation of the epithelial cells [
1]. HIV proteins tat, nef, gp120, matrix protein p17, reverse transcriptase (RT) induce oxidative stress with serious consequences in the form of DNA, protein and lipid damage, as well as changes in the intracellular signaling and have a direct carcinogenic potential
in vivo [
2,
3,
4]. Another potent driver are co-infections with the oncogenic viruses, such as HBV, HCV, EBV, or CMV [
5]. Individuals with HIV, especially with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), are at specifically high risk to develop cancers associated with infection with human papilloma viruses (HPV) [
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11]. Infection with high risk HPVs (HR HPVs) is responsible for most of the cases of cervical cancer, and a subset of cancers of the anus, oropharynx, penis, vagina, and vulva [
12,
13,
14]. Women living with HIV are 6 times more likely to develop cervical cancer compared to women without HIV, an estimated 5% of new cervical cancer cases are attributable to HIV [
15]. Cervical cancer in HIV-infected women shows specific features: it occurs at a younger age than in general population, reveals advanced stages at presentation, develops metastases in unusual locations, demonstrates poor response to treatment, higher recurrence rate, and shorter time interval to death [
16]. Anal cancer is also more common in immunocompromised individuals, specifically PLWH [
17,
18]. HIV-infected women had an anal cancer rate of 30/100 000 person-years, while no anal cancer cases were observed for HIV-noninfected women. Even in HIV patients with CD4 cell counts stably over 500/μL, the risk to develop anal cancer was shown to be more than 20-fold higher than among general population [
19]. Anal infections HR HPVs are very common among HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). The unadjusted anal cancer incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were reported to be 2 for noninfected men, 46 for other HIV+ men and 131 for HIV+ MSM [
20,
21,
22,
23].
Cooperation between HIV-1 and HR HPVs, specifically, HPV16 in malignant transformation of epithelial cells has long been anticipated, with HR HPVs infecting epithelial cells [
24,
25], and HIV-1 entering these cells by multiple un-conventional mechanisms as transversion of the epithelial lining or “natural pseudotyping” [
26,
27,
28,
29]. HIV-1 can also destroy antigens affecting the “innocent” bystander cells [
1,
30]. This enables an interaction between HIV-1 and HPV viral proteins in HPV-infected epithelial cells. Possibility of the molecular interactions between these viruses and/or their antigens leading to enhanced risk(s) to develop cancer have been independently addressed in several studies. As an example, HIV-1 nef is transported from HIV-1-infected cells to the neighboring target cells via filopodia and/or exosomes [
31,
32,
33] and interacts with ubiquitin (Ub)-protein ligase E3A (UBE3A/E6AP) complex [
34] targeting the tumor suppressor p53 for ubiquitination and degradation, thereby contributing to HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis [
35,
36,
37]. The effects of HIV-1 and HR HPVs can be independent but unidirectional, potentiating one another.
As of today, the data on direct interaction(s) between HPV and other HIV-1 proteins is missing. However, HIV-1 tat was shown to increase the expression of HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins, enhancing the E6 and E7 mediated oncogenic effects of HPV [
38,
39,
40,
41] as well as increase E2 transcription, which modulated HPV replication [
42]. НIV-1 rev was found to upregulate the expression of HPV L1 [
43] (which remains a mystery given its nuclear localization in HIV-1-infected cells). The same applies to other HIV-1 antigens: the nuclear protein vpr involved in cell cycle regulation [
44], the envelope protein gp120 and the reverse transcriptase (RT). Vpr was shown to interact with E6 in cervical cancer cells [
45]. Both gp120 and RT increase the expression of HPV16 E6 in HPV16 infected immortalized and/or completely transformed epithelial cells, while other HIV-1 proteins, such as capsid protein p24 had no effect [
1]. Furthermore, prolonged interaction of HIV-1 proteins gp120 and tat and cell-free HIV-1 virions with HPV16-immortalized anal, cervical, and oral epithelial cells stimulated EMT and increased the invasiveness of the cells [
46,
47]. Overall, these data indicate that presence of HIV-1 and/or its antigens in HPV16-infected neoplastic cells may potentiate HPV-associated tumorigenicity, making HIV-1 infection an integral part/a player in the process of HPV-associated tumorigenesis.
Earlier, we have shown that expression of HIV-1 RT in murine adenocarcinoma cells induces production of ROS and genetic instability, increases the expression of factors promoting the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Furthermore, RT expressing cancer cells acquire an enhanced capacity to grow and metastasize in immunocompetent mice [
1,
4]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of HIV-RT on the HPV16-infected human epithelial cancer cells to test if RT can, as in murine cells, modulate their phenotypical characteristics, metabolic activity, gene expression patterns and
in vivo tumorigenicity.
4. Discussion
We have an overall goal to uncover the mechanisms by which HIV-1 promotes malignant transformation of the epithelial cells, on its own and/or in interaction with other oncoviruses, or their proteins. Candidate number one causing the bulk of non-AIDS related cancer cases in HIV-1 infection is HPV16. In this study, we concentrated on the interplay between HPV16 and HIV-1 antigens. Major globally recognized oncoproteins of HPV16 are early proteins E6 and E7, the main actors in HR HPV - associated malignant transformation. E6 acts by targeting tumor suppressor protein p53 for proteasomal degradation, and E7, by inactivation of another tumor suppressor protein, pRb [
75]. Besides, both proteins are involved in wide panel of regulatory activities imposed on the intracellular machinery of infected and/or E6 and E7 exposed cells that gradually lead to transformation of the affected epithelial cells.
HIV-1 antigens with the capacity to induce ROS, be exported out of the cells (into extracellular space) and taken by other innocent bystander cells and induce transformation or enhance tumorigenic and metastatic activities of tumor cells, play active part in this process [
1]. We hypothesized that HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) is one of the players in this team.
Reverse transcriptase is a multifunctional enzyme that converts the viral RNA genome into dsDNA in the cytoplasm, shortly after virus entry into the cell. This enzyme displays a DNA polymerase activity that can copy either DNA or RNA templates, and a ribonuclease H (RNase H) activity that cleaves the RNA strand of RNA-DNA heteroduplexes in a partially processive 3’ to 5’ endonucleasic mode and is essential for HIV replication [
76]. It has been shown that RT was detected in the exosomes in the uterine of PLWH [
77] and capable to secrete into cell culture fluids of cells transiently expressing RT [
78]. Early studies demonstrated that expression of different RT variants, including drug resistant variants, and variants retargeted for lysosomal processing and secretion induced ROS production [
78,
79]. We have shown that constitutive expression of HIV-1 RT in murine mammary gland adenocarcinoma 4T1 cells leads to ROS – dependent activation of the transcription factor Twist, involved in EMT [
4], which regulates the expression of transcription factors involved in cellular redox balance Nrf2, which stimulating the expression of Phase II detoxifying enzymes HO-1 and Nqo-1 [
4].
Mitochondria are considered a major contributor to intracellular ROS production in most types of cells. Expression of HIV-1 RT led to an increase in mitochondrial respiration and the level of ATP synthesis in the cell, which was associated with restoration of the mitochondrial network. In fact, we have shown that HIV-1 RT induces an increased tolerance to stress in breast adenocarcinoma cells due to change cancer cell metabolism towards oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) [
70].
Induction of E6 (FL) expression – property of a broad panel of RT variants, property of extracellularly added protein, indicating that it enters into the cell. Altogether, these properties provide for RT capacity to enhance growth and metastatic activity of adenocarcinoma cells in mice.
Although this proves active role of HIV-1 RT in modifying the in vitro and in vivo properties of cancer cells of epithelioid origins, it does not prove that it can make an input into the properties of human epithelial cells, specifically epithelioid cancer cells infected with HPV16. The latter represent an adequate model to check of HIV-1 RT modulates their properties, and if so, does this modulation involve HPV16 antigens, namely, if RT works alone/on its own, alongside with, or in collaboration with HPV16 oncoproteins.
For this, we have selected a model cell line – Ca Ski cells (HPV-16 infected human cervical squamous carcinoma, [
57]). Ca Ski cells were transduced with lentivirus encoding consensus RT of HIV-1 clade A FSU_A strain (RT_A) [
4]. We generated subclones with one and six genomic inserts of RT_A coding sequence expressing from 20 to 55 fg protein per cell.
One HIV-1 virion contains approximately 50 molecules of RT [
80] as a complex of a polypeptides of 66 kDa and its proteolytic digestion product 51 kDa that lacks the carboxy-terminal sequences present in the 66-kDa form [
81]. For HIV-1, a single productively infected CD4+ T cells should carries a viral load of approximately 500 virions [
82]. Another estimation gives an average of 3900 (range 3162–5011) viral RNA copies per infected cell, with two RNA molecules per virion this accounts for approximately 2000 virions per cell [
83], ie four times more. After recalculation from kDa into fg, the total amount of RT in CD4+ T cells could be estimated as 2,75 fg of p66 and 2,12 fg of p51 polypeptide, on total 5 fg per infected cell based on the first, and 20 fg per cell based on the second estimation. Thus, Ca Ski subclones produced an adequate amount of HIV-1 RT corresponding to the levels of protein in natural infection (although in the epithelial cells, not CD4+ T lymphocytes).
Lentiviral infection has been reported to change properties of the transduced cells [
58,
59]. There are indications of the effects of lentiviral transduction as such, such as altered expression of JUN [
84] as well as restricted
in vivo growth of lentivirally transduced tumor cell lines - due to activation of type I IFNs [
85]. Furthermore, (over) expression of foreign proteins overloads protein synthesis machinery and can grossly affect properties of the cells. An effective strategy for mitigating nonspecific effects of viral transduction on cell line properties is to generate control cells expressing unrelated proteins. It enables to account for both effects (lentiviral transduction and overexpression of exogenic protein/metabolic burden). For this end, we have created a control Ca Ski cell line transduced by lentivirus encoding GFP, with multiplicity of infection similar to the highest one used to generate Ca Ski RT_A subclones. All
in vitro and
in vivo properties of Ca Ski RT_A subclones were further compared to the Ca Ski GFP control.
Firstly, we assessed the effect of HIV-1 RT on expression of HPV16 oncoproteins, checking the level of their transcription in Ca Ski cells. A bicistronic pre-mRNA encodes HPV-16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins and alternatively spliced transcripts encoding E6*I, E6*II [
86]. RT had no effect on the expression of mRNA of
E7, full-length
E6, or
E6*II isoform, but increased the expression of
E6*I isoform. The effect was only partly due to the lentiviral transduction, as it was also observed for the Ca Ski GFP subclone, but at a significantly lower level. Interestingly, the phenomenon was observed for all RT-expressing subclones, with one as well as with six RT_A DNA inserts and was not related to the level of RT_A expression (as there was no difference in the levels of E6*I in subclones expressing high and low level of RT_A). The latter indicated that RT_A was not the direct mediator of E6*I expression, but rather an inducer of the expression in concentration independent manner.
We next investigated the effects of HIV-1 RT on cell metabolism. The alteration of glucose metabolism is the basic property of cancer cells registered as the increases glucose consumption and glycolytic rates, also in the presence of oxygen, so called “aerobic glycolysis” or the Warburg effect. Oncoproteins E6 and E7 favor the Warburg effect through the increase in the activity of glycolytic enzymes, as well as the inhibition of the Krebs cycle and the respiratory chain [
87]. With this, HPV16 infected Ca Ski cells employ the metabolic pathway of aerobic glycolysis. Furthermore, artificial overexpression of HPV16 E6/E7 in Ca Ski cells significantly upregulates the glycolysis pathway [
88]. One can expect that any factor leading to an increase of E6 expression would tint these cells further into the glycolytic pathway. Indeed, the constitutive expression of RT_A in Ca Ski cells inducing an increase in the levels of E6*I isoform led to an increase in the intensity of glycolysis under aerobic conditions. Ca Ski subclones with six RT_A gene inserts demonstrated an increase in the basal and maximal glycolysis, and an increased maximum glycolytic capacity, while no changes in glycolytic pathway were observed for Ca Ski GFP subclone. At the same time, expression of RT_A suppressed mitochondrial respiration as compared to the GFP control. An increase (no reduction in our case) in proton leak and a decrease in basal or maximal respiration are indicators of mitochondrial dysfunction [
89]. Linear correlation analysis demonstrated a direct correlation of ECAR at low and high glucose, and an inverse correlation of the parameters of mitochondrial respiration with the levels on RT_A mRNA and of RT_A as a protein, as well as with the levels of E6*I mRNA, although the significance for the latter was lower (had lower R values). This pointed at unidirectional effect(s) of HIV-1 RT and of E6*I, with RT as a primary factor modifying cell metabolism by altering the amounts of E6*I isoform. Thus, expressed in Ca Ski cells HIV-1 RT changed their metabolism by enhancing glycolysis and inhibiting mitochondrial respiration, suppressive effect possibly mediated through the modulation of the levels of E6*I isoform. It was also shown that HIV-1 tat protein revealed decreased maximal respiration and reduced spare respiratory capacity in lund human mesencephalic (LUHMES) cells [
90]. On contrary, in other HPV associated cancers, namely head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells positive for human papillomavirus were found to favor mitochondrial metabolism mediated by HPV16 and HPV18 E6 over the glucose metabolism [
91]. Difference in the effects observed for Ca Ski RT_A subclones and HNSCC could have been due to HIV-1 RT interference.
One has to also consider an E6-independent effect of HIV-1 RT. We have already shown it to be able to alter metabolism of cancer cells. Interestingly, in adenocarcinoma cells characterized by the high levels of ROS, HIV-1 RT enhanced mitochondrial respiration (OXPHOS), not the glycolysis [
70]. The direction of the metabolic changes is tightly linked to the redox status of the cell. ROS are involved in glycolysis (dys)regulation. ROS inhibit multiple glycolytic enzymes, including glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, pyruvate kinase M2, and phosphofructokinase-1 [
92]. Vice versa, shift to glycolysis inhibits production of ROS. Consistently, glycolytic inhibition promotes flux into the oxidative arm (of the pentose phosphate pathway to generate NADPH) [
93]. The enhancement of OXPHOS on the background of high ROS reflected this process with HIV-1 RT adapting the adenocarcinoma cells to the high-ROS environment by shifting their metabolism towards mitochondrial respiration.
To see if this could be the case for Ca Ski subclones, we assessed their overall levels of ROS using a sensor dyes, DCFH2-DA sensing H2O2, hydroxyl radical and superoxide O2•−, and DHE sensing only superoxide O2•−. The majority of Ca Ski subclones demonstrated decreased levels of total ROS, while the levels of superoxide production remained unchanged compared to the parental cells. We could not delineate a specific effect of RT_A on the total ROS due to the overlap of the signals of DCFH2-DA and GFP. To compensate for this, we assessed the levels of transcription factors induced in response to the oxidative stress Nrf2, enzymes of glutathione biosynthesis GCLС, and of the enzyme of Phase II of oxidative stress response NQO1, which follow the changes in the levels of ROS [
94]. The levels of mRNA of
NRF2,
GCLC and
NQO1 in RT-expressing Ca Ski subclones did not differ from that in Ca Ski GFP indicating that expression of HIV-1 RT in human epithelioid cells infected with HPV16 is not associated with the induction of oxidative stress. Thus, the shift towards glycolysis in Ca Ski expressing HIV-1 RT was not associated with the change of the redox balance of the cells.
Metabolic changes often reflect changes in the mitochondrial dynamics and functionality caused by the changes in the cell cytoskeleton [
95,
96]. We addressed this option by assessing the levels of expression in Ca Ski subclones of A-tubulin as the parameter reflecting the state of microtubules (MT) and of Y-tubulin as the parameter reflecting the condition of the MT-supported mitochondrial network [
97]. Lentiviral transduction and (over)expression of RT_A and of GFP had no effect on the expression of either
A-TUBULIN, or
Y-TUBULIN genes which could have affected the cytoskeleton of Ca Ski subclones and influence their choice of metabolic pathway. Furthermore, earlier we have shown that overexpression of HIV-1 RT by murine adenocarcinoma 4T1luc2 actually restores the mitochondrial networks disrupted in the original tumor cells [
70]. Altogether, this spoke against metabolic changed being caused by HIV-1 RT (or cumulative HIV-1 RT & E6*I) induced disruption of cytoskeleton of Ca Ski cells.
Which properties of HIV-1 RT determine its capacity to regulate cell metabolism, apart from inducing the expression of E6*I isoform, remains unclear. One can hypothesize that these are certain cell factors that interact with HIV-1 RT and through this, fail to carry their functions in the cells causing a metabolic shift. Warren et al. described a number of cellular factors which can directly or indirectly bind to RT [
98]. Specific interest represents the kinase anchor protein 121 (AKAP121), also referred to as AKAP1 or AKAP149 (human homologue). AKAP121 is an essential regulator of the mitochondrial respiration. Decreased AKAP1 expression was detected in the glycolytic metabolism dependent migrating cells found in invasive populations of breast cancer cells [
99]. Molecular, cellular, and in silico analyses of breast cancer cell lines confirmed that AKAP1 depletion is associated with the impaired mitochondrial function and dynamics, concomitant with the increased glycolytic potential and invasiveness [
100]. One can hypothesize that interaction of HIV-1 RT with AKAP1 (AKAP121) may “deplete” functional protein from the cells, causing a shift towards glycolytic pathway.
Glucose metabolism is tightly linked to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [
101]. Cancer cells employ EMT to acquire the ability to migrate, resist therapeutic agents and escape immunity [
102]. Metabolic dysregulation is known to trigger EMT [
103,
104,
105,
106,
107], which in turn modulates cell migration [
108]. The process of EMT is characterized by the profiles of expression of a number of cellular factors, including cadherins E and N, and transcriptional factors Twist1, Snai1 (Snail) and Snai2 (Slug). Data show increase of expression level of
N-CADHERIN,
TWIST1,
SNAI1,
SNAI2 and
VIMENTIN mRNA in lentiviral transduction control cell expressing GFP. In early study, transfection of a murine colon adenocarcinoma CT26 cells with empty lentivirus vector (GFP-vector group) did no lead to changes in associated with EMT factors [
109]. It is likely that transfection of cells does not have such a strong effect, but the genomic damage caused by transduction leads to changes in the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal factors. Despite, Ca Ski RT_A subclones demonstrated an increase in the expression of
E-CADHERIN manifesting a loss of the typical heterogeneous morphology of epithelial cells. Besides, Ca Ski RT_A exhibited decreased levels of expression of
VIMENTIN, a type III intermediate filament expressed in the mesenchymal cells and upregulated during cancer metastasis [
102], as well as of the transcription factors Snai1 (Snail) and Snai2 (Slug) (but not for all subclones), master regulatory factors for organogenesis and wound healing, tightly involved in EMT of cancer cells [
110,
111,
112]. These data indicated that Ca Ski RT_A subclones acquired features of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal (E/M) phenotype where cells simultaneously demonstrate the epithelial traits of cell-to-cell adhesion and mesenchymal characteristics of migration and invasion [
113]. Hybrid E/M cells express both epithelial markers (E-cadherin, cytokeratins, claudins, occludins) and mesenchymal markers (N-cadherin, vimentin, fibronectins), and they may display phenotypic characteristics of both cell types [
114]. Hybrid E/M has been associated with an increased malignancy of tumor cells [
115], indicating the potential consequences of the presence of HIV-1 RT for Ca Ski cells.
We further assessed the effect of the biochemical & molecular characteristics of Ca Ski subclones described above on their phenotypic features, such as doubling time, cell cycle progression, cell migration and clonogenic activity. Lentiviral transduction and (over)expression of RT_A or GFP control increase cell doubling time and significantly decreased cell motility in wound healing assay (WHA). The expression of RT_A had no effect on cell cycle progression but might have served to overcome the G1/G0 decreased caused by the lentiviral transduction (for GFP control).
As for the behavior of Ca Ski RT_A and GFP subclones in the clonogenic assay, the lentiviral transduction was found to suppress the clonogenic activity, significantly decreasing the number and size of the colonies. Notably, as in the case of cell migration, (over)expression of RT_A (six RT_A inserts) reversed these effects, restoring the colony counts and mean size of the colonies to the levels characteristic to the parental Ca Ski cells. Both observations on cell motility in WHA and results of the clonogenic analysis indicated that overexpression of HIV-1 RT was able to compensate for the adverse effect(s) of lentiviral transduction and/or foreign protein overexpression in Ca Ski cells.
Multiple regression analysis revealed that cell motility in WHA could be predicted using the levels of expression of RT_A and of RT_A dependent parameters, including the expression levels of E-cadherin and Twist1 mRNA and ECAR at high glucose, E6*I and of N-cadherin. The first three were positive, and the last two, negative predictors of cell migration. While Twist1 as well as the shift to glycolysis are known to stimulate cell motility, the effects of E-cadherin (E-cad) and N-cadherin (N-cad) were unexpected, contradicting the accepted role of these proteins. E-cadherin is the major homophilic cell-cell adhesion molecule that inhibits motility of individual cells on matrix [
116], while N-cad is a key regulator of collective cell migration [
117,
118]. Although E-cad has been implicated as suppressor of tumor metastasis, some data indicate that it can also serve as the promoter of metastasis growth and spread [
119]. Specifically, expression of E-cad in the epithelial cancer cells increases their motility through the mechanical feedback as E-cad promotes direction sensing during collective cell migration [
120]. N-cadherin, on contrary, promotes cell migration by cell-to-cell adhesion, but the opposite to E-cad, N-cad function is cell-context-dependent, as it can mediate strong cell to cell adhesion in muscles, such as the heart, and in bones, but induce changes in cell behavior in favor of a migratory phenotype in the epithelial cells in the context of EMT [
121,
122,
123]. Thus, functions of both largely depend on the cellular context. Expression of HIV-1 RT in Ca Ski cells led to an increase of the expression of E-cad, possibly mimicking the stimulating effect observed in E-cad overexpressing epithelial cancer cells [
120]. Lentiviral transduction (but not the expression of RT_A) caused also a simultaneous increase in the expression of N-cadherin. The latter would increase the levels of N-cadherin-expressing cellular substrates, their adhesion to the migrating cells could decrease cell migration through fibroblast growth factor receptor-n-cadherin crosstalk [
124]. Interestingly, HPV16 E6 had the same effect, E6 expression by immortalized human keratinocytes increased the proportion of cells attached to the cell culture dishes [
125]. Capacity of E6 isoform(s) to promote cell adhesion was listed among the known “contravercial” anti-tumor properties of E6 [
63]. Our data indicated that N-cad and HPV16 E6 can cooperate in enhancing cell adhesion, resulting in the decreased cell motility in WHA.
All above would have an effect on the aggressiveness of these cells in the body. To see the biological outcomes, we characterized the ability of Ca Ski RT_A subclones to form tumors in the immunosuppressed mice, the property well defined for the parental Ca Ski cells [
73].Lentiviral transduction with expression of GFP grossly compromised the ability of Ca Ski cells to form tumors in nude mice, tumorigenicity of highly expressing Ca Ski RT_A was partially restored, coming to the level observed for the parental Ca Ski cells.
Altogether, the analysis of motility/migration, clonogenic and tumorigenic activities of HPV16 infected epithelial cells in the presence of HIV-1 RT revealed that: (i) these process depend on both HIV-1 RT and HPV16 E6; (ii) although HIV-1 RT increases the expression of E6*I isoform, the effects of HIV-1 RT and of HPV16 E6 are not aligned and often not cooperative, specifically in clonogenic activity test with HIV-1 RT partially mitigating the effect(s) of E6; (iii) direct or indirect interaction(s) of HIV-1 RT and HPV16 E6 dysregulated the cells switching on the “non-classical” traits and pathways.