Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Selective Recovery of Scandium (Sc) from Sulfate Solution of Bauxite Residue Leaching by Puromet МТS9580 Ion-exchange Sorption

Altmetrics

Downloads

171

Views

70

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

30 December 2023

Posted:

03 January 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Rare earth elements (REEs) and Sc are concentrated in aluminum production byproducts. The novel REEs recovery approach, which involves leaching by acid at a pH > 3 in the presence of MgSO4, results in the formation of a pregnant leach solution (PLS) with a low concentration of iron (Fe) and titanium (Ti) and a large quantity of valuable elements. The ion exchange method was acknowledged as the most favorable method used to separate the REEs from PLS. This work studies the application of chelating resin Puromet МТS9580 in the sorption recovery of Sc from sulfate solutions. To analyze the static Sc sorption data, Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models were used. The Langmuir isotherm model was the best fitted to the experimental data, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.983. The dynamic adsorption experiment was conducted using a PLS and a simulate solution without contaminants. Adsorption of Sc from the simulate solution was better fitted to the Thomas model with a Sc capacity greater than 7 mg mL–1. Because Ti had a gradual decrease in C/C0, which the Thomas model was unable to simulate, the modified dose-response (MDR) model fitted better with PLS. The NaHCO3 solution (200 g L–1) effectively desorbed Sc (>98 %) from simulated and PLS solutions after 1.5 h of stirring in a batch mode.
Keywords: 
Subject: Engineering  -   Chemical Engineering

1. Introduction

Rare earth elements (REEs) and Scandium (Sc) are found in many secondary resources, including the bauxite residue (BR) from the alumina industry. During bauxite alkaline leaching in the Bayer process and during sintering with soda, the REEs are concentrating in BR and in dust from electrostatic precipitators (ESPD) [1]. Despite the toxicity, excessive alkalinity, and complex composition of aluminum production byproducts, treatment to recover REEs can overcome the negative impacts of these factors on the economy. Therefore, the concentration of rare earth elements must be taken into account when extending the laboratory study of BR processing to a larger scale.
Sc, which is estimated to have 70–80 % of world reserves in bauxites, is far more economically valuable than the rest of the present in BR REEs [2]. The environmental analyses of hydrometallurgical processes inducing higher flexibility, reduced energy consumption, and other aspects stimulate the development of technologies based on them [3,4].
The Sc concentrate obtaining process involves several different approaches, including the stage of leaching into the aqueous phase and the stage of selective recovery from the PLS. The extraction of target elements is commonly accomplished by aqueous solutions of mineral acids such as HCl, H2SO4 or HNO3, as it ensures maximum extraction into the leachate. The obtained PLS is traditionally characterized by a high salt background, high acidity (рH < 2), and a low concentration of Sc. In order to concentrate the element and separate from lixiviants, the most established methods such as ion-exchange or solvent extraction are applied [3,4,5].
In solvent extracting (SX) to concentrate Sc from red mud processing solutions, organophosphorus solvents such as di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (D2EHPA/ DEHPA/HDEHP/P204) [6,7,8,9], tributyl phosphate (TBP) [7], bis(2,2,4 trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid (Cyanex 272) [8] and 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester (HEHEHP/EHEHPA/PC-88A/Ionquest 801/P507) [9,10] are the most prevalent, defined by high selectivity to scandium. But even D2EHPA, the most used Sc solvent [11] with a high extraction capacity, has a low affinity for Sc when it is mixed with Ti, Th, other REEs, and several other impurity elements. Furthermore, the tendency of D2EHPA to emulsify leads to loss of the extracted component. On the contrary, substantial quantities of BR or acidic leach solutions that have been processed are accompanied by the irreversible consumption of the costly extraction reagents themselves [5].
Due to the easy separation between liquid and solid phases, adsorption through ion-exchange (IX) has been considered as an alternative technique, that is simple to apply, inexpensive, and has low hazardous emissions (gaseous, organic) [12]. The recovery of metals from dilute solutions can be achieved using sorbent materials, which include novel promising substances such as Solvent-impregnated Resins (SIR) and Levextrel resins, commonly referred to as TVEX [13].
Solvent impregnated resins (SIR) are prepared by loading or soaking the material in a solution of an organic solvent. The SIR matrix solvent will selectively recover metal ions from the leachate, and these ions will diffuse into the resin phase [14]. The alternative resin is Levextrel, which was produced by the polymerization of styrene and divinylbenzene macroporous copolymers in the presence of extractant, which was incorporated during the synthesis [15]. Based on some extractants used to recover scandium, the following impregnates and TVEX containing TBP (TVEX-TBP) [16], D2EHPA (VP OC 1026) [17], Cyanex 272 (TP 272) [18], PC 88A (Amberlite XAD 7HP resin) [19] were obtained and tested for the concentration of Sc in hydrometallurgical processing of various mineral raw materials and concentrates.
SIR combines both the beneficial and negative aspects of both the ion-exchange and liquid-liquid extraction in a polymeric-material adsorbent. SIRs can recover ions from very diluted solutions, but they have a low capacity and are prone to fouling, because of aqueous solubility [20]. TVEX, unlike SIR, cannot be washed out by acid solutions and requires a strongly acidic medium (up to 8M HCl or 6M H2SO4) for selective recovery [5,16]. Searching of optimum conditions, it had not been reported that such a medium would be selective for the separation of Fe and Al from Sc at the stage of sorption and desorption.
Since the majority of feed sources containing REEs are acidic, the strong acid cation resin (SAC) containing cations as counterions is the preferred choice for REEs and Sc recovery [21,22]. In order to obtain a mixed rare earth product at the adsorption of La, Sm, and Ho in the study [23], SAC demonstrated the following selectivity order in a wide-applicable sulfuric acid media: REE ≈ Th > Fe ≈ Al. However, it is known that SAC have higher selectivity towards LREEs rather than HREEs and Sc [24,25,26]. The absence of selectivity towards heavier lanthanides can be overcome by the presence of chelating ligands on anion exchangers.
The chelating resins were designed to overcome the limited selectivity of conventional anion and cation exchange resins. Numerous researchers have examined their potential application in the recovery and purification of individual REEs, and CR application is prevalent [18,23,27]. CR can adsorb REEs both from strongly acidic solutions (0.5–1.0 M) and from diluted solutions (at pH > 3) [23]. Bao et al. [18] showed that Sc (III) adsorption capacity on chelating resins decreases with increasing sulfate concentration because of the formation of the anionic sulfate complex. As more ammonium sulfate is added, the distribution coefficient of average lanthanides (La, Lu, and Sm) decreases faster than that of Sc in the study [28]. Nonetheless, further study is required to assess the practical applicability of these type of resins in a real sulfate environment. Furthermore, new chelating resins must be developed and studied in order to recover Sc from a sulfate-based solution.
It can be summarized that the shorter lifespan of SIRs and TVEX imposes limitations on their industrial application in comparison to the conventional and chelating ion-exchange resins. Despite the available data on the use of ion exchangers to recover REEs from BR leaching solutions, the search for new separation materials to improve selectivity towards Sc, minimize reagent consumption, and establish greener processes is still ongoing.
In our previous studies [29,30] of the processes of aluminum raw materials hydrometallurgical treatment, it was suggested that rare earth elements could be recovered from BR with the addition of MgSO4 at the stage of selective acid leaching at pH > 3. Thus, it is possible to obtain a solution with a low content of Fe and Ti and a simultaneous high content of valuable elements. Since ion exchange sorption is the most favorable method for recovering Sc from complex PLS, this study extends our previous work and estimates Sc recovery from sulfuric acid solutions by chelating resin Puromet MTS9580.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

In this study, the chelating ion-exchange resin Puromet MTS9580 from Purolite® company was used for rare earth elements recovery from sulfuric acid leaching solutions. The resin is supposed to have functional groups of phosphonates [26], which are phosphonic acid derivatives in a polystyrene-divinylbenzene (St – DVB) matrix. Therefore, it has a selectivity to scandium and HREE against trivial impurities, such as Al (III) and Fe (III). The resin samples were converted from the chloride form by treatment with 100 g L–1 H2SO4 and deionized water until the pH of the eluate was neutral.
A simulated solution with a scandium concentration of 1–20 mg L–1 at a pH of 3.5 was prepared by dissolving Sc2O3 (with a purity of 99%) in dilute sulfuric acid. To evaluate the effect, specifically, of the presence of magnesium cations on the Sc adsorption under dynamic conditions, a certain amount of MgSO4 (analytical grade) was added to the solution and continuously stirred until complete dissolution using a laboratory magnetic stirrer (Daihan Scientific Co., Ltd., Seoul, South Korea). The simulated solution contained 24 g L–1 of MgSO4 and 10 mg L–1 Sc to approximate the data from real leaching solutions.
The required pH values were adjusted by adding 1 M H2SO4. The pH measurements were conducted using a portable pH meter HI 83141 (Hanna Instruments, Inc., Smithfield, RI, USA), which was equipped with a combined pH electrode HI 1230B.
The study of the adsorption of Sc in the column was conducted by utilizing a PLS that was obtained following sulfuric acid leaching of ESPDW (a solid phase or BR obtained after pre-leaching of ESPD by water) in the presence of magnesium cations [29]. The conditions of ESPD water leaching to maximize the concentration of REEs in ESPDW were previously investigated in [31]. The solution was prepared by leaching 400 g ESPDW with a sulfuric acid solution at the optimal parameters (T = 80 °C, CMgSO4 = 36 g L–1, liquid to solid ratio (L/S) = 10, and pH = 3.5) for 1 h. Table 1 shows the chemical composition of PLS. All the other reagents used were of analytical quality.

2.2. Experimental

A weighed amount of resin was placed into a laboratory flask or column. Batch and column adsorption experiments were conducted on simulated solution and PLS at a room temperature of 22±2 °C.
The batch adsorption was conducted by mixing 50 mL of simulated solution containing a scandium in concentration of 1–20 mg L−1 at a pH = 3,5 with 0.1 mL of chelating resin in a conical flask for 8 h. In batch experiments, a rotary laboratory shaker PE-6410 (ECROS, Saint-Petersburg, Russia) was used to mix at a speed of 60 rpm.
The column adsorption was performed using a 3 mL plastic ion-exchange column. The ion-exchange experimental unit is shown in Figure 1. The resin volume in the column was 2 mL. The transmission rate of 2.5 to 7.5 mL min−1 during the adsorption was established using a peristaltic pump LOIP LS-301 (Laboratory Equipment and Instruments Ltd., Russia), which supplied the initial solution to the bottom of the ion-exchange column. Samples of ion-exchanged liquid that came out of the top of the column were taken periodically for analysis.
The resins that were saturated were thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and then subsequently desorbed with a solution of 200 g L−1 Na2CO3 within a timeframe of 30 min to 2 h in a batch mode.

2.3. Analysis

The equilibrium ion concentrations of Sc (mg L−1) and impurities in the resulting solution samples diluted with 5% HNO3 were measured using an inductive coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) via Vista Pro spectrometer (Varian Optical Spectroscopy Instr., Mulgrave, Australia) and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AES) via Varian AA-240FS spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, San Jose, CA, USA).

2.4. Calculating Methods

2.4.1. Adsorption efficiency calculations

The sorption capacity of the resin at equilibrium was calculated using Equation (1), where Q is the amount of the metal ions adsorbed onto the resin (mg g−1), C0 and Ct are the initial and equilibrium metal concentrations (mg L−1), V is the volume of the solution (L), and Vr is the volume of the resin (mL).
Q = (C0 × Ct) × V / × Vr,
The desorption degree (D in %) was calculated using Equation (2):
D = m d e s o r b e d m r e s i n × 100 ,
where mdesorbed – mass of the element desorbed from the resin, g, mresin – the mass of the sorbed element, g.
The distribution coefficient (Kd) and the separation factor (βA/B) were calculated using Equations (3)-(4):
Kd = Qd/Ce,
βA/B = Kd A/Kd B,
where Kd is the ratio of the sorbed amount of metal divided by its equilibrium concentration in the solution (mL g−1); β is the ratio of the distribution coefficient of two metals A and B (Kd A ≥ Kd B).

2.4.2. Adsorption Isotherm Studies

To quantify the sorption process of Sc (III) in batch experiments the equations of two-parameter models of Langmuir (Equation (5)), Freundlich (Equation (6)) and Temkin (Equation (7)) were used.
Q = Q m K L C e 1 + K L C e ,
Q = K F C e 1 n ,
Q = R T K T ln ⁡ A T C e ,
where Q is the amount of adsorbed metal at adsorption equilibrium (g L−1), Qm is the maximum amount of adsorbed metal (g L−1), Ce is the equilibrium concentrations of the element in solution (mg L−1), KL is the Langmuir isotherm constant, KF and n are two constants of Freundlich model, KT and AT are two constants of Temkin model, R is universal gas constant (8.314 J mol−1·K−1), T is temperature (K).

2.4.3. Adsorption Column Studies

The dynamic adsorption system from PLS for MTS9580 resin was analyzed using the MDR and Thomas models in accordance with Equations (8)-(10): MDR model (Equation (8)), calculation of q0 using the constant b of MDR model (Equation (9)), Thomas model (Equation (10)).
C t C 0 = 1 − 1 1 + V t b a ,
q 0 = b C 0 V r ,
C t C 0 = 1 1 + e K t Q 0 V r F − K t C 0 t ,
where Ct and C0 are concentration in moment t and initial concentration (mg mL−1), Vt is the outlet solution volume in moment t, a and b is MDR model constants, q0 and Q0 are maximum column loading metal capacity (mg mL−1), Vr is volume of used resin (mL), Kt is Thomas constant (L min−1 mg−1), q0 is equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg g−1), F is the volumetric flow rate of the column (mL min−1). Model fitting was performed for Sc adsorption isotherms and breakthrough curves in OriginPro software using non-linear regression analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

For the recovery of Sc and rare earth elements from sulfate solutions, chelating resins are observed as the best choice [23]. The sorption capacity and selectivity of chelating ion exchangers are primarily influenced by the nature and relative position of the functional groups. Chelating ligands, especially those containing phosphorus, are of particular interest. In acidic systems, chelating resins with phosphonic functional groups adsorb rare earth elements, U and Fe and make it possible to separate Sc micro quantities from other REEs [32]. Marhol et al. [33] have discovered that the phosphinic ion exchangers exhibit a strong affinity for scandium (III), which is consistent with the affinity series: Sc (III) > Fe (III) > In (III) > Ga (III) > Al (III) > La (III).
The ion-exchange resin was chosen based on its functional groups, affinity, and selectivity with respect to scandium. Even though the REEs (III) ion-exchange with these complexes is still a poorly studied area, as indicated by the literature data, the REEs distribution efficiency from sulfate-based solutions on resin is as follows: chelating resin > strong anion resin > strong cation resin. The stability of the sulfate complexes is not apparent to be dependent on the REE (III) ion radius, with the exception of Sc, which exhibits a significantly higher distribution coefficient than the rest elements [17,34]. It is possible to separate scandium from other elements because many elements, as well as rare earths, have slight or no adsorption on anion exchange resins from sulfate or sulfuric acid medium.
According to thermodynamics, Sc forms positive and negative stable charged complexes in sulfate media. The main forms of Sc existence in solution are complexes of the anionic type [Sc(SO4)2]−, [Sc(SO4)3]3− (pH range 1.6-6.0) [24,35]. As concentration of sulfate ions in an aqueous solution increases, Sc anionic forms become dominant, thus decreasing Sc adsorption capacity on weak cation exchanger (WAC) with chelating amino methyl phosphonic acid groups [18]. For trivalent REEs, only the [LnSO4]+ and the [Ln(SO)4]2− complexes where the cation type is recognized as dominant were identified [36,37]. Thus, Sc behavior in sulfate media combined with selective desorption is crucial for designing a new effective approach.

3.1. Batch Sc adsorption Experiments and Study of Sorption Mechanism

The batch adsorption experiments were carried out on simulated solutions with a concentration of 1-20 mg L−1 Sc. Based on the obtained results, a sorption isotherm was constructed (Figure 2). Obtained results indicate a high affinity of the chelating ion-exchange resin for this particular type of adsorbed ions. Following the thermodynamic models’ equations, the static sorption data were analyzed using the Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models (Figure 2). For each model, the primary thermodynamic parameters of the sorption equilibrium and the values of the multiple correlation coefficients R2 (Table 2) were obtained.
The Langmuir model was successfully applied to describe the Sc adsorption by the ion-exchange resin with R2 = 0.983. According to the Langmuir equation, the capacity constant KL = 0.985, while the maximum calculated capacity Qm = 8.576 g L−1. The Langmuir isotherm is generally suited for describing the chemisorption process on chelating ion-exchange resins, wherein ionic or covalent chemical bonds are formed between the adsorbent and the adsorbate.

3.2. Column Adsorption and Breakthrough Modelling

3.2.1. Adsorption study from simulated solution

The ion breakthrough of the simulated solution was analyzed using the following breakthrough models, which are commonly applied to ion-exchange data based on the mass of the resin. MDR model and Thomas model.
Equations (8) and (9) [38] are used to apply the MDR model to ion-exchange breakthrough data. Using Equation (9), the maximum column loading capacity for each metal (Q0) can be estimated by assessing MDR model data. Furthermore, the MDR model generally reduces the error resulting from the Thomas model, especially when the breakthrough curve is shorter or longer.
The Thomas model (Equation (10)) assumes that the process follows the Langmuir adsorption/desorption kinetics without axial dispersion [39], and that the uptake is adjusted by pore-diffusion kinetics [40]. The main advantage of this model is its ability to predict breakthrough curves under different operating conditions.
The adsorption experimental data at different flow rates of 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mL per minute are shown in Figure 3, where C/C0 is the ratio of Sc-ion concentrations in the collected effluent over the feed solution. Base parameters and model constants (Kt, a, b) are shown in Table 3.
The results in Figure 3 and Table 2 suggest that the breakthrough data fits well with the Thomas model with correlation coefficients higher than 0.99 for 2.5 mL min−1 flow rate. The maximum adsorption capacity of Sc calculated according to Thomas model was 7.013 mg mL-1, which is close to the measured (based on the final solution) value of 6.7 mg mL−1. According to the MDR model, this value was too high (10.214 mg mL−1). As the dynamic capacity of the resin for Sc decreased slightly (to 6.3 mg mL−1) upon increasing the flow rate to 7.5 mL min−1, this flow rate was selected for experiments utilizing PLS.

3.2.1. Adsorption study from PLS

The metals adsorption from a PLS containing 12.3 mg L−1 of Sc, 50.7 mg L−1 of Fe, and 1.6 mg L−1 of Ti at a flow rate of 7.5 mL per minute was evaluated. Figure 4 shows the obtained breakthrough curves.
Compared to a simulated solution, the MDR model had a better fitting result with PLS, since a gradual decrease in C/C0 was observed for Ti, which could not be fitted using the Thomas model. The model constants and the dynamic resin capacity calculation results for the MDR model are shown in Table 4.
The adsorption of Fe (III) was observed at the initial moment, but after 100-200 min there was no further adsorption. In addition to the adsorption of Sc on the resin, a significant adsorption of Ti was observed, which is believed to be attributable to the similarity of Ti properties to REEs [35]. However, due to the selective nature of leaching, the concentration of Ti in solution does not exceed 1.6 mg L−1, resulting in a very low capacity for Ti. Based on the column experiments, the dynamic exchange capacity (Qd), the distribution coefficient (Kd) and the separation factor (βSc/Ti,Fe) were calculated (Table 5).
The high affinity of the Puromet MTS9580 ion-exchange resin for Sc is confirmed by the Qd and Kd values for Sc (III), as well as the high βSc/E value for Fe (III), despite the fact that the Fe concentration in the solution was four times greater than the Sc concentration.

3.3. Desorption Studies

It is also important to evaluate the desorption efficiency of the adsorption process. It is known that adsorbed Sc can be effectively desorbed from the resin by sodium bicarbonate solution, a kind of relatively economic desorbent. For saturated Puromet MTS9580 resin, the scandium desorption was caried out at room temperature for 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. The results are presented in Figure 5.
The results in Figure 5(a) show that 98% of Sc from saturated by using a simulated solution resin can be desorbed within 1.5 h. The degree of desorption reached 80% after 30 min. After 1.5 h of desorption, the final eluate contained up to 562 mg L−1 of Sc, while the Mg concentration was below 190 mg L−1. This indicates that the resin is very selective towards Sc or rare earth elements, since the concentration of Mg in the initial sulfate solution was 1000 times higher.
Figure 5(b) indicates that scandium desorption above 90 % from can be achieved within 30 min, and that almost complete Sc desorption occurs within 2 h. The degree of Ti desorption was less than 40%, and the concentration of Fe in the eluate was below 20 mg L−1. The desorption data of resin saturated by using PLS showed that the concentration of Mg and Ti was lower than 200 mg L−1 and 50 mg L−1, respectively (Table 6).
After Sc desorption and washing by deionized water the resin was regenerated with a sulfuric acid solution with a concentration of 200 g L−1, and the degree of the remaining elements desorption exceeds 95%, i.e. almost complete resin regeneration was achieved. The regeneration sulfate solution can be used to leach new portions of BR (Figure 6).

4. Conclusions

Based on the findings obtained from the present research, the predominant mechanism of sorption from simulated and pregnant leach solutions was examined on the chelating ion-exchange resin Puromet MTS9580. It is proposed to recover Sc first, since it is more expensive than the rest of the BR elements.
  • For the adsorption of Sc on resin, Langmuir equations adequately describe the sorption isotherms under batch conditions. This indicates the chemisorption process on the chelating resin.
  • The high values of R2 for the equations of the breakthrough models indicate that the Thomas model is applicable to describing the Sc adsorption from simulated Mg-containing solutions. According to Langmuir model, the maximum calculated capacity for batch process was 8.576 g L−1, while the maximum capacity for column sorption obtained using the Thomas model was 7.013 mg mL−1.
  • The results of the column adsorption study using PLS showed that significant sorption of Ti in addition to Sc was observed. This is apparently due to the properties of Ti being close to the properties of REEs.
  • Sc can be efficiently desorbed (>98%) by NaHCO3 solution (200 g L−1) from both simulated and real solutions within a duration of 1.5 h. After 1.5 h of desorption, the concentration of Sc in the desorption solution was 562 mg L−1, while the concentration of Mg and Ti was lower than 200 mg L−1 and 50 mg L−1, respectively. This indicates that the resin is very selective towards Sc or rare earth elements.
The high affinity and selectivity of Puromet MTS9580 make it a promising sorbent for the recovery of scandium from PLS of selective leaching of BR. The obtaining of Sc and other REEs concentrates from the desorption solutions will be discussed in future studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.L. and A.S.; methodology, I.L. and S.K.; validation, I.L. and S.K.; formal analysis, A.S. and D.V.; investigation, J.N. and A.S.; resources, A.S. and I.L.; data curation, A.S. and I.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.N., A.S. and D.V.; writing—review and editing, S.K., A.S. and D.V.; visualization, J.N. and D.V.; supervision, A.S.; project administration, I.L.; funding acquisition, I.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by State Assignment, grant No. 075-03-2021-051/5 (FEUZ-2021-0017). The study of bauxite residue leaching was funded by the Russian Science Foundation Project No. 22-29-01515. The methods for determining Sc and the impurities in the solution by ICP-OES and AES (see Section 2.3. “Analysis”) were funded by the Project of the State Assignment (Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, no. FMMZ-2024-0045).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vind, J.; Alexandri, A.; Vassiliadou, V.; Panias, D.; Vind, J.; Alexandri, A.; Vassiliadou, V.; Panias, D. Distribution of Selected Trace Elements in the Bayer Process. Metals 2018, 8, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Phoung, S.; Williams, E.; Gaustad, G.; Gupta, A. Exploring Global Supply and Demand of Scandium Oxide in 2030. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 401, 136673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ray, A.R.; Mishra, S. Hydro Metallurgical Technique as Better Option for the Recovery of Rare Earths from Mine Tailings and Industrial Wastes. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy 2023, 36, 101311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Salman, A.D.; Juzsakova, T.; Mohsen, S.; Abdullah, T.A.; Le, P.-C.; Sebestyen, V.; Sluser, B.; Cretescu, I. Scandium Recovery Methods from Mining, Metallurgical Extractive Industries, and Industrial Wastes. Materials 2022, 15, 2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zinoveev, D.; Pasechnik, L.; Fedotov, M.; Dyubanov, V.; Grudinsky, P.; Alpatov, A. Extraction of Valuable Elements from Red Mud with a Focus on Using Liquid Media—A Review. Recycling 2021, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ochsenkühn-Petropulu, M.; Lyberopulu, Th.; Ochsenkühn, K.M.; Parissakis, G. Recovery of Lanthanides and Yttrium from Red Mud by Selective Leaching. Analytica Chimica Acta 1996, 319, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, W.; Pranolo, Y.; Cheng, C.Y. Recovery of Scandium from Synthetic Red Mud Leach Solutions by Solvent Extraction with D2EHPA. Separation and Purification Technology 2013, 108, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abhilash; Sinha, S.; Sinha, M.K.; Pandey, B.D. Extraction of Lanthanum and Cerium from Indian Red Mud. International Journal of Mineral Processing 2014, 127, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Z.; Li, H.; Jing, Q.; Zhang, M. Recovery of Scandium from Leachate of Sulfation-Roasted Bayer Red Mud by Liquid–Liquid Extraction. JOM 2017, 69, 2373–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, C.; Chen, L.; Chen, J.; Zou, D.; Deng, Y.; Li, D. Application of P507 and Isooctanol Extraction System in Recovery of Scandium from Simulated Red Mud Leach Solution. Journal of Rare Earths 2019, 37, 1002–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Das, S.; Behera, S.S.; Murmu, B.M.; Mohapatra, R.K.; Mandal, D.; Samantray, R.; Parhi, P.K.; Senanayake, G. Extraction of Scandium(III) from Acidic Solutions Using Organo-Phosphoric Acid Reagents: A Comparative Study. Separation and Purification Technology 2018, 202, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hérès, X.; Blet, V.; Di Natale, P.; Ouaattou, A.; Mazouz, H.; Dhiba, D.; Cuer, F. Selective Extraction of Rare Earth Elements from Phosphoric Acid by Ion Exchange Resins. Metals 2018, 8, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Korovin, V.; Shestak, Y.; Pogorelov, Y.; Cortina, J.L. Solid Polymeric Extractants (TVEX). Synthesis, Extraction Characterization, and Applications for Metal Extraction Processes. ChemInform 2009, 40, chin.200927276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kabay, N.; Cortina, J.L.; Trochimczuk, A.; Streat, M. Solvent-Impregnated Resins (SIRs) – Methods of Preparation and Their Applications. Reactive and Functional Polymers 2010, 70, 484–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kauczor, H.W.; Meyer, A. Structure and Properties of Levextrel Resins. Hydrometallurgy 1978, 3, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Korovin, V.; Shestak, Y. Scandium Extraction from Hydrochloric Acid Media by Levextrel-Type Resins Containing Di-Isooctyl Methyl Phosphonate. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 95, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mostajeran, M.; Bondy, J.M.; Reynier, N.; Cameron, R. Mining Value from Waste: Scandium and Rare Earth Elements Selective Recovery from Coal Fly Ash Leach Solutions. Minerals Engineering 2021, 173, 107091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bao, S.; Hawker, W.; Vaughan, J. Scandium Loading on Chelating and Solvent Impregnated Resin from Sulfate Solution. Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange 2018, 36, 100–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharaf, M.; Yoshida, W.; Kubota, F.; Goto, M. A Novel Binary-Extractant-Impregnated Resin for Selective Recovery of Scandium. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan 2019, 52, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghosh, A.; Dhiman, S.; Gupta, A.; Jain, R. Process Evaluation of Scandium Production and Its Environmental Impact. Environments 2022, 10, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Orlandini, K.A. Cation Exchange Separation of Scandium from Rare Earths in Oxalic Acid Media. Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry Letters 1969, 5, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Molchanova, T.V.; Akimova, I.D.; Tatarnikov, A.V. Ion-Exchange Methods of Scandium Recovery from the Ores of the Tomtor Deposit. Russian Metallurgy (Metally) 2019, 2019, 674–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Page, M.J.; Soldenhoff, K.; Ogden, M.D. Comparative Study of the Application of Chelating Resins for Rare Earth Recovery. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 169, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. El Ouardi, Y.; Virolainen, S.; Massima Mouele, E.S.; Laatikainen, M.; Repo, E.; Laatikainen, K. The Recent Progress of Ion Exchange for the Separation of Rare Earths from Secondary Resources – A Review. Hydrometallurgy 2023, 218, 106047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Felipe, E.C.B.; Batista, K.A.; Ladeira, A.C.Q. Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Acid Mine Drainage by Ion Exchange. Environmental Technology 2021, 42, 2721–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mikhaylenko, M. Development and Screening of Resins to Recover REE and Scandium from Different Sources. In Extraction 2018; Davis, B.R., Moats, M.S., Wang, S., Gregurek, D., Kapusta, J., Battle, T.P., Schlesinger, M.E., Alvear Flores, G.R., Jak, E., Goodall, G., Free, M.L., Asselin, E., Chagnes, A., Dreisinger, D., Jeffrey, M., Lee, J., Miller, G., Petersen, J., Ciminelli, V.S.T., Xu, Q., Molnar, R., Adams, J., Liu, W., Verbaan, N., Goode, J., London, I.M., Azimi, G., Forstner, A., Kappes, R., Bhambhani, T., Eds.; The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp. 2113–2122. ISBN 978-3-319-95021-1. [Google Scholar]
  27. Koodynska, D.; Hubicki, Z. Investigation of Sorption and Separation of Lanthanides on the Ion Exchangers of Various Types. In Ion Exchange Technologies; Kilislioglu, A., Ed.; InTech, 2012; ISBN 978-953-51-0836-8. [Google Scholar]
  28. Virolainen, S.; Repo, E.; Sainio, T. Recovering Rare Earth Elements from Phosphogypsum Using a Resin-in-Leach Process: Selection of Resin, Leaching Agent, and Eluent. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 189, 105125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shoppert, A.; Loginova, I.; Napol’skikh, J.; Valeev, D. High-Selective Extraction of Scandium (Sc) from Bauxite Residue (Red Mud) by Acid Leaching with MgSO4. Materials 2022, 15, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Shoppert, A.; Loginova, I.; Napol’skikh, J.; Kyrchikov, A.; Chaikin, L.; Rogozhnikov, D.; Valeev, D. Selective Scandium (Sc) Extraction from Bauxite Residue (Red Mud) Obtained by Alkali Fusion-Leaching Method. Materials 2022, 15, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chaikin, L.; Shoppert, A.; Valeev, D.; Loginova, I.; Napol’skikh, J. Concentration of Rare Earth Elements (Sc, Y, La, Ce, Nd, Sm) in Bauxite Residue (Red Mud) Obtained by Water and Alkali Leaching of Bauxite Sintering Dust. Minerals 2020, 10, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hubicki, Z. Studies on Selective Separation of Sc(III) from Rare Earth Elements on Selective Ion-Exchangers. Hydrometallurgy 1990, 23, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Marhol, M.; Svehla, G.; Wilson, C.L.; Wilson, D.W.; Veselý, V. Ion Exchangers in Analytical Chemistry: Their Properties and Use in Inorganic Chemistry; Wilson and Wilson’s comprehensive analytical chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam Oxford New York, 1982; ISBN 978-0-444-99717-3. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hamaguchi, H.; Ohuchi, A.; Onuma, N.; Kuroda, R. Anion Exchange Behavior of Rare Earth Elements in Potassium Sulfate Medium. Journal of Chromatography A 1964, 16, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Smyshlyaev, D.; Kirillov, E.; Kirillov, S.; Bunkov, G.; Rychkov, V.; Botalov, M.; Taukin, A.; Yuldashbaeva, A.; Malyshev, A. Recovery and Separation of Sc, Zr and Ti from Acidic Sulfate Solutions for High Purity Scandium Oxide Production: Laboratory and Pilot Study. Hydrometallurgy 2022, 211, 105889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wood, S.A. The Aqueous Geochemistry of the Rare-Earth Elements and Yttrium. Chemical Geology 1990, 82, 159–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lin, P.; Yang, X.; Werner, J.M.; Honaker, R.Q. Application of Eh-pH Diagrams on Acid Leaching Systems for the Recovery of REEs from Bastnaesite, Monazite and Xenotime. Metals 2021, 11, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yan, G.; Viraraghavan, T.; Chen, M. A New Model for Heavy Metal Removal in a Biosorption Column. Adsorption Science & Technology 2001, 19, 25–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aksu, Z.; Gönen, F. Biosorption of Phenol by Immobilized Activated Sludge in a Continuous Packed Bed: Prediction of Breakthrough Curves. Process Biochemistry 2004, 39, 599–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Calero, M.; Hernáinz, F.; Blázquez, G.; Tenorio, G.; Martín-Lara, M.A. Study of Cr (III) Biosorption in a Fixed-Bed Column. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 171, 886–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 95010 g001
Figure 1. The column ion-exchange experimental unit.
Figure 1. The column ion-exchange experimental unit.
Preprints 95010 g001
Preprints 95010 g002
Figure 2. Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin adsorption isotherm obtained for Sc adsorption on MTS9580 from simulated sulfuric acid solutions at pH 3.5.
Figure 2. Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin adsorption isotherm obtained for Sc adsorption on MTS9580 from simulated sulfuric acid solutions at pH 3.5.
Preprints 95010 g002
Preprints 95010 g003
Figure 3. Column adsorption of Sc from a simulated solution on MTS9580 at flow rate 2.5-7.5 mL min−1.
Figure 3. Column adsorption of Sc from a simulated solution on MTS9580 at flow rate 2.5-7.5 mL min−1.
Preprints 95010 g003
Preprints 95010 g004
Figure 4. MDR model column adsorption on MTS9580 at PLS flow rate 7.5 mL min−1.
Figure 4. MDR model column adsorption on MTS9580 at PLS flow rate 7.5 mL min−1.
Preprints 95010 g004
Preprints 95010 g005
Figure 5. Desorption efficiency by NaHCO3 solution (200 g L−1) from MTS9580, saturated using: a model solution (a); PLS (b).
Figure 5. Desorption efficiency by NaHCO3 solution (200 g L−1) from MTS9580, saturated using: a model solution (a); PLS (b).
Preprints 95010 g005
Preprints 95010 g006
Figure 6. The principal flowsheet of Sc concentrate obtaining from PLS by Puromet МТS9580 ion-exchange sorption.
Figure 6. The principal flowsheet of Sc concentrate obtaining from PLS by Puromet МТS9580 ion-exchange sorption.
Preprints 95010 g006
Table 1. The chemical composition of pregnant leaching solution (PLS) obtained by leaching of bauxite residue with a sulfuric acid solution at T = 80 °C, CMgSO4 = 36 g L–1, liquid to solid ratio (L/S) = 10, and pH = 3.5 for 1 h.
Table 1. The chemical composition of pregnant leaching solution (PLS) obtained by leaching of bauxite residue with a sulfuric acid solution at T = 80 °C, CMgSO4 = 36 g L–1, liquid to solid ratio (L/S) = 10, and pH = 3.5 for 1 h.
Element Mg Na Ca Si Al K Fe Sc Ti
mg L−1 7270.0 1809.38 621.12 286.3 274.10 281.3 50.74 12.31 1.58
Table 2. The isotherm parameters for Sc adsorption on MTS9580 from simulated solutions at pH 3.5.
Table 2. The isotherm parameters for Sc adsorption on MTS9580 from simulated solutions at pH 3.5.
Model Langmuir Freundlich Temkin
Parameter R2 Qm, g L−1 KL, L mg−1 R2 KF, L mg−1 R2 KT, L mg−1
Value 0.983 8.576 0.985 0.975 3.440 0.963 1615
Table 3. Thomas and MDR model parameters for Sc adsorption on MTS958 from a simulated solution at different flow rates.
Table 3. Thomas and MDR model parameters for Sc adsorption on MTS958 from a simulated solution at different flow rates.
Thomas model 2.5 mL min−1 5 mL min−1 7.5 mL min−1
Kt (L min−1 mg−1) 0.00142 6.834×10-4 3.65×10-4
Q0 (mg mL−1) 7.013 6.776 6.383
R2 0.99 0.989 0.996
Modified dose-response model 2.5 mL min−1 5 mL min−1 7.5 mL min−1
a 2.197 2.184 3.115
q0 (mg mL−1) 10.214 4.845 3.213
R2 0.973 0.987 0.988
Table 4. MDR model parameters of column adsorption on MTS9580 from PLS.
Table 4. MDR model parameters of column adsorption on MTS9580 from PLS.
MDR model Sc Fe Ti
a 0.679 1.532 0.187
q0 (mg mL−1) 3.888 0.343 0.082
R2 0.984 0.997 0.905
Table 5. Results for Sc, Ti and Fe column adsorption on MTS9580 from PLS.
Table 5. Results for Sc, Ti and Fe column adsorption on MTS9580 from PLS.
Element Sc Ti Fe
βSc/E - 0.25 6.90
Kd (mL g−1) 0.40 1.61 0.06
Qd, mg mL−1 3.77 1.14 2.81
Table 6. The chemical composition of eluate after desorption of MTS9580, saturated using PLS.
Table 6. The chemical composition of eluate after desorption of MTS9580, saturated using PLS.
Element Sc Mg Ti Fe Y La Ce Nd Sm Th
mg L−1 461.5 195.9 48.8 16.1 9.4 4.3 6.2 5.0 1.9 1.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated