Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

The Lac Fallère Area as an Example of the Interplay between Deep-Seated Gravitational Slope Deformation and Glacial Shaping (Aosta Valley, NW Italy)

Altmetrics

Downloads

90

Views

26

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

29 December 2023

Posted:

03 January 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The Lac Fallère area, located in the upper Clusellaz Valley (tributary of the middle Aosta Valley), is shaped in micaschist and gneiss referred to as the Mont Fort Unit (Middle Penninic) near the tectonic contact with calcschist and marble of the Aouilletta Unit (Combin Zone). Lac Fallère exibits an elongated shape and is hosted in a WSW–ENE trending depression, according to slope direction. This lake also shows a semi-submerged WSW–ENE rocky ridge, that longitudinally divides the lake. This evidence, in addition to the extremely fractured rocks, indicates the presence of a wide deep-seated gravitational slope deformation (DSGSD), even if this area is not yet included within the regional landslide inventory of the Aosta Valley Region. The Lac Fallère area also shows reliefs involved by glacial erosion (roche moutonnée), a wide cover of subglacial sediments and many moraines essentially referred to as Lateglacial. The DSGSD evolution in a glacial environment produced, as observed in other areas, significant effects both on the facies of Quaternary sediments and the formation of numerous and wide moraines. Glacial slope sectors and lateral moraines displaced by minor scarps and counterscarps and glaciers using trenches forming several arched moraines suggest an interplay between glacial and gravitational processes, which shared part of their evolution history.
Keywords: 
Subject: Environmental and Earth Sciences  -   Geophysics and Geology

1. Introduction

The various and complex relationship between glacial and deep-seated gravitational processes in a high-mountain environment is the subject of this study. This issue represents a poorly investigated topic, due to a greater interest in the genetic mechanisms and kinematics of the deep- seated gravitational slope deformations (DGGPVs) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], chronology [10,11,12,13,14] and current activity [15,16,17,18], however it offers an interesting and innovative tool in the field of landscape genetics [19,20,21,22]. DSGSDs act over very long timescales [23,24,25,26] comparable, for example, to the extension of Lateglacial [18,27] that favours a possible interaction between glacial and gravitational processes.
Unlike most landslides, DSGSDs are characterised by slow movements of the rock mass [28,29,30,31,32,33,34].
Moreover, slopes affected by DSGSDs retain the original cover of glacial and gravitative deposits, even if these are partly buried by debris or extensively deformed, resedimented and reshaped. The retreat of glaciers causes a debuttressing phenomenon, that changes the stress state of the rock mass by progressive release of stress accumulated when the area was covered by ice mass [35]. The conseguent propagation of joints in the rocky mass predisposes the slope to rapid gravitational readjustment or slow release of accumulated residual stresses [36,37,38,39,40].
In the context of a DSGSD it is not uncommon for a glacial landform to be fragmented into slabs by one or more minor scarps (e.g., in the P. Leysser DSGSD) [41], while the preservation of a gravitationally-displaced moraine is unusual (e.g., Rodoretto DSGSD in the Chisone Valley) [42] or more difficult to recognise (e.g., Arp Vieille DSGSD in Valgrisenche) [43].
More generally, both dislocation of the pre-DSGSD glacial landforms and sediments, such as glacially-sculpted valley sides and moraines displaced by minor scarps or counterscarps, and glaciers that enlarged syn-glacial trenches and levelled minor scarps, suggest an interplay of glacial and gravitational processes. These processes are localised not only in the strictly DSDSD areas, but also in surrounding areas where the evidence is more nuanced.
The Lac Fallère area (Figure 1) is a sector conducive to this type of investigation and is characterized by a lake that shows a typical shape and a semi-submerged rocky ridge, that longitudinally divides it (Figure 2). It is located in the upper section of the Clusellaz Valley, an approximately E–W trending tributary valley of the Aosta Valley. This area, despite now being totally free of glaciers, was largely shaped by glaciers during the Pleistocene, which settled a diffuse cover of glacial sediments and several roche moutonnée.
In addition, even if not yet included within the regional landslide inventory of the Aosta Valley Region, it shows evidence of deep-seated gravitational slop deformation (DSDSG) as scarps, counterscarps and trenches. These evident morpho-structures involve both extremely fractured rocks of the bedrock and Quaternary succession.
These are very common features in the glacially-shaped valleys of the Western Alps. However, the upper Clusellaz is a valley with a particularly complex geomorphology in the context of the Aosta Valley catchment, due to its truncated valley head, markedly asymmetric topography in cross section and very wide valley floor divided into several tens of metres wide parallel furrows, corresponding to a series of abandoned valleys separated by rocky ridges. Furthermore, the low watershed between the tributary valley and Dora Baltea Valley coincides with the largest doubled ridge in the region, which borders the Pointe Leysser DSGSD, an extended deep gravitational deformation affecting the left side of the Dora Baltea Valley (Figure 1). In the DSGSD area the gravitational structures are evident, because they show a significant post-glacial evolution (i.e. not affected by glacial modelling during the Lateglacial and Holocene) [44].
The case study represents an expansion of the investigations to areas even further away from the Pointe Leysser DSGSD.

2. Materials and methods

A multidisciplinary approach comprising geological, structural, stratigraphic and geomorphological methods was used, allowing for a reconstruction of the geological framework and Quaternary evolution of the study area. A geological survey concerning the bedrock and Quaternary sediments covering an area of approximately 10 km2 at an altitude between 1800 and 3061 m a.s.l. was performed at a 1:5000 scale. It was integrated with photo interpretation of the Aosta Valley 1991A (Flight RAVA 97, strip A36, photos 11-15, and strip A37-2, photos 15-18) and the use of a digital terrain model (2 m DTM 2005-2008 of the Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta, available on Geoportale of Valle d’Aosta https://geoportale.regione.vda.it/download/dtm/) to better recognise and map bedrock outcrops and the distribution of Quaternary deposits, as well as major gravitational morpho- structures.
The lithostratigraphic analysis of each tectonic unit of the metamorphic bedrock was based on lithological correlation with other units outcropping in the Western Alps. The bedrock survey also identified the attitude of the regional schistosity, considered for the structural reconstruction, and structurally analysed the fracture systems. The regional schistosity, sub-parallel to the lithological layering, represents a composite foliation caused by the transposition of an older, locally still recognisable, metamorphic surface. All structural data were statistically processed through Schmidt diagrams consisting of equal-area projections plotted in the lower hemisphere using the OpenStereo programme. The Quaternary cover has been distinguished using the distribution and facies of sediments and their morphological features. Due to the scarcity of outcrops, morphostratigraphy was the main method of stratigraphic subdivision.
The geological survey concerning the bedrock and Quaternary cover resulted in a new detailed geological map drawn using ArcGisPro software. Lithological, structural and geomorphological data were stored in a GIS database using the WGS84 UTM zone 32N reference system and all topographic elements were derived from the “Carta Tecnica Regionale Vettoriale” map at a 1:10000 scale of the Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta (2005-2008 Edition). From the geological map two derived simplified maps at a scale of 1:20000 were extracted, the first showing the Quaternary units with their geomorphological elements and the latter the gravitational morpho-structures, in which the pre- Quaternary bedrock is mapped in an undifferentiated way. The geometric relationships between Quaternary sediments/landforms and gravitational morpho-structures are represented in other more detailed derived maps for different case studies.

3. Geological and geomorphological settings

The Clusellaz Valley is a minor (15 km2) tributary valley located within the Aosta Valley, one of the wider (3262 km2) mountain catchments of the Western Italian Alps, surrounded by some of the Alpine four-thousanders (Monte Bianco, Monte Rosa, Monte Cervino and Gran Paradiso) and deeply incised.
The Lac Fallère area is included within the axial zone of the Alpine Chain (Penninic Domain) and is located along the contact between the Mont Fort Unit belonging to the Gran San Bernardo nappe system and the overlying Aouilletta Unit referred to as the Combin Zone. These units reached alpine metamorphic peak conditions in blue schist with variable re-equilibration in green schist [43,45].
The Mont Fort Unit consists of a pre-Variscan basement, mainly made of rusty brown, often graphitic micaschist, albitic paragneiss and Permian quartzschist and phyllitic quartzite [46]. The Aouilletta Unit is made up of carbonate calcschist with decimetric levels of impure marble, lead-coloured phyllitic schist and grey to white dolomitic marble with local levels of carbonate/dolomite meta-breccia [43].
The dolomitic marble, grey marble and meta-breccia bodies were previously considered as the condensed cover of the micaschist and gneiss of the Mont Fort Unit [47]. Three major brittle fault systems developed at the regional scale intersect each other in the Lac Fallère area. The Chaligne system represents a few-kilometres-wide deformation zone characterised by sub-vertical faults trending ESE–WNW, also locally defining the boundary between the Aouilletta and Mont Fort units [48]. The Gignod system, up to 1 km thick, is characterized by NE-SW sub-vertical faults [48,49]. Another system oriented E–W, parallel to the Aosta-Ranzola Fault, deforms the Mont Fallère southern side testified by faults with decametric displacement [48].
The Aosta Valley catchment consists of a 92-km-long Dora Baltea Valley into which several tributary valleys converge (Figure 3). The survival of 175 glaciers (covering 120 km2, 3.7% of the basin) at the head of the tributary valleys is favored by the high average altitude (2100 m) [50].
Moreover, the Aosta Valley was greatly affected by glacial modelling during the Pleistocene glaciations, which strongly modified the mountain landscape. The 130-km-long Dora Baltea Glacier repeatedly reached the Po Plain during the peaks of the 100-ka glaciations, where an imposing end- moraine system (the Ivrea Morainic Amphitheatre) was built spanning from the MIS22-20 expansions at the end of the Lower Pleistocene [51] to the MIS2/LGM (Last Glacial Maximum) expansion at the end of the Upper Pleistocene [52,53,54]. According to the exposure ages of erratic boulders on the Ivrea Hills (20 ka 10Be BP), during the Lateglacial (19-11.7 ka BP) the glacier was completely retired into the Dora Baltea Valley, along which a series of six glacier halts (Alpine stadials) are recognised (see [54] for a review).
High average gradients (>1500 m) of the very steep valley slopes resulting from glacier modelling, coupled to post-glacial debuttressing, led to the widespread large-scale gravitational collapse of the slopes driven by pre-existing structural weaknesses such as faults and thrusts. These processes evolved during the Lateglacial-Holocene at the same time as the retreat of the main glaciers forming numerous DSGSDs (279 DSGSDs covering 460 km2, i.e., 14% of the whole Aosta Valley and approximately 25% of all recorded DSGSDs in the Alps chain) [2,18,55]. The post-glacial debuttressing favours along the slopes of glacial valleys both the collapse of rock slopes walls and the formation of major debris deposits parly referrred to paraglacial environment [35,56,57,58].
An early onset was highlighted for the Pointe Leysser DSGSD in the Mont Fallère area, following the Dora Baltea Glacier withdrawal, which triggered the collapse of the south-facing side of the Dora Baltea Valley in the Saint-Pierre, Saint-Nicolas and Sarre municipalities [59,60,61].
This 23-km2 DSGSD is one of the widest in the Alps chain, according to the European Alps DSGSD inventory (1033 gravitational collapses ranging from 0.03 to 108 km2 with an average area of 6 km2) [19,62]. The Pointe Leysser DSGSD shows an exemplar geomorphic expression due to the presence of striking 1.8 km-long doubled ridges, located at 2300 m a.s.l. on the watershed between the Dora Baltea Valley and Clusellaz Valley [59]. Its prominent most deformed 9 km2 wide central sector had been early mapped as a landslide [48,63,64]. This DSGSD was also reported in the Italian Landslide Inventory (IFFI) [55]. An extension of the DSGSD in the upper Verrogne Valley (Plan di Modzon area) was later highlighted [44,65]. This outstanding phenomenon has recently been studied and proposed as a complex geosite [41]. The glacier that flowed into the Clusellaz Valley during the LGM was very extensive due to the confluence of the Verrogne-Clusellaz Glacier with several tributary glaciers (Clusellaz, Clapin, Fallère, Feuilles, Morgnoz and Chesère glaciers) (Figure 1). The Pointe Leysser DSGSD expanded during the Lateglacial upwards weakening of the watershed ridge between the Dora Baltea Valley and Clusellaz Valley, promoting the diversion of the Verrogne-Clusellaz Glacier, which turned South through the present Verrogne Valley (Figure 3). Gravitational deformations during the post- diversion phase largely still occurred beneath the Verrogne Glacier in the Plan di Modzon sector, where a network of glacially abraded minor scarps and trenches are masked by subglacial deposits [65]. A minor amount of deformation occurred in a glacier-free environment, e.g., at the truncated head of the Clusellaz Valley, where well recognisable minor scarps and trenches are present [59].
This glacier-DSGSD interaction produced an unusually wide and gentle morphology between the Clusellaz Valley head and the middle Verrogne Valley (Plan di Modzon), that is easy to reach and favourable to the seasonal settlement of pre-historic humans at high altitudes since the Mesolithic [44]. The local collapse of the Becca France doubled watershed in historical time (1564 AD) is considered the worst natural disaster in the Aosta Valley region, causing the propagation of a rock avalanche in the whole lower Clusellaz Valley floor (Becca France rock avalanche), where the important Thora village was settled [59].

4. Geological survey results

A detailed geological survey was performed of both the bedrock and the Quaternary sediments. This survey allowed us to recognise several new pieces of information regarding the nature of the bedrock and the distribution of glacial evidence. Moreover, significant gravitational morpho-structures have been distinguished in an area not considered affected by DSGSD until now.
The geological results of this survey lie outside of the aim of this work, which is specifically focused on the relationships between glacial evidence and gravitational morpho-structures. Consequently, only simplified derived maps from the new geological map are shown here (Figure 4).
a) 
Bedrock
Two metamorphic units of the Penninic Zone are identified in the studied area, the Mont Fort Nappe, former uppermost subunit of the Grand St-Bernard nappe system [46], and Aouilletta Unit referred to Combin Zone [47,66,67].
The Mont Fort Unit includes the Distulberg, Mètailler and Greppon-Blanc formations as defined by various authors [45,46,68,69,70]. The Distulberg Formation consists of micaschist, gneissic micaschist and paragneiss. Locally, garnet micaschist were also found. Metric intercalations of quartzite, quartzite gneiss and phylladic carbonate schists have been recognised interbedded in micaschist. The Mètailler Formation consists of various types of gneiss, mainly with chlorite, white mica and chloritoid. Phylladic schist with graphite and ankerite in metric-thick levels is sometimes observed along the contact between the Mètailler and Distulberg formations. Both formations also host various types of metabasic rocks in metric-thick bodies with decametric extension along the regional foliation. The Greppon-Blanc Formation consists of meta-arkose with intercalation up to metric-thick levels of metabasic rock. The top of the formation is characterised by white quartz pebbles, quartzite and bluish quartzite with albite, white mica and ankerite.
The Aouilletta Unit is formed of various types of carbonate rocks, among which calcschist prevails. Decametric bodies of grey marble, yellowish dolomite marble and strongly foliated beige-grey marble are present. The calcschist also contains phylladic schist and carbonate meta-breccia with centimetric to decametric dolomitic pebbles.
The bedrock is involved in four alpine deformation phases. The first two phases are characterised by pervasive schistosity transposing all previous geological surfaces and the second phase is also responsible for developing regional foliation (S2). The third and fourth phases weakly deform the regional foliation without appreciably changing its southwards plunging.
Three major fault systems of cross each other in the southern side of the Monte Fallère. Two of these brittle systems are of regional importance and deform the bedrock by a thickness of some kilometres. This particular setting can partly explain the high fracturing of the bedrock which is made up of fractured and loosened rocks. The degree of fracturing is not homogeneous throughout the studied area although open fractures of up to 20 cm were always observed everywhere. All fractures measured on the field were plotted in Schmidt diagram in which it is possible to recognize some significant highly inclined ENE–WSW, NE–SW, NW–SE surfaces and at low angle NW–SE, E–W surfaces (Figure 5).
b) 
Quaternary cover
The detailed geological survey of the investigated area allowed us to map the glacial sediments that cover the bedrock in wide areas (Figure 4). The most common are the subglacial sediments (lodgement till, subglacial and sub-marginal melt-out till) composed of gravel with a sandy-silty matrix, typically massive and over-consolidated. Abundant clasts of centimetric size are subangular to angular. Their petrographic composition, formed by calcschist gneiss, micaschist, carbonate meta-breccia and metabasite, is strictly connected to the local bedrock. The matrix is scarce and consists of unsorted silty sand. The texture is mostly matrix-supported, but a clast-supported texture occurs locally. These sediments cover the low and medium sectors of the slopes (with inclinations of approximately 20-25°). The subglacial sediments are connected to the different glaciers flowing on the southern side of Mont Fallère and refer to the LGM and Lateglacial. The overall facies of the subglacial sediments is very different from the traditional subglacial sediments that are instead characterised by the predominance of a sandy-silty matrix, the abundance of subrounded clasts with typical shapes (i.e., faceted, polished and striated pebbles) and a petrographic composition representative of the entire basin [71].
Ice-marginal sediments are also common. They are mostly silty-sandy gravel with rare boulders up to a few decimetres in size with a clast-supported texture. Clasts display subangular to angular shapes and show a petrographic composition essentially of calcschist gneiss, micaschist, carbonate meta-breccia, metabasite and quartzite, representative of the local lithotypes. The scarce matrix shows an unsorted silty-sandy grain size. These sediments, massive or characterised by inclined bedding, appear to be normally consolidated and variously cemented.
The scarcity of large boulders, which is caused by the strong fracturing of the bedrock, represents the main difference between these sediments and the traditional ice-marginal and supraglacial ones outside DSGSD that, instead, typically show the abundance of large and giant boulders [72]. The clast petrography of the ice-marginal sediments in DSGSD areas, which is essentially local, is also different from the compositions of traditional sediments, which are usually significant of the entire glacial catchment [71]. The relatively low amounts of matrix in DSGSD areas favour the development of clast-supported textures and widespread carbonate cementation [22].
The ice-marginal sediments form several lateral and frontal moraines, tens of meter high and several hundreds of metres long. The location and morphology of these moraines suggest a supply both by the main Verrogne Glacier and local glaciers and a reference to the end of the LGM and mainly to the Lateglacial.
The supraglacial sediments are instead very scarce, locally covering the subglacial sediments and connected to the presence of dead ice.
c) 
Gravitational morpho-structures
Evidence of DSGSD was detected in the whole investigated area consisting of extremely fractured rocks and significant morpho-structures (Figure 6). The bedrock usually shows a joint spacing of few decimetres.
Trenches were also observed, with lengths ranging between 200 and 800 m, involving both bedrock and Quaternary successions. They are often characterised by a SW–NE trend and subordinately N– S, particularly closely around Lac Fallère. NNW–SSE trenches are also common to the head of the Clusellaz Valley. The shape of the lake is very peculiar, characterised by a SW-NE semi-submerged rocky ridge, that longitudinally divides the lake and is strictly conditioned by trenches with the same direction (Figure 2).
Several minor scarps strongly characterise the morphology of the whole area, displacing the bedrock and the glacial cover. They are metres high and several hundreds of metres long and form stepped slopes of alternating rocky walls and slightly sloping sectors, where subglacial deposit occur. These sets of scarps displace glacial sediments and landforms along the original slope of the glacial valley, e.g., on the Tsa de la Comba sector.
Another typical gravitational morpho-structure is a wide bulging relief located immediately South of Lac Fallère, where a particularly fractured bedrock appears loosened due to the presence of open fractures.
This type of structure consists of a rocky prominent and high relief separated from the main side by trenches and implies a rocky mass slided down and forward [1,73] along a basal concave surface [74].

5. Cases of interplay between glacial and gravitational evidence

The geological survey of Lac Fallère area evidenced several landforms connected to glacial shaping as slopes of the glacial valley covered by subglacial sediments, lateral and frontal moraines formed by ice-marginal sediments and roche moutonnée due to subglacial abrasion. Gravitational morpho- structures, such as minor scarps, trenches and counterscarps, associated with very fractured rocks, are also common and involve both the bedrock and the glacial cover. The various types and ages of glacial and gravitational evidence produce different cases of interaction between glacial and gravitational landforms.
Case 1 refers to the Lac Fallère depression, which shows an elongated shape in the ENE-WSW direction, hosting a lake with a length of approximately 300 m and width of 150 m (Figure 7). Around the lake the micaschist of the Fallère Formation, referred to as the Mont Fort Unit, crops out extensively. This rock consists of quartz, white mica, chlorite, albite, graphite and sporadic garnet. They are homogeneous rocks containing small lenticular bodies of impure quartzite and show intense brown to reddish alteration patina. Metric bodies of greenschist consisting of chlorite, albite and actinote with gneissic structure are sporadically embedded within micaschist.
The regional foliation usually plunges on average towards the S or SW, according to the general attitude of foliation on the whole southern side of Mont Fallère. In contrast, the regional foliation results in a highly variable dip in the bulging relief (2459.2 m a.s.l.) downstream of Lac Fallère (Figure 8). The micaschist outcropping in this relief is also very fractured, with a much higher degree of fracturing than in the surrounding areas.
The elongated shape of Lac Fallère is according to the direction of the slope and parallel to the rocky wall that defines the southern side of the Mont Fallère. A set of elongated depressions with the same direction were recognised around the lake, referred to as parallel trenches. This lake also shows a semi-submerged ridge shaped in the bedrock with the same ENE-WSW trend that partly longitudinally divides the lake (Figure 2). The Lac Fallère is bordered downstream by a bulging relief with an elevation of 2459.2 m a.s.l., 35 m higher than the lake, locally preserving roche moutonnée. Several moraines are recognised to the SW and SE edges of the lake (Figure 7).
The moraines located at the edges of the lake are built by the Fallère Glacier, which formed an elongated glacial cirque, strictly conditioned by parallel ENE–WSW trenches. In this case the gravitational trenches were then possibly partly already present during the LGM and the glacier used and enlarged them, creating the depression now occupied by the lake. The early opening of the trenches, before the LGM, can also be assumed from the modelling of a 300 m wide SW–NE depression, currently hosting the lake. Additionally, the roche moutonnée likely indicate a glacial shaping during the LGM. In particular, the direction of the glacial striae in the bulging relief, approximately perpendicular to the trench orientation, indicates that the Fallère Glacier flowed towards the SSE before the lake trench opening.
The location of this relief (Figure 7) downstream of the trenches associated with a highly variable dip of regional foliation and strongly fractured bedrock suggest its gravitational origin. This relief has therefore undergone more gravitational deformation than the surrounding areas and can be referred to as a bulging relief, as defined by the geological literature that described this morpho- structure in the toe sector of some DSGSDs [1,73].
The gradual evolution of the bulging relief immediately downstream of the lake, also consisting of an uplift of a rocky volume resulting from sliding on a concave surface, progressively decreased the supply of clasts to the frontal moraines of the Lac des Feuilles exclusively formed by Distulberg Formation micaschist clasts. Well preserved and relatively high frontal moraines are only present immediately downstream the bulging relief bordered around Lac des Feuilles, which is therefore linked to the barrage by frontal moraines.
The bulging relief evolution, that probably continued during the Lateglacial, forced the Fallère Glacier to laterally flow at its SW and NE edges originating a glacial diffluence, as suggested by a significant set of moraines at these two sites. The present configuration of the lake derives from the shape of the glacier in turn conditioned by the presence of trenches whose evolution likely continued in the Holocene, as testified by the semi-submerged ridge shaped in the bedrock within the lake (Figure 2).
Case 2 refers to a lateral moraine supplied by the tributary Feuilles Glacier of likely Lateglacial age. This moraine, stretched for several hundred metres in the NW–SE direction in the high basin and in the NE–SW and then again NW–SE downstream, shows an evident crest with a relatively constant slope (approximately 10°). The subglacial and ice-marginal deposits that form the moraine and its morainic crest appear interrupted by a W-E rocky scarp in the altimetric band of 2285-2300 m, which also bounds the Lac des Feuilles towards the North (Figure 9). This scarp, shaped in the rocks from Distulberg Formation, is not involved by the glacial erosion that indicates a Lateglacial- Holocene age.
This lateral moraine was displaced by a minor scarp for a height of approximately 20 m in the post- glacial period. This scarp is part of the set of approximately W–E minor scarps that characterises the area and is particularly common in the sector South of Lac Fallère. The evolution of this morpho-structure is subsequent to the deposition of the more recent Lateglacial moraines (Figure 9).
Case 3 refers to the complex morphology of the rocky relief approximately 700 m North of Fourmière, along the tributary Feuilles Valley (Figure 10).
In this area the micaschist of the Fallère Formation are covered by decametric thick gneiss of Mètailler Formation. This gneiss consists of albite, withe mica, chloritoid, sodium amphibole and quartz showing grey-greenish colour and schistose-gneissic structure. The contact between micaschist and gneiss plunges southward according to the regional foliation. Above the gneiss, still with a southward dipping boundary, dolomitic marble and meta-breccia with dolomitic clasts referred to the Aouilletta Unit crop out.
This rocky relief shows an articulated shape, with a higher northern sector (2265 m a.s.l.) (R1) and a lower southern sector (2249 m a.s.l.) (R2), approximately 10 m lower. This morphology is due to two NE–SW rocky minor scarps, with heigths of approximately 8 and 15 m, that dissected the relief (S1 and S2).
The bedrock outcropping in this relief is displaced by two gravitational morpho-structures with opposite movement to the DSGSD, referred to as counterscarps (C1 and C2).
The rocky relief is bounded to the north by a NW–SE moraine (M1), preserved for an approximately 200-m length (Figure 10). This moraine continues downstream and appears lower, South of the relief and with N–S and NW–SE trend (M2). The dimension, NW–SE trend and altitude of the moraine and composition of its clasts (Mètailler gneiss with subordinate metabasite and micaschist) suggest that it is shaped by the main Verrogne Glacier. The present location of this moraine north of the relief, instead of on the left side of the Fallère Valley, is likely connected to the movement along an approximately W–E counterscarp (C1), which displaced this moraine towards the North by approximately 10 m. Moreover, the trend of this moraine actually appears broken in two parts (M1 and M2) and the two sectors are separated by a rocky scarp. The displacement of the moraine is congruent with the displacement of the bedrock in which the gneiss/dolomitic marble boundary is lowered northward by the counterscarp C2.
The scarps (S1 and S2) are part of the set of approximately NE-SW minor scarps common in the investigated area, while the counterscarps (C1 and C2) are rarer.
The space between the main scarp (S) and the counterscarps (C1 and C2) forming a like “graben” structure was occupied by the sedimentation of the tributary glaciers which formed several relatively thick moraines.
Case 4 is located immediately North of the Becca France relief, along the right side of the high Clusellaz Valley (Figure 11). The metamorphic bedrock refers only to the rocks of the Aouilletta Unit and consists of carbonate grey calcschist with varying amounts of quartz and white mica alternating with chloritic micaceous marble showing an ochre-coloured alteration patina, in decimetre-thick layers.
Pervasive regional foliation constantly plunges to the South with low to medium inclination. The N-facing morphological surfaces with a constant slope of approximately 25° shaped in subglacial sediments represent sectors of the original glacial slope (G1, G2 and G3) (Figure 11).
Their location in the main glacial valley and petrographic composition of clasts (carbonate calcschist, gneiss, micaschist, metabasite and subordinate quartzite) indicate that these landforms are linked to the Verrogne-Clusellaz Glacier before its flow along the present Verrogne Valley, likely during the LGM [41].
These sectors of the original glacial slope were subsequently displaced by two WNW–ESE rocky scarps, with heights of approximately 8 (S1) and 5 m (S2), suggesting an evolution of DSGSD with the formation of two minor scarps during the Lateglacial (Figure 11).
The gravitational scarps were then locally covered by a lateral moraine, formed by ice-marginal sediments (M1), also referred to as the Clusellaz Glacier as suggested by its elongation and petrographic composition (carbonate calcschist, gneiss and micaschist, with subordinate metabasite and quartzite), because during the Lateglacial the Verrogne Glacier flowed along the Verrogne Valley (Figure 3).
This morphological arrangement is further involved in the development of a composite morpho- structure characterised by approximately E–W stretches (S3 and S4) consisting of minor scarps and stretches with directions between N125° and 165° consisting of trenches (T1 and T2). This composite landform indicates a further recent evolution of DSGSD (Figure 12).

6. Discussion

The Lac Fallère area shows evidence of glacial shaping, referred to as the Verrogne-Clusellaz Glacier and its tributary glaciers (Clapin, Fallère, Feuilles, Morgnoz, Chèsere), with different ages (LGM and the various withdrawal stages of the Lateglacial) (Figure 4). A wide cover of subglacial sediments is preserved, essentially connected to the LGM, characterised by flat or weakly inclined morphologies. Rounded reliefs involved by glacial erosion preserving roche moutonnée are also recognised. The directions of glacial striae can provide information about glacier flow directions. Several moraines linked to the different glaciers are also present. Their dimension and distribution suggest that only the external moraines are likely connected to the LGM (Verrogne-Clusellaz Valley), while most moraines (tributary valleys) are instead referred to the Lateglacial (Figure 4). The Lac Fallère area also shows evidence of deep-seated gravitational slope deformation (DSGSD), evidenced here for the first time (Figure 6). Very fractured and loose rocks are common in the entire area, which also shows particularly disjointed rocks in confined sectors. Several morpho-structures were also widely recognised consisting of open fractures in the bedrock and minor scarps, counterscarps and trenches, shaped both in the bedrock and in the subglacial and ice-marginal sediments.
Preprints 94951 g013
Figure 13. Elongated shape of the Lac Fallère along evident trenches (T), bordered downstream by a rocky bulging relief (B) and characterised by a submerged ridge shaped in the bedrock (R).
Figure 13. Elongated shape of the Lac Fallère along evident trenches (T), bordered downstream by a rocky bulging relief (B) and characterised by a submerged ridge shaped in the bedrock (R).
Preprints 94951 g013
A wide bulging relief was also recognised, which imply that rocky masses slipped down and forward (Figure 6). Displacement of the bedrock was also locally reconstructed involving the boundary between gneiss and carbonate meta-breccia (case 3) (Figure 15). This boundary is dislocated both at the cartographic scale and at the mesoscopic scale (Figure 10). Additionally, differences in the attitude of the bedrock foliation have been recognised (between the bedrock outcropping in the main southern Fallère side, where the attitude is almost constant with dip towards the S or SW and the bulging relief downstream of Lac Fallère, where the attitude is very variable) and suggest the slipping of the bulging relief (Figure 8).
Preprints 94951 g014
Figure 14. Scarps (S1 and S2) and counterscarps (C1 and C2) that dislocate both the rocky relief (with formation of R1 and R2 reliefs) and the moraine (M1 and M2). See the map of Figure 10 for the legend.
Figure 14. Scarps (S1 and S2) and counterscarps (C1 and C2) that dislocate both the rocky relief (with formation of R1 and R2 reliefs) and the moraine (M1 and M2). See the map of Figure 10 for the legend.
Preprints 94951 g014
Generally, the abundance of Quaternary sediments in a mountain area can be favoured by DSGSD phenomena [44]. In detail, glacial shaping in a DSGSD environment was also produced in the Lac Fallère area, as observed in other areas [73]. It creates great effects on the facies of glacial sediments which appear particularly rich in centimetric rocky fragments, with clast-rich subglacial deposits and ice-marginal deposits characterised by few erratics. The same DSGSD favours the construction of numerous and wide moraines, even if hosted in small basins, that are more extensive than those in areas with normally fractured bedrock outside DSGSD [73].
The abandoned glacial valleys, separated by rocky rounded reliefs with roche moutonnée, favoured the construction of moraines in the whole Lac Fallère area, that are conditioned by the bedrock gravitational morphologies and not exclusively triggered by climate-driven glacier readvances.
Preprints 94951 g015
Figure 15. Cross section of the articulated relief North of Fourmière (case 3). The section over the white band is in the background and represents the geological view of the slope. See the map of Figure 10 for the legend.
Figure 15. Cross section of the articulated relief North of Fourmière (case 3). The section over the white band is in the background and represents the geological view of the slope. See the map of Figure 10 for the legend.
Preprints 94951 g015
The numerous gravitational depressions in DSGSD areas along the main trenches, which can be used for glacier flow, also favour the diffluence phenomena (case 4) (Figure 4). The separation of the Verrogne-Clusellaz Glacier into various contemporary tongues was particularly noticeable in the Tsa de la Comba sector, with the shaping of several subparallel WNW–ESE depressions reported as abandoned glacial valleys (Figure 4). The shaping of these depressions is refferred to a thick Verrogne-Clusellaz Glacier essentially during the LGM and then implies a partly pre-LGM evolution of DSGSD (Figure 3). This type of depression can be interpreted as a “gravitational valley” because its shaping is partly due to the gravitational opening of trenches as already defined in other research [73].
Exclusively during the LGM a glacier tongue flowed across the in-uplift bulging relief shaping wide areas characterized by roche moutonnée and constructing the Lac des Feuilles frontal moraines (case 1) (Figure 7). The distribution of glacial striae and their orientation towards the SSE on the bulging relief immediately South of the lake indicate a glacial shaping during the LGM. As the bulging relief deformation continued, the small glacial tongue of Lac des Feuilles was also depleted, stopping the flow in this direction.
Lac Fallère is contained within a WSW–ENE elongated depression and shows lateral depressions and a semi-submerged ridge shaped in the bedrock with the same trend (Figure 2). Both depressions and rocky ridge along the lake correspond to evidence of three side-by-side gravitational trenches (Figure 13). A thick glacier occupied the depression, due to the SW–NE trenches, that hosted an elongated cirque during the LGM (Figure 7). Consequently, the glacier enlarged the trenches likely already present before the LGM, helping to shape a 300 m wide valley. A typical cirque lake presents a sub-circular form and shows upstream a curved-in plant wall. The elongated shape in the WSW–ENE direction and the presence of a straight wall upstream of Lac Fallère suggest a cirque significantly affected by the evolution of trenches that therefore began their evolution before the LGM (Figure 7).
Subsequently, another glacial diffluence occurred along Lac Fallère, where two tongues with opposite flow directions formed at the SW and SE edges of the lake (Figure 4). These two opposite tongue, that edified the more recent moraine, likely formed during the Lateglacial along the SW– NE evolving trenches (Figure 7).
Preprints 94951 g016
Figure 16. A Lateglacial lateral moraine of the Feuilles Glacier displaced in M1 and M2 by an E-W trending minor scarp (red line) which exposes rocks from Distulberg Formation.
Figure 16. A Lateglacial lateral moraine of the Feuilles Glacier displaced in M1 and M2 by an E-W trending minor scarp (red line) which exposes rocks from Distulberg Formation.
Preprints 94951 g016
The observation that locally (case 2) (Figure 9) these more recent moraines are displaced by E–W trending minor scarps, indicates a subsequent gravitational evolution, referred to as the Lateglacial (Figure 16). Additionally, the evolution of morpho-structures such as scarps and counterscarps strictly influenced the deposition of glacial sediments. For example, North of Fourmière (case 3), the bedrock and the more ancient moraines were affected by dislocation from counterscarps, which defines a DSGSD evolution post-LGM (Figure 14). The presence of a depressed sector delimited by a dipping to the South scarp and dipping to the North counterscarps defines a low sector (a like “graben” structure) in which glacial sedimentation was favoured, with the formation of several relatively young moraines (Figure 10).
Some stretches of the glacial side (case 4) were shaped by the Verrogne-Clusellaz Glacier essentially during the LGM because subsequently the diffluence of the Verrogne-Clusellaz Glacier (through the Verrogne Valley) resulted in local glaciers and dead-ice, no longer supplied by the main glacier (Figure 3). These glacial landforms were displaced by WSW–ENE minor scarps, during the Lateglacial (Figure 17). A subsequent Lateglacial moraine covers these minor scarps and is further displaced by a complex trench, suggesting a very recent evolution of DSGSD (Figure 12)

7. Conclusion

The Lac Fallère area, located immediately to the NE of the large Pointe Leysser DSGSD, represents a significant example where it is possible to preserve and identify the relationships between glacialism and gravitational structures. Such relationships are difficult or impossible to recognise in areas where the rate of rocky mass movement is high (greater than 10 mm/year) due to the intense deformation of bedrock resulting in totally disjointed rocks with the consequent obliteration of the older DSGSD history. Very deformed rocks in the DSGSD environment can be observed in the southern sector of the Pointe Leysser DSGSD where the disjointed rocky mass is shaped in a prominent tongue occupying the Aosta Valley floor. The rate of movement in the northern sector of the same DSGSD, as represented in the regional landslide inventory of the Aosta Valley Region, is much lower and occurs at between 5 and 10 mm/year [18]. This variable speed of rock movement is a general feature of DSGSDs that reflects their complex kinematics [17,75,76].
The polarisation of velocity in the Pointe Leysser DSGSD makes it possible to hypothesise that further North, in the area of Lac Fallère, the speed of movement of the rocky mass is lower. These conditions are therefore favourable for recognising the older history of the DSGSD in the pre- to syn- glacial time interval.
The bedrock of the Lac Fallère area is involved in three major brittle fault systems intersecting each other and developed at regional scale. They are ESE–WNW Chaligne System, NE–SW Gignod System and E-W system parallel to the Aosta-Ranzola Fault. These regional systems are several kilometres thick and develop sub-vertical or very sloped faults, resulting in a sharp decrease in the geomechanical features of the involved rocks. The brittle regional tectonic trends are well identified in the study area through statistical analysis of the fracture data collected in the field and performed by the Schmidt diagram (Figure 5). The trends of regional brittle structures are well identifiable through this analysis in which a SW-plunging low-angle fracture system is also revealed, probably referred to gravitational deformation-related sliding surfaces.
The linear gravitational morpho-structures identified in the field also show orientation according to regional brittle trends. The concordance of orientations among regional structures, mesoscopic scale fractures and linear gravitational morpho-structures indicates that the latter develop partly using previous tectonic discontinuities [77,78]. Large-scale deformational morpho-structures often show features similar to brittle regional tectonic elements [79] and there is no well-defined limit between tectonic and gravitational processes [80,81].
The relationship between tectonic structures and the development of gravity morpho-structures has been modelled by some authors [74] who proposed a range of variability in the development of both morpho-structures and shape of DSGSD as a function of the type and orientation of the considered tectonic structures. Therefore, the development of gravitational morpho-structures can be considered the last step in the brittle deformation history of the orogenic chain, characterized by generalized extensional processes. DSGSD development is also strongly constrained by high relief energy.
The bedrock of the studied area, located above 2000 m a.s.l. and 1500 m higher than the main valley floor, i.e., in the morphologically highest sector of the chain, experienced a strong gravitational collapse. The glacial cover, a few tens of metres thick, with density of 0, 917 kg/dm3, present at this altitude during glaciation is probably irrelevant in influencing the forces driving the gravitational collapse of a bedrock with an average density of 2.7 kg/dm3. As a consequence, gravitational structures could develop independently with respect to the presence of the glacial mass. Gravitational structures that developed before the LGM were often completely obliterated by glaciers, probably constraining their flow directions as well. Gravitational structures developed before the LGM were reused by glaciers, as the case 1, and are still recognised if subsequent gravitational deformation was not particularly developed. Post-LGM gravitational structures are easy to recognize as they interrupt glacial deposits and landforms, as in case 2.
In conclusion, this research reports gravitational morpho-structures that cut glacial evidence and glacial sediments and landforms that seal morpho-structures, suggesting a long activity of the DSGSD from pre-LGM to post-Lateglacial.

References

  1. Agliardi, F.; Crosta, G.; Zanchi, A. Structural constraints on deep-seated slope deformation kinematics. Engeneering Geology 2001, 59, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Martinotti, G.; Giordan, D.; Giardino, M.; Ratto, S. Controlling factors for deep-seated gravitational slope deformation (DSGSD) in the Aosta Valley (NW Alps, Italy). Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2011, 351, 113–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jaboyedoff, M.; Penna, I.; Pedrazzini, A.; Baroň, I.; Crosta, G.B. An introductory review on gravitational-deformation induced structures, fabrics and modelling. Tectonophysics 2013, 605, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Crosta, G.B.; Di Prisco, C.; Frattini, P.; Frigerio, G.; Castellanza, R.; Agliardi, F. Chasing a complete understanding of the triggering mechanisms of a large rapidly evolving rockslide. Landslides 2014, 11, 747–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Livio, F.A.; Zerboni, A.; Ferrario, M.F.; Mariani, G.S.; Martinelli, E.; Amit, R. Triggering processes of deep-seated gravitational slope deformation (DSGSD) in an un-glaciated area of the Cavargna Valley (Central Southern Alps) during the Middle Holocene. Landslides 2022, 19, 1825–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Discienza, M.E.; Esposito, C. State-of-art and remarks on some open questions about DSGSDs: Hints from a review of the scientific literature on related topics. Ital. J. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2021, 21, 31–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Demurtas, V.; Orrù, P.E.; Deiana, G. Deep-seated gravitational slope deformations in central Sardinia: Insights into the geomorphological evolution. J. Maps 2021, 17, 594–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Demurtas, V.; Orrù, P.E.; Deiana, G. Evolution of Deep-Seated Gravitational Slope Deformations in Relation with Uplift and Fluvial Capture Processes in Central Eastern Sardinia (Italy). Land 2021, 10, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Demurtas, V.; Orrù, P.E.; Deiana, G. Active lateral spreads monitoring system in East- Central Sardinia. Eur. J. Remote Sens 2022. [CrossRef]
  10. Tibaldi, A.; Rovida, A.; Corazzato, C. A giant deep-seated slope deformation in the Italian Alps studied by paleoseismological and morphometric techniques. Geomorphology 2004, 58, 27–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gutiérrez-Santolalla, F.; Acosta, E.; Ríos, S.; Guerrero, J.; Lucha, P. Geomorphology and geochronology of sackung features (uphill-facing scarps) in the Central Spanish Pyrenees. Geomorphology 2005, 69, 298–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Agliardi, F.; Crosta, G.B.; Zanchi, A.; Ravazzi, C. Onset and timing of deep-seated gravitational slope deformations in the eastern Alps, Italy. Geomorphology 2009, 103, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hippolyte, J.C.; Bourles, D.; Braucher, R.; Carcaillet, J.; Leanni, L.; Arnold, M.; Aumaitre, G. Cosmogenic 10Be dating of a sackung and its faulted rock glaciers, in the Alps of Savoy (France). Geomorphology 2009, 108, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McCalpin, J.P.; Corominas, J. Postglacial deformation history of sackungen on the northern slope of Pic d’Encampadana. Geomorphology 2019, 337, 134–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ambrosi, C.; Crosta, G.B. Large sackung along major tectonic features in the central Alps. Engr. Geol. 2006, 83, 183–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Amato, G.; Devoti, R.; Fubelli, G.; Aringoli, D.; Bignami, C.; Galvani, A.; Moro, M.; Polcari, M.; Sarolibe, M.; Sepe, V.; et al. Step-like displacements of a deep seated gravitational slope deformation observed during the 2016–2017 seismic events in Central Italy. Engr. Geol. 2018, 246, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Frattini, P.; Crosta, G.B.; Rossini, M.; Allievi, J. Activity and kinematic behaviour of deep-seated landslides from PS-InSAR displacement rate measurements. Landslides 2018, 15, 1053–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cignetti, M.; Godone, D.; Notti, D.; Giordan, D.; Bertolo, D.; Calò, F.; Reale, D.; Verde, F.; Fornaro, G. State of activity classification of deep-seated gravitational slope deformation at regional scale based on Sentinel-1 data. Landslides 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Agliardi, F.; Crosta, G.B.; Frattini, P.; Malusà, M.G. Giant non-catastrophic landslides and the long-term exhumation of the European Alps. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2013, 365, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Panek, T.; Mentlik, P.; Ditchburn, B.; Zondervan, A.; Norton, K.; Hradecky, J. Are sackungen diagnostic features of (de)glaciated mountains? Geomorphology 2015, 248, 396–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Coquin, J.; Mercier, D.; Bourgeois, O.; Cossart, E.; Decaulne, A. Gravitational spreading of mountain ridges coeval with Late Weichselian deglaciation: Impact on glacial landscapes in Tröllaskagi, northern Iceland. Quat. Science Rev. 2015, 107, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Forno, M.G.; Gattiglio, M.; Gianotti, F.; Rossato, S.; Taddia, G. Deep-seated gravitational slope deformation effects on Quaternary deposits in the western Alps (NW Italy). Alp. and Mediterr. Quat. 2020, 33, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Drouillas,Y; Lebourg, V. ; Zerathe, V.; Hippolyte, J.C.; Chochon, R.; Vidal, M.; Besso,R. Alpine deep-seated gravitational slope deformation and the Messinian Salinity Crisis. Landslides 2021, 18, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zerathe, S.; Lebourg, T. Evolution stages of large deep-seated landslides at the front of a subalpine meridional chain (Maritime-Alps, France). Geomorphology 2012, 138, 390–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pánek, T.; Hradecký, J.; Šilhán, K.; Smolková, V.; Altová, V. Time constraints for the evolution of a large slope collapse in karstified mountainous terrain (case study from the southwestern tip of the Crimean Mountains, Ukraine). Geomorphology 2009, 108, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gutiérrez, F.; Linares, R.; Roqué; C; Zarroca, M. ; Rosell, J.; Galve, J.P.; Carbonell, D. Investigating gravitational grabens related to lateral spreading and evaporite dissolu-tion subsidence by means of detailed mapping, trenching, and electrical resistivity to- mography (Spanish Pyrenees). Lithos 2012, 4, 331–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Panek, T.; Klimes, J. Temporal behavior of deep-seated gravitational slope deformations: A review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2016, 156, 14–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Herrera, G.; Gutiérrez, F.; García-Davalillo, J.C.; Guerrero, J.; Notti, D.; Galve, J.P.; Fernadez-Merodo, J.A.; Cooksley, G. Multi-sensor advanced DInSAR monitoring of very slow landslides: The Tena Valley case study (Central Spanish Pyrenees). Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 128, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Calò, F.; Ardizzone, F.; Castaldo, R.; Lollino, P.; Tizzani, P.; Guzzetti, F.; Lanari, R.; Tizzani, P.; Guzzetti, F.; Lanari, R.; et al. Enhanced landslide investigations through advanced DInSAR techniques: The Ivancich case study, Assisi, Italy. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 142, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cignetti, M.; Manconi, A.; Manunta, M.; Giordan, D.; De Luca, C.; Allasia, P.; Ardizzone, F. Taking advantage of the ESA G-POD service to study ground deformation processes in high mountain areas: A Valle d’Aosta case study, Northern Italy. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mantovani, M.; Bossi, G.; Marcato, G.; Schenato, L.; Tedesco, G.; Titti, G.; Pasuto, A. New perspectives in landslide displacement detection using Sentinel-1 datasets. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Solari, L.; Del Soldato, M.; Montalti, R.; Bianchini, S.; Raspini, F.; Thuegaz, P.; Bertolo, D.; Tofani, V.; Casagli, N. A Sentinel-1 based hotspot analysis: Landslide mapping in north-western Italy. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2019, 40, 7898–7921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hippolyte, J.C.; Brocard, G.; Tardy, M.; Nicoud, G.; Bourlès, D.; Braucher, R.; Ménard, G.; Souffaché, B. The recent fault scarps of the Western Alps (France): Tectonic sur Face ruptures or gravitational sackung scarps? A combined mapping, geomorphic, 10Be levelling, and dating approach. Tectonophysics 2006, 418, 255–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hippolyte, J.C.; Bourlès, D.; Léanni, L.; Braucher, R.; Chauvet, F.; Lebetard, A.E. 10Be ages reveal >12 ka of gravitational movement in a major sackung of the Western Alps (France). Geomorphology 2012, 171–172, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ballantyne, C.K. Paraglacial geomorphology. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2002, 21, 1935–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wyrwoll, K.-H. Causes of rock-slope failure in a cold area: Labrador-Ungava. In Reviews in Engineering Geology. Geological Society of America; Coates, D.R., Ed.; 1977; Volume 3, pp. 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Johnson, P.G. Paraglacial conditions of instability and mass movement: A discussion. Z. Fur Geomorphol. 1984, 28, 235–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mitchell, W.A. Dimlington Stadial ice sheet in the Western Pennines. In Western Pennines: Field Guide; Mitchell, W.A., Ed.; Quaternary Research Association: London, UK, 1991; pp. 25–42. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shakesby, R.A.; Matthews, J.A. Glacial activity and paraglacial landsliding in the Devensian lateglacial: Evidence from Craig Cerrygleisiad and Fan Dringarth, Forest Fawr (Brecon Beacons), South Wales. Geol. J. 1996, 31, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cruden, D. Rapid mass movement and climate: A North American perspective. Paläoklimaforschung 1997, 19, 371–378. [Google Scholar]
  41. Forno, M.G.; Bollati, I.M.; Gattiglio, M.; Gianotti, F.; Pelfini, M.; Sartori, G. How can a complex geosite be enhanced? A landscape-scale approach at the Deep Seated Gravitational Slope Deformation of Pointe Leysser (Aosta Valley, NW Italy). Geoheritage 2022, 14, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Forno, M.G.; Fubelli, G.; Gattiglio, M.; Taddia, G.; Ghignone, S. Object based geomorphological mapping: Application on an Alpine deep-seated gravitational slope deformation contest (Germanasca Valley, Western Alps). Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Polino, R.; Malusà, M.G.; Martin, S.; Carraro, F.; Gianotti, F.; Bonetto, F. Note Illustrative Della Carta Geologica d’Italia Alla Scala 1:50.000. Foglio 090 Aosta; ISPRA—Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale: Roma, Italy, 2015; pp. 1–144. [Google Scholar]
  44. Forno, M.G.; Comina, C.; Gattiglio, M.; Gianotti, F.; Lo Russo, S.; Sambuelli, L.; Raiteri, L.; Taddia, G. Preservation of Quaternary sediments in DSGSD environment: The Mont Fallère case study (Aosta Valley, NW Italy). Alp. Mediterr. Quat. 2016, 29, 181–191. [Google Scholar]
  45. Gouffon, Y. Géologie de la “nappe” du Grand St-Bernard entre la Doire Baltée et la frontière suisse (Vallée d’Aoste Italie). Mémoires Géologie (Lausanne) 1993, 12, 150. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pantet, A.; Epard, J.L.; Masson, H. Mimicking Alpine thrusts by passive deformation of synsedimentary normal faults: A record of the Jurassic extension of the European margin (Mont Fort nappe, Pennine Alps). Swiss J. Geosci. 2020, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Caby, R. Le Mesozoique de la zone du Combin en Val d’Aoste (Alpes Graies): Imbrications tectoniques entre series issues des domaines pennique, austroalpin et oceanique. Géologie Alpine 1981, 57, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
  48. Polino, R.; Carraro, F.; Martin, S.; Baggio, P.; Baster, I.; Bertolo, D.; Fontan, D.; Gianotti, F.; Malusà, M.G.; Monopoli, B.; et al. Carta Geologica d’Italia alla Scala 1:50.000, Foglio 090 Aosta, Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta; ISPRA: Roma, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  49. Malusà, M. Post-Metamorphic Evolution of the Western Alps: Kinematic Constraints from a Multi-Disciplinary Approach (Geological Mapping, Meso-Structural Analysis, Fission-Track Dating, Fluid Inclusion Analysis). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Torino—CNR-IGG, Torino, Italy, 2004; pp. 320p. [Google Scholar]
  50. Diolaiuti, G.A.; Bocchiola, D.; Vagliasindi, M.; D’Agata, C.; Smiraglia, C. The 1975-2005 glacier changes in Aosta Valley (Italy) and the relations with climate evolution. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2012, 36, 764–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Carraro, F.; Lanza, R.; Perotto, A.; Zanella, E. L’evoluzione morfologica del Biellese occidentale durante il Pleistocene inferiore e medio, in relazione all’inizio della costruzione dell’Anfiteatro Morenico d’Ivrea. Boll. Mus. Region. Sci. Nat. Torino 1991, 9, 99–117. [Google Scholar]
  52. Arobba, D.; Calderoni, G.; Caramiello, R.; Carraro, F.; Giardino, M.; Quagliolo, P. Palynological and radiometric evidence of a last glacial interstadial from peat sediments in the Ivrea morainic amphiteatre (NW Italy). Geol. Insubrica 1997, 2, 143–148. [Google Scholar]
  53. Gianotti, F.; Forno, M.G.; Ivy-Ochs, S.; Kubik, P. New chronological and stratigraphical data on the Ivrea amphitheatre (Piedmont, NW Italy). Quatern. Int. 2008, 190, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gianotti, F.; Forno, M.G.; Ivy-Ochs, S.; Monegato, G.; Pini, R.; Ravazzi, C. Stratigraphy of the Ivrea Morainic Amphitheatre (NW Italy): An updated synthesis. Alp. and Mediterr. Quat. 2015, 28, 29–58. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ratto, S.; Giardino, M.; Giordan, D.; Alberto, W.; Armand, M. Carta Dei Fenomeni Franosi della Valle d’Aosta, 1:100000 in Scale; Tipografia Valdostana: Aosta, Italy, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ballantyne, C.K. Paraglacial debris cone formation on recently deglaciated terrain. The Holocene 1995, 5, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cody, E.; Anderson, B.M.; McColl, S.T.; Fuller, I.C.; Purdie, H.L. Paraglacial adjustment of sediment slopes during and immediately after the debuttressing. Geomorphology 2020, 371, 107411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Church, M.; Ryder, J.M. Paraglacial sedimentation: A consideration of fluvial processes conditioned by glaciation. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1972, 83, 3059–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Forno, M.G.; Gattiglio, M.; Gianotti, F. Geological context of the Becca France historical landslide (Aosta Valley, NW Italy). Alp. Mediterr. Quat. 2012, 25, 125–139. Available online: https://amq.aiqua.it/index.php/amq/article/view/51.
  60. Forno, M.G.; Gattiglio, M.; Gianotti, F.; Guerreschi, A.; Raiteri, L. Deep-seated gravitational slope deformations as possible suitable locations for prehistoric human settlements: An example from the Italian Western Alps. Quat. Int. 2013, 303, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Delle Piane, L.; Perello, P.; Baietto, A.; Giorza, A.; Musso, A.; Gabriele, P.; Baster, I. Mature vs. active deep-seated landslides: A comparison through two case histories in the Alps. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2016, 49, 2189–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Crosta, G.B.; Frattini, P.; Agliardi, F. Deep seated gravitational slope deformations in the European Alps. Tectonophys 2013, 605, 13–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Elter, G. Carte Géologique de la Vallée d’Aoste, Échelle 1:100.000. C.N.R. Centro Studi sui Problemi dell’Orogeno Delle Alpi Occidentali; S.E.L.C.A.: Florence, Italy, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  64. De Giusti, F.; Dal Piaz, G.V.; Massironi, M.; Schiavo, A. Carta geotettonica della Valle d’Aosta. Mem. Sci. Geol. 2004, 55, 129–149. [Google Scholar]
  65. Comina, C.; Forno, M.G.; Gattiglio, M.; Gianotti, F.; Raiteri, L.; Sambuelli, L. ERT geophysical surveys contributing to the reconstruction of the geological landscape in high mountain prehistorical archaeological sites (Plan di Modzon, Aosta Valley, Italy). Ital. J. Geosci. 2015, 134, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dal Piaz, G.V. Alcune considerazioni sulla genesi delle ofioliti piemontesi e dei giacimenti ad esse associati. Boll. Della Assoc. Mineraria Subalp. 1971, 8, 365–388. [Google Scholar]
  67. Bearth, P. Zur Gliederung der Bundnerschiefer in der Region von Zermatt. Eclogae Geol. Helv. 1976, 69, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chessex, R. Tectonomagmatic setting of the Mont Fort nappe basement, Penninic Domain, Western Alps, Switzerland. In Proceedings of the International Earth Sciences Colloquium on the Aegean Region; Pişkin, Ö., Ergün, M., Savaşcin, M.Y., Tarcan, G., Eds.; Izmir: Güllück, Turkey, 1995; Volume 1, pp. 19–35. [Google Scholar]
  69. Gouffon, Y.; Burri, M. Les nappes des Pontis, de Siviez-Mischabel et du Mont Fort dans les vallées de Bagnes, d’Entremont (Valais, Suisse) et d’Aoste (Italie). Eclogae Geol. Helv. 1997, 90, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sartori, M.; Gouffon, Y.; Marthaler, M. Harmonisation et définition des unités lithostratigraphiques briançonnaises dans les nappes penniques du Valais. Eclogae Geol. Helv. 2006, 99, 363–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Goldthwait, R.P.; Matsch, C. Genetic classification of glacigenic deposits. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands 1988, 294p. [Google Scholar]
  72. Dreimanis, A. Tills: Their genetic terminology and classification. In Genetic Classification of Glacigenic Deposits. Rotterdam, Brookfield, Balkema; Goldthwait, R.P., Matsch, C.L. (Hrsg.); 1988; pp. 17–83. [Google Scholar]
  73. Forno, M.G.; Gattiglio, M.; Ghignone, S.; Taddia, G. Deep-seated gravitational slope deformation involving glacial evidence in the Rodoretto Valley (NW Alps). J. Maps 2021, 17, 846–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bois, T.; Bouissou, T.; Guglielm, Y. Influence of major inherited faults zones on gravitational slope deformation: A two-dimensional physical modelling of the La Clapière area (Southern French Alps). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2008, 272, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Giordan, D.; Cignetti, M.; Bertolo, D. The use of morpho-structural domains for the characterization of deep-seated gravitational slope deformations in Valle d’Aosta. In Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides; Mikoš, M., Vilímek, V., Yin, Y., Sassa, K., Eds.; Springer International Publishing WLF, 2017; pp. 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Crippa, C.; Franzosi, F.; Zonca, M.; Manconi, A.; Crosta, G.B.; Dei Cas, L.; Agliardi, F. Unraveling spatial and temporal heterogeneities of very slow rock-slope deformations with targeted DInSAR analyses. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Agliardi, F.; Crosta, G.B.; Frattini, P. Slow rock-slope deformation. In Landslides: Types, Mechanisms and Modeling; Clague, J.J., Stead, D., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp. 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Radbruch-Hall, D.H. Gravitational creep of rock masses on slopes. In Developments in Geotechnical Engineering; Chapter 17; 1978; Volume 14, pp. 607–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Crosta, G.B.; Frattini, P.; Agliardi, F. Deep seated gravitational slope deformations in the European Alps. Tectonophysics 2013, 605, 13–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jaboyedoff, M.; Crosta, G.B.; Stead, D. Slope Tectonics: A Short Introduction; Geological Society, London, Special Publications: London, UK, 2011; Volume 351, pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jaboyedoff, M.; Penna, I.; Pedrazzini, A.; Baroň, I.; Crosta, G.B. An introductory review on gravitational-deformation induced structures, fabrics and modeling. Tectonophysics 2013, 605, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 94951 g001
Figure 1. Location of the Lac Fallère area (yellow line) consisting of the upper Clusellaz Valley and its tributary valleys.
Figure 1. Location of the Lac Fallère area (yellow line) consisting of the upper Clusellaz Valley and its tributary valleys.
Preprints 94951 g001
Preprints 94951 g002
Figure 2. Elongated shape of the Lac Fallère, along WSW–ENE trenches, and also characterized by a rocky ridge that longitudinally divides the lake.
Figure 2. Elongated shape of the Lac Fallère, along WSW–ENE trenches, and also characterized by a rocky ridge that longitudinally divides the lake.
Preprints 94951 g002
Preprints 94951 g003
Figure 3. The Mont Fallère area evolution during LGM and Lateglacial (modified from [60]).
Figure 3. The Mont Fallère area evolution during LGM and Lateglacial (modified from [60]).
Preprints 94951 g003
Preprints 94951 g004
Figure 4. Simplified geological map of the Lac Fallère area. The red boxes refer to the case studies.
Figure 4. Simplified geological map of the Lac Fallère area. The red boxes refer to the case studies.
Preprints 94951 g004
Preprints 94951 g005
Figure 5. Schmidt diagram of fractures collected in the study area. The fractures are reported as plan poles (black dots). Poles are clustered according to highly inclined surfaces with ENE–WSW, NE–SW and NW–SE trends and at low angle surfaces NW–SE and E–W trends.
Figure 5. Schmidt diagram of fractures collected in the study area. The fractures are reported as plan poles (black dots). Poles are clustered according to highly inclined surfaces with ENE–WSW, NE–SW and NW–SE trends and at low angle surfaces NW–SE and E–W trends.
Preprints 94951 g005
Preprints 94951 g006
Figure 6. Main gravitational morpho-structures. The squares refer to the case studies.
Figure 6. Main gravitational morpho-structures. The squares refer to the case studies.
Preprints 94951 g006
Preprints 94951 g007
Figure 7. Detailed geological map of the Lac Fallère (case 1) characterized by evident trenches and a bulging relief downstream the lake. Black lines indicate the orientation of the glacial striae towards the SSE that characterize the roche moutonnée.
Figure 7. Detailed geological map of the Lac Fallère (case 1) characterized by evident trenches and a bulging relief downstream the lake. Black lines indicate the orientation of the glacial striae towards the SSE that characterize the roche moutonnée.
Preprints 94951 g007
Preprints 94951 g008
Figure 8. Schmidt diagrams reporting the S2 poles (black dots) for the bulging relief sector downward the Lac Fallère (A) and in the remaining study area (B). The dispersion of the regional foliation S2 is very evident in the bulging relief compared with S2 outside this.
Figure 8. Schmidt diagrams reporting the S2 poles (black dots) for the bulging relief sector downward the Lac Fallère (A) and in the remaining study area (B). The dispersion of the regional foliation S2 is very evident in the bulging relief compared with S2 outside this.
Preprints 94951 g008
Preprints 94951 g009
Figure 9. Detailed geological map of the Lac des Feuilles area (case 2) with a moraine displaced by a minor scarp immediately NE of the lake along the Feuilles T.
Figure 9. Detailed geological map of the Lac des Feuilles area (case 2) with a moraine displaced by a minor scarp immediately NE of the lake along the Feuilles T.
Preprints 94951 g009
Preprints 94951 g010
Figure 10. Detailed geological map of the complex rocky relief approximately 700 m North of Fourmière, involved by minor scarps and counterscarps that also dislocate a moraine in M1 and M2. A-A1 is the trace of the cross section of Figure 15.
Figure 10. Detailed geological map of the complex rocky relief approximately 700 m North of Fourmière, involved by minor scarps and counterscarps that also dislocate a moraine in M1 and M2. A-A1 is the trace of the cross section of Figure 15.
Preprints 94951 g010
Preprints 94951 g011
Figure 11. Detailed geological map of the right side of the upper Clusellaz Valley with subglacial sediments (G1, G2 and G3) involved by minor scarps (S1 and S2) that appear covered by a Lateglacial moraine (M1). The bedrock and this moraine are later affected by a composite morpho-structure (S3, T1, S4, T2). The square refers to Figure 17.
Figure 11. Detailed geological map of the right side of the upper Clusellaz Valley with subglacial sediments (G1, G2 and G3) involved by minor scarps (S1 and S2) that appear covered by a Lateglacial moraine (M1). The bedrock and this moraine are later affected by a composite morpho-structure (S3, T1, S4, T2). The square refers to Figure 17.
Preprints 94951 g011
Preprints 94951 g012
Figure 12. Trench T1 that involves the glacial slope G1 and the more recent moraine M1.
Figure 12. Trench T1 that involves the glacial slope G1 and the more recent moraine M1.
Preprints 94951 g012
Preprints 94951 g017
Figure 17. Morphological surfaces on the right side of the Clusellaz Valley with subglacial sediments (G1, G2 and G3) involved by rocky minor scarps (S1 and S2). The subsequent moraine (blue line) formed by ice-marginal sediments (M1) covers these minor scarps and is displaced by a more recent minor scarp (S3). See the map of Figure 11 for the legend.
Figure 17. Morphological surfaces on the right side of the Clusellaz Valley with subglacial sediments (G1, G2 and G3) involved by rocky minor scarps (S1 and S2). The subsequent moraine (blue line) formed by ice-marginal sediments (M1) covers these minor scarps and is displaced by a more recent minor scarp (S3). See the map of Figure 11 for the legend.
Preprints 94951 g017
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated