Introduction
Events that occur during childhood can lead to profound and permanent changes that become manifest later in life103. In animal models, neonatal pain experiences have been demonstrated to “prime” adult pain responses. This phenomenon was first reported by Ruda et al.100 using hindpaw inflammation, an observation that has been replicatede.g.,115. It has also been demonstrated following neonatal hindpaw incision8,25,53, facial incision82, neonatal systemic LPS exposure33, neonatal nerve injury116, neonatal muscle injection51, neonatal gastric suctioning109, neonatal colorectal distension35,122,123 and neonatal colonic inflammation4. Consistent with these multiple reports of adult hypersensitivity induced by nociceptive neonatal events are alterations that occur secondary to an episode of cystitis experienced at a critical period of development in rodents. First described by Randich et al.95 these changes mirror many of the phenotypic features of the disorder interstitial cystitis (IC) in humans61. As a consequence, this neonatal bladder inflammation (NBI) paradigm is able to serve as a model of the human disorder. In this review we propose to support the veracity of this statement by presenting a short summary of information related to IC in humans followed by a review of studies that have used NBI as an experimental manipulation. This review has identified some gaps in knowledge and when possible, we will present novel data to help fill those gaps. To optimize the ease of reading this information, the Materials and Methods section related to the new data is placed at the end of the document.
The disease to be modelled: Interstitial Cystitis (IC). IC is a chronic bladder disorder characterized by recurring pelvic discomfort or pain associated with altered urological organ function which is not due to readily defined causes of such sensations such as active urinary tract infections, stones or tumors. Dependent upon the precise definition of the disorder3,14,15, IC is present in either 1 in 10,000 females (1 in 100,000 males) when utilizing stringent criteria or in up to 2% of the population when utilizing purely symptom-based criteria. The term Bladder Pain Syndrome has often been used synonymously with IC. For purposes of this literature review, we will use the term “IC” and assign the diagnosis based on the following criteria: Inclusionary criteria: discomfort (pain and/or urgency) with low volume bladder filling or emptying and findings on cystoscopic examination that may include either a mucosal ulcer (Hunner’s patch) or submucosal petechial hemorrhages following hydrodistension (glomerulations indicative of vascular fragility); Exclusionary criteria: active urinary tract infection using standard criteria114; neoplasm on cystoscopy; anatomic abnormalities such as bladder diverticuli; current bladder or kidney stones; and neurological disease with identifiable pathology (e.g. spinal cord injury).
Common signs and symptoms. In addition to pain, subjects with the diagnosis of IC report frequent urination during the daytime (up to 30 times/day), persistent urgency, dyspareunia and nocturia13. Pain and urological symptoms are obviously related, but are viewed by many as distinct sensory entities29,45. Pain is commonly localized to the pelvis, but may extend into the abdomen and the perineum. Studies by the MAPP (Multidisciplinary Approach to Chronic Pelvic Pain of Urological Origin) Research Network, which is sponsored by the U.S. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases have characterized sites of pain in subjects with IC and identified that pain may be “global” in some subjects with evidence of diffuse widespread pain in some subjects44 and segmental pain in others2,13. Co-morbidities are common, especially “functional” disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome and fibromyalgia10,40. Some have suggested that the presence of such chronic overlapping pain conditions should be the basis for separation of the IC population into subgroups which are bladder-centric (pain more localized to regions in or near the bladder)50 and non-bladder-centric (or bladder-plus other) groups in which pain may be widespread44,46 including a group with multiple morbidities who are polysymptomatic and polysyndromic47. Brain imaging studies, psychophysical testing and cystoscopic findings support the stratification of the IC population into subgroups24,41,83,90,101. Flares in pain are the rule, rather than the exception, in the IC patient population and have been attributed to many causes with the most frequent being recurrent UTI, acutely stressful events and neighboring pathology associated with co-existing disease111,112. A common historical finding associated with the IC patient population is a history of childhood bladder infection88 and/or other adverse childhood events both psychological and physical30,49,89,102. Pain and urinary symptoms (e.g., urgency, frequency) occur commonly together, but clinically important differences in the severity of each, as part of flare symptomatology, have been noted110.
Physical exam findings. On examination, IC patients commonly report lower abdominal and pelvic floor tenderness to palpation31,42. Formal psychophysical testing has demonstrated statistically significant, hypersensitivity associated with deep tissue tests such as the ischemic forearm task, the cold pressor test, thumbnail bed pressure or muscle pressure thresholds23,24,32,42. In general, subjects with IC have not proven to be hypersensitive to cutaneous testing at either segmental or non-segmental levels using heat or superficial mechanical stimuli, but appear to require activation of deep (e.g. muscular) structures to demonstrate tenderness. Neuroimaging of the IC population has been extensive and differences in gray matter structure, bloodflow and connectivity have been demonstrated23,24,26,34,36,39,119. Studies have observed subgroup differences when other co-morbidities such as fibromyalgia are taken into account24.
Evocative Tests. At present, the gold standards for assessing pain are patient-based metrics. To refine localization of pain generation in IC, manipulations are performed to evoke bladder pain. For IC, evocative tests include cystometrograms (CMGs), the intravesical application of potassium solutions and the ice water test. CMGs are standard clinical tests used to diagnose altered bladder sensation. The test consists of catheterization of the bladder through the urethra followed by a slow infusion of a fluid (typically normal saline). A pressure transducer measures the intravesical pressure and the volume of fluid infused can be calculated. Subjects are instructed to report the point at which they have various sensations such as “First Pain” and “Maximal Toleration.” The volumes and pressures within the bladder at the time of the sensory reports are recorded, as are any contractions of the bladder. In experimental studies, numeric sensory intensity ratings are also reported during bladder filling. Studies in healthy females have demonstrated that repeated, sequential CMGs result in sensitization to bladder distension74 and there is a tight correlation between increases in intravesical pressure and sensory reports. Subjects with the diagnosis of IC report pain with lower intravesical volumes and pressures than healthy controls and tolerate much lower volumes and pressures of bladder filling75. The “Potassium Test” is uncommonly employed and consists of placement of a urinary catheter through the urethra and infusion of solutions of either normal saline or potassium chloride which are then allowed to dwell in the bladder85. If the patient reports an evocation of pain, the test is “positive.” It is intended to identify a “leaky bladder” in which potassium solutions are able to cross the urothelial barrier of the bladder and directly activate submucosal nerves. Parsons85 reported high sensitivity of the test in the IC population which he tested. A similar test is the “Ice Water Test” which is occasionally used to assess for neurogenic contractions of the bladder. It consists of placement of a urinary catheter and infusion of an ice water solution. An Ice Water Test is positive for central nervous system (CNS) injury if the infusion evokes a bladder contraction. Notably, subjects with IC given the Ice Water Test report bladder pain secondary to ice water infusion whereas healthy subjects do not. Hence, the diagnostic criteria of the test when looking for IC relates to a “negative” test for CNS injury (no bladder contraction), but a positive report of pain55. At present, there are no formal lab tests that have obtained acceptance as diagnostic for IC. Many substances including urinary fungi81, growth factors1 and neuropeptides in the bladder84 have been identified as being altered in subjects with IC when compared with controls, but at this point these do not serve as biomarkers but as topics for research.
Lack of Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) in IC subjects. A notable phenotypic finding related to subjects with the diagnosis of IC is that they, on formal testing, have deficient CPM mechanisms. In healthy humans, application of a painful stimulus to one part of the body as a conditioning stimulus reliably inhibits pain sensation in other body parts. This is typically quantified as an increase in thermal pain threshold or thermal pain tolerance following application of a painful stimulus to another body site. Ness et al.72 demonstrated that healthy subjects had robust CPM such that an increase in thermal pain thresholds/tolerance measured at the ankle was apparent after immersing a hand in ice water but subjects with IC had no such increase (no inhibitory CPM) and in some cases had a decrease in pain threshold/tolerance. This indicated a blunting or absence of this endogenous pain inhibitory system.
Summary of findings in humans with IC that can find correlate in rats. For a model of IC to have face validity it needs to have correlates to the human condition43. For this reason, we proposed that for a model of IC to be valid, it would need to demonstrate the following: hypersensitivity to bladder distension consistent with nociception (correlate to discomfort/pain); sensitivity to intravesical fluids such as in CMGs, ice water or potassium solutions (correlate to evocative tests); increases in symptoms with insults such as bladder inflammation, nearby pathology or stress (correlate to flares); altered central nervous system processing (correlate to altered fMRI); and altered endogenous antinociceptive systems (correlate to lack of CPM). We propose that, in the female rat, neuroplastic changes following NBI result in the fulfillment of these criteria.
Whole animal reflex responses that change following NBI. Models of visceral pain differ from those that use stimuli applied to the skin. Characterized by Sherrington at the beginning of the 20th century, pseudaffective reflexes are responses by animals that occur in response to noxious stimuli which are suggestive of responses to pain, with all of its emotional and physiological components, but which does not require a cortical level of processing of information67. Common measures include flexion-withdrawal reflexes evoked by noxious stimuli (e.g. heat, pinch) applied to superficial layers of the body. These reflexes are experienced by humans and their vigor correlates with human reports of pain. Visceral sensations have proved to be harder to model, but the distension of hollow organs produces pain in humans and robust visceromotor (abdominal contractions) and cardiovascular (typically pressor) reflex responses in both humans and non-humans9,12,67,71,74. These responses occur when the bladder is distended in rats and have correlates in humans74,75. The effects of NBI on these varied responses to UBD will be discussed individually below.
Effect of NBI on Reflex Responses to Bladder Filling. In a primary characterization paper, Randich et al.95 identified that there was a critical period of development during postnatal days 14 to 16 (P14-16; the end of the neonatal period) in which bladder inflammation induced by the transurethral intravesical administration of the yeast cell wall derivative zymosan (1% in saline, 30 minutes) resulted in an altered adult phenotype that had increased micturition episodes (measured using a Void Spot Assay) and increased vigor of cardiovascular and visceromotor (VMR; abdominal contractile) responses to UBD following acute bladder re-inflammation61,95. Neonatal control treatments for those experiments were intravesical saline and/or anesthesia/antibiotic treatments identical to what was received by the rats receiving intravesical treatments. Zymosan is a Toll-like Receptor 2 agonist (TLR2) and 1% solutions were utilized since previous experiments in adult rats had identified that concentration as optimal for the production of a time-limited bladder inflammation94. Similar intravesical administration of zymosan at P28-30 (equivalent of rat adolescence) did not produce the same effects in adults95. Subsequent reports refined timing and other methodology. Bladder inflammation on days P7-9 was not effective at producing adult effects61. Bladder inflammation on P21-23 led to increased micturition episodes as an adult, but not an augmentation of VMRs61. All subsequent timepoints had no effects on adult measures7,95. It is notable that bulbospinal inhibitory systems are forming in rats during the third week of life27. A single day of intravesical zymosan treatment on P14 was not sufficient to produce robust adult VMR effects but three daily treatments were sufficient61. Anecdotally, more than three days of NBI was associated with an undesirable level of pup mortality whereas three days of treatment had no effect on survival or weight gain after the period of treatment. Use of lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 100 mg/ml concentration) administered intravesically on P14-16 failed to produce adult effects61 suggesting subtleties related to innate inflammatory processes since LPS works via a TLR4 mechanism. The primary site for recording VMRs, quantified as electromyograms, has been the left external oblique musculature immediately superior to the inguinal ligament61. Similar (but less robust) visceromotor responses were also present in the pelvic floor musculature (pubococcygeus muscle). Both basal tone and evoked responsiveness of the pubococcygeus muscle was more robust in rats which experienced zymosan-induced bladder inflammation on P14-1661. Other nociceptive endpoints such as facial grimacing, vocalizations, locomotion and similar spontaneous behaviors have not been utilized in studies of NBI.
Protocols for Neonatal and Adult Bladder Inflammation. Based on these characterization studies a “standard” protocol for the production of NBI was established which is described more completely in the Materials and Methods section which consists of intravesical treatment with a 1% zymosan solution on days P14-16. Unless otherwise stated, the term “NBI” will indicate use of this standard protocol. Adult bladder inflammation (ABI) also followed a standard protocol in these studies which is also described in the Materials and Methods section and consisted of a single intravesical treatment with a 1% zymosan solution the day before testing. Unless otherwise stated, the term “ABI” will indicate use of this standard protocol.
NBI Increases Responsiveness to Infusion of Intravesical Solutions. Cystometrograms (CMGs) are the most common clinical measures of urinary bladder sensation. NBI results in reduced volume and pressure thresholds for the evocation of micturition responses20 when rats are tested as adults and compared with those that received neonatal control treatments. VMRs were also observed to be evoked by bladder contractions during the CMG testing when of sufficient intensity20. Adult rats which had experienced NBI also demonstrated VMRs following the infusion of a 0.4 mM solution of potassium chloride into their bladders (same as the human Potassium Test), whereas control rats do not61. Similarly, infusion of ice cold water (a correlate to the Ice Water Test) evokes VMRs but not bladder contractions in rats which experienced NBI, an apparent TRPA1-related phenomenon93, but not in control rats.
NBI Does Not Alter Hindpaw Somatic Nociception Measures. Both Randich et al.95 and DeBerry et al.20 examined hindpaw flexion withdrawal responses to thermal and mechanical stimuli and did not observe any quantitative differences between rats which had experienced NBI and their controls.
NBI Alters Elevated Plus Maze Measures. Elevated plus maze measures differ between rats which experienced NBI and their controls. NBI-treated rats spend significantly less time in the open arm of an Elevated Plus Maze compared to controls suggesting they have higher baseline levels of anxiety61.
Secondary Insults and Nociceptive Reflexes. As will be noted in following sections, NBI results in numerous biochemical and physiological alterations in adult rats without any additional manipulation. However, the evocation of augmented pseudaffective reflex responses (both cardiovascular and visceromotor) has required the administration of a secondary insult (NBI being the primary insult). The most common secondary insult which has been employed is ABI as described above using zymosan. However, infusion of a solution of 100 mg/ml LPS into adult rats which experienced NBI also produced augmented VMRs61. Notably, recent studies have identified that NBI not only increases the vigor of VMRs to UBD when treated as adults with these previously tested concentrations of zymosan and LPS, but also reduced the concentration of these TLR2/TLR4 agonists which was necessary to result in an augmention of VMRs to UBD when compared with controls6. Other secondary insults which have been demonstrated to produce an augmentation of VMRs to UBD in rats which experienced NBI include hindpaw inflammation (produced by injection of Complete Freund’s Adjuvant 3 days prior to testing)61,65, chronic constriction of the infraorbital nerve61 and acute footshock stress61,66. These secondary insults and their production of bladder hypersensitivity serve as correlates to flares in the symptomatology of IC subjects. Interestingly, others38,52 have noted differential effects on the vigor of VMRs evoked by non-bladder stimuli that occur between NBI-treated rats and their controls. In these studies, NBI-treated rats demonstrated significantly more robust colorectal distension-evoked VMRs than those of control rats.
Absence of Stress-Induced Somatic Analgesia. One of the robust endogenous inhibitory systems that can be evoked in animal models without pharmacological manipulation is the phenomenon of Stress-Induced Analgesia11. Whereas normal rats will demonstrate a stress-induced elevation in their cutaneous thermal and mechanical thresholds for evocation of a withdrawal reflex (i.e., it takes a higher temperature to evoke a flexion reflex following a stressor), rats which experienced NBI were demonstrated to have no effect of an episode of acute footshock stress on reflex responses to somatic stimuli66.
Summary of Changes in Whole Animal Measures Following NBI. Using whole animal reflexes and responses as primary endpoints, these studies have characterized hypersensitivity to bladder distension that is consistent with increased nociception. It is notable that the augmentation of pseudaffective reflex responses such as VMRs and cardiovascular responses that define hypersensitivity, require an accomplice: a second, adult insult. The present rodent model utilizing NBI is therefore presented as a “two-hit” model of pathology requiring a developmental insult (NBI) as a necessary but not sufficient event which must be followed by a secondary insult in order to become “clinically” manifest. The first insult appears to “prime” the system and the second insult makes the pain component of the disorder become manifest. Secondary insults which have been reported to increase the vigor or pseudaffective responses include segmental inflammatory events (e.g., bladder inflammation, hindpaw inflammation), distant neuropathic pain and acute stress61. These increases in responses also have correlates to the flares in symptoms that occur in subjects with IC. Other features of the NBI model include sensitivity to intravesical fluids such as occurs with ice water infusion or potassium chloride solution infusions, both of which activate VMRs in NBI-treated rats but not controls. Cystometrograms in NBI-treated rats also demonstrate hypersensitivity to fluid distension with lower pressure/volume thresholds needed to evoke micturition. Last, but not least, whole animal studies have demonstrated alterations in endogenous antinociceptive systems by demonstrated an absence of stress-induced analgesic mechanisms. Additional findings such as pelvic floor hypersensitivity and increased measures of anxiety round out positively comparative results between rats and humans. Taken together, these findings indicate that rats which experienced NBI have many of the behavioral phenotypic features of IC in humans. We would argue that the NBI model in female rats has good face value as a model of IC. Notably, a similar, but less extensive set of studies has also been performed examining the effects of NBI in female mice18 with similar, but not identical findings.
Theories related to etiologies. Ultimately, the goal of any model is to identify mechanisms related to the disease of interest so that preventative or interventional therapeutics may be devised in relation to the disorder. The main theories related to the etiology of IC include the following: Subjects with IC have a urothelial abnormality such that primary afferents in the bladder become exposed to “toxic urine”; IC is an autoimmune disease; IC is a variant of neuropathic pain; IC is a variant of myofascial pain; IC is a local manifestation of a total body pain mechanism; IC is due to genetic factors; IC is a psychiatric disorder; and IC is due to infection by a fastidious organism. What most proponents of these various theories fail to recognize is that they are not mutually exclusive as etiologies of IC. As noted above, a “two hit” model requires an initial developmental insult (in this case NBI) followed by an adult insult/susceptibility (one of the above). For purposes of face value of the NBI model, one also needs to understand specific neuroplastic changes that are due to NBI that occur in elements of sensation associated with the bladder. We will describe the ones that are known below, but first we will make an assessment of some current deficits of knowledge related to whole animal measures and attempt to fill some of the identified gaps with new data.
Gap #1 – what are effective second insults in the NBI model? This is obviously an open-ended question which will hopefully be addressed by individuals who ascribe to the different theories related to the etiology of IC since the theories are not mutually exclusive when a two-hit mechanism is hypothesized. A simpler, testable question is whether all nociceptive events in the body are sufficient to result in bladder hypersensitivity in the NBI model. To address this question we asked an even more mechanistic question: Is inflammatory pain anywhere always an effective “second insult”? Studies published-to-date which used inflammation as an adult pretreatment in the NBI model chose to inflame nearby tissues which had afferent information processed in the same, or immediately adjacent, spinal segments as conditioning stimuli (i.e. bladder re-inflammation, hindpaw inflammation). Therefore, studies identical to those described in Ness et al.61,65 were performed, the only exception in methodology being that instead of just inflaming the left hindpaw of the rat by injecting CFA three days prior to subsequent measurement of VMRs to UBD, the right hindpaw, cheek or forepaw were injected with the same amount of CFA (100 ml, or saline for controls) three days prior to testing. Measured endpoints were the VMRs evoked by graded UBD using electrodes placed into the left superior oblique musculature. Mechanical hypersensitivity at the sites of injection were confirmed by probing the sites with a cotton swab which activated a withdrawal response. Redness and swelling were also present at the sites of injection. A more complete description of these methods is presented in the Materials and Methods section.
Results of these studies reproduced earlier reports indicating that CFA-induced inflammation of the left hindpaw on the side ipsilateral to the EMG recording sites (a perisegmental inflammatory stimulus) produced an augmentation of VMRs to UBD in NBI-treated, but not in neonatal control-treated (NoNBI) rats which actually were slightly reduced [
Figure 1A]. A similar finding was observed when the site of CFA-induced inflammation was in the hindpaw contralateral to the EMG recording site (also a perisegmental inflammatory stimulus) [
Figure 1B]. However, when the site of CFA-induced inflammation was the contralateral forepaw or contralateral cheek region, there was no augmentation of VMRs to UBD in either NBI-treated or control rats (heterosegmental inflammatory stimuli) [
Figure 1C,D]. These findings suggest that any form of nociception experienced at another site of the body is
not sufficient as a secondary insult in the NBI model. Other secondary insults are yet to be investigated.
Bladder Tissue Measures That Change With NBI and/or ABI. The following sections will examine changes that occur as a consequence of NBI at different sites along the sensory pathway associated with the urinary bladder. ABI was used as a second insult in these studies.
Gross Histological Findings. When using Hematoxylin & Eosin, Gomori’s Trichrome or Toluidine Blue stains on thin sections of bladder tissue, there were no quantitative histological differences noted between rats which had experienced NBI and their controls20 when no second insult was presented. It was therefore notable that following “hydrodistension” (30 minutes of sustained intravesical pressure produced by a column of normal saline which is similar to what is done clinically in patients with suspected IC), the rats which had experienced NBI had a threefold increase in the number of hemorrhages upon release of the pressure than rats which had received neonatal control treatments61. These hemorrhages are a correlate to glomerulations that are noted following hydrodistension in humans with IC and suggest a vascular fragility within the bladder wall of rats which experienced NBI. Some human studies1 have suggested that Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) is increased in subjects with the diagnosis of IC. Since additional vascularity could explain the noted hemorrhages, we briefly investigated whether VEGF was changed in the NBI model.
Gap #2 – Are there differences in VEGF content of the bladder secondary to NBI?
More fully described in the Materials and Methods section, the experimental process was to form four groups of rats similar to previous studies which underwent combinations of the NBI and ABI protocols using intravesical zymosan as the inflammogen: NBI+ABI, NBI Only, Control Only and ABI Only groups. As adults, bladders were harvested and using ELISA measures, VEGF levels measured.
As apparent from the data presented in
Table 1, ABI led to statistically significant increases in VEGF levels, but NBI had no statistically significant effect. This indicates that VEGF levels in the NBI model are elevated, consistent with human studies, but only when local inflammation is present.
Other Endogenous Agonists and Receptors. As indicated in
Table 1 bladder content of the toll-like receptors TLR2 and TLR4 have been reported to be greater in rats which experienced NBI when compared with those which did not experience NBI
6. Interestingly, the bladder content of the endogenous kappa opioid agonist, dynorphin, was
reduced in rats which had experienced both NBI and ABI when compared to controls but NBI by itself was not sufficient to cause this reduction
108. In association with bladder sensation, the neuropeptides Substance P and Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) have particular relevance. Mustard oil-induced neurogenic inflammation, measured as Evan’s Blue extravasation has been demonstrated to be greater in rats which experienced NBI when compared with their controls
20. Thought to be an indirect measure of primary afferent neuropeptide content, this observation prompted more extensive studies related to Substance P and CGRP total content within the bladder both of which were demonstrated to be greater in rats which experienced NBI
20. Using ELISA measures, Shaffer et al.
106 examined the whole bladder neuropeptide content of rats which were in four groups: those which experienced NBI and ABI; those which experienced NBI Only; those which received ABI Only treatments and those which received Control Only treatments. Results for these studies are given in
Table 2. NBI led to both increased Substance P and CGRP content in rats with the greatest increases in rats which also experienced ABI. An additional study of note used a similar model of neonatal bladder irritation as described by Park et al.
86 in which 0.2% acetic acid solutions were infused into the bladders of female rats on P10. These investigators observed increased expression of TRPV1 in both bladder tissues and in lumbosacral dorsal root ganglia of the same rats when 8 weeks old. There are still a few lingering questions related to these studies. For example, the precise localization of the increased content of sensory neuropeptides in the bladder tissues due to NBI is unknown. To address this gap in knowledge, the following studies were performed.
Gap #3 – Does NBI change the location of Substance P and CGRP in the bladder? Studies published-to-date which demonstrated NBI-induced increases in Substance P and GCRP content (which are noted in
Table 2) only measured
total bladder content of the neuropeptides. Electrophysiologic study of primary afferents associated with the urinary bladder indicate that there are subpopulations of these neurons with differential distribution in the bladder tissues
120. Recent studies have identified a particular uniqueness to the “urothelial” bladder primary afferents which have bare nerve endings immediately adjacent to and within the urothelium
16,17,37 when compared with “non-urothelial” bladder primary afferents (all the rest). Using standard immunohistochemical techniques for Substance P and CGRP labelling of bladder tissues, it was possible to take photomicrographs that could be analyzed quantitatively for the intensity of neuropeptide labelling in the urothelial/immediate suburothelial area and to compare it with the labelling of the total bladder, generating a ratio indicating the relative labelling of the urothelial area. This data is presented in
Table 2. Specific methods for this study are given in the Materials and Methods section.
In these studies, NBI, by itself, produced a statistically significant increase in the Urothelial versus Non-Urothelial labelling of CGRP and a statistically significant decrease in the Urothelial versus Non-Urothelial distribution of Substance P labelling when compared with control animals. ABI produced a statistically significant increase in the Urothelial to Non-Urothelial ratio of both CGRP and Substance P labelling in rats which had not experienced NBI, but had no effect on relative distribution in rats which had experienced NBI (
Table 2).
Other Effects of NBI on Bladder Primary Afferent Neurons. Apart from the study by Park et al86, noted above, there is limited information related to changes induced by NBI measured in dorsal root ganglion neurons. There are also very few studies which have electrophysiologically assessed whether there are differences in the activity of bladder primary afferents that occurs secondary to NBI treatment. Kannampalli et al.38 examined the effects of NBI on a small sample of pelvic nerve afferents and observed a slightly lower rate of spontaneous activity in NBI-treated rats in comparison with control rats. However, this difference was not statistically significant due to low sample size. The level of excitation of these neurons evoked by bladder filling was similarly less in NBI-treated rats but interpretation was also limited by small sample size. Afferent pelvic nerve fibers in both treated and untreated rats appeared to encode for UBD in a similar accelerating monotonic fashion. Application of a selective GABAAa-2 receptor agonist increased the spontaneous activity of NBI-treated pelvic nerve afferents but had no statistical effect on control afferents. Zhang et al122 also identified that NBI led to downregulation of lumbosacral spinal tissue measures of potassium chloride co-transporters and vesicular GABA transport protein expression, but it not known whether this is primary afferent or second order neuron effect.
More deficits of knowledge. Any list of what we don’t know about changes in bladder primary afferent neurons as well as the bladder itself which are induced by NBI could be endless. Obvious candidates for investigation include other growth factors, other neuropeptides, measures related to the muscular, vasculature and immune systems, autonomic function measures and more. Particularly notable, our neurophysiological understanding of primary afferents associated with the bladder and how they may change secondary to NBI is almost non-existent. Obviously, neuropeptide content and distribution changes are relevant to our understanding. This is particularly true for CGRP changes since this peptide is only contained in primary afferents. It is known that bladder primary afferent neurons travel to both thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spinal segments5 and that characteristics of the different subpopulations which have different spinal destinations are different16,28,120 but at present, these spinal destination differences have only been characterized in the healthy or acutely inflamed states and NBI as a manipulation is still to be tested. Clearly, there is fertile ground for more studies, particularly in the realm of bladder primary afferent neurons. At present, we have to extrapolate NBI-induced changes observed in spinal processing and following spinal drug administration as indirect measures of their function.
What we know about “normal” spinal neurons excited by urinary bladder distension (UBD). Quantitative characterization studies of spinal dorsal horn neurons responsive to UBD in the rat have identified at least two populations of neurons that can be differentiated from each other by the existence versus absence of heterosegmental inhibitory influences56. Excitatory responses to visceral and cutaneous inputs are important defining characteristics, but have less predictive value in response to subsequent manipulations. Approximately half of spinal neurons that are excited by UBD demonstrate spontaneous activity that is inhibited >20% by the application of a noxious stimulus to a heterosegmental site (e.g., pinch of forepaw, neck skin, nose). These neurons are designated as Type I neurons. The other half of the UBD-excited neuronal sample (Type II neurons) are not inhibited by this stimulus demonstrating either no response to heterosegmental noxious stimuli or, in some cases, excitation. Both types of neurons demonstrate convergent excitatory cutaneous receptive fields, but the size of these receptive fields is smaller in Type I neurons (Type II neurons frequently have whole body noxious cutaneous excitatory inputs) and demonstrate an “inhibitory surround” characteristic where stimulation of cutaneous structures immediately outside of the excitatory field produce inhibition of the neuron56. A roughly 50%-50% Type I-Type II distribution has also been noted in spinal neurons excited by colorectal distension68. This Type I-Type II classification system has proven predictive of responsiveness to local inflammation and various pharmacological agents56,57,68-70. Notably, when examining spinal dorsal horn neurons in the lumbar enlargement which are excited by noxious somatic stimuli (e.g., heat, pinch) the Type I-Type II distribution is roughly 95%-5%76, but still predictive of response to pharmacological agents76. Categorization according to neurons’ excitatory cutaneous inputs (as Class 2 or Class 3 neurons, excited by both noxious and noxious inputs versus only noxious inputs respectively) was less predictive of the effects of pharmacological agents. Other characteristics of spinal neurons excited by UBD is that they are located in the superficial and deep laminae (including lamina X in the dorsal commissure region of the spinal cord) of the L6-S2 spinal segments, as well as the T10-L2 spinal segments and are generally absent from the lumbar segments exclusively associated with the hindlimb (L3-4). Both Type I and Type II neurons encode for UBD in a monotonic, accelerating fashion. Following acute inflammation, Type I neurons become less active and Type II neurons become more active57,69.
NBI and the activity of individual spinal dorsal horn neurons. In the absence of other manipulations, Type I and Type II neurons demonstrate similar levels of spontaneous activity as well as activity evoked by UBD56. This changes following NBI64,65,77. If no secondary pretreatments occur as adults, then both the spontaneous and UBD-evoked activity of Type I neurons in NBI-treated rats becomes reduced in comparison with their controls. However, if ABI occurs as an adult in NBI-treated rats, then the spontaneous and evoked activities of both Type I and Type II neurons are more robust when compared to the NBI-treated rats which did not get their bladders re-inflamed64,77. In contrast, rats which did not experience NBI but instead received neonatal control treatments, Type I neurons become less active following ABI and Type II neurons become more active in a fashion identical to that noted above in “naïve” (otherwise untreated) rats64,77. A similar phenomenon occurs with acute hindpaw inflammation induced by injection of Complete Freund’s Adjuvant: Type I neurons, which are inhibited by this treatment in control rats become more active in NBI-treated rats; Type II neurons become more active in both control and NBI-treated rats65. The simplest mechanism to describe these effects is that inhibitory influences on Type I neurons which are activated by noxious stimuli are reduced or absent in NBI-treated rats. As was noted above, human subjects with the diagnosis of IC also have reduced or absent Conditioned Pain Modulation, the human equivalent of noxious stimulus-activated inhibition72. As previously noted, in rats, stress-induced analgesia (another endogenous antinociceptive system) also appears to be reduced or absent in NBI-treated rats66. Kannampalli et al.38 also examined the effects of NBI on spinal dorsal horn neurons in a limited sample of neurons. In their hands, the spontaneous activity of spinal dorsal horn neurons in NBI-treated rats was similar to that of controls, but it was notable that the neurons in control rats appeared to be excited by a slow infusion of saline into the bladder whereas the same was not true for the NBI-treated rats. The findings of this study are difficult to compare with other studies as other characteristics of the neurons (e.g., cutaneous receptive fields, effect of heterosegmental noxious stimuli) were not described nor was the effect of segmental somatic stimuli. What was notable in these studies was that inhibition of dorsal horn neurons which was produced by the direct spinal application of a selective GABAAa-2 receptor agonist in control rats was absent in NBI-treated rats giving additional evidence of missing inhibitory mechanisms in NBI-treated rats. These findings were consistent with studies by these same investigators which identified deficits in other GABAA subunit receptor expression in the spinal cord of rats which had experienced NBI104. It is not known whether NBI alters excitability of different neuronal groups located within different laminae of the spinal cord (Type I and Type II neurons appear intermixed in both superficial and deep laminae) and so a set of studies was performed to answer the following question:
Gap #4. Does the location of dorsal horn neurons excited by UBD change with NBI?
Using nuclear c-Fos protein induction as an indirect measure of neuronal excitation, the location of spinal neurons excited by UBD was mapped to four locations: the lateral dorsal horn, the medial dorsal horn, the dorsal commissure region and the spinal parasympathetic nucleus (intermediolateal gray matter) in a fashion previously described by Vizzard
117 (more complete methods in the Material and Methods section). The data from these studies is indicated in
Table 3. Whereas UBD resulted in a robust, statistically significant increase in the number of c-Fos positive nuclei, particularly in the dorsal commissure area of the spinal cord, ANOVA analysis demonstrated no statistical effect of either NBI or ABI. This would suggest that the location of neurons which are excited by UBD is not grossly changed by NBI but this does not rule out changes in responsiveness. Namely, neurons do not appear to change from an excited to inhibited condition, but rather, may be less excited, such as was suggested by electrophysiological studies
77.
NBI-Induced Changes Following Intrathecal Receptor Antagonists. Using the effect of spinal intrathecal drug administration to localize effects of pharmacological antagonists, it is possible to imply tonic mechanisms that may be altering spinal neuronal processing in rats which have experienced NBI. These studies suggest there are tonic effects of alpha adrenergic63, serotonergic63, GABAergic63, glycinergic63 and NMDA glutaminergic66 receptor activation. The caveat associated with these studies is that other manipulations, such as peripheral nerve stimulation, were also being studied and so results could have be affected by the experimental preparation.
NBI Alters the Role of Endogenous Opioids. Numerous changes occur in the spinal opioid systems of rats when they experience neonatal injuries
e.g.53 including NBI. As noted in
Table 1, both bladder and spinal cord contents of opioidergic peptides are altered in rats which experienced NBI
108. Particularly notable is that the endogenous kappa opioid receptor agonist, dynorphin, was increased in the lumbosacral spinal cord of rats which had experienced NBI
108. In a series of studies, the nonselective opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone, was used to probe for a role of endogenous opioids in the modulation of sensory processing in rats which had experienced NBI. Spinal intrathecal administration of the naloxone allowed for localization of drug effect to spinal levels. Previous studies by Ball et al.
7 observed that intrathecal naloxone had minimal effects on rats which had not experienced any form of bladder inflammation. However, following ABI, otherwise naive-to-treatment rats demonstrated augmented VMRs to UBD which became even more magnified if pretreated with intrathecal naloxone. This indicated that in healthy rats, ABI results in the activation of a reactive, inhibitory, spinal opioidergic system which suppresses the vigor of VMRs. Deberry et al.
19 extended this observation to rats which had experienced NBI by demonstrating that this opioidergic system was absent in NBI-treated rats. In other words, rats which had received neonatal control treatments, when treated as adults with ABI had augmented VMRs that augmented further with systemic naloxone treatment (just like the rats in Ball et al.’s study). However, rats which had experienced NBI when further treated with ABI had augmented VMRs, but these VMRs were not altered by naloxone treatment.
A similar absence of an endogenous inhibitory opioidergic effect was noted in studies examining acute footshock (AFS) -induced bladder hyperalgesia. In these studies, naloxone, administered intrathecally, demonstrated that endogenous spinal opioids appear to switch from producing inhibition of VMRs following AFS in control rats to producing a pronociceptive effect in rats which experienced NBI and then AFS as an adult60,66 . In these studies, intrathecal naloxone led to more robust VMRs in rats which experienced AFS but no NBI. In contrast, the same dose of intrathecal naloxone reduced the robustness of VMRs in rats which had experienced both NBI and AFS66. These observations are consistent with a failed opioid inhibitory system, as noted above, but also suggests that an excitatory opioidergic system becomes manifest following NBI. As noted above, spinal cord dynorphin levels are increased in rats which experienced NBI and dynorphin is often a candidate for opioid-induced excitation. Other common candidates for pronociceptive processes include NMDA-glutamate receptor activation which was also demonstrated to increase VMR vigor in rats following AFS whether they had experienced NBI or control treatments66.
Effects of NBI on Responses to Exogenously Administered Opioids. Shaffer et al.107 also examined opioid effects in a functional fashion by administering the mu opioid receptor agonist, morphine, and the kappa opioid receptor agonist, U50,488H, systemically to rats which had experienced NBI and/or ABI and then compared the effect of these drugs on the VMRs to UBD with those of control rats. Whereas Control Only rats (no pretreatments) demonstrated dose dependent inhibition of VMRs to UBD for both drugs at all doses tested, rats which experienced both NBI and ABI demonstrated augmentation of their VMRs by a 1 mg/kg dose and a significantly diminished inhibitory effect of a 4 mg/kg dose of U50,488H. Rats which experienced NBI Only or ABI Only did not differ in their responses from rats which experienced neither NBI nor ABI. This differential effect of U50,488H was not observed when morphine was used as an analgesic as all groups demonstrated similar inhibitory effects of drug independent of previous treatment with NBI and/or ABI59,107. Subsequent studies using the kappa opioid antagonist, nor-BNI, administered into the spinal intrathecal space 24 hours prior to testing, gave good evidence that the sites of action of the U50,488H were at a spinal level, but methodological issues related to effects of the drug and spinal catheter placement on baseline measures of VMRs precluded a definitive demonstration of effect105.
Response to Baclofen. The analgesic/antispastic GABAB receptor agonist baclofen was also studied in the NBI model79. In rats which had not experienced NBI, baclofen was demonstrated to produce robust, dose-dependent inhibition of UBD-evoked VMRs and cardiovascular responses to UBD (pressor responses) when it was administered systemically or intrathecally. Receptor specificity was demonstrated using pretreatment with selective GABAB antagonists and a spinal action of effect was verified by topical application to the spinal cord which produced inhibition of spinal dorsal horn neurons excited by UBD. In rats which had experienced NBI and ABI baclofen was also demonstrated to produce a robust, dose-dependent inhibition of UBD-evoked VMRs which was statistically indistinguishable in magnitude from that measured in rats which had not experienced NBI. This suggests that GABAB-related spinal mechanisms are not altered by NBI.
CRFR1/CRFR2. Receptors important in stress-related hypersensitivity phenomena are those that are responsive to corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) and urocortins: CRF receptor 1 (CRFR1 – endogenous agonists are CRF and Urocortin 1) and CRF receptor 2 (CRFR2 – endogenous agonists are Urocortins 1-3). Studies by Robbins et al. observed that chronic stress produces an augmentation of VMRs to UBD96,97. Spinal intrathecal administration of CRFR2 but not CRFR1 antagonists blocked this VMR augmentation when produced by chronic footshock stress97. Chronic footshock was also demonstrated to alter CRFR1, CRFR2, CRF and Urocortins 1-3 content96. Due to these observations of augmentation in relation to bladder sensation, these agents were investigated in association with NBI-induced augmentation of UBD-evoked VMRs and dorsal horn neuronal responses.
When ABI is used as an adult pretreatment in rats which experienced NBI, there are multiple changes in CRFR1, CRFR2, CRF peptide and Urocortin 2 content is the lumbosacral spinal cord
64 (
Table 1). Most important of these is an increase in both the CRFR2 content and the associated content of its agonist Urocortin 2. CRFR1 content and the content of its agonist CRF are also increased in this group, but it appears to be more related to the acute inflammatory state than the neonatal treatment (
Table 1). VMRs in rats which experienced NBI and ABI were reduced when the CRFR2 antagonists aSVG30 and Astressin 2B were administered intrathecally. In rats which experienced NBI but no ABI, the aSVG30 paradoxically increased responses. Similar things happened in association with Type I and Type II spinal dorsal horn neurons following topical application of aSVG30: in rats which had experienced NBI and ABI, the aSVG30 was inhibitory; but in rats which experienced NBI but no ABI, application of the aSVG30 results in more vigorous responses, at least within the Type II neurons.
When CFA-induced hindpaw inflammation was used as a
second insult in adult rats which had experienced NBI or control treatments, it was observed that this manipulation increased spinal CRFR2 content in rats which had experienced NBI independent of adult treatments but also increased CRFR2 content in all rats which received CFA in their paws
65 (
Table 1). Notably, spinal CRFR1 content also increased in all NBI-treated rats whether they experienced CFA injections or not, but did not increase secondary to the hindpaw inflammation treatment by itself (
Table 1). The administration of spinal intrathecal CRFR2 antagonists blunted the augmentation of UBD-evoked VMRs produced by hindpaw inflammation in rats which had experienced NBI but produced an augmentation of VMRs in rats which experienced NBI, but no hindpaw inflammation
65. In a parallel set of studies, topical administration of the same antagonist to the exposed lumbosacral spinal cord led to an inhibition of spinal dorsal neurons in rats which had experienced NBI and hindpaw inflammation but an augmentation of responses in rats which experienced NBI, but no hindpaw inflammation
65. These findings were similar to those noted in NBI-treated rats which experienced ABI as a second insult. These findings which were consistent between VMR measures and dorsal horn neuronal measures and suggest that there is a tonic inhibitory effect of CRFR2 in rats which have experienced NBI but no second insult. This inhibition appears to convert to an excitatory effect of CRFR2 activation following the secondary insult. To test whether this was the case, we performed a brief set of experiments using the intrathecal administration of the CRFR2 agonist, Urocortin 2 to modify VMRs in rats which had experienced NBI and/or ABI in order to answer the following question:
Gap #5. Does the effect of Urocortin 2 change with a second insult in rats which had experienced NBI?
To answer this, rats which had experienced NBI also received either ABI or an adult control treatment. 24 hours later they were anesthetized, an intrathecal catheter placed and a 15 mg dose of Urocortin 2 administered to the lumbosacral cord (more complete methods are given in the Materials and Methods section). 15 minutes later VMRs to UBD were obtained. The data (
Figure 2) demonstrated that administration of Urocortin 2 produced analgesia in NBI-treated rats if their bladders were not re-inflamed when compared with similar rats given intrathecal normal saline. However, if the bladders were re-inflamed, augmented VMRs were observed when compared with those rats with uninflamed bladders. No additional augmentation of VMRs was noted in those rats with the administration of Urocortin 2. This result is consistent with the presence of an inhibitory mechanism that uses CRFR2s in NBI-treated rats which did not experience ABI. Following ABI there is either a loss of these inhibitory influences and/or they are overwhelmed by excitatory influences also occurring via CRFR2 mechanisms. The precise neurophysiological mechanism will take single cell neuronal studies to identify. At this point we can say that these studies have confirmed that an alteration in the overall effects of CRFR2s has occurred due to NBI. A similar, but not identical, switch in receptor effect in the kappa opioid receptor experiments was described above. In those studies, a 1 mg/kg IV dose of U50,488H which was inhibitory in control rats, became excitatory in NBI-treated rats
107.
An additional unanswered question raised by these experiments is whether all effective secondary insults in the NBI model utilize CRFR2 mechanisms to produce their augmentation of responses to UBD. To answer this question we examined the role of CRFRs following a different secondary insult, namely acute footshock stress (AFS), in NBI-treated rats and answered the more precise question:
Gap #6 – What is the role of CRFRs in the augmentation of VMRs produced by AFS?
As noted, ABI and CFA-induced hindpaw inflammation were both demonstrated to augment VMRs to UBD in NBI-treated rats through CRFR2-related mechanisms. Using similar methods (described more completely in the Materials and Methods section), rats were assigned to four groups: those that experienced NBI and then AFS as adults (NBI+AFS), those that experienced NBI but no AFS (NBI Only), those that received neonatal control treatments and AFS as adults (AFS Only) and those that received both neonatal and adult control treatments (Control Only). Immediately following their adult treatments rats were either sacrificed for harvest of their L6-S2 spinal cord segments for ELISA studies or underwent testing for VMRs to UBD. The spinal cord content of CRFR1s and CRFR2s was found to be statistically lower in rats which experienced NBI when compared to rats which did not experience NBI (two way ANOVA for NBI effect for CRFR1: F
1,1,16 = 11.657, p=0.004; two way ANOVA for NBI effect for CRFR2: F
1,1,16 = 12.457, p=0.003). The spinal cord content of CRFR1s and CRFR2s was statistically unaffected by AFS and there were no interaction effects in the data. These data are displayed in
Table 1. An augmentation effect related to AFS
61 was confirmed by comparing data from different pretreatment groups subsequently treated with IT normal saline (filled circles in
Figure 3A–D). Using only that subset of data, it is apparent that graded VMRs evoked by graded distensions were statistically more robust in rats that received AFS pretreatment whether they had been pretreated with both NBI+AFS (
Figure 3A) or received AFS Only pretreatment (
Figure 3B) when compared with rats that had been pretreated with NBI Only (
Figure 3C) or Control Only Pretreatments (
Figure 3D). A repeated-measures two-way ANOVA of the IT saline-treated data from all four pretreatment groups demonstrated statistical significance of the AFS pretreatment effect (F
1,1,27 = 7.711; p=0.010) and the NBI+AFS group had the most robust responses. To examine the role of CRFR1s and CRFR2s on the increased vigor of rats which experienced AFS, the CRFR1 antagonist antalarmin and the CRFR2 antagonist aSVG30 were administered intrathecally prior to the measure of VMRs to UBD. As apparent in
Figure 3, neither the CRFR1 nor CRFR2 antagonists at the doses employed were effective at reducing the vigor of the VMRs to UBD when compared with VMRs in rats administered intrathecal saline in any of the pretreatment groups.
These findings demonstrated that the augmenting effects of the adult exposure to AFS was unaffected by CRFR1 or CRFR2 antagonists at the doses tested and the lumbosacral spinal cord content of both CRFR1s and CRFR2s were reduced (rather than increased) in those rats which had experienced NBI. These findings are diametrically opposite to the effects of inflammatory treatments (to bladder or hind limb) which appear to activate CRFR1 and CRFR2 related mechanisms in rats which experienced NBI. As a consequence, we can answer the question of whether all effective secondary insults in the NBI model act via CRFR2-related mechanisms in the negative. Other mechanisms appeared to be in play when AFS is used as a pretreatment. These have been studied and reported60,66 subsequent to the present studies. As noted, NBI-treated rats appear to lack a stress-activated, opioidergic inhibitory system that is present in rats which have not experienced NBI. At the same time, in these rats, there is an intact excitatory glutamatergic system present which is activated by AFS. The result is an unopposed facilitatory effect with resultant increased vigor in VMRs. Therefore, our best explanation for second insult-related augmentation of VMRs is that the lack of an opioidergic inhibitory system in NBI-treated rats leads to an unopposed pro-nociceptive mechanism which in some paradigms are CRFR2-related and in others are NMDA-related. The end result of both of these alterations in pain modulatory systems is the presence of augmented VMRs to UBD. An important caveat in the AFS studies is that there was only limited time between AFS and the subsequent measures reported such that there may have been insufficient time for the induction of protein synthesis important to CRFR2-related mechanisms.
Obvious areas of ignorance related to spinal processing. Clearly, there are many more areas to define when it comes to the neuroplastic effects of NBI on spinal sensory processing. Intracellular recordings may be able to answer specific questions related to excitatory and inhibitory inputs that cannot be addressed by extracellular recordings which only have the quantal action potential response as readout. Lamina specific phenomena still need to be defined as do potential segmental phenomena and other measures of local connectivity. The neurochemistry of inputs, outputs and modulations of spinal neurons that may be altered by NBI is poorly understood. That said, there are even greater areas of ignorance in our understanding of areas lying cephalad to the spinal cord.
SupraSpinal Processing. Similar to our limited understanding of bladder primary afferents and how they are changed by NBI and our limited understanding of spinal processing, our neurophysiological understanding of supraspinal mechanisms related to bladder sensation and the effect of NBI is close to non-existent. Although supraspinal neurons responsive to bladder distension have been extensively studied, as have their spinal pathways for inpute.g. 98,99, study of the effects of NBI on specific supraspinal sites, to the best of our knowledge, is minimal. Talluri et al.113 characterized the effect of NBI on neurons located in the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) which received bladder inputs and/or colon inputs as identified by pseudorabies virus tracing. Following NBI there was an increase in the number of RVM neurons receiving both bladder and colon inputs. There was also a downregulation of vesicular GABA transporter and an increase in tryptophan hydroxylase 2 in bladder-linked RVM neurons.
Other studies have given indirect information related to supraspinal sites of bladder sensory processes by examining the effects of electrolytic lesions of the amygdala. Previous studies of AFS-induced hyperalgesia in the absence of NBI, demonstrated that structures in the amygdala were required for the induction of bladder hypersensitivity21,62 since an electrolytic lesion of the central nucleus of the amygdala appeared to abolish this phenomenon. As noted above, AFS has also been demonstrated to augment VMRs in rats which experienced NBI to a greater magnitude than the same manipulation augments VMRs in rats which did not experience NBI61. Interestingly, in rats which experienced NBI, AFS continues to augment VMRs despite the presence of lesions of the amygdala that were sufficient to abolish augmentation in rats which did not experience NBI62. This indicates that the amygdala is not needed for the “extra” augmenting effects observed to be induced by NBI in rats experiencing AFS. Clearly, there is plenty we do not know about the effect of NBI on supraspinal processing related to bladder sensation that are in need of investigation.
Novel Systemic Therapeutics Tested in the NBI Model. Neuroplastic changes that occur secondary to NBI is the focus of this review, but we would be remiss if we did not also mention the use of the NBI model to test potential therapeutics. These have included pharmacological agents administered systemically (as opposed to intrathecally, that was previously discussed) that have found a role in the treatment of other bladder disorders or in the treatment of pain. Mirabegron and CL316243, b3 adrenoceptor agonists, both inhibited VMRs to UBD in rats which had experienced both NBI and ABI as did the a1 adrenoceptor antagonist, tamsulocin73. The muscarinic antagonist oxybutynin and the antidepressant amitriptyline had no effect on the VMRs of these rats73. In contrast, the benzodiazepines diazepam and midazolam both produced dose-dependent inhibition of VMRs of these rats58 as did the intravenous infusion of the general anesthetic propofol73. Notably, differential effects of these drug treatments in NBI-treated versus controls was not performed.
Other novel therapeutics which have been studied are those which use electrical neuromodulation. In rodent models, such treatments produce antinociceptive effects when rats have been treated with NBI and ABI, but not in control animals. Spinal cord stimulation80 and bilateral Pudendal Nerve Stimulation78 (bPNS) have both found efficacy in reducing VMRs to UBD in NBI-treated rats, but not in their controls. In contrast, bilateral T13 or L6 spinal root stimulation were not similarly effective78. As in any investigation, not all options are effective for all types of pain, so it is particularly notable that bladder hypersensitivity induced by either ABI without previous NBI or by chronic footshock stress were not affected by bPNS. The inhibitory neuromodulatory effects were exclusive to the NBI model. The limited number of studies of therapeutics done-to-date suggest there is fertile ground available for research using the NBI model to study new drugs or other interventions.