Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Electrochemical Radical Tandem Difluoroethylation/Cyclization of Unsaturated Amides to Access MeCF2-Featured Indolo/Benzoimidazo[2,1-A]isoquinolin-6(5H)-Ones

Altmetrics

Downloads

58

Views

15

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

supplementary.pdf (4.18MB )

Submitted:

13 January 2024

Posted:

15 January 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
A metal-free electrochemical oxidative difluoroethylation of 2-arylbenzimidazoles was accomplished, which provided an efficient strategy for the synthesis of MeCF2-containing benzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]-isoquinolin-6(5H)-ones. In addition, the method also enabled the efficient construction of various difluoroethylated indolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H) ones. Notably, this electrochemical synthesis protocol proceeded well under mild conditions without metal catalysts or exogenous additives/oxidants added.
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Organic Chemistry

1. Introduction

Organofluorine compounds are very useful and attractive organic molecules, which play pivotal roles in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and performance materials [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Among various fluorine-containing groups, the difluoroethyl group (CF2Me) is receiving more and more attention due to its special chemical and biological properties [7,8,9]. In particular, the introduction of a difluoroethyl group can improve the metabolic stability and potency of a target molecule [10,11]. Therefore, it is highly demanded to develop new and efficient protocols for the rapid introduction of difluoroethyl group to target compounds. In this context, the radical strategy has emerged as a powerful approach for the synthesis of CF2Me–containing compounds. However, recent developments in this direction have always involved peroxides or photoredox catalysts [12,13,14,15,16]. On the other hand, electrochemical synthesis has also attracted much attention due to the advantages of avoiding the usage of chemical oxidants and reductants [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Very recently, much progress in electrochemical difluoroethylation has been made by Hu [24] and our group [25,26]. Although these methods have provided innovative transformations, the preparation of CF2Me-substituted polycyclic compounds has not been achieved.
Benzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolines and indolo [2,1-a]isoquinolines, which are significant classes of fused polycyclic nitrogen-containing scaffolds and widely exist in natural products and pharmaceuticals (Scheme 1-1) [27,28,29,30,31]. Although substantial efforts have been contributed to the construction of these polycyclic compounds [32,33,34,35,36,37], the CF2Me–containing target polycycles remain a great challenge to date (Scheme 1-2). As part of our continuing interest in difluoroethylation functionalizations, we anticipated that the radical cyclization process would provide a feasible platform for the synthesis of CF2Me–revised target polycycles. Herein, we report an electrochemical-induced radical cascade cyclization strategy, whereby a series of CF2Me-substituted indolo [2,1-a]isoquinolines and benzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolines could be efficiently prepared under mild and chemical oxidants-free conditions (Scheme 1-3).
Preprints 96286 g001
Figure 1. Strategies for radical difluoroethylated heterocycles.
Figure 1. Strategies for radical difluoroethylated heterocycles.
Preprints 96286 g001

2. Results and Discussion

We began our investigation by examining the electrochemical difluoroethylation reaction of N-methacryloyl-2-phenylbenzoimidazole (1a) with NaSO2CF2Me (2a) (Table 1). To our delight, the electrolysis furnished the 86% yield of the desired cyclization product 3a with a constant voltage of 2.1 V in an undivided cell equipped with a carbon plate anode and a Pt plate cathode (Table 1, entry 1). Then the various conditions, such as voltage, electrode material, electrolyte, and solvent were measured. Neither lower voltage nor higher voltage led to higher efficiency (entry 2-3). C(+) | Pt(−) was proved to be the optimal electrode material combination compared to others (entry 4-6). A switch of electrolytes LiClO4 to other electrolytes such as Et4NClO4, nBu4NClO4, or nBu4NPF6 significantly restrained the reaction (entry 7-9). The change of solvent proportion failed to improve the yield of 3a (entries 10−11). The cyclization product 3a could not be observed without electricity (entry 12).
With the above-optimized conditions in hand, we investigated the substrate scopes (Scheme 1). It can be seen that a wide range of 2-arylbenzoimidazoles with either electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituents worked well and afforded the corresponding products in good to high yields (3a-3h). The ortho-substituted 2-arylbenzoimidazoles were also tolerated with the reaction, and the desired products were obtained in 70-88% yields (3i-3m). When utilizing meta-substituted 2-arylbenzoimidazoles as the starting materials, the reactions demonstrated good site-selectivity with no regioisomers detected (3n). It also occurred smoothly on disubstituted substrates to produce the cyclization products in good yields (3o and 3p). The 3, 5-di substituent was successfully converted to the target product 3q in 72% yield without the interference of steric hindrance. For Ar1 substituents, the dimethyl-substituted N-methacryloyl-2-phenylbenzoimidazoles gave the desired products 3r in good yields. The substrates with phenyl or benzyl substitution of the terminal olefin were also able to produce the relevant products (3s and 3t). The substrates containing naphthalene or thiophene were all compatible with this reaction mode, delivering the corresponding products 3u and 3v in 74% and 67% yields, respectively.
Subsequently, we turned our attention to the synthesis of indolo[2,1-a]isoquinoline derivatives, which are key structural skeletons of various pharmaceuticals. As shown in Scheme 2, the desired CF2Me-substituted indolo[2,1-a]isoquinoline derivatives were obtained in moderate to excellent yields. The halosubstituted (F-, Cl-, Br-) substrates also smoothly underwent a cyclization process to give the corresponding products with good efficiency (5b-5e). Moreover, the substrates with ethyl group at the C3 position of the indole ring were demonstrated to be suitable substrates to provide the final products in 65-75% yield (5f-5h). Notably, this method was also enable to access cyclopropyldifluoromethylated indolo[2,1-a]isoquinoline (5i).
Then some control experiments were carried out to investigate the mechanism of this reaction (Scheme 3). When radical scavenger 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) was added to the standard reaction system, the reaction was significantly suppressed, and the desired product was not detected by TLC. When adding the 1,1-diphenylethylene into the system, only the 16% yield of the target product was obtained and the radical adduct was found by HRMS. The two experiments suggested that the reaction may involve a radical pathway. To further understand the details of this reaction mechanism, cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments were performed. As shown in Figure 2, the oxidation peaks of 1a and 2a were at 1.47 V and 0.67 V, respectively. These results indicated that 2a was more easily oxidized than 1a.
Based on the above results, a plausible mechanism of this reaction was proposed (Scheme 4). First, anodic oxidation of MeCF2SO2Na generated the MeCF2SO2 radical, which then liberated SO2 to afford MeCF2 radical. Subsequently, the addition of MeCF2 radical to the double bond of 1a yielded a carbon-centred radical A. The intermediate A underwent further intramolecular radical cyclization to afford the aryl radical B. The intermediate B was oxidized at the anode to give aryl cation C, which resulted in the expected product 3a via a deprotonation process.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Methods

1H and 13C NMR and 19F NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker advance III 400 or 500 spectrometer in CDCl3 with TMS as the internal standard. High-resolution mass spectral analysis (HRMS (TOF)) data were measured on a Bruker Apex II. All products were identified by 1H, 19F, 13C NMR and HRMS. The starting materials were purchased from Energy, J&K Chemicals, or Aldrich and used without further purification. The conversion was monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Flash column chromatography was performed over silica gel (200-300 mesh). Cyclic voltammetry experiments were carried out in an electrochemical workstation (CHI660E, Shanghai, China). 2-arylbenzimidazoles/2-arylindoles were prepared according to reported procedures.35

3.2. General Procedure for the Reaction

To a 20 mL test tube with a stir bar was charged with, 2-arylbenzimidazoles/2-arylindoles (1 equiv., 0.2 mmol), MeCF2SO2Na, or sodium cyclopropyldifluoromethylsulfinate (3 equiv., 0.6 mmol), LiClO4 (0.3 M), MeCN (4.5 mL), H2O (1.5 mL). The tube was equipped with a carbon plate (10 mm * 10 mm * 3 mm) as the anode and a platinum plate (10 mm × 10 mm × 0.2 mm) as the cathode. The reaction mixture was electrolyzed in an undivided cell at room temperature under a constant voltage of 2.1 V for 3 h. Upon completion, the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (10 mL × 3). The combined organic phases were dried over Na2SO4 and condensed under vacuum. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography to afford the final products. (1H NMR, 19F NMR and 13C NMR of compounds (3a–v and 5a-i ) are shown in Supplementary Materials).
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3a). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 56.1 mg, 86 % yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.52 – 8.49 (m, 1H), 8.37 – 8.35 (m, 1H), 7.84 – 7.82 (m, 1H), 7.59 – 7.55 (m, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.47 – 7.40 (m, 2H), 3.30 – 3.18 (m, 1H), 2.79 – 2.67 (m, 1H), 1.72 (s, 3H), 1.34 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.2, 149.6, 144.0, 140.0, 131.5, 131.3, 127.9, 126.8, 126.0, 125.9, 125.6, 122.6 (t, J = 240.5 Hz), 122.3, 119.8, 115.7, 48.2 (t, J = 23.9 Hz), 45.5, 31.1, 24.7 (t, J = 27.3 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -86.07 – -86.30 (m, 2F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C19H16F2N2O (M+H)+ 327.1303; Found 327.1306.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-3,5-dimethylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3b). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 55.7 mg, 82 % yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.37 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.35 – 8.33 (m, 1H), 7.80 – 7.79 (m, 1H), 7.44 – 7.38 (m, 2H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (s, 1H), 3.21 (q, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 2.70 (q, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 2.45 (s, 3H), 1.70 (s, 3H), 1.32 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.3, 149.8, 144.1, 141.8, 140.1, 131.4, 129.0, 127.1, 126.0, 125.8, 125.3, 122.5 (t, J = 240.6 Hz), 119.7, 119.6, 115.6, 48.2 (t, J = 24.1 Hz), 45.5, 31.0, 24.7(t, J = 27.4 Hz), 21.8. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -86.01 – -86.20 (m, 2F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C20H18F2N2O (M+H)+ 341.1460; Found 341.1461.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-3-fluoro-5-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3c). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate =10/1), 58.5 mg, 85 % yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.50 (dd, J = 8.4, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 8.34 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.46 – 7.39 (m, 2H), 7.22 – 7.15 (m, 2H), 3.29 – 3.17 (m, 1H), 2.71 – 2.59 (m, 1H), 1.70 (s, 3H), 1.40 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.6, 164.6 (d, J = 252.5 Hz), 148.8, 144.0, 142.9 (d, J = 7.9 Hz), 131.4, 128.5 (d, J = 9.1 Hz), 125.7 (d, J = 37.5 Hz), 122.4 (t, J = 240.6 Hz), 119.7, 118.9, 115.9 (d, J = 22.4 Hz), 115.6, 113.7 (d, J = 23.2 Hz), 48.3 (t, J = 23.7 Hz), 45.7, 30.9, 24.7 (t, J = 27.3 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.51 – -86.22 (m, 1F), -87.32 – -88.02 (m, 1F), -106.94 – -106.99 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C19H15F3N2O (M+H)+ 345.1209; Found 345.1211.
3-chloro-5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3d). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 62.6 mg, 87 % yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.43 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.34 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47 – 7.42 (m, 4H), 3.28 – 3.16 (m, 1H), 2.73 – 2.61 (m, 1H), 1.71 (s, 3H), 1.40 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.5, 148.7, 143.9, 141.8, 137.5, 131.4, 128.5, 127.4, 127.0, 126.0, 125.8, 122.5 (t, J = 239.0 Hz), 120.9, 119.8, 115.6, 48.2, 45.5 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 30.9, 24.8 (t, J = 27.2 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.56 – -86.27 (m, 1F), -87.33 – -88.03 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C19H15ClF2N2O(M+H)+ 361.0914; Found 361.0915.
3-bromo-5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3e). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 64.0 mg, 79 % yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.37 – 8.33 (m, 2H), 7.82 – 7.80 (m, 1H), 7.63 – 7.61 (m, 2H), 7.46 – 7.41 (m, 2H), 3.27 – 3.17 (m, 1H), 2.72 – 2.63 (m, 1H), 1.71 (s, 3H), 1.41 (t, J = 18.5 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.4, 148.7, 143.9, 141.9, 131.4 (d, J = 7.8 Hz), 129.9, 127.5, 126.0, 125.8, 122.5 (t, J = 238.5 Hz), 121.4, 119.9, 115.6, 48.2 (t, J = 23.7 Hz), 45.5 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 30.8, 24.8 (t, J = 27.2 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.57 – -86.28 (m, 1F), -87.26 – -87.96 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C19H15BrF2N2O (M+H)+ 405.0408; Found 405.0409.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3f). A light yellow solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 63.0 mg, 80 % yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.63 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.38 – 8.36 (m, 1H), 7.86 – 7.85 (m, 1H), 7.75 – 7.72 (m, 2H), 7.49 – 7.45 (m, 2H), 3.33 – 3.24 (m, 1H), 2.80 – 2.71 (m, 1H), 1.75 (s, 3H), 1.43 (t, J = 18.5 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.4, 148.1, 143.9, 140.7, 132.8 (q, J = 32.8 Hz), 131.5, 126.7, 126.24, 126.20, 125.6, 124.7 (q, J = 3.6 Hz), 124.0 – 123.9 (m), 122.5 (q, J = 271.1 Hz), 122.5 (t, J = 240.1 Hz), 120.2, 115.8, 48.1 (t, J = 23.5 Hz), 45.7 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 30.8, 24.8 (t, J = 27.2 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -62.91 (s, 3F), -85.44 – -86.13 (m, 1F), -87.85 – -88.51 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C20H15F5N2O (M+H)+ 395.1177; Found 395.1179.
methyl 5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5-methyl-6-oxo-5,6-dihydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinoline-3-carboxylate (3g). A light yellow liquid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 7/1), 57.6 mg, 75 % yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.57 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.38 – 8.36 (m, 1H), 8.18 (s, 1H), 8.13 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.86 – 7.84 (m, 1H), 7.49 – 7.44 (m, 2H), 3.98 (s, 3H), 3.31 – 3.19 (m, 1H), 2.87 – 2.75 (m, 1H), 1.76 (s, 3H), 1.40 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.7, 166.1, 148.6, 144.1, 140.3, 132.4, 131.5, 128.7, 128.3, 126.18, 126.16, 126.14, 126.12, 122.6 (t, J = 238.6 Hz), 120.1, 115.8, 52.5, 48.3 (t, J = 23.5 Hz), 45.7 (d, J = 3.4 Hz), 30.8, 24.8 (t, J = 27.2 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.83 – -86.54 (m, 1F), -87.26 – -87.96 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C21H18F2N2O3 (M+H)+ 385.1358; Found 385.1360.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5-methyl-6-oxo-5,6-dihydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinoline-3-carbonitrile (3h). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 7/1), 43.5 mg, 62% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.59 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.36 – 8.34 (m, 1H), 7.86 – 7.84 (m, 1H), 7.78 (s, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.48 – 7.46 (m, 2H), 3.31 – 3.21 (m, 1H), 2.76 – 2.66 (m, 1H), 1.73 (s, 3H), 1.46 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.9, 147.6, 143.9, 141.0, 131.4, 131.0, 130.9, 126.7, 126.5, 126.3, 122.5 (t, J = 238.6 Hz), 120.3, 118.0, 115.8, 114.5, 48.1 (t, J = 23.3 Hz), 45.5 (d, J = 3.1 Hz), 30.6, 29.6, 24.8 (t, J = 27.1 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.22 – -85.93 (m, 1F), -88.52 – -89.22 (m, 1F) HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C20H15F2N3O (M+H)+ 352.1256; Found 352.1260.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-1,5-dimethylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3i). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 55.1 mg, 81% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.38 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.36 – 7.34 (m, 1H), 7.81 – 7.79 (m, 1H), 7.45 – 7.38 (m, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (s, 1H), 3.22 (q, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (q, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (s, 3H), 1.71 (s, 3H), 1.34 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.3, 149.8, 144.0, 141.8, 140.0, 131.4, 129.1, 127.2, 125.9, 125.8, 125.3, 122.6 (t, J = 240.6 Hz), 119.7, 119.6, 115.6, 48.2 (t, J = 23.9 Hz), 45.5, 31.1, 24.7 (t, J = 27.3 Hz), 21.9. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.99 – -86.18 (m, 2F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C20H18F2N2O (M+H)+ 341.1460; Found 341.1462.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-1-methoxy-5-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3j). A brown solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 49.8 mg, 70% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.39 – 8.37 (m, 1H), 7.91 – 7.89 (m, 1H), 7.51 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.43 – 7.39 (m, 2H), 7.12 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (s, 3H), 3.23 (q, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 2.71 (q, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 1.72 (s, 3H), 1.32 (t, J = 18.5 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.1, 158.7, 147.7, 144.3, 142.6, 131.7, 130.3, 125.6, 124.8 (t, J = 463.0 Hz), 122.5, 120.5, 119.1, 115.5, 111.8, 110.4, 56.6, 48.6 (t, J = 23.9 Hz), 45.4, 31.5, 24.7 (t, J = 27.4 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.88 – -86.06 (m, 2F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C20H18F2N2O2 (M+H)+ 357.1409; Found 357.1410.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-1-fluoro-5-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3k). A yellow solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 55.0 mg, 80% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.38 – 8.37 (m, 1H), 7.94 – 7.92 (m, 1H), 7.51 (td, J = 8.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47 – 7.43 (m, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.24 – 7.21 (m, 1H), 3.29 – 3.19 (m, 1H), 2.76 – 2.67 (m, 1H), 1.72 (s, 3H), 1.39 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.6, 160.4 (d, J = 262.1 Hz), 145.8 (d, J = 8.4 Hz), 144.2, 142.5, 131.8 (d, J = 9.6 Hz), 130.4, 126.0 (d, J = 14.0 Hz), 122.8, 122.5 (t, J = 240.6 Hz), 120.5, 115.8, 115.6, 115.5, 111.8 (d, J = 9.9 Hz), 48.5 (t, J = 23.7 Hz), 45.4, 31.3, 24.8 (t, J = 27.3 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.44 – -86.11 (m, 1F), -87.00 – -87.69 (m, 1F), -107.12 – -107.16 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C19H15F3N2O (M+H)+ 345.1209; Found 345.1211.
1-chloro-5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3l). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 63.4 mg, 88% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.39 (dd, J = 6.0, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (dd, J = 6.0, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 7.58 – 7.56 (m, 1H), 7.47 – 7.42 (m, 4H), 3.30 – 3.19 (m, 1H), 2.77 – 2.65 (m, 1H), 1.72 (s, 3H), 1.38 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.4, 147.0, 143.9, 142.9, 133.5, 131.5, 130.6, 130.4, 126.3, 125.9, 125.7, 122.5 (t, J = 238.8 Hz), 120.7, 120.5, 115.7, 48.49 (t, J = 23.7 Hz), 45.76 (d, J = 3.5 Hz), 31.43 (s), 24.80 (t, J = 27.3 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.21 – -85.92 (m, 1F), -86.99 – -87.70 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C19H15ClF2N2O (M+H)+ 361.0914; Found 361.0916.
1-bromo-5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3m). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 63.2 mg, 78% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.38 (dd, J = 6.0, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (dd, J = 6.0, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.49 – 7.44 (m, 3H), 7.33 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.29 – 3.20 (m, 1H), 2.76 – 2.67 (m, 1H), 1.72 (s, 3H), 1.38 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.3, 147.1, 143.5, 143.1, 135.3, 130.8, 130.6, 126.4, 126.3, 125.9, 122.5 (t, J = 240.7 Hz), 121.8, 121.3, 120.8, 115.7, 48.4 (t, J = 23.5 Hz), 45.9 (d, J = 3.2 Hz), 31.5, 24.8 (t, J = 27.3 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.15 – -85.86 (m, 1F), -86.99 – -87.69 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C19H15BrF2N2O (M+H)+ 405.0408; Found 405.0412.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-2,5-dimethylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3n). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 51.7 mg, 76% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.37 – 8.35 (m, 1H), 8.32 (s, 1H), 7.83 – 7.81 (m, 1H), 7.45 – 7.40 (m, 2H), 7.37 (s, 2H), 3.22 (q, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 2.70 (q, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (s, 3H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.33 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.4, 149.8, 143.9, 137.9, 137.2, 132.4, 131.5, 126.7, 126.1, 125.8, 125.5, 122.6 (t, J = 240.5 Hz), 122.0, 119.7, 115.6, 48.2 (t, J = 24.0 Hz), 45.3 (d, J = 2.2 Hz), 31.1, 24.7 (t, J = 27.3 Hz), 20.9. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -86.02– -86.20 (m, 2F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C20H18F2N2O (M+H)+ 341.1460; Found 341.1462.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-1,3,5-trimethylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3o). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 58.0 mg, 82% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.39 – 8.38 (m, 1H), 7.83 – 7.81 (m, 1H), 7.44 – 7.39 (m, 2H), 7.15 (s, 2H), 3.27 – 3.18 (m, 1H), 3.02 (s, 3H), 2.76 – 2.67 (m, 1H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 1.71 (s, 3H), 1.32 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.5, 150.0, 144.2, 141.1, 140.2, 139.7, 132.3, 130.6, 125.5, 125.4, 125.3, 122.7 (t, J = 240.6 Hz), 119.9, 118.4, 115.6, 48.5 (t, J = 24.1 Hz), 45.4, 31.7, 24.7 (t, J = 27.3 Hz), 24.6, 21.6. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.66 – -85.96 (m, 2F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C21H20F2N2O (M+H)+ 355.1616; Found 355.1619.
1,3-dichloro-5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3p). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 58.5 mg, 74% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.38 – 8.36 (m, 1H), 7.92 – 7.91 (m, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.48 – 7.44 (m, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 3.29 – 3.20 (m, 1H), 2.72 – 2.63 (m, 1H), 1.73 (s, 3H), 1.45 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.7, 146.3, 144.1, 143.8, 136.2, 134.4, 131.3, 130.5, 126.5, 126.1, 122.4 (t, J = 240.8 Hz), 120.8, 119.2, 115.6, 48.4 (t, J = 23.4 Hz), 45.8 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 31.3, 24.9 (t, J = 27.1 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.15 – -85.86 (m, 1F), -87.94 – -88.64 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C19H14Cl2F2N2O (M+H)+ 395.0524; Found 395.0527.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-2,4,5-trimethylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3q). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 51.0 mg, 72% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.35 – 8.33 (m, 2H), 7.81 (dd, J = 7.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (pd, J = 7.2, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (s, 1H), 3.34 – 3.11 (m, 2H), 2.62 (s, 3H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 1.80 (s, 3H), 1.38 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.5, 150.4, 144.1, 137.7, 137.5, 136.4, 134.6, 131.5, 125.9, 125.2, 122.9 (t, J = 240.3 Hz), 122.9, 119.6, 115.7, 46.6, 44.9 (t, J = 23.5 Hz), 27.2, 24.5 (t, J = 27.5 Hz), 22.8, 20.6. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -88.43 – -88.61 (m, 1F), -88.66 – -88.85 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C21H20F2N2O (M+H)+ 355.1616; Found 355.1619.
3-bromo-5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5,9,10-trimethylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3r). A yellow solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 72.7 mg, 84% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.31 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 7.60 – 7.58 (m, 2H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 3.26 – 3.16 (m, 1H), 2.70 – 2.61 (m, 1H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 1.70 (s, 3H), 1.39 (t, J = 18.5 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.3, 148.0, 142.4, 141.7, 135.2, 135.0, 131.2, 129.9, 129.7, 127.2, 125.3, 122.4 (t, J = 240.7 Hz), 121.7, 120.0, 115.9, 48.2 (t, J = 23.8 Hz), 45.4 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 30.8, 24.7 (t, J = 27.2 Hz), 20.5, 20.4. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -85.57 – -86.28 (m, 1F), -87.17 – -87.87 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C21H19BrF2N2O (M+H)+ 433.0721; Found 433.0723.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5-phenylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3s). A yellow liquid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 44.2 mg, 57% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.58 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 8.26 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.56 – 7.37 (m, 4H), 7.32 – 7.24 (m, 4H), 7.22 – 7.17 (m, 3H), 3.98 – 3.07 (m, 1H), 3.18 – 3.07 (m, 1H), 1.47 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.3, 149.7, 144.1, 142.3, 139.8, 131.6, 131.2, 129.3, 129.1, 128.2, 128.1, 126.8, 125.93, 125.87, 125.7, 123.6, 122.8 (t, J = 239.8 Hz), 119.9, 115.7, 53.4, 46.0 (t, J = 23.5 Hz), 25.3 (t, J = 27.5 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -84.84 – -85.02 (m, 1F), -85.04 – -85.22 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C24H18F2N2O (M+H)+ 389.1460; Found 389.1463.
5-benzyl-5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)benzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (3t). A white solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 52.3 mg, 65% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.36 – 8.34 (m, 1H), 8.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.68 – 7.66 (m, 1H), 7.63 – 7.62 (m, 2H), 7.49 – 7.46 (m, 1H), 7.41 – 7.36 (m, 2H), 6.87 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.49 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.53 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 3.49 – 3.41 (m, 1H), 3.17 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 2.99 – 2.90 (m, 1H), 1.43 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.2, 149.2, 143.6, 137.4, 133.2, 130.9, 130.8, 129.1, 128.0, 127.8, 127.3, 125.72, 125.69, 125.4, 124.1, 122.6 (t, J = 240.8 Hz), 119.6, 115.4, 51.9, 50.7, 46.5 (t, J = 23.8 Hz), 25.1 (t, J = 27.3 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -83.32 – -84.00 (m, 1F), -84.83 – -85.51 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: C25H20F2N2O (M+H)+ 403.1616; Found 403.1617.
7-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-7-methylbenzo[h]benzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-8(7H)-one (3u). A yellow solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 55.6 mg, 74% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 10.56 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.47 – 8.45 (m, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.96 – 7.94 (m, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.84– 7.81 (m, 1H), 7.64 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.50 – 7.46 (m, 2H), 3.37 – 3.27 (m, 1H), 2.90 – 2.81 (m, 1H), 1.78 (s, 3H), 1.33 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.3, 149.7, 144.0, 140.6, 132.7, 132.0, 130.4, 130.3, 128.7, 128.4, 128.2, 126.9, 125.9, 125.8, 122.5 (d, J = 240.5 Hz), 123.7, 120.1, 117.6, 115.7, 47.9 (t, J = 24.1 Hz), 45.9, 31.0, 24.6 (t, J = 27.3 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -86.07 – -86.30 (m, 1F), -86.32 – -86.46 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C23H18F2N2O (M+H)+ 377.1460; Found 377.1462.
4-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-4-methylbenzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-a]thieno[2,3-c]pyridin-5(4H)-one (3v). A yellow solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 10/1), 44.5 mg, 67% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.33 – 8.30 (m, 1H), 7.78 – 7.75 (m, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.44 – 7.38 (m, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.24 – 3.12 (m, 1H), 2.66 – 2.54 (m, 1H), 1.67 (s, 3H), 1.38 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.6, 146.4, 145.9, 143.9, 130.9, 130.4, 125.9, 125.8, 125.5, 123.6, 122.4 (t, J = 240.5 Hz), 119.7, 115.2, 48.2 (t, J = 24.3 Hz), 45.6 – 45.5 (m), 29.9, 24.5 (t, J = 27.3 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -86.86 – -87.18 (m, 2F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C17H14F2N2OS (M+H)+333.0868; Found 333.0870.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-3,5,12-trimethylindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (5a). A white gummy after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 20/1), 46.6 mg, 66% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.62 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.60 – 7.58 (m, 1H), 7.41 – 7.34 (m, 3H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.28 – 3.16 (m, 1H), 2.71 – 2.60 (m, 1H), 2.65 (s, 3H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.31 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.0, 137.3, 137.0, 134.0 (d, J = 30.9 Hz), 132.6, 129.7, 129.4, 128.3, 127.4, 125.2 (d, J = 48.0 Hz), 124.2, 123.2, 122.9 (t, J = 240.2 Hz), 118.2, 116.7, 113.6, 48.1 (t, J = 24.2 Hz), 45.0 – 44.8 (m), 31.4, 24.5 (t, J = 27.4 Hz), 21.5, 11.5. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -84.11 – -84.82 (m, 1F), -85.19 – -85.89(m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C22H21F2NO (M+H)+ 354.1664; Found 354.1666.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-3-fluoro-5,12-dimethylindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (5b). A yellow liquid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 20/1), 51.4 mg, 72 % yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.61 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (dd, J = 8.8, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.42 – 7.35 (m, 2H), 7.17 – 7.11 (m, 2H), 3.28 – 3.18 (m, 1H), 2.63 (s, 3H), 2.62 – 2.55 (m, 1H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.38 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.2, 161.8 (d, J = 248.4 Hz), 139.8 (d, J = 6.9 Hz), 134.2, 132.4, 128.9, 126.9 (d, J = 8.3 Hz), 125.7, 124.3, 122.7 (t, J = 240.6 Hz), 122.4 (d, J = 2.5 Hz), 118.3, 116.7, 114.9 (d, J = 21.8 Hz), 114.1, 113.9, 48.1 (t, J = 24.1 Hz), 45.1, 31.2, 24.6 (t, J = 27.4 Hz), 11.4. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -84.17 – -84.88 (m, 1F), -86.70 – -87.41 (m, 1F), -112.80 – -112.85 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C21H18F3NO (M+H)+ 358.1413; Found 358.1415.
3-chloro-5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5,10,12-trimethylindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (5c). A yellow liquid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 20/1), 56.8 mg, 76 % yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.62– 8.59 (m, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.61 – 7.58 (m, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.41 – 7.35 (m, 3H), 3.28 – 3.16 (m, 1H), 2.63 (s, 3H), 2.67 – 2.55 (m, 1H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.38 (t, J = 18.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.2, 138.9, 134.2, 133.1, 132.3, 128.6, 127.6, 127.4, 126.2, 125.9, 124.5, 124.4, 122.8 (t, J = 240.4 Hz), 118.4, 116.7, 114.9, 48.0 (t, J = 23.9 Hz), 44.9, 31.2, 24.7 (t, J = 27.3 Hz), 11.5. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -84.35 – -85.06 (m, 1F), -86.79 – -87.49 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C21H18ClF2NO (M+H)+ 374.1118; Found 374.1120.
3-bromo-5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5,12-dimethylindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (5d). A yellowish liquid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 20/1), 57.7 mg, 69% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.60 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.60 – 7.58 (m, 2H), 7.52 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.43 – 7.35 (m, 2H), 3.27 – 3.17 (m, 1H), 2.63 (s, 3H), 2.65 – 2.56 (m, 1H), 1.68 (s, 3H), 1.38 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.1, 139.2, 134.3, 132.3, 130.5, 130.3, 128.7, 126.4, 126.0, 124.9, 124.4, 122.7 (t, J = 240.5 Hz), 121.2, 118.5, 116.8, 115.1, 48.1 (t, J = 23.9 Hz), 44.9, 31.2, 24.7 (t, J = 27.3 Hz), 11.5. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -84.40 – -85.07 (m, 1F), -86.79 – -87.47 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C21H18BrF2NO (M+H)+ 420.0594; Found 420.0598.
3-chloro-5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-5,10,12-trimethylindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (5e). A yellow liquid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 20/1), 56.6 mg, 73% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.34 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (s, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (s, 1H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.14 – 3.04 (m, 1H), 2.50 (s, 3H), 2.52 – 2.43 (m, 1H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 1.56 (s, 3H), 1.25 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.9, 139.0, 134.1, 133.0, 132.5, 132.5, 128.8, 127.6, 127.4, 127.2, 126.1, 124.6, 122.7 (t, J = 240.4 Hz), 118.5, 116.4, 114.7, 48.1 (t, J = 24.0 Hz), 44.9, 31.2, 24.6 (t, J = 27.4 Hz), 21.6, 11.5. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -84.19 – -84.90 (m, 1F), -86.72 – -87.42 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C22H20ClF2NO (M+H)+ 388.1274; Found 388.1275.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-12-ethyl-5-methylindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (5f). A yellow liquid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 20/1), 52.9 mg, 75% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.64 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.44 – 7.35 (m, 4H), 3.26 – 3.13 (m, 3H), 2.70 – 2.61 (m, 1H), 1.70 (s, 3H), 1.42 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.31 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.0, 137.1, 134.5, 131.8, 128.8, 127.5, 127.4, 127.3, 125.7, 124.7, 124.3, 122.9 (t, J = 240.2 Hz), 121.1, 118.2, 116.9, 48.1 (t, J = 24.3 Hz), 44.9, 31.3, 24.5 (t, J = 27.4 Hz), 18.6, 13.3. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -84.21 – -84.92 (m, 1F), -85.41 – -86.12 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C22H21F2NO (M+H)+ 354.1664; Found 354.1667.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-12-ethyl-5,10-dimethylindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (5g). A yellow solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 20/1), 47.7 mg, 65% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.50 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.45 – 7.35 (m, 3H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.25 – 3.16 (m, 1H), 3.13 (q, J =7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.69 – 2.60 (m, 1H), 2.51 (s, 3H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.41 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.30 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.7, 137.0, 133.9, 132.6, 131.9, 128.9, 127.4, 127.3, 127.0, 125.8, 124.6, 122.9 (t, J = 240.2 Hz), 121.0, 118.2, 116.6, 48.1 (t, J = 24.4 Hz), 44.8, 31.2, 24.4 (t, J = 27.4 Hz), 21.6, 18.6, 13.3. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -84.10 – -84.77 (m, 1F), -85.39 – -86.06 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C23H23F2NO (M+H)+ 368.1820; Found 368.1824.
5-(2,2-difluoropropyl)-12-ethyl-10-fluoro-5-methylindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (5h). A yellow liquid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 20/1), 51.9 mg, 70% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.57 (dd, J = 9.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.44 – 7.37 (m, 2H), 7.23 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (td, J = 9.0, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.24 – 3.15 (m, 1H), 3.12 – 3.07 (m, 2H), 2.69 – 2.60 (m, 1H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.31 (t, J = 19.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.8, 160.4 (d, J = 241.1 Hz), 137.3, 133.2 (d, J = 9.4 Hz), 130.7, 130.4, 127.65 (d, J = 41.6 Hz), 127.3, 125.4, 124.8, 122.8 (d, J = 240.4 Hz), 120.6 (d, J = 4.1 Hz), 118.0 (d, J = 9.0 Hz), 113.1 (d, J = 24.6 Hz), 104.0 (d, J = 24.0 Hz), 48.3 (t, J = 24.2 Hz), 44.8, 31.2, 24.6 (t, J = 27.4 Hz), 18.7, 13.2. 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -84.78 – -85.42 (m, 1F), -85.86 – -86.52 (m, 1F), -118.11 – -118.16 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C22H20F3NO (M+H)+ 372.1570; Found 372.1575.
3-chloro-5-(2-cyclopropyl-2,2-difluoroethyl)-5,12-dimethylindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one (5i). A yellow solid after purification by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 20/1), 50.4 mg, 63% yield. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.61 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (s, 1H), 7.42 – 7.36 (m, 3H), 3.40 – 3.30 (m, 1H), 2.76 – 2.67 (m, 1H), 2.63 (s, 3H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.02 – 0.95 (m, 1H), 0.44 – 0.23 (m, 4H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.2, 139.2, 134.3, 133.1, 132.3, 128.8, 127.5, 126.1, 125.9, 124.4, 124.3, 122.4 (t, J = 242.3 Hz), 118.4, 116.8, 114.7, 47.7 (t, J = 25.9 Hz), 45.0, 31.7, 16.6 (t, J = 28.9 Hz), 11.5, 1.25 (dt, J = 6.3, 3.1 Hz). 19F NMR (471 MHz, CDCl3): δ -94.49 – -95.10 (m, 1F), -99.95 – -100.56 (m, 1F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: Calcd for C23H20ClF2NO (M+H)+ 400.1274; Found 400.1279.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a novel electrochemical tandem cyclization/difluoroethylation reaction of 2-arylbenzimidazoles/2-arylindoles was reported by our group. Various CF2Me-substituted benzimidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-ones and indolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H) ones could be readily synthesized with good to high yield. Additionally, it also offered a convenient protocol for the preparation of cyclopropyldifluoromethylated indolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H) ones. Further investigation to construct other useful substituted heterocycles by electrochemical oxidative difluoroethylation is currently underway in our laboratory as well.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1, Figure S1: HRMS analysis of adduct products; Figure S2: Cyclic voltammograms of substrates; Figure S3: Structure of product 3m; Figure S4: Structure of product 5i; Tables S1 and S2: crystal and structure refinement data for 3m and 5i; 1H NMR, 19F NMR and 13C NMR of compounds 3a–v and 5a-i.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.T.; methodology, D.G. and Y.T.; investigation, Y.T., L.Z., D.G., S.Y. and N.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.T.; writing—review and editing, Y.T. and Z.L.; supervision, W.F.; funding acquisition, Y.T. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22302088 and 21702044), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (B2022201059), the Key Scientific Research Project of Higher Education of Henan Province (24B150022) and the Key Laboratory of Photochemical Conversion and Optoelectronic Materials, TIPC, CAS (PCOM202304).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information. Deposition Numbers 2303467 (for 3m) and 2307007 (for 5i) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe “http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kirsch, P. Modern Fluoroorganic Chemistry: Synthesis Reactivity, Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  2. Szpera, R.; Moseley, D.F.J.; Smith, L.B.; Sterling, A.J.; Gouverneur, V. The fluorination of C−H bonds: Developments and perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 14824–14848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Purser, S.; Moore, P.R.; Swallow, S.; Gouverneur, V. Fluorine inmedicinal chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Müller, K.; Faeh, C.; Diederich, F. Fluorine in pharmaceuticals: Looking beyond intuition. Science 2007, 317, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, X.; Tao, M.; Gong, K.; Feng, Q.; Hu, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, S.; Liang, D. Electrochemical or Photoelectrochemical Alkenylpolyfluoroalkylation of 3-Aza-1,5-dienes: Regioselective Entry to Polyfluoroalkylated 4-Pyrrolin-2-ones. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 12935–12948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hiyama, T. Organofluorine Compounds: Chemistry and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  7. O’Hagan, D.; Wang, Y.; Skibinski, M.; Slawin, A.M.Z. Influence of the difluoromethylene group (CF2) on the conformation and properties of selected organic compounds. Pure Appl. Chem. 2012, 84, 1587–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zafrani, Y.; Yeffet, D.; Sod-Moriah, G.; Berliner, A.; Amir, D.; Marciano, D.; Gershonov, E.; Saphier, S.J. Difluoromethyl bioisostere: examining the “lipophilic hydrogen bond donor” concept. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 797–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meanwell, N.A. Fluorine and fluorinated motifs in the design and application of bioisosteres for drug design. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 5822–5880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Coteron, J.M.; Marco, M.; Esquivias, J.; Deng, X.; White, K.L.; White, J.; Koltun, M.; El Mazouni, F.; Kokkonda, S.; Katneni, K.; et al. Structure-Guided Lead Optimization of Triazolopyrimidine-Ring Substituents Identifies Potent Plasmodium falciparum Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors with Clinical Candidate Potential. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 5540–5561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Anderson, M.O.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Yao, C.; Phuan, P.-W.; Verkman, A.S. Nanomolar potency and metabolically stable inhibitors of kidney urea transporter UT-B. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 5942–5950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, Q.; Ruffoni, A.; Gianatassio, R.; Fujiwara, Y.; Sella, E.; Shabat, D.; Baran, P.S. Direct synthesis of fluorinated heteroarylether bioisosteres. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3949–3952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rong, J.; Deng, L.; Tan, P.; Ni, C.; Gu, Y.; Hu, J. Radical Fluoroalkylation of Isocyanides with Fluorinated Sulfones by Visible-Light Photoredox Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2743–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, N.; Liu, R.; Zhang, C.; Wang, K.; Feng, J.; Zhao, X.; Lu, K. Photoinduced Three-Component Difluoroalkylation of Quinoxalinones with Alkenes via Difluoroiodane(III) Reagents. Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 3576–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, C.; Han, X.; Feng, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, L.; Dong, Y.; Li, X. Straightforward Synthesis of Alkyl Fluorides via Visible-Light-Induced Hydromono- and Difluoroalkylations of Alkenes with α-Fluoro Carboxylic Acids. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 87, 9232–9241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gutiérrez-Bonet, Á.; Liu, W. Synthesis of alkyl fluorides and fluorinated unnatural amino acids via photochemical decarboxylation of α-fluorinated carboxylic acids. Org. Lett. 2023, 25, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sperry, J.B.; Wright, D.L. The application of cathodic reductions and anodic oxidations in the synthesis of complex molecules. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 605–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jutand, A. Contribution of electrochemistry to organometallic catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2300–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Feng, R.; Smith, J.A.; Moeller, K.D. Anodic cyclization reactions and the mechanistic strategies that enable optimization. Accounts Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 2346–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yan, M.; Kawamata, Y.; Baran, P.S. Synthetic organic electrochemical methods since 2000: On the verge of a renaissance. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 13230–13319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, Y.; Xu, K.; Zeng, C. Use of electrochemistry in the synthesis of heterocyclic structures. Chem. Rev. 2017, 118, 4485–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Waldvogel, S.R.; Lips, S.; Selt, M.; Riehl, B.; Kampf, C.J. Electrochemical Arylation Reaction. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 6706–6765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, D.; Yang, X.; Wang, D.; Li, Y.; Shi, L.; Liang, D. Electrophotocatalytic tri- or difluoromethylative cyclization of alkenes. Org. Chem. Front. 2023, 10, 2482–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, X.; Ni, C.; Deng, L.; Hu, J. Electrochemical reduction of fluoroalkyl sulfones for radical fluoroalkylation of alkenes. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 8750–8753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tian, Y.; Zheng, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Fu, W. Metal-Free Electrochemical Oxidative Difluoroethylation/Cyclization of Olefinic Amides To Construct Difluoroethylated Azaheterocycles. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 1875–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tian, Y.; Zheng, L.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J.; Jing, Z.; Li, Z.-J.; Fu, W. Electrochemically Promoted Oxydifluoroethylation of Alkenes for the Synthesis of Difluoroethylated Benzoxazines and Lactones. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2023, 365, 1901–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Polossek, T.; Ambros, R.; Von Angerer, S.; Brandl, G.; Mannschreck, A.; Von Angerer, E. 6-Alkyl-12-Formylindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolines. Syntheses, Estrogen Receptor Binding Affinities, and Stereospecific Cytostatic Activity. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 3537–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Goldbrunner, M.; Loidl, G.; Polossek, T.; Mannschreck, A.; von Angerer, E. Inhibition of Tubulin Polymerization by 5,6-Dihydroindolo[2,1-a]isoquinoline Derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3524–3533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Faust, R.; Garratt, P.J.; Jones, R.; Yeh, L.-K.; Tsotinis, A.; Panoussopoulou, M.; Calogeropoulou, T.; Teh, M.-T.; Sugden, D. Mapping the Melatonin Receptor. 6. Melatonin Agonists and Antagonists Derived from 6H-Isoindolo[2,1-a]indoles, 5,6-Dihydroindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolines, and 6,7-Dihydro-5H-benzo[c]-azepino[2,1-a]indoles. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 1050–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kraus, G.A.; Gupta, V.; Kohut, M.; Singh, N. A Direct Synthesis of 5,6-Dihydroindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolines That Exhibit Immunosuppressive Activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 5539–5542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Taublaender, M.J.; Glöcklhofer, F.; Marchetti-Deschmann, M.; Unterlass, M.M. Green and Rapid Hydrothermal Crystallization and Synthesis of Fully Conjugated Aromatic Compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12270–12274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, M.; Tang, Z.; Fu, W.; Wang, W.; Tan, R.; Yin, D. An Ionic Liquid-Functionalized Amphiphilic Janus Material as a Pickering Interfacial Catalyst for Asymmetric Sulfoxidation in Water. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 592–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, K.; Li, S.-J.; Chen, X.-L.; Liu, Y.; Huang, X.-Q.; Wei, D.-H.; Qu, L.-B.; Zhao, Y.-F.; Yu, B. Silver-Catalyzed Decarboxylative Radical Cascade Cyclization toward Benzimidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-ones. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 2861–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pan, C.; Yuan, C.; Yu, J. Molecular Oxygen-Mediated Radical Cyclization of Acrylamides with Boronic Acids. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021, 363, 4889–4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yuan, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Xu, B.; Liao, J.; Bu, F.; Wang, S.; Hu, J.-G.; Lei, A. Mn-Catalyzed Electrochemical Radical Cascade Cyclization toward the Synthesis of Benzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-one Derivatives. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 6676–6681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, J.R.; Liu, H.Y.; Fan, T.; Chen, Y.Y.; Xu, Y.L. Synthesis of Indolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-Ones Derivatives via Fe(OTf)3-Promoted Tandem Selenylation/Cyclization of 2-Arylindoles. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021, 363, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luo, Y.; Tian, T.; Nishihara, Y.; Lv, L.; Li, Z. Iron-Catalysed Radical Cyclization to Synthesize Germanium-Substituted Indolo[2,1-a]isoquinolin-6(5H)-ones and Indolin-2-ones. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 9276–9279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Preprints 96286 sch001
Scheme 1. Scope of the substrates 2-arylbenzimidazoles. Reaction conditions: Carbon plate (10 mm * 10 mm * 3 mm) as the anode, platinum plate (10 mm * 10 mm * 0.20 mm) as the cathode, undivided cell, 2.1 V, 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol), LiClO4 (0.3 M), CH3CN (4.5 mL), H2O (1.5 mL), rt, 3 h, isolated yields.
Scheme 1. Scope of the substrates 2-arylbenzimidazoles. Reaction conditions: Carbon plate (10 mm * 10 mm * 3 mm) as the anode, platinum plate (10 mm * 10 mm * 0.20 mm) as the cathode, undivided cell, 2.1 V, 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol), LiClO4 (0.3 M), CH3CN (4.5 mL), H2O (1.5 mL), rt, 3 h, isolated yields.
Preprints 96286 sch001
Preprints 96286 sch002
Scheme 2. Scope of the substrates 2-arylindoles. Reaction conditions: Carbon plate (10 mm * 10 mm * 3 mm) as the anode, platinum plate (10 mm * 10 mm * 0.20 mm) as the cathode, undivided cell, 2.1 V, 4 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.6 mmol), LiClO4 (0.3 M), CH3CN (4.5 mL), H2O (1.5 mL), rt, 3 h, isolated yields.
Scheme 2. Scope of the substrates 2-arylindoles. Reaction conditions: Carbon plate (10 mm * 10 mm * 3 mm) as the anode, platinum plate (10 mm * 10 mm * 0.20 mm) as the cathode, undivided cell, 2.1 V, 4 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.6 mmol), LiClO4 (0.3 M), CH3CN (4.5 mL), H2O (1.5 mL), rt, 3 h, isolated yields.
Preprints 96286 sch002
Preprints 96286 sch003
Scheme 3. Reactions for mechanistic determination.
Scheme 3. Reactions for mechanistic determination.
Preprints 96286 sch003
Preprints 96286 g002
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms of substrates in 0.1 M LiClO4/(CH3CN/H2O), using glassy carbon working electrode, platinum wire counter electrode, and Ag/AgNO3 reference electrode at 50 mVs-1 scan rates: (a) Background, (b) 1a (5 mM), (c) 2a (5 mM), (d) 1a (5 mM) and 2a (5 mM).
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms of substrates in 0.1 M LiClO4/(CH3CN/H2O), using glassy carbon working electrode, platinum wire counter electrode, and Ag/AgNO3 reference electrode at 50 mVs-1 scan rates: (a) Background, (b) 1a (5 mM), (c) 2a (5 mM), (d) 1a (5 mM) and 2a (5 mM).
Preprints 96286 g002
Preprints 96286 sch004
Scheme 4. Proposed reaction mechanism.
Scheme 4. Proposed reaction mechanism.
Preprints 96286 sch004
Table 1. Optimization of the typical conditionsa.
Table 1. Optimization of the typical conditionsa.
Preprints 96286 i001
Entry variations from standard conditions Yield (%)b
1 none 86
2 1.8 V 52
3 2.5 V 65
4 C (+)|Ni (−) 62
5 C (+)|C (−) 56
6 Pt (+)|Pt (−) 39
7 nBu4NClO4 as the electrolyte 37
8 Et4NClO4 as the electrolyte 61
9 nBu4NPF6 as the electrolyte 26
10 CH3CN/H2O (9:1) 47
11 CH3CN/H2O (1:1) 66
12 No electricity n.d
aReaction conditions: Carbon plate (10 mm * 10 mm * 3 mm) as the anode, platinum plate (10 mm * 10 mm * 0.20 mm) as the cathode, undivided cell, 2.1 V, 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol), LiClO4 (0.3 M), CH3CN (4.5 mL), H2O (1.5 mL), rt, 3 h. bIsolated yields.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated