Hydrothermal synthesis of N,S-GQDs were implemented by using citric acid as the carbon source, urea as the nitrogen source and thiourea as sulfur source. 1 mmol citric acid, 3 mmol urea and 3 mmol thiourea were dissolved in 5 ml of deionized water, and sonicated for 10 minutes to dissolve uniformly and form a clear solution. Then transfer the solution to a 20 ml high-pressure autoclave and heat it in an oven at 160 °C for 4 hours. After the reaction was completed, it naturally cooled to room temperature to undergo continuous dialysis and freeze drying, the targeted product achieved N,S-GQDs. For comparison, pristine GQDs were prepared similarly without using urea or thiourea as the N or S sources, respectively. Afterwards, quantum dots mediated MoSe2 heterojunction was synthesized by another hydrothermal process of mixed two solutions: first, 4 mmol Se powder dispersed in 10 mL N2H4·H2O, and second the 0.353 g (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O and 5 mg N,S-GQDs dissolved in 20 mL H2O. The hydrothermal condition was set at 150℃for 48 h to convert Mo7O246− into Mo4+ for the MoSe2 generation. The resulted sample was rinsed and centrifugated for 6 times to obtain the target heterojunction samples.
In
Figure 1a, the transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of MoSe
2 nanosheets demonstrated that the stacked nanosheets consisted of around 3 to 8 monolayers. And the interlayer spacing is about 0.65 nm, corresponding to the interlayer spacing of 2H MoSe
2, indicating the existence of 2H phase MoSe
2 [
23].Interestingly, a triangular lattice structure (octahedral coordination) has been magnified and highlighted in the red box, with a lattice spacing of approximately 0.276 nm, which is close to the 1T phase (100) crystal plane spacing of MoSe
2 [
22]. These results substantiated the existence of 1T phase and suggested the coexistence of 1T and 2H phases, where 2H phase is thermodynamically stable and 1T phase is much more conductive with higher electron density which has been caused by the highly reductive N
2H
4 agent. In addition, there are numerous defects on the basal plane and edge sites of MoSe
2, as indicated by the red circles, which may be ascribed to the lattice mismatching, resulting in a large number of internal and edge defects, and contributing to increased active sites. The high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) of N,S-GQDs on MoSe
2 nanosheets were apparently observed in
Figure 1b. Quantum dots smaller than 5 nm were evenly dispersed on surface of MoSe
2 nanosheets. The magnified HRTEM of red box area was exhibited in
Figure 1c, showing periodic lattice arrangement with lattice spacing of 0.285 nm, indexed to the 2H phase (100) crystal plane spacing of MoSe
2. As indicated by the red circles, there are abundant defective vacancies, lattice mismatching and lattice disorders at the edge sites, which may increase the active sites and active surface areas. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) characterized elemental mapping has been shown in
Figure 1d. Element distribution of C, N and S is mostly the same as that of Mo and Se, and the distribution is relatively uniform, which proves that N,S-GQDs are evenly dispersed on the MoSe
2 support. Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (
Figure 1e) shows clear and highly symmetrical hexagonal or triangular pattern implying that the grown MoSe
2 nanosheets have hexagonal/triangular crystal structures. Scan electron microscopy (SEM) observation (
Figure 1f) exhibited the relatively uniform size of nanosheets without obvious reaggregation toward large sheets. There are some curls on the edges, due to their relatively thin thickness and the decreased stiffness. To determine the thickness and number of atomic layers, the atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis was performed (
Figure 1g). The AFM results, consistent with the SEM and TEM results, demonstrate large layers and small fragments, showing quantum dots stacked on the MoSe
2 layers. The layer thickness is ranged from 4.6 to 5.4 nm. And the number of layers approximately ranged from 6 to 8, calculated based on the monolayer thickness of around 0.65 nm, and the additional distance induced by the influence of interatomic repulsion, capillary and adhesion forces.
The heterojunction structure of N,S-GQDs/MoSe
2 has been illustrated in
Figure 2a. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra (
Figure 2b) show two main diffraction peaks at 33.7 ° and 55 °, significantly differentiated from the standard PDF card of 2H phase MoSe
2 (JCPDs NO.29-0914). The two peaks at 33.7 ° and 55 ° are indexed to the (100) and (110) crystal planes, respectively. The small lattice spacing of 0.276 nm of 1T MoSe
2 corresponds to the (100) crystal plane peak (33.7 °) according to the Bragg law [
27]. The Raman spectra in the range of 100-400 cm
-1 were displayed in
Figure 2c. The out of plane and in plane A
1g and E
12g vibration modes were observed at approximately 237 cm
-1 and 281 cm
-1, respectively, attributed to the semiconductive 2H phase structure of MoSe
2. There is an in-plane B
12g vibration mode at around 335 cm
-1, attributed to the translational symmetry disruption occurring in the few layer MoSe
2 nanosheets [
28]. In addition, there are some new Raman peaks located at 110 cm
-1, 148 cm
-1, 192 cm
-1 and 375 cm
-1, labeled as J
1, J
2, J
3, and J
4 vibrational modes, respectively, attributed to the metal 1T phase of MoSe
2. The vibration modes of J
1, J
2, and J
3 are consistent with the Raman peaks of 1T-MoSe
2 prepared by Miao et al. [
29], indicating good formation of 1T phase MoSe
2 nanosheets. Meanwhile, the J
4 mode has also been demonstrated in the report by Saghar et al [
30]. Based on the analysis of Raman peak positions, it is further demonstrated that the hydrothermal synthesized MoSe
2 has a dual phase mixed structure of 1T and 2H.
Figure 2d shows the overall XPS spectra of N,S-GQDs/MoSe
2, showing the coexistence of C, Mo, Se, N, and S elements, which is consistent with the results of EDS mapping. Figure 2d-i show the high-resolution XPS spectra of C 1s, Mo 3d, Se 3d, N 1s, and S 2p, respectively. The characteristic peaks located at 282.8 eV, 284.8 eV, 286.7 eV, and 288.6 eV in the C 1s XPS spectra are indexed to Mo-C, C-C, C-O, and C=O, respectively (
Figure 2e). The presence of Mo-C bonds indicates that during hydrothermal reactions, N, S-GQDs form a certain number of covalent bonds with Mo
4+, contributing to the conductivity and active sites of the heterojunction. There are 5 characteristic peaks in the Mo 3d XPS spectra (
Figure 2f), among which the characteristic peaks at binding energies of 229.1 eV, 232.3 eV, 230.5 eV, 233.7 eV, and 235.8 eV correspond to Mo
4+ 3d
5/2, Mo
4+ 3d
3/2, Mo
5+ 3d
5/2, Mo
5+ 3d
3/2, and Mo
6+ 3d, respectively [
31]. The presence of Mo
5+ 3d
5/2, Mo
5+ 3d
3/2, and Mo
6+ 3d may be related to the incomplete reduction of Mo precursor (NH
4)
6Mo
7O
24·4H
2O. Interestingly, the binding energies of Mo
4+ 3d
5/2 and Mo
4+ 3d
3/2 shifted by ~0.9 eV compared to the standard binding energies of 2H MoSe
2 (Mo
4+ 3d
5/2 and Mo
4+ 3d
3/2 at 228.2 eV and 231.4 eV, respectively), implying that 1T MoSe
2 can engender from the hydrothermal method [
32]. In Se 3d XPS spectra (
Figure 2g), the characteristic peaks at 54.8 eV and 55.7 eV belong to Se
2- 3d
5/2 and Se
2- 3d
3/2, respectively, implying the −2 valence state of Se [
33]. The N 1s XPS (
Figure 2h) can be deconvoluted into four characteristic peaks at binding energies of 395 eV, 397.8 eV, 399.5 eV, and 401.5 eV indexed to the Mo 3p, Mo-N, pyrrolic-N, and graphitic-N, respectively. The presence of Mo-N indicates that N, S-GQDs, and MoSe
2 are not merely physically mixed, but also form Mo-N coordination bonds [
34]. Graphene-N has been formed via substituting C atoms by N atoms. The S 2p XPS (
Figure 2i) can be deconvoluted into four characteristic peaks, and the main S
2− 2p
3/2 and S
2− 2p
1/2 peaks are localized at 161 eV and 162.2 eV, respectively [
35]. The characteristic peak at 164.8 eV indexed to the bridged disulfide S
22−, while the peak at 167.1 eV may be attributed to S
4+, caused by the incomplete oxidation of S
2−.