Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

The Multifaceted Perspective on the Role of Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles in Promoting a Sustainable Green Economy

Altmetrics

Downloads

249

Views

87

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

16 January 2024

Posted:

16 January 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The current economic development paradigm, which is based on steadily rising resource consumption and pollution emissions, is no longer viable in a world with limited resources and ecological capacity. The "green economy" idea has presented this context with a chance to alter how society handles the interplay between the environmental and economic spheres. The related concept of "green nanotechnology" aims to use nano-innovations within the fields of materials science and engineering to generate products and processes that are economically and ecologically sustainable, enabling society to establish and preserve a green economy. Many different economic sectors are anticipated to be impacted by these applications, including those related to corrosion inhibitor nano fertilizers, nano remediation, biodegradation, heavy metal detection, biofuel, insecticides & pesticides, and catalytic CO2 reduction. These innovations might make it possible to use non-traditional water sources safely and to create construction materials that are enabled by nanotechnology, improving living and ecological conditions. Therefore, our aim is to highlight how nanotechnology is being used in the green economy and to present promises for nano applications in this domain. Additionally, we want to critically examine the practical difficulties these applications raise, especially in consideration of any possible implications for the health and safety of those employed within this innovative sector. In the end, it emphasizes how critical it is to attain a really sustainable advancement in nanotechnology.
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Nanotechnology

1. Introduction

Many factors have contributed to the widespread acceptance of the “green economy” concept in policy discussions. These include the ongoing global economic crisis, the projected increase in global energy demand of more than one-third between 2010 and 2035, price hikes for commodities, and the urgent need to address global issues about energy, the environment, and health. The term “green economy,” which mostly relates to the ideas of sustainable development, was first used by a group of well-known environmental economists in a revolutionary 1989 assessment for the federal government of the United Kingdom [1,2,3]. The most widely recognized and reliable definition of a “green economy” comes from the United Nations Environment Programme, which states that one is “a green economy if it leads to enhanced human well-being and social equity while substantially decreasing environmental risks and environmental shortages.” It is socially inclusive, low-carbon, and resource-efficient [4].
A collection of concepts, objectives, and practices collectively referred to as the “green economy” include: (i) advocating for justice and equity for all generations; (ii) upholding sustainable development principles; (iii) applying caution about the environment and social effect; (iv) appreciating natural and social capital through techniques such as whole-life expenses, internalizing external costs, and enhancing governance; (v) utilizing resources wisely and effectively; and (vi) aligning with previously present macroeconomic objectives by abolishing poverty, fostering green jobs, and enhancing competitiveness as well as development in significant industries [3,4,5,6,7].
Nanoparticles play a key role in the transition of a green economy to sustainable and environmentally friendly technologies due to their unique properties. At the nanoscale, these materials present chances to create economically viable and energy-efficient solutions that support the goals of the green economy [8].
The application of nanoparticles in the green economy has the potential to revolutionize various industries and promote sustainability. However, it’s crucial to acknowledge that while nanomaterials can offer significant benefits for sustainable processes and products, there are associated challenges. These include moral and social issues, ambiguities around commercial acceptability, environmental as well as safety concerns, and competition with traditional technologies. To ensure the success of nanoparticle applications in the green economy, careful consideration of these factors is essential to strike a balance between innovation and responsible implementation [9].
This study examines the opportunities and real-world challenges that nano-applications offer for addressing the principles of a green economy. There are examples given of how nano-applications could help with social and environmental issues. Green synthesis produces highly efficient nanoparticles without affecting the environment. The goal of this review article is to promote the use of regional botanical items for the synthesis of nanoparticles and their application for the control of environmental issues that harm both human health and the environment. Such a problem is faced worldwide, either in developed countries, developing countries, or underdeveloped countries. This review supports the pathway to prepare nanoparticles and use them for mitigation in eco-friendly means, which is also a visionary action for sustainable development. This review is also concerned with the green synthesis of nanoparticle and their mitigation approach toward environmental problems, etc. Moreover, the study also focuses on the unique approach of green synthesis of nanoparticles, which are highly efficient, responsive to external stimuli, and cheap. The transformative potential of green nanotechnology across various sectors such as biofuel, CO2 reduction, detection of heavy metals, and many more is demonstrated graphically in Figure 1.

2. Green Synthesis

The environmentally friendly synthesis of nanoparticles is essential for the development of a green economy because it provides viable substitutes for conventional synthesis techniques. This environmentally beneficial method reduces the need for dangerous chemicals and energy-intensive procedures by utilizing biological sources, such as bacteria and plants. Green synthesis is the process of recycling biological and agricultural waste to minimize environmental effects while fostering resource efficiency and the circular economy. The resultant nanoparticles frequently show improved biocompatibility, which qualifies them for use in industry, agriculture, and medicine. Furthermore, the method supports international efforts to promote ecologically friendly practices and generates economic opportunities through the valorization of biomass. All things considered, the green synthesis of nanoparticles addresses environmental issues, encourages innovation and supports responsible resource management, all of which lead to a more robust and sustainable economy [10,11]
A broad area of study encompassing multiple nanotechnology applications. There is now a trend to employ NPs for environmental purposes. Metallic nanoparticles are one of the many kinds of nanoparticles (NPs) employed in environmental applications. Plant-assisted synthesis of NPs is more affordable, ecologically benign, and commercially feasible than chemical and physical procedures [13]. Most often, in green synthesis, plant components are used as reducing and capping agents. Leaf, bark, fruit, and flower extracts have been used to make metallic nanoparticles (NPs) of a variety of sizes and shapes [14]. Biosurfactants generated from microbes, plants, and other biological resources have also been used in the manufacturing of metallic nanoparticles. Bio-fabricated metallic nanoparticles can be used to detect and eliminate metal dyes, antibiotics and metal ions [15]. Particles made via green synthesis are not the same as particles generated via physicochemical methods. Metal or metal oxide nanoparticles were created by employing the bottom-up method. In green synthesis, a natural extract such as fruit leaves, crops, or plants was combined with a costly chemical reduction agent. There is a huge potential for the creation of NPs in biological entities. The application of nanoparticles derived from plants is given in Table 1.

3. Applications

The current economic model is no longer viable in a society with finite resources and ecological capability since it depends on increasing pollution and resource consumption. The idea of the “green economy” presents an opportunity to redefine the environment-economic interface. “Green nanotechnology” affects industries including biofuel, nanofertilizers, nanoremediation, and more by employing materials science’s nanotechnologies to create economically and ecologically sound goods. Our goals are to address issues, particularly those related to worker health and safety, to emphasize the role that nanotechnology plays in promoting a green economy, and to underscore the necessity of sustainable advancements in nanotechnology. Moreover, the explanation is illustrated below:

4. Corrosion Inhibitor

Due to its ability to increase the sustainability and efficiency of corrosion protection techniques, nanoparticles’ involvement in corrosion inhibition significantly advances the green economy. As corrosion inhibitors, nanoparticles provide metallic surfaces with durable protection that lowers maintenance costs and increases infrastructure longevity. Environmentally friendly and economical methods are frequently used in the application of these nanomaterials, which reduces the ecological impact of corrosion prevention and conserves resources. Adopting corrosion inhibition technologies based on nanoparticles helps companies become cleaner and more sustainable, which is in line with international initiatives to lessen the environmental impact of different sectors. This shift creates a market for environmentally friendly corrosion prevention products in the developing green economy while also ensuring the longevity of vital infrastructure and promoting innovation and job creation [29,30,31].
A range of natural deep eutectic solvents was synthesized using various polyphenols sourced from plants, and choline chloride was employed as a corrosion inhibitor for mild steel [26]. By depositing surfactant C16H33N+(CH3)3[CeCl3Br]−(CTACe)-modified silica nanoparticles, a metallic material was endowed with a good resistance to corrosion [27]. Fifteen distinct kinds of amino acids were present in the hydrolysate, and their adsorption on the surface effectively prevented the steel from corroding in the acidic media. [28]. Corrosion can be managed and averted through diverse methods such as combining manufacturing fluids, enhancing material quality, implementing chemical barriers, and various other approaches [32,33]. Therefore, their effectiveness in preventing and managing surface deterioration of metals caused by various corrosive substances is regarded as the most significant corrosion inhibitors [34,35]. Table 2 lists the nanoparticles that were isolated from the plant with the corresponding efficacy.

5. Nano fertilizer

Through the optimization of agricultural output and resource utilization, nano fertilizers are essential to the advancement of the green economy. By precisely delivering nutrients, nanofertilizers increase crop yields and foster economic efficiency in the agriculture industry. Farmers save money because of the reduced need for fertilizer due to the regulated release of nutrients. Moreover, nano fertilizers help to ensure the sustainability of agricultural operations and their long-term economic viability by reducing environmental consequences including pollution and nutrient runoff. In addition to providing financial benefits to farmers, the technology’s ability to enhance soil health and nutrient use efficiency positions agriculture as a more resilient and environmentally conscious component of the broader green economy. The broad use of nano fertilizers holds promise for a more environmentally and economically sustainable agricultural future as they continue to provide benefits through higher yields, resource conservation, and less environmental externalities [43,44,45].
The use of zinc oxide nanoparticles as a foliar fertilizer has been shown in several studies to enhance the agro-morphological characteristics, photosynthesis, and yields of wheat plants [46] and common bean plants. Tomato plants’ traits and yield are enhanced by carbon nanoparticles [47]. Zinc oxide nanoparticles are a more effective way to support wheat growth and germination than zinc sulphur dioxide. Additionally, at larger dosages, they demonstrated in the literature that zinc sulphur dioxide posed a greater risk than ZnO-NPs [48]. The common bean that is harvested from the ZnO-NP-treated plant affects the lipid parameters and the liver and renal functions of the rats that consume it [13]. Many plants, like squash, require the three nutrients iron, manganese, and zinc to flourish [49,50]. Furthermore, as observed by Kaur et al., the application of Mn nano oxide greatly decreased the yield of fruit squash (kg/plant and tons/hectare), particularly when coupled with the application of Fe nano oxide. It was also mentioned that the fruits of squash plants sprayed with Fe oxide nanoparticles had higher concentrations of energy, proteins, lipids, and organic matter [13].
Moreover, NFs may raise plants’ defence mechanisms, lengthen stress resistance, and improve nutrient absorption and output by maintaining the accessibility of nutrients in the rhizosphere. Due to their better suitability for promoting plant development, they can potentially replace synthetic fertilizers and provide a new route for sustainable and healthy agriculture [51]. They reduce external pressures and improve tolerance to unfavourable environmental conditions for plants. Recent nano-technological developments have been filling the gaps between agriculture and technology and have craved a sustainable plan for solving the global food crisis [52]. In light of this, nanoparticles are quickly becoming a cutting-edge agro-technology for agro-improvement. Surprisingly, they give crop plants the ability to resist stress [53]. Additional nano-fertilizers have been studied with respective plants and are given in Table 3.

6. Heavy metal detection

By solving environmental issues and fostering economic sustainability, the use of nanoparticles in heavy metal detection is crucial to the growth of the green economy. When used with state-of-the-art sensing technologies, nanoparticles improve the accuracy and efficacy of heavy metal detection techniques, allowing for the early detection of pollution in soil, water, and air. This reduces the financial burden of environmental cleanup and medical costs while also protecting human health and ecosystems [62]. Industries are adopting detecting systems based on nanoparticles in compliance with strict environmental rules, which lowers the possibility of legal repercussions and increases corporate accountability. Businesses that invest in and use these technologies not only help to create a cleaner and healthier environment but also boost economic growth by creating and distributing novel solutions that support a green economy that is more robust and sustainable [63,64].
The primary heavy metals that are environmentally hazardous in recent research are Pb2+, Cr3+, Hg2+, As3+, and Cu2+. As a result, several attempts have been undertaken to measure and detect heavy metals using analytical techniques [65]. However, current technology is still needed for the sensitive and user-friendly detection of heavy metals. In reaction to this, nanotechnology was created. These nanotechnologies were demonstrated to be extremely sensitive, selective, and fast-acting, which improved the efficacy of analytical equipment [66]. For several reasons, including their low detection limit, high linear range, and ease of system integration, nano-based sensors are an effective tool for on-the-spot identification or on-field recognition. The benefits of using ways based on nanotechnology gave them a new idea for combining these technologies into portable devices that can be used anywhere and at any time, as Figure 2 [67] illustrates. Table 4 also contains a tabulation of the nanoparticles that were employed to detect heavy metals.

7. Biofuel

One of the keystones for advancing the green economy is the use of nanoparticles in the manufacturing of biofuel. When used as additives or catalysts, nanoparticles improve the productivity of biofuel synthesis processes, leading to higher yields and lower production costs. They play a key role in increasing the production of sustainable fuels because of their capacity to enhance reaction conditions and the overall effectiveness of biofuel production technologies. The application of nanoparticles makes it easier to create economical and ecologically beneficial processes for producing biofuels, which draws capital and promotes economic expansion in the renewable energy industry. A more effective and financially feasible route to sustainable energy is made possible by industries’ growing adoption of nanoparticle technology for the manufacturing of biofuels. This boosts the green economy overall by fostering innovation in the renewable energy industry and generating jobs [77,78,79].
A range of products have been produced as replacements for previously utilized fossil fuels through several green synthesis projects. Utilizing green copper oxide nanoparticles for enhanced transesterification of citrus medica-generated biodiesel in the core composite design. This green biodiesel that was manufactured adhered to international standards for properties like methyl ester. The biodiesel generated by the green CaTiO3 catalyzed transesterification reaction reached 97.5%, and the catalyst may be reused several times, demonstrating 80% efficacy on the fifth usage. The characteristics of the biodiesel generated by this procedure demonstrate that it falls within the range of ASTM criteria. Green ZnO nanoparticles produced from banana corm extract showed significant performance in the production of biodiesel from waste fish lipids, with an ideal yield of 2.5% and over 90% transesterification efficiency [80]. The use of nanoparticles as catalysts for the production of biofuels are given in Table 5.

8. Catalytic Reduction of CO2

When it comes to catalytic CO2 reduction, nanoparticles are revolutionary and greatly advance the green economy. These small catalysts, which are frequently made of sustainable materials, improve the effectiveness of CO2 conversion processes and open up new economic opportunities by producing useful chemicals and fuels. Their distinctive characteristics and large surface area improve catalytic efficacy, maximizing reaction rates and lowering energy inputs. The commercial feasibility of CO2 reduction technologies can be enhanced by the application of nanoparticles, which can result in scalable and affordable catalytic systems. A new frontier of economic prospects arises as companies incorporate these catalysts based on nanomaterials more and more. Investment in sustainable technology, innovation, and job creation propel the economy toward being greener and wealthier [89,90,91].
The environmentally benign photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CH3OH is achieved by the use of nanoporous CeO2, while sunlight is employed to initiate exothermic combustion, ensure uniform heating, and create vacancies in CeO2. The homogeneous distribution of heat energy made possible by the nanosize can raise CeO2’s reduction efficiency [92]. The triple-functional precursor NH3BH3, which has a narrow band that enhances light energy harvesting and electron transfers via the catalyst for surface adoption of CO2 in reduction, was used to synthesise the B, N co-doped TiO2 nanosheets [93]. Moreover, Table 6 tabulates the nanoparticle involved in CO2 removal.

9. Insecticides & Pesticides

Due to their revolutionary effect on agricultural operations, nanoparticles in herbicides and insecticides represent a significant step toward the advancement of the green economy. Pesticides and insecticides using nanoparticle-based formulations have a more focused and regulated delivery system, which boosts effectiveness while reducing environmental impact. These nanoparticles help maintain soil health and biodiversity by lowering the need for overuse of chemicals in agricultural activities. The implementation of solutions based on nanoparticles improves resource efficiency and reduces the financial and ecological expenses linked to conventional pesticides. As a result, of industry investments in and use of these cutting-edge technologies, the objectives of a green economy are advanced and a more environmentally conscious and sustainable agricultural sector is fostered, as well as economic growth is stimulated through the development and commercialization of cutting-edge environmentally friendly pest control solutions [97,98,99].
The usage of nanoparticles as insecticides in agriculture has increased recently. It is also being used as an inexpensive sensing tool, which has to be studied for better farming practices and higher yields [92]. Low-cost resources may be obtained through green synthesis, which can also be utilized to produce biopesticides and medications for treating people and animals. Ulrichs et al. claim that NP has a large surface area that affects lepidopteran insects in less than a day, which is necessary for human use [93]. Table 7 presents a tabulation of the nanoparticles present in the activity along with their interaction pests.

10. Conclusions

The substantial and adaptable influence of environmentally produced nanoparticles on a range of important fields, such as the development of insecticides and pesticides, the production of biofuel, the inhibition of corrosion, the use of nano fertilizers, the remediation of nano damaged materials, the facilitation of biodegradation, the detection of heavy metals, and the catalytic reduction of CO2 to promote the green economy. Utilizing eco-friendly nanomaterials in novel ways highlights their revolutionary potential in advancing sustainability, as well as their ability to address urgent environmental and industrial issues. This research offers a promising path towards a more environmentally conscious and commercially successful future by utilizing the multifaceted properties of green-synthesized nanoparticles. It also strengthens the fundamental role that these nanoparticles will play in forming a more sustainable and greener world by providing comprehensive solutions for a range of industries.
Generally speaking, green nanotechnology needs to “become green” in terms of the attention it pays to worker safety and health in addition to offering green solutions. In this context, a thorough open debate between specialists is necessary to appropriately weigh the advantages of green nanotechnology against any possible costs to society, especially regarding public, occupational, and environmental health. This methodical planning procedure will work well advantages for society, the environment, health, and the economy reductions and increase the likelihood of additional funding being allocated to this exciting area of technology.

Future Perspectives:

1. Ongoing investigation into novel environmentally friendly nanoparticle production techniques.
2. Researching materials for biodegradable nanoparticles to lessen their influence on the environment.
3. The creation of intelligent nanofertilizers to minimize chemical usage and enable precision farming.
4. Using nanoremediation methods to remediate pollution in water and soil.
5. Improving the biodegradation processes based on nanoparticles to manage waste effectively.
6. Progress in heavy metal identification technology to enhance environmental surveillance.
7. Using catalysts made of nanoparticles to increase the generation of biofuels for sustainable energy.
8. Research how nanoparticles affect ecosystems and microbial communities.
9. Improving and extending the application of nanoparticles in herbicides and insecticides to manage pests.
10. Research on environmentally acceptable and sustainable substitutes for conventional chemical pesticides.
11. Using nanoparticles and catalytic reduction of CO2 to fight climate change.
12. Examining the possibility of using nanoparticles for carbon collection and usage.
13. Developing rules and policies for the safe and responsible use of nanoparticles.
14. Public awareness initiatives to inform people about the advantages of green nanoparticles as well as any possible hazards.
15. Cooperation to hasten the adoption of green nanoparticles for a greener economy among businesses, academic institutions, and governments.

Ethical Approval

• The manuscript is not submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
• The submitted work is original and should not have been published elsewhere in any form or language (partially or in full).
• A single study has not been split up.
• Results are presented, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation (including image-based manipulation). Authors adhere to discipline-specific rules for acquiring, selecting, and processing data.
• No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements of other works are given.

Abbreviations

ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
ZnO Zinc Oxide
NPs Nanoparticles
NFs Nanofertilizers

References

  1. Pearce DW, Markandya A, Barbier ER: Blueprint for a Green Economy. In. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.; 1989.
  2. International Energy Agency: World Energy Outlook 2012. In. Paris: International Energy Agency; Available at http://www.iea.org/publications/ freepublications/publication/English.pdf.
  3. European Environment Agency. Towards a Green Economy in Europe :EU Environmental Policy Targets and Objectives 2010–2050.; Publications Office: LU, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. United Nations Environment Programme: Green Economy Report. Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. In 2011. http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/ green economy report/tabid/29846/default.aspx.
  5. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean: A Green Economy: Introduction To The Debate And Implications for Latin America and Caribbean. In 2010. http://www.cepal.org/dmaah/noticias/ noticias/4/41684/DraftDiscussionPaper.pdf.
  6. European Environment Agency: The European Environment—State And Outlook 2010: Synthesis. In State of The Environment Report No 1/2010. http://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/synthesis/.
  7. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Interim Report of the Green Growth Strategy: Implementing Our Commitment fora Sustainable Future. In; 2010. http://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/45312720.pdf.
  8. Dai, L.; Chang, D. W.; Baek, J.; Lu, W. Carbon Nanomaterials for Advanced Energy Conversion and Storage. Small 2012, 8, 1130–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Nanotechnology for Green Innovation. 2013. In http://search.oecd.org/ official documents/public display documentpdf/?cote=DSTI/STP/NANO (2013)3/FINAL&docLanguage=En.
  10. Omran, B. A.; Baek, K.-H. Valorization of Agro-Industrial Biowaste to Green Nanomaterials for Wastewater Treatment: Approaching Green Chemistry and Circular Economy Principles. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 311, 114806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gubitosa, J.; Rizzi, V.; Laurenzana, A.; Scavone, F.; Frediani, E.; Fibbi, G.; Fanelli, F.; Sibillano, T.; Giannini, C.; Fini, P.; Cosma, P. The “End Life” of the Grape Pomace Waste Become the New Beginning: The Development of a Virtuous Cycle for the Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles and Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Water. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alsaiari, N. S.; Alzahrani, F. M.; Amari, A.; Osman, H.; Harharah, H. N.; Elboughdiri, N.; Tahoon, M. A. Plant and Microbial Approaches as Green Methods for the Synthesis of Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Applications, and Future Perspectives. Molecules 2023, 28, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vijayaram, S.; Razafindralambo, H.; Sun, Y.-Z.; Vasantharaj, S.; Ghafarifarsani, H.; Hoseinifar, S. H.; Raeeszadeh, M. Applications of Green Synthesized Metal Nanoparticles — a Review. Biological Trace Element Research, 2023. [CrossRef]
  14. Gour, A.; Jain, N. K. Advances in Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, 2019, 47, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nambela, L., Haule, L. V., &Mgani, Q. (2020). A review on source, chemistry, green synthesis and application of textile colorants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 119036. [CrossRef]
  16. Patil, C. D.; Borase, H. P.; Suryawanshi, R. K.; Patil., S. V. Trypsin Inactivation by Latex Fabricated Gold Nanoparticles: A New Strategy towards Insect Control. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2016, 92, 18–25. [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, P.; Singh, K. R.; Verma, R.; Singh, J.; Singh, R. P. Efficient Electro-Optical Characteristics of Bioinspired Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Synthesized by Terminalia Chebula Dried Seed Extract. Materials Letters, 2022, 307, 131053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abdelmigid, H. M.; Morsi, M. M.; Hussien, N. A.; Alyamani, A. A.; Alhuthal, N. A.; Albukhaty, S. Green Synthesis of Phosphorous-Containing Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles (nHAP) as a Novel Nano-Fertilizer: Preliminary Assessment on Pomegranate (PunicaGranatum L.). Nanomaterials, 2022, 12, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ali, T.; Warsi, M. F.; Zulfiqar, S.; Sami, A.; Ullah, S.; Rasheed, A.; Alsafari, I. A.; Agboola, P. O.; Shakir, I.; Baig, M. M. Green Nickel/Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles for Prospective Antibacterial and Environmental Remediation Applications. Ceramics International, 2022, 48, 8331–8340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Samuel, M. S.; Jose, S.; Selvarajan, E.; Mathimani, T.; Pugazhendhi, A. Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens; Application for Cytotoxicity Effect on A549 Cell Line and Photocatalytic Degradation of p-Nitrophenol. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 2020, 202, 111642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jain, P.; Patidar, B.; Bhawsar, J. Potential of Nanoparticles as a Corrosion Inhibitor: A Review. Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion, 2020, 6. [CrossRef]
  22. Rathish, R. J., Joany, R. D. R., Pandiarajan, M., & Rajendran, S. (2013). Corrosion resistance of nanoparticle-incorporated nano coatings. European Chemical Bulletin, 2(12), 965-970.
  23. Ituen, E.; Ekemini, E.; Yuanhua, L.; Singh, A. Green Synthesis of Citrus Reticulata Peels Extract Silver Nanoparticles and Characterization of Structural, Biocide and Anticorrosion Properties. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2020, 1207, 127819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fetouh, H. A.; Hefnawy, A.; Attia, A. M.; Ali, E. Facile and Low-Cost Green Synthesis of Eco-Friendly Chitosan-Silver Nanocomposite as Novel and Promising Corrosion Inhibitor for Mild Steel in Chilled Water Circuits. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2020, 319, 114355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liao, B.; Cen, H.; Xiang, T.; Dai, H.; Wu, H.; Wan, S.; Guo, X. Functionalized Nanocomposites as Corrosion Inhibitors. ACS Symposium Series, 2022, 213–229. [CrossRef]
  26. Picchio, M. L.; Minudri, D.; Mantione, D.; Criado-Gonzalez, M.; Guzmán-González, G.; Schmarsow, R.; Müller, A. J.; Tomé, L. C.; Minari, R. J.; Mecerreyes, D. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents Based on Choline Chloride and Phenolic Compounds as Efficient Bioadhesives and Corrosion Protectors. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2022, 10, 8135–8142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, S.; Wang, J.; Lu, H.; Xu, L. Surfactant-Modified Silica Nanoparticles-Stabilized Magnetic Polydimethylsiloxane-in-Water Pickering Emulsions for Lubrication and Anticorrosion. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2022, 10, 10816–10826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Su, W.; Tang, B.; Fu, F.; Huang, S.; Zhao, S.; Bin, L.; Ding, J.; Chen, C. A New Insight into Resource Recovery of Excess Sewage Sludge: Feasibility of Extracting Mixed Amino Acids as an Environment-Friendly Corrosion Inhibitor for Industrial Pickling. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 279, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Akkalatham, W.; Taghipour, A.; Yongsiri, P.; Ali, S. M. Circular Economy in Materials to Decarbonize Mobility. Renewable Energy in Circular Economy, 2023, 89–112. [CrossRef]
  30. Thakur, A.; Sharma, S.; Ganjoo, R.; Assad, H.; Kumar, A. Anti-Corrosive Potential of the Sustainable Corrosion Inhibitors Based on Biomass Waste: A Review on Preceding and Perspective Research. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2022, 2267, 012079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lateef, A. Cola Nitida: Milestones in Catalysis, Biotechnology and Nanotechnology for Circular Economy and Sustainable Development. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 2023, 53, 102856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Düdükcü, M.; Yazici, B.; Erbil, M. The Effect of Indole on the Corrosion Behaviour of Stainless Steel. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2004, 87, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Galal, A.; Atta, N. F.; Al-Hassan, M. H. S. Effect of Some Thiophene Derivatives on the Electrochemical Behavior of AISI 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel in Acidic Solutions Containing Chloride Ions. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2005, 89, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. de Souza, F. S.; Spinelli, A. Caffeic Acid as a Green Corrosion Inhibitor for Mild Steel. Corrosion Science, 2009, 51, 642–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Raja, P. B.; Rahim, A. A.; Osman, H.; Awang, K. Inhibitive Effect of XylopiaFerruginea Extract on the Corrosion of Mild Steel in 1M HCl Medium. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 2011, 18, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ali, T.; Warsi, M. F.; Zulfiqar, S.; Sami, A.; Ullah, S.; Rasheed, A.; Alsafari, I. A.; Agboola, P. O.; Shakir, I.; Baig, M. M. Green Nickel/Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles for Prospective Antibacterial and Environmental Remediation Applications. Ceramics International, 2022, 48, 8331–8340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. El-Lateef, H. M. A.; Gouda, M. Novel Nanocomposites of Nickel and Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Embedded in a Melamine Framework Containing Cellulose Nanocrystals: Material Features and Corrosion Protection Applications. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2021, 342, 116960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mrunal, V. K.; Vishnu, A. K.; Momin, N.; Manjanna, J. Cu2O Nanoparticles for Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye from Aqueous Medium. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, 2019, 12, 100265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ardekani, P. S.; Karimi, H.; Ghaedi, M.; Asfaram, A.; Purkait, M. K. Ultrasonic Assisted Removal of Methylene Blue on Ultrasonically Synthesized Zinc Hydroxide Nanoparticles on Activated Carbon Prepared from Wood of Cherry Tree: Experimental Design Methodology and Artificial Neural Network. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2017, 229, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Razali, S. Z.; Aziz, M. Y.; Edinur, H. A.; Razali Ishak, A. Adsorption of Methylene Blue onto Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles Coated with Sugarcane Bagasse. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 596, 012052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ramesh, A. V.; Rama Devi, D.; Mohan Botsa, S.; Basavaiah, K. Facile Green Synthesis of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Leaf Extract of ZanthoxylumArmatum DC. for Efficient Adsorption of Methylene Blue. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, 2018, 6, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kamaraj, M.; Srinivasan, N. R.; Assefa, G.; Adugna, A. T.; Kebede, M. Facile Development of Sunlit ZnO Nanoparticles-Activated Carbon Hybrid from Pernicious Weed as an Operative Nano-Adsorbent for Removal of Methylene Blue and Chromium from Aqueous Solution: Extended Application in Tannery Industrial Wastewater. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2020, 17, 100540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Escribà-Gelonch, M.; Butler, G. D.; Goswami, A.; Tran, N. N.; Hessel, V. Definition of Agronomic Circular Economy Metrics and Use for Assessment for a Nanofertilizer Case Study. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2023, 196, 917–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rabalao, T. M.; Ndaba, B.; Roopnarain, A.; Vatsha, B. Towards a Circular Economy: The Influence of Extraction Methods on Phytosynthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Impact on Crop Growth and Protection. JSFA reports, 2022, 2, 208–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jeet, K.; Kumar, V.; Anushree; Devi, R. Valorization of Agricultural Wastes: A Step Toward Adoption of Smart Green Materials with Additional Benefit of Circular Economy. Handbook of Biomass Valorization for Industrial Applications, 2022, 343–367. [CrossRef]
  46. Munir, T., Rizwan, M., Kashif, M., Shahzad, A., Ali, S., Amin, N., ... & Imran, M. (2018). Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the growth and Zn uptake in wheat (TRITICUMAESTIVUM L.) by seed priming method. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials & Biostructures (DJNB), 13(1).
  47. Khodakovskaya, M. V.; Kim, B.; Kim, J. N.; Alimohammadi, M.; Dervishi, E.; Mustafa, T.; Cernigla, C. E. Carbon Nanotubes as Plant Growth Regulators: Effects on Tomato Growth, Reproductive System, and Soil Microbial Community. Small, 2012, 9, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Du, W.; Yang, J.; Peng, Q.; Liang, X.; Mao, H. Comparison Study of Zinc Nanoparticles and Zinc Sulphate on Wheat Growth: From Toxicity and Zinc Biofortification. Chemosphere, 2019, 227, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shebl, A.; Hassan, A. A.; Salama, D. M.; Abd El-Aziz, M. E.; Abd Elwahed, M. S. A. Green Synthesis of Nanofertilizers and Their Application as a Foliar forCucurbitaPepoL. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2019, 2019, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rui, M.; Ma, C.; Hao, Y.; Guo, J.; Rui, Y.; Tang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Fan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, T.; Zhu, S. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Potential Iron Fertilizer for Peanut (ArachisHypogaea). Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7. [CrossRef]
  51. Adisa, I. O.; Pullagurala, V. L. R.; Peralta-Videa, J. R.; Dimkpa, C. O.; Elmer, W. H.; Gardea-Torresdey, J. L.; White, J. C. Recent Advances in Nano-Enabled Fertilizers and Pesticides: A Critical Review of Mechanisms of Action. Environmental Science: Nano, 2019, 6, 2002–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ghosh, S. K.; Bera, T. Molecular Mechanism of Nano-Fertilizer in Plant Growth and Development: A Recent Account. Advances in Nano-Fertilizers and Nano-Pesticides in Agriculture, 2021, 535–560. [CrossRef]
  53. Solanki, P.; Bhargava, A.; Chhipa, H.; Jain, N.; Panwar, J. Nano-Fertilizers and Their Smart Delivery System. Nanotechnologies in Food and Agriculture, 2015, 81–101. [CrossRef]
  54. Singla, R.; Kumari, A.; Yadav, S. K. Impact of Nanomaterials on Plant Physiology and Functions. Nanomaterials and Plant Potential, 2019, 349–377. [CrossRef]
  55. Masarovičová, E.; Kráľová, K. Metal Nanoparticles and Plants / NanocząstkiMetaliczne I Rośliny. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S, 2013, 20, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. SALAMA, D. M.; ABD EL-AZIZ, M. E.; EL-NAGGAR, M. E.; SHAABAN, E. A.; ABD EL-WAHED, M. S. Synthesis of an Eco-Friendly Nanocomposite Fertilizer for Common Bean Based on Carbon Nanoparticles from Agricultural Waste Biochar. Pedosphere, 2021, 31, 923–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hussein, H. S.; Shaarawy, H. H.; Hussien, N. H.; Hawash, S. I. Preparation of Nano-Fertilizer Blend from Banana Peels. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 2019, 43. [CrossRef]
  58. Abdel-Aziz, H. M. M.; Soliman, M. I.; Abo Al-Saoud, A. M.; El-Sherbeny, G. A. Waste-Derived NPK Nanofertilizer Enhances Growth and Productivity of Capsicum Annuum L. Plants, 2021, 10, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Pais, M.; George, S. D.; Rao, P. Glycogen Nanoparticles as a Potential Corrosion Inhibitor. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2021, 182, 2117–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Surendhiran, S.; Gowthambabu, V.; Balamurugan, A.; Sudha, M.; Senthil Kumar, V. B.; Suresh, K. C. Rapid Green Synthesis of CuO Nanoparticles and Evaluation of Its Photocatalytic and Electrochemical Corrosion Inhibition Performance. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 47, 1011–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Syed Khadar, Y. A.; Surendhiran, S.; Gowthambabu, V.; Halimabi Alias Shakila Banu, S.; Devabharathi, V.; Balamurugan, A. Enhancement of Corrosion Inhibition of Mild Steel in Acidic Media by Green-Synthesized Nano-Manganese Oxide. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 47, 889–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ungureanu, C.; Tihan, G. T.; Zgârian, R. G.; Fierascu, I.; Baroi, A. M.; Răileanu, S.; Fierăscu, R. C. Metallic and Metal Oxides Nanoparticles for Sensing Food Pathogens—An Overview of Recent Findings and Future Prospects. Materials, 2022, 15, 5374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ciani, M.; Adessi, A. Cyanoremediation and Phyconanotechnology: Cyanobacteria for Metal Biosorption toward a Circular Economy. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023, 14. [CrossRef]
  64. Maddaloni, M.; Alessandri, I.; Vassalini, I. Food-Waste Enables Carboxylated Gold Nanoparticles to Completely Abat Hexavalent Chromium in Drinking Water. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, 2022, 18, 100686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lokhande, R. S., Singare, P. U., & Pimple, D. S. (2011). Toxicity study of heavy metals pollutants in wastewater effluent samples collected from Taloja industrial estate of Mumbai, India. Resources and Environment, 1(1), 13-19. 1.
  66. Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, J.; Huang, L.; Yu, S.; Chen, L.; Song, G.; Qiu, M.; Wang, X. Applications of Water-Stable Metal-Organic Frameworks in the Removal of Water Pollutants: A Review. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 291, 118076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shrivastava, P.; Jain, V. K.; Nagpal, S. Nanoparticle Intervention for Heavy Metal Detection: A Review. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, 2022, 17, 100667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fu, L.; Li, X.; Yu, J.; Ye, J. Facile and Simultaneous Stripping Determination of Zinc, Cadmium and Lead on Disposable Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Modified Screen-Printed Electrode. Electroanalysis, 2013, 25, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xiao, L.; Wildgoose, G. G.; Compton, R. G. Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Arsenic (III) Using Gold Nanoparticle Modified Carbon Nanotubes via Anodic Stripping Voltammetry. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2008, 620, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Wang, D.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, H.; Zhuang, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Wang, J. Synthesis of Au-Decorated Tripod-Shaped Te Hybrids for Applications in the Ultrasensitive Detection of Arsenic. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5, 5733–5740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Yu, C.-J.; Tseng, W.-L. Colorimetric Detection of Mercury(II) in a High-Salinity Solution Using Gold Nanoparticles Capped with 3-Mercaptopropionate Acid and Adenosine Monophosphate. Langmuir, 2008, 24, 12717–12722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hong, S.; Park, S.; Lee, S.; Yang, Y. I.; Song, H. D.; Yi, J. The Sensitive, Anion-Selective Detection of Arsenate with Poly(Allylamine Hydrochloride) by Single Particle Plasmon-Based Spectroscopy. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2011, 694, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Teng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, K.; Yu, Z. Screen Graphene-Printed Electrode for Trace Cadmium Detection in Rice Samples Combing with Portable Potentiostat. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2018, 13, 6347–6357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ruengpirasiri, P.; Punrat, E.; Chailapakul, O.; Chuanuwatanakul, S. Graphene Oxide-Modified Electrode Coated with In-situ Antimony Film for the Simultaneous Determination of Heavy Metals by Sequential Injection-Anodic Stripping Voltammetry. Electroanalysis, 2016, 29, 1022–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chen, K.; Lu, G.; Chang, J.; Mao, S.; Yu, K.; Cui, S.; Chen, J. Hg(II) Ion Detection Using Thermally Reduced Graphene Oxide Decorated with Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles. Analytical Chemistry, 2012, 84, 4057–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pérez-Ràfols, C.; Serrano, N.; Díaz-Cruz, J. M.; Ariño, C.; Esteban, M. A Screen-Printed Voltammetric Electronic Tongue for the Analysis of Complex Mixtures of Metal Ions. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2017, 250, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mujtaba, M.; Fernandes Fraceto, L.; Fazeli, M.; Mukherjee, S.; Savassa, S. M.; Araujo de Medeiros, G.; do Espírito Santo Pereira, A.; Mancini, S. D.; Lipponen, J.; Vilaplana, F. Lignocellulosic Biomass from Agricultural Waste to the Circular Economy: A Review with Focus on Biofuels, Biocomposites and Bioplastics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 402, 136815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Moreira, J. B.; Santos, T. D.; Duarte, J. H.; Bezerra, P. Q. M.; de Morais, M. G.; Costa, J. A. V. Role of Microalgae in Circular Bioeconomy: From Waste Treatment to Biofuel Production. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2021. [CrossRef]
  79. Mena-Cervantes, V. Y.; Hernández-Altamirano, R.; García-Solares, S. M.; Arreola-Valerio, E. Biodiesel in Circular Economy. Biofuels in Circular Economy, 2022, 251–278. [CrossRef]
  80. Rozina; Chia, S. R.; Ahmad, M.; Sultana, S.; Zafar, M.; Asif, S.; Bokhari, A.; Nomanbhay, S.; Mubashir, M.; Khoo, K. S.; Show, P. L. Green Synthesis of Biodiesel from Citrus Medica Seed Oil Using Green Nanoparticles of Copper Oxide. Fuel, 2022, 323, 124285. [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, Z.; Lv, F.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, C.; Wei, F.; Xing, X.-H. Enhanced Hydrogen Production in a UASB Reactor by Retaining Microbial Consortium onto Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 10619–10626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rai, M.; Ingle, A. P.; Birla, S.; Yadav, A.; Santos, C. A. D. Strategic Role of Selected Noble Metal Nanoparticles in Medicine. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 2015, 1–24. [CrossRef]
  83. Shakeel, N.; Ahamed, M. I.; Ahmed, A.; Inamuddin; Rahman, M. M.; Asiri, A. M. Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticle-Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite for Enzymatic Biofuel Cell Applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44, 28294–28304. [CrossRef]
  84. Dantas, J.; Leal, E.; Mapossa, A. B.; Cornejo, D. R.; Costa, A. C. F. M. Magnetic Nanocatalysts of Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 Doped with Cu and Performance Evaluation in Transesterification Reaction for Biodiesel Production. Fuel, 2017, 191, 463–471. [CrossRef]
  85. Cherian, E.; Dharmendirakumar, M.; Baskar, G. Immobilization of Cellulase onto MnO2 Nanoparticles for Bioethanol Production by Enhanced Hydrolysis of Agricultural Waste. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2015, 36, 1223–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, T.; Jin, X.; Chen, Z.; Megharaj, M.; Naidu, R. Green Synthesis of Fe Nanoparticles Using Eucalyptus Leaf Extracts for Treatment of Eutrophic Wastewater. Science of The Total Environment, 2014, 466–467, 210–213. [CrossRef]
  87. Hou, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P.; Wang, C.; Miao, L.; Wang, X.; Lv, B.; You, G.; Liu, Z. Effects of CeO2, CuO, and ZnO Nanoparticles on Physiological Features of Microcystis Aeruginosa and the Production and Composition of Extracellular Polymeric Substances. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 24, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sai Ram, M.; Singh, L.; Suryanarayana, M. V. S.; Alam, S. I. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2000, 117, 305–312. [CrossRef]
  89. Hart, A. Circular Economy: Closing the Catalyst Loop with Metal Reclamation from Spent Catalysts, Industrial Waste, Waste Shells and Animal Bones. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2021, 13, 11483–11498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wrasman, C. J.; Wilson, A. N.; Mante, O. D.; Iisa, K.; Dutta, A.; Talmadge, M. S.; Dayton, D. C.; Uppili, S.; Watson, M. J.; Xu, X.; Griffin, M. B.; Mukarakate, C.; Schaidle, J. A.; Nimlos, M. R. Catalytic Pyrolysis as a Platform Technology for Supporting the Circular Carbon Economy. Nature Catalysis, 2023, 6, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chen, Z.; Yun, S.; Wu, L.; Zhang, J.; Shi, X.; Wei, W.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, R.; Han, N.; Ni, B.-J. Waste-Derived Catalysts for Water Electrolysis: Circular Economy-Driven Sustainable Green Hydrogen Energy. Nano-Micro Letters, 2022, 15. [CrossRef]
  92. Dwivedi, S.; Saquib, Q.; Al-Khedhairy, A. A.; Musarrat, J. Understanding the Role of Nanomaterials in Agriculture. Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity, 2016, 271–288. [CrossRef]
  93. Servin, A.; Elmer, W.; Mukherjee, A.; De la Torre-Roche, R.; Hamdi, H.; White, J. C.; Bindraban, P.; Dimkpa, C. A Review of the Use of Engineered Nanomaterials to Suppress Plant Disease and Enhance Crop Yield. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2015, 17. [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, Y.; Jia, H.; Chen, P.; Fang, X.; Du, T. Synthesis of La and Ce Modified X Zeolite from Rice Husk Ash for Carbon Dioxide Capture. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2020, 9, 4368–4378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hsieh, S.-L.; Li, F.-Y.; Lin, P.-Y.; Beck, D. E.; Kirankumar, R.; Wang, G.-J.; Hsieh, S. CaO Recovered from Eggshell Waste as a Potential Adsorbent for Greenhouse Gas CO2. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 297, 113430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. VANATHI, P.; RAJIV, P.; SIVARAJ, R. Synthesis and Characterization of Eichhornia-Mediated Copper Oxide Nanoparticles and Assessing Their Antifungal Activity against Plant Pathogens. Bulletin of Materials Science, 2016, 39, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sharifi-Rad, J., Sharifi-Rad, M., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2018). Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Crops (Zea mays L., Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Medicinal Plants (Hyssopus officinalis L., Nigella sativa L.), and Weeds (Amaranthus retroflexus L., Taraxacumofficinale FH Wigg) Exposed to SiO 2 Nanoparticles.
  98. Intisar, A.; Ramzan, A.; Sawaira, T.; Kareem, A. T.; Hussain, N.; Din, M. I.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H. M. N. Occurrence, Toxic Effects, and Mitigation of Pesticides as Emerging Environmental Pollutants Using Robust Nanomaterials—A Review. Chemosphere, 2022, 293, 133538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bindra, H. S.; Singh, B. Nanofertilizers and Nanopesticides: Future of Plant Protection. Advances in Nano-Fertilizers and Nano-Pesticides in Agriculture, 2021, 57–84. [CrossRef]
  100. Moorthi, P. V.; Balasubramanian, C.; Mohan, S. An Improved Insecticidal Activity of Silver Nanoparticle Synthesized by Using SargassumMuticum. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2014, 175, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Devi, G. D. , Murugan, K., & Selvam, C. P. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Euphorbia hirta (Euphorbiaceae) leaf extract against crop pest of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpaarmigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Biopesticides, 2014, 7, 54. [Google Scholar]
  102. Madhiyazhagan, P.; Murugan, K.; Kumar, A. N.; Nataraj, T.; Dinesh, D.; Panneerselvam, C.; Subramaniam, J.; Kumar, P. M.; Suresh, U.; Roni, M.; Nicoletti, M.; Alarfaj, A. A.; Higuchi, A.; Munusamy, M. A.; Benelli, G. S ArgassumMuticum-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles: An Effective Control Tool against Mosquito Vectors and Bacterial Pathogens. Parasitology Research, 2015, 114, 4305–4317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kamil, D., Prameeladevi, T., Ganesh, S., Prabhakaran, N., Nareshkumar, R., & Thomas, S. P. (2017). Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles by entomopathogenic fungus Beauveriabassiana and their bioefficacy against mustard aphid (LipaphiserysimiKalt.).
  104. Roni, M.; Murugan, K.; Panneerselvam, C.; Subramaniam, J.; Nicoletti, M.; Madhiyazhagan, P.; Dinesh, D.; Suresh, U.; Khater, H. F.; Wei, H.; Canale, A.; Alarfaj, A. A.; Munusamy, M. A.; Higuchi, A.; Benelli, G. Characterization and Biotoxicity of HypneaMusciformis-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles as Potential Eco-Friendly Control Tool against Aedes Aegypti and PlutellaXylostella. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2015, 121, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Siva, C., Kumar, M. S., Nagar, G., Nadu, T., Nagar, G., & Nadu, T. (2015). The pesticidal activity of eco-friendly synthesized silver nanoparticles using Aristolochiaindica extracts against HelicoverpaarmigeraHubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Int J Adv Sci Tech Res, 2(5), 197-226.
  106. Zahir, A. A., Bagavan, A., Kamaraj, C., Elango, G., &Rahuman, A. A. (2012). Efficacy of plant-mediated synthesized silver nanoparticles against Sitophilus oryzae. Journal of Biopesticides, 5, 95.
  107. Chandrashekharaiah, M.; Kandakoor, S. B.; Basana Gowda, G.; Kammar, V.; Chakravarthy, A. K. Nanomaterials: A Review of Their Action and Application in Pest Management and Evaluation of DNA-Tagged Particles. New Horizons in Insect Science: Towards Sustainable Pest Management, 2015, 113–126. [CrossRef]
  108. Sahayaraj, K.; Madasamy, M.; Anbu Radhika, S. INSECTICIDAL ACTIVITY OF BIO-SILVER AND GOLD NANOPARTICLES AGAINST PERICALLIA RICINI FAB.(LEPIDAPTERA: ARCHIDAE). Journal of Biopesticides, 2016, 9, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. El-Saadony, M. T.; Abd El-Hack, M. E.; Taha, A. E.; Fouda, M. M. G.; Ajarem, J. S.; N. Maodaa, S.; Allam, A. A.; Elshaer, N. Ecofriendly Synthesis and Insecticidal Application of Copper Nanoparticles against the Storage Pest TriboliumCastaneum. Nanomaterials, 2020, 10, 587. [CrossRef]
  110. Muthamil Selvan, S.; Vijai Anand, K.; Govindaraju, K.; Tamilselvan, S.; Kumar, V. G.; Subramanian, K. S.; Kannan, M.; Raja, K. Green Synthesis of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles and Mosquito Larvicidal Activity against Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya Causing Vector Aedes Aegypti. IET Nanobiotechnology, 2018, 12, 1042–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Stadler, T.; Buteler, M.; Weaver, D. K. Novel Use of Nanostructured Alumina as an Insecticide. Pest Management Science, 2010, 66, 577–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hamza, R. Z. M. M. (2015). Larvicidal, antioxidant activities and perturbation of transaminases activities of titanium dioxide nanoparticles synthesized using Moringa oleifera leaves extract against the red palm WEEVIL (Rhynchophorusferrugineus. Innovare academic sciences, 49-54.
  113. Nair, R.; Varghese, S. H.; Nair, B. G.; Maekawa, T.; Yoshida, Y.; Kumar, D. S. Nanoparticulate Material Delivery to Plants. Plant Science, 2010, 179, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Santiago, E. F.; Pontes, M. S.; Arruda, G. J.; Caires, A. R. L.; Colbeck, I.; Maldonado-Rodriguez, R.; Grillo, R. Understanding the Interaction of Nanopesticides with Plants. Nanopesticides, 2020, 69–109. [CrossRef]
  115. Patil, C. D.; Borase, H. P.; Suryawanshi, R. K.; Patil., S. V. Trypsin Inactivation by Latex Fabricated Gold Nanoparticles: A New Strategy towards Insect Control. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2016, 92, 18–25. [CrossRef]
  116. Hák, T.; Janoušková, S.; Moldan, B. Sustainable Development Goals: A Need for Relevant Indicators. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 60, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 96467 g001
Figure 1. Exploring the transformative potential of green nanotechnology across various sectors.
Figure 1. Exploring the transformative potential of green nanotechnology across various sectors.
Preprints 96467 g001
Preprints 96467 g002
Figure 2. Nanoparticle intervention for heavy metal detection [67].
Figure 2. Nanoparticle intervention for heavy metal detection [67].
Preprints 96467 g002
Table 1. Nanoparticles from Plants and their Applications.
Table 1. Nanoparticles from Plants and their Applications.
Plant Nanoparticles Applications Reference
Ficuscarica Fe3O4 Antioxidant [16]
Azadirachtaindica CuO Anticancer [16]
Peltophorumpterocarpum Fe3O4 Degradation of Rhodomine [17]
Terminalia chebula Fe3O4 Degradation of MB [17]
Punicagranatum ZnO Antibacterial [18]
Lactucaserriols NiO Dye Degradation [19]
Vitisrotundifolia CoO Acid blue dye degradation [20]
Ziziphus spina-christi ZnO-SeO Antimicrobial/ antioxidant activity [21]
Seriphidiumoliverianum CuO Photocatalytic dye degradation from water [22]
Punicagranatum Ag2O antibiotic removal from wastewater [23]
Jacaranda mimosaefolia Cu Corrosion inhibition [24]
Scallion’s peel ZnO Nano fertilizer [25]
FicusBenjamina TiO2 Heavy metal detection [26]
watermelon CaO The catalyst for biofuel production [27]
Cola nitida FeO Absorption of MB/MO dye from wastewater [28]
Table 2. Nanoparticle for Green Corrosion Inhibitor.
Table 2. Nanoparticle for Green Corrosion Inhibitor.
Nanoparticle Plant Effect Efficiency Reference
Glycogen NP Biogenic sources Controlled the corrosion of zinc in sulfamic acid (NH2SO3H) 92% for 0.02 gL-1 [23]
CuO Moringa oleifera
leaf extract		 Improved overall anticorrosive activity 56% [36,59]
Manganese oxide Rose petal (RP) and lotus petal (LP) Overall anticorrosion behavior of mild steel increased 72.63% [23]
Ag Citrus reticulata peels extract Inhibited steel corrosion from HCl 93.9% at 303K and 90.3% at 333K [37]
Ag palm oil leaf extracts A protective film formed which protected the steel from acid attack 94.1% [38]
Ag nanocomposite Red onion peels A surface protection layer formed against corrosion 86% [39]
Cellulose nanocrystal Organic product Protected AISI360-steel from corrosion in petroleum manufacturing. 85.3% at 300 mg L-1 [40]
CuO/melamine/cellulose nanocrystals nanocomposite Organic product Protected AISI360-steel from corrosion in petroleum manufacturing. 96.8% at 300 mg L-1 [41]
NiO/melamine/cellulose nanocrystals nanocomposite Organic product Protected AISI360 steel from corrosion in petroleum manufacturing. 98.3% at 300 mg L-1 [42]
Table 3. Nanoparticles used as Nano-fertilizers.
Table 3. Nanoparticles used as Nano-fertilizers.
Nanoparticle Plant Affected Effect Reference
Hydroxylapatite (Ca5(PO4)3OH) Soybean (Glycine max) Increase of 33% growth rate and 20% seed yield [54]
AgNPs red ginseng shoot Ginsenoside content increased [55]
TiO2 aged spinach seeds Increased germination rate due to increase in nitrogen assimilation [56]
Iron oxide Soybean 48% increase in grain yield [57]
Ag Fusarium solani Reduced fungal infection [58]
C nanoparticle Phaseolus vulgaris L. Improved the quality and constituents of leaves and seeds. [59]
K+, Fe, tryptophan, urea, amino acids tomato,
fenugreek		 Increased germination percentage of tomato from 14% to 97% and fenugreek from 25% to 93.14%. [60]
Nano-NPK Capsicum annuum leaves Caused better quality of fruit and increased the yield too. [61]
Table 4. Nanoparticle for detection of heavy metal detection.
Table 4. Nanoparticle for detection of heavy metal detection.
Nanoparticles Heavy Metal Detected Limit of Detection Reference
Multiwalled carbon nanotube Zn (II) 0.3 μgL-1 [68]
Multiwalled carbon nanotube Pb (II) 0.07 μgL-1 [68]
Multiwalled carbon nanotube Cd (II) 0.1 μgL-1 [68]
CNT/ Pt As (III) - [69]
Au-decorated Te hybrids As (III) 0.0026 ppb [70]
AuNP Hg (II) - [71]
AuNP As 0.01 μM [72]
Graphene Cd (II) 10-7 M [73]
Graphene oxide Cd (II) 0.1-1.5 μM [74]
Graphene oxide Hg (II) 2.5 x 10-8 M [75]
AuNP Cr 0.01 μM [75]
Carbon nanofibers Bi (III) 16.8 μgL-1 [76]
Carbon nanofibers In (III) 3 μgL-1 [76]
Table 5. Nanoparticles used as the catalyst for biofuel.
Table 5. Nanoparticles used as the catalyst for biofuel.
Nanoparticles Effect Reference
Carbon nanotubes Used in biosensors and microbial fuel cell fabrication as well as a catalyst in biofuel production also raises the overall concentration of enzymes in biofuel generation as well as helps in enzyme mobilization [81,82]
Aniline incorporated with Fe3O4-NH2 and reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite Enhanced the process of bio-electrocatalysis of glucose oxidase [83]
magnetic nano ferrites
doped with calcium		 Raises biodiesel production yield [84]
MnO2 with sugarcane leaf Increased bioethanol synthesis [85]
Nano zero-valent iron (nZVI) and Fe2O3 Improves the production of biogas like methane [86]
CeO2 Improved the production of biogas [87]
Pt and silica Raises methane production yield [88]
Ni and silica Raises methane production yield [88]
Co and silica Raises methane production yield [88]
Fe and silica Raises methane production yield [88]
Table 6. Nanoparticles serve as a reduction of CO2.
Table 6. Nanoparticles serve as a reduction of CO2.
Nanoparticle Treated along with Period of experiment Temperature reference
CoNP-treated cocoa shell Cocoa shell and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane 25 °C [94]
magnetite nano capsules nanocomposite polyaniline 90 minutes 28 °C [94]
Porous silica nanoparticle Polyethyleneimine 30 minutes 75 °C [95]
La and Ce Zeolite - 0, 30, 60 °C [95]
CaO Eggshell waste 23 minutes 700-900 °C [96]
MgO Graphene oxide - 60-120 °C [96]
Table 7. Nanoparticle serves as insecticides & pesticides.
Table 7. Nanoparticle serves as insecticides & pesticides.
Nanoparticle. Activity Pests affected Reference
ZnO Blocks the organism. Fusarium graminearum, Penicillium expansum, Alternaria alternate, F. oxysporum, Rhizopus stolonifer, Mucorplumbeus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aspergillus flavus [92,93,97]
MO Stops fungal conidiophores and conidia growth on vegetative parts of fungi Conidia and conidiophores of fungi [98]
C nanotubes Raises the nutrients and elemental uptake by plants and is also involved in ameliorating the development of plants. [99,100]
Ag Is used to control agricultural pests and organisms. Helicoverpaarmigera, Ariadne merione, Pediculushumanus, Aedesstephensi, Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus, Lipaphiserysimiwas, Plutellaxylostella, Helicoverpaarmigera and Sitophilus oryzae. [101,102,103,104,105,106,107]
Cd Causes larval death of 93.79% at 2400 ppm Spodopteralitura [108]
TiO2 Causes larval death of 73.79% at 2400 ppm Spodopteralitura [108]
Pungam oil based AuNP Causes high mortality of pests. Pericalliaricini larvae [109]
Cu Causes toxicity against pests. Triboliumcastaneum, Spodopteralittoralis larvae, Aedes aegypti larvae [110,111]
nanostructured alumina (Al2O3) Causes mortality when exposed to wheat pests. Sitophilus oryzae, and Rhizopertha Dominica [112]
Al Kills the pest S. oryzae [113]
TiO2 Destroys the pest S. oryzae [113]
Nanosilica Enters inside the pest from the cuticle, thus, destroying the pest Different pests [114]
Nanosphere of silica Helps bactericides to enter into plant cell sap - [115]
Bioactive silver Lags the action of trypsin, hence, makes the pest harmless. Different pests [116]
AuNPs with protein Improves catalytic inhibition - [117]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated