Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

A Pharmacological Investigation of the TMEM16A Currents in Murine Skeletal Myogenic Precursor Cells

Altmetrics

Downloads

94

Views

26

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

18 January 2024

Posted:

19 January 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
TMEM16A is a Ca2+-activated Cl- channel expressed in various species and tissues. In mammalian skeletal muscle precursors, the activity of these channels is still poorly investigated. Here, we characterized TMEM16A channels and investigated if the pharmacological activation of Piezo1 channels could modulate the TMEM16A currents in mouse myogenic precursors. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings combined with the pharmacological agents Ani9, T16inh-A01 and Yoda1 were used to characterize TMEM16A-mediated currents and the possible modulatory effect of Piezo1 activity on TMEM16A channels. Western blot analysis was also carried out to confirm the expression of TMEM16A and Piezo1 channel proteins. We found that TMEM16A channels were functionally expressed in fusion-competent mouse myogenic precursors. The pharmacological blockage of TMEM16A inhibited myocyte fusion into myotubes. Moreover, the specific Piezo1 antagonist Yoda1 positively regulated TMEM16A currents. The findings demonstrate, for the first time, a sarcolemmal TMEM16A channel activity and its involvement at the early stage of mammalian skeletal muscle differentiation. In addition, the results suggest a possible role of mechanosensitive Piezo1 channels in the modulation of TMEM16A currents.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Cell and Developmental Biology

1. Introduction

Satellite cells represent a quiescent myogenic stem cell population located between the basal lamina and the sarcolemma of adult muscle fibers [1]. During skeletal muscle regeneration, part of this population proliferates as myoblasts, to give rise to differentiated mononucleated fusion-competent cells named myocytes, which fuse with each other to form new myofibers. The latter step is a Ca2+-dependent process and requires myocytes to undergo bioelectric membrane modifications controlled by the expression and the activity of specific cell membrane ion channels [2].
It is well known that the Ca2+-activated Cl- Channels (CaCCs) affect the cell membrane permeability to Cl- by sensing the variation of the [Ca2+]i. Firstly identified as endogenous channels in Xenopus oocytes [3,4] and activated by intracellular Ca2+ increase upon fertilization, CaCCs were later reported broadly expressed in different species and tissues. They play a role in epithelial secretion [5], nociceptive responses [6], vascular smooth muscle [7], cardiac and neuronal membrane excitability [8], olfactory transduction [9,10], and modulation of photoreceptor light responses [11].
The expression and function of CaCCs have not been extensively studied in mammalian skeletal muscle. The voltage-gated CIC-1 was the first plasmalemma Cl- channel identified in this tissue [12]. Almost exclusively expressed in adult skeletal muscle, CIC-1 channel activity provides ~80% of the resting membrane conductance [13] and contributes to action potential repolarization. However, the CIC-1 mRNA was found to be orders of magnitude lower in myogenic precursors, suggesting that in undifferentiated skeletal muscle cells it is not translated into functional channels [14].
Among the CaCCs expressed in skeletal muscle, the role of TMEM16A channels is emerging. The TMEM16 family (TMEM16A-K) includes phospholipid scramblase and/or ion channels [15]. Among them, TMEM16A and TMEM16B are CaCCs. In particular, TMEM16A (also named Anectamine 1, ANO 1) channels were first identified in heterologous systems by 3 groups independently [16,17,18] and subsequently characterized by a strong outward rectification [19].
With regard to skeletal muscle, CaCCs with “TMEM16A-like” properties were first identified in the plasmalemma of developing chick muscle cells as ion channels activated by both intracellular Ca2+ and depolarization and characterized by deactivating tail currents. They were proposed to be involved in long duration spikes (LDS), membrane depolarization, myoblast fusion competence and spontaneous contractions [20]. Only after a number of years, the presence of functional TMEM16A channels was demonstrated in zebrafish myotubes where they have been proposed to be gated by ryanodine receptor 1 (RyR1)-mediated Ca2+ release during excitation-contraction coupling and to participate in the action potential repolarizing phase, together with the delayed K+ currents, speeding in this way the muscle contractions for a more potent swimming [21]. More recently, in mouse, the TMEM16A channels were described as cytosolic in undifferentiated myogenic precursors and present at the sarcolemma level in fully-differentiated skeletal muscle fibers. In undifferentiated myogenic precursors, they were supposed to regulate the IP3R-mediated Ca2+ release [22]. In addition, since in TMEM16A KO mice, the lack of the channel protein was reported to stimulate proliferation and to inhibit differentiation of myogenic precursors, TMEM16A channels were proposed as important molecular players during myogenesis [22]. In contrast, the biological function of the sarcolemmal, TMEM16A channels in adult mouse skeletal fibers still remains unknown. Although mostly based on immunofluorescence analysis, the observations done in the mouse model suggest a migration of the TMEM16A channels from the intracellular compartment to the sarcolemma and a potential switch of their cellular function during myogenesis in mammals.
Similarly to TMEM16A channels, mechanically-activated Piezo1 channels play an important role in mouse skeletal muscle regeneration by controlling the activity of the myogenic precursors [23,24,25]. These channels, discovered in Patapoutian’s lab in 2010 [26], are permeable to Ca2+ [26,27] as well as to monovalent alkali cations (K+ > Cs+ ≅ Na+ > Li3+: [28] and could also interact with intracellular organelles, as reported in other cell types [29]. Moreover, they can be activated by the selective agonist Yoda1 [30].
In this study, for the first time, the TMEM16A currents were electrophysiologically recorded with the patch-clamp technique and characterized by using a pharmacological approach in mammalian mononucleated fusion-competent myogenic precursors (myocytes). The functional role of TMEM16A during myotube formation was also explored.

2. Results

2.1. Pharmacological identification of TMEM16A currents in mouse skeletal myocytes

The mean resting membrane potential value of the 2-3 day old myocytes, recorded in NES, was - 42.33 ± 1.79 mV (n = 9). To avoid possible contamination by K+ and Na+-mediated currents, all the electrophysiological patch-clamp recordings aimed at characterizing the TMEM16A currents were performed in a standard bath solution containing 150 mM TEA-Cl plus 2 µM TTX. The currents were recorded by holding the membrane potential at -40 mV with 1 s voltage steps ranging from -100 mV to +80 mV, in 20 mV increments, before being stepped back to -80 mV (Figure 1A, top).
In our experimental conditions, the recorded currents displayed a strong outward rectification at more positive potentials (Figure 1A, Ctrl), as already reported elsewhere and ascribed to CaCCs [19,31]. To confirm the involvement of TMEM16A channel activity, the selective inhibitor Ani9 [19] was bath-applied at a concentration of 1 µM for 2-5 minutes. The blocker partially inhibited the amplitude of the currents in a voltage-dependent manner (Figure 1A, +Ani9). A representative example of Ani9-sensitive currents calculated by subtraction is shown in Figure 1A (Ani9-sensitive current); the characteristic outward rectification is clearly visible. The Ani9 blockage was voltage-dependent as confirmed by the comparison of the I-V relationships measured in control conditions and in the presence of the drug (Figure 1B). On average, Ani9 did not significantly affect the currents recorded at negative membrane potential (e.g. -80 mV: from -43.04 ± 18.58 pA to -36.73 ± 16.35 pA, n = 8, P > 0.05), while the reduction was detectable at positive potentials reaching significance at +80 mV (e.g. + 80 mV: from 162.30 ± 56.20 pA to 110.20 ± 39.42 pA, n = 8, Figure 1C).
The next set of recordings was aimed at investigating the Cl- nature of the Ani9-sensitive currents calculated by subtraction in 150 mM TEA-Cl-based standard bath-solution and in 80 mM TEA-Cl (low [Cl-]e). In low [Cl-]e conditions, the outward rectification was reduced, as confirmed by the I-V relationships of Ani9-sensitive currents calculated in Ctrl vs low [Cl-]e conditions (Figure 2A).
Moreover, the reversal potential of the Ani9-sensitive currents was positively shifted from -43.69 ± 9.58 mV (Ctrl) to -7.20 ± 2.42 mV (low [Cl-]e, n = 8, Figure 2B).
Similarly to the Ani9 effect, the aminophenylthiazole TMEM16A-selective blocker T16Ainh-A01 used at a concentration of 5 µM [19] significantly reduced the evoked Cl- current amplitude (Figure 3A) but at both negative and positive potentials (- 80 mV: from -67.18 ± 38.90 mV to 49.07 ± 32.60 mV; + 80 mV: from 96.22 ± 38.90 pA to 69.23 ± 32.60 pA, n = 6). The T16inh-A01-sensitive component calculated by subtraction displayed the characteristic outward rectification of TMEM16A currents (Figure 3C,D).

2.2. The blockage of TMEM16A currents reduces myoblast fusion

So far, the Ca2+-driven Cl- currents have been proposed to regulate myogenesis possibly through the intervention of kinase and phosphatase activity [22,32]. Since CaCCs have been proposed to be involved in myoblast fusion [20], we have investigated the possible participation of TMEM16A channels in myotube formation. The effect of the specific TMEM16A antagonist Ani9 (3, 5, 10 and 30 μM) was studied in the fusion-competent myoblasts quantifying the fusion index (Figure 4). The fusion index was significantly reduced by (~ 37%) starting from the concentration of 5 µM Ani9 (control: 18.26 ± 0.87%, n = 19 o.f.; 5 μM Ani9: 11.56 ± 0.60%, n = 16 o.f). This effect was even more evident (~ 55%) at 10 µM Ani9 (8.33 ± 0.47%, n = 15 o.f, P < 0.001). At 30 µM Ani9, a significant reduction in the number of cells was observed, suggesting a toxic effect of the antagonist at the highest concentration tested in our experimental conditions (data not shown).

2.3. TheTMEM16A currents are modulated by the Piezo1 agonist Yoda1

Mechanically-activated Piezo1 channels are permeable to Ca2+ and their activity is of crucial importance in muscle cell precursors [24]. Western blot analysis confirmed the expression of both TMEM16A and Piezo1 channel proteins in the fusion-competent myoblasts (Figure 5A), in line with what has previously been reported in other studies [22,23].
Thus, we planned experiments to investigate the possible functional interaction between Piezo1 and TMEM16A channels.
The effect of the selective Piezo1 channel agonist Yoda1 (3 µM) on the TMEM16A chloride currents was therefore tested in the standard bath solution (Figure 5B). Interestingly, Yoda1 induced an increase in the Cl- current amplitude with a strong outward rectification (Figure 5C). The effect appeared voltage-dependent, detectable at positive potentials and significant at +80 mV (from 76.18 ± 56.74 pA to 175 ± 65.32 pA in presence of Yoda1, n = 8, Figure 5D).
To assess the specific activity of Yoda 1 on TMEM16A currents, the agonist was applied in the presence of 5 µM T16Ainh-A01. As expected, T16Ainh-A01 alone, reduced the endogenous outward chloride currents but also abolished the Yoda1 effect (Figure 6A,B), suggesting a functional interaction between Piezo1 and TMEM16A currents.
The mean current amplitude recorded at +80 mV was 196.40 ± 89.47 pA in Ctrl, reduced to125.80 ± 53.11 pA in presence of T16inh-A01, and was 140.2 ± 63.88 pA in Yoda1 plus the TMEM16A blocker (n = 5, Figure 6B).

3. Discussion

In this work, for the first time, the presence of TMEM16A-mediated Cl- currents was demonstrated in the sarcolemma of mouse fusion-competent myocytes, suggesting an important role at the early stage of mammalian skeletal muscle differentiation.
The currents recorded and identified in this study as TMEM16A-mediated were characterized by voltage-dependency, Cl- permeability and sensitivity to specific TMEM16A blockers. The currents were predominantly carried by Cl- as confirmed by amplitude reduction and shift of the reversal potential towards more positive values in the case of partial replacement of Cl- in the extracellular medium. Besides this, the observed outward rectifying features of the measured currents, was consistent with the higher intracellular Ca2+ affinity at positive voltages, typical of the TMEM16A currents reported in other cell types [18]. Lastly, the currents were significantly reduced by the specific TMEM16A blockers Ani9 and T16inh-A01 respectively [19,33,34,35], albeit by possibly different mechanisms, as evidenced by the different voltage-sensitivity of the blocking effects. So far, the TMEM16A channels have been reported to be expressed mostly intracellularly in undifferentiated myoblasts in mammals. Only in fully differentiated skeletal muscle cells, TMEM16A channels have been described at the sarcolemma level [22]. In this work, using the patch-clamp technique, we demonstrated the presence of functional TMEM16A channels in mouse myocytes, i.e. in differentiated mononucleated fusion-competent cells. Our findings thus indicate a possible role for TMEM16A currents starting from the early phase of myogenesis. Accordingly, the fusion index of myoblasts into myotubes was impaired by the specific TMEM16A antagonist Ani9 revealing a role of Ca2+- dependent Cl- channels in the cell fusion process. It must be pointed out that the efficacious Ani-9 concentration on TMEM16A-mediated currents (1 µM) was lower comparing to that affecting the fusion index (5 µM). The electrophysiological recordings were performed in a saline solution whereas the fusion index was assessed in a culture medium. In the latter condition, interactions of the antagonist with serum proteins could occur influencing its pharmacological effect. Thus, the apparent discrepancy could be the result of different experimental conditions. Biophysical forces, as for example shear stress imposed on the extracellular matrix, are continuously exerted on membrane surfaces and are known to influence biological responses such as gene expression regulation. In skeletal muscle, the mechanical stress is known to promote satellite cell proliferation [36] and skeletal muscle regeneration [24,37,38]. We have recently demonstrated the presence of the Ca2+-permeable mechanically-activated Piezo1 channels in myogenic precursors in vitro [23,24]. The expression of both TMEM16A and Piezo1 channel proteins was demonstrated by Western blotting as well as the positive modulatory effect of the Piezo1 channel agonist Yoda1 on TMEM16A currents. Considering the specific Yoda1 selectivity [39,40], a novel functional interaction between Piezo1 and TMEM16A channels in the myotube formation seems to emerge from our observations. If this hypothesis was correct, the intracellular Ca2+ increase induced by the activation of Piezo1 channels could promote TMEM16A activity. This new intringuing aspect of the skeletal myogenesis deserves further investigation. Besides the role in regulating cell fusion, TMEM16A channels could control other aspects of the myocyte physiology. Myocytes are known to be characterized by a resting membrane potential more depolarized [41,42] before the expression of the inward-rectifying K+ channels required for myocyte fusion [43]. In any cell type, an increase in Cl- conductance can lead to a cell depolarization or hyperpolarization depending on the [Cl−]i. Assuming a [Cl−]i of ~55 mM, as reported by direct measurements in myocytes [44] and a [Cl-]e of ~160 mM as reported under physiological conditions [45], a reversal potential of Cl- currents can be estimated at ~ -27 mV. Thus, if the myocyte resting membrane potential is ~-40 mV, as measured in this study and by other groups [43,46,47], the electrochemical gradient would suggest a depolarizing Cl- efflux though TMEM16A channels. Interestingly, a Cl- efflux mediated by undefined CaCCs was already suggested in chick skeletal myoblasts in a previous study [20]. Our results suggest TMEM16A as a new candidate in the control of chloride homeostasis required to regulate membrane excitability and/or enzyme activity [32]. In epithelial tissue, for instance, Cl- homeostasis might even regulate molecular interactions among microdomains, proper phosphoinositide functions and signalling pathways responsible for the tissue stability [48,49]. Certainly, the characterization of the downstream molecular mechanism triggered by TMEM16A channel activity remains an open issue and merits further ad hoc experiments in order to be clarified.
In conclusion, the identification of functional TMEM16A channels in myocytes represents an advance in the knowledge of the ion channels functionally expressed during skeletal myogenesis. Their contribution to the control of mouse myocyte fusion into myotubes indicates a role in the physiology of myogenic precursors in mammalian skeletal muscle. Moreover, the potential role of biomechanical forces on the control of TMEM16A currents mediated by Piezo1 channels offers new perspectives for understanding the mechano-regulation of skeletal myogenic precursors.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell cultures

Mouse primary myoblasts derived from satellite cells of the hind leg muscles of 7-day-old male Balb/c mice were kindly provided by Prof. A. Werning’s laboratory (i28 cells, [50]. Myoblast cultures were maintained in growth medium (GM, F-10 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 20 % (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Burlington, ON, Canada), 4 mM L-glutamine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Euroclone, Milan, Italy) and subcultured by standard trypsinization every 3 days. To achieve the myocyte phenotype (differentiated mononucleated fusion-competent cells), myoblasts were plated on matrigel-coated Petri dishes at low density (1 x 104 cells/ml) to avoid cell fusion and 24 h after plating, the GM was replaced with a differentiation medium (DM) consisting in Dulbecco’s modified minimal essential medium (DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, Sigma), 2% (v/v) horse serum (Sigma) and the same concentration of L-glutamine and penicillin-streptomycin as in GM. Cell cultures were maintained at 37°C, 5% CO2, and used within 2-3 days in DM.

4.2. Electrophysiological recordings

Resting membrane potential was measured using a conventional whole-cell patch clamp configuration, in current clamp mode (I=0), in a normal external solution (NES) containing (in mM): 140 NaCl, 2.8 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, pH 7.3 adjusted with NaOH and a pipette solution containing (in mM): 140 K-aspartate, 10 NaCl, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, pH 7.3 adjusted with KOH. Cell capacitance was measured by integrating the area underlying an uncompensated capacitive transient evoked by a voltage step of +10 mV. Mean membrane capacitance was 12.95 ± 0.20 pF (n = 31).
Membrane currents were recorded in voltage-clamp mode and the solutions used were as follows: standard bath (in mM: 150 TEA-Cl, 2 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, pH 7.4 adjusted with CsOH); pipette solution (in mM: 140 K-aspartate, 10 NaCl, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, pH 7.4 adjusted with KOH). Currents were always measured at the end of 1 s voltage steps. The electrode resistance was 4-6 MΩ and all experiments were performed at room temperature (20-25°C).
Data were acquired by an Axopatch 200B amplifier controlled by pClamp 8 software (Axon Instruments), using a Digidata 1321A analogue-digital converter (Axon Instruments). Signals were sampled at 500 µs and low-passed filtered at 1kHz.
In all the recordings, the bath was grounded through a 2M KCl agar bridge connected to an Ag/AgCl reference electrode. The value of the liquid junction potential (VLJPs) was off-line subtracted from all command voltages [51].

4.3. Western blotting

Myocytes were lysed in RIPA buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH = 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0,5% sodium deoxycholate, 0,1% SDS, 1 mM EDTA) supplemented with 1x EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Sigma), for 30 minutes at 4°C. The insoluble debris were removed by centrifugation (13,000 g at 4°C for 10 minutes) and protein concentration was determined by Bio-Rad DC Protein assay. 30 µg aliquots of total protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE (8%, wt/v) and subject to Western blot analysis. Following electrophoresis, proteins were transferred onto a 0.22-µm nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham) in wet conditions. To minimize background signal, the membranes were incubated with 5% non-fat milk in TBS-0.1% Tween 20 (blocking buffer) for 1 hour at room temperature with gentle shaking. Membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit polyclonal antibody against Piezo1 and TMEM16A (NBP1-78446 Novus Biologicals and BS-3794R Thermo Fischer, 1:1000 and 1:500, respectively) in the blocking buffer. Primary antibodies were revealed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Sigma) followed by enhanced chemiluminescence WesternBright ECL (Advasta, San Jose, CA).

4.4. Fusion index

Myocytes fusion index was established by dividing the number of nuclei in the myotubes (i.e. cells with more than two nuclei) by the total number of nuclei in 3-day cultures in DM. The number of nuclei was evaluated using fluorescent staining with 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Briefly, cells grown on glass coverslips were fixed in freshly prepared 3.7 % (w/v) paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffer saline (PBS, 15 min, 22 ᵒC). After an extensive and gentle wash-out with PBS (3 x 10 min, 22 °C), myocytes were permeabilized by an incubation in PBS added with Triton-X 100 0.1% and 5% normal goat serum (Blocking Solution, 10 min, 4 ᵒC). Staining was then carried out by incubating the cells in Blocking Solution containing 10 μm DAPI (60 min, 4 ᵒC). Samples were visualized under a Leica DMLS fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with software LASV4.13. The fluorescence images were captured by g a 20x objective and the acquired fluorescence images were compared to the corresponding bright-field images. Nuclei count, image sizing, cropping and overlay were performed with Fiji software [52]. Myocyte fusion index was calculated in control condition and in the presence of Ani9 (3, 5 and 10 μM) in DM in two independent cell cultures. For each experimental condition, at least 15 randomly selected optical fields (o.f.) were analysed. In each o.f. at least 300 nuclei were counted.

4.5. Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 8 and OriginPro software. The results are shown as the mean ± standard error (S.E.M) values. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used for normality testing. The ratio t-test was utilized to compare two groups of paired and normally distributed values. Depending on whether the values were paired or not, the Wilcoxon or the Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare non-normally distributed values respectively. Data were considered statistically significant when the P value was <0.05 (*).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B, M.S. and P.L.; methodology, A.B., M.S., P.Z, P.D.A. and A.R.; formal analysis, A.B, M.S.; investigation, M.S., A.R. and P.Z.; data curation, M.S., A.R., P.D.A. and P.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B., M.S., P.L., V.B.; writing—review and editing, A.B., M.S., P.L., P.D.A., V.B; supervision, A.B., M.S.; funding acquisition, P.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the University of Trieste, Italy, with the grant “Bando straordinario per il finanziamento dell’acquisto di attrezzature specifiche- Anno 2022-Prot n.96508 dd 11/07/22”.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to prof. Andrew Constanti (UCL, School of Pharmacy, London, UK) for critically reading the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mauro, A. Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961, 9, 493–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fennelly, C.; Soker, S. Bioelectric Properties of Myogenic Progenitor Cells. Bioelectricity. 2019, 1, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miledi, R. A calcium-dependent transient outward current in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982, 215, 491–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barish, M.E. A transient calcium-dependent chloride current in the immature Xenopus oocyte. J Physiol. 1983, 342, 309–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wagner, J.A.; Cozens, A.L.; Schulman, H.; Gruenert, D.C.; Stryer, L.; Gardner, P. Activation of chloride channels in normal and cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells by multifunctional calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. Nature. 1991, 349, 793–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jin, X.; Shah, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Lees, M.; Fu, Z.; Lippiat, J.D.; Beech, D.J.; Sivaprasadarao, A.; Baldwin, S.A.; Zhang, H.; Gamper, N. Activation of the Cl- channel ANO1 by localized calcium signals in nociceptive sensory neurons requires coupling with the IP3 receptor. Sci Signal. 2013, 6, ra73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Large, W.A.; Wang, Q. Characteristics and physiological role of the Ca(2+)-activated Cl- conductance in smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1996, 271, C435–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Frings, S.; Reuter, D.; Kleene, S.J. Neuronal Ca2+ -activated Cl- channels--homing in on an elusive channel species. Prog Neurobiol. 2000, 60, 247–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dauner, S.; Lissmann, J.; Jeridi, S.; Frings, S.; Mohrlen, F. Expression patterns of anoctamin 1 and anoctamin 2 chloride channels in the mammalian nose. Cell Tissue Res. 2012, 347, 327–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maurya, D.K.; Menini, A. Developmental expression of the calcium-activated chloride channels TMEM16A and TMEM16B in the mouse olfactory epithelium. Dev Neurobiol. 2014, 74, 657–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ferrera, L.; Zegarra-Moran, O.; Galietta, L.J. Ca2+-activated Cl- channels. Compr Physiol. 2011, 1, 2155–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Steinmeyer, K.; Ortland, C.; Jentsch, T.J. Primary structure and functional expression of a developmentally regulated skeletal muscle chloride channel. Nature. 1991, 354, 301–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bretag, A.H. Muscle chloride channels. Physiol Rev. 1987, 67, 618–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bardouille, C.; Vullhorst, D.; Jockusch, H. Expression of chloride channel 1 mRNA in cultured myogenic cells: a marker of myotube maturation. FEBS Lett. 1996, 396, 177–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pedemonte, N.; Galietta, LJ. Structure and function of TMEM16 proteins (anoctamins). Physiol Rev. 2014, 94, 419–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Schroeder, B.C.; Cheng, T.; Jan, Y.N.; Jan, L.Y. Expression cloning of TMEM16A as a calcium-activated chloride channel subunit. Cell. 2008, 134, 1019–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Caputo, A.; Caci, E.; Ferrera, L.; Pedemonte, N.; Barsanti, C.; Sondo, E.; Pfeffer, U.; Ravazzolo, R.; Zegarra-Moran, O.; Galietta, L.J. TMEM16A, a membrane protein associated with calcium-dependent chloride channel activity. Science. 2008, 322, 590–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yang, Y.D.; Cho, H.; Koo, J.Y.; Tak, M.H.; Cho, Y.; Shim, W.S.; Park, S.P.; Lee, J.; Lee, B.; Kim, B.M.; Raouf, R.; Shin, Y.K.; Oh, U. TMEM16A confers receptor-activated calcium-dependent chloride conductance. Nature. 2008, 455, 1210–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bradley, E.; Fedigan, S.; Webb, T.; Hollywood, M.A.; Thornbury, K.D.; McHale, N.G.; Sergeant, G.P. Pharmacological characterization of TMEM16A currents. Channels (Austin). 2014, 8, 308–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hume R.I., Thomas S,A. A calcium- and voltage-dependent chloride current in developing chick skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1989, 417, 241-61. [CrossRef]
  21. Dayal, A.; Ng, S.F.J.; Grabner, M. Ca2+-activated Cl- channel TMEM16A/ANO1 identified in zebrafish skeletal muscle is crucial for action potential acceleration. Nat Commun. 2019, 10, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yuan, W.; Cui, C.C.; Li, J.; Xu, Y.H.; Fan, C.E.; Chen, Y.C.; Fan, H.W.; Hu, B.X.; Shi, M.Y.; Sun, Z.Y.; Wang, P.; Ma, T.X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, M.S.; Chen, H.Q. Intracellular TMEM16A is necessary for myogenesis of skeletal muscle. Science. 2022, 25, 105446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bosutti, A.; Giniatullin, A.; Odnoshivkina, Y.; Giudice, L.; Malm, T.; Sciancalepore, M.; Giniatullin, R.; D'Andrea, P.; Lorenzon, P.; Bernareggi, A. "Time window" effect of Yoda1-evoked Piezo1 channel activity during mouse skeletal muscle differentiation. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2021, 233, e13702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bernareggi, A.; Bosutti, A.; Massaria, G.; Giniatullin, R.; Malm, T.; Sciancalepore, M.; Lorenzon, P. The State of the Art of Piezo1 Channels in Skeletal Muscle Regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2022, 23, 6616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sciancalepore, M.; Massaria, G.; Tramer, F.; Zacchi, P.; Lorenzon, P.; Bernareggi, A. A preliminary study on the role of Piezo1 channels in myokine release from cultured mouse myotubes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022, 623, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Coste, B.; Mathur, J.; Schmidt, M.; Earley, T.J.; Ranade, S.; Petrus, M.J.; Dubin, A.E.; Patapoutian, A. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 2010, 330, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cahalan, S.M.; Lukacs, V.; Ranade, S.S.; Chien, S.; Bandell, M.; Patapoutian, A. Piezo1 links mechanical forces to red blood cell volume. Elife. 2015, 4, e07370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gnanasambandam, R.; Bae, C.; Gottlieb, P.A.; Sachs, F. Ionic Selectivity and Permeation Properties of Human PIEZO1 Channels. PLoS One. 2015, 10, e0125503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Vladislav Chubinskiy-Nadezhdin, V.; Semenova, S.; Vasileva, V.; Shatrova, A.; Pugovkina, N.; Negulyaev, Y.; Negulyaev Y. Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry Contributes to Piezo1-Induced Ca2+ Increase in Human Endometrial Stem Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2022, 23, 3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Syeda, R.; Xu, J.; Dubin, A.E.; Coste, B.; Mathur, J.; Huynh, T.; Matzen, J.; Lao, J.; Tully, D.C.; Engels, I.H.; Petrassi, H.M.; Schumacher, A.M.; Montal, M.; Bandell, M.; Patapoutian, A. Chemical activation of the mechanotransduction channel Piezo1. Elife. 2015, 4, e07369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Centeio, R.; Cabrita, I.; Benedetto, R.; Talbi, K.; Ousingsawat, J.; Schreiber, R.; Sullivan, J.K.; Kunzelmann, K. Pharmacological Inhibition and Activation of the Ca2+ Activated Cl- Channel TMEM16A. Int J Mol Sci. 2020, 21, 2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Valdivieso, Á.G.; Santa-Coloma, T.A. The chloride anion as a signalling effector. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019, 94, 1839–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Seo, Y.; Lee, H.K.; Park, J.; Jeon, D.K.; Jo, S.; Jo, M.; Namkung, W. Ani9, A Novel Potent Small-Molecule ANO1 Inhibitor with Negligible Effect on ANO2. PLoS One. 2016, 11, e0155771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Choi, S.; Ryu, S.; Sim, K.; Song, C.; Shin, I.; Kim, S.S.; Lee, Y.-S; Park, J.-Y; Sim, T. Anti-glioma effects of 2-aminothiophene-3-carboxamide derivatives, ANO1 channel blockers. Eur. J. Med Chem. 2020, 208, 112688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wozniak, K.L.; Phelps, W.A.; Tembo, M.; Lee, M.T.; Carlson, A.E. The TMEM16A channel mediates the fast polyspermy block in Xenopus laevis. J Gen Physiol. 2018, 150, 1249–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Haroon, M.; Klein-Nulend, J.; Bakker, A.D.; Jin, J.; Seddiqi, H.; Offringa, C.; de Wit, G.M.J.; Le Grand, F.; Giordani, L.; Liu, K.J.; Knight, R.D.; Jaspers, R.T. Myofiber stretch induces tensile and shear deformation of muscle stem cells in their native niche. Biophys J. 2021, 120, 2665–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Seale, P.; Rudnicki, M.A. A new look at the origin, function, and "stem-cell" status of muscle satellite cells. Dev Biol. 2000, 218, 115–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hawke, T.J.; Garry, D.J. Myogenic satellite cells: physiology to molecular biology. J Appl Physiol. 2001, 91, 534–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Botello-Smith W.M.; Jiang W.; Zhang H.; OzkN ad; Lin Y.C.; Pham C.N.; Lacroix J.J.; Luo Y. A mechanism for the activation of the mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel by the small molecule Yoda1. Nature Communications 2019, 10:, 4503. [CrossRef]
  40. Wijerathne T.D.; Alper A.D.; Lacroix J.J. Yoda1’s energetic footprint on Piezo1 channels and its modulation by voltage and temperature. PNAS 119, e2202269119. [CrossRef]
  41. Bernheim, L.; Liu, J.H.; Hamann, M.; Haenggeli, C.A.; Fischer-Lougheed, J.; Bader, C.R. Contribution of a non-inactivating potassium current to the resting membrane potential of fusion-competent human myoblasts. J Physiol. 1996, 493, 129–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bijlenga, P.; Occhiodoro, T.; Liu, J.H.; Bader, C.R.; Bernheim, L.; Fischer-Lougheed, J. An ether -à-go-go K+ current, Ih-eag, contributes to the hyperpolarization of human fusion-competent myoblasts. J Physiol. 1998, 512, 317–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, J.H.; Bijlenga, P.; Fischer-Lougheed, J.; Occhiodoro, T.; Kaelin, A.; Bader, C.R.; Bernheim, L. Role of an inward rectifier K+ current and of hyperpolarization in human myoblast fusion. J Physiol. 1998, 510, 467–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, L.; König, B.; Stauber, T. LRRC8 channel activation and reduction in cytosolic chloride concentration during early differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020, 532, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dulhunty, A.F. The dependence of membrane potential on extracellular chloride concentration in mammalian skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1978, 276, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ritchie, A.K.; Fambrough, D.M. Electrophysiological properties of the membrane and acetylcholine receptor in developingrat and chick myotubes. J Gen Physiol. 1975, 66, 327–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Spector, I.; Prives, J.M. Development of electrophysiological and biochemical membrane properties during differentiation of embryonic skeletal muscle in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977, 74, 5166–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Stauber, T.; Jentsch, T.J. Chloride in vesicular trafficking and function. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013, 75, 453–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. He, M.; Ye, W.; Wang, W.J.; Sison, E.S.; Jan, Y.N.; Jan, LY. Cytoplasmic Cl- couples membrane remodeling to epithelial morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017, 114, E11161–E11169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Irintchev, A.; Langer, M.; Zweyer, M.; Theisen, R.; Wernig, A. Functional improvement of damaged adult mouse muscle by implantation of primary myoblasts. J Physiol. 1997, 500, 775–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Barry, P.H. JPCalc, a software package for calculating liquid junction potential corrections in patch-clamp, intracellular, epithelial and bilayer measurements and for correcting junction potential measurements. J Neurosci Methods. 1994, 51, 107–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; Tinevez, J.Y.; White, D.J.; Hartenstein, V.; Eliceiri, K.; Tomancak, P.; Cardona, A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012, 9, 676–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 96726 g001
Figure 1. Block of TMEM16A chloride currents by Ani9. (A) Representative currents elicited by 1000-ms test potentials between -100 and +80 mV in the same myocyte before (Ctrl, black) and after the addition of 1 µM Ani9 (+ Ani9, gray) and the corresponding Ani9-sensitive currents (magenta) calculated by subtraction. On top, the stimulation protocol used to elicit currents. (B) the I-V relationships in absence and presence of Ani9. (C) The histogram shows the blockage exerted by Ani9 that was significant only for the outward currents at +80 mV (n = 8, ** P= 0.002).
Figure 1. Block of TMEM16A chloride currents by Ani9. (A) Representative currents elicited by 1000-ms test potentials between -100 and +80 mV in the same myocyte before (Ctrl, black) and after the addition of 1 µM Ani9 (+ Ani9, gray) and the corresponding Ani9-sensitive currents (magenta) calculated by subtraction. On top, the stimulation protocol used to elicit currents. (B) the I-V relationships in absence and presence of Ani9. (C) The histogram shows the blockage exerted by Ani9 that was significant only for the outward currents at +80 mV (n = 8, ** P= 0.002).
Preprints 96726 g001
Preprints 96726 g002
Figure 2. Ani9-sensitive currents are permeable to chloride. (A) Representative I-V relationships of Ani9-sensitive currents recorded in standard (magenta) and low [Cl-]e bath (ochre) solution. (B) The histogram shows the significant shift of the reversal potential towards a more positive value in low [Cl-]e. (n = 8, **P =0.006).
Figure 2. Ani9-sensitive currents are permeable to chloride. (A) Representative I-V relationships of Ani9-sensitive currents recorded in standard (magenta) and low [Cl-]e bath (ochre) solution. (B) The histogram shows the significant shift of the reversal potential towards a more positive value in low [Cl-]e. (n = 8, **P =0.006).
Preprints 96726 g002
Preprints 96726 g003
Figure 3. Detection of T16Ainh-A01-sensitive currents. (A) Representative currents recorded in absence (Ctrl, black) and in presence of 5 µM T16Ainh-A01 (+ T16inh-A01, blu) and corresponding T16inh-A01-sensitive currents (green) calculated by subtraction. (B) In the presence of the blocker, there is a significant reduction of the currents recorded both at -80 mV and +80 mV (n = 6, *P = 0.03. (C) I-V relationship of T16inh-A01-sensitive currents (n = 5).
Figure 3. Detection of T16Ainh-A01-sensitive currents. (A) Representative currents recorded in absence (Ctrl, black) and in presence of 5 µM T16Ainh-A01 (+ T16inh-A01, blu) and corresponding T16inh-A01-sensitive currents (green) calculated by subtraction. (B) In the presence of the blocker, there is a significant reduction of the currents recorded both at -80 mV and +80 mV (n = 6, *P = 0.03. (C) I-V relationship of T16inh-A01-sensitive currents (n = 5).
Preprints 96726 g003
Preprints 96726 g004
Figure 4. The effect of Ani9, a TMEM16A antagonist, on the myocyte fusion index. (A) Representative optical fields where nuclei are stained in 3-days myocyte cultures in control condition and in the presence of 5 μM Ani9. Nuclei staining is shown as DAPI fluorescence overlay on corresponding bright-field images. Myotubes are indicated by white arrowheads. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) A reduction in the mean fusion index was observed at the concentrations of 5 μM (****P < 0.0001) and 10 µM Ani9 (****P < 0.0001) in respect to control. Ani9 3 μM vs 5 μM, P < 0.0001; Ani9 3 μM vs 10 μM, P < 0.0001; Ani9 5 μM vs 10 μM, P = 0.0005.
Figure 4. The effect of Ani9, a TMEM16A antagonist, on the myocyte fusion index. (A) Representative optical fields where nuclei are stained in 3-days myocyte cultures in control condition and in the presence of 5 μM Ani9. Nuclei staining is shown as DAPI fluorescence overlay on corresponding bright-field images. Myotubes are indicated by white arrowheads. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) A reduction in the mean fusion index was observed at the concentrations of 5 μM (****P < 0.0001) and 10 µM Ani9 (****P < 0.0001) in respect to control. Ani9 3 μM vs 5 μM, P < 0.0001; Ani9 3 μM vs 10 μM, P < 0.0001; Ani9 5 μM vs 10 μM, P = 0.0005.
Preprints 96726 g004
Preprints 96726 g005
Figure 5. The effect of Piezo1 channel activation on TMEM16A. (A) Representative Western blot revealing TMEM16A and Piezo1 presence in myocyte lysate (2 preparations). (B) Representative currents elicited in control (black) and after 2 minutes in Yoda 1 (3 µM, red). (C) Mean I-V curves before and after the addition of Yoda 1 (n = 8). (D) Note the significant (**P = 0.008) Yoda1- induced increase of the current amplitude at positive potentials of +80 mV.
Figure 5. The effect of Piezo1 channel activation on TMEM16A. (A) Representative Western blot revealing TMEM16A and Piezo1 presence in myocyte lysate (2 preparations). (B) Representative currents elicited in control (black) and after 2 minutes in Yoda 1 (3 µM, red). (C) Mean I-V curves before and after the addition of Yoda 1 (n = 8). (D) Note the significant (**P = 0.008) Yoda1- induced increase of the current amplitude at positive potentials of +80 mV.
Preprints 96726 g005
Preprints 96726 g006
Figure 6. Yoda1 effect on TMEM16A currents. (A) I-V relationships of controls (Ctrl), in presence of 5 µM T16Ainh-A01 (T16Ainh) or 5 µM Yoda 1 plus 5 µM T16Ainh-A01 (T14Ainh + Yoda1). (B) The TMEM16A blocker T16Ainh-A01 significantly affected the currents recorded at both -80 mV (*P = 0.04) and +80 mV (*P = 0.03). Note that the addition of Yoda1 did not induce significant changes in the presence of T16inh-A01 both at -80 mV (P =0.74; n = 5) and +80 mV (P = 0.6; n = 5).
Figure 6. Yoda1 effect on TMEM16A currents. (A) I-V relationships of controls (Ctrl), in presence of 5 µM T16Ainh-A01 (T16Ainh) or 5 µM Yoda 1 plus 5 µM T16Ainh-A01 (T14Ainh + Yoda1). (B) The TMEM16A blocker T16Ainh-A01 significantly affected the currents recorded at both -80 mV (*P = 0.04) and +80 mV (*P = 0.03). Note that the addition of Yoda1 did not induce significant changes in the presence of T16inh-A01 both at -80 mV (P =0.74; n = 5) and +80 mV (P = 0.6; n = 5).
Preprints 96726 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated