Altmetrics
Downloads
357
Views
241
Comments
0
supplementary.docx (4.34MB )
This version is not peer-reviewed
Submitted:
25 January 2024
Posted:
25 January 2024
You are already at the latest version
Construct | Items | OL | CA | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First-Order Construct | |||||
Dance Movements | DM.1 | 0.931 | 0.912 | 0.943 | 0.846 |
DM.2 | 0.921 | ||||
DM.3 | 0.908 | ||||
Music & Sound | MS.1 | 0.826 | 0.818 | 0.892 | 0.734 |
MS.2 | 0.893 | ||||
MS.3 | 0.849 | ||||
Gestures & Expression | GE.1 | 0.809 | 0.717 | 0.841 | 0.639 |
GE.2 | 0.853 | ||||
GE.3 | 0.732 | ||||
Narrative & Storytelling | NS.1 | 0.823 | 0.800 | 0.883 | 0.715 |
NS.2 | 0.895 | ||||
NS.3 | 0.817 | ||||
Technology & Visual Effect | TE.1 | 0.757 | 0.776 | 0.869 | 0.689 |
TE.2 | 0.880 | ||||
TE.3 | 0.885 | ||||
Sustainability Symbolism | SS.1 | 0.825 | 0.822 | 0.894 | 0.737 |
SS.2 | 0.871 | ||||
SS.3 | 0.879 | ||||
Cultural Adaptation | CA.1 | 0.790 | 0.738 | 0.740 | 0.852 |
CA.2 | 0.872 | ||||
CA.3 | 0.766 | ||||
Attention | AT.1 | 0.832 | 0.738 | 0.740 | 0.852 |
AT.2 | 0.899 | ||||
AT.3 | 0.786 | ||||
Emotional Engagement | EE.1 | 0.761 | 0.704 | 0.835 | 0.630 |
EE.2 | 0.883 | ||||
EE.3 | 0.728 | ||||
Environmental Consciousness | EC.1 | 0.902 | 0.625 | 0.800 | 0.669 |
EC.2 | 0.859 | ||||
EC.3 | 0.802 | ||||
Interest | INT.1 | 0.802 | 0.758 | 0.861 | 0.675 |
INT.2 | 0.859 | ||||
INT.3 | 0.801 | ||||
Desire | DSR.1 | 0.941 | 0.702 | 0.861 | 0.758 |
DSR.2 | 0.828 | ||||
DSR.3 | 0.883 | ||||
Sustainable Behavior Action | SBA.1 | 0.793 | 0.657 | 0.845 | 0.732 |
SBA.2 | 0.828 | ||||
SBA.3 | 0.883 | ||||
Second-Order Construct | |||||
Dance Elements | DM | 0.920 | 0.771 | 0.811 | 0.718 |
MS | 0.856 | ||||
GE | 0.798 | ||||
NS | 0.845 | ||||
TE | 0.840 | ||||
SS | 0.858 | ||||
CA | 0.809 |
Construct | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Attention (1) | 0.840 | ||||||
Desire Elements (2) | 0.658 (0.708) |
0.847 | |||||
Desire (3) | 0.520 (0.653) |
0.479 (0.809) |
0.870 | ||||
Emotional Engagement (4) | 0.523 (0.696) |
0.579 (0.685) |
0.492 (0.659) |
0.794 | |||
Environmental Consciousness (5) | 0.410 (0.599) |
0.571 (0.899) |
0.608 (0.559) |
0.375 (0.598) |
0.818 | ||
Interest (6) | 0.540 (0.701) |
0.555 (0.610) |
0.425 (0.542) |
0.462 (0.628) |
0.302 (0.458) |
0.821 | |
Sustainable Behavior Action (7) | 0.240 (0.336) |
0.378 (0.500) |
0.468 (0.654) |
0.263 (0.378) |
0.278 (0.483 |
0.181 (0.254) |
0.856 |
Notes:
|
Constructs | Measures |
Dance Movements (Developed from Bräuninger [86]) |
The choreography’s creative impact endured post-performance. |
Graceful dance movements aligned with sustainability for impactful messaging. | |
Expressive dance vividly communicated the message’s emotions. | |
Music & Sound (Developed from Bernardi et al. [87]) |
Music and movement synced for a powerful performance impact. |
Rhythmic music deepened my engagement with the sustainability theme. | |
Strategic sound effects made the performance more immersive. | |
Gesture & Expression (This study) |
Dancers’ gestures and props vividly expressed sustainability emotions. |
Elusive dance gestures intrigued and drew me into the message. | |
Dancers’ faces showed strong commitment to sustainability. | |
Narrative & Storytelling (This study) |
Dance’s narrative structure effectively conveyed sustainability. |
Coherent dance narrative deepened sustainability understanding. | |
Storytelling in the performance emotionally connected me to sustainability. | |
Technology & Visual Effect (This study) |
Technology integration boosted the performance's visual storytelling and impact |
Technology amplified the sustainability message for modern audiences | |
Techology strategically used for a more immersive dance experience | |
Sustainability Symbolism (This study) |
Symbols and metaphors in dance strengthened the sustainability link. |
Sustainability symbols clearly conveyed the environmental message in the performance | |
Symbolic dance elements deepened my understanding of sustainability | |
Cultural Adaptation (This study) |
Respectful cultural elements in dance fostered cross-cultural understanding. |
Adapting dance to different cultures showed commitment to global sustainability | |
Cultural adaptation in dance effectively reached diverse audiences | |
Emotional Engagement (Modified from Esmail & Mathews-Roper [88]) |
The dance performance evoked strong emotional connection in me. |
I was emotionally moved by the sustainability message conveyed through the dance. | |
I felt a deep connection between the dance performance and the sustainability cause. | |
Environmental Consciousness | From the dance, I realize that natural resources are scarce, thus must be used wisely. |
(Modified from Alsmadi [89]) | From the dance, I believe that man and nature have to be in harmony for survival. |
From the dance performance, I understand that the environment is for us and future generations, thus must be well maintained and preserved. (*) | |
Attention (Modified from Song et al. [14] and Tapia-Fonllem et al. [90]) |
Dynamic opening dance movements instantly grabbed my attention. |
The use of captivating visuals at the start of the performance drew me in. | |
Unique, attention-grabbing cultural elements in the dance performance intrigued me. | |
Interest (Modified from Song et al. [14] and Tapia-Fonllem et al. [90]) |
Engaging choreography with a sustainability message held my interest in the dance. |
The music and dance blend piqued my interest in the sustainability message. | |
The thematic alignment of the performance elements with the message captured my interest. | |
Desire (Modified from Song et al. [14] and Tapia-Fonllem et al. [90]) |
The emotional impact of the performance enhanced my desire to contribute to sustainability. |
The passionate delivery of the message through dance increased my willingness to adopt sustainable behaviors. | |
The performance evoked a sense of responsibility, igniting my desire to support sustainable causes. (*) | |
Sustainable Behavior Action (Modified from Tapia-Fonllem et al. [90]) |
After watching the dance performance, I felt motivated to take concrete steps towards sustainability. |
The performance encouraged me to consider making changes aligned with the sustainability message. | |
The dancers' expressions and actions inspired me to become more involved in sustainability efforts. (*) | |
Note: ‘(*)’ represents omitted items due to low statistical threshold unfulfillment. |
Reference | Key Findings | Methodology | Limitations and Gaps | Theoretical Framework | Current Study’s Contribution |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wu & Lai [11] | Short videos influence audience emotions; impacts digital marketing engagement. | Systematic audience response analysis. | Limited to YouTube celebrities’ videos. | AIDA Model; Parasocial interaction. | Integrates dance into the AIDA model for enhanced digital marketing management. |
Mosko [12] | Dance supports sustainable development operationally and artistically. | Qualitative analysis of dance organizations. | Case-specific focus. | Sustainability; Art Integration. | Shows dance’s role in sustainable marketing, informing our communication strategies. |
O’Rourke et al. [13] | Music festivals promote environmental responsibility and community. | Interviews exploring festival environmental practices. | Limited to New Zealand festivals. | Sustainable Festival Management. | Align with our approach to communal events and sustainability in marketing. |
Bojner Horwitz et al. [7] | Music and dance improve social behaviors and connectedness | Review of the impact of artistic activities on well-being. | Theoretical focus without empirical data. | Inner Sustainability; Artistic Practices. | Supports using dance for social sustainability in marketing communications. |
Grindheim & Grindheim [21] | Dance experiences enhance cultural sustainability and belonging. | Phenomenological study of dance genres. | Adult-focused, less on nonverbal children. | Cultural Sustainability in ECE | Validates dance’s role in fostering community, applied to sustainable marketing. |
Foster & Turkki [8] | Dance education via EcoJustice transforms values towards sustainability. | Theoretical reflection based on teaching experience. | Limited to educational settings. | EcoJustice Education | Reflects on dance’s transformative power, influencing our sustainability narrative. |
Song et al. [14] | Found a strong relationship between AIDA’s attention/interest and TAM's perceived usefulness/ease of use. Marketing communication is crucial in the acceptance of new technology; attitude towards technology mediates the desire for the app. | Developed a conceptual model and hypotheses integrating TAM and AIDA to predict app acceptance behavior. | Did not specifically investigate how the AIDA model is integrated into marketing communications to promote sustainable behavior. | TAM and AIDA model. | The aim is to integrate the AIDA model and dance performance into marketing communication to promote environmental messages for sustainable behavior. |
This study | Merges dance and the AIDA model to boost engagement and eco-awareness. | Mixed methods with panelists and audience surveys. | Overcomes previous cultural-artistic gaps in marketing. | Dance Integration; AIDA Model | Innovates a marketing model combining AIDA and dance to drive sustainable behavior, underpinned by validated research tools for broad societal impact. |
Hypothesis |
Path Coefficient |
T-Value | Bootstrapping CI 97.5% | Decision | |
Min | Max | ||||
H1. Dance Elements → Attention | 0.626*** | 18.082 | 0.558 | 0.691 | Accept |
H2a. Attention → Emotional Engagement | 0.523*** | 10.822 | 0.427 | 0.617 | Accept |
H2b. Attention → Environmental Consciousness | 0.294*** | 4.814 | 0.179 | 0.415 | Accept |
H3. Emotional Engagement → Environmental Consciousness | 0.221** | 3.442 | 0.096 | 0.346 | Accept |
H4a. Emotional Engagement → Interest | 0.406*** | 6.520 | 0.280 | 0.526 | Accept |
H4b. Environmental Consciousness → Interest | 0.150** | 2.463 | 0.036 | 0.217 | Accept |
H5. Interest → Desire | 0.425*** | 9.092 | 0.331 | 0.516 | Accept |
H6. Desire → Sustainable Behavior Action | 0.469*** | 11.390 | 0.388 | 0.547 | Accept |
Notes: Significance level at ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated