Extraribosomal Functions of Bacterial Ribosomal Proteins—an Update 2023

Preprint

Review

Extraribosomal Functions of Bacterial Ribosomal Proteins—an Update 2023

Altmetrics

Downloads

181

Views

Comments

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Leonid V Aseev,Ludmila S Koledinskaya,

Irina V Boni^*

Leonid V Aseev,Ludmila S Koledinskaya,

Irina V Boni^*

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

25 January 2024

Posted:

26 January 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts

Abstract

Ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) are abundant, highly conserved, and multifaceted cellular proteins in all domains of life. Most r-proteins have RNA-binding properties and are able to form protein-protein contacts. Bacterial r-proteins govern the co-transcriptional rRNA folding during ribosome assembly and participate in formation of the ribosome functional sites such as the mRNA binding site, tRNA binding sites, the peptidyl- transferase center, and the protein exit tunnel. In addition to their primary role in a cell as integral components of the protein synthesis machinery, many of r-proteins can function beyond the ribosome (the phenomenon known as moonlighting), acting either as individual regulatory proteins or in complexes with various cellular components. Extraribosomal activities of r-proteins have been intensively studied over decades (reviewed in [1]). The past decade brought significant advancement in our knowledge of r-protein functions due to expanding studies on ribosomes and gene expression mechanisms not only in model bacteria like Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis, but also in previously little-explored bacterial species from various phyla. This review is aimed to update the information on multiple functions of r-proteins in bacteria.

Keywords:

Subject: Biology and Life Sciences - Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

1. Introduction

1.1. Ribosome Structure and Functions

Ribosomes are huge ribonucleoprotein complexes that synthesize proteins in all living cells, which is fundamental for life. Ribosomes consist of two subunits: a small 30S subunit and a large 50S subunit (in bacteria), their association results in formation of a 70S ribosome active in translation. A 30S subunit comprises a sole RNA molecule, 16S rRNA, and about 20 different ribosomal proteins (r-proteins), e.g., 21 r-proteins, S1-S21, in E. coli. A large bacterial 50S subunit contains two molecules of rRNA, 23S rRNA and 5S rRNA, and more than 30 (33 in E. coli) r-proteins. The ribosomal subunits carry out different functions in protein synthesis. The 30S subunit is responsible for recognizing and binding of mRNA during translation initiation, decoding information bearing by mRNA, and maintaining the reading frame during protein synthesis; it provides a space for interaction of the mRNA codon with the tRNA anticodon in a decoding center. The large 50S subunit does not form contacts with mRNA and is directly involved in catalysis of the peptidyl transfer reaction (in the peptidyl transferase center, PTC), translocation along mRNA and ensures the exit of the growing polypeptide chain through the exit channel. The 50S subunit accommodates the universal CCA tails of tRNAs carrying an amino acid or the growing protein chain and provides the binding sites for protein factors assisting in initiation, elongation, and termination steps. During a translation cycle, tRNAs occupy consecutively A, P and E sites that locate on both subunits. Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and high-resolution X-ray analyses have provided numerous detailed structures of ribosomes from diverse sources and in different conformational states resolved to near-atomic resolutions. These structures allow to understand how r-proteins and rRNA regions are arranged in the most important functional centers, how ligands (mRNA, tRNAs, translational factors, antibiotics) are positioned and how they interact with the ribosomal components [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].

We still know little about the origin of ribosomes and their evolution, this issue is a matter of discussion [10,11,12,13,14,15]. It is widely accepted that molecular mechanisms of the peptide chain synthesis emerged in the RNA world, and that the evolutionary most ancient part of the ribosome is the peptidyl transferase center, PTC, which consists of almost exclusively RNA even in the extant ribosome, thus representing a relic of the early steps of evolution of translation machinery [10,11,12]. Separate evolution of the peptidyl transferase and decoding functions has been suggested [13]. However, it is not easy to imagine how translation could have evolved from a primitive RNA world, because an extant ribosome absolutely requires r-proteins for functioning. The question about the evolutionary step when r-proteins associated with rRNA remains unresolved. Given the surprising structural diversity of r-proteins, it is broadly accepted that the most ancient among them have co-evolved with rRNA to maintain its active conformation, while “younger” r-proteins could be recruited from other processes to improve the quality and fidelity of protein synthesis [10,11,14,15]. Ribosomal proteins are among the most abundant proteins in bacterial cells [16]. They account for about a third to half of the molecular mass of the modern bacterial ribosome and as a rule are essential for translation. Although deleting the genes for some proteins does not lead to lethality (such proteins are referred to as nonessential), this may cause various growth defects in certain conditions [17,18,19,20]. R-proteins are highly conserved molecules, and for many of them the conservation can be traced from bacteria to human. Thus, 15 of the 30S r-proteins and 19 of the 50S subunit r-proteins are universally conserved, and according to new nomenclature [21], they are designated as uS2, uS4, uL1 etc. Other r-proteins are bacteria specific and are designated as bS1, bS6, bS21, bL9 etc. As structural components of ribosome, most r-proteins are capable of RNA-binding, and some of them can bind DNA, suggesting their cooptation at later evolutionary steps. Within the ribosome, r-proteins interact not only with rRNA but also with other r-proteins, displaying their ability for protein-protein interactions. Given their high abundance in a cell, r-proteins have the potential to form functional complexes with RNA or protein molecules outside the ribosome, showing extraribosomal or moonlighting activities, which will be discussed in a present review.

1.2. Arrangement of the r-Protein Genes on Bacterial Chromosome

Genes encoding r-proteins are organized in operons (21 in E. coli) that may include one (e.g. rpsT, rplY, rpmE), two (e.g. rplU-rpmA, rplM-rpsI, rpmB-rpmG), or several genes (up to 11 genes as in spc or S10 operons). Rather often the r-protein operons comprise genes encoding non-ribosomal proteins such as translation factors (tsf, fus, tufA), components of the replication complex (dnaG, priB), subunits of RNA-polymerase (rpoA, rpoB, rpoC, rpoD). This suggests the close interrelationship of the main processes involved in realization of genetic information and the necessity of their coordination in bacterial cells. In addition, some operons include genes encoding enzymes participating in modification and processing of tRNA (trmD and rnpA), maturation of rRNA (rimM), protein export (secY). The biological sense of including these genes in r-protein operons is not fully clear. In some cases, the non-ribosomal genes are regulated independently of the r-protein genes [22]. The structure and distribution of r-protein operons on the E. coli chromosome are shown on Figure 1. Although the operon structure is mainly conserved across bacterial kingdom, it may be rather divergent depending on the taxonomic group. Moreover, one or more r-protein genes may be missing in some prokaryotic genomes [23]. These aspects, if necessary, will be considered in subsections below.

Ribosome biogenesis requires the coordinated synthesis of all ribosomal components in stoichiometric amounts and hence must be tightly controlled both at the transcriptional and translational levels. One of the control mechanisms playing a key role in maintaining the stoichiometry of rRNA and r-proteins is autogenous regulation of r-protein synthesis [22,24,25]. An ability to regulate the expression of its own mRNA by acting as an autogenous repressor is the most distinctive (but not the only one) moonlighting activity of r-proteins, and most of r-protein operons include a gene encoding the r-protein regulator (Figure 1). Often, the r-protein-repressor uses the same RNA-binding site for binding with rRNA during ribosome assembly and with its own mRNA to control its expression. Moreover, in several cases, there exists a visible similarity in a structure of both RNA targets, which is referred to as a principle of “molecular mimicry» [26]. Most but not all r-protein operons are feedback regulated. For instance, the expression levels of the rplU-rpmA and rpmB-rpmG operons do not response to augmented synthesis of their products [27]; on Figure 1 these operons have white background but not marked with a yellow circle.

Specific functions of individual r-proteins within the ribosome are often unclear, although the recent studies brought significant advancement in our knowledge of r-protein activities in translation. In this review, we discuss moonlighting activities of r-proteins along with their functions within the ribosome, in case if they have been revealed. The review is composed in a form of catalogue where each moonlighting r-protein is discussed in a separate subsection. Each r-protein is named according to [21], where “u” designates a universally conserved protein and “b” – bacteria specific.

The name and position (in centisomes of the chromosome map) for each operon are indicated according to EcoCyc version 14.6 (http://biocyc.org/ECOLI); r-proteins regulating its own expression are encircled (pink); r- proteins with unknown regulation are marked with asterisks and yet-unexplored operons with yellow circles. Black background indicates r-protein genes regulated by r-protein-repressors, grey – by the mechanism of retroregulation, white – non-regulated or unstudied genes. P - promoter, t – terminator, att – attenuator. The initial [22] has been revised and updated considering the most recent data.

2. Moonlighting r-Proteins of the 30S Ribosomal Subunit

2.1. Multiple Activities of bS1

2.1.1. Structure and Unique Features of bS1

Ribosomal protein bS1 is a real champion among all other r-proteins in growing number of functions which it carries out in a living bacterial cell, either non-infected or infected with DNA- or RNA-containing bacteriophages (reviewed in [1,28,29]). bS1 is the largest r-protein (557 amino acid residues in E. coli); it is an integral and essential component of translation machineries in all members of Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Actinobacteria and many other bacterial phyla, but it is absent from ribosomes of Gram-positive bacteria with a low GC content (e.g., Bacillus) [30]. Although the rpsA gene encoding bS1 is present in the same context as in E. coli, it is not essential, and the function of its product remains unknown. In Gram-negative bacteria bS1 is essential and composed of six homologous repeats (72-75 amino acid residues each) known as S1 motifs or S1 domains [28,30]; a few known viable bS1 mutants lacking one or two C-terminal domains cause significant growth defects [28,29,32,33]. The S1 domain adopts an OB-fold highly specific for binding single-stranded nucleic acids, which is an ancient evolutionary conserved module found in many RNA-associated proteins from bacteria to humans [34]. The two N-terminal S1 domains lost their RNA-binding functions during evolution and acquired an ability for protein-protein interactions, while the C-terminal domains (D3-D6) provide the RNA-binding capacity of bS1. bS1 binds the 30S subunit at the last step of the assembly via domains D1-D2 forming contacts with r-proteins, in particular uS2 [35,36], and its extended, flexible C-terminal part is exposed in solution to provide mRNA binding [28,29]. Interestingly, in hibernating 100S ribosome particles formed by 70S ribosome dimerization under stress conditions, bS1 has a compact conformation with domains D4-D6 folded back to the 30S surface; this inactive conformation is stabilized by the ribosome modulation factor (RMF) that binds to a domain D4 of bS1 to sequester the anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence at the end of 16S rRNA, thereby inhibiting translation initiation [37].

2.1.2. Functions of bS1 in Translation, Translational Control, Transcription, and RNA Decay

The vital function of bS1 as a component of the 30S subunit is the recognition and binding of various mRNAs at the first step of translation initiation [31]. bS1 lacks strict sequence specificity and binds most leadered mRNAs (including heterologous mRNAs) regardless of the presence of SD- sequences or secondary structures in their 5’UTRs [31,33,38,39,40,41,42], being dispensable only for leaderless mRNA [43]. Targets for bS1 are situated within mRNA leaders 5’ to the SD-element (if it is present) [29]. Although lacking strict sequence preference, bS1 has higher affinity for U- or AU-rich sites, and such S1 targets may serve as translational enhancers [38,40,41]; another type of the high-affinity bS1 targets is the pseudoknot structure [44,45]. Translational enhancers bound by bS1 are essential elements ensuring efficient translation of mRNA and providing the way for its regulation. Thus, the U-rich enhancer of the manY mRNA can be targeted by a small RNA SgrS, which interferes with efficient translation, suggesting that sRNA-mediated enhancer silencing could be a common mode of gene regulation [46]. Recent data show that mRNA-bound specificity of bS1 can be changed by the acetylation reaction in response to nutrient starvation [47]. Under stress conditions, acetylation of the lysin residues K411 and K454 in domain D5 allows bS1 to selectively recruit a subset of stress-responsive mRNAs, simultaneously lowering its affinity to mRNAs responsible for rapid growth, thus highlighting the role of bS1 in the ribosome-mediated cellular response to stress [47].

Despite the absence of strict sequence preference, bS1 is a highly specific autogenous repressor that distinguishes its own mRNA from all the others [32,48,49]. The synthesis of bS1 is strictly feedback regulated at the translation level due to specific sequence/structure features of the rpsA mRNA translation initiation region (TIR) highly conserved in several families of γ-proteobacteria [48,49]. In these species, the rpsA TIR has a specific fold and lacks a canonical SD-element, so that the formation of the 30S initiator complex strongly depends on the S1-mRNA interaction. The mechanism of the autogenous regulation is based on competition for the TIR between free bS1 and bS1 bound to a 30S subunit. Transformation of a weak SD to a canonical SD-sequence completely abolishes autogenous repression by allowing a 30S subunit to win [48]. The preferential binding of bS1 to its own mRNA is most likely explained by the cooperative interaction of several bS1 molecules with the AU-rich single-stranded regions in the 5’UTR of the rpsA mRNA [48,49]. bS1 domain D6 appears to be indispensable for its activity as an autogenous repressor [32].

In addition to its role as a highly specific autogenous repressor, bS1 has other moonlighting activities outside the ribosome. bS1 can associate with RNAP and stimulate transcriptional activity by promoting transcription cycling and processivity, with bS1 domains D5 and D6 being involved [50,51]. It has been reported that bS1 may act at the interface of translation and mRNA decay, and its overexpression can protect a set of mRNAs from degradation in E. coli [52,53]. At the same time, in Caulobacter crescentus, bS1 has been found as an accessory protein participating in the RNA degradosome assembly at low temperature and promoting the RNA destabilization [54].

2.1.3. bS1 and Trans-Translation

RNA-binding features of bS1 provide its binding with almost all RNAs in vitro, raising the question whether the observed interaction is biologically relevant. An example of such a problem is the involvement of bS1 in trans-translation which is a remarkable pathway controlling the quality of mRNAs and synthesized proteins in bacteria [55,56,57]. A key player in trans-translation is a transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA, SsrA) that combines the properties of mRNA and tRNA in that it is charges with alanine and contains a short ORF encoding a tag-peptide. Four proteins have been suggested to participate in tmRNA functioning: tmRNA-specific SmpB, alanyl-tRNA synthetase, EF-Tu and bS1, with the role of bS1 remaining questionable up to now; pro et contra arguments have been reported [58,59,60], with weighty arguments against the possible involvement of bS1 in tmRNA-mediated quality control in E. coli [59,60]. While in E. coli trans-translation is not the sole way to rescue ribosomes from nonstop mRNA, in some bacteria (e.g., mycobacteria) this pathway is essential for viability [56,57]. It has been proposed that bS1 plays a critical role in trans-translation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and that this essential pathway might serve as a target for pyrazinamide (PZA), a first-line drug in tuberculosis treatment [61]. Within a living cell, PZA transforms in a biologically active derivative, pyrazinoic acid (POA) that may target Mtb S1 at the beginning of a C-terminal extension specific only for Actinobacteria. The binding of POA to Mtb bS1 inhibits trans-translation thereby affecting the viability of the pathogen [61]. These findings have attracted much attention and promoted studies on the rpsA polymorphism in PZA resistant strains [62]. However, recent data provide evidence that trans-translation in Mtb is not inhibited by PZA or its active metabolite POA, in vitro or in vivo, and moreover, the action of POA appears entirely independent of Mtb bS1 [63].

2.1.4. Functions of bS1 during Infections with Bacteriophages

The ability of bS1 to bind both proteins and nucleic acids underlies its multiple functions during phage infections. Different bacteriophages recruit bS1 for diverse phage-specific processes. bS1 is one of the four subunits of the Qβ phage RNA replicase as well as replicases of other RNA phages [29,64,65]. Historically, it was the first discovered moonlighting activity of a ribosomal protein [64]. The role of bS1 in replication of Qβ RNA has been thoroughly studied by various biochemical and structural approaches [66,67,68,69]. bS1 is strictly required for initiation of replication of Qβ RNA (+) strand but dispensable for replication of a (-) strand. The two N-terminal domains D1-D2 anchor bS1 onto the phage-specific β-subunit, and the third domain D3 is mobile and protrudes beyond the surface of the β-subunit to interact with phage RNA [66,67]. bS1 does not appreciably influence the rate of elongation during replication of Qβ RNA but is necessary for termination of RNA synthesis. The N-terminal domains D1-D3 appear sufficient for efficient release of the single-stranded RNA product from the template RNA [68,69]

bS1 has been found to form a strong complex with the β protein of the λ phage, which is a component of the Red pathway of the phage recombination system [70]. Although this could suggest the role of bS1 in red recombination events, the effect has not been further investigated. The most intriguing findings concern multiple activities of bS1 during infection with the T4 bacteriophage. bS1 has been found to stimulate (by a factor up to 100) the activity of the T4 endoribonuclease RegB that inactivates some early phage mRNAs by cleaving in the middle of the SD sequence GGAG [71,72,73,74,75]. The minimal domain combination required for stimulation of RegB is D4-D5, whereas all C-terminal domains (D3-D4-D5-D6) stimulates RegB to the same extent as the full-length protein. Given that direct interactions between RegB and bS1 have not been detected, and RegB has only a low affinity for its RNA substrate, it has been suggested that bS1 stabilizes the mRNA-RegB complex during a primary step of mRNA binding [75]. While the RegB activity is activated by bS1, this activation may be abolished by the T4-encoded RIII protein known as cytoplasmic antiholin [76]. The direct protein-protein interactions between bS1 and RIII have been characterized, suggesting that RIII may interfere with the biological activities of bS1 in infected cells. RIII appears to be the first effector protein of the T4 phage targeting bS1 at its RNA-binding domains, mainly at the domain D5 [76]. One more remarkable finding concerning the T4-mediated processes in E. coli has been recently reported. When T4 infects E. coli, it modifies translational apparatus of the host by using adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribosyltransferase ModB that can attach entire NAD-capped RNA chains to acceptor proteins in an ‘RNAylation’ reaction [77]. In particular, ModB specifically RNAylates bS1 at arginine residues R139 and R142 in domain 2 (D2) by using selected NAD-capped E. coli and T4 RNAs, which is one of molecular mechanisms used by the T4 phage to target the translational machinery of its host [77].

Figure 2. Modular structure of E. coli bS1 and involvement of its domains in diverse interactions and processes in a cell.

2.2. Functions of uS2 beyond the Ribosome

uS2 is a highly conserved r-protein essential for all organisms from bacteria to human, although its exact functions as a ribosomal component remain incompletely understood. It has been suggested that prokaryotic uS2 might be involved in stabilizing the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) helix docked in a chamber between the head and the platform [78], as well as in protecting the SD duplex at the early post-initiation step [79]. However, this does not explain the vital function of uS2 in organisms that do not exploit the SD interactions in translation initiation. uS2 is one of the latest components in the 30S assembly [80]. In E. coli and most likely in other Gram-negative bacteria, its association with the 30S particle is indispensable for binding bS1 that accomplishes the assembly of the 30S subunit fully competent in recruiting mRNA [35,36]. Within the ribosome, uS2 is located on the back of the 30S subunit at the hinge between the head and body. Possessing an elongated bidomain structure, uS2 forms direct contacts with several 16S rRNA helices, viz h35-h37 in the head via the coiled-coil α₂ domain and h26 in the body via the large globular domain [81].

uS2 is encoded by the first gene of the rpsB-tsf operon that also comprises a gene for the elongation factor Ts (Figure 1). When synthesized in excess over the 30S ribosome, uS2 acts as a translational autogenous repressor of the rpsB-tsf mRNA [82,83]. As a repressor, uS2 recognizes and binds the unique structural features within the 5’UTR of the mRNA, inhibiting its own translation directly. This repression interrupts transcription-translation coupling in the operon, thereby decreasing the level of the bicistronic rpsB-tsf mRNA and hence the level of the essential Ts; that’s why expression of uS2 from a plasmid significantly slows down the growth rate.

The mRNA structural features recognized by uS2 are highly conserved at least across γ-proteobacteria [83,84]. The mechanistic details of the autoregulation remain unclear as the ribosome binding site (RBS) including the SD sequence and the start codon is not involved in the operator structure, and a small deletion of the conserved bulge far upstream RBS may eliminate the uS2-mediated regulation [82,83]. To act as an autogenous repressor efficiently, uS2 needs a companion, bS1, with which uS2 forms a complex not only on but also outside the ribosome [82], indicating an intimate relationship between these two r-proteins. Moreover, moderate overexpression of bS1 from a plasmid can suppress the thermosensitive phenotype of one of the rpsB mutant, rpsB1^ts, allowing its growth at the elevated temperature otherwise lethal to the strain [85]. Thus, there are several distinct features of the uS2-mediated autogenous regulation: (i) uS2 as an autogenous repressor is not a primary RNA binding protein but binds to the 30S subunit at the late step of the assembly; (ii) to serve as a repressor efficiently, uS2 needs an assistance of bS1; (iii) the rpsB operator site bears no visible similarity to the regions on 16S rRNA bound by uS2 within the ribosome. However, more sophisticated analysis of the rpsB mRNA regulatory structure (in-cell PAIR-MaP analysis) has revealed a common architecture of the uS2 binding sites on 16S rRNA and rpsB mRNA at least in enterobacteria [86].

Besides its role as an autogenous repressor, uS2 may have other moonlighting activities in pathogenic bacteria, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear and await further studies. Recently, RpsB (uS2) has been shown to be a surface-exposed protein of rickettsia, representing an important ligand and adhesin of these obligate intracellular microorganisms [87]. Elevated expression of peptides derived from uS2 has been observed in the highly virulent strains of Streptococcus suis cultured under the host-simulated conditions, indicating that uS2 or its peptides might serve as specific virulence factors [88]. The role of uS2 in pathogenesis is obviously not related to its functions in the ribosome. Potential functioning of uS2 beyond the ribosome has also been proposed for a harmful human pathogen M. tuberculosis (Mtb). Mtb RpsB has been identified not only in cytosolic but partially in cell wall fractions, while its counterpart from non-pathogenic M. smegmatis (Msm) localizes only in cytoplasm. Moreover, Mtb RpsB ectopically expressed in Msm has been also found to associate with cell membrane/wall. Msm cells expressing Mtb RpsB in trans show reduced cell wall permeability and increased tolerance to drugs, oxidative stress, SDS and starvation. An ability to impart stress resilience to mycobacteria can be ascribed to the unique C-terminal sequence of Mtb RpsB which is absent from RpsB of non-tuberculosis mycobacteria, and a deletion of the C-terminal extra-fragment deprives Mtb S2 of its influence on the cell resistance to stresses [89].

2.3. uS4, an Essential r-Protein Functioning in Ribosome Biogenesis, Translation, and Transcription

An essential r-protein uS4 is a primary protein in the 30S ribosomal subunit biogenesis, which nucleates assembly by binding to a five-way helix junction in the 16S rRNA 5’ domain. It is believed that early uS4-16S rRNA interactions guide rRNA folding and impact later steps of the 30S assembly [90,91,92]. Surprisingly, additional r-proteins, particularly a late-binding protein uS12, may accelerate proper binding of uS4 during rRNA transcription by acting on the nascent rRNA as an RNA-chaperonin [93]. Within the ribosome, uS4 is involved in multiple functions including mRNA decoding, and mutations in uS4 have impact on translation fidelity [94,95]. uS4 along with uS3 and uS5 are located at the mRNA entry site between the head and the shoulder of the 30S subunit and endow the ribosome with a helicase activity necessary to disrupt downstream helices in mRNA as the narrow mRNA channel can accommodate only unpaired mRNA segments [96].

In addition to its role in ribosome biogenesis and formation of the mRNA entry site, uS4 possesses moonlighting activities as a regulator of both translation and transcription. First, it is a regulatory protein in the post-transcriptional control of the α-operon that in E. coli comprises genes for four r-proteins and the α-subunit of RNA polymerase (uS13, uS11, uS4, RpoA, bL17, in this order, see Figure 1). Autogenous repression of the E. coli α-operon mRNA translation by uS4 has been thoroughly studied for years [97,98,99,100,101]. Interaction of uS4 with the target site in the α-operon mRNA results in translational repression of not only the proximal three cistrons for uS13, uS11 and uS4, but also of the last cistron encoding bL17, without affecting the intervening α-cistron that is regulated independently. A presumable second binding site for uS4 on the α mRNA in front of rplQ has been proposed, suggesting that uS4 may repress bL17 translation directly [102], but strong evidence for this has not been provided.

The operator site for the uS4-repressor on E. coli α mRNA forms a complex pseudoknot structure comprising the ribosome binding site of the first cistron, rpsM [99,100,101]. The uS4 interaction with a pseudoknot traps mRNA in a conformation that allows binding of the 30S subunit but prevents formation of the active initiation complex with the initiator tRNA, thus blocking translation. Such a mechanism for the translation inhibition was named “entrapment” to underline the absence of the competition between the repressor and the ribosome for mRNA binding [100,101].

In B. subtilus (Bsu), as well as in other species of the class Bacilli, the rpsD gene does not belong to the cluster of genes encoding uS13, uS11, α, bL17; it is situated in a separate region of the chromosome, while the other genes are kept in the same order. At the same time, Bsu S4 binds to the untranslated leader of the rpsD mRNA and represses its own translation. The regulatory region does not form a pseudoknot hence the regulation is essentially different from that in E. coli [103,104]. How r-protein genes within the α operon in Bacilli are regulated remains unknown. Interestingly, the members of the class Clostridia, in contrast with the class Bacilli, keep the rpsD gene in the α operon (NCBI, Gene database). Although the E. coli-like gene order of the α operon containing rpsD is widely distributed in bacteria, there are many lineages where rpsD is separated. Thus, β-, γ- and ε-proteobacteria bear E. coli-like α operons, while in α-proteobacterial species, rpsD is located distantly (NCBI, Gene database). The reason for this diversity remains an open question.

Another well-known moonlighting activity of uS4 is its role in transcription as a general antitermination factor with properties very similar to NusA [105]. uS4 associates with RNA polymerase (RNAP) in vivo and inhibits the premature termination on the rRNA operons. The antitermination activity of uS4 is specific for Rho-dependent terminators. Thus, uS4 together with uS10 (NusE, see below) are important components of the rrn antitermination system involved in ribosome biogenesis. The antitermination complex forms in response to cis-acting elements (boxB, boxA and boxC) in the nascent pre-rRNA. Recent studies [106,107] show that Nus-factors (A, B, E, G), SuhB (the inositol mono-phosphatase) and uS4 assemble on RNAP into a capped ring around the RNA-exit channel, where uS4 serves as a flexible lid. Such a bulky protein structure may block an approach of the termination factor Rho to RNAP. Moreover, Nus-factors, SuhB and uS4 together support the co-transcriptional rRNA folding by acting as an RNAP-associated RNA chaperone according to the well-known RNA- chaperone molecular principles [106,107]. The structure of the rRNA-specific antitermination complex is represented on Figure 3.

Finally, it has been recently found that uS4 (along with TufA and GacA) can be cross-linked in vivo in the stationary phase to a “mysterious” PA2504 protein from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It was supposed that PA2504 might block the biological functions of these proteins to fine-tune cellular response to stationary phase-dependent nutrient starvation [108]. It is currently unknown which of the uS4 functions is blocked by PA2504.

2.4. Ribosomal Proteins bS6 and bS18 Act in Tandem

Proteins bS6 and bS18 should be considered in tandem because they function as a heterodimer both in the ribosome assembly and in regulating expression of their own operon rpsF (S6)-priB-rpsR(S18)-rplI (L9). In β- and γ-proteobacteria this operon includes non-ribosomal gene priB that encodes the primosomal n protein necessary for replication restart, while in certain phyla priB is absent from the operon (α-proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi). Actinobacteria have ssb instead of priB as well as Firmicutes which, in addition, lack rplI at the end of the operon. Despite these differences, in most taxonomic groups rpsF and rpsR are expressed from the same transcription unit and, most likely, are regulated jointly [109]. bS6 and bS18 are secondary binding proteins in the assembly of the central domain of a 30S subunit, which is nucleated by binding of the primary uS15 protein to a highly conserved 16S rRNA region. However, there is no protein-protein contacts between uS15 and bS6-bS18, and the rRNA site bound by bS18 within a heterodimer is formed due to the uS15-mediated structure remodeling [110].

Relatively recently, it has been discovered that bS6-bS18 proteins regulate expression of their own operon at the translation level by binding to the 5’ UTR upstream of the rpsF start [109,111,112]. Initially, a high phylogenetic conservation of a presumable regulatory region has been computationally predicted, and it has been demonstrated that an S6-S18 complex indeed binds to this RNA fragment from E. coli in vitro. A putative RNA operator bears a conserved CCG sequence in a bulge flanked by a stem and a hairpin, which is analogous to the structural context of the 16S rRNA binding site for bS6-bS18, thus suggesting the molecular basis for the autoregulatory mechanism [109]. Further, wide distribution across many bacterial phyla of the structural RNA motif in front of rpsF has been also described by Meyer’s group, and a direct interaction of an S6-S18 complex with the RNA motif from B. subtilis has been confirmed [111]. Finally, in vivo reporter experiments in E. coli have demonstrated that an S6-S18 complex indeed functions as an autogenous repressor to regulate expression of the operon by binding to the regulatory site preceding rpsF, with the bS18-mRNA interaction being crucial for the translation inhibition [112].

Interestingly, bS6 in E. coli is modified by ATP-dependent glutamate ligase RimK that can add up to four glutamate residues to the C-terminus of the protein. Oligoglutamylation of bS6 by RimK occurs only in the stationary phase [113]. It is yet difficult to ascribe any reasonable role for such a modification in E. coli. The same modification of bS6 by RimK has been studied in a soil bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescence [114,115] where it is able to change expression of a set of genes encoding surface attachment factors, amino acid transporters and secreted molecules. However, the mechanistic details of the impact of a single r-protein modification on gene expression and proteomic changes are not yet understood.

2.5. A Key Primary Assembly r-Protein uS7 Is Bifunctional

Ribosomal protein uS7 is a key primary protein in the 30S subunit assembly [80]. Its interaction with 16S rRNA initiates folding of the 3’-major domain and further formation of the 30S head where it faces the decoding center. Like uS4, uS7 initially makes numerous short-lived contacts with the 3′ domain of the 16S rRNA, but the stable incorporation of uS7 is promoted by the secondary r-proteins uS9, uS13, and uS19 which act as chaperones to provide the correct folding of rRNA helices [92]. Besides the interaction with 16S rRNA, uS7 forms contacts with uS9 and uS11 within the ribosome [81].

uS7 stably associates with the trigger factor chaperone (TF) in vivo in E. coli, in Thermotoga maritima [116] and likely in other bacteria [117]. TF in the TF:S7 complex masks 16S RNA binding sites on uS7, and uS7 within the complex is more stable than free uS7 in solution. It was suggested that by providing correct folding of r-proteins (e.g. uS7) TF might act as a ribosome assembly factor [117].

The only moonlighting activity of uS7 described so far is its ability to serve as an autogenous translational repressor of the str operon. If the uS7 synthesis in a cell exceeds that of 16S rRNA, the same RNA-binding determinants which provide uS7 binding to 16S rRNA participate in binding of uS7 to its own str mRNA [118,119]. The str operon encode r-proteins uS12, uS7, and translation elongation factors EF-G (fus) and EF-Tu (tufA), in this order (Figure 1). To inhibit translation of the str mRNA, uS7 binds to the intercistronic region preceding its own cistron [118,119,120,121]. Interestingly, uS7 acts as a translational repressor in vivo only in the presence of the intact rpsL (uS12) cistron but does not repress independent rpsG (S7) translation, indicating that the coupled rpsL-rpsG translation is indispensable to achieve autogenous repression [120]. Both targets, 16S rRNA and str mRNA, bear similar sites recognized by uS7 [119,121]. Overexpression of uS7 from a plasmid inhibits bacterial growth due to translational repression of the essential fus gene (EF-G) whose translation is coupled with rpsG [119]. At the same time, expression of the last gene in the str operon, tufA, that encodes EF-Tu, is not noticeably inhibited because of the presence of two additional promoters within the fus gene (Figure 1). The first cistron, rpsL, is regulated by the “retroregulation” mechanism based on destabilization of the corresponding mRNA region by the repressor binding [120].

A similar mechanism likely regulates the str operon in cyanobacteria where the intercistronic region separated rpsL and rpsG bears structural similarity with the S7-binding region of 16S rRNA [122]. It is a pity that uS7-mediated regulation has not been studied in other bacterial phyla, as it has been reported that while extended distances between the uS12 and uS7 cistrons exist in many species, the mRNA structure observed in E. coli is not obviously conserved [84].

2.6. uS8 Regulates the Longest spc Operon

uS8 is an important rRNA-binding protein that occupies a central position within a 30S subunit. It interacts with 16S rRNA specifically binding the helix h21 and is crucial for the correct folding of the central domain of 16S rRNA [81]. The binding of uS8 to 16S rRNA has been extensively characterized using a variety of techniques. A minimal 16S rRNA fragment located in helix 21 was shown to be sufficient to confer specificity and high affinity to the S8-rRNA interaction [123].

Like uS7, uS8 is bifunctional. It serves as an autogenous repressor controlling translation of the spc mRNA [124,125,126,127]. The spc operon in E. coli is the longest r-protein operon encoding uL14, uL24, uL5, uS14, uS8, uL6, uL18, uS5, uL30 and uL15, and, in addition, comprising the secY gene encoding a component of the protein export machinery, and rpmJ, a gene for a small r-protein bL36 (Figure 1). The regulatory mechanism is analogous to the repression of the str operon by uS7 (see above). The repressor uS8 binds not upstream of the first cistron but at the initiation region of the third cistron, rplE, encoding uL5. This binding directly blocks translation of rplE, while translation of the downstream cistrons appears inhibited due to the interruption of translational coupling [126]. The first two cistrons, rplN and rplX, are subject to “retroregulation” resulting from mRNA destabilization [127]. Regulation of the last two cistrons, secY and rpmJ, remains unclear.

The S8 binding site at the beginning of rplE (uL5) bears a strong resemblance to the S8 binding site on the 16S rRNA [123,125,128,129]. The structure of the uS8 complex with its operator site on the spc mRNA has been resolved at a high resolution, and it has been shown that uS8 uses the same RNA-binding site both for 16S rRNA and mRNA binding [128,129]. The high similarity of both RNA targets for uS8 implies the principle of molecular mimicry. The spc operon of V. cholerae (γ-proteobacterium) is autogenously regulated by uS8 presumably in a E. coli-like manner [130], but how the spc operon is regulated in B. subtilis or other species remains unknown [131]. Given that the E. coli-like structure involved in uS8 binding with the spc mRNA is not found in B. subtilis, the regulatory mechanism seems to be different [131]. Unfortunately, phylogenetic studies of the spc mRNA autogenous regulation have not been advanced.

2.7. uS10, an Essential Player in Transcription-Translation Coupling and Transcription Antitermination

uS10 is a tertiary binding protein in the 30S assembly; its addition to the assembly intermediates depends on uS9, a secondary protein, and uS7, a primary assembly protein interacting with 16S rRNA [132]. A well-studied functional role of uS10 in E. coli ribosomes is its assistance in transcription-translation coupling where uS10 provides physical contacts between the leading ribosome and RNA polymerase (RNAP) synthesizing the mRNA [133,134]. Another factor critical for a direct link between RNAP and a translating ribosome is NusG. NusG contacts with RNAP via its N-terminal domain while through its C-terminal domain it can physically interact with uS10 on the 70S ribosome or with the termination factor Rho to stimulate Rho-dependent termination [134,135]. A competition between uS10 and Rho for NusG might explain why Rho cannot terminate translated transcripts. When the translation rate matches that of transcription, an approach of Rho to the transcript is blocked by the NusG interaction with uS10 on the ribosome, but when translation is inhibited, weakened NusG-uS10 contacts lead to uncoupling, resulting in RNAP backtracking and Rho-mediated termination [136,137]. Close relations between the leading translating ribosome and transcribing RNAP have led to the suggestion that they may form a physical complex, a so-called ‘expressome’, a molecular super-machine performing both steps of gene expression [138,139,140]. However, the current models structurally describing bacterial transcription-translation coupling are rather controversial [140].

Surprisingly, in contrast with E. coli, transcription and translation in B. subtilis seem to be functionally uncoupled, and an active transcription elongation complex may be independent of the leading ribosome, suggesting that E. coli and B. subtilis use divergent regulatory mechanisms [141]. While translation elongation in these species proceeds with a similar rate, the transcription elongation rate of mRNAs in B. subtilis is nearly twice as fast as that in E. coli (runaway transcription). Moreover, factors that mediate translation- transcription coupling, Rho and NusG. are essential in E. coli but dispensable in B. subtilis. Phylogenetic analysis predicts that uncoupling of transcription and translation may be widespread in Gram-positive bacteria [141]. Thus, the idea that transcription and translation are tightly coupled in all bacteria appears misleading: in E. coli - tightly coupled, in Bacillus – uncoupled, in other bacteria – we do not know yet.

The most studied moonlighting activity of uS10 is its functioning in antitermination of transcription first discovered in studies of phage λ. Upon transcription of N-utilization (nut) sites on the λ genome, phage protein λN and a set of host Nus factors (N-utilization substances) A, B, E (uS10) and G associate with RNAP, thus enabling the enzyme to read through intrinsic and Rho-dependent terminators [142]. uS10 was the first r-protein for which its participation in transcription regulation was shown [143]. It forms a complex with NusB to bind to a single-stranded boxA motif on λ nut sites. The same boxA motif is present in E. coli rRNA operon (rrn) transcripts, and binding of uS10-NusB to the boxA sequences in nascent rRNA is indispensable for the rrn antitermination. The bound to boxA uS10-NusB complex interacts with elongating RNAP via uS10-NusG interaction [144,145]. It should be noted that in the complex with NusB, uS10 adopts the same fold as in the 30S subunit and is blocked from simultaneous association with the ribosome [146]. Thus, the functions of uS10 in transcription-translation coupling and in antitermination are very similar: in both processes its interaction with NusG bound to RNAP prevents the Rho-dependent transcription termination.

Further studies have identified an additional member of the rrn antitermination machinery, SuhB (inositol mono-phosphatase), and revealed that a complex of Nus factors (NusB, NusE, NusA, NusG and SuhB) not only participates in antitermination on the rrn operons but also provides correct folding and maturation of rRNA [147]. Moreover, Nus factors may act beyond rRNA and regulate expression of mRNAs as well. Thus, in E. coli, binding of the NusB-NusE (uS10) complex to the boxA sequence within the suhB 5’UTR represses translation of the suhB mRNA. This binding sterically prevents ribosomes from initiating translation, and translation inhibition in turn promotes Rho-dependent termination within the suhB gene due to transcription-translation uncoupling [148]. It is believed that the boxA-mediated regulation of Nus factors is highly conserved and widespread.

The regulatory activity of Nus factors has been recently proposed to be involved in the complex regulatory cascade of flagella biosynthesis [149]. One of the flagella-specific sRNAs implicated in regulation of flagellar operons, MotR, appears to base pair internal to the rpsJ (uS10) coding sequence and to promote Hfq binding to the rpsJ leader sequence, which in turn results in increased rpsJ translation. Due to its elevated concentration in a cell, uS10 in conjunction with NusB may increase transcription antitermination of long flagellar operons, contributing to flagellin protein levels, flagella number and cell motility [149].

2.8. uS15, a Translational Auto-Repressor in Various Bacterial Phyla

uS15 is a primary protein in the 30S assembly pathway. It interacts with a highly evolutionary conserved central domain of 16S rRNA comprising a three-helix junction (h20, h21, h22), and this interaction is required for the subsequent binding of other proteins (e.g., bS6, bS18) necessary for the formation of the 30S subunit platform [110]. Surprisingly, despite its primary role in the 30S assembly, uS15 is not essential as the strains with a deleted rpsO gene are viable albeit reveal a cold-sensitive phenotype [150]. This means that under appropriate temperature conditions in vivo the 30S assembly may proceed in the absence of uS15.

The only extraribosomal activity of uS15 found so far is its functioning as an autogenous repressor of the rpsO gene. The uS15-mediated autogenous control represents the most studied case among the regulatory processes involving r-proteins; it has been examined in various bacterial species including E.coli [151,152,153,154,155,156], B. stearothermophilus [157,158], Geobacillus kaustophilus [159], Thermus thermophilus [160], Rhizobium radiobacter [161]. In all these cases, the autoregulation operates at the translation initiation level but through divergent mechanisms: e.g. in E. coli, binding of uS15 to the rpsO mRNA leads to the ribosome ‘entrapment’ in a non-productive complex [151], while a direct competition with the ribosome binding takes place in Th. thermophilus [160] and B. stearothermophilus [157,158]. In contrast with a high conservation of uS15 and its 16S rRNA targets, the regulatory structures on the rpsO mRNAs widely vary both at the primary and secondary structure levels, suggesting that there are many ways to allow autogenous regulation [159,161,162].

In E. coli, the regulatory site (operator) on the rpsO mRNA folds in a pseudoknot that is stabilized by uS15, allowing the 30S ribosome to bind but preventing the formation of an active initiation complex [151,152,154,155]. The only common determinant shared by the two uS15 targets on rRNA and mRNA is a U-G/C-G motif that contributes modestly to rRNA binding but is crucial for mRNA recognition [153,154,155]. Unlike E. coli, the operator structures for uS15 on the B. stearothermophilus and Th. thermophilus rpsO mRNAs are organized in three-way junction motifs that mimic the conserved three-way junction of the S15 rRNA-binding site [157,158,160]. Stabilization of the three-helix junction on the mRNA by uS15 may prevent the ribosome binding thus blocking translation initiation. Recently, we have examined the rpsO regulation in mycobacteria M. smegmatis (Msm) and M. tuberculosis (Mtb) and provided evidence for the S15-mediated autoregulation at the translation initiation level [163]. Remarkably, the autogenous regulation of the mycobacterial rpsO genes appears to strictly require the pseudoknot conformation of the 5′UTR, so that mutations destroying the pseudoknot completely abolish the uS15-mediated translational repression (Figure 4). As in the case of E. coli, a U-G/C-G motif in a pseudoknot turns out to be crucial for the autogenous control. Moreover, E. coli S15 appears capable of acting as an efficient repressor of the Msm/Mtb rpsO expression, but this ability has been lost after destroying the pseudoknot. Thus, the mechanism for the uS15-mediated autogenous control in mycobacteria bears close resemblance to that described for E. coli, despite the large phylogenetic distance between these species. At the same time, while the regulatory pseudoknot in E. coli embraces the rpsO SD-sequence and the initiator codon (in a loop2 region), the pseudoknots in mycobacteria are situated upstream from the initiation site, implying that the mechanistic details of the autogenous repression may be different, and in mycobacteria, uS15 binding to the pseudoknot might prevent the ribosome binding rather than entrap the ribosome.

2.9. bS20, a Curious Case of a Regulatory Protein

bS20 is one of the six primary r- proteins (along with uS4, uS7, uS8, uS15 and uS17) that bind to 16S rRNA during the 30S subunit assembly. bS20 may interact with at least two regions on 16S rRNA, in the 5’domain and in the 3’minor domain (specifically with helix 44), bringing these very distant regions into proximity [164,165]. This is a puzzle since in vivo the 3’domain is transcribed much later than the 5’domain, given that the 30S ribosome assembly proceeds co-transcriptionally. bS20 is encoded by the gene rpsT that is a monocistronic operon located apart from clusters of most r-protein genes on a bacterial chromosome (Figure 1). Though bS20 is a primary binding protein, it is not essential, but its absence results in a slow growth due to poor assembly of the 70S initiation complex and defects in the translation initiation. These defects are caused by a significant reduction in the rate of mRNA association rather than impairment in P-site fMet-tRNA^fMet binding [166]. Curiously enough, being a 30S subunit r-protein, bS20 has been repeatedly co-purified with the 50S subunit and even designated as a protein L26. Moreover, the copy number of bS20/bL26 in the 70S ribosome was evaluated as 1.38, thus implying the possibility of its independent binding to each subunit [167]. A specific feature of the rpsT mRNA is the use of the otherwise inefficient UUG as a start codon that is unusual for the mRNA of a highly abundant r-protein. The use of UUG is not widespread among bacterial rpsT mRNAs, being typical only for several γ-proteobacterial families (e.g., Enterobacteriaceae, Pasteurellaceae, Vibrionaceae) but not for others, e.g., members of Pseudomonadaceae, Legionellaceae and Xanthomonadaceae use GUG, and alpha-, beta- and epsilon-proteobacteria use a normal AUG start codon to initiate translation of the rpsT mRNAs (NCBI Gene Database). It is believed that like other primary r-proteins in E. coli bS20 may regulate its own synthesis as an autogenous repressor, and the weak start codon plays a fundamental role in the autoregulation, allowing bS20 to compete with ribosomes for mRNA binding [168]. However, compelling arguments have not been provided, and attempts to demonstrate any measurable affinity of bS20 for its own mRNA have appeared unsuccessful [169]. No conserved mRNA secondary structures typical of autogenous operators for r-protein-repressors have been found either [84]. Thus, until now the belief that bS20 acts as a translational autogenous repressor remains neither proved nor disproved.

2.10. bS21 and Heterogeneity of Ribosome Population

In E. coli, the rpsU gene encoding bS21 belongs to the unique operon called macromolecular synthesis operon (MMS) that comprises genes involved in initiation of the major processes in the flow of genetic information [170]: bS21 (rpsU) - in initiation of translation, DNA primase (dnaG) - in initiation of chromosome replication, and the rpoD-encoded major sigma factor, sigma-70, - in transcription initiation (Figure 1). E. coli bS21 is an essential r-protein that participates in translation initiation by providing base pairing of the 3’ terminus of 16S rRNA with the SD sequence on mRNA [171]. It should be noted, rpsU belongs to the MMS operon only in Gram-negative relatives of E. coli, while in Gram-positive Firmicutes rpsU is situated separately (NCBI Gene database). A striking example is the absence of bS21 in every member of Actinobacteria. This protein is also missing in all representatives of the phyla Deinococcus-Thermus, Fusobacteria, and Thermotogae [23], Conversely, some bacterial species encode multiple bS21 homologs, e.g. an intracellular bacterial pathogen Francisella tularensis encodes three distinct homologs of bS21 [172,173].

bS21 is one of the last proteins in the 30S assembly, which is loosely bound to and easily exchangeable among ribosomes [174]. Its absence in a part of the cellular ribosomal population leads to intrinsic ribosome heterogeneity and hence may provide a regulatory capacity. The presence of several bS21 homologs, as in F. tularensis, also implies ribosome heterogeneity that can contribute to post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Recent data convincingly demonstrate how variations in the bS21 content may affect translation efficiency of certain mRNAs.

Selective translational control mediated by bS21 has been reported for Flavobacterium johnsoniae [175,176]. Representatives of Flavobacteria, as well as other members of the phylum Bacteroidota, do not use the SD interactions for translation initiation. Although the anti-SD sequence is present at the 3’-terminus of 16S rRNA, it is buried in a pocket formed by bS21, bS6 and bS18 on the 30S platform and hence is unavailable for base-pairing with mRNA. The C-terminal region of bS21, highly conserved in Bacteroidota but not in other phyla like γ-Proteobacteria, is responsible for the anti-SD sequence sequestration [175]. The rpsU mRNA in Flavobacteria represents an exception in that it bears unusually extended Shine-Dalgarno sequences and therefore can be efficiently translated only by a subpopulation of ribosomes lacking bS21, resulting in replenishing the cellular amount of bS21 [176]. This kind of the autoregulatory mechanism represents a unique case when the r-protein serves as an autogenous translational regulator not in a free state but as an integral part of the ribosome. It should be mentioned that regulation of rpsU in E. coli, unlike in Flavobacteria, remains unknown.

The presence of several bS21 homologs in a cell can play a regulatory role as well. In a human pathogen F. tularensis, one of the three bS21 homologs, bS21-2, specifically governs translation of virulence genes [172]. The mRNAs responsive to bS21-2 bear specific features in their 5’UTRs, such as an imperfect SD sequence and a particular six nucleotide sequence, while mRNAs with a classic SD-element do not require bS21-2 for translation [173]. This raises a possibility that other bS21 homologs, in F. tularensis or other organisms, may influence translation in a leader sequence-dependent manner.

3. Multifunctional Proteins of the 50S Ribosomal Subunit

3.1. uL1 as a Widespread Autogenous Repressor

uL1 is a highly conserved two-domain protein that binds 23S rRNA helices H76 to H78 with the formation of a so-called L1-stalk. This mobile structural element governs tRNA dynamics during translation elongation and is responsible for the release of deacylated tRNAs from the ribosomal E-site [177,178,179]. In most bacteria, the rplA gene encoding uL1 is co-transcribed with rplK that encodes uL11 (Figure 1). It has been revealed that uL1 is bifunctional and uses its prominent RNA-binding properties to autogenously regulate the rplK-rplA expression at the translation level [180,181]. Moreover, autogenous regulation by uL1 has been observed not only in Bacteria but also in Archaea, and due to a high evolutionary conservation, bacterial L1 proteins are able to regulate archaeal L1-specific mRNAs [182,183]. The L1-binding sites on the mRNA have a high similarity, both in sequence and secondary structure, to the binding site for uL1 on the 23S rRNA, indicating the molecular mimicry principle of autoregulation [183]. At the same time, the complex of uL1 with 23S rRNA is more stable than the regulatory complex with the mRNA of the L11-L1 operon, so that an emergence of a newly synthesized rRNA in a cell releases uL1 from the repressor complexes [183].

The crystal structure has been resolved for several uL1 homologs from bacterial and archaeal species [184,185]. The proteins comprise two domains, with domain 1 including N- and C-termini and domain II corresponding to the central part. This structure implies that domain II represents an insertion in domain I and can be deleted, which is useful for studying the role of each domain. Several studies show that RNA-binding properties belong to domain I, and domain II just stabilizes the L1-RNA complex. Moreover, the isolated domain I from T. thermophilus uL1 can be incorporated in vivo in the E. coli and T. thermophilus ribosomes [186,187] and possesses regulatory activities in vitro similar to the intact protein [187,188].

The binding sites for the uL1-repressor on the L1 operon mRNAs have been located in the 5’UTR preceding the L11 (rplK) cistron (in Proteobacteria), or in a region preceding the L1 cistron (Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria), or, in some cases, there exist two L1-binding sites, one upstream of rplK, another upstream of rplA (e.g. in Firmicutes) [84]. In all cases, the regulatory site consists of an irregular stem-loop structure with an internal bulge [84]. A recent study [188] has demonstrated that thermophilic bacteria T. thermophilus and T. maritima also bear two uL1-regulatory sites preceding each gene in the rplK-rplA operon. This might be necessary to provide enhanced regulation of gene expression in the organisms living at high temperatures.

3.2. Multiple Activities of uL2

Ribosomal protein uL2 is encoded in the long S10 operon regulated by uL4 (Figure 1). It plays important roles in the assembly of the 50S ribosomal subunit by incorporating at the early stages of biogenesis, binding of the tRNA to the A and P sites, peptidyl-transferase activity of the 50S subunits and formation of the peptide bond [189]. uL2 is thought to be one of the most evolutionarily ancient and the most conserved proteins of the large ribosomal subunit [190]. uL2 contains a solvent-accessible globular domain that contacts with the 30S subunit through bS20 and the stem regions of helices h23 and h24, thus forming the intersubunit bridge B7b. [189,191]. Although it has been suggested that peptidyl- transferase activity is primarily a property of rRNA [10,12] and r-proteins may act only as scaffolding, accumulating evidence has shown that uL2 is functionally essential for the peptidyl- transferase center (PTC) [189,192,193]. uL2 interacts with PTC through its C-terminal domain, and mutations in this domain confer resistance to the antibiotic bactobolin which specifically inhibits the peptidyl transfer step of translation [194]. Thus, uL2 represents a unique site on the ribosome directly targeted by the antibiotic able to block PTC, while mutations in uL2 do not confer resistance to other PTC-inhibiting drugs like chloramphenicol, clindamycin, or linezolid [194]. The RNA-binding domain of uL2 is homologous to the OB-fold [193]. It is of interest that in T4-infected E. coli cells uL2, similarly to bS1, is ‘RNAylated’ by the T4- encoded adenosine diphosphate-ribosyltransferase ModB which covalently attaches NAD-capped RNA to defined arginine residues of the OB-fold proteins [77]. Future studies will reveal whether and how the ‘RNAylation’ of uL2 and bS1 influences the translation efficiency of the ribosome in T4-infected cells.

In addition to its essential functions as a ribosomal component, uL2 possesses several moonlighting activities. First, uL2 plays a specific and direct role in transcription, both in vitro and in vivo, acting as a transcriptional modulator through its interaction with the RNAP α-subunit in E. coli. Associated with the α-subunit, uL2 can specifically increase activity of the P1 promoter of rRNA operons, thereby contributing to the coordination of synthesis of ribosomal components [195]. Further, uL2 has been suggested to act as an inhibitor of the unwinding of oriC by DnaA and the assembly of the oriC prepriming complex. As reported, uL2 or its truncated form lacking 59 C-terminal amino acid residues may physically interact with the N-terminal region of DnaA to inhibit initiation of replication on oriC plasmids. This activity of uL2 may serve to coordinate the initiation of DNA replication with cell growth [196]. The moonlighting activities of uL2 also include its recently discovered interaction with a novel sRNA23 involved in regulation of pathogenicity in Streptococcus suis. However, the exact role of uL2 in bacterial pathogenesis is yet to be explored [197].

3.3. uL4 Is Multifunctional

E. coli uL4 is an important r- protein participating in the assembly of the 50S subunit and its proper functioning, so that uL4 mutant ribosomes are compromised in multiple steps of protein synthesis. Moreover, the uL4 alteration has numerous effects on the structure and function of both 50S and 30S subunits [198]. Structurally. uL4 consists of a globular domain residing on the 50S subunit surface and an extended loop (“tentacle”) which penetrates the core where it forms multiple contacts with 23S rRNA in the vicinity of PTC in the peptide exit tunnel. This is a place where erythromycin and other macrolides bind, and mutations in the uL4 loop strongly reduce ribosome susceptibility to these antibiotics ([199] and references therein). At the same time, there is no direct contact between the uL4 loop and erythromycin, and the resistance is most likely caused by perturbations in the 23S rRNA structure caused by the uL4 loop mutations, leading to the narrowing of the tunnel entrance site and sterically impeding erythromycin binding [200].

Beyond the ribosome, uL4 possesses several activities due to its RNA- and protein- binding features. First, uL4 is a specific regulator controlling expression of its own operon, S10 (Figure 1). Unlike many other r-proteins acting as autogenous translational repressors, uL4 regulates both transcription and translation of the S10 operon [22]. In both cases, uL4 binds within a long, highly structured 5’UTR of the S10 operon mRNA, with the regulatory sites for transcription and translation regulation partially overlapping. Transcription inhibition is believed to be caused by premature transcription termination at a Rho-independent termination site in the leader sequence. The mechanism most likely includes a transcription factor NusA that promotes RNAP pausing at an attenuator hairpin, and further stabilization of the paused transcription complex by uL4 binding to the upstream elements [201,202]. uL4 binding to the mRNA leader in vitro is outcompeted by the 23S RNA fragment comprising the uL4 binding site within the ribosome, thus implying the structural similarity of the two RNA targets for uL4 [203]. In contrast to the high phylogenetic conservation of uL4, its regulatory site on the S10 mRNA is not widely conserved even in γ-proteobacteria: structural and functional conservation was shown for members of enterobacteria, Haemophilus influenzae, Vibrio cholerae, but not for Pseudomonas, suggesting that an E. coli-like uL4-mediated regulatory mechanism has emerged rather lately during γ-proteobacterial evolution [204].

In addition to RNA-binding sites involved in interactions with rRNA and mRNA, uL4 contains a C-terminal protein-binding interface potentially able to form protein-protein contacts [205]. As reported later, uL4 indeed forms such contacts both on the ribosome and beyond [206,207,208]. On the ribosome, uL4 interacts with the DEAD-box RNA helicase SrmB that participates at the early steps of 50S subunit assembly [206,207]. Beyond the ribosome, uL4 binds to the C-terminal region of RNase E, outside of its catalytic domain, thereby stabilizing mRNAs targeted by RNase E in vivo. This interaction is involved in controlling plasmid DNA replication by stabilizing an antisense regulatory RNA normally attacked by RNase E. Inhibiting by ectopic expression of uL4 of the RNase E activity towards a set of mRNAs for stress-responsive proteins is believed to account, at least in part, for the bacterial adaptation to adverse conditions [208].

One more moonlighting activity of uL4 has been recently discovered as unrelated to its protein-protein interaction with RNase E [209]. uL4 appears to fine-tune the level of TnaA protein (tryptophanase) independently of the RNase E inhibition. Post-transcriptional uL4-mediated regulation of the tnaCAB operon expression is likely based on binding of uL4 to the operon mRNA within the spacer between tnaC and tnaA, which leads to the alteration of the spacer structural conformation and, as a result, downregulation of translation of the tnaA cistron [209]. An ability of the ribosomal protein to repress non-ribosomal mRNAs is a rare case, and sequence/structure features underlying the impact of uL4 on the tnaA translation deserve further investigations.

3.4. bL7/12 and uL10 Form Pentameric Complex Both on and beyond the Ribosome

Ribosomal protein bL12 (bL7/L12) is the only multi-copy r-protein representing an exception to the rule of the equal molarity of ribosomal components. 50S subunits of bacterial ribosomes may comprise two (like in E. coli), three (like in T. maritima or M. smegmatis), or even four dimers of bL12 as in ribosomes of some cyanobacteria, with the bL12 copy number being independent of the living conditions of bacteria [210]. The dimers of bL12 form a stable complex with uL10 termed the L7/12 stalk which interacts with uL11 and 23S rRNA in the 50S subunit structure [211]. The L7/L12 stalk serves for recruitment of translation initiation, elongation, and termination factors (IF2, EF-G, EF-Tu, RF3 and LepA) to bacterial ribosomes in their GTP states and thereby is critical for translation processes [212,213,214,215]. The common interaction site for translational GTPases is the C-terminal domain of bL12 [214].

The pentameric complex L10(L12)₄ participates in autogenous regulation of the rplJ-rplL mRNA at the level of translation initiation [216]. The rplJ and rplL genes are promoter proximal genes of the rif operon that also comprises the rpoB and rpoC genes encoding β and β’ subunits of RNAP (Figure 1). Expression of rpoBC is regulated independently by the autogenous control mechanism [217]. Autogenous regulation of the rplJ-rplL mRNA by a pentameric complex of its products provided first evidence that r-proteins may act as repressors not individually but in concert with their partners in the ribosome structure. Subsequently, the same type of regulation has been demonstrated for bS6-bS18 and uS2-bS1 regulatory complexes (see above, sections 2.2 and 2.4). A key role in the autogenous regulation of the rplJ-rplL mRNA belongs to uL10 that recognizes similar features on 23S rRNA and on the leader sequence of mRNA. In both cases RNA targets comprise a ‘kink-turn’ structural motif [218]. Mutations introduced in analogous positions of the kink-turn motifs on rRNA, and mRNA have impacted similarly on the corresponding RNA-protein interactions, thus providing a strong argument in favor of high similarities of uL10 recognition sites [216,218]. The detailed mechanism of the translational autorepression in E. coli has not yet been resolved as the recognition site on the 5’UTR is located rather distantly from the ribosome binding site of the rplJ cistron, making unlikely a direct competition between the repressor complex and the initiating ribosome.

Autogenous regulation by a pentameric L10(L12)₄ complex has also been demonstrated in B. subtilis, but the underlying mechanism turns out to be principally different from that in E. coli [219]. Like in the case of bL20 (see below), the rplJL autoregulation in B. subtilis occurs not at the translational level but at the level of transcription through transcription attenuation. The long 5’UTR of the B. subtilis rplJL mRNA can be folded in structures that function as an anti-antiterminator, antiterminator or intrinsic terminator. The model proposed specifies that a pentameric L10(L12)₄ complex binds to and stabilizes the anti-antiterminator structure comprising a kink-turn motif, thus promoting transcriptional termination [219]. Most likely, this mechanism is highly conserved across Bacillus species. The regulatory mRNA region for a pentameric L10(L12)₄ complex is widely phylogenetically distributed and can be identified in more than half of sequenced Fusobacteria, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Chloroflexi [84]). However, the mechanisms underlying the regulation might be divergent and should be experimentally explored.

3.5. Ribosomal and Extraribosomal Functions of bL9

Though nonessential, a 23S rRNA-binding r-protein bL9 has been reported to play an important role in reading-frame maintenance in Salmonella enterica [220], ribosomal “hopping” over a 50- nucleotide region within the mRNA of the bacteriophage T4 gene 60 in E. coli [221], and response to starvation stress [222,223]. E. coli bL9 is stably phosphorylated, with all phosphorylation sites being located at the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD). Phosphorylation of bL9 causes complete disordering of its CTD and helps cell survival under nutrient-limiting conditions. It has been suggested that conformation of the bL9 CTD may be involved in regulating the RelA function [223]. Another important role for bL9 has been proposed owing to mapping the intracellular organization of translating ribosomes in Mycoplasma pneumoniae. It has been shown that their association into polysomes involves a local coordination mechanism mediated by bL9. The model implies that an extended conformation of bL9 within polysomes helps to maintain translation fidelity by avoiding direct collision within polysomes during active translation elongation [224].

The abovementioned activities are related to bL9 within the ribosome. Recently, an unforeseen moonlighting activity of bL9 has been revealed [225]. In P. aeruginosa, bL9 appears to repress translation of the exsA mRNA by binding to its 5’ UTR. No obvious sequence similarity exists between 5’UTR of the exsA mRNA and the 23S rRNA region involved in bL9 binding during ribosome assembly. ExsA is a master regulator that activates transcription of all genes of the type III secretion system (T3SS), a critical virulence determinant of P. aeruginosa. Therefore, by inhibiting the exsA translation, bL9 serves as a novel T3SS repressor. This finding represents a rare case when the r-protein can regulate translation of the non-ribosomal mRNA.

3.6. uL13, a Novel Autogenous Repressor

An essential r-protein uL13 is an early 50S assembly component that interacts with 23S rRNA. Its incorporation in vivo requires a DEAD-box RNA helicase SrmB that is necessary for organizing the uL13 binding site on 23S rRNA by preventing formation of improper alternative structures [207,236]. uL13 is encoded by a promoter-proximal gene of a bicistronic operon rplM-rpsI (uS9) (Figure 1). Regulation of the uL13-uS9 operon has been recently studied at the transcriptional and translational levels [27]. Transcription of rplM-rpsI is subject to negative stringent control as in the case of many other ribosomal operons, while its translation is autogenously regulated by uL13 that serves as a highly specific translational repressor of both rplM and rpsI expression if produced in excess over 23S rRNA available for de novo ribosome assembly [27]. To act as a translational repressor, uL13 binds to a highly structured 5’UTR of the operon mRNA. This 157-nt-long 5’UTR folds in a developed secondary structure that comprises several highly conserved (at least in several families of γ-proteobacteria) sequence/structure features including three hairpins and an unusual Shine-Dalgarno sequence GGGU. Upstream of the SD-element, there is an extended (12-nt) AU-rich single-stranded region which serves as a translation enhancer (a presumable target for bS1), as its deletion abolishes translation efficiency (our unpublished data). An important role of a unique, conserved 2D/3D structure of the rplM 5’UTR in forming an autogenous operator for the uL13-repressor has been demonstrated in a more recent study [237].

Interestingly, a recent work [238] has identified a series of ΔsrmB suppressor mutations mapped to the 5’UTR of the uL13-uS9 operon, which increase (albeit modestly) expression of both proteins, thereby alleviating the cold-sensitive phenotype of the ΔsrmB strain and the assembly defects. These findings suggest that SrmB may participate in a mechanism regulating the uL13 production, in addition to its role in forming the 23S binding site for uL13 during the 50S ribosome assembly. However, another recent study [239] has revealed that there is no significant reduction of uL13 in the ΔsrmB strain at either 37°C or 18°C, and hence it is unlikely that a “uL13-limited” assembly pathway underlies cold-sensitivity in the absence of SrmB.

3.7. bL20, an Autogenous Repressor in E. coli and B. subtilis

Ribosomal protein bL20 belongs to the group of r-proteins (uL3, uL4, uL13, bL20, uL22 and uL24) essential for the first step of the 50S subunit assembly [230]. In E. coli, the rplT gene encoding bL20 is a part of the infC (IF3)-rpmI (bL35)-rplT (bL20) gene cluster, in which two genes for r-proteins are regulated at the translation level by bL20 [231]. The infC gene is not under bL20-mediated control, it is regulated by IF3 itself. Moreover, in E. coli, the promoter for the downstream r-protein genes is located within the infC coding region. As a translational repressor, bL20 can bind two sites on the operon mRNA: the first site is represented by a long-range pseudoknot structure, while the second binding site is an irregular hairpin. Both binding sites are important for the bL20 repressor activity in vivo and together bear a structural similarity to the bL20 binding site on 23S rRNA, which argues in favor of molecular mimicry [231]. Because the ribosome preferentially binds the pseudoknot structure, a competition mechanism is likely to underly the autoregulation [232].

In contrast with E. coli, infC-rpmI-rplT genes in B. subtilis form a real operon which is transcribed from a promoter located upstream of infC [233]. The operon is similarly controlled by bL20, but not at the translation level as in E. coli. Two alternative secondary structures may be formed in the mRNA leader upstream the infC translation initiation site, one of which may serve as a transcriptional terminator. Binding of bL20 provokes the formation of the terminator structure that attenuates transcription of the downstream genes. Although the bL20-mediated regulatory mechanism differs from that of E. coli, a structural similarity between mRNA and 23S rRNA regions bound by bL20 underlies the regulation in either case [233]. More recently, it has been shown that removing of the regulatory structure targeted by bL20 in B. subtilis results in reduced log- phase growth, improper rRNA maturation, and accumulation of misassembled ribosomal particles at low temperatures, suggesting defects in ribosome biogenesis. This indicates an importance of the autogenous regulation of r-proteins for bacterial fitness [234]. The overexpression of bL20 may cause not only autogenous repression. As shown recently, the overexpressed bL20 can partially suppress a cold-sensitive phenotype of the bipA null mutant. BipA is a cold- shock inducible GTPase that is pivotal for 50S ribosomal subunit assembly at low temperature, so that the bipA-deleted strain is defective in rRNA processing and 50S biogenesis under these conditions. Ectopic expression of bL20 partially recovers these defects, implying that BipA and bL20 may exert coordinated actions for proper ribosome assembly at low temperature [235].

3.8. Autogenous Regulation of bL25

bL25 is one of the three r-proteins (bL25, uL5, uL18) interacting with 5S rRNA in eubacteria. Unlike the rplE (uL5) and rplR (uL18) genes which belong to the polycistronic spc-operon regulated by uS8 at the translation level (see above), the rplY gene encoding bL25 forms an independent transcription unit (Figure 1). Although bL25 is not essential, E. coli cells lacking bL25 reveal a slow-growth phenotype [236,237]. Not all bacteria keep the rplY gene in their genomes, e.g. representatives of Fusobacteria as well as certain lineages of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Tenericutes lack rplY [23]. In rplY-containing species, proteins of the bL25 family may consist of one (E. coli and its closest relatives in γ-proteobacteria) or two domains (all others), with the N-terminal domain being homologous to E. coli bL25 and serving for 5S rRNA binding. Why this diversity exists and what is the function of the C-terminal part remains unclear. In E. coli and its relatives possessing a short variant of bL25, the rplY expression is regulated in vivo by the mechanism of autogenous repression at the translation level [237]. 5’UTRs of the rplY mRNAs from these bacteria bear specific structural and sequence features indispensable for autogenous control. A conserved irregular hairpin structure (translational operator) preceding the ribosome binding site and an unusually weak (for highly expressing mRNAs) SD-sequence (GAGA), also highly conserved, are crucial for autogenous regulation [237]. Interestingly, these features are inherent only for species with a short bL25. The conversion of a weak GAGA into a classic GGAGG SD-element by mutagenesis abolished autogenous control, which argues in favor of the competition between the repressor and a 30S subunit for the rplY mRNA. In the presence of a classic SD a 30S ribosome wins. Analogous situation has been described for the rpsA regulation [48].

3.9. Dual activity of bL31 and Its Paralog

Ribosomal protein bL31 is encoded by the rpmE gene that forms a monocistronic operon in many bacterial taxa (Figure 1). Though nonessential for bacterial survival under normal growth conditions [17], bL31 plays a crucial role in formation of the protein–protein intersubunit bridge B1b by interacting with uL5 in a central protuberance of the 50S subunit via its N-terminal domain, and with uS13 in a head of the 30S subunit via its C-terminal part [191]. The role of bL31 in the initiation of translation and maintaining the reading frame has been also suggested [238]. Recently, we have shown that bL31, as many other r-proteins (see above), possesses dual activity in living cells, acting both as an integral ribosome component and a specific autogenous translational repressor [239]. The rpmE mRNA 5’UTR in γ -proteobacteria folds in a secondary structure dedicated for regulation; the structure includes a highly conserved stem–loop element bearing two internal bulges. This conserved irregular hairpin serves as a translational operator targeted by bL31, and the two internal bulges play a critical role so that their eliminating by mutations results in a loss of the bL31-mediated translational control. Interestingly, the operator hairpin separates the SD-element from the upstream AU-rich translational enhancer (a target for bS1) that is indispensable for efficient translation of the rpmE mRNA but not necessary for the autogenous repression. Mutational analysis has revealed that an intrinsically disordered N-terminal segment of bL31 is responsible for its repressor activity [239].

In many bacterial species, a zinc-binding bL31 (also termed bL31A) has a non-zinc binding paralog, e.g. YkgM in E. coli or YtiA in B. subtilis, referred to as bL31B [240,241,242,243]. The paralogs have a very modest amino acid identity (less than 40%) but nevertheless occupy the same position on the ribosome. In the log-phase under normal Zn supply, a functionally active paralog is bL31A, while the bL31B synthesis is strongly inhibited by a Zn-dependent transcriptional repressor Zur (zinc uptake regulator). Under Zn deficiency or in a stationary growth phase, Zur-mediated transcription inhibition is alleviated leading to an increase in the bL31B cellular concentration. As a result, bL31B displaces bL31A in the ribosome structure [242,243]. Importantly, the E. coli paralog bL31B (YkgM) is also able to modulate the rpmE expression through a mechanism similar to the autogenous repression by bL31A itself [239,244]

4. Non-Specific Activities of Bacterial r-Proteins

4.1. Antimicrobial Activity

Intriguingly, r-proteins sometimes display antimicrobial activity, though corresponding information is rather fragmentary, and the way how the r-proteins may act as antimicrobials remains unclear. According to current hypotheses, r-proteins or their fragments could interfere with the ribosomal assembly of closely related bacteria, or they can induce the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) with a harmful effect on DNA, RNA, lipids, or proteins of the recipient strain [245]. For instance, the 50S r-proteins bL27 and uL30 of Lactobacillus salivarius were shown to possess antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus uberis and Enterococcus faecium [246]. Antimicrobial peptides from S15, a eukaryotic homolog of bacterial S19, can inhibit bacterial growth and cause bacterial cell destruction, membrane depolarization and intracellular ROS production [247]. The intriguing antimicrobial actions of r-proteins and underlying mechanisms deserve further investigations.

4.2. Ribosomal Proteins as Chaperons

An important feature of r-proteins is their ability to act as chaperons by assisting in both RNA and protein folding to prevent misfolding into non-functional conformations. Thus, r-proteins uL16, uL18 and bL19 have been shown to act as RNA- and protein-chaperons, and their chaperoning activities towards proteins are comparable with that of a classical Hsp90 chaperone [248]. The moonlighting function as a protein chaperon has been proposed for uS9 [249]. uS9 in concert with UmuC has been suggested to participate in the error- prone SOS repair process. UmuC plays an important role in the SOS response, and the fact that uS9 can accelerate UmuC renaturation after partial denaturation in vitro has been regarded as an argument for the functional significance of their interaction [249]. However, while the DNA repair mechanisms have been further intensively investigated [250], the role of uS9 in the process has not been discussed anymore.

The role of RNA-chaperoning proteins in bacterial physiology cannot be overestimated. As a rule, RNA can adopt several conformations, with only one being functionally active. Incorrect structures of RNA can lead to inefficiency of RNA-dependent processes. RNA chaperones resolve such misfolded structures without requirement for ATP [251]. Certain r-proteins may play a dual role by both stabilizing native rRNA structures and accelerating rRNA refolding during the co-transcriptional assembly of ribosomes. Earlier in vitro experiments demonstrated that uS12 facilitated the splicing of group I introns of phage T4 by preventing the formation of non-catalytic structures, without participating in splicing itself, as it could be removed from the reaction mix by proteases before initiating the splicing by GTP addition [252]. Recent data show that uS12 may fulfil an RNA-chaperoning role in vivo during the 30S co-transcriptional assembly. This conserved late-binding r-protein enhances and accelerates stable binding of the primary r-protein uS4 by acting on the folding path of the nascent rRNA [93].

A prominent example of a ribosomal protein possessing both RNA- and protein-chaperoning activities is bS1 (see 2.1). As a protein chaperone, bS1 suppresses a temperature sensitive missense mutation in a coiled-coil domain of uS2, so that the corresponding rpsB1^ts strain acquires an ability to grow at elevated temperature in the presence of bS1 expressed from a plasmid [85]. The RNA-chaperone function of bS1 has been widely recognized [253]. An activity of bS1 in remodeling the RNA structure underlies many regulatory pathways at the translation level. It is believed that intricate coupling of protein and mRNA folding-unfolding dynamics enables translation initiation on structured mRNAs. For bS1 from Vibrio vulnificus, RNA chaperoning activity has been attributed to domains D3 and D4 which provide the mRNA-binding platform, while the D5 domain can significantly increase the chaperoning impact [254]. Further, it has been reported that an ability of riboswitches to regulate translation by inducing metabolite-dependent ON- and OFF- conformations of ribosome binding site is not based only on the ligand binding but also needs the partnership with RNA-binding proteins [255]. In accordance with this, for the adenine-sensing riboswitch from Vibrio vulnificus, the synergistic effect of adenine binding and interaction with bS1 was indispensable for switching to a translational ON-state [256]. bS1 promotes partial mRNA unfolding in other riboswitches as well [45], indicating that the chaperoning activity of bS1 towards the effector domains of translational riboswitches might be an important function of this essential bacterial protein.

4.3. Interactions of r-Proteins with DNA

It has been repeatedly observed that certain r-proteins are able to interact with DNA; however, strong evidence of biological significance of these interactions has not yet been provided. Encoded by the rpsP gene bS16 is an essential bacterial protein that plays an important role in the 30S subunit assembly [257]. The rpsP gene belongs to the trmD operon which comprises not only r-protein genes, rpsP (bS16) and rplS (bL19), but also genes responsible for 30S maturation (rimM) and tRNA modification (trmD) (Figure 1). Up to now, there exist no information on the regulation of the operon expression (a rare case among r-protein operons). E. coli bS16 was shown to act as a DNase and to interact with the cruciform DNA in solution [258,259]. Cruciform structures are known to influence various aspects of DNA replication and other processes [260]. It remains unclear whether the DNA-nicking activity of bS16 and its ability to bind to the cruciform DNA have any physiological role in the extant bacterial cell or are remnants of previous stages of bacterial evolution when proteins could be adopted by the ribosome from other physiological processes.

Other examples of the DNA-binding r-proteins are represented by bL17 found to bind preferentially to curved DNA in B. subtilis [261] and uL24 isolated as a nucleoid bound protein again from B. subtilis [262]. Bsu bL17 when overproduced in E. coli had a strong effect on nucleoid morphology and segregation. It was suggested that its affinity for curved DNA might be used for certain extraribosomal functions [261]. However, no further evidence for this has been provided. The condensation of DNA in bacterial nucleoids is a complex and dynamic process in which proteins displaying the properties of histones serve as important contributors. In a search for B. subtilis nucleoid associated proteins, uL24 was identified as an abundant protein in nucleoid containing fractions [262]. Purified Bsu L24 can bind and condense DNA in vitro. Overexpression of the rplX gene encoding uL24 has been shown to disrupt nucleoid segregation and positioning, which hints at the probable extraribosomal function of uL24 as a nucleoid- associated protein. Whether homologous uL24 proteins from other bacterial species could demonstrate analogous nucleoid binding features remains unexplored. Finally, DNA-binding properties were also ascribed to uL14 which was found to stimulate an ATP-dependent DNA helicase Rep from E. coli [263]. An ability of uL14 to increase the rate as well as the extent of the unwinding reaction catalyzed by Rep was explained by its interaction with the DNA. Binding of uL14 might lower the energy required for the disruption of hydrogen bonds in the double-stranded substrate, making it more favorable for unwinding the duplex region by Rep. Although the data would be of interest, the biological significance of this finding has not been further confirmed.

Concluding Remarks

The data described in this review show that many bacterial r-proteins have the capacity to function beyond the ribosome (to moonlight), participating in a variety of cellular processes as regulators of translation, transcription, RNA folding and RNA stability, DNA replication, cell wall permeability, pathogenicity of virulent species. To moonlight, r-proteins interact with other cellular components such as proteins, RNA, membrane, or DNA. Extraribosomal functions of r-proteins have been repeatedly detected over the last decades in all kingdoms of life [1,264,265,266]. It is widely accepted, to conclude that a certain r-protein possesses moonlighting activities, three criteria should be considered: (i) the r-protein interacts specifically with non-ribosomal component of the cell; (ii) such an interaction has a physiological effect; (iii) the interaction occurs outside the ribosome [265,266]. If to follow these criteria, not all r-proteins described in this review are, strictly speaking, moonlighters. For instance, bS21 regulates its own synthesis in Flavobacteria or discriminates certain mRNAs in F. tularensis as an integral part of the ribosome, not outside (see 2.9). However, such an unforeseen regulatory function of the r-protein deserves to be described, given that until now, our knowledge of functional specificities of ribosomal components is incomplete, and much is still unknown about the mechanisms by which r-proteins may act within, not to mention beyond, the ribosome. To find and to characterize novel extraribosomal activities of r-proteins, it is highly desirable to have a notion about their specific functions in translation. It is noteworthy, r-proteins with moonlighting activities appear, as a rule, more stable even during extended stationary- phase growth, while other r-proteins are subject to rapid degradation as soon as rRNA is degraded [267]. Remarkably, some r-protein-moonlighters can perform several different functions beyond the ribosome, being really polyfunctional cellular components (e.g., bS1, uS4, uL4). The list of moonlighting r-proteins has significantly expanded during the last decade but remains, no doubt, far from completeness even for well-studied model bacteria like E. coli or B. subtilis. There are all reasons to believe that many potential moonlighters with a previously unrecognized role outside the ribosome will be discovered in future studies of both model and yet poor-explored bacterial species.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

References

Aseev, L.V.; Boni, I.V. Extraribosomal functions of bacterial ribosomal proteins. Mol. Biol. 2011, 45, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Watson, Z.L.; Ward, F.R.; Méheust, R.; Ad, O.; Schepartz, A.; Banfield, J.F.; Cate, J.H. Structure of the bacterial ribosome at 2 Å resolution. Elife 2020, 9, e60482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Steitz, T.A. A structural understanding of the ribosome. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Selmer, M.; Dunham, C.M.; Murphy, F.V. 4th; Weixlbaumer, A.; Petry, S.; Kelley, A.C. 4^th; Weixlbaumer, A.; Petry, S.; Kelley, A.C.; Weir, JR, Ramakrishnan V. Structure of the 70S ribosome complexed with mRNA and tRNA. Science 2006, 313, 1935–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gao, Y.G.; Selmer, M.; Dunham, C.M.; Weixlbaumer, A.; Kelley, A.C.; Ramakrishnan, V. The structure of the ribosome with elongation factor G trapped in the posttranslocational state. Science 2009, 326, 694–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhou, J.; Lancaster, L.; Donohue, J.P.; Noller, H.F. How the ribosome hands the A-site tRNA to the P site during EF-G-catalyzed translocation. Science 2014, 345, 1188–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sharma, M.R.; Manjari, S.R.; Agrawal, E.K.; Keshavan, P.; Koripella, R.K.; Majumdar, S.; Marcinkiewicz, L.; Lin, Y.P.; Agrawal, R.K.; Banavali, N.K. The structure of a hibernating ribosome in a Lyme disease pathogen. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Morgan, C.E.; Huang, W.; Rudin, S.D.; Taylor, D.J.; Kirby, J.E.; Bonomo, R.A.; Yu, E.W. Cryo-electron microscopy structure of the Acinetobacter baumannii 70S ribosome and implications for new antibiotic development. mBio. 2020, 11, e03117-119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kushwaha, A.K.; Bhushan, S. Unique structural features of the Mycobacterium ribosome. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2020, 152, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fox, G.E. Origin and evolution of the ribosome. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol 2010, 2, a003483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Petrov, A.S.; Gulen, B.; Norris, A.M.; Kovacs, N.A.; Bernier, C.R.; Lanier, K.A.; Fox, G.E.; Harvey, S.C.; Wartell, R.M.; Hud, N.V.; Williams, L.D. History of the ribosome and the origin of translation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2015, 112(50), 15396–15401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tirumalai, M.R.; Rivas, M.; Tran, Q.; Fox, G.E. The peptidyl transferase center: a window to the past. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 2021, 85, e001042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Noller, H.F. Evolution of protein synthesis from an RNA world. Cold. Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4, a003681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bowman, J. C.; Petrov, A. S. , Frenkel-Pinter, M.; Penev, P. I.; Williams, L. D. Root of the tree: the significance, evolution, and origins of the ribosome. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 4848–4878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bose, T.; Fridkin, G.; Davidovich, C.; Krupkin, M.; Dinger, N.; Falkovich, A.H.; Peleg, Y.; Agmon, I.; Bashan, A.; Yonath, A. Origin of life: protoribosome forms peptide bonds and links RNA and protein dominated worlds. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50(4), 1815–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ishihama, Y.; Schmidt, T.; Rappsilber, J.; Mann, M.; Hartl, F.U.; Kerner, M.J.; Frishman, D. Protein abundance profiling of the Escherichia coli cytosol. BMC Genomics 2008, 9, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Baba, T.; Ara, T.; Hasegawa, M.; Takai, Y.; Okumura, Y.; Baba, M.; Datsenko, K.A.; Tomita, M.; Wanner, B.L.; Mori, H. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutantsmutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2006, 2, 2006.0008. [Google Scholar]
Akanuma, G.; Nanamiya, H.; Natori, Y.; Yano, K.; Suzuki, S.; Omata, S.; Ishizuka, M.; Sekine, Y.; Kawamura, F. Inactivation of ribosomal protein genes in Bacillus subtilis reveals importance of each ribosomal protein for cell proliferation and cell differentiation. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 6282–6291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bubunenko, M.; Baker, T.; Court, D.L. Essentiality of ribosomal and transcription antitermination proteins analyzed by systematic gene replacement in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 2844–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Goodall, E.C.A.; Robinson, A.; Johnston, I.G.; Jabbari, S.; Turner, K.A.; Cunningham, A.F.; Lund, P.A.; Cole, J.A.; Henderson, I.R. The essential genome of Escherichia coli K-12. mBio 2018, 9, e02096-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ban, N.; Beckmann, R.; Cate, J.H.; Dinman, J.D.; Dragon, F.; Ellis, S.R.; Lafontaine, D.L.; Lindahl, L.; Liljas, A.; Lipton, J.M.; McAlear, M.A.; Moore, P.B.; Noller, H.F.; Ortega, J.; Panse, V.G.; Ramakrishnan, V.; Spahn, C.M.; Steitz, T.A.; Tchorzewski, M.; Tollervey, D.; Warren, A.J.; Williamson, J.R.; Wilson, D.; Yonath, A.; Yusupov, M. A new system for naming ribosomal proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2014, 24, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zengel, J.M.; Lindahl, L. Diverse mechanisms for regulating ribosomal protein synthesis in Escherichia coli. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 1994, 47, 331–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Galperin, M.Y.; Wolf, Y.I.; Garushyants, S.K.; Vera Alvarez, R.; Koonin, E.V. Nonessential ribosomal proteins in bacteria and archaea identified using COGs. J. Bacteriol. 2021, 203, e00058-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nomura, M.; Yates, J.L.; Dean, D.; Post, L.E. Feedback regulation of ribosomal protein gene expression in Escherichia coli: structural homology of ribosomal RNA and ribosomal protein mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 1980, 77, 7084–7088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nomura, M.; Gourse, R.; Baughman, G. Regulation of the synthesis of ribosomes and ribosomal components. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 1984, 53, 75–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Meyer, M.M. rRNA Mimicry in RNA regulation of gene expression. Microbiol. Spectr 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Aseev, L.V.; Koledinskaya, L.S.; Boni, I.V. V. Regulation of ribosomal protein operons rplM-rpsI, rpmB-rpmG, and rplU-rpmA at the transcriptional and translational levels. J. Bacteriol. 2016, 198, 2494–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Subramanian, A.R. Structure and functions of ribosomal protein S1. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 1983, 28, 101–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hajnsdorf, E.; Boni, I.V. Multiple activities of RNA-binding proteins S1 and Hfq. Biochimie 2012, 94, 1544–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Salah, P.; Bisaglia, M.; Aliprandi, P.; Uzan, M.; Sizun, C.; Bontems, F. Probing the relationship between Gram-negative and Gram-positive S1 proteins by sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 5578–5588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sørensen, M.A.; Fricke, J.; Pedersen, S. Ribosomal protein S1 is required for translation of most, if not all, natural mRNAs in Escherichia coli in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 280, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Boni, I.V.; Artamonova, V.S.; Dreyfus, M. The last RNA-binding repeat of the Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 is specifically involved in autogenous control. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 5872–5879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Duval, M.; Korepanov, A.; Fuchsbauer, O.; Fechter, P.; Haller, A.; Fabbretti, A.; Choulier, L.; Micura, R.; Klaholz, B.P.; Romby, P.; et al. Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 unfolds structured mRNAs onto the ribosome for active translation initiation. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11, e1001731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bycroft, M.; Hubbard, T.J.P.; Proctor, M.; Freund, S.M.V.; Murzin, A.G. The solution structure of the S1 RNA binding domain: a member of an ancient nucleic acid-binding fold. Cell 1997, 88, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Byrgazov, K.; Grishkovskaya, I.; Arenz, S.; Coudevylle, N.; Temmel, H.; Wilson, D.N.; Djinovic-Carugo, K.; Moll, I. Structural basis for the interaction of protein S1 with the Escherichia coli ribosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43(1), 661–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
D'Urso, G.; Chat, S.; Gillet, R.; Giudice, E. Structural insights into the binding of bS1 to the ribosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, 3410–3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Beckert, B.; Turk, M.; Czech, A.; Berninghausen, O.; Beckmann, R.; Ignatova, Z.; Plitzko, J.M.; Wilson, D.N. Structure of a hibernating 100S ribosome reveals an inactive conformation of the ribosomal protein S1. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3(10), 1115–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Boni, I.V.; Isaeva, D.M.; Musychenko, M.L.; Tzareva, N.V. Ribosome-messenger recognition: mRNA target sites for ribosomal protein S1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tzareva, N.V.; Makhno, V.I.; Boni, I.V. Ribosome-messenger recognition in the absence of the Shine-Dalgarno interactions. FEBS Lett. 1994, 337, 189–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Komarova, A.V.; Tchufistova, L.S.; Supina, E.V.; Boni, I.V. Protein S1 counteracts the inhibitory effect of the extended Shine-Dalgarno sequence on translation. RNA 2002, 8, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Komarova, A.V.; Tchufistova, L.S.; Dreyfus, M.; Boni, I.V. AU-rich sequences within 5 ' untranslated leaders enhance translation and stabilize mRNA in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 1344–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Roberts, L.; Wieden, H.J. The prokaryotic activity of the IGR IRESs is mediated by ribosomal protein S1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, 9355–9367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Beck, H.J.; Moll, I. Leaderless mRNAs in the Spotlight: Ancient but Not Outdated! Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ringquist, S.; Jones, T.; Snyder, E.E.; Gibson, T.; Boni, I.; Gold, L. High-affinity RNA ligands to Escherichia coli ribosomes and ribosomal protein S1: comparison of natural and unnatural binding sites. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 3640–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lund, P.E.; Chatterjee, S.; Daher, M.; Walter, N.G. Protein unties the pseudoknot: S1-mediated unfolding of RNA higher order structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 2107–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Azam, M.S.; Vanderpool, C.K. Translation inhibition from a distance: The small RNA SgrS silences a ribosomal protein S1-dependent enhancer. Mol. Microbiol. 2020, 114, 391–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhang, B.Q.; Chen, Z.Q.; Dong, Y.Q.; You, D.; Zhou, Y.; Ye, B.C. Selective recruitment of stress-responsive mRNAs to ribosomes for translation by acetylated protein S1 during nutrient stress in Escherichia coli. Commun Biol. 2022, 5, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Boni, I.V.; Artamonova, V.S.; Tzareva, N.V.; Dreyfus, M. Non-canonical mechanism for translational control in bacteria: synthesis of ribosomal protein S1. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 4222–4232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tchufistova, L.S.; Komarova, A.V.; Boni, I.V. A key role for the mRNA leader structure in translational control of ribosomal protein S1 synthesis in γ-proteobacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 6996–7002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sukhodolets, M.V.; Garges, S. Interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with the ribosomal protein S1 and the Sm-like ATPase Hfq. Biochemistry 2003, 42(26), 8022–8034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sukhodolets, M.V.; Garges, S.; Adhya, S. Ribosomal protein S1 promotes transcriptional cycling. RNA 2006, 12, 1505–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Delvillani, F.; Papiani, G.; Dehò, G.; Briani, F. S1 ribosomal protein and the interplay between translation and mRNA decay. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39(17), 7702–7715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Briani, F.; Curti, S.; Rossi, F.; Carzaniga, T.; Mauri P, Dehò, G. Polynucleotide phosphorylase hinders mRNA degradation upon ribosomal protein S1 overexpression in Escherichia coli. RNA 2008, 14(11), 2417–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Aguirre, A.A.; Vicente, A.M.; Hardwick, S.W.; Alvelos, D.M.; Mazzon, R.R.; Luisi, B.F.; Marques, M.V. Association of the cold-shock DEAD-box RNA helicase RhlE to the RNA degradosome in Caulobacter crescentus. J. Bacteriol. 2017, 199, e00135-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Janssen, B.D.; Hayes, C.S. S. The tmRNA ribosome-rescue system. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2012, 86, 151–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Keiler, K.C.; Feaga, H.A. Resolving nonstop translation complexes is a matter of life or death. J. Bacteriol. 2014, 196, 2123–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Keiler, K.C. Mechanisms of ribosome rescue in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Saguy, M.; Gillet, R.; Skorski, P.; Hermann-Le Denmat, S.; Felden, B. Ribosomal protein S1 influences trans-translation in vitro and in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 2368–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
McGinness, K.E.; Sauer, R.T. Ribosomal protein S1 binds mRNA and tmRNA similarly but plays distinct roles in translation of these molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, 101, 13454–13459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Qi, H.; Shimizu, Y.; Ueda, T. Ribosomal protein S1 is not essential for the trans-translation machinery. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 368, 845–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Shi, W.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, X.; Yuan, H.; Lee, J.S.; Barry, C.E. 3rd; Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y. Pyrazinamide inhibits trans-translation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 2011, 333, 1630–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Bi, J.; Cai, Q.; Liao, X.; Li, W.; Guo, C.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, T.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu., J.; Zhang, X.; Lin, D. Structural basis for targeting the ribosomal protein S1 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by pyrazinamide. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 95, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dillon, N.A.; Peterson, N.D.; Feaga, H.A.; Keiler, K.C.; Baughn, A.D. Anti-tubercular activity of pyrazinamide is independent of trans-translation and RpsA. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wahba, A.J.; Miller, M.J.; Niveleau, A.; Landers, T.A.; Carmichael, G.G.; Weber, K.; Hawley, D.A.; Slobin, L.I. Subunit I of Q beta replicase and 30 S ribosomal protein S1 of Escherichia coli. Evidence for the identity of the two proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249, 3314–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wagner, A.; Weise, L.I.; Mutschler, H. In vitro characterization of the MS2 RNA polymerase complex reveals host factors that modulate emesviral replicase activity. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5(1), 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Takeshita, D.; Yamashita, S.; Tomita, K. Molecular insights into replication initiation by Qβ replicase using ribosomal protein S1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 10809–10822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gytz, H.; Mohr, D.; Seweryn, P.; Yoshimura, Y.; Kutlubaeva, Z.; Dolman, F.; Chelchessa, B.; Chetverin, A.B.; Mulder, F.A.; Brodersen, D.E.; Knudsen, C.R. Structural basis for RNA-genome recognition during bacteriophage Qβ replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43(22), 10893–10906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vasilyev, N.N.; Kutlubaeva, Z.S.; Ugarov, V.I.; Chetverina, H.V.; Chetverin, A.B. Ribosomal protein S1 functions as a termination factor in RNA synthesis by Qβ phage replicase. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kutlubaeva, Z.S.; Chetverina, H.V.; Chetverin, A.B. The contribution of ribosomal protein S1 to the structure and function of Qβ replicase. Acta Naturae. 2017, 9, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Venkatesh, T.V.; Radding, C.M. Ribosomal protein S1 and NusA protein complexed to recombination protein β of phage λ. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 1844–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ruckman, J.; Ringquist, S.; Brody, E.; Gold, L. The bacteriophage T4 regB ribonuclease. Stimulation of the purified enzyme by ribosomal protein S1. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 26655–26662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Durand, S.; Richard, G.; Bisaglia, M.; Laalami, S.; Bontems, F.; Uzan, M. Activation of RegB endoribonuclease by S1 ribosomal protein requires an 11 nt conserved sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 6549–6560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bisaglia, M.; Laalami, S.; Uzan, M.; Bontems, F. Activation of the RegB endoribonuclease by the S1 ribosomal protein is due to cooperation between the S1 four C-terminal modules, in a substrate-dependent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 15261–15271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Aliprandi, P.; Sizun, C.; Perez, J.; Mareuil, F.; Caputo, S.; Leroy, J.L.; Odaert, B.; Laalami, S.; Uzan, M.; Bontems, F. S1 ribosomal protein functions in translation initiation and ribonuclease RegB activation are mediated by similar RNA-protein interactions: An NMR and SAXS analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 13289–13301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Uzan, M. RNA processing and decay in bacteriophage T4. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2009, 85, 43–89. [Google Scholar]
Juškauskas, A.; Zajančkauskaitė, A.; Meškys, R.; Ger, M.; Kaupinis, A.; Valius, M.; Truncaitė, L. Interaction between phage T4 protein RIII and host ribosomal protein S1 inhibits endoribonuclease RegB activation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wolfram-Schauerte, M.; Pozhydaieva, N.; Grawenhoff, J.; Welp, L.M.; Silbern, I.; Wulf, A.; Billau, F.A.; Glatter, T.; Urlaub, H.; Jäschke, A.; Höfer, K. A viral ADP-ribosyltransferase attaches RNA chains to host proteins. Nature 2023, 620, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kaminishi, T.; Wilson, D.N.; Takemoto, C.; Harms, J.M.; Kawazoe, M.; Schluenzen, F.; Hanawa-Suetsugu, K.; Shirouzu, M; Fucini, P.; Yokoyama, S. A snapshot of the 30S ribosomal subunit capturing mRNA via the Shine-Dalgarno interaction. Structure 2007, 15, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yusupova, G.; Jenner, L.; Rees, B.; Moras, D.; Yusupov, M. Structural basis for messenger RNA movement on the ribosome. Nature 2006, 444, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Culver, G.M. Assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Biopolymers 2003, 68(2), 234–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Brodersen, D.E.; Clemons, W.M. Jr; Carter, A.P.; Wimberly, B.T.; Ramakrishnan, V. Crystal structure of the 30 S ribosomal subunit from Thermus thermophilus: structure of the proteins and their interactions with 16S RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 316(3), 725–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Aseev, L.V.; Levandovskaya, A.A.; Tchufistova, L.S.; Skaptsova, N.V.; Boni, I.V. A new regulatory circuit in ribosomal protein operons: S2-mediated control of the rpsB-tsf expression in vivo. RNA 2008, 14, 1883–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Aseev, L.V.; Levandovskaya, A.A.; Skaptsova, N.V.; Boni, I.V. Conservation of regulatory elements controlling the expression of the rpsB-tsf operon in γ-proteobacteria. Mol. Biol. 2009, 43, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fu, Y.; Deiorio-Haggar, K.; Anthony, J.; Meyer, M.M. Most RNAs regulating ribosomal protein biosynthesis in Escherichia coli are narrowly distributed to Gammaproteobacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 3491–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Aseev, L.V.; Chugunov, A.O.; Efremov, R.G.; Boni, I.V. A single missense mutation in a coiled-coil domain of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S2 confers a thermosensitive phenotype that can be suppressed by ribosomal protein S1. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mustoe, A.M.; Lama, N.N.; Irving, P.S.; Olson, S. W/; Weeks, K.M. RNA base-pairing complexity in living cells visualized by correlated chemical probing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019, 116, 24574–24582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Qi, Y.; Rao, J.; Shen, W. , Li, J.; Zeng, W.; Zheng, S.; Liu, S.; Li,Y.; Wang, B.; Wu, F.; Li,Y.; Li, Y. Identification of a ribosomal protein RpsB as a surface-exposed protein and adhesin of Rickettsia heilongjiangensis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 9297129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chaiden, C.; Jaresitthikunchai, J.; Phaonakrop, N.; Roytrakul, S.; Kerdsin, A.; Nuanualsuwan, S. Peptidomics analysis of virulent peptides involved in Streptococcus suis pathogenesis. Animals (Basel) 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Prakash, C.; Pandey, M.; Talwar, S.; Singh, Y.; Kanojiya, S.; Pandey, A.K.; Kumar, N. Extra-ribosomal functions of Mtb RpsB in imparting stress resilience and drug tolerance to mycobacteria. Biochimie 2020, 177, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mayerle, M.; Woodson, S.A. Specific contacts between protein S4 and ribosomal RNA are required at multiple stages of ribosome assembly. RNA, 2013, 19, 574–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rodgers, M.L.; Woodson, S.A. Transcription increases the cooperativity assembly. Cell 2019, 179, 1370–1381.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Duss, O.; Stepanyuk, G.A.; Puglisi, J.D.; Williamson, J.R. Transient protein-RNA interactions guide nascent ribosomal RNA folding. Cell 2019, 179, 1357–1369.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rodgers, M.L.; Sun, Y.; Woodson, S.A. Ribosomal Protein S12 hastens nucleation of co-transcriptional ribosome assembly. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kamath, D.; Allgeyer, B.B.; Gregory, S.T.; Bielski, M.C.; Roelofsz, D.M.; Sabapathypillai, S.L.; Vaid, N.; O'Connor, M. The C-terminus of ribosomal protein uS4 contributes to small ribosomal subunit biogenesis and the fidelity of translation. Biochimie 2017, 138, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agarwal, D.; Kamath, D.; Gregory, S.; O'Connor, M. Modulation of decoding fidelity by ribosomal proteins S4 and S5. J. Bacteriol. 2015, 197, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Takyar, S.; Hickerson, R.P.; Noller, H.F. mRNA helicase activity of the ribosome. Cell 2005, 120, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jinks-Robertson, S.; Nomura, M. Ribosomal protein S4 acts in trans as a translational repressor to regulate expression of the alpha operon in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1982, 151, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Thomas, M.S.; Bedwell, D.M.; Nomura, M. Regulation of alpha operon gene expression in Escherichia coli. A novel form of translational coupling. J. Mol. Biol. 1987, 196, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tang, C.K.; Draper, D.E. Unusual mRNA pseudoknot structure is recognized by a protein translational repressor. Cell 1989, 57, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Spedding, G.; Draper, D.E. Allosteric mechanism for translational repression in the Escherichia coli alpha operon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 1993, 90, 4399–4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Schlax, P.J.; Xavier, K.A.; Gluick, T.C.; Draper, D.E. Translational repression of the Escherichia coli alpha operon mRNA: importance of an mRNA conformational switch and a ternary entrapment complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 38494–38501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Meek, D.W.; Hayward, R.S. Nucleotide sequence of the rpoA-rplQ DNA of Escherichia coli: a second regulatory binding site for protein S4? Nucleic Acids Res. 1984, 12(14), 5813–5821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Grundy, F.J.; Henkin, T.M. M. The rpsD gene, encoding ribosomal protein S4, is autogenously regulated in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 4595–4602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Grundy, F.J.; Henkin, T.M. Characterization of the Bacillus subtilis rpsD regulatory target site. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 6763–6770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Torres, M.; Condon, C.; Balada, J.M.; Squires, C.; Squires, C.L. Ribosomal protein S4 is a transcription factor with properties remarkably similar to NusA, a protein involved in both non-ribosomal and ribosomal RNA antitermination. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 3811–3820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Huang, Y.H.; Said, N.; Loll, B.; Wahl, M.C. Structural basis for the function of SuhB as a transcription factor in ribosomal RNA synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 6488–6503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Huang, Y.H.; Hilal, T.; Loll, B.; Bürger, J.; Mielke, T.; Böttcher, C.; Said, N.; Wahl, M.C. Structure-based mechanisms of a molecular RNA polymerase/chaperone machine required for ribosome biosynthesis. Mol. Cell. 2020, 79, 1024–1036.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Drabinska, J.; Steczkiewicz, K.; Kujawa, M.; Kraszewska, E. Searching for biological function of the mysterious PA2504 protein from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Matelska, D.; Purta, E.; Panek, S.; Boniecki, M.J.; Bujnicki, J.M.; Dunin-Horkawicz, S. S6:S18 ribosomal protein complex interacts with a structural motif present in its own mRNA. RNA 2013, 19, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agalarov, S.C.; Sridhar Prasad, G.; Funke, P.M.; Stout, C.D.; Williamson, J.R. Structure of the S15, S6, S18-rRNA complex: assembly of the 30S ribosome central domain. Science 2000, 288(5463), 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fu, Y.; Deiorio-Haggar, K.; Soo, M.W.; Meyer, M.M. Bacterial RNA motif in the 5' UTR of rpsF interacts with an S6:S18 complex. RNA 2014, 20, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Babina, A.M.; Soo, M.W.; Fu, Y.; Meyer, M.M. An S6:S18 complex inhibits translation of E. coli rpsF. RNA 2015, 21, 2039–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pletnev, P.I.; Nesterchuk, M.V.; Rubtsova, M.P.; Serebryakova, M.V.; Dmitrieva, K.; Osterman, I.A.; Bogdanov, A.A.; Sergiev, P.V. Oligoglutamylation of E. coli ribosomal protein S6 is under growth phase control. Biochimie 2019. 167, 61–67. [CrossRef]
Grenga, L.; Little, R.H.; Chandra, G.; Woodcock, S.D.; Saalbach, G.; Morris, R.J.; Malone, J.G. Control of mRNA translation by dynamic ribosome modification. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1008837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Thompson, C.M.A.; Little, R.H.; Stevenson, C.E.M.; Lawson, D.M.; Malone, J.G. Structural insights into the mechanism of adaptive ribosomal modification by Pseudomonas RimK. Proteins 2023, 91(3), 300–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Martinez-Hackert, E.; Hendrickson, W.A. Promiscuous substrate recognition in folding and assembly activities of the trigger factor chaperone. Cell 2009, 138, 923–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Li, Z.; Wu, D.; Zhan, B.; Hu, X.; Gan, J.; Ji, C.; Li, J. Structural insights into the complex of trigger factor chaperone and ribosomal protein S7 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 512, 838–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Saito, K.; Nomura, M. Post-transcriptional regulation of the str operon in Escherichia coli. Structural and mutational analysis of the target site for translational repressor S7. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 235, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Robert, F.; Brakier-Gingras, L. Ribosomal protein S7 from Escherichia coli uses the same determinants to bind 16S ribosomal RNA and its messenger RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Saito, K.; Mattheakis, L.C.; Nomura, M. Post-transcriptional regulation of the str operon in Escherichia coli. Ribosomal protein S7 inhibits coupled translation of S7 but not its independent translation. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 235, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Golovin, A.; Spiridonova, V.; Kopylov, A. Mapping contacts of the S12-S7 intercistronic region of str operon mRNA with ribosomal protein S7 of E. coli. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580(25), 5858–5862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Meng, B.Y.; Shinozaki, K.; Sugiura, M. Genes for the ribosomal proteins S12 and S7 and elongation factors EF-G and EF-Tu of the cyanobacterium, Anacystis nidulans: structural homology between 16S rRNA and S7 mRNA. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1989, 216, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wu, H.; Jiang, L.; Zimmermann, R.A. The binding site for ribosomal protein S8 in 16S rRNA and spc mRNA from Escherichia coli: minimum structural requirements and the effects of single bulged bases on S8-RNA interaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 1687–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Olins, P.O.; Nomura, M. Translational regulation by ribosomal protein S8 in Escherichia coli: structural homology between rRNA binding site and feedback target on mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981, 9(7), 1757–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cerretti, D.P.; Mattheakis, L.C.; Kearney, K.R.; Vu, L.; Nomura, M. Translational regulation of the spc operon in Escherichia coli. Identification and structural analysis of the target site for S8 repressor protein. J. Mol. Biol. 1988, 204(2), 309–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mattheakis, L.C.; Nomura, M. . Feedback regulation of the spc operon in Escherichia coli: translational coupling and mRNA processing. J. Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 4484–4492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mattheakis, L.; Vu, L.; Sor, F.; Nomura, M. Retroregulation of the synthesis of ribosomal proteins L14 and L24 by feedback repressor S8 in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 1989, 86(2), 448–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gregory, R.J.; Cahill, P.B.F.; Thurlow, D.L.; Zimmermann, R.A. Interaction of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S8 with its binding sites in ribosomal RNA and messenger RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 1988, 204, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Merianos, H.J.; Wang, J.; Moore, P.B. The structure of a ribosomal protein S8/spc operon mRNA complex. RNA 2004, 10, 954–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Allen, T.D.; Watkins, T.; Lindahl, L.; Zengel, J.M. Regulation of ribosomal protein synthesis in Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 5933–5937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Henkin, T.M.; Moon, S.H.; Mattheakis, L.C.; Nomura, M. Cloning and analysis of the spc ribosomal protein operon of Bacillus subtilis: comparison with the spc operon of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 7469–7486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Shajani, Z.; Sykes, M.T.; Williamson, J.R. Assembly of bacterial ribosomes. Annu Rev. Biochem. 2011, 80, 501–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Proshkin, S.; Rahmouni, A.R.; Mironov, A.; Nudler, E. Cooperation between translating ribosomes and RNA polymerase in transcription elongation. Science 2010, 328(5977), 504–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Burmann, B.M.; Schweimer, K.; Luo, X.; Wahl, M.C.; Stitt, B.L.; Gottesman, M.E.; Rösch, P. A NusE:NusG complex links transcription and translation. Science 2010, 328(5977), 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Washburn, R.S.; Zuber, P.K.; Sun, M.; Hashem, Y.; Shen, B.; Li, W.; Harvey, S.; Acosta Reyes, F.J.; Gottesman, M.E.; Knauer, S.H.; Frank, J. Escherichia coli NusG links the lead ribosome with the transcription elongation complex. iScience 2020, 23, 101352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Saxena, S.; Myka, K.K.; Washburn, R.; Costantino, N.; Court, D.L.; Gottesman, M.E. Escherichia coli transcription factor NusG binds to 70S ribosomes. Mol. Microbiol. 2018, 108, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bailey, E.J.; Gottesman, M.E.; Gonzalez, R.L. Jr. NusG-mediated coupling of transcription and translation enhances gene expression by suppressing RNA polymerase backtracking. J. Mol. Biol. 2022, 434, 167330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kohler, R.; Mooney, R.A.; Mills, D.J.; Landick, R.; Cramer, P. Architecture of a transcribing-translating expressome. Science 2017, 356, 194–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
O'Reilly, F.J.; Xue, L.; Graziadei, A.; Sinn, L.; Lenz, S.; Tegunov, D.; Blötz, C.; Singh, N.; Hagen, W.J. H/; Cramer, P.; Stülke, J.; Mahamid, J.; Rappsilber, J. In-cell architecture of an actively transcribing-translating expressome. Science 2020, 369, 554–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Woodgate, J.; Zenkin, N. Transcription–translation coupling: Recent advances and future perspectives. Mol. Microbiol. 2023, 120, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Johnson, G.E.; Lalanne, J.B.; Peters, M.L.; Li, G.W. Functionally uncoupled transcription-translation in Bacillus subtilis. Nature 2020, 585, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gottesman, M.E.; Weisberg, R.A. Little lambda, who made thee? Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2004, 68, 796–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Friedman, D.I.; Schauer, A.T.; Baumann, M.R.; Baron, L.S.; Adhya, S.L. Evidence that ribosomal protein S10 participates in control of transcription termination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 1981, 78, 1115–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nodwell, J.R; Greenblatt, J. Recognition of boxA antiterminator RNA by the E. coli antitermination factors NusB and ribosomal protein S10. Cell 1993, 72, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Burmann, B.M.; Luo, X.; Rösch, P.; Wahl, M.C.; Gottesman, M.E. Fine tuning of the E. coli NusB:NusE complex affinity to BoxA RNA is required for processive antitermination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 314–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Luo, X.; Hsiao, H.H.; Bubunenko, M.; Weber, G.; Court, D.L.; Gottesman, M.E.; Urlaub, H.; Wahl, M.C. Structural and functional analysis of the E. coli NusB-S10 transcription antitermination complex. Mol. Cell 2008, 32, 791–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
147. Singh, N.; Bubunenko, M.; Smith, C.; Abbott, D.M.; Stringer, A.M.; Shi, R.; Court, D.L.; Wade, J.T. SuhB associates with Nus factors to facilitate 30S ribosome biogenesis in Escherichia coli. mBio 2016, 7, e00114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Baniulyte, G.; Singh, N.; Benoit, C.; Johnson, R.; Ferguson, R.; Paramo, M.; Stringer, A.M.; Scott, A.; Lapierre, P.; Wade, J.T. Identification of regulatory targets for the bacterial Nus factor complex. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Melamed, S.; Zhang, A.; Jarnik, M.; Mills, J.; Silverman, A.; Zhang, H.; Storz, G. σ²⁸-dependent small RNA regulation of flagella biosynthesis. Elife 2023, 12, RP87151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bubunenko, M.; Korepanov, A.; Court, D.L.; Jagannathan, I.; Dickinson, D.; Chaudhuri, B.R.; Garber, M.B.; Culver, G.M. 30S ribosomal subunits can be assembled in vivo without primary binding ribosomal protein S15. RNA 2006, 12, 1229–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Philippe C., Eyermann F., Benard L., Portier C., Ehresmann B., Ehresmann C. Ribosomal protein S15 from Escherichia coli modulates its own translation by trapping the ribosome on the mRNA initiation loading site. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993, 90, 4394–4398. [CrossRef]
Ehresmann C., Philippe C., Westhof E., Benard L., Portier C., Ehresmann B. A pseudoknot is required for efficient translation initiation and regulation of the E. coli rpsO gene coding for ribosomal protein S15. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1995, 73, 1131–1140. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bénard L., Mathy N., Grunberg-Manago M., Ehresmann B., Ehresmann C., Portier C. Identification in a pseudoknot of a U.G motif essential for the regulation of the expression of ribosomal protein S15. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998, 95, 2564–2567. [CrossRef]
Serganov A., Ennifar E., Portier C., Ehresmann B., Ehresmann C. Do mRNA and rRNA binding sites of E. coli ribosomal protein S15 share common structural determinants? J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 320, 963–978. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mathy N., Pellegrini O., Serganov A., Patel D.J., Ehresmann C., Portier C. Specific recognition of rpsO mRNA and 16S rRNA by Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S15 relies on both mimicry and site differentiation. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 52, 661–675. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Marzi S., Myasnikov A.G., Serganov A., Ehresmann C., Romby P., Yusupov M., Klaholz B.P. Structured mRNAs regulate translation initiation by binding to the platform of the ribosome. Cell. 2007, 130, 1019–1031. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scott L.G., Williamson J.R. Interaction of the Bacillus stearothermophilus ribosomal protein S15 with its 5′-translational operator mRNA. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 314, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scott L.G., Williamson J.R. The binding interface between Bacillus stearothermophilus ribosomal protein S15 and its 5’-translational operator mRNA. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 351, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Slinger B.L., Meyer M.M. RNA regulators responding to ribosomal protein S15 are frequent in sequence space. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 9331–9341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Serganov A., Polonskaia A., Ehresmann B., Ehresmann C., Patel D.J. Ribosomal protein S15 represses its own translation via adaptation of an rRNA-like fold within its mRNA. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 1898–1908. [CrossRef]
Slinger B.L., Deiorio-Haggar K., Anthony J.S., Gilligan M.M., Meyer M.M. Discovery and validation of novel and distinct RNA regulators for ribosomal protein S15 in diverse bacterial phyla. BMC Genom. 2014, 15. [CrossRef]
Slinger B.L., Newman H., Lee Y., Pei S., Meyer M.M. Coevolution of bacterial ribosomal protein S15 with diverse mRNA regulatory structures. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005720. [CrossRef]
Aseev, L.V.; Koledinskaya, L.S.; Bychenko, O.S.; Boni, I.V. Regulation of ribosomal protein synthesis in Mycobacteria: The autogenous control of rpsO. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dutca, L.M.; Culver, G.M. Assembly of the 5' and 3' minor domains of 16S ribosomal RNA as monitored by tethered probing from ribosomal protein S20. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 376, 92–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hedrick, E.G.; Hill, W.E. Protein S20 binds two 16S rRNA sites as assembly is initiated. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 401, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tobin, C.; Mandava, C.S.; Ehrenberg, M.; Andersson, D.I.; Sanyal, S. Ribosomes lacking protein S20 are defective in mRNA binding and subunit association. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 397, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wada, A. Analysis of Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins by an improved two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. I. Detection of four new proteins. J. Biochem. 1986, 100, 1583–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parsons, G.D.; Donly, B.C.; Mackie, G.A. Mutations in the leader sequence and initiation codon of the gene for ribosomal protein S20 (rpsT) affect both translational efficiency and autoregulation. J Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 2485–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Donly, B.C.; Mackie, G.A. Affinities of ribosomal protein S20 and C-terminal deletion mutants for 16S rRNA and S20 mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16(3), 997–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Burton, Z.F.; Gross, C.A.; Watanabe, K.K.; Burgess, R.R. The operon that encodes the sigma subunit of RNA polymerase also encodes ribosomal protein S21 and DNA primase in E. coli K12. Cell 1983, 32, 335–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Backendorf, C.; Ravensbergen, C.J.; Van der Plas, J.; van Boom, J.H.; Veeneman, G.; Van Duin, J. Basepairing potential of the 3' terminus of 16S RNA: dependence on the functional state of the 30S subunit and the presence of protein S21. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981, 9, 1425–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Trautmann, H.S.; Ramsey, K.M. A ribosomal protein homolog governs gene expression and virulence in a bacterial pathogen. J. Bacteriol. 2022, 204, e0026822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Trautmann, H.S.; Schmidt, S.S.; Gregory, S.T.; Ramsey, K.M. Ribosome heterogeneity results in leader sequence-mediated regulation of protein synthesis in Francisella tularensis. J. Bacteriol. 2023, e0014023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Robertson, W.R.; Dowsett, S.J.; Hardy, S.J. Exchange of ribosomal proteins among the ribosomes of Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1977, 157, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jha, V.; Roy, B.; Jahagirdar, D.; McNutt, Z.A.; Shatoff, E.A.; Boleratz, B.L.; Watkins, D.E.; Bundschuh, R.; Basu, K.; Ortega, J.; Fredrick, K. Structural basis of sequestration of the anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence in the Bacteroidetes ribosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 547–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
McNutt, Z.A.; Roy, B.; Gemler, B.T.; Shatoff, E.A.; Moon, K.M.; Foster, L.J.; Bundschuh, R.; Fredrick, K. Ribosomes lacking bS21 gain function to regulate protein synthesis in Flavobacterium johnsoniae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51(4), 1927–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fei, J.; Bronson, J.E.; Hofman, J.M.; Srinivas, R.L.; Wiggins, C.H.; Gonzalez, R. L Jr. Allosteric collaboration between elongation factor G and the ribosomal L1 stalk directs tRNA movements during translation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2009, 106, 15702–15707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Trabuco, L.G.; Schreiner, E.; Eargle, J.; Cornish, P.; Ha, T.; Luthey-Schulten, Z.; Schulten, K. The role of L1 stalk-tRNA interaction in the ribosome elongation cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 402, 741–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mohan, S.; Noller, H.F. Recurring RNA structural motifs underlie the mechanics of L1 stalk movement. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Baughman, G.; Nomura, M. Localization of the target site for translational regulation of the L11 operon and direct evidence for translational coupling in Escherichia coli. Cell 1983, 34(3), 979–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Thomas, M.S.; Nomura, M. Translational regulation of the L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli: mutations that define the target site for repression by L1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15, 3085–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Köhrer, C.; Mayer, C.; Neumair, O.; Gröbner, P.; Piendl, W. Interaction of ribosomal L1 proteins from mesophilic and thermophilic Archaea and Bacteria with specific L1-binding sites on 23S rRNA and mRNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 256, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nevskaya, N.; Tishchenko, S.; Gabdoulkhakov, A.; Nikonova, E.; Nikonov, O.; Nikulin, A.; Platonova, O.; Garber, M.; Nikonov, S.; Piendl, W. Ribosomal protein L1 recognizes the same specific structural motif in its target sites on the autoregulatory mRNA and 23S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nikonov, S.; Nevskaya, N.; Eliseikina, I.; Fomenkova, N.; Nikulin, A.; Ossina, N.; Garber, M.; Jonsson, B.H.; Briand, C.; Al-Karadaghi, S.; Svensson, A.; Aevarsson, A.; Liljas, A. Crystal structure of the RNA binding ribosomal protein L1 from Thermus thermophilus. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 1350–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nevskaya, N.; Tischenko, S.; Fedorov, R.; Al-Karadaghi, S.; Liljas, A.; Kraft, A.; Piendl, W.; Garber, M.; Nikonov, S. Archaeal ribosomal protein L1: the structure provides new insights into RNA binding of the L1 protein family. Structure 2000, 8, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tishchenko, S.; Nikonova, E.; Kljashtorny, V.; Kostareva, O.; Nevskaya, N.; Piendl, W.; Davydova, N.; Streltsov, V.; Garber, M.; Nikonov, S. Domain I of ribosomal protein L1 is sufficient for specific RNA binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 7389–7395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Korepanov, A.P.; Kostareva, O.S.; Bazhenova, M.V.; Bubunenko, M.G.; Garber, M.B.; Tishchenko, S.V. Studying the properties of domain I of the ribosomal protein L1: Incorporation into ribosome and regulation of the L1 operon expression. Protein J. 2015, 34, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mikhaylina, A.O.; Nikonova, E. Y/; Kostareva, O.S.; Piendl, W.; Erlacher, M.; Tishchenko, S.V. Characterization of regulatory elements of L11 and L1 operons in thermophilic Bacteria and Archaea. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2021, 86(4), 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diedrich, G.; Spahn, C.M.; Stelzl, U.; Schäfer, M.A.; Wooten, T.; Bochkariov, D.E.; Cooperman, B.S.; Traut, R.R.; Nierhaus, K.H. Ribosomal protein L2 is involved in the association of the ribosomal subunits, tRNA binding to A and P sites and peptidyl transfer. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 5241–5250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Müller, E.C.; Wittmann-Liebold, B. Phylogenetic relationship of organisms obtained by ribosomal protein comparison. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1997, 53(1), 34–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, Q.; Fredrick, K. Intersubunit bridges of the bacterial ribosome. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428 10 Pt B, 2146–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cooperman, B.S.; Wooten, T.; Romero, D.P.; Traut, R.R. Histidine 229 in protein L2 is apparently essential for 50S peptidyl transferase activity. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1995, 73, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nakagawa, A.; Nakashima, T.; Taniguchi, M.; Hosaka, H.; Kimura, M.; Tanaka, I. The three-dimensional structure of the RNA-binding domain of ribosomal protein L2; a protein at the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosome. EMBO J. 1999, 18(6), 1459–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chandler, J.R.; Truong, T.T.; Silva, P.M.; Seyedsayamdost, M.R.; Carr, G.; Radey, M. Bactobolin resistance is conferred by mutations in the L2 ribosomal protein. MBio 2012, 3, e00499–e00512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rippa, V.; Cirulli, C.; Di Palo, B.; Doti, N.; Amoresano, A.; Duilio, A. The ribosomal protein L2 interacts with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit and acts as a transcription modulator in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192(7), 1882–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chodavarapu, S.; Felczak, M.M.; Kaguni, J.M. Two forms of ribosomal protein L2 of Escherichia coli that inhibit DnaA in DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39(10), 4180–4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Xu, Q.; Chen, H.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, D.; Rai, K.R.; Chen, J.L.; Chen, Y. sRNA23, a novel small RNA, regulates to the pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Virulence 2021, 12(1), 3045–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
O'Connor, M.; Gregory, S.T.; Dahlberg, A.E. Multiple defects in translation associated with altered ribosomal protein L4. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32(19), 5750–5756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lawrence, M.G.; Shamsuzzaman, M.; Kondopaka, M.; Pascual, C.; Zengel, J.M.; Lindahl, L. The extended loops of ribosomal proteins uL4 and uL22 of Escherichia coli contribute to ribosome assembly and protein translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44(12), 5798–5810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gabashvili, I.S.; Gregory, S.T.; Valle, M.; Grassucci, R.; Worbs, M.; Wahl, M.C.; Dahlberg, A.E.; Frank, J. The polypeptide tunnel system in the ribosome and its gating in erythromycin resistance mutants of L4 and L22. Mol. Cell 2001, 8(1), 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zengel, J.M.; Lindahl, L. Ribosomal protein L4 and transcription factor NusA have separable roles in mediating terminating of transcription within the leader of the S10 operon of Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 1992, 6, 2655–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lindahl, L.; Zengel, J.M. Domain I of 23S rRNA competes with a paused transcription complex for ribosomal protein L4 of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21(10), 2429–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Stelzl, U.; Zengel, J.M.; Tovbina, M.; Walker, M.; Nierhaus, K.H.; Lindahl, L.; Patel, D.J. RNA-structural mimicry in Escherichia coli ribosomal protein L4-dependent regulation of the S10 operon. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 28237–28245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Allen, T.; Shen, P.; Samsel, L.; Liu, R.; Lindahl, L.; Zengel, J.M. Phylogenetic analysis of L4-mediated autogenous control of the S10 ribosomal protein operon. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181(19), 6124–6132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Worbs, M.; Huber, R.; Wahl, M.C. Crystal structure of ribosomal protein L4 shows RNA-binding sites for ribosome incorporation and feedback control of the S10 operon. EMBO J. 2000, 19(5), 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Trubetskoy, D.; Proux, F.; Allemand, F.; Dreyfus, M.; Iost, I. SrmB, a DEAD-box helicase involved in Escherichia coli ribosome assembly, is specifically targeted to 23S rRNA in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37(19), 6540–6549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Proux, F.; Dreyfus, M.; Iost, I. Identification of the sites of action of SrmB, a DEAD-box RNA helicase involved in Escherichia coli ribosome assembly. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 82(2), 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Singh, D.; Chang, S.J.; Lin, P.H.; Averina, O.V.; Kaberdin, V.R.; Lin-Chao, S. Regulation of ribonuclease E activity by the L4 ribosomal protein of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106(3), 864–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Singh, D.; Murashko, O.N.; Lin-Chao, S. Posttranscriptional regulation of tnaA by protein-RNA interaction mediated by ribosomal protein L4 in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol 2020, 202, e00799-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Davydov, I.I.; Wohlgemuth, I.; Artamonova, I.I.; Urlaub, H.; Tonevitsky, A.G.; Rodnina, M.V. Evolution of the protein stoichiometry in the L12 stalk of bacterial and organellar ribosomes. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wahl, M.C.; Möller, W. Structure and function of the acidic ribosomal stalk proteins. Curr. Prot. Pept. Sci. 2002, 3, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diaconu, M.; Kothe, U.; Schlünzen, F.; Fischer, N.; Harms, J.M.; Tonevitsky, A.G.; Stark, H.; Rodnina, M.V.; Wahl, M.C. Structural basis for the function of the ribosomal L7/12 stalk in factor binding and GTPase activation. Cell 2005, 121, 991–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Carlson, M.A.; Haddad, B.G.; Weis, A.J.; Blackwood, C.S.; Shelton, C.D.; Wuerth, M.E.; Walter, J.D.; Spiegel, P.C. Jr. Ribosomal protein L7/L12 is required for GTPase translation factors EF-G, RF3, and IF2 to bind in their GTP state to 70S ribosomes. FEBS J. 2017, 284, 1631–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Helgstrand, M.; Mandava, C.S.; Mulder, F.A.; Liljas, A.; Sanyal, S.; Akke, M. The ribosomal stalk binds to translation factors IF2, EF-Tu, EF-G and RF3 via a conserved region of the L12 C-terminal domain. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 365, 468–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ge, X.; Mandava, C.S.; Lind, C.; Åqvist, J.; Sanyal, S. Complementary charge-based interaction between the ribosomal-stalk protein L7/12 and IF2 is the key to rapid subunit association. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U S A 2018, 115, 4649–4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Johnsen, M.; Christensen, T.; Dennis, P.P.; Fiil, N.P. Autogenous control: ribosomal protein L10-L12 complex binds to the leader sequence of its mRNA. EMBO J. 1982, 1, 999–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Passador, L.; Linn, T. Autogenous regulation of the RNA polymerase beta subunit of Escherichia coli occurs at the translational level in vivo. J. Bacteriol. 1989, 171(11), 6234–6242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Iben, J.R; Draper, D.E. Specific interaction of the L10(L12)4 ribosomal protein complex with mRNA, rRNA, and L11. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 2721–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yakhnin, H.; Yakhnin, A.V.; Babitzke, P. Ribosomal protein L10(L12)4 autoregulates expression of the Bacillus subtilis rplJL operon by a transcription attenuation mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 7032–7043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Leipuviene, R.; Björk, G.R. Alterations in the two globular domains or in the connecting alpha-helix of bacterial ribosomal protein L9 induces +1 frameshifts. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189(19), 7024–7031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Herr, A.I.; Nelson, C.C.; Wills, N.M.; Gesteland, R.F.; Atkins, J.F. Analysis of the roles of tRNA structure, ribosomal protein L9, and the bacteriophage T4 gene 60 bypassing signals during ribosome slippage on mRNA. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 309, 1029–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Soni, D.; Bafana, A.; Gandhi, D.; Sivanesan, S.; Pandey, R.A. Stress response of Pseudomonas species to silver nanoparticles at the molecular level. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33, 2126–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pei, H.; Han, S.; Yang, S.; Lei, Z.; Zheng, J.; Jia, Z. Phosphorylation of bacterial L9 and its functional implication in response to starvation stress. FEBS Lett. 2017, 591(20), 3421–3430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Xue, L.; Lenz, S.; Zimmermann-Kogadeeva, M.; Tegunov, D.; Cramer, P.; Bork, P.; Rappsilber, J.; Mahamid, J. Visualizing translation dynamics at atomic detail inside a bacterial cell. Nature, 2022, 610, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, D.; Zhang, X.; Yin, L.; Liu, Q.; Yu, Z.; Xu, C.; Ma, Z.; Xia, Y.; Shi, J.; Gong, Y.; Bai, F.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, W.; Lin, J.; Jin, Y. RplI interacts with 5' UTR of exsA to repress its translation and type III secretion system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog 2022, 18(1), e1010170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Charollais, J.; Pflieger, D.; Vinh, J.; Dreyfus, M.; Iost, I. The DEAD-box RNA helicase SrmB is involved in the assembly of 50S ribosomal subunits in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 48, 1253–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mustoe, A.M.; Busan, S.; Rice, G.M.; Hajdin, C.E.; Peterson, B.K.; Ruda, V.M.; Kubica, N.; Nutiu., R.; Baryza, J.L.; Weeks, K.M. Pervasive regulatory functions of mRNA structure revealed by high-resolution SHAPE probing. Cell 2018, 173, 181–195.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Iost, I.; Jain, C. A DEAD-box protein regulates ribosome assembly through control of ribosomal protein synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 8193–8206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rabuck-Gibbons, J.N.; Popova, A.M.; Greene, E.M.; Cervantes, C.F.; Lyumkis, D.; Williamson, J.R. SrmB rescues trapped ribosome assembly intermediates. J. Mol. Biol. 2020, 432(4), 978–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dong, X.; Doerfel, L.K.; Sheng, K.; Rabuck-Gibbons, J.N.; Popova, A.M.; Lyumkis, D.; Williamson, J.R. Near-physiological in vitro assembly of 50S ribosomes involves parallel pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, 2862–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Guillier, M.; Allemand, F.; Dardel, F.; Royer, C.A.; Springer, M.; Chiaruttini, C. Double molecular mimicry in Escherichia coli: binding of ribosomal protein L20 to its two sites in mRNA is similar to its binding to 23S rRNA. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 56, 1441–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Haentjens-Sitri, J.; Allemand, F.; Springer, M.; Chiaruttini, C. A competition mechanism regulates the translation of the Escherichia coli operon encoding ribosomal proteins L35 and L20. J. Mol. Biol 2008, 375, 612–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Choonee, N.; Even, S.; Zig, L.; Putzer, H. Ribosomal protein L20 controls expression of the Bacillus subtilis infC operon via a transcription attenuation mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 1578–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Babina, A.M.; Parker, D.J.; Li, G.W.; Meyer, M.M. Fitness advantages conferred by the L20-interacting RNA cis-regulator of ribosomal protein synthesis in Bacillus subtilis. RNA 2018, 24, 1133–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Choi, E.; Jeon, H.; Oh, J.I.; Hwang, J. Overexpressed L20 rescues 50S ribosomal subunit assembly defects of bipA-deletion in Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Korepanov, A.P.; Gongadze, G.M.; Garber, M.B.; Court, D.L.; Bubunenko, M.G. Importance of the 5 S rRNA-binding ribosomal proteins for cell viability and translation in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 366, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Aseev, L.V.; Bylinkina, N.S.; Boni, I.V. Regulation of the rplY gene encoding 5S rRNA binding protein L25 in Escherichia coli and related bacteria. RNA 2015, 21, 851–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lilleorg, S.; Reier, K.; Remme, J.; Liiv, A. The intersubunit bridge B1b of the bacterial ribosome facilitates initiation of protein synthesis and maintenance of translational fidelity. J. Mol. Biol. 2017, 429, 1067–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Aseev, L.V.; Koledinskaya, L.S.; Boni, I.V. Autogenous regulation in vivo of the rpmE gene encoding ribosomal protein L31 (bL31), a key component of the protein-protein intersubunit bridge B1b. RNA 2020, 26, 814–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lilleorg, S.; Reier, K.; Pulk, A.; Liiv, A.; Tammsalu, T.; Peil, L.; Cate, J.D.; Remme, J. Bacterial ribosome heterogeneity: changes in ribosomal protein composition during transition into stationary growth phase. Biochimie 2019, 156, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Akanuma, G.; Nanamiya, H.; Natori, Y.; Nomura, N.; Kawamura, F. Liberation of zinc-containing L31 (RpmE) from ribosomes by its paralogous gene product, YtiA, in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188(7), 2715–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ueta, M.; Wada, C.; Wada, A. YkgM and YkgO maintain translation by replacing their paralogs, zinc-binding ribosomal proteins L31 and L36, with identical activities. Genes Cells. 2020, 25, 562–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lilleorg, S.; Reier, K.; Volõnkin, P.; Remme, J.; Liiv, A. Phenotypic effects of paralogous ribosomal proteins bL31A and bL31B in E. coli. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10(1), 11682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rasmussen, R.A.; Wang, S.; Camarillo, J.M.; Sosnowski, V.; Cho, B.K.; Goo, Y.A. , Lucks JB, O'Halloran, T.V. Zur and zinc increase expression of E. coli ribosomal protein L31 through RNA-mediated repression of the repressor L31p. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, 12739–12753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hurtado-Rios, J.J.; Carrasco-Navarro, U.; Almanza-Pérez, J.C.; Ponce-Alquicira, E. Ribosomes: The new role of ribosomal proteins as natural antimicrobials. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2022, 23(16), 9123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pidutti, P.; Federici, F.; Brandi, J.; Manna, L.; Rizzi, E.; Marini, U.; Cecconi, D. Purification and characterization of ribosomal proteins L27 and L30 having antimicrobial activity produced by the Lactobacillus salivarius SGL 03. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 124, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Qu, B.; Ma, Z.; Yao, L.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, S. Preserved antibacterial activity of ribosomal protein S15 during evolution. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 127, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kovacs D, Rakacs M, Agoston B, Lenkey K, Semrad K, Schroeder R, Tompa P. Janus chaperones: assistance of both RNA- and protein-folding by ribosomal proteins. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 88–92. [CrossRef]
Woodgate, R.; Rajagopalan, M.; Lu, C.; Echols, H. UmuC mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: purification and interaction with UmuD and UmuD'. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 1989, 86, 7301–7305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gao, B.; Liang, L.; Su, L.; Wen, A.; Zhou, C.; Feng, Y. Structural basis for regulation of SOS response in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2023, 120(2), e2217493120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Katsuya-Gaviria, K.; Paris, G.; Dendooven, T.; Bandyra, K.J. Bacterial RNA chaperones and chaperone-like riboregulators: behind the scenes of RNA-mediated regulation of cellular metabolism. RNA Biol. 2022, 19, 419–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Coetzee, T.; Herschlag, D.; Belfort, M. Escherichia coli proteins, including ribosomal protein S12, facilitate in vitro splicing of phage T4 introns by acting as RNA chaperones. Genes Dev. 1994, 8(13), 1575–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Woodson, S.A.; Panja, S.; Santiago-Frangos, A. Proteins that chaperone RNA regulation. Microbiol Spectr 2018, 6(4), 10.1128/microbiolspec.RWR-0026-2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Qureshi, N.S.; Bains, J.K; Sreeramulu, S.; Schwalbe, H.; Fürtig, B. Conformational switch in the ribosomal protein S1 guides unfolding of structured RNAs for translation initiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 10917–10929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bédard, A.V.; Hien, E.D.M.; Lafontaine, D.A. Riboswitch regulation mechanisms: RNA, metabolites and regulatory proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech 2020, 1863(3), 194501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
de Jesus, V.; Qureshi, N.S.; Warhaut, S.; Bains, J.K.; Dietz, M.S.; Heilemann, M.; Schwalbe, H.; Fürtig, B. Switching at the ribosome: riboswitches need rProteins as modulators to regulate translation. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ramaswamy, P.; Woodson, S.A. S16 throws a conformational switch during assembly of 30S 5' domain. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16(4), 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Oberto, J.; Bonnefoy, E.; Mouray, E.; Pellegrini, O.; Wikström, P.M.; Rouvière-Yaniv, J. The Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S16 is an endonuclease. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 19, 1319–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bonnefoy, E. The ribosomal S16 protein of Escherichia coli displaying a DNA-nicking activity binds to cruciform DNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997, 247, 852–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bowater, R.P.; Bohálová, N.; Brázda, V. Interaction of proteins with inverted repeats and cruciform structures in nucleic acids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zouine, M.; Beloin, C.; Ghelis, C.; Le Hégarat, F. The L17 ribosomal protein of Bacillus subtilis binds preferentially to curved DNA. Biochimie 2000, 82(1), 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Exley, R.; Zouine, M.; Pernelle, J.J.; Beloin, C.; Le Hégarat, F.; Deneubourg, A.M. A possible role for L24 of Bacillus subtilis in nucleoid organization and segregation. Biochimie 2001, 83, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yancey, J.E.; Matson, S.W. The DNA unwinding reaction catalyzed by Rep protein is facilitated by an RHSP-DNA interaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 3943–3951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wool, I.G. Extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1996, 21, 164–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Warner, J.R.; McIntosh, K.B. How common are extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins? Mol. Cell. 2009, 34, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Xiong, W.; Lan, T.; Mo, B. Extraribosomal functions of cytosolic ribosomal proteins in plants. Front. Plant. Sci 2021, 12, 607157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Reier, K.; Lahtvee, P.J.; Liiv, A.; Remme, J. A conundrum of r-protein stability: Unbalanced stoichiometry of r-proteins during stationary phase in Escherichia coli. mBio 2022, 13, e0187322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Composition of r-protein operons and their distribution on the E. coli chromosome.

Figure 2. Summarizes interactions of different domains of bS1 with its partners.

Figure 3. Composition of a specialized transcription complex to achieve efficient transcription of rRNA in E. coli. Two r-proteins moonlight as participants of the complex formation -- uS4 and uS10 (NusE). The figure is adopted from [106] (Huang, Y.H.; Said, N.; Loll, B.; Wahl, M.C. Structural basis for the function of SuhB as a transcription factor in ribosomal RNA synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47(12), 6488-6503. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz290).

Figure 4. Mycobacterial uS15 represses its own translation by binding to the pseudoknot structure within the rpsO 5’UTR [163]. A, B. Results of in vivo fluorescent reporter assays for M. smegmatis (Msm) and M. tuberculosis (Mtb) rpsO -egfp fusions incorporated in the Msm chromosome. pAMYC – an empty vector, pS15Msm and pS15Eco – pAMYC derivatives expressing uS15 from Msm and E. coli. C. uS15-mediated repression disappears after pseudoknot mutagenesis (mutPK).

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Choose an area of interest and we will send you notifications of new preprints at your preferred frequency.

Disclaimer

Extraribosomal Functions of Bacterial Ribosomal Proteins—an Update 2023

Abstract

1. Introduction

1.1. Ribosome Structure and Functions

1.2. Arrangement of the r-Protein Genes on Bacterial Chromosome

2. Moonlighting r-Proteins of the 30S Ribosomal Subunit

2.1. Multiple Activities of bS1

2.1.1. Structure and Unique Features of bS1

2.1.2. Functions of bS1 in Translation, Translational Control, Transcription, and RNA Decay

2.1.3. bS1 and Trans-Translation

2.1.4. Functions of bS1 during Infections with Bacteriophages

2.2. Functions of uS2 beyond the Ribosome

2.3. uS4, an Essential r-Protein Functioning in Ribosome Biogenesis, Translation, and Transcription

2.4. Ribosomal Proteins bS6 and bS18 Act in Tandem

2.5. A Key Primary Assembly r-Protein uS7 Is Bifunctional

2.6. uS8 Regulates the Longest spc Operon

2.7. uS10, an Essential Player in Transcription-Translation Coupling and Transcription Antitermination

2.8. uS15, a Translational Auto-Repressor in Various Bacterial Phyla

2.9. bS20, a Curious Case of a Regulatory Protein

2.10. bS21 and Heterogeneity of Ribosome Population

3. Multifunctional Proteins of the 50S Ribosomal Subunit

3.1. uL1 as a Widespread Autogenous Repressor

3.2. Multiple Activities of uL2

3.3. uL4 Is Multifunctional

3.4. bL7/12 and uL10 Form Pentameric Complex Both on and beyond the Ribosome

3.5. Ribosomal and Extraribosomal Functions of bL9

3.6. uL13, a Novel Autogenous Repressor

3.7. bL20, an Autogenous Repressor in E. coli and B. subtilis

3.8. Autogenous Regulation of bL25

3.9. Dual activity of bL31 and Its Paralog

4. Non-Specific Activities of Bacterial r-Proteins

4.1. Antimicrobial Activity

4.2. Ribosomal Proteins as Chaperons

4.3. Interactions of r-Proteins with DNA

Concluding Remarks

Funding

References

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Subscribe