Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Dairy Farm Management - Biometric Facial Recognition for Cows

Altmetrics

Downloads

468

Views

462

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

28 January 2024

Posted:

29 January 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in dairy farm management through biometric facial recognition for cows is a significant stride in livestock management. This review critically evaluates the evolution, applications, and challenges of AI-driven biometric facial recognition in dairy farming. It emphasizes the role of this technology in enhancing individual monitoring of dairy cows, providing accurate health, behavior, and productivity tracking. Originally derived from human facial recognition systems, this approach utilizes distinctive bovine facial features for essential, non-invasive, real-time monitoring in large-scale operations. The progression of AI from elementary pattern recognition to advanced Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and deep learning models marks a shift toward data-driven farming. This study addresses key challenges such as environmental variability, data collection hurdles, ethical concerns, and technological limitations. It also contrasts various AI models, spotlighting their unique strengths and practical utility in dairy farming scenarios. Despite these challenges, facial recognition technology holds promise for improving farm efficiency, animal welfare, and sustainable practices, highlighting the need for continuous research and development. The review concludes by advocating for future research focused on environmental adaptability, ethical AI application, cross-breed compatibility, and integration with other farming technologies. Ultimately, it underscores AI's transformative potential in modernizing dairy farming towards a more data-oriented, responsible agricultural future.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Zoology

1. Importance of Biometric Facial Recognition in Dairy Farming

In the realm of modern dairy farming, the incorporation of technological advancements has been pivotal in transforming various aspects of livestock management. Among these advancements, biometric facial recognition for dairy cows has emerged as a groundbreaking tool, offering a blend of precision, efficiency, and data-driven decision-making processes [1]. This technology has revolutionized how dairy farmers monitor, track, and manage individual animals [2,3], thereby significantly enhancing both productivity and animal welfare.
Biometric facial recognition in dairy farming primarily involves the identification and verification of individual cows based on unique facial features [4,5]. This technology is akin to human facial recognition systems but tailored to address the specific patterns and contours of bovine faces [6,7]. The essence of biometric recognition lies in its ability to offer non-invasive, real-time tracking and monitoring of cattle, which is critical in large-scale dairy operations where manual monitoring is impractical.
The significance of this technology in dairy farming extends beyond mere identification. It enables the monitoring of health and behavioral patterns, aids in the efficient management of breeding programs, and ensures timely medical interventions [8,9]. By identifying each cow as a unique individual, biometric facial recognition supports personalized care strategies, which are crucial in managing the health and wellbeing of the herd. This targeted approach to livestock management not only enhances productivity but also plays a vital role in addressing welfare concerns, as it allows for the early detection of illness and stress.
Furthermore, the integration of biometric technology aligns with the growing emphasis on sustainable and ethical farming practices [11]. By enabling precise tracking and management, it contributes to the reduction of waste, optimization of resource allocation, and minimizes the environmental footprint of dairy operations [12].

1.1. Brief History of AI Applications in Livestock Management

The journey of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in livestock management is a narrative of continuous evolution and innovation. The inception of AI applications in this field dates back to the early days of computer vision and pattern recognition technologies. Initially, these technologies were rudimentary, focusing on basic monitoring and tracking tasks. However, as AI evolved, so did its applications in livestock management, becoming more sophisticated and multifaceted.
The early 2000s marked a significant milestone with the introduction of RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) tags for livestock [13,14]. This technology provided a basic framework for individual animal identification and tracking. However, the real transformation began with the advent of advanced machine learning algorithms and the increasing accessibility of powerful computational resources.
In recent years, deep learning, a subset of AI, has taken center stage in advancing livestock management technologies [15]. Deep learning models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have proven highly effective in image recognition and classification tasks, which are central to biometric facial recognition [16,17]. These models can process and analyze vast amounts of visual data, learning to identify intricate patterns and features specific to individual animals.
Moreover, the integration of IoT (Internet of Things) in farm management has further propelled the use of AI. Sensors and cameras equipped with AI capabilities now provide continuous, real-time data streams, enabling dynamic monitoring of animal health, behavior, and productivity [18,19]. This data-driven approach not only enhances operational efficiency but also provides valuable insights for informed decision-making in dairy farming.

1.2. Objectives of the Review

The primary objective of this review is to critically analyze the advancements and challenges associated with the integration of AI in biometric facial recognition for dairy cows. This involves a comprehensive examination of the current state of technology, its applications, and the impact it has had on the dairy farming industry.
The review aims to,
Examine the Evolution of AI Technologies in Dairy Farming: Exploring how AI has evolved from basic identification systems to sophisticated biometric recognition tools and understanding the technological milestones that have marked this journey.
Assess the Applications and Benefits: Delving into various applications of biometric facial recognition in dairy farming, including health monitoring, behavioral analysis, and individualized care strategies, and evaluating their benefits in terms of efficiency, productivity, and animal welfare.
Identify Challenges and Limitations: Analyzing the challenges that hinder the widespread adoption of this technology, including issues related to accuracy, environmental factors, data privacy, and ethical considerations.
Explore Future Prospects and Innovations: Forecasting future trends and potential innovations in AI and biometric technology that could further enhance dairy farming practices.
Provide Recommendations for Stakeholders: Offering insights and recommendations for farmers, technologists, and policymakers on harnessing the potential of AI in dairy farming, while addressing the challenges and ethical considerations.
By achieving these objectives, this review aims to present a holistic view of the role of AI in transforming dairy farming through biometric facial recognition, highlighting both its potential and the hurdles that need to be overcome to realize its full benefits.

2. Methodology

Here we outline the methods used in selecting and analyzing research papers and studies related to the application of facial recognition technologies in dairy cows, focusing on biometric identification and AI applications in Holstein facial recognition.

2.1. Criteria for Selecting Research Papers and Studies

The selection of papers for this review was guided by a set of criteria designed to ensure the relevance and quality of the information. These criteria included:
Relevance to the Topic: Papers had to focus explicitly on dairy cow facial recognition, biometric applications in livestock, and the use of AI in animal identification.
Research Quality: Preference was given to peer-reviewed papers, published in reputable journals or conference proceedings.
Innovation and Novelty: Papers that introduced new methodologies, technologies, or significant improvements to existing systems were prioritized.
Impact and Application: Studies that demonstrated real-world applications, effectiveness in a practical setting, or potential impact on the dairy farming industry were considered highly relevant.

2.2. Search Strategy

The search strategy involved a comprehensive and systematic approach:
Databases Used: The primary databases for this review were Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. These platforms were chosen for their extensive coverage of scientific and technical literature.
Keywords Used: The search focused on specific keywords and phrases such as "dairy cow facial images," "biometrics in livestock," "Holstein facial recognition," and "AI in animal identification." Boolean operators like “AND” and “OR” were used to refine the searches.
Time Frame: The search was limited to papers published in the last five years to ensure the relevance and currency of the data. This time frame was considered sufficient to capture the recent advancements in the field.

2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

To maintain the focus and quality of the review, the following inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied:
Inclusion Criteria: Studies that specifically addressed facial recognition technology in dairy cows. Research that provided empirical data on the effectiveness of these technologies. Papers that discussed the integration of AI and machine learning in biometric recognition systems for livestock.
Exclusion Criteria: Papers that did not directly focus on dairy cow facial recognition or AI applications in livestock management. Studies older than five years, to ensure the inclusion of only the most recent advancements. Non-peer-reviewed articles, opinion pieces, or editorial content that did not provide empirical evidence or substantial theoretical analysis.

2.4. Data Extraction and Analysis Methods

The selected papers underwent a thorough data extraction and analysis process:
Data Extraction: Relevant information was extracted from each paper, including the study's objectives, methodologies, findings, and conclusions. Particular attention was paid to the types of AI and biometric technologies used, their application in dairy farming, and the results of their implementation.
Analysis Methods: The data were analyzed using a thematic approach. This involved identifying common themes and trends across the different studies, such as the types of facial recognition technologies used, their effectiveness, challenges encountered, and the implications for dairy farming. The analysis also looked at methodological variations, technological advancements, and the potential future direction of the field.
Synthesis of Findings: The final step involved synthesizing the findings from the various papers to draw coherent conclusions about the state of facial recognition technology in dairy farming, its effectiveness, challenges, and future prospects.

3. Overview of Biometric Facial Recognition in Dairy Cows

The integration of biometric facial recognition technology in the dairy industry represents a significant leap forward in livestock management.

3.1. Basic Principles of Biometric Facial Recognition

Biometric facial recognition technology operates on the principle of identifying unique physical characteristics in an individual’s face. This process involves several key stages:
Data Capture: The first stage involves capturing a digital image of the individual's face using a camera. In this context, the individual is a dairy cow. The image capture process must account for various factors such as lighting, angle, and distance to ensure the quality and consistency of the images.
Feature Extraction: This step involves analyzing the captured image to identify and extract unique facial features. These features typically include landmarks such as the eyes, nose, mouth, and snout or the jawline. In cows, specific markers suitable for identification are chosen, such as the shape and pattern of the muzzle, distance between the eyes, and other distinguishable features.
Feature Comparison and Matching: The extracted features are then compared with stored data in a database. This comparison is conducted using complex algorithms that calculate the probability of a match. The system then either verifies the identity of the individual (verification mode) or identifies the individual from a database of known faces (identification mode).
Decision and Output: Based on the comparison, the system makes a decision. If a match is found, the system outputs the identity of the individual. In the case of dairy cows, this could be linked to a specific cow’s health records, productivity data, and other relevant information.

3.2. Adaptation of These Principles for Dairy Cows

Adapting facial recognition technology for dairy cows involves several modifications and considerations:
Feature Selection: Unlike human faces, cow faces have different anatomical features. Researchers and developers must identify which facial features of cows are most distinct and consistent for use in recognition. This often involves studying patterns and shapes unique to bovine faces, such as ear shape, muzzle pattern, snout angle, eye shape, upper and lower lids of the eyes, tightening angle between the upper and lower jaws, and forehead markings.
Algorithm Adaptation: The algorithms used for feature extraction and matching must be adapted to recognize bovine features accurately. This involves training the algorithm with a large dataset of cow faces to learn the specific patterns and variations in bovine facial features.
Behavioral Considerations: Cows may not always face the camera directly, and their movements are less predictable. The technology must account for various angles, partial views, and motion to accurately capture and process images in a farm setting.
Environmental Adaptability: Farm environments can be challenging due to varying lighting conditions, weather, and obstructions. The technology must be robust enough to handle these variations and still capture usable images for recognition.

3.3. Technological Components

Several key technological components are essential for the successful implementation of facial recognition systems in dairy farms:
Cameras: High-resolution cameras capable of capturing clear images in various lighting conditions are crucial. These cameras may include standard RGB cameras, infrared cameras for low-light conditions, and even 3D cameras for capturing depth information.
Image Processing Software: This software preprocesses the captured images to enhance quality, adjust lighting, crop, and align images before feature extraction. This step is vital in ensuring that the algorithms have the best quality data to work with.
Facial Recognition Algorithms: Advanced algorithms, particularly those based on deep learning and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), are used for feature extraction and matching. These algorithms are trained on large datasets of cow facial images to achieve high accuracy levels.
Data Storage and Management Systems: Given the large volume of data generated, robust data storage and management systems are required. These systems store the facial images, extracted features, and identification data, often integrating with existing farm management systems for easy access and use.
User Interface: A user-friendly interface is essential for farm operators to interact with the system. This interface typically includes features for registering new cows, accessing individual cow profiles, and viewing alerts or reports generated by the system.
Networking and Connectivity: In large farms, the system may require a network setup to connect multiple cameras and computing units. Ensuring reliable and fast connectivity is key for real-time processing and data transfer.
Hardware and Infrastructure: Apart from cameras, the system requires hardware for processing the images and running the algorithms. This hardware needs to be robust and suitable for farm environments. Additionally, infrastructure for mounting cameras and protecting hardware from environmental elements is necessary.
The adaptation of biometric facial recognition technology for dairy cows is a complex but highly beneficial process. It involves careful consideration of bovine anatomy, behavior, and the farm environment, along with the integration of advanced technological components. This technology holds the promise of transforming dairy farm management by offering a more efficient, accurate, and animal-friendly approach to cow identification and monitoring.

4. Artificial Intelligence in Facial Recognition

The incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in facial recognition has revolutionized the way this technology is applied across various fields, including dairy farming. The synergy between AI and facial recognition technology has led to significant advancements, enhancing accuracy, efficiency, and adaptability [20–22]. Here, we delve into the role of AI in facial recognition, explor the AI techniques employed, and discuss the integration of AI with biometric data, particularly in the context of dairy cow identification.

4.1. Role of AI in Enhancing Facial Recognition Technology

AI has played a transformative role in the evolution of facial recognition technology. Its impact can be understood in the following dimensions:
Improved Accuracy: AI algorithms, especially those based on deep learning, have dramatically improved the accuracy of facial recognition systems [23]. They can analyze vast datasets of facial images, learning nuanced patterns and variations that would be imperceptible to the human eye or traditional software [24,25]. This level of accuracy is crucial in correctly identifying individual cows in a herd, each with its unique facial features.
Real-Time Processing: AI enables real-time processing of complex data. In the context of a dairy farm, this means being able to instantaneously identify a cow as it enters a milking parlor or feeding station [26,27]. Such prompt processing aids in efficient herd management and immediate action based on the identified data [28,29].
Handling Diverse Conditions: AI-powered systems can adapt to and function effectively in a range of environmental conditions – a critical requirement in the variable settings of a dairy farm [30,31]. They can compensate for poor lighting, partial views of the face, and even motion, ensuring consistent performance.
Scalability: AI algorithms can handle large-scale operations, making them suitable for farms with extensive herds [32,33]. As more data is fed into these systems, they become even more refined and effective.

4.2. Overview of AI Techniques Used

Several AI techniques have been instrumental in advancing facial recognition technology:
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) - CNNs are a class of deep neural networks most commonly applied to analyzing visual imagery [34]. They are particularly adept at recognizing patterns in images, making them ideal for facial recognition tasks [35]. In dairy farming, CNNs can be trained to recognize specific cow faces by processing thousands of images, learning to identify individual animals based on their facial features [36,37].
Deep Learning Models - Apart from CNNs, other deep learning models like autoencoders and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have also found applications in facial recognition [38,39]. These models can process sequential data (like video footage), learning from temporal patterns which is valuable in monitoring cow movements and behaviors over time [40,41].
Transfer Learning - This technique involves taking a pre-trained AI model (usually trained on human facial recognition) and fine-tuning it for bovine facial recognition [42,43]. This approach significantly reduces the time and resources required to develop an effective model from scratch.
Data Augmentation - AI systems often employ data augmentation techniques to expand the training dataset. This could involve artificially altering images (e.g., changing lighting conditions, adding noise) to make the model more robust to various real-world scenarios [44–46].

4.3. Integration of AI with Biometric Data

The integration of AI with biometric data, particularly in the context of dairy cow identification, involves several critical steps:
Data Collection and Preprocessing: Initially, biometric data, in this case, facial images of cows, are collected. This data is then preprocessed to enhance quality and consistency. Preprocessing steps might include image normalization, alignment, and augmentation.
Feature Extraction: AI models then analyze these images to extract meaningful features. For cows, this could include specific patterns on the muzzle, shape of the ears, and distance between the eyes. The AI system learns to recognize these features as unique identifiers for each cow.
Data Analysis and Interpretation: After extracting features, AI models analyze this data to make identifications or predictions. In a dairy farm setting, this might involve not just identifying the cow but also interpreting its health, stress levels, or even predicting its milk production based on historical data.
Integration with Farm Management Systems: The insights gained from AI analysis are then integrated into broader farm management systems. This integration allows for automatic updating of individual cow profiles, health records, and productivity data, enabling farmers to make informed decisions about each animal.
AI's role in facial recognition represents a paradigm shift in how biometric data is processed and utilized, especially in dairy farming. The precision, efficiency, and scalability brought by AI techniques like CNNs, and deep learning models have made it possible to implement sophisticated facial recognition systems in dairy farms. These systems not only enhance herd management but also pave the way for more personalized and humane animal care practices.

5. Advancements in the Field

The field of biometric facial recognition, particularly in dairy cows, has seen remarkable technological advancements and breakthroughs in recent years. These developments, driven by continuous research and innovative approaches, have significantly enhanced the capabilities of facial recognition systems. Here, we explore these advancements, key studies that have shaped the field, and the innovations in algorithms that have led to improved model accuracy and real-time processing.

5.1. Major Technological Advancements and Breakthroughs

The progression in biometric facial recognition technology for dairy cows can be attributed to several major technological advancements:
High-Resolution Imaging Technology - The development of high-resolution, robust cameras capable of capturing detailed images in various lighting and weather conditions has been a game-changer. These cameras provide the high-quality input data necessary for effective facial recognition.
3D Imaging and Depth Sensing - The adoption of 3D imaging and depth-sensing technologies has allowed for more accurate and detailed capture of bovine facial features. This technology helps in distinguishing individual cows even in a crowded environment and aids in accurate feature mapping.
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms - The advancement in machine learning, especially deep learning algorithms like CNNs, has dramatically increased the accuracy of facial recognition systems. These algorithms can process and analyze large datasets, learning complex patterns in facial features specific to each cow.
Edge Computing in Data Processing - The integration of edge computing allows data processing to occur closer to the data source (i.e., on or near the farm). This technology has enabled real-time or near-real-time processing, which is essential for timely decision-making in farm management.
Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics - The use of cloud computing and big data analytics has provided the infrastructure and capability to handle the massive amounts of data generated by facial recognition systems. This technology supports the storage, analysis, and easy retrieval of data, making the system more efficient and scalable.

5.2. Key Studies and Their Findings

Several studies have been instrumental in advancing the field of biometric facial recognition in dairy cows.
Study on CNN-based Facial Recognition: A landmark study [47] introduced the use of CNN models specifically trained on bovine faces. The study demonstrated that these models could achieve high accuracy levels in identifying individual cows, even in challenging conditions [48,49].
Research on Behavioral Prediction: Kawagoe et al., [50] explored the use of facial recognition technology not just for identification but also for predicting behavioral patterns and health conditions in cows. The research indicated that certain facial features and expressions could be linked to health status, stress levels, and even reproductive cycles [51].
Comparative Analysis of Algorithms: A comparative study of various machine learning algorithms in bovine facial recognition provided valuable insights into their relative performance [4,48,52–54]. The studies concluded that deep learning models, particularly those employing transfer learning, outperformed traditional machine learning models in both accuracy and efficiency.

5.3. Innovations in Algorithms, Model Accuracy, and Real-Time Processing

The field has seen several innovations in algorithms and processing techniques, leading to improved model accuracy and real-time capabilities:
Algorithmic Innovation for Robust Feature Extraction - New algorithms have been developed that are more adept at extracting and analyzing complex facial features in cows. These algorithms can isolate and process key identifiers like muzzle patterns and ear shapes with high precision.
Enhancements in Real-Time Processing - Advancements in GPU technology and optimization of algorithms have led to faster processing speeds. This improvement is crucial for real-time applications where decisions need to be made quickly, such as sorting cows for milking or feeding.
Accuracy Improvement Through Data Augmentation - Researchers have employed data augmentation techniques to expand the training dataset, thereby improving the model's accuracy and robustness. This includes artificially altering images to simulate different conditions and angles, making the system more adaptable to real-world scenarios.
Integration of AI with Other Biometric Technologies - There has been a growing trend in integrating facial recognition with other biometric technologies like RFID tagging and gait analysis. This multimodal approach enhances the overall accuracy and reliability of the system.
The advancements in biometric facial recognition technology for dairy cows represent a significant leap forward in livestock management. The integration of cutting-edge imaging technologies, advanced AI algorithms, and innovative data processing techniques has not only improved the accuracy and efficiency of these systems but also broadened their application scope. These developments hold great promise for the future of dairy farming, paving the way for more automated, data-driven, and sustainable farming practices.

6. Applications of Biometric Facial Recognition technologies in Dairy Farming

The incorporation of biometric facial recognition technology in dairy farming has the potential to revolutionize traditional practices, by introducing a new era of efficiency and precision in the management of dairy herds.

6.1. Monitoring and Tracking Individual Cows

The integration of facial recognition technology in dairy farming offers a transformative approach to monitoring and tracking individual cows. In the past, dairy farmers depended on manual methods or elementary electronic systems for livestock tracking. These traditional methods were not only time-consuming but also prone to errors. Facial recognition technology dramatically alters this landscape, bringing a host of benefits coupled with certain challenges.
With facial recognition technology, individual cows within a herd can be identified, irrespective of the herd's size. Each cow possesses unique facial features that act as biometric markers, rendering physical tags, which are prone to loss or damage, redundant. This system of identification is far more reliable and efficient. Moreover, the technology empowers farmers with advanced algorithms that analyze cows' facial expressions and movements. This capability is invaluable for understanding behavioral patterns and detecting changes that might indicate stress, illness, or shifts in herd dynamics. Such insights are crucial for timely interventions, ensuring the health and well-being of each animal.
Additionally, facial recognition facilitates the tracking of cows' movements across the farm. This information is critical in deciphering patterns related to feeding, milking, and social interactions within the herd, leading to more informed farm management decisions. However, the implementation of facial recognition in dairy farming is not without its challenges. Consistent data capture is often hampered by variable lighting conditions, physical obstructions, and the natural movements of cows. These factors can significantly impact the accuracy and reliability of the technology. Ensuring that the system can consistently and accurately identify and track cows across diverse environmental conditions is essential for leveraging the full potential of this technology. Addressing these challenges is crucial for the successful integration of facial recognition in dairy farming, paving the way for more efficient, data-driven, and humane livestock management practices.

6.2. Enhancements in Health Management and Welfare

Facial recognition technology plays a pivotal role in enhancing the health management and welfare of dairy cows, marking a significant shift in how livestock health is monitored and managed. By continuously monitoring cows, this technology can detect early signs of illness, which is crucial for prompt and effective treatment. For instance, subtle changes in facial features such as drooping eyes or alterations in muzzle texture, often imperceptible to the human eye, can signal potential health issues. Early detection not only ensures timely medical intervention but also prevents the spread of diseases within the herd.
Beyond disease detection, facial recognition technology is instrumental in monitoring stress and welfare among dairy cows. It can identify signs of stress or discomfort, which are critical for maintaining a healthy and productive herd. Early recognition of these signs leads to immediate interventions, significantly enhancing the overall welfare of the animals. This aspect of technology is particularly valuable in large herds where individual monitoring would otherwise be impractical.
Another key advantage of facial recognition technology is its ability to enable customized care for each cow. Individual tracking allows for care strategies tailored to each cow's specific health and nutritional needs. This level of personalization, unattainable on a large scale in the past, ensures that each cow receives the most appropriate care, contributing to the overall health and efficiency of the herd.
However, the effectiveness of facial recognition technology in health predictions and stress detection is heavily reliant on the accuracy of the algorithms used and the quality of input data. There is a risk of misinterpretations leading to incorrect health assessments. This underscores the need for continuous refinement of the technology and the datasets used for training the algorithms. Consistent improvement and updating of these systems are imperative to ensure their reliability and accuracy in monitoring and managing the health and welfare of dairy cows. Thus, while facial recognition technology offers remarkable benefits in dairy farming, its successful application hinges on rigorous algorithmic training and data quality assurance.

6.3. Implications for Milk Production and Farm Efficiency

The implementation of facial recognition technology in dairy farming brings a multitude of benefits that extend to milk production and overall farm efficiency. This technology enables farmers to monitor the health and behavior of each cow in real-time, facilitating the optimization of milking schedules and dietary plans. Such targeted management can lead to increased milk yield, a critical factor in the profitability and sustainability of dairy farms.
In addition to optimizing milk production, facial recognition technology significantly enhances labor efficiency. By automating the tracking and monitoring processes, it reduces the labor required for these tasks. This automation allows farm workers to concentrate on more critical and strategic aspects of farm management, thereby streamlining operations and increasing productivity.
Another key advantage of this technology is its capacity for data-driven decision-making. The wealth of data generated through facial recognition can be analyzed to make informed decisions regarding breeding, health management, and resource allocation. This data-centric approach enables farmers to manage their herds more effectively and respond quickly to any emerging issues.
When integrated with other farm management systems, facial recognition technology offers a comprehensive view of farm operations. This holistic approach enhances overall efficiency, ensuring all aspects of farm management work in synergy for optimal results.
However, the journey to realizing these benefits is not without challenges. A significant initial investment in technology and infrastructure is required to implement facial recognition systems, posing a cost-benefit consideration, especially for smaller farms. Additionally, reliance on technology brings concerns about system reliability, the need for constant maintenance, updates, and potential system failures.
While the potential of biometric facial recognition technology in enhancing dairy farming efficiency is substantial, its successful implementation depends on overcoming these challenges. Addressing issues related to data accuracy, environmental variability, and cost implications is crucial. Continuous research, development, and practical field insights are imperative in advancing this technology. Such efforts will ensure that facial recognition technology meets the diverse needs of the modern dairy industry, driving it towards more efficient, data-driven, and sustainable farming practices.

7. Challenges and Limitations

While biometric facial recognition technology in dairy farming heralds a new age of efficiency and precision, its implementation is not without challenges and limitations.

7.1. Accuracy in Diverse Environmental Conditions

One of the most significant challenges in implementing facial recognition technology in dairy farming is ensuring accuracy under diverse environmental conditions:
Lighting Variability - Farms experience a wide range of lighting conditions – from bright sunlight to dimly lit barns. These variations can significantly affect the quality of the images captured, impacting the accuracy of facial recognition algorithms.
Weather Conditions - Outdoor systems must contend with weather conditions such as rain, fog, or snow, which can obscure a cow's facial features and lead to inaccurate recognition.
Physical Obstructions - In a typical farm environment, physical obstructions like feeders or other cows can block a full view of the face, complicating the recognition process.
Critical Analysis - Addressing these environmental challenges requires robust and adaptive algorithms capable of handling variations in image quality. Enhanced data preprocessing techniques and the development of algorithms specifically designed for variable conditions are necessary. Moreover, deploying cameras with higher resolution and better sensitivity to different light conditions can partially mitigate these issues.

7.2. Challenges in Data Collection and Model Training

Effective model training for facial recognition is contingent upon the collection of high-quality, diverse data such as,
Large and Diverse Datasets - Training AI models for facial recognition requires extensive datasets with varied images. Collecting such a dataset is time-consuming and labor-intensive.
Data Annotation - The process of labeling images with the correct cow identities (annotation) is crucial for training. This process can be particularly challenging given the subtle differences in bovine faces.
Balancing Quantity with Quality - While a large quantity of data is necessary for training robust models, the quality of this data is equally important. Poor-quality images can lead to inaccuracies in model training.
Critical Analysis - Innovative approaches such as transfer learning, where a model developed for one task is repurposed on a second related task, can alleviate some of the data requirements. However, ensuring the quality and diversity of training data remains a significant challenge that requires ongoing attention.

7.3. Ethical Considerations and Animal Welfare Concerns

The use of facial recognition technology in dairy farming raises several ethical and animal welfare concerns,
Privacy and Data Security - While cows do not have privacy concerns in the human sense, the collection and storage of biometric data raise questions about data security and the potential misuse of this information.
Animal Welfare - Continuous monitoring might be perceived as an intrusion into the natural behavior of cows. Ensuring that the technology is used in a way that does not negatively affect the animals is paramount.
Human-Animal Relationship - Relying heavily on technology for monitoring and decision-making could potentially alter the traditional human-animal relationship in farming.
Critical Analysis - Addressing these ethical considerations requires clear guidelines and policies on data use and storage. It is also essential to ensure that the technology is used to augment, rather than replace, human care and management, thereby enhancing animal welfare.

7.4. Limitations in Current Technologies and Methodologies

Despite the significant advancements in facial recognition technology, current systems face a range of limitations that need to be addressed for optimal performance in dairy farming. One of the primary constraints is the quality of hardware used in these systems. The effectiveness of facial recognition largely depends on the capabilities of cameras and processors, with any limitations in these components potentially leading to reduced system performance. For instance, lower-quality cameras might struggle to capture clear images in varying farm conditions, impacting the accuracy of cow identification.
Software limitations also pose a challenge in effectively implementing this technology. While current algorithms are advanced, they still confront difficulties in handling the complexities and unpredictability of farm environments. Challenges such as partial facial visibility due to cow movements or occlusions, and difficulties in distinguishing between similar-looking animals, can hinder the system's ability to accurately identify individual cows.
Another significant hurdle is the dependency on continuous internet connectivity. Many facial recognition systems require a stable internet connection for data processing and storage. This dependency can be a significant limitation in remote or rural farm settings where internet connectivity might be unreliable or unavailable.
Additionally, the cost of implementing and maintaining sophisticated facial recognition systems can be a major barrier, particularly for small to medium-sized farms. The investment in high-quality hardware, software, and ongoing maintenance can be substantial, making it a less viable option for smaller operations.
To overcome these challenges, ongoing research and development are crucial. Innovations in both hardware and software, as well as the development of more cost-effective solutions, are necessary for wider adoption. For instance, creating systems that can function effectively with offline or low-bandwidth solutions could significantly enhance the accessibility of facial recognition technology for farms located in more remote areas.
While facial recognition technology holds great promise for transforming dairy farming, its successful implementation requires a concerted effort to address these technological and practical challenges. This involves not only technological advancements but also considering ethical implications and ensuring the technology benefits all stakeholders, including the animals at the center of the dairy industry. A multi-faceted approach is essential to ensure the technology is effective, practical, and beneficial for the advancement of modern dairy farming.
Table 1. Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Models in Bovine Facial Recognition.
Table 1. Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Models in Bovine Facial Recognition.
References AI Models Evaluated Key Features of Model Effectiveness (Accuracy, Speed etc.,) Practical Applications in Dairy Farming
[55] Vision Transformer (ViT), YOLOv5 Real-time facial recognition system for cows; deep neural networks 97.8% mAP, 96.3% accuracy Monitoring individual cow behavior and health
[56] Hand-designed Feature Descriptors, CNNs Combination of gait and texture features High accuracy, slightly time-consuming Better registration, traceability, and security of livestock/cattle
[49] RetinaFace-mobilenet, ArcFace (CattleFaceNet) Facial recognition using infrared and RGB images High accuracy (97.54%) Real-time livestock individual identification in production scenarios
[48] SVM, KNN, ANN, CNN, ResNet, YOLO, Faster R-CNN Machine learning and deep learning models for cattle identification Varied effectiveness based on algorithm and data quality Traceability and identification systems in livestock supply chain
[57] Computer Vision Techniques Auto-detection of cow breeds using visual characteristics Effective in breed classification Breed-specific management and breeding decisions
[58] Custom Algorithms Unique algorithm for feature extraction and recognition Good accuracy, efficient processing Improved cattle recognition in varied conditions
[59] Automated Monitoring Systems Monitoring of feeding behavior and patterns Reliable data collection, real-time monitoring Optimizing feeding strategies and health monitoring
[60] Hybrid Deep Learning Models Hybrid approach combining multiple DL models Enhanced accuracy and robustness Reliable and versatile cattle identification
[61] Unknown Cattle Recognition Techniques Techniques to identify unknown cattle Effective in identifying new or untagged cattle Enhances herd management and security
[62] Siamese Neural Network Utilizing twin networks for feature comparison High accuracy in matching and recognition Effective in tracking and re-identifying cattle
[63] YoloV5 Applied to pig recognition, adaptable to cattle High speed and accuracy in real-time processing Potential application in diverse livestock recognition
[64] Open Pose, Mask R-CNN Skeleton key points extraction for identification Accurate even with varying poses and angles Useful in movement analysis and health monitoring
[65] LAD-RCNN Focus on livestock face normalization, detection of rotation angles More than 97% average precision in face detection, 13.7 ms processing time per picture Enhances accuracy of livestock face recognition systems
[66] Yolo V5, Filter_Attention Mechanism Detection of key cattle body parts, soft pooling algorithm High mAP and F1 values, accurate part detection, 90.74% mAP Useful in behavior analysis and health monitoring
[50] YOLO Detector, Transfer Learning Facial region analysis, Hough transform for feeding time estimation Effective in individual cow identification and feeding time estimation Monitoring systems for individual cow behavior and health analysis
[67] Siamese DB Capsule Network Dense Block and Capsule Network for feature extraction High accuracy, especially in small sample datasets Effective in individual cow recognition with limited data
[68] GPN Model Global and part feature extraction with attention mechanism High Rank-1 accuracy and mAP Improved cow re-identification and verification
[69] Feature Fusion Model Multi-angle data acquisition and feature matching Good recognition accuracy and robustness Individual cattle recognition in complex environments
[70] FacEDiM Few-shot biometric authentication using Mahalanobis distance Significant performance with pre-trained ImageNet models Biometric authentication of cattle
[71] VGG16_BN, Wide ResNet50 Accuracy measurement, large image feature extraction VGG16_BN showed lower accuracy compared to Wide ResNet50 Cattle identification using muzzle images
[72] SSD, FaceNet with ArcFace Deep learning-based approach for cattle face localization and recognition Accuracy of 94.74% on a dataset of 152 cattle Cattle face recognition for AutoID
[73] Mask R-CNN, SimCLR, MAE Precision, recall, mean average precision, and F1 score evaluation SimCLR showed the best performance across multiple metrics Self-supervised animal detection
[74] VGG-16, ResNet-50, DenseNet-121, AlexNet CNN models for cow identification AlexNet outperformed other models with 96.65% accuracy Individual identification of cows
[75] FAST, SIFT, FLANN, ORB, BruteForce Feature extraction, descriptor, and matching Accuracy up to 96.72%, efficient computational performance Real-time accurate identification of dairy cattle
[76] AlexNet, VGG16, MobileV3, ResNet50 Fusion experiments with key area identification ResNet50_LKA showed high accuracy (99.81%) Cattle identification based on locating key area
[77] SVM with RBF Accuracy as an evaluation metric High accuracy in identification Cow identification based on deep parts features fusion
[78] SVM with radial basis function in Mask R-CNN Precision, recall, AP, F1, run time per image, model parameters High recognition accuracy with best feature subset Dairy cow prediction using SVM in Mask R-CNN
[79] YOLACT++ Improved single-stage instance segmentation algorithm Average precision of multi-view images was 85.9%, relative error of 2.18% in 3D point cloud segmentation Effective in 3D point cloud segmentation for animal shape acquisition
[80] RetinaNet with ResNet50 Backbone, GMM Self-supervision framework for video identification, uses orientation-aware cattle detector, Frame-triplet contrastive learning Top-1 accuracy: 57.0%, Top-4: 76.9%, Adjusted Rand Index: 0.53 Identification of individual animals in dairy farming using video imagery
[81] DeepOtsu, EfficientNet-B1, YOLOX Binarization of body pattern image, classification using EfficientNet-B1, cow trunk localization using YOLOX Binarization segmentation accuracy of 0.932, identification accuracy of 0.985, processing time of 0.433 seconds per image Individual cow identification in dairy farms
[82] YOLO-v5, Wide ResNet with SPP-Net, Ensemble Kalman Filter Tracking algorithm for multi-cattle, handles appearance and scale deformation, angle prediction, and occlusion handling Accuracy of 84.49% in data association, various metrics like MOTA and MOTP also evaluated Multi-cattle tracking using video for precision livestock farming applications
[83] YOLOv5s, NVIDIA Deepstream Real-time cattle ear tag reading, "WhenToRead" module for decision making High accuracy of 96.1% for printed ear tags Individual cattle identification in dairy farming
[84] ResNet50, Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) Self-supervised metric learning, cluster analysis, and active learning Top-1 accuracy of 92.44% after minimal labeling effort Identification of individual cattle using CCTV in real-world farm settings
[85] Keypoint R-CNN (R50-FPN and R101-FPN) Uses keypoint detection and alignment in top view. Converts aligned images into bit patterns like QR codes. Employs a keypoint detector for body keypoints and a semantic mask for each cow instance. Top-1 accuracy: 61.5% Top-4 accuracy: ~83% Efficient training with one image per cow and no retraining needed for new cows. Non-intrusive, fast identification of individual cows. Useful for monitoring health, milk production, and behavior patterns. Can track cow ownership.
[86] CD-YOLOv7 Depthwise Separable Convolution, DS-MPConv module, CBAM integration mAP up to 98.55%, FPS of 31, reduced parameters and computational complexity Individual cow identification in complex pasture environments
[87] CUMDA Cumulative Unsupervised Multi-Domain Adaptation for diverse farm environments Effective for re-identification (Re-ID) across multiple unlabeled domains Non-intrusive health monitoring and minimizing economic losses
[88] Deep Metric Learning Open-set recognition, RetinaNet detection, reciprocal triplet loss 93.8% accuracy with half of the cattle population Automated detection, localisation, and identification of individual cattle
[89] Fusion of RetinaFace and improved FaceNet MobileNet-enhanced RetinaFace, improved facial feature and keypoint detection High accuracy in varying conditions, 99.50% training accuracy, 83.60% test accuracy Non-contact, high-precision identification of individual cows
[90] ResNet50 with Ghost and CBAM Modules Lightweight model, large receptive field, Ghost Bottleneck to reduce parameters, CBAM for attention 98.58% recognition accuracy, model size of 3.61 MB Individual cow identification with reduced model complexity and size

8. Key Questions for Farmers - Assessing Readiness for Implementing Facial Recognition Technology in Dairy Farming

Engaging in a conversation with a farmer about implementing a facial recognition system for dairy cows involves asking insightful and pertinent questions. These questions should not only gauge the farmer's current operations and challenges but also explore their openness to technological solutions. Here's a list of intriguing questions one might ask:

8.1. Understanding Current Practices

  • Can you describe your current methods for monitoring and identifying individual cows in your herd?
  • How do you currently track the health and productivity of each cow?
  • What challenges do you face with your current livestock management system?

8.2. Technology Awareness and Perception

  • How familiar are you with the concept of facial recognition technology for dairy cows?
  • What is your perception of integrating artificial intelligence in dairy farming?
  • Have you previously considered or used any form of advanced technology or automation in your farming practices?

8.3. Addressing Specific Needs

  • Are there particular aspects of your dairy operations where you think technology could make a significant impact?
  • What are your primary concerns when it comes to the health and welfare of your herd?
  • Have you experienced any difficulties with cow identification or tracking that you think technology could solve?

8.4. Exploring Benefits and Outcomes

  • What outcomes would you most hope to achieve by implementing a facial recognition system for your cows?
  • In what ways do you think such a system could enhance your farm's efficiency and productivity?
  • How important is it for you to have real-time data and analytics about your herd?

8.5. Understanding Hesitations or Concerns

  • Do you have any reservations or concerns about adopting a facial recognition system for your dairy cows?
  • How do you perceive the cost versus benefit aspect of investing in such technology?
  • What are your thoughts on the learning curve and ease of use of new technologies in farming?

8.6. Long-Term Perspectives

  • How do you envision technology, specifically AI and facial recognition, impacting dairy farming in the long run?
  • What are your long-term goals for your farm, and how do you see technology fitting into these plans?
  • How open are you to experimenting with and adopting new technologies to meet future challenges in dairy farming?

8.7. Practical and Technical Considerations

  • What features or capabilities would you consider essential in a facial recognition system for it to be useful on your farm?
  • How would you want to integrate the data from a facial recognition system with your existing farm management systems?
  • Are there specific technical support or training you would find most helpful when implementing such a system?

8.8. Feedback and Decision Making

  • What information or assurance would you need to make a decision about adopting a facial recognition system?
  • Who else in your business or family would be involved in making a decision about implementing such technology?
  • What would be your ideal scenario or solution when it comes to employing technology in your dairy farming operations?
These questions are designed to encourage a comprehensive and thoughtful discussion, providing valuable insights into the farmer's needs, perceptions, and readiness to embrace innovative solutions in dairy farming.

9. Overcoming Obstacles in Biometric Technology - Navigating the Challenges of Implementing Facial Recognition Systems for Dairy Cows

The development and application of facial recognition systems for dairy cows, while promising, come with several bottlenecks and technical challenges. These obstacles must be addressed to ensure the effective implementation and adoption of such technologies. Some of the key challenges include:
Environmental Variability - Dairy farms present a highly variable environment with different lighting conditions, weather changes, and physical obstructions. Ensuring that the facial recognition system is robust enough to function accurately in all these conditions is a significant challenge.
Data Collection and Quality - Collecting high-quality, consistent images of cows for training the AI models can be difficult. Factors like movement, dirt, or occlusions (like feeders or other cows) can affect image quality, impacting the system's accuracy.
Large Dataset Requirement - AI and machine learning models, particularly those based on deep learning, require large datasets for training. Gathering a sufficiently large and diverse set of facial images of cows to ensure the model's effectiveness across different breeds and conditions is a daunting task.
Real-Time Processing - For the system to be practical, it needs to process and analyze data in real-time or near-real-time. This requires substantial computational power, which can be a challenge, especially in remote or rural farm settings where resources may be limited.
Integration with Existing Systems - Integrating the facial recognition system with existing farm management software and systems can be complex. It requires seamless data transfer, compatibility, and potentially significant changes to existing IT infrastructure.
Animal Behavior and Welfare - Ensuring that the technology does not negatively impact the cows' behavior or welfare is crucial. The system must be non-intrusive and not cause stress or discomfort to the animals.
Cost and Return on Investment - Developing and implementing such systems can be costly. Farmers and stakeholders need to be convinced of a tangible return on investment for it to be economically viable, especially for smaller operations.
Accuracy and Reliability - Achieving high accuracy and reliability in cow identification is essential. Mistakes in identification can lead to incorrect health assessments, feeding, or breeding decisions, affecting the farm's overall productivity.
Scalability - The system needs to be scalable to accommodate farms of different sizes and potentially different species of livestock. It should maintain its effectiveness whether it's monitoring a few dozen or several hundred animals.
User-Friendly Interface - Farmers and farm workers may not be tech-savvy. Thus, the system needs a user-friendly interface that is easy to understand and operate.
Data Security and Privacy - Protecting the data collected by such systems is paramount. There need to be strong cybersecurity measures in place to prevent unauthorized access or data breaches.
Ethical and Legal Considerations - There may be ethical and legal considerations, especially related to data usage and animal rights, which need to be carefully navigated.
Hardware Durability and Maintenance - The hardware used for imaging and data collection must be durable enough to withstand farm conditions and require minimal maintenance.
Customization and Flexibility - Different farms may have different requirements. The system must be flexible and customizable to cater to a wide range of needs.
These challenges represent a combination of technical, logistical, and socio-economic factors that must be addressed to ensure the successful implementation and widespread adoption of facial recognition systems in dairy farming.

10. Future Trends in Dairy Farming - The Impact of AI and Biometric Recognition

The realm of dairy farming is on the cusp of a revolution, with biometric recognition and AI poised to usher in a new era of technological advancements. These emerging technologies promise to reshape dairy farming practices, offering a glimpse into a future where precision and efficiency take center stage.
Advanced imaging technologies are at the forefront of this transformation. Techniques like hyperspectral imaging are expected to emerge, providing a more comprehensive analysis of cow health by examining a broader spectrum of light. This advancement could lead to more precise health monitoring and earlier disease detection, fundamentally changing the approach to animal healthcare in dairy farming.
AI-driven predictive analytics are set to play a pivotal role, enhancing the capability to forecast health issues, optimize feeding patterns, and predict milk production with unprecedented accuracy. By integrating AI with big data analytics, dairy farmers could gain insights into the future needs and potential challenges of their herds, allowing for proactive rather than reactive management.
The integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) in dairy farming will likely lead to more interconnected systems, where data from facial recognition is combined with information from other sensors, such as GPS trackers and health monitors. This holistic approach to farm management will enable more nuanced decision-making, based on comprehensive data.
The potential of automated robotic systems and drone technology in dairy farming is also significant. The integration of facial recognition with automated milking machines and feeding systems could pave the way for autonomous dairy farm operations, reducing the need for human intervention and focusing on strategic oversight. Drones, equipped with cameras and facial recognition capabilities, could revolutionize the management of large grazing areas, improving efficiency and coverage.
Looking to the future, several research areas in AI and biometric recognition are ripe for exploration. Developing algorithms that can adapt to a wide range of environmental conditions, such as varying lighting and weather, remains a key research focus. Ethical AI practices, especially concerning data privacy and security, will become increasingly important as AI's role in farming expands. Research into extending the technology across different cow breeds and potentially to other livestock species will broaden its applicability. Integrating facial recognition with health monitoring technologies could lead to comprehensive health profiles for each cow, enhancing disease prevention and treatment strategies.
Technological advancements are expected to propel dairy farming into the realm of precision agriculture, where farm management is based on detailed, real-time data. This shift promises enhanced animal welfare, with farmers able to respond more quickly to health and welfare issues. Eco-friendly practices are likely to emerge, optimizing feed consumption, reducing waste, and managing resources more efficiently. The workforce in dairy farming will also undergo a transformation, shifting towards more skilled labor focused on technology management and analysis.
However, the adoption of these technologies could lead to economic reshaping within the dairy industry. Smaller farms might need to adopt new technologies to remain competitive or consider consolidation with larger, more technologically advanced operations.
The future of biometric facial recognition in dairy farming, intertwined with AI and related technologies, promises to revolutionize farming practices. This transition to more efficient, humane, and sustainable methods, however, brings challenges that require a thoughtful approach to integration, balancing technological possibilities with ethical considerations and the practical realities of farming.

11. Conclusions

The integration of biometric facial recognition technology with Artificial Intelligence (AI) in dairy farming provides a detailed understanding of the present scenario, existing challenges, and future possibilities in this innovative arena. This technology, significantly advanced by deep learning and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has markedly improved the precision and efficiency of identifying individual cows, revolutionizing herd management and operational effectiveness.
This technology's capacity to enhance health management and welfare is notable, as it facilitates early illness detection and stress identification, leading to improved care. However, challenges persist, including environmental variability, data collection complexities, ethical considerations, and current technological constraints.
A comparative analysis reveals that while deep learning models typically outshine traditional machine learning in accuracy, they demand more computational power. The adoption of facial recognition indicates a paradigm shift towards data-centric and precision-based farming within the dairy industry. It promises improved animal welfare and productivity, aligning with sustainable and ethical farming practices. This shift may also reshape the industry's economic and operational dynamics, favoring technologically adept farms and stimulating a demand for a workforce proficient in technology management and data analysis.
Looking forward, research should concentrate on developing algorithms resilient to diverse farm environments and addressing ethical concerns in AI and data security. Extending research to various breeds and species, integrating facial recognition with other emerging technologies, and conducting cost-benefit analyses for smaller farms are essential. Continuous innovation in hardware, software, and AI models is vital to address current limitations and enhance the capabilities of facial recognition in dairy farming.
The biometric facial recognition technology, augmented by AI, holds great promise for the dairy farming industry, offering a pathway to enhanced efficiency, welfare, and sustainability. Achieving this potential fully hinges on addressing current challenges and persisting in innovation and development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, SN; formal analysis, SM; SN.; investigation, SM; SN; writing—original draft preparation, SM; SN; writing—review and editing, SN.; project administration, S.N.; funding acquisition, S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Neethirajan, S. Happy Cow or Thinking Pig? Wur Wolf-Facial Coding Platform for Measuring Emotions in Farm Animals. AI 2021, 2, 342-354. [CrossRef]
  2. Neethirajan, S. Affective State Recognition in Livestock-Artificial Intelligence Approaches. Animals 2022, 12, 759. [CrossRef]
  3. Neethirajan, S. Is Seeing Still Believing? Leveraging Deepfake Technology for Livestock Farming. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 740253. [CrossRef]
  4. Kumar, S.; Singh, S.K. Cattle Recognition: A New Frontier in Visual Animal Biometrics Research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 2020, 90, 689-708. [CrossRef]
  5. Awad, A.I. From Classical Methods to Animal Biometrics: A Review on Cattle Identification and Tracking. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2016, 123, 423-435. [CrossRef]
  6. Awad, A.I.; Hassaballah, M. Bag-of-Visual-Words for Cattle Identification from Muzzle Print Images. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4914. [CrossRef]
  7. Winston, J.J.; Hemanth, D.J. A Comprehensive Review on Iris Image-Based Biometric System. Soft Comput. 2019, 23, 9361-9384. [CrossRef]
  8. Neethirajan, S.; Kemp, B. Digital Livestock Farming. Sens. Biosens. Res. 2021, 32, 100408. [CrossRef]
  9. Neethirajan, S. Transforming the Adaptation Physiology of Farm Animals through Sensors. Animals 2020, 10, 1512. [CrossRef]
  10. Fuentes, S.; Viejo, C.G.; Tongson, E.; Dunshea, F.R. The Livestock Farming Digital Transformation: Implementation of New and Emerging Technologies Using Artificial Intelligence. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2022, 1-13. [CrossRef]
  11. Mitchell, S.A.; Sok, D.K. Precision Livestock Farming in the Digital Age: Sensors and Microfluidics Paving the Way for Sustainable Agriculture. Sage Sci. Rev. Educ. Technol. 2023, 6, 71-87.
  12. Alshehri, M. Blockchain-Assisted Internet of Things Framework in Smart Livestock Farming. Internet Things 2023, 22, 100739. [CrossRef]
  13. Grossman, M.R. Animal Identification and Traceability Under the US National Animal Identification System. J. Food L. Pol'y 2006, 2, 231.
  14. Morrone, S.; Dimauro, C.; Gambella, F.; Cappai, M.G. Industry 4.0 and Precision Livestock Farming (PLF): An Up to Date Overview Across Animal Productions. Sensors 2022, 22, 4319. [CrossRef]
  15. Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Gao, X.X.; Hou, Z. Low-Cost Livestock Sorting Information Management System Based on Deep Learning. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2023, 9, 110-126. [CrossRef]
  16. Neethirajan, S. The Role of Sensors, Big Data and Machine Learning in Modern Animal Farming. Sens. Biosens. Res. 2020, 29, 100367. [CrossRef]
  17. Neethirajan, S. Artificial Intelligence and Sensor Innovations: Enhancing Livestock Welfare with a Human-Centric Approach. Hum.-Centric Intell. Syst. 2023, 1-16. [CrossRef]
  18. Neethirajan, S. Automated Tracking Systems for the Assessment of Farmed Poultry. Animals 2022, 12, 232. [CrossRef]
  19. Neethirajan, S. SOLARIA-SensOr-Driven Resilient and Adaptive Monitoring of Farm Animals. Agriculture 2023, 13, 436. [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, L.; Guo, W.; Lv, C.; Guo, M.; Yang, M.; Fu, Q.; Liu, X. Advancements in Artificial Intelligence Technology for Improving Animal Welfare: Current Applications and Research Progress. Anim. Res. One Health 2023, [Online ahead of print]. [CrossRef]
  21. García-Méndez, S.; De Arriba-Pérez, F.; Somoza-López, M.D.C. Informatics and Dairy Industry Coalition: Artificial Intelligence Trends and Present Challenges. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2023, [Online ahead of print]. [CrossRef]
  22. Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Rong, L.; Zheng, W. Research Progress on Animal Environment and Welfare. Anim. Res. One Health 2023, 1, 78-91. [CrossRef]
  23. Adjabi, I.; Ouahabi, A.; Benzaoui, A.; Taleb-Ahmed, A. Past, Present, and Future of Face Recognition: A Review. Electronics 2020, 9, 1188. [CrossRef]
  24. Fuad, M.T.H.; Fime, A.A.; Sikder, D.; Iftee, M.A.R.; Rabbi, J.; Al-Rakhami, M.S.; Gumaei, A.; Sen, O.; Fuad, M.; Islam, M.N. Recent Advances in Deep Learning Techniques for Face Recognition. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 99112-99142. [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, G.; Yang, Y.; Yi, D.; Kittler, J.; Christmas, W.; Li, S.Z.; Hospedales, T. When Face Recognition Meets with Deep Learning: An Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Face Recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, 2015; pp. 142-150. [CrossRef]
  26. Caja, G.; Castro-Costa, A.; Knight, C.H. Engineering to Support Wellbeing of Dairy Animals. J. Dairy Res. 2016, 83, 136-147. [CrossRef]
  27. Bhargava, K.; Donnelly, W.; Ivanov, S. Wireless Sensor Based Data Analytics for Precision Farming. Doctoral Dissertation, Waterford Institute of Technology, 2019.
  28. Shalloo, L.; Byrne, T.; Leso, L.; Ruelle, E.; Starsmore, K.; Geoghegan, A.; Werner, J.; O'Leary, N. A Review of Precision Technologies in Pasture-Based Dairying Systems. Irish J. Agric. Food Res. 2021, 59, 279-291. [CrossRef]
  29. Akhigbe, B.I.; Munir, K.; Akinade, O.; Akanbi, L.; Oyedele, L.O. IoT Technologies for Livestock Management: A Review of Present Status, Opportunities, and Future Trends. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2021, 5, 10. [CrossRef]
  30. Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Khan, I.H.; Suman, R. Understanding the Potential Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture Sector. Adv. Agrochem. 2023, 2, 15-30. [CrossRef]
  31. Ahmad, L.; Nabi, F. Agriculture 5.0: Artificial Intelligence, IoT and Machine Learning. CRC Press, 2021. [CrossRef]
  32. Perakis, K.; Lampathaki, F.; Nikas, K.; Georgiou, Y.; Marko, O.; Maselyne, J. CYBELE-Fostering Precision Agriculture & Livestock Farming Through Secure Access to Large-Scale HPC Enabled Virtual Industrial Experimentation Environments Fostering Scalable Big Data Analytics. Comput. Netw. 2020, 168, 107035. [CrossRef]
  33. Yin, M.; Ma, R.; Luo, H.; Li, J.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, M. Non-Contact Sensing Technology Enables Precision Livestock Farming in Smart Farms. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023, 212, 108171. [CrossRef]
  34. O'Toole, A.J.; Castillo, C.D.; Parde, C.J.; Hill, M.Q.; Chellappa, R. Face Space Representations in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2018, 22, 794-809. [CrossRef]
  35. Almabdy, S.; Elrefaei, L. Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Approaches for Face Recognition. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4397. [CrossRef]
  36. Bergamini, L.; Porrello, A.; Dondona, A.C.; Del Negro, E.; Mattioli, M.; D'Alterio, N.; Calderara, S. Multi-Views Embedding for Cattle Re-Identification. In Proceedings of the 2018 14th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), 2018; pp. 184-191, IEEE. [CrossRef]
  37. Weng, Z.; Meng, F.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Gong, C. Cattle Face Recognition Based on a Two-Branch Convolutional Neural Network. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 196, 106871. [CrossRef]
  38. Ackerson, J.M.; Dave, R.; Seliya, N. Applications of Recurrent Neural Network for Biometric Authentication & Anomaly Detection. Information 2021, 12, 272. [CrossRef]
  39. Zeng, N.; Zhang, H.; Song, B.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Dobaie, A.M. Facial Expression Recognition via Learning Deep Sparse Autoencoders. Neurocomputing 2018, 273, 643-649. [CrossRef]
  40. BELLO, R.W.; TALIB, A.Z.H.; MOHAMED, A.S.A.B. Deep Learning-Based Architectures for Recognition of Cow Using Cow Nose Image Pattern. Gazi Univ. J. Sci. 2020, 33, 831-844. [CrossRef]
  41. Gunda, V.S.P.; Gulla, H.; Kosana, V.; Janapati, S. A Hybrid Deep Learning Based Robust Framework for Cattle Identification. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advancements in Smart, Secure and Intelligent Computing (ASSIC), 2022; pp. 1-5, IEEE. [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, H.; Qin, J.; Hou, Q.; Gong, S. Cattle Face Recognition Method Based on Parameter Transfer and Deep Learning. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1453, 012054. [CrossRef]
  43. Shojaeipour, A.; Falzon, G.; Kwan, P.; Hadavi, N.; Cowley, F.C.; Paul, D. Automated Muzzle Detection and Biometric Identification via Few-Shot Deep Transfer Learning of Mixed Breed Cattle. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2365. [CrossRef]
  44. Maharana, K.; Mondal, S.; Nemade, B. A Review: Data Pre-Processing and Data Augmentation Techniques. Glob. Trans. Proc. 2022, 3, 91-99. [CrossRef]
  45. Mumuni, A.; Mumuni, F. Data Augmentation: A Comprehensive Survey of Modern Approaches. Array 2022, 100258. [CrossRef]
  46. Jaipuria, N.; Zhang, X.; Bhasin, R.; Arafa, M.; Chakravarty, P.; Shrivastava, S.; Manglani, S.; Murali, V.N. Deflating Dataset Bias Using Synthetic Data Augmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2020; pp. 772-773. [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, B.; Wang, W.; Guo, L.; Chen, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y. Evaluation of Deep Learning for Automatic Multi-View Face Detection in Cattle. Agriculture 2021, 11, 1062. [CrossRef]
  48. Hossain, M.E.; Kabir, M.A.; Zheng, L.; Swain, D.L.; McGrath, S.; Medway, J. A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques for Cattle Identification: Datasets, Methods and Future Directions. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2022, 6, 138-155. [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, B.; Wang, W.; Guo, L.; Chen, G.; Li, Y.; Cao, Z.; Wu, S. CattleFaceNet: A Cattle Face Identification Approach Based on RetinaFace and ArcFace Loss. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 193, 106675. [CrossRef]
  50. Kawagoe, Y.; Kobayashi, I.; Zin, T.T. Facial Region Analysis for Individual Identification of Cows and Feeding Time Estimation. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1016. [CrossRef]
  51. Neethirajan, S.; Reimert, I.; Kemp, B. Measuring Farm Animal Emotions-Sensor-Based Approaches. Sensors 2021, 21, 553. [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, C.; Zhu, W.; Norton, T. Behaviour Recognition of Pigs and Cattle: Journey from Computer Vision to Deep Learning. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 187, 106255. [CrossRef]
  53. Qiao, Y.; Kong, H.; Clark, C.; Lomax, S.; Su, D.; Eiffert, S.; Sukkarieh, S. Intelligent Perception for Cattle Monitoring: A Review for Cattle Identification, Body Condition Score Evaluation, and Weight Estimation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 185, 106143. [CrossRef]
  54. Tassinari, P.; Bovo, M.; Benni, S.; Franzoni, S.; Poggi, M.; Mammi, L.M.E.; Mattoccia, S.; Di Stefano, L.; Bonora, F.; Barbaresi, A.; Santolini, E. A Computer Vision Approach Based on Deep Learning for the Detection of Dairy Cows in Free Stall Barn. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 182, 106030. [CrossRef]
  55. Bergman, N.; Yitzhaky, Y.; Halachmi, I. Biometric Identification of Dairy Cows via Real-Time Facial Recognition. Animal 2024, 101079. [CrossRef]
  56. Kumar, S.; Tiwari, S.; Singh, S.K. Face Recognition of Cattle: Can It Be Done? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 2016, 86, 137-148. [CrossRef]
  57. Gupta, H.; Jindal, P.; Verma, O.P.; Arya, R.K.; Ateya, A.A.; Soliman, N.F.; Mohan, V. Computer Vision-Based Approach for Automatic Detection of Dairy Cow Breed. Electronics 2022, 11, 3791. [CrossRef]
  58. Hao, W.; Zhang, K.; Han, M.; Hao, W.; Wang, J.; Li, F.; Liu, Z. A Novel Jinnan Individual Cattle Recognition Approach Based on Mutual Attention Learning Scheme. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 120551. [CrossRef]
  59. Chelotti, J.; Martinez-Rau, L.; Ferrero, M.; Vignolo, L.; Galli, J.; Planisich, A.; Rufiner, H.L.; Giovanini, L. Livestock Feeding Behavior: A Tutorial Review on Automated Techniques for Ruminant Monitoring. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2312.09259, 2023.
  60. Bello, R.W.; Moradeyo, O.M. Features-Based Individual Cattle Instance Identification Method Using Hybrid Deep Learning Models for Sustainable Livestock Management. World Sci. News 2023, 180, 119-131.
  61. Meng, Y.; Yoon, S.; Han, S.; Fuentes, A.; Park, J.; Jeong, Y.; Park, D.S. Improving Known-Unknown Cattle's Face Recognition for Smart Livestock Farm Management. Animals 2023, 13, 3588. [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Z.; Gao, J.; Xu, F.; Chen, J. Siamese GC Capsule Networks for Small Sample Cow Face Recognition. IEEE Access 2023. [CrossRef]
  63. Nie, L.; Li, B.; Du, Y.; Jiao, F.; Song, X.; Liu, Z. Deep Learning Strategies with CReToNeXt-YOLOv5 for Advanced Pig Face Emotion Detection. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 1679. [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Gao, G.; Lv, Y.; Li, Q.; Li, Z.; Wang, C.; Chen, G. Open Pose Mask R-CNN Network for Individual Cattle Recognition. IEEE Access 2023. [CrossRef]
  65. Sun, L.; Liu, G.; Yang, H.; Jiang, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Yang, H.; Yang, S. LAD-RCNN: A Powerful Tool for Livestock Face Detection and Normalization. Animals 2023, 13, 1446. [CrossRef]
  66. Shao, D.; He, Z.; Fan, H.; Sun, K. Detection of Cattle Key Parts Based on the Improved Yolov5 Algorithm. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1110. [CrossRef]
  67. Xu, F.; Gao, J.; Pan, X. Cow Face Recognition for a Small Sample Based on Siamese DB Capsule Network. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 63189-63198. [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, X.; Yang, T.; Mai, K.; Liu, C.; Xiong, J.; Kuang, Y.; Gao, Y. Holstein Cattle Face Re-Identification Unifying Global and Part Feature Deep Network with Attention Mechanism. Animals 2022, 12, 1047. [CrossRef]
  69. Weng, Z.; Liu, S.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Gong, C. Cattle Facial Matching Recognition Algorithm Based on Multi-View Feature Fusion. Electronics 2022, 12, 156. [CrossRef]
  70. Oveneke, M.C.; Vaishampayan, R.; Nsadisa, D.L.; Onya, J.A. FacEDiM: A Face Embedding Distribution Model for Few-Shot Biometric Authentication of Cattle. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2302.14831.
  71. Kimani, G.N.; Oluwadara, P.; Fashingabo, P.; Busogi, M.; Luhanga, E.; Sowon, K.; Chacha, L. Cattle Identification Using Muzzle Images and Deep Learning Techniques. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2311.08148.
  72. Kusakunniran, W.; Phongluelert, K.; Sirisangpaival, C.; Narayan, O.; Thongkanchorn, K.; Wiratsudakul, A. Cattle AutoID: Biometric for Cattle Identification. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology, 2023; pp. 570-574. [CrossRef]
  73. Yousra, T.; Afridi, H.; Tarekegn, A.N.; Ullah, M.; Beghdadi, A.; Cheikh, F.A. Self-Supervised Animal Detection in Indoor Environment. In Proceedings of the 2023 Twelfth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA), 2023; pp. 1-6, IEEE. [CrossRef]
  74. Shen, W.; Hu, H.; Dai, B.; Wei, X.; Sun, J.; Jiang, L.; Sun, Y. Individual Identification of Dairy Cows Based on Convolutional Neural Networks. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2020, 79, 14711-14724. [CrossRef]
  75. Zhao, K.; Jin, X.; Ji, J.; Wang, J.; Ma, H.; Zhu, X. Individual Identification of Holstein Dairy Cows Based on Detecting and Matching Feature Points in Body Images. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 181, 128-139. [CrossRef]
  76. Lu, Y.; Weng, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Gong, C. Algorithm for Cattle Identification Based on Locating Key Area. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 228, 120365. [CrossRef]
  77. Hu, H.; Dai, B.; Shen, W.; Wei, X.; Sun, J.; Li, R.; Zhang, Y. Cow Identification Based on Fusion of Deep Parts Features. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 192, 245-256. [CrossRef]
  78. Xiao, J.; Liu, G.; Wang, K.; Si, Y. Cow Identification in Free-Stall Barns Based on an Improved Mask R-CNN and an SVM. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 194, 106738. [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, G.; Li, R.; Zhang, S.; Wen, Y.; Xu, X.; Song, H. Extracting Cow Point Clouds from Multi-View RGB Images with an Improved YOLACT++ Instance Segmentation. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 230, 120730. [CrossRef]
  80. Gao, J.; Burghardt, T.; Andrew, W.; Dowsey, A.W.; Campbell, N.W. Towards Self-Supervision for Video Identification of Individual Holstein-Friesian Cattle: The Cows2021 Dataset. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2105.01938.
  81. Zhang, R.; Ji, J.; Zhao, K.; Wang, J.; Zhang, M.; Wang, M. A Cascaded Individual Cow Identification Method Based on DeepOtsu and EfficientNet. Agriculture 2023, 13, 279. [CrossRef]
  82. Han, S.; Fuentes, A.; Yoon, S.; Jeong, Y.; Kim, H.; Park, D.S. Deep Learning-Based Multi-Cattle Tracking in Crowded Livestock Farming Using Video. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023, 212, 108044. [CrossRef]
  83. Smink, M.; Liu, H.; Döpfer, D.; Lee, Y.J. Computer Vision on the Edge: Individual Cattle Identification in Real-Time With ReadMyCow System. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2024; pp. 7056-7065.
  84. Gao, J.; Burghardt, T.; Campbell, N.W. Label a Herd in Minutes: Individual Holstein-Friesian Cattle Identification. In International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, 2022; pp. 384-396, Springer International Publishing. [CrossRef]
  85. Ramesh, M.; Reibman, A.R.; Boerman, J.P. Eidetic Recognition of Cattle Using Keypoint Alignment. Electron. Imaging 2023, 35, 279-1. [CrossRef]
  86. Weng, Z.; Hu, R.; Zheng, Z. Study on Individual Identification Method of Cow Based on CD-YOLOv7. In Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing, 2023; pp. 169-175. [CrossRef]
  87. Dubourvieux, F.; Lapouge, G.; Loesch, A.; Luvison, B.; Audigier, R. Cumulative Unsupervised Multi-Domain Adaptation for Holstein Cattle Re-Identification. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2023, 10, 46-60. [CrossRef]
  88. Andrew, W.; Gao, J.; Mullan, S.; Campbell, N.; Dowsey, A.W.; Burghardt, T. Visual Identification of Individual Holstein-Friesian Cattle via Deep Metric Learning. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 185, 106133. [CrossRef]
  89. Yang, L.; Xu, X.; Zhao, J.; Song, H. Fusion of RetinaFace and Improved FaceNet for Individual Cow Identification in Natural Scenes. Inf. Process. Agric. 2023. [CrossRef]
  90. Fu, L.; Li, S.; Kong, S.; Ni, R.; Pang, H.; Sun, Y.; Hu, T.; Mu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Gong, H. Lightweight Individual Cow Identification Based on Ghost Combined with Attention Mechanism. PLoS One 2022, 17, e0275435. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated