Case Report
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Upgrading Façade Systems, the Art of Simplification as a Criterion
Version 1
: Received: 31 January 2024 / Approved: 1 February 2024 / Online: 1 February 2024 (08:36:06 CET)
How to cite: Martín Goñi, P.; Ferrés Padró, X. Upgrading Façade Systems, the Art of Simplification as a Criterion. Preprints 2024, 2024020016. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.0016.v1 Martín Goñi, P.; Ferrés Padró, X. Upgrading Façade Systems, the Art of Simplification as a Criterion. Preprints 2024, 2024020016. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.0016.v1
Abstract
The resolution of façade construction is not considered in the design process, as it can be expressed by complex technological innovations that emphasize the beauty of buildings. Nevertheless, resorting to this type of technology solution may not always be necessary. This study demonstrates this hypothesis through the investigation of five iconic case studies emphasizing the construction system analysis and the revelation of the brainwave idea. The brainwave idea defines the construction innovation that enables the detail by simplification rather than sophistication. Notable, unlike complex technological innovation, standard systems or elements applied strategically are considered little innovations to facilitate the resolutions of the façade complexity. Many of these innovations occur during the visual and constructive prototype progress required to validate the proposed solution and its performance. Therefore, real-scale prototype development that operates as a real-scale laboratory is necessary to correct and validate successive solutions.
Keywords
Design processes; Brainwave idea; Case study; Technological solutions
Subject
Engineering, Architecture, Building and Construction
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment