Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Topical Neuropeptide Y for Ischemic Skin Wounds

Altmetrics

Downloads

101

Views

83

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

06 February 2024

Posted:

07 February 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Our objective was to investigate the effects of topically applied neuropeptide Y (NPY) on ischemic wounds. Initially, the animal model for ischemic wound healing was validated using 16 male Sprague-Dawley albino rats. In the intervention study, an additional 28 rats were divided into three groups: NPY (0.025%), the positive control insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I, 0.0025%), and the hydrogel carrier alone (control). The hydrogel was selected due to its capacity to prolong NPY release (p < 0.001), as demonstrated in a Franz diffusion cell. In the animals, an 8-mm full-thickness wound was made in a pedunculated dorsal ischemic skin flap. Wounds were then treated and assessed for 14 days, and procured at the end of the experiment for in situ hybridization analysis (RNAscope®) targeting NPY receptor Y2R and for meticulous histologic examination. Wound healing rates, i.e. the percentage wound area changes, did not show an increase with NPY (p = 0.938) but did with rhIGF-I (p = 0.039) compared to the control. Y2R mRNA was not detected in the wounds or adjacent skin but was identified in the rat brain (positive control). Light microscopic examination revealed trends of increased angiogenesis and enhanced inflammatory cell infiltration with NPY compared to control. An interesting secondary discovery was the presence of melanophages in the wounds. Our findings suggest the potential of NPY to enhance neovascularization under ischemic wound healing conditions, but further optimization of the carrier and dosage is necessary. The mechanism is elusive but likely involves NPY receptor subtypes other than Y2R.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Surgery

1. Introduction

Wound management poses a considerable challenge for patients and contributes significantly to healthcare costs [1,2]. Ischemia, often associated with conditions like diabetes mellitus, hampers the natural process of wound healing. While various treatments exist, none have demonstrated convincing clinical efficacy under ischemic conditions [3].
Peptide growth factors play a crucial role in wound healing [4], and the significance of neuropeptides in this context has only recently been acknowledged [5]. Neuropeptide Y (NPY), a 36-amino acid peptide, is the most abundant neuropeptide in the brain, participating in both central and peripheral nervous processes. Centrally, NPY regulates appetite, feeding, stress response, anxiety, circadian rhythms, and blood [6]. It is associated with the adrenergic mediators along the terminal ends of sympathetic nerve fibers. NPY stimulates endothelial cell proliferation and migration, and angiogenesis [7,8,9,10], which is particularly relevant for ischemic wound healing.
Humans have four 4 different G-protein coupling functional NPY receptor subtypes (Y1R, Y2R, Y4R and Y5R) [11]. Y4R is predominantly expressed in the colon, small intestine, and prostate, preferentially activated by pancreatic polypeptide (PP). Conversely, Y1R, Y2R and Y5R exhibit high affinity for NPY [12]. Y1R is highly expressed in smooth muscle cells and mediates vasoconstriction, including in the skin [13,14]. The presence and function of Y2R and Y5R in the skin are not well understood [15]. In the cornea of mice, the expression of Y1R, Y2R, and Y5R was differentially studied in induced angiogenesis through immunohistochemistry [8]. Y2R, but not Y1R or Y5R, was detected on the formed blood capillaries [8]. In full-thickness skin wounds made on the back of Y2R-deficient mice, topical NPY neither stimulated angiogenesis nor restored delayed wound healing, unlike in wild-type mice [8]. These results underscore the importance of Y2R in mediating the beneficial effects of NPY on angiogenesis and wound healing in normoxia.
The situation appears different under ischemic conditions, where Y2R protein levels were increased in ischemic compared to nonischemic full-thickness skin wounds in rabbits [16]. In rats, Y2R mRNA was absent in nonischemic muscle but induced in ischemic skeletal muscle, and exogenous NPY promoted angiogenesis specifically in ischemic skeletal muscle [17,18]. Notably, there are no studies investigating the effect of NPY on cutaneous wound healing under ischemic conditions in rats or other animal species, and the expression of NPY receptors in skin and skin wounds remains unknown [8].
The delivery system for growth factors is crucial [19,20,21]. Hydrogels, composed of three-dimensional polymeric materials, swell upon contact with water, and their mechanical properties determine the release profile of pharmaceutical agents [22]. Unfortunately, there is no standardized laboratory test to evaluate the impact of hydrogels on the release of bioactive molecules [23,24].
In this study, we explored the release of NPY in an amorphous hydrogel in vitro using a Franz diffusion cell [24]. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of NPY in vivo on ischemic wound healing in a validated preclinical model [20,25]. Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), known to promote wound healing in this model, was used as a positive control [20]. Wound areas were measured until termination postoperative day 14, when biopsies were taken for in situ hybridization analysis of Y2R mRNA using the RNAscope® technology and for histological examination.

2. Results

The primary objective of these studies was to examine the impact of NPY on ischemic wounds. Initially, we validated the ischemic wound model. Subsequently, we assessed the release of NPY from a hydrogel designed for sustained delivery using a Franz Cell in vitro. Finally, we utilized this hydrogel carrier to investigate the effect of locally delivered NPY to ischemic wounds in vivo.

2.1. Validation of the Ischemic Wound Model

The ischemic wound model’s validation involved comparing wound area changes in the skin flap (ischemic wound) with those in adjacent normal skin (nonischemic wound) outside the skin flap, made using an 8-mm punch biopsy instrument. The relative change in wound area from day 0 to day 6 revealed a slower healing process for the ischemic wounds, irrespective of the topical treatment, in comparison to the nonischemic wounds within the same animal (Figure 1). The hydrogel carrier alone did not influence the healing of either the ischemic (p = 0.603) or the nonischemic wounds (p = 0.748).

2.2. Release of NPY In Vitro

When NPY was introduced into PBS, the donor chamber exhibited a gradual depletion of NPY, with less than 50 µl of donor solution remaining after 6 hours. The amorphous hydrogel containing NPY initially displayed slight acidity but became neutral after 2 hours (Figure 2a). At the 6-hour mark, an amount of 250 ± 8.1 (mean ± SD) mg material was aspirated from the donor chamber. The rheology of the hydrogel remained essentially unaltered. The release of NPY from the hydrogel (0.4-0.5 µg per hour) over the 6-hour experimental period was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced compared to NPY in the PBS (Figure 2b).

2.3. Effects of NPY In Vivo

2.3.1. Body Weight Development

A significant (p < 0.001) effect of time on postoperative body weight changes was observed. The animals experienced a weight loss of approximately 4% from day 0 to day 2 (p = 0.007) but showed weight gain of around 6% from postoperative day 8 (p < 0.001) compared with their pre-operative body weight day 0. No significant (p = 0.572) effect of the treatments on body weight development was identified.

2.3.2. Ischemic Wound Healing

Wound healing, assessed as the relative change in wound area from day 0, followed the expected pattern based on previous results from the applied ischemic wound model [20,25]. The wound healing curves indicated significant effects of postoperative time (p < 0.001) and treatment (p = 0.025). Overall, the wounds decreased in size from postoperative day 6 compared to their initial size on the day of wounding (p = 0.032). There was no significant difference in wound healing (p = 0.907) between the NPY and the hydrogel control groups, while the positive control topical IGF-I increased wound healing compared to the hydrogel control (p = 0.039), as illustrated in Figure 3.

2.3.3. In Situ Hybridization for Y2R mRNA

Y2R mRNA could not be detected in the wounds or in adjacent uninjured skin. In another animal experiment involving three-day-old 6-mm biopsy nonischemic wounds on the back of rats [26], Y2R mRNA was also not detected, while scattered ganglion cells in rat colon were positive for Y2R mRNA by the RNAscope® assay.

2.3.4. Light Microscopy Examination

Representative microphotographs of the wounds stained with H&E are shown at two magnifications in Figure 4. Angiogenesis was most pronounced in the NPY-treated wounds. Lymphocytes, constituting approxiamately 75% of immune cells in the granulation tissue, were the predominant cell type, followed by neutrophil granulocytes (about 20%). The distribution among the different immune cells was similar in the three groups, but they were more numerous in the NPY group. Histiocytes were not quantified, as they could not definitively be distinguished from fibroblasts in the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections [27]. Mast cells were few in numbers. Dermal melanophages were identified in all groups but were not quantified. Quantifying collagen in van Gieson-stained sections proved challenging, but the control wounds appeared to contain the most collagen among the three groups. The ingrowth of epithelium in the NPY-treated and IGF-I-treated wounds appeared to be more advanced than in the control-treated wounds (Table 1). Foreign bodies were observed in all wounds, accompanied by multinucleated giant cells in the NPY and IGF-I groups.

3. Discussion

This study aimed to investigate the impact of repeated topical application of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) on ischemic full-thickness skin wounds in a standardized animal model. Despite NPY treatment showing an increase in new blood vessel formation, analogous to the observed stimulatory effects on cultured endothelial cells [9], this heightened angiogenesis did not correlate with accelerated wound closure rates.
NPY activates cells through four main functional receptors. We opted to examine the presence of Y2R because findings from multiple studies have suggested that Y2R plays a crucial role in mediating NPY-induced angiogenesis and is up-regulated under ischemic conditions [8,10,28]. Unexpectedly, using the RNAscope® technique, Y2R mRNA could not be detected in the wounds, but it was detected in neurons as expected [29]. While Pradhan et al. [16] detected Y2R mRNA in rabbit full-thickness skin wounds using qRT-PCR, the mRNA levels in the ischemic wounds were not increased compared to those in normal skin. It is possible that our assay was less sensitive than theirs. Silva et al. [30] ] treated endothelial cells (HUVEC) with proinflammatory cytokines and observed a significant downregulation of Y2R mRNA, while Y1R mRNA remained unchanged. This observation is relevant, considering that proinflammatory cytokine levels are elevated in ischemic wounds [31]. The absence of Y2R expression may also be attributed to the gradual vascularization of the skin flap from underneath, transitioning it from ischemic to nonischemic tissue. Notably, intracutaneous pO2 levels did not differ between the skin flap and adjacent normal skin on postoperative day 14 in the animal model employed in this study [20].
In contrast to NPY, topical application of IGF-I stimulated the closure of the ischemic wounds over 14 days, consistent with previous results in this animal model [19]. Beckert et al. [20] conducted a study applying IGF-I daily using two different carriers and found that IGF-I in a PVA film was more effective than IGF-I delivered in a methylcellulose gel, supporting the notion that the mode of peptide delivery is crucial for their stimulatory effect. Our goal was to achieve sustained delivery of peptides, assuming that this would prolong their bioactivities in the wounds. The selected hydrogel has been used alone or as a carrier for bioactive compounds in rodent wound healing studies [32,33,34,35,36,37] and met our objective by delaying the release of the NPY depot, at least in the in vitro Franz Cell setup. The mechanisms contributing to sustained release are likely multiple, such as electrostatic interaction between the basic NPY with positive net charge at pH less than 7.0 [38] and the polyanionic polymer carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) of the hydrogel, along with diffusion resistance.
Given the exploratory nature of this study, a relatively high dosage of NPY was chosen. Ekstrand et al. [8] delivered 1.5 µg NPY to 6-mm biopsy wounds using pellets made of sucralfate and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). Sucralfate inhibits pepsin activity [39], potentially increasing the half-life of NPY in wounds. Their dosage should be compared with ours, which involved delivering 50 µg NPY to 8-mm wounds. The in vitro release experiment indicated a delivery rate of 0.4-0.5 µg NPY per hour. Additionally, the molecular forms that the delivered full-length NPY1-36 adopts in the proteolytic microenvironment of the wounds remain unknown. In human serum (25-50 ng NPY/ml), proteinases generate NPY species with different receptor affinities [40]. The dominant species NPY3-36 is generated by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV), implicated in angiogenic processes during wound healing [41]. In summary, there is a need for optimization of topical NPY administration to wounds.
One drawback observed was the unfavorable tissue reactions to the hydrogel, evident by the presence of foreign bodies and multinucleated giant cells in the granulation tissue. CMC is a common constituent in hydrogel, film, and fiber wound dressings [42]. For instance, the growth factor rhPDGF-BB is formulated in aqueous sodium CMC as Regranex® 0.01% gel, and no foreign bodies were observed in rat wounds treated with nonmodified sodium CMC [43]. In contrast, wound treatment with another brand of amorphous hydrogel composed of modified (crosslinked) CMC resulted in foreign bodies with associated multinucleated giant cells [44], highlighting the impact of chemical modification on the biocompatibility and biodegradability of CMC. We do not have information on the structure of the CMC in the hydrogel used here. It is recognized that the viscosity of hydrogels increases with the degree of crosslinking. The viscosity of the hydrogel matches that of a crosslinked CMC [45,46]. This brand is approved by FDA for the use in tissue expansion [45]. Although the hydrogel was slightly diluted (5%) and acidified, this modification is unlikely to have caused the adverse tissue reactions, as Pilakasiri et al. [47] reported similar tissue reactions to the hydrogel in full-thickness excisions in normoxic skin. They observed adverse consequences of the hydrogel residues, particularly on epithelialization during the later stages of wound healing, as foreign bodies in the granulation tissue may impair keratinocyte migration [48]. This may explain our findings of no effect of the hydrogel on early wound healing up to postoperative day 6, i.e., wound contraction, but less epithelialization than expected based on previous observations in the same animal model [25]. Taken together, hydrogel residues may have impeded epithelialization and potentially masked beneficial effects on epithelialization during the later stage of wound healing.
NPY treatment led to an increase in the number of immune cells in the wounds. We speculate that the heightened infiltration of inflammatory cells is not the consequence of increased deposition of foreign bodies. The immunomodulatory effects of NPY are complex, and both anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory properties have been attributed to NPY [11,49].
A notable discovery was the presence of melanophages in the wounds. The literature provides inconsistent information on whether melanin is present in the skin of albino rats [50,51,52]. Our histology results indicate that wounds of albino rats do contain melanin, although the sources of melanin are currently unknown. One possibility is that microorganisms colonizing the wounds may have the capacity to produce melanins [53].
Collectively, our findings imply that NPY has the potential to improve wound healing, but further work is required to optimize the dosing regimen.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Synthetic NPY (molecular weight: 4271 Da) with a peptide purity exceeding 96% by by high-performance liquid chromatography was purchased from Bachem AG (Bubendorf, Switzerland) as a trifluoroacetate salt. rhIGF-I (molecular weight: 7600 Da) was purchased from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). The amorphous, hypertonic [46] hydrogel (IntraSite® Gel) was purchased from Smith & Nephew (Hull, England). The hydrogel (pH 6.8) consists of 2.3% modified carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), propylene glycol (20%), and water.

4.2. In Vitro Release of NPY

The release of NPY from the hydrogel was studied using a flow-type Franz Cell in borosilicate glass (PermeGear, Hellertown, PA, USA). The Franz Cell comprises a donor chamber (9-mm inner orifice diameter, 1.0 ml) and a receptor chamber (5.5-5.7 ml), as shown in Figure 5. A porous (0.22 µm), 165-185 µm thick Millipore Express® hydrophilic polyethersulfone membrane (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) separated the donor and receptor chambers. To prevent leakage, the apical side of the membrane was sealed to the donor chamber by transparent silicone adhesive (Dowsil™ 732, Dow Europe GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany), and a Teflon foam ring was placed in the interface between the donor and receptor chambers. The two chambers were hold together by a clamp.
The donor and receptor chambers were filled with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS), and the diffusion cell was equilibrated for 2 hours at 37°C. The temperature was maintained at 37°C by the circulating water in the heating jacket from an external water bath. The receptor chamber was continuously agitated with a magnetic Teflon-coated cylindrical (8 × 3 mm) stirring bar. Ten µl NPY (5 mg/ml 10 mM acetic acid (HOAc)) was mixed with 190 µl of the hydrogel and centrifuged at 2000 × g for deaeration. The development of pH of the blend was studied in a separate experiment using the phenol red pH indicator (final concentration: 0.015 mg/ml; P3532, Sigma-Aldrich). The control consisted of 10 µl NPY (5 mg/ml 10 mM HOAc) and 190 µl PBS. The 200-µl blends were added to the donor chambers using a positive displacement pipette (Gilson®). The donor compartment was covered with Parafilm®. Aliquots (200 µl) of receptor medium were obtained after 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours using a PermeGear pipette tip via the upper sampling arm and replaced with fresh PBS via the lower sampling arm. At the end of the experiment, the content of the donor chamber was emptied with the positive displacement pipette and weighed. The samples were added to 200 µl of the reagent diluent (1% BSA) used in the ELISA assay and stored in 1.5-ml polypropylene reaction tubes (Cat. No.: 616201, Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) at -80°C until analyzed on NPY contents by a DuoSet™ ELISA (DY8517, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with ancillary reagents (DY008B, R&D Systems). The cumulative amount of NPY (µg) released was calculated for each cell from standard curve fitted by 4-parameter logistic function (SigmaPlot 14.0, Systat Software, Inc.).

4.3. In Vivo Wound Experiments

The experiments were conducted in adherence to institutional guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals, with approval from the Danish animal ethical committee (2006/561-1092).

4.3.1. Animals

Forty-four male 9-week-old Sprague-Dawley albino rats (Taconic M&B, Ry, Denmark) weighing 280-330 g, were utilized. The animals were provided a basal diet (Altromin 1324; Altromin Spezialfutter, Lage, Germany) ad libitum and individually housed in standard type IV cages at controlled temperatures (18-22°C) and light (12-hour light/12-hour dark, lights on from 06.00 am) [54]. A week of acclimatization was allowed before surgery.

4.3.2. Surgery and Wounding

Preoperative analgesia (0.1 mg/kg buprenorphine) was administered subcutaneously, and rats were anaesthetized via subcutaneous injection of a mixture containing 0.14 mg/kg fentanyl citrate, 4.4 mg/kg fluanisone, and 2.2 mg/kg midazolam [54].
The rats’ backs were shaved, cleansed with 70% alcohol, and a standardized pedunculated dorsal ischemic skin flap (3 cm × 7 cm) was lifted, repositioned, and fixed with skin staples [20]. An 8-mm trephine was used to make one full-thickness wound in the ischemic skin flap, and in the validation study, another full-thickness wound was made in normal skin outside the ischemic skin flap. The outer margins of the wounds were traced on a transparent sheet (Opsite Flexigrid, Smith & Nephew), and a Velcro® loop ring of surrounding the wound was sutured in place.

4.3.3. Validation Study of Ischemic versus Nonischemic Wound Healing

This study included 16 of the rats. Both wounds received hydrogel (200 µl) covered by an occlusive and adhesive 2 cm × 4 cm dressing (Hydrosorb® comfort, Hartmann, Heidenheim, Germany) in 8 rats. The wounds in the remaining 8 rats were treated with the Hydrosorb® dressing alone. A protective nylon fabric lid was secured to the sutured Velcro® loop, and the experiment concluded on postoperative day 6.

4.3.4. Intervention Study in the Ischemic Wounds

This study included 28 rats, stratified by body weight into 3 groups: NPY (n = 9), IGF-1 (n = 9), and control hydrogel (n = 10). One volume of NPY (5 mg/ml 10 mM HOAc), or 1 volume IGF-I (0.5 mg/ml 10 mM HOAc) was blended with 19 volumes of the hydrogel, and the control consisted of 1 volume of 10 mM HOAc blended with 19 volumes of the hydrogel.
The final concentrations were 250 µg/ml for NPY and 25 µg/ml for IGF-I. The charged and control hydrogel blends were transferred to 4-ml polypropylene cryogenic tubes (430491, Corning®) labeled 1, 2 or 3, centrifuged (2000 × g), and applied (200 µl) to the wounds by a positive displacement pipette with combitips (Eppendorf® Multipipette® plus). The wounds were covered with an occlusive and adhesive 2 cm × 4 cm dressing (Hydrosorb® comfort). A protective nylon fabric lid was attached to the sutured Velcro® loop, and the experiment concluded on postoperative day 14. Procedures are summarized in Table 2.

4.3.5. Wound Toilet, Wound Area Measurements and Calculation of Relative Wound Area Change

Every second day, rats were weighed, and wounds were cleansed with saline-moistened nonwoven swabs. The outer margins of the wounds were traced on transparent sheet. The wounds were redosed, and Hydrosorb® comfort was applied. From day 6 onwards, gauze was applied over the Velcro® device, and Tensoplast® (BSN Medical GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was wrapped around the animals. Wound areas were determined by the image analysis ImageJ software. The relative change (%) in wound area (Ri) from day 0 was calculated as Ri = (Ai – ADay 0)/ADay 0 × 100, where A equals wound area and i equals postoperative day.

4.3.6. Tissue Procurement

Rats were euthanized by a blow to the head followed by cervical dislocation. Wounds with adjoining uninjured skin were excised, fixed in neutral 4% phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde, and embedded in paraffin.

4.3.7. In Situ Hybridization Assay of Y2R mRNA by RNAscope®

Tissue sections were cut at 3 µm and deparaffinized. Proprietary reagents for pre-treatment, hybridization with the specific Rn-Npy2r probe (41448), and signal amplification were used according to the manufacturer (ACD, Bio-Techne, Abingdon, UK). The assay was validated in rat brain tissue [29], as shown in Figure 6.

4.3.8. Histology

Tissue sections (3 µm) were cut onto microscopic glass slides, deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in a descending alcohol series, and stained with H&E, or with van Gieson. A consultant pathologist (L.M.R.G.) performed these investigations in a blinded fashion. Angiogenesis was estimated using a 4-point grading scale: 0 = absent; 1 = slight; 2 = moderate; 3 = pronounced. The overall degree of inflammation was assessed on a 4-point grading scale [55]: 0 = absent; 1 = slight; 2 = moderate; 3 = pronounced. Additionally, extravascular lymphocytes, neutrophil granulocytes, plasma cells and mast cells were counted in 3 different high-power (× 400) fields of the granulation tissue; 2 at each wound margin and 1 in the middle of the wound. The length and thickness of neoepithelium was measured at the longest and thickest part of the epithelial tongue. The presence of foreign bodies was graded on a 4-point scale: 0 = none; 1 = few; 2 = moderate; 3 = many. Multinucleated giant cells were counted. The slides were scanned at high resolution (NanoZoomer, C13220, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu-city, Japan) and the digitized images were processed by the NDP.View2 software (Hamamatsu Photonics).

4.3.9. Blinding

The blends were indistinguishable, and the identity of the hydrogels remained blinded to the caretakers of the animals, the operators, and the primary investigator until the experimental series was completed, and results analyzed and interpreted.

4.4. Statistical Analyses

Mean values were compared using one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by the Holm-Šídák test for multiple comparisons. Statistical tests were performed using SigmaPlot 14.0. p < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.Å., L.A., A.-M.H. and L.N.J.; methodology, M.S.Å, M.B., L.M.R.G. and A.-M.H.; validation, M.S.Å., L.A. and A.-M.H.; formal analysis, M.S.Å., A.-M.H. and L.N.J.; investigation, M.S.Å. and L.A.; resources, M.S.Å. and A.-M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.S.; writing—review and editing, M.S.Å.; visualization, L.A.; supervision, M.S.Å. and A.-M.H.; project administration, M.S.Å., A.-M.H. and L.N.J.; funding acquisition, M.S.Å. and L.N.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The experiments were funded by 7TM Pharma and Aagren Dermaconsulting ApS.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Danish animal ethical committee (2006/561-1092).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Francis Vreven, SES GmbH was very helpful in setting up the in vitro release system.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

BSA Bovine serum albumin
CMC carboxymethyl cellulose
FGF fibroblast growth factor
HUVEC human umbilical vascular endothelial cell
IGF insulin-like growth factor
LC lymphocytes
MC mast cells
NG neutrophil granulocytes
NPY neuropeptide Y
PC plasma cells
PDGF platelet-derived growth factor
PP Pancreatic polypeptide

References

  1. Sen, C.K.; Gordillo, G.M.; Roy, S.; Kirsner, R.; Lambert, L.; Hunt, T.K.; Gottrup, F.; Gurtner, G.C.; Longaker, M.T. Human skin wounds: A major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair. Regen. 2009, 17, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sen, C.K. Human wounds and its burden: An updated compendium of estimates. Adv. Wound Care 2019, 8, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nelson, E.; Bradley, M. Dressings and topical agents for arterial leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007, CD001836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barrientos, S.; Stojadinovic, O.; Golinko, M.S.; Brem, H.; Tomic-Canic, M. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair. Regen. 2008, 16, 585–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ashrafi, M.; Baguneid, M.; Bayat, A. The role of neuromediators and innervation in cutaneous wound healing. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2016, 96, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saraf, R.; Mahmood, F.; Amir, R.; Matyal, R. Neuropeptide Y is an angiogenic factor in cardiovascular regeneration. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 776, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zukowska-Grojec, Z.; Karwatowska-Prokopczuk, E.; Rose, W.; Rone, J.; Movafagh, S.; Ji, H.; Yeh, Y.; Chen, W.T.; Kleinman, H.K.; Grouzmann, E.; et al. Neuropeptide Y: A novel angiogenic factor from the sympathetic nerves and endothelium. Circ. Res. 1998, 83, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ekstrand, A.J.; Cao, R.; Björndahl, M.; Nyström, S.; Jönsson-Rylander, A.C.; Hassani, H.; Hallberg, B.; Nordlander, M.; Cao, Y. Deletion of neuropeptide Y (NPY) 2 receptor in mice results in blockage of NPY-induced angiogenesis and delayed wound healing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 6033–6038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Movafagh, S.; Hobson, J.P.; Spiegel, S.; Kleinman, H.K.; Zukowska, Z. Neuropeptide Y induces migration, proliferation, and tube formation of endothelial cells bimodally via Y1, Y2, and Y5 receptors. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 1924–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, E.W.; Grant, D.S.; Movafagh, S.; Zukowska, Z. Impaired angiogenesis in neuropeptide Y (NPY)-Y2 receptor knockout mice. Peptides 2003, 24, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, W.C.; Liu, Y.B.; Liu, W.F.; Zhou, Y.Y.; He, H.F.; Lin, S. Neuropeptide Y is an immunomodulatory factor: Direct and indirect. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 580378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pedrazzini, T.; Pralong, F.; Grouzmann, E. Neuropeptide Y: The universal soldier. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2003, 60, 350–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kopp, J.; Collin, O.; Villar, M.; Mullins, D.; Bergh, A.; Hokfelt, T. Regulation of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors by testosterone in vascular smooth muscle cells in rat testis. Neuroendocrinology 2008, 88, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chu, D.Q.; Cox, H.M.; Costa, S.K.; Herzog, H.; Brain, S.D. The ability of neuropeptide Y to mediate responses in the murine cutaneous microvasculature: An analysis of the contribution of Y1 and Y2 receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 140, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dumont, Y.; Bastianetto, S.; Duranton, A.; Breton, L.; Quirion, R. Immunohistochemical distribution of neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, pancreatic polypeptide-like immunoreactivity and their receptors in the epidermal skin of healthy women. Peptides 2015, 70, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pradhan Nabzdyk, L.; Kuchibhotla, S.; Guthrie, P.; Chun, M.; Auster, M.E.; Nabzdyk, C.; Deso, S.; Andersen, N.; Gnardellis, C.; LoGerfo, F.W.; et al. Expression of neuropeptides and cytokines in a rabbit model of diabetic neuroischemic wound healing. J. Vasc. Surg. 2013, 58, 766–775 e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lee, E.W.; Michalkiewicz, M.; Kitlinska, J.; Kalezic, I.; Switalska, H.; Yoo, P.; Sangkharat, A.; Ji, H.; Li, L.; Michalkiewicz, T.; et al. Neuropeptide Y induces ischemic angiogenesis and restores function of ischemic skeletal muscles. J. Clin. Invest. 2003, 111, 1853–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zukowska, Z.; Grant, D.S.; Lee, E.W. Neuropeptide Y: A novel mechanism for ischemic angiogenesis. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2003, 13, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Puolakkainen, P.A.; Twardzik, D.R.; Ranchalis, J.E.; Pankey, S.C.; Reed, M.J.; Gombotz, W.R. The enhancement in wound healing by transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) depends on the topical delivery system. J. Surg. Res. 1995, 58, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Beckert, S.; Hierlemann, H.; Muschenborn, N.; Witte, M.; Ranke, M.; Coerper, S. Experimental ischemic wounds: Correlation of cell proliferation and insulin-like growth factor I expression and its modification by different local IGF-I release systems. Wound Repair. Regen. 2005, 13, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gainza, G.; Villullas, S.; Pedraz, J.L.; Hernandez, R.M.; Igartua, M. Advances in drug delivery systems (DDSs) to release growth factors for wound healing and skin regeneration. Nanomedicine 2015, 11, 1551–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Harrison, I.P.; Spada, F. Hydrogels for atopic dermatitis and wound management: A superior drug delivery vehicle. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shin, D.Y.; Park, J.U.; Choi, M.H.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.E.; Jeong, S.H. Polydeoxyribonucleotide-delivering therapeutic hydrogel for diabetic wound healing. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ji, J.A.; Liu, J.; Shire, S.J.; Kamerzell, T.J.; Hong, S.; Billeci, K.; Shen, Y.; Wang, Y.J. Characteristics of rhVEGF release from topical hydrogel formulations. Pharm. Res. 2010, 27, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Weinreich, J.; Ågren, M.S.; Bilali, E.; Kleinman, H.K.; Coerper, S.; Königsrainer, A.; Beckert, S. Effects of isoniazid and niacin on experimental wound-healing. Surgery 2010, 147, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ågren, M.S.; Andersen, T.L.; Andersen, L.; Schiødt, C.B.; Surve, V.; Andreassen, T.T.; Risteli, J.; Franzén, L.E.; Delaissé, J.M.; Heegaard, A.M.; et al. Nonselective matrix metalloproteinase but not tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibition effectively preserves the early critical colon anastomotic integrity. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2011, 26, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Danielsen, P.L.; Holst, A.V.; Maltesen, H.R.; Bassi, M.R.; Holst, P.J.; Heinemeier, K.M.; Olsen, J.; Danielsen, C.C.; Poulsen, S.S.; Jorgensen, L.N.; et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 overexpression prevents proper tissue repair. Surgery 2011, 150, 897–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Parker, S.L.; Balasubramaniam, A. Neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor in health and disease. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 153, 420–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, X.; Shi, T.; Holmberg, K.; Landry, M.; Huang, W.; Xiao, H.; Ju, G.; Hökfelt, T. Expression and regulation of the neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor in sensory and autonomic ganglia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Silva, A.P.; Cavadas, C.; Baïsse-Agushi, B.; Spertini, O.; Brunner, H.R.; Grouzmann, E. NPY, NPY receptors, and DPP IV activity are modulated by LPS, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma in HUVEC. Regul. Pept. 2003, 116, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, C.; Schultz, G.S.; Bloch, M.; Edwards, P.D.; Tebes, S.; Mast, B.A. Molecular and mechanistic validation of delayed healing rat wounds as a model for human chronic wounds. Wound Repair. Regen. 1999, 7, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Amin, Z.A.; Ali, H.M.; Alshawsh, M.A.; Darvish, P.H.; Abdulla, M.A. Application of Antrodia camphorata promotes rat's wound healing in vivo and facilitates fibroblast cell proliferation in vitro. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat Med. 2015, 2015, 317693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cheng, P.G.; Phan, C.W.; Sabaratnam, V.; Abdullah, N.; Abdulla, M.A.; Kuppusamy, U.R. Polysaccharides-rich extract of Ganoderma lucidum (M.A. Curtis:Fr.) P. Karst accelerates wound healing in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat Med. 2013, 2013, 671252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hajiaghaalipour, F.; Kanthimathi, M.S.; Abdulla, M.A.; Sanusi, J. The effect of Camellia sinensis on wound healing potential in an animal model. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat Med. 2013, 2013, 386734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tan, M.K.; Hasan Adli, D.S.; Tumiran, M.A.; Abdulla, M.A.; Yusoff, K.M. The efficacy of gelam honey dressing towards excisional wound healing. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat Med. 2012, 2012, 805932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Albaayit, S.F.; Abba, Y.; Rasedee, A.; Abdullah, N. Effect of Clausena excavata Burm. f. (Rutaceae) leaf extract on wound healing and antioxidant activity in rats. Drug Des. Devel Ther. 2015, 9, 3507–3518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rouhollahi, E.; Moghadamtousi, S.Z.; Hajiaghaalipour, F.; Zahedifard, M.; Tayeby, F.; Awang, K.; Abdulla, M.A.; Mohamed, Z. Curcuma purpurascens BI. rhizome accelerates rat excisional wound healing: Involvement of Hsp70/Bax proteins, antioxidant defense, and angiogenesis activity. Drug Des. Devel Ther. 2015, 9, 5805–5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Thomas, L.; Scheidt, H.A.; Bettio, A.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G.; Huster, D.; Zschörnig, O. The interaction of neuropeptide Y with negatively charged and zwitterionic phospholipid membranes. Eur. Biophys. J. 2009, 38, 663–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nagashima, R.; Yoshida, N.; Terao, N. Sucralfate, a basic aluminum salt of sucrose sulfate. II. Inhibition of peptic hydrolysis as it results from sucrose sulfate interaction with protein substrate, serum albumins. Arzneimittelforschung 1980, 30, 73–76. [Google Scholar]
  40. Abid, K.; Rochat, B.; Lassahn, P.G.; Stocklin, R.; Michalet, S.; Brakch, N.; Aubert, J.F.; Vatansever, B.; Tella, P.; De Meester, I.; et al. Kinetic study of neuropeptide Y (NPY) proteolysis in blood and identification of NPY3-35: A new peptide generated by plasma kallikrein. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 24715–24724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Baticic Pucar, L.; Pernjak Pugel, E.; Detel, D.; Varljen, J. Involvement of DPP IV/CD26 in cutaneous wound healing process in mice. Wound Repair. Regen. 2017, 25, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kanikireddy, V.; Varaprasad, K.; Jayaramudu, T.; Karthikeyan, C.; Sadiku, R. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based materials for infection control and wound healing: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 963–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ågren, M.S.; Franzén, L. Foam cells after treatment with hydrocolloid dressings. Br. J. Dermatol. 1991, 125, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ågren, M.S. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are required for re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1999, 291, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Leonardis, M.; Palange, A.; Dornelles, R.F.; Hund, F. Use of cross-linked carboxymethyl cellulose for soft-tissue augmentation: Preliminary clinical studies. Clin. Interv. Aging 2010, 5, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ågren, M.S. An amorphous hydrogel enhances epithelialisation of wounds. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1998, 78, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pilakasiri, K.; Molee, P.; Sringernyuang, D.; Sangjun, N.; Channasanon, S.; Tanodekaew, S. Efficacy of chitin-PAA-GTMAC gel in promoting wound healing: Animal study. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2011, 22, 2497–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ågren, M.S.; Everland, H. Two hydrocolloid dressings evaluated in experimental full-thickness wounds in the skin. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1997, 77, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Mitić, K.; Stanojević, S.; Kuštrimović, N.; Vujic, V.; Dimitrijević, M. Neuropeptide Y modulates functions of inflammatory cells in the rat: Distinct role for Y1, Y2 and Y5 receptors. Peptides 2011, 32, 1626–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kastin, A.J.; Kuzemchak, B.; Tompkins, R.G.; Schally, A.V.; Miller, M.C., 3rd. Melanin in the rat brain. Brain Res. Bull. 1976, 1, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Manunta, G.; Cancedda, M. [Skins of albino animals contain melanin]. Boll. Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1975, 51, 766–770. [Google Scholar]
  52. Blaszczyk, W.M.; Arning, L.; Hoffmann, K.P.; Epplen, J.T. A Tyrosinase missense mutation causes albinism in the Wistar rat. Pigment. Cell Res. 2005, 18, 144–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Singh, S.; Nimse, S.B.; Mathew, D.E.; Dhimmar, A.; Sahastrabudhe, H.; Gajjar, A.; Ghadge, V.A.; Kumar, P.; Shinde, P.B. Microbial melanin: Recent advances in biosynthesis, extraction, characterization, and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2021, 53, 107773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kjaer, M.; Kristjansdottir, H.; Andersen, L.; Heegaard, A.M.; Ågren, M.S.; Jorgensen, L.N. The effect of gender on early colonic anastomotic wound healing. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2018, 33, 1269–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ågren, M.S.; Mertz, P.M.; Franzén, L. A comparative study of three occlusive dressings in the treatment of full-thickness wounds in pigs. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1997, 36, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 98359 g001aPreprints 98359 g001b
Figure 1. Validation of the ischemic wound model [20,25]. The nonischemic wound was made cephalad of the pedunculated ischemic skin flap (before application of hydrogel). The nonischemic control wounds were 71 ± 3.9 mm2 day 0 and 30 ± 3.9 mm2 day 6. The corresponding values for the ischemic control wounds were 65 ± 2.7 mm2 and 48 ± 2.9 mm2. Wound area changes values on postoperative day 6 represent the eight rats treated without the hydrogel (control) and the eight rats treated with the hydrogel. Mean ± SEM (n = 8). Negative values represent decreased wound size from day 0. One-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šídák test for multiple comparisons; **p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Validation of the ischemic wound model [20,25]. The nonischemic wound was made cephalad of the pedunculated ischemic skin flap (before application of hydrogel). The nonischemic control wounds were 71 ± 3.9 mm2 day 0 and 30 ± 3.9 mm2 day 6. The corresponding values for the ischemic control wounds were 65 ± 2.7 mm2 and 48 ± 2.9 mm2. Wound area changes values on postoperative day 6 represent the eight rats treated without the hydrogel (control) and the eight rats treated with the hydrogel. Mean ± SEM (n = 8). Negative values represent decreased wound size from day 0. One-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šídák test for multiple comparisons; **p < 0.01.
Preprints 98359 g001aPreprints 98359 g001b
Preprints 98359 g002aPreprints 98359 g002b
Figure 2. Release experiment with the Franz Cell. (a) NPY hydrogel formulation in donor chamber showing the shift of pH from acidic to neutral pH (phenol red) with time of incubation. Scale bar, 2 mm. (b) Release of NPY in PBS (closed circles) compared with NPY in hydrogel (open circles) as a function of time. Inset: Close-up of the release of NPY in hydrogel. Mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Figure 2. Release experiment with the Franz Cell. (a) NPY hydrogel formulation in donor chamber showing the shift of pH from acidic to neutral pH (phenol red) with time of incubation. Scale bar, 2 mm. (b) Release of NPY in PBS (closed circles) compared with NPY in hydrogel (open circles) as a function of time. Inset: Close-up of the release of NPY in hydrogel. Mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Preprints 98359 g002aPreprints 98359 g002b
Preprints 98359 g003
Figure 3. Relative change of wound area of the ischemic wounds in the NPY (n = 9), IGF-I (n = 9) and control (n = 10) groups. The initial wound area on day 0 was 49 ± 2.1 mm2 in the NPY group, 57 ± 3.5 mm2 in the IGF-I group and 54 ± 3.7 mm2 in the control group. Mean ± SEM.
Figure 3. Relative change of wound area of the ischemic wounds in the NPY (n = 9), IGF-I (n = 9) and control (n = 10) groups. The initial wound area on day 0 was 49 ± 2.1 mm2 in the NPY group, 57 ± 3.5 mm2 in the IGF-I group and 54 ± 3.7 mm2 in the control group. Mean ± SEM.
Preprints 98359 g003
Preprints 98359 g004
Figure 4. Microphotographs of full-thickness wounds on day 14 from the NPY (a, d), IGF-I (b, e) and control (c, f) groups at low magnification (a-c) and central granulation tissue at higher magnification (d-f). Note the many blood vessels in the NPY group (d). Scale bars, 500 µm (a-c), 100 µm (d-f). H&E stain.
Figure 4. Microphotographs of full-thickness wounds on day 14 from the NPY (a, d), IGF-I (b, e) and control (c, f) groups at low magnification (a-c) and central granulation tissue at higher magnification (d-f). Note the many blood vessels in the NPY group (d). Scale bars, 500 µm (a-c), 100 µm (d-f). H&E stain.
Preprints 98359 g004
Preprints 98359 g005
Figure 5. Franz Cell model (PermeGear) used in the studies on NPY release.
Figure 5. Franz Cell model (PermeGear) used in the studies on NPY release.
Preprints 98359 g005
Preprints 98359 g006
Figure 6. In situ hybridization reveals the presence of Y2R mRNA in several neurons of the brain of a female rat (280 g). Scale bar, 25 µm.
Figure 6. In situ hybridization reveals the presence of Y2R mRNA in several neurons of the brain of a female rat (280 g). Scale bar, 25 µm.
Preprints 98359 g006
Table 1. Histological analysis of wounds after 14 days of treatment.
Table 1. Histological analysis of wounds after 14 days of treatment.
Group Angiogenesis 1 Inflammatory cell infiltrate Neoepithelium (mm) 2 Foreign bodies 4 Giant cells
Grade 1 LC 3 NG 3 PC 3 MC 3 Ingrowth Thickness
NPY 3 3 320 85 6 3 1.1 0.14 1 3
IGF-I 1 1 140 42 1 0 1.4 0.061 3 1
Control 2 1.5 250 75 8 3 0.88 0.10 2 0
1 Assessed on a 4-point scale: 0 = absent; 1 = slight; 2 = moderate; 3 = pronounced. 2 Measured at the longest and thickest part of the epithelial tongue. 3 Number of cells in field of view (x400) (mean of 3). 4 Assessed on a 4-point scale: 0 = none; 1 = few; 2 = moderate; 3 = many. LC, lymphocytes; MC, mast cells; NG, neutrophil granulocytes; PC, plasma cells.
Table 2. Summary of the procedures in the intervention study.
Table 2. Summary of the procedures in the intervention study.
Procedure Day
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Wounding 1 X
Treatment 2 X X X X X X X
Wound tracing 3 X X X X X X X X
1 One 8-mm full-thickness wound was made in the central pedunculated dorsal ischemic skin flap (3 cm × 7 cm). 2 NPY (50 µg/wound) and IGF-I (5 µg/wound) were delivered to the wounds in 200 µl of an amorphous hydrogel. Control wounds were treated with 200 µl of the amorphous hydrogel. 3 Wounds were traced (outer margins) 30 minutes after wounding day 0 and on subsequent days after cleansing the wound with saline-moistened nonwoven swab.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated