1. Introduction
1.1. A Brief Overview of BDNF Functions
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a pivotal molecule in the field of neuroscience and neurobiology, playing a crucial role in the growth, development, maintenance, and plasticity of the nervous system [1]. BDNF is a member of the neurotrophin family of proteins, which includes nerve growth factor (NGF), neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), and neurotrophin-4/5 (NT-4/5). It is primarily synthesized as a precursor protein known as proBDNF (
Figure 1). This precursor molecule is then proteolytically cleaved to generate mature BDNF, which is the biologically active form [2], although proBDNF has been recognized to also play a role in regulating neuronal activity [3].
The mature BDNF protein consists of 247 amino acids and forms a homodimer. Each monomer consists of a long pro-domain, followed by a mature BDNF domain. The pro-domain is cleaved during secretion to release the biologically active mature BDNF. This cleavage process is essential for the correct functioning of BDNF. Once released, BDNF can bind to its high-affinity receptor, the tropomyosin receptor kinase B (trkB), and initiate a series of intracellular signaling pathways that play a crucial role in neuronal survival, growth, and plasticity [2]. ProBDNF and mature BDNF activate different receptors to produce different effects on neurons. Specifically, proBDNF activates the low-affinity p75 pan neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) rather than trkB, and years ago, it was demonstrated neurons release both proBDNF and mature BDNF [3].
BDNF is primarily known for its role in the development, maintenance, and plasticity of the nervous system. However, the role of BDNF extends beyond the realm of neuroscience and influences various aspects of human health and disease. The several functions of BDNF, span from the regulation of neuronal differentiation, survival, and growth, to the intervention in synaptic plasticity [4,5], neuroprotection [6,7], neurodegeneration [1], and the control of mood disorders [4]. Thus, most of the (initially) discovered functions of this neurotrophin play a primary role in shaping the cellular and functional organization of the normal brain, but more recent findings have converged to demonstrate that dysregulation of BDNF is implicated in a range of neurological disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease [6,7], Parkinson’s disease [8], Huntington’s disease [9,10], and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [11,12] and that low BDNF levels associated with depression [13] and anxiety [14].
BDNF also intervenes in the modulation of pain, the subject of this contribution.
1.2. Pain as a Complex and Multifaceted Sensory Experience
Pain is a universal and complex phenomenon in the animal world that has intrigued scientists, clinicians, and philosophers for centuries. It transcends mere sensory perception and encompasses a multidimensional experience that involves not only the discernment of noxious stimuli but also emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses. This multifaceted nature of pain makes it a subject of great interest and study in various fields, including neuroscience, psychology, and clinical medicine.
Pain can be broadly defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage [16]. It serves as a vital protective mechanism, alerting individuals to harmful stimuli and prompting them to take action to prevent further injury. However, pain is far from being a simple “alarm system” for the body; instead, it exhibits complexity at multiple levels.
At its core, pain begins with nociception, the detection of noxious or potentially harmful stimuli by specialized receptors known as nociceptors [17]. These receptors lie in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and are scattered throughout the body, from the skin to the internal organs [18]. When stimulated, nociceptors initiate a cascade of events that lead to the transmission of pain signals to the central nervous system (CNS), via the spinal nerves and the ascending pathways to the brain and some cranial nerves that possess somatic and/or visceral sensory fibers [19]. Beyond nociception, i.e., the encoding of a noxious stimulus and its transduction into electric signals, pain involves emotional and affective components. The brain processes these components of pain in regions associated with emotions, such as the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex [20]. This emotional aspect of pain gives rise to the subjective experience of suffering, distress, and fear often associated with painful stimuli. Emotional responses to pain can vary greatly among individuals and are influenced by factors like previous experiences, psychological state, and cultural background. Cognition plays a critical role in shaping the perception of pain. Cognitive factors, such as attention, expectation, and belief, can significantly influence how individuals perceive and respond to painful stimuli. Cognitive strategies, such as distraction or cognitive reappraisal, can either exacerbate or mitigate the experience of pain. Pain is also influenced by sociocultural and contextual factors.
According to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), there are several types of pain (
https://www.iasp-pain.org/resources/terminology/) [16]. Nociceptive pain is the pain that arises from non-neural tissues and is a consequence of the activation of nociceptors. Neuropathic pain is a type of pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. It can be further classified as central and peripheral according to the division of the somatosensory system that is lesioned. Nociplastic pain arises from altered nociception, despite no clear evidence of actual or threatened tissue damage activating peripheral nociceptors or evidence of disease or lesion of the somatosensory system causing the pain. There are also differences between acute and chronic pain [21]. Acute pain is self-limited, is triggered by a particular illness or injury, and has a protective function. On the other hand, chronic pain might be seen as a medical condition. It is discomfort that, whether connected to a sickness or injury, lasts longer than the typical recovery period. Chronic pain lacks a biological purpose, can have psychological causes, and has no obvious endpoint. Chronic pain conditions, characterized by persistent pain lasting beyond the expected healing period, represent a particularly challenging aspect of pain.
1.3. Overview of the Anatomical Arrangement of Pain Pathways
This section describes the general organization of somatic and visceral pain pathways (
Figure 2). More comprehensive accounts can be found e.g., in ref. [19,22].
1.3.1. Somatic Pain Pathways – Subcortical Structures
The somatic pain pathways [23] are responsible for gathering sensory input from several sources, including the skin, muscles, joints, ligaments, and bones. Except for the head and the proximal regions of the neck, which receive sensory innervation from the peripheral projections of the trigeminal primary sensory neurons (PSNs), the transmission of pain signals from all other body parts is initially carried out by the PSNs of the dorsal root ganglia (DRGs). From these two sets of neurons originate the main pathways responsible for transmitting nociceptive signals to the brain: the trigeminothalamic (TTP) and spinothalamic (STP) pathways. Both are composed of a polysynaptic chain including three sensory neurons, commonly known as first, second, and third-order somatic sensory neurons. The sensory discriminative features of pain perception are reliant upon the crucial role of these cells. The first-order sensory neurons, i.e., the PSNs, are situated in the trigeminal ganglion (TG), the proximal ganglia of the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves (the petrosal – PG and nodose NG ganglia), or the DRGs. The second-order sensory neurons are located within the dorsal horn of the spinal cord or the spinal nucleus of the trigeminal nerve (SNTN). These are projection neurons that give rise to long axons crossing the midline and ascending throughout the spinal cord and/or brainstem, ultimately reaching the thalamus. Third-order sensory neurons are in the ventroposterior lateral nucleus of the thalamus (VPLN) and project their axons to the first-order (S1) and second-order (S2) somatosensory area of the cerebral cortex. Nociceptive signal modulation can take place at various points within this polyneuronal chain. It is primarily observed at the substantia gelatinosa of the dorsal horn (lamina II) of the spinal cord or the SNTN. Additionally, several descending pathways can exert inhibitory or facilitatory effects on the trigeminothalamic or spinothalamic neurons.
Other ascending pathways play a significant role in the overall perception of pain. These pathways transmit stimuli associated with motivational and cognitive aspects (the spinoreticular tract and spinoparabrachial tract), motor responses, and affectivity (the spinomesencephalic tract and spinoparabrachial tract), as well as neuroendocrine and autonomic responses (the spinohypothalamic tract). Remarkably, the spinoparabrachial pathway (SPBP) serves as a significant site of convergence for both somatic and visceral nociceptive stimuli. It is also worth noting that besides nociceptive responses visual and auditory stimuli can generate exteroceptive responses that contribute to pain [24].
These basic circuits may undergo modifications in switching from physiological (acute) to pathological (chronic) pain. Likewise, additional pathways may be recruited in several conditions leading to chronic pain. The polysynaptic dorsal column pathway (DCP) is e.g., involved in the processing of pain following peripheral nerve damage, as a phenotypic switch (see
Section 3.1 – Peripheral sensitization) occurs in DRG neurons projecting to the gracile and cuneate nucleus following nerve injury [25–27].
1.3.2. Visceral Pain Pathways – Subcortical Structures
Visceral pain originates from the internal organs, such as the heart, blood vessels, airways, gastrointestinal tract, and urinary and reproductive organs [28]. Nevertheless, it should be noted that visceral discomfort does not arise from all internal organs, nor is it necessarily associated with demonstrable physical harm to these organs. The challenging task of identifying and localizing visceral pain stems from the comparatively sparse distribution of sensory nerves in visceral organs and the vast dispersion of visceral input within the CNS. Input from the viscera has a broader and less precise distribution, primarily targeting lamina I and the deep dorsal horn. In different individuals, pain originating from various visceral organs can exhibit distinct patterns of presentation, such as discomfort radiating from the bladder to the perineal area or from the heart to the left arm and neck. Consequently, visceral pain frequently exhibits localization to anatomical sites that are distant from its actual source, leading to its designation as referred pain. Thus, symptoms often involve the occurrence of referred pain to somatic tissues located in the same metameric field as the damaged viscera. Furthermore, it is worth noting that secondary hyperalgesia can manifest in the superficial or deep body wall tissues because of viscerosomatic convergence. Visceral discomfort is frequently accompanied by notable motor and autonomic reactions, including excessive perspiration, feelings of nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal disturbances, as well as alterations in body temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate.
The afferent fibers that primarily innervate the viscera transmit signals to the CNS via sympathetic and parasympathetic neurons. The sympathetic innervation is provided by visceral afferent fibers that originate from a small subset of DRG neurons and travel along the hypogastric, lumbar, and splanchnic nerves, which traverse both prevertebral and paravertebral ganglia to connect with their target organs. The parasympathetic innervation is made of the afferent fibers originating from the glossopharyngeal (IX), vagus (X), and pelvic nerves, which end in the brainstem and lumbosacral cord, respectively. While it is true that vagal afferents do not directly transmit pain signals, multiple investigations have shown evidence that the stimulation of the vagus nerve can reduce both somatic and visceral pain. The glossopharyngeal and vagal afferents arise from the PSNs in the PG and NG, respectively, which then transmit signals to the second-order neurons of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) of the medulla oblongata. Sympathetic visceral afferents that converge in the spinal cord synapse with second-order neurons located in the dorsal horn. These second-order neurons then transmit signals to higher centers via the DCP, the SPBP, and a component of the STP projecting to specific midline thalamic nuclei. The projections originating from the superficial dorsal horn, primarily comprising the SPBP, are linked to autonomic and emotional reactions to painful stimuli. In addition to projections from vagal afferents, spinoparabrachial projections are conveyed to higher relay centers associated with limbic and cognitive functions, including brain regions implicated in affectivity, such as the amygdala, hypothalamus, and periaqueductal grey (PAG). The visceral spinothalamic projections originate from the deep dorsal horn traverse to the contralateral side and reach the ventroposterior medial nucleus (VPMN) and VPLN of the thalamus. The medial thalamic nuclei ultimately transmit signals to the cortical regions associated with visceral pain. It is of relevance that also the DCP plays a part in visceral nociception and that the gracile nucleus cells react to painful stimulation of the viscera. This pathway originates from cells in lamina III of the dorsal horn and is located slightly lateral to lamina X [26].
1.3.3. Cortical Structures
Somatic pain stimuli that reach the thalamus relay nuclei (VPLN and ventroposterior inferior nucleus) are primarily conveyed to S1. However, other cortical areas are involved in the processing of these stimuli including S2. A ventrally oriented cortico-limbic somatosensory circuit connects S1 and S2, integrating somatosensory input with learning and memory as well as other sensory modalities such as vision and audition. S1 and S2 also connect with the posterior parietal cortical areas and the insular cortex. The insular cortex is, in turn, linked to the amygdala, perirhinal cortex, and hippocampus.
Visceral pain stimuli that are conveyed to the midline thalamic nuclei are subsequently transferred to limbic cortical areas such as the anterior cingulate (ACC) and insular cortex (INS). Individual neurons often project in more than one of these pathways. Significantly, the ascending spinal connections directly target the limbic and subcortical areas where this system ultimately converges. This twofold convergence could be associated with a process wherein several different brain sources mediate the impact of pain.
The provided diagram (
Figure 2) is presented for reference.
4. Implications for Pain Management
Understanding the role of BDNF in nociception has significant implications for the management of chronic pain and pain-related conditions. There are three different primary therapeutic strategies derived from preclinical research for pain treatment through inhibition of BDNF/trkB signaling: the sequestration of BDNF, the blocking of the extracellular trkB region, or disruption of the intracellular kinase region of trkB. These approaches have therapeutic potential but are far from being of use in clinical settings.
To scavenge BDNF in living organisms, one can use a trkB-Fc fusion protein derived from the extracellular domain of trkB and the Fc domain of human IgGs [
258]. This method has been widely employed to investigate the function of naturally occurring BDNF in various pain models, e.g., [
152,
259,
260]. While the approach is highly targeted, its applicability in clinical settings is limited due to the requirement of intrathecal or local application at the exact central areas where BDNF is released.
To decrease the likelihood of ligand binding, one can target the extracellular domain by using trkB-blocking antibodies [
261] or by synthesizing novel receptor antagonists [
262]. Monoclonal antibodies that block the function of TrkB receptors have been used successfully in preclinical studies. Specifically, a mouse monoclonal antibody [
263] has been shown to effectively block the effects of BDNF on neuronal activity in acute spinal cord slices [59]. Additionally, other neutralizing antibodies have been found to reverse neuropathic [
152] and other types of pathological pain [
264] in rodents. Like trkB-Fc, anti-trkB blocking antibodies that are delivered systemically do not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and thus cannot penetrate the CNS. This, combined with their relatively limited sensitivity, makes them unsuitable for clinical therapy.
Over the past ten years, the discovery of small new compounds that function as negative allosteric modulators of trkB receptors has led to significant progress in understanding how ligands are processed in the body and their ability to be absorbed into the bloodstream. A peptidomimetic strategy was used to discover cyclotraxin-B, a tiny fragment of BDNF. This fragment can modify the conformation of trkB through an allosteric mechanism [
265]. Subsequently, cyclotraxin-B was demonstrated to possess distinct antinociceptive properties in various pain models [74,
158,
266,
267,
268,
269], to be able to block LTP and central sensitization induced by BDNF [
253], as well as the in vitro activation of PKCε in rat Schwann cells that, as mentioned, plays a role in peripheral sensitization [
270] (see 3.1 Peripheral sensitization). However, the peptide has little specificity as it affects both BDNF-dependent and -independent trkB activation. In addition, cyclotraxin-B demonstrates efficacy when given intravenously, but not by other tested routes of administration. These shortcomings were bypassed after discovering ANA-12, a non-peptidic small molecule that allosterically inhibits the binding of BDNF to trkB at nanomolar concentrations [
262]. ANA-12 has shown great potential in preclinical research, with a growing body of evidence confirming its effectiveness in reducing pain in many experimental settings [
94,
119,
185,
188,
271,
272,
273,
274,
275,
276,
277,
278,
279,
280,
281,
282,
283,
284,
285,
286]. Unlike cyclotraxin-B, ANA-12 can be administered orally, making it a potential and targeted option for clinical trials.
To inhibit the activity of tyrosine kinases within cells, the primary method is to disrupt the ATP binding site of these enzymes [
287,
288]. K252a, an indolocarbazole molecule, is among the initial substances employed as a competitive inhibitor of the ATP site, effectively obstructing trk catalytic activity [
288,
289]. Administration of K252a successfully inhibits the increase of intracellular Ca2
+ induced by BDNF in acute slices of the rat superficial dorsal horn [59]. Moreover,
in vivo, it diminishes hypersensitivity in several pain models [
152,
290,
291,
292,
293,
294,
295,
296,
297,
298]. Based on promising results from preclinical studies, various pharmaceutical companies have allocated significant resources toward developing and ameliorating kinase inhibitors. Many of these inhibitors have been patented and some are (or have been) undergoing clinical trials or investigations for a wide range of diseases and pain [
287,
299,
300,
301,
302]. While several of these compounds demonstrate significant effectiveness in laboratory tests, the creation of a trkB inhibitor that can be successfully brought to market has not yet been achieved. Regrettably, the task of creating tyrosine kinase antagonists for particular trk receptors is difficult because ATP competitive trk inhibitors, at most, are only selective to trk receptors as a whole (i.e., they are pan-trk inhibitors) and struggle to differentiate between trk subtypes [
287]. Hence, a significant drawback associated with the utilization of these compounds is the potential for developing adverse effects on the CNS. To minimize negative consequences, numerous endeavors have been undertaken to create compounds that do not penetrate the BBB but mostly exert their actions at the periphery. Certain compounds, such as ARRY-470 [
303] or PF-06273340A [
304], demonstrate antinociceptive effects in animal models of chronic pain. The efficacy of the pan-trk inhibitor ONO-4474 as an analgesic in patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis was demonstrated in a recent randomized, double-blinded clinical trial [
305]. However, it is probable that these chemicals also affect peripheral trk receptors in addition to trkB, such as trkA.
As a result of the restrictions mentioned above, there are currently no successful pain therapies that rely on BDNF/trkB. The crucial function performed by BDNF and trkB receptors in the preservation of central neurons imposes further constraints on the utilization of trkB antagonists as a secure treatment strategy. Furthermore, the intricate and diverse nature of the intracellular signaling cascades triggered by tyrosine kinase receptors poses challenges in the development of targeted pharmaceutical interventions. Targeting BDNF/trkB might result in unintended side effects caused by the deactivation of BDNF-dependent pathways crucial for the proper functioning of healthy neurons or by the lack of specificity and interaction with other non-BDNF pathways [
306].
To tackle trkB-dependent pathological changes, alternative treatment approaches can be pursued by targeting either the upstream or downstream effectors. Targeting upstream microglia can effectively decrease the BDNF-induced changes in neuropathic pain [
174]. Microglial P2RX4, when activated, plays a crucial role in releasing BDNF. Therefore, targeting these receptors could be a promising approach for clinical therapies [
307]. As mentioned, one important way that trkB-dependent pain hypersensitivity occurs is through the downregulation of KCC2, which leads to an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission in downstream signaling pathways [
152]. Therefore, KCC2 is considered a potential pharmaceutical target [
308] and the making of KCC2 enhancers holds great potential as a therapeutic approach to reinstate inhibition and mitigate the symptoms linked to the BDNF-trkB-KCC2 cascade [
309].
5. Clinical Trials
In this section, I will briefly consider the clinical trials of the last ten years related to BDNF in the context of pain modulation. It is worth noting that these trials have focused on measuring BDNF as a biomarker in several clinical pain conditions of a heterogeneous nature, rather than trying to translate into the clinic the results of the preclinical studies that have used the approaches described in the previous section to inhibit BDNF/trkB signaling.
Among the pathologies, one of the most intensely investigated is fibromyalgia, a persistent and recurring disorder characterized by widespread pain that is accompanied by intense emotional discomfort and functional impairment. Several clinical trials were devoted to the study of BDNF levels in fibromyalgia because persons diagnosed with fibromyalgia exhibit elevated levels of serum BDNF compared to healthy persons, indicating a significant involvement of BDNF in the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia [
310]. One of the first trials using serum BDNF as a biomarker dates back to 2014 and aimed, among others, at assessing the association with conditional pain modulation (CPM) [
311]. In this randomized, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study the cold-heat task (CPM-TASK) was used as an experimental pain stimulus to activate the diffuse noxious inhibitory control-like effect to evaluate the effect of melatonin analgesia. It was thus suggested that BDNF could be used as a biomarker of central sensitization and correlated with pain reduction in the CPM-TASK although with some caveat. In another study, plasma samples were analyzed after a 15-week progressive resistance exercise, and it was shown that the levels of NGF remained unchanged while the levels of BDNF increased suggesting that BDNF may affect nociception/pain in fibromyalgia [
312]. In addition, serum BDNF was proposed to be a valuable predictor of the tDCS effect on pain score decreases across the treatment for the condition [
313,
314]. In keeping with these observations are those in patients not only suffering from fibromyalgia but also other forms of central sensitivity syndrome such as osteoarthritis and endometriosis, leading to somatic and visceral pain, respectively [
315]. That serum BDNF inversely correlated with different forms of postoperative pain was also demonstrated using a new predictive tool for postoperative pain, the brief measure of emotional preoperative stress (B-MEPS) to find that blood BDNF was inversely correlated with morphine consumption and length of stay after surgery [
316]. Likewise, serum levels of BDNF and trkB were inversely associated with depressive symptoms and sleep quality in patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer [
317].
The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was investigated in chronic myofascial pain syndrome in a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial [
318]. They observed that rTMS reduced pain scores in parallel with an increase in serum BDNF. The increase in serum BDNF in the rTMS-treated patients was interpreted as an indication of the neuroplasticity that underlies the therapeutic effect of rTMS and serum BDNF was considered as a surrogate marker that could be used to monitor the therapeutic effects of rTMS rather than a marker of the pain severity. These authors have also investigated the effect of electroacupuncture in chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) in a randomized, sham-controlled, crossover trial and concluded that electroacupuncture analgesia in CTTH was related to neuroplasticity that could be monitored by serum BDNF [
319]. Partly in agreement with these observations, another group observed a decrease in urinary NGF but not BDNF in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome treated with hyaluronic acid [
320]. Moreover, in a randomized, double-blind, factorial design, and controlled placebo-sham clinical trial using rTMS and deep intramuscular stimulation therapy in chronic myofascial pain syndrome no variations in blood BDNF were observed although both treatments were effective in relieving pain [
321]. The variation of serum BDNF levels following integrated multimodal intervention in postherpetic neuralgia was studied in a randomized, double-blind controlled study to conclude that minimally invasive pulsed radiofrequency and pregabalin were effective in early pain reduction that was accompanied by elevated serum BDNF levels [
322]. In another randomized double-blind, controlled study to test the effectiveness of intraoperative ketamine on postoperative depressed mood after elective orthopedic surgery, there was an increase in blood BDNF after surgery [
323]. Similar results were obtained in a randomized sham-controlled study on patients with persistent chronic pain after hallux valgus surgery where an increase in the level of BDNF in cerebrospinal fluid was observed after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and was again interpreted as a result of an indirect measurement of neuroplasticity changes induced by tDCS [
324]. Similarly, another group observed that serum BDNF increased after three weeks of high-frequency rTMS in patients with SCI [
325]. These authors speculated that frequency of rTMS may play an important role in the BDNF secretion processes and in keeping with most of the findings reported above showed a negative correlation between serum BDNF levels and pain scores. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been used to relief osteoarthritic knee pain and a clinical trial has explored the effects of genotype on TENS efficacy without finding any correlation with expression of the BDNF gene [
326].
Altogether, a large part of these and other studies [
327,
328] converged to the conclusion that BDNF could be a good serum biomarker of neuroplasticity state under different clinical settings related to a pain experience with an increase of serum BDNF in parallel with the reduction of pain. If this interpretation is correct, one should consider that the elevation of BDNF is related to its function as a trophic factor rather than a pain modulator. On the other hand, in a study on fibromyalgia, attachment-based compassion therapy seemed to reduce serum BDNF and appeared to be correlated to anti-inflammatory effects on patients, leading to speculation that reduction in BDNF could be a mechanism of functional status improvement [
329].
At the beginning of this year, a study protocol for a randomized clinical trial was proposed aiming to test whether a targeted biobehavioral therapeutic education program could induce alterations in pain perception and biomarkers of brain plasticity (among which BDNF) in individuals suffering from chronic pain [
330]. Notably, the authors emphasized that it is crucial to acknowledge that measuring BDNF levels can be challenging because of the inherent unpredictability of collecting, storing, and analyzing samples. Their study will focus on measuring BDNF levels in plasma samples since they have been determined to be more resistant to changes during analysis compared to serum samples [
331] which were the most used in the studies quoted above. The investigation will be performed with standardized ELISA kits, incorporating regular calibration and quality control checks to mitigate potential sources of variation. For future studies, implementing these steps is essential to guarantee the precision and authenticity of the BDNF measurements and maintain the integrity and dependability of the study’s results.
Abbreviations
1NMP = 1-(1, 1-dimethyl ethyl)-3-(1-naphthalenyl methyl)-1H-pyrazolo [3,4-d] pyrimidine-4-amine
ACC = anterior cingulate cortex
ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
AMPA = α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid
AMPAR = α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor
AMYG = amygdala
aPKC = atypical isoform of PKC
Au1 =primary auditory area of the cerebral cortex
BBB = blood-brain barrier
BDNF = brain-derived neurotrophic factor
B-MEPS = brief measure of emotional preoperative stress
[Ca++]i = intracellular calcium concentration
CaMKII = calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II
CCI = chronic constriction injury
CCL2 = chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2
CCR2 = C-C chemokine receptor type 2
CFA = complete Freund adjuvant
CGRP = calcitonin gene-related peptide
C-LTMRs = C- low-threshold mechanoreceptors
CN = cuneiform nucleus
CNS = central nervous system
CPM = conditional pain modulation
COX2 = cyclooxygenase-2
CREB = cAMP response element-binding protein
CSF-1 = colony-stimulating factor 1
CTTH = chronic tension-type headache
D-APV= D-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid
DCP = dorsal column pathway
DREAM = downstream regulatory element antagonist modulator
DRGs = dorsal root ganglia
EAAT3 = excitatory amino acid transporter 3
ER = endoplasmic reticulum
ERK = extracellular signal-regulated kinase
GABA = γ-amino-butyric acid
GABAAR= γ-amino-butyric acid receptor A
GDNF = glial-derived neurotrophic factor
GFAP = glial fibrillary acidic protein
GLUN2B-NMDA = NMDA receptor GluN2B
GlyR = glycine receptor
HYPO = hypothalamus
IAN = inferior alveolar nerve
Iba1 = ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1
IL-10 = interleukin-10
IL-1β = interleukin-1β
IL-6 = interleukin-6
INS = insular cortex
JG = jugular ganglion
KCC2 =K-Cl co-transporter 2
LTD = long-term depression
LTP = long-term potentiation
MAO-B = type-B monoamine oxidase
mEPSC = miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents
mIPSC = miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents
mTORC1 = mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1
NaV1.8 = voltage-gated sodium channel 1.8
NF-κB = nuclear factor-kappa B
NGF = nerve growth factor
NMDA = N-methyl-d-aspartate
NMDAR = N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor
NO = nitric oxide
NT-3 = neurotrophin 3
NT-4/5 = neurotrophin-4/5
NTS = nucleus tractus solitarius
P2RX4 = ATP-gated purinergic receptor 4
p75NTR = low-affinity p75 neurotrophin receptor
PAC1R = PACAP type I receptor
PACAP = pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide
PAG = periaqueductal gray
PAR2 = proteinase-activated receptor 2
PBN = parabrachial nucleus
PGE2 = prostaglandin E2
PI3K = phosphoinositide 3-kinase
PKA = protein kinase A
PKC = protein kinase C
PKCε = protein kinase type Cε
PLC = phospholipase C
PNS = peripheral nervous system
PSNs = primary sensory neurons
rTMS = repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
RvD1 = resolvin D1
S1 = first-order somatosensory area of the cerebral cortex
S2 = second-order somatosensory area of the cerebral cortex
SCI = spinal cord injury
sEPSC = spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents
SHP2 = Src homology-2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-2
sIPSC = spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents
SNL = spinal nerve ligation
SNTN = spinal nucleus of the trigeminal nerve
SorCS2 = sortilin-related VPS10 domain-containing receptor 2
SPBP = spinoparabrachial pathway
SSN = somatic sensory neurons
STP = spinothalamic pathway
tDCS = transcranial direct current stimulation
TENS = transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
TET1 = ten-eleven translocation methylcytosine dioxygenase
TG = trigeminal ganglion
TNFα = tumor necrosis α
trkB = tropomyosin receptor kinase B
trkB.T1 = truncated isoform 1 of trkB
TRP = transient receptor potential
TRPA1 = transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily A, member 1
TRPV1 = transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor 1
TTP = trigeminothalamic pathway
VPLN = ventroposterior lateral nucleus of the thalamus
VPMN = ventroposterior medial nucleus of the thalamus
WDR = wide dynamic range
ZIP = Zrt and Irt-like proteins