Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Revisiting the use of the Gumbel distribution: A Frequency Analysis Perspective
Version 1
: Received: 8 February 2024 / Approved: 9 February 2024 / Online: 9 February 2024 (12:21:17 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 26 February 2024 / Approved: 26 February 2024 / Online: 26 February 2024 (12:31:09 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 26 February 2024 / Approved: 26 February 2024 / Online: 26 February 2024 (12:31:09 CET)
How to cite: Anghel, C.-G.; Ilinca, C. Revisiting the use of the Gumbel distribution: A Frequency Analysis Perspective. Preprints 2024, 2024020589. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.0589.v1 Anghel, C.-G.; Ilinca, C. Revisiting the use of the Gumbel distribution: A Frequency Analysis Perspective. Preprints 2024, 2024020589. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.0589.v1
Abstract
The manuscript presents the applicability of the Gumbel distribution in the frequency analysis of extreme events in hydrology. The advantages and disadvantages of using the distribution are highlighted, as well as recommendations regarding its proper use. A literature review was also carried out regarding the methods of estimating the parameters of the Gumbel distribution in hydrology. Thus, for the verification of the methods, case studies are presented regarding the determination of the maximum annual flows and precipitations using 9 methods of estimating the distribution parameters. The influence of the variability of the observed data lengths on the estimation of the statistical indicators, the estimation of the parameters and the quantiles corresponding to the field of small exceedance probabilities (p
Keywords
Gumbel; parameter estimation; variability; theoretical bias; frequency analysis.
Subject
Environmental and Earth Sciences, Environmental Science
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment