1. Introduction
The development of today’s society is closely linked to two very important aspects, energy, and environmental sustainability. Conventional energy conversion systems use fossil fuels and are associated with greenhouse gas emissions and other atmospheric pollutants. These negative environmental impacts are increasing due to the growing demand for energy. The progressive depletion of fossil fuels and the growing concern about global warming and climate change have driven the search for renewable energy generation techniques. In addition to the growing energy demand, another consequence of the pace of development of today’s society is the increase in waste generation, there being a great concern to manage them in a sustainable and economically viable way. For these reasons, it is reasonable to think that one of the ways to make the development of society energetically and environmentally sustainable is the use of the maximum waste for energy production, since the benefit would be twofold: waste would be reduced and at the same time the consumption of natural resources would be reduced by producing and using an alternative energy.
Sewage sludge (SS) is one of the wastes whose production has significantly grown. Due to urbanization, industrialization, population expansion, an increase in the proportion of people using the sewer system, and better wastewater treatment facilities, the rate of sewage sludge (SS) creation is rising globally. Sewage sludge is a hazardous waste, which is produced by wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) [
1,
2]. The management and disposal of the large amount of sewage sludge generated are increasingly complicated due to the strict conditions imposed by current legislation regarding its disposal in landfills and its use as an agricultural fertilizer [
3]. Currently, 92.5% of Catalonia’s sewage sludge, of the total 120,000 tons of dry matter produced annually, is destined for soil application and 2.5% for landfill [
4]. For this reason, the implementation of new ways of valorization of sludge that cannot be destined to agriculture and/or landfills is relevant. One of these ways is gasification in order to produce syngas which could be used to produce chemicals, alternative fuels, hydrogen or combined head and power (CHP). The sewage sludge gasification process involves multiple reactions and transformations and is therefore considered a complex process. Thus, it is useful to use simulation models that help to study the system behavior and allow predicting the process efficiency under different operating conditions with high reliability and low cost [
5]. There are numerous process simulation software tools, among which Aspen Plus stands out for its flexibility and intuitive handling have been used by several authors.
Given that supercritical water gasification has emerged as preferred means of converting wet biomass to hydrogen-rich gases [
6], sewage sludge has been studied almost exclusively resorting to supercritical water gasification. For example, Qian et al. [
7] experimentally investigated the effects of moisture and pressure on mole fraction, yield, gasification efficiency of gaseous products from supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge. Ruya et al. [
8] simulated the supercritical water gasification of various sewage sludge for power generation in Aspen Plus. Chen et al. [
9] studied the sewage sludge gasification in supercritical water with high heating rate batch reactor. Hantoko et al. [
10] evaluated through experimental and thermodynamic analysis, the potential of sewage sludge for hydrogen-rich syngas production from supercritical water gasification. In this work, the sewage sludge will be subjected to autothermal gasification, which, as discussed by Ramos et al. [
11] requires the feedstock to be exposed to a drying process.
The thermochemical techniques for hydrogen production from biomass were reviewed by Pandey et al. [
12]. They found that the literature confirms that hydrogen obtained from biomass has high-energy efficiency and potential to reduce greenhouse gases. They also found that higher temperature, suitable steam to biomass ratio and catalyst type favor useful hydrogen yield. However, hydrogen is not available in sufficient amounts and production cost is still high. The hydrogen production costs issue based on three different gasification processes of high-moisture forest residues was studied by Martins et al. [
13]. They found that supercritical water gasification is the most suitable process for hydrogen production, with hydrogen yields of 0.844 Nm
3/kg. Hydrogen yields of 0.828 Nm
3/kg, and 0.758 Nm
3/kg were achieved for the conventional gasification and plasma gasification processes, respectively. Conventional gasification is viable for steam-to-biomass ratios below 3. Process intensification techniques applied to supercritical water gasification make this process viable for feed concentrations between 15 and 25%. Alves et al. [
14] develop a techno-economic analysis for a small-scale gasification plant processing mixtures of solid recovered fuels and sewage sludge, assuming a capacity of 883 kg/h and two different sale scenarios: production of electric energy, and production of hydrogen. Gasification tests and mass and energy flow analyses were carried out for the economic assessment. The results showed that both scenarios presented viability for implementation. Although the production of electric energy scenario was more attractive in the short-term period due to the lower payback period and higher internal rate of return, the other option was more favorable at the end of plant’s life once the net present value was greater. The exploration of conventional gasification of sewage sludge is a recent topic of research, mostly experimental studies. Kang et al. [
15] explored the catalytic gasification of sewage sludge using activated carbon and sawdust biochar catalysts, bed temperatures, and gasifying agents. The effects of the porosity of activated carbon on tar adsorption and cracking, and biochar containing alkali and alkaline earth metallic species were investigated. A catalyst bed temperature of 800ºC and particle size of 0.5-1.7 mm showed optimum conditions for increasing H
2 and CO content and decrease CO
2 fraction. The injection of steam had a positive effect on the H
2 amount, owing to the enhancement of water gas shift and hydrocarbon steam reforming reactions. Tezer et al. [
16] experimentally studied sewage sludge gasification carried out in two different fixed bed gasifiers, updraft and downdraft. The effect of temperature, gasification agents (air and pure oxygen), and their different flow rates on gasification efficiency are investigated. The maximum hydrogen content in syngas from updraft and downdraft gasifiers was achieved as 42 vol.% and 46 vol.% by using dry air as gasifying agent. Hydrogen content for updraft and downdraft gasifiers was also obtained as 40 vol.% and 45 vol.%, respectively in the case of pure oxygen. Carotenuto et al. [
1] developed a numerical model of sewage sludge gasification, based on a restricted chemical equilibrium approach in Aspen Plus. The novelty of this work consists of considering different sludge samples. The developed gasification model is used to identify optimum temperature (900°C) and equivalence ratio (0.2) through sensitivity analyses. Then the model is used to assess the combined heat and power generation potentiality of sewage sludge by integrating a gasifier with an internal combustion engine. They found that the energy recovery from sewage sludge through the proposed solution may supply near 50% of electrical energy demand to run wastewater treatment plants and from 60 to 75% of thermal energy needed for thermal drying of mechanically dewatered sewage sludge for gasification. Andrés et al. [
3] performed sewage sludge gasification assays in an atmospheric fluidized bed reactor using air and air-steam mixtures as the gasifying agents. The objective of this study is to determine the influence of dolomite, olivine and alumina catalysts in the product distribution and tar production during sewage sludge gasification. They show that dolomite has the highest activity in tar elimination, followed by alumina and olivine. In addition to improving tar removal, the presence of water vapor and the catalysts increased the content of hydrogen in the gases by nearly 60%.
This briefly state-of-the art shows that the sewage sludge conversion to hydrogen-rich gas is mostly approach using the supercritical water gasification. The economic studies on the high-moisture biomass also shows that conventional gasification is more suitable to the economic viability of a gasification plant producing hydrogen. Therefore, in this work, a thermodynamic equilibrium model has been developed using Aspen Plus® to simulate the air and steam gasification process of sewage sludge from a wastewater treatment plant in Catalonia (Spain). The main contribution of this work is to determine the potential of sewage sludge for hydrogen-rich gas production and provide fundamental data for economic studies of the implementation of this waste-to-energy technology.
4. Conclusions
In this work, a thermodynamic equilibrium model was developed using Aspen Plus® to simulate the air and steam gasification processes of sewage sludge from a wastewater treatment plant in Catalonia (Spain). A sensitivity analysis to various process parameters was performed to determine the optimal conditions for higher calorific value of the syngas and higher hydrogen molar fractions.
Air-blown sewage sludge gasification finds the highest LHV conditions under the minimum sewage sludge moisture content and equivalence ratio (and high temperature). Specifically, under conditions of ER = 0.2, MC = 5%, and Tgas = 1200ºC, it generates a syngas with a calorific value of 7.48 MJ/m3. On the other hand, using steam as the gasifying agent, the lower the SBR and the lower the MC, the higher the LHV (at high temperature). Working at SBR = 0.2, MC = 5%, and Tgas = 1200ºC generates syngas with a calorific value of 10.30 MJ/m3.
Under optimal operating conditions that maximize the LHV of the syngas and considering a moisture content of 7% in the dried sewage sludge, the LHV of the syngas is 7.37 MJ/m3 and 10.26 MJ/m3 when using air and steam as the gasifying agents, respectively.
The hydrogen molar fraction is maximized when steam is used as the gasifying agent in combination with high moisture contents of the sewage sludge, high steam-to-biomass ratios, and low gasification temperatures. Particularly, a moisture content of 25%, an SBR of 1.2, and a temperature of 600°C allow for a maximum H2 molar fraction of 69.7%.
From a technical point of view, for the implementation of gasification as an alternative method to sewage sludge treatment in the region of Catalonia (Spain), the present project suggests using steam as a gasifying agent instead of air since it provides a higher LHV of the syngas as well as a hydrogen-richer syngas. However, the economic aspect should also be considered when proposing such a paradigm shift to the sewage sludge treatment method. In this regard, our sensitivity analysis provides precious information regarding some gasification parameters that could be reduced without prejudice to the quality of the syngas while reducing operational expenditures. Our study demonstrated that the gasification temperature can be reduced without significantly decreasing the LHV (e.g., with an SBR of 0.2, MC of 7%, and Tgas = 1100ºC, the LHV is 10.15 MJ/m3 while with the same conditions but Tgas = 1200ºC, the LHV is 10.26 MJ/m3). Other examples can be given for moisture content and SBR ratio. Because these parameters are energy-intensive, it is worthwhile to reduce the sewage sludge pre-drying or inject less steam into the gasifier. Further studies should be carried out such as a cost-benefit study, which can be made using the developed tool. The main contribution of this work is to determine the potential of sewage sludge for hydrogen-rich gas production and provide fundamental data for economic studies of the implementation of this waste-to-energy technology.